Edgar Filing: Global Ship Lease, Inc.

Amendment No. 1 to Form 20-F

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 20-F/A

(Mark One)

¨	REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) or (g) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

x	ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009

¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

¨	SHELL COMPANY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Date of event requiring this shell company report

For the transition period from to

Commission file number 1-34153

Global Ship Lease, Inc.

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

Republic of The Marshall Islands

(Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)

c/o Portland House

Stag Place

London SW1E 5RS

United Kingdom

(Address of principal executive offices)

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act.


Title of each class		Name of each exchange on which registered
Class A Common Shares, par value of $0.01 per share		New York Stock Exchange

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act: None

Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the issuer’s classes of capital or common stock as of the close of the period covered by the annual report.

46,830,467 Class A Common Shares, par value of $0.01 per share

7,405,956 Class B Common Shares, par value of $0.01 per share

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ¨ No x

If this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Yes ¨ No x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ¨ No x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer ¨ Accelerated filer x Non-accelerated filer ¨

Indicate by check mark which basis of accounting the registrant has used to prepare the financial statements included in this filing:

U.S. GAAP x International Financial Reporting Standards as Issued by the International Accounting Standards Board ¨ Other ¨

If “Other” has been checked in response to the previous question, indicate by check mark which financial statement item the registrant has elected to follow.

Item 17 ¨ Item 18 ¨

If this is an annual report, indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x

EXPLANATORY NOTE

This Amendment No. 1 on Form 20-F/A amends and restates in its entirety the annual report of Global Ship Lease, Inc. on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 18, 2010 to reflect the expiration of the warrants issued by Marathon Acquisition Corp. in connection with its initial public offering and to reflect certain amendments following review of the original filing by the Securities and Exchange Commission.

GLOBAL SHIP LEASE, INC.

INDEX TO REPORT ON FORM 20-F


			Page
PART I			1

Item 1.	Identity of Directors, Senior Management and Advisors		2

Item 2.	Offer Statistics and Expected Timetable		2

Item 3.	Key Information		2

	A.	Selected Financial Data	2

	B.	Capitalization and Indebtedness	4

	C.	Reasons for the Offer and Use of Proceeds	4

	D.	Risk Factors	4

Item 4.	Information on the Company		18

	A.	History and Development of the Company	18

	B.	Business Overview	19

	C.	Organizational Structure	35

	D.	Property, Plants and Equipment	35

Item 5.	Operating and Financial Review and Prospects		36

	A.	Results of Operations	36

	B.	Liquidity and Capital Resources	45

	C.	Research and Development	49

	D.	Trend Information	49

	E.	Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements	49

	F.	Contractual Obligations	49

Item 6.	Directors, Senior Management and Employees		51

	A.	Directors and Senior Management	51

	B.	Compensation	53

	C.	Board Practices	55

	D.	Employees	56

	E.	Share Ownership	56

Item 7.	Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions		57

	A.	Major Shareholders	57

	B.	Related Party Transactions	57

Item 8.	Financial Information		59

	A.	Financial Statements and Other Financial Information	59

	B.	Significant Changes	60

Item 9.	The Offer and Listing		60


			Page
Item 10.	Additional Information		60

	A.	Share Capital	60

	B.	Memorandum and Articles of Association	60

	C.	Material Contracts	61

	D.	Exchange Controls	61

	E.	Taxation	61

	F.	Dividends and Paying Agents	68

	G.	Statements by Experts	68

	H.	Documents on Display	68

Item 11.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk		68

Item 12.	Description of Securities Other than Equity Securities		69

PART II			70

Item 13.	Defaults, Dividend Arrearages and Delinquencies		70

Item 14.	Material Modifications to the Rights of Security Holders and Use of Proceeds		70

Item 15.	Controls and Procedures		70

Item 16A.	Audit Committee Financial Expert		71

Item 16B.	Code of Ethics		71

Item 16C.	Principal Accountant Fees and Services		71

Item 16D.	Exemptions from the Listing Standards for Audit Committees		72

Item 16E.	Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers		72

Item 16F.	Change in Registrants’ Certifying Accountant		72

Item 16G.	Corporate Governance		72

PART III			72

Item 17.	Financial Statements		72

Item 18.	Financial Statements		72

Item 19.	Exhibits		73

PART I

This Annual Report contains forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements provide Global Ship Lease’s current expectations or forecasts of future events. Forward-looking statements include statements about Global Ship Lease’s expectations, beliefs, plans, objectives, intentions, assumptions and other statements that are not historical facts. Words or phrases such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “continue,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “may,” “ongoing,” “plan,” “potential,” “predict,” “project,” “will” or similar words or phrases, or the negatives of those words or phrases, may identify forward-looking statements, but the absence of these words does not necessarily mean that a statement is not forward-looking. Examples of forward-looking statements in this Annual Report include, but are not limited to, statements regarding Global Ship Lease’s disclosure concerning its operations, cash flows, financial position, dividend policy and likelihood of success in acquiring additional vessels to expand its business.

Forward-looking statements appear in a number of places in this Annual Report including, without limitation, in the sections entitled “Business Overview,” “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Conditions and Operations,” and “Dividend Policy.” The risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to:

•

future operating or financial results;

•

expectations regarding the future growth of the container shipping industry, including the rates of annual demand and supply growth;

•

the financial condition of CMA CGM, our charterer and sole source of operating revenue, and its ability to pay charterhire in accordance with the charters;

•

Global Ship Lease’s financial condition and liquidity, including its ability to obtain additional waivers which might be necessary under the existing credit facility or obtain additional financing to fund capital expenditures, contracted and yet to be contracted vessel acquisitions including the two newbuildings to be purchased from German interests in the fourth quarter of 2010, and other general corporate purposes;

•

Global Ship Lease’s ability to meet its financial covenants and repay its credit facility;

•

Global Ship Lease’s expectations relating to dividend payments and forecasts of its ability to make such payments including the availability of cash and the impact of constraints under its credit facility;

•

future acquisitions, business strategy and expected capital spending;

•

operating expenses, availability of crew, number of off-hire days, drydocking and survey requirements and insurance costs;

•

general market conditions and shipping industry trends, including charter rates and factors affecting supply and demand;

•

assumptions regarding interest rates and inflation;

•

changes in the rate of growth of global and various regional economies;

•

risks incidental to vessel operation, including piracy, discharge of pollutants and vessel accidents and damage including total or constructive total loss;

•

estimated future capital expenditures needed to preserve its capital base;

•

Global Ship Lease’s expectations about the availability of ships to purchase, the time that it may take to construct new ships, or the useful lives of its ships;

•

Global Ship Lease’s continued ability to enter into or renew long-term, fixed-rate charters;

•

the continued performance of existing long-term, fixed-rate time charters;

•

Global Ship Lease’s ability to capitalize on its management team’s and board of directors’ relationships and reputations in the containership industry to its advantage;

•

changes in governmental and classification societies’ rules and regulations or actions taken by regulatory authorities;

•

expectations about the availability of insurance on commercially reasonable terms;

•

unanticipated changes in laws and regulations including taxation;

•

potential liability from future litigation; and

•

other factors discussed in “Risk Factors.”

Forward-looking statements are subject to known and unknown risks and uncertainties and are based on potentially inaccurate assumptions that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expected or implied by the forward-looking statements. Global Ship Lease’s actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in forward-looking statements for many reasons, including the factors described in “Risk Factors” in this Annual Report. Accordingly, you should not unduly rely on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this Annual Report. Global Ship Lease undertakes no obligation to publicly revise any forward-looking statement to reflect circumstances or events after the date of this Annual Report or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events. You should, however, review the factors and risks Global Ship Lease describes in the reports it will file from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, after the date of this Annual Report.

Unless the context otherwise requires, references to “the company”, “we”, “us” or “our” refers to Global Ship Lease, Inc.; “CMA CGM” refers to CMA CGM S.A., “initial Charterer” refers to CMA CGM in its capacity as a charterer of our vessels; and “Ship Manager” refers to CMA Ships, a wholly-owned subsidiary of CMA CGM and our current ship manager.

For the definition of certain terms used in this Annual Report, please see “Glossary of Shipping Terms” at the end of this Annual Report.

Unless otherwise indicated, all references to “$” and “dollars” in this Annual Report are in United States dollars. We use the term “TEU”, meaning twenty-foot equivalent unit, the international standard measure of container size, in describing volumes in world container trade and other measures, including the capacity of Global Ship Lease’s containerships, which we also refer to as vessels. Unless otherwise indicated, we calculate the average age of Global Ship Lease’s vessels on a weighted average basis, based on TEU capacity.

Item 1.

Identity of Directors, Senior Management and Advisors

Not applicable.

Item 2.

Offer Statistics and Expected Timetable

Not applicable.

Item 3.

Key Information

A. Selected Financial Data

You should read the information set forth below in conjunction with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and Global Ship Lease’s combined financial statements and notes thereto, which are referred to as Global Ship Lease’s combined financial statements, included elsewhere in this Annual Report.

This selected historical combined financial and operating information gives effect to the Merger as at August 14, 2008 and consequently the combined financial statements up to December 31, 2009 include two distinct reporting periods (i) January 1, 2004 through August 14, 2008 (“Predecessor”) and (ii) August 15, 2008 through December 31, 2009 (“Successor”), which relate to the period preceding the Merger and the period succeeding the Merger, respectively. Further, the company derived all of its revenue in 2009 and virtually all of its revenue in 2008 from chartering out its vessels under its continuing business of long-term fixed rate time charters whereas for periods before 2008, under predecessor accounting rules, it earned virtually all of its revenue from carrying containerized cargo. Global Ship Lease uses the term “Predecessor Group” to mean the container shipping services provided by the 10 secondhand vessels, which it purchased in December 2007, and two newly built vessels, which it purchased in January 2008, in Global Ship Lease’s initial fleet when these vessels were owned and operated by CMA CGM and its subsidiaries rather than to mean any particular entity or entities.

There are significant differences between Global Ship Lease’s business after the acquisition of its initial fleet in December 2007 and January 2008, when it started its time charter business, and the business of Global Ship Lease’s Predecessor Group when the vessels earned revenue from carrying cargo for customers. Accordingly, the selected historical combined financial data prior to January 2008, which includes mainly the Predecessor Group’s trading activities of the vessels earning freight rates or revenue from carrying cargo for third party customers, are not indicative of the results Global Ship Lease would have achieved had it historically operated as an independent ship-owning company earning charterhire or of Global Ship Lease’s future results.

The combined financial statements for the Successor period reflect the acquisition of Global Ship Lease, Inc., as a result of the Merger, under the purchase method of accounting. The results of the Successor are not comparable to the results of the Predecessor due to the difference in the basis of presentation under purchase accounting as compared to historical cost and due to the changes in capital and legal structure following the Merger including the company becoming listed on the New York Stock Exchange.

The historical selected combined financial data as of December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 and for each of the years then ended (2008 including two distinct reporting periods before and after the Merger) together with such information for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005 have been derived from audited combined financial statements of Global Ship Lease, Inc. The historical selected combined financial data as of December 31, 2006 and 2005 is derived from carve-out information of the Predecessor Group prepared by management of CMA CGM. Certain financial information has been rounded, and, as a result, certain totals shown in this Annual Report may not equal the arithmetic sum of the figures that should otherwise aggregate to those totals.

This selected financial information should be read together with, and is qualified in its entirety by, Global Ship Lease’s combined financial statements and the notes thereto included elsewhere in this Annual Report.

GLOBAL SHIP LEASE, INC.


	2009			August 15 to December 31 2008			January 1 to August 14 2008			2007			2006			2005
	Successor			Successor			Predecessor			Predecessor			Predecessor			Predecessor
							(in millions of U.S. dollars, except per share data)
Statement of Income
Operating revenues:
Freight revenue (1)	$	—		$	—		$	2.1		$	332.2		$	299.6		$	111.6
Time charter revenue (2)		148.7			39.1			55.9			2.9			—			—
Operating expenses:
Voyage expenses (3)		—			—			(1.9	)		(249.5	)		(213.1	)		(70.2	)
Vessel expenses		(41.4	)		(11.9	)		(18.1	)		(24.0	)		(22.6	)		(13.7	)
Depreciation		(37.3	)		(8.7	)		(12.2	)		(16.1	)		(16.7	)		(7.2	)
General and administrative (4)		(8.7	)		(3.7	)		(3.8	)		(17.8	)		(11.3	)		(2.7	)
Other operating income / (expense)		0.4			0.1			(0.1	)		2.3			11.9			(2.5	)

Total operating expenses		(87.0	)		(24.2	)		(36.1	)		(304.9	)		(251.9	)		(96.2	)

Operating income		61.7			14.9			21.9			30.2			47.7			15.4
Non operating income/ (expense)
Interest income		0.5			0.4			0.4			0.2			—			—
Interest expense		(24.2	)		(3.8	)		(17.6	)		(13.6	)		(15.1	)		(6.4	)
Realized and unrealized gain on interest rate derivatives		4.8			(55.3	)		2.7			—			—			—

Income before income taxes		42.8			(43.9	)		7.4			16.8			32.7			9.0
Taxes on income		(0.4	)		(0.1	)		—			—			—			—

Net income (loss)	$	42.4		$	(44.0	)	$	7.4		$	16.8		$	32.7		$	9.0

Net income per share in thousand $ per share
Basic and diluted (5)		n.a.			n.a.			74			168			327			90
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding
Basic and diluted		n.a.			n.a.			100			100			100			100
Net income (loss) per Class A common share in $
Basic and diluted (5)		0.91			(1.30	)		n.a.			n.a.			n.a.			n.a.
Weighted average number of Class A common shares outstanding
Basic in millions		46.5			33.8			n.a.			n.a.			n.a.			n.a.
Diluted in millions		46.8			33.8			n.a.			n.a.			n.a.			n.a.
Net (loss) per Class B common share in $
Basic and diluted		Nil			Nil			n.a.			n.a.			n.a.			n.a.
Weighted average number of Class B common shares outstanding
Basic and diluted in millions		7.4			7.4			n.a.			n.a.			n.a.			n.a.

Statement of cash flow
Net cash from operating activities	$	72.9		$	14.0		$	20.7		$	56.6		$	22.8		$	17.4

Balance sheet data (at period end)
Total current assets		44.2			32.9			n/a			192.9			32.1			11.2
Total vessels		961.7			906.9			n/a			475.3			286.2			177.8
Total assets		1,027.4			966.6			n/a			674.6			344.5			203.0
Long-term debt (current and non-current portion)		588.2			542.1			n/a			401.1			139.2			109.9
Shareholder loan (6)		—			—			n/a			176.9			—			—


	2009		August 15 to December 31 2008		January 1 to August 14 2008
	2009		August 15 to December 31 2008		January 1 to August 14 2008		2007		2006	2005
	Successor		Successor		Predecessor		Predecessor		Predecessor	Predecessor
					(in millions of U.S. dollars, except per share data)
Preferred shares	48.0		48.0		—		—		—	—
Stockholders’ equity	327.6		295.0		n.a.		87.5		170.0	18.4

Other data (time charter business)
Number of vessels in operation at period end	17		16		12		10		n.a	n.a
Ownership days	5,968		1,717		2,699		159		n.a	n.a
Utilization (7)	98.8	%	100	%	98	%	99	%	n.a	n.a

(1)	This line item reports revenue earned by the Predecessor Group from carrying cargo on the vessels.

(2)	This line item reports revenues earned from Global Ship Lease’s chartering business following the purchase of its initial fleet of 10 secondhand vessels in December 2007.

(3)	This line item reports the voyage related expenses of carrying cargo by the Predecessor Group.

(4)

Global Ship Lease’s combined financial statements include the general and administrative expenses incurred by its Predecessor Group related to its operations and such costs incurred by Global Ship Lease as a wholly owned subsidiary of CMA CGM in the predecessor period prior to the Merger. Subsequent to the completion of the Merger, Global Ship Lease has incurred additional administrative expenses, including legal, accounting, treasury, premises, securities regulatory compliance and other costs normally incurred by an independent listed public entity. Accordingly, general and administrative expenses incurred by and allocated to the Predecessor Group and incurred in the predecessor period do not purport to be indicative of future expenses.

(5)	The weighted average number of shares outstanding of Global Ship Lease as of June 30, 2008 has been used for purposes of computing earnings per share for all presented prior periods.

(6)	Amounts due to the former shareholder were not assumed by Global Ship Lease following completion of the Merger.

(7)

Utilization is used to measure our efficiency in operating the fleet and is calculated by dividing the total number of operating days by the total number of ownership days, with the result expressed as a percentage. Operating days represent the number of days in the period that the vessels were available and were not off-hire for any reason, including scheduled dry-dockings, breakdowns or repairs. Ownership days represent the number of days in the period that we owned the relevant vessels. These data are non-GAAP statistical measures used by management to assess operating performance and are not included in combined financial statements prepared under U.S. GAAP.

B. Capitalization and Indebtedness

Not applicable.

C. Reasons for the Offer and Use of Proceeds

Not applicable.

D. Risk Factors

Risks Related to Our Business

Global Ship Lease is highly dependent on charter payments from CMA CGM.

All of Global Ship Lease’s vessels in its fleet are chartered to its initial Charterer, CMA CGM. The initial Charterer’s payments to Global Ship Lease under the charters are currently its sole source of revenue. Global Ship Lease is highly dependent on the performance by the initial Charterer of its obligation under the charters. The container shipping industry has suffered a significant cyclical downturn with a substantial amount of excess ship capacity and many container shipping companies, including CMA CGM, have reported substantial losses in 2009. Further, CMA CGM announced in September 2009 that CMA CGM and its lenders are exploring a potential financial restructuring to address its short and medium term financing requirements and that CMA CGM is seeking to reduce and in some cases cancel certain ship deliveries. Global Ship Lease is not involved in these discussions and it is not possible to predict the outcome of these discussions. In addition, Global Ship Lease has experienced delays in receiving charterhire payments from the initial Charterer, where between one and three installments have been outstanding, which under the charter contracts are due to be paid every 15 days in advance. If the initial Charterer ceases doing business or fails to perform its obligations under Global Ship Lease’s charters, Global Ship Lease’s business, financial position and results of operations would be materially adversely affected as it is probable that, even if the company was able to find replacement charters, such replacement charters would be at significantly lower daily rates and shorter durations. If such events occur, there would be significant uncertainty about Global Ship Lease’s ability to continue as a going concern.

Global Ship Lease’s credit facility contains restrictive covenants including a maximum leverage ratio based on borrowings under the credit facility expressed as a percentage of charter-free market value of its secured vessels. As a result of an amendment to the credit facility effective as of August 20, 2009 (the “Credit Facility Amendment”), regular testing of the leverage ratio covenant has been suspended effectively until April 30, 2011 and prepayment of outstanding borrowings commencing November 30, 2009 is required. If the leverage ratio tested as of April 30, 2011, or earlier in certain circumstances set forth in the credit facility, exceeds the permitted level, or if the company fails to meet the minimum scheduled prepayments, the lenders under the credit facility may require the company to make a prepayment of the borrowings or provide additional security, which would likely cause a default under the credit facility and which would raise substantial doubt about the company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

Global Ship Lease entered into its current credit facility with Fortis Bank (Nederland) N.V. (the “Agent”), Citibank Global Markets Limited, HSH Nordbank AG, Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation, Brussels Branch, KFW, DnB Nor Bank ASA and Bank of Scotland in order to acquire its current fleet, additional vessels and fund working capital, among other things. As of December 31, 2008, outstanding borrowings under the credit facility were $542.1 million. Subsequently, the company borrowed an additional $57.0 million under the credit facility to partially finance the purchase of the CMA CGM Berlioz. The credit facility contains restrictive covenants including minimum cash, minimum net worth, minimum EBITDA to debt service, maximum net debt to total capital and maximum leverage ratio, which is the ratio of borrowings under credit facility to the charter-free market value of security posted. If Global Ship Lease exceeds the maximum permitted leverage ratio of 75%, the Agent may require a prepayment of borrowings or the delivery of additional security to the extent necessary to reduce the leverage ratio to 75%.

Due to the global economic downturn and significantly reduced demand for container shipping services and containerships, combined with continued delivery of newbuildings, containership values have experienced dramatic declines since mid 2008. Purchase and sale transactions in the containership market have been very limited, confined primarily to small vessels and, in instances where such transactions have been completed, the prices have been significantly lower than comparable transactions in the past. No newbuilding orders have been placed for many months and many ship brokers have not been providing certificates of market value due to the disrupted market.

Due to the possibility that Global Ship Lease could exceed the maximum permitted leverage ratio under the credit facility as a result of the declines in charter-free market values of its vessels, Global Ship Lease’s lenders agreed to enter into the Credit Facility Amendment. Under the Credit Facility Amendment, the maximum 75% leverage ratio will not apply until the leverage ratio is first tested after the expiration of the waiver period which is up to and including November 30, 2010. Consequently the first such test is scheduled to be as of April 30, 2011. In addition, and in connection with the purchase of the CMA CGM Berlioz for $82.0 million, which was completed in August 2009, the Credit Facility Amendment permitted drawings of up to $42.0 million under the main credit facility and up to an additional $20.0 million as a newly created Over Advance Portion. In August, $42 .0 million was drawn under the main credit facility and $15.0 million was drawn under the Over Advance Portion. The $25.0 million balance of the purchase price was met from available cash. The Credit Facility Amendment provides that borrowings under the Over Advance Portion will be paid quarterly commencing November 2009 with free cash in excess of $20.0 million determined as of the previous month end. The Over Advance Portion is required to be fully prepaid by June 30, 2010. The credit facility will be repaid quarterly commencing June 30, 2010 with free cash in excess of $20.0 million determined as of the previous month end, subject to a minimum $40.0 million prepayment per rolling four-quarters as long as the leverage ratio is, or is deemed to be, over 75%. When the leverage ratio becomes 75% or less, scheduled repayments will be set at $10.0 million per quarter.

If the leverage ratio at the next test date scheduled for April 30, 2011 exceeds 75% or if the company fails to meet its scheduled prepayments under the credit facility or is otherwise in potential default under the credit facility, and if a further amendment to or waiver under the credit facility or other relief is not obtained, the Agent may require a prepayment of borrowings or the delivery of additional security. In such an event, Global Ship Lease is likely to go into default under the credit facility, which would raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern.

The credit facility also imposes additional operating and financial restrictions on Global Ship Lease. These restrictions may limit its ability to, among other things:

•

incur additional indebtedness in the vessel owning subsidiaries, including through the issuance of guarantees;

•

change the management of its vessels without the prior consent of the lender;

•

permit liens on its assets;

•

sell its vessels or change the ownership of its subsidiaries;

•

merge or consolidate with, or transfer all or substantially all its assets to, another person; and

•

enter into certain types of charters.

Therefore, Global Ship Lease may need to seek consent from its lenders in order to engage in certain corporate actions. Its lenders’ interests may be different from Global Ship Lease’s and it cannot guarantee that it will be able to obtain its lenders’ consent when needed. This may limit its ability to pay dividends, finance its future operations, make acquisitions or pursue business opportunities. Please see Item 4B “Business Overview—Global Ship Lease Credit Facility” for more information.

The Credit Facility Amendment provides that Global Ship Lease may not declare or pay common dividends before November 30, 2010 or until the leverage ratio is no more than 75%, whichever is later.

The Credit Facility Amendment provides that Global Ship Lease may not declare or pay common dividends before November 30, 2010 or until the leverage ratio is no more than 75%, whichever is later. As a result, Global Ship Lease has suspended its previous policy of paying dividends to common shareholders. Additionally, Global Ship Lease’s credit facility provides that it may not pay dividends if there is a continuing default under the facility. Global Ship Lease is also prohibited from paying dividends if the payment of the dividend would result in a default and any payments to be made into the retention account are not fully up to date. The charter-free market value of Global Ship Lease’s vessels can fluctuate substantially depending on market supply and demand for vessels. Since mid 2008, due to an excess of containership capacity as described above, vessel values have fallen significantly. In addition, it is probable that the market value of Global Ship Lease’s vessels will decrease over time, as vessels generally decrease in value as they age. Consequently, the leverage ratio is volatile and will likely increase over time, which will negatively affect Global Ship Lease’s ability to comply with its leverage ratio covenants. This, in turn, will impact Global Ship Lease’s ability to resume dividend payments in the future.

Global Ship Lease cannot assure you that it will be able to refinance any indebtedness incurred under its credit facility.

Global Ship Lease cannot assure you that at the credit facility’s final maturity date in August 2016 or when otherwise required, it will be able to refinance its indebtedness on terms that are acceptable to Global Ship Lease or at all. The actual or perceived credit quality of its charterers, any defaults by them, and the market value of its fleet, among other things, may materially affect its ability to obtain new or replacement debt financing. If Global Ship Lease is not able to refinance its indebtedness, it will have to dedicate cash flow from operations not already committed to prepay borrowings to pay the principal and interest of its indebtedness. Global Ship Lease cannot assure you that it will be able to generate cash flow in amounts that are sufficient for these purposes. If Global Ship Lease is not able to satisfy its debt service obligations with its cash flow from operations, Global Ship Lease may have to sell some or all of its assets, which may not be possible and which would have an adverse effect on its cash flows and results of operations. If Global Ship Lease is unable to meet its debt obligations for any reason, its lenders could declare its debt, together with accrued interest and fees, to be immediately due and payable and foreclose on vessels in its fleet.

Under the Credit Facility Amendment, all undrawn commitments of approximately $200.0 million was cancelled and consequently Global Ship Lease does not have any capacity under the credit facility to pay for any further vessel acquisitions, including the two 4,250 TEU newbuildings scheduled to be delivered in the fourth quarter of 2010. If Global Ship Lease is unable to secure sufficient financing, it will not be able to meet its obligations under the purchase contracts and Global Ship Lease may be exposed to legal action by the sellers for damages.

On September 11, 2008, Global Ship Lease entered into contracts to purchase from German interests two 4,250 TEU containerships for a price of approximately $77.4 million each. The vessels are expected to be delivered in December 2010 and are to be chartered to Zim Integrated Shipping Services Limited (“Zim”) for seven to eight years. A deposit of 10% was paid when the purchase contracts were signed and the balance of 90%, or approximately $139.3 million, is due upon delivery. As a result of the Credit Facility Amendment, Global Ship Lease has no capacity to borrow any further amounts under the credit facility to fund the remainder of the purchase price of the two newbuildings, and as such, must secure other sources of financing to meet its obligations to the sellers under the contracts. Global Ship Lease’s obligations under the purchase contracts are not conditioned on either the availability of financing or on the performance of the charters. Although the purchase contracts contain a clause to limit liability in the event of buyer default to the forfeiture of the previously paid deposit, this limitation on liability may not be effective. Unless Global Ship Lease can secure additional financing or an amendment to the purchase contracts, Global Ship Lease may be exposed to legal action by the sellers for damages which may exceed the deposit already paid. In addition, Global Ship Lease may suffer impairment loss on any part of the deposit which has been paid and which might not be recoverable.

The status of Global Ship Lease’s agreements to charter the two 4,250 TEU newbuildings is uncertain due to the financial restructuring of Zim.

Global Ship Lease has an agreement with Zim to charter the two 4,250 TEU newbuildings upon their delivery for a term of seven to eight years at a net rate of $28,000 per vessel per day. In November 2009 Zim announced a financial restructuring in order to reduce its cashflow burden, including obtaining a reduction in charter payments under certain long-term charter agreements. Although Global Ship Lease has not agreed to any reduction in charterhire, Zim could unilaterally fail to perform under the charters when the charters are due to go into effect, such that Global Ship Lease could become the owner of the vessels with no effective charters in place.

Global Ship Lease’s Ship Manager and CMA CGM, its initial Charterer, are privately held companies and there is little or no publicly available information about them.

CMA CGM is Global Ship Lease’s sole Charterer and its wholly owned subsidiary, CMA Ships, is Global Ship Lease’s Ship Manager. CMA CGM’s ability to continue to pay charterhire and CMA Ships’ ability to render ship management services will depend in part on their own financial strength. CMA CGM has guaranteed the performance of CMA Ships under the ship management agreements. As described above, the container shipping sector has suffered a severe cyclical downturn and has been incurring substantial losses. Furthermore, many containership operators, including CMA CGM, have commitments to purchase newbuildings for delivery over the next three to four years which may not be fully funded with committed financing.

Circumstances beyond their control could impair CMA CGM’s and CMA Ships’ financial strength, and because they are privately held companies, information about their financial strength is not publicly available. As a result, Global Ship Lease and an investor in its securities might have little advance warning of financial or other problems affecting CMA CGM or their wholly owned subsidiaries even though their financial or other problems could have a material adverse effect on Global Ship Lease.

CMA CGM and Global Ship Lease’s Ship Manager have conflicts of interest with Global Ship Lease and limited contractual duties, which may make them favor their own interests to Global Ship Lease’s detriment.

Conflicts of interest may arise between Global Ship Lease, on the one hand, and CMA CGM, Global Ship Lease’s initial Charterer, and CMA Ships, its Ship Manager, on the other hand. As a result of these conflicts, Global Ship Lease’s Ship Manager may favor its own or its parent company’s interests over Global Ship Lease’s interests. These conflicts may have unfavorable consequences for Global Ship Lease. For example, Global Ship Lease’s Ship Manager could be encouraged to incur unnecessary costs, for which it would seek reimbursement from Global Ship Lease. Although Global Ship Lease’s ship management agreements expressly prohibit its Ship Manager from giving preferential treatment when performing any of its ship management services to any other vessel that is affiliated with it, or otherwise controlled by CMA CGM, conflicts of interest may arise between Global Ship Lease, and its Ship Manager and its initial Charterer.

Global Ship Lease’s financial reporting is dependent on CMA CGM.

Under the ship management agreement with CMA Ships, the Ship Manager is obligated to provide Global Ship Lease with requisite financial information on a timely basis so that Global Ship Lease can meet its own reporting obligations under U.S. securities laws. CMA Ships and its parent company CMA CGM are privately held French corporations with financial reporting schedules different from Global Ship Lease. If CMA Ships or any of its affiliates is delayed in providing Global Ship Lease with key financial information, Global Ship Lease could fail to meet its financial reporting deadlines.

CMA CGM could compete with Global Ship Lease.

Along with many other vessel-owning companies, CMA CGM, currently Global Ship Lease’s sole Charterer and largest holder of its common shares, could compete with Global Ship Lease in its search to purchase newbuildings and secondhand vessels. Further, CMA CGM is not precluded from acting as an owner in the direct chartering market. While Global Ship Lease understands that CMA CGM currently has no intention of doing so, competition from CMA CGM may potentially harm Global Ship Lease’s ability to grow the business and may decrease its results of operations.

Certain terms in Global Ship Lease’s agreements with CMA CGM and its affiliates may be the result of negotiations that were not conducted at arms-length and may not reflect market standard terms. In addition, they may include terms that may not be obtained from future negotiations with unaffiliated third parties.

The asset purchase agreement, the charters, the ship management agreements and the other contractual agreements Global Ship Lease entered into with CMA CGM and its wholly owned subsidiaries were made in the context of an affiliated relationship and were negotiated in the overall context of the previously contemplated public offering of its Class A common shares in 2007, the Merger in August 2008 and other related transactions. Global Ship Lease’s agreements with CMA CGM may include terms that could not have been obtained from arms-length negotiations with unaffiliated third parties for similar services and assets. As a result, its future operating results may be negatively affected if Global Ship Lease does not receive terms as favorable in future negotiations with unaffiliated third parties or has to enter into lengthy and costly negotiations with third parties in connection with entering into such agreements.

Global Ship Lease’s growth depends on its ability to purchase further vessels, obtain new charters and maintain and potentially expand its relationship with CMA CGM. Global Ship Lease will require additional financing to be able to grow and will face substantial competition.

One of Global Ship Lease’s objectives is to grow by acquiring additional vessels and chartering them out to container shipping companies including potentially CMA CGM. This will be particularly challenging since Global Ship Lease will need to obtain additional financing in order to acquire vessels. Due to the global banking crisis and the severe cyclical downturn in the containership industry, financing for investment in containerships, whether newbuildings or existing vessels, is severely limited. Further, demand for new long-term or medium-term charters of containerships has significantly reduced due to the current excess of capacity.

The process of obtaining new charterers is highly competitive and often takes several months. Charters are awarded based upon a variety of factors relating to the vessel owner, including:

•

competitiveness of overall price;

•

the availability of committed financing;

•

containership experience and quality of ship operations (including cost effectiveness);

•

shipping industry relationships and reputation for reliability, customer service and safety;

•

quality and experience of seafaring crew;

•

the ability to finance containerships at competitive rates and financial stability generally;

•

relationships with shipyards and the ability to get suitable berths for newbuildings; and

•

construction management experience, including the ability to obtain on-time delivery of new vessels according to customer specifications.

Global Ship Lease will face substantial competition in expanding its business, including with respect to obtaining new containership charters, from a number of experienced companies. Many of these competitors may have greater financial resources than Global Ship Lease, and may also operate larger fleets and may be able to offer better charter rates. Due to the industry downturn, there are an increasing number of vessels available for charter, including many from owners with strong reputations and experience. The lack of available financing and excess supply of vessels in the container shipping market results in a more active short-term charter market and greater price competition for charters. As a result of these factors, Global Ship Lease may be unable to purchase additional containerships, expand its relationships with CMA CGM or to obtain new charterers on a profitable basis, if at all, which would have a material adverse effect on its business, results of operations and financial condition.

Global Ship Lease may be unable to make or realize expected benefits from vessel acquisitions, and implementing its growth strategy through acquisitions may harm its business, financial condition and operating results.

Global Ship Lease’s growth strategy includes, among other things, selectively acquiring newbuildings and secondhand vessels. Growing any business through acquisition presents numerous risks, such as undisclosed liabilities and obligations, the possibility that indemnification agreements will be unenforceable or insufficient to cover potential losses and obtaining the necessary resources to manage an enlarged business. Global Ship Lease cannot give any assurance that it will be successful in executing its growth plans, that Global Ship Lease will be able to employ any acquired vessels under long-term charters or have ship management agreements with similar or better terms than those Global Ship Lease has obtained from its Ship Manager or that it will not incur significant expenses and losses in connection with its future growth.

Factors that may limit Global Ship Lease’s ability to acquire additional vessels include availability of financing, shipyard capacity for newbuildings, the relatively small number of independent fleet owners and the limited number of modern vessels with appropriate characteristics not subject to existing long-term or other charters. Competition from other purchasers could reduce Global Ship Lease’s acquisition opportunities or cause Global Ship Lease to pay higher prices.

Any acquisition of a vessel may not be profitable to Global Ship Lease and may not generate cash flow sufficient to justify Global Ship Lease’s investment. In addition, Global Ship Lease’s acquisition growth strategy exposes Global Ship Lease to risks that may harm its business, financial condition and operating results, including risks that Global Ship Lease may:

•

fail to obtain financing, ship management agreements and charters on acceptable terms;

•

be unable, including through its ship managers, to hire, train or retain qualified shore and seafaring personnel to manage and operate its growing business and fleet;

•

fail to realize anticipated benefits of cost savings or cash flow enhancements;

•

decrease its liquidity by using a significant portion of its available cash or borrowing capacity to finance acquisitions;

•

significantly increase its interest expense or financial leverage if Global Ship Lease incurs additional debt to finance acquisitions;

•

incur or assume unanticipated liabilities, losses or costs associated with the vessels acquired; or

•

not be able to pay dividends.

Unlike newbuildings, secondhand vessels typically do not carry warranties as to their condition at the time of acquisition. While Global Ship Lease would generally inspect existing containerships prior to purchase, such an inspection would normally not provide Global Ship Lease with as much knowledge of a containership’s condition as if it had been built for Global Ship Lease and operated by Global Ship Lease during its life. Future repairs and maintenance costs for existing vessels are difficult to predict and may be substantially higher than for equivalent vessels of which Global Ship Lease has had direct experience. These additional costs could decrease Global Ship Lease’s cash flow and reduce its liquidity.

Global Ship Lease’s business depends upon certain individuals who may not necessarily continue to be affiliated with Global Ship Lease.

Global Ship Lease’s current performance and future success depends to a significant extent upon its Chief Executive Officer, Ian J. Webber, its Chief Financial Officer, Susan J. Cook, its Chief Commercial Officer, Thomas A. Lister and its Chief Technical Officer, Vivek Puri. Mr. Webber, Ms. Cook, Mr. Lister and Mr. Puri have an aggregate of over 80 years of experience in the shipping industry and have worked with several of the world’s largest shipping companies. They and members of the board of directors are crucial to the execution of the company’s business strategies and to the growth and development of its business. If these individuals were no longer to be affiliated with Global Ship Lease, or if Global Ship Lease were to otherwise cease to receive advisory services from them, Global Ship Lease may be unable to recruit other employees with equivalent talent and experience, and its business and financial condition may suffer as a result.

Global Ship Lease is a recently formed company with a limited separate operating history and its historical financial and operating data are not representative of its future results.

Global Ship Lease is a recently formed company with limited operating history. The historical combined financial statements included in this Annual Report include, mainly as comparatives, its Predecessor Group’s historical business activities as a container shipping company earning revenue from transporting shippers’ cargo and incurring both vessel and voyage expenses, including fuel costs and all costs related to handling of containers for its vessels while the vessels were owned and operated by CMA CGM until the date of the individual transfer of each of 10 vessels in December 2007 and two further vessels in January 2008. These historical combined financial statements reflect the results of Global Ship Lease under its fixed-rate long-term charters, ship management agreements and its financing arrangements only from the date of the individual transfer to it of each vessel in December 2007, January 2008, December 2008 and August 2009. Further, Global Ship Lease’s capital and legal structure changed significantly as a result of the Merger in August 2008, including it becoming listed on the New York Stock Exchange. Consequently, historical financial information is not a meaningful representation of its future results of operations.

Global Ship Lease has not performed and does not intend to perform underwater inspections of its vessels.

Although Global Ship Lease performed physical inspections of the vessels, Global Ship Lease has not performed and does not intend to perform any underwater inspections either prior to or after their purchase. As a result, Global Ship Lease will not be aware of any damage to a vessel that may exist at the time of delivery and which could only be discovered through an underwater inspection. Global Ship Lease purchased the vessels and newbuildings from CMA CGM on an “as is” basis, subject to CMA CGM being responsible for any class condition or recommendation that existed at the date of delivery of the vessels. However, if any damage is subsequently found, Global Ship Lease could incur substantial costs to repair the damage which would not be recoverable from the sellers.

Global Ship Lease is a holding company and it depends on the ability of its subsidiaries to distribute funds to Global Ship Lease in order to satisfy its financial and other obligations.

Global Ship Lease is a holding company and has no significant assets other than the equity interests in its subsidiaries. Global Ship Lease’s subsidiaries own all of its vessels and payments under charters are made to the subsidiaries. As a result, its ability to pay dividends depends on the performance of its subsidiaries and their ability to distribute funds to it. The ability of its subsidiaries to make these distributions could be affected by a claim or other action by a third party, including a creditor, or by Marshall Islands law or the laws of any jurisdiction which regulates the payment of dividends by companies. If Global Ship Lease is unable to obtain funds from its subsidiaries, Global Ship Lease may not be able to meet its own liabilities or pay dividends, including on its preferred shares.

As its fleet ages, Global Ship Lease may incur increased operating costs, which would adversely affect its earnings.

In general, the day-to-day cost of operating and maintaining a vessel in good operating condition increases with age. In addition, older vessels are typically less fuel efficient and would attract lower charter rates compared to modern more fuel efficient vessels. Governmental regulations and safety or other equipment standards may also require expenditures for alterations, or the addition of new equipment, to its vessels and may restrict the type of activities in which its vessels may engage. Global Ship Lease cannot assure you that, as its vessels age, market conditions will justify those expenditures or expenditures to otherwise improve fuel efficiency to enable it to operate its vessels profitably during the remainder of their useful lives.

Global Ship Lease’s insurance may be insufficient to cover losses that may occur to its property or result from its operations.

The shipping industry has inherent operational risks. Although Global Ship Lease carries hull and machinery insurance, war risks insurance and protection and indemnity insurance (which includes environmental damage and pollution insurance), Global Ship Lease may not be adequately insured against all risks or its insurers may not pay every claim. Even if its insurance coverage is adequate to cover its losses, Global Ship Lease may not be able to obtain a replacement vessel in the event of a total or constructive total loss in a timely manner. Further, under the terms of its credit facility, Global Ship Lease is subject to restrictions on the use of any proceeds Global Ship Lease may receive from claims in the event of a total or constructive total loss under its insurance policies. Furthermore, in the future, Global Ship Lease may not be able to obtain adequate insurance coverage at reasonable rates for its fleet. Global Ship Lease may also be subject to calls, or premiums, in amounts based not only on its own claim records but also the claim records of all other members of the protection and indemnity associations through which Global Ship Lease receives indemnity insurance coverage for tort liability. In addition, insurers typically charge additional premiums if vessels transit certain “excluded areas” which may be subject to higher risk of piracy, war or terrorism. Global Ship Lease cannot be certain that its insurers will continue to provide such cover, or that it will be able to pass these increased costs to its charterers. Its insurance policies also contain deductibles, limitations and exclusions which, although Global Ship Lease believes are standard in the shipping industry, may nevertheless increase its costs.

In addition, Global Ship Lease does not presently carry loss-of-hire insurance, which covers the loss of revenue during extended vessel off-hire periods, such as those that might occur during an unscheduled drydocking due to damage to the vessel from an accident. Accordingly, any vessel that is off-hire for an extended period of time, due to an accident or otherwise, could have a material adverse effect on the company’s business, results of operations and financial condition.

Global Ship Lease is incorporated in the Republic of the Marshall Islands, which does not have a well-developed body of corporate law.

Global Ship Lease’s corporate affairs are governed by its articles of incorporation and bylaws and by the Business Corporations Act of the Republic of the Marshall Islands, or BCA. The provisions of the BCA resemble provisions of the corporation laws of a number of states in the United States. However, there have been few judicial cases in the Republic of the Marshall Islands interpreting the BCA. The rights and fiduciary responsibilities of directors under the law of the Republic of the Marshall Islands are not as clearly established as the rights and fiduciary responsibilities of directors under statutes or judicial precedent in existence in certain United States jurisdictions. Shareholder rights may differ as well. While the BCA does specifically incorporate the non-statutory law, or judicial case law, of the State of Delaware and other states with substantially similar legislative provisions, Global Ship Lease’s shareholders may have more difficulty in protecting their interests in the face of actions by the management, directors or controlling shareholders than would shareholders of a corporation incorporated in a United States jurisdiction.

Because Global Ship Lease is organized under the laws of the Republic of the Marshall Islands, it may be difficult to serve Global Ship Lease with legal process or enforce judgments against it, its directors or its management.

Global Ship Lease is organized under the laws of the Republic of the Marshall Islands, and substantially all of its assets are located outside of the United States. Its principal executive offices are located outside the United States and most of its directors and officers reside outside the United States. As a result, it may be difficult or impossible for you to bring an action against Global Ship Lease or against its directors or its management in the United States if you believe that your rights have been infringed under securities laws or otherwise. Even if you are successful in bringing an action of this kind, the laws of the Republic of the Marshall Islands and of other jurisdictions may prevent or restrict you from enforcing a judgment against Global Ship Lease’s assets or its directors and officers.

Global Ship Lease cannot assure you if and when Global Ship Lease will resume paying dividends.

As a result of the Credit Facility Amendment, the credit facility prohibits the declaration or payment of any common dividend until the later of November 30, 2010 or when the leverage ratio is no more than 75%. The declaration and payment of dividends is also subject at all times to the discretion of Global Ship Lease’s board of directors. When permitted by the credit facility and other contractual obligations, Global Ship Lease may resume the distribution of a portion of its cash flow to its shareholders, while retaining the remaining cash flow for reinvestment in its business, to fund vessel or fleet acquisitions, make debt repayments and for other purposes, as determined by Global Ship Lease’s management and board of directors. There can be no assurance that its actual results will be as anticipated, that its board of directors will not increase the level of cash reserves or otherwise change its dividend policy or that Global Ship Lease will not have additional cash expenses or liabilities, including extraordinary expenses.

In addition to restrictions imposed by the credit facility, the timing and amount of future dividends, if any, could also be affected by various factors, including:

•

Global Ship Lease’s earnings, financial condition and anticipated cash requirements;

•

unexpected repairs to, or required expenditures on, vessels or drydocking costs in excess of those anticipated;

•

additional acquisitions of vessels;

•

the loss of a vessel; and

•

the provisions under Marshall Islands law affecting distributions to shareholders, which generally prohibit the payment of dividends other than from surplus (retained earnings and the excess of consideration received from the sale of shares above the par value of the shares) or while a company is insolvent or would be rendered insolvent by the payment of such dividend.

Global Ship Lease has anti-takeover provisions in its organizational documents that may discourage a change of control.

Certain provisions of Global Ship Lease’s articles of incorporation and bylaws may have an anti-takeover effect and may delay, defer or prevent a tender offer or takeover attempt that a shareholder might consider in its best interest, including those attempts that might result in a premium over the market price for the shares held by shareholders.

Certain of these provisions provide for:

•

a classified board of directors with staggered three-year terms;

•

restrictions on business combinations with certain interested shareholders;

•

directors only to be removed for cause and only with the affirmative vote of holders of at least a majority of the common shares entitled to vote in the election of directors;

•

advance notice for nominations of directors by shareholders and for shareholders to include matters to be considered at annual meetings; and

•

a limited ability for shareholders to call special shareholder meetings.

These anti-takeover provisions could make it more difficult for a third party to acquire Global Ship Lease, even if the third party’s offer may be considered beneficial by many shareholders. As a result, shareholders may be limited in their ability to obtain a premium for their shares.

The price of Global Ship Lease’s securities may be volatile.

The price of Global Ship Lease’s common shares may be volatile, and may fluctuate due to factors such as:

•

actual or anticipated fluctuations in quarterly and annual results;

•

market conditions in the industry;

•

perceived counterparty risk;

•

fluctuations in Global Ship Lease’s quarterly revenues and earnings and those of publicly held containership owners or operators;

•

shortfalls in Global Ship Lease’s operating results from levels forecasted by securities analysts;

•

announcements concerning Global Ship Lease or other containership owners or operators;

•

limited operating history;

•

mergers and strategic alliances in the shipping industry;

•

changes in government regulation; and

•

the general state of the securities markets.

The international containership industry has been highly unpredictable and volatile. The market for common shares in companies operating in this industry may be equally volatile.

There will be a substantial number of Global Ship Lease’s common shares available for sale in the future that may adversely affect the market price of Global Ship Lease’s Class A common shares.

The common shares (not including the common shares purchased by Mr. Gross and CMA CGM on the closing date of the Merger pursuant to assignment and acceptance agreements with Marathon) issued in the Merger to Marathon’s initial stockholders and CMA CGM were subject to transfer restrictions set forth in the stockholders agreement. Generally, such shares could not be sold for one year from the date of the Merger. Furthermore, in connection with the Credit Facility Amendment, CMA CGM has agreed not to reduce its holding of common shares below the present level of approximately 24.4 million Class A and B common shares before November 30, 2010. Pursuant to the registration rights agreement entered into at the effective time of the Merger, Marathon’s initial stockholders and CMA CGM can demand that Global Ship Lease register the resale of their common shares at any time after the one year anniversary of the Merger. The registration and availability of such a significant number of securities for trading in the public market may have an adverse effect on the market price of Global Ship Lease’s Class A common shares.

The Class A Warrants may be exercised in the future, which would increase the number of shares eligible for future resale in the public market and result in dilution to our shareholders.

There are 6,188,088 Class A warrants expiring September 1, 2013 with an exercise price of $9.25. These are owned by CMA CGM, Michael Gross and other initial stockholders of Marathon. These warrants would likely only be exercised if the $9.25 per share exercise price is below the market price of the Class A common shares. To the extent they are exercised, additional Class A common shares will be issued, which will result in dilution to our shareholders and increase the number of shares eligible for resale in the public market. Sales of substantial numbers of such shares in the public market could adversely affect the market price of our shares.

Global Ship Lease has swapped the majority of its anticipated core debt from floating rate based on LIBOR to fixed rate debt until at least March 2013 and therefore is locked into a base borrowing rate to which the applicable spread is added to determine the effective rate. Accordingly, Global Ship Lease has removed most of the volatility from its interest charge, other than for changes in the applicable margin, and is unable to benefit from falling LIBOR rates.

As part of its risk management strategy and in order to avoid volatility in its interest expense as well as meet the requirement of the credit facility to fix the interest rate on at least 50% of drawn debt, Global Ship Lease has swapped the majority of its anticipated core debt from floating rate based on LIBOR to fixed rate debt until at least March 2013. Approximately $580 million of debt has been swapped into an average fixed rate of 3.59%. Global Ship Lease is therefore unable to benefit from falling LIBOR rates. Further, under the terms of the Credit Facility Amendment, prepayment of outstanding borrowings has been accelerated and it is likely that Global Ship Lease will be in an over-hedged position.

Depending on fluctuations in LIBOR, our interest rate swap agreements and their accounting treatment in our financial statements could result in deceases in our reported net income.

We have entered into certain financial instrument contracts to hedge our exposure to interest rate fluctuations. These derivative instruments are accounted for under the relevant U.S. GAAP guidance at market value, as none of the derivatives qualify for hedge accounting, with changes in the value being recognized directly in our combined statement of income. During the year ended December 31, 2009, LIBOR the related forward interest rate curve experienced upward movement which significantly impacted the estimated market value of our financial instruments, resulting in a non-cash gain of $17.9 million in 2009. However, for the period from August 15, 2008 to December 31, 2008, we recorded a non-cash loss of $55.9 million.

Future interest rate volatility may expose our net income to significant variations.

Risks Related to the Industry of Global Ship Lease

Global Ship Lease’s growth and long term profitability depend mainly upon growth in demand for containerships and the condition of the charter market. The container shipping industry is cyclical and volatile and the industry is currently experiencing a severe cyclical downturn. There is an excess of vessel capacity and demand for containerships has fallen. Charter rates and vessel values have dropped, thus reducing the company’s ability to secure new charterers at attractive rates.

The container shipping industry is both cyclical and volatile in terms of charter rates and profitability. Fluctuations in charter rates result from changes in the supply and demand for ship capacity, which is driven mainly by changes in the supply and demand for world trade container shipping services. There is currently an oversupply of ship capacity which has caused freight rates, charter rates and asset values, to fall. Charter rates have decreased significantly since mid 2008 and although short term charter rates have increased recently, rates may decrease in the future. The factors affecting the supply and demand for containerships and container shipping services are outside Global Ship Lease’s control, and the nature, timing and degree of changes in industry conditions are unpredictable.

The factors that influence demand for containership capacity include:

•

supply and demand for products suitable for shipping in containers;

•

changes in the pattern of global production of products transported by containerships;

•

the globalization of manufacturing;

•

global and regional economic and political conditions;

•

developments in international trade;

•

changes in seaborne and other transportation patterns, including changes in the distances over which container cargoes are transported, the size of containerships, the extent of trans-shipments and the competitiveness of other forms of marine transportation including dry bulk and refrigerated vessels;

•

environmental and other legal and regulatory developments;

•

the price of oil and economics of slow steaming;

•

the availability of trade finance and currency exchange rates; and

•

port and canal congestion.

The factors that influence the supply of containership capacity include:

•

the containership newbuilding orderbook;

•

the availability of financing;

•

the scrapping rate of older containerships;

•

the number of containerships off-hire;

•

the price of steel and other raw materials;

•

changes in environmental and other laws and regulations that may limit the useful life of containerships;

•

the availability of shipyard capacity;

•

port and canal congestion; and

•

the price of oil, economics of slow steaming and number of vessels laid-up.

Global Ship Lease’s ability to re-charter its fleet upon the expiration or termination of its charters, and the charter rates receivable under and the duration of any renewal or replacement charters will depend upon, among other things, the then state of the containership market and how the then age and quality of Global Ship Lease’s fleet are perceived by the market. If the containership market is in a period of depression when Global Ship Lease’s vessels’ charters expire for whatever reason, including an oversupply of containership capacity, Global Ship Lease may be forced to re-charter its vessels at reduced or unprofitable rates, which may reduce or eliminate its earnings or make its earnings increasingly volatile, or it may not be able to re-charter its vessels at all. The same issues will exist if Global Ship Lease acquires additional vessels without charter arrangements in place, or at the expiration of charters that may be in place, obliging Global Ship Lease to try to fix employment of the additional vessels in the spot market while attempting to subject them to a long-term time charter arrangement.

If the market value of vessels or charter rates substantially declines then Global Ship Lease may incur a financial loss if it attempts to sell one or more of its vessels.

Containership values can fluctuate substantially over time and have recently declined significantly. A number of factors may contribute to a decrease in the market value of containerships, including:

•

unfavorable economic conditions in the market in which the containership trades;

•

a substantial or extended decline in world trade growth leading to reduced demand for container shipping services;

•

increases or an oversupply in global containership capacity; and

•

the cost of retrofitting or modifying existing ships, as a result of technological advances in vessel design or equipment, changes in applicable environmental or other regulations or standards or otherwise.

If a charter terminates when the charter market for containerships is depressed, Global Ship Lease may be unable to re-charter the vessel at attractive rates and, rather than continue to incur costs to maintain and finance the vessel, Global Ship Lease may seek to dispose of it. It is likely that in such circumstances asset values will also be depressed. Inability to dispose of the containership at a reasonable price could result in a loss on the vessel’s sale and adversely affect Global Ship Lease’s results of operations and financial condition.

Future fluctuations in charter rates and vessel values may trigger a possible impairment of Global Ship Lease’s vessels as described in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of Global Ship Lease—Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates.”

Charter-free market values of Global Ship Lease’s vessels pledged as security under the credit facility may also impact its ability to satisfy its leverage ratio covenant under the credit facility.

Global Ship Lease may have more difficulty entering into long-term charters if a more active and cheaper short-term or spot container shipping market develops.

At the expiration of Global Ship Lease’s charters, if a charter terminates early for any reason or if Global Ship Lease acquires vessels charter-free, Global Ship Lease will need to charter or re-charter its vessels. Should more vessels be available on the spot or short-term market at the time Global Ship Lease is seeking to fix new long-term charters, Global Ship Lease may have difficulty entering into such charters at profitable rates and for any term other than short term and, as a result, Global Ship Lease’s cash flow may be subject to instability in the long-term. In addition, it would be more difficult to fix relatively older vessels should there be an oversupply of younger vessels on the market. A more active short-term or spot market may require Global Ship Lease to enter into spot or short-term charters based on prevailing market rates, as opposed to long-term contracts based on a fixed rate, which could result in a decrease in Global Ship Lease’s cash flow in periods when charter rates are depressed.

Acts of piracy on ocean-going vessels have recently increased in frequency, which could adversely affect our business.

Piracy is an inherent risk in the operation of ocean-going vessels and has recently affected vessels trading in several regions of the world such as the South China Sea, the Gulf of Aden and off the coast of Somalia. In recent years, the frequency of piracy incidents against commercial shipping vessels has increased significantly, particularly in the Gulf of Aden and off the coast of Somalia. Pirate attacks on any of the company’s vessels could result in loss of life, the kidnapping of crew or the theft, damage or destruction of vessels or of containers or cargo being transported thereon. We may not be adequately insured to cover losses from these incidents, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. In addition, insurance premiums and costs such as onboard security guards, should we decide to employ them, could increase in such circumstances. Further, acts of piracy may materially adversely affect our charterers, impairing their ability to make payments to us under our charters.

Terrorist attacks and international hostilities could affect its results of operations and financial condition.

Terrorist attacks, such as the attacks on the United States on September 11, 2001, and the continuing response of the United States and other countries to these attacks, as well as the threat of future terrorist attacks, continue to cause uncertainty in the world financial markets and may affect Global Ship Lease’s business, results of operations and financial condition from increased security costs and more rigorous inspection procedures at borders and ports. From time to time acts of terrorism, regional conflict and other armed conflict around the world, may contribute to further economic instability in the global financial markets. These uncertainties could also adversely affect Global Ship Lease’s ability to obtain additional financing on terms acceptable to Global Ship Lease or at all.

Terrorist attacks targeted at oceangoing vessels may also negatively affect Global Ship Lease’s future operations and financial condition from, for example, increased insurance costs, and directly impact its containerships or its customers. Future terrorist attacks could result in increased market volatility or even a recession in the United States or elsewhere or negatively affect global financial markets, and could further increase inspection and security requirements and regulation that could slow its operations and negatively affect its profitability. Any of these occurrences could have a material adverse impact on Global Ship Lease’s operating results, revenue and costs.

Risks inherent in the operation of containerships could impair the ability of the initial Charterer to make payments to Global Ship Lease, increase its costs or reduce the value of Global Ship Lease’s assets.

Global Ship Lease’s containerships and its cargoes are at risk of being damaged or lost because of events such as marine accidents, bad weather, mechanical failures, human error, war, terrorism, piracy, environmental accidents and other circumstances or events. Any of these events connected to Global Ship Lease’s vessels or other vessels under the initial Charterer’s control, or any other factor which negatively affects the initial Charterer’s business such as the current economic downturn and significant cyclical depression in the container shipping industry, could impair the ability of the initial Charterer to make payments to Global Ship Lease pursuant to its charters. Although the initial Charterer is obligated to pay Global Ship Lease charterhire regardless of the amount of cargo being carried on board, it is possible that generally low cargo volumes and low freight rates or events noted above may render the initial Charterer financially unable to pay Global Ship Lease its hire. Furthermore, there is a risk that a vessel may become damaged, lost or destroyed during normal operations and any such occurrence may cause Global Ship Lease additional expenses to repair or substitute the vessel or may render Global Ship Lease unable to provide the vessel for chartering, which will cause Global Ship Lease to lose charter revenue.

These occurrences could also result in death or injury to persons, loss of property or environmental damage, loss of revenues from or termination of charter contracts, governmental fines, penalties or restrictions on conducting business, higher insurance rates, and damage to Global Ship Lease’s reputation and customer relationships generally. Any of these circumstances or events could increase its costs or lower Global Ship Lease’s revenues, which could result in reduction in the market price of its Class A common shares.

Maritime claimants could arrest Global Ship Lease’s vessels, which could interrupt the initial Charterer’s or Global Ship Lease’s cash flow.

Crew members, suppliers of goods and services to a vessel, shippers of cargo and other parties may be entitled to a maritime lien against that vessel for unsatisfied debts, claims or damages. In many jurisdictions, a maritime lien holder may enforce its lien by arresting a vessel through foreclosure proceedings. The arrest or attachment of one or more of Global Ship Lease’s vessels, for valid or invalid reasons, could interrupt the initial Charterer’s or Global Ship Lease’s cash flow and require the initial Charterer or Global Ship Lease or Global Ship Lease’s insurance to pay a significant amount to have the arrest lifted. In addition, in some jurisdictions, such as South Africa, under the “sister ship” theory of liability, a claimant may arrest both the vessel that is subject to the claimant’s maritime lien and any “associated” vessel, which is any vessel owned or controlled by the same owner. Claimants could try to assert “sister ship” liability against one vessel in its fleet for claims relating to another vessel in its fleet. In any event, any lien imposed may adversely affect its results of operations by delaying the revenue gained from ships.

Governments could requisition Global Ship Lease’s vessels during a period of war or emergency without adequate compensation.

A government could requisition one or more of Global Ship Lease’s vessels for title or for hire. Requisition for title occurs when a government takes control of a vessel and becomes its owner, while requisition for hire occurs when a government takes control of a vessel and effectively becomes its charterer at dictated charter rates. Generally, requisitions occur during periods of war or emergency, although governments may elect to requisition vessels in other circumstances. Although Global Ship Lease would likely be entitled to compensation in the event of a requisition of one or more of its vessels, the amount and timing of payment would be uncertain. Government requisition of one or more of Global Ship Lease’s vessels may negatively impact its revenues and cash flow.

Technological innovation could reduce Global Ship Lease’s charter income and the value of Global Ship Lease’s vessels.

The charter rates and the value and operational life of a vessel are determined by a number of factors including the vessel’s efficiency, operational flexibility and physical condition. Efficiency includes speed, fuel economy and the ability to load and discharge containers quickly. Flexibility includes the ability to enter harbors with draft or other physical considerations, utilize related dock facilities, such as cranes, load or unload with on-board cranes, carry temperature controlled containers and pass through canals and straits. Physical condition is related to the original design and construction, maintenance and the impact of the stress of operations. If new containerships are built that are more efficient or more flexible or have longer physical lives than Global Ship Lease’s vessels, competition from these more technologically advanced containerships could adversely affect the amount of charterhire Global Ship Lease receives for its vessels once their initial charters expire and the resale value of its vessels could significantly decrease.

Compliance with safety and other vessel requirements imposed by classification societies may be costly and may adversely affect Global Ship Lease’s business and operating results.

The hull and machinery of every commercial vessel must conform to the rules and standards of a classification society approved by the vessel’s country of registry. Such societies set the rules and standards for the design, construction, classification, and surveys of vessels and conduct surveys to determine whether vessels are in compliance with such rules and standards. A certification by the society is an attestation that the vessel is in compliance with the society’s rules and standards. A vessel involved in international trade must also conform to national and international regulations on safety, environment and security, including (but not limited to) the Safety of Life at Sea Convention, or SOLAS, and the International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships. A vessel conforms to such regulations by obtaining certificates from its country of registry and/or a classification society authorized by the country of registry.

A vessel must undergo annual surveys, intermediate surveys and special surveys. In lieu of a special or class renewal survey, a vessel’s machinery may be reviewed on a continuous survey cycle, under which the machinery would be surveyed periodically over a five-year period. Please see “Business Overview—Inspection by Classification Societies” for more information regarding annual surveys, intermediate surveys and special surveys. Bureau Veritas, Lloyd’s Register and Germanischer Lloyd, the classification societies for the vessels in Global Ship Lease’s fleet, may approve and carry out in-water inspections of the underwater parts of its vessels once every three to five years, in lieu of drydocking inspections. In-water inspections are typically less expensive than drydocking inspections and Global Ship Lease intends to conduct in-water inspections when that option is available to it.

If a vessel does not maintain its “in class” certification or fails any annual survey, intermediate survey or special survey, port authorities may detain the vessel, refuse her entry into port or refuse to allow her to trade resulting in the vessel being unable to trade and therefore rendering her unemployable. In the event that a vessel becomes unemployable, Global Ship Lease could also be in violation of provisions in its charters, insurance coverage, covenants in its loan agreements and ship registration requirements and its revenues and future profitability would be negatively affected.

Global Ship Lease is subject to regulation and liability under environmental laws that could require significant expenditures and affect Global Ship Lease’s cash flows and net income.

The shipping industry, and the operations of containerships, are materially affected by environmental regulation in the form of international conventions, national, state and local laws and regulations in force in the jurisdictions in which Global Ship Lease’s containerships operate, as well as in the country or countries of their registration, including those governing the management and disposal of hazardous substances and wastes, the cleanup of oil spills and other contamination, air emissions, water discharges and ballast water management. Because such conventions, laws and regulations are often revised, Global Ship Lease cannot predict the cost of complying with such requirements or the impact thereof on the value or useful life of its containerships. Additional conventions, laws and regulations may be adopted that could limit Global Ship Lease’s ability to do business or increase the cost of its doing business and which may materially adversely affect Global Ship Lease’s operations. Global Ship Lease is required by various governmental and quasi-governmental agencies to obtain certain permits, licenses, certificates and financial assurances with respect to its operations. Many environmental requirements are designed to reduce the risk of pollution, such as oil spills, and compliance with these requirements can be costly.

Environmental requirements can also affect the value or useful lives of vessels, require a reduction in cargo capacity, ship modifications or operational changes or restrictions, lead to decreased availability of insurance coverage for environmental matters or result in the denial of access to certain jurisdictional waters or ports, or detention in certain ports. Under local, national and foreign laws, as well as international treaties and conventions, Global Ship Lease could incur material liabilities, including cleanup obligations and natural resource damages, in the event that there is a release of oil-based products or other hazardous materials from its vessels or otherwise in connection with its operations. Global Ship Lease could also become subject to personal injury or property damage claims relating to the release of hazardous materials associated with its existing or historic operations. Violations of, or liabilities under, environmental requirements can result in substantial penalties, fines and other sanctions, including in certain instances, criminal liabilities or seizure or detention of its vessels.

In addition, significant compliance costs could be incurred due to existing environmental laws and regulations and those that may be adopted, which could require new maintenance and inspection procedures and new restrictions on air emissions from its containerships, the development of contingency arrangements for potential spills and/or obtaining insurance coverage. Government regulation of vessels, particularly in the areas of safety and environmental requirements, can be expected to become increasingly strict in the future and require Global Ship Lease to incur significant capital expenditures on its vessels to keep them in compliance, or even to scrap or sell certain vessels altogether. Global Ship Lease believes that regulation of the shipping industry will continue to become more stringent and more expensive for Global Ship Lease and its competitors. Substantial violations of applicable requirements or a catastrophic release of bunker fuel from one of its containerships, among other events, could have a material adverse impact on its business, financial condition and results of operations. For additional information on these and other environmental requirements, you should carefully review the information contained in “Business Overview—Environmental and Other Regulations.”

Risks Related to Tax Matters

Global Ship Lease’s operating income could fail to qualify for an exemption from U.S. federal income taxation, which will reduce its cash flow.

Global Ship Lease does not expect to be engaged in a United States trade or business. In the case of a foreign corporation that is not so engaged, the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), imposes a 4% U.S. federal income tax (without allowance of any deductions) on 50% of the corporation’s gross transportation income that is attributable to transportation that begins or ends, but that does not both begin and end, in the United States, unless the corporation qualifies for the exemption provided in Section 883 of the Code. The imposition of this tax could have a negative effect on Global Ship Lease’s business, financial condition and results of operations. Under the charter agreements, the initial Charterer has agreed to provide reimbursement for any such taxes as the initial Charterer determines where each vessel trades.

There are factual circumstances, such as the composition of its shareholder base, beyond Global Ship Lease’s control that could cause it not to have the benefit of the exemption provided by Section 883 of the Code and thereby be subject to the 4% tax described above. Based on information that Global Ship Lease has as to its shareholders and other matters, Global Ship Lease may qualify for the Section 883 exemption for 2009. Because the availability of the Section 883 exemption depends on matters over which Global Ship Lease has no control, Global Ship Lease can give no assurances that it will or will continue to qualify for the Section 883 exemption. See “Additional Information—Taxation—Taxation of Global Ship Lease—The Section 883 exemption” for a more comprehensive discussion of the transportation income exemption.

Global Ship Lease could be taxed as a United States corporation.

Section 7874 of the Code provides that a foreign corporation which acquires substantially all the properties of a U.S. corporation is generally treated as though it were a U.S. corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes if, after the acquisition, at least 80% (by vote or value) of the stock of the foreign corporation is owned by former shareholders of the U.S. corporation by reason of owning stock in the U.S. corporation. Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP has given a legal opinion that this rule should not apply to Global Ship Lease. Such opinion relied, in part, on assumptions, representations and other information as to certain factual matters, including valuation. Valuation is a question of fact and is subjective. There can be no assurance that the Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”) would not seek to challenge the correctness of such assumptions, representations or other information or the conclusion reached in such legal opinion, or that such a challenge would not be successful. Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP has not undertaken any obligation to update its opinion.

If Global Ship Lease were to be treated as a U.S. corporation, its net income would be subject to U.S. federal corporate income tax, with the highest statutory rate currently being 35%. The imposition of this tax would likely have a negative effect on its business, financial condition and results of operations. Please see “Additional Information—Taxation—Taxation of Global Ship Lease—Possibility of taxation as a U.S. corporation” for a more comprehensive discussion of the tax consequences to Global Ship Lease being taxed as a U.S. corporation.

Certain adverse U.S. federal income tax consequences could arise for United States holders.

Shareholders of a “passive foreign investment company,” or PFIC, that are United States persons within the meaning of the Code, which Global Ship Lease refers to as “United States shareholders,” are subject to a disadvantageous U.S. federal income tax regime with respect to the distributions they receive from a PFIC and the gain, if any, they derive from the sale or other disposition of their shares in a PFIC (as discussed below). In addition, dividends paid by a PFIC do not constitute qualified dividend income and, hence, are ineligible for the preferential rate of tax that applies to qualified dividend income.

A foreign corporation is treated as a PFIC if either (1) 75% or more of its gross income for any taxable year consists of certain types of “passive income” or (2) 50% or more of the average value of the corporation’s assets produce or are held for the production of those types of “passive income.” For purposes of these tests, “passive income” includes dividends, interest and gains from the sale or exchange of investment property and rents and royalties other than rents and royalties which are received from unrelated parties in connection with the active conduct of a trade or business; income derived from the performance of services does not, however, constitute “passive income.”

While there are legal uncertainties involved in this determination, based on representations made by Global Ship Lease, GSL Holdings and Marathon, Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP, or Simpson Thacher, has advised Global Ship Lease, and has delivered an opinion to the effect, that (1) the charters Global Ship Lease has entered into with CMA CGM should constitute service contracts rather than leases for U.S. federal income tax purposes and (2) as a result, the income from these charters should not constitute “passive income,” and the assets Global Ship Lease owns for the production of this income should not constitute passive assets. Based on this opinion, Global Ship Lease does not expect that it will constitute a PFIC with respect to the current or any future taxable year.

There is, however, no direct legal authority under the PFIC rules addressing its current and projected future operations. In addition, Simpson Thacher’s opinion was based on certain representations made by Global Ship Lease, GSL Holdings and Marathon, and such representations were not and will not be presented for review to the IRS. Accordingly, no assurance can be given that the IRS will not assert that Global Ship Lease is a PFIC with respect to any taxable year, nor that a court would not uphold any such assertion. Moreover, no assurance can be given that Global Ship Lease will be able to avoid PFIC classification for any future taxable year if Global Ship Lease decides to change the nature and/or extent of its operations. Simpson Thacher has not undertaken any obligation to update its opinion.

Further, in a recent case not concerning PFICs, Tidewater Inc. v. U.S., 2009-1 USTC ¶ 50,337, the Fifth Circuit held that a vessel time charter at issue generated rental, rather than services, income. However, the court’s ruling was contrary to the position of the IRS that the time charter income should be treated as services income, and the terms of the time charter in that case differ in material respects from the terms of most of Global Ship Lease’s time charters. No assurance can be given that the IRS or a court of law would accept Global Ship Lease’s position, and there is a risk that the IRS or a court of law could determine that the company is a PFIC.

If the IRS were to determine that Global Ship Lease is or has been a PFIC for any taxable year, its United States shareholders will face adverse United States tax consequences. Distributions paid by Global Ship Lease with respect to its shares will not constitute qualified dividend income if Global Ship Lease were a PFIC in the year Global Ship Lease pays a dividend or in the prior taxable year and, hence, will not be eligible for the preferential rate of tax that applies to qualified dividend income. In addition, its United States shareholders (other than shareholders who have made a “qualified electing fund” or “mark-to-market” election) will be subject to special rules relating to the taxation of “excess distributions”—with excess distributions being defined to include certain distributions Global Ship Lease may make on its Class A common shares as well as gain recognized by a U.S. holder on a disposition of its Class A common shares. In general, the amount of any “excess distribution” will be allocated ratably to each day of the U.S. holder’s holding

period for its Class A common shares. The amount allocated to the current year and any taxable year prior to the first taxable year for which Global Ship Lease was a PFIC will be included in the U.S. holder’s gross income for the current year as ordinary income. With respect to amounts allocated to prior years for which Global Ship Lease was a PFIC, the tax imposed for the current year will be increased by the “deferred tax amount,” which is an amount calculated with respect to each prior year by multiplying the amount allocated to such year by the highest rate of tax in effect for such year, together with an interest charge as though the amounts of tax were overdue. See “Additional Information—Taxation—Taxation of Global Ship Lease—Tax Consequences of Holding Class A Common Shares—U.S. holders—Consequences of possible passive foreign investment company classification” for a more comprehensive discussion of the U.S. federal income tax consequences to United States shareholders if Global Ship Lease were treated as a PFIC (including those applicable to United States shareholders who make a qualified electing fund or mark-to-market election).

Global Ship Lease may be subject to taxation on all or part of its income in the United Kingdom, which could have a material adverse effect on its results of operations.

If Global Ship Lease were considered to be a resident of the United Kingdom or to have a permanent establishment in the United Kingdom, all or a part of its profits could be subject to UK corporate tax, which currently has a maximum rate of 28%. Global Ship Lease is managed and controlled from outside the United Kingdom and restricts its activities within the United Kingdom so that its UK taxes will be minimized. Certain intra-group services may be provided from within the United Kingdom, in which case UK corporate tax will be payable on the arms-length price for those services. The appropriate arms-length price in these circumstances is likely to be a matter of negotiation with the UK taxing authorities.

Because some administrative and executive services will be provided to Global Ship Lease by a subsidiary company located in the United Kingdom and certain of its directors may reside in the United Kingdom, and because UK statutory and case law fail to definitively identify the activities that constitute a trade being carried on in the United Kingdom through a permanent establishment, the UK taxing authorities may contend that Global Ship Lease is subject to UK corporate tax on all of its income, or on a greater portion of its income than Global Ship Lease currently expects to be taxed. If the UK taxing authorities made such a contention, Global Ship Lease could incur substantial legal costs defending its position, and, if Global Ship Lease was unsuccessful in its defense, its results of operations would be materially adversely affected.

Item 4.

Information on the Company

A. History and Development of the Company

Global Ship Lease is a Republic of the Marshall Islands corporation that owns a fleet of modern containerships of diverse sizes and charters the vessels out under long-term, fixed-rate charters to reputable container shipping companies to generate stable revenues.

Pursuant to an asset purchase agreement (the “asset purchase agreement”) with CMA CGM and certain of its vessel-owning subsidiaries, Global Ship Lease acquired from CMA CGM its current fleet of 14 secondhand vessels and three newly built vessels. All of the vessels are time chartered to CMA CGM (which, in such capacity, is sometimes referred to as the “initial Charterer”) for terms between five and 17 years equal to a non-weighted average term of 9.1 years remaining at December 31, 2009 for the 17 vessels in the fleet at that date. Global Ship Lease’s management team undertakes all management of, and strategy for, its fleet and supervises the day-to-day ship management of its vessels which is currently provided by CMA Ships (the “Ship Manager”), a wholly owned subsidiary of CMA CGM, pursuant to ship management agreements.

On March 21, 2008, Global Ship Lease entered into a merger agreement pursuant to which Marathon Acquisition Corp. (“Marathon”) and Global Ship Lease, Inc., a subsidiary of CMA CGM, merged with and into GSL Holdings, Inc. (“GSL Holdings”), Marathon’s newly-formed, wholly owned Marshall Islands subsidiary, with GSL Holdings (now renamed Global Ship Lease, Inc.) continuing as the surviving company incorporated in the Republic of the Marshall Islands (collectively, “Merger”). The Merger was consummated on August 14, 2008.

Pursuant to the Merger, holders of shares of Marathon common stock (other than Marathon Founders, LLC and the other initial stockholders of Marathon) received one Class A common share of Global Ship Lease for each share of Marathon common stock issued and outstanding immediately prior to the effective time of the Merger. In respect of the aggregate 9,375,000 shares of Marathon common stock held by them, Marathon Founders, LLC and the other initial stockholders of Marathon received in the Merger an aggregate of 2,846,906 Class A common shares of Global Ship Lease, 3,471,906 Class B common shares and warrants to acquire an aggregate of 3,056,188 Class A common shares at an exercise price of $9.25. CMA CGM received consideration consisting of 6,778,650 Class A common shares, 3,934,050 Class B common shares, 12,375,000 Class C common shares, 1,000 Series A preferred shares, warrants to acquire 3,131,900 Class A common shares at an exercise price of $9.25, and $18,570,135 in cash. The rights of holders of Class B common shares are identical to those of holders of Class A common shares subject to meeting certain tests, except that the holders of Class B common shares were not entitled to receive any dividends with respect to any quarter prior to the fourth quarter of 2008 and their dividend rights are subordinated to those of holders of Class A common shares until at least the third quarter of 2011. The Class C common shares automatically converted into Class A common shares on a one-for-one basis on January 1, 2009.

The Class A common shares are listed on the NYSE under the symbol GSL.

The mailing address of Global Ship Lease’s principal executive office is c/o Global Ship Lease Services Limited, Portland House, Stag Place, London SW1E 5RS, United Kingdom, and its telephone number is 44 (0) 20 7869 8006.

B. Business Overview

Our Fleet

Global Ship Lease’s fleet, as of December 31, 2009, consisted of 17 containerships, including three newly built vessels, with an aggregate capacity of 66,297 TEU and a weighted average age of approximately 5.8 years and a non-weighted average age of 6.9 years. All of these vessels were acquired from CMA CGM or its subsidiaries pursuant to the asset purchase agreement.

The table below provides information about Global Ship Lease’s current fleet. Each vessel is on charter to CMA CGM:


Vessel Name	Size (TEU)	Year Built	Classification Society
Ville d’Orion	4,113	1997	Bureau Veritas
Ville d’Aquarius	4,113	1996	Bureau Veritas
CMA CGM Matisse	2,262	1999	Bureau Veritas
CMA CGM Utrillo	2,262	1999	Bureau Veritas
Delmas Keta	2,207	2003	Bureau Veritas
Julie Delmas	2,207	2002	Bureau Veritas
Kumasi	2,207	2002	Bureau Veritas
Marie Delmas	2,207	2002	Bureau Veritas
CMA CGM La Tour	2,272	2001	Bureau Veritas
CMA CGM Manet	2,272	2001	Bureau Veritas
CMA CGM Alcazar	5,100	2007	Bureau Veritas
CMA CGM Château d’If	5,100	2007	Bureau Veritas
CMA CGM Thalassa	10,960	2008	Bureau Veritas
CMA CGM Jamaica	4,298	2006	Germanischer Lloyd
CMA CGM Sambhar	4,045	2006	Lloyd’s Register
CMA CGM America	4,045	2006	Lloyd’s Register
CMA CGM Berlioz	6,627	2001	Bureau Veritas

In addition, Global Ship Lease has contracted to purchase two further containerships as set out below:


Vessel Name	Size (TEU)	Year Built	Estimated Delivery Date to GSL	Charterer	Charter Period (years)		Net Daily Rate ($)
Hull 789 ⁽¹⁾	4,250	2010	December 2010	Zim	7-8	⁽²⁾	$	28,000
Hull 790 ⁽¹⁾	4,250	2010	December 2010	Zim	7-8	⁽²⁾	$	28,000

(1)

Contracted to be purchased from German interests

(2)

Seven to eight year charter at charterer’s option

Time Charters

A time charter is a contract for the use of a vessel for a fixed period of time at a specified daily rate. Under a time charter, the vessel owner provides crew, lubricating oil, all maintenance and other services related to the vessel’s operation, the cost of which is included in the daily rate. The vessel owner is also responsible for insuring its interests in the vessel and liabilities as owner arising from its use. The charterer is responsible for substantially all of the vessel’s voyage costs, such as fuel and cargo handling charges.

Initial Term

Each of the vessels in our current fleet is subject to a long-term time charter with CMA CGM. Global Ship Lease has separate subsidiaries to own each vessel in its fleet. Global Ship Lease guarantees the obligations of each of its subsidiaries under the charters. Each of Global Ship Lease’s charters commenced on each vessel’s delivery. Due to different delivery dates and durations, its charters will expire on different dates and over a period of time. Global Ship Lease believes the staggered expirations of its charters will reduce its exposure to re-chartering risk upon expiration of its initial charters and may mitigate the impact of the cyclical nature of the container shipping industry. The charters have initial terms of five to 17 years and its fleet has a non-weighted average charter period of 9.1 years remaining at December 31, 2009 for the 17 vessels in the fleet at that date. The initial charter periods for Global Ship Lease’s current fleet are as follows:


Vessel Name	Commencement of Charter	Charter Period (Years)
Ville d’Orion	December 2007	5
Ville d’Aquarius	December 2007	5
CMA CGM Matisse	December 2007	9
CMA CGM Utrillo	December 2007	9
Delmas Keta	December 2007	10
Julie Delmas	December 2007	10
Marie Delmas	December 2007	10
Kumasi	December 2007	10
CMA CGM La Tour	December 2007	9
CMA CGM Manet	December 2007	9
CMA CGM Alcazar	January 2008	13
CMA CGM Château d’If	January 2008	13
CMA CGM Thalassa	December 2008	17
CMA CGM Jamaica	December 2008	14
CMA CGM Sambhar	December 2008	14
CMA CGM America	December 2008	14
CMA CGM Berlioz	August 2009	12

Net Daily Rate

“Net daily rate” refers to the basic payment by the charterer to the owner for the use of the vessel, net of any chartering commission (if applicable). Under all of the time charters for its current fleet, hire is payable to Global Ship Lease in advance every 15 days in United States dollars. The net daily rate is a fixed daily amount that will remain the same for the duration of the charter, although in certain circumstances the charter rate can increase. For example, under the global expense agreement, CMA CGM has agreed, effective as of the fourth year of each charter agreement, to compensate Global Ship Lease for any vessel in its fleet on charter to CMA CGM by the amount by which actual operating costs per day (excluding any drydock costs and insurance premiums) are greater than $500 over a specified amount, which specified amount is based on projected operating costs over the life of each charter, provided more than 50% of such increase is attributable to crew and lubricating oil costs, such compensation not to exceed $500 per day per vessel.

The following chart shows the net daily hire rate that CMA CGM has agreed to pay for each vessel:


Vessel Name		Net Daily Rate ($)
Ville d’Orion		28,500
Ville d’Aquarius		28,500
CMA CGM Matisse		18,465
CMA CGM Utrillo		18,465
Delmas Keta		18,465
Julie Delmas		18,465
Marie Delmas		18,465
CMA CGM La Tour		18,465
CMA CGM Manet		18,465
Kumasi		18,465
CMA CGM Alcazar		33,750
CMA CGM Château d’If		33,750
CMA CGM Thalassa		47,200
CMA CGM Jamaica		25,350
CMA CGM Sambhar		25,350
CMA CGM America		25,350
CMA CGM Berlioz		34,000

Operations and Expenses

As owner, Global Ship Lease is required to maintain each vessel in class and in an efficient state of hull and machinery and is responsible for vessel costs such as crewing, lubricating oil, maintenance, insurance and drydocking. The charterer is responsible for the voyage costs, which includes bunker fuel, stevedoring, port charges and towage. As described below, Global Ship Lease has entered into ship management agreements and the global expense agreement with its Ship Manager.

For vessels in the current fleet, costs incurred due to structural changes because of changes in legal, classification society or regulatory requirements regarding the vessel shall be paid by Global Ship Lease although if the annual costs aggregate to more than $100,000 for each vessel impacted by such changes, the initial Charterer will compensate Global Ship Lease through an increase in charterhire from the year the aggregate amount is reached.

The charter agreements for vessels in the current fleet stipulate that the initial Charterer should reimburse Global Ship Lease for any costs of war risks insurance additional premiums and additional crew expenses, if any, that are applicable if the initial Charterer acts outside the insurance limits and for entering areas which are specified by the insurance underwriters as being subject to additional premiums.

Right of First Refusal

Pursuant to the terms of the time charter, the initial Charterer of the current fleet has a right of first refusal to purchase the vessel at matching terms to any offer of any third party if Global Ship Lease decides to sell the vessel during, or at the end of, the charter period. Should the initial Charterer not exercise its right of first refusal in case of a sale during the charter period, Global Ship Lease will be entitled to sell the vessel, subject to the initial Charterer’s approval, which shall not be unreasonably withheld. The initial Charterer has the right to reject a sale of a vessel to owners whose business or shareholding is determined to be detrimental or contrary to the initial Charterer’s interest.

Off-hire

Under the time charter, when the vessel is not available for service, or “off-hire,” the initial Charterer generally is not required to pay charter hire (unless the initial Charterer is responsible for the circumstances giving rise to the ship’s unavailability), and Global Ship Lease is responsible for costs during any off-hire period, and possible additional costs of fuel to regain lost time. A vessel generally will be deemed to be off-hire if there is an occurrence that affects the full working condition of the vessel, such as:

•

any drydocking for repairs, maintenance or classification society inspection;

•

any damage, defect, breakdown or deficiency of the ship’s hull, machinery or equipment or repairs or maintenance thereto;

•

any deficiency of the ship’s master, officers and/or crew, including the failure, refusal or inability of the ship’s master, officers and/or crew to perform the service immediately required, whether or not within its control;

•

its deviation, other than to save life or property, which results in initial Charterer’s lost time;

•

crewing labor boycotts or certain vessel arrests; or

•

Global Ship Lease’s failure to maintain the vessel in compliance with the charter’s requirements, such as maintaining operational certificates.

Ship Management and Maintenance

Under each of its time charters, Global Ship Lease is responsible for the operation and technical management of each vessel, which includes crewing, provision of lubricating oils, maintaining the vessel, periodic drydocking and performing work required by regulations. The day-to-day crewing and technical management of its vessels are provided by its Ship Manager pursuant to the terms of the ship management agreements.

Termination and Withdrawal

If a vessel in the current fleet is off-hire for more than 90 consecutive days, then the initial Charterer may cancel the charter without any further consequential claims provided the vessel is free of cargo.

If a vessel’s fuel consumption is increased for a prolonged period above a specified percentage or speed is decreased below a specified level, the time charter provides that hire payments under the time charter may be adjusted until or unless the speed and fuel consumption return to the level specified in the time charter. If a vessel’s fuel consumption exceeds a higher percentage than the percentages specified in the charter over a continuous period of 30 days, and the reason is within its or the vessel’s control, the initial Charterer may request that Global Ship Lease cures the deficiency. If the deficiency is not cured within 30 days after Global Ship Lease receives notice, then the initial Charterer may terminate the charter.

If either party informs the other party of a default under the charter, and the default is not rectified within 60 days of such notice, then the party giving the notice has the right to terminate the time charter with respect to that vessel.

The charter will terminate in the event of a total (actual or constructive) loss of the vessel or if the vessel is requisitioned.

Global Ship Lease may suspend the performance of its obligations under the charter if the initial Charterer defaults on its payment obligations under the charter.

Ship Management Agreements

For the current fleet Global Ship Lease’s Ship Manager, CMA Ships, a subsidiary of CMA CGM, provides day-to-day technical ship management services, including purchasing, crewing, provision of lubricating oil, vessel maintenance including arranging drydocking inspections and ensuring compliance with flag, class and other statutory requirements necessary to support Global Ship Lease’s business. CMA CGM guarantees the performance of all services and any payment due to Global Ship Lease by its Ship Manager pursuant to the ship management agreements.

Pursuant to its ship management agreements, Global Ship Lease expects to pay its Ship Manager for its services an annual management fee of $114,000 per vessel. Under the ship management agreements, its Ship Manager is responsible for all day-to-day ship management, including crewing, purchasing stores, lubricating oils and spare parts, paying wages, pensions and insurance for the crew, and organizing other vessel operating necessities, including the arrangement and management of drydocking. Global Ship Lease will reimburse the Ship Manager for costs it incurs on Global Ship Lease’s behalf. However, such cost reimbursement is capped on a quarterly basis pursuant to the global expense agreement described in more detail below in “Global Expense Agreement.” Each ship management agreement provides that Global Ship Lease has the right to audit the accounts of its Ship Manager to verify the costs incurred. The Ship Manager has agreed to maintain Global Ship Lease’s vessels so that they remain in class with valid certification. In addition, the Ship Manager will be responsible for Global Ship Lease’s current fleet’s compliance with all government and other regulations, and compliance with class certifications.

The Ship Manager has established an accounting system and maintains the records of all costs and expenditures incurred as well as data necessary for the settlement of accounts between parties.

The Ship Manager is required to use its best endeavors to provide the services specified in the ship management agreements. Pursuant to the terms of the ship management agreements, Global Ship Lease will indemnify its Ship Manager and its employees, agents and sub-contractors and hold them harmless against all actions, proceedings, claims, demands or liabilities which may be brought against them or incurred by them arising out of or in connection with the performance of the ship management agreements, unless the same is proved to have resulted solely from the negligence, gross negligence or willful default of the Ship Manager, its employees, agents and sub-contractors.

Global Ship Lease’s Ship Manager will not be permitted to sub-contract its obligations under the ship management agreements without Global Ship Lease’s consent, which Global Ship Lease will not unreasonably withhold. With Global Ship Lease’s consent, the Ship Manager has sub-contracted all of its management services under its ship management agreements to its UK subsidiary, CMA Ships UK. Global Ship Lease’s ship management agreements with the Ship Manager have a term of three years from delivery of each vessel subject to the termination rights set forth below.

The ship management agreements are cancelable by Global Ship Lease if its Ship Manager fails to meet its obligations under the ship management agreements for any reason within its control and fails to remedy the default. In addition, after a ship management agreement has been in effect for one year, Global Ship Lease has the option of terminating the ship management agreement upon three months notice if Global Ship Lease can secure more competitive pricing from a recognized third party, approved by CMA CGM as charterer of the vessels, such approval not to be unduly withheld, subject to CMA Ships’ right to match the third party’s terms.

Global Ship Lease’s Ship Manager can terminate the agreement prior to the end of its term if, among other things: (a) it has not been paid within 30 days of a written request for payment (and Global Ship Lease fails to remedy such default) or (b) Global Ship Lease undergoes a change in control.

Either party may terminate a ship management agreement in the event of an order being made or a resolution being passed for the winding up, dissolution or bankruptcy of either party, or if a receiver is appointed, or if it suspends payment, ceases to carry on business or makes a special arrangement with its creditors. The ship management agreement will also terminate if the vessel becomes a total loss, is declared as a constructive or compromised or arranged total loss, is requisitioned or sold.

Global Ship Lease intends that the ship management of newbuilding hulls 789 and 790, scheduled for delivery in the fourth quarter of 2010 for timecharter to Zim, will be subcontracted to a third party ship manager unrelated to CMA CGM.

Insurance

Global Ship Lease arranges for insurance coverage for each of its vessels, including hull and machinery insurance, protection and indemnity insurance and war risk insurance. Global Ship Lease is responsible for the payment of all premiums.

Global Expense Agreement

Pursuant to the ship management agreements with CMA Ships, ship operating expenses incurred by the Ship Manager on Global Ship Lease’s behalf in the operation of its fleet on charter to CMA CGM will be reimbursed. Pursuant to the global expense agreement that Global Ship Lease entered into with its Ship Manager, these expenses will be subject to a quarterly cap. Drydocking expenses and insurance premiums are not included in the cap arrangements. For each quarterly period, its Ship Manager bears the amount (if any) by which the actual aggregate expenses, excluding drydocking expenses and insurance premiums and costs of accidents and incidents, incurred with respect to all vessels in service exceed the aggregate cap for such quarterly period. The table below sets out the per diem cap per vessel.


Vessel Name		Per Diem Cap ($)
Ville d’Orion		6,400
Ville d’Aquarius		6,400
CMA CGM Matisse		5,400
CMA CGM Utrillo		5,400
Delmas Keta		5,400
Julie Delmas		5,400
Marie Delmas		5,400
CMA CGM La Tour		5,400
CMA CGM Manet		5,400
Kumasi		5,400
CMA CGM Alcazar		5,900
CMA CGM Château d’If		5,900
CMA CGM Thalassa		8,800
CMA CGM Jamaica		6,650
CMA CGM Sambhar		6,650
CMA CGM America		6,650
CMA CGM Berlioz		7,800

Once its ship management agreements and the global expense agreement with its Ship Manager expire or are terminated, Global Ship Lease may not be able to negotiate similar terms in replacement agreements.

Also in the global expense agreement, CMA CGM has agreed, effective as of the fourth year of each charter agreement, to compensate Global Ship Lease, for any vessel in its current fleet by the amount by which actual operating costs per day (excluding any drydock costs and insurance premiums) are greater than $500 over a specified amount, which specified amount is based on projected operating costs over the life of each charter, provided more than 50% of such increase is attributable to crew and lubricating oil costs, such compensation not to exceed $500 per day per vessel.

Credit Facility

Global Ship Lease has a senior secured credit facility with Fortis Bank (Nederland) N.V. (the “Agent”), Citibank Global Markets Limited, HSH Nordbank AG, Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation, Brussels Branch, KFW, DnB Nor Bank ASA and Bank of Scotland, which Global Ship Lease refers to as its credit facility. Global Ship Lease drew funds under its credit facility to finance in part the purchase of its vessels from CMA CGM. All of Global Ship Lease’s vessel-owning subsidiaries are included as borrowers and guarantors jointly and severally guaranteeing Global Ship Lease’s obligations under the credit facility.

Credit Facility Amendment

Under the terms of the Credit Facility Amendment, effective as of August 20, 2009, the credit facility effectively became a term loan of approximately $600 million with a final maturity date of August 14, 2016. Following the Credit Facility Amendment, there is no undrawn capacity under the credit facility.

The credit facility has a leverage ratio test which provides that, if the leverage ratio exceeds 75%, the Agent may require a prepayment of the borrowings or the delivery of additional security to the extent necessary to reduce the leverage ratio to 75%.

Due to the global economic downturn and significantly reduced demand for container shipping services and containerships, combined with continued delivery of newbuildings, containership values have experienced dramatic declines in recent months. Purchase and sale transactions in the containership market have been very limited, confined primarily to small vessels and, in instances where such transactions have been completed, the prices have been significantly lower than comparable transactions in the past. No newbuilding orders have been placed for many months and many ship brokers have not been providing certificates of market value due to the disrupted market.

Due to the possibility that Global Ship Lease would exceed the maximum permitted leverage ratio under the credit facility as a result of the declines in charter-free market values of its vessels, Global Ship Lease’s lenders agreed to enter into the Credit Facility Amendment. Under the Credit Facility Amendment, the maximum 75% leverage ratio will not apply until the leverage ratio is first tested after the expiration of the waiver period which is up to and including November 30, 2010. Consequently the first such test is scheduled to be as of April 30, 2011. In addition, and in connection with the purchase of the CMA CGM Berlioz for $82.0 million, which was completed in August 2009, the Credit Facility Amendment permitted drawings of up to $42.0 million under the main credit facility and up to an additional $20.0 million as a newly created Over Advance Portion. In August, $42 .0 million was drawn under the main credit facility and $15.0 million was drawn under the Over Advance Portion. The $25.0 million balance of the purchase price was met from available cash. The Credit Facility Amendment provides that borrowings under the Over Advance Portion will be paid quarterly commencing November 2009 with free cash in excess of $20.0 million determined as of the previous month end. The Over Advance Portion is required to be fully prepaid by June 30, 2010. The credit facility will be repaid quarterly commencing June 30, 2010 with free cash in excess of $20.0 million determined as of the previous month end subject to a minimum $40.0 million prepayment per rolling four-quarters as long as the leverage ratio is, or is deemed to be, over 75%. When the leverage ratio becomes 75% or less, scheduled repayments will be set at $10.0 million per quarter.

No additional indebtedness is permitted until the Over Advance Portion is repaid in full, other than for the purpose of financing the purchase of the two contracted vessels from German interests.

If any additional capital is raised, 25% of such additional capital, net of expenses, must be used to prepay borrowings under the credit facility. This provision terminates when the repayment profile of the credit facility is reduced to 18 years or lower, based on the market value and weighted average age of the vessels. In the event of a sale of a vessel or a total loss or constructive total loss of a vessel, the proceeds received from such sale, total loss or constructive total loss must be used to prepay borrowings under the credit facility.

Further, the undrawn portion of the credit facility amounting to approximately $200.0 million was cancelled and Global Ship Lease has agreed that it will not declare or pay any dividends to common shareholders during the waiver period or thereafter until the leverage ratio falls to 75% or below.

In connection with the Credit Facility Amendment, CMA CGM has agreed not to reduce its holding of common shares in Global Ship Lease below the current level of approximately 24.4 million common shares at least until November 30, 2010 and to defer the redemption of the $48.0 million preferred shares until after the final maturity of the credit facility in August 2016.

General Borrowing Terms

Borrowings under the credit facility bear interest at a rate of the margin over one, three, six, nine or 12 month United States Dollar LIBOR, or such other periods as the Agent may agree. The margin depends on the “leverage ratio,” which is defined as the ratio of the aggregate amount outstanding under its credit facility, net of surplus cash held in the retention account, to the aggregate charter-free market value of the vessels securing the credit facility plus the value of other security held. The charter-free market value of a vessel is calculated semi-annually in April and November as the arithmetic average of valuations determined by two independent sale and purchase brokers acceptable to the Agent. If only one such valuation is available at the relevant time, then the result of that valuation will be used to assess the leverage ratio until a second valuation, to be sought monthly, becomes available and the two valuations can be averaged. Should no current valuations be available at the relevant time, then the leverage ratio will be assumed to be over 100%. The margin is fixed at 3.50% until the leverage ratio is first tested after November 30, 2010. Set forth below is the margin that applies for the relevant leverage ratio once the fixed margin period expires.


Leverage Ratio	Margin
Up to 65%	2.50	%
Greater than 65% to 75%	3.00	%
Greater than 75%	3.50	%

During the continuance of any principal or interest default, the margin on the overdue amounts increases by 2% per annum. Pursuant to the terms of the credit facility, Global Ship Lease must hedge at least 50% of the amounts outstanding under the credit facility. Global Ship Lease hedged, prior to the Merger, the majority of the amounts outstanding under the credit facility.

Until undrawn commitments were cancelled pursuant to the Credit Facility Amendment, Global Ship Lease paid a commitment fee of 0.50% per annum on the undrawn portion of the credit facility. Global Ship Lease is responsible for the duly justified costs properly incurred in connection with the establishment and the maintenance of the credit facility.

Global Ship Lease is permitted to make early prepayments that can reduce subsequent prepayment obligations. Any amount outstanding under the credit facility at the final maturity date in August 2016 must be repaid in one installment.

Security

Global Ship Lease’s credit facility provides that borrowings under the credit facility are secured by the following:

•

a first priority pledge over Global Ship Lease’s bank accounts, and those of Global Ship Lease’s subsidiaries’ owning vessels in the security package, which are held with the Agent;

•

cross-collateralized first priority mortgages on each of the vessels in the security package registered or flagged in a jurisdiction acceptable to the lenders;

•

marine and war risks insurance covering a minimum of 110% of the outstanding credit facility amount;

•

a first priority assignment of time charter contracts, in respect of the vessels in the security package;

•

a first priority assignment of insurances in respect of each of the vessels in the security package;

•

a first priority pledge over the shares of Global Ship Lease’s borrowing or guaranteeing subsidiaries;

•

corporate guarantees for Global Ship Lease’s obligations from guarantors being Global Ship Lease’s non-borrowing subsidiaries under this credit facility;

•

a first priority assignment of the unconditional and irrevocable corporate guarantee from CMA CGM to Global Ship Lease for the obligations of the initial Charterer, under the time charters, in cases where the initial Charterer is a subsidiary of CMA CGM;

•

a first priority assignment of the management agreements for the vessels in the security package; and

•

a first priority (general) assignment of the earnings of the vessels in the security package.

In the event of either the sale or total loss of a vessel, the amount available for Global Ship Lease to borrow under its credit facility will be reduced so that its borrowings under the credit facility does not exceed 70% of the market value of the remaining vessels that secure its obligations under the credit facility.

Covenants

Global Ship Lease’s credit facility contains covenants that require Global Ship Lease to ensure, among other things, that:

•

the employment details of additional vessels that Global Ship Lease acquires are given to the Agent;

•

technical and/or operational management of all the vessels secured under this facility and/or the supervisor in respect of newbuildings to be executed by CMA CGM or any of its wholly owned subsidiaries, or any other company internationally recognized and acceptable to the Agent;

•

the earnings accounts, the operating account and retention account in relation to the vessels are held with the Agent;

•

the vessels are in class, free of any material overdue recommendations, and the classification society is part of the IACS. No change of class without the prior written consent of the Agent, such consent not to be unreasonably withheld;

•

Global Ship Lease is only to be involved in the business of ownership of vessels, technical and commercial management of such vessels and related activities;

•

Global Ship Lease may not charter-in vessels, lease vessels or enter into any similar arrangement without the prior written approval of the Agent, other than time chartering up to three months, such consent not to be unreasonably withheld, unless the arrangement is with or to Global Ship Lease or its subsidiaries, in which case no approval from the Agent shall be required;

•

Global Ship Lease supplies a list of acceptable flags approved by the Agent. Global Ship Lease may change flag to another approved flag provided the Agent receives the required documentation;

•

Global Ship Lease is restricted from certain asset acquisitions and disposals with respect to its subsidiaries other than disposals made in the ordinary course of business of the disposing subsidiary on arms-length terms and for fair value or any disposal of assets (other than vessels) in exchange for other assets comparable or superior as to type, value and quality;

•

there are restrictions on the ability of Global Ship Lease’s subsidiaries to incur additional indebtedness;

•

Global Ship Lease will at all times comply with the International Maritime Code for the Safe Operation of Ships and for Pollution Prevention adopted by the IMO;

•

there is no change of ownership of any of Global Ship Lease’s subsidiaries;

•

Global Ship Lease will provide the Agent with audited annual consolidated accounts, quarterly management accounts and, in respect of each subsidiary, annual unaudited accounts as soon as they are made available, in no event later than 120 days of the year-end and 60 days of the end of each quarter. Further relevant financial information will be provided on demand;

•

Global Ship Lease shall, at the same time the audited annual consolidated accounts and management accounts are due, provide the Agent with compliance certificates showing the calculation of the financial covenants. A listing of charter rates may also be included;

•

Global Ship Lease cannot dispose of net assets in excess of $300.0 million (of which a maximum of $200.0 million in aggregate should be in respect of its initial and contracted fleet) over any period of three consecutive calendar years other than with the consent of the Agent; and

•

Global Ship Lease may pay dividends if (1) no event of default has occurred or is continuing, (2) the payment of such a dividend does not trigger an event of default and (3) any payments to be made into the retention account are fully up to date.

Global Ship Lease’s credit facility contains financial covenants requiring that, among other things:

•

its cash balance on a consolidated basis must be a minimum of $15.0 million or six months’ net interest expense at all times;

•

Global Ship Lease’s financial net debt to total capitalization ratio shall not exceed 75%;

•

Global Ship Lease’s ratio of EBITDA to debt service, on a trailing four-quarter basis, shall be no less than 1.10 to 1. (Under the Credit Facility Amendment, $10.0 million per quarter is the amount of debt prepayment deemed to be the scheduled prepayment for the purposes of determining debt service); and

•

Global Ship Lease maintains a minimum net worth of $200.0 million.

Events of Default

Among other things, each of the following events with respect to Global Ship Lease or any of its subsidiaries, in some cases after the passage of time or notice or both, is an event of default under the credit facility agreement:

•

non-payment of amounts due and payable under this credit facility within four business days of the due date;

•

Global Ship Lease’s or its subsidiaries’ breach of Global Ship Lease’s non-financial covenants and failure to remedy within seven business days of receipt of a notice;

•

Global Ship Lease’s breach of a financial covenant;

•

cross default with respect to Global Ship Lease’s and its subsidiaries’ other obligations for any amount in excess of $15.0 million (with respect to Global Ship Lease) and $10.0 million (with respect to its subsidiaries);

•

if any person other than CMA CGM, and not agreed to by the lenders, acquires more than 51% of its outstanding voting shares; and

•

default of the initial Charterer or the Charter Guarantor which is continuing in respect of three or more of the time charter contracts associated with its initial and contracted fleet or default of more than half by number of the time charters associated with any approved charterer (provided such charterer is the charterer of at least 25% of Global Ship Lease’s vessels).

The credit facility agreement provides that upon the occurrence of an event of default, the lenders may require that all amounts outstanding under the credit facility be repaid immediately and terminate Global Ship Lease’s ability to borrow under the credit facility and foreclose on the mortgages over the vessels and the related collateral.

Inspection by Classification Societies

Every seagoing vessel must be “classed” by a classification society. The classification society certifies that the vessel is “in class,” signifying that the vessel has been built and maintained in accordance with the rules of the classification society and complies with applicable rules and regulations of the vessel’s country of registry and the international conventions of which that country is a member. In addition, where surveys are required by international conventions and corresponding laws and ordinances of a flag state, the classification society will undertake them on application or by official order, acting on behalf of the authorities concerned.

The classification society, on request, also undertakes other surveys and checks that are required by regulations and requirements of the flag state. These surveys are subject to agreements made in each individual case and/or to the regulations of the country concerned. In addition, the classification society will make recommendations, including imposing a timetable, for repairs following accidents and check to confirm such repairs have been effected to an acceptable standard.

For maintenance of the class, regular and extraordinary surveys of hull, machinery, including the electrical plant, and any special equipment classed, are required to be performed as follows:

•

Annual Surveys. For seagoing ships, annual surveys are conducted for the hull and the machinery, including the electrical plant, and where applicable for special equipment classed.

•

Intermediate Surveys. Also referred to as extended annual surveys, intermediate surveys are typically conducted two and one-half years after (a) commissioning the vessel and (b) after each class renewal. A drydocking is usually required during the intermediate survey for inspection of underwater parts and for repairs related to inspections. However, by increasing the resilience of the underwater coating and marking the vessel’s hull to accommodate in-water inspection by divers, in-water inspections may be accepted by classification societies in lieu of drydockings at intermediate surveys. If any defects are found, the classification surveyor will issue a “recommendation” that must be rectified by the ship-owner within prescribed time limits. A drydocking would only be required if the in-water inspection showed urgent repairs that could only be carried out in drydock. In-water inspections are typically less expensive than drydocking inspections and Global Ship Lease intends to conduct in-water inspections when that option is available to it.

•

Class Renewal Surveys. Class renewal surveys, also known as special surveys, are carried out typically every five years on the ship’s hull, machinery, including the electrical plant, and any special equipment classed, at the intervals indicated by the character of classification for the hull. Vessels are required to be inspected in a drydock as part of the special survey. At the special survey, the vessel is thoroughly examined including audio-gauging to determine the thickness of the steel structures. Should the thickness be found to be less than class requirements, the classification society would prescribe steel renewals. Substantial expense may have to be incurred for steel renewals to pass a special survey if the vessel has experienced excessive wear and tear. As an alternate to carrying out all of the required inspections at the special survey every five years, a ship-owner has the option of arranging with the classification society for the vessel’s hull or machinery to be on a continuous basis, in which every relevant part of the vessel would be surveyed on a five year cycle. A dry-docking is still required at the firth year anniversary to inspect underwater parts. The process of continuous class renewal spreads out the required inspections and their associated cost, whilst the vessel is still in service, and reduces the amount of inspection required each fifth year.

As a condition for obtaining insurance coverage as well as for obtaining financing from its lenders, each of Global Ship Lease’s vessels needs to be certified “in class” by a member of the IACS. Pursuant to the terms of the asset purchase agreement, any recommendations or suspensions from class which existed at the time of sale to Global Ship Lease would need to be remedied at the sole expense of the vendor before or during the next scheduled drydocking of that vessel. Global Ship Lease is also indemnified for a period of two years from the date of the purchase of each vessel for certain losses incurred prior to the full repair of any vessel that arise out of any recommendations existing on the vessel or suspensions from class at the time of sale. Generally, if the recommendations are not sufficiently corrected as determined by a member of the IACS, then the vessel may not remain “in class.” If a vessel is not “in class,” it may not be covered by insurance, and may not be available for charter. In addition, Global Ship Lease’s vessels must remain “in class” as a condition to obtaining financing from the lenders under its credit facility.

The following table lists the month by which the vessels in Global Ship Lease’s fleet need to have completed their next drydocking:


Vessel Name		Drydocking Month*
Ville d’Orion		January 2012
Ville d’Aquarius		December 2011
CMA CGM Matisse		November 2014
CMA CGM Utrillo		December 2014
Delmas Keta		March 2013
Julie Delmas		October 2012
Marie Delmas		January 2012
CMA CGM La Tour		June 2011
CMA CGM Manet		October 2011
Kumasi		March 2012
CMA CGM Alcazar		November 2012
CMA CGM Château d’If		December 2012
CMA CGM Thalassa		December 2013
CMA CGM Jamaica		September 2011
CMA CGM Sambhar		July 2011
CMA CGM America		September 2011
CMA CGM Berlioz		July 2011

*	Expected month of drydocking assume that the vessels of Global Ship Lease’s fleet qualify for in-water inspections.

Competition

Global Ship Lease operates in markets that are highly competitive. Global Ship Lease expects to compete for vessel purchases and charters based upon price, customer relationships, operating expertise, professional reputation and size, age and condition of the vessel. Global Ship Lease also expects to compete with many other companies, including CMA CGM and its subsidiaries, to, among other things, purchase newbuildings and secondhand vessels to grow its fleet.

Global Ship Lease expects substantial competition in obtaining new containership charters from a number of experienced and substantial companies. Many of these competitors may have greater financial resources than Global Ship Lease, and may also operate larger fleets and may be able to offer better charter rates. Due to the industry downturn, there are an increasing number of vessels available for charter, including many from owners with strong reputations and experience. The lack of available financing and excess supply of vessels in the container shipping market results in a more active short-term charter market and greater price competition for charters. As a result of these factors, Global Ship Lease may be unable to purchase additional containerships, expand its relationships with CMA CGM or to obtain new charterers on a profitable basis, if at all, which would have a material adverse effect on its business, results of operations and financial condition.

Permits and Authorizations

Global Ship Lease is required by various governmental and other agencies to obtain certain permits, licenses and certificates with respect to its vessels. The kinds of permits, licenses and certificates required depend upon several factors, including the commodities transported, the waters in which the vessel operates, the nationality of the vessel’s crew and the age of a vessel. Not all of the permits, licenses and certificates currently required to operate the vessels globally have been obtained by Global Ship Lease or its Ship Manager. For example, the Delmas Keta, Julie Delmas, Kumasi and Marie Delmas are not compliant with all United States, Canadian and Panama Canal regulations, as the initial Charterer does not intend to operate them in these waters.

Environmental and Other Regulations

Government regulation significantly affects the ownership and operation of vessels. Global Ship Lease is subject to international conventions and codes, and national, state and local laws and regulations in force in the countries in which its vessels may operate or are registered, including those governing the management and disposal of hazardous substances and wastes, the cleanup of oil spills and other contamination, air emissions, and water discharges and ballast water management. Compliance with these laws, regulations and other requirements entails significant expense, including vessel modifications and implementation of certain operating procedures, and are subject to frequent change.

A variety of governmental and private entities subject its vessels to both scheduled and unscheduled inspections. These entities include the local port authorities, United States Coast Guard, harbor master or equivalent, classification societies, flag state administrations, country of registry, charterers, and terminal operators. Certain of these entities require Global Ship Lease to obtain permits, licenses and certificates for the operation of its vessels. Failure to maintain necessary permits or approvals could require Global Ship Lease to incur substantial penalties, costs or temporarily suspend the operation of one or more of its vessels in one or more ports.

Global Ship Lease believes that the heightened level of environmental and quality concerns among insurance underwriters, regulators and charterers is leading to greater inspection and safety requirements on all vessels and may accelerate the scrapping of older vessels throughout the shipping industry.

Increasing environmental concerns have created a demand for vessels that conform to the stricter environmental standards. Global Ship Lease will be required to maintain operating standards for all of its vessels that emphasize operational safety, quality maintenance, continuous training of its officers and crews and compliance with United States and international regulations. Because such laws and regulations are changed frequently and may impose increasingly strict requirements, future environmental regulations may limit Global Ship Lease’s ability to do business, increase its operating costs, force the early retirement of its vessels and/or affect their resale value, all of which could have a material adverse affect on its financial condition and results of operations.

International Maritime Organization

Global Ship Lease’s vessels are subject to standards imposed by the International Maritime Organization, or IMO, the United Nations agency for maritime safety and the prevention of pollution by ships. The IMO has negotiated international conventions and implemented regulations that address oil discharges, ballasting and unloading operations, sewage, garbage and air emissions, and impose liability for pollution in international waters and a signatory’s territorial waters.

The IMO’s International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships, or MARPOL, imposes environmental standards on the shipping industry relating to oil spills, management of garbage, the handling and disposal of noxious liquids, harmful substances in packaged forms, sewage and air emissions. Annex I specifies requirements for continuous monitoring of oily water discharges and establishes a number of special areas in which more stringent discharge standards are applicable. Carriage of chemicals in bulk is covered by regulations MARPOL Annex II. Annex III of MARPOL regulates the transportation of packaged dangerous goods (marine pollutants) and includes standards on packing, marking, labeling, documentation, stowage, quantity limitations and pollution prevention. These Annex III requirements have been expanded by the International Maritime Dangerous Goods Code, which imposes additional standards for all aspects of the transportation of dangerous goods and marine pollutants by sea. Annex IV contains a set of regulations regarding the discharge of sewage into the sea, the configuration and operation of ships’ equipment and systems for the control of sewage discharge, and requirements for survey and certification. Annex V totally prohibits the disposal of plastics anywhere into the sea, and severely restricts discharges of other garbage from ships into coastal waters and special areas. MARPOL’s Annex VI sets limits on sulfur oxide, nitrogen oxide, carbon dioxide and particulate matter emissions from ship exhausts and prohibits deliberate emissions of ozone depleting substances, such as chlorofluorocarbons. Annex VI also includes a global cap on the sulfur content of fuel oil and allows for special areas to be established with more stringent controls on sulfur emissions. Global Ship Lease has registered the vessels in its fleet in flag states that have ratified Annex VI, which require that Global Ship Lease obtains International Air Pollution Prevention Certificates, or IAPP Certificates, for the vessels in its fleet, from those flag states. As of December 31, 2009, all of the vessels in the fleet had IAPP Certificates. On July 21, 2008, the United States enacted the Maritime Pollution Protection Act of 2008, implementing Annex VI in territorial waters of the United States. Once the president delivers the instrument of ratification to the IMO, the United States will become a party to Annex VI within 90 days. On October 9, 2008, the Member States of the IMO adopted amendments to Annex VI creating more stringent standards for engines and fuels The main changes to MARPOL Annex VI will see a progressive reduction in sulphur oxide (SOx) emissions from ships, with the global sulphur cap reduced initially to 3.50% (from the current 4.50%), effective from 1 January 2012; then progressively to 0.50 %, effective from 1 January 2020, subject to a feasibility review to be completed no later than 2018.

The limits applicable in Sulphur Emission Control Areas (SECAs) will be reduced to 1.00%, beginning on 1 July 2010 (from the current 1.50 %); being further reduced to 0.10 %, effective from 1 January 2015.

Progressive reductions in nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from marine engines were also agreed, with the most stringent controls on so-called “Tier III” engines, i.e. those installed on ships constructed on or after 1 January 2016, operating in Emission Control Areas.

These requirements could require modifications to Global Ship Lease’s vessels to achieve compliance. Global Ship Lease is evaluating these requirements and the alternatives for achieving compliance. The costs to comply with these requirements may be material or significant to the company’s operations.

The operation of Global Ship Lease’s vessels is also affected by the requirements set forth in the International Management Code for the Safe Operation of Ships and Pollution Prevention, or ISM Code, compliance with which is required under the International Convention of Safety of Life at Sea, or SOLAS. The ISM Code requires ship-owners or any other entity such as a manager or a bareboat charterer, who has assumed the responsibility for operating and managing the vessel, to develop and maintain a “Safety Management System,” which includes the requirements to adopt a safety and environmental protection policy; instructions and procedures to ensure safe operation of ships and protection of the environment pursuant to international and flag state laws and regulations; defined levels of authority and lines of communication between, and among, shore and shipboard personnel; procedures for reporting accidents and non-conformities within the provision of the ISM Code; procedures to prepare guidelines and respond to emergency situation; and procedures for internal audits and management reviews. The ISM Code requires that the vessel operator be

issued a Document of Compliance and the vessels it operates be issued a Safety Management Certificate, evidencing compliance by the vessel’s management with ISM Code requirements for a Safety Management System. The failure of a ship-owner or bareboat charterer to comply with the ISM Code may subject such party to increased liability, may decrease available insurance coverage for the affected vessels and may result in a denial of access to, or detention in, certain ports. As of December 31, 2009, each of the vessels in the fleet, and the entities managing or owning them, were certified pursuant to requirements of ISM Code. There can be no assurance that any certification will be maintained indefinitely. SOLAS itself specifies minimum standards for the construction, equipment and operation of ships, compatible with their safety. Flag states are responsible for ensuring that ships under their jurisdictions comply with these requirements, and require various certificates pursuant to SOLAS as proof of such compliance.

The IMO has also adopted an International Convention for the Control and Management of Ships’ Ballast Water and Sediments, or BWM Convention. The BWM Convention’s implementing regulations call for a phased introduction of mandatory ballast water exchange requirements beginning in 2009, to be replaced in time with mandatory concentration limits. The BWM Convention will not enter into force until 12 months after it has been adopted by 30 IMO Member States, the combined merchant fleets of which represent not less than 35% of the gross tonnage of the world’s merchant shipping. The BWM Convention has not yet been ratified by the required number of states to come into force. The IMO has indicated that it may seek to postpone the deadline for inclusion of ballast water treatment facilities on newly built ships to the end of 2011. Please see “Ballast Water Management,” below, for a discussion of possible impacts of increased ballast water management regulation.

In 2001, the IMO adopted the International Convention on Civil Liability for Bunker Oil Pollution Damage, or the Bunker Convention, which imposes strict liability on ship owners for pollution damage in jurisdictional waters of convention states caused by discharges of “Bunker Oil.” The Bunker Convention defines “Bunker Oil” as “any hydrocarbon mineral oil, including lubricating oil, used or intended to be used for the operation or propulsion of the ship, and any residues of such oil.” The Bunker Convention also requires registered owners of ships over a certain size to maintain insurance for pollution damage in an amount equal to the limits of liability under the applicable national or international limitation regime (but not exceeding the amount calculated in accordance with the Convention on Limitation of Liability for Maritime Claims of 1976, as amended). The Bunker Convention took effect on November 21, 2008.

On September 17, 2008, the International Convention on the Control of Harmful Anti-fouling Systems on Ships, or AFSC, came into force. It prohibits the use of harmful organo-tins in anti-fouling paints used on ships and will establish a mechanism to prevent the potential future use of other harmful substances in anti-fouling systems. Our vessels are required to obtain certification of compliance.

Increasingly, independent agencies representing various nations and regions are adopting additional unilateral requirements on the operation of vessels in their territorial waters. These regulations, as described below, apply to its vessels when they are in their waters and can add to the costs of operating and maintaining those vessels as well as increasing the potential liabilities that apply to spills or releases of oil or other materials or violations of the applicable requirements.

United States

The United States Oil Pollution Act of 1990

The United States Oil Pollution Act of 1990, or OPA, establishes an extensive regulatory and liability regime for the protection and cleanup of the environment from oil spills. OPA applies to discharges of any oil from a vessel, including discharges of fuel and lubricants and affects all owners and operators whose vessels trade to the United States, including its territories and possessions, or whose vessels operate in United States waters, which includes the United States’ territorial sea and its two hundred nautical mile exclusive economic zone. Although OPA is primarily directed at oil tankers (which are not owned or operated by Global Ship Lease), it also applies to non-tanker ships, including containerships, with respect to the fuel oil, or bunkers, used to power such ships.

Under OPA, vessel owners, operators and bareboat charterers are “responsible parties” and are jointly, severally and strictly liable (unless the spill results solely from the act or omission of a third party, an act of God or an act of war) for all containment and clean-up costs and other damages arising from discharges or threatened discharges of oil from their vessels. OPA defines these other damages broadly to include:

•

natural resources damage and the costs of assessment thereof;

•

real and personal property damage;

•

net loss of taxes, royalties, rents, fees and other lost revenues;

•

lost profits or impairment of earning capacity due to property or natural resources damage; and

•

net cost of public services necessitated by a spill response, such as protection from fire, safety or health hazards, and loss of subsistence use of natural resources.

On July 1, 2009 the United States Coast Guard by Interim Rule increased the limits of the liability of responsible parties with effect from July 31, 2009. For any non-tank vessel, the new limits on liability are the greater of $1,000 per gross ton or $854,400. These limits of liability do not apply if an incident was directly caused by violation of applicable United States federal safety, construction or operating regulations or by a responsible party’s gross negligence or willful misconduct, or if the responsible party fails or refuses to report the incident or to cooperate and assist in connection with oil removal activities. Additionally, OPA specifically permits individual states to impose their own liability regimes with regard to oil pollution incidents occurring within their boundaries, and some states have enacted legislation providing for unlimited liability for oil spills. Global Ship Lease intends to comply with all applicable state regulations in the ports where its vessels call.

Global Ship Lease intends to maintain pollution liability coverage insurance in the amount of $1.0 billion per incident for each of its vessels. If the damages from a catastrophic spill were to exceed its insurance coverage it could have an adverse effect on its business and results of operation.

OPA requires owners and operators of vessels to obtain a certificate of financial responsibility by establishing and maintaining with the United States Coast Guard, or Coast Guard, evidence of financial responsibility sufficient to meet their potential liabilities under the OPA; an owner or operator of a fleet of vessels is required only to demonstrate evidence of financial responsibility in an amount sufficient to cover the vessels in the fleet having the greatest maximum liability under OPA. An owner or operator may evidence its financial responsibility by showing proof of insurance, surety bond, self-insurance or guaranty. Under the self-insurance provisions, the ship-owner or operator must have a net worth and working capital, measured in assets located in the United States against liabilities located anywhere in the world, that exceeds the applicable amount of financial responsibility. For its vessels that are likely to enter U.S. waters, Global Ship Lease intends to comply with the United States Coast Guard regulations by providing a certificate of responsibility from third party entities that are acceptable to the United States Coast Guard evidencing sufficient insurance.

The United States Coast Guard’s regulations concerning certificates of financial responsibility provide, in accordance with OPA, that claimants may bring suit directly against an insurer or guarantor that furnishes certificates of financial responsibility. In the event that such insurer or guarantor is sued directly, it is prohibited from asserting any contractual defense that it may have had against the responsible party and is limited to asserting those defenses available to the responsible party and the defense that the incident was caused by the willful misconduct of the responsible party. Certain organizations, which had typically provided certificates of financial responsibility under pre-OPA laws, including the major protection and indemnity organizations, have declined to furnish evidence of insurance for vessel owners and operators if they are subject to direct actions or required to waive insurance policy defenses. This requirement may have the effect of limiting the availability of the type of coverage required by the Coast Guard and could increase costs of obtaining this insurance for Global Ship Lease and its competitors.

In addition, Title VII of the Coast Guard and Maritime Transportation Act of 2004, or CGMTA, amended OPA to require the United States Coast Guard to issue regulations to require the owner or operator of any non-tank vessel of 400 gross tons or more that carries oil of any kind as a fuel for main propulsion, to prepare and submit a response plan for each vessel. The United States Coast Guard has not issued such regulations yet, but has published a guidance document that allows for the issuance of interim authorization letters until the final regulations are promulgated. The vessel response plans include detailed information on actions to be taken by vessel personnel to prevent or mitigate any discharge or threat of discharge of oil from the vessel due to operational activities or casualties. Global Ship Lease has plans to comply with the requirements of the CGMTA and OPA. Global Ship Lease’s vessels that call at U.S. ports have appropriate vessel response plans filed with the United States Coast Guard and copies are available onboard.

The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act

The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, or CERCLA, governs spills or releases of hazardous substances other than petroleum or petroleum products. CERCLA imposes joint and several liability, without regard to fault, on the owner or operator of a ship, vehicle or facility from which there has been a release, along with other specified responsible parties. Costs recoverable under CERCLA include cleanup and removal costs, natural resource damages and governmental oversight costs. Liability under CERCLA is generally limited to the greater of $300 per gross ton or $0.5 million unless the incident is caused by gross negligence, willful misconduct or a violation of certain regulations, in which case liability is unlimited. These liability amounts are included in the total financial responsibility amounts required to obtain a Coast Guard certificate of financial responsibility, as described above.

Ballast Water Management

The National Invasive Species Act, or NISA, was enacted in 1996 in response to growing reports of harmful organisms being released into United States ports through ballast water taken on by ships in foreign ports. Under NISA, the Coast Guard requires mandatory ballast water management practices for all vessels equipped with ballast water tanks bound for United States ports or entering United States waters and requires vessels to maintain a ballast water management plan that is specific for that vessel and assigns responsibility to the master or appropriate official to understand and execute the ballast water management strategy for that vessel.

Coast Guard regulations also establish penalties for ships headed to the United States that fail to submit a ballast water management reporting form, as well as vessels bound for the Great Lakes or portions of the Hudson River that violate mandatory ballast water management requirements. The Coast Guard may now impose a civil penalty of up to $27,500 per day or, in the case of knowing violations, Class C Felony charge for non-submittal.

In the absence of federal standards, states have enacted legislation or regulations to address invasive species through ballast water and hull cleaning management and permitting requirements. For example, Michigan has approved a law requiring vessels to obtain a ballast water discharge permit to operate in state waters and use certain technologies to prevent the introduction of non-native species into waters of the state. The Michigan Department of Environmental Quality has approved four options for ballast water treatment that involve sodium hypochlorite, chlorine dioxide, ultraviolet light radiation, or de-oxygenation. The use of these technologies may be costly for oceangoing vessels operating in Michigan ports to implement. The Sixth Circuit rejected a challenge to this law in November 2007, and it is unclear if it will be challenged on other grounds.

Similarly, on October 10, 2007, the California governor signed into law legislation, or A.B. 740, expanding the state’s marine invasive species ballast water regulatory program (A.B. 433, California’s Marine Invasive Species Act, which regulates the discharge and/or exchange of ballast water of vessels coming from outside the exclusive economic zone into a California port) to regulate “hull fouling organisms.” A.B. 740 gives the State Lands Commission until 2012 to adopt regulations requiring vessels owners and operators to use best available and economically feasible “inwater” technology to remove aquatic species from submerged parts of vessels. Until the regulations can be implemented, A.B. 740 specifies that “hull fouling organisms,” such as barnacles, algae, mussels, and worms that attach to the hard parts of ships, must be removed and disposed of on a regular basis. Furthermore, on October 15, 2007, the California State Lands Commission approved regulations governing the discharge of ballast water for vessels operating in California waters, which among other things, sets limits for the number of living organisms allowed in ballast water discharge. The regulations will be implemented on a graduated time schedule beginning on January 1, 2009, with a final performance standard of zero detectable living organisms going into effect on January 1, 2020. Other states may create other similar hull cleaning regulations or ballast water performance standards that could increase the costs of operating in state waters of the United States.

The Clean Water Act, or CWA, prohibits the discharge of oil or hazardous substances in United States navigable waters without a permit and imposes strict liability in the form of penalties for any unauthorized discharges. Current Environmental Protection Agency, or EPA, regulations exempt ships in United States’ navigable waters from the requirement to obtain CWA permits for discharges of ballast water and other substances incidental to the normal operation of vessels. However, a United States District Court ruled in 2006 that EPA lacks the authority to exclude discharges of vessel ballast water from permitting requirements under the CWA, invalidating the blanket exemption in EPA regulations for all discharges incidental to the normal operation of a vessel as of September 30, 2008, and directed EPA to develop a system for regulating all discharges from vessels by that date. EPA’s appeal failed and the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the District Court’s ruling on July 23, 2008. In response, EPA issued a Vessel General Permit, or the VGP, covering the discharges incidental to the operation of vessels greater than 79 feet in length on December 18, 2008. Vessels must comply with the VGP by February 6, 2009. The VGP requires the use of Best Management Practices, inspections, and monitoring of the areas of the vessel the permit addresses. States may also add additional conditions. For example, California requires that all vessel discharges in its waters comply with numeric effluent limitations.

Changes in ballast water management rules and regulations, either in the United States or internationally (please see “International Maritime Organization” above), could increase the cost of compliance for ocean carriers, including requiring installation of equipment of ballast water treatment systems on vessels at substantial cost.

Clean Air Act

The Federal Clean Air Act of 1970, as amended by the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1977 and 1990, or the CAA, requires the EPA to promulgate standards applicable to emissions of volatile organic compounds and other air contaminants. The company’s vessels are subject to vapor control and recovery requirements when cleaning fuel tanks and conducting other operations in regulated port areas and emissions standards for compression-ignition marine engines operating in U.S. waters. These types of engines are called “Category 3” marine diesel engines and are typically found on large oceangoing vessels. These rules are currently limited to new engines beginning with the 2004 model year. More recently, in November 2007, the EPA issued an Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking regarding its plan to propose more stringent emission standards and other related provisions for new Category 3 marine engines. The standards under consideration are consistent with the U.S. Government’s proposal to amend Annex VI of MARPOL discussed above, by establishing more stringent standards for vessel emissions of particulate matter, sulfur oxides, and nitrogen oxides. Certain emission standards under consideration could take effect as early as 2011. This announcement comes as the EPA is defending a lawsuit seeking to require new limits for emissions from Category 3 marine diesel engines on U.S. and foreign-flagged vessels operating in U.S. waters. If these amendments are implemented and apply to existing vessels (as opposed to vessels manufactured after the effective date), we may incur costs to install equipment in these vessels to comply.

The CAA also requires states to draft State Implementation Plans, or SIPs, designed to attain national health-based air quality standards in primarily major metropolitan and/or industrial areas. Where states fail to present approvable SIPs or SIP revisions by certain statutory deadlines, the federal government is required to draft a Federal Implementation Plan. Several SIPs regulate emissions resulting from degassing operations by requiring the installation of vapor control equipment on vessels. A risk exists that new regulations could require significant capital expenditures and otherwise increase our costs.

After a previous attempt to regulate the emissions of auxiliary diesel engines on ocean-going vessels was rejected by the Ninth Circuit, California’s Air Resources Board, or CARB, approved new regulations on July 24, 2008. These regulations apply to ocean-going vessels’ main diesel engines, auxiliary engines, and auxiliary boilers when operating within 24 miles of the California coast and require operators to use low sulfur fuels. The Office of Administrative Law approved the rulemaking and filed it with the Secretary of State on May 29, 2009. The regulation became effective on June 28, 2009.

California also approved regulations on December 3, 2008 to reduce emissions from diesel auxiliary engines on certain ocean-going vessels while in California ports, including container ship fleets that make 25 or more annual visits to California ports. The regulations became effective January 2, 2009 and require vessel operators to either (1) turn off auxiliary engines for most of their stay and connect the vessel to some other source of power, most likely a shore-based grid, or (2) use alternative control techniques to achieve equivalent emission reductions. These requirements may increase operating costs while in California ports.

European Union

In waters of the European Union, or the EU, the company’s vessels are subject to regulation EU-level directives implemented by the various nations through laws and regulations of these requirements. These laws and regulations prescribe measures to prevent pollution, protect the environment, and support maritime safety. For instance, the EU has adopted directives that require member states to refuse access to their ports to certain sub-standard vessels, according to vessel type, flag, and number of previous detentions. Member states must inspect at least 25% of vessels using their ports annually and provide increased surveillance of vessels posing a high risk to maritime safety or the marine environment. If deficiencies are found that are clearly hazardous to safety, health or the environment, the state is required to detain the vessel until the deficiencies are addressed. Member states are also required to implement a system of penalties for breaches of these standards.

Our vessels are also subject to inspection by appropriate classification societies. Classification societies typically establish and maintain standards for the construction and classification of vessels, supervise that construction is according to these standards, and carry out regular surveys of ships in service to ensure compliance with the standards. The EU has adopted directives that provide member states with greater authority and control over classification societies, including the ability to seek to suspend or revoke the authority of classification societies that are negligent in their duties. The EU requires member states to monitor these organizations’ compliance with EU inspection requirements and to suspend any organization whose safety and pollution prevention performance of the organization becomes unsatisfactory.

The EU’s directive on the sulfur content of fuels restricts the maximum sulfur content of marine fuels used in vessels operating in EU member states’ exclusive economic zones. Under this Directive, our vessels may need to make expenditures to comply with the sulfur fuel content limits in the marine fuel they use in order to avoid delays or other obstructions to their operations. The EU has also issued a directive adopting the IMO’s standards for the maximum sulfur content of marine fuels used in special SOx Emission Control Areas, or ECAs, in the Baltic Sea, North Sea, and for any other seas or ports the IMO may designate as SOx ECAs 12 months after the date of entry into force of the designation. These and other related requirements may increase our costs of operating and may affect financial performance.

In response to the sinking of the MT Prestige and resulting oil spill in 2003, the EU adopted a directive requiring member states to impose criminal sanctions for certain pollution discharges committed intentionally, recklessly, or by serious negligence. Penalties may include fines, imprisonment, permanent or temporary disqualification from engaging in commercial activities, placement under judicial supervision, or exclusion from access to public benefits or aid.

The EU also authorizes member states to adopt the IMO’s Bunker Convention, discussed above, that imposes strict liability on ship owners for pollution damage caused by spills of oil carried as fuel in vessels’ bunkers and requires vessels of a certain size to maintain financial security to cover any liability for such damage.

The EU is currently considering other proposals to further regulate vessel operations. In October 2007, the EU adopted a new Integrated Maritime Policy for the European Union that included, in part, the development of environmentally sound end-of-life ship dismantling requirements, promotion of the use of shore-side electricity by ships at berth in EU ports to reduce air emissions, and consideration of options for EU legislation to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from maritime transport. Individual countries in the EU may also have additional environmental and safety requirements. It is impossible to predict what additional legislation or regulations, if any, may be promulgated by the European Union or any other country or authority. The trend, however, is towards increasing regulation and our expectation is that requirements will become more extensive and more stringent. Were more stringent future requirements to be put in effect in the future, they may require, individually or in the aggregate, significant expenditures and could increase our costs of operating, potentially affecting financial performance.

It is impossible to predict what additional legislation or regulations, if any, may be promulgated by the European Union or any other country or authority.

Other Regions

The environmental protection regimes in other relatively high-income countries, such as Canada, resemble those of the United States. To the extent Global Ship Lease’s vessels operate in the territorial waters of such countries or enter their ports, the relevant vessels would typically be subject to the requirements and liabilities imposed in such countries. Other regions of the world also have the ability to adopt requirements or regulations that may impose additional obligations on its vessels and may entail significant expenditures on its part and may increase the company’s costs to operate its fleet. These requirements, however, would apply to the industry as a whole and would also affect Global Ship Lease’s competitors.

Greenhouse Gas Legislation

In February 2005, the Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, or the Kyoto Protocol, entered into force. Pursuant to the Kyoto Protocol, adopting countries are required to implement national programs to reduce emissions of certain gases, generally referred to as greenhouse gases, which are suspected of contributing to global warming. Greenhouse gas emissions from international shipping are not expressly excluded from the Kyoto Protocol though are not included in the Annex 1 country’s national targets. The Protocol directs those countries to pursue limitation and reduction measures through the IMO. The European Union confirmed in April 2007 and in 2009 that it plans to expand the European Union emissions trading scheme (ETS) by adding vessels. The 2009 ETS Directive requires the EU to propose an alternate plan to reduce shipping emissions if agreement is not reached by the IMO by December 2011. In the United States, the California Attorney General and a coalition of environmental groups petitioned the EPA in October 2007 to regulate greenhouse gas emissions from ocean-going ships under the Clean Air Act. Legislation has been introduced into the U.S. Congress to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in the United States. In addition, EPA’s December 2009 “endangerment finding” regarding greenhouse gases allows the EPA to begin regulating greenhouse gas emissions under existing provisions of the federal Clean Air Act. To date, rules proposed by EPA pursuant to this authority have not involved ocean-going vessels. Any passage of climate control legislation or other regulatory initiatives by the IMO, European Union, or individual countries where we operate that restrict emissions of greenhouse gases from vessels could require us to make significant financial expenditures we cannot predict with certainty at this time.

Vessel Security Regulations

Since the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, there have been a variety of initiatives intended to enhance vessel security. On November 25, 2002, the Maritime Transportation Security Act of 2002, or MTSA, came into effect. To implement certain portions of the MTSA, the United States Coast Guard in July 2003 issued regulations requiring the implementation of certain security requirements aboard vessels operating in waters subject to the jurisdiction of the United States. Similarly, in December 2002, amendments to SOLAS created a new chapter of the convention dealing specifically with maritime security. The new chapter came into effect in July 2004 and imposes various detailed security obligations on vessels and port authorities, most of which are contained in the newly created International Ship and Port Facilities Security Code, or ISPS Code. Among the various requirements are:

•

on-board installation of automatic information systems to enhance vessel-to-vessel and vessel-to-shore communications;

•

on-board installation of ship security alert systems;

•

the development of vessel security plans; and

•

compliance with flag state security certification requirements.

United States Coast Guard regulations are intended to align with international maritime security standards and they exempt non-United States vessels from MTSA vessel security measures provided such vessels have on board a valid International Ship Security Certificate that attests to the vessel’s compliance with SOLAS security requirements and the ISPS Code. Global Ship Lease has implemented various security measures addressed by SOLAS and the ISPS Code for the vessels in its initial fleet and intends to do so in the future for the vessels of its contracted fleet.

100% Container Screening

The United States signed into law the 9/11 Commission Act on August 3, 2007. The Act requires that all containers destined to the United States be scanned by x-ray machines before leaving port. This new requirement for 100% scanning is set to take effect in 2012, but the Secretary of the United States Department of Homeland Security has the authority to set an earlier deadline (based on developments arising from the on-going pilot program under the SAFE-Port Act of 2006) or to extend the deadline up to two years, to 2014. Ports that ship to the United States will likely have to install new x-ray machines and make infrastructure changes in order to accommodate the screening requirements. Such implementation requirements may change which ports are able to ship to the United States and shipping companies may incur significant increased costs. It is impossible to predict how this requirement will affect the industry as a whole, but changes and additional costs can be reasonably expected.

Risk of Loss and Liability Insurance

General

The operation of any container vessel includes risks such as mechanical failure, collision, property loss, cargo loss or damage and business interruption due to political circumstances in foreign countries, hostilities and labor strikes. In addition, there is an inherent possibility of marine disaster, including oil spills and other environmental damages, other spills or releases, and the liabilities arising from owning and operating vessels in international trade. OPA, which imposes, in certain circumstances, virtually unlimited liability upon owners, operators and demise charterers of vessels trading in the United States exclusive economic zone for certain oil pollution accidents in the United States, has made liability insurance more expensive for ship owners and operators trading in the United States market.

Global Ship Lease maintains marine hull and machinery insurance, war risks insurance, protection and indemnity cover, increased value insurance and freight, demurrage and defense cover for all its vessels in amounts that it believes to be prudent to cover normal risks in its operations, but Global Ship Lease may not be able to maintain these levels of coverage throughout its vessels’ useful lives. Furthermore, while Global Ship Lease believes that its insurance coverage will be adequate, not all risks can be insured, and there can be no guarantee that any specific claim will be paid, or that Global Ship Lease will always be able to obtain adequate insurance coverage at reasonable rates.

Hull & Machinery, Loss of Hire and War Risks Insurance

Global Ship Lease maintains marine hull and machinery and war risks insurances, which cover the risk of actual or constructive total loss, for all of its vessels. Its vessels are each covered up to at least fair market value, which Global Ship Lease expects to assess at least annually, with certain deductibles per vessel per incident. Global Ship Lease also maintains increased value coverage for each of its vessels under which in the event of total loss or constructive total loss of a vessel, Global Ship Lease will be entitled to recover amounts otherwise not recoverable under its basic hull and machinery or war policies due to under-insurance. Under the terms of its credit facility, Global Ship Lease has assigned these insurance policies to its lenders and is subject to restrictions on its use of any proceeds there from.

Global Ship Lease generally does not obtain loss-of-hire insurance covering the loss of revenue during extended off-hire periods. Global Ship Lease will evaluate the need for such coverage on an ongoing basis, taking into account insurance market conditions and the employment of its vessels.

Protection and Indemnity Insurance

Protection and indemnity insurance is mutual indemnity insurance provided by mutual protection and indemnity associations, or P&I Associations, which insure its third-party and crew liabilities in connection with its shipping activities. This includes third-party liability, crew liability and other related expenses resulting from the injury or death of crew, passengers and other third parties, the loss or damage to cargo, claims arising from collisions with other vessels, damage to other third-party property, pollution arising from oil or other substances and salvage, towing and other related costs, including wreck removal. Subject to the “capping” discussed below, its coverage, except for pollution, will be unlimited. Its protection and indemnity insurance coverage for pollution will be $1.0 billion per vessel per incident.

The International Group is comprised of 13 P&I Associations. The International Group insures approximately 90% of the world’s commercial blue-water tonnage and has entered into a pooling agreement with each of its members to reinsure each association’s liabilities. This pooling agreement provides a mechanism for sharing all claims up to a current cap of approximately $5.4 billion. Global Ship Lease intends to remain a member of a P&I Association that is a member of the International Group, and as such, Global Ship Lease will be subject to calls payable to the other P&I Associations based on the International Group’s claim records as well as the claim records of all other members of the individual P&I Associations.

C. Organizational Structure

The holding company, Global Ship Lease, Inc., is a Marshall Islands corporation. Each vessel is owned by a directly held separate wholly owned subsidiary. Sixteen vessels are owned by companies incorporated in Cyprus and one is held by a Marshall Islands company. In addition, Global Ship Lease Services Limited, a company incorporated in England and Wales and which is directly wholly owned by the holding company, provides administrative services to the group.

D. Property, Plants and Equipment

Global Ship Lease’s only material properties are the vessels in its fleet, which are described in Item 4.B. Global Ship Lease does not own any real property.

Item 5.

Operating and Financial Review and Prospects

A. Results of Operations

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion of the financial condition and results of operations for Global Ship Lease and Global Ship Lease’s Predecessor Group, or the Predecessor Group, should be read in conjunction with Global Ship Lease’s combined financial statements and the related notes and the financial and other information included elsewhere in this Annual Report. The term combined financial statements refers to the combined financial statements of Global Ship Lease, and its subsidiaries, and the Predecessor Group. The term Predecessor Group refers to the container shipping services provided by CMA CGM, and certain of its subsidiaries, using the vessels of Global Ship Lease’s initial fleet before they were purchased by Global Ship Lease. CMA CGM and its subsidiaries are in the business of providing container shipping services to shippers and earning revenue by carrying containerized cargo, whereas Global Ship Lease is a vessel owner earning revenue from chartering out its vessels. Further, as a result of the Merger between Global Ship Lease and Marathon on August 14, 2008, the combined financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 are not comparable to prior periods, primarily as a result of the change in the capital and legal structure of the company and the effect of the purchase price allocation in connection with the Merger on periods subsequent to August 14, 2008. The period from January 1 to August 14, 2008 is described as Predecessor and August 15 to December 31, 2008 as Successor.

Overview

The combined financial statements include:

•

the carve out financial information reflecting the results and financial position of the 10 secondhand vessels and two newly built vessels (from their dates of purchase by the Predecessor Group) as they were operated by the Predecessor Group, in its business as a container shipping company, for the period up to the dates in December 2007 that CMA CGM sold the 10 secondhand vessels to Global Ship Lease, and the dates in January 2008 that CMA CGM sold the two newly built vessels to Global Ship Lease;

•

the results and financial position of the 10 secondhand vessels and the two newly built vessels as they were operated by Global Ship Lease, in its business as a vessel owner earning revenue from chartering out vessels, from the dates of the vessels’ acquisition in December 2007 and January 2008 by Global Ship Lease from CMA CGM;

•

the results and financial position of the three secondhand vessels and one newly built vessel as they were operated by Global Ship Lease, in its business as a vessel owner earning revenue from chartering out vessels, from the dates of the vessels’ acquisition in December 2008 by Global Ship Lease from CMA CGM and the results and financial position of the one secondhand vessel as it was operated by Global Ship Lease, in its business as a vessel owner earning revenue from chartering out vessels, from the date of the vessel’s acquisition in August 2009 by Global Ship Lease from CMA CGM.

Assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses that relate to the Predecessor Group have been included where relevant in the combined financial statements. The shipping interests and other assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses of the Predecessor Group that do not relate to vessels in Global Ship Lease’s initial fleet are not included in the combined financial statements.

The combined financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America, which we refer to as U.S. GAAP, and are presented in United States dollars.

This discussion contains forward-looking statements based on assumptions about Global Ship Lease’s future business. Global Ship Lease’s actual results will likely differ materially from those contained in the forward-looking statements. See “Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements.”

Global Ship Lease acquired 10 secondhand vessels in December 2007, two newly built vessels in January 2008, three secondhand vessels, one newly built vessel in December 2008 and a further second-hand vessel in August 2009 from CMA CGM. All 17 vessels are chartered to CMA CGM under fixed-rate time charters, with staggered expirations, for terms that range from five years to 17 years. Each charter commenced on the delivery of the relevant vessel to Global Ship Lease.

The company has also contracted to purchase two newly built vessels from German interests scheduled for delivery in the fourth quarter of 2010. These two vessels are to be chartered to Zim for seven to eight years.

Global Ship Lease has entered into ship management agreements with its Ship Manager for the day-to-day technical management of its current fleet of vessels. See “Business Overview—Ship Management Agreements” for a more detailed description of Global Ship Lease’s ship management agreements.

Global Ship Lease commenced its business operations in December 2007 with its acquisition of the 10 secondhand vessels from CMA CGM. Global Ship Lease’s operations as a time charter owner differ significantly from the historical operations of the Predecessor Group upon which the Predecessor Group’s historical carve-out financial information included in the combined financial statements is based. In particular, Global Ship Lease generates revenues primarily from charter payments made to it by the charterers of its vessels and not from freight rates for transporting cargoes as undertaken by the Predecessor Group. Costs are also different. Global Ship Lease’s expenses consist mainly of vessel operating expenses including for crewing, provision of lubricating oil and for routine maintenance, as well as insurance costs and general and administrative expenses. Global Ship Lease does not bear the cost of bunker fuel or any costs associated with loading, unloading or transporting containers. The Predecessor Group’s costs include vessel operating expenses but also voyage expenses including costs for bunker fuel, stevedoring, provision of containers and inland transportation. Global Ship Lease believes that its contracted revenue under the fixed rate time charters that are in place and fixed fee and capped operating costs arrangements will help provide it with a stable cash flow that is sufficient for Global Ship Lease’s present operating requirements.

Because Global Ship Lease’s operations as ship-owner differ significantly from the business operations of the Predecessor Group as a vessel operator, trends or performance that likely had a material effect on the Predecessor Group’s revenues will likely have limited direct impact on Global Ship Lease’s future revenues, except to the extent that these trends are a result of changing economic conditions in the overall containership industry, which may affect the viability of Global Ship Lease’s customers or generally affect the global demand for and the supply of containerships.

Global Ship Lease’s financial results will be largely driven by the following factors:

•

the continued performance of the charter agreements;

•

the number of vessels in Global Ship Lease’s fleet and their charter rates;

•

the number of days that Global Ship Lease’s vessels are utilized and not subject to drydocking, special surveys or otherwise are off-hire;

•

Global Ship Lease’s ability to control its expenses, including ship operating costs, ship management fees, insurance costs, drydock costs, general, administrative and other expenses and interest and financing costs. Operating costs may vary from month to month depending on a number of factors, including the timing of purchases of spares and stores and of crew changes; and

•

access to, and the pricing and other terms of, Global Ship Lease’s credit facility.

Global Ship Lease has entered into long-term fixed rate time charters for all of its vessels. Global Ship Lease expects that its base revenue will be largely fixed until (a) any of its charters expire or otherwise terminate when it will need to seek a renewal or recharter, at possibly a significantly different and lower rate depending on market conditions at the time, or (b) it acquires additional vessels. Global Ship Lease’s shortest time charter agreements expire in December 2012 on two vessels. The charter rate that it will be able to achieve on renewal will be affected by market conditions at that time. As discussed further below, operational matters such as off-hire days for planned maintenance or for unexpected accidents and incidents affect the actual amount of revenues Global Ship Lease receives.

CMA CGM is currently Global Ship Lease’s only customer and charter payments from CMA CGM are Global Ship Lease’s sole source of operating cash flow. At any given time in the future, the cash resources of CMA CGM may be diminished or exhausted, and Global Ship Lease cannot assure its shareholders that CMA CGM will be able to make charter payments to it. In particular, CMA CGM announced in September 2009 that CMA CGM and its lenders are exploring a potential financial restructuring and that CMA CGM is seeking to reduce and in some cases cancel certain ship deliveries. In addition, Global Ship Lease has experienced increased delays in receiving charterhire from CMA CGM, where between one and three installments have been outstanding. If CMA CGM is unable to make charter payments to it, Global Ship Lease’s results of operations and financial condition will be materially adversely affected. If Global Ship Lease’s existing charters with CMA CGM were terminated and Global Ship Lease was required to recharter at lower rates or if it failed to find new charters due to market conditions, its results of operations and financial condition would be materially adversely affected.

Merger

On March 21, 2008, Global Ship Lease entered into a merger agreement with Marathon, GSL Holdings and CMA CGM and thereafter entered into amendments to the merger agreement pursuant to which Marathon merged with and into GSL Holdings, its newly-formed, wholly owned Marshall Islands subsidiary, and then Global Ship Lease merged with and into GSL Holdings, with GSL Holdings (now renamed Global Ship Lease, Inc.) continuing as the surviving company incorporated in the Republic of the Marshall Islands. The Merger was consummated on August 14, 2008. Pursuant to the Merger, holders of shares of Marathon common stock (other than Marathon Founders, LLC and the other initial stockholders of Marathon) received one Class A common share of Global Ship Lease for each share of Marathon common stock issued and outstanding immediately prior to the effective time of the Merger. In respect of the aggregate 9,375,000 shares of Marathon common stock held by them, Marathon Founders, LLC and the other initial

stockholders of Marathon received in the Merger an aggregate of 2,846,906 Class A common shares of Global Ship Lease, 3,471,906 Class B common shares and warrants to acquire an aggregate of 3,056,188 Class A common shares at an exercise price of $9.25. CMA CGM received consideration consisting of 6,778,650 Class A common shares, 3,934,050 Class B common shares, 12,375,000 Class C common shares, 1,000 Series A preferred shares, warrants to acquire 3,131,900 Class A common shares, and $18,570,135 in cash.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The combined financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP, which requires Global Ship Lease to make estimates in the application of certain accounting policies based on its best assumptions, judgments and opinions. Global Ship Lease bases these estimates on the information available to it at the time and on various other assumptions it believes are reasonable under the circumstances. The following is a discussion of the principal accounting policies of Global Ship Lease and the Predecessor Group, some of which involve a high degree of judgment, and the methods of their application.

For a further description of Global Ship Lease’s material accounting policies, including for the Merger, please see notes 3 and 4 to the combined financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report.

Combined Financial Statements of the Vessels of Global Ship Lease’s Initial Fleet

The combined financial statements up to December 31, 2007 reflect mainly the financial position, results of operations and cash flows of the 10 secondhand vessels of Global Ship Lease’s initial fleet as they were operated by the Predecessor Group, in its business as a containership operator, up to the dates that those vessels were sold to Global Ship Lease by CMA CGM in December 2007. The combined financial statements up to December 31, 2008 include the two newly built vessels for the period of the Predecessor Group’s ownership up to dates in January 2008 when they were also sold to Global Ship Lease. The relevant financial information has been carved out of the consolidated financial statements of CMA CGM and its subsidiaries. The Predecessor Group’s business is as a containership operating company providing cargo transportation services, not as an independent ship-owner as is Global Ship Lease’s business. Global Ship Lease believes that the information on these vessels, including their assets, liabilities, results of operations and cash flows, reasonably represent those vessels’ financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the Predecessor Group. However, the carve-out financial information on those vessels and their financial positions, results of operations and cash flows are not indicative of those that would have been realized had those or all the vessels of Global Ship Lease’s initial fleet been operated by it as an independent, stand-alone ship-owning entity for the periods presented. For example, the combined financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2007 include only 159 ship days, all in December 2007, when the 10 secondhand vessels were owned by Global Ship Lease and operated by it in its business as a vessel owner chartering out its vessels on long-term time charters. These 10 vessels were owned by Global Ship Lease for 3,660 ship days in the year ended December 31, 2008. Accordingly, the financial position, results of operations and cash flows reflected in the combined financial statements are not indicative of those that would have been achieved had Global Ship Lease’s operated as an independent, stand-alone entity for the periods presented or of future results.

Successor / Predecessor presentation

In accordance with SAB Topic 5-J, Global Ship Lease reports separately the historical financial information related to its Predecessor which was acquired at the time of the Merger in August 2008. Accordingly, the combined financial statements up to December 31, 2008 include two distinct reporting periods (i) January 1, 2006 through August 14, 2008 (“Predecessor”) and (ii) August 15, 2008 through December 31, 2008 (“Successor”), which relate to the period preceding the Merger referred to in Note 1 to combined financial statements and the period succeeding the Merger, respectively. Predecessor and Successor historical financial information is presented on the face of the combined balance sheet, combined statements of income, cash flow and shareholders’ equity with vertical “black line” between the Predecessor and Successor columns as these periods refer to two different entities.

Business Combination

In accordance with ASC Topic 805 “Business Combinations” (“ASC Topic 085”), the purchase method of accounting is used to account for the acquisition of Global Ship Lease Inc. The cost of the acquisition is measured as the fair value of the assets given, equity instruments issued at the date of acquisition, plus costs directly attributable to the acquisition. The acquired assets, assumed liabilities, contractual contingencies and contingent liabilities, are recognized and measured at their fair value at the acquisition date. Management considered a number of factors, including valuations and appraisals, in determining the fair values of assets. Liabilities were revalued at using appropriate then current interest rates. In addition to revaluing existing assets and liabilities, Global Ship Lease recorded certain previously unrecognized assets and liabilities, including an intangible asset for the favorable purchase agreements related to the five vessels to be delivered post Merger and an intangible liability for below-market charters. The sum of the amounts assigned to assets and liabilities exceeded the allocable purchase price, creating negative goodwill. In accordance with ASC Topic 805, Global Ship Lease allocated this negative goodwill as a reduction of asset values (to vessels in operation, other fixed assets, and intangible assets) on a pro-rata basis.

Revenue Recognition

Unlike the Predecessor Group, whose revenue was derived from freight revenue generated by cargo transportation services, Global Ship Lease’s charter revenue is generated from long-term time charters for each vessel. The charters are regarded as operating leases and provide for a per vessel fixed daily charter rate. Revenue is recorded as earned. Assuming Global Ship Lease’s vessels are not off-hire, Global Ship Lease’s charter revenues are fixed for the period of the current charters and, accordingly, little judgment is required to be applied to the amount of revenue recognition.

Accounting for lease and similar transactions

Global Ship Lease’s charter hire agreements are classified as operating leases based on the facts and circumstances at their inception. In accordance with ASC Topic 840 “Leases” , an operating lease is a lease agreement that does not transfer substantially all the risks and rewards incidental to the ownership to the lessee. The company pays a particular attention in evaluating and applying the proper accounting treatment to lease transactions.

Vessel Lives

Vessels represent Global Ship Lease’s most significant tangible assets and Global Ship Lease states them in its financial statements at their acquisition cost (less an amount allocated to dry dock component), less accumulated depreciation and impairment loss, if any. Following the Merger, the vessels are recorded at their fair value less a proportion of the negative goodwill arising on the acquisition, allocated to these vessels.

Subsequent expenditures for major improvements and upgrading are capitalized, provided they appreciably extend the life, increase the earning capacity or improve the efficiency or safety of the vessels.

Borrowing costs incurred during the construction of vessels or as part of the pre-financing of the acquisition of vessels are capitalized. Interest capitalized in the year ended December 31, 2009 was $524 (2008: $1,643 and 2007: $833). Other borrowing costs are expensed as incurred.

Vessels are depreciated to their estimated residual value using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives which are reviewed on an ongoing basis to ensure they reflect current technology, service potential and vessel structure. During the period of ownership by CMA CGM when the vessels were earning freight revenues generated by containerized transportation, the useful life was estimated at 25 years. Following the sale of the vessels to Global Ship Lease, the nature of operations changed significantly and the useful life was reassessed and estimated to be 30 years as Global Ship Lease anticipates that it will be able to earn revenue from its vessels at least until they are 30 years old.

Should certain factors or circumstances cause Global Ship Lease to revise its estimate of vessel service lives in the future, depreciation expense could be materially lower or higher. Such factors and circumstances include, but are not limited to, the extent of cash flows generated from future charter arrangements, changes in international shipping requirements and other factors, many of which are outside of Global Ship Lease’s control.

Derivative Instruments

The Predecessor Group entered into bunker derivative agreements to reduce its exposure to cash flow risks from changing bunker prices. In accordance with the requirements of U.S. GAAP, Global Ship Lease has recognized these derivative instruments on its balance sheet at fair value with the changes in the fair value of these derivative instruments recognized in the statement of income or deferred in equity within “Accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss)” until settlement of the hedge transaction. Global Ship Lease does not expect to enter into such hedging transactions in its on-going business as bunker costs are borne by its charterers.

In connection with its credit facility and as part of overall risk management, Global Ship Lease has entered into interest rate swap agreements to reduce its exposure to cash flow risks from floating interest rates. See Item 11 “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk—Interest Rate Risk” for more information about Global Ship Lease’s interest rate swap agreements. The swaps are not accounted for as hedging instruments as they have not been designated as such and are not effective in mitigating the risks of changes in interest rates under U.S. GAAP. As such swaps are not accounted for as hedging instruments, Global Ship Lease recognizes them on its balance sheet at fair value with the changes in the fair value of these derivative instruments (mark to market adjustment) recognized in the statement of income. Global Ship Lease will not hold or issue derivative financial instruments for trading or other speculative purposes.

Impairment of Long-lived Assets

In accordance with ASC Topic 360, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets” Global Ship Lease’s long-lived assets are regularly reviewed for impairment. Global Ship Lease performs the impairment test at the individual vessel level pursuant to paragraph 10 of ASC Topic 360.

Due to the global economic downturn and significantly reduced demand for container shipping services and thus for containerships, combined with continuing delivery of newbuilds, containership values have experienced dramatic declines since mid 2008. The book value of the Global Ship Lease’s fleet is likely to be greater than its market value based on ship brokers’ valuation. Please see — Item 3 “Key Information—Risk Factors”.

To determine whether there is an impairment indicator under ASC Topic 360, Global Ship Lease compares the sum of the undiscounted future cash flows resulting from existing charters for each vessel less estimated operating and dry dock expenses, plus the estimated undiscounted residual value of each vessel at the end of the charter, with its book value at the end of each reporting period in order to determine if the book value of such vessel is recoverable. The residual value at the end of the charter is determined taking into account the impact of possible future new charters and operating and dry dock expenses and/or the eventual disposition of the vessel.

The assumptions used to determine whether the sum of undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use and eventual disposition of the vessels exceeds the carrying value involve a considerable degree of estimation on the part of Global Ship Lease’s management team. Actual results could differ from those estimates, which could have a material effect on the recoverability of the vessels.

The most significant assumptions used are:

•

the determination of the possible future new charters, future market values and/or the eventual disposition of each vessel. Estimates are based on market data and reports, including for the chartering and sale of comparable vessels, prepared by the industry press and by independent shipping analysts and brokers, and assessment by management thereof. The assumed daily charter rates subsequent to initial charter are based on the 10 years average historical charter rates and range from $18,900 for 2,207 TEU vessels to $60,400 for 10,960 TEU vessels. The container shipping industry has experienced significant cyclical volatility over its history. The Company believes that assuming a reversion to historical average charter hire levels, assessed over a period including both cyclical highs and lows, is the most objective approach for forecasting charter rates over an extended time horizon for long lived assets and is thus also the most objective indicator of rates at which the Company’s vessels may be re-marketed on conclusion of their initial charters;

•

the days on-hire which are estimated at a level consistent with Global Ship Lease’s on-hire statistics and peer group benchmarking;

•

useful life;

•

future operating costs including insurance; and

•

the drydock expenses which are estimated based on one drydock every five years.

These assumptions are based on historical trends as well as future expectations. Although management believes that the assumptions used to evaluate potential impairment are reasonable and appropriate, such assumptions are highly subjective.

Whenever the sum of the undiscounted future cash flows resulting from the charter of each vessel less operating expenses plus its expected residual value is above its book value, Global Ship Lease considers that there is no indication of impairment. Whenever the sum of the undiscounted future cash flows resulting from the charter of each vessel less operating expenses plus its expected residual value is below its book value, Global Ship Lease considers that there is a potential impairment and perform a recoverability test, similar to the above but based on discounted cashflows. An impairment loss will be recognized if the book value of the vessel exceeds the sum of the discounted cash flows expected to result from the use and eventual disposition of the vessel.

As of December 31, 2009, Global Ship Lease concluded that the undiscounted sum of the undiscounted future cash flows resulting from the charter of each vessel less operating expenses plus its expected residual value exceeded the vessel’s book value and accordingly the recoverability test of the impairment analysis was not required as no individual impairment of vessels existed.

An impairment indication, requiring the Company to recognize an impairment loss based on discounted cashflows, would exist for certain vessels if the forecasted charter rates were 60% less than the average historical charter rates assumed from the end of the initial charter term for the remaining lives of the vessels.

Drydocking

Global Ship Lease’s drydocking costs are recognized as a component of the cost of the related vessel, depreciated to the date of the next drydocking. Global Ship Lease’s vessels are drydocked approximately every five years for major repairs and maintenance that cannot be performed while the vessels are operating. Costs associated with the drydocks are capitalized as a component of the cost of the relevant vessel as they occur and are amortized on a straight line basis over the period to the next anticipated drydock. Other expenditures relating to maintenance and repairs are expensed when incurred.

Upon initial purchase, an element of the purchase price is allocated to the drydock component and is amortized on a straight line basis to the next anticipated drydocking.

Costs capitalized as part of the drydock include costs directly associated with the required regulatory inspection of the ship, its hull and its machinery and for the defouling and repainting of the hull. Any cost of repair to hull or machinery that extends useful life is capitalized. Other repair costs are expensed. Two vessels were drydocked in 2009 for a total cost of $1.7 million. One vessel was drydocked in 2008 for a total cost of $1.5 million. In 2007, three vessels were drydocked by the Predecessor Group for a total cost of $4.7 million.

Share based compensation

Global Ship Lease has awarded restricted stock units to its employees which vest, based on service conditions only, over a period of time up to three years from the award date. In addition, half of the base compensation paid to the directors for 2009 and for 2008 (from their appointment) was in the form of restricted stock units which vest, based on service conditions only, annually in arrears. The fair value of restricted stock unit grants is determined by reference to the quoted stock price on the date of grant, as adjusted for estimated dividends forgone until the restricted stock units vest. Compensation expense is recognized based on a graded expense model over the vesting period.

Recent accounting pronouncements

Management does not believe that there are recently issued, but not yet effective accounting pronouncements, if currently adopted, would have a material impact on the combined financial statements of Global Ship Lease.

Year ended December 31, 2009 Compared to Year ended December 31, 2008

Comparison between these two periods is of somewhat limited value as operations in the year ended December 31, 2009 were comprised entirely of Global Ship Lease’s on-going business of owning and chartering out containerships under time charters whereas operations in the year ended December 31, 2008 included for a few days in January 2008 the results for two vessels when they were owned and operated by the Predecessor Group earning revenue from the transportation of containerized cargo. Further, as a result of the accounting for the Merger on August 14, 2008, the year ended December 31, 2008 is reported as a Predecessor period, prior to the Merger, and a Successor period, after the Merger. The capital and legal structure of Global Ship Lease changed significantly on the Merger, including Global Ship Lease becoming listed on the New York Stock Exchange.

Total operating revenue

Operating revenue was $148.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2009 compared to $58.0 million for the period from January 1 to August 14, 2008, including time charter revenue of $55.9 million and voyage revenue of $2.1 million, and $39.1 million for the period from August 15 to December 31, 2008 all related to the time charter business. The total time charter revenue for 2008 was $95 million.

Time charter revenue reflects income under the fixed rate time charters in effect. The significant increase in time charter revenue between 2008 and 2009 reflects a full year’s contribution of the three secondhand vessels and one newly built vessel purchased by Global Ship Lease in December 2008 and the contribution of the secondhand vessel purchased in August 2009. Certain time charter rates were also increased with effect from April 1 and August 12, 2008. Ownership days in 2009 were 5,968 compared to 4,416 in 2008 (1,717 for the Successor and 2,699 for the Predecessor periods). There were 74 planned and unplanned off-hire days in 2009 compared to 45 in 2008 resulting in a utilization rate of 99%. Of the off-hire days, 32 were for the planned drydocking of CMA CGM Matisse in August and CMA CGM Utrillo in November/December 2009. In 2008 15 off-hire days were for the planned drydocking of the Delmas Keta in March.

Voyage revenue of $2.1 million in 2008 is the revenue earned by the Predecessor Group in carrying cargo on the two newly built vessels up to their dates of sale to Global Ship Lease in January 2008.

Operating expenses

Total operating expenses totaled $87.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2009 (or 58% of operating revenue) compared to $36.1 million for the period from January 1 to August 14, 2008 (or 62% of operating revenue) and $24.2 million for the period from August 15 to December 31, 2008 (or 62% of operating revenue). Operating expenses can be analyzed as follows:

•

Vessel expenses: Vessel expenses, which relate to the operation of the vessels themselves, were $41.4 million for 2009 (or 28% of operating revenue) compared $18.1 million for the period from January 1 to August 14, 2008 (or 31% of operating revenue) of which $17.9 million related to the time charter business of Global Ship Lease and $0.2 million related to the Predecessor Group’s business, and $11.9 million for the period from August 15 to December 31, 2008 (or 30% of

operating revenue) all related to the time charter business. The increase in vessel operating expenses in 2009 for the time charter business is due to the full year’s effect of the three secondhand vessels and one newly built vessel purchased by Global Ship Lease in December 2008 and the of the secondhand vessel purchased in August 2009.

•

Depreciation: Depreciation was $37.3 million for 2009 (or 25% of operating revenue) compared to $12.2 million for the period from January 1 to August 14, 2008 (or 21% of operating revenue) of which $11.9 million related to the time charter business of Global Ship Lease and $0.3 million related to the Predecessor Group’s business, and was $8.7 million for the period from August 15 to December 31, 2008 (or 22% of operating revenue) all related to the time charter business. Depreciation in 2009 was higher than 2008 mainly due to the effect of the full year effect of the four vessels purchased in December 2008 and the secondhand vessel purchased in August 2009.

•

General and Administrative: General and administrative expenses in 2009 were $8.7 million (or 6% of operating revenue) compared to $3.8 million for the period from January 1 to August 14, 2008 (or 7% of operating revenue), of which $2.3 million related to the time charter business of Global Ship Lease and $1.5 million related to the Predecessor Group’s business, and $3.7 million for the period from August 15 to December 31, 2008 (or 9% of operating revenue) all related to the time charter business. The increase in general and administrative expenses after August 14, 2008 reflects Global Ship Lease becoming a publicly listed company which carries incremental costs together with the costs of stock based incentive plans which were $2.5 million in 2009 compared to $1.2 million in the period from August 15 to December 31, 2008.

•

Other operating (income) expense: Other operating income was $0.4 million in 2009 compared to an expense of $0.1 million for the period from January 1 to August 14, 2008, of which $(0.2) million income related to the time charter business of Global Ship Lease and $0.3 million expense related to bunker hedging activities in the Predecessor Group’s business, and $(0.1) million income for the period from August 15 to December 31, 2008 all related to the time charter business. Other operating income related to the time charter business is miscellaneous revenue mainly from carrying passengers and sundry recharges under the time charters.

Operating Income

As a consequence of all preceding items, operating income was $61.7 million in 2009 compared to $21.9 million for the period from January 1 to August 14, 2008, of which $24.0 million related to the time charter business of Global Ship Lease and $2.1 million loss related to the Predecessor Group’s business, and $14.9 million for the period from August 15 to December 31, 2008 all related to the time charter business.

Interest Income

Interest income on cash deposits made by Global Ship Lease in 2009 was $0.5 million compared to $0.4 million for the period from January 1 to August 14, 2008 all related to the time charter business of Global Ship Lease, and $0.4 million for the period from August 15 to December 31, 2008 also all related to the time charter business.

Interest Expense

Interest expense was $24.2 million for 2009 (or 16% of operating revenue) compared to $17.6 million for the period from January 1 to August 14, 2008 (or 30% of operating revenue) all of which related to the time charter business of Global Ship Lease and $3.8 million for the period from August 15 to December 31, 2008 (or 10% of operating revenue) also all related to the time charter business. The substantial reduction in interest cost after August 14, 2008 is due to the changes in capital structure of Global Ship Lease on completion of the Merger including cancellation of the fixed rate $176.9 million shareholder loan and repayment of $115.0 million drawing under Global Ship Lease’s credit facility.

Realized and unrealized gain on derivatives

During 2008, Global Ship Lease entered into derivative interest rate agreements to fix the interest rate on debt drawn or anticipated to be drawn under its credit facility. A total of $580.0 million of anticipated core debt was swapped into fixed rate debt at an average rate of 3.59%. Of the notional amount of $580.0 million, $494.0 million of the swaps were effective by December 31, 2008 with a further $41.0 million becoming effective in July 2009 and the balance of $45.0 million becoming effective in 2010 consistent with anticipated purchases of further vessels. All swap agreements continue until at least March 2013 at the full notional amount, without amortization.

None of the interest rate agreements qualify for hedge accounting, therefore, the net changes in the fair value of the interest rate derivative assets and liabilities at each reporting period are reflected in the current period financial statements as unrealized gains or losses on derivatives. Cash flows related to interest rate derivatives (initial payments of derivatives and periodic cash settlements) are included within cash flows from investing activities in the combined statement of cash flows. In 2008, initial payments in respect of derivatives of $4.7 million were made.

unrealized gains or losses. Taken as a whole, the market experienced upward movements in the U.S.$ LIBOR yield curve through 2009 and, to a lesser extent, in 2008 from May, when the Company entered into the interest rate derivatives, up to mid August, and consequently the Company’s interest rate derivatives appreciated in value. The unrealized gain on interest rate derivatives in 2009 was $17.9 million compared to $3.1 million for the period from January 1 to August 14, all related to the time charter business of Global Ship Lease. Conversely, during the later part of 2008 there was a downward shift in the U.S.$ LIBOR yield curve causing the Company’s interest rate derivatives to fall significantly in value. Accordingly a $54.9 million loss was recorded for the period from August 15 to December 31, 2008 also all related to the time charter business.

Taxes on Income

Taxes on income were $0.4 million or 1% of income before income taxes. Taxes on income in 2008 were not material.

Net Income

As a consequence of all preceding items net income was $42.4 million for 2009 compared to $7.4 million for the period from January 1 to August 14, 2008, of which $9.5 million related to the time charter business of Global Ship Lease and $(2.1) million loss related to the Predecessor Group’s business, and $(44.0) million loss for the period from August 15 to December 31, 2008 all related to the time charter business.

Year ended December 31, 2008 Compared to Year ended December 31, 2007

Comparison between these two periods is of limited value as operations in the year ended December 31, 2008 were comprised almost entirely of Global Ship Lease’s on-going business of owning and chartering out containerships under time charters, whereas operations in the year ended December 31, 2007 were comprised almost entirely of the Predecessor Group earning revenue from the transportation of containerized cargo. Further, as a result of the accounting for the Merger on August 14, 2008, the year ended December 31, 2008 is reported as a Predecessor period, prior to the Merger, and a Successor period, after the Merger. The capital and legal structure of Global Ship Lease changed significantly on the Merger, including Global Ship Lease becoming listed on the New York Stock Exchange.

Total operating revenue

Operating revenue was $58.0 million for the period from January 1 to August 14, 2008, including time charter revenue of $55.9 million and voyage revenue of $2.1 million, and $39.1 million for the period from August 15 to December 31, 2008 all related to the time charter business. This compares to time charter revenue of $2.9 million and voyage revenue of $332.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2007.

Time charter revenue reflects income under the fixed rate time charters in effect. The significant increase in time charter revenue between 2007 and 2008 reflects a full year’s contribution of the 10 secondhand vessels purchased by Global Ship Lease in December 2007 and the contribution of the two newly built vessels purchased in January 2008. Certain time charter rates were also increased with effect from April 1 and August 12, 2008. Ownership days in 2008 were 4,416 (1,717 for the Successor and 2,699 for the Predecessor periods) compared to 159 in 2007. There were 45 planned and unplanned off-hire days in 2008 resulting in a utilization rate of 99%. Of the off-hire days, 15 were for the planned drydocking of the Delmas Keta in March. In 2007, there was one day off-hire and utilization was 99%.

Voyage revenue of $2.1 million in 2008 is the revenue earned by the Predecessor Group in carrying cargo on the two newly built vessels up to their dates of sale to Global Ship Lease in January 2008. Voyage revenue at $332.2 million in 2007 is significantly higher as it represents the Predecessor Group’s freight revenue carrying containerized cargo on the 10 vessels owned by it throughout almost all of 2007 and the two newly built vessels from their delivery to the Predecessor Group in November and December 2007 that are now owned by Global Ship Lease.

Operating expenses

Total operating expenses totaled $36.1 million for the period from January 1 to August 14, 2008 (or 62% of operating revenue) and $24.2 million for the period from August 15 to December 31, 2008 (or 62% of operating revenue). This compares to $304.9 million in 2007 (or 91% of operating revenue). The significant drop in total operating expenses is due to the change in business model and the elimination of voyage expenses, which were $249.5 million in 2007, from the cost base. Operating expenses can be analyzed as follows:

•

Voyage expenses: Voyage expenses, which are associated only with the Predecessor Group’s activity of earning freight revenue, were $1.9 million in 2008 relating only to the two newly built ships for the part of January whilst they were owned by the Predecessor Group. Voyage expenses of $249.5 million in 2007 (or 74% of operating revenue) related to 10 secondhand vessels for the entire period and the two newly built vessels for part of the year.

•

Vessel expenses: Vessel expenses, which relate to the operation of the vessels themselves, were $18.1 million for the period from January 1 to August 14, 2008 (or 31% of operating revenue) of which $17.9 million related to the time charter business of Global Ship Lease and $0.2 million related to the Predecessor Group’s business, and $11.9 million for the period from August 15 to December 31, 2008 (or 30% of operating revenue) all related to the time charter business. In 2007, vessel operating expenses were $24.0 million (or 7% of operating revenue) of which $0.7 million related to Global Ship Lease’s time charter business and $23.2 million related to the Predecessor Group’s business. The increase in vessel operating expenses in 2008 for the time charter business and the reduction in these costs related to the Predecessor Group’s business is due to the transfer of vessels from the Predecessor Group to Global Ship Lease.

•

Depreciation: Depreciation was $12.2 million for the period from January 1 to August 14, 2008 (or 21% of operating revenue) of which $11.9 million related to the time charter business of Global Ship Lease and $0.3 million related to the Predecessor Group’s business, and was $8.7 million for the period from August 15 to December 31, 2008 (or 22% of operating revenue) all related to the time charter business. In 2007, depreciation was $16.1 million (or 5% of operating revenue) of which $0.6 million related to the time charter business of Global Ship Lease and $15.5 million related to the Predecessor Group’s business. Depreciation in 2008 was higher than 2007 mainly due to the effect of the two newly built vessels being included for a full year in 2008 together with the result of the step-up in the value of vessels under purchase accounting on the Merger offset by the impact of the application of the 30 year vessel life in Global Ship Lease’s ownership compared to 25 years in the Predecessor Group’s ownership.

•

General and Administrative: General and administrative expenses in 2008 were $3.8 million for the period from January 1 to August 14, 2008 (or 7% of operating revenue), of which $2.3 million related to the time charter business of Global Ship Lease and $1.5 million related to the Predecessor Group’s business, and $3.7 million for the period from August 15 to December 31, 2008 (or 9% of operating revenue) all related to the time charter business. The increase in general and administrative expenses after August 14, 2008 reflects Global Ship Lease becoming a publicly listed company which carries incremental costs together with the costs of stock based incentive plans which were $1.2 million in the period from August 15 to December 31, 2008. In 2007, general and administrative expenses were $17.8 million (or 5% of operating revenue) of which $0.3 million related to the time charter business of Global Ship Lease and $17.4 million related to the Predecessor Group’s business. General and administrative expenses for the Predecessor Group represent an allocation of the total CMA CGM group overhead and are thus not comparable to the costs incurred by Global Ship Lease as a standalone entity.

•

Other operating (income) expense: Other operating expense was $0.1 million for the period from January 1 to August 14, 2008, of which $(0.2) million income related to the time charter business of Global Ship Lease and $0.3 million expense related to bunker hedging activities in the Predecessor Group’s business, and $(0.1) million income for the period from August 15 to December 31, 2008 all related to the time charter business. Other operating income related to the time charter business is miscellaneous revenue mainly from carrying passengers. In 2007, other operating income was $(2.3) million and was entirely attributable to the Predecessor Group and related to bunker hedging.

Operating Income

As a consequence of all preceding items, operating income was $21.9 million for the period from January 1 to August 14, 2008, of which $24.0 million related to the time charter business of Global Ship Lease and $2.1 million loss related to the Predecessor Group’s business, and $14.9 million for the period from August 15 to December 31, 2008 all related to the time charter business. This compares to $30.2 million in 2007 of which $1.2 million related to the time charter business of Global Ship Lease and $28.9 million related to the Predecessor Group’s business.

Interest Income

Interest income on cash deposits made by Global Ship Lease in 2008 was $0.4 million for the period from January 1 to August 14, 2008 all related to the time charter business of Global Ship Lease, and $0.4 million for the period from August 15 to December 31, 2008 also all related to the time charter business. There were no such deposits in 2007.

Interest Expense

Interest expense was $17.6 million for the period from January 1 to August 14, 2008 (or 30% of operating revenue) all of which related to the time charter business of Global Ship Lease and $3.8 million for the period from August 15 to December 31, 2008 (or 10% of operating revenue) also all related to the time charter business. The substantial reduction in interest cost after August 14, 2008 is due to the changes in capital structure of Global Ship Lease on completion of the Merger including cancellation of the fixed rate $176.9 million shareholder loan and repayment of $115.0 million drawing under Global Ship Lease’s credit facility. Interest expense in 2007 was $13.4 million (or 4% of operating revenue) of which $1.1 million relates to the time charter business and $12.3 million relates to the Predecessor Group’s on borrowings associated with the relevant vessels.

Realized and unrealized gain on derivatives

During 2008, Global Ship Lease entered into derivative interest rate agreements to fix the interest rate on debt drawn or anticipated to be drawn under its credit facility. A total of $580.0 million of anticipated core debt was swapped into fixed rate debt at an average rate of 3.59%. Of the notional amount of $580.0 million, $494.0 million of the swaps were effective by December 31, 2008 with the balance of $86.0 million becoming effective in 2009 and 2010 when debt is anticipated to be drawn to purchase the one secondhand vessel in July 2009 and the two newly built vessels in fourth quarter 2010. All swap agreements continue until at least March 2013 at the full notional amount, without amortization.

Realized gains or losses from interest rate derivatives are recognized in the statement of income concurrent with cash settlements. In addition, the interest rate derivatives are “marked to market” each reporting period to determine the fair values which generate unrealized gains or losses. The unrealized gain on interest rate derivatives in 2008 was $3.1 million for the period from January 1 to August 14, all related to the time charter business of Global Ship Lease, and $54.9 million loss for the period from August 15 to December 31, 2008 also all related to the time charter business. Unrealized gains amounted to $9.1 million in 2007.

Taxes on Income

Taxes on income were not material.

Net Income

As a consequence of all preceding items net income was $7.4 million for the period from January 1 to August 14, 2008, of which $9.5 million related to the time charter business of Global Ship Lease and $(2.1) million loss related to the Predecessor Group’s business, and $(44.0) million loss for the period from August 15 to December 31, 2008 also all related to the time charter business compared to $16.8 million in 2007 of which $0.1 million related to the time charter business and $16.7 million to the Predecessor Group.

B. Liquidity and Capital Resources

Year ended December 31, 2009 Compared to Year ended December 31, 2008

For the year ended December 31, 2009 Global Ship Lease’s operating activities were comprised entirely of the chartering out its vessels under time charters.

Net cash provided by operating activities was $72.9 million in 2009 reflecting mainly net income of $42.4 million, depreciation of $37.3 million, amortization of deferred charges $3.1 million, share based compensation $2.5 million less $1.5 million amortization of intangible liability, $4.3 million deterioration in net working capital, $4.8 million change in fair value of interest rate derivatives net of settlement of hedges which do not qualify for hedge accounting and $1.7 million payment of drydock costs.

The cash settlement of interest rate derivatives was $13.1 million. CMA CGM Berlioz was purchased in August 2009 for a total cash cost of $83.6 million, financed by $57.0 million of borrowings under the credit facility and the balance from cash on hand.

In November 2009 $10.9 million of borrowings were repaid. Professional fees and other costs associated with the amendments to the credit facility that were secured in 2009 totaled $5.4 million.

After paying a dividend in respect of fourth quarter 2008 in March 2009 totaling $12.4 million, the net increase in cash and cash equivalents during 2009 was $4.4 million resulting in closing cash of $30.8 million.

Year ended December 31, 2008 Compared to Year ended December 31, 2007

For the year ended December 31, 2008 Global Ship Lease’s operating activities were comprised almost entirely of the chartering out its vessels under time charters. The combined financial statements comprise two distinct reporting periods, the Predecessor period before the Merger, which completed on August 14, 2008, and the Successor period from that date.

Net cash provided by operating activities was $20.7 million in the period from January 1 to August 14, 2008 reflecting net income of $7.4 million, depreciation and amortization expense of $12.6 million, $5.1 million improvement in net working capital less $3.0 million change in fair value of interest rate derivatives net of settlement of hedges which do not qualify for hedge accounting and $1.5 million payment of drydock costs.

The cash settlement of interest rate derivatives was $4.9 million. The two newly built vessels were purchased in January for $188.7 million, financed by $188.0 borrowings under the credit facility which had been made in December 2007 with the proceeds being placed on deposit.

The net change in cash for the period January 1 to August 14, 2008 was an increase of $14.4 million leaving cash at the end of the period of $16.3 million.

Net cash provided by operating activities for the period from August 15 to December 31, 2008 was $14.0 million reflecting the net loss of $44.0 million, depreciation and amortization expense of $8.9 million, $55.5 million non cash change in fair value of interest rate derivatives net of settlement of hedges which do not qualify for hedge accounting, $1.1 million non cash charge for stock based compensation less $7.5 million settlement of accounts payable and other liabilities mainly associated with the Merger.

The cash settlement of interest rate derivatives was $0.6 million. Net current liabilities of $6.5 million (net of cash of $16.3 million) were acquired in the Merger and $317.4 million was released from the trust account. $147.1 million was used to retire stock in connection with the Merger and $115.0 million of long term debt was repaid. Amendment and other fees relating to the credit facility totaling $3.9 million were paid in connection with the Merger.

Warrant proceeds of $3.0 million were received and placed on restricted deposit. Four vessels were purchased in December 2008 for $257.4 million cash (in addition to the $99 million that had been prepaid through the issuance of 12,375,000 common shares to CMA CGM pursuant to the Merger). The cash payment was mainly financed by additional drawings under the credit facility of $256 million. A deposit of $15.5 million was paid for the two vessels anticipated to be purchased in fourth quarter 2010 and $15.6 million of dividends were paid.

The net change in cash for the period August 15, 2008 to December 31, 2008 was an increase of $25.8 million leaving cash at the end of the period of $26.4 million.

For the year ended December 31, 2007, Global Ship Lease’s operating activities, largely those of the Predecessor Group until Global Ship Lease’s acquisition of the 10 secondhand vessels in December 2007, generated $56.6 million. This amount reflects net income of $16.8 million, depreciation and amortization expenses of $18.3 million, $9.1 million change in the fair value of financial derivative instruments less payment of drydock costs of $4.7 million. Improvements in working capital contributed $17.0 million.

For the year ended December 31, 2007, net cash used in Global Ship Lease’s and the Predecessor Group’s investing activities amounted to $183.8 million, almost entirely being the acquisition of the two newly built vessels for $183.7 million.

For the year ended December 31, 2007, net cash received from Global Ship Lease’s and the Predecessor Group’s financing activities was $129.1 million. Drawings under Global Ship Lease’s credit facility were $401.1 million of which $188.0 million was placed on deposit pending the acquisition of the two newly built vessels in January 2008. A shareholder loan totaling $176.9 million was received from CMA CGM. Out of these inflows, costs of $5.9 million for the credit facility were paid and $146.2 million debt relating to certain vessels when owned by the Predecessor Group was repaid. The remaining cash outflow of $108.8 million is comprised (i) a reduction of $11.9 million in the amount due to CMA CGM within stockholders equity and (ii) a deemed distribution of $96.9 million relating to the difference between the purchase price of the initial fleet paid by Global Ship Lease and the value at which the initial fleet was recorded in the Predecessor Group’s financial statements at the dates of sale.

Overall, the net increase in cash and cash equivalents in 2007 was $1.9 million.

Global Ship Lease’s Credit Facility

Global Ship Lease has a senior secured credit facility with Fortis Bank (Nederland) N.V. (the “Agent”), Citibank Global Markets Limited, HSH Nordbank AG, Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation, Brussels Branch, KFW, DnB Nor Bank ASA and Bank of Scotland, which Global Ship Lease refers to as its credit facility. Global Ship Lease drew funds under its credit facility to finance in part the purchase of its vessels from CMA CGM. All of Global Ship Lease’s vessel-owning subsidiaries are borrowers and guarantors jointly and severally guaranteeing Global Ship Lease’s obligations under the credit facility.

Credit Facility Amendment

No additional indebtedness is permitted until the Over Advance Portion is repaid in full, other than for the purpose of financing the purchase of the two contracted vessels from German interests.

If any additional capital is raised, 25% of such additional capital, net of expenses, must be used to prepay borrowings under the credit facility. This provision terminates when the repayment profile of the credit facility reduces to 18 years or lower, based on the market value and weighted average age of the vessels. In the event of a sale of a vessel or a total loss or constructive total loss of a vessel, the proceeds received from such sale, total loss or constructive total loss must be used to prepay borrowings under the credit facility.

Further, the undrawn portion of the credit facility amounting to approximately $200.0 million was cancelled and Global Ship Lease has agreed that it will not declare or pay any dividends to common shareholders during this waiver period or thereafter until the leverage ratio falls to 75% or below.

General Borrowing Terms


Leverage Ratio	Margin
Up to 65%	2.50	%
Greater than 65% to 75%	3.00	%
Greater than 75%	3.50	%

See “Business Overview—Credit Facility” for further details on Global Ship Lease’s credit facility, including a description of the security provided, covenants and events of default.

Utilization of the credit facility

Global Ship Lease financed the purchase of the 10 secondhand vessels in December 2007 with $213.1 million of borrowings under the credit facility and drawings of $171.9 million under a shareholder loan made between Global Ship Lease and CMA CGM. In addition, Global Ship Lease drew approximately $5.0 million under the shareholder loan to pay lenders’ fees and expenses in connection with the credit facility bringing the total borrowings under the shareholder loan to $176.9 million. Prior to December 31, 2007, Global Ship Lease drew a further $188.0 million under the credit facility, which was placed on restricted cash deposit, in order to pay for the two newly built vessels of Global Ship Lease’s initial fleet purchased in January 2008. Total drawings under the credit facility as of December 31, 2007 were $401.1 million. The shareholder loan of $176.9 million was cancelled on the closing of the Merger and $115 million of the drawings under the credit facility were prepaid.

Pursuant to the Merger, $99.0 million of the total $355.0 million purchase price of the four vessels acquired in December 2008 was prepaid by the issuance of 12,375,000 Class C common shares to CMA CGM. These shares converted to Class A common shares on January 1, 2009. The balance of the purchase price of $256.0 million was settled from further borrowings under Global Ship Lease’s credit facility. As of December 31, 2008, total drawings under the credit facility were $542.1 million.

An additional $57.0 million was borrowed in August 2009 under the credit facility to purchase the CMA CGM Berlioz, the final ship to be purchased pursuant to the asset purchase agreement with CMA CGM, consisting of drawings of $42.0 million under the main credit facility and $15.0 million under the newly created Over Advance Portion. The $25.0 million balance of the purchase price of $82.0 million was met from available cash. In November 2009, $10.9 million of the Over Advance Portion was prepaid leaving a total balance outstanding on the credit facility of $588.2 million at December 31, 2009 of which $68.3 million has been presented as current.

As a result of the Credit Facility Amendment, the undrawn portion of the credit facility was cancelled. Alternate sources of financing are required in order to complete the purchases of the two 4,250 TEU newbuildings for total contracted price of $77.4 million per vessel, of which 10% has been paid and 90% is to be paid upon delivery, which is expected to be in the fourth quarter of 2010.

Working capital and dividends

Global Ship Lease’s net cash flows from operating activities corresponds directly with the number of vessels under charter, days on-hire, vessel charter rates, operating expenses, drydock costs, interest and other financing costs and general and administrative expenses. Global Ship Lease’s net cash flows from operating activities will not be exposed to the same fluctuations in operating expenses to which the Predecessor Group’s cash flows were subject. Pursuant to Global Ship Lease’s ship management agreements, Global Ship Lease has agreed to pay its Ship Manager an annual management fee of $114,000 per vessel and to reimburse the Ship Manager for operating costs it incurs on Global Ship Lease’s behalf up to a quarterly cap pursuant to the global expense agreement (other than drydocking expenses and insurance premiums which will not be subject to the cap). Charterhire is payable by the initial Charterer 15 days in advance and estimated ship management costs are payable monthly in advance. Although Global Ship Lease can provide no assurances (see “Risk Factors – Risks Related to our Business – Global Ship Lease is highly dependent on charter payments from CMA CGM”), it expects that its cash flow from its chartering arrangements will be sufficient to cover its ship management costs and fees, interest payments, commitment fees and other financing costs under its credit facility, insurance premiums, vessel taxes, general and administrative expenses and other costs and any other working capital requirements for the short and medium term and planned drydocking expenses. Based on such arrangements, Global Ship Lease expects that its operating cash flow will be reasonably stable for at least the initial three year terms of the ship management agreements and will be sufficient to fund its working capital requirements.

The Credit Facility Amendment provides that borrowings under the Over Advance Portion totaling $15.0 million will be repaid quarterly commencing November 2009 with free cash in excess of $20.0 million determined as of the previous month end. The Over Advance Portion is required to be fully prepaid by June 30, 2010. The credit facility will be repaid quarterly commencing June 30,

2010 with free cash in excess of $20.0 million determined as of the previous month end subject to a minimum $40.0 million prepayment per rolling four-quarter basis as long as the leverage ratio is, or is deemed to be, over 75%. When the leverage ratio becomes 75% or less, scheduled repayments will be set at $10.0 million per quarter.

Further, the $48.0 million Preferred Shares are mandatorily redeemable at par by quarterly installments of approximately $4.0 million commencing August 31, 2016.

Over the five years following the closing of the Merger, Global Ship Lease estimates that the average cost of the first drydocking of each of its vessels will be $1,150,000. Global Ship Lease has included a schedule of the next anticipated drydocking date for each of Global Ship Lease’s vessels in the section of this Annual Report entitled “Business Overview—Inspection by Classification Societies.”

Global Ship Lease’s other liquidity requirements include repaying the credit facility quarterly commencing June 30, 2010, financing the purchase of the two 4,250 TEU newbuildings from German interests which is expected to be in the fourth quarter 2010 and the repaying the remaining principal balance of its credit facility at the final maturity date in August 2016. In addition to funds generated by the business, Global Ship Lease may require new borrowings, issuances of equity or other securities, or a combination of the former and the latter to meet its obligations and will likely require such further funding to meet all of its repayment obligations under the credit facility.

C. Research and Development

Not applicable.

D. Trend Information

Container shipping is a cyclical industry, with the demand for container shipping services driven by global trade. Between 1997 and 2007 containerized trade exhibited compound annual growth of approximately 10%, with a period of super-cyclical growth from 2002 to mid-2008 fuelled partly by exports from China. This period of high growth, combined with operators seeking economies of scale achievable with ever larger vessels, led to a significant orderbook of new containerships. In December, 2008 the orderbook was estimated to represent approximately 50% of existing global capacity measured in TEU. By March 2010 it had fallen to approximately 34%, with almost no additional newbuildings contracted in the preceding 12 months.

Vessel newbuilding prices, second hand values and charter rates have tended to be closely correlated and are all strongly influenced by the dynamics of supply and demand. A theoretical 3,500 TEU containership newbuilding could have been contracted for approximately $34 million in first quarter 2002, with contract prices peaking in third quarter 2008 at around $67 million for essentially the same vessel. Over this period, second hand values for a 10 year old vessel of comparable size increased from approximately $21 million to $46 million, peaking at around $50 million in first quarter 2008. During the same timeframe, spot market charter rates for such a vessel moved from approximately $10,000 per day to $26,000 per day, peaking at $44,000 per day in first quarter 2005.

The global economic crisis has adversely impacted containerized trade, with demand contracting by approximately 9% in 2009. Liner operators’ published results for 2009 have been poor, reflecting the challenging market environment with both lower trade volumes and significantly reduced freight rates. However, first quarter 2010 has seen improvement in both volume and freight rates although this modest recovery is fragile.

For charter-owners, the adverse impact of reduced demand has been compounded in the near term by supply-side growth. As of March 2010 approximately 10% of the existing containership fleet was assessed to be idle, with the substantial orderbook still to be delivered. In March 2010, spot market charter rates for a 3,500 TEU vessel were around $7,000 per day, improved on a low of approximately $5,500 per day in fourth quarter 2009 but substantially below peak rates. Vessel values declined significantly during 2009 but may have bottomed out and, for certain size categories, both asset values and charter rates have shown some slight upward momentum during first quarter 2010.

E. Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

Except as described under Item 5F (Contractual Obligations) and Item 11 (Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk), Global Ship Lease does not have any other transactions, obligations or relationships that could be considered material off-balance sheet arrangements.

F. Contractual Obligations

The contractual obligations presented below represent Global Ship Lease’s estimates of future payments under fixed contractual obligations and commitments as of December 31, 2009. Changes in Global Ship Lease’s business needs or in interest rates, as well as actions by third parties and other factors, may cause these estimates to change. These estimates are necessarily subjective and Global Ship Lease’s actual payments in future periods are likely to vary from those presented in the table.


Contractual Obligations	Less than 1 year		1-3 years		3-5 years		More than 5 years		Total
	(in millions of U.S. dollars)
Long term debt obligations (1)	$	68.3	$	85.3	$	80.0	$	354.6	$	588.2
Interest on long term debt obligations (1)(2)		22.9		35.4		28.4		18.8		105.5
Net obligation under Interest Rate Swaps (3)		16.8		36.5		20.5		13.7		87.5
Ship management agreements (4)		1.9		0.6		—		—		2.5
Vessel purchase agreements (5)		139.3		—		—		—		139.3
Mandatorily Redeemable Preferred Shares and related interest (6)		1.2		2.4		2.4		50.0		56.1

	$	250.2	$	160.2	$	131.3	$	437.2	$	979.1

(1)

Global Ship Lease did not assume any of the Predecessor Group’s debt relating to the vessels in Global Ship Lease’s fleet. Amounts shown in the table reflect debt and interest payable to Fortis Bank (Nederland) N.V., or Agent, Citibank Global Markets Limited, HSH Nordbank AG, Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation, Brussels Branch, KFW, DnB Nor Bank ASA and Bank of Scotland under Global Ship Lease’s credit facility. Interest on the outstanding portion of Global Ship Lease’s credit facility will be charged at the rate of the margin over one, three, six, nine or 12 month LIBOR as determined by the Agent. During the continuance of any principal or interest payment default, the margin will increase by 2%. Global Ship Lease expects that interest on the balance outstanding will be payable at least quarterly. Long term debt obligations do not include the effect of the financing of the two vessels to be acquired from German interests in fourth quarter 2010. The consequences of the Credit Facility Amendment are reflected in the table. Remaining borrowings under the Over Advance Portion of $4.1 million were prepaid in February 2010. The credit facility will be repaid quarterly commencing June 30, 2010 with free cash in excess of $20.0 million determined as of the previous month end subject to a minimum $40.0 million prepayment per rolling four-quarters as long as the leverage ratio is, or is deemed to be, over 75%. When the leverage ratio becomes 75% or less, scheduled repayments will be set at $10.0 million per quarter. For the purposes of the above table, it is assumed that the leverage ratio becomes 75% or less when the leverage ratio is next tested as at April 30, 2011. The Credit Facility Amendment cancelled all undrawn commitments and therefore there is no availability under the facility to finance the purchase of the two vessels from German interests.

(2)

The estimated contractual interest obligation has been calculated using an assumed all in interest rate of 4.00% being estimated LIBOR of 0.50% plus a spread of 3.50% being the margin set by the Credit Facility Amendment, effectively up to April 30, 2011 then reduced to an assumed all in interest rate of 3.50% including a spread of 3.00% on the assumption that the leverage ratio becomes 75% or less. The Credit Facility Amendment contemplates a continuation of a spread of 3.50% if the leverage ratio remained over 75%. As all undrawn commitments were cancelled by the Credit Facility Amendment, commitment fees are no longer payable.

(3)

The estimated net obligations under Global Ship Lease’s interest rate swaps have been calculated using a LIBOR of 0.5% and assumes that the counterparties do not exercise their options to terminate, as at March 17, 2013, three contracts totaling $191.0 million but that these continue to maturity of December 17, 2016.

(4)	Obligations under Global Ship Lease’s ship management agreements include an annual management fee of $114,000 per vessel and do not include the reimbursement of daily operating costs incurred on Global Ship Lease’s behalf.

(5)

On September 11, 2008, Global Ship Lease entered into contracts to purchase from German interests two 4,250 TEU containerships for a price of approximately $77.4 million each. The vessels are expected to be delivered in December 2010. A deposit of 10% was paid when the purchase contracts were signed and the balance of 90%, or approximately $139.3 million, is due upon delivery. As a result of the Credit Facility Amendment, Global Ship Lease has no capacity to borrow any further amounts under the credit facility to fund the remainder of the purchase price of the two newbuildings, and as such, must secure other sources of financing to meet its obligations to the sellers under the contracts. Global Ship Lease’s obligations under the purchase contracts are not conditioned on either the availability of financing or on the performance of the charters with Zim which are due to come into effect on delivery of each vessel.

(6)

In connection with the Credit Facility Amendment, CMA CGM agreed to defer the redemption of the $48.0 million Preferred Shares until after the final maturity date of the Credit Facility such that the Preferred Shares are mandatorily redeemable at par by quarterly installments of approximately $4.0 million commencing August 31, 2016. The interest obligation has been determined using an all in rate of 2.50% being estimated LIBOR of 0.5% plus the contractual spread of 2.0%.

Item 6.

Directors, Senior Management and Employees

A. Directors and Senior Management

Our directors and executive officers as of the date of this annual report and their ages as of December 31, 2009 are listed below:


Name	Age	Position
Michael S. Gross	48	Chairman of the Board
Howard Boyd	65	Director
Angus R. Frew	51	Director
Guy Morel	60	Director
Jeffrey D. Pribor	52	Director
Ian J. Webber	52	Chief Executive Officer
Susan J. Cook	53	Chief Financial Officer
Thomas A. Lister	40	Chief Commercial Officer
Vivek Puri	52	Chief Technical Officer

Michael S. Gross. Michael S. Gross has been a director of Global Ship Lease since its inception and was appointed Chairman in September 2008. Since 2007, Mr. Gross has served as the chairman of the board and chief executive officer of Solar Capital Ltd. (including its predecessor), a company which invests primarily in leveraged, middle market companies and which has been a publicly-traded closed-end investment company since February 2010. From July 2006 through approximately the first quarter 2009, Mr. Gross was a partner in Magnetar Capital Partners LP, the holding company for Magnetar Financial LLC. Between February 2004 and February 2006, Mr. Gross was the president and chief executive officer of Apollo Investment Corporation, a publicly traded business development company that he founded and on whose board of directors and investment committee he served as chairman from February 2004 to July 2006, and was the managing partner of Apollo Investment Management, L.P., the investment adviser to Apollo Investment Corporation. From 1990 to February 2006, Mr. Gross was a senior partner at Apollo Management, L.P., a private equity firm which he founded in 1990 with five other persons. In addition, from 2003 to February 2006, Mr. Gross was the managing partner of Apollo Distressed Investment Fund, an investment fund he founded to invest principally in non-control oriented distressed debt and other investment securities of leveraged companies. Mr. Gross currently also serves on the boards of directors of Saks, Inc. and Jarden Corporation. Mr. Gross holds a B.B.A. in accounting from University of Michigan and an M.M. from the J.L. Kellogg Graduate School of Management at Northwestern University.

Howard Boyd. Howard Boyd has been a director of Global Ship Lease since August 2008. In 1996, Mr. Boyd was named chief executive officer of Safmarine, a container liner operator based in Antwerp, which was purchased by AP Moller-Maersk in 1999. Mr. Boyd took a leading role in the takeover and continued as chief executive officer of the separate Safmarine entity until his retirement in 2004. His career with Safmarine began in 1970 when he joined as a tanker accountant. Mr. Boyd held a variety of positions with Safmarine, including financial controller, USA trade executive, chief operating officer of the bulk division and bulk director. He became a member of the Safmarine board of directors in 1988. Mr. Boyd was appointed a consultant to AP Moller-Maersk, continuing as a director of Safmarine, from 2004 to 2008. During this period, he served on the Audit and Remuneration Committees. Mr. Boyd has a Bachelor of Commerce from University of Cape Town and qualified as a South African Chartered Accountant.

Angus R. Frew. Angus R. Frew has been a director of Global Ship Lease since August 2008. Mr. Frew has been chief executive of the British Chamber of Shipping since July 2009 and was president and chief executive officer from 2003 until early 2008 of GE SeaCo SRL, a joint venture between GE Capital and Sea Containers Ltd and one of the largest global container leasing companies. Mr. Frew was a director of the Institute of International Container Lessors from 2003 until early 2008, serving as chairman in 2004, and a director of the Container Owners’ Association from 2007 to early 2008. Mr. Frew was an officer of Sea Containers Ltd from 2003 to 2005 and senior vice president of its container division. From 1990 to 2002, Mr. Frew held senior management positions in the beverages industry with Grand Metropolitan Plc, Diageo Plc and The Seagram Company Ltd. After qualifying as a British Chartered Accountant in 1983, Mr. Frew held senior financial positions in a number of small entrepreneurial businesses in the IT consultancy, design and retail industries. Mr. Frew has an honors degree in chemistry from the University of Durham.

Guy Morel. Guy Morel has been a director of Global Ship Lease since August 2008. Mr. Morel is the general secretary of InterManager, the International Association of Shipmanagers. From 2005 to 2007, he was a professor of corporate finance and director of development at the International University of Monaco. From 1993 to 2004, he was the president and chief operating officer of MC Shipping Inc, a company quoted on the American Stock Exchange, and involved in the ownership and time chartering of containerships and LPG carriers. Between 1979 and 1993, Mr. Morel was one of the founders, a director and a shareholder of V.Ships Inc., a leading ship management group, where he was a vice president in charge of strategic planning and marketing. Prior to 1979, he was a consultant with Data Resources Inc., an American consulting group involved in econometric modeling and economic forecasting. Mr. Morel holds a Bachelor’s Degree in civil engineering from Ecole Centrale de Paris and an MBA from Harvard Business School.

Jeffrey D. Pribor. Jeffrey D. Pribor has been a director of Global Ship Lease since August 2008. Mr. Pribor is currently executive vice president and the chief financial officer of General Maritime Corporation. Prior to that, from 2002 to 2004, Mr. Pribor was managing director and president of DnB NOR Markets, Inc., the U.S. investment banking division of DnB NOR Bank ASA, responsible for mergers and acquisitions, strategic advisory services and U.S. capital market activities for the bank’s shipping, offshore, logistics and energy clients. From 2001 to 2002, Mr. Pribor was managing director and group head of transportation banking at ABN AMRO, Inc. where he was responsible for all commercial and investment banking activities for shipping and other transportation companies in North America. From 1996 to 2001, Mr. Pribor was managing director and sector head of transportation and logistics investment banking for ING Barings. He also worked for over 10 years in the mergers and acquisitions group at Merrill Lynch, and as an attorney in the corporate and banking law practice of Milbank, Tweed, Hadley and McCloy. Mr. Pribor holds a B.A. from Yale University and a J.D. and an M.B.A. from Columbia University.

Ian J. Webber. Upon the completion of the Merger, Mr. Webber became the Chief Executive Officer of Global Ship Lease. From 1979 to 1996, Mr. Webber worked for PriceWaterhouse, the last five years of which he was a partner. From 1996 to 2006, Mr. Webber served as the Chief Financial Officer and a director of CP Ships Limited, a subsidiary of Canadian Pacific Limited until 2001 and thereafter a public company listed on the New York and Toronto stock exchanges until its acquisition by TUI A.G. in 2005. Mr. Webber is a graduate of Cambridge University.

Mr. Webber was named, along with his former employer CP Ships Limited and other officers of that company, as a defendant in a securities class action case before the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida (the “Court”). The consolidated amended class action complaint alleged violations of Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5 of the Exchange Act against all defendants and Section 20(a) of the Exchange Act against the individual defendants. The parties have reached an agreement to settle this class action proceeding in its entirety. Under the terms of the settlement, Mr. Webber denies all wrongdoing, is not making any payment, and will be fully released from any liability in this matter. The settlement was given final approval by the Court on October 21, 2008. One objector appealed the Court’s final approval of the settlement to the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals. On August 13, 2009, the 11th Circuit dismissed the objector’s appeal. All time for further appeal has expired and a joint motion was filed on November 30, 2009 to dismiss a separate appeal from the district court’s dismissal of the complaint that had been stayed pending final approval of the settlement. The 11^th Circuit granted the parties’ joint motion to dismiss the appeal with prejudice on December 16, 2009. Mr. Webber was also named, along with CP Ships Limited and several of its officers and directors, as a defendant in three purported securities class actions in Canada (the “Canadian Actions”). The Canadian Actions allege similar claims to those raised in the United States securities class action. The parties have reached an agreement to settle the Canadian Actions in their entirety. Under the terms of the settlement, Mr. Webber denies all wrongdoing, is not making any payment, and is fully released from any liability in this matter. The settlement of the Canadian Actions received final approval by the Quebec Superior Court on January 18, 2010 and by the Ontario Superior Court of Justice on February 3, 2010.

Susan J. Cook. Upon the completion of the Merger, Ms. Cook became the Chief Financial Officer of Global Ship Lease. From 1986 to 2006, Ms. Cook worked for The Peninsular and Oriental Steam Navigation Company and served as Group Head of Specialized Finance from 2003 to 2006, Head of Structured Finance from 1999 to 2003, Deputy Group Treasurer from 1994 to 1999 and Treasury Manager from 1989 to 1993. She is a Chartered Management Accountant and a member of the Association of Corporate Treasurers. Ms. Cook graduated from Brunel University and received a Master of Science from Oxford University.

Thomas A. Lister. Upon the completion of the Merger, Mr. Lister became the Chief Commercial Officer of Global Ship Lease. From 2005 until 2007, Mr. Lister was Senior Vice President at DVB Group Merchant Bank (Asia) Ltd, responsible for developing DVB’s Singapore ship fund and leasing project. Before that, from 2004 to 2005, he worked for the German KG financier and ship owning group Nordcapital as Director of Business Development. From 1991 to 2002, Mr. Lister worked for a number of shipping companies in both South America and the United States. Mr. Lister graduated from Durham University and holds an MBA from INSEAD.

Vivek Puri. In November 2008 Mr. Puri was appointed as Chief Technical Officer of Global Ship Lease. Prior to joining Global Ship Lease, Mr. Puri was Senior Vice President and Chief Technical Officer for British Marine PLC UK. Before that he was Chief Technical Officer at Synergy Marine Cyprus, where he was responsible for the technical and commercial operations of a rapidly growing fleet of containerships. Mr. Puri spent 26 years with the Wallem Group, a global ship management company, where he held several positions including Managing Director of Wallem Ltd UK. Mr. Puri graduated from the Marine Engineering College India in 1978. He is a Chartered engineer, a Chartered marine engineer and a Fellow of the Institute of Marine Engineers and Scientists.

B. Compensation

Employment Agreements and Executive Compensation of Global Ship Lease

Global Ship Lease Services Limited, Global Ship Lease’s wholly owned subsidiary, entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Webber and, pursuant to the terms of an inter-company agreement between Global Ship Lease and Global Ship Lease Services Limited, Mr. Webber serves as Global Ship Lease’s Chief Executive Officer. Pursuant to his employment agreement, Mr. Webber receives an annual salary of £250,000 and is eligible to receive a bonus payment up to an annual maximum of 50% of his salary at the discretion of Global Ship Lease Services Limited.

The agreement is terminable by Mr. Webber if he provides not less than six months advance written notice to Global Ship Lease Services Limited, or by Global Ship Lease Services Limited if it provides not less than 12 months advance written notice to him (subject to exceptions in the case of summary termination). Global Ship Lease Services Limited has the right to terminate Mr. Webber at any time and in its absolute discretion by paying Mr. Webber a sum equal to his salary and contractual benefits for the relevant period of notice. If Mr. Webber terminates his employment agreement for “good reason” following a “change of control” (each as defined in the employment agreement) he will be entitled to receive payment in lieu of salary and contractual benefits for the 12 month notice period, together with any accrued but unpaid bonus.

The agreement also provides that, during his employment or for a period of one year thereafter, Mr. Webber will not, among other actions, solicit or attempt to solicit certain employees or certain customers of Global Ship Lease (or one of its group companies) or be involved in any relevant business in competition with Global Ship Lease (or one of its group companies).

Global Ship Lease Services Limited entered into an employment agreement with Ms. Cook and, pursuant to the inter-company agreement, Ms. Cook serves as its Chief Financial Officer. Pursuant to her employment agreement, Ms. Cook receives an annual salary of £160, 000 (£135,000 up to December 31, 2009) and is eligible to receive a bonus payment up to an annual maximum of 25% of her salary at the discretion of Global Ship Lease Services Limited.

The agreement is terminable by Ms. Cook if she provides not less than six months advance written notice to Global Ship Lease Services Limited, or by Global Ship Lease Services Limited if it provides not less than nine months advance written notice to her (subject to exceptions in the case of summary termination). Pursuant to the terms of her employment agreement, Global Ship Lease Services Limited has the right to terminate Ms. Cook at any time and in its absolute discretion by paying Ms. Cook a sum equal to her salary and contractual benefits for the relevant period of notice. If Ms. Cook terminates her employment agreement for “good reason” following a “change of control” (each as defined in the employment agreement) she will be entitled to receive payment in lieu of salary and contractual benefits for the nine-month notice period, together with any accrued but unpaid bonus.

The agreement also provides that, during her employment or for a period of one year thereafter, Ms. Cook, will not, among other actions, solicit or attempt to solicit certain employees or certain customers of Global Ship Lease (or one of its group companies) or be involved in any relevant business in competition with Global Ship Lease (or one of its group companies).

Global Ship Lease Services Limited entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Lister and, pursuant to the inter-company agreement, Mr. Lister serves as its Chief Commercial Officer. Pursuant to his employment agreement, Mr. Lister receives an annual salary of £150, 000 (£135,000 up to December 31, 2009) and is eligible to receive a bonus payment up to an annual maximum of 25% of his salary at the discretion of Global Ship Lease Services Limited.

The agreement is terminable by Mr. Lister if he provides not less than three months advance written notice to Global Ship Lease Services Limited, or by Global Ship Lease Services Limited if it provides not less than six months advance written notice to him (subject to exceptions in the case of summary termination). Pursuant to the terms of his employment agreement, Global Ship Lease Services Limited will have the right to terminate Mr. Lister at any time and in its absolute discretion by paying him a sum equal to his salary and contractual benefits for the relevant period of notice. If Mr. Lister terminates his employment agreement for “good reason” following a “change of control” (each as defined in the employment agreement) he will be entitled to receive payment in lieu of salary and contractual benefits for the six-month notice period, together with any accrued but unpaid bonus.

The agreement also provides that, during his employment or for a period of six months thereafter, Mr. Lister, will not, among other actions, solicit or attempt to solicit certain employees or its certain customers of Global Ship Lease (or one of its group companies) or be involved in any relevant business in competition with Global Ship Lease (or one of its group companies).

Global Ship Lease Services Limited entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Puri and, pursuant to the inter-company agreement, Mr. Puri serves as its Chief Technical Officer. Pursuant to his employment agreement, Mr. Puri receives an annual salary of £110, 000 (£85,000 up to December 31, 2009) and is eligible to receive a bonus payment up to an annual maximum of 25% of his salary at the discretion of Global Ship Lease Services Limited.

The agreement is terminable by Mr. Puri if he provides not less than three months advance written notice to Global Ship Lease Services Limited, or by Global Ship Lease Services Limited if it provides not less than six months advance written notice to him (subject to exceptions in the case of summary termination). Pursuant to the terms of his employment agreement, Global Ship Lease Services Limited will have the right to terminate Mr. Puri at any time and in its absolute discretion by paying him a sum equal to his salary and contractual benefits for the relevant period of notice. If Mr. Puri terminates his employment agreement for “good reason” following a “change of control” (each as defined in the employment agreement) he will be entitled to receive payment in lieu of salary and contractual benefits for the six-month notice period, together with any accrued but unpaid bonus.

The agreement also provides that, during his employment or for a period of 12 months thereafter, Mr. Puri, will not, among other actions, solicit or attempt to solicit certain employees or its certain customers of Global Ship Lease (or one of its group companies) or be involved in any relevant business in competition with Global Ship Lease (or one of its group companies).

Compensation of Directors of Global Ship Lease

The Chairman of the board of directors receives an annual fee of $150,000, consisting up to December 31, 2009 of $75,000 in cash and an annual restricted stock grant with a grant date value of $75,000. From January 1, 2010, the annual fee consists of $120,000 in cash and an annual restricted stock grant with a grant date value of $30,000. The other directors of Global Ship Lease receive an annual fee of $100,000, consisting up to December 31, 2009 of $50,000 in cash and an annual restricted stock grant with a grant date value of $50,000. From January 1, 2010, the annual fee consists of $80,000 in cash and an annual restricted stock grant with a grant date value of $20,000. The Chairman of the audit committee receives an additional fee of $15,000 and each member of the audit committee an additional $7,500. The Chairmen of the governance and nominating committee and the compensation committee each receive an additional $5,000 and each member receives an additional $2,500. In addition, each director is reimbursed for out-of-pocket expenses in connection with attending meetings of the board of directors or committees.

2008 Equity Incentive Plan

Global Ship Lease adopted the 2008 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”), which entitles employees, consultants and directors of Global Ship Lease and its subsidiaries to receive options, stock appreciation rights, stock grants, stock units and dividend equivalents. The following description of the Plan is a summary of the material terms of the Plan.

The Plan is administered by the board of directors of Global Ship Lease or a committee of the board of directors. Subject to adjustment as provided below, the maximum aggregate number of Class A common shares that may be delivered pursuant to awards granted under the Plan during the 10-year term of the Plan is 1,500,000. The maximum number of Class A common shares with respect to which awards may be granted to any participant in the Plan in any fiscal year is 500,000 per participant. If an award granted under the Plan is forfeited, or otherwise expires, terminates or is canceled without the delivery of shares, then the shares covered by such award will again be available to be delivered pursuant to other awards under the Plan.

In the event that Global Ship Lease is subject to a change of control, the Plan administrator in its discretion may make such adjustments and other substitutions to the Plan and outstanding awards under the Plan as it deems equitable or desirable in its sole discretion.

The exercise price for options cannot be less than 100% of the fair market value on the date of grant. The maximum term of each stock option agreement shall not exceed 10 years from the date of the grant.

Stock appreciation rights, or SARs, may provide for a maximum limit on the amount of any payout notwithstanding the fair market value on the date of exercise of the SAR. The exercise price of a SAR shall not be less than 100% of the fair market value on the date of grant. The SAR Agreement shall also specify the maximum term of the SAR which shall not exceed 10 years from the date of grant.

Stock grants may be issued with or without cash consideration under the Plan. The holder of a stock grant awarded under the Plan shall have the same voting, dividend and other rights as the company’s other Class A common shareholders. The Plan administrator may provide a participant who holds stock grants with dividends or dividend equivalents payable in cash, Class A common shares or other property.

Settlement of vested stock units may be in the form of cash, shares or any combination of both, as determined by the Plan administrator at the time of the grant of the stock units. Methods of converting stock units into cash may include (without limitation) a method based on the average fair market value of shares over a series of trading days. The holders of stock units shall have no voting rights.

Subject to the provisions of the Plan, awards granted under the Plan may include dividend equivalents. The Plan administrator may determine the amounts, terms and conditions of any such awards provided that they comply with applicable laws.

The Plan became effective as of the closing of the Merger. No award may be granted under the Plan after the tenth anniversary of the date of shareholder approval of the Plan.

In August 2008, the Global Ship Lease board of directors granted 375,000 restricted shares to Mr. Webber, 202,500 restricted shares to Ms. Cook and 202,500 restricted shares to Mr. Lister under the Plan, which are expected to vest over a three-year period. One third of the award vested over 20 business days commencing mid September 2009, one third is expected to vest over 20 business days commencing mid September 2010 and one third on the third anniversary of the Merger. In November 2008, Mr. Puri was been granted 80,000 restricted shares, half of which vested over 20 business days commencing mid September 2009 and half of which is expected to vest over 20 business days commencing mid September 2009. No further awards have been made.

C. Board Practices

Global Ship Lease’s board of directors is divided into three classes with one class of directors being elected in each year and each class serving a three-year term. The term of office of the first class of directors, consisting of Mr. Morel and Mr. Pribor, expired at the first annual meeting of stockholders held in July 2009. They were re-elected to serve until the Annual Meeting to be held in 2012.

The term of office of the second class of directors, consisting of Mr. Boyd and Mr. Frew, expires at the second annual meeting of stockholders. The term of office of the third class of directors, consisting of Mr. Gross, expires at the third annual meeting of stockholders.

Director Independence

Global Ship Lease’s board of directors has determined that Messrs. Pribor, Frew and Morel are “independent directors” as such term is defined in Rule 10A-3 of the Exchange Act and the rules of the NYSE.

Board Committees

Global Ship Lease’s board of directors has formed an audit committee, a compensation committee, and a governance and nominating committee.

Audit Committee

Global Ship Lease’s audit committee consists of Messrs. Pribor, Frew and Morel, each of whom is “independent” as defined in Rule 10A-3 of the Exchange Act and the rules of the NYSE. In addition, Global Ship Lease’s board of directors has determined that Mr. Pribor is an “audit committee financial expert” as that term is defined under Item 401 of Regulation S-K of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

Financial Experts on Audit Committee

The audit committee will at all times be composed exclusively of “independent directors” who, as required by the NYSE listing standards, are able to read and understand fundamental financial statements, including a company’s balance sheet, income statement and cash flow statement.

In addition, Global Ship Lease has certified to the NYSE that the committee has, and will continue to have, at least one member who has past employment experience in finance or accounting, requisite professional certification in accounting, or other comparable experience or background that results in the individual’s financial sophistication. The board of directors has determined that Mr. Pribor satisfies the NYSE’s definition of financial sophistication and also qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert,” as defined under rules and regulations of the SEC.

Compensation Committee

U.S. issuers are required to have a compensation committee that is comprised entirely of independent directors. Although as a foreign private issuer this rule does not apply to Global Ship Lease, we have a compensation committee. Global Ship Lease’s compensation committee consists of Messrs. Boyd, Frew, Gross and Pribor. The compensation committee is responsible for and reports to the board of directors on the evaluation and compensation of executives, oversees the administration of compensation plans, reviews and determines director compensation and prepares any report on executive compensation required by the rules and regulations of the SEC.

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

Global Ship Lease’s nominating and corporate governance committee consists of Messrs. Boyd, Gross and Morel. The nominating and corporate governance committee reports to the board of directors on and is responsible for issues succession planning and the appointment, development and performance evaluation of the members of the board and senior executives of Global Ship Lease. It also assesses the adequacy and effectiveness of Global Ship Lease’s corporate governance guidelines, reviewing and recommending changes to the board whenever necessary.

Code of Business Conduct and Ethics

Global Ship Lease has adopted a code of business conduct and ethics (“Code of Ethics”) that applies to its officers, employees and directors. More information on the Code of Ethics and board committee charters is available on Global Ship Lease’s website (www.globalshiplease.com) and in print to any shareholder upon request.

Exemptions from NYSE Corporate Governance Rules

As a foreign private issuer, we are exempted from certain corporate governance rules that apply to domestic companies under NYSE listing standards. The following are the significant ways in which our corporate governance practices differ from those followed by domestic companies:

•

we hold annual meetings of shareholders under the Business Corporations Act of the Republic of the Marshall Islands, similar to NYSE requirements; and

•

in lieu of obtaining shareholder approval prior to the adoption of equity compensation plans, the full board of directors approves such adoption.

D. Employees

At December 31, 2009, the company had five employees.

E. Share Ownership

See Item 7.A for information regarding beneficial ownership by our directors and executive officers.

Item 7.

Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions

A. Major Shareholders

The following table sets forth information regarding the beneficial ownership of Global Ship Lease common shares as of August 31, 2010 by:

•

each person known by Global Ship Lease to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of its outstanding common shares;

•

each of Global Ship Lease’s officers and directors; and

•

all of Global Ship Lease’s officers and directors as a group.

Except as otherwise indicated, each person or entity named in the table has sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of Global Ship Lease common shares shown as beneficially owned, subject to applicable community property laws. As of August 31, 2010, an aggregate of 54,236,423 Global Ship Lease Class A and Class B common shares were issued and outstanding. IPO warrants and sponsor warrants expired on August 24, 2010.


	Amount of Beneficial Ownership	Approximate Percentage of Outstanding Common Shares
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner (1)
Michael S. Gross (2)(3)	13,705,525	23.94	%
Jeffrey Pribor (3)	59,019	0.11	%
Howard Boyd (3)	34,019	0.06	%
Angus R. Frew (3)	34,019	0.06	%
Guy Morel (3)	34,019	0.06	%
Ian J. Webber (4)	209,800	0.39	%
Susan J. Cook (5)	106,300	0.20	%
Thomas Lister (6)	106,300	0.20	%
Vivek Puri (7)	63,000	0.12	%
All directors and executive officers as a group (9 individuals)	14,352,001	24.94	%
CMA CGM S.A.	27,544,600	48.01	%

(1)	Unless otherwise noted, the business address of each of the individuals is c/o Portland House, Stag Place, London SW1E 5RS, United Kingdom.

(2)

Marathon Founders, LLC is the record holder of 6,217,712 Class A and Class B common shares and 3,007,288 Class A warrants (which are included in the table above). Marathon Founders, LLC is owned and controlled by Mr. Gross. As a result, Mr. Gross may be deemed to beneficially own the shares held by Marathon Founders, LLC. At August 31, 2010 Mr. Gross held 15,958 restricted stock units in relation to his remuneration for 2010 as Chairman of the Board of Directors which are expected to vest in January 2011 (which are not included in the table above). The business address of Mr. Gross is c/o Marathon Founders, LLC, 500 Park Avenue, 5th Floor, New York, New York 10022.

(3)	Each of these individuals is a director.

(4)

Mr. Webber serves as Chief Executive Officer of Global Ship Lease. At August 31, 2010 Mr. Webber held 125,000 restricted stock units scheduled to vest prior to October 31, 2010, and which are included in the table above, and 125,000 restricted stock units which are scheduled to vest after October 31, 2010, which are not included in the table above.

(5)

Ms. Cook serves as Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of Global Ship Lease. At August 31, 2010 Ms. Cook held 67,500 restricted stock units scheduled to vest prior to October 31, 2010, and which are included in the table above, and 67,500 restricted stock units which are scheduled to vest after October 31, 2010, which are not included in the table above.

(6)

Mr. Lister serves as Chief Commercial Officer of Global Ship Lease. At August 31, 2010 Mr. Lister held 67,500 restricted stock units scheduled to vest prior to October 31, 2010, and which are included in the table above, and 67,500 restricted stock units which are scheduled to vest after October 31, 2010, which are not included in the table above.

(7)

Mr. Puri serves as Chief Technical Officer of Global Ship Lease. At August 30, 2010 Mr. Puri held 20,000 restricted stock units scheduled to vest prior to October 31, 2010, and which are included in the table above, and 20,000 restricted stock units which are scheduled to vest after October 31, 2010, which are not included in the table above.

B. Related Party Transactions

See Item 4.B for a discussion of our commercial transactions and agreements with CMA CGM.

Stockholders Agreement

At the time of the Merger, Global Ship Lease entered into a stockholders agreement with CMA CGM and Marathon Founders, LLC, pursuant to which, until August 14, 2013, CMA CGM agrees not to:

•

acquire additional common shares or other equity securities of Global Ship Lease;

•

make any tender offer or exchange offer for any common shares or other equity securities of Global Ship Lease;

•

make, or take any action to solicit, initiate or encourage, any offer or proposal for, or any indication of interest in, a merger, other business combination or other extraordinary transaction involving Global Ship Lease or any of its subsidiaries, or the acquisition of any common shares or other equity interest in, or a substantial portion of the assets of, Global Ship Lease or any of its subsidiaries;

•

propose any changes to the size or members of the board of directors of Global Ship Lease;

•

solicit, or become a participant in any solicitation of, any proxy from any holder of common shares in connection with any vote on the matters described in the two preceding bullet points above, or agree or announce its intention to vote with any person undertaking a solicitation or grant any proxies with respect to any common shares to any person with respect to such matters, or deposit any common shares in a voting trust or enter into any other arrangement or agreement with respect to the voting thereof; or

•

form, join or in any way participate in a “group” (within the meaning of the Exchange Act) with respect to any common shares of Global Ship Lease.

These standstill restrictions will be temporarily released (i) in the event Global Ship Lease or its shareholders receive an unsolicited third party tender offer or exchange offer to acquire at least a majority of the outstanding common shares or there is a public announcement of a proposal or offer, or commencement of a proxy contest, to effect a change of control of Global Ship Lease, until such time as the board of directors of Global Ship Lease notifies CMA CGM that in the good faith determination of the board of directors such offer or proposal or proxy contest has concluded or been withdrawn, and (ii) to allow CMA CGM to respond to any vote, offer or other transaction involving a tender offer or exchange offer or a merger, business combination, sale of a substantial portion of assets or other extraordinary transaction that has been approved by the board of directors and/or for which the board of directors has granted its recommendation. Global Ship Lease agrees to include such standstill exceptions in any shareholder rights plan it may adopt.

Furthermore, in connection with the Credit Facility Amendment in August 2009, CMA CGM has agreed not to reduce before November 30, 2010 its holding of common shares in Global Ship Lease below the current level of approximately 24.4 million shares.

Registration Rights Agreement

At the time of the Merger, Global Ship Lease entered into a registration rights agreement with CMA CGM, Marathon Investors, LLC, Marathon Founders, LLC and the other initial stockholders of Marathon common stock (including Michael Gross), pursuant to which Global Ship Lease agreed to register for resale on a registration statement under the Securities Act and applicable state securities laws, the common shares issued to such shareholders pursuant to the Merger or upon exercise of warrants. CMA CGM has the right to demand up to three registrations and the Marathon initial stockholders will have the right to demand up to two registrations. These shareholders also have the right to request that Global Ship Lease file a shelf registration statement with respect to their common shares as soon as the applicable transfer restrictions under the stockholders agreement expire. In addition, these shareholders also have piggyback registration rights allowing them to participate in offerings by Global Ship Lease and in demand registrations of the other shareholders. Global Ship Lease is obligated to pay all expenses incidental to the registration, excluding underwriter discounts and commissions.

Item 8.

Financial Information

A. Financial Statements and Other Financial Information

Please see Item 18 below.

Legal Proceedings

We have not been involved in any legal proceedings that may have, or have had a significant effect on our business, financial position, results of operations or liquidity, and we are not aware of any proceedings that are pending or threatened that may have a material effect on our business, financial position, results of operations or liquidity. From time to time, we may be subject to legal proceedings and claims in the ordinary course of business, principally personal injury and property casualty claims associated with operating containerships. We expect that these claims would be covered by insurance, subject to customary deductibles. Claims, even if lacking merit, could result in the expenditure of significant financial and managerial resources.

Dividend Policy

As noted in “Business Overview—Credit Facilities” above, pursuant to the terms of the Credit Facility Amendment, Global Ship Lease has agreed not to declare or pay any dividends to common shareholders until the later of November 30, 2010 or the date at which the leverage ratio falls to 75% or lower. The board of directors intends to review Global Ship Lease’s dividend policy once the company is eligible to resume dividend payments.

Dividends, if any, would be based on available cash flow, rather than net income, after all relevant cash expenditures, including cash interest expense on borrowings that finance operating assets, cash income taxes and after an allowance for the cash cost of future drydockings but not including deductions for non-cash items including depreciation and amortization and changes in the fair values of financial instruments, if any.

In addition to the 46,680,194 Class A common shares outstanding at December 31, 2009, there are 7,405,956 subordinated Class B common shares held by Marathon’s initial stockholders and CMA CGM. During the subordination period, no dividends can be paid on the Class B common shares unless dividends at the rate of $0.23 per share have been paid on all Class A common shares for all quarters. In general, during the subordination period, Global Ship Lease can pay quarterly dividends on its Class A common shares and subordinated Class B common shares from its operating surplus (as defined in the amended and restated articles of incorporation) in the following manner:

first, 100% to all Class A common shares, pro rata, until each outstanding common share has been paid an amount equal to the applicable dividend for that quarter;

second, 100% to all Class A common shares, pro rata, until they have received any unpaid arrearages in the dividend for prior quarters during the subordination period;

third, 100% to all subordinated Class B common shares, pro rata, until each outstanding Class B common share has been paid an amount equal to the applicable dividend for that quarter;

after that, 100% to all Class A and Class B common shares, pro rata, as if they were a single class.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, the dividend rights of the holders of Class B common shares will be subordinated to those of holders of Class A common shares until at least the third quarter of 2011 absent a prior change in control of Global Ship Lease.

The declaration and payment of any dividend is subject at all times to the discretion of Global Ship Lease’s board of directors and will depend on, among other things, its earnings, financial condition and anticipated cash requirements and availability, additional acquisitions of vessels, restrictions under its credit facility, the provisions of Marshall Islands law affecting the payment of distributions to shareholders, required capital and drydocking expenditures, reserves established by its board of directors, increased or unanticipated expenses, a change in its dividend policy, additional borrowings or future issuances of securities and other factors, many of which will be beyond its control.

Global Ship Lease’s ability to pay dividends may be limited by the amount of cash it can generate from operations following the payment of fees and expenses and the establishment of any reserves as well as additional factors unrelated to its profitability. Global Ship Lease is a holding company, and Global Ship Lease will depend on the ability of its subsidiaries to distribute funds to Global Ship Lease in order to satisfy its financial obligations and to pay dividend payments. Further, its board of directors may elect to not distribute any dividends or may significantly reduce the dividends. As a result, the amount of dividends actually paid, if any, may vary from the amount previously paid and such variations may be material. Please see Item 3 – “Key Information—Risk Factors” for a discussion of the risks associated with Global Ship Lease’s ability to pay dividends.

Marshall Islands law generally prohibits the payment of dividends other than from surplus (retained earnings and the excess of consideration received for the sale of shares above the par value of the shares) or while a company is insolvent or would be rendered insolvent by the payment of such a dividend.

Global Ship Lease believes that, under current U.S. federal income tax law, some portion of the distributions you receive from Global Ship Lease will constitute dividends and, if you are an individual that is a citizen or resident of the United States and that meets certain holding period and other requirements, such dividends will be taxable as “qualified dividend income” (subject to a maximum 15% U.S. federal income tax rate through 2010). Please see “Additional Information—Taxation—Tax Consequences of Holding Class A Shares—U.S. holders—Taxation of dividends paid on Class A common shares” for information regarding the eligibility requirements for “qualified dividend income” and for a discussion of proposed legislation that, if enacted, would prevent dividends paid by Global Ship Lease from constituting qualified dividend income.

B. Significant Changes

Not applicable.

Item 9.

The Offer and Listing.

On August 15, 2008, our Class A common shares began trading on the NYSE under the symbol “GSL”.

The following sets forth the high and low closing sales price of our Class A common shares as reported on the NYSE for the periods shown:

Class A Common Shares


Quarter Ended	High		Low
September 30, 2008 (since August 15, 2008)	$	7.64	$	6.33
December 31, 2008	$	6.30	$	2.34
March 31, 2009	$	3.60	$	1.84
June 30, 2009	$	2.35	$	1.75
September 30, 2009	$	2.10	$	1.19
December 31, 2009	$	1.66	$	1.05
March 31, 2010	$	2.66	$	1.45
June 30, 2010	$	3.45	$	2.00
September 30, 2010 (through August 31, 2010)	$	3.29	$	2.31

Item 10. Additional Information

A. Share Capital

Not applicable.

B. Memorandum and Articles of Association

Our Articles of Incorporation have previously been filed as Exhibit C to Exhibit 2.1 of Marathon Acquisition Corp.’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-32983), filed with the SEC on July 8, 2008 and are hereby incorporated by reference into this Annual Report. Our Bylaws have previously been filed as Exhibit 3.2 to Form F-4 (File No. 333-150309) filed with the SEC on April 18, 2008 and are hereby incorporated by reference into this Annual Report.

The necessary actions required to change the rights of shareholders and the conditions governing the manner in which annual general meetings and special meetings of shareholders are convoked are described in our Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws and are hereby incorporated by reference into this Annual Report.

The rights, preferences and restrictions attaching to each class of our capital stock are described in the section “Description of Securities” of our Form F-1 (File No. 333-147070), filed with the SEC on September 12, 2008 and hereby incorporated by reference into this Annual Report and there have been no changes since that date.

There are no limitations on the rights to own securities, including the rights of non-resident or foreign shareholders to hold or exercise voting rights on the securities imposed by the laws of the Republic of the Marshall Islands or by our Articles of Incorporation or Bylaws.

C. Material Contracts

Reference is made to Item 4.B for a description of the time charters, the ship management agreements and the global expense agreement, which are incorporated herein by reference. Reference is made to Item 5.B for a description of our credit facility, which is incorporated herein by reference. Reference is made to Item 6.B for a description of employment agreements, which is incorporated herein by reference. Reference is made to Item 7.B for a description of the registration rights agreement and the stockholders agreement, which are incorporated herein by reference.

D. Exchange Controls

We are not aware of any governmental laws, decrees or regulations in the Republic of The Marshall Islands that restrict the export or import of capital, including foreign exchange controls, or that affect the remittance of dividends, interest or other payments to non-resident holders of our securities.

We are not aware of any limitations on the right of non-resident or foreign owners to hold or vote our securities imposed by the laws of the Republic of the Marshall Islands or our Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws.

E. Taxation

The following represents the material U.S. federal income tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership and disposition of our Class A common shares.

This section is based on current provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”) current and proposed Treasury regulations promulgated thereunder, and administrative and judicial decisions as of the date hereof, all of which are subject to change, possibly on a retroactive basis.

This section does not purport to be a comprehensive description of all of the tax considerations that may be relevant to us or each investor. This section does not address all aspects of U.S. federal income taxation that may be relevant to any particular investor based on such investor’s individual circumstances. In particular, this section considers only investors that will own Class A common shares as capital assets and does not address the potential application of the alternative minimum tax or the U.S. federal income tax consequences to investors that are subject to special treatment, including:

•

broker-dealers;

•

insurance companies;

•

taxpayers who have elected mark-to-market accounting;

•

tax-exempt organizations;

•

regulated investment companies;

•

real estate investment trusts;

•

financial institutions or “financial services entities”;

•

taxpayers who hold Class A common shares as part of a straddle, hedge, conversion transaction or other integrated transaction;

•

certain expatriates or former long-term residents of the United States; and

•

U.S. holders (as defined herein) whose functional currency is not the U.S. dollar.

No ruling has been or will be requested from the IRS regarding any matter affecting us or our shareholders. The statements made herein may be challenged by the IRS and, if so challenged, may not be sustained upon review in a court.

The following does not address any aspect of U.S. federal gift or estate tax laws, or state, local or non-U.S. tax laws. Additionally, the section does not consider the tax treatment of partnerships or other pass-through entities or persons who hold Global Ship Lease’s Class A common shares through such entities. Prospective investors may want to consult their tax advisors regarding the specific tax consequences to them of the acquisition, holding or disposition of Class A common shares, in light of their particular circumstances.

Taxation of Global Ship Lease

Taxation of operating income

Unless exempt from U.S. federal income taxation under the rules described below in “The Section 883 exemption,” a foreign corporation that earns only transportation income is generally subject to U.S. federal income taxation under one of two alternative tax regimes: (1) the 4% gross basis tax or (2) the net basis tax and branch profits tax.

The 4% gross basis tax

For foreign corporations not engaged in a United States trade or business, the United States imposes a 4% U.S. federal income tax (without allowance of any deductions) on the corporation’s United States source gross transportation income. For this purpose, transportation income includes income from the use, hiring or leasing of a vessel, or the performance of services directly related to the use of a vessel (and thus includes time charter and bareboat charter income). The United States source portion of transportation income includes 50% of the income attributable to voyages that begin or end (but not both) in the United States. Generally, no amount of the income from voyages that begin and end outside the United States is treated as United States source, and consequently none of the transportation income attributable to such voyages is subject to this 4% tax. Although the entire amount of transportation income from voyages that begin and end in the United States would be United States source, Global Ship Lease does not expect to have any transportation income from voyages that begin and end in the United States.

The net basis tax and branch profits tax

Global Ship Lease does not expect to engage in any activities in the United States or otherwise have a fixed place of business in the United States. Nonetheless, if this situation were to change or Global Ship Lease were to be treated as engaged in a United States trade or business, all or a portion of Global Ship Lease’s taxable income, including gain from the sale of vessels, could be treated as effectively connected with the conduct of this United States trade or business, or effectively connected income. Any effectively connected income would be subject to U.S. federal corporate income tax (with the highest statutory rate currently being 35%). In addition, an additional 30% branch profits tax would be imposed on Global Ship Lease at such time as Global Ship Lease’s after-tax effectively connected income is viewed as having been repatriated to Global Ship Lease’s offshore office. The 4% gross basis tax described above is inapplicable to income that is treated as effectively connected income.

The Section 883 exemption

Both the 4% gross basis tax and the net basis and branch profits taxes described above are inapplicable to U.S. source transportation income that qualifies for exemption under Section 883 of the Code. To qualify for the Section 883 exemption a foreign corporation must, among other things:

•

be organized in a jurisdiction outside the United States that grants an equivalent exemption from tax to corporations organized in the United States, which we call an Equivalent Exemption;

•

satisfy one of the following three ownership tests (discussed in more detail below): (1) the more than 50% ownership test, or 50% Ownership Test, (2) the controlled foreign corporation test, or CFC Test or (3) the “Publicly Traded Test”; and

•

meet certain substantiation, reporting and other requirements (which include the filing of United States income tax returns).

Global Ship Lease is organized under the laws of the Marshall Islands. Each of the vessels in the fleet is owned by a separate wholly owned subsidiary organized either in the Marshall Islands or Cyprus. The United States Treasury Department recognizes both the Marshall Islands and Cyprus as jurisdictions that grant an Equivalent Exemption; therefore, Global Ship Lease should meet the first requirement for the Section 883 exemption. Additionally, Global Ship Lease intends to comply with the substantiation, reporting and other requirements that are applicable under Section 883 of the Code. As a result, qualification for the Section 883 exemption will turn primarily on Global Ship Lease’s ability to satisfy the second requirement enumerated above.

(1) The 50% Ownership Test

In order to satisfy the 50% Ownership Test, a non-United States corporation must be able to substantiate that more than 50% of the value of its stock is owned, directly or indirectly, by “qualified shareholders.” For this purpose, qualified shareholders are: (1) individuals who are residents (as defined in the regulations promulgated under Section 883 of the Code, or Section 883 Regulations) of countries, other than the United States, that grant an Equivalent Exemption, (2) non-United States corporations that meet the Publicly Traded Test of the Section 883 Regulations and are organized in countries that grant an Equivalent Exemption, or (3) certain foreign governments, non-profit organizations, and certain beneficiaries of foreign pension funds. A corporation claiming the Section 883 exemption based on the 50% Ownership Test must obtain all the facts necessary to satisfy the IRS that the 50% Ownership Test has been satisfied (as detailed in the Section 883 Regulations). Global Ship Lease believes that it satisfied the 50% Ownership Test up to and including 2008 due to being a wholly owned subsidiary of CMA CGM until the merger on August 14, 2008 but does not believe that it will be able to satisfy the 50% Ownership Test for 2009 and beyond due to its lack of knowledge of the direct and indirect owners of entities which own its Class A common shares.

(2) The CFC Test

The CFC Test requires that the non-United States corporation be treated as a controlled foreign corporation, or CFC, for U.S. federal income tax purposes. As discussed below at “Tax Consequences of Holding Class A Common Shares—U.S. holders—Possible treatment as a controlled foreign corporation,” Global Ship Lease cannot predict at this time whether it will be a CFC.

(3) The Publicly Traded Test

The Publicly Traded Test requires that one or more classes of equity representing more than 50% of the voting power and value in a non-United States corporation be “primarily and regularly traded” on an established securities market either in the United States or in a foreign country that grants an Equivalent Exemption.

The Section 883 Regulations provide, in pertinent part, that stock of a non-United States corporation will be considered to be “primarily traded” on an established securities market in a given country if the number of shares of each class of stock that are traded during any taxable year on all established securities markets in that country exceeds the number of shares in each such class that are traded during that year on established securities markets in any other single country. Global Ship Lease’s Class A common shares are listed on the NYSE, and are not listed on any other securities exchange. Therefore, the Class A common shares should be treated as primarily traded on an established securities market in the United States. Moreover, the Class A common shares represent more than 50% of both the voting power and value of all classes of shares of Global Ship Lease.

The Section 883 Regulations also generally provide that stock will be considered to be “regularly traded” on an established securities market if one or more classes of stock in the corporation representing in the aggregate more than 50% of the total combined voting power and value of all classes of stock of the corporation are listed on an established securities market during the taxable year. However, even if a class of shares is so listed, it is not treated as regularly traded under the Section 883 Regulations unless (1) trades are made in the common shares on the established securities market, other than in minimal quantities, on at least 60 days during the taxable year (or ¹/ 6 of the days in a short taxable year); and (2) the aggregate number of common shares traded on the established securities market during the taxable year is at least 10% of the average number of outstanding common shares during that year (as appropriately adjusted in the case of a short taxable year). Even if these trading frequency and trading volume tests are not satisfied with respect to the Class A common shares, however, the Section 883 Regulations provide that such tests will be deemed satisfied if the Class A common shares are regularly quoted by dealers making a market in such Class A common shares. While Global Ship Lease anticipates that these trading frequency and trading volume tests will be satisfied each year, satisfaction of these requirements is outside of Global Ship Lease’s control and, hence, no assurances can be provided that Global Ship Lease will satisfy the Publicly Traded Test each year.

In addition, even if the “primarily and regularly traded” tests described above are satisfied, a class of stock will not be treated as primarily and regularly traded on an established securities market if, during more than half the number of days during the taxable year, one or more shareholders holding, directly or indirectly, at least 5% of the vote and value of that class of stock, or 5% Shareholders, own, in the aggregate, 50% or more of the vote and value of that class of stock. This is referred to as the 5% Override Rule. In performing the analysis, the company is entitled to rely on current Schedule 13D and 13G filings with the SEC to identify its 5% Shareholders, without having to make any independent investigation to determine the identity of the 5% Shareholder. In the event the 5% Override Rule is triggered, the Section 883 Regulations provide that the 5% Override Rule will nevertheless not apply if the

company can establish that among the closely-held group of 5% Shareholders, sufficient shares are owned by 5% Shareholders that are considered to be “qualified shareholders”, as defined above, to preclude non-qualified 5% Shareholders in the closely-held group from owning 50% or more of the value of the class of stock for more than half the number of days during the taxable year. Based on information currently available to Global Ship Lease on its shareholders, it appears that the 5% Override Rule did not apply for 2009 and will continue to not apply if such shareholders were to retain the Global Ship Lease Class A common shares throughout 2010 and the company was to satisfy certain substantiation requirements. However, it is possible that Global Ship Lease’s ownership may change such that the 5% Override Rule may apply. The ability to avoid application of the 5% Override Rule will be outside of Global Ship Lease’s control and, as a result, no assurances can be provided that Global Ship Lease will satisfy the Publicly Traded Test for any year.

If Global Ship Lease were not to qualify for the Section 883 exemption in any year, the United States income taxes that become payable could have a negative effect on Global Ship Lease’s business, and could result in decreased earnings available for distribution to Global Ship Lease’s shareholders. However, under the charter agreements, the initial Charterer has agreed to provide reimbursement for any such taxes.

United States taxation of gain on sale of vessels

If Global Ship Lease qualifies for the Section 883 exemption, then gain from the sale of any vessel may be exempt from tax under Section 883. Even if such gain is not exempt from tax under Section 883, Global Ship Lease will not be subject to U.S. federal income taxation with respect to such gain, assuming that Global Ship Lease is not, and has never been, engaged in a U.S. trade or business. Under certain circumstances, if Global Ship Lease is so engaged, gain on sale of vessels could be subject to U.S. federal income tax.

Possibility of taxation as a U.S. corporation

Under changes made to the Code by the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004, which added Section 7874 of the Code, a foreign corporation which acquires substantially all the properties of a U.S. corporation is generally treated, for U.S. federal tax purposes, as though it were a U.S. corporation if, after the acquisition, at least 80% (by vote or value) of the stock of the foreign corporation is owned by former shareholders of the U.S. corporation by reason of owning stock in the U.S. corporation. Marathon has received a legal opinion of Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP that this rule should not apply to Global Ship Lease following the Merger. The opinions of tax counsel neither bind the IRS nor preclude the IRS or courts from adopting a contrary position. Marathon did not obtain a ruling from the IRS on the application of Section 7874 of the Code to the Merger. Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP has not undertaken any obligation to update its opinion.

Such opinion relied, in part, on assumptions, representations and other information as to certain factual matters, including the value per share of Global Ship Lease Class B stock and Class C stock relative to the market value per share of Global Ship Lease Class A stock. Valuation is a question of fact and is subjective. If the IRS were successfully to challenge the correctness of any such assumptions, representations or other information, it is possible that Section 7874 of the Code could apply.

In addition, there is no definitive legal authority applying the rules under Section 7874 of the Code. Therefore, no assurance can be provided that the IRS will not successfully assert that Global Ship Lease should be treated as a U.S. corporation, in which case Global Ship Lease’s net income would be subject to U.S. federal corporate income tax (with the highest statutory rate currently being 35%).

Tax Consequences of Holding Class A Common Shares

U.S. holders

For purposes of this discussion, a U.S. holder is a beneficial owner of Global Ship Lease Class A common shares that is:

•

an individual who is a citizen or resident of the United States;

•

a corporation (or other entity taxed as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes) created or organized under the laws of the United States, any state thereof or the District of Columbia;

•

an estate whose income is includible in gross income for U.S. federal income tax purposes regardless of its source; or

•

a trust if (i) a court within the United States is able to exercise primary supervision over the administration of the trust and one or more U.S. persons have the authority to control all substantial decisions of the trust, or (ii) it has in effect a valid election to be treated as a U.S. person.

Taxation of dividends paid on Class A common shares

When Global Ship Lease makes a distribution with respect to its Class A common shares, subject to the discussions of the passive foreign investment company, or PFIC, and CFC rules below, a U.S. holder will be required to include in gross income as foreign source dividend income the amount of the distribution to the extent paid out of Global Ship Lease’s current or accumulated earnings

and profits as determined for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Distributions in excess of such earnings and profits will be applied against and will reduce the U.S. holder’s tax basis in the Class A common shares and, to the extent in excess of such basis, will be treated as gain from the sale or exchange of the Class A common shares.

Subject to the discussions of the PFIC and CFC rules below, in the case of a U.S. holder that is a corporation, dividends that Global Ship Lease pays will generally be taxable at regular corporate rates of up to 35% and generally will not qualify for a dividends-received deduction available for dividends received from United States corporations. In the case of certain non-corporate U.S. holders, dividends that Global Ship Lease pays prior to January 1, 2011 generally will be subject to tax at a maximum rate of 15%, provided that the U.S. holder meets certain holding period and other requirements and Global Ship Lease is not a PFIC in the taxable year in which the dividends are paid or in the immediately preceding taxable year. Legislation has been introduced which, if enacted, would deny the benefit of the 15% maximum rate to dividends that Global Ship Lease pays. Global Ship Lease cannot predict whether such legislation will be enacted, or, if so, what its effective date might be.

Taxation of the disposition of Class A common shares

Subject to the discussions of the PFIC and CFC rules below, upon the sale, exchange or other disposition of Class A common shares, a U.S. holder will recognize capital gain or loss in an amount equal to the difference between the amount realized on the disposition and such U.S. holder’s tax basis in its Class A common shares.

Subject to the discussions of the PFIC and CFC rules below, capital gain from the sale, exchange or other disposition of Class A common shares held more than one year is long-term capital gain, and is eligible for a reduced rate of taxation for individuals. Gain recognized by a U.S. holder on a sale, exchange or other disposition of Class A common shares generally will be treated as U.S. source income. A loss recognized by a U.S. holder on the sale, exchange or other disposition of Class A common shares generally will be allocated to U.S. source income. The deductibility of a capital loss recognized on the sale, exchange or other disposition of Class A common shares may be subject to limitations, and U.S. holders may want to consult their own tax advisors regarding their ability to deduct any such capital loss in light of their particular circumstances.

Consequences of possible passive foreign investment company classification

A non-United States entity treated as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes will be a PFIC in any taxable year in which, after taking into account the income and assets of the corporation and certain subsidiaries pursuant to a “look through” rule, either: (1) 75% or more of its gross income is “passive” income or (2) 50% or more of the average value of its assets is attributable to assets that produce passive income or are held for the production of passive income. If a corporation is a PFIC in any taxable year that a person holds stock in the corporation (and was not a qualified electing fund with respect to such year, as discussed below), the stock held by such person will be treated as stock in a PFIC for all future years (absent an election which, if made, may require the electing person to pay taxes in the year of the election).

While there are legal uncertainties involved in this determination, Simpson Thacher has advised Global Ship Lease, and has delivered an opinion to the effect, that (1) the charters Global Ship Lease has entered into with CMA CGM should constitute service contracts rather than leases for U.S. federal income tax purposes and (2) as a result, the income from these charters should not constitute “passive income,” and the assets that Global Ship Lease owns for the production of this income should not constitute passive assets. Simpson Thacher’s opinion was based on certain representations that Global Ship Lease made to counsel including:

•

the terms of the charters that Global Ship Lease has entered into with CMA CGM were negotiated at arm’s-length, and the terms of the charters are customary for long-term charters of comparable vessels;

•

the terms of the ship management agreements and the global expense agreement that Global Ship Lease has entered into with CMA Ships were negotiated at arm’s-length and are reflective of the terms that Global Ship Lease believes could be reached in an agreement between unrelated third parties;

•

all charters that Global Ship Lease has entered into with CMA CGM and all ship management agreements that Global Ship Lease has entered into with CMA Ships are substantially similar to the charter and the ship management agreement that Global Ship Lease provided to Simpson Thacher for its review;

•

each vessel in Global Ship Lease’s initial and contracted fleet had, at charter inception, a remaining economic useful life of no less than (a) 30 years minus (b) the age of the vessel at charter inception; and

•

the total payments due to Global Ship Lease under each of the charters with CMA CGM were, at the time each such charter was entered into, substantially in excess of the bareboat charter rate for a comparable vessel.

Simpson Thacher’s opinion was also based on a representation that Global Ship Lease and Marathon made to counsel that, for each of the ship management agreements with CMA Ships, Global Ship Lease will enter into replacement ship management agreements with ship managers unrelated to CMA Ships or any of its affiliates on or prior to the expiration of each agreement’s initial three year term.

Based on this opinion (and Global Ship Lease’s expectation that the representations set forth above will apply equally to any future charters that Global Ship Lease enters into, that the terms of any future charters that Global Ship Lease enters into will contain terms that are substantially similar to those contained in the charter that was provided to Simpson Thacher for its review, that Global Ship Lease’s income from its chartering activities will be greater than 25% of Global Ship Lease’s total gross income at all relevant times and that the gross value of Global Ship Lease’s vessels subject to charter will exceed the gross value of all other assets Global Ship Lease owns at all relevant times), Global Ship Lease does not expect that it will constitute a PFIC with respect to any taxable year.

There can be no assurance that the representations made by Global Ship Lease, GSL Holdings, and Marathon will prove correct or that the nature of Global Ship Lease’s assets, income and operations will remain the same in the future (notwithstanding Global Ship Lease’s current expectations). Simpson Thacher has not undertaken any obligation to update its opinion. Further, in a recent case not concerning PFICs, Tidewater Inc. v. U.S., 2009-1 USTC ¶ 50,337, the Fifth Circuit held that a vessel time charter at issue generated rental, rather than services, income. However, the court’s ruling was contrary to the position of the IRS that the time charter income should be treated as services income, and the terms of the time charter in that case differ in material respects from the terms of most of our time charters. No assurance can be given that the IRS or a court of law will accept Simpson Thacher’s position that the charters Global Ship Lease has entered into with CMA CGM constitute service contracts rather than leases for U.S. federal income tax purposes, or that future changes of law will not adversely affect Simpson Thacher’s opinion. Unlike a ruling, an opinion of counsel represents only that counsel’s best legal judgment (based on the law then in effect) and does not bind the IRS or the courts. Any contest with the IRS may materially and adversely impact the market for the Class A common shares and the prices at which Class A common shares trade. In addition, the costs of any contest with the IRS will result in a reduction in cash available for distribution and thus will be borne indirectly by Global Ship Lease’s shareholders.

If Global Ship Lease were to be classified as a PFIC in any year, each U.S. holder of Global Ship Lease’s Class A common shares will be subject (in that year and all subsequent years) to special rules with respect to: (1) any “excess distribution” (generally defined as any distribution received by a shareholder in a taxable year that is greater than 125% of the average annual distributions received by the shareholder in the three preceding taxable years or, if shorter, the shareholder’s holding period for the Class A common shares), and (2) any gain realized upon the sale or other disposition of the Class A common shares. Under these rules:

•

the excess distribution or gain will be allocated ratably over the U.S. holder’s holding period for its Class A common shares;

•

the amount allocated to the current taxable year and any year prior to the first year in which Global Ship Lease was a PFIC will be taxed as ordinary income in the current year; and

•

the amount allocated to each of the other taxable years in the U.S. holder’s holding period for its Class A common shares will be subject to U.S. federal income tax at the highest rate in effect for the applicable class of taxpayer for that year, and an interest charge will be added as though the amount of the taxes computed with respect to these other taxable years were overdue.

In order to avoid the application of the PFIC rules, U.S. holders of Global Ship Lease Class A common shares may make a qualified electing fund, or a QEF, election provided in Section 1295 of the Code. In lieu of the PFIC rules discussed above, a U.S. holder that makes a valid QEF election will, in very general terms, be required to include its pro rata share of Global Ship Lease’s ordinary income and net capital gains, unreduced by any prior year losses, in income for each taxable year (as ordinary income and long-term capital gain, respectively) and to pay tax thereon, even if the amount of that income is not the same as the distributions paid on the Class A common shares during the year. If Global Ship Lease later distributes the income or gain on which the U.S. holder has already paid taxes under the QEF rules, the amounts so distributed will not again be subject to tax in the hands of the U.S. holder. A U.S. holder’s tax basis in any Class A common shares as to which a QEF election has been validly made will be increased by the amount included in such U.S. holder’s income as a result of the QEF election and decreased by the amount of nontaxable distributions received by the U.S. holder. On the disposition of a common share, a U.S. holder making the QEF election generally will recognize capital gain or loss equal to the difference, if any, between the amount realized upon such disposition and its adjusted tax basis in the common share. In general, a QEF election should be made on or before the due date for filing a U.S. holder’s federal income tax return for the first taxable year for which Global Ship Lease is a PFIC or, if later, the first taxable year for which the U.S. holder held common stock. In this regard, a QEF election is effective only if certain required information is made available by the PFIC. Subsequent to the date that Global Ship Lease first determines that it is a PFIC, Global Ship Lease will use commercially reasonable efforts to provide any U.S. holder of Class A common shares, upon request, with the information necessary for such U.S. holder to make the QEF election. If Global Ship Lease does not believe that it is a PFIC for a particular year but it is ultimately determined that it was a PFIC, it may not be possible for a holder to make a QEF election for such year.

In addition to the QEF election, Section 1296 of the Code permits United States persons to make a “mark-to-market” election with respect to marketable stock in a PFIC. If a U.S. holder of Global Ship Lease Class A common shares makes a mark-to-market election, such U.S. holder generally would, in each taxable year: (1) include as ordinary income the excess, if any, of the fair market value of the Class A common shares at the end of the taxable year over such U.S. holder’s adjusted tax basis in the Class A common shares, and (2) be permitted an ordinary loss in respect of the excess, if any, of such U.S. holder’s adjusted tax basis in the Class A common shares over their fair market value at the end of the taxable year, but only to the extent of the net amount previously included in income as a result of the mark-to-market election (with the U.S. holder’s basis in the Class A common shares being increased and decreased, respectively, by the amount of such ordinary income or ordinary loss). The consequences of this election are generally less favorable than those of a QEF election for U.S. holders that are sensitive to the distinction between ordinary income and capital gain, although this is not necessarily the case. U.S. holders may want to consult their tax advisors as to the consequences to them of making a mark-to-market or QEF election, as well as other U.S. federal income tax consequences of holding stock in a PFIC in light of their particular circumstances.

As previously indicated, if Global Ship Lease were to be classified as a PFIC for a taxable year in which Global Ship Lease pays a dividend or the immediately preceding taxable year, dividends paid by Global Ship Lease would not constitute “qualified dividend income” and, hence, would not be eligible for the reduced rate of U.S. federal income tax.

Possible treatment as a controlled foreign corporation

If more than 50% of the voting power or value of Global Ship Lease’s shares is owned by U.S. persons (within the meaning of the Code) who each own (directly or through application of certain rules of attribution) 10% or more of the voting power of the shares, or U.S 10% Holders, Global Ship Lease will be a controlled foreign corporation, or a CFC. If Global Ship Lease is so treated, there will be additional tax consequences to U.S. 10% Holders. In particular, in each year Global Ship Lease is a CFC, such U.S. 10% Holders who directly or indirectly own Global Ship Lease shares on the last day of the year will be required to include in ordinary income their pro rata share of Global Ship Lease’s “Subpart F income,” even if no distributions are made, for each such year. Such inclusions will not be eligible for the 15% maximum rate of tax on qualified dividends received by non-corporate taxpayers. In general, Subpart F income will include dividends, interest, royalties and other passive income of Global Ship Lease, but will not include active business income. Global Ship Lease believes, and intends to take the position, that the charters Global Ship Lease has entered into should not generate passive income, and thus the income generated by Global Ship Lease’s charters should not be treated as Subpart F income to its U.S. 10% Holders, although no assurance can be provided that the IRS will not successfully challenge such position.

Additionally, if Global Ship Lease is treated as a CFC, gain realized by a U.S. 10% Holder on the sale or other disposition of Class A common shares may be treated as dividend income to the extent of certain accumulated earnings and profits of Global Ship Lease. Moreover, for taxable years of a U.S. 10% Holder in which Global Ship Lease is a CFC, and taxable years of Global Ship Lease that end with or within such taxable years of such U.S. 10% Holders, Global Ship Lease generally will not be treated as a PFIC with respect to Class A common shares held by such U.S. 10% Holder (but may be treated as a PFIC with respect to other U.S. holders). However, it appears that a U.S. 10% Holder of a CFC who disposes of common shares received upon exercise of warrants may be subject to tax treatment under the PFIC regime with respect to such common shares. Each U.S. holder is advised to consult such U.S. holder’s own tax advisor concerning the PFIC and CFC rules with respect to ownership and disposition of Class A common shares received upon the exercise of warrants.

Global Ship Lease believes that it is not a CFC but cannot predict whether it will become a CFC, and satisfaction of the CFC definitional test is outside of Global Ship Lease’s control. U.S. holders may want to consult their own tax advisors concerning the application of the controlled foreign corporation rules to them in light of their particular circumstances.

Non-U.S. holders

For purposes of this discussion, a non-U.S. holder is a beneficial owner of Global Ship Lease Class A common shares that is neither a U.S. holder nor a partnership (or any other entity taxed as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes).

A non-U.S. holder will generally not be subject to U.S. federal income tax on dividends paid in respect of the Class A common shares or on gains recognized in connection with the sale or other disposition of the Class A common shares, provided, in each case, that the non-U.S. holder makes certain tax representations regarding the identity of the beneficial owner of the Class A common shares, and that such dividends or gains are not effectively connected with the non-U.S. holder’s conduct of a United States trade or business.

Dividends or gains that are effectively connected with a non-U.S. holder’s conduct of a United States trade or business (and, if required by an applicable income tax treaty, are attributable to a United States permanent establishment) are subject to U.S. federal income tax on a net income basis in the same manner as if the non-U.S. holder were a U.S. holder, and may be subject to an additional “branch profits tax” at a 30% rate or such lower rate as may be specified by an applicable income tax treaty.

If Global Ship Lease is treated as a U.S. corporation pursuant to Section 7874 of the Code, non-U.S. holders generally will be subject to withholding tax at a rate of 30% on all dividends paid by Global Ship Lease, unless a reduced rate of tax is available under a tax treaty.

Information Reporting and Back-up Withholding

U.S. holders generally are subject to information reporting requirements with respect to dividends paid on Class A common shares, and on the proceeds from the sale, exchange or disposition of Class A common shares. In addition, a holder may be subject to back-up withholding (currently at 28%) on dividends paid on Class A common shares, and on the proceeds from the sale, exchange or other disposition of Class A common shares, unless the holder provides certain identifying information, such as a duly executed IRS Form W-9 or W-8BEN, or otherwise establishes an exemption. Back-up withholding is not an additional tax and the amount of any back-up withholding will be allowable as a credit against a holder’s U.S. federal income tax liability and may entitle such holder to a refund, provided that certain required information is timely furnished to the IRS.

F. Dividends and Paying Agents

Not applicable.

G. Statements by Experts

Not applicable.

H. Documents on Display

Documents concerning us that are referred to herein may be inspected at the offices of our subsidiary Global Ship Lease Services Limited, Portland House, Stag Place, London SW1E 5RS, United Kingdom. Those documents electronically filed via the Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis, and Retrieval (or EDGAR) system may also be obtained from the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov or from the SEC public reference room at 100 F Street, N.E., Room 1580, Washington, D.C. 20549. Further information on the operation of the public reference rooms may be obtained by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. Copies of documents can be requested from the SEC public reference rooms for a copying fee.

Item 11.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Interest Rate Risk

Global Ship Lease is exposed to the impact of interest rate changes primarily through its floating-rate borrowings under Global Ship Lease’s credit facility and its $48 million preferred shares. Significant increases in interest rates could adversely affect Global Ship Lease’s results of operations and its ability to service its own debt. The Predecessor Group did not enter into interest rate swap agreements to reduce its exposure to cash flow risks from changing interest rates.

In connection with Global Ship Lease’s credit facility and as part of overall risk management, it has entered into interest rate swap agreements to reduce its exposure to market risks of variable interest rates. The swaps are not accounted for as hedging instruments as for accounting purposes they are not expected to be effective in mitigating the risks of changes in interest rates over the term of the debt and they do not meet all U.S. GAAP requirements. As a result, changes in the fair value of the interest rates swaps (mark to market adjustment) are included in earnings each period.

Counterparties to these financial instruments expose Global Ship Lease to credit-related losses in the event of non-performance; however, counterparties to these agreements are major financial institutions, and Global Ship Lease considers the risk of loss due to non-performance to be minimal. Global Ship Lease will not require collateral from these institutions. Global Ship Lease will not enter into interest rate swaps for trading purposes.

Sensitivity Analysis

Global Ship Lease’s analysis of the potential effects of variations in market interest rates is based on a sensitivity analysis, which models the effects of potential market interest rate changes on Global Ship Lease’s financial condition and results of operations. The following sensitivity analysis may have limited use as a benchmark and should not be viewed as a forecast as it does not include a variety of other potential factors that could affect Global Ship Lease’s business as a result of changes in interest rates.

Without applying the effect of any interest rate swap arrangements that Global Ship Lease has entered into in connection with Global Ship Lease’s credit facility, and based on borrowings under the credit facility together with the preferred shares and ignoring cash on deposit as of December 31, 2009, a hypothetical 1% increase in LIBOR would have the impact of reducing Global Ship Lease’s net income, before income taxes, by approximately $6.4 million.

The interest rate swaps agreements that Global Ship Lease entered into in connection with the credit facility is intended to minimize the risks associated with Global Ship Lease’s variable rate debt under its credit facility. Global Ship Lease expects that these interest rate swaps will significantly reduce the additional cash interest expense that could be caused by upward changes in variable market interest rates.

Foreign Currency Exchange Risk

The shipping industry’s functional currency is the United States dollar. All of Global Ship Lease’s revenues and the majority of Global Ship Lease’s operating costs are in United States dollars. In the future, Global Ship Lease does not expect to be exposed to any significant extent to the impact of changes in foreign currency exchange rates. Consequently, Global Ship Lease does not presently intend to enter into derivative instruments to hedge the foreign currency translation of assets or liabilities or foreign currency transactions or to use financial instruments for trading or other speculative purposes.

Inflation

With the exception of rising costs associated with the employment of international crews for Global Ship Lease’s vessels and the impact of the price of lube oil costs, Global Ship Lease does not believe that inflation has had or is likely, in the foreseeable future, to have a significant impact on vessel operating expenses, drydocking expenses and general and administrative expenses. For the duration of the Ship Management Agreements, daily operating costs, including the costs of crews and lube oils, are capped as discussed elsewhere in this Annual Report.

Item 12.

Description of Securities Other than Equity Securities

Not applicable.

PART II

Item 13.

Defaults, Dividend Arrearages and Delinquencies

None.

Item 14.

Material Modifications to the Rights of Security Holders and Use of Proceeds

None.

Item 15.

Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

As required by Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15 under the Exchange Act, management has evaluated, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Disclosure controls and procedures refer to controls and other procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the SEC. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in our reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding our required disclosure. In designing and evaluating our disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management was required to apply its judgment in evaluating and implementing possible controls and procedures.

Based on the foregoing, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of December 31, 2009, the end of the period covered by this report, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Management acknowledges its responsibility for establishing and maintaining adequate internal controls over financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting refers to a process designed by, or under the supervision of, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer and effected by our board of directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and includes those policies and procedures that:

•

Relate to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets;

•

provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and members of our board of directors; and

•

provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on our financial statements.

Internal control over financial reporting cannot provide absolute assurance of achieving financial reporting objectives because of its

inherent limitations. Internal control over financial reporting is a process that involves human diligence and compliance and is subject to lapses in judgment and breakdowns resulting from human failures. Internal control over financial reporting also can be circumvented by collusion or improper override. Because of such limitations, there is a risk that material misstatements may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis by internal control over financial reporting. However, these inherent limitations are known features of the financial reporting process, and it is possible to design into the process safeguards to reduce, though not eliminate, this risk.

Management evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009 using the framework set forth in the report of the Treadway Commission’s Committee of Sponsoring Organizations. Based on the foregoing, management has concluded that internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2009.

The effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009 has been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers Audit, France, the independent registered public accounting firm that audited the company’s December 31, 2009 combined financial statements, as stated in their report which is included herein.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

In accordance with Rule 13a-15(d), management has evaluated, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, whether any changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during our last fiscal year have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

During the year ended December 31, 2009 there were no changes with regard to internal control over financial reporting that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to materially affect the Company’s internal control over financial reporting

Item 16A.

Audit Committee Financial Expert

The Board has determined that director and member of the Audit Committee, Jeffrey D. Pribor, qualifies as an audit committee financial expert and is independent under applicable NYSE and SEC standards.

Item 16B.

Code of Ethics

We have adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for all employees and directors. This document is available in the Corporate Governance section of our website (www.globalshiplease.com). We also intend to disclose any waivers to or amendments of our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for the benefit of our directors and executive officers on our website. We will provide a hard copy of our Code of Ethics free of charge upon written request of a shareholder.

Item 16C.

Principal Accountant Fees and Services

Our principal accountant for 2009 and 2008 was PricewaterhouseCoopers Audit, France, an independent registered public accounting firm.

Fees Incurred by Global Ship Lease for PricewaterhouseCoopers Audit’s Services

In 2009 and 2008, the fees rendered by the auditors were as follows:


	2009 (Successor)		2008 (Predecessor for the period from January 1, 2008 to August 14, 2008)		2008 (Successor for the period from August 15, 2008 to December 31, 2008)
Audit Fees	$	383,753	$	403,250	$	342,118
Audit-Related Fees		—		7,250		—
Tax Fees		60,386		32,389		32,389
All Other Fees		—		—		—
	$	444,140	$	442,889	$	374,507

Audit Fees

Audit fees represent professional services rendered for the audit of our combined annual financial statements, the quarterly reviews and services provided by our principal accountant in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements. Included in Audit Fees for the Predecessor period 2008 is $403,250 for professional services rendered in connection with the review of our regulatory filings for our merger.

Audit-Related Fees

Audit-Related fees consist of assurance and related services rendered by the principal accountant related to the performance of the audit or review of our combined financial statements which have not been reported under Audit Fees above.

Tax Fees

Tax fees for 2009 and 2008 are primarily for tax consultation services.

The Audit Committee has the authority to pre-approve permissible audit-related and non-audit services not prohibited by law to be performed by our independent auditors and associated fees. Engagements for proposed services either may be separately pre-approved by the Audit Committee or entered into pursuant to detailed pre-approval policies and procedures established by the Audit Committee, as long as the Audit Committee is informed on a timely basis of any engagement entered into on that basis. The Audit Committee separately pre-approved all engagements and fees paid to our principal accountant after the Merger which took place in August 2008.

Item 16D.

Exemptions from the Listing Standards for Audit Committees

Not applicable.

Item 16E.

Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers

Not applicable.

Item 16F.

Change in Registrants’ Certifying Accountant

Not applicable.

Item 16G.

Corporate Governance

Not applicable.

The following are the significant ways in which our corporate governance practices differ from those followed by domestic companies:

•

we hold annual meetings of shareholders under the Business Corporations Act of the Republic of the Marshall Islands, similar to NYSE requirements; and

•

in lieu of obtaining shareholder approval prior to the adoption of equity compensation plans, the full board of directors approves such adoption.

U.S. issuers are required to have a compensation committee that is comprised entirely of independent directors. Although as a foreign private issuer this rule does not apply to us, we have a compensation committee that consists of four directors, all of whom satisfy NYSE standards for independence.

PART III

Item 17.

Financial Statements

Not applicable.

Item 18.

Financial Statements

The following financial statements, together with the report of PricewaterhouseCoopers Audit thereon, are filed as part of this Annual Report:


		Page
GLOBAL SHIP LEASE, INC.
Audited
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm		F-1
Combined Balance Sheets as at December 31, 2009 and 2008		F-2
Combined Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007		F-4
Combined Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007		F-6
Combined Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007		F-8
Notes to the Combined Financial Statements		F-10

Item 19.

Exhibits

The following exhibits are filed as part of this Annual Report:


Exhibit Number		Description
1.1		Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of GSL Holdings, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit C to Exhibit 2.1 Marathon Acquisition Corp.’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-32983) filed on July 8, 2008).

1.2		Amended and Restated By-laws of GSL Holdings, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of Global Ship Lease, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form F-4 (File No. 333-150309) filed on April 18, 2008).

2.1		Specimen Unit certificate (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of Global Ship Lease, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form F-1 (File No. 333-153448) filed on September 12, 2008).

2.2		Specimen Class A common share certificate (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of Global Ship Lease, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form F-1 (File No. 333-153448) filed on September 12, 2008).

2.3		Specimen Warrant certificate (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 of Global Ship Lease, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form F-1 (File No. 333-153448) filed on September 12, 2008).

2.4		Warrant Agreement entered into by The Bank of New York and Marathon Acquisition Corp. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 of Global Ship Lease, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form F-1 (File No. 333-153448) filed on September 12, 2008).

2.5		First Supplemental Warrant Agreement, dated March 18, 2008, between Marathon Acquisition Corp. and the Warrant Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of Marathon Acquisition Corp.’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-32983) filed on March 25, 2008).

2.6		Second Supplemental Warrant Agreement, dated March 24, 2008, between Marathon Acquisition Corp. and the Warrant Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 of Marathon Acquisition Corp.’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-32983) filed on March 25, 2008).

2.7		Third Supplemental Warrant Agreement between Marathon Acquisition Corp. and the Warrant Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of Global Ship Lease, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form F-4 (File No. 333-150309) filed on August 7, 2008).

4.1		Agreement and Plan of Merger by and among Marathon Acquisition Corp., GSL Holdings, Inc., Global Ship Lease, Inc. and CMA CGM S.A., dated as of March 21, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 of Marathon Acquisition Corp.’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-32983) filed on March 25, 2008).

4.2		Amendment, dated as of June 2, 2008, to Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of March 21, 2008, among Marathon Acquisition Corp., GSL Holdings, Inc., CMA CGM S.A. and Global Ship Lease, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 of Marathon Acquisition Corp.’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-32983) filed on June 3, 2008).

4.3		Second Amendment, dated as of July 3, 2008, to Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of March 21, 2008, among Marathon Acquisition Corp., GSL Holdings, Inc., CMA CGM S.A. and Global Ship Lease, Inc., as amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 of Marathon Acquisition Corp.’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-32983) filed on July 8, 2008).

4.4		Form of Registration Rights Agreement between GSL Holdings, Inc., Marathon Founders, LLC, Marathon Investors, LLC, the insiders listed on the signature page thereto and CMA CGM S.A. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit A-1 to Exhibit 2.1 of Marathon Acquisition Corp.’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-32983) filed on July 24, 2008).

4.5		Founder Warrant Purchase Agreement, dated as of May 11, 2006, between Marathon Acquisition Corp. and Marathon Investors, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 of Amendment No. 1 to Marathon Acquisition Corp.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-134078) filed on June 29, 2006).

4.6		First Supplemental Founder Warrant Purchase Agreement, dated March 18, 2008, between the Marathon Acquisition Corp. and Marathon Investors, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of Marathon Acquisition Corp.’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-32983) filed on March 25, 2008).

4.7		Founder Unit Purchase Agreement, dated as of May 11, 2006 among Marathon Acquisition Corp. and Marathon Founders, LLC and certain directors of Marathon (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 of Amendment No. 1 to Marathon Acquisition Corp.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-134078) filed on June 29, 2006).


Exhibit Number		Description
4.8		Form Indemnification Agreement between Marathon Acquisition Corp. and each of its directors and executive officers (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 of Amendment No. 2 to Marathon Acquisition Corp.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-134078) filed on August 1, 2006).

4.9		Form of Transitional Services Agreement between Global Ship Lease Services Limited and CMA CGM S.A. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit A-5 to Exhibit 2.1 of Marathon Acquisition Corp.’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-32983) filed on March 25, 2008).

4.10		Amended and Restated Asset Purchase Agreement, dated as of December 5, 2007, among Global Ship Lease, Inc. and CMA CGM S.A., Delmas S.A.S., Pacific I S.N.C. and Pacific II S.N.C. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 of Global Ship Lease, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form F-4 (File No. 333-150309) filed on April 18, 2008).

4.11		Form of Second Amended and Restated Asset Purchase Agreement among Global Ship Lease, Inc. and CMA CGM S.A., Delmas S.A.S., Pacific I S.N.C. and Pacific II S.N.C. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit A-2 to Exhibit 2.1 of Marathon Acquisition Corp’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-32983) filed on March 25, 2008).

4.12		Credit Facility, dated as of December 10, 2007, among the Companies Listed In Part 1 of Schedule 1 thereto, Global Ship Lease, Inc., Fortis Bank (Nederland) N.V., Citigroup Global Markets Limited, HSH Nordbank AG, DNB Nor Bank ASA, Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation, Brussels Branch (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 of Amendment No. 3 to Global Ship Lease, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form F-1 (File No. 333-147070) filed on November 13, 2007).

4.13		Addendum No. 1 to Credit Facility, dated December 10, 2007, among the Companies Listed In Part 1 of Schedule 1 thereto, Global Ship Lease, Inc., Fortis Bank (Nederland) N.V., Citigroup Global Markets Limited, HSH Nordbank AG, DNB Nor Bank ASA, Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation, Brussels Branch (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 of Global Ship Lease, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form F-4 (File No. 333-150309) filed on April 18, 2008).

4.14		Addendum No. 2 to Credit Facility, dated February 2009, among the Companies Listed In Part 1 of Schedule 1 thereto, Global Ship Lease, Inc., Fortis Bank (Nederland) N.V., Citigroup Global Markets Limited, HSH Nordbank AG, DNB Nor Bank ASA, Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation, Brussels Branch, (incorporated by reference to Exhibit II of Global Ship Lease, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 6-K (File No. 001-341539) filed on February 10, 2009).

4.15		Waiver Agreement to Credit Facility, dated April 29, 2009, between Global Ship Lease, Inc. and Fortis Bank (Nederland) N.V., as Facility Agent for and on behalf of the Lenders to the Credit Facility, (incorporated by reference to Exhibit II of Global Ship Lease, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 6-K (File No. 001-341539) filed on May 1, 2009).

4.16		Waiver Agreement to Credit Facility, dated June 26, 2009, between Global Ship Lease, Inc. and Fortis Bank (Nederland) N.V., as Facility Agent for and on behalf of the Lenders to the Credit Facility, (incorporated by reference to Exhibit II of Global Ship Lease, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 6-K (File No. 001-341539) filed on June 29, 2009).

4.17		Waiver Agreement to Credit Facility, dated July 30, 2009, between Global Ship Lease, Inc. and Fortis Bank (Nederland) N.V., as Facility Agent for and on behalf of the Lenders to the Credit Facility, (incorporated by reference to Exhibit II of Global Ship Lease, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 6-K (File No. 001-341539) filed on July 31, 2009).

4.18		Amendment and Restatement Agreement to Credit Facility, dated August 20, 2009, among the Companies Listed In Part 1 of Schedule 1 thereto, Global Ship Lease, Inc., Fortis Bank (Nederland) N.V., Citigroup Global Markets Limited, HSH Nordbank AG, DNB Nor Bank ASA, Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation, Brussels Branch, (incorporated by reference to Exhibit II of Global Ship Lease, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 6-K (File No. 001-341539) filed on August 21, 2009).

4.19		Form of Guarantee made by Global Ship Lease, Inc. in favor of the charterer listed on Schedule I thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 of Global Ship Lease, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form F-1 (File No. 333-147070) filed on November 1, 2007).

4.20		Form of Guarantee made by the CMA CGM S.A. in favor of Global Ship Lease, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 of Global Ship Lease, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form F-1 (File No. 333-147070) filed on November 1, 2007).

4.21		Form of Charter Agreement entered into by a subsidiary of Global Ship Lease, Inc. and CMA CGM S.A. or one of its subsidiaries (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 of Marathon Acquisition Corp.’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-32983) filed on March 25, 2008).


Exhibit Number		Description
4.22		Form of Ship Management Agreement entered into by CMA Ships and a Subsidiary of Global Ship Lease, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit A-3 to Exhibit 2.1 of Marathon Acquisition Corp.’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-32983) filed on March 25, 2008).

4.23		Form of Guarantee made by Global Ship Lease, Inc. in favor of CMA CGM S.A. and CMA Ships (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 of Global Ship Lease, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form F-1 (File No. 333-147070) filed on November 1, 2007).

4.24		Form of Guarantee made by CMA CGM S.A. in favor of Global Ship Lease, Inc. and its Subsidiaries (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1015 of Global Ship Lease, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form F-1 (File No. 333-147070) filed on November 1, 2007).

4.25		Form of Global Expense Agreement between CMA Ships and Global Ship Lease, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 of Global Ship Lease, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form F-1 (File No. 333-147070) filed on November 1, 2007).

4.26		Form of Indemnification Agreement entered into between Global Ship Lease, Inc. and each of its directors and officers (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17 of Global Ship Lease, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form F-1 (File No. 333-147070) filed on November 1, 2007).

4.27		Form of Stockholders Agreement among GSL Holdings, Inc., CMA CGM S.A. and Marathon Founders, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit B to Exhibit 2.1 of Marathon Acquisition Corp.’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-32983) filed on June 3, 2008).

4.28		2008 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.22 of Global Ship Lease, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form F-1 (File No. 333-153448) filed on September 12, 2008).

4.29		Form of Employment Agreement of Ian J. Webber (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.23 of Amendment No. 3 to Global Ship Lease, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form F-4 (File No. 333-150309) filed on July 3, 2008).

4.30		Form of Employment Agreement of Susan J. Cook (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.24 of Amendment No. 3 to Global Ship Lease, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form F-4 (File No. 333-150309) filed on July 3, 2008).

4.31		Form of Employment Agreement of Thomas A. Lister (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.25 of Amendment No. 3 to Global Ship Lease, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form F-4 (File No. 333-150309) filed on July 3, 2008).

4.32		Memorandum of Agreement for Hull 789 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.26 of Global Ship Lease, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form F-1/A (File No. 333-153448) filed on September 18, 2008).

4.33		Memorandum of Agreement for Hull 790 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.27 of Global Ship Lease, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form F-1/A (File No. 333-153448) filed on September 18, 2008).

8.1		List of Subsidiaries of Global Ship Lease, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit II of Global Ship Lease, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 20-F (File No. 001-341539) filed on June 25, 2009).

11.1		Code of Ethics (incorporated by reference to Exhibit II of Global Ship Lease, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 20-F (File No. 001-341539) filed on June 25, 2009).

12.1*		Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Global Ship Lease, Inc.’s Chief Executive Officer.

12.2*		Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Global Ship Lease, Inc.’s Chief Financial Officer.

13.1*		Global Ship Lease, Inc. Certification of Ian J. Webber, Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

13.2*		Global Ship Lease, Inc. Certification of Susan J. Cook, Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

15.1*		Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers Audit to the incorporation by reference of the consolidated financial statements of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009.

*	Filed herewith.

SIGNATURES

The registrant hereby certifies that it meets all of the requirements for filing on Form 20-F and that it has duly caused and authorized the undersigned to sign this annual report on its behalf.


GLOBAL SHIP LEASE, INC.

By:		/S/ IAN J. WEBBER
		Ian J. Webber Chief Executive Officer

Date: September 16, 2010

GLOSSARY OF SHIPPING TERMS

The following are definitions of certain terms that are commonly used in the shipping industry and in this Annual Report.

Annual Survey. The inspection of a ship pursuant to international conventions, by a classification society surveyor, on behalf of the flag state, that takes place every year.

Backhaul. The weaker leg of a round trip voyage with less volume than the stronger headhaul leg or the return movement of a container—often empty—from a destination of unloading to a point of reloading of cargo.

Ballast. Weight in solid or liquid form, such as sea water, taken on a ship to increase draught, to change trim, or to improve stability or a voyage in which a ship is not laden with cargo.

Bareboat Charter. A charter of a ship under which the ship-owner is usually paid a fixed amount of charterhire for a certain period of time during which the charterer is responsible for the ship operating expenses and voyage expenses of the ship and for the management of the ship, including crewing. A bareboat charter is also known as a “demise charter” or a “time charter by demise.”

Bunkers. Heavy fuel and diesel oil used to power a ship’s engines.

Capacity. The nominal carrying capacity of the ship.

Charter. The hire of a ship for a specified period of time or a particular voyage to carry a cargo from a loading port to a discharging port.

Charterer. The party that hires a ship for a period of time or for a voyage.

Charterhire. A sum of money paid to the ship-owner by a charterer for the use of a ship.

Charter owners. A company that owns containerships and charters out its ships to container shipping companies rather than operating the ships for liner services; also known as ship-owner.

Charter rate. The rate charged by charter owners normally as a daily rate for the use of their containerships by container shipping companies. Charter rates can be on a time charter or bareboat charter basis.

Classification society. An independent organization that certifies that a ship has been built and maintained according to the organization’s rules for that type of ship and complies with the applicable rules and regulations of the country of the ship’s registry and the international conventions of which that country is a member. A ship that receives its certification is referred to as being “in-class.”

Container shipping company. A shipping company operating liners services using its own or chartered ships with fixed port of call schedules. Also known as a liner company or a container operator.

Drydocking. Placing the ship in a drydock in order to check and repair areas and parts below the water line. During drydockings, which are required to be carried out periodically, certain mandatory classification society inspections are carried out and relevant certifications are issued. Drydockings for containerships are generally required once every three to five years, one of which must be a Special survey.

Freight rate. The amount charged by container shipping companies for transporting cargo, normally as a rate per 20-foot or 40-foot container.

Geared Containerships. Self-sustained containerships, which are able to load and discharge containers with their own onboard cranes and derricks.

Gross tonnage. A unit of measurement of the entire internal cubic capacity of the ship expressed in tons of 100 cubic feet to the ton.

Headhaul .. The stronger leg of a round trip voyage with greater volume than the weaker backhaul or the outgoing goods to be delivered from a point of origin.

Hull. The main body of the ship without engines, buildings and cranes.

IMO. International Maritime Organization, a United Nations agency that issues international standards for shipping.

Intermediate survey. The inspection of a ship by a classification society surveyor that takes place 24 to 36 months after each special survey.

Newbuilding. A ship on order, construction or just delivered.

Off-hire. The period in which a ship is not available for service under a time charter and, accordingly, the charterer generally is not required to pay the hire. Off-hire periods can include days spent on repairs, drydocking and surveys, whether or not scheduled.

Protection and indemnity insurance. Insurance obtained through a mutual association formed by ship-owners to provide liability indemnification protection from various liabilities to which they are exposed in the course of their business, and which spreads the liability costs of each member by requiring contribution by all members in the event of a loss.

Scrapping. The sale of a ship for conversion into scrap metal.

Ship management. The provision of shore-based ship management services related to crewing, technical and safety management and the compliance with all government, flag state, class certification and international rules and regulations.

Ship operating expenses. The costs of operating a ship, primarily consisting of crew wages and associated costs, insurance premiums, ship management fee, lubricants and spare parts, and repair and maintenance costs. Ship operating expenses exclude fuel cost, port expenses, agents’ fees, canal dues and extra war risk insurance, as well as commissions, which are included in “voyage expenses.”

Sister ships. Ships of the same class and specifications typically built at the same shipyard.

Special survey. The inspection of a ship by a classification society surveyor that takes place every five years, as part of the recertification of the ship by a classification society.

Spot market. The market for immediate chartering of a ship, usually for single voyages.

TEU. A 20-foot equivalent unit, the international standard measure for containers and containership capacity.

Time charter. A charter under which the ship-owner hires out a ship for a specified period of time. The ship-owner is responsible for providing the crew and paying ship operating expenses while the charterer is responsible for paying the voyage expenses and additional voyage insurance. The ship-owner is paid charterhire, which accrues on a daily basis.

Voyage expenses. Expenses incurred due to a ship’s voyage from a loading port to a discharging port, such as bunkers cost, port expenses, agents’ fees, canal dues, extra war risk insurance and commissions.

GLOBAL SHIP LEASE, INC.

COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2009

Global Ship Lease, Inc.

Index to Combined Financial Statements


		Page
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm		F-1

Combined Balance Sheets as at December 31, 2009 and 2008		F-2

Combined Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007		F-4

Combined Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007		F-6

Combined Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007		F-8

Notes to Combined Financial Statements		F-10

Page 1

Global Ship Lease, Inc.

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders

In our opinion, the accompanying combined balance sheets and the related combined statements of income, shareholders’ equity and cash flows present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Global Ship Lease, Inc. (the “Company”) as at December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the periods then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Company’s management is responsible for these financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in section entitled Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting within the Company’s Annual Report. Our responsibility is to express opinions on these financial statements and on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audits (which was an integrated audit in 2009). We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audits of the financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

The accompanying combined financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a Going Concern. As discussed in Note 2 to the combined financial statements, the uncertainty related to the financial situation of the Company’s charterer raises substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a Going Concern. Management’s description of these matters is also included in the note. The combined financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers

PricewaterhouseCoopers

May 10, 2010, except for the effect on the combined financial statements of the amendments which are referred in Note 2(c), as to which the date is September 14, 2010

PricewaterhouseCoopers is represented by PricewaterhouseCoopers Audit, 63 rue de Villiers—92200 Neuilly-sur-Seine, France.

F-1

Global Ship Lease, Inc.

Combined Balance Sheets

The combined financial statements up to December 31, 2009 include two distinct reporting periods (i) January 1, 2007 through August 14, 2008 (“Predecessor”) and (ii) August 15, 2008 through December 31, 2009 (“Successor”), which relate to the period preceding the merger referred to in note 1 and the period succeeding the merger, respectively. Further, the Company derived all of its revenue in 2009 and virtually all of its revenue in 2008 from chartering out its vessels under long term fixed rate time charters whereas in 2007, it earned virtually all of its revenue from carrying containerized cargo. The combined financial statements for the Successor period reflect the acquisition of Global Ship Lease, Inc. under the purchase method of accounting. The results of the Successor are not comparable to the results of the Predecessor due to the difference in the basis of presentation under purchase accounting as compared to historical cost. Further, the results for the periods after January 1, 2008 are not comparable to results prior to that date due to the different nature of the business.

(Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars)


	Note	December 31, 2009		December 31, 2008
		Successor		Successor
Assets

Cash and cash equivalents		$	30,810	$	26,363
Restricted cash	16		3,026		3,026
Accounts receivable			7,838		638
Prepaid expenses			685		734
Other receivables			613		1,420
Deferred tax			285		176
Deferred financing costs	9		903		526


Total current assets			44,160		32,883


Vessels in operation	5		961,708		906,896
Vessel deposits	6		16,243		15,720
Other fixed assets			9		21
Intangible assets – purchase agreement	7		—		7,840
Deferred tax			161		117
Deferred financing costs	9		5,077		3,131


Total non-current assets			983,198		933,725


Total Assets		$	1,027,358	$	966,608


Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity

Liabilities

Intangible liability – charter agreements	10	$	2,119	$	1,608
Current portion of long term debt	11		68,300		—
Accounts payable			3,502		36
Accrued expenses			4,589		6,436
Derivative instruments	8		15,971		10,940


Total current liabilities			94,481		19,020


Long term debt	11		519,892		542,100
Preferred shares	16		48,000		48,000
Intangible liability – charter agreements	10		24,288		26,348
Derivative instruments	8		13,142		36,101


Total long term liabilities			605,322		652,549

Total Liabilities		$	699,803	$	671,569

Commitments and contingencies	14		—		—

See accompanying notes to combined financial statements

F-2

Global Ship Lease, Inc.

Combined Balance Sheets (continued)

(Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars)


	Note	December 31, 2009			December 31, 2008
		Successor			Successor
Stockholders’ Equity
Class A Common stock - authorized 214,000,000 shares with a $.01 par value; 46,680,194 shares issued and outstanding	16		467			339
Class B Common stock - authorized 20,000,000 shares with a $.01 par value; 7,405,956 shares issued and outstanding	16		74			74
Class C Common stock - authorized 15,000,000 shares with a $.01 par value; 12,375,000 shares issued, converted to Class A common shares on January 1, 2009	16		—			124

Retained deficit			(65,679	)		(9,338	)
Net income (loss) for the period			42,374			(43,970	)
Additional paid in capital			350,319			347,810

Total Stockholders’ Equity			327,555			295,039


Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity		$	1,027,358		$	966,608

See accompanying notes to combined financial statements

F-3

Global Ship Lease, Inc.

Combined Statements of Income

(Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars except share data)


	Note	Year ended December 31, 2009			August 15 to December 31, 2008			January 1 to August 14, 2008			Year ended December 31, 2007
		Successor			Successor			Predecessor			Predecessor
Operating Revenues
Voyage revenue		$	—		$	—		$	2,072		$	332,186
Time charter revenue			148,708			39,095			55,883			2,909

			148,708			39,095			57,955			335,095

Operating Expenses
Voyage expenses			—			—			1,944			249,457
Vessel operating expenses			41,368			11,904			18,074			23,959
Depreciation	5		37,307			8,731			12,163			16,119
General and administrative			8,748			3,712			3,814			17,751
Other operating (income) expense	12		(432	)		(106	)		93			(2,341	)


Total operating expenses			86,991			24,241			36,088			304,945


Operating Income			61,717			14,854			21,867			30,150

Non Operating Income (Expense)
Interest income			519			413			424			207
Interest expense			(24,224	)		(3,842	)		(17,600	)		(13,561	)
Realized and unrealized gain (loss) on interest rate derivatives	17		4,806			(55,293	)		2,749			—


Income (Loss) before Income Taxes			42,818			(43,868	)		7,440			16,796

Income taxes			(444	)		(102	)		(23	)		(20	)


Net Income (Loss)		$	42,374		$	(43,970	)	$	7,417		$	16,776

See accompanying notes to combined financial statements

F-4

Global Ship Lease, Inc.

Combined Statements of Income (continued)

(Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars except share data)


	Note	Year ended December 31, 2009		August 15 to December 31, 2008			January 1 to August 14, 2008		Year ended December 31, 2007
		Successor		Successor			Predecessor		Predecessor
Weighted average number of Common shares outstanding basic and diluted			n.a.		n.a.			100		100

Net Income in $ per share Basic and diluted			n.a.		n.a.		$	74,170	$	167,760

Weighted average number of Class A common shares outstanding
Basic	20		46,459,509		33,800,307			n.a.		n.a.
Diluted	20		46,754,858		33,800,307			n.a.		n.a.
Net Income (Loss) in $ per share
Basic	20	$	0.91	$	(1.30	)		n.a.		n.a.
Diluted	20	$	0.91	$	(1.30	)		n.a.		n.a.

Weighted average number of Class B common shares outstanding
Basic and diluted	20		7,405,956		7,405,956			n.a.		n.a.
Net Income in $ per share
Basic and diluted	20	$	nil	$	nil			n.a.		n.a.

See accompanying notes to combined financial statements

F-5

Global Ship Lease, Inc.

Combined Statements of Cash Flows

(Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars)


	Note	Year ended December 31, 2009			August 15 to December 31, 2008			January 1 to August 14, 2008			Year ended December 31, 2007
		Successor			Successor			Predecessor			Predecessor
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
Net Income (Loss)		$	42,374		$	(43,970	)	$	7,417		$	16,776

Adjustments to Reconcile Net Income to Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
Depreciation	5		37,307			8,731			12,164			16,119
Amortization of deferred financing costs			3,108			199			491			2,194
Change in fair value of certain derivative instruments	17		(17,928	)		54,851			(3,081	)		9,132
Amortization of intangible liability			(1,549	)		(67	)		—			—
Settlements of hedges which do not qualify for hedge accounting	17		13,121			632			141			58
Share based compensation	18		2,513			1,167			—			—
(Increase) decrease in other receivables and other assets			(6,510	)		337			(980	)		26,574
Decrease in inventories			—			—			1,613			2,390
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable and other liabilities			2,165			(7,849	)		4,420			(11,918	)
Costs relating to drydocks			(1,706	)		—			(1,459	)		(4,738	)
Unrealized foreign exchange loss (gain)			17			(80	)		—			—


Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities			72,912			13,951			20,726			56,587


Cash Flows from Investing Activities
Settlements of hedges which do not qualify for hedge accounting	17		(13,121	)		(632	)		(4,871	)		(58	)
Acquisition of Global Ship Lease, Inc. net of cash acquired	3		—			(6,547	)		—			—
Release of trust account	3		—			317,446			—			—
Purchase of other fixed assets			—			—			—			(36	)
Purchases of vessels, vessel prepayments and vessel deposits			(83,639	)		(272,927	)		—			(183,713	)


Net Cash (Used in) Provided by Investing Activities			(96,760	)		37,340			(4,871	)		(183,807	)


Cash Flows from Financing Activities
Proceeds from debt			57,000			256,000			—			401,100
Repayments of debt			(10,908	)		(115,000	)		—			(146,166	)
Variation in restricted cash			—			(3,026	)		188,000			(188,000	)
Issuance costs of debt			(5,426	)		(3,856	)		(276	)		(5,892	)
Proceeds from shareholder loans			—			—			—			176,875
Proceeds from warrant exercise			—			3,026			—			—
Buyback of shares	3		—			(147,053	)		—			—
(Decrease) in amount due to CMA CGM Deemed distribution to CMA CGM			— —			— —			(188,713 (505	) )		(11,881 (96,925	) )
Dividend payments	16		(12,371	)		(15,624	)		—			—


Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Financing Activities			28,295			(25,533	)		(1,494	)		129,111


Net Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents			4,447			25,758			14,361			1,891

Cash and Cash Equivalents at start of Period			26,363			605			1,891			—


Cash and Cash Equivalents at end of Period		$	30,810		$	26,363		$	16,252		$	1,891

See accompanying notes to combined financial statements

F-6

Global Ship Lease, Inc.

Combined Statements of Cash Flows (continued)

The combined financial statements up to December 31, 2009 include two distinct reporting periods (i) January 1, 2007 through August 14, 2008 (“Predecessor”) and (ii) August 15, 2008 through December 31, 2009 (“Successor”), which relate to the period preceding the merger referred to in note 1 and the period succeeding the merger, respectively. Further, the Company derived all of its revenue in 2009 and virtually all of its revenue in 2008 from chartering out its vessels under long-term fixed rate time charters whereas in 2007, it earned virtually all of its revenue from carrying containerized cargo. The combined financial statements for the Successor period reflect the acquisition of Global Ship Lease, Inc. under the purchase method of accounting. The results of the Successor are not comparable to the results of the Predecessor due to the difference in the basis of presentation under purchase accounting as compared to historical cost. Further, the results for the periods after January 1, 2008 are not comparable to results prior to that date due to the different nature of the business.

(Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars)


	Year ended December 31 2009		August 15 to December 31, 2008		January 1 to August 14, 2008		Year ended December 31, 2007
	Successor		Successor		Predecessor		Predecessor
Supplemental Information

Non cash investing and financing activities

Issuance of shares and preferred shares for the acquisition of 100% shares of Global Ship Lease, Inc.	$	—	$	216,730	$	—	$	—

Dividends declared	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—

Total interest paid	$	22,092	$	4,639	$	10,782	$	10,102

Total income tax paid	$	186	$	—	$	—	$	310

See accompanying notes to combined financial statements

F-7

Global Ship Lease, Inc.

Combined Statements of Stockholders’ Equity

The combined financial statements up to December 31, 2009 include two distinct reporting periods (i) January 1, 2007 through August 14, 2008 (“Predecessor”) and (ii) August 15, 2008 through December 31, 2009 (“Successor”), which relate to the period preceding the merger referred to in note 1 and the period succeeding the merger, respectively. Further, the Company derived all of its revenue in 2009 and virtually all of its revenue in 2008 from chartering out its vessels under long-term fixed rate time charters whereas in 2007, it earned virtually all of its revenue from carrying containerized cargo. The combined financial statements for the Successor period reflect the acquisition of Global Ship Lease, Inc. under the purchase method of accounting. The results of the Successor are not comparable to the results of the Predecessor due to the difference in the basis of presentation under purchase accounting as compared to historical cost. Further, the results for the periods after January 1, 2008 are not comparable to results prior to that date due to the different nature of the business.


	Number of Common Stock at $0.01 Par value		Common Stock		Accumulated Earnings (Deficit)			Net Income			Due to CMA CGM			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income			Additional Paid in Capital		Stockholders’ Equity
Balance at December 31, 2006 (Predecessor)	100		$	—	$	—		$	32,677		$	115,350		$	21,969		$	—	$	169,996
Change in amount due from CMA CGM	—			—		—			—			(11,881	)		—			—		(11,881	)
Allocation of prior year net income	—			—		—			(32,677	)		32,677			—			—		—

Net income for the period	—			—		—			16,776			—			—			—		16,776
Effect of derivative instruments	—			—		—			—			—			(211	)		—		(211	)
Effect of currency translation adjustment	—			—		—			—			—			9,509			—		9,509
Other effect of the transfer of the initial ten vessels in 2007	—			—		—			—			26,739			(26,528	)		—		211
Deemed distribution to CMA CGM (note 13)	—			—		(96,925	)		—			—			—			—		(96,925	)


Balance at December 31, 2007 (Predecessor)	100			—		(96,925	)		16,776			162,885			4,739			—		87,475
Change in amount due from CMA CGM	—			—		—			—			(188,716	)		—			—		(188,716	)
Allocation of prior year net income	—			—		(4,967	)		(16,776	)		21,743			—			—		—
Net income for the period	—			—		—			7,417			—			—			—		7,417
Other effect of the transfer of the two vessels in 2008	—			—		—			651			4,088			(4,739	)		—		—
Deemed distribution to CMA CGM (note 13)	—			—		(505	)		—			—			—			—		(505	)
Allocation of net income	—			—		8,068			(8,068	)		—			—					—


Balance at August 14, 2008 (Predecessor)	100			—		(94,329	)		—			—			—			—		(94,329	)
Elimination of historical stockholders’ equity	(100	)		—		94,329			—			—			—			—		94,329
Recognition of GSL Holdings stockholders’ equity pre-merger	26,685,209			266		6,286			—			—			—			175,375		181,927
Issuance of shares and warrants in connection with the merger (note 3)
Class A	6,778,650			68		—			—			—			—			51,672		51,740
Class B	7,405,956			74		—			—			—			—			26,043		26,117
Class C	12,375,000			124		—			—			—			—			89,348		89,472
Warrants	—			—		—			—			—			—			1,184		1,184
Warrants exercised into Class A shares (note 16)	504,502			5		—			—			—			—			3,021		3,026
Restricted Stock Units (note 18)	—			—		—			—			—			—			1,167		1,167
Net (loss) for the period	—			—		—			(43,970	)		—			—			—		(43,970	)

Dividends declared (note 16)	—			—		(15,624	)		—			—			—			—		(15,624	)


Balance at December 31, 2008 (Successor)	53,749,317		$	537	$	(9,338	)	$	(43,970	)	$	—		$	—		$	347,810	$	295,039

See accompanying notes to combined financial statements

F-8

Global Ship Lease, Inc.

Combined Statements of Stockholders’ Equity (continued)

The combined financial statements up to December 31, 2009 include two distinct reporting periods (i) January 1, 2007 through August 14, 2008 (“Predecessor”) and (ii) August 15, 2008 through December 31, 2009 (“Successor”), which relate to the period preceding the merger referred to in note 1 and the period succeeding the merger, respectively. Further, the Company derived all of its revenue in 2009 and virtually all of its revenue in 2008 from chartering out its vessels under long-term fixed rate time charters whereas in 2007, it earned virtually all of its revenue from carrying containerized cargo. The combined financial statements for the Successor period reflect the acquisition of Global Ship Lease, Inc. under the purchase method of accounting. The results of the Successor are not comparable to the results of the Predecessor due to the difference in the basis of presentation under purchase accounting as compared to historical cost. Further, the results for the periods after January 1, 2008 are not comparable to results prior to that date due to the different nature of the business.


	Number of Common Stock at $0.01 Par value		Common Stock			Accumulated Earnings (Deficit)			Net Income			Due to CMA CGM		Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income		Additional paid in Capital			Stockholders’ Equity
Balance at December 31, 2008 (Successor)	53,749,317		$	537		$	(9,338	)	$	(43,970	)	$	—	$	—	$	347,810		$	295,039

Allocation of prior year net (loss)	—			—			(43,970	)		43,970					—		—			—

Class C Shares converted to Class A
Class C	(12,375,000	)		(124	)		—			—			—		—		—			(124	)
Class A	12,375,000			124			—			—			—		—		—			124
Restricted Stock Units (note 18)	—			—			—			—			—		—		2,513			2,513
Shares issued (note 18)	336,833			4													(4	)		—
Net income for the period	—			—			—			42,374			—		—		—			42,374
Dividends declared (note 16)	—			—			(12,371	)		—			—		—		—			(12,371	)


Balance at December 31, 2009 (Successor)	54,086,150		$	541		$	(65,679	)	$	42,374		$	—	$	—	$	350,319		$	327,555

See accompanying notes to combined financial statements

F-9

Global Ship Lease, Inc.

Notes to the Combined Financial Statements

(Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars)

1.	General

On August 14, 2008, Global Ship Lease, Inc. (the “Company”) merged indirectly with Marathon Acquisition Corp. (“Marathon”), a company then listed on The American Stock Exchange. Following the merger, the Company became listed on the New York Stock Exchange on August 15, 2008.

Under the merger agreement, Marathon, a U.S. corporation, first merged with its 100% owned Marshall Islands subsidiary, GSL Holdings, Inc. (“Holdings”), with Holdings continuing as the surviving company. Global Ship Lease, Inc., at that time a subsidiary of CMA CGM, then merged with Holdings, with Holdings again being the surviving company. Holdings was renamed Global Ship Lease, Inc. and became listed on the New York Stock Exchange on August 15, 2008.

In accordance with ASC Topic 805 “Business Combinations”, Marathon (through its subsidiary Holdings) has been treated as the accounting acquirer and Global Ship Lease, Inc. was treated as the acquiree. Under the purchase method of accounting, the identifiable assets and assumed liabilities of Global Ship Lease, Inc. were recorded at their estimated fair values as of the acquisition date. The excess of the fair value of the net acquired assets over the purchase price has been recorded as a pro rata reduction of identified intangible assets, vessels in operation and other fixed assets. Because the activities of Marathon were insignificant prior to the acquisition, Global Ship Lease, Inc. (the acquiree), was determined to be the Predecessor for the purpose of reporting historical financial information.

The financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2009 and for the period August 15, 2008 to December 31, 2008 are wholly “Successor”, reflecting results of the combined operations following the merger. The results for the period January 1, 2008 to August 14, 2008 and for the year ended December 31, 2007 (labeled “Predecessor”), reflect results of the operations as historically reported for Global Ship Lease, Inc. prior to the merger. Under Predecessor accounting rules, the period January 1, 2008 to August 14, 2008 includes for a few days of January 2008 the results of two vessels when they were owned and operated by CMA CGM (rather than Global Ship Lease, Inc.) in its business of carrying containerized cargo prior to the sale of the vessels to the Company (see note 15).

As the merger was consummated on August 14, 2008, the balance sheets as of December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 (both labeled “Successor”) reflect the acquisition under the purchase method of accounting of all the identified assets and assumed liabilities of Global Ship Lease, Inc. (see note 3).

The term “Company” refers to both Successor and Predecessor periods.

2.	Nature of Operations and Basis of Preparation

(a)

Nature of Operations

The Company has a business of owning and chartering out containerships under long term time charters. It contracted under an asset purchase agreement dated December 5, 2007, to acquire 17 containerships from CMA CGM. Of these, 10 were purchased by the Company during December 2007, two in January 2008, four in December 2008 and one in August 2009. All vessels are time chartered to CMA CGM for remaining terms as at December 31, 2009 ranging from 3 to 16 years. The Company has also entered into an agreement with German interests to acquire in the fourth quarter of 2010 two newbuildings for approximately $77,000 per vessel. The Company has an agreement to charter out these vessels to ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Limited (“ZIM”) for a period of seven years that could be extended to eight years at ZIM’s option.

During the period covered by these combined financial statements, the Company operated under two business models. During the period up to the delivery of the 10 vessels in December 2007 and the two ships in January 2008 (i.e. virtually all of the year ended December 31, 2007 and, for two ships of the fleet, for a few days of January 2008 included in the year ended December 31, 2008) operations involved earning freight revenues from containerized transportation of goods for shippers whilst the vessels were owned by CMA CGM. Following the purchase by the Company of the 10 vessels in December 2007 and a further two vessels in January 2008, the activities changed and consisted solely of ownership and provision of vessels to container shipping companies under time charters.

F-10

Global Ship Lease, Inc.

Notes to the Combined Financial Statements (continued)

(Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars)

2.	Nature of Operations and Basis of Preparation (Continued)

The following table provides information about the 17 vessels in the fleet chartered to CMA CGM and reflected in these combined financial statements:


Vessel Name	Capacity in TEUs ⁽¹⁾	Year Built	Purchase Date by GSL⁽²⁾	Charter Remaining Duration (years)	Daily Charter Rate
Ville d’Orion	4,113	1997	December 2007	3.00	$	28,500
Ville d’Aquarius	4,113	1996	December 2007	3.00	$	28,500
CMA CGM Matisse	2,262	1999	December 2007	7.00	$	18,465
CMA CGM Utrillo	2,262	1999	December 2007	7.00	$	18,465
Delmas Keta	2,207	2003	December 2007	8.00	$	18,465
Julie Delmas	2,207	2002	December 2007	8.00	$	18,465
Kumasi	2,207	2002	December 2007	8.00	$	18,465
Marie Delmas	2,207	2002	December 2007	8.00	$	18,465
CMA CGM La Tour	2,272	2001	December 2007	7.00	$	18,465
CMA CGM Manet	2,272	2001	December 2007	7.00	$	18,465
CMA CGM Alcazar	5,100	2007	January 2008	11.00	$	33,750
CMA CGM Château d’lf	5,100	2007	January 2008	11.00	$	33,750
CMA CGM Thalassa	10,960	2008	December 2008	16.00	$	47,200
CMA CGM Jamaica	4,298	2006	December 2008	13.00	$	25,350
CMA CGM Sambhar	4,045	2006	December 2008	13.00	$	25,350
CMA CGM America	4,045	2006	December 2008	13.00	$	25,350
CMA CGM Berlioz ⁽³⁾	6,627	2001	August 2009	11.75	$	34,000

(1)

Twenty-foot Equivalent Units.

(2)

The table shows purchase dates of vessels related to the Company’s time charter business, which occurred during both the Predecessor and Successor periods.

(3)

The vessel, CMA CGM Berlioz, is a second hand vessel acquired during the year.

The following table provides information about the contracted fleet not reflected in these combined financial statements, other than deposits paid:

Vessel Name

Capacity
in TEUs ⁽¹⁾

Year Built

Estimated
Delivery Date
to GSL

Charterer

Charter
Duration
(years)

Daily
Charter
Rate

Hull 789 ⁽²⁾

4,250

2010

October 2010

ZIM

7-8 ⁽³⁾

28,000

Hull 790 ⁽²⁾

4,250

2010

December 2010

ZIM

7-8 ⁽³⁾

28,000

(1)

Twenty-foot Equivalent Units.

(2)

Contracted to be purchased from German interests (note 8).

(3)

Seven years charter that could be extended to eight years at Charterer’s option.

(b)

Basis of Preparation

CMA CGM, the Company’s sole source of operating revenue, announced in September 2009 that it and its lenders were exploring a potential financial restructuring to address its short and medium term financing requirements and that it was seeking to reduce and in some cases cancel certain ship deliveries. The Company is not involved in these discussions. The Company has experienced delays in receiving charterhire from CMA CGM, where between one and three instalments have been outstanding. Under the charter contracts charterhire is due to be paid every 15 days in advance on the 1^st and 16^th of each month.

As at December 31, 2009, one period of charterhire, due on December 16, 2009, was outstanding amounting to $6.9 million. This was received in January 2010. As at close of business on May 7, 2010, the latest practicable date prior to the issuance of these combined financial statements, charterhire due on May 1, 2010 totalling approximately $6.4 million was outstanding.

Under the ship management contracts with CMA Ships, a wholly owned subsidiary of CMA CGM, vessel operating costs and management fees are payable monthly in advance. As at December 31, 2009 the Company owed its ship manager approximately $3.4 million under the ship management agreement for operating costs and management fees for December 2009. This was paid in January 2010. As at close of business on May 7, 2010, the latest practicable date prior to the issuance of these combined financial statements, $3.1 million was owed by the Company to CMA Ships for operating costs and management fees for May 2010.

The Company’s combined financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. These combined financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded assets, nor relate to the amounts and classification of liabilities that may be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

If CMA CGM is unable to accomplish a financial restructuring and ceases doing business or otherwise fails to perform its obligations under the Company’s charters, Global Ship Lease’s business, financial position and results of operations would be

F-11

Global Ship Lease, Inc.

Notes to the Combined Financial Statements (continued)

(Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars)

2.	Nature of Operations and Basis of Preparation (Continued)

materially adversely affected as it is probable that, should the Company be able to find replacement charters, these would be at significantly lower daily rates and for shorter durations than currently in place. In this situation there would be significant uncertainty about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

Statement of income accounts for the Predecessor Group reflected in predecessor periods 2007 and 2008

Voyage revenue and voyage expenses have been allocated to the Predecessor Group by direct attribution through the use of the comprehensive information system used by CMA CGM. For each accounting transaction, specific information is recorded, including the port calls (localization and date) and the vessel operated. Therefore, the Predecessor Group was able to specifically identify voyage revenues, voyage expenses, vessel expenses and depreciation by vessel.

General and administrative expenses, as well as logistic, container costs and insurance expenses, were allocated to the Predecessor Group based on the number of loaded containers carried onboard each vessel. This allocation method is considered to be commonly used in the container shipping industry and is considered by management to be a reasonable basis for determining the attributable costs of the respective operations. General and administrative expenses, consisting primarily of salaries and other employee related costs, office rent, legal and professional fees, travel and entertainment were allocated based on the vessels’ proportionate share of Predecessor Group’s general and administrative expenses for each of the periods presented.

During the periods presented, CMA CGM was subject to various tonnage tax regimes relating to the container shipping business. Accordingly, taxes for the Predecessor Group is based on the tonnage of each vessel and is therefore allocated directly to each vessel and included within general and administrative expenses.

Derivative financial instruments mainly relate to bunker fuel. The allocation of the accounting impact of such derivatives is based on the ratio of the actual fuel consumption for the vessels in the Predecessor Group’s fleet compared to the actual fuel consumption of the CMA CGM total fleet. This ratio is considered by management to be a reasonable basis for determining the attributable costs of the respective operations.

Other operating income(expense) relates to bunker hedges that did not qualify for hedge accounting and have been allocated based on the ratio of the actual fuel consumption for the vessels in the Predecessor Group’s fleet compared to the actual fuel consumption of the CMA CGM total fleet. This ratio is considered by management to be a reasonable basis for determining the attributable costs of the respective operations.

Interest expense for the Predecessor Group was directly derived from the actual debt on each vessel operated by the Predecessor Group.

(c)

Amended Combined Financial Statements

These combined financial statements amend the original combined financial statements included in the Company’s annual report for the year ended December 31, 2009 which was filed on Form 20-F with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 18, 2010. Amendments made to notes 2.(b), 3, 13, 14, 20 and 21 incorporate certain disclosure modifications which were made following comments received from the Securities and Exchange Commission related to the original filing and events which have occurred up to date of the approval of the amended combined financial statements.

3.	Accounting for the Merger

On August 14, 2008, pursuant to the terms of the merger agreement, Holdings acquired all of Global Ship Lease, Inc.’s outstanding capital stock for $235,300 excluding transaction expenses, funded by the issue to CMA CGM of 6,778,650 Class A common shares, 3,934,050 Class B common shares, 12,375,000 Class C common shares, warrants to acquire 3,131,900 Class A common shares with an exercise price of $9.25 and 1,000 Series A preferred shares with a total nominal value of $48,000 and $18,570 in cash. The rights of the different classes of securities are set out in note 16.

The Company accounted for the business combination under the purchase method as prescribed by ASC Topic 805. Under the purchase method, the identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed were recorded at their fair value as of the acquisition date. Any excess of the fair value of the net acquired assets over the purchase price was recorded as a pro rata reduction of identified intangible assets, vessels in operation and other fixed assets.

F-12

Global Ship Lease, Inc.

Notes to the Combined Financial Statements (continued)

(Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars)

3.	Accounting for the Merger (Continued)

The following table shows the calculation of allocable purchase price:


	Number of Instruments	Fair Value		Fair Value Per Instrument
Cash payment ⁽¹⁾	n.a.	$	18,570	n.a.
Class A common shares	6,778,650		51,992	7.67
Class B common shares	3,934,050		26,083	6.63
Class C common shares	12,375,000		89,471	7.23
Warrants to acquire Class A common shares	3,131,900		1,184	0.38
Mandatory redeemable preferred shares	1,000		48,000	n.a.

			235,300
Transaction related expenses			14,556	n.a.

Total allocable purchase price		$	249,856

(1)

An amount of $8,056 cash was paid in the Successor period in 2008.

Equity instruments issued in connection with the merger were assessed at their respective fair value reflecting specific features of each instrument at the date of the announcement of the definitive terms of the merger on July 24, 2008.

The Class A common shares were valued at the $7.67 per share average closing price of the common stock (using the average closing price of the five business days on and surrounding the date of the announcement of definitive terms of the merger i.e. July 24, 2008). The rights of holders of Class B common shares are identical to those of holders of Class A common shares, except that the holders of Class B common shares were not entitled to receive any dividends with respect to any quarter prior to those paid with respect to the fourth quarter of 2008 and their dividend rights are subordinated to those of holders of Class A common shares until at least the third quarter of 2011. The rights of holders of Class C common shares were identical to those of holders of Class A common shares, except that holders of Class C common shares were not entitled to receive any dividends. The Class C common shares converted into Class A common shares on a one-for-one basis on January 1, 2009. Management estimated the per share fair value of the Class C common shares at the merger by discounting the share price of $7.67 by the present value of the first two $0.23 anticipated dividends foregone in 2008. Management calculated the discount rate of 10.75% by using the average of (a) a 12.6% cost of equity using the dividend growth model (assumes a comparable dividend of 8.6% and long term dividend growth of 4.0%) and (b) an 8.9% cost of equity using the beta method (4.38% U.S. Risk Free Rate (30-year U.S. Treasury) plus a 5.0% adjusted equity market risk premium). Using this rate, the discount for the present value of the foregone dividends was $0.44. This results in an implied share price of $7.23. Management estimated the per share fair value of the Class B common shares using the same method for the forgone dividends as used for Class C common shares. Management also applied an additional discount for subordinated dividend risk and impaired liquidity. Management estimated this additional discount of 7.8% (or $0.60 per share) by examining the trading performance of subordinated share class for precedent transactions. This resulted in an implied share value of $6.63.

Warrants issued to CMA CGM as part of the purchase price were valued using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, with an average share value of $7.67 (as described above), expected volatility at 30.0%, a risk free rate of 3.87%, an expected dividend yield of 11.99% over the duration of the instrument, and an expected duration of five years.

F-13

Global Ship Lease, Inc.

Notes to the Combined Financial Statements (continued)

(Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars)

3.	Accounting for the Merger (Continued)

The following table shows the fair value of identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the merger date:


	Fair Value of Net Assets acquired			Adjustments for Negative Goodwill			Purchase Price Allocation
Cash and cash equivalents	$	16,252		$	—		$	16,252
Prepaid expenses and other receivables		2,894			—			2,894
Derivative instruments		7,811			—			7,811
Vessels in operation		635,000			(110,921	)		524,079
Vessel deposit		99,000			—			99,000
Other fixed assets		26			(5	)		21
Intangible assets – purchase agreement		51,750			(9,043	)		42,707
Long term debt		(401,100	)		—			(401,100	)
Accounts payable		(1,181	)		—			(1,181	)
Accrued expenses and other liabilities		(12,604	)		—			(12,604	)
Intangible liabilities – charter agreements		(28,023	)		—			(28,023	)
Negative goodwill to be allocated		(119,969	)		119,969			—

Total allocable purchase price	$	249,856		$	—		$	249,856

The fair value of the identifiable acquired assets and liabilities was reduced by $119,969 which equals the estimated excess of the fair value of the net acquired assets over the purchase price. Three asset classes were reduced pro rata: (i) identified intangible assets from $51,750 to $42,707, (ii) other fixed assets from $26 to $21 and (iii) vessels in operation from $635,000 to $524,079.

Derivative instruments comprised solely of interest rate financial instruments that were recognized at their mark-to-market value. Vessels in operation were written up to their estimated fair market value at the merger date. The intangible asset recognized in connection with the purchase agreement is for the five vessels contracted to be purchased as at August 14, 2008 from CMA CGM and was valued by comparing the acquisition prices as per the agreement and the vessels estimated fair market values at the merger date. The intangible liability recognized in connection with charter agreements was valued using the market approach where the Company’s actual charter agreements were compared to market rates at the merger date and discounted at an 8.0% interest rate.

In connection with the merger, $317,446 cash previously held in trust by Marathon was released. These funds were used to repay $115,000 of the assumed credit facility, to pay a total of $147,053 for the conversion of 7.7 million shares and repurchase of 10.8 million shares in connection with the merger closing, to pay $18,500 of costs associated with the merger and to pay $18,570 to CMA CGM due under the merger agreement. The balance was held for general working capital purposes including financing the deposits of $15,477 for the two vessels to be purchased in the fourth quarter of 2010 paid in September 2008.

In connection with the merger, the equity in GSL Holdings pre-merger was $181,927 consisting of additional paid in capital $175,375, accumulated earnings of $6,286 and par value of common shares $266.

Unaudited Supplemental Pro Forma Information

The following pro forma information for the year ended December 31, 2008 assumes that the acquisition of the Company occurred at the beginning of the reporting period being presented.


	Year Ended December 31, 2008
Operating revenue	$	100,135

Net loss	$	(26,045	)

Pro forma net income per share

Weighted average number of Class A common shares outstanding (1)
Basic		33,591,788
Diluted		33,591,788
Net loss per share
Basic	$	(0.78	)
Diluted	$	(0.78	)

Weighted average number of Class B common shares outstanding (1)
Basic		7,405,956
Diluted		7,405,956
Net income per share
Basic	$	—
Diluted	$	—

(1)

Assuming Class A and B common shares are participating securities under the two-class method.

F-14

Global Ship Lease, Inc.

Notes to the Combined Financial Statements (continued)

(Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars)

4.	Significant Accounting Policies

(a)

Basis of combination

The accompanying combined financial statements have been prepared in accordance with United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“US GAAP”) and include the financial statements of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, together with the carve-out information during the period CMA CGM owned the vessels and the merger referred to in note 1. All inter-company transactions and accounts have been eliminated on consolidation. For the Successor period, the Company’s financial statements have been prepared on a consolidated basis.

The accounting policies have been consistently applied throughout the periods presented.

(b)

Use of estimates

The preparation of combined financial statements in conformity with US GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the combined financial statements and the accompanying notes. It is possible that actual results may differ from those estimates. Allocation methodologies used to prepare the combined financial statements are based on estimates and have been described in the notes, where appropriate.

(c)

Cash and cash equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents include cash in hand, deposits held at call with banks, other short-term highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less.

(d)

Restricted cash

Cash and cash equivalent subject to restrictions are excluded from cash and cash equivalents in the balance sheet and are presented as restricted cash.

(e)

Accounts receivable

The Company carries its accounts receivable at cost less an allowance for doubtful accounts. On a periodic basis, the Company evaluates its accounts receivable and establishes an allowance for doubtful accounts, based on a history of past write-offs, collections and current credit conditions. The Company does not generally charge interest on past-due accounts unless the accounts are subject to legal action, and accounts are written off as uncollectible when all reasonable collection efforts have failed. Accounts are deemed as past-due based on contractual terms. Allowances for doubtful accounts amount to $nil as of December 31, 2009 (2008: $nil).

During the period of operations under ownership by CMA CGM, customers were shippers, comprising exporters, importers and intermediaries, also known as freight forwarders. At that time, the Company sub-contracted certain freight recruitment and payment collections to shipping agencies who were obligated to pay for services provided if a customer defaulted on payment. Amounts receivable directly from final customers or shipping agents were shown within accounts receivables. An allowance for doubtful accounts was established for amounts that were considered uncollectible at year-end, based on review of outstanding invoices.

(f)

Inventories

Inventories consisted of bunkers on board vessels and lubricants in the period when the vessels were owned by CMA CGM. They are valued at cost on a first-in-first-out basis. Inventory costs include the transfer from equity of any gains/losses on qualifying cash flow hedges relating to inventory purchases.

(g)

Vessels

Vessels are recorded at their acquisition cost (less an amount allocated to dry dock component), less accumulated depreciation and impairment loss, if any. Following the merger described in note 1, the vessels are recorded at their fair value, less a proportion of the negative goodwill arising at the time of the merger allocated to these vessels, rather than at their acquisition cost.

In connection with the merger (note 1), the Company recognised an intangible asset arising from the comparison of the acquisition prices per the asset purchase agreement and the estimated fair values at the merger date of the vessels yet to be purchased. This intangible asset was transferred to the cost of the appropriate vessel on delivery and as all such vessels have now been delivered, no intangible asset remains.

F-15

Global Ship Lease, Inc.

Notes to the Combined Financial Statements (continued)

(Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars)

4.	Significant Accounting Policies(Continued)

(g)

Vessels (Continued)

Borrowing costs incurred during the construction of vessels or as part of the prefinancing of the acquisition of vessels are capitalized. Interest capitalized in the year ended December 31, 2009 was $523 (2008: $1,643 and 2007: $833). Other borrowing costs are expensed as incurred.

Vessels are depreciated to their estimated residual value using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives which are reviewed on an ongoing basis to ensure they reflect current technology, service potential and vessel structure. During the period when the vessels were owned by CMA CGM when the vessels were earning freight revenues generated by the containerized transportation, the useful life was estimated as 25 years. Following the sale of the vessels to the Company, the nature of operations changed significantly and from this date, the vessels earn time charter income from the chartering out of the vessels instead of from carrying cargo. On this new basis of operations the useful life was reassessed and estimated to be 30 years.

Prepayments and costs directly related to the future acquisition of vessels are presented in the balance sheet as vessel deposits.

(h)

Drydocking costs

Vessels are drydocked approximately every five years for major repairs and maintenance that cannot be performed while the vessels are operating. Costs directly associated with the required regulatory inspection of the ship, its hull and its machinery and for the defouling and repainting of the hull are capitalized as they are incurred and depreciated on a straight line basis over the period between drydocks. Upon initial purchase, an element of the cost of a vessel is allocated to a drydock component which is amortised on a straight line basis to the anticipated next dry dock.

(i)

Long-lived assets

In accordance with ASC Topic 360, “Impairment of long-lived assets”, intangible and fixed assets such as vessels are reviewed for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying amounts may not be recoverable. An impairment loss is recognized when the sum of the expected undiscounted future cash flows from the asset over its estimated remaining useful life is less than its carrying amount. An impairment loss is recorded equal to the amount by which the asset’s carrying amount exceeds its fair value. Fair value is the net present value of future cash flows discounted by an appropriate discount rate.

During the year ended December 31, 2009, market conditions deteriorated as a result of the global economic downturn and a surplus of containership capacity. Containership spot charter rates and asset values decreased significantly during the year. These changes are considered indicators of potential impairment of the carrying amount of the Company’s vessels. Accordingly, the undiscounted cash flow test for each vessel was performed as of December 31, 2009.

The assumptions used to determine the cash flows expected to be generated by each vessel involve a considerable degree of estimation. Actual conditions may differ significantly from the assumptions used and thus actual cash flows may be significantly different to those expected with a material effect on the recoverability of each vessel’s carrying amount. The most significant assumptions made for the determination of expected cash flows are (i) charter rates on expiry of existing charters, which are based on a reversion to the historical mean for each category of vessel, adjusted to reflect current and expected market conditions (ii) off-hire days, which are based on actual off-hire statistics for the GSL fleet (iii) operating costs, based on current levels escalated over time based on long term trends (iv) dry docking frequency, duration and cost and (v) estimated useful life which is assessed as a total of 30 years. In case of an indication of impairment, the results of a recoverability test would also be sensitive to the discount rate applied.

Based on the assumptions made, the expected undiscounted future cash flows exceed the vessels’ carrying amounts as of December 31, 2009.

(j)

Derivative instruments

(i)

Interest rate hedging activities

The Company has entered into certain hedging agreements in connection with its borrowings.

Interest rate derivatives are initially recognized at fair value on the date a derivative contract is entered into and are subsequently re-measured at their fair value. The method of recognizing the resulting gain or loss depends on whether the derivative is designated and qualifies as a hedging instrument, and if so, the nature of the item being hedged.

F-16

Global Ship Lease, Inc.

Notes to the Combined Financial Statements (continued)

(Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars)

4.	Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

The Company’s interest rate derivative instruments do not qualify for hedge accounting. Changes in the fair value, as well as cash settlements of interest rate derivative instruments, are recognized immediately in the statement of income within “Realized and unrealized gain (loss) on interest rate derivatives”. Cash flows related to interest rate derivatives (including payments and periodic cash settlements) are included within “Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities”.

The fair value of derivatives is presented on the face of the balance sheet under the line item “Derivative instruments” and is split into current and non-current portions based on the net cash flows expected within one year.

(ii)

Commodity hedging activities

Since the acquisition of the vessels from CMA CGM, the Company has not entered into any bunker derivative instruments and has not undertaken any bunker hedging activities. However these were activities undertaken during the period when the vessels were owned by CMA CGM.

(k)

Deferred finance costs

Costs incurred in connection with obtaining long term debt and in obtaining amendments to existing facilities are recorded as deferred financing costs and are amortized to interest expense over the estimated duration of the related debt. Such costs include fees paid to the lenders or on the lenders’ behalf and associated legal and other professional fees.

(l)

Preferred shares

Preferred shares have been included within liabilities in the combined balance sheet and preferred share dividends included within interest expense in the combined income statement as their nature is similar to that of a liability rather than equity. Holders of these mandatorily redeemable preferred shares are entitled to receive a dividend equal to 3-month Libor plus 2% on the original issue price and rank senior to the Class A and Class B common shares with respect to dividend rights and rights upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Company.

(m)

Intangible liabilities – charter agreements

In connection with the merger (note 1), the Company recognised an intangible liability using the market approach wherein the Company’s actual charter agreements were compared to market rates at the merger date.

These intangible liabilities are amortized as an increase of time charter revenue over the remaining term of the relevant charter.

(n)

Classification of long term debt

Long term debt is classified within current liabilities unless the Company has an unconditional right to defer settlement of the liability for at least 12 months after the balance sheet date.

(o)

Other comprehensive income (loss)

Other comprehensive income (loss), which is reported in the accompanying combined statement of equity, consists of net income (loss) and other gains and losses affecting equity that, under US GAAP, are excluded from net income (loss). Other comprehensive income (loss) only relates to the period in which the vessels were owned and operated by CMA CGM and includes the effective portion of bunker derivative financial instruments that qualified as hedge accounting and the impact of the translation of foreign currency statements, as certain of CMA CGM’s vessel owning subsidiaries had a functional currency other than the U.S. dollar.

(p)

Segment information

Segment information has been prepared on the same basis that it is reported internally to the Company’s chief operating decision maker. The Company operated under two business models from which it derives its revenues reported within these financial statements: (i) the provision of vessels by the Company under time charters to container shipping companies and (ii) freight revenues generated by the containerized transportation of a broad range of industrial and consumer goods by the Predecessor group. There are no transactions between reportable segments.

(q)

Revenue recognition and related operating expense

The Company charters out its vessels on time charters which involves placing a vessel at a charterer’s disposal for a period of time during which the charterer uses the vessel in return for the payment of a specified daily hire rate. Such revenues are accounted for as operating leases and are therefore recognized on a straight line basis as the average revenues over the rental periods of such charter agreements, as service is performed, except for loss generating time charters, in which case the loss would be recognized in the period when such accumulated loss is determined.

F-17

Global Ship Lease, Inc.

Notes to the Combined Financial Statements (continued)

(Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars)

4.	Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

(q)

Revenue recognition and related operating expense (Continued)

Under time charter arrangements the Company, as owner, is responsible for all the operating expenses of the vessels, such as crew costs, insurance, repairs and maintenance, and such costs are expensed as incurred.

Freight revenues earned during the period of the vessels’ ownership by CMA CGM and related costs directly attributable to loaded container movements were recognized on delivery of the loaded container to its final destination. Freight revenues and costs directly attributable to containers not delivered at the closing date, excluding mainly time based costs such as charter costs, fuel and lubrication oil consumption and port taxes and expenses, were reported as “other receivables” and “other payables”. A provision for net realizable value was recorded only when all costs necessary to complete the delivery of the service exceeded the corresponding expected freight revenue.

(r)

Foreign currency transactions

The Company’s functional currency is the U.S. dollar as substantially all revenues and a majority of expenditures are denominated in U.S. dollars. Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated at the rate of exchange at the balance sheet dates. Expenses paid in foreign currencies are recorded at the rate of exchange at the transaction date. Exchange gains and losses are included in the determination of net income.

(s)

Repairs and maintenance

All expenditures relating to routine maintenance and repairs are expensed when incurred.

(t)

Insurance

The Company maintains hull and machinery insurance, war risks insurance, protection and indemnity insurance coverage, increased value insurance, and freight, demurrage and defence insurance coverage in amounts considered prudent to cover normal risks in the ordinary course of its operations. Premiums paid in advance to insurance providers are recognized as prepaid expenses and expensed over the period covered by the insurance contract.

(u)

Share based compensation

The Company awards restricted stock units to its employees and directors which vest, based on service conditions only, over a period of time up to three years from the award date.

The fair value of restricted stock unit grants is determined by reference to the quoted stock price on the date of grant, adjusted for estimated dividends forgone until the restricted stock units vest. Compensation expense is recognized based on a graded expense model over the vesting period.

(v)

Income taxes

The Company and its Marshall Island subsidiaries are exempt from taxation in the Marshall Islands. The Company’s Cyprus subsidiaries are liable for a tax based on the tonnage of the vessel each company owns. The cost, which is included within operating expenses, amounted to $109, $48 and $nil for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The Cyprus subsidiaries are also liable for income tax payable on interest income.

The Company has one subsidiary in the United Kingdom, where the principal rate of corporate income tax is 28% (2008: 28%, 2007: 30%). This subsidiary earns management and other fees from fellow group companies.

The Company accounts for deferred income taxes using the liability method which requires the determination of deferred tax assets and liabilities, based upon temporary timing differences that arise between the financial statement and tax bases of recording assets and liabilities, using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which differences are expected to reverse. The net deferred tax asset is adjusted by a valuation allowance where appropriate, if, based on the weight of available evidence, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the net deferred tax asset will not be realized. However, with regard to a deferred tax asset arising from the recognition of compensation costs for share awards, the Company recognizes a deferred asset based on the compensation cost booked in the reporting period with no adjustment for a valuation allowance, in accordance with the requirements of ASC Topic 718 “Accounting for stock based compensation.” At December 31, 2009 a deferred tax asset of $445 (2008: $293) presented within “Other receivables” was recognized relating to the stock based compensation costs booked in the year.

(w)

Dividends

Dividends are recorded in the period in which they are declared by the Company’s Board of Directors. Dividends to be paid are presented in the combined balance sheet in the line item “Dividends payable”.

(x)

Earnings per share

In accordance with ASC Topic 260 “Earnings Per Share”, basic earnings per common share is based on income available to common shareholders divided by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period, excluding non-vested restricted stock units. Diluted earnings per common share is calculated by applying the treasury stock method. All outstanding warrants and non-vested restricted stock units that have a dilutive effect are included in the calculation. The basic and diluted Earnings Per Share for the Successor period is presented for each category of participating common shares under the two-class method.

F-18

Global Ship Lease, Inc.

Notes to the Combined Financial Statements (continued)

(Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars)

4.	Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

(y)

Recently issued accounting standards

The FASB “Accounting Standards Codification” (the Codification) became effective on July 1, 2009, officially becoming the single source of authoritative non-governmental U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (US GAAP), superseding existing FASB, American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA), Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF), and related accounting literature. Only one level of authoritative US GAAP now exists and it is termed Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”). All other accounting literature is considered non-authoritative. The Codification reorganizes US GAAP pronouncements into accounting topics and displays them using a consistent structure. Also included in the Codification is relevant Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) guidance organized using the same topical structure in separate sections within the Codification. This has impacted the Company’s financial statements as all references to authoritative accounting literature have now been referenced in accordance with the Codification.

On April 9, 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued guidance now codified as ASC Topic 825, “Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments.” This pronouncement requires disclosures of fair value for any financial instruments not currently reflected at fair value on the balance sheet for all interim periods. This pronouncement is effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009 and is applied prospectively. The adoption of this pronouncement did not have a material impact on the combined financial statements of the Company.

On April 9, 2009 the FASB issued guidance now codified as ASC Topic 320, “Recognition and Presentation of Other Than Temporary Impairments.” This pronouncement is intended to bring greater consistency to the timing of impairment recognition, and provide greater clarity to investors about the credit and noncredit components of impaired debt securities that are not expected to be sold. This pronouncement also requires increased and more timely disclosures regarding expected cash flows, credit losses, and an aging of securities with unrealized losses. This pronouncement is effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009 and is applied prospectively. The adoption of this pronouncement did not have a material impact on the combined financial statements of the Company.

In May 2009, the FASB issued guidance now codified as ASC Topic 855, “Subsequent Events,” which establishes general standards of accounting for, and requires disclosure of, events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. The Company adopted this pronouncement and has evaluated for disclosure subsequent events that have occurred up to the date of issuance of the combined financial statements of the Company.

Management do not believe that any other recently issued, but not yet effective accounting pronouncements, if currently adopted, would have a material impact on the combined financial statements of the Company.

5.	Vessels in Operation, less Accumulated Depreciation


	December 31, 2009			December 31, 2008

	Successor			Successor
Cost	$	1,007,500		$	915,627
Accumulated Depreciation		(45,792	)		(8,731	)

Net Book Value	$	961,708		$	906,896

Variations in net book value of vessels including drydocking, are presented below:


	December 31, 2009			December 31, 2008

	Successor			Successor
Opening balance	$	906,896		$	475,299
Depreciation expense (Predecessor)		—			(12,163	)
Additions in the period (Predecessor)		—			1,460
Purchase price adjustment (note 3)		—			59,302
Additions in the period (Successor)		84,267			356,862
Transfer from intangible assets – purchase agreement (note 7)		7,840			34,867
Depreciation expense (Successor)		(37,295	)		(8,731	)

Closing balance	$	961,708		$	906,896

F-19

Global Ship Lease, Inc.

Notes to the Combined Financial Statements (continued)

(Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars)

5.	Vessels in Operation, less Accumulated Depreciation (Continued)

In December 2008 the Company took delivery of four of the five vessels in the contracted fleet. Included within additions for the year ended December 31, 2008 was an advance payment of $99,000 made in that year and capitalized interest of $1,400 (2007: $833) relating to the advance payment.

In August 2009, the Company took delivery of the CMA CGM Berlioz, the final vessel in its contracted fleet. The book value of the CMA CGM Berlioz includes the transfer of $7,840 from the intangible asset recognized at the time of the merger, and which arose from the comparison of the acquisition prices per the asset purchase agreement and the estimated fair value at the merger date of the vessels yet to be purchased. There was no interest capitalized during the year ended 31 December 2009 in respect of vessels in operation.

As of December 31, 2009 all 17 vessels were pledged as collateral under the credit facility agreement.

6.	Vessel Deposits


	December 31, 2009		December 31, 2008

	Successor		Successor
Opening balance	$	15,720	$	—
Additions in the period		—		15,477
Capitalized interest		523		243

Closing balance	$	16,243	$	15,720

Vessel deposits relate to two 4,250 TEU newbuildings that the Company has agreed to acquire from German interests for approximately $77,000 per vessel. The purchase is subject to the completion of customary additional documentation and closing conditions. The two vessels are scheduled to be delivered in the fourth quarter of 2010. Both vessels are contracted to be chartered to ZIM for a term of seven or eight years at a net rate of $28,000 per vessel per day.

The Company is not liable for any other prepayments before the delivery of these vessels other than to provide certain owner’s supplies such as lashing gear. Vessel deposits include capitalized interest of $766 as at December 31, 2009 (2008: $243).

7.	Intangible Assets – Purchase Agreement


	December 31, 2009			December 31, 2008
	Successor			Predecessor
Purchase price allocation (note 3)	$	7,840		$	42,707
Transfer to vessels in operation		(7,840	)		(34,867	)

Closing balance	$	—		$	7,840

Intangible assets related to the agreement in place as at August 14, 2008 to purchase five vessels from CMA CGM. These intangible assets were not amortised but on delivery of the related vessel were allocated to the cost of the purchased vessels.

During the year ended December 31, 2009, the final vessel in the contracted fleet (2008: four) was purchased by the Company. The related intangible asset of $7,840 (2008: $34,867) was transferred to the cost of the vessel.

8.	Derivative Instruments

The fair value of derivative financial instruments contracted by the Company is as follows:


	December 31, 2009			December 31, 2008

	Successor			Successor
Fair value of interest rate swap hedging instruments - current and non current portions	$	(29,113	)	$	(47,041	)

Closing balance	$	(29,113	)	$	(47,041	)

As at December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, none of the Company’s derivative instruments qualified for hedge accounting. In the year ended December 31, 2007 the net gains recognized in earnings during the period for bunker derivative instruments that qualified as cash flow hedging instruments amounted to $3,083.

F-20

Global Ship Lease, Inc.

Notes to the Combined Financial Statements (continued)

(Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars)

8.	Derivative Instruments (Continued)

During 2008 the Company entered into certain derivative interest rate agreements to fix the interest rate on debt drawn or anticipated to be drawn under its credit facility. A total of $580,000 of anticipated core debt has been swapped into fixed rate debt at a weighted average rate of 3.59%, with details as follows:


Start Date	Maturity Date	Notional Amount		Fixed Rate %
May 12, 2008	March 17, 2013	$	60,000	3.40
May 19, 2008	March 17, 2013		60,000	3.40
May 20, 2008	March 17, 2013		68,000	3.40
November 19, 2008	September 17, 2013		50,000	3.32
December 17, 2008	March 17, 2013		20,000	3.40
December 17, 2008	December 17, 2016		60,000	3.69	(1)
December 17, 2008	December 17, 2016		60,000	3.80	(1)
December 17, 2008	March 17, 2013		45,000	3.40
December 17, 2008	December 17, 2016		71,000	3.70	(1)
July 15, 2009	June 17, 2014		41,000	3.80
October 29, 2010	October 29, 2015		45,000	4.25

	Total / Weighted average rate:	$	580,000	3.59	%

(1)

The swap counterparty has a one time option to cancel the swap as of March 17, 2013

As of December 31, 2009 the maximum length of time over which the entity is hedging its interest rate exposure is approximately seven years.

9.	Deferred Financing Costs


	December 31, 2009			December 31, 2008

	Successor			Successor
Opening balance	$	3,657		$	5,882
Amortization expense included within interest expense (Predecessor)		—			(491	)
Expenditure in the period		5,431			3,856
Purchase price adjustment (note 3)		—			(5,391	)
Amortization expense included within interest expense (Successor)		(3,108	)		(199	)

Closing balance	$	5,980		$	3,657

The Company’s borrowing capacity under its credit facility was reduced as part of amendments agreed on February 10, 2009 and August 20, 2009 (see note 11). A portion of the unamortized deferred financing costs at the date of each amendment was written off, in proportion to the decrease in the borrowing capacity, for $176 and $2,015 respectively. These amounts have been included within interest expense. The remaining unamortized deferred financing costs existing at the date of each amendment together with the additional fees and attributable costs paid ($3,293 and $2,138, respectively) were deferred and are amortized over the remaining term of the credit agreement.

10.	Intangible Liability – Charter Agreements


	December 31, 2009			December 31, 2008

	Successor			Successor
Opening balance	$	27,956		$	—
Purchase price allocation (note 3)		—			28 ,023
Amortization in period		(1,549	)		(67	)

Closing balance	$	26,407		$	27,956

Intangible liabilities relate to management’s estimate of fair value of below-market charters at the date of the merger (note 1), on August 14, 2008. The intangible liabilities will be amortized for each vessel over the remaining life of the charter. The fair value was estimated by management based on its experience with regard to availability of similar vessels, costs to build new vessels and current market demand. The contracted lease rates were compared to the estimated current market lease rates for similar vessels. The estimated lease intangibles were computed by discounting the difference in the projected lease cash flows using a discount rate of 8.0% and the length of the charter as the relevant time period.

F-21

Global Ship Lease, Inc.

Notes to the Combined Financial Statements (continued)

(Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars)

10.	Intangible Liability – Charter Agreements (Continued)

Amortization of the intangible liabilities for the 12 initial vessels began on the date following the merger and for the remaining five vessels delivered to the Company after the merger, amortization commenced on delivery.

11.	Long term Debt

In December 2007 the Company entered into an $800,000 senior secured credit facility with Fortis Bank, Citibank, HSH Nordbank, Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation, KFW and DnB Nor Bank. Subsequently, Bank of Scotland joined the syndicate.

On February 10, 2009 the Company announced it had amended the terms of the original agreement in response to significant decreases in market values of containerships and the consequent implications on the loan to value covenant in the credit facility. Loan to value is the ratio of the balance outstanding on the credit facility to the aggregate charter free market value of the secured vessels, determined in April and November each year. The amended agreement increased temporarily the permitted maximum loan to value to 100% (previously 75%) applicable for test dates up to and including April 30, 2010. The margin applicable on interest payable under the credit facility varied from 1.25% to 2.75% over Libor depending on the loan to value ratio. The Company also paid a commitment fee of 0.50% per annum based on the undrawn portion of the credit facility (0.25% per annum up to February 10, 2009). During this period, the Company had no restrictions on its ability to distribute dividends unless the loan to value ratio exceeded 90%, at which point the Company would have been required to place 50% of its quarterly cash available for distribution in a pledged account. The pledged account would be released back to the Company if loan to value fell back below 90% during a subsequent valuation period. If the loan to value ratio exceeded 100%, the Company may have been required to prepay the loan or provide additional security to reduce the loan to value ratio to below 100%. The credit facility amount of $800,000 was to be reduced by 19 equal quarterly instalments, based on the market value weighted average age of the secured vessels compared to 18 years, commencing in December 2011. The final maturity date of the credit facility continued to be August 14, 2016 at which point any remaining outstanding balance had to be repaid.

On April 29, 2009, the Company agreed with the lenders that no loan to value tests would be performed pending agreement of a further amendment to the credit facility in response to further deterioration in market values of containerships. The margin applicable during this waiver period was 2.75% and the Company agreed that no dividends would be declared or paid on common shares during this time. The waiver period was extended on June 25, 2009 and again on July 30, 2009 through until August 31, 2009.

On August 20, 2009, the Company further amended the terms of the credit facility. Under the revised terms of the credit facility, the loan to value covenant has been waived up to and including November 30, 2010 with the next loan to value test scheduled for April 30, 2011. Further, the amendment enabled the Company to borrow $57,000 under the credit facility including a $15,000 newly created Over Advance Portion (“OAP Loan”) to allow the purchase of the CMA CGM Berlioz on August 26, 2009. The balance of the $82,000 vessel purchase price was funded by cash. Amounts borrowed under the amended credit facility bear interest at Libor plus a fixed margin of 3.50% up to November 30, 2010. Thereafter, the margin will be between 2.50% and 3.50% depending on the loan to value ratio, to be determined at the end of April and November each year.

Under the amendment, all undrawn commitments of $200,900 were cancelled after the delivery of the CMA CGM Berlioz. No further commitment fees are payable subsequent to the cancellation of the undrawn commitments. The commitment fee in the year ended December 31, 2009 amounted to $779 (2008: $473 (Successor) and $624 (Predecessor), 2007: $92 (Predecessor). The Company may not declare or pay dividends to common shareholders during the period up to November 30, 2010 or thereafter until the loan to value ratio is at or below 75%.

A repayment of $10,908 of the OAP loan was made in November 2009. The second repayment in February 2010 fully repaid the OAP loan.

The balance of borrowings under the credit facility is to be repaid quarterly commencing June 30, 2010 in an amount equal to free cash in excess of $20,000 determined as at the previous month end subject to a minimum of $40,000 repayment a year on a rolling 12 month trailing basis. Once loan to value is at or below 75%, repayment of borrowings will become fixed at $10,000 per quarter. The final maturity date of the credit facility remains August 14, 2016 at which point any remaining outstanding balance must be repaid.

As part of the August 20, 2009 amendment, CMA CGM has agreed to defer redemption of the $48,000 preferred shares it holds until after the final maturity of the credit facility in August 2016, subject to any earlier redemption from proceeds from the exercise of warrants (see note 10), and also to retain its current holding of approximately 24.4 million common shares in the Company until at least November 30, 2010.

The credit facility is secured by, inter alia, first priority mortgages on each of the vessels in the security package, a pledge of shares of the vessel owning subsidiaries as well as assignments of earnings and insurances. The financial covenants in the credit facility are: a) a minimum cash balance of the lower of $15,000 or six months net interest expense; b) net debt to total capitalization ratio not to exceed 75%; c) EBITDA to debt service, on a trailing four-quarter basis, to be no less than 1.10 to 1; and d) a minimum net worth of $200,000 (with all terms as defined in the credit facility).

F-22

Global Ship Lease, Inc.

Notes to the Combined Financial Statements (continued)

(Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars)

11.	Long term Debt (Continued)

Long term debt is summarized as follows:


	December 31, 2009			December 31, 2008

	Successor			Successor
Credit facility, at Libor USD + 2.5% to 3.5%	$	588,192		$	542,100
Less current instalments of long term debt		(68,300	)		—

	$	519,892		$	542,100

As described above and as part of the amendment dated August 20, 2009, outstanding borrowings under the credit facility are to be repaid quarterly in an amount equal to free cash in excess of $20,000 determined as at the month end prior to the scheduled repayment. Repayments become fixed at $10,000 per quarter once loan to value is at or below 75% which, for the purposes of the following table, is assumed to be as at April 30, 2011, the next scheduled test date. Based on management’s reasonable estimates of excess cashflow, as at December 31, 2009 the estimated repayments in each of relevant periods are as follows:


	December 31, 2009		December 31, 2008

	Successor		Successor
Due in one year or less	$	68,300	$	—
Due after one year through two years		45,300		—
Due after two years through five years		120,000		—
Due after five years		354,592		542,100

	$	588,192	$	542,100

The amount of excess cash generated may vary significantly from management’s estimates and consequently the repayment profile of outstanding debt may be significantly different from that presented. Further, loan to value may not be at or below 75% as at April 30, 2011 in which case, assuming a continuation of the current waiver, prepayments will continue to be based on excess cash.

12.	Other operating (income) expense

Other operating (income) expense is summarized as follows:


	Year ended December 31,
	2009			2008						2007
	Successor			Successor			Predecessor			Predecessor
				August 15 to December 31			January 1 to August 14
Sundry shipping income	$	(288	)	$	(106	)	$	(187	)	$	—
Other sundry income		(144	)
Realized (gains) losses on bunker derivative instruments		—			—			280			(2,341	)

	$	(432	)	$	(106	)	$	93		$	(2,341	)

F-23

Global Ship Lease, Inc.

Notes to the Combined Financial Statements (continued)

(Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars)

13.	Related Party Transactions

CMA CGM is presented as a related party as it was, until the merger, the parent company of Global Ship Lease, Inc. and at December 31, 2009 is a significant shareholder of the Company, owning certain Class A and Class B common shares representing a 45% voting interest in the Company.

Amounts due to CMA CGM companies are summarized as follows:


	December 31, 2009		December 31, 2008

	Successor		Successor
Current account (below)	$	3,764	$	1,040


Amounts due to CMA CGM companies presented within liabilities	$	3,764	$	1,040


Current account (below)	$	7,838	$	958


Amounts due from CMA CGM companies presented within assets	$	7,838	$	958

CMA CGM charters all of the Company’s operating vessels and one of its subsidiaries provides the Company with ship management services. The current account balances at December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 relate to amounts payable to or recoverable from CMA CGM group companies.

CMA CGM holds all of the Series A preferred shares of the Company. During the year to December 31, 2009, the Company paid CMA CGM dividends on the preferred shares of $2,279 (2008: $nil) of which $848 related to the year ended December 31, 2008.

Under a shareholder’s loan agreement dated December 11, 2007, CMA CGM provided to the Predecessor a credit facility of $250,000. The amount of the loan outstanding on August 14, 2008 of $176,875 was cancelled upon completion of the merger (note 1). The loan was unsecured and bore interest at 5.25% per annum.

Asset Purchase Agreement

As reported in note 2, the Company entered into an asset purchase agreement with CMA CGM on December 5, 2007. Pursuant to this agreement, during December 2007, the Company purchased 10 secondhand vessels for a total price of $385,000 and in January 2008, the Company purchased two newly built vessels for a total price of $188,000. In December 2008 the Company purchased four vessels for a total price of $354,780 of which $99,000 was prepaid by virtue of the 12,375,000 Class C common shares in the Company issued to CMA CGM in the merger (note 3).

In August 2009, the Company took delivery of the CMA CGM Berlioz, a 2001-built 6,627 TEU container vessel and the last vessel of its contracted fleet with CMA CGM. The vessel was purchased for $82,000 and was funded by drawings under the credit facility and available cash (see note 11). The CMA CGM Berlioz is on a non-cancellable, 12-year time charter to CMA CGM at a daily rate of $34.

As Global Ship Lease, Inc. and CMA CGM were entities under common control at the time of the purchase of the first 12 vessels, the difference between the purchase price paid to CMA CGM by the Company for these vessels and the in aggregate lower amount at which the vessels were recorded in the Predecessor Group’s financial statements at the dates of sale, was recognized as a deemed distribution to CMA CGM. The amounts presented within the statements of cash flows and of stockholders’ equity were as follows:

1. The difference between (i) the $385,000 purchase price paid for the 10 vessels purchased in December 2007 and (ii) the carrying amount at the transfer dates, amounting to $288,075, in Predecessor Group carve-out financial statements, has been recorded as a deemed distribution to CMA CGM for $96,925.

2. The difference between (i) the $188,000 purchase price paid for the two vessels purchased in January 2008 and (ii) the carrying amount at the transfer dates, amounting to $187,495, in Predecessor Group carve-out financial statements, has been recorded as a deemed distribution to CMA CGM for $505.

During the Predecessor Group’s period and prior to the purchase by the Company of the initial fleet of 12 vessels, the vessels were owned and operated by CMA CGM. At that time, the vessels as a whole did not belong to a separate legal group, nor were they owned by a separate legal entity or operated as a discrete unit. Accordingly, there was no separate share capital and

F-24

Global Ship Lease, Inc.

Notes to the Combined Financial Statements (continued)

(Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars)

13.	Related Party Transactions (Continued)

reserves relating to the vessels for the periods covered by these combined financial statements up to the purchase of these vessels by the Company. The net investment by the Predecessor Group during this period of operations has been shown on the balance sheet as an amount due to CMA CGM and included within equity. This balance reflects the accumulated net investment by CMA CGM, including the accumulated net income relating to prior periods, and is impacted by all transactions as CMA CGM in effect was the source of finance for all operating, investing and financing transactions. All funding of the Predecessor Group’s operations during the period of the combined financial statements has been assumed to be by cash flows generated by operations, bank loans specifically related to the acquisition of the ships, and due to CMA CGM as a net investment in equity. The variation in net investment can be analyzed as follows:


In thousand of $	January 1 to August 14, 2008		Year ended December 31, 2007
	Predecessor		Predecessor
Net cash provided by operating activities of the Predecessor Group	(1,359	)	(53,743	)
Settlements of hedges which do not qualify for hedge accounting	141		58
Acquisition of vessels by the Predecessor Group	—		183,713
Repayments of long-term debt by the Predecessor Group	—		146,166
Net book value of the 12 vessels transferred to the Company	(187,495	)	(288,075	)

Change in amount due to CMA CGM	(188,713	)	(11,881	)

The average balance due to CMA CGM for the period from January 1 to August 14, 2008 and year ended December 31, 2007 amounted to $81,442 and $139,118 respectively.

Time Charter Agreements

All of the Company’s vessels are time chartered to CMA CGM. Under each of the time charters, hire is due in advance and the daily rate is fixed for the duration of the charter. The charters are for remaining periods as at December 31, 2009 of between 3 and 16 years. Of the $1,659,803 maximum future charter hire receivable for the total fleet set out in note 14 (including for two vessels scheduled to be purchased in fourth quarter 2010 and to be chartered to ZIM, a company not related to CMA CGM), $1,516,611 relates to the 17 ships currently chartered to CMA CGM.

Ship Management Agreement

The Company outsources day to day technical management of its vessels to a ship manager, CMA Ships Ltd, a wholly owned subsidiary of CMA CGM. The Company pays CMA Ships Ltd an annual management fee of $114 per vessel and reimburses costs incurred on its behalf, mainly being for the provision of crew, lubricating oils and routine maintenance. Such reimbursement is subject to a cap of between $5.4 and $8.8 per day per vessel depending on the vessel. The impact of the cap is determined quarterly and for the fleet as a whole. Ship management fees expensed for the year ended December 31, 2009 amounted to $1,864 (2008: Successor period $528 and Predecessor period $848, 2007: $49).

Except for transactions with CMA CGM, the Company did not enter into any other related party transactions.

F-25

Global Ship Lease, Inc.

Notes to the Combined Financial Statements (continued)

(Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars)

14.	Commitments and Contingencies

Contracted Vessel Purchases

As reported in note 2, the Company has agreed to purchase two vessels from German interests in the fourth quarter of 2010 for approximately $77,000 each. The purchase contracts are non-cancelable. A deposit of 10% has been paid for these two vessels. The remaining purchase obligation of approximately $139,300 is unfunded and is due on delivery of the vessels, which is anticipated to be in December 2010. The vessels are to be chartered to Zim Integrated Shipping Services Limited for seven to eight years. Global Ship Lease has no capacity to borrow any further amounts under its credit facility and therefore must secure other sources of financing to meet its obligations to the sellers under the contracts. The Company continues to discuss opportunities for raising sufficient capital to meet its obligations with a number of different providers of finance, but can give no assurances as to the likely success of these discussions.

The purchase contracts contain a clause to limit liability in the event of buyer default to the forfeiture of the previously paid deposit. However, this intended limitation on liability may not be effective. Unless Global Ship Lease can secure additional financing or an amendment to the purchase contracts, Global Ship Lease may be exposed to legal action by the sellers for damages which may exceed the deposit already paid. In addition, Global Ship Lease may suffer impairment loss on any part of the deposit which has been paid and which might not be recoverable.

Charter Hire Receivable

The Company has entered into long term charters for its vessels owned at December 31, 2009. The charter hire (including those relating to vessels due for delivery in 2010), is due in advance and the daily rate is fixed for the duration of the charter. The charters were originally for periods of between five and 17 years and the maximum future annual charter hire receivable for the fleet of 17 vessels as at December 31, 2009 and for the total contracted fleet of 19 vessels, taking account of actual or anticipated delivery dates and before allowance for any off-hire periods, is as follows:


Year ending December 31	Fleet operated as at December 31, 2009		Total fleet to be operated
2010	$	156,756	$	158,911
2011		156,756		177,197
2012		156,502		176,998
2013		135,952		156,392
2014		135,952		156,392
2013 and thereafter		774,693		833,913

	$	1,516,611	$	1,659,803

F-26

Global Ship Lease, Inc.

Notes to the Combined Financial Statements (continued)

(Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars)

15.	Operating Segments

Segment information reported below has been prepared on the same basis that it is reported internally to the Company’s chief operating decision maker. The Company operated under two business models from which it derives its revenues reported within these combined financial statements: (i) the provision of vessels by the Company under time charters to container shipping companies and (ii) freight revenues generated by the containerized transportation of a broad range of industrial and consumer goods by the Predecessor group. There are no transactions between reportable segments. Following the delivery of the initial 12 vessels in December 2007 and January 2008, the activity consists solely of the ownership and provision of vessels for container shipping under time charters.

The “Adjustment” columns in the table below include (i) the elimination of the containerized transportation activity performed by the Predecessor up to August 14, 2008, and (ii) the IPO and merger costs expensed by the Predecessor.

During the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 the activities can be analyzed as follows:


	2009			2008												2007
	Year ended December 31,			Period August 15 to December 31,			Period January 1 to August 14,									Year ended December 31,
	Successor			Successor			Predecessor									Predecessor
	Time Charter			Time Charter			Time Charter			Adjustment			Total			Time Charter			Adjustment			Total
Operating revenues	$	148,708		$	39,095		$	55,883		$	2,072		$	57,955		$	2,909		$	332,186		$	335,095


Operating expenses

Voyage expenses		—			—			—			1,944			1,944			—			249,457			249,457
Vessel operating expenses		41,368			11,904			17,893			181			18,074			740			23,219			23,959
Depreciation		37,307			8,731			11,902			261			12,163			622			15,497			16,119
General and administrative		8,748			3,712			2,306			1,508			3,814			330			17,421			17,751
Other operating (income) expense		(432	)		(106	)		(187	)		280			93			—			(2,341	)		(2,341	)


Total operating expenses		86,991			24,241			31,914			4,174			36,088			1,692			303,253			304,945


Operating income (loss)		61,717			14,854			23,969			(2,102	)		21,867			1,217			28,933			30,150

Interest income		519			413			424			—			424			—			—			—
Interest expense		(24,224	)		(3,842	)		(17,600	)		—			(17,600	)		(1,103	)		(12,251	)		(13,354	)
Realised and unrealised gain (loss) on derivatives		4,806			(55,293	)		2,749			—			2,749			—			—			—


Income (loss) before income taxes		42,818			(43,868	)		9,542			(2,102	)		7,440			114			16,682			16,796

Income taxes		(444	)		(102	)		(23	)		—			(23	)		(20	)		—			(20	)


Net income (loss)	$	42,374		$	(43,970	)	$	9,519		$	(2,102	)	$	7,417		$	94		$	16,682		$	16,776

F-27

Global Ship Lease, Inc.

Notes to the Combined Financial Statements (continued)

(Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars)

16.	Share Capital

At December 31, 2009 the Company has two classes of common shares. The rights of holders of Class B common shares are identical to those of holders of Class A common shares, except that the dividend rights of holders of Class B common shares are subordinated to those of holders of Class A common shares until at least the third quarter of 2011. Class B common shares will convert to Class A common shares on a one-for-one basis after the expiration of the subordination period and provided certain financial conditions are met. Until January 1, 2009 the Company had three classes of common shares but on that date the 12,375,000 Class C common shares issued by the Company were converted into Class A common shares on a one-for-one basis.

The restricted stock units granted to the Directors in November 2008 as part of their compensation for service during 2008 vested on January 1, 2009, and subsequently 36,833 shares were issued to the Directors. A proportion of the restricted stock units granted to management in August and November 2008 as part of their compensation arrangements vested in September and October 2009, and consequently 300,000 Class A common shares were issued to management in this period.

The Series A preferred shares rank senior to the common shares and are mandatorily redeemable in 12 quarterly instalments commencing on August 31, 2016 and are required to be redeemed earlier using the proceeds of any exercise of Public Warrants. The preferred shares are redeemed each time that proceeds from the exercise of warrants reach $5,000. As at December 31, 2009 total proceeds received from the exercise of warrants, classified in the balance sheet as restricted cash, were $3,026 (2008: $3,026) and therefore none of the preferred shares have been redeemed. Series A preferred shares are classified as a liability. The dividend that preferred shares holders are entitled to be paid is presented as part of interest expense.

In addition to the outstanding Class A and B common shares and the Series A Preferred shares, there are 39,531,348 Public Warrants (2008: 39,531,348) which have an expiry of August 24, 2010 and give the holder the right to purchase one Class A common share at a price of $6. There are 5,500,000 Sponsor Warrants (2008: 5,500,000) which have similar terms to the Public Warrants except that the exercise must be on a cashless basis. Further, there are 6,188,088 Class A Warrants (2008: 6,188,088) which expire on September 1, 2013 and give the holders the right to purchase one Class A common share at a price of $9.25.

On September 30, 2008 500,102 Public Warrants were exercised at a price of $6 each and 500,102 Class A common shares issued.

On October 22, 2008, 4,400 Public Warrants were exercised at a price of $6 each and 4,400 Class A common shares issued.

On September 22, 2008 the Company announced a starting dividend of $0.23 per Class A common share which was paid on October 14, 2008 to Class A common shareholders and unit holders of record on October 2, 2008.

On November 13, 2008 the Company announced a third quarter 2008 dividend of $0.23 per Class A common share which was paid on November 28, 2008 to Class A common shareholders and unit holders of record as of November 21, 2008.

On February 10, 2009, the Company announced a fourth quarter 2008 dividend of $0.23 per Class A common share, unit and Class B share which was paid on March 5, 2009 to Class A common shareholders and unit holders and Class B shareholders of record as of February 20, 2009.

17.	Interest Rate Derivatives and Fair Value Measurements

The Company is exposed to the impact of interest rate changes on its variable rate debt. Accordingly, the Company enters into interest rate swap agreements to manage the exposure to interest rate variability and details of existing interest rate derivatives are set out in note 8. None of the Company’s interest rate agreements qualify for hedge accounting, therefore, the net changes in the fair value of the interest rate derivative assets and liabilities at each reporting period are reflected in the current period operations as unrealized gains and losses on derivatives. Cash flows related to interest rate derivatives (initial payments of derivatives and periodic cash settlements) are included within cash flows from investing activities in the combined statement of cash flows. There were no initial payments on derivatives made in the year ended December 31, 2009 (2008: Successor period $nil and Predecessor period $4,730).

Realized gains or losses from interest rate derivatives are recognized in the statement of income concurrent with cash settlements. In addition, the interest rate derivatives are “marked to market” each reporting period to determine the fair values which generate unrealized gains or losses. The unrealized gain on interest rate derivatives for the year ended December 31, 2009 was $17,928 (2008: $51,770 loss, of which Successor period loss of $54,851 and Predecessor period gain of $3,081, 2007 $nil).

The Company adopted ASC Topic 820 “Fair Value Measurements.” The fair value hierarchy under ASC Topic 820 has three levels based on the reliability of the inputs used to determine fair value as follows:


Level 1.		Observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets;

Level 2.		Inputs, other than the quoted prices in active markets, that are observable either directly or indirectly; and

Level 3.		Unobservable inputs in which there is little or no market data, which require the reporting entity to develop its own assumptions.

F-28

Global Ship Lease, Inc.

Notes to the Combined Financial Statements (continued)

(Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars)

17.	Interest Rate Derivatives and Fair Value Measurements (Continued)

The Company has determined that the only derivative instruments that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis and are categorized using the fair value hierarchy are its interest rate swap agreements. These are all categorized as Level 2 and at December 31, 2009 there was a liability of $29,113 (2008: $47,041). The fair value of the Company’s derivative instruments is the estimated amount that the Company would receive or pay to terminate the agreements at the reporting date, taking into account interest rates at that date.

18.	Share-based compensation

In August 2008, the Company’s Board adopted the 2008 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”), which enables employees, consultants and Directors of the Company and its subsidiaries to receive options, stock appreciation rights, stock grants, stock units and dividend equivalents.

The Plan is administered by the Board or a committee of the Board. The maximum aggregate number of Class A common shares that may be delivered pursuant to awards granted under the Plan during the 10-year term of the Plan is 1,500,000. The maximum number of Class A common shares with respect to which awards may be granted to any participant in the Plan in any fiscal year is 500,000 per participant.

The holder of a stock grant awarded under the Plan shall have the same voting, dividend and other rights as the Company’s other Class A common shareholders when the grant vests and the shares are issued.

Under the plan, the Company has issued the following share based awards:


	Restricted Stock Units
	Number of Shares				Weighted Average Fair Value
	Management		Directors		Weighted Average Fair Value
Granted on August 14, 2008	780,000		—		$	7.37
Granted on November 12, 2008	80,000		37,671		$	2.80

Un-vested as at January 1, 2009	860,000		37,671		$	6.77
Vested in January 2009	—		(37,671	)	$	(2.80	)
Granted on May 18, 2009	—		150,273		$	1.83
Vested in September 2009	(195,000	)	—		$	(6.76	)
Vested in October 2009	(105,000	)	—		$	(6.76	)

Un-Vested as at December 31, 2009	560,000		150,273		$	5.94

The restricted stock units granted to management on August 14, 2009 were to vest over a period of three years; one third on the first anniversary of the merger, one third on the second anniversary and one third on the third anniversary. The vesting date of the first tranche was amended and total of 260,000 vested in September and October 2009. The vesting date on the second and third tranches remains unchanged.

The restricted stock units granted on to management on November 12, 2008 were to vest over a period of two years; half on the first anniversary of the merger and half on the second anniversary. The vesting date of the first tranche was amended and a total of 40,000 vested in September and October 2009. The vesting date on the second tranche remains unchanged.

The restricted stock units granted to Directors on November 12, 2008 vested in January 2009.

The restricted stock units granted to Directors in May 2009 vested in January 2010.

Using the graded vesting method of expensing the restricted stock unit grants, the weighted average fair value of the shares is recognized as compensation costs in the income statement over the vesting period. The fair value of the restricted share units for this purpose is calculated by multiplying the number of share units by the fair value of the shares at the grant date, which is discounted for dividends forfeited over the vesting period.

For the grants issued on August 14, 2008 and November 12, 2008, the fair value at the grant date was $7.37 and $2.80 respectively, both of which were the average closing prices for the common stock surrounding those dates. The share values were discounted by 10.75% (the same rate used to discount the Class C shares in the purchase price allocation) and for the estimated $0.23 quarterly dividend over the relevant vesting periods.

For the grant issued on May 18, 2009, the fair value at the grant date was $1.83, which was the closing price for the common stock on that date. The share value has not been discounted.

During the year ended December 31, 2009 the Company recognized a total of $2,513 (2008: Successor period $1,167 and Predecessor period $nil, 2007: $nil) in respect of share based compensation costs. As at December 31, 2009, there was a total of $1,126 (2008: $3,363, 2007: $nil) unrecognized compensation costs relating to the above share based awards. The remaining costs are expected to be recognized over a period of 20 months.

F-29

Global Ship Lease, Inc.

Notes to the Combined Financial Statements (continued)

(Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars)

19.	Risks associated with concentration

The Company is exposed to certain concentration risks that may adversely affect the Company’s financial position in the near term:

(i)

There is a concentration of credit risk with respect to cash and cash equivalents at December 31, 2009 to the extent that substantially all of the amounts are deposited with two banks (2008; one bank). However, the Company believes this risk is remote as the banks are high credit quality financial institutions.

(ii)

The Company derives 100% of its revenue from CMA CGM which is exposed to the slowdown in the container market industry and which announced in September 2009 that it and its lenders were exploring a potential financial negotiation to address its short and medium term financing requirements (see note 2).

(iii)

The Company has contracted to purchase two vessels in the fourth quarter of 2010 for approximately $77,000 each, of which 10% has been paid. The balance of the purchase price is unfunded and the acquisition of these vessels is dependent upon the Company being able to generate sufficient funding.

20.	Earnings per share

Basic earnings per common share presented under the two-class method is computed by dividing the earnings applicable to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period.

Under the two class method applied by the Company, net income is first reduced by the amount of dividends declared for the current period and the remaining earnings are allocated to common shares and participating securities to the extent that each security can share the earnings assuming all earnings for the period are distributed. For the year ended December 31, 2009, no dividend was declared on 2009 net income. Dividends paid in the period related to 2008 net income. Class B common shareholders were not entitled to receive dividends in respect of income prior to the fourth quarter of 2008 and until at least the third quarter 2011, Class B common share dividend rights are subordinated to those of holders of Class A common shares. Net income for the period was allocated based on the contractual rights of each class of security and there was insufficient net income to allow any dividend on the Class B common shares and accordingly no earnings were allocated to Class B common shares.

Losses are only allocated to participating securities in a period of net loss if, based on the contractual terms, the relevant common shareholders have an obligation to participate in such losses. No such obligation exists for Class B common shareholders and, accordingly, all losses for the Successor period from August 15, 2008 through December 31, 2008 were allocated to the Class A common shareholders.

At December 31, 2009, there were 51,219,436 warrants (2008: 51,219,436 warrants) to purchase Class A common shares outstanding, including 39,531,348 Public Warrants exercisable at $6 which expired on August 24, 2010, 5,500,000 Sponsor Warrants (2008: 5,500,000 Sponsor Warrants) (which must be exercised on a cashless basis), at an exercise price of $6 which also expired on August 24, 2010, and 6,188,088 Class A Warrants exercisable at $9.25 and which expire September 1, 2013. In addition, there were 710,273 restricted stock units (2008: 897,671 restricted stock units) authorized as part of management’s equity incentive plan and as part of the Directors’ compensation for 2009. As of December 31, 2009 only Class A and B common shares are participating securities.

The diluted weighted average number of Class A common shares outstanding as at December 31, 2009 includes the incremental effect relating to outstanding restricted stock units, but excludes the outstanding warrants. The warrants are excluded because they would have an antidilutive effect.

21.	Subsequent events

On August 2, 2010, the Class A common shares and Public Warrants underlying the units of the Company commenced mandatory separate trading. On August 24, 2010, all outstanding Sponsor Warrants and Public Warrants expired.

F-30