e20vf
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 20-F
REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT
TO SECTION 12(b) OR (g)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
OF 1934
o
OR
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO
SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
OF 1934
x
For the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2008
OR
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO
SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
OF 1934
For the transition period from
to
.
o
OR
SHELL COMPANY REPORT PURSUANT TO
SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
OF 1934
o
Date of event requiring this shell company report
.
Commission file
number: 1-15000
Infineon Technologies
AG
(Exact name of Registrant as
specified in its charter)
Federal Republic of
Germany
(Jurisdiction of incorporation or
organization)
Am Campeon 1-12,
D-85579 Neubiberg
Federal Republic of
Germany
(Address of principal executive
offices)
(Name, Telephone, E-mail and/or
Facsimile number and Address of Company Contact Person)
Securities registered or to be
registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
|
|
|
|
|
Name of each exchange
|
Title of each class
|
|
on which registered
|
|
American Depositary Shares, each representing
one ordinary share, notional value 2.00 per share
Ordinary shares, notional value 2.00 per share*
|
|
New York Stock Exchange
New York Stock Exchange
|
|
|
|
|
* |
Listed, not for trading or quotation purposes, but only in
connection with the registration of American Depositary Shares
pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange
Commission
|
Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to
Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to
Section 15(d) of the Act: None
Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the
issuers classes of capital or common stock as of the close
of the period covered by the annual report. 749,728,635 ordinary
shares, notional value 2.00 per share
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known
seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities
Act.
Yes
x
No
o
If this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by
check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports
pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934.
Yes
o
No
x
Note Checking the box above will not relieve any
registrant required to file reports pursuant to Section 13
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 from their
obligations under those Sections.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes
x
No
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated
filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large
accelerated filer in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
Large
accelerated filer
x
|
Accelerated
filer
o
|
Non-accelerated
filer
o
|
Indicate by check mark which basis of accounting the registrant
has used to prepare the financial statements included in this
filing:
U.S.
GAAP x International
Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International
Accounting Standards Board
o Other o
If Other has been checked in response to the
previous question, indicate by check mark which financial
statement item the registrant has elected to follow.
Item 17
o
Item 18
x
If this is an annual report, indicate by check mark whether the
registrant is a shell company (as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act).
Yes
o
No
x
(APPLICABLE ONLY TO ISSUERS INVOLVED IN BANKRUPTCY PROCEEDINGS
DURING THE PAST FIVE YEARS)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all
documents and reports required to be filed by Sections 12,
13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to
the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court.
Yes
o
No
o
INFINEON
TECHNOLOGIES AG
ANNUAL REPORT ON
FORM 20-F
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR
ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 2008
CROSS REFERENCES
TO
FORM 20-F
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
PART I:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 1:
|
|
Identity of Directors, Senior Management and Advisers
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
Item 2:
|
|
Offer Statistics and Expected Timetable
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
Item 3:
|
|
Key Information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected Financial Data
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
Exchange Rate Information
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
|
Risk Factors
|
|
|
40
|
|
Item 4:
|
|
Information on the Company:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
History and Development of the Company
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
Business Overview
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
Organizational Structure
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
|
Property, Plant and Equipment
|
|
|
66, 83
|
|
Item 4A:
|
|
Unresolved Staff Comments
|
|
|
none
|
|
Item 5:
|
|
Operating and Financial Review and Prospects
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
Operating Results
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
Liquidity and Capital Resources
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
Research and Development; Patents and Licenses
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
Trend Information
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
Contractual Obligations
|
|
|
24
|
|
Item 6:
|
|
Directors, Senior Management and Employees:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Directors and Senior Management
|
|
|
85, 88
|
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
Board Practices
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
Employees
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
Share Ownership
|
|
|
100
|
|
Item 7:
|
|
Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal Shareholders
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
|
Related Party Transactions
|
|
|
103
|
|
Item 8:
|
|
Financial Information
|
|
|
F-1
|
|
|
|
Litigation
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
Dividend Policy
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
|
Significant Changes
|
|
|
112
|
|
Item 9:
|
|
The Offer and Listing:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price History of the Stock
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
Markets
|
|
|
115
|
|
Item 10:
|
|
Additional Information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Articles of Association
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
Material Contracts
|
|
|
123
|
|
|
|
Exchange Controls
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
|
Taxation
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
Documents on Display
|
|
|
121
|
|
|
|
Subsidiary Information
|
|
|
114
|
|
Item 11:
|
|
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk
|
|
|
32
|
|
Item 12:
|
|
Description of Securities Other Than Equity Securities
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PART II:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 13:
|
|
Defaults, Dividend Arrearages and Delinquencies
|
|
|
none
|
|
Item 14:
|
|
Material Modifications to the Rights of Security Holders and Use
of Proceeds
|
|
|
none
|
|
Item 15:
|
|
Controls and Procedures
|
|
|
121
|
|
Item 16A:
|
|
Audit Committee Financial Expert
|
|
|
122
|
|
Item 16B:
|
|
Code of Ethics
|
|
|
122
|
|
Item 16C:
|
|
Principal Accountant Fees and Services
|
|
|
122
|
|
Item 16D:
|
|
Exemption from the Listing Standards for Audit Committees
|
|
|
123
|
|
Item 16E:
|
|
Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated
Purchasers
|
|
|
none
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PART III:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 18:
|
|
Financial Statements
|
|
|
F-1
|
|
Item 19:
|
|
Exhibits (See Exhibit Index)
|
|
|
|
|
i
PRESENTATION OF
FINANCIAL AND OTHER INFORMATION
Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States (U.S. GAAP). Our consolidated financial
statements are expressed in Euro. In this annual report,
references to Euro or are to Euro
and references to U.S. dollars or $
are to United States dollars. For convenience, this annual
report contains translations of Euro amounts into
U.S. dollars at the rate of 1.00 = $1.4081, the
noon buying rate of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York for
Euro on September 30, 2008. The noon buying rate for Euro
on December 22, 2008 was 1.00 = $1.3952. Our
fiscal year ends on September 30 of each year. References to any
fiscal year refer to the year ended September 30 of the calendar
year specified. In this annual report, references to:
|
|
|
|
|
our company are to Infineon Technologies AG and its
subsidiaries; and
|
|
|
|
we, us or Infineon are to
Infineon Technologies AG and, unless the context otherwise
requires, to its subsidiaries including Qimonda, and its
predecessor, the former semiconductor group of Siemens
AG; and
|
|
|
|
Qimonda are to Qimonda AG and its subsidiaries, and
its predecessor, the former memory products segment of Infineon.
|
|
|
|
Infineon Logic are to the Company excluding Qimonda.
|
This annual report contains market data that has been prepared
or reported by Gartner Inc. and its unit Dataquest, Inc.
(together Gartner Dataquest), Frost &
Sullivan, IC Insights, Inc. (IC Insights), iSuppli
Corporation (iSuppli), IMS Research, Strategy
Analytics, Inc. (Strategy Analytics), and World
Semiconductor Trade Statistics (WSTS).
Amounts presented in tabular format may not add up due to
rounding.
Special terms used in the semiconductor industry are defined in
the glossary.
Forward-Looking
Statements
This annual report contains forward-looking statements.
Statements that are not historical facts, including statements
about our beliefs and expectations, are forward-looking
statements. These statements are based on current plans,
estimates and projections. Forward-looking statements speak only
as of the date they are made, and we undertake no obligation to
update any of them in light of new information or future events.
Forward-looking statements involve inherent risks and
uncertainties. We caution you that a number of important factors
could cause actual results or outcomes to differ materially from
those expressed in any forward-looking statement. These factors
include those identified under the heading Risk
Factors and elsewhere in this annual report.
Use of
Non-U.S.
GAAP Financial Measures
This document contains
non-U.S. GAAP
financial measures.
Non-U.S. GAAP
financial measures are measures of our historical or future
performance, financial position or cash flows that contain
adjustments that exclude or include amounts that are included or
excluded, as the case may be, from the most directly comparable
measure calculated and presented in accordance with
U.S. GAAP in our consolidated financial statements. For
descriptions of these
non-U.S. GAAP
financial measures and the adjustments made to the most directly
comparable U.S. GAAP financial measures, please refer to
Operating and Financial Review.
Principal
Business Address
Our principal business address is Am Campeon 1-12, D-85579
Neubiberg, Federal Republic of Germany.
iii
SELECTED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA
You should read the following selected consolidated financial
data in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements,
the related notes and Operating and Financial
Review, all of which appear elsewhere in this annual
report.
We have derived the selected consolidated statement of
operations and cash flow data for the 2004 through 2008 fiscal
years and the selected consolidated balance sheet data at
September 30, 2004 through 2008 from our consolidated
financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance
with U.S. GAAP and audited by KPMG AG
Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft (previously KPMG Deutsche
Treuhand-Gesellschaft Aktiengesellschaft
Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft), an independent registered
public accounting firm.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the years ended
September 30,(1)(2)
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008(3)(4)
|
|
|
|
(in millions, except per share data)
|
|
|
Selected Consolidated Statement of Operations data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
|
4,187
|
|
|
|
3,934
|
|
|
|
4,114
|
|
|
|
4,074
|
|
|
|
4,321
|
|
|
$
|
6,084
|
|
Cost of goods sold
|
|
|
2,608
|
|
|
|
2,745
|
|
|
|
2,805
|
|
|
|
2,702
|
|
|
|
2,823
|
|
|
|
3,975
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
1,579
|
|
|
|
1,189
|
|
|
|
1,309
|
|
|
|
1,372
|
|
|
|
1,498
|
|
|
|
2,109
|
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
871
|
|
|
|
903
|
|
|
|
816
|
|
|
|
768
|
|
|
|
755
|
|
|
|
1,063
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
486
|
|
|
|
449
|
|
|
|
520
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
569
|
|
|
|
801
|
|
Restructuring
charges(5)
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
181
|
|
|
|
255
|
|
Other operating (income) expenses, net
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
|
(319
|
)
|
|
|
(86
|
)
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
(50
|
)
|
|
|
(71
|
)
|
Interest (expense) income, net
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(67
|
)
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
Equity in earnings (losses) of associated companies, net
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Other non-operating income (expense), net
|
|
|
(54
|
)
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
(41
|
)
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
Minority interests
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes, discontinued operations, and
extraordinary loss
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
(291
|
)
|
|
|
(203
|
)
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
(74
|
)
|
|
|
(105
|
)
|
Income tax (expense) benefit
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|
|
(47
|
)
|
|
|
(69
|
)
|
|
|
(61
|
)
|
|
|
(85
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
|
(324
|
)
|
|
|
(250
|
)
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
(135
|
)
|
|
|
(190
|
)
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
|
(79
|
)
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
(296
|
)
|
|
|
(2,987
|
)
|
|
|
(4,206
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before extraordinary loss
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
(312
|
)
|
|
|
(268
|
)
|
|
|
(333
|
)
|
|
|
(3,122
|
)
|
|
|
(4,396
|
)
|
Extraordinary loss, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
(312
|
)
|
|
|
(268
|
)
|
|
|
(368
|
)
|
|
|
(3,122
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,396
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) per share from continuing operations
|
|
|
0.19
|
|
|
|
(0.43
|
)
|
|
|
(0.34
|
)
|
|
|
(0.05
|
)
|
|
|
(0.18
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.25
|
)
|
Earnings (loss) per share from discontinued operations
|
|
|
(0.11
|
)
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
|
(0.40
|
)
|
|
|
(3.98
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5.60
|
)
|
Earnings (loss) per share from extraordinary loss, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share
|
|
|
0.08
|
|
|
|
(0.42
|
)
|
|
|
(0.36
|
)
|
|
|
(0.49
|
)
|
|
|
(4.16
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5.86
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding basic (millions)
|
|
|
735
|
|
|
|
748
|
|
|
|
748
|
|
|
|
749
|
|
|
|
750
|
|
|
|
750
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding diluted (millions)
|
|
|
737
|
|
|
|
748
|
|
|
|
748
|
|
|
|
749
|
|
|
|
750
|
|
|
|
750
|
|
Selected Consolidated Balance Sheet data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
516
|
|
|
|
1,108
|
|
|
|
1,073
|
|
|
|
749
|
|
|
$
|
1,055
|
|
Marketable securities
|
|
|
1,936
|
|
|
|
858
|
|
|
|
477
|
|
|
|
210
|
|
|
|
143
|
|
|
|
201
|
|
Working capital (deficit), excluding cash and cash equivalents,
marketable securities and assets held for disposal
|
|
|
377
|
|
|
|
381
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
150
|
|
Assets held for disposal
|
|
|
4,750
|
|
|
|
4,861
|
|
|
|
5,861
|
|
|
|
5,653
|
|
|
|
2,224
|
|
|
|
3,131
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
10,976
|
|
|
|
10,853
|
|
|
|
11,693
|
|
|
|
10,753
|
|
|
|
7,083
|
|
|
|
9,974
|
|
Short-term debt and current maturities
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
797
|
|
|
|
260
|
|
|
|
207
|
|
|
|
291
|
|
Liabilities held for disposal
|
|
|
1,933
|
|
|
|
1,813
|
|
|
|
1,911
|
|
|
|
1,897
|
|
|
|
2,091
|
|
|
|
2,945
|
|
Long-term debt, excluding current portion
|
|
|
1,400
|
|
|
|
1,458
|
|
|
|
1,058
|
|
|
|
1,149
|
|
|
|
1,051
|
|
|
|
1,480
|
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
|
5,978
|
|
|
|
5,629
|
|
|
|
5,315
|
|
|
|
4,914
|
|
|
|
1,764
|
|
|
|
2,484
|
|
Selected Consolidated Cash Flow data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities from continuing
operations
|
|
|
1,164
|
|
|
|
607
|
|
|
|
677
|
|
|
|
227
|
|
|
|
535
|
|
|
|
753
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities from
continuing operations
|
|
|
(761
|
)
|
|
|
682
|
|
|
|
(52
|
)
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
(620
|
)
|
|
|
(873
|
)
|
Net cash used in financing activities from continuing operations
|
|
|
(790
|
)
|
|
|
(804
|
)
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
(214
|
)
|
|
|
(230
|
)
|
|
|
(324
|
)
|
Depreciation and amortization expense from continuing operations
|
|
|
568
|
|
|
|
788
|
|
|
|
702
|
|
|
|
609
|
|
|
|
542
|
|
|
$
|
763
|
|
Notes:
|
|
(1)
|
Columns may not add up due to rounding.
|
|
(2)
|
During the 2008 fiscal year we committed to a plan to dispose of
Qimonda. Accordingly, the results of Qimonda are reported as
discontinued operations in the Selected Consolidated Statement
of Operations data for all periods presented, and the assets and
liabilities of Qimonda have been reclassified as held for
disposal in the Selected Consolidated Balance Sheet data for all
periods presented.
|
|
(3)
|
Unaudited.
|
|
(4)
|
Converted from Euro into U.S. dollars at an exchange rate of
1 = $1.4081, which was the noon buying rate on
September 30, 2008.
|
|
(5)
|
These charges relate to cost-reduction programs implemented to
restructure our organization.
|
1
OPERATING AND
FINANCIAL REVIEW FOR THE 2008 FISCAL YEAR
This discussion and analysis of our consolidated financial
condition and results of operations should be read in
conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements
and other financial information included elsewhere in this
annual report. Our audited consolidated financial statements
have been prepared on the basis of a number of assumptions more
fully explained in Note 1 (Description of Business and
Basis of Presentation) and Note 2 (Summary of Significant
Accounting Policies) to our audited consolidated financial
statements appearing elsewhere in this annual report.
Overview of the
2008 Fiscal Year
In our 2008 fiscal year, which ended September 30, the
global economy slowed substantially compared with our prior
fiscal year. This slow-down was intensified by the deepening
crisis in financial markets, by major corrections in housing
markets in a number of major economies, and by surges in
commodity prices. Global semiconductor market growth was in the
low single-digits compared to market volume in the prior fiscal
year.
The following were the key developments in our business during
the 2008 fiscal year:
Financial
Results
|
|
|
|
|
Despite unfavorable currency exchange rates and pricing
pressure, we were able to increase overall net sales in our
logic segments during the 2008 fiscal year. Net sales in our
Automotive, Industrial & Multimarket segment declined
slightly. This resulted mainly from the deconsolidation of our
high power bipolar business in the first quarter of the 2008
fiscal year as a consequence of the formation of a joint venture
with Siemens AG (Siemens) and the sale of our hard
disk drive (HDD) business to LSI Corporation
(LSI). Excluding these effects, and despite
significant pricing pressure, this segment experienced slightly
increased net sales in the 2008 fiscal year. Furthermore, during
the 2008 fiscal year, net sales of our Communication Solutions
segment increased strongly, driven mainly by the wireless
business. Overall, net sales of our combined logic segments
increased by 6 percent, from 4,074 million
in the 2007 fiscal year to 4,321 million in the
2008 fiscal year.
|
|
|
|
During the quarter ended March 31, 2008, we committed to a
plan to dispose of Qimonda. The results of Qimonda are reported
as discontinued operations in our companys consolidated
statements of operations for all periods presented, and the
assets and liabilities of Qimonda have been reclassified as held
for disposal in the consolidated balance sheets for all periods
presented. Following this reclassification, Qimonda has been
remeasured to its current fair value less costs to sell for each
period thereafter, resulting in write-downs
of 1,303 million, which have been recorded in
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax. With
this reclassification, the individual line items in
Infineons consolidated statements of operations, including
Net sales, reflect Infineons continuing
operations without Qimonda for all periods presented. All
results relating to Qimonda are reported in the line item
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax for
all periods presented. In addition, earnings per share and the
statements of cash flows differentiate between
continuing and discontinued operations
for all periods presented.
|
|
|
|
Earnings before interest and taxes (EBIT) in our
Automotive, Industrial & Multimarket segment improved
primarily as a result of the sale of 40 percent of our high
power bipolar business to, and the formation of a joint venture
with Siemens, as well as the disposal of the HDD business. EBIT
of our Automotive, Industrial & Multimarket segment
was negatively impacted by production equipment impairment
charges. Excluding these effects, EBIT of this segment remained
stable in the 2008 fiscal year. In our Communication Solutions
segment, EBIT continued to improve mainly driven by the sales
increase. EBIT for our combined logic segments in the 2008
fiscal year was negative 48 million compared to
positive 37 million in the 2007 fiscal year, and
was negatively impacted by restructuring and impairment charges
in particular, which were only partly offset by gains from the
sale of businesses.
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
The extreme pricing pressure experienced in the memory products
industry during the last year resulted in Qimonda incurring
significant losses, which are reflected in Loss from
discontinued operations, net of tax in our consolidated
statements of operations. These losses and the write-downs
recorded during the 2008 fiscal year to re-measure Qimonda to
its current fair value less costs to sell had a material
negative impact on our results of operations. Our net loss
increased from 368 million in the 2007 fiscal
year to 3,122 million in the 2008 fiscal year.
On December 21, 2008, we, the German Free State of Saxony,
and Qimonda jointly announced a financing package for Qimonda.
The package includes a 150 million loan from the
German Free State of Saxony, a 100 million loan from
a state bank in Portugal and a 75 million loan from
us. In addition to this financing package, Qimonda has announced
that it expects to receive guarantees totaling
280 million from the Federal Government of Germany
and the Free State of Saxony. Based on such guarantees, Qimonda
has announced that it is already in advanced negotiations
regarding the financing of 150 million. The
availability of the total financing package is contingent upon
successful completion of the relevant state, federal and
European Commission approval procedures as well as final
agreement on the detailed terms and conditions of the
transaction. See Recent Developments Related
to Qimonda.
|
|
|
|
Our cash flow provided by operating activities from continuing
operations increased from 227 million in the 2007
fiscal year to 535 million in our 2008 fiscal
year. Cash flow used in operating activities from discontinued
operations was 659 million in the 2008 fiscal
year, compared to an inflow of 980 million in
the prior year. This decrease of 1,639 million
primarily reflects the loss incurred by Qimonda in the 2008
fiscal year. The sum of our cash flows from operating activities
(continuing and discontinued operations combined) decreased
from 1,207 million provided in the 2007 fiscal
year to 124 million used during the 2008 fiscal
year.
|
Corporate
Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
To address rising risks in the current market environment,
adverse currency trends and below benchmark margins, we
implemented our cost-reduction program IFX10+ in the
third quarter of the 2008 fiscal year. Subsequent to the end of
the 2008 fiscal year, and in light of continuing adverse
developments in general economic conditions and in our industry,
we identified significant further costs savings in addition to
those originally anticipated. We expect that this program will
result in significant annualized cost savings in the next fiscal
year, primarily through measures in the following areas:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product portfolio management to eliminate unprofitable or
insufficiently profitable product families and to increase
efficiency in research and development (R&D);
|
|
|
|
Reduction of manufacturing costs and optimization of the value
chain;
|
|
|
|
Improved efficiency of processes and tasks in the fields of
general and administrative expenses, R&D and marketing and
sales;
|
|
|
|
Re-organization of our structure along our target markets.
Starting October 1, 2008, our company is organized in five
segments: Automotive, Industrial & Multimarket, Chip
Card & Security, Wireless Solutions and Wireline
Communications; and
|
|
|
|
Reductions in workforce.
|
During the 2008 fiscal year, we incurred restructuring charges
of 181 million, which are primarily related to
the IFX10+ cost-reduction program.
|
|
|
|
|
During the 2008 fiscal year, we completed the following two
business acquisitions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
In October 2007, we acquired the mobility products business of
LSI to further strengthen our activities in the field of
communications. The acquired business develops semiconductors
and software for mobile phone platform solutions.
|
|
|
|
In April 2008, we acquired Primarion, Inc., Torrance, California
(Primarion) in order to further strengthen our
activities in the field of power management applications.
Primarion is among the
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
leaders in designing, manufacturing and marketing digital power
ICs for computing, graphics and communication applications.
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the 2008 fiscal year we completed the following three
business disposals:
|
|
|
|
|
|
In November 2007, we entered into a joint venture agreement with
Siemens, whereby we contributed all assets and liabilities of
our high power bipolar business to a newly formed legal entity
called Infineon Technologies Bipolar GmbH & Co. KG
(Bipolar). Siemens subsequently acquired a
40 percent interest in Bipolar. We realized a gain before
tax of 27 million from this transaction.
|
|
|
|
In April 2008, LSI acquired our HDD business, which designs,
manufactures and markets semiconductors for HDD devices. We
transferred our entire HDD activities, including customer
relationships and know-how, to LSI, and we granted LSI a license
for intellectual property (IP). We realized a gain
before tax of 41 million from this sale.
|
|
|
|
In August 2008, we sold our bulk acoustic wave filter business
(BAW) to Avago Technologies Ltd (Avago)
and entered into a supply agreement through December 2009 with
Avago. The BAW business designs, manufactures and markets
cellular duplexers for N-CDMA and W-CDMA applications and
filters for GPS. We realized a gain before tax
of 11 million and recorded a deferred gain
of 6 million which will be realized over the
term of the supply agreement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the third quarter of the 2008 fiscal year, we repurchased
a notional amount of 100 million of our
convertible subordinated notes due 2010. The repurchase was made
out of available cash. These notes were subsequently cancelled.
|
|
|
|
In August 2007, we and International Business Machines
Corporation, New York, USA (IBM) signed an agreement
in principle to divest our respective shares in ALTIS
Semiconductor S.N.C., Essonnes, France (ALTIS) via a
sale to Advanced Electronic Systems AG (AES). As of
September 30, 2008, negotiations with AES have not
progressed as previously anticipated and could not be completed.
Despite the fact that negotiations are ongoing with additional
parties, the outcome of these negotiations is uncertain. As a
result, we reclassified related assets and liabilities
previously classified as held for sale into held and used in the
consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2008. The
reclassification of the disposal group into held and used
required an adjustment of 59 million to the
carrying amount of the disposal group, which was recorded in
income from continuing operations. The disposal group was
measured at the lower of its carrying amount before being
classified as held for sale, adjusted for any depreciation and
amortization expense that would have been recognized had the
disposal group been continuously classified as held and used, or
the fair value at the date of the reclassification.
|
|
|
|
As part of our ongoing efforts to improve our production
processes, expand our production capabilities, and improve our
cost position, we:
|
|
|
|
|
|
continued to invest in our front-end power fabrication facility
located in Kulim Hi-Tech Park, Malaysia. The capacity upon
completion will be approximately 100,000 wafer starts per month
using 200-millimeter wafers. At the end of the 2008 fiscal year
aggregate capital expenditures to date were
approximately 450 million and production was
running at 40,000 wafer starts per month. The facility produces
power and logic chips used in industrial and automotive power
applications;
|
|
|
|
are currently qualifying products in 65-nanometer technology at
several manufacturing partners and have begun to develop
products based on 40-nanometer technology, which we currently
plan to have manufactured by one of our manufacturing
partners; and
|
|
|
|
are proceeding with our development agreements with IBM and its
development and manufacturing partners to develop 32-nanometer
technology. This agreement builds on the success of earlier
joint development and manufacturing agreements.
|
4
Product and
Technology Developments
|
|
|
|
|
We continued to invest heavily in research and development and
achieved a number of significant milestones and product
developments during the year:
|
Energy Efficiency
|
|
|
|
|
the introduction of three new families of
OptiMOStm
3 N-channel MOSFETs with breakdown voltages of 40V, 60V and 80V,
offering industry-leading performance in such key power
conversion matrices as on-state resistance, which enables
reductions of power losses of as much as 30 percent in
power conversion and management applications, including switched
mode power supplies, DC/DC converters and DC motor drives in
computers, home appliances, industrial automation systems,
telecommunications equipment and such consumer devices as power
tools, electric lawnmowers and fans;
|
|
|
|
the introduction of the worlds first 900V high voltage
power MOSFETs using a charge compensation principle for switched
mode power supplies (for example, PC silverboxes and server
power supplies), industry (for example, building and
streetlighting) and renewable energy applications (for example,
photovoltaic converters);
|
|
|
|
the introduction of our new
MIPAQtm
family of IGBT modules that offers a very high level of
integration enabling highly efficient power inverter designs to
be used in uninterruptible power supplies, industrial drives
such as compressors, pumps and fans, solar power plants, and air
conditioning systems;
|
Security
|
|
|
|
|
our companys appointment to provide security
microcontrollers for the largest contactless microcontroller
transportation card project in China in 2008, known as the
Shenzhen Tong microcontroller cards, which
are multi-application cards that can be used as both a ticket in
public transportation and for payment in stores;
|
|
|
|
the introduction of a 32-bit high-security flash microcontroller
designed to bring a significant layer of security and
convenience to mobile applications based on NFC (Near Field
Communications), which enables new services on mobile devices,
such as ticketing, secure banking and loyalty programs, by
holding a NFC-enabled mobile phone in front of a contactless
terminal;
|
|
|
|
the introduction of the new SLM 76 family of security
microcontrollers targeting the growing market of
machine-to-machine communication (M2M) for various applications,
such as utility monitoring, remote alarm systems, car
telematics, fleet management and vending machines (stock level
checks);
|
Communications
|
|
|
|
|
the start of volume production of our HSDPA mobile phone
platform
XMMtm6080
to Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Seoul, Korea
(Samsung) and another customer. We also introduced a
new generation 3G platform family. The new XMM61xx platform
family addresses all major 3G market segments from cost
efficient HSDPA to high-end HSUPA phones;
|
|
|
|
the sampling of our 65-nanometer GSM/GPRS single-chip solution
X-GOLDtm113
and EDGE single-chip solution
X-GOLDtm213.
Both chips integrate the baseband, RF transceiver, power
management unit, and FM radio in a single die; and
|
|
|
|
the introduction of
XWAYtm
ARX168, a single-chip ADSL2+ device with industry-first
integrated Gigabit Ethernet support and advanced features to
support Internet Protocol Television (IPTV) and wireless
transmission rates of over 150 Mbps.
|
Our
Business
We design, develop, manufacture and market a broad range of
semiconductors and complete system solutions used in a wide
variety of microelectronic applications, including computer
systems,
5
telecommunications systems, consumer goods, automotive products,
industrial automation and control systems, and chip card
applications. Our products include standard commodity
components, full-custom devices, semi-custom devices, and
application-specific components for memory, analog, digital, and
mixed-signal applications. We have operations, investments, and
customers located mainly in Europe, Asia and North America.
During the 2008 fiscal year, our continuing core business was
organized in two segments, our Automotive,
Industrial & Multimarket segment and our Communication
Solutions segment.
|
|
|
|
|
Our Automotive, Industrial & Multimarket segment
designs, develops, manufactures and markets semiconductors and
complete system solutions primarily for use in automotive,
industrial and security applications, and applications with
customer-specific product requirements.
|
|
|
|
Our Communication Solutions segment designs, develops,
manufactures and markets a wide range of ICs, other
semiconductors and complete system solutions for wireline and
wireless communication applications.
|
Effective October 1, 2008, to better align our business
with our target markets, we reorganized our core business into
five operating segments: Automotive, Industrial &
Multimarket, Chip Card & Security, Wireless Solutions
and Wireline Communications:
|
|
|
|
|
The Automotive segment designs, develops, manufactures and
markets semiconductors for use in automotive applications.
Together with its product portfolio, Infineon offers
corresponding system know-how and support to its customers.
|
|
|
|
The Industrial & Multimarket segment designs,
develops, manufactures and markets semiconductors and complete
system solutions primarily for use in industrial applications
and in applications with customer-specific product requirements.
|
|
|
|
The Chip Card & Security segment designs, develops,
manufactures and markets semiconductors and complete system
solutions primarily for use in chip card and security
applications.
|
|
|
|
The Wireless Solutions segment designs, develops, manufactures
and markets a wide range of ICs, other semiconductors and
complete system solutions for wireless communication
applications.
|
|
|
|
The Wireline Communications segment designs, develops,
manufactures and markets a wide range of ICs, other
semiconductors and complete system solutions focused on wireline
access applications.
|
We have two additional segments for reporting purposes, our
Other Operating Segments, which includes remaining activities
for certain product lines that have been disposed of, and other
business activities, and our Corporate and Eliminations segment,
which contains items not allocated to our operating segments,
such as certain corporate headquarters costs, strategic
investments, unabsorbed excess capacity and restructuring costs.
In addition, we currently hold a 77.5 percent interest in
Qimonda. Qimonda designs memory technologies and develops,
manufactures, and markets a large variety of memory products on
a module, component and chip level. During the second quarter of
the 2008 fiscal year, we committed to a plan to dispose of
Qimonda and classified the assets and liabilities of Qimonda as
held for disposal for all periods presented.
On December 21, 2008, we, the German Free State of Saxony,
and Qimonda jointly announced a financing package for Qimonda.
The package includes a 150 million loan from the
German Free State of Saxony, a 100 million loan from
a state bank in Portugal and a 75 million loan from
us. In addition to this financing package, Qimonda has announced
that it expects to receive guarantees totaling
280 million from the Federal Government of Germany
and the Free State of Saxony. Based on such guarantees, Qimonda
has announced that it is already in advanced negotiations
regarding the financing of 150 million. The
availability of the total financing package is contingent upon
successful completion of the relevant state, federal and
European Commission approval procedures as well as final
agreement on the detailed terms and conditions of the
transaction. See Recent Developments Related
to Qimonda.
6
The Semiconductor
Industry and Factors that Impact Our Business
Our business and the semiconductor industry generally are highly
cyclical and characterized by constant and rapid technological
change, rapid product obsolescence and price erosion, evolving
standards, short product life-cycles and wide fluctuations in
product supply and demand. Although these factors affect all
segments of our business, they are especially pronounced for
Qimonda, are increasingly true for our Communication Solutions
segment, and have historically had the least impact on our
Automotive, Industrial & Multimarket segment.
Cyclicality
The industrys cyclicality results from a complex set of
factors, including, in particular, fluctuations in demand for
the end products that use semiconductors and fluctuations in the
manufacturing capacity available to produce semiconductors. This
cyclicality is especially pronounced in the memory portion of
the industry. Semiconductor manufacturing facilities (so-called
fabrication facilities, or fabs) can take several
years to plan, construct, and begin operations. Semiconductor
manufacturers have in the past made capital investments in plant
and equipment during periods of favorable market conditions, in
response to anticipated demand growth for semiconductors. If
more than one of these newly built fabs comes on-line at about
the same time, the supply of chips to the market can be vastly
increased. Without sustained growth in demand, this cycle has
typically led to manufacturing over-capacity and oversupply of
products, which in turn has led to sharp drops in semiconductor
prices. When prices drop, manufacturers have in the past cut
back on investing in new fabs. As demand for chips grows over
time, without additional fabs coming on-line, prices tend to
rise, leading to a new cycle of investment. The semiconductor
industry has generally been slow to react to declines in demand,
due to its capital-intensive nature and the need to make
commitments for equipment purchases well in advance of planned
expansion.
We attempt to mitigate the impact of cyclicality by investing in
manufacturing capacities throughout the cycle and entering into
alliances and foundry manufacturing arrangements that provide
flexibility in responding to changes in the cycle.
Substantial
Capital and R&D Expenditures
Semiconductor manufacturing is very capital-intensive. The
manufacturing capacities that are essential to maintain a
competitive cost position require large capital investments. The
top 10 capital spenders in the industry, according to IC
Insights, account for approximately 60 percent of the
industrys projected 2008 capital spending budgets.
Manufacturing processes and product designs are based on
leading-edge technologies that require considerable research and
development expenditures. A high percentage of the cost of
operating a fab is fixed; therefore, increases or decreases in
capacity utilization can have a significant effect on
profitability.
Because pricing, for DRAM products in particular, is
market-driven and largely beyond our and Qimondas control,
a key factor for Qimonda in achieving and maintaining
profitability is to continually lower its
per-unit
costs by reducing total costs and by increasing unit production
output through productivity improvements.
To reduce total costs, we and Qimonda each intend to share the
costs of our respective research and development and
manufacturing facilities with third parties, either by
establishing alliances or through the use of foundry facilities
for manufacturing. We believe that cooperation in alliances for
R&D, as well as manufacturing and foundry partnerships,
provide us with a number of important benefits, including the
sharing of risks and costs, reductions in our own capital
requirements, acquisitions of technical know-how, and access to
additional production capacities. In our logic business, our
principal alliances are with IBM, Chartered Semiconductor
Manufacturing Ltd., Singapore (Chartered
Semiconductor) and Samsung for CMOS development and
manufacturing at 65-nanometer, 45-nanometer, and 32-nanometer
process technologies. Further, we have established foundry
relationships with United Microelectronics Corporation, Taipei,
Taiwan (UMC) for 130-nanometer and 90-nanometer
manufacturing. In the backend field, in August 2008, we,
STMicroelectronics NV and STATS ChipPAC Ltd. announced an
agreement to jointly develop the next-generation of embedded
Wafer-Level Ball Grid Array (eWLB) technology,
based on our
7
first-generation technology, for use in manufacturing
future-generation semiconductor packages. This will build on our
existing eWLB packaging technology, which we have licensed to
our development partners. The new R&D effort, for which the
resulting IP will be jointly owned by the three companies, will
focus on using both sides of a reconstituted wafer to provide
solutions for semiconductor devices with a higher integration
level and a greater number of contact elements. In addition,
Qimonda has established foundry relationships with partners in
Asia, including Winbond Electronics Corp., Taichung, Taiwan
(Winbond), to increase its manufacturing capacities,
and therefore its potential revenues, without investing in
additional manufacturing assets.
We expect to continue to increase unit production output through
improvements in manufacturing, which is achieved by producing
chips with smaller structure sizes (more bits per chip) and by
producing more chips per silicon wafer (by using larger wafers).
Currently, a substantial portion of our logic capacity is based
on 130-nanometer structure sizes. Our 130-nanometer process
technology, with up to eight layers of copper metallization, is
in full production at several manufacturing sites, including our
Dresden facility. Additional 130-nanometer process options have
been developed to fulfill the needs of specialty applications.
Our 90-nanometer logic technology is in production. We are
currently qualifying 65-nanometer technology at several
manufacturing partners and have begun to develop products based
on
40-nanometer
technology which are currently planned to be manufactured
initially at one of our manufacturing partners.
About half of our fab capacity for logic products is used for
the manufacture of power semiconductors used in automotive and
industrial applications. We have manufacturing sites in
Regensburg, Germany, in Villach, Austria and in Kulim, Malaysia.
We continue to focus on innovation for power semiconductors,
introducing power copper metallization and special processes to
fabricate ever thinner wafers to optimize electrical resistance.
Technological
Development and Competition
Sales prices per unit are volatile and generally decline over
time due to technological developments and competitive pressure.
Logic products generally have a certain degree of application
specification. Although generally less volatile than those for
commodity memory products, unit sales prices for logic products
typically decline over time as technological developments occur.
By contrast, DRAM products are to a large extent commodities.
Since most specifications are standardized, customers can switch
between suppliers on short notice. This leads to strong
competition within the market, especially for standard DRAM
products for PC applications, and causes manufacturers to pass
cost savings on to their customers in an effort to gain market
share.
We aim to offset the effects of declining unit sales prices on
total net sales by optimizing product mix, by increasing unit
sales volume and by continually reducing
per-unit
production costs. The growth in volume depends in part on
productivity improvements in manufacturing. By moving to
ever-smaller structure sizes, the number of functional elements
has historically doubled approximately every two years. In the
area of DRAM products, this trend, often referred to as
Moores Law, has led to an average growth rate of
bit-volumes of between 40 percent and 45 percent per
year and, assuming constant costs per square inch of silicon, to
an approximately 30 percent cost reduction per bit per year.
Seasonality
Our sales are affected by seasonal and cyclical influences, with
sales historically strongest in our fourth fiscal quarter. These
short cycles are influenced by longer cycles that are a response
to innovative technical solutions from our customers that
incorporate our products. The short-term and mid-term
cyclicality of our sales reflects the supply and demand
fluctuations for the products that contain our semiconductors.
If anticipated sales or shipments do not occur when expected,
expenses and inventory levels in a given quarter can be
disproportionately high, and our results of operations for that
quarter, and potentially for future quarters, may be adversely
affected.
8
Product
Development Cycles
For logic products, the cycle for test, evaluation and adoption
of our products by customers before the start of volume
production can range from several months to more than one year.
Due to this lengthy cycle, we may experience significant delays
from the time we incur expenses for R&D, marketing efforts,
and investments in inventory, to the time we generate
corresponding revenue, if any. Development cycles affect memory
products to a lesser extent due to the higher degree of
standardization for most memory products.
Acquisition
and Divestiture Strategy
A key element of our core business strategy is to seek to reduce
the time required to develop new technologies and products and
bring them to market, and to optimize our existing product
offerings, market coverage, engineering workforce, and
technological capabilities. We plan to continue to evaluate
strategic opportunities as they arise, including business
combination transactions, strategic relationships, capital
investments, and the purchase or sale of assets or businesses.
Intellectual
Property
Due to the high-technology nature of the semiconductor industry,
IP, meaning intangible assets relating to proprietary
technology, is of significant importance. We do not record
assets on our balance sheet for self-developed IP. Only IP
licensed from others or acquired through business combinations
is reflected on our balance sheet, and reduced through
amortization over its expected useful life. The value of such
acquired IP is often complex and difficult to estimate. We also
derive modest revenues from the licensing of our IP, generally
pursuant to cross licensing arrangements.
Challenges
that Lie Ahead
Going forward, our success will remain highly dependent on our
ability to stay at the leading edge of technology development,
and to continue to optimize our product portfolio. We must
achieve both objectives to ensure that we have the flexibility
to react to fluctuations in market demand for different types of
semiconductor products. We believe that the ability to offer and
the flexibility to manufacture a broad portfolio of products
will be increasingly important to our long-term success in many
markets within the semiconductor industry. Establishing and
maintaining advantageous technology, development and
manufacturing alliances, including the use of third-party
foundries, and continuing our efforts to broaden our product
portfolio will make it easier for us to respond to changes in
market conditions and to improve our financial performance.
Semiconductor
Market Conditions in the 2008 Fiscal Year
According to WSTS, the global semiconductor market grew by
4 percent through the first nine months of the 2008
calendar year compared to the same period last year, following a
growth rate of 3.2 percent in the 2007 calendar year. In
November 2008, WSTS predicted a growth rate of 2 percent
for the full 2008 calendar year. Sales in North America are
expected to decrease by 8 percent and in Europe by
1 percent in the 2008 calendar year, according to WSTS. The
semiconductor market in Asia/Pacific (excluding Japan) is
expected to increase by 8 percent; the Japanese market is
expected to grow by 1 percent. Sales of non-memory products
(logic chips, analog, and discretes), which accounted for
81 percent of the entire market in the first nine months of
the 2008 calendar year, are predicted to grow by 8 percent
compared with the 2007 calendar year. Sales of memory products
are predicted to decline by 15 percent compared with the
2007 calendar year.
9
Results of
Operations
Results of
Operations as a Percentage of Net Sales
The following table presents the various line items in our
consolidated statements of operations expressed as percentages
of net sales.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the years ended September
30,(1)
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
Cost of goods sold
|
|
|
(68.2
|
)
|
|
|
(66.3
|
)
|
|
|
(65.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
31.8
|
|
|
|
33.7
|
|
|
|
34.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
(19.8
|
)
|
|
|
(18.9
|
)
|
|
|
(17.5
|
)
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
(12.6
|
)
|
|
|
(12.3
|
)
|
|
|
(13.2
|
)
|
Restructuring charges
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
|
|
(1.1
|
)
|
|
|
(4.2
|
)
|
Other operating (expense) income, net
|
|
|
(0.9
|
)
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
(1.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating (loss) income
|
|
|
(2.1
|
)
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
(1.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
(1.6
|
)
|
|
|
(1.0
|
)
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
Equity in (losses) earnings of associated companies, net
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
Other non-operating (expense) income, net
|
|
|
(1.0
|
)
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
Minority interests
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income before income taxes, discontinued operations, and
extraordinary loss
|
|
|
(5.0
|
)
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
(1.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
(1.1
|
)
|
|
|
(1.7
|
)
|
|
|
(1.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations
|
|
|
(6.1
|
)
|
|
|
(0.9
|
)
|
|
|
(3.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
|
(7.3
|
)
|
|
|
(69.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before extraordinary loss
|
|
|
(6.5
|
)
|
|
|
(8.2
|
)
|
|
|
(72.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Extraordinary loss, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
(6.5
|
)%
|
|
|
(9.0
|
)%
|
|
|
(72.2
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Columns may not add up due to rounding.
|
Reorganization
Our organizational structure for the period through March 31,
2008 became effective on May 1, 2006, following the legal
separation of our memory products business into the stand-alone
legal company Qimonda. Effective March 31, 2008, the
results of Qimonda are reported as discontinued operations in
our consolidated statements of operations for all periods
presented, and the assets and liabilities of Qimonda have been
classified as held for disposal in the consolidated balance
sheets for all periods presented.
As a result, our company operated primarily in two operating
segments during the 2008 fiscal year: Automotive,
Industrial & Multimarket, and Communication Solutions.
Further, certain of our remaining activities for product lines
sold, for which there are no continuing contractual commitments
subsequent to the divestiture date, and new business activities
also meet the SFAS No. 131 Disclosure about
Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information
definition of an operating segment, but do not meet the
requirements of a reportable segment as specified in
SFAS No. 131. Accordingly, these segments are combined
and disclosed in the Other Operating Segments
category pursuant to SFAS No. 131.
Following the completion of the Qimonda carve-out, certain
corporate overhead expenses are no longer apportioned to Qimonda
and are instead allocated to our logic segments. In addition,
Other Operating Segments includes net sales and earnings that
Infineon Logics 200-millimeter production facility in
Dresden recorded from the sale of wafers to Qimonda under a
foundry agreement, which was
10
cancelled during the 2008 fiscal year. The Corporate and
Eliminations segment reflects the elimination of these net sales
and earnings. Also, effective October 1, 2007, we record
gains and losses from sales of investments in marketable debt
and equity securities in the Corporate and Eliminations segment.
The segments results of operations for prior periods have
been reclassified to be consistent with the revised reporting
structure and presentation, as well as to facilitate analysis of
current and future operating segment information.
Effective October 1, 2008, to better align our business
with our target markets we reorganized our core business into
five operating segments: Automotive, Industrial &
Multimarket, Chip Card & Security, Wireless Solutions
and Wireline Communications. We will report our segment results
under this new structure beginning with the first quarter of the
2009 fiscal year.
Net
Sales
We generate our revenues primarily from the sale of our
semiconductor products and systems solutions. Our semiconductor
products include a wide array of chips and components used in
electronic applications ranging from wireless and wireline
communication systems, to chip cards, to automotive electronics,
and industrial applications.
We generated the majority of our product sales in the 2008
fiscal year through our direct sales force, with approximately
22 percent of net sales from our logic segments derived
from sales made through distributors.
We derive our license revenue from royalties and license fees
earned on technology that we own and license to third parties.
This enables us to recover a portion of our research and
development expenses, and also often allows us to gain access to
manufacturing capacity at foundries through joint licensing and
capacity reservation arrangements.
Our net sales fluctuate in response to a combination of factors,
including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
The market prices for our products, including fluctuations in
exchange rates that affect our prices;
|
|
|
|
Our overall product mix and sales volumes;
|
|
|
|
The stage of our products in their respective life cycles;
|
|
|
|
The effects of competition and competitive pricing strategies;
|
|
|
|
Governmental regulations influencing our markets (e.g., energy
efficiency regulations); and
|
|
|
|
The global and regional economic cycles.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the years ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
( in millions, except percentages)
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
|
4,114
|
|
|
|
4,074
|
|
|
|
4,321
|
|
Changes
year-on-year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)%
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
Of which:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
License income
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
Percentage of net sales
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
Effect of foreign exchange over prior year
|
|
|
142
|
|
|
|
(174
|
)
|
|
|
(271
|
)
|
Percentage of net sales
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
(4
|
)%
|
|
|
(6
|
)%
|
Impact of acquisitions over prior year
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
133
|
|
Percentage of net sales
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
In the 2008 fiscal year, net sales increased primarily as a
result of the revenue increase in the wireless business of the
Communication Solutions segment, while net sales in our
Automotive, Industrial & Multimarket segment slightly
decreased. The increase in license income was due to higher
license income within our Communication Solutions segment. The
strength of the Euro (primarily against the U.S. dollar)
during the 2007 and 2008 fiscal years negatively impacted net
sales, whereas net sales in the 2006 fiscal year were positively
impacted by the effect of foreign exchange rates. The effect of
foreign exchange over the prior year is calculated as the
estimated change in current year sales if the average
11
exchange rate for the preceding year were applied as a constant
rate in the current year. The increase in net sales resulting
from business acquisitions since the beginning of the prior year
reflects primarily the inclusion of a full-year consolidation of
sales in the year after the initial acquisition. Net sales for
the 2008 fiscal year include the effect of the mobility products
business acquired from LSI starting October 25, 2007, and
Primarion starting April 28, 2008. Net sales for the 2007
fiscal year include the effect of the DSL Customer Premises
Equipment (CPE) business acquired from Texas
Instruments Inc. (TI) starting August 1, 2007.
Net Sales by
Segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the years ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
( in millions, except percentages)
|
|
|
Automotive, Industrial & Multimarket
|
|
|
2,839
|
|
|
|
69
|
%
|
|
|
3,017
|
|
|
|
74
|
%
|
|
|
2,963
|
|
|
|
69
|
%
|
Communication
Solutions(1)
|
|
|
1,205
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
1,051
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
1,360
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
Other
Operating
Segments(2)
|
|
|
310
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
219
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Corporate and
Eliminations(3)
|
|
|
(240
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(213
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(102
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
4,114
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
4,074
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
4,321
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Includes sales of 0, 30 million and
10 million for fiscal years ended September 30,
2006, 2007, and 2008, respectively, from sales of wireless
communication applications to Qimonda.
|
|
(2)
|
Includes sales of 256 million, 189 million
and 79 million for fiscal years ended
September 30, 2006, 2007 and 2008, respectively, from sales
of wafers from Infineon Logics 200-millimeter facility in
Dresden to Qimonda under a foundry agreement.
|
|
(3)
|
Includes the elimination of sales of 256 million,
219 million and 89 million for fiscal
years ended September 30, 2006, 2007 and 2008,
respectively, since these sales are not expected to be part of
the Qimonda disposal plan.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automotive, Industrial & Multimarket
Despite continued segment-wide pricing pressure,
we were able to increase net sales in the 2007 fiscal year. The
sales growth was mainly driven by continuing strong demand for
high power products in industrial applications, an increase of
sales for energy efficient devices in industrial and multimarket
applications, and increasing demand for government ID
applications. In the 2008 fiscal year, net sales of the segment
slightly decreased due to the sale of an interest in the bipolar
business and formation of a joint venture which is being
consolidated under the equity method of accounting effective
October 1, 2007, and the sale of the HDD business to LSI in
the third quarter of the 2008 fiscal year. Net sales of the
remaining businesses increased as higher sales volumes more than
offset the continued pricing pressures caused by technological
developments and competition. Growth in net sales was driven
mainly by continued strong demand for industrial high power
applications, an increase in sales of multimarket applications,
and a continued growing demand for government ID applications.
|
|
|
|
Communication Solutions In the 2007 fiscal
year, net sales in the Communication Solutions segment declined
primarily due to a continued decrease in net sales in the
wireless business mainly driven by the insolvency of BenQs
German subsidiary as well as ongoing pricing pressure that could
not be fully offset by increased shipments of complete mobile
phone platform solutions to leading customers such as LG,
Panasonic, and ZTE. In addition, net sales in the wireline
business declined mainly due to lower revenues for digital
cordless products and the phase-out of our fiber optics business
during the 2006 fiscal year. Net sales in the 2008 fiscal year
increased strongly, primarily driven by the wireless business,
resulting from a strong increase in mobile phone platform
shipments and the consolidation of the mobility products
business acquired from LSI. Net sales in the wireline business
increased slightly as growth in broadband solutions
mainly driven by the consolidation of the CPE business acquired
from TI was partially offset by declining legacy
revenues and negative currency effects.
|
|
|
|
Other Operating Segments Net sales in the
2006, 2007 and 2008 fiscal years comprised mainly inter-segment
sales of wafers from Infineon Logics 200-millimeter
facility in Dresden to Qimonda under a foundry agreement which
are eliminated in the Corporate and Eliminations segment.
Effective November 30, 2007, as part of its measure aimed
at further focusing its production on
300-millimeter
capacities, Qimonda canceled the foundry agreement with Infineon
Logic resulting in
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
a significant decline in net sales during the 2008 fiscal year.
The last wafers were delivered to Qimonda in May 2008.
|
Net Sales by
Region and Customer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the years ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
( in millions, except percentages)
|
|
|
Germany
|
|
|
1,010
|
|
|
|
25
|
%
|
|
|
907
|
|
|
|
22
|
%
|
|
|
924
|
|
|
|
21
|
%
|
Other Europe
|
|
|
933
|
|
|
|
23
|
%
|
|
|
888
|
|
|
|
22
|
%
|
|
|
818
|
|
|
|
19
|
%
|
North America
|
|
|
535
|
|
|
|
13
|
%
|
|
|
564
|
|
|
|
14
|
%
|
|
|
503
|
|
|
|
12
|
%
|
Asia/Pacific
|
|
|
1,324
|
|
|
|
32
|
%
|
|
|
1,450
|
|
|
|
36
|
%
|
|
|
1,800
|
|
|
|
42
|
%
|
Japan
|
|
|
209
|
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
|
213
|
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
|
198
|
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
Other
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
4,114
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
4,074
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
4,321
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales decreased in Germany during our 2007 fiscal year primarily
due to the insolvency of BenQs German subsidiary, while
sales increased in the Asia/Pacific region driven by higher
sales volumes, particularly in the Automotive,
Industrial & Multimarket and Communication Solutions
segments. The absolute and relative increase in the share of net
sales in Asia/Pacific in the 2008 fiscal year was mainly due to
the acquisition of the mobility products business from LSI and
higher shipments of mobile phone platforms solutions to
customers in Asia/Pacific in our Communication Solutions segment.
The net sales in our Automotive, Industrial &
Multimarket segment increased in Germany and
Asia/Pacific,
whereas sales decreased in Other Europe, North America and
Japan. The number of customers in this segment grew by more than
10 percent in the 2008 fiscal year. The top 20 customers in
this segment accounted for approximately 62 percent of the
segments sales in the 2008 fiscal year.
In the Communication Solutions segment, we have experienced a
further shift of net sales from Europe and North America to the
Asia/Pacific region in the 2008 fiscal year. Our top 20
customers in this segment accounted for over 70 percent of
its net sales in the 2008 fiscal year.
Cost of Goods
Sold and Gross Margin
Our cost of goods sold consists principally of:
|
|
|
|
|
Direct materials, which consist principally of raw wafer costs;
|
|
|
|
Labor costs;
|
|
|
|
Overhead, including maintenance of production equipment,
indirect materials, utilities and royalties;
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization;
|
|
|
|
Subcontracted expenses for assembly and test services;
|
|
|
|
Production support, including facilities, utilities, quality
control, automated systems and management functions; and
|
|
|
|
Foundry production costs.
|
In addition to factors that affect our revenue, our gross margin
is impacted by:
|
|
|
|
|
Factory utilization rates and related idle capacity costs;
|
|
|
|
Amortization of purchased intangible assets;
|
|
|
|
Product warranty costs;
|
|
|
|
Provisions for excess or obsolete inventories; and
|
|
|
|
Government grants, which are recognized over the remaining
useful life of the related manufacturing assets.
|
13
We include in cost of goods sold the cost of inventory purchased
from our joint ventures and other associated and related
companies. Our purchases from these associated and related
companies amounted to 200 million,
47 million, and 148 million in the 2006,
2007 and 2008 fiscal years respectively.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the years ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
( in millions, except percentages)
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold
|
|
|
2,805
|
|
|
|
2,702
|
|
|
|
2,823
|
|
Changes
year-on-year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)%
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
Percentage of net sales
|
|
|
68
|
%
|
|
|
66
|
%
|
|
|
65
|
%
|
Gross margin
|
|
|
32
|
%
|
|
|
34
|
%
|
|
|
35
|
%
|
Our gross margin in the 2007 fiscal year increased slightly from
the prior year. During the 2008 fiscal year our gross margin
further increased primarily as a result of productivity measures.
|
|
|
|
|
Automotive, Industrial &
Multimarket The gross margin in the 2007
fiscal year remained unchanged from the prior year, as pricing
pressure and certain corporate overhead expenses that resulted
from the Qimonda carve out were offset by increases in
productivity. In the 2008 fiscal year, we were able to slightly
increase gross margin by means of measures to increase
productivity despite an increase in idle capacity cost.
|
|
|
|
Communication Solutions In the 2006 fiscal
year, gross margin was positively impacted by lower idle
capacity costs and the successful implementation of measures to
increase productivity, which more than offset the inventory
write-downs resulting from the insolvency of BenQs German
subsidiary. In the 2007 and 2008 fiscal years, the gross margin
of this segment remained stable.
|
Research and
Development Expenses
Research and development expenses consist primarily of salaries
and benefits for research and development personnel, material
costs, depreciation and maintenance of equipment used in our
research and development efforts, and contracted technology
development costs. R&D expenses also include our joint
technology development arrangements with partners such as IBM.
We continue to focus our investments on the development of
leading-edge manufacturing technologies and products with high
potential for growth and profitability.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the years ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
( in millions, except percentages)
|
|
|
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
816
|
|
|
|
768
|
|
|
|
|
755
|
|
|
Changes
year-on-year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
%
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
%
|
Percentage of net sales
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
|
19
|
|
%
|
|
|
17
|
|
%
|
Government subsidies
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
Percentage of net sales
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
|
|
2
|
|
%
|
|
|
1
|
|
%
|
Some of our R&D projects qualify for subsidies from local
and regional governments where we do business. If the criteria
to receive a grant are met, the subsidies received reduce
R&D expenses over the project term as expenses are incurred.
|
|
|
|
|
Automotive, Industrial & Multimarket
In the 2007 fiscal year, R&D expenses
remained stable as a percentage of net sales and slightly
increased in absolute terms mainly driven by automotive and
industrial applications. In the 2008 fiscal year, R&D
expenses remained unchanged, both in terms of absolute figures
and as a percentage of sales.
|
|
|
|
Communication Solutions In the 2007 fiscal
year, R&D expenses continued to decline in absolute terms
and remained stable as a percentage of net sales, reflecting the
implementation of cost reduction measures in response to the
insolvency of BenQs German subsidiary. In the 2008 fiscal
year, R&D expenses remained stable in absolute terms
despite the consolidation effect of the acquired activities for
DSL customer premises equipment and mobile phone ICs, as
efficiency gains
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
and cost reduction measures initiated during the 2007 fiscal
year were taking effect for a full fiscal year. As a percentage
of sales, R&D expenses in the Communication Solutions
segment declined sharply, mainly driven by the revenue increase.
|
Selling,
General and Administrative (SG&A) Expenses
Selling expenses consist primarily of salaries and benefits for
personnel engaged in sales and marketing activities, costs of
customer samples, other marketing incentives, and related
marketing expenses.
General and administrative expenses consist primarily of
salaries and benefits for administrative personnel,
non-manufacturing related overhead costs, consultancy, legal and
other fees for professional services, recruitment and training
expenses.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the years ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
( in millions, except percentages)
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
520
|
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
569
|
|
|
Changes
year-on-year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)%
|
|
|
14
|
|
%
|
Percentage of net sales
|
|
|
13
|
|
%
|
|
|
12
|
%
|
|
|
13
|
|
%
|
In the 2007 fiscal year, selling, general and administrative
expenses decreased in absolute terms as a result of cost saving
measures and the non-recurrence of the unusual charges from the
2006 fiscal year. As a percentage of net sales, selling, general
and administrative expenses remained broadly unchanged in the
2007 and 2008 fiscal years. The
year-on-year
increase in absolute terms in the 2008 fiscal year primarily
reflects increased selling expenses following the acquisitions
of the mobility product business from LSI and the CPE business
from TI.
Other Items
Affecting Earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the years ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
( in millions, except percentages)
|
|
|
|
Restructuring charges
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
181
|
|
|
Percentage of net sales
|
|
|
1
|
|
%
|
|
|
1
|
|
%
|
|
|
4
|
|
%
|
Other operating expense (income), net
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
Percentage of net sales
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
%
|
|
|
0
|
|
%
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
%
|
Equity in (losses) earnings of associated companies, net
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
Percentage of net sales
|
|
|
0
|
|
%
|
|
|
0
|
|
%
|
|
|
0
|
|
%
|
Other non-operating (expense) income, net
|
|
|
(41
|
)
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
Percentage of net sales
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
%
|
|
|
0
|
|
%
|
|
|
0
|
|
%
|
Extraordinary loss, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of net sales
|
|
|
0
|
|
%
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
%
|
|
|
0
|
|
%
|
Restructuring Charges. During the 2006 fiscal
year, we announced restructuring plans to downsize our workforce
at ALTIS and at our chip card back-end activities in order to
maintain competitiveness and reduce cost. As part of this and
other restructuring measures, we agreed upon plans to lay off
approximately 390 employees and recorded restructuring
charges in the 2007 fiscal year. During the 2007 fiscal year, we
took further restructuring measures, mainly in response to the
insolvency of one of our largest mobile phone customers, BenQ
Mobile GmbH & Co. OHG, and in order to further
streamline certain research and development locations.
Approximately 280 jobs were affected worldwide, thereof
approximately 120 in the German locations Munich, Salzgitter and
Nuremberg. A large portion of these restructuring measures were
completed during the 2007 fiscal year. The Infineon Complexity
Reduction program (ICoRe) was launched in July 2007,
aimed at reducing costs and seeking added efficiencies by
optimizing process flows. To address rising risks in the current
market environment, adverse currency trends and below benchmark
margins, we implemented the IFX10+ cost-reduction program in the
third quarter of the 2008 fiscal year. The IFX10+ program
includes measured target areas including product portfolio
management, manufacturing cost reductions, value chain
optimization, processes efficiency,
15
reorganization of our structure along our target markets, and
reductions in workforce. Approximately 10 percent of
Infineon Logics workforce worldwide is expected to be
impacted by IFX10+, which resulted in restructuring charges of
166 million in the 2008 fiscal year.
Other Operating (Expense) Income, net. In the
2006 fiscal year, other operating expense, net consisted mainly
of goodwill and intangible assets impairment charges of
32 million which were partly offset by other
operating income. In the 2007 fiscal year, other operating
income, net consisted primarily of gains of
17 million from the sale of the polymer optical fiber
business to Avago, and gains of 3 million from the
sale of the Sci-Worx business to Silicon Image Inc. In the 2008
fiscal year, other operating expense, net increased to
43 million and primarily resulted from impairment
charges of 130 million. These impairment charges were
partly offset by gains from sales of businesses of
79 million, and gains of 4 million
resulting from the disposal of long-term assets.
Equity in (Losses) Earnings of Associated Companies,
net. In the 2008 fiscal year, equity in earnings
of associated companies, net was 4 million, and
primarily reflected our share in the net income of the Bipolar
joint venture with Siemens.
Other Non-Operating (Expense) Income,
net. Other non-operating income and expense
consists of various items in different periods not directly
related to our principal operations, including gains and losses
on sales of marketable securities. In the 2006 fiscal year,
other non-operating expense, net consisted mainly of
30 million related to net losses from foreign
currency derivatives and foreign currency transactions and
investment-related impairment charges of 13 million,
partly offset by gains from the sale of investments. In the 2007
fiscal year, other non-operating income, net included primarily
gains and losses from financial instruments transactions. In the
2008 fiscal year, other non-operating expense, net comprised net
losses from financial investments and related impairments
charges.
Extraordinary Loss, net of tax. During the
quarter ended March 31, 2007, we entered into agreements
with Molstanda Vermietungsgesellschaft mbH
(Molstanda) and a financial institution. Molstanda
is the owner of a parcel of land located in the vicinity of our
headquarters south of Munich. Pursuant to FASB Interpretation
No. 46 (revised December 2003), Consolidation of
Variable Interest Entities an Interpretation of ARB
No. 51 (FIN 46R), we determined
that Molstanda is a variable interest entity since it does not
have sufficient equity to demonstrate that it could finance its
activities without additional financial support, and as a result
of the agreements we became its primary beneficiary.
Accordingly, we consolidated the assets and liabilities of
Molstanda beginning in the second quarter of the 2007 fiscal
year. Since Molstanda is not considered a business pursuant to
FIN 46R, the 35 million excess in fair value of
liabilities assumed and consolidated of 76 million,
over the fair value of the newly consolidated identifiable
assets of 41 million, was recorded as an
extraordinary loss during the second quarter of the 2007 fiscal
year. Due to our cumulative loss situation no tax benefit was
provided on this loss. We subsequently acquired the majority of
the outstanding capital of Molstanda during the fourth quarter
of the 2007 fiscal year. In August 2007, we entered into an
agreement to sell part of the acquired parcel of land to a third
party developer-lessor in connection with the construction and
lease of Qimondas new headquarters office in the south of
Munich.
16
Earnings
Before Interest and Taxes (EBIT)
EBIT of our separate reporting segments were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the years ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
EBIT:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automotive, Industrial & Multimarket
|
|
|
240
|
|
|
|
291
|
|
|
|
315
|
|
Communication Solutions
|
|
|
(234
|
)
|
|
|
(165
|
)
|
|
|
(73
|
)
|
Other Operating Segments
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
Corporate and Eliminations
|
|
|
(146
|
)
|
|
|
(77
|
)
|
|
|
(287
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
(136
|
)
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
(48
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjust: Interest expense, net
|
|
|
(67
|
)
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
Extraordinary loss, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income before income taxes, discontinued operations, and
extraordinary loss
|
|
|
(203
|
)
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
(74
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBIT developments of our reporting segments were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Automotive, Industrial & Multimarket
In the 2007 fiscal year, EBIT improved due to an
increase in net sales despite being negatively impacted by
additional corporate expense allocations subsequent to the
Qimonda carve out. In addition, a 17 million gain was
realized from the sale of our POF business to Avago in June
2007, which also had a positive impact on EBIT in the 2007
fiscal year. In the 2008 fiscal year, EBIT improved mainly due
to gains of 68 million realized from the sale of
40 percent of our interest in Bipolar to Siemens and the
sale of our HDD business to LSI. These gains were partly offset
by impairment charges of 25 million. Furthermore, the
negative impact from ongoing pricing pressure could be nearly
offset by improvements primarily in the chip card business.
|
|
|
|
Communication Solutions In the 2007 fiscal
year, EBIT improved despite a decline in net sales, as no
significant charges were recognized and further cost reduction
measures were successfully implemented. The EBIT improvement in
the 2008 fiscal year was mainly driven by the strong increase in
revenue and despite the negative impact of currency fluctuations
between the U.S. dollar and the Euro. Segment EBIT in the
2008 fiscal year included a write-off of 14 million
of acquired in-process R&D in connection with the
acquisition of the mobility products business of LSI.
|
|
|
|
Other Operating Segments EBIT in the 2008
fiscal year improved as a result of better gross margins.
|
|
|
|
Corporate and Eliminations EBIT improved
in the 2007 fiscal year mainly due to reduced unabsorbed idle
production cost, lower stock option expense, and a revision to
accrued personnel costs. EBIT in the 2008 fiscal year decreased
significantly primarily as a result of restructuring costs
incurred in connection with the IFX10+ program and charges
resulting from the reclassification of the ALTIS disposal group
into the held and used category.
|
Interest
Expense, Net
We derive interest income primarily from cash and cash
equivalents and marketable securities. Interest expense is
primarily attributable to bank loans and
convertible/exchangeable notes, and is net of interest
capitalized on manufacturing facilities under construction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the years ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
( in millions, except percentages)
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
(67
|
)
|
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
Percentage of net sales
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
%
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
%
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
%
|
17
Interest expense relates principally to our convertible
subordinated notes issued in February 2002 and in June 2003, our
exchangeable subordinated notes issued in September 2007 and, to
a lesser extent, bank loans and interest on outstanding tax
obligations. In February 2007, we redeemed the remaining
outstanding principal of the convertible subordinated notes
issued in 2002, which resulted in a decrease in interest expense
in the 2007 and 2008 fiscal years. The partial repurchase of our
convertible subordinated notes due 2010 during the third quarter
of the 2008 fiscal year, as well as the amortization of our
syndicated credit facility, further contributed to lowering our
overall interest expense in the 2008 fiscal year, more than
offsetting the impact of coupon payments on our exchangeable
subordinated notes issued in September 2007.
Income
Taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the years ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
( in millions, except percentages)
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
(47
|
)
|
|
|
(69
|
)
|
|
|
(61
|
)
|
|
Percentage of net sales
|
|
|
(1
|
)%
|
|
|
(2
|
)%
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
%
|
Effective tax rate
|
|
|
(24
|
)%
|
|
|
149
|
%
|
|
|
(68
|
)
|
%
|
Generally, deferred tax assets in tax jurisdictions that have a
three-year cumulative loss are subject to a valuation allowance
excluding the impact of forecasted future taxable income. In the
2006, 2007 and 2008 fiscal years we continued to have a
three-year cumulative loss in certain tax jurisdictions and,
accordingly, we recorded increases in the valuation allowance of
161 million, 58 million, and
185 million in those periods, respectively. We assess
our deferred tax asset position on a regular basis. Our ability
to realize benefits from our deferred tax assets is dependent on
our ability to generate future taxable income sufficient to
utilize tax loss carry-forwards or tax credits before
expiration. We expect to continue to recognize no tax benefits
in these jurisdictions until we have ceased to be in a
cumulative loss position for the preceding three-year period.
Loss from
discontinued operations, net of tax
The results of Qimonda, presented in the consolidated statements
of operations as discontinued operations for the 2006, 2007 and
2008 fiscal years, consist of the following components:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the years ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
|
3,815
|
|
|
|
|
3,608
|
|
|
|
|
1,785
|
|
|
Costs and expenses
|
|
|
(3,719
|
)
|
|
|
|
(3,894
|
)
|
|
|
|
(3,324
|
)
|
|
Loss on measurement to fair value less costs to sell
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,303
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, before tax
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
|
(286
|
)
|
|
|
|
(2,842
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
(114
|
)
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
|
(145
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
|
(296
|
)
|
|
|
|
(2,987
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the 2008 fiscal year Qimondas total revenues decreased
by 1,823 million, or 51 percent, to
1,785 million from 3,608 million in the
2007 fiscal year. Primarily responsible for this decrease was a
significant decrease in DRAM prices and to a lesser extent the
average exchange rate of the U.S. dollar against the euro.
These decreases were partly offset by increases of higher bit
shipments.
Cost and expenses of Qimonda decreased by 570 million
from 3,894 million in the 2007 fiscal year to
3,324 million in the 2008 fiscal year, mainly as a
result of a decrease in cost of goods sold. This decrease was
partly offset by restructuring charges, impairment charges and
higher R&D expenses primarily related to Qimondas
efforts in the new Buried Wordline technology for 65-nanometers
and 46-nanometers. Restructuring expenses of Qimonda during the
2008 fiscal year related mainly to the relocation of the
back-end production in Malaysia, the combination of the research
centers in North America, a comprehensive cost reduction
program, the shutdown of our Flash activities in Italy and a
global repositioning program. During the 2008 fiscal year,
Qimonda recognized impairment charges for goodwill and for
long-lived assets of the Richmond 200-millimeter facility.
Additionally, as a result of
18
Qimondas agreement to sell its 35.6 percent interest
in Inotera Memories Inc. (Inotera) to Micron
Technology, Inc. for US$400 million, Qimonda recognized
impairment charges to reduce the carrying value of its
investment in Inotera to the sales price less costs to sell.
Net
Loss
In the 2006 fiscal year, the net loss incurred primarily
reflected charges resulting from allowances recorded in response
to the insolvency of BenQs German subsidiary, losses
recognized in connection with the initial public offering of
Qimonda, and the settlement of litigation. In addition, in the
2006 fiscal year we began to recognize the fair value of
employee stock options in earnings, which further contributed to
the net loss. In the 2007 fiscal year, the most significant
factor contributing to the increase in net loss was the
significant deterioration of results from discontinued
operations, net of tax, primarily due to Qimondas net
loss, which resulted from the deterioration in memory product
prices and a weaker U.S. dollar, and consequently a
significant decrease in Qimondas gross margin. Net loss
from discontinued operations in the 2007 fiscal year also
included an 84 million loss from the sale of
28.75 million Qimonda ADSs. Restructuring charges of
45 million, and the extraordinary loss of
35 million resulting from the consolidation of
Molstanda also contributed to the net loss in the 2007 fiscal
year. In the 2008 fiscal year, the increase in net loss was
primarily due to the increase in losses from discontinued
operations, resulting from our share in Qimondas net loss,
and the write-downs of 1,303 million to reduce
Qimonda to its estimated current fair value less costs to sell.
Furthermore, restructuring charges of 181 million,
primarily related to the IFX10+ program, and impairment charges,
contributed to the net loss in the 2008 fiscal year.
Financial
Condition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage Change
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
year-on-year
|
|
|
|
|
( in millions, except percentages)
|
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
|
8,491
|
|
|
|
4,773
|
|
|
|
(44
|
)
|
%
|
thereof: assets held for disposal
|
|
|
5,653
|
|
|
|
2,224
|
|
|
|
(61
|
)
|
%
|
Non-current assets
|
|
|
2,262
|
|
|
|
2,310
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
10,753
|
|
|
|
7,083
|
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
3,468
|
|
|
|
3,643
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
%
|
thereof: liabilities held for disposal
|
|
|
1,897
|
|
|
|
2,091
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
%
|
Non-current liabilities
|
|
|
1,338
|
|
|
|
1,219
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
4,806
|
|
|
|
4,862
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority Interests
|
|
|
1,033
|
|
|
|
457
|
|
|
|
(56
|
)
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
|
4,914
|
|
|
|
1,764
|
|
|
|
(64
|
)
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2008, our total assets and current
assets decreased in comparison to the prior year end, primarily
due to a decrease in current assets of 44 percent, or
3,718 million. This decrease primarily related to a
decrease in assets held for disposal of
3,429 million, primarily due to the write-down to
reduce Qimonda to its estimated current fair value less costs to
sell. The remaining decrease in assets held for disposal
primarily relates to changes at Qimonda. Our gross cash
position, representing cash and cash equivalents and marketable
securities from continuing operations, decreased from
1,283 million by 391 million as of
September 30, 2007, to 892 million as of
September 30, 2008. This decrease was incurred as cash used
in investing activities from continuing operations and cash used
in financing activities from continuing operations were higher
than cash provided by operating activities. In addition, cash
and cash equivalents and marketable securities in the amount of
121 million were reclassified to other current assets
as of September 30, 2008.
As of September 30, 2008, non-current assets increased
slightly compared to prior year end, resulting primarily from an
increase in intangible assets, which resulted from the
acquisition of the mobility product business from LSI and the
purchase of Primarion. This increase was despite the
reclassification of ALTIS
19
partly offset by the decrease of property, plant and equipment,
net as capital expenditures were more than offset by
depreciation, amortization and impairment charges during the
2008 fiscal year.
Total liabilities increased as of September 30, 2008
compared to September 30, 2007 by 56 million.
The increase reflects an increase of current liabilities of
175 million, primarily resulting from an increase of
liabilities held for disposal and other current liabilities. The
increase in other current liabilities mainly relates to
liabilities in connection with the IFX10+ program. This increase
was partly offset by decreases in short-term debt and current
maturities of long-term debt, and trade accounts payable.
The increase of current liabilities was partly offset by the
decrease of non current liabilities of 119 million,
primarily resulting from a decrease of long-term debt of
98 million as we repurchased convertible subordinated
notes due 2010 with a notional amount of 100 million
during the 2008 fiscal year. Furthermore, deferred income taxes
decreased as of September 30, 2008 compared to the prior
year end by 20 million.
The decrease in minority interests resulted primarily from the
minoritys share of Qimondas net loss.
Total Shareholders equity decreased by
3,150 million as of September 30, 2008,
primarily as a result of the net loss incurred in the 2008
fiscal year.
Financial
Ratios
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
Non-current
asset
intensity(1)
|
|
|
21
|
|
%
|
|
|
21
|
|
%
|
|
|
33
|
|
%
|
Current asset
intensity(2)
|
|
|
79
|
|
%
|
|
|
79
|
|
%
|
|
|
67
|
|
%
|
Degree of
wear of fixed
assets(3)
|
|
|
78
|
|
%
|
|
|
79
|
|
%
|
|
|
81
|
|
%
|
Depreciation
rate of fixed
assets(4)
|
|
|
8
|
|
%
|
|
|
8
|
|
%
|
|
|
7
|
|
%
|
Inventory
intensity(5)
|
|
|
5
|
|
%
|
|
|
6
|
|
%
|
|
|
9
|
|
%
|
Inventory
turnover(6)
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
|
Inventory
turnover in
days(7)
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
Days sales
outstanding(8)
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
Equity
ratio(9)
|
|
|
45
|
|
%
|
|
|
46
|
|
%
|
|
|
25
|
|
%
|
Return on
equity(10)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
%
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
%
|
|
|
(94
|
)
|
%
|
Return on
assets(11)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
%
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
%
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
%
|
Equity-to-fixed-assets
ratio(12)
|
|
|
316
|
|
%
|
|
|
336
|
|
%
|
|
|
135
|
|
%
|
Debt-to-equity
ratio(13)
|
|
|
35
|
|
%
|
|
|
29
|
|
%
|
|
|
71
|
|
%
|
The aforementioned financial condition ratios are calculated as
follows:
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Non-current asset intensity =
non-current assets / total assets
|
|
(2) |
|
Current asset intensity = current
assets / total assets
|
|
(3) |
|
Degree of wear of fixed assets =
accumulated depreciation on fixed assets / historical costs of
fixed assets at the end of the fiscal year
|
|
(4) |
|
Depreciation rate of fixed assets =
annual depreciation of fixed assets / historical costs of fixed
assets at the end of the fiscal year
|
|
(5) |
|
Inventory intensity = inventory /
total assets
|
|
(6) |
|
Inventory turnover = Cost of goods
sold / average inventory
|
|
(7) |
|
Inventory turnover in days =
average inventory x 360 days / annual net sales
|
|
(8) |
|
Days sales outstanding = average
accounts receivable x 360 days / annual net sales
|
|
(9) |
|
Equity ratio = equity / total assets
|
|
(10) |
|
Return on equity = net income
(loss) for the year / average equity
|
|
(11) |
|
Return on assets = net income
(loss) for the year / average total assets
|
|
(12) |
|
Equity-to-fixed-assets
ratio = equity / property, plant and equipment
|
|
(13) |
|
Debt-to-equity
ratio = (short-term debt + long-term debt) / equity
|
|
|
|
The average of a balance sheet
position is calculated as the arithmetic average of the amount
as of the balance sheet dates of the current and the prior years.
|
In the 2008 fiscal year, the net loss incurred was primarily the
result of Qimondas operating losses and the recorded
write-down in order to remeasure Qimonda to its current fair
value less cost to sell.
20
Accordingly, our equity and total assets decreased
significantly. This resulted in significant decreases in
non-current asset intensity, current asset intensity, equity
ratio, return on equity, return on assets and
equity-to-fixed
assets ratio.
In the 2008 fiscal year, lower net capital expenditures in
property, plant and equipment resulted in an increase in our
degree of wear of fixed assets and a decrease in our
depreciation rate of fixed assets.
The
debt-to-equity
ratio significantly increased in the 2008 fiscal year due to the
equity decrease. In the 2007 fiscal year the
debt-to-equity
ratio had decreased due to the redemption of the remaining
outstanding principal amount of 640 million of
convertible subordinated notes issued in 2002, partially offset
by the issuance of 215 million in exchangeable
subordinated notes due in 2010.
Liquidity
Cash
Flow
Our consolidated statements of cash flows show the sources and
uses of cash and cash equivalents during the reported periods.
They are of key importance for the evaluation of our financial
position.
Cash flows from investing and financing activities are both
indirectly determined based on payments and receipts. Cash flows
from operating activities are determined indirectly from net
loss. The changes in the balance sheet items have been adjusted
for the effects of foreign currency exchange fluctuations and
for changes in the scope of consolidation. Therefore, they do
not conform to the corresponding changes in the respective
balance sheet line items.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the years ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities from continuing
operations
|
|
|
677
|
|
|
|
227
|
|
|
|
535
|
|
Net cash used
in investing activities from continuing
operations(1)
|
|
|
(52
|
)
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
(620
|
)
|
Net cash used in financing activities from continuing operations
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
(214
|
)
|
|
|
(230
|
)
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents from
discontinued operations
|
|
|
298
|
|
|
|
(174
|
)
|
|
|
(318
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
912
|
|
|
|
(181
|
)
|
|
|
(633
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
In the 2006 fiscal year the amount
includes a 119 million cash increase as a result of
the initial consolidation of ALTIS.
|
Cash provided by operating activities from continuing operations
was 535 million in the 2008 fiscal year, and
reflected mainly the loss from continuing operations of
135 million, which is net of non-cash charges for
depreciation and amortization of 542 million,
impairment charges of 135 million and a
14 million charge for in-process R&D acquired
from LSI. Also included in loss from continuing operations were
gains from sales of businesses of 79 million. Cash
provided by operating activities from continuing operations was
negatively impacted by the changes in operating assets and
liabilities of 44 million, primarily resulting from
an increase in other current assets of 77 million.
Net cash used in investing activities from continuing operations
of 620 million in the 2008 fiscal year mainly
reflects capital expenditures of 353 million for the
acquisition of the mobility products business of LSI and
Primarion, and 312 million for the purchase of
property, plant and equipment. These cash outflows were
partially offset by proceeds from the sale of businesses and
interests in subsidiaries of 122 million, and by net
proceeds from the sale and purchase of marketable securities of
27 million.
Net cash used in financing activities from continuing operations
increased by 16 million to 230 million in
the 2008 fiscal year. During the 2008 fiscal year, we made
repayments of short-term and long-term debt of
294 million, of which 98 million related
to the repurchase of a notional amount of 100 million
of convertible subordinated notes due 2010. We also made
dividend payments to minority interest holders of
80 million, which were partly offset by proceeds from
issuance of long-term debt of 149 million.
21
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents from discontinued
operations was 318 million in the 2008 fiscal year
compared to 174 million in the prior year. The net
decrease in cash and cash equivalents from discontinued
operations was mainly due to Qimondas net cash used in
operating activities which was partly offset by Qimondas
net cash provided by financing activities. Qimondas cash
flow from operating activities decreased significantly from net
cash provided of 980 million in the 2007 fiscal year
to net cash used of 659 million in the 2008 fiscal
year. This was mainly caused by Qimondas net loss, which
was largely a result of lower revenues due to the strong decline
in average selling prices as compared to the prior year. This
negative impact on Qimondas cash flow from operating
activities was partly offset by working capital improvements
resulting from a decrease in its inventories and trade accounts
receivable. Qimondas cash flow from operating activities
was also negatively impacted by a decrease in trade accounts
payable in the 2008 fiscal year compared to the 2007 fiscal
year. Qimondas net cash provided by financing activities
was 337 million in the 2008 fiscal year and refers
mainly to Qimondas issuance of US$248 million of
convertible notes due 2013 from which Qimonda raised
168 million. Furthermore, drawings under several
short-term and long-term loan agreements net of repayments and
partially offset by redemptions under capital lease agreements
contributed to Qimondas net cash provided by financing
activities.
Free Cash
Flow
We define free cash flow as cash from operating and investing
activities from continuing operations excluding purchases or
sales of marketable securities. Since we hold a substantial
portion of our available monetary resources in the form of
readily available marketable securities, and operate in a
capital-intensive industry, we report free cash flow to provide
investors with a measure that can be used to evaluate changes in
liquidity after taking capital expenditures into account. It is
not intended to represent the residual cash flow available for
discretionary expenditures, since debt service requirements or
other non-discretionary expenditures are not deducted. Free cash
flow includes only amounts from continuing operations, and is
determined as follows from the consolidated statements of cash
flows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the years ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities from continuing
operations
|
|
|
677
|
|
|
|
227
|
|
|
|
535
|
|
Net cash used
in investing activities from continuing
operations(1)
|
|
|
(52
|
)
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
(620
|
)
|
Sales of marketable securities, net
|
|
|
(376
|
)
|
|
|
(266
|
)
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Free cash flow
|
|
|
249
|
|
|
|
(59
|
)
|
|
|
(112
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
In the 2006 fiscal year, the amount includes a
119 million cash increase as a result of the initial
consolidation of ALTIS.
|
Free cash flow was negative 112 million in the 2008
fiscal year, compared to negative 59 million in the
2007 fiscal year. The decrease in free cash flow was primarily
due to higher net cash used in investing activities from
continuing operations of 620 million, partly offset
by increased net cash provided by operating activities from
continuing operations of 535 million.
22
Net Cash
Position
The following table presents our gross and net cash positions
and the maturity of debt. It is not intended to be a forecast of
cash available in future periods.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments due by period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than
|
|
|
1-2
|
|
|
2-3
|
|
|
3-4
|
|
|
4-5
|
|
|
After
|
|
As of September 30, 2008
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1 year
|
|
|
years
|
|
|
years
|
|
|
years
|
|
|
years
|
|
|
5 years
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
749
|
|
|
|
749
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketable securities
|
|
|
143
|
|
|
|
143
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross cash position
|
|
|
892
|
|
|
|
892
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
1,051
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
861
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term debt and current maturities
|
|
|
207
|
|
|
|
207
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total financial debt
|
|
|
1,258
|
|
|
|
207
|
|
|
|
861
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash position
|
|
|
(366
|
)
|
|
|
685
|
|
|
|
(861
|
)
|
|
|
(82
|
)
|
|
|
(68
|
)
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our gross cash position, representing cash and cash equivalents
plus marketable securities, decreased to 892 million
at September 30, 2008, compared with
1,283 million at the prior year end. The decrease was
mainly due to the negative free cash flow of
112 million, the repurchase of convertible
subordinated notes due 2010 in the principal outstanding amount
of 100 million, and the reclassification of cash and
cash equivalents and marketable securities in the amount of
121 million into other current assets as of
September 30, 2008.
Long-term debt principally consists of convertible and
exchangeable subordinated notes that were issued in order to
strengthen our liquidity position and allow us more financial
flexibility in conducting our business operations. The total
notional amount of outstanding convertible and exchangeable
notes as of September 30, 2008 amounted to
815 million.
On June 5, 2003, we issued 700 million in
convertible subordinated notes due 2010 at par in an
underwritten offering to institutional investors in Europe. The
notes are unsecured and accrue interest at 5 percent per
year. The notes are convertible, at the option of the holders of
the notes, into a maximum of 68.4 million ordinary shares
of our company, at a conversion price of 10.23 per share
through maturity. During the third quarter of the 2008 fiscal
year, we repurchased a notional amount of 100 million
of convertible subordinated notes due 2010. The repurchase was
made out of available cash. These notes were subsequently
cancelled.
On September 26, 2007, we issued 215 million in
exchangeable subordinated notes due 2010 at par in an
underwritten offering to institutional investors in Europe. The
notes are unsecured and accrue interest at 1.375 percent
per year. The notes are exchangeable for a maximum of
20.5 million Qimonda ADSs, at an exchange price of
10.48 per ADS at any time during the exchange period
through maturity. Subsequent to September 30, 2008, we
repurchased notional amounts of 95 million and
22 million of our exchangeable subordinated notes due
2010 and our convertible subordinated notes due 2010,
respectively. The repurchases were made out of available cash.
Our net cash position, meaning cash and cash equivalents, plus
marketable securities, less total financial debt, decreased by
240 million to negative 366 million at
September 30, 2008, compared with negative
126 million at September 30, 2007, principally
due to negative free cash flow and dividend payments to minority
interest holders.
To secure our cash position and to keep flexibility with regards
to liquidity, we have implemented a policy with risk limits for
the amounts deposited with respect to the counterparty, credit
rating, sector, duration, credit support and type of instrument.
23
Capital
Requirements
We require capital in the 2009 fiscal year to:
|
|
|
|
|
Lend funds to Qimonda (see Recent Developments
Related to Qimonda);
|
|
|
|
Finance our operations;
|
|
|
|
Make scheduled debt payments;
|
|
|
|
Settle contingencies if they occur; and
|
|
|
|
Make planned capital expenditures.
|
We expect to meet these requirements through:
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows generated from operations;
|
|
|
|
Cash on hand and securities we can sell; and
|
|
|
|
Available credit facilities.
|
As of September 30, 2008, we require funds for the 2009
fiscal year aggregating 876 million, consisting of
207 million for short-term debt payments and
669 million for commitments. In addition, we may need
up to 31 million for currently known and estimable
contingencies. We also plan to invest approximately
200 million in capital expenditures. We have a gross
cash position of 892 million as of September 30,
2008, and also the ability to draw funds from available credit
facilities of 541 million.
We will need to continue to generate significant cash going
forward in order to fund our investments and meet scheduled debt
repayments. Given the recent trading price of our ordinary
shares and Qimonda ADSs, it is unlikely that a noteholder would
convert or exchange its notes for our ordinary shares or Qimonda
ADSs, as applicable. Therefore, we may be required to find an
alternative source of funds, to repay the outstanding principal
and accrued interest on the convertible and exchangeable notes
in June and August 2010, respectively.
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due/Expirations by Period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
than
|
|
|
1-2
|
|
|
2-3
|
|
|
3-4
|
|
|
4-5
|
|
|
After
|
|
As of September 30,
2008(1)
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1 year
|
|
|
years
|
|
|
years
|
|
|
years
|
|
|
years
|
|
|
5 years
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Contractual commitments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating lease payments
|
|
|
776
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
465
|
|
Unconditional purchase commitments
|
|
|
634
|
|
|
|
594
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commitments
|
|
|
1,410
|
|
|
|
669
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
469
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other contingencies:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantees(2)
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
Contingent
government
grants(3)
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contingencies
|
|
|
144
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Certain payments of obligations or expiration of commitments
that are based on the achievement of milestones or other events
that are not date-certain are included for purposes of this
table, based on our estimate of the reasonably likely timing of
payments or expirations in each particular case. Actual outcomes
could differ from those estimates.
|
|
(2)
|
Guarantees are mainly issued for the payment of import duties,
rentals of buildings and contingent obligations related to
government grants received.
|
|
(3)
|
Contingent government grants refer to amounts previously
received, related to the construction and financing of certain
production facilities, which are not guaranteed otherwise and
could be refundable if the total project requirements are not
met.
|
The above table should be read together with note 34 to our
consolidated financial statements for the year ended
September 30, 2008.
24
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
We issue guarantees in the normal course of business, mainly for
the payment of import duties, rentals of buildings and
contingent obligations related to government grants received. As
of September 30, 2008, the undiscounted amount of potential
future payments for guarantees was 97 million.
Capital
Expenditures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the years ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Continuing operations
|
|
|
640
|
|
|
|
498
|
|
|
|
312
|
|
Depending on market developments and our business situation we
currently expect to invest approximately 200 million
in property, plant and equipment capital expenditures in the
2009 fiscal year, principally for our manufacturing facilities
in Malacca, Malaysia, and in Kulim, Malaysia. We also
continuously seek to improve productivity and upgrade technology
at existing facilities. As of September 30, 2008,
44 million of this amount was committed and included
in unconditional purchase commitments. Due to the lead times
between ordering and delivery of equipment, a substantial amount
of capital expenditures typically is committed well in advance.
Credit
Facilities
We have established both short- and long-term credit facilities
with a number of different financial institutions in order to
meet our anticipated funding requirements. These facilities,
which aggregate 987 million, of which
541 million remained available at September 30,
2008, comprise the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
Nature of financial
|
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term
|
|
institution commitment
|
|
Purpose/intended use
|
|
facility
|
|
|
Drawn
|
|
|
Available
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Short-term
|
|
firm commitment
|
|
general corporate purposes, working capital, guarantees
|
|
|
504
|
|
|
|
139
|
|
|
|
365
|
|
Short-term
|
|
no firm commitment
|
|
working capital, cash management
|
|
|
176
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
176
|
|
Long-
term(1)
|
|
firm commitment
|
|
project finance
|
|
|
307
|
|
|
|
307
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
987
|
|
|
|
446
|
|
|
|
541
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Including current maturities.
|
In September 2004, we executed a $400/400 million
syndicated credit facility with a
five-year
term, which was subsequently reduced to
$345/300 million in August 2006. The facility
consists of two tranches. Tranche A is a term loan
originally intended to finance the expansion of the Richmond,
Virginia, manufacturing facility. In January 2006, we drew
$345 million under Tranche A, on the basis of a
repayment schedule that foresees equal installments falling due
in March and September each year. At September 30, 2008,
$125 million was outstanding under Tranche A.
Tranche B, which is a multicurrency revolving facility to
be used for general corporate purposes, remained undrawn at
September 30, 2008. The facility has customary financial
covenants, and drawings bear interest at market-related rates
that are linked to financial performance. The lenders of this
credit facility have been granted a negative pledge relating to
the future financial indebtedness of the Company with certain
permitted encumbrances.
At September 30, 2008, we were in compliance with our debt
covenants under the relevant facilities.
We plan to fund our working capital and capital requirements
from cash provided by operations, available funds, bank loans,
government subsidies and, if needed, the issuance of additional
debt or equity securities. See Risk Factors
Our business could suffer if we do not have adequate access to
capital. We have also applied for governmental subsidies
in connection with certain capital expenditure projects, but can
provide no assurance that such subsidies will be granted on a
timely basis or at all. We can provide
25
no assurance that we will be able to obtain additional financing
for our research and development, working capital or investment
requirements or that any such financing, if available, will be
on terms favorable to us.
Taking into consideration the financial resources available to
us, including our internally generated funds and currently
available banking facilities, we believe that we will be in a
position to fund our capital requirements in the 2009 fiscal
year.
Pension Plan
Funding
Our projected pension benefit obligation, which takes into
account future compensation increases, amounted to
377 million at September 30, 2008, compared to
415 million at September 30, 2007. The fair
value of plan assets as of September 30, 2008 was
350 million, compared to 381 million as of
September 30, 2007.
The actual return on plan assets between the last measurement
dates amounted to negative 7.9 percent, or
(27) million, for domestic (German) plans and
negative 5.2 percent, or (2) million, for
foreign plans, compared to the expected return on plan assets
for that period of 6.5 percent for domestic plans and
7.0 percent for foreign plans. We have estimated the return
on plan assets for the next fiscal year to be 7.1 percent,
or 14 million, for domestic plans and
7.2 percent, or 3 million, for foreign plans.
At September 30, 2007 and 2008, the combined funding status
of our pension plans reflected an under-funding of
34 million and 27 million, respectively.
Our investment approach with respect to the pension plans
involves employing a sufficient level of flexibility to capture
investment opportunities as they occur, while maintaining
reasonable parameters to ensure that prudence and care are
exercised in the execution of the investment program. The
pension plans assets are invested with several investment
managers. The plans employ a mix of active and passive
investment management programs. Considering the duration of the
underlying liabilities, a portfolio of investments of plan
assets in equity securities, debt securities and other assets is
targeted to maximize the long-term return on plan assets for a
given level of risk. Investment risk is monitored on an ongoing
basis through periodic portfolio reviews, meetings with
investment managers and liability measurements. Investment
policies and strategies are periodically reviewed to ensure the
objectives of the plans are met considering any changes in
benefit plan design, market conditions or other material items.
Our asset allocation targets for pension plan assets are based
on our assessment of business and financial conditions,
demographic and actuarial data, funding characteristics, related
risk factors, market sensitivity analyses and other relevant
factors. The overall allocation is expected to help protect the
plans level of funding while generating sufficiently
stable real returns (i.e., net of inflation) to meet current and
future benefit payment needs. Due to active portfolio
management, the asset allocation may differ from the target
allocation up to certain limits. As a matter of policy, our
pension plans do not invest in Infineon shares.
Financial
Instruments
We periodically enter into derivatives, including foreign
currency forward and option contracts as well as interest rate
swap agreements. The objective of these transactions is to
reduce the impact of interest rate and exchange rate
fluctuations on our foreign currency denominated net future cash
flows. We do not enter into derivatives for trading or
speculative purposes.
26
Employees
The following table indicates the composition of our workforce
by function and region at the end of the fiscal years indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Function:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production
|
|
|
20,528
|
|
|
|
20,376
|
|
|
|
19,358
|
|
Research & Development
|
|
|
5,989
|
|
|
|
5,833
|
|
|
|
6,273
|
|
Sales & Marketing
|
|
|
1,781
|
|
|
|
1,832
|
|
|
|
1,905
|
|
Administrative
|
|
|
1,551
|
|
|
|
1,557
|
|
|
|
1,583
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Infineon Logic
|
|
|
29,849
|
|
|
|
29,598
|
|
|
|
29,119
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Qimonda
|
|
|
11,802
|
|
|
|
13,481
|
|
|
|
12,224
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
41,651
|
|
|
|
43,079
|
|
|
|
41,343
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Region:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Germany
|
|
|
11,052
|
|
|
|
10,151
|
|
|
|
10,053
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
5,578
|
|
|
|
5,564
|
|
|
|
5,192
|
|
North America
|
|
|
532
|
|
|
|
581
|
|
|
|
821
|
|
Asia/Pacific
|
|
|
12,497
|
|
|
|
13,145
|
|
|
|
12,897
|
|
Japan
|
|
|
149
|
|
|
|
157
|
|
|
|
156
|
|
Other
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Infineon Logic
|
|
|
29,849
|
|
|
|
29,598
|
|
|
|
29,119
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Qimonda
|
|
|
11,802
|
|
|
|
13,481
|
|
|
|
12,224
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
41,651
|
|
|
|
43,079
|
|
|
|
41,343
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the 2007 fiscal year, the number of employees in our logic
business decreased in Germany primarily as a result of the phase
out of manufacturing at Munich-Perlach, and the restructuring
program initiated following the insolvency of BenQs German
subsidiary, but increased in the Asia/Pacific region due to
expansion of production in Kulim, Malaysia, and research and
development in Malaysia and China.
During the 2008 fiscal year, the number of employees in our
logic business decreased slightly, primarily due to the
foundation of the Bipolar joint venture with Siemens and further
decreases of production employees primarily in Asia/Pacific.
These decreases were partly offset by employees that joined the
company as a result of the acquisitions we made during the year.
Critical
Accounting Policies
Our results of operations and financial condition are dependent
upon accounting methods, assumptions and estimates that we use
as a basis for the preparation of our consolidated financial
statements. We have identified the following critical accounting
policies and related assumptions, estimates and uncertainties,
which we believe are essential to understanding the underlying
financial reporting risks and the impact that these accounting
methods, assumptions, estimates and uncertainties have on our
reported financial results.
Revenue
Recognition
We generally market our products to a wide variety of customers
and a network of distributors. Our policy is to record revenue
when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the price is
fixed or determinable, shipment is made and collectability is
reasonably assured. We record reductions to revenue for
estimated product returns and allowances for discounts and price
protection, based on actual historical experience, at the time
the related revenue is recognized. We establish reserves for
sales discounts, price protection allowances and product returns
based upon our evaluation of a variety of factors, including
industry demand. This process requires the exercise of
substantial judgments in evaluating the above-
27
mentioned factors and requires material estimates, including
forecasted demand, returns and industry pricing assumptions.
In future periods, we may be required to accrue additional
provisions due to (1) deterioration in the semiconductor
pricing environment, (2) reductions in anticipated demand
for semiconductor products or (3) lack of market acceptance
for new products. If these or other factors result in a
significant adjustment to sales discount and price protection
allowances, they could significantly impact our future operating
results.
We have entered into licensing agreements for our technology in
the past, and anticipate that we will increase our efforts to
monetize the value of our technology in the future. As with
certain of our existing licensing agreements, any new licensing
arrangements may include capacity reservation agreements with
the licensee. Such transactions could represent multiple element
arrangements pursuant to SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin
(SAB) 104, Revenue Recognition,
and Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue
No. 00-21,
Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Elements.
The process of determining the appropriate revenue recognition
in such transactions is highly complex and requires significant
judgment, which includes evaluating material estimates in the
determination of fair value and the level of our continuing
involvement.
Recoverability
of Long-Lived Assets
Our business is extremely capital-intensive, and requires a
significant investment in property, plant and equipment. Due to
rapid technological change in the semiconductor industry, we
anticipate the level of capital expenditures to be significant
in future periods. During the 2008 fiscal year, we spent
312 million on purchases of property, plant and
equipment. At September 30, 2008, the carrying value of our
property, plant and equipment was 1,311 million. We
have acquired other businesses, which resulted in the generation
of significant amounts of long-lived intangible assets,
including goodwill. At September 30, 2008, we had
long-lived intangible assets of 362 million.
In accordance with the provisions of Financial Accounting
Standards Board (FASB) Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 142,
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, we test
goodwill and indefinite life intangible assets for impairment at
least once a year.
We also review long-lived assets, including intangible assets,
for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate
that the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable.
Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a
comparison of the carrying value of an asset to future net cash
flows expected to be generated by the asset. If such assets are
considered to be impaired, the impairment recognized is measured
by the amount by which the carrying value of the assets exceeds
the fair value of the assets. Estimated fair value is generally
based on either appraised value or discounted estimated future
cash flows. Considerable management judgment is necessary to
estimate discounted future cash flows. During the 2008 fiscal
year, impairment charges of 133 million were
recognized on long-lived assets.
We tested goodwill for impairment and recognized impairment
charges of 7 million during the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2006. The goodwill impairment charges in the
2006 fiscal year related primarily to our acquisition of Savan
and Sci-Worx. We did not recognize any material goodwill
impairment charges in the 2007 and 2008 fiscal years.
Valuation of
Inventory
Historically, the semiconductor industry has experienced periods
of extreme volatility in product demand and in industry
capacity, resulting in significant price fluctuations. Since
semiconductor demand is concentrated in such highly-volatile
industries as wireless communications, wireline communications
and the computer industry, this volatility can be extreme. This
volatility has also resulted in significant fluctuations in
price within relatively short time-frames.
As a matter of policy, we value inventory at the lower of cost
or market price. We review the recoverability of inventory based
on regular monitoring of the size and composition of inventory
positions, current economic events and market conditions,
projected future product demand, and the pricing environment.
This evaluation is inherently judgmental and requires material
estimates, including both
28
forecasted product demand and pricing environment, both of which
may be susceptible to significant change. At September 30,
2008, total inventory was 663 million.
In future periods, write-downs of inventory may be necessary due
to (1) reduced semiconductor demand in the industries we
serve, including the computer industry and the wireless and
wireline communications industries, (2) technological
obsolescence due to rapid developments of new products and
technological improvements, or (3) changes in economic or
other events and conditions that impact the market price for our
products. These factors could result in adjustments to the
valuation of inventory in future periods, and significantly
impact our future operating results.
Recoverability
of Long-Term Investments
We have made a series of investments in companies that are
principally engaged in the research and development, design, and
manufacture of semiconductors and related products. At
September 30, 2008, the carrying value of our long-term
investments totaled 33 million.
Our accounting policy is to record an impairment of investments
when the decline in fair value below carrying value is
other-than-temporary.
We assess declines in the value of investments to determine
whether such decline is
other-than-temporary,
thereby rendering the investment impaired. This assessment is
made by considering available evidence including changes in
general market conditions, specific industry and investee data,
the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has
been less than cost, and our intent and ability to hold the
investment for a period of time sufficient to allow for any
anticipated recovery in fair value. We incurred
2 million in impairment charges of long-term
investments in the 2008 fiscal year as a result of such
impairment tests.
At September 30, 2008, our most significant long-term
investment was our investment in Bipolar, which is a joint
venture with Siemens.
The high cyclicality in the semiconductor industry could
adversely impact the operations of these investments and their
ability to generate future net cash flows. Furthermore, to the
extent that these investments are not publicly traded, further
judgments and estimates are required to determine their fair
value. As a result, potential impairment charges to write-down
such investments to net realizable value could adversely affect
our future operating results.
While we have recognized all declines that are believed to be
other-than-temporary,
it is reasonably possible that individual investments in our
portfolio may experience an
other-than-temporary
decline in value in the future if the underlying investee
experiences poor operating results or the global equity markets
experience future broad declines in value.
Realization of
Deferred Tax Assets
At September 30, 2008, total net deferred tax assets were
413 million. Included in this amount are the tax
benefits of net operating loss and credit carry-forwards of
approximately 382 million, net of the valuation
allowance. These tax loss and credit carry-forwards generally do
not expire under current law.
We evaluate our deferred tax asset position and the need for a
valuation allowance on a regular basis. The assessment requires
the exercise of judgment on the part of our management with
respect to, among other things, benefits that could be realized
from available tax strategies and future taxable income, as well
as other positive and negative factors. The ultimate realization
of deferred tax assets is dependent upon our ability to generate
the appropriate character of future taxable income sufficient to
utilize loss carry-forwards or tax credits before their
expiration. Since we have incurred a cumulative loss in certain
tax jurisdictions over the three-year period ended
September 30, 2008, the impact of forecasted future taxable
income is excluded from such an assessment. For these tax
jurisdictions, the assessment was therefore based only on the
benefits that could be realized from available tax strategies
and the reversal of temporary differences in future periods.
As a result of this assessment, we increased the deferred tax
asset valuation allowance in the 2007 and 2008 fiscal years by
58 million and 185 million, respectively,
in order to reduce the deferred tax asset to an amount that is
more likely than not expected to be realized in the future. We
expect to continue to recognize low levels of deferred tax
benefits in the 2009 fiscal year, until such time as taxable
income is
29
generated in tax jurisdictions that would enable us to utilize
our tax loss carry-forwards in those jurisdictions.
The recorded amount of total deferred tax assets could be
reduced if our estimates of projected future taxable income and
benefits from available tax strategies are lowered, or if
changes in current tax regulations are enacted that impose
restrictions on the timing or extent of our ability to utilize
tax loss and credit carry-forwards in the future.
Purchase
Accounting
We have acquired businesses in the 2008 fiscal year, including
the mobility products business from LSI, and Primarion. The
acquisition of the mobility products business from LSI resulted
in an in-process research and development charge of
14 million. Both acquisitions resulted in long-term
intangible assets and goodwill.
Accounting for business combinations requires the allocation of
the purchase price to identifiable tangible and intangible
assets and liabilities based upon their fair value. The
allocation of purchase price is highly judgmental, and requires
the extensive use of estimates and fair value assumptions, which
can have a significant impact on operating results.
Pension Plan
Accounting
Our pension benefit costs are determined in accordance with
actuarial computations using the
projected-unit-credit
method, which rely on assumptions including discount rates and
expected return on plan assets. Discount rates are established
based on prevailing market rates for high-quality fixed-income
instruments that, if the pension benefit obligation were settled
at the measurement date, would provide the necessary future cash
flows to pay the benefit obligation when due. The expected
return on plan assets assumption is determined on a uniform
basis, considering long-term historical returns, asset
allocation, and future estimates of long-term investment
returns. Other key assumptions for our pension costs are based
on current market conditions. A significant variation in one or
more of these underlying assumptions could have a material
effect on the measurement of our long-term obligation.
We account for our pension-benefit liabilities and related
postretirement benefit costs pursuant to SFAS No. 87,
Employers Accounting for Pensions. We
offer defined benefit pension plans, which generally specify the
amount of pension benefit that each employee will receive for
services performed during a specified period of employment. The
amount of the employers periodic contribution to a defined
benefit pension plan is based on the total pension benefits that
could be earned by all eligible participants.
Generally, if our total contribution to our pension plans for
the period is not equal to the amount of net periodic pension
cost as determined by the provisions of SFAS No. 87,
we recognize the difference either as a liability or as an
asset. Effective September 30, 2007, we adopted the
recognition provision of SFAS No. 158,
Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension
and Other Postretirement Plans an amendment of FASB
Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and 132(R), whereby
we recognize the over-funded or under-funded status of our
defined benefit postretirement plans as an asset or liability in
our consolidated balance sheet. Changes in funded status will be
recognized in the year in which the changes occur through other
comprehensive income.
Consolidated Balance Sheets. Defined
benefit plans determine the entitlements of their beneficiaries.
The net present value of the total fixed benefits for service
already rendered is represented by the actuarially calculated
accumulated benefit obligation (ABO).
An employees final benefit entitlement at regular
retirement age may be higher than the fixed benefits at the
measurement date due to future compensation or benefit
increases. The net present value of this ultimate future benefit
entitlement for service already rendered is represented by the
projected benefit obligation (PBO), which is
actuarially calculated with consideration for future
compensation increases.
The pension liabilities are equal to the PBO when the
assumptions used to calculate the PBO such as discount rate,
compensation increase rate and projected future pension
increases are achieved. In the case of funded plans, the market
value of the external assets is offset against the benefit
obligations. The
30
net liability or asset recorded on the consolidated balance
sheets is equal to the under- or over-funding of the PBO in this
case, when the expected return on plan assets is subsequently
realized.
Differences between actual experience and the assumptions made
for the compensation increase rate and projected future pension
increases, as well as the differences between actual and
expected returns on plan assets, generally result in the
unrecognized actuarial gains or losses, which are reflected as a
separate component of shareholders equity.
Consolidated Statements of
Operations. The recognized expense related to
pension plans and similar commitments in the consolidated
statements of operations is referred to as net periodic pension
cost (NPPC) and consists of several separately
calculated and presented components, including service cost,
which is the actuarial net present value of the part of the PBO
for the service rendered in the respective fiscal year; the
interest cost for the expense derived from the addition of
accrued interest on the PBO at the end of the preceding fiscal
year on the basis of the identified discount rate; and the
expected return on plan assets in the case of funded benefit
plans. Actuarial gains and losses, resulting for example from an
adjustment of the discount rate, and asset gains and losses,
resulting from a deviation of actual and expected return on plan
assets, are included in the net pension cost for the fiscal year
if, as of the beginning of the fiscal year, the unrecognized net
gains or losses exceed 10 percent of the greater of the
projected benefit obligation or the market value of the plan
assets. The amortization is the excess divided by the average
remaining service period of active employees expected to receive
benefits under the plan.
In the consolidated statements of operations, NPPC is allocated
among functional costs (cost of sales, research and development
expenses, selling and general administrative expenses),
according to the function of the employee groups accruing
benefits.
In the consolidated statements of operations, NPPC expenses
before income taxes for our Infineon Logic pension plans for the
fiscal years ended September 30, 2006, 2007 and 2008, were
31 million, 34 million and
17 million, respectively.
The consolidated balance sheets include the following
significant components related to pension plans and similar
commitments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
Less income tax effect
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income, net of income taxes
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current pension assets
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
Current pension liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Non-current pension liabilities
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash
Flows. We make payments directly to the
participants in the case of unfunded benefit plans and the
payments are included in net cash used in operating activities.
For funded pension plans, the participants are paid by the
external pension fund and accordingly these payments are cash
neutral to us. In this case, our regular funding (service cost)
and supplemental cash contributions result in net cash used in
operating activities.
In the consolidated statements of cash flows, our principal
pension and other postretirement benefits resulted in net cash
used in operating activities from continuing operations of
5 million, 8 million and
6 million in the fiscal years ended
September 30, 2006, 2007 and 2008, respectively.
31
Pension benefits Sensitivity
Analysis. A one percentage point change in
the established assumptions used for the calculation of the NPPC
for the 2009 fiscal year would result in the following impact on
the NPPC for the 2009 fiscal year:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect on net periodic pension costs
|
|
|
|
One percentage
|
|
|
One percentage
|
|
|
|
increase
|
|
|
decrease
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
4
|
|
Rate of compensation increase
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Rate of projected future pension increases
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
3
|
|
Increases and decreases in the discount rate, rate of
compensation increase and rate of projected future pension
increases which are used in determining the PBO do not have a
symmetrical effect on NPPC primarily due to the compound
interest effect created when determining the present value of
the future pension benefit. If more than one of the assumptions
were changed simultaneously, the impact would not necessarily be
the same as would be the case if only one assumption were
changed in isolation.
For a discussion of our current funding status and the impact of
these critical assumptions, see note 31 to our consolidated
financial statements for the year ended September 30, 2008.
Contingencies
We are subject to various legal actions and claims, including
intellectual property matters, which arise in and outside the
normal course of business. Current proceedings are described
under the heading Business Legal Matters.
We regularly assess the likelihood of any adverse outcome or
judgments related to these matters, as well as estimating the
range of possible losses and recoveries. Liabilities, including
accruals for significant litigation costs, related to legal
proceedings are recorded when it is probable that a liability
has been incurred and the associated amount of the loss can be
reasonably estimated. Where the estimated amount of loss is
within a range of amounts and no amount within the range is a
better estimate than any other amount or the range cannot be
estimated, the minimum amount is accrued. Accordingly, we have
accrued a liability and charged operating income in the
accompanying consolidated financial statements related to
certain asserted and unasserted claims existing as of each
balance sheet date. As additional information becomes available,
any potential liability related to these actions is assessed and
the estimates are revised, if necessary. These accrued
liabilities would be subject to change in the future based on
new developments in each matter, or changes in circumstances,
which could have a material impact on our results of operations,
financial position and cash flows.
Transition to
International Financial Reporting Standards
(IFRS)
Beginning with the first quarter of the 2009 fiscal year, we
will prepare our financial statements according to IFRS. For the
years prior to the 2009 fiscal year, we have prepared our
financial statements according to U.S. GAAP. As part of the
transition to IFRS, we have published IFRS consolidated
financial statements for the 2007 and 2008 fiscal years as
supplemental information to the U.S. GAAP consolidated
financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report on
Form 20-F.
Quantitative and
Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with
notes 2, 32 and 33 to our consolidated financial statements
for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008.
Market risk is the risk of loss related to adverse changes in
market prices of financial instruments, including those related
to commodity prices, foreign exchange rates and interest rates.
We are exposed to various financial market risks in the ordinary
course of business transactions, primarily resulting from
changes in commodity prices, foreign exchange rates and interest
rates. We enter into diverse financial
32
transactions with multiple counterparties to limit such risks.
Derivative instruments are used only for hedging purposes and
not for trading or speculative purposes.
Commodity
Price Risk
We are exposed to commodity price risks with respect to raw
materials used in the manufacture of our products. We seek to
minimize these risks through our sourcing policies (including
the use of multiple sources, where possible) and our operating
procedures. We do not use derivative financial instruments to
manage any exposure to fluctuations in commodity prices
remaining after these operating measures.
In addition, a significant portion of the business of Qimonda is
exposed to fluctuations in market prices for standard DRAM
products. For these products, the sales price responds to market
forces in a way similar to that of other commodities. This price
volatility can be extreme and has resulted in significant
fluctuations within relatively short time-frames. Qimonda
attempts to mitigate the effects of volatility by continuously
improving its cost position, by entering into new strategic
partnerships and by focusing its product portfolio on
application-specific products that are subject to less
volatility, such as DRAM products for infrastructure, graphics,
mobile and consumer applications.
Foreign
Exchange and Interest Risk
Although we prepare our consolidated financial statements in
Euro, major portions of our sales volumes as well as costs
relating to the design, production and manufacturing of products
are denominated in U.S. dollars. As a multinational
company, our activities in markets around the world create cash
flows in a number of different currencies. Exchange rate
fluctuations may have substantial effects on our sales, our
costs and our overall results of operations.
33
The table below provides information about our derivative
financial instruments that are sensitive to changes in foreign
currency exchange and interest rates as of the end of our 2008
fiscal year. For foreign currency exchange forward contracts
related to certain sale and purchase transactions and debt
service payments denominated in foreign currencies, the table
presents the notional amounts and the weighted average
contractual foreign exchange rates. At September 30, 2008,
our foreign currency forward contracts mainly had terms up to
one year. Our interest rate swaps expire in 2010. We do not
enter into derivatives for trading or speculative purposes.
Derivative
Financial Instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
contractual
|
|
|
Fair value
|
|
|
|
Contract amount
|
|
|
forward
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
buy/(sell)
|
|
|
exchange rate
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Foreign currency forward contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. dollar
|
|
|
157
|
|
|
|
1.39498
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
U.S. dollar
|
|
|
(213
|
)
|
|
|
1.47112
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
Japanese yen
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
149.79970
|
|
|
|
|
|
Japanese yen
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
153.12944
|
|
|
|
|
|
Singapore dollar
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
2.06060
|
|
|
|
|
|
Singapore dollar
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
2.02664
|
|
|
|
|
|
Great Britain pound
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
0.79446
|
|
|
|
|
|
Malaysian ringgit
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
4.86630
|
|
|
|
|
|
Malaysian ringgit
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
4.89110
|
|
|
|
|
|
Norwegian krone
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
8.03916
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency Options sold
|
|
|
(177
|
)
|
|
|
1.4150
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
Currency Options purchased
|
|
|
(163
|
)
|
|
|
1.5310
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our policy with respect to limiting short-term foreign currency
exposure generally is to economically hedge at least
75 percent of our estimated net exposure for the initial
two-month period, at least 50 percent of our estimated net
exposure for the third month and, depending on the nature of the
underlying transactions, a significant portion for the periods
thereafter. Part of our foreign currency exposure cannot be
mitigated due to differences between actual and forecasted
amounts. We calculate this net exposure on a cash-flow basis
considering balance sheet items, actual orders received or made
and all other planned revenues and expenses.
We record our derivative instruments according to the provisions
of SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities, as amended.
SFAS No. 133 requires all derivative instruments to be
recorded on the balance sheet at their fair value. Gains and
losses resulting from changes in the fair values of those
derivatives are accounted for depending on the use of the
derivative instrument and whether it qualifies for hedge
accounting. During the 2008 fiscal year, we designated as cash
flow hedges certain foreign exchange forward contracts and
foreign exchange options related to highly probable forecasted
sales denominated in U.S. dollars. We did not record any
ineffectiveness for these hedges for the 2008 fiscal year.
However, we excluded differences between spot and forward rates
and the time value from the assessment of hedge effectiveness
and included this component of the financial instruments
gain or loss as a part of cost of goods sold. We estimate that
4 million of net losses recognized directly in other
comprehensive income as of September 30, 2008 will be
reclassified into earnings during the 2009 fiscal year. All
foreign exchange derivatives designated as cash flow hedges held
as of September 30, 2008 have maturities of six months or
less. Foreign exchange derivatives entered into to offset
exposure to anticipated cash flows that do not meet the
requirements for applying hedge accounting are marked to market
at each reporting period, with unrealized gains and losses
recognized in earnings. For the 2008 fiscal year, no gains or
losses were reclassified from accumulated other
34
comprehensive income as a result of the discontinuance of
foreign exchanges cash flow hedges resulting from a
determination that it was probable that the original forecasted
transaction would not occur.
In the 2008 fiscal year, foreign exchange transaction losses
were 0 and were offset by gains from our economic
hedge transactions of 15 million, resulting in net
foreign exchange gains of 15 million. This compares
to foreign exchange losses of 13 million, which were
offset by gains from our economic hedge transactions of
16 million, resulting in net foreign exchange losses
of 3 million in the 2007 fiscal year. A large portion
of our manufacturing, selling and marketing, general and
administrative, and research and development expenses are
incurred in currencies other than the Euro, primarily the
U.S. dollar and Japanese yen. Fluctuations in the exchange
rates of these currencies to the Euro had an effect on
profitability in the 2006, 2007 and 2008 fiscal years.
Interest Rate
Risk
We are exposed to interest rate risk through our debt
instruments, fixed-term deposits and loans. During the 2003
fiscal year, we issued convertible subordinated notes and in the
2007 fiscal year we issued subordinated notes exchangeable for
Qimonda shares. Due to the high volatility of our core business
and to maintain high operational flexibility, we keep a
substantial amount of cash and marketable securities. These
assets are mainly invested in instruments with contractual
maturities ranging from three to twelve months, bearing interest
at short-term rates. To reduce the risk caused by changes in
market interest rates, we attempt to align the duration of the
interest rates of our debts and current assets by the use of
interest rate derivatives.
Fluctuating interest rates have an impact on parts of each of
our marketable securities, debt obligations and standby lines of
credit. We make use of derivative instruments such as interest
rate swaps to hedge against adverse interest rate developments.
We have entered into interest rate swap agreements that
primarily convert the fixed interest rate on our convertible
subordinated notes to a variable interest rate based on the
relevant European Interbank Offering Rate (EURIBOR).
Outlook
Industry
Environment and Outlook
The current global financial crisis and general slow-down in the
world economy has resulted in a number of major economies
entering into recession. This drop in economic activity has
significantly affected the global semiconductor market. For the
2009 calendar year, analysts expect a contraction of the market.
WSTS, for example, currently forecasts that the overall market
will decrease (in U.S. dollar terms) by 2.2 percent in
the 2009 calendar year (compared with its spring 2008 forecast
of 5.8 percent growth). In December 2008, Gartner Dataquest
forecast a decrease in worldwide semiconductor revenues of
16 percent in the 2009 calendar year. For the 2008 calendar
year, WSTS currently forecasts a growth of world semiconductor
revenues of 2.5 percent, compared to 4.7 percent in
its spring 2008 forecast. Overall, we believe that a significant
decline in global semiconductor revenues from 2008 levels cannot
be ruled out. In the 2010 calendar year, WSTS currently
forecasts world semiconductor revenues growth of
6.5 percent.
In the 2009 calendar year, iSuppli expects all semiconductor
market segments to be affected by the economic downturn.
Personal computers (PC) and mobile phones will remain the most
significant applications. So-called netbooks, which
are small and low-cost portable computers, are expected to
become a driver of growth in the PC market. Wireless
infrastructure may be a driver in the wireless semiconductor
market. In the automotive semiconductor market, safety
applications, such as driver assistance and emergency calling,
as well as energy-efficient and pollution-control systems, are
expected to outperform the market. Similar trends are
anticipated for renewable energy, energy-saving electric drives
and medical in the industrial semiconductor market.
Outlook for
Infineon Logic
Significant planning assumptions: When
preparing this outlook, we made certain important planning
assumptions for Infineon Logic.
35
We implemented International Financial Reporting Standards
(IFRS) as the primary accounting standards for
Infineon effective October 1, 2008. While we are reporting
our results for the 2008 fiscal year under United States
Generally Accepted Accounting Standards (U.S. GAAP),
the following outlook for the 2009 fiscal year is in accordance
with IFRS. With the publication of the results for the first
quarter of the 2009 fiscal year onwards, we will apply IFRS
only. For ease of comparison, we will compare 2009 forecasts
under IFRS to actual results in 2008 under IFRS.
As a result of the reclassification of Qimonda as discontinued
operations effective March 31, 2008, all statements below
reflect Infineons continuing operations without Qimonda.
In addition, in line with our goal of increased efficiency, we
reorganized the company along our target markets effective
October 1, 2008. As a result, Infineon is organized in five
operating segments: Automotive, Industrial &
Multimarket, Chip Card & Security, Wireless Solutions,
and Wireline Communications.
Furthermore, from October 1, 2008, our Management Board
uses Segment Profit to assess the operating performance of our
reportable segments and as a basis for allocating resources
among our segments. We have defined Segment Profit as Operating
Income (Loss) under IFRS, net of asset impairments,
restructuring and other related closure costs, stock-based
compensation expense, acquisition-related amortization and
gains/losses, gains/losses on sales of assets, businesses, or
interests in subsidiaries, and other income/expense, including
litigation settlement costs. Gains/losses on sales of assets,
businesses, or interests in subsidiaries include, among others,
gains or losses that may be realized from potential sales of
Qimonda shares or other investments and activities.
To address rising risks in the market environment of the 2008
fiscal year as well as adverse currency trends, we implemented
our IFX10+ cost-reduction program in the third quarter of the
2008 fiscal year. Under IFRS, a total of 172 million
in expenses related to this program were recorded in the fourth
quarter of the 2008 fiscal year. Due to the dramatic weakening
of the global market since August 2008, we have identified very
substantial additional savings, primarily in operating expenses,
in addition to the originally announced annualized savings of at
least 200 million by the end of the 2009 fiscal year.
These additional savings, however, are likely to be more than
completely offset by the simultaneous decline in our revenue
expectations versus our planning assumptions when IFX10+ was
originally conceived, as well as the increase in idle cost
caused by the drop in capacity utilization of our manufacturing
sites. Moreover, we cannot rule out the possibility that we may
incur additional expenses or record additional charges in the
future in connection with this cost reduction program.
For the purpose of forecasting our total Segment Profit from
continuing operations in the 2009 fiscal year, we assumed a
U.S. dollar/Euro exchange rate of 1.40. About
50 percent of our revenues and 30 percent of the costs
are exposed to the U.S. dollar. Any strengthening of the
U.S. dollar against the Euro would have a positive impact
on revenues, primarily in the segments with the largest exposure
to the U.S. dollar, such as Industrial &
Multimarket, Wireless Solutions and Wireline Communications. A
strengthening of the U.S. dollar would not, however, have
any material impact on earnings for the first half of the 2009
fiscal year, as we have already hedged a significant portion of
the expected cash flow. For the remainder of the 2009 fiscal
year, a strengthening of the U.S. dollar would have a
material impact on earnings, as we have hedged only a small
portion of the expected cash flows.
Infineon Logics Revenues: For the 2009
fiscal year, visibility is very limited. We note that the
weakness in the global economy is having a severe impact on
demand in all of our target markets, leading to a decrease in
revenues in all operating segments, with the least severe effect
on the Wireless Solutions segment, in the 2009 fiscal year.
Based on our current forecast, we expect total revenues for
Infineon in the 2009 fiscal year, consisting of the operating
segments Automotive, Industrial & Multimarket, Chip
Card & Security, Wireless Solutions, and Wireline
Communications, as well as Other Operating Segments and
Corporate & Eliminations, to decrease by at least
15 percent compared to the 2008 fiscal year. The
year-over-year
decrease is expected to be driven in particular by the
Automotive segment, where world wide production cuts at car
manufacturers, are expected to last throughout the full 2009
fiscal year, are having a severe impact on semiconductor demand.
In addition, significant revenue decreases are
anticipated
in the Industrial & Multimarket, Chip Card &
Security and Wireline Communications segments due to the general
global weakening in demand. In the Industrial &
Multimarket segment, an additional
36
decrease in revenues is anticipated as a result of the disposal
of the HDD business following its sale to LSI in the 2008 fiscal
year. The Wireless Solutions segment is currently expected to be
least severely affected by the revenue decrease in the 2009
fiscal year, due mainly to gains in market share.
Despite the down-turn of the worldwide economy, mentioned above,
and the global recession, and despite the significant reduction
in global semiconductor demand that has resulted from the global
slow-down, we continue to see long-term growth in demand for our
products beyond the expected decline, as our products address
three current global issues: energy efficiency, communications,
and security. We have organized our business around those growth
drivers and expect added company value created by the products
which address challenges linked to those trends. First, as
natural resources become scarce, as costs of energy generation
and consumption continue to rise, and as the awareness of
environmental issues continues to increase, people and
businesses are seeking to economize on energy usage. Our
semiconductor solutions, particularly in the automotive and
industrial businesses, enable improved energy efficiency.
Second, people intensify communication and want flexible access
to the internet in any place and at any time. We contribute to
this trend through our products and solutions in the segments
Wireless Solutions and Wireline Communications. Third, with
increasing communication and peoples need to access data
securely anywhere and at any time, the need to protect data and
intellectual property is growing. Likewise, the need to securely
authenticate and identify users and travelers continues to grow.
We cater to this trend in our Chip Card and Security activities.
Infineon Logics Total Segment
Profit: Under IFRS, Infineon Logic EBIT in the
2008 fiscal year was negative 52 million. Under IFRS,
this translates into a total Segment Profit of
258 million. In the 2009 fiscal year, we expect
Infineon total Segment Profit to decrease significantly compared
to the total Segment Profit of 258 million under IFRS
for the 2008 fiscal year and we expect negative total Segment
Profit. The decline in Segment Profit expected for the 2009
fiscal year is anticipated to be caused principally by sharp
revenue decreases in combination with idle capacity costs caused
by ongoing low capacity utilization. This decline will be offset
only in part by savings in connection with the IFX10+
cost-reduction program. Beyond the 2009 fiscal year, we expect
that any increase in revenues from continuing operations would
also lead to increased total Segment Profit for Infineons
continuing operations.
Fixed assets investment and depreciation for Infineon
Logic: We are pursuing a differentiated
manufacturing strategy for our five operating segments. In the
context of this strategy, we will continue to invest in
manufacturing capacities for special processes, particularly in
the power semiconductor arena. In contrast, we do not plan to
invest in our own manufacturing capacities starting with
65-nanometer structure sizes for the standard semiconductor
manufacturing process, so called CMOS technology. We anticipate
that our annual investment in property, plant and equipment and
intangible assets including capitalized development costs, will
fall to approximately 250 million in the 2009 fiscal
year. This compares to an investment in property, plant and
equipment and intangible assets including capitalized
development costs of 370 million in the 2008 fiscal
year as recorded under IFRS. In the 2009 fiscal year,
depreciation expense is expected to total around
400 million and additional amortization of intangible
assets, including capitalized development costs, will be around
50 million, compared to 496 million and
75 million in the prior year, respectively, as
recorded under IFRS. In subsequent fiscal years, we will tailor
our capital investment to the demand development, but expect to
limit such investments to 10 percent or less of our
revenues. We expect annual depreciation and amortization
expense, including amortization charges for capitalized
development costs under IFRS, to decrease further and to fall in
line with our capital investment.
Expenditures for research & development for
Infineon Logic: We expect expenditures for
Research and Development (R&D) for Infineon Logic in the
2009 fiscal year to decrease by around 10 percent compared
to the 2008 fiscal year and as recorded under IFRS, mainly due
to the cost reduction measures in connection with the IFX10+
program.
In the Automotive segment, our R&D efforts are mainly
focused on the technology development of analog, bipolar, and
flash products, as well as new products, and the widening of the
existing product portfolio. The development of new power
technologies for industrial drives and power supply application
and the widening of the product portfolio, particularly in power
conversion ICs and industrial ASICs, are examples of areas of
emphasis within R&D in the Industrial & Multimarket
segment. In the Chip Card & Security
37
segment, we have intensified our R&D efforts in developing
next-generation, highly secure technologies and platforms being
used in many fields of application. In the Wireless Solutions
and Wireline Communications segments, our R&D spending is
focused, for example, on developing next-generation
system-on-a-chip
products and system solutions for mobile phones and the
broadband access market. Another important focus of our R&D
activities is process technologies that we develop in alliances
with several partners and consortia in order to maintain a
competitive technology roadmap at an affordable cost level.
Recent
Developments Related to Qimonda
On December 21, 2008, we, the German Free State of Saxony,
and Qimonda jointly announced a financing package for Qimonda.
The package includes a 150 million loan from the
German Free State of Saxony, a 100 million loan from
a state bank in Portugal and a 75 million loan from
us. In addition to this financing package, Qimonda has announced
that it expects to receive guarantees totaling
280 million from the Federal Government of Germany
and the Free State of Saxony. Based on such guarantees, Qimonda
has announced that it is already in advanced negotiations
regarding the financing of 150 million. The
availability of the total financing package is contingent upon
successful completion of the relevant state, federal and
European Commission approval procedures as well as final
agreement on the detailed terms and conditions of the
transaction.
In the context of the extraordinary circumstances currently
confronting the world economy in general and the semiconductor
industry in particular, we and Qimonda have found it necessary
to explore a wider range of financing alternatives. Given the
conditions of the equity markets and the trading price of
Qimondas ADSs, as well as the severe credit crisis,
Qimondas opportunities to obtain further funding have been
extremely limited. We and Qimonda have determined that accepting
the offer of funding from the German Free State of Saxony and
from a state bank in Portugal is the only realistic current
alternative that will permit Qimonda to receive necessary
financial resources. The government entities participating in
this transaction have required that we also make funding
available to Qimonda as a condition to their participation. In
light of the severe negative consequences of an insolvency of
Qimonda to that company and its employees, as well as
Infineons potential exposure to certain significant
liabilities related to the Qimonda business, we believe that the
provision of this funding by us at this time is in the best
interest of Infineon and its shareholders.
Subsequent
Events
Various
Matters
Subsequent to September 30, 2008, we repurchased notional
amounts of 95 million and 22 million of
our exchangeable subordinated notes due 2010 and our convertible
subordinated notes due 2010, respectively. The repurchases were
made out of available cash.
Effective October 1, 2008, we are organized into the
following five operating segments: Automotive, Chip
Card & Security, Industrial & Multimarket,
Wireline Communications and Wireless Solutions.
On October 3, 2008, approximately 95 California schools,
political subdivisions and public agencies that were previously
putative class members of the multistate attorney general
complaint described in note 34 to our consolidated
financial statements filed suit in California Superior Court
against us, Infineon Technologies North America, and several
other DRAM manufacturers alleging DRAM price-fixing and
artificial price inflation in violation of California state
antitrust and consumer protection laws arising out of the
alleged practices described in note 34. The plaintiffs seek
recovery of actual and treble damages in unspecified amounts,
restitution, costs (including attorneys fees) and
injunctive and other equitable relief. We and Infineon
Technologies North America have agreed to accept service of
process as of November 19, 2008 in exchange for an extended
period of time to respond to the complaint. The current response
date is February 12, 2009.
On October 7, 2008, we and Third Dimension Semiconductor
Inc. signed a Settlement and License Agreement and on
October 21, 2008, filed a joint motion to dismiss the
patent infringement case brought against us.
38
On October 13, 2008, Qimonda announced that it had entered
into a share purchase agreement to sell its 35.6 percent
stake in Inotera Memories, Inc., to Micron Technology, Inc., for
cash proceeds of $400 million. The sale of the Inotera
stake occurred in two equal tranches, on October 20, 2008
and November 26, 2008.
In the litigation led by LSI (see note 34), the court in
the Eastern District of Texas stayed the case on June 20,
2008, while the ITC Case is pending. On October 17, 2008,
Qimonda became a party to the ITC Case.
On October 21, 2008, we learned that the European
Commission had commenced an investigation involving our Chip
Card & Security segment for alleged violations of
antitrust laws. The investigation is in its very early stages,
and we are assessing the facts and monitoring the situation
carefully.
On October 30, 2008, the district court in the MDL
proceedings entered an order staying the indirect purchaser
proceedings in the Northern District of California during the
period that the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals considers the
appeal on the decision of the district court to dismiss certain
claims of the plaintiffs.
On November 12, 2008, Volterra Semiconductor Corporation
filed suit against Primarion, Inc., Infineon Technologies North
America and Infineon Technologies AG in the United States
District Court for the Northern District of California for
alleged infringement of five U.S. patents by certain
products offered by Primarion.
On November 25, 2008, Infineon Technologies AG, Infineon
Technologies Austria AG and Infineon Technologies North America
filed suit in the United States District Court for the District
of Delaware against Fairchild Semiconductor International, Inc.
and Fairchild Semiconductor Corporation (collectively
Fairchild) regarding (1) a complaint for patent
infringement by certain products of Fairchild and (2) a
complaint for declaratory judgment of non-infringement and
invalidity of certain patents of Fairchild against the
allegation of infringement of those patents by certain products
of Infineon. Fairchild has filed a counterclaim in Delaware for
a declaratory judgment on (1) infringement by Infineon of
those patents which are the subject of Infineons complaint
for declaratory judgment and (2) non-infringement and
invalidity of those patents which are the subject of
Infineons complaint for infringement. Fairchild has
further filed another patent infringement suit against Infineon
Technologies AG and Infineon Technologies North America in the
United States District Court for the District of Maine alleging
that certain products of Infineon infringe on two other patents
of Fairchild which are not part of the Delaware lawsuit.
On December 5, 2008, we received a request for information
from the European Commission regarding DRAM turnover data for
our 2001 fiscal year.
Qimonda
On December 21, 2008, we, the German Free State of Saxony,
and Qimonda jointly announced a financing package for Qimonda.
This proposed transaction is described under Operating and
Financial Review Recent Developments Related to
Qimonda.
39
RISK
FACTORS
You should carefully consider the risks described below
before making an investment decision. The occurrence of any of
the following events could harm us. If these events occur, the
trading price of our companys shares could decline, and
you may lose all or part of your investment. Additional risks
not currently known to us or that we now deem immaterial may
also harm us and affect your investment.
Risks related to
the semiconductor industry
Ongoing financial market volatility and further adverse
developments in the global economic environment could have a
significant adverse impact on our business, financial condition
and operating results.
Our business, financial condition and results of operations
could be significantly negatively impacted by general economic
conditions and the related downturn in the semiconductor market.
In recent months, the global economy has experienced a
significant downturn, reflecting the effects of the credit
market crisis, slower economic activity and a generally negative
economic outlook, a decrease in consumer and business confidence
and liquidity concerns. A severe or prolonged economic downturn
could result in a variety of risks to our business, including:
|
|
|
|
|
significant declines in sales;
|
|
|
|
significant reductions in selling prices;
|
|
|
|
increased volatility and/or declines in our share price;
|
|
|
|
increased volatility or adverse movements in foreign currency
exchange rates;
|
|
|
|
delays in, or curtailment of, purchasing decisions by our
customers or potential customers either as a result of overall
economic uncertainty or as a result of their inability to access
the liquidity necessary to engage in purchasing initiatives or
new product development;
|
|
|
|
increased credit risk associated with our customers or potential
customers, particularly those that may operate in industries
most affected by the economic downturn, such as
automotives; and
|
|
|
|
impairment of goodwill or other assets.
|
To the extent that the current economic downturn worsens or is
prolonged, our business, financial condition and results of
operations could be significantly and adversely affected.
The
semiconductor industry is characterized by intense competition,
which could reduce our sales or put continued pressure on our
prices.
The semiconductor industry is highly competitive, and has been
characterized by rapid technological change, short product
lifecycles, high capital expenditures, intense pricing pressure
from major customers, periods of oversupply and continuous
advancements in process technologies and manufacturing
facilities. Increased competitive pressure or the relative
weakening of our competitive position could materially and
adversely affect our business, financial condition and results
of operations.
We operate in
a highly cyclical industry and our business could suffer from
periodic downturns.
The semiconductor industry is highly cyclical and has suffered
significant economic downturns at various times. These downturns
have involved periods of production overcapacity, oversupply,
lower prices and lower revenues. The markets for memory products
have been especially volatile. In addition, average selling
prices for our products, particularly Qimondas standard
memory products, can fluctuate significantly from quarter to
quarter or month to month.
There can be no assurance that the market will continue to grow
in the near term, that the growth rates experienced in recent
past periods will be attainable again in the coming years, or
that we will be successful in managing any future downturn or
substantial decline in average selling prices, any of which
could have a material adverse effect on our results of
operations and financial condition.
40
Industry
overcapacity could require us or Qimonda to lower our prices,
particularly for Qimondas memory products.
Both semiconductor companies with their own manufacturing
facilities and semiconductor foundries, which manufacture
semiconductors designed by others, have added significant
capacity from time to time in recent periods. In the past, the
net increases of supply sometimes exceeded demand requirements,
leading to oversupply situations and downturns in the industry.
Downturns have severely hurt the profitability of the industry
in general, especially the DRAM business of Qimonda. Given the
volatility and competition of the semiconductor industry, we are
likely to face downturns in the future as well, which would
likely have similar effects. Fluctuations in the rate at which
industry capacity grows relative to the growth rate in demand
for semiconductor products may in the future put pressure on our
average selling prices and hurt our results of operations.
Our business
could suffer as a result of volatility in different parts of the
world.
We operate globally, with numerous manufacturing, assembly and
testing facilities on three continents, including those that we
operate jointly with partners. In the 2008 fiscal year, 78.6
percent of our revenues were generated outside Germany and 59.7
percent were generated outside Europe. Our business is therefore
subject to risks involved in international business, including:
|
|
|
|
|
negative economic developments in foreign economies and
instability of foreign governments, including the threat of war,
terrorist attacks, epidemic or civil unrest;
|
|
|
|
changes in laws and policies affecting trade and
investment; and
|
|
|
|
varying practices of the regulatory, tax, judicial and
administrative bodies in the jurisdictions where we operate.
|
Substantial changes in any of these conditions could have an
adverse effect on our business and results of operations. Our
results of operations could also be hurt if demand for the
products made by our customers decreases due to adverse economic
conditions in any of the regions where they sell their own
products.
Threats of disease outbreaks or pandemics, such as the avian flu
and Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) outbreaks, in
regions where we have manufacturing sites may negatively effect
our operations by limiting the productivity of our workforce,
inhibiting transportation or the shipment of products or
reducing the ability of local suppliers to provide adequate
goods and services. Furthermore, the purchasing patterns of our
customers located in these regions may suffer if there is an
epidemic outbreak. This could negatively impact our operations.
In difficult
market conditions, our high fixed costs adversely impact our
results.
In less favorable industry conditions, in addition to price
pressure we are faced with a decline in the utilization rates of
our manufacturing facilities due to decreases in product demand.
Since the semiconductor industry is characterized by high fixed
costs, we are not always able to reduce our total costs in line
with revenue declines. The costs associated with the excess
capacity, particularly for our front-end fabs, are charged
directly to cost of sales as idle capacity charges. We cannot
guarantee that difficult market conditions will not adversely
affect the capacity utilization of our fabs and, consequently,
our future gross margins.
The
competitive environment of the semiconductor industry has led to
industry consolidation, and we may face even more intense
competition from newly merged competitors or we may seek to
acquire a competitor or become an acquisition
target.
The highly competitive environment of the semiconductor industry
and the high costs associated with manufacturing technologies
and developing marketable products have resulted in significant
consolidation in the industry and is likely to lead to further
consolidation in the future. Such consolidation can allow a
company to further benefit from economies of scale, provide
improved or more comprehensive product portfolios and increase
the size of its serviceable market. Consequently, we may seek to
acquire or merge with a competitor to improve our market
position and the applications and products we can market. We
also
41
may become a target for a company looking to improve its
competitive position. Such an occurrence may take place at any
time with consequences that may not be predictable and which
could have a materially adverse effect on our results of
operations and financial condition or which may otherwise fail
to achieve the positive results we anticipate. Even if we do not
enter into a merger or acquisition transaction, our competitive
position may be adversely impacted by consolidation among other
industry participants, who may leverage increased market share
and economies of scale to improve their competitive position.
Risks related to
our operations
We intend to
engage in acquisitions, joint ventures and other transactions
that may complement or expand our business. We may not be able
to complete these transactions, and even if executed, these
transactions pose significant risks and could have a negative
effect on our operations.
Our future success may be dependent on opportunities to enter
into joint ventures and to buy other businesses or technologies
that could complement, enhance or expand our current business or
products or that might otherwise offer us growth opportunities
or gains in productivity. If we are unable to identify suitable
targets, our growth prospects may suffer, and we may not be able
to realize sufficient scale advantages to compete effectively in
all relevant markets. We may also face competition for desirable
targets from other companies in the semiconductor industry. Our
ability to acquire targets may also be limited by applicable
antitrust laws and other regulations in the United States, the
European Union and other jurisdictions in which we do business.
We may not be able to complete such transactions, for reasons
including, but not limited to, a failure to secure financing or
as a result of restrictive covenants in our debt instruments.
Any transactions that we are able to identify and complete may
involve a number of risks, including:
|
|
|
|
|
the diversion of our managements attention from our
existing business to integrate the operations and personnel of
the acquired or combined business or joint venture;
|
|
|
|
possible negative impacts on our operating results during the
integration process; and
|
|
|
|
our possible inability to achieve the intended objectives of the
transaction.
|
We may be
unable to successfully integrate businesses we acquire, and may
be required to record charges related to the goodwill or other
long-term assets associated with the acquired
businesses.
We have acquired other companies, businesses and technologies
from time to time. We intend to continue to make acquisitions
of, and investments in, other companies. We face risks resulting
from the expansion of our operations through acquisitions,
including the risk that we might be unable to successfully
integrate new businesses or teams with our culture and
strategies on a timely basis or at all. We also cannot be
certain that we will be able to achieve the full scope of the
benefits we expect from a particular acquisition or investment.
Our business, financial condition and results of operations may
suffer if we fail to coordinate our resources effectively to
manage both our existing businesses and any businesses we
acquire.
We review the goodwill associated with our acquisitions for
impairment at least once a year. Changes in our expectations due
to changes in market developments which we cannot foresee have
in the past resulted in our writing off amounts associated with
the goodwill of acquired companies, and future changes may
require similar further write-offs in future periods.
We may not be
able to protect our proprietary intellectual property and may be
accused of infringing the intellectual property rights of
others.
Our success depends on our ability to obtain patents, licenses
and other intellectual property rights covering our products and
our design and manufacturing processes. The process of seeking
patent protection can be long and expensive. Patents may not be
granted on currently pending or future applications or may not
be of sufficient scope or strength to provide us with meaningful
protection or commercial advantage. In addition, effective
copyright and trade secret protection may be unavailable or
42
limited in some countries, and our trade secrets may be
vulnerable to disclosure or misappropriation by employees,
contractors and other persons.
Competitors may also develop technologies that are protected by
patents and other intellectual property rights. These
technologies may therefore either be unavailable to us or be
made available to us only on unfavorable terms and conditions.
Litigation, which could require significant financial and
management resources, may be necessary to enforce our patents or
other intellectual property rights or to defend against claims
of infringement of intellectual property rights brought against
us by others. Lawsuits may have a material adverse effect on our
business. We may be forced to stop producing substantially all
or some of our products or to license the underlying technology
upon economically unfavorable terms and conditions or we may be
required to pay damages for the prior use of third party
intellectual property. See Business Legal
Matters for a description of current claims and
proceedings.
Our results
may suffer if we are not able to match our production capacity
to demand.
It is difficult to predict growth in the markets we serve,
making it hard to estimate requirements for production capacity.
If the market does not grow as we have anticipated, we risk
underutilization of our facilities. This may also result in
future write-offs of inventories and losses on products for
which demand is lower than current forecasts may indicate, and
potentially require us to undertake restructuring activities
that may involve significant charges to our earnings.
During periods of increased demand we may not have sufficient
capacity to meet customer orders. Such constraints affect our
customers ability to deliver products in accordance with
their planned manufacturing schedules, straining relationships
with affected customers. During periods of industry overcapacity
and declining selling prices, customers do not generally order
products as far in advance of the scheduled shipment date as
they do during periods when our industry is operating closer to
capacity.
In the past we have responded to fluctuations in industry
capacity and demand by adapting production levels, closing
existing production facilities, opening new production
facilities or entering into strategic alliances, which in many
cases resulted in significant expenditures. We have also
purchased an increasing number of processed wafers and packages
from semiconductor foundries and subcontractors to meet higher
levels of demand and have incurred higher cost of goods sold as
a result. In order to expand or reduce our production capacity
in the future, we may have to spend substantial amounts, which
could hurt our results of operations.
Our business
could suffer due to decreases in the volume of demand of our
customers.
Our sales volume depends significantly on the market success of
our customers in developing and selling end-products that
incorporate our products. The fast pace of technological change,
difficulties in the execution of individual projects, general
economic conditions and other factors may limit the market
success of our customers, resulting in a decrease in the volume
of demand for our products and adversely affecting our results
of operations. This risk is particularly acute in our
communications business, in which we also face significant
pricing and margin pressures.
Due to the time needed to develop the final product for end
customers and the ultimate market introduction, we may face
significant and sometimes unpredictable delays between the
implementation of our products and volume ramp up. This may
cause significant idle capacity costs.
The loss of
one or more of our key customers may adversely affect our
business.
Historically, a significant portion of our revenue has come from
a relatively small number of customers and distributors. The
loss or financial failure of any significant customer or
distributor, or any reduction in orders by any of our key
customers or distributors could materially and adversely affect
our business.
Fluctuations
in the mix of products sold may adversely affect our financial
results.
We achieve differing gross margins across our wide range of
products. Our financial results therefore depend in part on the
structure of our product portfolio. Fluctuations in the mix and
types of our products may also affect the extent to which we are
able to recover our fixed costs and investments that are
associated with a particular product, and as a result can
negatively impact our financial results.
43
If we fail to
successfully implement an optimum
make-or-buy
strategy, our business could suffer from higher
costs.
We intend to continue to invest in leading-edge process
technologies such as power, embedded flash and RF technologies.
At the same time, for CMOS below 90-nanometers, we will continue
to share risks and expand our access to leading-edge technology
through long-term strategic partnerships with other leading
industry participants and by making more extensive use of
manufacturing at silicon foundries. However, the decision to
develop our own solutions or to cooperate with third party
suppliers could result in disadvantages if we fail to achieve
sufficient volume production or if market conditions for the
services we obtain from foundries become more expensive due to
increases in worldwide demand for foundry services.
Our business
could suffer from problems with manufacturing.
The semiconductor industry is characterized by the introduction
of new or enhanced products with short life cycles in a rapidly
changing technological environment. We manufacture our products
using processes that are highly complex, require advanced and
costly equipment and must continuously be modified to improve
yields and performance. Difficulties in the manufacturing
process can reduce yields or interrupt production, especially
during rapid ramp up periods, and as a result of such problems
we may on occasion not be able to deliver products on time or in
a cost-effective, competitive manner.
We cannot foresee and prepare for every contingency. If
production at a fabrication facility is interrupted, we may not
be able to shift production to other facilities on a timely
basis or customers may purchase products from other suppliers.
In either case, the loss of revenues and damage to the
relationship with our customers could be significant. Increasing
our production capacity to reduce our exposure to potential
production interruptions would increase our fixed costs. If the
demand for our products does not increase proportionally to the
increase in production capacity, our operating results could be
harmed.
If our outside
foundry suppliers fail to meet our expectations, our results of
operations and our ability to exploit growth opportunities could
be adversely affected.
We outsource production of some of our products to third-party
suppliers, including semiconductor foundry manufacturers and
assembly and test facilities, and expect that our reliance on
outsourcing will increase. If our outside suppliers are unable
to satisfy our demand, or experience manufacturing difficulties,
delays or reduced yields, our results of operations and ability
to satisfy customer demand could suffer. In addition, purchasing
rather than manufacturing these products may adversely affect
our gross profit margin if the purchase costs of these products
are higher than our own manufacturing costs. Our internal
manufacturing costs include depreciation and other fixed costs,
while costs for products outsourced are based in large part on
market conditions. Prices for foundry products also vary
depending on capacity utilization rates at our suppliers,
quantities demanded, product technology and geometry.
Furthermore, these outsourcing costs can vary materially from
quarter to quarter and, in cases of industry shortages, they can
increase significantly, negatively impacting our results of
operations.
Products that
do not meet customer specifications or that contain, or are
perceived to contain, defects or errors or that are otherwise
incompatible with their intended end use could impose
significant costs on us.
The design and production processes for our products are highly
complex. It is possible that we may produce products that do not
meet customer specifications, contain or are perceived to
contain defects or errors, or are otherwise incompatible with
their intended uses. We may incur substantial costs in remedying
such defects or errors, which could include material inventory
write-downs. Moreover, if actual or perceived problems with
nonconforming, defective or incompatible products occur after we
have shipped the products, we might not only bear direct
liability for providing replacements or otherwise compensating
customers but could also suffer from long-term damage to our
relationship with important customers or to our reputation in
the industry generally. This could have a material adverse
effect on our business, financial condition and results of
operations.
44
We are subject
to the risk of property loss and business
interruption.
We may experience property loss or damage or interruptions to
our business; including as a result of fire, natural disasters
or other disturbance at our facilities or those of our customers
or suppliers. We have constructed and operate our facilities in
ways that are designed to minimize these risks and to enable a
fast return to operations if such an event should occur. We
continue to invest in prevention and response measures at our
facilities as well as in our supplier relations, and carry
insurance in amounts that we believe are adequate. Any such
events, however, could have a material adverse affect on our
operations or financial results, and any losses may exceed the
amounts recoverable under our insurance policies.
Our business
could suffer if we are not able to secure the development of new
technologies or if we cannot keep pace with the technology
development of our competition.
The semiconductor industry is characterized by rapid
technological changes. New process technologies using smaller
feature sizes and offering better performance characteristics
are introduced every one to two years. The introduction of new
technologies allows us to increase the functions per chip while
at the same time optimizing performance parameters, such as
decreasing power consumption or increasing processing speed. In
addition, the reduction of feature sizes allows us to produce
smaller chips offering the same functionality and thereby
considerably reduce the costs per function. In order to remain
competitive, it is essential that we secure the capabilities to
develop and qualify new technologies for the manufacturing of
new products. If we are unable to develop and qualify new
technologies and products, or if we devote resources to the
pursuit of technologies or products that fail to be accepted in
the marketplace or that fail to be commercially viable, our
business may suffer.
We rely on our
strategic partners and other third parties, and our business
could be harmed if they fail to perform as expected or
relationships with them were to be terminated.
As part of our strategy, we have entered into a number of
long-term strategic alliances with leading industry
participants, both to manufacture semiconductors and to develop
new manufacturing process technologies and products. If our
strategic partners encounter financial difficulty or change
their business strategies, they may no longer be able or willing
to participate in these alliances. Some of the agreements
governing our strategic alliances allow our partners to
terminate the agreement if our equity ownership changes so that
a third party gains control of our company or of a significant
portion of our companys shares. Our business could be
harmed if any of our strategic partners were to discontinue its
participation in a strategic alliance or if the alliance were
otherwise to terminate. To the extent we rely on alliances and
third-party design
and/or
manufacturing relationships, we face the risks of:
|
|
|
|
|
reduced control over delivery schedules and product costs;
|
|
|
|
manufacturing costs that are higher than anticipated;
|
|
|
|
the inability of our manufacturing partners to develop
manufacturing methods appropriate for our products and their
unwillingness to devote adequate capacity to produce our
products;
|
|
|
|
a decline in product reliability;
|
|
|
|
an inability to maintain continuing relationships with our
suppliers; and
|
|
|
|
limited ability to meet customer demand when faced with product
shortages.
|
If any of these risks materialize, we could experience an
interruption in our supply chain or an increase in costs, which
could delay or decrease our revenues or adversely affect our
business, financial condition and results of operations.
45
New business
is often subject to a competitive selection process that can be
lengthy and uncertain and that requires us to incur significant
expenses in advance. Even if we win and begin a product design,
a customer may decide to cancel or change its product plans,
which could cause us to generate no sales from a product and
adversely affect our results of operations.
In several of our business areas we focus on winning competitive
bid selection processes, known as design wins, to
develop products for use in our customers products. These
selection processes can be lengthy and can require us to incur
significant design and development expenditures. We may not win
the competitive selection process and may never generate any
revenues despite incurring significant design and development
expenditures.
If we win a product design and receive corresponding orders from
our customers, we may experience delays in generating revenues
from our products as a result of the lengthy development and
design cycle. In addition, a delay or cancellation of a
customers plans could significantly adversely affect our
financial results, as we may have incurred significant expenses
and generated no revenues. Finally, if our customers fail to
successfully market and sell their products our results of
operations could be materially adversely affected as the demand
for our products falls.
We rely on a
limited number of suppliers of manufacturing equipment and
materials, and we could suffer shortages if they were to
interrupt supply or increase prices.
Our manufacturing operations depend upon obtaining deliveries of
equipment and adequate supplies of materials on a timely basis.
We purchase equipment and materials from a number of suppliers
on a
just-in-time
basis. From time to time, suppliers may extend lead times, limit
supply to us or increase prices due to capacity constraints or
other factors. Because the equipment that we purchase is
complex, it is difficult for us to substitute one supplier for
another or one piece of equipment for another. Some materials
are only available from a limited number of suppliers. Although
we believe that supplies of the materials we use are currently
adequate, shortages could occur in critical materials, such as
silicon wafers or specialized chemicals used in production, due
to interruption of supply or increased industry demand. Our
results of operations would be hurt if we were not able to
obtain adequate supplies of quality equipment or materials in a
timely manner or if there were significant increases in the
costs of equipment or materials.
We may be
adversely affected by rising raw material prices.
We are exposed to fluctuations in raw material prices. In the
recent past, gold, copper and petroleum-based organic polymer
prices in particular have increased on a worldwide basis. If we
are not able to compensate for or pass on our increased costs to
customers, such price increases could have a material adverse
impact on our financial results.
Our business
could suffer if we are unable to secure dependable power
supplies at reasonable cost.
Our business requires reliable electrical power at reasonable
cost, and may be adversely affected by power shortages due to
disruptions in supply, as well as increases in market prices for
fuel or electricity.
Our operations
rely on complex information technology systems and networks, and
any disruptions in such systems or networks could have a
material adverse impact on our business and results of
operations.
Like other globally operating technology companies, we rely
heavily on information technology systems and networks to
support business processes as well as internal and external
communications. These systems and networks are potentially
vulnerable to damage or interruption from a variety of sources.
We have implemented numerous measures in order to manage our
risks related to system and network disruptions, including the
use of multiple suppliers and sophisticated information
technology security to protect highly confidential information.
However, despite such precautions, an extended outage in a
telecommunications network utilized by our systems or a similar
event could lead to an extended
46
unanticipated interruption of our systems or networks, which
could have an adverse effect on our business. Furthermore, any
data leaks resulting from information technology security
breaches could adversely affect our business operations or
reputation.
If we are
unsuccessful in implementing our strategic restructuring plans,
our revenue and profitability may be adversely
affected.
Our future success and financial performance are largely
dependent on our ability to successfully implement our business
strategy and to achieve sustained profitability. In furtherance
of our overall strategy, we have announced plans to restructure
our operations to improve our focus on our core business. Those
restructuring plans include anticipated further acquisitions of
complementary businesses and assets and sales of non-core
businesses and assets. Any failure to execute our strategy
successfully, including a failure to consummate such
acquisitions or dispositions, could have material adverse effect
on our operations or financial performance.
We have
recorded significant reorganization costs and asset impairment
charges in the past and may do so again in the future, which
could materially adversely affect our business.
In the past we have recorded restructuring and asset impairment
charges relating to our efforts to consolidate and refocus our
business. As we respond to continuing rapid change in the
semiconductor industry in order to remain competitive, we may
incur additional employee termination and asset impairment
charges in the future. Such charges may have a material adverse
effect on our business, financial condition and results of
operations.
Our success
depends on our ability to recruit and retain a sufficient number
of qualified key personnel.
Our success depends significantly on the recruitment and
retention of highly skilled personnel, particularly in the areas
of research and development, marketing, production management
and general management. The competition for such highly skilled
employees is intense and the loss of the services of key
personnel without adequate replacement or the inability to
attract new qualified personnel could have a material adverse
effect on us. We can provide no assurance that we will be able
to successfully retain
and/or
recruit the key personnel we require.
Our business
could suffer if we do not have adequate access to
capital.
Although we seek to make optimal use of third-party foundries
when appropriate,we require significant amounts of capital to
maintain, modernize, expand and build our own facilities.
Likewise, we increasingly require significant amounts of capital
to fund research and development and advance product platform
development.
We used cash in our investing activities of
853 million in the 2006 fiscal year,
867 million in the 2007 fiscal year and
616 million in the 2008 fiscal year. Our research and
development expenses were 816 million in the 2006
fiscal year, 768 million in the 2007 fiscal year and
755 million in the 2008 fiscal year. Our capital
expenditures in the 2006, 2007 and 2008 fiscal years were
640 million, 498 million and
312 million, respectively. We intend to continue to
invest in research and development and manufacturing facilities,
while continuing our policy of cooperation with other
semiconductor companies to share these costs with us.
In June 2003, we issued 700 million in convertible
subordinated notes due 2010, and in September 2007, we issued
215 million in exchangeable subordinated notes due
2010. The convertible notes are convertible into ordinary shares
of our company at a conversion price of 10.23 per share.
The exchangeable notes are exchangeable into Qimonda ADSs at an
exchange price of 10.48 per Qimonda ADS. Given the recent
trading price of our ordinary shares and Qimonda ADSs, it is
unlikely that a noteholder would convert or exchange its notes
for our ordinary shares or Qimonda ADSs, as applicable.
Therefore, we may be required to find an alternative source of
funds, to repay the outstanding principal and accrued interest
on the convertible and exchangeable notes in June and August
2010, respectively.
47
To the extent that cash from operations is not sufficient to
meet our investment and debt repayment needs, we may need to
access the equity or debt markets or tap bank credit lines from
time to time in the future. We can provide no assurance that we
will generate adequate cash from operations or that we will be
able to access the financial markets or commercial lending
markets as and when needed on favorable terms, or at all. Our
ability to access the financial and commercial lending markets,
and the terms of any debt or equity financings, will be affected
by factors outside our control including general economic and
market conditions. A prolonged state of adverse market
conditions and the banking crisis may block or limit our access
to the capital and debt markets and impair the ability of banks
to provide new credit financing
and/or honor
their lending commitments to us. In addition, the trading price
of our shares on the Frankfurt Stock Exchange has recently
fallen below 2 per share, which is the nominal value of
each of our shares. Generally, we cannot sell shares at a price
per share below nominal value. Therefore, for so long as the
trading price of our shares remains below 2 per share, we
are generally unable to raise capital by issuing new shares,
which significantly decreases our ability to raise capital.
Inadequate liquidity could materially adversely affect our
business, financial condition and results of operations.
Because our ability to raise cash on the financial and
commercial lending markets may be limited, we may be required to
sell assets to raise cash in order to repay our convertible
notes due in June 2010 and our exchangeable notes due in August
2010. Such a sale may involve selling assets that we would not
otherwise sell, including assets that we believe are
strategically important to develop and implement our business
plan, or selling assets at below-market prices. Moreover, there
is no guarantee that the proceeds of any asset sales would be
sufficient for us to meet our obligations. The failure to meet
our obligations under the notes or any of our credit lines, or
the required sale of any of our assets, will likely have a
material adverse effect on our business, operations and
financial condition.
Reductions in
the amount of government subsidies we receive or demands for
repayment could increase our reported expenses or limit our
ability to fund our capital expenditures.
As is the case with many other semiconductor companies, our
reported expenses have been reduced in recent years by various
subsidies received from governmental entities. In particular, we
have received, and expect to continue to receive, subsidies for
investment projects as well as for research and development
projects. We recognized governmental subsidies as a reduction of
R&D expenses and cost of sales in an aggregate amount of
54 million in the 2006 fiscal year,
122 million in the 2007 fiscal year and
88 million in the 2008 fiscal year.
As the general availability of government funding is outside our
control, we cannot assure you that we will continue to benefit
from such support, that sufficient alternative funding would be
available if necessary or that any such alternative funding
would be provided on terms as favorable to us as those we
currently receive.
The application for and implementation of such subsidies often
involves compliance with extensive regulatory requirements,
including, in the case of subsidies to be granted within the
European Union, notification to the European Commission of the
contemplated grant prior to disbursement. In particular,
establishment of compliance with project-related ceilings on
aggregate subsidies defined under European Union law often
involves highly complex economic evaluations. If we fail to meet
applicable requirements, we may not be able to receive the
relevant subsidies or may be obliged to repay them, which could
have a material adverse effect on our business.
The terms of certain of the subsidies we have received impose
conditions that may limit our flexibility to utilize the
subsidized facility as we deem appropriate, to divert equipment
to other facilities, to reduce employment at the site, or to use
related intellectual property outside the European Union. This
could impair our ability to operate our business in the manner
we believe to be most cost effective.
48
Our operating
results may fluctuate significantly from quarter to quarter, and
as a result we may fail to meet the expectations of securities
analysts and investors, which could cause our stock price to
decline.
Our operating results have fluctuated significantly from quarter
to quarter in the past and are likely to continue to do so due
to a number of factors, many of which are not within our
control. If our operating results do not meet the expectations
of securities analysts or investors, the market price of our
ordinary shares and ADSs will likely decline. Our reported
results can be affected by numerous factors including those
described in this Risk Factors section, among them:
|
|
|
|
|
the overall cyclicality of, and changing economic and market
conditions in, the semiconductor industry, as well as
seasonality in sales of consumer products in which our products
are incorporated;
|
|
|
|
our ability to scale our operations in response to changes in
demand for our existing products and services or demand for new
products requested by our customers;
|
|
|
|
intellectual property disputes, customer indemnification claims
and other types of litigation risks;
|
|
|
|
the gain or loss of a key customer, design win or order;
|
|
|
|
the timing, rescheduling or cancellation of significant customer
orders and our ability, as well as the ability of our customers,
to manage inventory;
|
|
|
|
additional changes in accounting rules, such as the change
requiring the recording of expenses for employee shares options
and other stock-based compensation expense, which commenced in
the 2006 fiscal year, and
|
|
|
|
adverse developments with respect to Qimonda.
|
Due to the foregoing factors, and the other risks discussed in
this annual report, you should not rely on
quarter-to-quarter
comparisons of our operating results as an indicator of future
performance.
Removal of our
shares from the DAX 30 or the Philadelphia Stock Exchange
Semiconductor Sector Index could cause the market price of our
securities to drop significantly.
Our shares have been included in the DAX 30 since June 2000 and
in the Philadelphia Stock Exchange Semiconductor Index
(SOX) since December 2004. The DAX 30 is a
market-capitalization weighted index and the SOX is a
price-weighted index. Our shares could be removed from the DAX
30 or the SOX if our shares were to trade below a certain price
for a sustained period of time. Certain investors will only
invest funds in companies that are included in one of these
indexes. Any such removal or the announcement thereof could
cause the market price of our shares to drop significantly.
Our results of
operations and financial condition can be adversely impacted by
changes in exchange rates.
Our results of operations can be hurt by changes in exchange
rates, particularly between the Euro and the U.S. dollar or
the Japanese yen. In addition, the balance sheet impact of
currency translation adjustments has been, and may continue to
be, material. Further information on foreign currency derivative
and transaction gains and losses can be found in the section
headed Operating and Financial Review
Qualitative and Quantitative Disclosure about Market
Risk Foreign Exchange and Interest Risk.
If we fail to
maintain effective internal controls, we may not be able to
report financial results accurately or on a timely basis, or to
detect fraud, which could have a material adverse effect on our
business or share price.
Effective internal controls are necessary for us to provide
reasonable assurance with respect to our financial reports and
to effectively prevent financial fraud. Pursuant to the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act, we are required to periodically evaluate the
effectiveness of the design and operation of our internal
controls. Internal control over financial reporting may not
prevent or detect misstatements because of inherent limitations,
including the possibility of human error or collusion, the
circumvention or overriding of controls,
49
or fraud. If we fail to maintain an effective system of internal
controls, our business and operating results could be harmed,
and we could fail to meet our reporting obligations, which could
have a material adverse effect on our business and the share
price.
Changes in tax
regulations could result in lower earnings and cash
flows.
We operate in numerous countries throughout the world, and
therefore are subject to numerous tax regimes. Changes in tax
regulations in any applicable jurisdiction could result in
higher tax expenses and payments, and could adversely impact our
tax liabilities and deferred tax assets.
Environmental
laws and regulations may expose us to liability and increase our
costs.
Our operations are subject to many environmental laws and
regulations wherever we operate governing, among other things,
air emissions, wastewater discharges, the use and handling of
hazardous substances, waste disposal and the investigation and
remediation of soil and ground water contamination.
A number of environmental requirements in the European Union,
including some that have only recently come into force, affect
our business. These requirements include:
|
|
|
|
|
a directive that imposes a take-back obligation on
manufacturers to finance the collection, recovery and disposal
of electrical and electronic equipment. Because of unclear
statutory definitions and interpretations in individual member
states, we are unable at this time to determine in detail the
consequences of this directive for us.
|
|
|
|
an European legislation that restricts the use of lead and other
hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment.
|
|
|
|
Directive, that restricts the use of hazardous substances in
automotive vehicles.
|
|
|
|
a directive that describes ecodesign requirements for
energy-using products, including information requirements for
components and
sub-assemblies.
|
|
|
|
the European regulatory framework for chemicals, called REACH,
which deals with the registration, evaluation, authorization and
restriction of chemicals.
|
|
|
|
a recent directive on environmental liability with regard to the
prevention and remedying of environmental damage.
|
These requirements are partly under revision by the European
Union and their potential impacts cannot currently be determined
in detail.
In addition, the Chinese government restricts the use of lead
and other hazardous substances in electronic products. Because
not all implementing measures are in place, the consequences for
our company cannot currently be determined in detail. Similar
regulations or substance bans are being proposed or implemented
in various countries of the world. We are not able at this time
to estimate the amount of additional costs that we may incur in
connection with these regulations.
As with other companies engaged in similar activities, we face
inherent risks of environmental liability in our current and
historical manufacturing locations. Costs associated with future
additional environmental compliance or remediation obligations
could adversely affect our business. For a further description
of environmental issues that we face see
Business Environmental Protection and
Sustainable Management.
Our business
and financial condition could be adversely affected by current
or future litigation.
We are a party to lawsuits in the normal course of our business,
including suits involving allegations of intellectual property
infringement, product liability and breaches of contract. The
results of complex legal proceedings are difficult to predict.
There can be no assurance that the results of current or future
legal proceedings will not materially harm our business,
reputation or brand.
We record a provision for litigation risks when it is probable
that a liability has been incurred and the associated amount can
be reasonably estimated. We maintain liability insurance for
certain legal risks at
50
levels our management believes are appropriate and consistent
with industry practice. We may incur losses relating to
litigation beyond the limits, or outside the coverage, of such
insurance and such losses may have a material adverse effect on
the results of our operations or financial condition, and our
provisions for litigation-related losses may not be sufficient
to cover our ultimate loss or expenditure. An unfavorable
resolution of a particular lawsuit could have a material adverse
effect on our business, operating results, or financial
condition. For additional information with respect to legal
proceedings, see Business Legal Matters.
We are a
subject of investigations in several jurisdictions in connection
with pricing practices in the DRAM industry, and are a defendant
in civil antitrust claims in connection with these
matters.
In September 2004, we entered into a plea agreement with the
Antitrust Division of the U.S. Department of Justice (the
DOJ) in connection with its investigation of alleged
antitrust violations in the DRAM industry. Pursuant to this plea
agreement, we agreed to plead guilty to a single count relating
to the pricing of DRAM products and to pay a fine of
$160 million, payable in equal annual installments through
2009.
In April 2003 we received a request for information regarding
DRAM industry practices from the European Commission (the
Commission) and in May 2004 we received a notice of
a formal inquiry into alleged DRAM industry competition law
violations from the Canadian Competition Bureau. We are
cooperating with the Commission and the Canadian Competition
Bureau in their inquiries.
Subsequent to the commencement of the DOJ investigation, a
number of purported class action lawsuits were filed against us
and other DRAM suppliers in U.S. federal courts and in
state courts in various U.S. states, as well as in
different Canadian provinces. The complaints allege violations
of U.S. federal and state or Canadian antitrust and
competition laws and seek significant damages on behalf of the
plaintiffs. In July 2006 the state attorney generals of a number
of U.S. states filed actions against us and other DRAM
suppliers in U.S. federal courts. The claims involve
allegations of DRAM price fixing and artificial price inflation
and seek to recover three times actual damages and other relief.
In connection with these matters as well as for legal expenses
relating to the securities class action described in
Business Legal Matters and in accordance
with U.S. GAAP, as of September 30, 2008 Infineon
Logic had accrued liabilities in the amount of
37 million, and Qimonda had accrued liabilities in
the amount of 36 million. Because these matters
remain ongoing, we cannot predict at this time whether the
reserves will be adequate to cover any further potential
liabilities that may be incurred.
An adverse final resolution of the matters described above could
result in significant financial liability to, and other adverse
effects upon us, which would have a material adverse effect on
our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Irrespective of the validity or the successful assertion of the
above-referenced claims, we could incur significant costs with
respect to defending against or settling such claims, which
could have a material adverse effect on our results of
operations or financial condition or cash flows.
Purported
class action lawsuits have been filed against us alleging
securities fraud.
Following our announcement in September 2004 of our agreement to
plead guilty in connection with the DOJs antitrust
investigation and to pay a fine of $160 million, several
purported securities class action lawsuits have been brought
against us in U.S. district courts. The lawsuits were
consolidated into one complaint that is pending at the
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of
California. Plaintiffs allege violations of the
U.S. securities laws and assert among other things that we
made materially false and misleading public statements about our
historical and projected financial results as well as
competitive position and manipulated the price of our
securities, thereby injuring our shareholders. Although we are
defending against these suits vigorously, a significant
settlement or negative outcome at trial could have a material
adverse effect on our financial results. See
Business Legal Matters for a description
of these matters.
51
We are the
subject of an investigation by the European Commission in
connection with alleged violations of competition laws in the
Chip Card & Security segment.
On October 21, 2008, we learned that the European
Commission had commenced an investigation involving our Chip
Card & Security segment for alleged violations of
competition laws. This investigation is in the very early
stages. We are assessing this situation and will continue to
monitor the investigation carefully. If the European Commission
were to find that our Chip Card & Security segment
violated European Union competition laws, the fines and
penalties that would likely be imposed on us could be
substantial and would be expected to have a material adverse
effect on our business, operations and financial condition.
We might be
faced with product liability or warranty claims.
Despite extensive quality assurance measures, such as our
Automotive Excellence program, there remains a risk that defects
may occur in our products. The occurrence of such
defects particularly in consumer areas and areas in
which personal injury could result, such as our automotive
business group could give rise to warranty claims or
to liability for damages caused by such defects. We could also
incur consequential damages and could, moreover, experience
limited acceptance of our products in the market. In addition,
customers have from time to time notified us of potential
contractual warranty claims in respect of products supplied by
us, and may do so in the future. These matters could have a
material adverse effect on our business and financial condition.
Additional risks
related to Qimonda
As the
majority shareholder in Qimonda, we will continue to be
negatively impacted by any further adverse developments in the
business of Qimonda.
Because we will continue to fully consolidate the financial
results of Qimonda as discontinued operations in our
consolidated financial statements for so long as Infineon
remains the majority shareholder of that company, fluctuations
in Qimondas results of operations will be reflected in our
operating results. Our consolidated results of operations will
therefore be significantly affected by the success or failure of
the management of Qimonda and, although we will have control
over Qimonda for so long as we remain its majority shareholder,
we will not have the ability to direct its operations on a
day-to-day
basis. Our ability to realize cash from any further sales of
Qimonda securities held by Infineon will be substantially
dependent on the market performance of Qimondas stock,
which will in turn depend on the business success of Qimonda and
the development of the market for semiconductor memory products,
both of which are substantially outside our control.
Market prices for DRAM have experienced extremely significant
declines since the beginning of the 2007 calendar year. As a
result of this intense pricing pressure, Qimonda continued to
incur significant losses during the 2008 fiscal year, which are
reflected in Income (loss) from discontinued operations,
net of tax in our consolidated statements of operations.
During the 2008 fiscal year, we also recorded material
write-downs to the carrying value of Qimondas assets to
reflect them at current fair value less costs to sell, in
accordance with SFAS No. 144, Accounting for
the Impairment or Disposal of Long-lived Assets. We
currently do not intend to make any further capital
contributions to Qimonda and have repeatedly announced that we
are seeking to dispose of our remaining 77.5 percent
interest in that company. We continue to pursue all potential
strategic alternatives for the disposal of our remaining
interest in Qimonda, but can provide no assurance that we will
be successful in this regard.
On November 7, 2008, the New York Stock Exchange
(NYSE) notified Qimonda that it was not in
compliance with the NYSEs continued listing standards
because the average closing price of its ADSs had been below
$1.00 over a consecutive
30-day
trading period. Over the
12-month
period ended November 19, 2008, Qimondas share price
fell 98 percent, from $8.62 to $0.11. Qimonda has notified
the NYSE that it intends to regain compliance with this listing
standard. If Qimonda cannot do so by May 7, 2009, however,
the NYSE has indicated that it will commence suspension and
delisting procedures against Qimonda.
52
Qimonda may be
unsuccessful in its ongoing strategic and operational efforts to
improve its financial position. If Qimonda is unable to continue
to meet its obligations as they come due, Infineon could be
exposed to material liabilities related to the Qimonda business,
and the operating results and financial condition of Infineon
could be materially and adversely affected.
In order to address the ongoing adverse market conditions in the
memory products industry and to better enable it to meet its
current obligations in the short term, Qimonda has intensively
explored operational and strategic alternatives to raise and
conserve cash. In furtherance of these goals, on
October 13, 2008, Qimonda announced a global restructuring
and cost-reduction program that is intended to reposition
Qimonda in the market and substantially increase its
efficiencies through a wide-ranging realignment of its business.
As a part of this program, Qimonda also announced that it had
agreed to sell its 35.6 percent interest in Inotera
Memories Inc. to Micron Technology, Inc. for $400 million
in cash (approximately 296 million). The transaction
was completed in November 2008. Additionally, on
December 21, 2008, we, the German Free State of Saxony, and
Qimonda jointly announced a financing package for Qimonda. This
proposed transaction is described under Operating and
Financial Review Recent Developments Related to
Qimonda. Qimonda has announced that it intends to use the
proceeds from this joint investment and the sale of the assets
described above to fund its operations in the short-term,
including the development of its Buried Wordline technology.
During the 2008 fiscal year, we committed to a plan to dispose
of our interest in Qimonda. We remain committed to this plan to
dispose of our interest in Qimonda. Accordingly, Infineon has
classified the assets and liabilities of Qimonda as held for
disposal in accordance with SFAS 144, Accounting
for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-lived Assets,
and recorded the write-downs of Qimondas assets described
above totaling 1,303 million. The net book value of
the Qimonda disposal group in our consolidated balance sheet as
of September 30, 2008 has been recorded at the estimated
fair value less costs to sell of Qimonda in accordance with
SFAS No. 144. Upon disposal of Qimonda, in accordance
with IFRS, we would also realize losses related to unrecognized
currency translation effects for the Qimonda disposal group
which are recorded in equity. As of September 30, 2008, the
amount of such losses recorded in shareholders equity
under IFRS totaled 187 million.
There can be no assurance that the operational and strategic
measures described above will enable Qimonda to continue to meet
its obligations, or that Qimonda will be successful in
implementing any further operational or strategic initiatives to
adequately address its financial condition. There can also be no
assurance that we will be successful in disposing of our
remaining interest in Qimonda. In the event that Qimondas
ongoing operational and strategic efforts fail to generate
adequate cash or to result in desired operational efficiencies
and resulting cash savings, Qimonda may have difficulty meeting
its obligations as they come due. In such a case, our financial
condition and results of operations would be materially
adversely affected.
In the event that Qimonda were to be unable to meet its
obligations, we may be exposed to certain significant
liabilities related to the Qimonda business, including pending
antitrust and securities law claims, the potential repayment of
governmental subsidies received, and employee-related
contingencies. Qimonda has accrued approximately
70 million in connection with the antitrust matters
and anticipated defense costs in connection with the securities
law matters. Given the uncertainty of the timing, nature, scope
or success of any specific claim, we are unable to meaningfully
quantify our total potential exposure in respect of these
matters, but are aware that such exposure, were it to arise, is
likely to be material.
Even if we are
successful in reducing or eliminating our interest in Qimonda,
we will continue to be affected by negative developments in
Qimondas business.
We may conclude a transaction to sell our remaining interest in
Qimonda. If we reduce our position to less than 50 percent,
as we have announced we intend to do, we will no longer
consolidate the results of Qimonda in our group results. If we
retain a minority stake, however, we will continue to be exposed
to any adverse developments in Qimondas results.
53
The memory
products business is characterized by particularly intense
competition and pricing pressure, which could reduce
Qimondas sales or revenues.
The memory products business is particularly competitive, and
has been characterized by rapid technological change, short
product lifecycles, high capital expenditures, intense pricing
pressure, periods of oversupply and continuous advancements in
process technologies and manufacturing facilities. Qimonda
competes globally with other major DRAM suppliers, including
Samsung Electronics, Inc., Micron Technology, Inc., Hynix
Semiconductor, Inc., Elpida Memory, Inc., and Nanya Technology
Corporation. Some of Qimondas competitors have
substantially greater capital, human and other resources and
manufacturing capacities, more efficient cost structures, higher
brand recognition, larger customer bases and more diversified
product lines than Qimonda. Competitors with greater resources
and more diversified operations may have long-term advantages,
including the ability to better withstand downturns in the DRAM
market and to finance research and development activities. In
addition, unfair price competition, government support or trade
barriers by or for the benefit of its competitors would
adversely affect Qimondas competitive position.
Increased competitive pressure or the relative weakening of
Qimondas competitive position could continue to materially
and adversely affect Qimondas and our business financial
condition and results of operations.
Qimondas
business would continue to suffer if it does not have adequate
access to capital.
Qimonda may continue to experience difficulties in raising the
amounts of capital required for its business on acceptable terms
due to a number of factors, such as general market and economic
conditions, inadequate cash flow from operations or unsuccessful
asset management. Our business may be hurt if Qimonda is not
able to make necessary capital expenditures and finance
necessary research and development activities.
54
BUSINESS
Overview
We are one of the worlds leading semiconductor companies.
We have been at the forefront of the development, manufacture
and marketing of semiconductors for more than fifty years, first
as the Siemens Semiconductor Group and, since 1999, as an
independent company. We have been a publicly traded company
since March 2000. According to market research company iSuppli,
we were the sixth-largest semiconductor company worldwide in the
nine months of the 2008 calendar year with our
non-memory businesses alone ranked number 10 in that period.
We design, develop, manufacture and market a broad range of
semiconductors and complete system solutions used in a wide
variety of microelectronic applications. Our core business is
conducted through our Automotive, Industrial &
Multimarket segment and our Communication Solutions segment.
Effective October 1, 2008, we have reorganized our business
to better align with our target markets, with five operating
divisions: Automotive, Chip Card & Security,
Industrial & Multimarket, Wireline Communications and
Wireless Solutions.
In addition, we currently hold a 77.5 percent interest in
the memory products company Qimonda. During the quarter ended
March 31, 2008, we committed to a plan to dispose of
Qimonda. We are actively pursuing our disposal plan and expect
to finalize the disposal by the end of the second quarter of the
2009 fiscal year. As a result, the historical results of Qimonda
are reported as discontinued operations in the condensed
consolidated statements of operations for all periods presented,
and the assets and liabilities of Qimonda have been reclassified
as held for disposal in the condensed consolidated balance
sheets for all periods presented. On December 21, 2008, we,
the German Free State of Saxony, and Qimonda jointly announced a
financing package for Qimonda. This proposed transaction is
described under Operating and Financial Review
Recent Developments Related to Qimonda.
The address of our principal executive offices is: Am Campeon
1-12, D-85579, Neubiberg, Germany, and our main telephone number
is +49-89-234-0. Our agent in the United States is Infineon
Technologies North America Corp., which has its principal
executive offices at 640 N. McCarthy Blvd., Milpitas, CA 95035.
The principal developments during the 2008 fiscal year included
the following:
Corporate and
Commercial Developments
|
|
|
|
|
In December 2007, we announced an agreement with IBM to broaden
the availability of our high-volume Embedded Flash process. We
will license our 130-nanometer Embedded Flash technology to IBM
for new chip designs manufactured by IBM in North America.
Additionally, we will utilize IBM foundry services for future
products based on this process.
|
|
|
|
In January 2008, we and automotive system manufacturer Delphi
Corporation announced a strategic technology collaboration for
the development of a new generation of body control units based
on the AUTOSAR (AUTomotive Open System ARchitecture) standard.
|
|
|
|
Also in January 2008, we entered an agreement with Volkswagen to
use an Infineon microcontroller in automotive body and
convenience electronics. Volkswagen will use the microcontroller
to provide greater gateway capabilities in automotive body and
convenience electronics to support the increasing requirements
for networking and communication between individual automotive
subsystems.
|
|
|
|
In February 2008, we signed an agreement with a tier 1
handset company to supply our
SMARTitmUE+
chip for their HSxPA/ EDGE products. The
SMARTitmUE+
is the worlds first single chip Receive-diversity
transceiver IC with a standard DigRF V3.09 interface. The single
chip RF significantly improves the signal quality from base
station to handset.
|
|
|
|
In March 2008, we announced a collaboration with Intel
Corporation to serve the TPM (Trusted Platform Module) market.
Infineon was selected as an Intel Preferred Supplier of TPM 1.2
Client Software for Intels Trusted Platform Module (Intel
TPM) 1.2 Hardware Solution.
|
55
|
|
|
|
|
Also in March 2008, we and LSI Corporation entered into an
agreement under which LSI acquired our HDD (hard disk drive)
business. By divesting our non-core HDD business, we furthered
our strategic goal of focusing on our core markets. The
transaction closed in April 2008.
|
|
|
|
In April 2008, we signed a memorandum of understanding with the
European Commission to advance the development of intelligent
emergency call systems. The European emergency call system eCall
is to be a standard feature in all new automobiles registered
for road use in EU countries from September 2010.
|
|
|
|
Also in April 2008, we and Samsung Electronics, Inc. entered
into a collaboration for the use of Infineons HSDPA
Platform
XMMtm6080
in Samsungs new family of HEDGE (HSDPA/EDGE) mobile
handsets.
|
|
|
|
Also in April 2008, we entered into an agreement to buy
Primarion Corporation. Primarion produces digital power
integrated circuits (ICs) for power management in computing,
graphics and communication markets. With this acquisition, we
strive to broaden our product portfolio in the area of digital
power management ICs and to become a leader in this fast growing
market.
|
|
|
|
In August 2008, we announced that we are the sole supplier for
security chip cards for one of Chinas largest contactless
transportation cards the Shenzhen Tong
microcontroller card. The Shenzhen Tong card
utilizes contactless microcontrollers from our SLE 66PE product
family. More than three million of these microcontroller cards
are expected to be issued by the end of the 2008 calendar year.
|
Technical and
Product Developments
|
|
|
|
|
We introduced a new family of radar system ICs
(RASICtm)
which could bring long- and medium-range automotive radar to
mid-range cars as soon as mid 2010. Infineons RXN7740 is a
highly integrated front-end chip for the
76-77 GHz
frequency range which includes function blocks for the
oscillator, the power amplifier and four mixers for multiple
antennas.
|
|
|
|
We introduced our new family of 16-bit real-time signal
controllers that feature fast interrupt response time and
context switching specifically targeting industrial drive
applications. The new XE166 family of Real-Time Signal
Controllers (RTSC) can control up to four individual motors
simultaneously.
|
|
|
|
We announced a 32-bit high-security flash microcontroller
designed to bring a significant layer of security and
convenience to mobile applications based on NFC (Near Field
Communication). In addition to its extensive hardware security
capability, the new NFC-enabled SIM card microcontroller
combines a Single Wire Protocol (SWP) interface with contactless
Mifaretm
technology.
|
|
|
|
We unveiled a new TVS (transient voltage suppression) protection
diode, which is the smallest in the world. With a footprint of
just 0.6 x 0.3 square millimeter and a mere
0.3 millimeter high, the ESD series diode is designed to
protect the latest electronic communication and consumer devices
against electrostatic overvoltages. The TVS diode can reliably
absorb electrostatic discharges as high as 20kV and a response
time of less than 0.5 nanoseconds.
|
|
|
|
We launched a new microcontroller family for automotive
powertrain and chassis applications. The new Infineon AUDO
FUTURE family of 32-bit microcontrollers uses the TriCore core
that combines microcontroller functions with digital signal
processing and the industrys highest density flash memory.
The family also includes the first FlexRay communications block
that has been approved by the TÜV Nord Groups
Institute for Vehicle Technology and Mobility, combined with
industry-proven AUTOSAR software and a peripheral control
processor that offers additional system performance.
|
|
|
|
We introduced the CoolMOS 900 V power MOSFET family, intended
for high-efficiency SMPS (switched-mode power supply),
industrial and renewable energy applications.
|
|
|
|
We announced three new families of power semiconductors, the
OptiMOS 3 40V, 60V and 80V families, which reduce power losses
by as much as 30 percent in a given standard TO (Transistor
Outline) package.
|
56
|
|
|
|
|
We introduced the SmartLEWIS MCU PMA71xx family for wireless
control applications. With the SmartLEWIS MCU family, remote
control units can use radio frequency (RF) technology instead of
todays infrared transmission, overcoming the disadvantage
of
line-of-sight
communication.
|
|
|
|
We presented the worlds first single chip CAT-iq/DECT
wireless engine for basestations, dubbed the COSIC (Cordless
Single Chip)-Modem. The COSIC-Modem integrates the baseband
processor, transceiver and power amplifier in a monolithic CMOS
single chip for high quality cordless IP telephony.
|
|
|
|
We introduced the X-GOLD 113 and the X-GOLD 213 which enable
advanced mobile phone features such as camera, mobile Internet
and audio-entertainment to be accessible in low-cost markets.
The integration of these features allows customers to reduce the
production cost of core mobile functions by up to
40 percent compared with more traditional solutions.
|
|
|
|
We announced two new LDMOS RF power transistors targeting
wireless infrastructure applications, such as WiMAX, in the
2.5 GHz-to-2.7 GHz frequency band. The high peak power
performance of the new LDMOS RF power transistors will enable
designers to simplify their RF power amplifier designs.
|
|
|
|
We introduced a new generation 3G platform family. This new
platform family addresses all major 3G market segments and
includes a high performance HSPA modem solution, a feature phone
solution enriched with high multimedia capabilities and a
cost-efficient 3G solution.
|
|
|
|
We announced the worlds first DSL CPE (customer premise
equipment) solution optimizing support for such applications as
IPTV (Internet Protocol Television) and providing the best
possible quality of service across a wide range of deployment
conditions. Our IPTV over DSL feature package includes
innovative features such as predictive error decoding (Erasure
Decoding) and Gamma Layer Retransmission for xDSL CPE solutions.
|
Industry
Background
Semiconductors power, control and enable an increasing variety
of electronic products and systems. Improvements in
semiconductor process and design technologies continue to result
in ever more powerful, complex and reliable devices at a lower
cost per function. As their performance has increased and size
and costs have decreased, semiconductors have become common
components in products used in everyday life, including personal
computers, telecommunications systems, wireless handheld
devices, automotive products, industrial automation and control
systems, digital cameras, digital audio devices, digital TVs,
chip cards, security applications and game consoles.
The market for semiconductors has historically been volatile.
Supply and demand have fluctuated cyclically and have caused
pronounced fluctuations in prices and margins. Following a
severe downturn in 2001, the industry experienced a further
period of low demand and ongoing worldwide overcapacity during
2002. In 2003 and in particular in 2004, the semiconductor
market showed stronger performance. During 2005, global
semiconductor market growth slowed significantly to
7 percent, according to WSTS. In 2006 market growth
slightly accelerated to 9 percent. In 2007, market growth
decelerated, down to 3 percent. For the 2008 calendar year,
WSTS anticipates a growth rate of 2.5 percent for the
global semiconductor market. For the 2009 calendar year, WSTS
forecasts a decrease in revenues in the global semiconductor
market of 2.2 percent and Gartner Dataquest forecasts a
decrease of 16 percent.
Strategy
We strive to achieve profitable growth in our core businesses by
maintaining and expanding our leadership position in
semiconductor solutions for energy efficiency, security, and
communications. To achieve these goals, we seek to:
|
|
|
|
|
Build on our leadership position in key markets, in
particular by helping to improve energy
efficiency. We believe that our success to
date has been based on a deep understanding of a wide range of
applications for the automotive and industrial sectors as well
as for personal computers and other consumer devices. Our
leading position in these areas is built on high-
|
57
|
|
|
|
|
performance products, superior process technologies and
optimized in-house manufacturing capabilities. We see
significant growth potential for our power business, in
particular, driven by high energy costs and the need for ever
longer battery lifetimes in mobile devices.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provide the technology to be connected every
day & everywhere from home, in the office
or on the way. We seek to continue to profit
from our key strengths in areas such as RF and mixed signal
technologies employed in particular in our communications
businesses. In order to benefit from the ever-increasing need
for mobility and communication in all aspects of
day-to-day
life, we intend to broaden our customer base and to focus on the
most promising solutions for future profitable growth, such as
cellular phone platforms and broadband customer premises
equipment.
|
|
|
|
Strengthen our leadership position in security
solutions. We intend to leverage our know-how
to address applications in new areas, and believe we are well
positioned to benefit from future trends like the transition to
e-passports
and the implementation of digital rights management in consumer
devices. We believe that the ever-increasing digitalization and
increasing mobility in daily life will continue to be a key
driver for our security business.
|
|
|
|
Manage carefully the mix of make-versus-buy in
manufacturing and process technology
development. We intend to continue to invest
in those process technologies that provide Infineon with a
competitive differentiator. This is the case in particular in
our power process technologies and in manufacturing capacity
that can meet the very high quality requirements of automotive
customers. At the same time, in standard CMOS below
90-nanometer, we will continue to share risks and expand our
access to leading-edge technology through long-term strategic
partnerships with other leading industry participants. We do not
intend to invest in in-house capacity for standard CMOS
processes below the 90-nanometer node, and we will make use of
manufacturing at silicon foundries instead.
|
|
|
|
Seek to improve our margin in the 2009 fiscal year and
beyond and to secure our long-term competitiveness, including
through our IFX 10+ program. In
order to improve our margin and maximize the overall efficiency
of our operations, we have introduced our IFX 10+ cost reduction
program, with the goal of identifying and executing structural
improvements leading to significant ongoing cost savings. In
particular, through this program we seek to improve our
portfolio management, further reduce manufacturing and
administrative costs, and boost the efficiency of our R&D
efforts and our overall organization.
|
58
Products and
Applications
The following summary provides an overview of some of our more
significant products and applications, and the four largest
customers of each of our two reportable segments, in the 2008
fiscal year.
Principal
Products, Applications and Customers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Four Largest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customers in the 2008
|
Segment
|
|
Principal Products
|
|
Principal Applications
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
Automotive, Industrial & Multimarket
|
|
Power semiconductors (discretes, ICs and modules), sensors and
microcontrollers (8-bit, 16-bit, 32-bit) with and without
embedded memory, silicon discretes, chip card and security ICs,
ASIC design solutions including secure ASICs, Trusted Platform
Modules
|
|
Automotive: Powertrain (engine control, transmission control,
hybrid), body and convenience (comfort electronics, air
conditioning), safety and vehicle dynamics (ABS, airbag,
stability control), connectivity (wireless communication,
telematics/navigation)
|
|
Avnet, Bosch, Continental, Siemens
|
|
|
|
|
Industrial & Multimarket: Power management & supplies,
lighting, drives, renewable energy, power generation and
distribution, industrial control, discrete commodity products
(e.g., handsets)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Security & ASICs: Chip card and security ICs (e.g., for
mobile communication, identification, finance), platform
security for computers and in networks (i.e., Trusted Platform
Modules), game consoles, hearing aids, computer peripherals
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Communication Solutions
|
|
Baseband ICs, RF transceivers, power management ICs, single chip
ICs integrating these components, mobile phone platform
solutions including software, DECT chipsets, tuner ICs, RF-power
transistors, ICs for voice access and core access (e.g., CODECs,
SLICs, ISDN, T/E), broadband access ICs for xDSL CO/CPE, VoIP,
Ethernet switch and PHY, system solutions for DSL-modems,
home-gateways
|
|
Mobile telephone systems for major standards (GSM, GPRS, EDGE,
UMTS), cordless telephone systems for major standards (WDCT,
DECT), RF connectivity solutions (e.g., Bluetooth, GPS),
cellular base stations, voice access and core access, broadband
access solutions for central office, broadband customer premises
equipment
|
|
Hon Hai Precision, LG Electronics, Nokia, Samsung
|
Automotive,
Industrial & Multimarket
The Automotive, Industrial & Multimarket segment
designs, develops, manufactures and markets semiconductors and
complete system solutions primarily for use in automotive,
industrial and security applications, in addition to
applications with customer-specific product requirements. Our
automotive and industrial business units focus on
microcontrollers and power semiconductors (which handle higher
voltage and higher current than standard semiconductors),
discrete semiconductors, modules and sensors. According to
Strategy Analytics, we were the second largest producer of ICs
for automotive electronics worldwide in 2007, with more than
9 percent of the market, and the largest in Europe. Within
the fragmented market for industrial semiconductor applications,
we focus on power management and supply, as well as drives and
power generation and distribution. IMS Research reported that we
were the number one supplier worldwide for power semiconductors
in 2007, with a market share of more than 9 percent. Our
broad portfolio addressing consumer, computing and communication
applications ranges from discrete semiconductors and power
devices to chip card and security ICs and ASIC design solutions.
59
Automotive
The market for semiconductors for automotive applications has
grown substantially in recent years, reflecting increased
electronic content in automotive applications in the areas of
safety, power train, body and convenience systems. This growth
also reflects increasing substitution of mechanical devices,
such as relays, by semiconductors, in order to meet more
demanding reliability, space, weight, and power reduction
requirements.
Our automotive team offers semiconductors and complete system
solutions in the engine management, safety and chassis, body and
convenience, and infotainment markets, in some cases including
software. Our principal automotive products include:
|
|
|
|
|
Semiconductors for power train applications, which perform
functions such as engine and transmission control and hybrid
power trains;
|
|
|
|
Semiconductors for safety management, which manage tasks such as
the operation of airbags, anti-lock braking systems, electronic
stability systems, power steering systems and tire pressure
monitoring systems;
|
|
|
|
Semiconductors for body and convenience systems, which include
light modules, heating, ventilation and air conditioning
systems, door modules (power windows, door locks, mirror
control) and electrical power distribution systems; and
|
|
|
|
Semiconductors for connectivity, such as those used for wireless
communication and navigation/telematics.
|
According to Strategy Analytics, body & convenience
systems comprise the largest portion of the market, followed by
safety and vehicle dynamics systems, power train applications,
such as transmission, engine and exhaust control, in-car
entertainment, and driver information.
Our automotive products include power semiconductors,
microcontrollers, discrete semiconductors and silicon sensors,
along with related technologies and packaging. To take advantage
of expected growth in the market for green vehicles,
our power competencies across all of our business units are
bundled in order to better enable us to provide semiconductor
and power module solutions for hybrid vehicles.
Time periods between design and sale of our automotive products
are relatively prolonged (three to four years) because of the
long periods required for the development of new automotive
platforms, many of which may be in different stages of
development at any time. This is one of the reasons why
automotive products tend to have relatively long life-cycles
compared to our other products. The nature of this market,
together with the need to meet demanding quality and reliability
requirements designed to ensure safe automobile operation, makes
it relatively difficult for new suppliers to enter.
In order to strengthen our position in all areas of automotive
electronics, we seek to further develop our strong relationships
with world-wide leading car manufacturers and their suppliers,
with a particular focus on those at the forefront in using
electronic components in cars. We also seek to further
strengthen our presence in the United States and to expand in
other geographic areas, notably Asia Pacific including Japan. We
believe that our ability to offer complete semiconductor
solutions integrating power, analog and mixed-signal ICs and
sensor technology is an important differentiating factor among
companies in the automotive market. We also believe that our
strength in this historically relatively stable market
complements our strengths in other markets that may be subject
to greater market volatility.
We strongly emphasize high quality in our products. We have
implemented a group-wide program called Automotive Excellence,
through which we aim for the goal of zero defects in
our automotive semiconductors and solutions.
Industrial &
Multimarket
The market for semiconductors for industrial applications is
highly fragmented in terms of both suppliers and customers. It
is characterized by large numbers of both standardized and
application-
60
specific products. These products are employed in a large number
of diverse applications in industries such as transportation,
factory automation and power supplies.
Within the industrial business, we focus on two major
applications: power management & supply, and power
conversion. We provide differentiated products combining diverse
technologies to meet our customers specific needs. With
global energy demand continuing to rise and supplies generally
tightening, power semiconductors can make a major contribution
by addressing the increasing need for energy savings.
We have a strong position in power applications within the
industrial and automotive segments. According to the annual
market reports of IMS Research, we have been the global market
leader for power semiconductors for the past five years, with a
9.7 percent market share in 2007.
Our broad portfolio comprises power modules, small signal and
discrete power semiconductors, power management ICs and
microcontrollers. Our industrial products are used in a wide
range of applications, such as:
|
|
|
|
|
Power supplies (AC/DC), divided into two main categories:
uninterruptible power supplies, such as power backbones for
Internet servers; and switched-mode power supplies for PCs,
servers and consumer electronics such as televisions and gaming
consoles, as well as battery chargers for mobile phones,
notebook computers and other handheld devices;
|
|
|
|
DC/DC power converters for computing and communication
applications such as motherboards, telecommunications equipment
and graphic cards;
|
|
|
|
Lighting (electronic lamp ballast and control);
|
|
|
|
Drives for machine tools, motor controls, pumps, fans and
heating, ventilation, consumer appliances (such as washing
machines), air-conditioning systems and transportation as well
as power supplies for additional consumer appliances such as
inductive cooking;
|
|
|
|
Industrial automation, meters and sensors;
|
|
|
|
Power generation, especially in the fields of renewable energy
and power distribution systems; and
|
|
|
|
Other industrial applications such as medical equipment.
|
Our portfolio of semiconductor discretes includes:
|
|
|
|
|
AF (audio frequency) discretes (general purpose diodes and
transistors, switching diodes, digital transistors);
|
|
|
|
RF (radio frequency) discretes (diodes, transistors, Small Scale
Integrated Circuits (SSICs), Monolithic ICs);
|
|
|
|
HIPAC (High Performance Active and Passive Integration) devices
offering ESD/EMI (Electro Static Discharge/Electro Magnetic
Interference) protection and high integration in advanced
applications (e.g., in mobile communication devices); and
|
|
|
|
SMM (Silicon MEMS Microphone): acoustical sensors based on MEMS
(Micro-Electro-Mechanical System) semiconductor technology (for
use in mobile phone applications, for example).
|
Security &
ASICs
Our chip card and security unit designs, develops, manufactures
and markets a wide range of security controllers and security
memories for chip card and security applications. According to
Frost & Sullivan, we remained the market leader in ICs
for smart card applications in the 2007 calendar year, with a
market share of 26.6 percent.
61
Our products include security memory ICs, security
microcontroller ICs for identification documents, payment cards,
SIM cards, prepaid telecom cards, access and transportation
cards, as well as RFID ICs for object identification and access.
The markets for our security products are characterized by an
increasing emphasis on high-security applications like
identification and payment, and by trends towards lower prices
and higher demand for embedded non-volatile memory in SIM cards.
Within our ASIC design & security business we focus on
customer-specific products integrating intellectual property
from our customers with our own IP. These products are used in a
variety of markets, with a special focus on systems for
mobility, industrial, data storage and security. The main
products of this business unit include:
|
|
|
|
|
Systems on Chip (SoC) for HDD applications;
|
|
|
|
Products for computer and gaming peripherals (e.g., in wireless
control pads or memory sticks);
|
|
|
|
Secure ASICs, taking advantage of our security know-how (e.g.,
for authentication or copy protection);
|
|
|
|
Trusted Platform Module (TPM) products
(hardware-based security for trusted computing); and
|
|
|
|
Customer designs manufactured by us on a foundry basis.
|
Many of these products are made to meet customer specifications,
and are often provided by us on a sole-source basis. As a
result, we are often able to establish long-term relationships
with customers in this area, in some cases actively supporting
the customers product roadmap.
Communication
Solutions
Our Communication Solutions segment designs, develops,
manufactures and markets a wide range of ICs, other
semiconductors and complete system solutions for wireless and
wireline communication applications. We are among the leading
players in the markets for semiconductor solutions for mobile
phones as well as wireline access networks.
Wireless
Communications
In wireless communications, our principal products include
baseband ICs, RF transceivers and single-chip ICs for the major
standards (GSM, GPRS, EDGE and UMTS), power management ICs,
radio-frequency products such as Bluetooth ICs, GPS ICs, and
tuner ICs, as well as RF-power components for wireless
infrastructure (base stations). Our principal solutions include
hardware system design and software solutions for mobile
telephone systems (addressing primarily the GSM, GPRS, EDGE, and
UMTS standards).
According to iSuppli in the 2007 calendar year we held the
number three position in wireless ASSPs with a worldwide market
share of 6 percent.
The markets for products in which our cellular communication ICs
and systems are utilized are characterized by trends towards
lower cost, increasingly rapid succession of product
generations, increased system integration, and market
consolidation. According to Strategy Analytics, over
1.1 billion cellular handsets were produced in the 2007
calendar year, compared with about 1 billion devices in
2006. This growth was to a large extent driven by a strong
demand in emerging markets. Increasing demand for connectivity
and multimedia capability is expected to increase the IC content
of mobile phones. However, despite such increased demand, the
average selling prices for cellular phone ICs have declined in
recent years. We expect that a further price decline of
entry-level handset models, often referred to as Ultra Low
Cost telephones, will generate additional demand in
emerging markets. We expect these trends to create both
opportunities and threats for suppliers of cellular
communication semiconductors and systems.
62
We offer products and solutions to customers in the following
principal application areas:
|
|
|
|
|
GSM, or Global System for Mobile Communication, which is the de
facto wireless telephone standard in Europe and available in
more than 120 countries. GSM is a wireless mobile
telecommunication standard that includes General Packet Radio
Service (GPRS), Enhanced Data rate for GSM Evolution
(EDGE), and Universal Mobile Telecommunications
System (UMTS). We offer products and solutions such
as baseband ICs, RF transceivers, power management ICs,
single-chip ICs integrating these components, mobile software,
and reference designs addressing all of these wireless
communication standards;
|
|
|
|
UMTS, a GSM-based standard for third-generation (3G)
broadband, packet-based transmission of text, digitized voice,
video, and multimedia at data rates up to 2 megabits per second
(Mbps). We offer complete multimedia mobile phone
platforms, RF transceivers and mobile software for UMTS and also
for the HSDPA standard (High-Speed Downlink Packet Access) that
supports data rates of up to 7.2 Mbps;
|
|
|
|
DVB (Digital Video Broadcasting), covering a number of generally
accepted protocol standards for digital television. DVB-T
(Digital Video Broadcasting Terrestrial) and DVB-H
(Digital Video Broadcasting Handhelds) are
television protocol standards that enable digital transmission
of digital content for moving reception devices, such as mobile
phones and PDAs (Personal Digital Assistants). We offer tuner
ICs for stationary, portable and mobile television receivers for
the analog (PAL, NTSC) and digital (DVB-C/T, ISDB, ATSC, DAB,
DVB-H, T-DMB, ISDB-T) TV standards;
|
|
|
|
The Global Positioning System (GPS), a location
system based on a network of satellites. GPS is widely used in
automotive, wireless, mobile computing and consumer
applications. Together with a development partner (which was
subsequently acquired by Broadcom), we have introduced the
Hammerhead product family, a single-chip Assisted Global
Positioning System (A-GPS) receiver for mobile
telephones, smart phones and PDAs; and
|
|
|
|
Bluetooth, a computing and telecommunications industry
specification that allows mobile phones, computers and PDAs to
connect with each other and with home and business phones and
computers using a short-range wireless connection. We offer
BlueMoon UniCellular, a fast and energy-efficient Bluetooth-chip
which supports the Bluetooth enhanced data rate
(EDR) protocol.
|
In the first quarter of our 2008 fiscal year we acquired the
Mobility Products Group of LSI Logic Corporation. With this
acquisition we furthered our strategic goal of strengthening our
product portfolio for our wireless customers.
Wireline
Communications
In Wireline Communcations, we offer a broad product portfolio
and complete system solutions focused on wireline access
applications. Our solutions are deployed at major service
providers worldwide. According to Gartner Dataquest, we held the
number one position in the wireline access network IC market
(excluding cable modem transceiver ICs, which we do not address)
in 2007, with a market share of 22 percent.
The market for our wireline communications products is currently
characterized by the launch of high-speed data and video
broadband services (e.g. IPTV) from service providers around the
world, the convergence of voice and data networks into a single
IP-based
Next-Generation Network (NGN) infrastructure, market
consolidation, and strong pricing pressure.
Our broad portfolio in wireline communication includes
semiconductors for voice access and core access, xDSL
transceivers for central office (CO) and customer premises
equipment (CPE), VoIP ICs, Ethernet switches and PHYs, DECT ICs
and system solutions for DSL modems and home gateways. This
63
comprehensive product portfolio allows complete, end-to-end
access solutions that enable the triple play of
voice, data, and video applications.
The primary applications for our wireline communication products
include:
|
|
|
|
|
broadband CPE equipment such as xDSL-modems and home-gateways;
|
|
|
|
broadband access solutions for the central office, such as xDSL
line cards; and
|
|
|
|
voice access, core access and enterprise applications, e.g.,
analog line cards, ISDN, T/E, ATM and PBX.
|
During the fourth quarter of the 2007 fiscal year we acquired
the DSL CPE business of Texas Instruments, Inc. This acquisition
has enabled us to combine our innovative broadband CPE roadmap
with Texas Instruments Inc.s large deployed DSL CPE base
at major carriers worldwide.
Customers, Sales
and Marketing
Customers
We sell our products to customers located mainly in Europe, the
United States, the Asia/Pacific region and Japan.
We target our sales and marketing efforts on demand creation at
approximately 440 direct customers worldwide without customers
specific to Qimonda.
On a group-wide basis, no customer accounted for more than
10 percent of our sales in the 2008 fiscal year, and our
top 20 customers accounted for approximately 56 percent of
our sales.
We focus our sales efforts on semiconductors customized to meet
our customers needs. We therefore seek to design our
products and solutions in cooperation with our customers so as
to become their preferred supplier. We also seek to create
relationships with our major customers that are leaders in their
market segments and have the most demanding technological
requirements in order to obtain the system expertise necessary
to compete in the semiconductor markets.
We have sales offices throughout the world. We believe that this
global presence enables us not only to respond promptly to our
customers needs, but also to be involved in our
customers product development processes and thereby be in
a better position to design customized ICs and solutions for
their new products. We believe that cooperation with customers
that are leaders in their respective fields provides us with a
special insight into these customers concerns and future
development of the market. Contacts to our customers
customers and market studies about the end consumer also
position us to be an effective partner for our customers.
We believe that a key element of our success is our ability to
offer a broad portfolio of technological capabilities and
competitive services to support our customers in providing
innovative and competitive products to their customers and
markets. This ability permits us to balance variations in demand
in different markets and, in our view, is a significant factor
in differentiating us from many of our competitors.
Below we provide more detailed information on the customers of
each of our principal segments:
Automotive,
Industrial & Multimarket
Automotive
In the automotive business, which includes sales of
microcontrollers, power devices and sensors, our customer base
includes most of the worlds major automotive suppliers.
Our two largest customers in the 2008 fiscal year were Bosch and
Continental. Sales of automotive products are made primarily in
Europe and, to an increasing extent, in the United States,
China, Korea and Japan.
64
Industrial &
Multimarket
In the industrial & multimarket businesses, the
Siemens group is the largest OEM customer, but the bulk of our
sales of industrial products are made in small volumes to
customers that are either served directly or through third-party
distributors such as Arrow, Avnet and WPG Holdings. Our sales of
industrial products vary by type of product, with devices for
drive and power conversion applications sold primarily in Europe
and the United States, and devices for power management and
supply sold primarily in Asia (other than Japan) and Europe. Our
wide variety of discrete commodity products is targeted at
customers in all major fields of applications, including
consumer, computing and communication.
Security &
ASICs
Our chip card and security business derives a large portion of
its revenues from large-scale projects like ePassport projects.
Within the chip card business, three card
manufacturers Gemalto, Giesecke & Devrient
and Oberthur Technologies accounted for a
significant portion of sales. We maintained our strong worldwide
position in the security business during the 2008 fiscal year.
With our broad and complementary IP portfolio, system
integration skills, and manufacturing expertise, we seek to
leverage our IP into ASIC-based system solutions. We concentrate
on customized designs for customers such as Siemens and
Microsoft Corporation.
Communication
Solutions
Wireless
Communications
In the field of wireless communications, we sell a wide variety
of products addressing applications such as cellular phones,
transmission technologies for short, middle and long distances,
tuners, positioning systems and wireless infrastructure to most
of the worlds leading wireless device and equipment
suppliers. In cellular phone applications, customers purchase
products that range from ASSPs and customized ASSPs that we
produce to customer design and specifications to complete system
solutions including mobile software. With complete system
solutions, we target OEMs as well as design houses and ODMs. Our
largest announced cellular phone customers include LG
Electronics, Nokia and Samsung. To our wireless infrastructure
customers, such as Ericsson, we supply RF-power products.
Wireline
Communications
The wireline communications business sells IC products for
telecommunication and data communication applications to a
world-wide customer base, targeted at system providers of
broadband communication applications. Our product portfolio
includes ICs for voice and core access solutions (for example,
CODECs, SLICs, ISDN, T/E), broadband access system solutions for
xDSL and VoIP, as well as system solutions for broadband CPE,
home networking equipment, and cordless phones.
The largest customers of our wireline communications business
include leading telecommunications and data communications
customers such as Alcatel-Lucent, Arcadyan, AVM, Ericsson,
Huawei and Nokia Siemens Networks. We deliver our semiconductor
solutions to our customers either directly, via distributors
such as Avnet, or via system manufacturers. Our cordless
telephone customers typically purchase complete system IC kits
including baseband ICs, RF ICs and power amplifiers.
Sales and
Marketing
As of September 30, 2008, we had approximately 2,259 sales
and marketing employees (including approximately 354 Qimonda
employees) worldwide.
We create and fulfill our product sales either directly or
through our network of distribution partners.
A team of Corporate Account Executives is assigned to develop
business relationships with our most important strategic
customers. Dedicated Account Managers foster our relationships
with all other important direct customers. Regional sales units
offer additional support for global accounts based in
65
their regions, as well as local accounts that are key players in
specific markets. In three smaller markets we still have
contractual arrangements with the Siemens and Epcos sales
organizations to provide defined sales support.
To serve the broader market and expand our indirect sales, a
dedicated organization develops, maintains and interacts with a
strong network of distribution partners. This optimized network
includes globally active distributors, strong regional partners
and committed niche specialists. In addition, third-party sales
representatives help to identify and create business,
particularly in the United States.
A number of our important direct customers increasingly
outsource activities ranging from product design and procurement
to manufacturing and logistics to global Electronics
Manufacturing Services (EMS). To meet the specific
requirements of the EMS industry, we have a dedicated EMS sales
team. Focusing on the EMS market leaders, these account managers
follow up on manufacturing transfers from OEM to EMS and
conclude strategic partnerships for design and technology to
increase our market share within the EMS channel.
Within each of our business units, we have product- and
applications-oriented marketing employees. These employees
investigate market trends and the needs of their respective
segments to grow our market share. They define, develop,
optimize and position new products and provide product support
from market introduction up to the end-of-life stage.
Finally, we utilize advertising campaigns mainly in the trade
press to establish and strengthen our identity as a major
semiconductor provider and actively participate in trade shows,
conferences and events to strengthen our brand recognition and
industry presence.
Backlog
Standard
Products
Cyclical industry conditions in the memory products
market, in particular make it undesirable for many
customers to enter into long-term, fixed-price contracts to
purchase standard (i.e., non-customized) semiconductor products.
As a result, the market prices of our standard semiconductor
products, and our revenues from sales of these products,
fluctuate very significantly from period to period. Most of our
standard non-memory products are priced, and orders are
accepted, with an understanding that the price and other
contract terms may be adjusted to reflect market conditions at
the delivery date. It is a common industry practice to permit
major customers to change the date on which products are
delivered or to cancel existing orders. For these reasons, we
believe that the backlog at any time of standard products, such
as memory products, is not a reliable indicator of future sales.
Non-Standard
Products
For more customized products, orders are generally made well in
advance of delivery. Quantities and prices of such products may
nevertheless change between the times they are ordered and when
they are delivered, reflecting changes in customer needs and
industry conditions. During periods of industry overcapacity and
falling sales prices, customer orders are generally not made as
far in advance of the scheduled shipment date as during periods
of capacity constraints, and more customers request logistics
agreements based on rolling forecasts. The resulting lower
levels of backlog reduce our managements ability to
forecast optimum production levels and future revenues. As a
result, we do not rely solely on backlog to manage our business
and do not use it to evaluate performance.
Competition
The markets for many of our products are intensely competitive,
and we face significant competition in each of our product
lines. We compete with other major international semiconductor
companies, some of which have substantially greater financial
and other resources with which to pursue research, development,
manufacturing, marketing and distribution of their products.
Smaller niche companies are also
66
becoming increasingly important players in the semiconductor
market, and semiconductor foundry companies have expanded
significantly. Competitors include manufacturers of standard
semiconductors, application-specific ICs and fully customized
ICs, including both chip and board-level products, as well as
customers that develop their own integrated circuit products and
foundry operations. We also cooperate in some areas with
companies that are our competitors in other areas.
The following table shows key competitors for each of our
principal operating segments in alphabetical order:
Key Competitors
by Segment
|
|
|
Automotive, Industrial & Multimarket
|
|
Atmel, Freescale, International Rectifier, Mitsubishi, NXP,
Renesas, Samsung, STMicroelectronics, Texas Instruments
|
Communication Solutions
|
|
Broadcom, Conexant, Freescale, ST-NXP Wireless, Qualcomm, Texas
Instruments
|
We compete in different product lines to various degrees on the
basis of product design, technical performance, price,
production capacity, product features, product system
compatibility, delivery times, quality and level of support.
Innovation and quality are competitive factors for all segments.
Production capacity as well as the ability to deliver products
reliably and within a very short period of time play
particularly important roles.
Our ability to compete successfully depends on elements both
within and outside of our control, including:
|
|
|
|
|
successful and timely development of new products, services and
manufacturing processes;
|
|
|
|
product performance and quality;
|
|
|
|
manufacturing costs, yields and product availability;
|
|
|
|
pricing;
|
|
|
|
our ability to meet changes in our customers demands by
altering production at our facilities;
|
|
|
|
our ability to provide solutions that meet our customers
specific needs;
|
|
|
|
the competence and agility of our sales, technical support and
marketing organizations; and
|
|
|
|
the resilience of our supply chain for services that we
outsource and the delivery of products, raw materials and
services by third-party providers needed for our manufacturing
capabilities.
|
Manufacturing
Our production of semiconductors is generally divided into two
steps, referred to as the front-end process and the back-end
process.
Front-end
In the first step, the front-end process, electronic circuits
are produced on raw silicon wafers through a series of
patterning, etching, deposition and implantation processes. At
the end of the front-end process, we test the chips for
functionality.
We believe that we are one of the leaders in the semiconductor
industry in terms of the structure size on our wafers. Structure
size refers to the minimum distances between electronic
structures on a chip. Smaller structure sizes increase
production efficiencies in the production of memory and logic
products. The structure size of our current logic products is as
small as 90-nanometers and we have qualified
65-nanometer
technology at multiple manufacturing sites.
67
We think that we achieve substantial differentiation at our
customers due to our power semiconductor process technology and
our world-wide network of manufacturing sites that combine the
highest quality standards and flexibility.
Back-end
In the second step of semiconductor production, the back-end
process (also known as the packaging, assembly and test phase),
the processed wafers are ground and mounted on a synthetic foil,
which is fixed in a wafer frame. Mounted on this foil, the wafer
is diced into small silicon chips, each one containing a
complete integrated circuit. One or multiple individual chips
are removed from the foil and fixed onto a substrate or
lead-frame base, which will enable the physical connection of
the product to the electronic board. The next step is creating
electrical links between the chip and the base by soldering or
wiring. Subsequently, the chips and electrical links are molded
with plastic compounds for stabilization and protection.
Depending on the package type, the molded chips undergo a
separation and pin bending process. Finally, the semiconductor
is subject to functional tests.
Our back-end facilities are equipped with state-of-the-art
equipment and highly automated manufacturing technology,
enabling us to perform assembly and test on a cost-effective
basis. We have improved our cost position by moving significant
production volumes to lower-cost countries such as Malaysia and
China. Our back-end facilities also provide us with the
flexibility needed to customize products according to individual
customer specifications (giving us System in Package
capabilities). We continued the process of converting our
packages to comply with new international environmental
requirements for lead- and/or halogen-free green
packages in the 2008 fiscal year.
68
Manufacturing
Facilities
We operate manufacturing facilities around the world, including
through joint ventures in which we participate. The following
table shows selected key information with respect to our current
major logic manufacturing facilities:
Manufacturing
Logic Facilities in 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year of
|
|
|
|
|
|
commencement
|
|
|
|
|
|
of first
|
|
|
|
|
|
production line
|
|
|
Principal products or functions
|
|
Front-end facilities wafer fabrication plants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dresden, Germany
|
|
|
1996
|
|
|
ASICs with embedded flash memory, logic ICs
|
Essonnes,
France(1)
|
|
|
1963
|
(2)
|
|
Logic ICs and ASICs with embedded flash memory
|
Horten, Norway
|
|
|
1985
|
|
|
MEMS
|
Kulim, Malaysia
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Power, smart power, ASICs with embedded flash memory
|
Regensburg, Germany
|
|
|
1986
|
|
|
Power, smart power, sensors, mixed signal
|
Villach, Austria
|
|
|
1979
|
|
|
Power, smart power and discretes
|
Warstein, Germany
|
|
|
1965
|
(2)
|
|
High power
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Back-end facilities assembly and final testing
plants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Batam, Indonesia
|
|
|
1996
|
|
|
Leaded power and non-power ICs
|
Cegléd, Hungary
|
|
|
1997
|
|
|
High power
|
Morgan Hill, California
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
RF-power
|
Regensburg, Germany
|
|
|
2000
|
|
|
Chip card modules, sensors and pilot lines
|
Singapore
|
|
|
1970
|
|
|
Leadless and leaded non-power ICs, wafer test
|
Skoppum, Norway
|
|
|
1991
|
|
|
Sensors
|
Warstein, Germany
|
|
|
1965
|
(2)
|
|
High power
|
Wuxi, China
|
|
|
1996
|
|
|
Discretes, chip card modules
|
Malacca, Malaysia
|
|
|
1973
|
|
|
Discretes, power packages, sensors, logic ICs, leaded power
|
|
|
(1)
|
ALTIS, our joint venture with IBM.
|
|
(2)
|
The current main production line began operations in 1991.
|
In addition to our own manufacturing capacity, we have entered
into a number of alliances and joint ventures, and have
relationships with several foundry partners, which give us
access to substantial additional manufacturing capacity,
allowing us to more flexibly meet variable demand for products
over market cycles. These arrangements are described below under
Manufacturing joint venture and Strategic
Alliances and Other Collaborations.
Front-end
Our logic front-end facilities currently have a capacity of
approximately 280,000 200-millimeter equivalent wafer starts per
month. In implementing our fab-light strategy, we
have begun to shift the focus of our in-house manufacturing
toward power logic products and to shift manufacturing of
advanced CMOS logic products to foundries. In this context we
have pursued the sale of our share in ALTIS.
In 2008, in-house production of advanced logic wafers (with
structure sizes of 250-nanometers or less) was carried out at
our 200-millimeter manufacturing facility in Dresden and at our
ALTIS joint-venture with IBM in Essonnes, France, while in-house
production of power logic wafers (with structure sizes of
69
more than 250-nanometers) was largely carried out at our
front-end manufacturing facilities in Kulim, Regensburg, and
Villach.
Generally, we use foundries to provide flexibility in meeting
demand, as well as managing investment expenditures. In recent
years, we have enhanced our manufacturing cooperation with
United Microelectronics Corporation (UMC),
particularly with respect to leading-edge CMOS products for
wireless communications down to 90-nanometer.
We have entered into a joint development agreement with IBM,
Chartered Semiconductor and Samsung, to accelerate the move to
65-nanometer and below. We are currently qualifying 65-nanometer
technology at several manufacturing partners and began to
develop products based on 40-nanometer technology for which it
is currently planned first to be manufactured at one of our
manufacturing partners.
We continue with our development agreements with IBM and its
development and manufacturing partners to the 32-nanometer
generation. This agreement builds on the success of earlier
joint development and manufacturing agreements. Starting with
65-nanometer technology, our advanced logic front-end
manufacturing will be solely sourced from manufacturing
partners, optimizing capital investment and business
flexibility. Verified samples of 65-nanometer technologies are
currently available. Volume production in 65-nanometer is
scheduled to start in the second half of 2009.
We are continuing the ramp up of our new power-logic plant in
the Kulim Hi-Tech Park in the north of Malaysia and plan to
further increase our production capacity at that site. This will
allow us to further expand our presence in the growing Asian
market, as well as to strengthen our cost and competitive
positions. We expect to
ramp-up
capacity at Kulim according to market demand. We expect that
maximum capacity could reach approximately 100,000 wafer starts
per month.
Back-end
We have a number of logic back-end facilities, located primarily
in Asia. We also use assembly and test subcontractors to provide
us with flexibility in meeting demand, as well as managing
investment expenditures. For assembly services, we have further
intensified our partnership with AMKOR Technology on leadless
and flip-chip technologies.
We and Advanced Semiconductor Engineering Inc. (ASE) announced
in November 2007 a partnership to introduce semiconductor
packages with a higher integration level of package size, the
Wafer-Level Ball
Grid Array (WLB) technology, which achieves a 30 percent
reduction of dimension compared to conventional (lead-frame
laminate) packages. This partnership unites the technology
developed by Infineon with the packaging know-how of ASE in a
license model.
In August 2008, we, STMicroelectronics and STATS ChipPAC
announced an agreement to jointly develop the next-generation of
embedded Wafer-Level Ball Grid Array (eWLB) technology,
based on our first-generation technology, for use in
manufacturing future-generation semiconductor packages. This
will build on our existing eWLB packaging technology, which we
have licensed to our development partners. The new R&D
effort, for which the resulting IP will be jointly owned by the
three companies, will focus on using both sides of a
reconstituted wafer to provide solutions for semiconductor
devices with a higher integration level and a greater number of
contact elements.
Manufacturing
joint venture
In 1991, we entered into an arrangement with IBM, under which
IBM manufactured DRAM products in its facility in Essonnes,
France and we received a share of the production. Later we
agreed with IBM to convert the Essonnes facility to the
production of logic devices and to convert the existing
production cooperation arrangement into a joint venture called
ALTIS. In 2008, we owned 50 percent of the joint
ventures shares plus one share and IBM owned the rest.
Following an amendment in December 2005 we began to fully
consolidate ALTIS whereby IBMs 50 percent ownership
interest has been reflected as a minority interest. Our
allocated percentage of the output of ALTIS was 90 percent
in the 2008 fiscal year.
70
Research and
Development
Research and development (R&D) is critical to
our continuing success, and we are committed to maintaining high
levels of R&D over the long term. The table below sets
forth information with respect to our research and development
expenditures for the periods shown:
Research and
Development Expenditures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the years ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
( in millions, except percentages)
|
|
|
Expenditures (net of subsidies received)
|
|
|
816
|
|
|
|
768
|
|
|
|
755
|
|
As a percentage of net sales
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
|
19
|
%
|
|
|
17
|
%
|
Our R&D activities are concentrated in the areas of
semiconductor based product and system development, as well as
process technology. Major R&D activities range from the
development of leading edge RF, analog and power circuits,
complex digital
system-on-chip
solutions, high and low power discretes, sensors, reusable
IP-blocks,
software blocks, CAD flow and libraries, and packaging
technology to complex mobile phone system integration.
Our logic ICs generally utilize complex
system-on-chip
designs and require a wide variety of intellectual property and
sophisticated design methodologies, to combine high performance
with low power consumption. We believe that our range of
intellectual property and methodologies for logic ICs, in
particular our capability to integrate various ICs and complex
software products, will enable us to continue to strengthen our
position in the logic IC market. We view expertise in
analog/mixed-signal devices and RF design as a particular
competitive strength.
Our power ICs and discrete power transistors utilize a
sophisticated co-design of circuits and technology procedures to
optimize parameters like on-resistance, switching speed and
reliability. We believe our expertise in all fields of power
applications up to the highest voltage and current levels will
enable us to retain a leading development position and help us
to remain a leading supplier for power semiconductors.
Process technologies are another important focus of our R&D
activities. We continuously develop our power technologies in
order to support our number one position in the power market.
Requirements for automotive and industrial applications, such as
high-temperature, high switching power and reliability allow for
differentiation through in-house R&D. For advanced logic
technologies we are following a strategy of alliances with
several partners and consortia to maintain a competitive
technology roadmap at an affordable cost level. Our process
technologies benefit from many modular characteristics,
including special low-power variants, analog options and
high-voltage capabilities.
71
Locations
Our research and development activities are conducted at
locations throughout the world. The following table shows our
major research and development locations and their respective
areas of competence:
Principal
Research and Development Locations
|
|
|
Location
|
|
Areas of Competence
|
|
Allentown, Pennsylvania, USA
|
|
IC, software and system development for wireless products
|
Bangalore, India
|
|
IC, software and system development for wireless, wireline,
automotive and industrial products, CAD flow and library
development
|
Bucharest, Romania
|
|
Power mixed-signal semiconductors, chip card ICs, RF IC
development for wireless products
|
Dresden, Germany
|
|
Advanced technology development
|
Duisburg, Germany
|
|
IC and system development for wireless products, RF IC
development, customer support for wireline products
|
Graz, Austria
|
|
Contactless systems, automotive power systems, sensor products
|
Linz, Austria
|
|
RF IC and software development for wireless and sensor products
|
Morgan Hill, California, USA
|
|
RF IC development for high power applications
|
Munich, Germany
|
|
Main product development site
Technology integration, CAD flow, library development, IC,
software and system development for wireline products,
microcontrollers, ASICs with embedded DRAM, chip card ICs,
automotive power and industrial products, process technology
development
|
Nuremberg, Germany
|
|
Software and system development for wireless products
|
Regensburg, Germany
|
|
Package development, process technology development
|
Shanghai, China
|
|
System development for wireless products
|
Singapore
|
|
IC, software and system development for wireline, wireless and
industrial products, package development
|
Sophia Antipolis, France
|
|
IC development for wireless products, library development, CAD
flow
|
Villach, Austria
|
|
IC development for power semiconductor products, mixed signal IC
development for automotive and communication products
|
Xian, China
|
|
IC development for automotive and communication products
|
As of September 30, 2008, our research and development
staff consisted of approximately 8,364 employees working in
our R&D units throughout the world (including approximately
2,091 Qimonda employees), a net increase of approximately 25
from September 30, 2007 (including a net decrease of
approximately 415 Qimonda employees). We have given particular
emphasis in recent years to the expansion of our R&D
resources in cost-attractive locations with good access to lead
markets and lead customers. We believe that appropriate
utilization of skilled R&D personnel in lower-cost
locations will improve our ability to maintain our technical
position while controlling expenses.
Intellectual
Property
Our intellectual property rights include patents, copyrights,
trade secrets, trademarks, utility models and designs. The
subjects of our patents primarily relate to IC designs and
process technologies. We believe that our intellectual property
is a valuable asset not only to protect our investment in
technology but also a vital prerequisite for cross licensing
agreements with third parties.
72
At September 30, 2008, the Infineon group (without Qimonda)
owned more than 21,600 patent applications and granted patents
(both referred to as patents below) in over 40
countries throughout the world. These patents belong to
approximately 8,150 patent families (each patent
family containing all patents originating from the same
invention). We filed first patent applications for approximately
710 inventions during the 2008 fiscal year.
National and regional patent offices examine whether our patent
applications meet the necessary requirements. Owing to the
complex nature of our patent applications this examination
process typically takes several years until grant of a patent.
It is common industry practice for semiconductor companies to
enter into patent cross licensing agreements with each other.
These agreements enable each company to utilize the patents of
the other on specified conditions. In some cases, these
agreements provide for payments to be made by one party to the
other. We are a party to a number of patent cross licensing
agreements, including agreements with other major semiconductor
companies. We believe that our own substantial patent portfolio
enables us to enter into patent cross licensing agreements on
favorable terms and conditions. We are currently in patent cross
licensing negotiations with several major industry participants.
Depending on new developments, new products or other business
necessities, we may initiate additional patent cross licensing
agreements in the future.
Our success depends in part on our ability to obtain patents,
licenses and other intellectual property rights covering our
products and their design and manufacturing processes. To that
end, we have obtained many patents and patent licenses and
intend to continue to seek patents on our developments. The
process of seeking patent protection can be lengthy and
expensive, and there can be no assurance that patents will be
issued from currently pending or future applications or that, if
patents are issued, they will be of sufficient scope or strength
to provide us with meaningful protection or a commercial
advantage. In addition, effective copyright and trade secret
protection may be limited in some countries or even unavailable.
Our competitors also seek to protect their technology by
obtaining patents and asserting other forms of intellectual
property rights. Third-party technology that is protected by
patents and other intellectual property rights may be
unavailable to us or available only on unfavorable terms and
conditions. Third parties may also claim that our technology
infringes their patents or other intellectual property rights,
and they may bring suit against us to protect their intellectual
property rights. From time to time, it may also be necessary for
us to initiate legal action to enforce our own intellectual
property rights. Litigation can be very expensive and can divert
financial resources and management attention from other
important uses. It is difficult or impossible to predict the
outcome of most litigation matters, and an adverse outcome can
result in significant financial costs that can have a material
adverse effect on the losing party. For a description of ongoing
disputes, see Legal Matters.
Strategic
Alliances and Other Collaborations
As a part of our long-term strategy, we have entered into a
number of strategic alliances with other leaders in the
semiconductor industry, primarily in the areas of research and
development for manufacturing process technologies and joint
manufacturing facilities as well as cooperative product design
and development.
R&D in advanced process technology nodes for wafer
manufacturing is a particular focus for
multi-party
alliances. During the 2008 fiscal year, accordingly, we
continued our technology agreements down to the 32/28-nanometer
CMOS technology nodes with our alliance partners IBM, Chartered
and Samsung (the ICIS alliance) as well as
Freescale. Pooling of human and technological resources supports
a high level of innovation coupled with mutual learning and fast
feedback, which in turn increases efficiencies, improves
economies of scale and reduces time to market for new products.
The 90-, 65- and 45-nanometer technologies developed to date
through this alliance will be used for a broad range of systems
including, for example, next-generation hand-held products.
Future technologies
73
are intended to solve real life problems in fields such as
medicine, communications, transportation and security. Advanced
technology nodes are intended to support energy efficiency, high
performance and cost conscious solutions.
Since advanced products include digital, analog, RF and embedded
memory circuitry, it is important for Infineon to stay involved
in leading edge technology development in order to be able to
bridge the requirements for wafer manufacturing and optimum
design. This need is independent of our manufacturing strategy,
whether in-house or outsourced.
New
collaborations announced in the 2008 fiscal year
During the 2008 fiscal year, we announced a number of
collaborations and partnerships, including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
To complement our cooperation on wafer technologies, we entered
into a development alliance with STMicroelectronics and
STATSChipPAC on next-generation embedded wafer level ball grid
array technology. This packaging technology enables small form
factor, heterogeneous integration of subsystems and systems in
single packages. The cooperation is designed to pave the way to
widespread adoption of this technology by printed circuit board
manufacturers and assembly houses.
|
|
|
|
With respect to our core competence in the security and chip
card business, we entered into new collaborations with Intel.
One agreement concerns the development of optimized chip
solutions for high-density SIM cards in the 4- to 64-megabit
memory capacity range, for which we are contributing our
expertise in security hardware. Pursuant to a second agreement,
we are providing our Trusted Platform Module professional
package software to fully support Intels TPM1.2 hardware
solutions. This package, fully compliant with TCGs Trusted
Software Stack Work Group Specifications, will enable PC
designers to take advantage of a cost effective, flexible and
reliable security solution for Intel vPro technology, Intel
Centrino processor technology and other fundamental business
platforms.
|
|
|
|
We also entered into a collaboration agreement with PGP
Corporation to increase and enhance security options. Together,
we will initially provide a combined solution towards Trusted
Platform Module provisioning and management in conjunction with
PGP Whole Disk Encryption.
|
|
|
|
We signed a license agreement for Differential Power Analysis
Contermeasures with Cryptography Research.
|
|
|
|
Based on our background in confidential data storage, smart
cards and security controllers, we expanded our cooperation with
the German Federal Ministry of the Interior on certification and
identity documents.
|
|
|
|
In the USA we entered a cooperation with IBM on the technology
and manufacturing of security solutions for the USA government,
specifically USA passports.
|
|
|
|
We expanded our cooperation with IMEC on innovative design -
technology interfaces in future technology nodes.
|
|
|
|
We signed a memorandum of understanding with the European
Commission on its automotive safety initiative. This move adds
momentum to eCall, an integrated, automatic accident alert
system for automobiles. The system collects data from key safety
components and transmits this data to an emergency call center
along with location information supplied by a GPS navigation
module.
|
|
|
|
Our subsidiary Comneon and Sonus Networks joined forces in
developing, testing and provisioning advanced consumer-ready
mobile services, including
IP-voice for
mobile networks and Voice Call Continuity (VCC), a service that
allows seamless roaming between operator controlled mobile and
open WiFi networks.
|
74
|
|
|
|
|
In order to strengthen our MEMS based business, we entered a
cooperation with Hosiden on the development of silicon-based
microphones. Hosiden is contributing its competence in
electro-mechanics
and acoustics as well as its market expertise, while we are
providing our rugged microphone MEMS technology.
|
|
|
|
With respect to our CPE business, we entered into a cooperation
with Jungo Ltd. to deliver production-ready carrier-grade
reference designs for the multi-service residential gateway
market. The partnership, currently based upon our ADSL2/2+ and
VDSL solutions, enables customers to offer complete solutions
for operator-specific products based on a pre-integrated,
carrier-ready software platform from Jungo.
|
Qimonda
We currently hold a 77.5 percent interest in the memory
products company Qimonda. We have announced our intention to
reduce our interest in Qimonda to less than 50 percent and,
accordingly, report the results of Qimonda as discontinued
operations in our consolidated financial statements.
On December 21, 2008, we, the German Free State of Saxony,
and Qimonda jointly announced a financing package for Qimonda.
This proposed transaction is described under Operating and
Financial Review Recent Developments Related to
Qimonda.
Qimonda designs semiconductor memory technologies and develops,
manufactures, and markets a variety of memory products with
various packaging and configuration options, architectures and
performance characteristics on a chip, component and module
level.
Qimonda currently offers more advanced DRAM products for
infrastructure graphics and consumer applications, as well as
standard DRAM products for PCs, notebooks and workstations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Four Largest
|
|
|
|
|
Customers in the
|
Principal Products
|
|
Principal Applications
|
|
2008 Fiscal Year
|
|
Standard DRAM components (DDR, DDR2, DDR3)
|
|
Memory modules, components-on-mainboards, consumer devices
(digital TV, set-top boxes, DVD recorders)
|
|
HP, Kingston,
Microsoft, Sony
|
Personal system DRAM modules (Unbuffered DIMMs with and without
ECC, SO-DIMMs, Micro-DIMMs)
|
|
Desktop computers, workstations, entry-level servers, notebook
computers, sub-notebooks, ultra-mobile PCs
|
|
|
Infrastructure DRAM modules (Registered DIMMs, FB-DIMMs,
VLP-DIMMs)
|
|
Servers, Workstations, blade servers
|
|
|
Networking, storage and industrial DRAM products
|
|
Networking, telecom and industrial equipment, storage
|
|
|
Graphics (DDR2, GDDR3, GDDR5)
|
|
Graphic cards in desktop and notebook computers, game consoles
|
|
|
Consumer (DDR1, DDR2)
|
|
Digital TV, set-top boxes, digital cameras, dvd recorders
|
|
|
The global market for DRAM has experienced strong cyclicality in
the past and is expected to continue to do so in the future.
Historically, the average price per bit of DRAM experienced an
annual decrease of approximately 30 percent. Price and
therefore revenue volatility depends on the relation between
supply and demand, leading to strong price declines in times of
oversupply and relative stability or even increases in times of
shortage. However, visibility for both supply and demand is
restricted and therefore market
75
development is difficult to predict. The table below presents
revenue and bit data as well as calendar
year-over-year
price-per-bit
development for the DRAM market since 2002 (source: WSTS).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calendar Year
|
|
2002
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
DRAM market in billion
|
|
$
|
15
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
DRAM market in billion megabits
|
|
|
563
|
|
|
|
785
|
|
|
|
1,260
|
|
|
|
1,902
|
|
|
|
2,809
|
|
|
|
5,069
|
|
Year-over-year change average price per bit
|
|
|
(3
|
)%
|
|
|
(23
|
)%
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
(37
|
)%
|
|
|
(11
|
)%
|
|
|
(51
|
)%
|
In the 2002 calendar year, prices for Qimondas DRAM
products stabilized due to increased demand and consolidation
within the industry following a substantial industry downturn
and price decline in the 2001 calendar year. In the 2003
calendar year prices dropped again due to slow demand
development. In the 2004 calendar year, prices remained flat. In
the 2005 calendar year, prices declined more strongly than the
historical average due to slow demand development especially in
the first half of the year. During the 2006 calendar year,
prices stabilized due to reduced growth in DRAM supply as some
DRAM manufacturers focused capacity growth on NAND flash. In the
2007 calendar year, prices declined severely due to a strong
increase in production volumes as a consequence of capacity
increases, technology conversions and capacity conversions from
NAND to DRAM by some competitors, following severe price erosion
in the NAND flash area. In the 2008 calendar year, prices
stabilized at low levels and recovered slightly in the first
half but declined again in the quarter ending September 2008 due
to continued oversupply in the DRAM industry.
DRAMs for
Infrastructure, Graphics and Consumer Applications
Qimonda designs, manufactures and sells technologically advanced
DRAM components and modules for use in servers, networking and
storage equipment, including specialty DRAMs for use primarily
in graphics applications, as well as in consumer applications.
Infrastructure
Applications. Qimondas current
portfolio of DRAMs for use in servers, networking and storage
equipment includes FB-DIMMs and DDR3 RDIMMs, which Qimonda
believes serve as the most advanced memory used in high-end
servers, and very-low-profile-DIMMs, intended for the blade
server market. DRAM consumption in entry level servers is
expected to see a 60 percent compound annual growth rate
(CAGR) based on bits shipped from 2006 to 2011,
according to iSuppli. Qimonda also provides customized modules
to server manufacturers, in each case specifically designed to
meet the individual customers unique platform
requirements. Qimonda expects the market for servers to grow
substantially in the next few years, and Qimonda is currently
engaged in the development of products it believes will address
that growth. For example, Qimonda is developing new generations
of standard DRAM with 2 gigabits and 4 gigabits of capacity
for use in future IT infrastructure applications.
Graphics Applications. Qimonda offers a
broad portfolio of graphics DRAMs that support applications with
performance ranging from entry level to very advanced. Due to
their speed, low power consumption and limited heat generation,
Qimondas graphics DRAM components are used in game
consoles, graphics cards and PC and notebook computers. In some
cases, Qimonda makes customized products for use in
entertainment applications, including game consoles and imaging
devices. Qimonda believes that the trend toward the extensive
use of sophisticated graphics applications will result in strong
growth in high performance graphics systems, which it believes
will in turn drive the demand for its graphics DRAM products.
Consumer Applications. In the 2008
fiscal year, Qimonda also offered a broad range of DRAM products
for consumer applications. As part of the repositioning of
Qimonda, the company has decided to focus mainly on products for
infrastructure and graphics applications going forward and as
such will reduce the number of applications which will be
supported based on the more focused product portfolio. Demand
for consumer DRAM products is often less volatile, and their
prices are relatively steadier compared to other standard DRAM
products.
76
Mobile Applications. As part of the
repositioning of Qimonda, the company has decided to focus
mainly on products for infrastructure and graphics applications
going forward and as such will reduce its support of mobile
applications in the future.
Standard DRAMs
for PC, Notebook and Workstation Applications
In addition to DRAMs for infrastructure, graphics and consumer
applications, Qimonda offers a portfolio of standard DRAM
products that provide a variety of speeds, configurations and
densities suited to particular end uses. In the 2008 fiscal
year, Qimonda sold the majority of its standard DRAM products
for use in PCs and workstations to desktop and notebook computer
manufacturers and to distributors who sell DRAMs to smaller OEMs
and contract manufacturers. Qimondas standard modules,
including Unbuffered DIMMs and SO-DIMMs, are used primarily for
PCs and notebooks, while its more specialized modules such as
High-Density SO-DIMMs and Micro-DIMMs are typically used in
high-end notebook computers and sub-notebooks. Qimonda intends
to invest in technology development and anticipates playing an
active role in the development of future DRAM architectures,
including third-generation DDR, or DDR3.
As part of the repositioning of Qimonda, it decided to reduce
its exposure to the PC market and has sold or reduced capacities
for DRAM products for PC applications.
Other
Products
In the beginning of the 2007 fiscal year, Qimonda ramped down
the production of its flash products and converted the capacity
to DRAM, as had been decided in the prior fiscal year following
the significant price decline for data flash memories. In the
2008 fiscal year, Qimonda has reduced its engagement in
technology development for non-volatile memories to a basic
research level.
Qimonda continues to develop non-volatile memory technologies
based on alternative technology platforms, including MRAMs,
PCRAMs and CBRAMs.
In the 2008 fiscal year, Qimonda sold a small volume of embedded
memories, which are
systems-on-a-chip
designed for special applications. The production and sales of
these products had been phased out by the end of the 2008 fiscal
year.
Sales
Qimonda makes memory-product sales primarily through direct
sales channels and makes use of distributors in order to ensure
the best possible customer coverage. It focuses its principal
sales and marketing efforts on the technology leaders in each of
the DRAM markets it serves. We believe Qimonda has strong
customer relationships and that its customers, many of which are
leaders in their respective fields, provide Qimonda with special
insights into the current state of their respective markets.
Qimondas engineering experts work directly with its
customers to optimize products towards each of their specific
needs.
Qimondas regional sales teams are located in Europe, North
America, Asia/Pacific and Japan, and are supported by
headquarters staff in Germany. These regional sales centers
enable Qimonda to bring its business to its customer base and to
provide local contact and support to the teams in those regions.
Qimondas marketing teams work closely with its customers
and with its sales and R&D organizations. The product
marketing groups help plan Qimondas product roadmap, to
enable it to develop and manufacture products that meet
customers changing requirements.
Customers
Qimondas customers include the worlds largest
suppliers of computers and electronic devices. Qimondas
current principal customers include major computing OEMs, or
OEMs in the PC and server markets, including HP, Dell, IBM, Sun
Microsystems and Sony. To expand customer coverage and breadth,
77
Qimonda also sells a wide range of products to memory module
manufacturers that have diversified customer bases, such as
Kingston, and to a number of distributors. In the area of
graphics applications, Qimonda supplies customers with a strong
focus on enabling these applications, such as nVidia and AMD,
and customers who are active in the game console market, such as
Microsoft, Sony and Nintendo. Qimonda believes that having a
close relationship with these customers can benefit it in the
development of future memory generations by making it easier to
develop memory solutions for future end applications and improve
its product designs. In the 2008 fiscal year Qimonda also
supplied customers in the area of consumer and mobile
applications. The company has recently decided to reduce its
product support in these areas and to focus its product
development efforts on its core strengths in products for
infrastructure and graphics applications in order to reduce
costs in R&D and manufacturing complexity.
Competition
Qimondas principal competitors include Elpida Memory,
Hynix Semiconductor, Micron Technology, Nanya Technology and
Samsung Electronics.
Manufacturing
The following table shows selected key information with respect
to Qimondas current major manufacturing facilities:
Qimonda
Manufacturing Facilities in 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year of
|
|
|
|
|
|
commencement of
|
|
|
|
|
|
first production
|
|
|
|
|
|
line
|
|
|
Principal products or functions
|
|
Front-end facilities wafer fabrication plants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dresden 300-millimeter, Germany
|
|
|
2001
|
|
|
DRAM
|
Richmond
200-millimeter,
Virginia(1)
|
|
|
1998
|
|
|
DRAM
|
Richmond 300-millimeter, Virginia
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
DRAM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Back-end facilities assembly and final
testing plants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dresden,
Germany(2)
|
|
|
1996
|
|
|
DRAM components and modules
|
Malacca,
Malaysia(3)
|
|
|
1973
|
|
|
DRAM components and modules
|
Johor, Malaysia
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
DRAM modules
|
Porto, Portugal
|
|
|
1997
|
|
|
DRAM components and modules
|
Suzhou,
China(4)
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
DRAM components and modules
|
|
|
(1)
|
On October 13, 2008, Qimonda announced plans to reposition
itself in light of the severe downturn in the DRAM industry. As
part of the related restructuring plan, it decided to ramp down
manufacturing at the 200-millimeter facility in Richmond,
Virginia by the end of the second quarter of the 2009 fiscal
year.
|
|
(2)
|
As part of the repositioning of Qimonda, it was decided to close
the back-end manufacturing at Dresden by March 2009.
|
|
(3)
|
Module production was terminated in Malacca in October 2008 with
production being transferred to Johor. The facility in Malacca
has been sold and transferred to Infineon in November 2008.
|
|
(4)
|
Qimonda Technologies Suzhou Co. Ltd., Qimondas joint
venture with CSVC.
|
Front-end
The structure size of the memory products of Qimonda is as small
as 65-nanometers and Qimonda is currently developing production
processes for memory products with structure sizes as small as
46-nanometers.
78
In the 2008 fiscal year, Qimonda focused on the phase out of
less productive 200-millimeter and
300-millimeter
wafer capacities and on technology conversion of its DRAM
manufacturing on 300-millimeter diameter wafers. As a
consequence of the DRAM market downturn and in an effort to
reduce capacities with less competitive wafer size or technology
generation, Qimonda has phased out manufacturing at its foundry
partner SMIC on 200-millimeter and 300-millimeter wafers in the
2008 fiscal year. As part of its repositioning program, Qimonda
has sold its stake in Inotera, its former joint venture with
Nanya, to Micron. Available capacity at Inotera will ramp down
over an eight month period until the end of the 2009 fiscal
year. Qimonda also decided to ramp down its 200-millimeter
capacity at Richmond, Virginia by end of the second quarter of
the 2009 fiscal year. Qimondas 300-millimeter facility at
Richmond ramped up production to a capacity of approximately
39,000 wafer starts per month by September 2008. The maximum
capacity of this facility is expected to amount to 50,000 wafer
starts per month. Qimondas foundry and development partner
Winbond has converted the majority of its 300-millimeter
facility in Taiwan to the 75-nanometer technology by the end of
the 2008 fiscal year and is preparing to introduce the next
generation 65-nanometer Buried Wordline technology early in the
2009 calendar year. Qimonda started commercial production of its
65-nanometer Buried Wordline technology in October 2008 and
achieved first yields on its next generation 46-nanometer Buried
Wordline technology. The focus on 300-millimeter production and
the conversion to the 65-nanometer and
46-nanometer
technologies should substantially reduce Qimondas overall
per-unit
cost for memory chips.
In April 2006, Qimonda entered into an agreement with Infineon
for the production of wafers in the Dresden 200-millimeter fab.
Supply to Qimonda from this facility ended in the third quarter
of the 2008 fiscal year.
Back-end
As part of the repositioning of Qimonda, it decided to ramp down
manufacturing at its back-end facility at Dresden, Germany by
March 2009. Qimonda has back-end operations at Porto, Portugal
and Johor, Malaysia. Qimonda has transferred its module
manufacturing from its back-end site at Malacca, Malaysia to
Johor. The facility in Malacca has been sold and transferred to
Infineon in November 2008. In addition, Qimonda sources back-end
capacities from its joint venture Qimonda Suzhou, China and uses
third party subcontractors for part of the back-end volumes to
balance the load in its own fabs. Package development was mainly
done at Dresden and will be transferred to Porto. The back-end
sites in Porto and Suzhou focus on volume manufacturing of
components and the site at Johor focuses on the manufacturing of
DRAM modules.
Qimonda
Fab Cluster System
Qimonda has structured and organized its memory fabrication
facilities worldwide in its so-called
fab cluster. Through this organizational
approach, Qimonda seeks to use best processes to maximize
quality and consistency across facilities. This allows it to
ship many products from multiple sites, and therefore supply
products to anywhere in the world from multiple facilities. In
addition, by locating facilities in different areas, Qimonda can
also recruit talent globally. The fab cluster includes
Qimondas front-end facilities in Dresden and Richmond and
corresponding back-end sites in Porto and Johor, as well as its
back-end manufacturing joint venture Qimonda Suzhou and its
front-end foundry partner Winbond.
Qimonda Joint
Ventures and Partnerships
CSVC. Qimonda Technologies (Suzhou)
Co., Ltd. is Qimondas consolidated joint venture with
China-Singapore Suzhou Industrial Park Venture Co., Ltd.
(CSVC) in Suzhou, China, which has constructed a
back-end facility for the assembly and testing of Qimondas
products. The joint venture agreement was entered into in July
2003 and has an initial term of 50 years. It can generally
be terminated upon material breach by the other party, a
partys bankruptcy or insolvency and various other events
relating to a partys financial condition. The facility
officially opened in September 2004 and is scheduled to have
capacity of up to one billion chips per year. The facility will
be ramped in a number of stages as dictated by growth and trends
in the global semiconductor memory market. Qimonda is required
to
79
purchase the entire output of the facility. Infineon and Qimonda
have invested $241.5 million in the venture. Qimonda holds
72.5 percent of the outstanding capital stock of Qimonda
Suzhou, with CSVC owning the remaining 27.5 percent.
Qimonda has the option to acquire the remaining CSVC stake at
the nominal investment value plus accrued and unpaid return. The
joint venture intends to arrange external financing for any
further investment required to purchase additional equipment.
There can be no assurance that this external financing can be
obtained at favorable terms or at all.
SMIC. In December 2002, we entered into
a Product Purchase and Capacity Reservation Agreement, as most
recently amended in September 2008, with Semiconductor
Manufacturing International Corporation (SMIC), a
Chinese foundry. As amended, this agreement provides Qimonda
access to additional DRAM manufacturing capacity. Under the
terms of this agreement, SMIC agreed to manufacture, and Qimonda
agreed to purchase, up to 20,000 wafers per month at SMICs
200-millimeter manufacturing facility in Shanghai at least until
2007 and up to 15,000 wafers per month at SMICs
300-millimeter
manufacturing facility in Beijing at least until 2009. The
agreement remains in effect until December 31, 2010 but due
to unfavorable market conditions the capacity had been reduced
to zero wafer starts. Qimonda has the unilateral right to
terminate this agreement in the event that one of its
competitors acquires 50 percent of SMICs voting
shares. In addition, either party may terminate the agreement
upon material breach by the other party of any obligation under
this or the ancillary know-how transfer agreement or upon
bankruptcy or insolvency of the other party.
Winbond. In May 2002, we entered into a
Product Purchase and Capacity Reservation Agreement with
Winbond, a Taiwanese foundry. This agreement provides Qimonda
access to additional DRAM production capacity. Under the terms
of this agreement, Winbond agreed to manufacture, and Qimonda
agreed to purchase, up to 19,000 wafer starts per month from
Winbonds 200-millimeter production facility in Hsinchu,
Taiwan until 2007.
In August 2004, we entered into an extended Product Purchase and
Capacity Reservation Agreement, as amended in August 2006, with
Winbond. This agreement gives Qimonda access to additional DRAM
production capacity of up to 15,000 wafers per month in
Winbonds 300-millimeter manufacturing facility in Taiwan
until 2009. Qimonda has exceeded this level from time to time.
Under the terms of this agreement Qimonda agreed to provide its
80-nanometer DRAM trench technology to Winbonds
300-millimeter manufacturing facility and Winbond agreed to
manufacture DRAMs for computing applications using this
technology exclusively for Qimonda.
In June 2007, Qimonda signed agreements with Winbond, as amended
in April 2008, to expand its existing cooperation with Winbond
and its reservation of capacity at Winbonds facility for
up to 24,000 300-millimeter wafer starts per month. Under the
terms of the agreement, Qimonda will provide its
75-nanometer
DRAM trench technology and its 65-nanometer DRAM Buried Wordline
technology to Winbonds 300-millimeter manufacturing
facility. In return, Winbond will manufacture DRAMs for
computing applications using these technologies exclusively for
Qimonda.
Each agreement remains in effect until the last shipment of, and
payment for, products manufactured under the agreement unless it
is earlier terminated for breach.
Inotera. We entered into agreements
with Nanya relating to a strategic cooperation in the
development of DRAM products and assigned these agreements to
Qimonda. We also established a joint venture, Inotera Memories,
with Nanya.
On October 13, 2008, Qimonda announced that it had reached
an agreement to sell its stake in Inotera to Micron. The
transaction was completed on November 26, 2008. The
capacity available for Qimonda at Inotera will ramp down over an
eight month period following the close of the transaction. With
the close of the transaction, the joint development of
58-nanometer trench technology has also officially terminated.
80
Qimonda
Research and Development
Qimondas R&D activities are broadly divided into two
major steps. First, Qimonda develops a manufacturing process
technology and a design platform in conjunction with a
lead product. Subsequently, the rest of the product
portfolio is developed as follower products that
utilize the design platform established in the first step. The
goal of Qimondas technology development efforts is to
support its product designers to meet the customer requirements
for memory products regarding high performance, low power
consumption and small form factors (i.e., structure sizes) at a
competitive cost level.
In the area of memory process technology, Qimonda started
commercial production of DRAM products based on its new
65-nanometer Buried Wordline technology in Ocotober 2008.
Qimonda terminated the partnership with Nanya and engaged in a
new technology development partnership with Elpida for the
40-nanometer and 30-nanometer technology generations. This
strategic development alliance with Elpida allows Qimonda to
share development costs and resources. The development
activities with Elpida are currently on hold as both companies
focus on next generation 50-nanometer/46-nanometer development
activities. All of Qimondas memory technology development
takes place at its memory technology development center in
Dresden, Germany.
Qimondas product development activities focus on those
specialized and advanced memory products that it believes
provide more stable and higher selling prices than standard
DRAMs. Following Qimondas repositioning program, the
company intends to focus on a reduced number of product designs
going forward and specifically focus on products for
infrastructure and graphics applications where Qimonda already
has strong positions at its customers and is well known as
leading innovator in the industry. Qimonda defines its products
in close cooperation with lead customers and industry partners
and is actively driving new standards and participating in
standardization committees such as the Joint Electron Device
Engineering Council (JEDEC). Qimondas
worldwide operating Application Engineering team helps its
customers to design in Qimonda products into their systems.
Locations
Going forward, Qimonda intends to focus its R&D at three
major locations in Dresden and Munich, Germany and in
Xian, China. As part of its repositioning and
restructuring programs, Qimonda has been or is ramping down
development efforts at its design centers in Burlington, Vermont
and Raleigh, North Carolina as well as for Flash products in
Padua and Milan, Italy. The following table shows Qimondas
major research and development locations and their respective
areas of competence:
Principal Qimonda
Research and Development Locations
|
|
|
Location
|
|
Areas of Competence
|
|
Dresden, Germany
|
|
DRAM technology development
|
Munich, Germany
|
|
Computing and graphic DRAMs, emerging memory research
|
Xian, China
|
|
Infrastructure DRAMs
|
Qimonda
Strategic Alliances
In order to achieve and maintain technological leadership in the
DRAM market and to share
start-up
costs inherent in developing successive generations of memory
products, Qimonda has entered into a number of strategic
alliances over the years with selected partners for research and
development and manufacturing activities in relation to memory
products.
In November 2002, we entered into agreements with Nanya to
establish a strategic cooperation in the development of DRAM
products and to form Inotera, a joint venture to construct
and operate a
300-millimeter
manufacturing facility with two manufacturing modules in Taiwan.
Under the terms of the initial development agreement, we have
developed 90- and 75-nanometer DRAM technologies. In
81
September 2005, we entered into another agreement with Nanya for
the joint development of advanced 58-nanometer production
technologies for 300-millimeter wafers.
On October 13, 2008, Qimonda announced that it has reached
an agreement to sell its stake in Inotera to Micron. The
transaction was completed on November 26, 2008. The
capacity available for Qimonda at Inotera will ramp down over an
eight month period following the close of the transaction. With
the close of the transaction, the joint development of
58-nanometer trench technology has also officially terminated.
On June 11, 2008, Qimonda announced that it has signed and
agreement with Elpida to jointly develop DRAM technologies for
the 40-nanometer and 30-nanometer generations. Development will
be conducted at the technology R&D centers in Dresden,
Germany and Hiroshima, Japan. The development activities with
Elpida are currently on hold as both companies focus on next
generation 50-/46-nanometer development activities.
Acquisitions and
Dispositions
Reflecting our commitment to achieve profitability, we continued
to dispose of non-core assets in the 2008 fiscal year. In
addition, we also continued to strengthen our businesses through
selective acquisitions. The principal transactions completed in
the 2008 fiscal year were as follows:
Acquisition of
Mobility Products Business of LSI
On October 24, 2007, we completed the acquisition of the
mobility products business of LSI for cash consideration of
316 million ($450 million) plus transaction
costs and a contingent performance-based payment of up to
$50 million in order to further strengthen our activities
in the field of communications. The contingent performance-based
payment is based on the relevant revenues in the measurement
period following the completion of the transaction and ending
December 31, 2008. The mobility products business designs
semiconductors and software for cellular telephone handsets. The
business acquired consists mainly of mobile radio baseband
processors and platforms that complement our existing portfolio.
Sale of
40 percent of High Power Bipolar business
In September 2007, we entered into a joint venture agreement
with Siemens, pursuant to which we contributed all assets and
liabilities of our high power bipolar business (including
licenses, patents, and front-end and back-end production assets)
into a newly formed legal entity called Infineon Technologies
Bipolar GmbH & Co. KG (Bipolar) and
Siemens subsequently acquired a 40 percent interest in
Bipolar for 37 million. We and Siemens already had
ongoing technology cooperation, and this joint venture was a
logical next step in that partnership to secure our
international competitiveness in this area. The transaction
closed in the first quarter of the 2008 fiscal year.
Sale of Hard
Disk Drive (HDD) IC Business
In March 2008, we and LSI entered into an agreement pursuant to
which LSI acquired our HDD business. The HDD business designs,
manufactures and markets semiconductors for HDD devices. The
transaction closed in April 2008, with total proceeds of
60 million ($95 million) in cash.
Acquisition of
Primarion, Inc.
In April 2008, we acquired Primarion, Inc.
(Primarion) for cash consideration of
32 million ($50 million) plus a contingent
performance-based payment of up to $30 million. Primarion
designs, manufactures and markets digital power ICs for
computing, graphics and communication applications. The
companys power architecture addresses the need for
adaptive local intelligent control over power delivery to
optimize performance and minimize power consumption. Combining
power conversion and power management on a single chip
simplifies system design and reduces costs. With this
acquisition, we strive to broaden our product portfolio in the
area of digital power management ICs and to become a leader in
this fast growing market.
82
Sale of Bulk
Acoustic Wave (BAW) Filter Business
In June 2008, we entered into a definitive agreement with Avago
Technologies Ltd. (Avago) to sell our bulk acoustic
wave filter business (BAW) for approximately
21 million in cash. BAW develops bulk acoustic wave
filters for cellular duplexers and GPS applications. The
transaction closed in August 2008.
Employees
We employed a total of 29,119 employees as of
September 30, 2008 (excluding 12,224 Qimonda employees).
For a further description of our workforce by location and
function over the past three years, see Operating and
Financial Review Employees.
A significant percentage of our employees, especially in
Germany, are covered by collective bargaining agreements
determining remuneration, working hours and other conditions of
employment, and are represented by works councils. Works
councils are employee-elected bodies established at each
location in Germany and also at the parent company-wide level
(Infineon Technologies AG). Furthermore, works councils exist at
our subsidiaries in Austria and France (including ALTIS). In
Germany, works councils have extensive rights to notification
and of codetermination in personnel, social and economic
matters. Under the German Works Constitution Act
(Betriebsverfassungsgesetz), the works
councils must be notified in advance of any proposed employee
termination, they must confirm hirings and relocations and
similar matters, and they have a right to codetermine social
matters such as work schedules and rules of conduct. Management
considers its relations with the works councils to be good. The
members of the senior management of Infineon Technologies AG are
represented by a senior management committee
(Sprecherausschuss).
In October 2005, the relevant union organized a work stoppage in
connection with our plans to shut down our Munich-Perlach
facility. This work stoppage lasted one week and was ended
following an agreement to financially compensate those employees
whose contracts were not continued following the closing of this
manufacturing facility in March 2007. Other than this incident,
we have not experienced any labor disputes resulting in major
work stoppages in the last three fiscal years.
Within the scope of Infineons IFX10+ cost-reduction
program, adjusting Infineons manpower capacities has
proven to be inevitable. Approximately 10 percent of Infineon
Logics worldwide workforce is expected to be impacted by
IFX10+.
Since the primary objective is to avoid redundancies for
operational reasons, and as a first step towards improving
business results as quickly as possible, Infineon has offered a
limited-term, voluntary severance bonus based on a voluntary
severance agreement for German locations except Dresden. At the
same time, Infineon has entered into negotiations with the
central works council on a reconciliation of interests and a
social plan. Human resources measures resulting from these
agreements may include, for example, severance pay, partial
retirement arrangements, internal transfer, reductions of
temporary and other external staff.
Legal
Matters
Pending
Matters
We and Qimonda are the subject of a number of governmental
investigations and civil lawsuits which are described in detail
in note 34 to our consolidated financial statements,
included elsewhere in this annual report.
In addition, we are involved in a dispute with Dr. Ulrich
Schumacher, our former CEO. In March 2006, Dr. Schumacher
filed a lawsuit against us alleging that three statements made
by the Chairman of our Supervisory Board in the media were
incorrect and applying for a declaratory judgment that
Dr. Schumacher was entitled to damages. That lawsuit is
still pending.
83
Accruals and
the Potential Effect of these Lawsuits on Our
Business
Liabilities related to legal proceedings are recorded when it is
probable that a liability has been incurred and the associated
amount can be reasonably estimated. Where the estimated amount
of loss is within a range of amounts and no amount within the
range is a better estimate than any other amount, the minimum
amount is accrued. As of September 30, 2008, Infineon Logic
had accrued liabilities in the amount of 37 million
related to the DOJ and European antitrust investigations and the
direct and indirect purchaser litigation and settlements
described in note 34 to our consolidated financial
statements as well as for legal expenses for the DOJ related and
securities class action complaints. In addition, as of September
30, 2008, Qimonda had accrued 36 million in
connection with these matters. As additional information becomes
available, the potential liability related to these matters will
be reassessed and the estimates revised, if necessary. These
accrued liabilities would be subject to change in the future
based on new developments in each matter, or changes in
circumstances, which could have a material adverse effect on our
financial condition and results of operations.
An adverse final resolution of the antitrust investigations or
related civil claims or the securities class action lawsuits
described in note 34 to our consolidated financial
statements could result in significant financial liability to,
and other adverse effects on, us, which would have a material
adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition
and cash flows. In each of these matters we are continuously
evaluating the merits of the respective claims and defending
ourselves vigorously or seeking to arrive at alternative
resolutions in our best interest, as we deem appropriate.
Irrespective of the validity or the successful assertion of the
claims described above, we could incur significant costs with
respect to defending against or settling such claims, which
could have a material adverse effect on our results of
operations, financial condition and cash flows.
We are subject to various additional lawsuits, legal actions,
claims and proceedings related to products, patents and other
matters incidental to our businesses. We have accrued a
liability for the estimated costs of adjudication or settlement
of various asserted and unasserted claims existing as of the
balance sheet date. Based upon information presently known to
management, we do not believe that the ultimate resolution of
such other pending matters will have a material adverse effect
on our financial position, although the final resolution of such
matters could have a material adverse effect on our results of
operations or cash flows in the period of settlement.
Environmental
Protection and Sustainable Management
The Infineon Integrated Management Program for Environment,
Safety and Health (IMPRES) is a dynamic framework integrating
our safety, health, and environmental protection processes,
strategy, and objectives, using high standards globally. IMPRES
is certified according to OHSAS 18001 and EN ISO 14001. The
integration of both standards enables synergies throughout our
business. IMPRES is designed to minimize or eliminate the
possible impact of our manufacturing processes on the
environment, our employees and third parties.
Hazardous substances or materials are to a certain extent
necessary in the production of semiconductors. However, most of
our processes are carried out in closed loops and systems that
eliminate the impact of hazardous substances or materials on our
employees health and the environment. We regularly test
and monitor employees whose work may expose them to hazardous
substances or materials, in order to detect any potential health
risks and to take appropriate remedial measures by an early
diagnosis. As part of IMPRES, we train our employees in the
proper handling of hazardous substances. We have introduced a
harmonized process for risk assessment at the relevant sites.
Where we are not able to eliminate adverse environmental impact
entirely, we aim to minimize the impact. For example, we need to
utilize PFCs (perfluorinated compounds) as etching agents in the
production of semiconductors. As early as 1992, we started to
install exhaust air filter systems to reduce PFC emissions. We
are signatories to the Memorandum of Agreement, a voluntary
commitment by the European Semiconductor Industry which has the
goal of reducing overall PFC emissions by 2010 by approximately
10 percent from the emission level of 1995, calculated in
CO2
equivalents. We have signed
84
a similar commitment for Germany, with a normalized target of
8 percent emission reduction on the basis of
CO2
equivalents, which is on track. With our European sites we
achieved our European reduction target by the end of calendar
year 2007.
We believe that we are in substantial compliance with
environmental as well as health and safety laws and regulations.
There is, nevertheless, a risk that we may become the subject of
environmental, health or safety liabilities or litigation.
Environmental, health, and safety claims or the failure to
comply with current or future regulations could result in the
assessment of damages or imposition of fines against us,
suspension of production or a cessation of operations.
Significant financial reserves or additional compliance
expenditures could be required in the future due to changes in
law or new information regarding environmental conditions or
other events, and those expenditures could adversely affect our
business or financial condition.
National legislation enacted pursuant to European Commission
Directive 2002/96/EC creates significant obligations regarding
the collection, recovery and disposal of waste electrical and
electronic equipment. This directive obligates manufacturers to
finance the collection, recovery and disposal of such products
at the end of their life cycle. The end-of-life obligations may
affect us as suppliers to electrical and electronic equipment
producers and as producers of electronic equipment. Because the
directive is currently under revision, and because a number of
statutory definitions and interpretations remain unclear and are
still pending, the consequences for our company cannot currently
be determined in detail. As a result, we are not able at this
time to estimate the amount of additional costs that we may
incur in connection with this legislation.
Since July 1, 2006, another relevant European Commission
Directive, 2002/95/EC, has restricted the use of lead and other
hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment.
Because of this directive, ongoing compliance expenditures could
be required in the future. This directive is currently under
revision, which could result in additional adverse impacts on
our business.
A further European Directive, 2000/53/EC, restricts the use of
hazardous substances in vehicles. Because the directive has been
amended and further revision is foreseen, the impact for our
company cannot currently be determined in detail.
Directive 2005/32/EC on the eco-design of Energy-using Products
establishes ecologically sound development for electrical and
electronic devices. It also provides for the possibility that
manufacturers of components and sub-assemblies may be subject to
specific information requirements regarding environmentally
relevant product characteristics. Implementing measures and
possible market requirements are not yet fully defined. As a
result, we are not able at this time to estimate the amount of
additional costs that we may incur in connection with this
legislation.
A European Union regulatory framework, called REACH, dealing
with the registration, evaluation, authorization and restriction
of chemicals, became effective on June 1, 2007. Subsequent
obligations will become effective in stages over the next few
years. This regulation could have a considerable impact not only
on producers and importers of chemical substances, but also on
downstream users like the semiconductor industry. The
availability of chemical substances could be significantly
reduced in the European Union, which could have a negative
impact on our production as well as research and development
activities. We are in close contact with our suppliers and
consider ourselves prepared according to the current status of
REACH obligations. However, we cannot exclude the possibility of
significant future costs in connection with this regulation.
The European Commission is considering restrictions on the use
of PFOS (Perfluoroctanyle sulphonate) in the EU. PFOS is an
important constituent of key chemicals used in the semiconductor
industry. Any restriction affecting its use may adversely impact
our production and cost position.
The Chinese government restricts the use of lead and other
hazardous substances in electronic products. Because neither all
implementing measures nor the schedule of affected products are
in place, the consequences to us cannot currently be determined.
As a result, we are not able to estimate the impact, including
the additional costs, in connection with these regulations.
85
Similar regulations on substance bans are being established in
various countries of the world. We are not able at this time to
estimate the impact, including the amount of additional costs
that we may incur, in connection with these possible regulations.
Because the damage and loss caused by fire, natural hazards,
supply shortage, or other disturbance at a semiconductor
facility or within our supply chain at customers as
well as at suppliers can be severe, we have
constructed and operate our facilities in ways that minimize the
specific risks and that enable a quick response if such an event
should occur. We expect to continue to invest in prevention and
response measures at our facilities.
Because some of our facilities, including some of those of our
joint ventures, are located close to or shared with those of
other companies, we may need to respond to certain claims and
certain liabilities relating to environmental issues, such as
contamination, not entirely originating from our own operations.
Real
Estate
We own approximately 2.5 million square meters of land at
Cegled (Hungary), Dresden, Neubiberg, Regensburg and Warstein
(Germany), Essonnes (France), Horten (Norway) and Villach
(Austria). This includes approximately 1.2 million square
meters of land for Qimonda facilities at Dresden (Germany),
Porto (Portugal) and Richmond (Virginia, USA).
Furthermore, we own approximately 1,115,000 square meters
of building space at Batam (Indonesia), Cegled (Hungary),
Dresden, Regensburg and Warstein (Germany), Essonne (France),
Horton (Norway), Kulim and Malacca (Malaysia), Singapore
(Singapore), Villach (Austria) and Wuxi (PR China). This
includes approximately 398,000 square meters of building
space for Qimonda facilities at Dresden (Germany), Malacca and
Senai (Malaysia) Porto (Portugal), Richmond (Virginia, USA) and
Suzhou (PR China).
In addition, we have long-term rental and lease arrangements
covering approximately 1.2 million square meter of land at
Batam (Indonesia), Kulim and Malacca (Malaysia), Neubiberg and
Duisburg (Germany), Singapore (Singapore), Wuxi (PR China). This
includes approximately 0.3 million square meters of land
for Qimonda facilities at Malacca and Senai (Malaysia) and
Suzhou (PR China).
Furthermore we have long-term rental and lease arrangements
covering approximately 422,000 square meters of building
space in various locations in Asia Pacific, Europe and North
America. This includes 90,000 square meters of building
space for Qimonda facilities. We believe that these properties
are rented or leased on ordinary market terms and conditions.
86
MANAGEMENT
Supervisory Board
Members
The current members of our Supervisory Board, the Supervisory
Board position held by them, their occupation, their principal
external positions and their ages are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Membership of other Supervisory
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Boards and comparable governing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
bodies of domestic and foreign
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term
|
|
|
|
|
companies during the fiscal year ended
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
|
expires
|
|
|
Occupation
|
|
September 30, 2008
|
|
Max Dietrich Kley
Chairman
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Lawyer
|
|
Chairman of the Supervisory Board of:
SGL Carbon AG, Wiesbaden
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Member of the Supervisory Board of:
BASF SE, Ludwigshafen
HeidelbergCement AG, Heidelberg
Schott AG, Mainz
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Member of the Board of Directors of:
UniCredit S.p.A., Milan, Italy
|
Gerd
Schmidt(1)
Deputy Chairman
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Chairman of the Infineon Central Works Council
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chairman of the Infineon Works Council, Regensburg
|
|
|
Wigand
Cramer(1)
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Labor union clerk IG Metall, Berlin
|
|
|
Alfred
Eibl(1)
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Chairman of the Infineon Works Council, Munich-Campeon
|
|
|
Prof. Johannes
Feldmayer(2)
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Management Consultant
|
|
|
Jakob
Hauser(1)
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Chairman of the Works Council, Qimonda AG, Munich
|
|
|
Gerhard
Hobbach(1)
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Deputy Chairman of the Infineon Works Council, Munich-Campeon
|
|
|
Prof. Dr. Renate Köcher
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Managing Director of Institut für Demoskopie Allensbach
GmbH, Allensbach
|
|
Member of the Supervisory Board of:
Allianz SE, Munich
BASF SE, Ludwigshafen (until January 14, 2008)
MAN AG, Munich
BMW AG, Munich (since May 8, 2008)
|
Dr. Siegfried Luther
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Managing Director of Reinhard Mohn Verwaltungs GmbH,
Gütersloh
|
|
Member of the Supervisory Board of:
WestLB AG, Duesseldorf/Muenster
Wintershall Holding AG, Kassel
EVONIK Industries AG, Essen
(since December 3, 2007)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chairman of the Board of Administration of:
RTL Group S.A., Luxembourg
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Member of the Board of Administration of:
Compagnie Nationale à
Portefeuille S.A., Loverval, Belgium
|
Michael
Ruth(1)
Representative of Senior Management
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Corporate Vice President Reporting and Planning, Infineon
Technologies AG
|
|
|
Prof. Dr. rer. nat. Doris
Schmitt-Landsiedel
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Professor at the Munich Technical University, Munich
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Membership of other Supervisory
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Boards and comparable governing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
bodies of domestic and foreign
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term
|
|
|
|
|
companies during the fiscal year ended
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
|
expires
|
|
|
Occupation
|
|
September 30, 2008
|
|
Kerstin
Schulzendorf(1)
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Member of the Works Council, Infineon-Dresden
|
|
|
Dr. Eckart Sünner
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
President Legal, Taxes & Insurance BASF SE, Ludwigshafen
(until December 31, 2007)
|
|
Member of the Supervisory Board of:
K+S AG, Kassel
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
President, Chief Compliance Officer BASF SE, Ludwigshafen
(since January 1, 2008)
|
|
|
Alexander
Trüby(1)
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Member of the Works Council Infineon Dresden
|
|
|
Prof. Dr. rer. nat. Martin Winterkorn
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Chairman of the Management Board
Volkswagen AG, Wolfsburg
|
|
Chairman of the Supervisory Board of: Audi AG, Ingolstadt Member of the Supervisory Board of: Salzgitter AG, Salzgitter FC Bayern München AG, Munich TÜV Süddeutschland Holding AG, Munich
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Member of the Board of Administration of:
SEAT S.A., Barcelona, Spain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chairman of the Board of Directors of:
Scania AB, Södertälje, Sweden
(since May 3, 2007)
|
Prof. Dr.-Ing. Dr.-Ing. E.h. Klaus Wucherer
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Member of the Corporate Executive Committee (until December
31, 2007)
Management Consultant (since January 1, 2008) Siemens
AG, Munich
|
|
Member of the Supervisory Board of: Deutsche Messe AG, Hanover BSH Bosch und Siemens Hausgeräte GmbH, Munich (until April 30, 2008) Leoni AG, Nuremberg SAP AG, Walldorf Chairman of the Board of Administration of: Siemens Ltd., Beijing, Peoples Republic of China (until May 19, 2008) Siemens S.A., Lisbon, Portugal (until April 28, 2008) Siemens Ltd., Mumbai, India (until March 31, 2008) Siemens Ltd., Seoul, Korea (since May 1, 2007)
|
|
|
(1)
|
Employee representative.
|
|
(2)
|
Prof. Johannes Feldmayer was recently convicted by a state court
in Germany for breach of confidence and tax evasion for actions
taken while he was an executive of Siemens AG.
|
88
The Supervisory Board maintains the following principal
committees:
|
|
|
Committee
|
|
Members
|
|
Executive Committee
|
|
Max Dietrich Kley
Gerd Schmidt
Prof. Dr. rer. nat. Martin Winterkorn
|
Investment, Finance and Audit Committee
|
|
Max Dietrich Kley
Dr. Siegfried Luther
Gerd Schmidt
|
Mediation Committee
|
|
Max Dietrich Kley
Gerd Schmidt
Alexander Trüby
Prof. Dr. rer. nat. Martin Winterkorn
|
Nomination Committee
|
|
Max Dietrich Kley
Prof. Johannes Feldmayer
Prof. Dr. Renate Köcher
Dr. Siegfried Luther
Prof. Dr. rer. nat. Doris Schmitt-Landsiedel
Dr. Eckart Sünner
Prof. Dr. rer. nat. Martin Winterkorn
Prof. Dr.-Ing. Dr.-Ing. E.h. Klaus Wucherer
|
Strategy and Technology Committee
|
|
Alfred Eibl
Jakob Hauser
Alexander Trüby
Prof. Dr. rer. nat. Doris Schmitt-Landsiedel
Prof. Dr. rer. nat. Martin Winterkorn
Prof. Dr.-Ing. Dr.-Ing. E.h. Klaus Wucherer
|
Qimonda Committee
|
|
Alfred Eibl
Prof. Johannes Feldmayer
Dr. Siegfried Luther
Gerd Schmidt
|
The members of our Supervisory Board, individually or in the
aggregate, do not own, directly or indirectly, more than
1 percent of our companys outstanding share capital.
The business address of each of the members of our Supervisory
Board is Infineon Technologies AG, Am Campeon 1-12, D-85579
Neubiberg, Germany.
89
Management Board
Members
The current members of our Management Board, their positions and
their ages are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Memberships of Supervisory Boards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and comparable governing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
bodies of domestic and foreign
|
|
|
|
|
Term
|
|
|
|
companies during the fiscal year
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
expires
|
|
Position
|
|
ended September 30, 2008
|
|
Peter Bauer
|
|
48
|
|
September 30, 2011
|
|
Spokesman of the Management Board, Chief Executive Officer
(since June 1, 2008)
|
|
Member of the Board of Directors of:
Infineon Technologies China Co., Ltd.,
Shanghai, Peoples Republic of China
(since June 1,
2008)
Infineon Technologies Asia Pacific Pte.,
Ltd., Singapore (since June 1,
2008)
Infineon Technologies North America Corp.,
Wilmington, Delaware, USA (since June
1, 2008)
Infineon Technologies Japan K.K., Tokyo, Japan
(since June 12, 2008)
|
Prof. Dr. Hermann Eul
|
|
49
|
|
August 31, 2012
|
|
Member of the Management Board and Executive Vice President
|
|
Member of the Supervisory Board of:
7 Layers AG, Ratingen
|
Dr. Reinhard Ploss
|
|
52
|
|
May 31, 2012
|
|
Member of the Management Board and Executive Vice President
|
|
Chairman of the Supervisory Board of: Infineon Technologies Austria AG, Villach, Austria
Member of the Board of Directors of: Infineon Technologies (Kulim) Sdn. Bhd., Kulim, Malaysia
Member of the Supervisory Board of: Qimonda AG, Munich (since August 19, 2008)
|
Dr. Marco Schröter (since April 1, 2008)
|
|
45
|
|
March 31, 2013
|
|
Member of the Management Board, Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
|
|
Member of the Supervisory Board of:
Infineon Technologies Austria AG, Villach, Austria
(since May 5, 2008)
Member of the Board of Directors of (each since
April 1, 2008):
Infineon Technologies Asia Pacific Pte.,
Ltd., Singapore
Infineon Technologies China Co., Ltd., Shanghai,
Peoples Republic of China
Infineon Technologies North America
Corp., Wilmington, Delaware, USA
|
Resigned Members of the Management Board
|
Dr. Wolfgang Ziebart (resigned as of May 31,
2008)
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
Chairman of the Management Board, President and Chief Executive
Officer
|
|
Member of the Board of Directors of (each until May 31,
2008):
Infineon Technologies China Co., Ltd.,
Shanghai, Peoples Republic of
China
Infineon Technologies Asia Pacific Pte.,
Ltd., Singapore
Infineon Technologies Japan K.K., Tokyo, Japan
Infineon Technologies North America
Corp., Wilmington, Delaware, USA
|
90
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Memberships of Supervisory Boards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and comparable governing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
bodies of domestic and foreign
|
|
|
|
|
Term
|
|
|
|
companies during the fiscal year
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
expires
|
|
Position
|
|
ended September 30, 2008
|
|
Peter J. Fischl (retired as of March 31, 2008)
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
Member of the Management Board, Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
|
|
Chairman of the Supervisory Board of:
Qimonda AG, Munich
Infineon Technologies Austria AG, Villach,
Austria (since December 5, 2007 until
March 31,
2008)
Member of the Board of Directors of (each until March 31,
2008):
Infineon Technologies Asia Pacific Pte., Ltd.,
Singapore
Infineon Technologies China Co., Ltd.,
Shanghai, Peoples Republic of China
Infineon Technologies North America Corp.,
Wilmington, Delaware, USA
|
Peter Bauer was appointed our Chief Executive Officer
effective June 1, 2008. From 2005 to 2008, Mr. Bauer
served as head of our Automotive, Industrial &
Multimarket Business Group and was responsible for the Central
Sales Functions. From the formation of Infineon Technologies AG
in 1999 until 2005, he served as our Executive Vice President
and Chief Sales and Marketing Officer. He was President and
Chief Executive Officer of Siemens Microelectronics, Inc. from
1998 to April 1999. From 1997 to 1999, Mr. Bauer was
President of Sales and Solution Centers for the Siemens
Semiconductor Group. He began his career with the Siemens
Semiconductor Group in 1986 as a development engineer.
Mr. Bauer holds a degree in electrical engineering from the
Munich Technical University.
Dr. Marco Schröter was appointed as a Member of
the Management Board and Chief Financial Officer effective
April 1, 2008. He was previously Chief Financial Officer at
Schenker AG, Essen, where he was responsible for accounting,
finance, controlling, risk management and purchasing. From 1994
to 2002, he held several positions, including Head of Central
Controlling, at Stinnes AG, Mühlheim.
Dr. Schröter holds a degree in business administration
and received his Ph.D. from Saarland University in 1994.
Prof. Dr. Hermann Eul was appointed Deputy Executive
Vice President of our Management Board as of August 2005 and
subsequently Executive Vice President as of December 1,
2006. Until 1999 he was General Manager of the Digital TeleCom
and Data Com ICs operations at Siemens. When Infineon was
formed, he took over the Wireless Baseband and Systems Business
Group as Vice President and General Manager. From 2001 to 2002
he was responsible for Security & Chip Card ICs
operations as Chief Executive Officer. In 2003 he was appointed
as full Professor and Faculty Chair for RF-Technology and
Radio-Systems at Hanover University. In 2004 he returned to
Infineon where he first co-managed the Wireline Communications
segment as Senior Vice President and then, following a
reorganization, became Executive Vice President and General
Manager of the Communication Solutions segment. Professor Eul
studied electrical engineering and has a doctorate in
engineering.
Dr. Reinhard Ploss was appointed Executive Vice
President and Head of Operations effective June 1, 2007.
Dr. Ploss joined Siemens in 1986 as a process engineer. In
1996 he took over the Power Semiconductor business unit,
focusing on development and manufacturing. In 1999, he was
appointed President of eupec GmbH Co. KG. In 2000,
Dr. Ploss became head of the Automotive &
Industrial segment, which at the time consisted of power
semiconductors, electric drives, automotive applications and the
microcontroller business unit. In 2005, he assumed
responsibility for manufacturing, development and operational
management in the Automotive, Industrial & Multimarket
segment.
The members of our Management Board, individually or in the
aggregate, do not own, directly or indirectly, more than
1 percent of our companys outstanding share capital.
The business address of each of the members of our Management
Board is Infineon Technologies AG, Am Campeon 1-12, D-85579
Neubiberg, Germany.
91
Overview of
Corporate Governance Structure
In accordance with the German Stock Corporation Act
(Aktiengesetz), our company has a Supervisory Board and a
Management Board. The two boards are separate and no individual
may simultaneously exercise functions or serve as a member of
both boards. The Management Board is responsible for managing
our business in accordance with applicable laws, our Articles of
Association and the rules of procedure of the Management Board.
It represents us in our dealings with third parties. The
Supervisory Board appoints and removes the members of the
Management Board and oversees the management of our company but
is not permitted to make management decisions.
In carrying out their duties, members of both the Management
Board and Supervisory Board must exercise the standard of care
of a prudent and diligent businessman, and they are liable to us
for damages if they fail to do so. Both boards are required to
take into account a broad range of considerations in their
decisions, including the interests of our company and its
shareholders, employees and creditors. The Management Board is
required to respect the shareholders rights to equal
treatment and equal information.
The Supervisory Board has comprehensive monitoring functions. To
ensure that these functions are carried out properly, the
Management Board must, among other things, regularly report to
the Supervisory Board with regard to current business operations
and future business planning. The Supervisory Board is also
entitled to request special reports at any time. The Management
Board is required to ensure appropriate risk management within
our company and must establish an internal monitoring system.
As a general rule under German law, a shareholder has no direct
recourse against the members of the Management Board or the
Supervisory Board in the event that they are believed to have
breached a duty to our company. Apart from insolvency or other
special circumstances, only our company has the right to claim
damages from members of either board. We may waive these damages
or settle these claims only if at least three years have passed
and if the shareholders approve the waiver or settlement at the
shareholders general meeting with a simple majority,
provided that opposing shareholders do not hold, in the
aggregate, one-tenth or more of the share capital of our company
and do not have their opposition formally noted in the minutes
maintained by a German notary.
Supervisory
Board
Our Supervisory Board consists of 16 members. The shareholders,
by a majority of the votes cast in a general meeting, elect
eight members and the employees elect the remaining eight
members. Among the eight employee representatives on the
Supervisory Board is one member from the ranks of the executive
employees (Leitende Angestellte), five members are from
the ranks of the employees (excluding executive employees) and
two representatives are of the trade unions represented in the
Infineon group in Germany. According to German law, the
shareholders may determine the term of each shareholder-elected
member of the Supervisory Board. The maximum term of office of
shareholder-elected Supervisory Board members expires at the end
of shareholders general meeting in which the shareholders
discharge the Supervisory Board members for the fourth fiscal
year after the start of their term as a Supervisory Board
member. The fiscal year in which the term of office begins is
not included in this calculation. Seven shareholder
representatives on the Supervisory Board were elected at the
general shareholders meeting held on January 25,
2005, one was elected at the general shareholders meeting
held on February 16, 2006. The term of all shareholder
representatives ends with the annual general meeting to be held
in 2010. Seven of the employee representatives on the
Supervisory Board took office on January 20, 2004, one
trade union representative was appointed by the lower district
court of Munich on April 20, 2006. The term of all employee
representatives ends with the annual general meeting to be held
in 2009.
The shareholders may remove any member of the Supervisory Board
they have elected at a general meeting. The employee
representatives may be removed by those employees that elected
them by a vote of three-quarters of the votes cast. The
Supervisory Board elects a chairman and a deputy chairman from
among its members. If no candidate is elected by a vote of
two-thirds of the members of the Supervisory Board, the
shareholder representatives elect the chairman and the employee
representatives elect a
92
deputy chairman. The Supervisory Board normally acts by simple
majority vote, with the chairman having a deciding vote in the
event of a deadlock in a second vote on the same matter.
The Supervisory Board meets at least once a quarter. Its main
functions are:
|
|
|
|
|
to monitor our management;
|
|
|
|
to appoint our Management Board;
|
|
|
|
to approve decisions of our Management Board in relation to the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
financial and investment planning, including both budgets and
the establishment of limits for financial indebtedness;
|
|
|
|
any investment or disposition that exceeds 10 percent of
our total investment budget; and
|
|
|
|
the taking of any financial risk vis-à-vis third parties in
an amount exceeding 5 percent of our share capital.
|
|
|
|
|
|
to approve matters in areas that the Supervisory Board has made
generally subject to its approval; and
|
|
|
|
to approve matters that the Supervisory Board decides on a
case-by-case
basis to make subject to its approval.
|
Our Supervisory Board has established an Investment, Finance and
Audit Committee, comprising the chairman of the Supervisory
Board and two other members of the Supervisory Board, one of
whom is elected from the shareholder representatives and the
other from the employee representatives on the Supervisory
Board. The Investment, Finance and Audit Committee carries out
the functions normally carried out by the audit committee of a
U.S. company including, among other duties:
|
|
|
|
|
preparing the decisions of the Supervisory Board regarding
approval of our companys annual financial statements,
including review of the financial statements, our annual
reports, the proposed application of earnings and the reports of
our auditors;
|
|
|
|
reviewing the interim financial statements of our company that
are made public or otherwise filed with any securities
regulatory authority;
|
|
|
|
issuing to our auditors terms of reference for their audit of
our annual financial statements;
|
|
|
|
examining our compliance, internal control, internal audit and
risk management systems; and
|
|
|
|
approving decisions of our Management Board or a committee
thereof regarding increases of our companys capital
through the issuance of new shares out of authorized or
conditional capital, to the extent they are not issued to
employees as part of a share option plan.
|
The Investment, Finance and Audit Committee also supports the
Supervisory Board in its duty of supervising our business and
may exercise the oversight powers conferred upon the Supervisory
Board by German law for this purpose. Decisions of the
Investment, Finance and Audit Committee require a simple
majority.
We entered into a consulting agreement with Prof. Johannes
Feldmayer, a member of our Supervisory Board, with a term from
March 4 to September 1, 2008. The Supervisory Board
approved this agreement. Under the consulting agreement, Prof.
Feldmayer provided advice and support to the Management Board
with regard to the development of its strategy for reducing its
interest in Qimonda, as well as its growth strategy for the AIM
segment. In addition to the compensation for his membership on
the Supervisory Board, Prof. Feldmayer received compensation in
the total amount of EUR 62,500.00 for his services under
this consulting agreement.
Neither we nor any of our subsidiaries have entered into special
service contracts with the members of the Supervisory Board that
provide for benefits during or upon termination of their board
membership other than as described under
Compensation.
93
Management
Board
Our Management Board currently consists of four members. Under
our Articles of Association, our Supervisory Board determines
the Management Boards size, although it must have at least
two members.
Under our Articles of Association and German law, the Management
Board adopts rules of procedure for the conduct of its affairs,
and may amend them at any time. The adoption and amendment of
these rules require the unanimous vote of the Management Board
and the consent of the Supervisory Board. The Supervisory Board
may, however, decide to adopt rules of procedure for the
Management Board instead.
Our Management Board has adopted rules of procedure. Our
Supervisory Board approved these rules and resolved that the
following decisions of the Management Board require the consent
of the Supervisory Board:
|
|
|
|
|
Decisions relating to financial and investment planning,
including both budgets and the establishment of limits for
financial indebtedness;
|
|
|
|
Decisions relating to any investment or disposition that exceeds
10 percent of our total investment budget; and
|
|
|
|
Decisions relating to the taking of any financial risk
vis-à-vis third parties in an amount exceeding
5 percent of our share capital.
|
In addition, the rules of procedure provide that the chairman of
the Management Board must notify the chairman of the Supervisory
Board of any pending matter that is significant. The Supervisory
Board may, on a
case-by-case
basis, designate such matter as one requiring Supervisory Board
approval.
The Management Board members are jointly responsible for all
management matters and pursuant to the current rules of
procedure must jointly decide on a number of issues, including:
|
|
|
|
|
the annual financial statements;
|
|
|
|
the calling of the shareholders general meeting;
|
|
|
|
matters for which the consent of the shareholders general
meeting or of the Supervisory Board must be obtained; and
|
|
|
|
matters involving basic organizational, business policy and
investment and financial planning questions for our company.
|
The rules of procedure provide that decisions of the Management
Board require simple majority, unless statutory law, the
Articles of Association of our company or the rules of procedure
require otherwise.
The chairman of the Management Board must propose a plan that
allocates responsibilities among the Management Board members
and must obtain the consent of the Supervisory Board without
delay once the Management Board has adopted the plan. This
consent has been obtained.
The Supervisory Board appoints the members of the Management
Board for a maximum term of five years. Members of the
Management Board may be reappointed or have their term extended
for one or more terms of up to five years each. The Supervisory
Board may remove a member of the Management Board prior to
expiration of such members term for good cause, for
example, in the case of a serious breach of duty or a bona fide
vote of no confidence by the shareholders general meeting.
A member of the Management Board may not deal with, or vote on,
matters that relate to proposals, arrangements or contracts
between such member and our company.
94
Significant
Differences between our Corporate Governance Practices and those
of U.S. Companies Listed on the New York Stock
Exchange
A brief, general summary of the significant differences between
our corporate governance practices under German law and the
practices applicable to U.S. companies listed on the New
York Stock Exchange is available in the corporate governance
section of our website, www.infineon.com.
Compensation
In compliance with legal requirements and the recommendations of
the German Corporate Governance Code as amended on June 6,
2008, this report provides information on the principles for
determining the compensation of the Management Board and
Supervisory Board of Infineon Technologies AG and the amount of
compensation paid to the individual members of the Management
Board and Supervisory Board.
Compensation
of the Management Board
Compensation
structure
The Executive Committee of the Supervisory Board, which includes
the chairman of the Supervisory Board Max Dietrich Kley, the
deputy chairman of the board Gerd Schmidt, and board member
Prof. Dr. Martin Winterkorn, is responsible for determining
the compensation of the Management Board. The compensation of
the members of the Management Board is intended to reflect the
Companys size and global presence, its economic condition
and performance, and the level and structure of the compensation
paid to management boards of comparable companies within Germany
and abroad. Additional factors taken into account are the
duties, responsibilities and contributions of each member of the
Management Board. Their compensation complies with the
stipulations of Section 87 of the German Stock Corporation
Act and is calculated to be competitive both nationally and
internationally and thus to provide an incentive for dedicated
and successful work within a dynamic environment. The level of
compensation is reevaluated every two years, taking into account
an analysis of the income paid to executives of comparable
companies.
The compensation of the Management Board comprises the following
elements:
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed annual base salary. The
non-performance-related annual base salary is contractually
fixed. It is partly paid in 12 equal monthly installments, and
partly paid as a lump sum at the end of each fiscal year
(referred to below as the Annual Lump Sum).
|
|
|
|
Performance-related compensation. The
annual bonus is dependent on the return on assets, which we
define as earnings before interest and taxes (EBIT) adjusted for
exceptional effects, in proportion to capital employed. This
ensures that a bonus is earned only if the business develops
positively. The annual bonus is determined by the Executive
Committee in a two-phase process. In a first step, a target
bonus amount is determined from a table agreed in the service
agreements on the basis of the return on assets. The Executive
Committee subsequently evaluates the personal performance of
each individual board member over the past fiscal year, and then
determines the actual bonus amount. In addition to the bonus
dependent on the return on assets, Management Board contracts
provide for a possible special bonus awarded in recognition of
special business achievements.
|
|
|
|
Infineon Technologies AG stock
options. Management Board members are
eligible to receive stock options under the 2006 Stock Option
Plan approved by the Infineon Technologies AG Shareholders
Annual General Meeting on February 16, 2006, as a variable
compensation element with a long-term incentive effect and a
risk character. Each stock option guarantees the right to
acquire one share at a fixed exercise price. The options are
valid for six years and may be exercised only after an initial
waiting period of three years and not during specified black-out
periods. The exercise price at which a share may be acquired
upon exercise of an option is equal to 120 percent of the
average Infineon opening prices on the Frankfurt Stock Exchange
in the XETRA
|
95
|
|
|
|
|
trading system over the five trading days preceding the date
that the option is granted. The exercise of the options is
dependent on the attainment of absolute and relative performance
targets. The precondition for the exercise of the option rights
is that the Infineon share price on the Frankfurt Stock Exchange
in the XETRA trading system equals or exceeds the exercise price
on at least one trading day during the option life. Furthermore,
the options can only be exercised if the Infineon share price
exceeds the performance of the comparative index Philadelphia
Semiconductor Index for three consecutive days on at least one
occasion during the life of the option. These absolute and
relative performance targets serve to ensure that the options
are only exercised if the value of the Company significantly
increases. The Supervisory Board is responsible for all
decisions on granting options to members of the Management
Board. In the 2008 fiscal year, no options were granted to
members of the Management Board. The main provisions of our 2006
stock option plan are described in note 27 to our
consolidated financial statements for the year ended
September 30, 2008, and are available in full text on the
Internet at www.infineon.com.
|
Compensation
of the Management Board in the 2008 fiscal year
In the 2008 fiscal year, the active members of the Management
Board received total compensation of 4,920,006. No
performance-related bonuses were paid for the 2008 fiscal year.
The individual members of the Management Board who were active
in the 2008 fiscal year received the following annual
compensation (gross without statutory
deductions)(1):
Overview of
the total compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
Stock-based
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
compensation
|
|
compensation
|
|
compensation
|
Management Board member
|
|
Fiscal year
|
|
in
|
|
in
|
|
in
(2)
|
|
Peter Bauer (CEO)
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
1,089,614
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,089,614
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
920,146
|
|
|
|
203,000
|
|
|
|
1,123,146
|
|
Prof. Dr. Hermann Eul
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
914,457
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
914,457
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
729,815
|
|
|
|
203,000
|
|
|
|
932,815
|
|
Peter J. Fischl
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
515,933
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
515,933
|
|
(until March 31, 2008)
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
1,027,130
|
|
|
|
304,500
|
|
|
|
1,331,630
|
|
Dr. Reinhard Ploss
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
720,859
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
720,859
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
235,659
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
235,659
|
|
Dr. Marco Schröter
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
584,757
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
584,757
|
|
(as of April 1, 2008)
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dr. Wolfgang Ziebart
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
1,094,386
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,094,386
|
|
(until May 31, 2008)
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
1,636,828
|
|
|
|
406,000
|
|
|
|
2,042,828
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
4,920,006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,920,006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
4,549,578
|
|
|
|
1,116,500
|
|
|
|
5,666,078
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Each in accordance with the duration of membership on the
Management Board during the respective fiscal year.
|
|
(2)
|
This amount includes the fair value of the stock options granted
in the respective fiscal year.
|
96
Cash
compensation
The cash compensation listed in the overview above comprises the
following elements (in ):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-performance-related compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual Base
Salary(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount paid in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
monthly
|
|
Annual lump
|
|
|
|
Total cash
|
Management Board member
|
|
Fiscal year
|
|
installments
|
|
sum
|
|
Other(2)
|
|
compensation
|
|
Peter Bauer (CEO)
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
533,333
|
|
|
|
533,333
|
|
|
|
22,948
|
|
|
|
1,089,614
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
367,500
|
|
|
|
532,500
|
|
|
|
20,146
|
|
|
|
920,146
|
|
Prof. Dr. Hermann Eul
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
450,000
|
|
|
|
450,000
|
|
|
|
14,457
|
|
|
|
914,457
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
358,333
|
|
|
|
358,333
|
|
|
|
13,149
|
|
|
|
729,815
|
|
Peter J. Fischl
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
300,000
|
|
|
|
15,933
|
|
|
|
515,933
|
|
(until March 31, 2008)
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
400,000
|
|
|
|
600,000
|
|
|
|
27,130
|
|
|
|
1,027,130
|
|
Dr. Reinhard Ploss
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
350,000
|
|
|
|
350,000
|
|
|
|
20,859
|
|
|
|
720,859
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
116,667
|
|
|
|
116,667
|
|
|
|
2,325
|
|
|
|
235,659
|
|
Dr. Marco Schröter
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
|
|
84,757
|
|
|
|
584,757
|
|
(as of April 1, 2008)
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dr. Wolfgang Ziebart
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
533,333
|
|
|
|
533,333
|
|
|
|
27,720
|
|
|
|
1,094,386
|
|
(until May 31, 2008)
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
800,000
|
|
|
|
800,000
|
|
|
|
36,828
|
|
|
|
1,636,828
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
2,316,666
|
|
|
|
2,416,666
|
|
|
|
186,674
|
|
|
|
4,920,006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2,042,500
|
|
|
|
2,407,500
|
|
|
|
99,578
|
|
|
|
4,549,578
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Each in accordance with the duration of membership on the
Management Board during the respective fiscal year.
|
|
(2)
|
The compensation included under Other comprises
primarily the monetary value of the provision of a company car
and insurance contributions, and, in the case of
Dr. Schröter, the reimbursement of expenses for the
maintenance of double residence.
|
Stock-based
compensation
In the 2008 fiscal year, no stock options were granted to
members of the Management Board (in the previous year, 550,000
stock options with a fair value at the grant date totaling
1,116,500 were granted to the members of the Management
Board). In the 2008 fiscal year, no member of the Management
Board exercised stock options.
Commitments to
the Management Board upon termination of
employment
Allowances and
pension entitlements in the 2008 fiscal year
The pension agreement with Dr. Wolfgang Ziebart provided
for a monthly pension payment equal to 70 percent of his
last monthly base salary. The other members of the Management
Board are contractually entitled to a fixed pension payment,
which increases by 5,000 (and in the case of
Mr. Bauer by 10,000) annually until a maximum amount
is attained. In accordance with U.S. GAAP, a total of
3,137,082 was added to pension reserves in the 2008 fiscal
year (previous year: 3,146,830). Upon termination of
membership in the Management Board, pension entitlements
normally begin from age 60 at the earliest. Exceptions are
provided for in cases such as departures from the board for
health reasons and surviving dependents pensions. Our
agreements with Dr. Ziebart and Mr. Bauer deviate from
this model, and each is entitled to a pension before age 60
if his contract is not renewed (the monthly pension of
Dr. Ziebart will commence as of September 1, 2009),
provided that there is no good cause for a revocation of the
appointment in accordance with section 84, paragraph 3
of the German Stock Corporation Act. In such a case, however,
his income from other employment and self-employed activities
would be set off against up to one half of his pension
entitlements.
97
The following overview represents the annual pension
entitlements, as of the beginning of retirement, for Management
Board members active in the 2008 fiscal year, on the basis of
the entitlements vested through September 30, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
entitlements
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfer to pension
|
|
|
|
(annual) as of
|
|
|
|
|
|
reserves in
|
|
|
|
beginning of
|
|
|
Maximum
|
|
|
fiscal year 2008
|
|
Management Board member
|
|
pension period in
|
|
|
amount in
|
|
|
(US-GAAP) in
|
|
|
Peter Bauer (CEO)
|
|
|
280,000
|
(1)
|
|
|
400,000
|
|
|
|
226,778
|
|
Prof. Dr. Hermann Eul
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
270,000
|
|
|
|
175,369
|
|
Peter J. Fischl
|
|
|
350,000
|
|
|
|
350,000
|
|
|
|
475,576
|
|
Dr. Reinhard Ploss
|
|
|
170,000
|
|
|
|
210,000
|
|
|
|
169,488
|
|
Dr. Marco Schröter
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
|
|
350,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dr. Wolfgang Ziebart
|
|
|
560,000
|
|
|
|
560,000
|
|
|
|
2,089,871
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1,810,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,137,082
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Mr. Bauers pension entitlement was increased
effective October 1, 2008 to 280,000.
|
The contracts of Dr. Ziebart and Mr. Bauer,
furthermore, allow for a one-time transitional allowance upon
termination of employment. This transitional allowance is
equivalent to one years income, composed of the last 12
basic monthly installments, and a sum amounting to the average
of the bonus sums received over the last three fiscal years
prior to termination. There is no right to the payment of a
transitional allowance in the event of termination by a member
of the Management Board not prompted by the company, and if the
company has good cause for the termination. Accordingly,
Dr. Ziebart is entitled to a one-time transitional
allowance, which is payable on August 31, 2009.
Early
termination of employment
The contracts with the members of our Management Board include
change-of-control clauses: A change-of-control within the
meaning of this clause occurs when a third party, individually
or in cooperation with another party, holds 30 percent of
voting rights in Infineon Technologies AG as stipulated by
section 30 of the German Securities Acquisition and
Takeover Act (Wertpapiererwerbs- und
Übernahmegesetz). In case of such a change-of-control,
the Management Board members have the right to resign and
terminate their contracts within a period of 12 months
after the announcement of a change of control if the exercise of
their office and the fulfillment of their service contract
become unacceptable, due, for example, to considerable
restrictions in their areas of responsibility. In such an event,
board members are entitled to a continuation of their annual
target income for the full remaining duration of their contracts
and a minimum of two years. This amount is based on the annual
target income for the year of termination and the variable
components assuming a return on assets of 6 percent. In the
event of a termination of the contract by Infineon Technologies
AG within 12 months after the announcement of a change of
control, the members of the Management Board are entitled to a
continuation of their annual target income for the full
remaining duration of their contracts and a minimum of three
years. The Management Board members pension entitlements
remain unaffected. These rights in the event of a change of
control, however, only exist if there is no serious breach of
duty.
Management Board contracts do not generally provide for
severance payments in the event of an early termination of
contract.
Fringe
benefits and other awards in the 2008 fiscal year
|
|
|
|
|
The members of the Management Board received no fringe benefits
besides the elements listed under Other in the
compensation table.
|
|
|
|
We do not provide loans to the members of the Management Board.
|
98
|
|
|
|
|
The members of the Management Board received no compensation or
promise of compensation with regard to their activities on the
Management Board from third parties in the 2008 fiscal year.
|
|
|
|
We maintain directors and officers group liability
insurance (D&O insurance). The insurance policy covers the
personal liability risk in the event of claims made against
members of the Management Board for indemnification of losses
incurred in the exercise of their duties. Each member of the
Management Board has agreed to an adequate deductible (which
constitutes a deductible as defined by the German Corporate
Governance Code, clause 3.8, paragraph 2).
|
Payments to
former members of the Management Board in the 2008 fiscal
year
Former members of the Management Board received total payments
of 916,896 (severance and pension payments) in the 2008
fiscal year. This includes the compensation paid to
Dr. Ziebart starting June 2008 in the amount of
624,396 as stipulated under his employment contract.
According to U.S. GAAP, a total of 2,194,127 was
added to pension reserves during the 2008 fiscal year for
current pensions and entitlements to pensions by former
Management Board members. Furthermore, pension reserves for
active members of the Management Board in the amount of
13,514,299 were reclassified into pension reserves for
former members of the Management Board; as of September 30,
2008, these pension reserves amount to 26,190,751.
Compensation
of the Supervisory Board
Compensation
structure
The compensation of the Supervisory Board is determined in our
Articles of Association. It is intended to reflect our
companys size, the duties and responsibilities of the
members of the Supervisory Board, and our economic condition and
performance. The compensation of the Supervisory Board is
governed by Section 11 of the Articles of Incorporation and
comprises two elements:
|
|
|
|
|
fixed compensation of 25,000 per year and
|
|
|
|
a variable element in the form of 1,500 share
appreciation rights per annum, which are granted and may be
exercised on the same terms as provided for by the Infineon
Stock Option Plan 2006 approved by the Shareholders Annual
General Meeting, which is valid in the fiscal year in which
these rights are granted. These share appreciation rights,
however, do not entitle the holder to purchase shares but only
to a settlement in cash. The share appreciation rights expire
six years from the date of grant, and can be exercised only
following a waiting period of three years. The exercise price
per share appreciation right amounts to 120 percent of the
average Infineon opening price on the Frankfurt Stock Exchange
in the XETRA trading system over the five trading days preceding
the date the respective share appreciation right is granted. The
exercise of share appreciation rights is dependent on the
attainment of absolute and relative performance targets as
stipulated in the 2006 Stock Option Plan. The basic principles
of our 2006 Stock Option Plan are described in note 27 to
the consolidated financial statements for the year ended
September 30, 2008 and are available in full text on the
Internet at www.infineon.com.
|
Additional compensation is paid for certain functions on the
Supervisory Board. The Chairman of the Supervisory Board
receives an additional 100 percent of the fixed
compensation. Furthermore, each Vice-Chairman and each other
member of a Supervisory Board committee, with the exception of
the Nomination Committee and the Mediation Committee, receives
an additional 50 percent of their fixed compensation.
Members of the Supervisory Board, moreover, receive
reimbursement of all expenses incurred in connection with their
duties, as well as the value-added tax apportioned to their
compensation, to the extent that they can charge for it
separately and do so.
99
Compensation
of the Supervisory Board in the 2008 fiscal year
In the 2008 fiscal year, the members of the Supervisory Board
waived their share appreciation rights. The Supervisory Board
compensation otherwise remained unchanged from the previous
year. The individual members of the Supervisory Board received
the following cash compensation (excluding
19 percent VAT), in the 2008 fiscal year:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
compensation for
|
|
|
|
|
Base compensation
|
|
special functions
|
|
Total payment
|
Supervisory Board member
|
|
in
|
|
in
|
|
in
|
|
Max Dietrich Kley
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
Wigand Cramer
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
Alfred Eibl
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
12,500
|
|
|
|
37,500
|
|
Prof. Johannes Feldmayer
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
Jakob Hauser
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
12,500
|
|
|
|
37,500
|
|
Gerhard Hobbach
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
Prof. Dr. Renate Köcher
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
Dr. Siegfried Luther
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
12,500
|
|
|
|
37,500
|
|
Michael Ruth
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
Gerd Schmidt
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
12,500
|
|
|
|
37,500
|
|
Prof. Dr. Doris
Schmitt-Landsiedel
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
12,500
|
|
|
|
37,500
|
|
Kerstin Schulzendorf
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
Dr. Eckart Sünner
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
Alexander Trüby
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
12,500
|
|
|
|
37,500
|
|
Prof. Dr. Martin Winterkorn
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
12,500
|
|
|
|
37,500
|
|
Prof. Dr.-Ing. Klaus Wucherer
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
12,500
|
|
|
|
37,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
400,000
|
|
|
|
125,000
|
|
|
|
525,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
We do not provide loans to the members of the Supervisory Board.
We maintain a directors and officers group liability
insurance (D&O insurance). The insurance covers the
personal liability risk in the event of claims made against
members of the Supervisory Board for indemnification of losses
incurred in the exercise of their duties. Each member of the
Supervisory Board has agreed to an adequate deductible (which
constitutes a deductible as defined by the German Corporate
Governance Code, section 3.8, paragraph 2).
Long-Term
Incentive Plans
2006 Stock Option Plan. In February
2006, we adopted and our shareholders approved the Infineon
Technologies AG 2006 Stock Option Plan, which we refer to as the
2006 plan. Under the 2006 plan, we have the authority over a
three-year period to grant non-transferable share options to
members of our Management Board, members of senior management of
our subsidiaries, and other key managers and employees at
Infineon Technologies AG and our domestic and foreign
subsidiaries. We may grant options covering up to
1.625 million shares to members of our Management Board,
1.3 million shares to senior management of our domestic and
foreign subsidiaries, and 10.075 million shares to other
key managers and employees at levels below the Management Board
of Infineon Technologies AG and senior management of our
domestic and foreign subsidiaries. No more than 40 percent
of the options available for grant to one of those three groups
may be issued during one fiscal year, and we may not grant
options under the 2006 plan covering more than 13 million
shares in the aggregate. As of September 30, 2008, options
to purchase an aggregate of 2.2 million shares were
outstanding under the 2006 plan, of which
100
options to purchase 550,000 shares were granted to members
of our Management Board during their membership on the
Management Board.
Under the 2006 plan, the Supervisory Board decides annually
within a period of 45 days after publication of the results
for the fiscal year then ended or of the first or second quarter
of a fiscal year, but no later than two weeks before the end of
the quarter, how many options to grant to the Management Board.
During that same period the Management Board may grant options
to other eligible persons.
The exercise price of the options granted under the 2006 plan is
120 percent of the average opening share price of our
shares on the Frankfurt Stock Exchange over the five trading
days preceding the date of grant. Options granted under the 2006
plan have a term of six years after the date of grant and may be
exercised after the third anniversary of the date of grant, at
the earliest. In addition, options may be exercised only if both
(a) the share price of our company has reached the exercise
price at least once during a trading day, and (b) the share
price of our company has exceeded for at least three consecutive
days, on at least one occasion since the date of grant, the
trend of the Philadelphia Semiconductor Stock Index, a
comparative index of the share price of companies in a similar
sector to Infineon Technologies AG. If the Philadelphia
Semiconductor Index is discontinued or is fundamentally altered
so as not to provide an appropriate means for comparison, then
the Management Board will either select another index to serve
as a comparative index or use a new index including as many as
possible of the individual prices previously tracked by the
Philadelphia Semiconductor Stock Index. In addition, holders may
not exercise an option within a fixed time period prior to or
following publication of our quarterly or annual results.
2001 International Long-Term Incentive
Plan. In April 2001, we adopted the Infineon
Technologies AG 2001 International Long-Term Incentive Plan,
which we refer to as the 2001 plan.
Under the 2001 plan, we granted non-transferable share options
to members of our Management Board, to the members of the top
management of our subsidiaries, and to other senior level
executives and employees with exceptional performance. As of
September 30, 2008, options to purchase an aggregate of
31.1 million shares were outstanding under the 2001 plan,
of which options to purchase 1.5 million shares were held
by members of our Management Board. No further options will be
granted under the 2001 plan.
The exercise price of the options granted under the 2001 plan is
105 percent of the average closing share price of our
companys shares on the Frankfurt Stock Exchange over the
five trading days preceding the date of grant. Options granted
under the 2001 plan have a term of seven years from the date of
grant and may be exercised at the earliest after the second
anniversary of the date of grant, but only if the share price of
our company has reached the exercise price at least once during
a trading day. In addition, holders may not exercise an option
within fixed time periods prior to or following publication of
our quarterly or annual results.
1999 Stock Option Plan. Under our 1999
Stock Option Plan we granted non-transferable share options to
members of our Management Board, directors of subsidiaries and
affiliates, managers and key employees.
As of September 30, 2008, there were no options to purchase
shares outstanding under the 1999 plan. The 1999 plan was
discontinued and, accordingly, we no longer grant options under
that plan.
101
PRINCIPAL
SHAREHOLDERS
The following table shows the beneficial ownership, as of
September 30, 2008, of our companys share capital by
(1) the principal shareholders (each person or entity that
has reported to us, as required by applicable German law, that
it beneficially owns 5 percent or more of our shares) and
(2) the members of our Management Board and Supervisory
Board, each as a group. We are not directly or indirectly owned
or controlled by any foreign government.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares owned
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
Dodge &
Cox Investment
Managers(1)
|
|
|
75,227,800
|
|
|
|
10.0
|
|
Merrill Lynch
International(2)
|
|
|
39,347,562
|
|
|
|
5.3
|
|
Templeton
Global Advisors
Limited(3)
|
|
|
38,674,360
|
|
|
|
5.2
|
|
AXA
S.A.(4)
|
|
|
37,960,797
|
|
|
|
5.1
|
|
Members of
the Management Board as a
group(5)
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Members of
the Supervisory Board as a
group(5)
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
The business address of Dodge & Cox Investment
Managers is 555 California Street, 40th Floor,
San Francisco, California 94104, USA. Based solely on a
notification to Infineon by the shareholder on March 11,
2008 pursuant to the requirements of the German Securities
Trading Act.
|
|
(2)
|
The business address of Merrill Lynch International is Merrill
Lynch Financial Centre, 2 King Edward Street, London ECA1HQ,
United Kingdom. Based solely on a notification to Infineon by
the shareholder on February 15, 2008 pursuant to the
requirements of the German Securities Trading Act.
|
|
(3)
|
The business address of Templeton Global Advisors Limited is
Templeton Building, Lyford Cay, PO Box N7759, Nassau,
Bahamas. Based solely on a notification to Infineon by the
shareholder on February 23, 2007 pursuant to the
requirements of the German Securities Trading Act. On
February 7, 2008, Templeton Global Advisors Limited,
Franklin Resources, Inc., Charles B. Johnson and Rupert H.
Johnson jointly filed a Schedule 13G with the US Securities and
Exchange Commission reporting a beneficial holding of
116,664,804 ordinary shares as of December 31, 2007,
representing 15.6 percent of our outstanding shares as of such
date. On December 17, 2008, Templeton Global Advisors
Limited notified Infineon that its shareholding had fallen below
3 percent.
|
|
(4)
|
The business address of AXA S.A. is 25, Avenue Matignon, 75008
Paris, France. Based solely on a notification to Infineon by the
shareholder on September 11, 2008 pursuant to the
requirements of the German Securities Trading Act. On
December 12, 2008, AXA S.A. notified Infineon that its
shareholding had fallen below 3 percent.
|
|
(5)
|
Represents less than 1 percent of our outstanding share
capital.
|
The German Securities Trading Act (Wertpapierhandelsgesetz)
requires each person whose shareholding of a listed German
company reaches, exceeds or, after exceeding, falls below
3 percent, 5 percent, 10 percent,
15 percent, 20 percent, 25 percent,
30 percent, 50 percent or 75 percent voting
rights thresholds to notify the corporation and the German
Federal Supervisory Authority for Financial Services in writing
without undue delay, at the latest within four trading days
after they have reached, exceeded or fallen below such a
threshold. In their notification, they must also state the
number of shares they hold.
Other than as disclosed above, we have not been notified by any
party holding 5 percent or more of our shares as of
September 30, 2008.
Major shareholders do not have differing voting rights.
Significant changes in the percentage ownership held of record
by major shareholders in the last three fiscal years were as
follows: On April 3, 2006, Siemens AG sold the remaining
shares in our company held by it and it is no longer one of our
shareholders.
To our knowledge, as of September 30, 2008, there were
106,564,907 of our American Depositary Shares outstanding
(representing an equivalent number of our ordinary shares),
which represented approximately 14.2 percent of our issued
and outstanding share capital, and there were approximately 154
holders of record of our American Depositary Shares.
102
RELATED PARTY
TRANSACTIONS AND RELATIONSHIPS
Qimonda
On December 21, 2008, we, the German Free State of Saxony,
and Qimonda jointly announced a financing package for Qimonda.
This proposed transaction is described under Operating and
Financial Review Recent Developments Related to
Qimonda.
In connection with the formation of Qimonda as a separate legal
entity, Infineon and Qimonda entered into a number of agreements
governing the carve-out of the memory products business, the
licensing of intellectual property, the use of Infineons
200-millimeter fabrication facility in Dresden, and support
services in the areas of general support, IT services and
research and development services.
Carve-out and
Control
Qimonda was carved out as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Infineon
effective May 1, 2006. Pursuant to the contribution
agreements Infineon and Qimonda entered into in connection with
the carve-out, Infineon contributed substantially all of the
assets, liabilities, operations and activities, as well as the
employees, of its memory products business to Qimonda. Infineon
and Qimonda entered into arrangements with respect to various
relationships between the two groups.
We are currently Qimondas largest shareholder, with a
direct and indirect shareholding of 77.5 percent. We have
committed to a plan to dispose of our stake in Qimonda. Our
majority ownership permits Qimonda to use the entire
intellectual property umbrella as well as other benefits from
contracts between the Infineon group of companies and third
parties. We are a party to certain intellectual property
cross-licensing and other contractual relationships with third
parties for Qimondas benefit. For as long as we, directly
or indirectly, own a majority of Qimondas shares, we will
also have the majority of votes in Qimondas
shareholders general meeting and will therefore be in a
position to elect all of the shareholder-elected members of
Qimondas Supervisory Board.
All of the agreements relating to Qimondas carve-out from
Infineon, including those governing Qimondas ongoing
relationship with us, were concluded in the context of a
parent-subsidiary relationship and in the overall context of
Qimondas carve-out from Infineon. The terms of these
agreements may be less favorable to us than had they been
negotiated with unaffiliated third parties.
Arrangements
relating to AMTC and BAC
Our partnership interests in the Advanced Mask Technology Center
(AMTC) and the Maskhouse Building Administration
Company (BAC) in Dresden were transferred to Qimonda
pursuant to an agreement dated December 10, 2007 with
Qimonda, Advanced Micro Devices, Toppan Photomask, AMTC and BAC.
Arrangement
concerning the Licensing of Intellectual Property
In connection with the transfer of intellectual property to
Qimonda, Infineon and Qimonda have entered into certain
cross-licensing arrangements.
Indemnification
The contribution agreement includes provisions pursuant to which
Qimonda agreed to indemnify Infineon against any claim
(including any related expenses) arising in connection with the
liabilities, contracts, offers, uncompleted transactions,
continuing obligations, risks, encumbrances and other matters
relating to the memory products business that were transferred
to Qimonda in the carve-out. Qimonda also agreed to indemnify
Infineon against any losses it may suffer under several
guarantee and financing arrangements that relate to
Qimondas business but that cannot be transferred to
Qimonda for legal, technical or practical reasons. In addition,
the contribution agreement provides for indemnification of
Infineon with respect to certain existing and future legal
claims. With the exception of the securities and
103
certain patent infringement and antitrust claims identified in
note 34 to our consolidated financial statements, for which
different arrangements apply as described in that section,
Qimonda is obligated to indemnify Infineon against any liability
arising in connection with claims related to the memory products
business described in that section. Finally, the contribution
agreement in principle provides for Qimonda to bear
60 percent of the total license fee payments payable by
Infineon and Qimonda to which Infineon and Qimonda may agree in
connection with two cases in which negotiations relating to
licensing and cross-licensing were ongoing at the time of the
carve-out, one of which is still ongoing. These payments could
be substantial and could remain in effect for lengthy periods.
The contribution agreement does not limit the aggregate
liability Qimonda may incur as a result of its indemnification
obligations, nor does it restrict the obligations to a certain
time period after the carve-out as long as the events giving
rise to them occurred prior to the carve-out.
Ongoing Services
Relationships
Prior to Qimondas carve-out, most of the administrative,
financial, risk management, information technology and other
services that Qimonda required were provided centrally by
Infineon. Infineon has provided some of these services under
certain services agreements. The terms of these agreements may
be less favorable to Infineon than they might have been had they
been negotiated with unaffiliated third parties.
For more information on related party transactions with Qimonda,
please see Major Shareholders and Related Party
Transactions Related Party Transactions in the
Annual Report on
Form 20-F
filed by Qimonda with the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission on November 16, 2007 (file
no. 001-32972).
104
ARTICLES OF
ASSOCIATION
This section summarizes the material rights of holders of the
shares of our company under German law and the material
provisions of the Articles of Association of our company. This
description is only a summary and does not describe everything
that the Articles of Association contain. Copies of the Articles
of Association are publicly available at our website,
www.infineon.com, and from the Commercial Register in Munich,
Germany. An English translation has been filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission in the United States.
Equity
The issued share capital of our company consists of
1,499,484,170 divided into 749,742,085 individual shares
in registered form with a notional value of 2.00 each.
Since our formation, changes in our share capital have been as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
At our formation, our share capital consisted of
400,000,000, represented by 200,000,000 shares.
|
|
|
|
On January 26, 2000, we increased our share capital from
400,000,000 to 800,000,000 by issuing
200,000,000 shares for a 400,000,000 transfer of
corporate funds to capital. The new shares were issued to
Siemens and Siemens Nederland N.V. in proportion to their
respective ownership interests in our company at that time.
|
|
|
|
On February 14, 2000, we increased our share capital from
800,000,000 to 1,200,000,000 by issuing
200,000,000 shares for a 400,000,000 transfer of
corporate funds to capital. The new shares were issued to
Siemens and Siemens Nederland N.V. in proportion to their
respective ownership interests in our company at that time.
|
|
|
|
On March 8, 2000, we increased our share capital by
33,400,000 to 1,233,400,000 for cash contributions
by issuing 16,700,000 shares with full dividend entitlement
for the 2000 fiscal year. The shares were sold in our initial
public offering.
|
|
|
|
On April 28, 2000, we increased our share capital by
15,184,860 by issuing to Intel Corporation
7,592,430 shares with full dividend entitlement for the
2000 fiscal year. After the execution of the capital increase,
our share capital consisted of 1,248,584,860.
|
|
|
|
On June 28, 2000, we increased our share capital by
2,418,154 against a contribution in kind by issuing
1,209,077 shares with full dividend entitlement for the
2000 fiscal year to Savan Communications Ltd. After execution of
the capital increase our share capital consisted of
1,251,003,014.
|
|
|
|
On March 16, 2001, we increased our share capital by
886,976 against a contribution in kind by issuing
443,488 shares with full dividend entitlement for the 2001
fiscal year in connection with our investment in Ramtron
International Corporation. After execution of the capital
increase our share capital consisted of 1,251,889,990.
|
|
|
|
On April 11, 2001, we increased our share capital by
1,413,428 against a contribution in kind by issuing
706,714 shares with full dividend entitlement for the 2001
fiscal year in connection with our acquisition of Ardent
Technologies Incorporated. After the execution of the capital
increase our share capital consisted of 1,253,303,418.
|
|
|
|
In July 2001, we increased our share capital by
120,000,000 by issuing 60,000,000 shares (with full
dividend entitlement for the 2001 fiscal year) in our secondary
public offering. After the execution of the capital increase our
share capital consisted of 1,373,303,418.
|
|
|
|
On July 25, 2001, we increased our share capital by
12,746,870 against a contribution in kind by issuing
6,373,435 shares with full dividend entitlement for the
2001 fiscal year in connection with our acquisition of Catamaran
Communications Incorporated. After the execution of the capital
increase, our share capital consisted of 1,386,050,288.
|
105
|
|
|
|
|
On November 29, 2001, we increased our share capital by
24,000 by issuing 12,000 shares with full dividend
entitlement for the 2002 fiscal year to group employees in
connection with our 2001 employee share purchase program.
After the execution of the capital increase, our share capital
consisted of 1,386,074,288.
|
|
|
|
On July 24, 2002, we increased our share capital by
686,920 by issuing 343,460 shares with full dividend
entitlement for the 2002 fiscal year to group employees in
connection with our 2002 employee share purchase program.
After the execution of the capital increase, our share capital
consisted of 1,386,761,208.
|
|
|
|
On August 30, 2002, we increased our share capital by
55,000,000 against a contribution in kind by issuing
27,500,000 shares with full dividend entitlement for the
2002 fiscal year in connection with our acquisition of Ericsson
Microelectronics AB, Stockholm, Sweden. After the execution of
the capital increase, our share capital consisted of
1,441,761,208.
|
|
|
|
On March 23, 2004, we increased our share capital by
53,358,510 against a contribution in kind by issuing
26,679,255 shares with full dividend entitlement for the
2004 fiscal year in connection with the acquisition of the
remaining interest in Infineon Technologies SC300
GmbH & Co. KG, Dresden. After the execution of the
capital increase our share capital consisted of
1,495,119,718.
|
|
|
|
During the 2005 fiscal year, our share capital increased by
19,000 as a result of the exercise of 9,500 employee
stock options. After these exercises our share capital consisted
of 1,495,138,718.
|
|
|
|
During the 2006 fiscal year, our share capital increased by
79,870 as a result of the exercise of 39,935 employee
stock options. After these exercises our share capital consisted
of 1,495,218,588.
|
|
|
|
During the 2007 fiscal year, our share capital increased by
4,238,682 as a result of the exercise of
2,119,341 employee stock options. After these exercises our
share capital consisted of 1,499,457,270.
|
|
|
|
During the 2008 fiscal year, our share capital increased by
26,900 as a result of the exercise of 13,450 employee
stock options. After these exercises our share capital consisted
of 1,499,484,170.
|
Registrar Services GmbH, the transfer agent and registrar of our
company in Germany, registers record holders of shares in the
share register on our behalf pursuant to a transfer agent
agreement. The transfer agent also maintains the register of our
shareholders.
Authorized
Capital
Under the German Stock Corporation Act, a stock
corporations shareholders can authorize the Management
Board to issue shares in a specified aggregate nominal amount of
up to 50 percent of the issued share capital at the time
the resolution is passed. The shareholders authorization
may extend for a period of no more than five years.
The Articles of Association of our company authorize the
Management Board to increase the share capital with the
Supervisory Boards consent. The Management Board may use
these authorizations to issue new shares in one or more tranches:
|
|
|
|
|
in an aggregate nominal amount of up to 30 million to
issue shares to employees of the Infineon group companies (in
which case preemptive rights of the existing shareholders are
excluded) until January 19, 2009 (Authorized Capital
II/2004); and
|
|
|
|
in an aggregate nominal amount of up to 224 million
to issue shares for cash (in which case preemptive rights of
existing shareholders may be excluded under certain
circumstances by the Management Board with the consent of the
Supervisory Board) or in exchange for contributions in kind (in
which case preemptive rights of the existing shareholders may be
excluded by the
|
106
|
|
|
|
|
Management Board with the consent of the Supervisory Board)
until February 14, 2012 (Authorized Capital 2007).
|
Conditional
Capital
Under the German Stock Corporation Act, a stock
corporations shareholders can create conditional capital
of up to 50 percent of the issued share capital at the time
of the resolution. Our Articles of Association provide for the
following conditional capital as approved by our shareholders:
|
|
|
|
|
Conditional Capital I in an aggregate nominal amount of
91.6 million that may be used to issue up to
45.8 million new registered shares in connection with our
1999 and our 2001 long-term incentive plans;
|
|
|
|
Conditional Capital III in an aggregate nominal amount of
29 million that may be used to issue up to
14.5 million new registered shares in connection with our
2001 and 2006 long-term incentive plan;
|
|
|
|
Conditional Capital IV/2006 in an aggregate nominal amount of
24.5 million that may be used to issue up to
12.25 million new registered shares in connection with our
2006 long-term incentive plan;
|
|
|
|
Conditional Capital 2002 in an aggregate nominal amount of
152 million that may be used to issue up to
76 million new registered shares upon conversion of debt
securities issued in June 2003; and
|
|
|
|
Conditional Capital 2007 in an aggregate nominal amount of
248 million that may be used to issue up to
124 million new registered shares upon conversion of debt
securities, which we may issue at any time prior to
February 14, 2012.
|
|
|
|
Conditional Capital 2008 in an aggregate nominal amount of
149.9 million that may be used to issue up to
74.95 million new registered shares upon conversion of debt
securities, which we may issue at any time prior to
February 13, 2013.
|
All of these shares will have dividend rights from the beginning
of the fiscal year in which they are issued.
Preemptive
Rights
Under the German Stock Corporation Act, an existing shareholder
in a stock corporation has a preferential right to subscribe for
issuances of new shares by that corporation in proportion to the
number of shares he holds in the corporations existing
share capital. These rights do not apply to shares issued out of
conditional capital. Preemptive rights also apply to securities
that may be converted into shares, securities with warrants,
profit sharing certificates and securities with dividend rights.
The German Stock Corporation Act allows the exclusion of this
preferential right only in limited circumstances. At least three
fourths of the share capital represented at the relevant
shareholders meeting must vote for exclusion. In addition
to approval by the shareholders, the exclusion of preemptive
rights requires a justification which the Management Board has
to set forth in a written report the shareholders. The
justification must be based on the principle that the interest
of the company in excluding preemptive rights outweighs the
shareholders interest in their preemptive rights.
Preemptive rights resulting from a capital increase may
generally be transferred and may be traded on any of the German
stock exchanges upon which our shares are traded for a limited
number of days prior to the final date on which the preemptive
rights may be exercised.
Shareholders
Meetings and Voting Rights
Our shareholders vote at general meetings. A general meeting of
the shareholders of Infineon may be called by the Management
Board or, in certain cases, by the Supervisory Board.
Shareholders holding in
107
the aggregate at least 5 percent of our issued share
capital may also require the Management Board to call a meeting.
The annual general meeting must take place within the first
eight months of the fiscal year. The Management Board calls this
meeting upon the receipt of the Supervisory Boards report
on the annual financial statements.
Under German law and the Articles of Association of our company,
our company must publish notices of shareholder meetings in the
electronic edition of the German Federal Gazette
(elektronischer Bundesanzeiger) at least thirty days
before the last day on which the shareholders must notify our
company that they intend to attend the meeting. According to our
Articles of Association, we may also communicate information to
shareholders of our company using electronic media.
A shareholder or group of shareholders holding a minimum of
either 5 percent of the share capital of our company or
shares representing at least 500,000 of its registered
capital may require that additional or modified proposals be
made at our shareholders general meeting.
Shareholders who are registered in the share register may
participate in and vote at the shareholders general
meeting. A notice by a shareholder of his or her intention to
attend a shareholders general meeting must be given to our
company at least six days before the meeting, not counting the
day of notice and the day of the meeting. Following the deadline
for the registration of attendance at the shareholders
general meeting, the shares are not blocked and may be
transferred. In certain cases, a shareholder can be prevented
from exercising his or her voting rights. This would be the
case, for instance, for resolutions on the waiver or assertion
of a claim by our company against the shareholder. Furthermore,
a breach of the notification requirements with regard to
material holdings in voting rights according to the German
securities laws results in a loss of the rights attached to the
shares, including the voting rights, until the satisfaction of
the notification requirement. In the event of willful or grossly
negligent breaches of the notification requirement, the loss of
the rights continues for six months following the subsequent
submission of the notification.
Each share carries one vote at general meetings of the
shareholders. Resolutions are generally passed with a simple
majority of the votes cast. Resolutions that require a capital
majority are passed with a simple majority of the issued
capital, unless statutory law or the Articles of Association of
our company require otherwise. Under the German Stock
Corporation Act, a number of significant resolutions must be
passed by a majority of the votes cast and at least
75 percent of the share capital represented in connection
with the vote taken on that resolution. The majority required
for some of these resolutions may be lowered by the Articles of
Association. The shareholders of our company have lowered the
majority requirements to the extent permitted by law.
Although our company must notify shareholders of an ordinary or
extraordinary shareholders meeting as described above,
neither the German Stock Corporation Act nor our Articles of
Association fix a minimum quorum requirement. This means that
holders of a minority of our shares could control the outcome of
resolutions not requiring a specified majority of our
outstanding share capital.
According to our Articles of Association, a resolution that
amends the Articles of Association must be passed by a majority
of the votes cast and at least a majority of the nominal capital
represented at the meeting of shareholders at which the
resolution is considered. However, resolutions to amend the
business purpose stated in our Articles of Association also
require a majority of at least three quarters of the share
capital represented at the meeting. The 75 percent majority
requirement also applies to the following matters:
|
|
|
|
|
the exclusion of preemptive rights in a capital increase or the
issue of convertible bonds or bonds with warrants;
|
|
|
|
capital decreases;
|
|
|
|
a creation of authorized capital or conditional capital;
|
|
|
|
a dissolution;
|
108
|
|
|
|
|
a merger or a consolidation with another stock corporation or
another corporate transformation;
|
|
|
|
a transfer of all or virtually all of the assets of our
company; and
|
|
|
|
the conclusion of any direct control, profit and loss pooling or
similar inter-company agreements.
|
Dividend
Rights
Shareholders participate in profit distributions in proportion
to the number of shares they hold.
Under German law, we may declare and pay dividends only from
balance sheet profits as they are shown in our unconsolidated
annual financial statements prepared in accordance with
applicable German law. In determining the distributable balance
sheet profits, the Management Board and the Supervisory Board
may allocate to profit reserves up to one half of the annual
surplus remaining after allocations to statutory reserves and
losses carried forward.
The shareholders, in determining the distribution of profits,
may allocate additional amounts to profit reserves and may carry
forward profits in part or in full.
According to the Articles of Association of our company the
shareholders general meeting may also resolve upon a
dividend in kind in addition to or instead of a dividend in cash.
Dividends approved at a shareholders general meeting are
payable on the first stock exchange trading day after that
meeting, unless otherwise decided at the shareholders
general meeting. Where shareholders hold physical certificates,
we will pay dividends to those shareholders who present us or
the paying agent or agents that we may appoint from time to
time, with the appropriate dividend coupon. If a shareholder
holds shares that are entitled to dividends in a clearing
system, the dividends will be paid according to that clearing
systems rules. We will publish notice of dividends paid
and the paying agent or agents that we have appointed in the
electronic edition of the German Federal Gazette.
Liquidation
Rights
In accordance with the German Stock Corporation Act, if we are
liquidated, any liquidation proceeds remaining after all of our
liabilities have been paid off would be distributed among our
shareholders in proportion to their holdings.
Shareholders
Other Rights and Obligations
Our shareholders have other rights and obligations, for example
the right to participate in the general discussion at the annual
meeting of shareholders and ask questions of our management. If
shareholders believe that our company has been harmed by members
of the Management Board or Supervisory Board they can initiate
proceedings against those persons under certain conditions. If a
German court determines that members of the Management Board or
Supervisory Board have violated their obligations towards our
company, then they are liable for damages to our company, but
generally not to the shareholders directly. Such direct claims
would be successful under very rare circumstances, for example
upon a finding that the member of the Management Board or the
Supervisory Board has engaged in willful misconduct with the
intention of harming shareholders.
Disclosure
Requirement
The German Securities Trading Act requires each person whose
shareholding of a listed company reaches, exceeds or, after
exceeding, falls below 3 percent, 5 percent,
10 percent, 15 percent, 20 percent,
25 percent, 30 percent, 50 percent or
75 percent voting rights thresholds to notify the
corporation and the German Federal Supervisory Authority for
Financial Services in writing without undue delay, at the latest
within four trading days after they have reached, exceeded or
fallen below such a threshold. In their notification, they must
also state the number of shares they hold. Such holders cannot
exercise any rights associated with those shares until they have
satisfied this disclosure requirement. In the event of willful
or grossly negligent breaches of the notification requirement,
the loss of the rights continues for six months
109
following the subsequent submission of the notification. In
addition, the German Securities Trading Act contains various
rules designed to ensure the attribution of shares to the person
who has effective control over the exercise of the voting rights
attached to those shares.
Repurchase of
Our Own Shares
We may repurchase our own shares pursuant to the authorization
granted by the shareholders general meeting on
February 14, 2008 or in other very limited circumstances
set out in the German Stock Corporation Act. The authorization
granted by our shareholders general meeting expires on
August 13, 2009. Shareholders may grant a new authorization
at our 2009 shareholders general meeting.
Shareholders may not grant a share repurchase authorization
lasting for more than 18 months. The rules in the German
Stock Corporation Act generally limit repurchases to
10 percent of our share capital and resales must be made
either on the stock exchange, in a manner that treats all
shareholders equally or in accordance with the rules that apply
to preemptive rights relating to a capital increase.
Corporate
Purpose of Our Company
The corporate purpose of our company, described in
section 2 of the Articles of Association, is direct or
indirect activity in the field of research, development,
manufacture and marketing of electronic components, electronic
systems and software, as well as the performance of related
services.
Registration
of Our Company with the Commercial Register
Our company was entered into the commercial register of Munich,
Germany, as a stock corporation on July 14, 1999 under the
number HRB 126492.
110
ADDITIONAL
INFORMATION
Organizational
Structure
Infineon Technologies AG is the parent company of the Infineon
group, including Qimonda, with subsidiaries incorporated in
jurisdictions throughout Europe and Asia, as well as in the
United States. Our most significant subsidiaries are set out
below. Unless otherwise indicated, all of the subsidiaries in
the Infineon group (including Qimonda) were directly or
indirectly 100 percent owned by Infineon Technologies AG,
and all of the subsidiaries in the Qimonda group were directly
or indirectly 100 percent owned by Qimonda AG, as of
September 30, 2008.
Principal
Subsidiaries as of September 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate name
|
|
Registered office
|
|
Principal activity
|
|
Infineon Group:
|
|
|
|
|
ALTIS Semiconductor
S.N.C(1)
|
|
Essonnes, France
|
|
Production
|
Infineon Technologies Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd.
|
|
Singapore
|
|
Production, distribution
|
Infineon Technologies Austria AG
|
|
Villach, Austria
|
|
Production
|
Infineon Technologies Bipolar GmbH & Co.
KG(2)
|
|
Warstein, Germany
|
|
Production and development
|
Infineon Technologies China Co. Ltd.
|
|
Shanghai, China
|
|
Holding
|
Infineon Technologies Dresden GmbH & Co. OHG
|
|
Dresden, Germany
|
|
Production
|
Infineon Technologies Finance GmbH
|
|
Neubiberg, Germany
|
|
Financial services
|
Infineon Technologies France S.A.S.
|
|
Saint Denis, France
|
|
Distribution
|
Infineon Technologies Holding B.V.
|
|
Rotterdam, The Netherlands
|
|
Holding
|
Infineon Technologies Investment B.V.
|
|
Rotterdam, The Netherlands
|
|
Holding
|
Infineon Technologies Japan K.K.
|
|
Tokyo, Japan
|
|
Distribution
|
Infineon Technologies North America Corp.
|
|
Delaware, USA
|
|
Research, development and distribution
|
Infineon Technologies SensoNor AS
|
|
Horten, Norway
|
|
Production
|
Infineon Technologies (Advanced Logic) Sdn. Bhd.
|
|
Malacca, Malaysia
|
|
Production
|
Infineon Technologies (Kulim) Sdn. Bhd.
|
|
Kulim, Malaysia
|
|
Production
|
Infineon Technologies (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd.
|
|
Malacca, Malaysia
|
|
Production
|
Primarion Inc.
|
|
Torrance, California
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
|
|
|
Qimonda Group:
|
|
|
|
|
Inotera Memories
Inc.(3)
|
|
Taoyuan, Taiwan
|
|
Production
|
Qimonda
AG(4)
|
|
Munich, Germany
|
|
Research, development, production and distribution of
semiconductor memory products and related services
|
Qimonda Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd.
|
|
Singapore
|
|
Distribution
|
Qimonda Dresden GmbH & Co. OHG
|
|
Dresden, Germany
|
|
Production
|
Qimonda Europe GmbH
|
|
Munich, Germany
|
|
Distribution, sales and marketing
|
Qimonda Holding B.V.
|
|
Rotterdam, The Netherlands
|
|
Holding
|
Qimonda Japan K.K.
|
|
Tokyo, Japan
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
Qimonda Investment B.V.
|
|
Rotterdam, The Netherlands
|
|
Holding
|
Qimonda Malaysia Sdn. Bhd.
|
|
Malacca, Malaysia
|
|
Production
|
Qimonda Module (Suzhou) Co. Ltd.
|
|
Suzhou, China
|
|
Production
|
Qimonda North America Corp.
|
|
Delaware, USA
|
|
Distribution, sales and marketing, research and development
|
Qimonda Portugal S.A.
|
|
Vila do Conde, Portugal
|
|
Production
|
Qimonda Richmond, LLC
|
|
Delaware, USA
|
|
Production
|
Qimonda Technologies (Suzhou) Co.
Ltd.(5)
|
|
Suzhou, China
|
|
Production
|
|
|
(1)
|
50 percent interest plus one share held by Infineon. In
August 2007, Infineon, IBM and Advanced Electronic Systems AG
(AES) entered into an agreement, under which AES is
to acquire the interests in ALTIS from Infineon and IBM. As of
September 30, 2008, negotiations with AES have not
progressed as previously anticipated and could not be completed.
Despite the fact that negotiations are ongoing with additional
parties, the outcome of these negotiations is uncertain.
|
|
(2)
|
60 percent held by Infineon.
|
|
(3)
|
35.6 percent ownership interest held by Qimonda. On
October 13, 2008, Qimonda announced that they entered into
a share purchase agreement to sell its 35.6 percent stake
in Inotera Memories, Inc, to Micron Technology, Inc,
for cash proceeds of US$400 million. The sale of the
Inotera stake occurred in two equal tranches, on
October 20, 2008 and November 26, 2008, respectively.
|
|
(4)
|
77.5 percent held by Infineon.
|
|
(5)
|
62.8 percent interest held by Qimonda.
|
111
Dividend
Policy
Under the German Stock Corporation Act (Aktiengesetz),
the amount of dividends available for distribution to
shareholders is based on the level of earnings
(Bilanzgewinn) of the ultimate parent, Infineon
Technologies AG, as determined in accordance with HGB, the
German Commercial Code . All dividends must be approved by the
shareholders. The ordinary shareholders meeting held in February
2008 did not authorize a dividend in respect of the 2007 fiscal
year. No earnings are available for distribution as a dividend
for the 2008 fiscal year, since Infineon Technologies AG on a
stand-alone basis as the ultimate parent incurred a cumulative
loss (Bilanzverlust) as of September 30, 2008.
Subject to market conditions, we intend to retain future
earnings for investment in the development and expansion of our
business.
Significant
Changes
Except as discussed elsewhere in this annual report on
Form 20-F,
no significant change has occurred since the date of the annual
financial statements included in this annual report on
Form 20-F.
Market
Information
General
The principal trading market for our shares is the Frankfurt
Stock Exchange, where our ordinary shares trade under the
trading symbol IFX. Options on the shares trade on the German
options exchange (Eurex Deutschland) and other exchanges. All of
our shares are in registered form. ADSs, each representing one
share, are listed on the New York Stock Exchange and trade under
the symbol IFX. The depositary for the ADSs is Deutsche Bank.
112
Trading on the
Frankfurt Stock Exchange
Our shares have traded on the Frankfurt Stock Exchange since
March 13, 2000. The table below sets forth, for the periods
indicated, the high and low closing sales prices for our
companys shares on the Frankfurt Stock Exchange, as
reported by the Frankfurt Stock Exchange Xetra trading system:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price per share in Euro
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
Fiscal year ended September 30, 2004
|
|
|
13.65
|
|
|
|
7.80
|
|
Fiscal year ended September 30, 2005
|
|
|
9.00
|
|
|
|
6.43
|
|
Fiscal year ended September 30, 2006
|
|
|
9.95
|
|
|
|
7.60
|
|
Fiscal year ended September 30, 2007
|
|
|
13.44
|
|
|
|
9.25
|
|
Fiscal year ended September 30, 2008
|
|
|
11.95
|
|
|
|
3.66
|
|
October 2006 through December 2006
|
|
|
10.68
|
|
|
|
9.25
|
|
January 2007 through March 2007
|
|
|
12.27
|
|
|
|
10.66
|
|
April 2007 through June 2007
|
|
|
12.81
|
|
|
|
10.88
|
|
July 2007 through September 30, 2007
|
|
|
13.44
|
|
|
|
10.70
|
|
October 2007 through December 2007
|
|
|
11.95
|
|
|
|
7.62
|
|
January 2008 through March 2008
|
|
|
8.13
|
|
|
|
4.08
|
|
April 2008 through June 2008
|
|
|
7.11
|
|
|
|
4.57
|
|
July 2008 through September 30, 2008
|
|
|
6.25
|
|
|
|
3.66
|
|
June 2008
|
|
|
6.67
|
|
|
|
5.53
|
|
July 2008
|
|
|
5.32
|
|
|
|
4.37
|
|
August 2008
|
|
|
6.12
|
|
|
|
4.80
|
|
September 2008
|
|
|
6.25
|
|
|
|
3.66
|
|
October 2008
|
|
|
4.12
|
|
|
|
2.05
|
|
November 2008
|
|
|
3.06
|
|
|
|
1.72
|
|
December
2008(1)
|
|
|
1.69
|
|
|
|
0.65
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Up to and including
December 22, 2008.
|
On December 22, 2008, the closing sales price per share on
the Frankfurt Stock Exchange, as reported by the Xetra trading
system, was 0.70, equivalent to $0.98 per share
(translated at the noon buying rate on December 22, 2008).
113
Trading on the
New York Stock Exchange
ADSs representing our shares have traded on the New York Stock
Exchange since March 13, 2000. The table below sets forth,
for the periods indicated, the high and low closing sales prices
for the ADSs on the New York Stock Exchange:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price per ADS in
|
|
|
|
U.S. dollars
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
Fiscal year ended September 30, 2004
|
|
|
15.87
|
|
|
|
9.39
|
|
Fiscal year ended September 30, 2005
|
|
|
11.74
|
|
|
|
8.40
|
|
Fiscal year ended September 30, 2006
|
|
|
12.68
|
|
|
|
8.95
|
|
Fiscal year ended September 30, 2007
|
|
|
18.68
|
|
|
|
11.77
|
|
Fiscal year ended September 30, 2008
|
|
|
17.13
|
|
|
|
5.24
|
|
October 2006 through December 2006
|
|
|
14.03
|
|
|
|
11.77
|
|
January 2007 through March 2007
|
|
|
16.26
|
|
|
|
13.94
|
|
April 2007 through June 2007
|
|
|
17.28
|
|
|
|
14.75
|
|
July 2007 through September 30, 2007
|
|
|
18.68
|
|
|
|
14.36
|
|
October 2007 through December 2007
|
|
|
17.13
|
|
|
|
11.29
|
|
January 2008 through March 2008
|
|
|
11.87
|
|
|
|
6.34
|
|
April 2008 through June 2008
|
|
|
10.96
|
|
|
|
7.20
|
|
July 2008 through September 30, 2008
|
|
|
8.99
|
|
|
|
5.24
|
|
June 2008
|
|
|
10.30
|
|
|
|
8.53
|
|
July 2008
|
|
|
8.39
|
|
|
|
6.96
|
|
August 2008
|
|
|
8.97
|
|
|
|
7.40
|
|
September 2008
|
|
|
8.99
|
|
|
|
5.24
|
|
October 2008
|
|
|
5.74
|
|
|
|
2.57
|
|
November 2008
|
|
|
3.97
|
|
|
|
2.02
|
|
December
2008(1)
|
|
|
2.07
|
|
|
|
0.88
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Up to and including
December 22, 2008.
|
On December 22, 2008, the closing sales price per ADS on
the New York Stock Exchange was $0.98.
Exchange
Rates
Fluctuations in the exchange rate between the Euro and the
U.S. dollar will affect the U.S. dollar amounts
received by owners of shares or ADSs on conversion of dividends,
if any, paid in Euro on the shares and will affect the
U.S. dollar price of the ADSs on the New York Stock
Exchange. In addition, to enable you to ascertain how the trends
in our financial results might have appeared had they been
expressed in U.S. dollars, the table below states the
average exchange rates of U.S. dollars per Euro for the
periods shown. The annual average exchange rate is computed by
using the Federal Reserve noon buying rate for the Euro on the
last business day of each month during the period indicated.
Annual average
exchange rates of the U.S. dollar per Euro
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal year ended September 30,
|
|
Average
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
1.2199
|
|
2005
|
|
|
1.2727
|
|
2006
|
|
|
1.2364
|
|
2007
|
|
|
1.3415
|
|
2008
|
|
|
1.5067
|
|
114
The table below shows the high and low Federal Reserve noon
buying rates for Euro in U.S. dollars per Euro for each
month from April 2008 through September 2008:
Recent high and
low exchange rates of the U.S. dollar per Euro
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
April 2008
|
|
|
1.6010
|
|
|
|
1.5568
|
|
May 2008
|
|
|
1.5784
|
|
|
|
1.5370
|
|
June 2008
|
|
|
1.5749
|
|
|
|
1.5368
|
|
July 2008
|
|
|
1.5923
|
|
|
|
1.5559
|
|
August 2008
|
|
|
1.5569
|
|
|
|
1.4660
|
|
September 2008
|
|
|
1.4737
|
|
|
|
1.3939
|
|
The noon buying rate on September 30, 2008 was 1.00 =
$1.4081, and on December 22, 2008 was 1.00 = $1.3952.
Taxation
German
Taxation
The following is a summary discussion of the material German tax
consequences for shareholders who are not resident in Germany
for income tax purposes and who do not hold shares or ADSs as
business assets of a permanent establishment or fixed base in
Germany (Non-German Shareholders). The discussion
does not purport to be a comprehensive description of all the
tax considerations that may be relevant to a decision to invest
in or hold our shares or ADSs. The discussion is based on the
tax laws of Germany as in effect on the date of this annual
report, which may be subject to change at short notice and,
within certain limits, possibly also with retroactive effect.
You are advised to consult your tax advisors in relation to the
tax consequences of the acquisition, holding and disposition or
transfer of shares and ADSs and in relation to the procedure
which needs to be observed in the event of a possible reduction
or refund of German withholding taxes. Only these advisors are
in a position to duly consider your specific tax situation.
Taxation of
the Company
In Germany, the Corporate Tax Reform Act of 2008 introduced
several changes to the taxation of German business activities,
including a reduction of the combined corporate and trade tax
rate for the Company from approximately 37 percent to
approximately 28 percent.
In principle, German corporations are subject to corporate
income tax at a rate of 15 percent (25 percent prior
to 2008). This tax rate applies irrespective of whether profits
are distributed or retained. In addition, a solidarity surcharge
of 5.5 percent is levied on the assessed corporate income
tax liability, so that the combined effective tax burden of
corporate income tax and solidarity surcharge is
15.825 percent (26.375 percent prior to 2008). Certain
foreign source income is exempt from corporate income tax.
Generally, dividends received by us and capital gains realized
by us on the sale of shares in other corporations will also be
exempt from corporate income tax. However, 5 percent of
such dividends and capital gains are considered non-deductible
business expenses.
In addition, German corporations are subject to a profit-based
trade tax, the exact amount of which depends on the municipality
in which the corporation conducts its business. With effect for
fiscal years ending after December 31, 2007, the basic
factor for the calculation of trade tax applicable to
corporations has been reduced from 0.05 to 0.035. As a
compensation, trade tax is no longer a deductible item in
calculating the corporations tax base for corporate income
tax and trade tax purposes.
Tax losses carried forward in respect of German corporate income
tax and trade tax have an indefinite life. According to a
minimum taxation regime applicable as of 2004, not more than
1 million plus
115
60 percent of the amount exceeding 1 million of
the income of one fiscal year may be offset against tax losses
carried forward.
The Corporate Tax Reform Act of 2008 provides certain new rules
regarding the computation of profits, which shall broaden the
tax base for corporate income tax and trade tax. Inter
alia, the deductibility of interest expenses of the company
(payable to shareholders or to third parties) may be limited to
30 percent of the companys taxable income before
interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization provided that the
net interest expense of the company (interest payable less
interest receivable) exceeds 1 million.
Non-deductible interest can be carried forward.
Taxation of
Dividends
Tax must be withheld at a rate of 20 percent plus
solidarity surcharge of 5.5 percent (in total
21.1 percent) on dividends paid (if any). In 2009, the rate
will increase to 25 percent plus solidarity surcharge (in
total 26.375 percent).
Pursuant to most German tax treaties, including the income tax
treaty between Germany and the United States (the
Treaty), the German withholding tax may not exceed
15 percent of the dividends received by Non-German
Shareholders who are eligible for treaty benefits. The
difference between the withholding tax including solidarity
surcharge that was levied and the maximum rate of withholding
tax permitted by an applicable tax treaty is refunded to the
shareholder by the German Federal Tax Office
(Bundeszentralamt für Steuern, An der Küppe 1,
D-53225 Bonn, Germany) upon application. Forms for a refund
application are available from the German Federal Tax Office and
German embassies and consulates. A further reduction applies
pursuant to most tax treaties if the shareholder is a
corporation which holds a stake of 25 percent or more, and
in some cases (including under the Treaty) of 10 percent or
more, of the registered share capital (or according to some tax
treaties of the votes) of a company.
Withholding
Tax Refund for U.S. Shareholders
U.S. shareholders who are eligible for treaty benefits
under the Treaty (as discussed below in United States
Taxation) are entitled to claim a refund of the portion of
the otherwise applicable 20 percent German withholding tax
and 5.5 percent solidarity surcharge on dividends that
exceeds the applicable Treaty rate (generally 15 percent).
For shares or ADSs kept in custody with the Depository
Trust Company in New York or one of its participating
banks, the German tax authorities have introduced a collective
procedure for the refund of German dividend withholding tax and
solidarity surcharge thereon. Under this procedure, the
Depository Trust Company may submit claims for refunds
payable to U.S. shareholders under the Treaty collectively
to the German tax authorities on behalf of these
U.S. shareholders. The German Federal Tax Office will pay
the refund amounts on a preliminary basis to the Depository
Trust Company, which will redistribute these amounts to the
U.S. shareholders according to the regulations governing
the procedure. The Federal Tax Office may review whether the
refund was made in accordance with the law within four years
after making the payment to the Depository Trust Company.
Details of this collective procedure are available from the
Depository Trust Company. This procedure is currently
permitted by German tax authorities but that permission may be
revoked, or the procedure may be amended, at any time in the
future.
Individual claims for refunds may be made on a special German
form, which must be filed with the German Federal Tax Office
(Bundeszentralamt für Steuern, An der Küppe 1,
D-53225 Bonn, Germany) within four years from the end of the
calendar year in which the dividend is received. Copies of the
required forms may be obtained from the German tax authorities
at the same address or from the Embassy of the Federal Republic
of Germany, 4645 Reservoir Road, NW, Washington D.C.
20007-1998.
As part of the individual refund claim, a U.S. shareholder
must submit to the German tax authorities the original
withholding certificate (or a certified copy thereof) issued by
the paying agent documenting the tax withheld and an official
certification of United States tax residency on IRS
Form 6166. IRS Form 6166 generally may be obtained by
filing a properly completed IRS Form 8802 with the Internal
Revenue Service, P.O. Box 42530, Philadelphia,
PA 19101-2530.
Requests for certification must include the
116
U.S. shareholders name, Social Security Number or
Employer Identification Number, the type of U.S. tax return
filed, the tax period for which the certification is requested
and a user fee of US$35. An online payment option is also
available. The Internal Revenue Service will send the
certification on IRS Form 6166 to the U.S. shareholder
who then must submit the certification with the claim for refund.
Taxation of
Capital Gains
In case of an acquisition of shares and ADSs prior to
January 1, 2009, capital gains from the disposition of such
shares and ADSs realized by a Non-German shareholder other than
a corporation are subject to German tax only if (i) such
shareholder at any time during the five years preceding the
disposition held directly or indirectly an interest of
1 percent or more in a companys issued share capital;
if the shareholder has acquired the shares or ADSs without
consideration, the previous owners holding period and size
of shareholding will also be taken into account, or
(ii) the shareholder has acquired the shares no earlier
than 12 months before the disposition. After 2008, the
disposition of shares acquired after December 31, 2008 will
be generally subject to German tax.
If the shareholder is an individual, one half of the capital
gain realized in 2008 will generally be taxable. After 2008,
100 percent of the capital gain will be taxable, but
generally at a uniform tax rate of 25 percent plus
solidarity surcharge of 5.5 percent (in total:
26.375 percent). If the shareholder is a corporation,
effectively 5 percent of the capital gain will generally be
taxable. However, most German tax treaties, including the
Treaty, provide that Non-German shareholders who are
beneficiaries under the respective treaty are generally not
subject to German tax even under the circumstances described in
the preceding paragraph. See the discussion regarding
shareholders that generally are eligible for benefits under the
Treaty in United States Taxation, below.
Special rules may apply to certain companies of the finance or
insurance sector (including pension funds) that are not
protected from German tax under a tax treaty.
Inheritance
and Gift Tax
Under German domestic law, the transfer of shares or ADSs will
be subject to German inheritance or gift tax on a transfer by
reason of death or as a gift if:
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
the donor or transferor or the heir, donee or other beneficiary
is resident in Germany at the time of the transfer, or, if a
German citizen, was not continuously outside of Germany and
without German residence for more than five years; or
|
|
|
(b)
|
at the time of the transfer, the shares or ADSs are held by the
decedent or donor as assets of a business for which a permanent
establishment is maintained or a permanent representative is
appointed in Germany; or
|
|
|
|
|
(c)
|
the decedent or donor has held, alone or together with related
persons, directly or indirectly, 10 percent or more of a
companys registered share capital at the time of the
transfer.
|
The few presently existing German estate tax treaties (e.g. the
Estate Tax Treaty with the United States) usually provide
that German inheritance or gift tax may only be imposed in cases
(a) and (b) above.
Other
Taxes
There are no transfer, stamp or similar taxes which would apply
to the sale or transfer of the shares or ADSs in Germany. Net
worth tax is no longer levied in Germany.
United States
Taxation
The following discussion is a summary of the material United
States federal tax consequences of the purchase, ownership and
disposition of shares or ADSs. This summary addresses only
U.S. Holders (as
117
defined below) that hold shares or ADSs as capital assets for
United States federal income tax purposes and that use the
U.S. dollar as their functional currency.
As used in this document, the term U.S. Holder
means a beneficial owner of shares or ADSs that is for United
States federal income tax purposes:
|
|
|
|
|
an individual who is a citizen or resident of the United States;
|
|
|
|
a corporation, or other entity taxable as a corporation, formed
under the laws of the United States or any state thereof or the
District of Columbia; or
|
|
|
|
an estate or trust, the income of which is subject to United
States federal income taxation regardless of its source.
|
The tax consequences to a partner in a partnership holding
shares or ADSs will generally depend on the status of the
partner and the activities of the partnership. If you are a
partner in a partnership that holds shares or ADSs, you are
urged to consult your own tax advisor regarding the specific tax
consequences of the purchase, ownership and disposition by the
partnership of shares or ADSs.
The following summary is of a general nature and does not
address all of the tax consequences that may be relevant to you
if you are a member of a special class of holders, some of which
may be subject to special rules, such as banks or other
financial institutions, insurance companies, regulated
investment companies, securities brokers-dealers, traders in
securities that elect to use a
mark-to-market
method of accounting for security holdings, persons who are
owners of an interest in a partnership or other pass-through
entity that is a holder of shares or ADSs, tax-exempt entities,
holders owning directly, indirectly or by attribution
10 percent or more of our voting shares, persons holding
shares or ADSs as part of a hedging, straddle, conversion or
constructive sale transaction or other integrated investment,
persons who receive shares or ADSs as compensation, or persons
who are resident in Germany for German tax purposes, hold the
shares or ADSs in connection with the conduct of business
through a permanent establishment in Germany, or perform
personal services through a fixed base in Germany.
In addition, this summary does not discuss the tax consequences
of the exchange or other disposition of foreign currency in
connection with the purchase or disposition of shares or ADSs.
This summary is based on the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended, its legislative history, existing and proposed
regulations thereunder, published rulings and court decisions,
as well as on the Treaty, all as currently in effect and all
subject to change at any time, possibly with retroactive effect,
or to different interpretation. There can be no assurance that
the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (the IRS)
will not challenge one or more of the tax consequences described
in this summary, and we have not obtained, nor do we intend to
obtain, a ruling from the IRS with respect to the United States
federal income tax consequences of the purchase, ownership or
disposition of shares or ADSs. In addition, this discussion is
based in part upon the representations of the depositary and the
assumption that each obligation in the deposit agreement and any
related agreement will be performed in accordance with its terms.
In general, for U.S. federal income tax purposes and for
purposes of the Treaty, holders of ADSs will be treated as the
owners of our shares represented by those ADSs. Exchanges of
shares for ADSs, and ADSs for shares, generally will not be
subject to United States federal income tax.
Taxation of
Dividends
For United States federal income tax purposes, the gross amount
of cash distributions (including the amount of foreign taxes, if
any, withheld therefrom) paid out of our current or accumulated
earnings and profits (as determined for United States federal
income tax purposes) will be includible in your gross income as
dividend income on the date of receipt. Dividends paid by us
will be treated as foreign source income and will not be
eligible for the dividends received deduction generally allowed
to corporate shareholders under United States federal income tax
law. Distributions in excess of our earnings and profits will be
treated, for United States federal income tax purposes, first as
a nontaxable return of capital to the extent of your tax basis
in the shares or ADSs, and thereafter as capital gain. The
amount of any
118
dividend paid in a
non-United
States currency will be equal to the United States dollar value
of the
non-United
States currency on the date of receipt, regardless of whether
you convert the payment into United States dollars. You will
have a tax basis in the
non-United
States currency distributed equal to such United States dollar
amount. Gain or loss, if any, recognized by you on the sale or
disposition of the
non-United
States currency generally will be United States source ordinary
income or loss.
Dividend income is generally taxed as ordinary income. However,
a maximum United States federal income tax rate of
15 percent will apply to qualified dividend
income received by individuals (as well as certain trusts
and estates) in taxable years beginning before January 1,
2011, provided that certain holding period requirements are met.
Qualified dividend income includes dividends paid on
shares of United States corporations as well as dividends
paid on shares of qualified foreign corporations if,
among other things: (i) the shares of the foreign
corporation are readily tradable on an established securities
market in the United States; or (ii) the foreign
corporation is eligible with respect to substantially all of its
income for the benefits of a comprehensive income tax treaty
with the United States which contains an exchange of information
program (a qualifying treaty). ADSs backed by our
shares are readily tradable on an established securities market
in the United States. In addition, the Treaty is a qualifying
treaty. Accordingly, we believe that dividends paid by us with
respect to our shares and ADSs should constitute qualified
dividend income for United States federal income tax
purposes, provided that the holding period requirements are
satisfied and none of the other special exceptions apply.
Any foreign tax withheld from a distribution will generally be
treated as a foreign income tax that you may elect to deduct in
computing your United States federal taxable income or, subject
to certain complex conditions and limitations which must be
determined on an individual basis by each U.S. Holder,
credit against your United States federal income tax liability.
The limitations include, among others, rules that may limit
foreign tax credits allowable with respect to specific classes
of income to the United States federal income taxes otherwise
payable with respect to each such class of income. Dividends
paid by us generally will be foreign source income. The American
Jobs Creation Act of 2004 modified the foreign tax credit rules
by reducing the number of classes of foreign source income to
two for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2006.
Under such legislation, dividends distributed by us will
generally constitute passive category income, but
could, in the case of certain U.S. Holders, constitute
general category income.
Taxation of
Sales or Other Taxable Dispositions
Sales or other taxable dispositions by U.S. shareholders of
shares or ADSs generally will give rise to capital gain or loss
equal to the difference between the U.S. dollar value of
the amount realized on the disposition and the
U.S. shareholders U.S. dollar basis in the
shares or ADSs. Any such capital gain or loss will be a
long-term capital gain or loss, subject to taxation at reduced
rates for non-corporate taxpayers, if the shares or ADSs were
held for more than one year. The deductibility of capital losses
is subject to limitations.
Information
Reporting and Backup Withholding
Dividends paid in respect of shares or ADSs, and payments of the
proceeds of a sale, exchange, redemption or other disposition of
shares or ADSs, paid within the United States or through certain
U.S.-related
financial intermediaries are subject to information reporting
and may be subject to backup withholding unless the holder
(i) is a corporation or other exempt recipient or
(ii) provides a taxpayer identification number and
certifies that no loss of exemption from backup withholding has
occurred. Holders that are not U.S. persons generally are
not subject to information reporting or backup withholding.
However, such a holder may be required to provide a
certification to establish its
non-U.S. status
in connection with payments received within the United States or
through certain
U.S.-related
financial intermediaries (generally an IRS
Form W-8BEN).
Backup withholding is not an additional tax. Amounts withheld as
backup withholding may be credited against a holders
U.S. federal income tax liability. A holder may obtain a
refund of any excess amounts withheld under the backup
withholding rules by filing the appropriate claim for a refund
with the IRS and furnishing any required information.
119
United States
Gift and Estate Taxes
An individual U.S. Holder generally will be subject to
United States gift and estate taxes with respect to the shares
or ADSs in the same manner and to the same extent as with
respect to other types of personal property.
Exchange Controls
and Limitations Affecting Shareholders
Germany does not currently restrict the movement of capital
between Germany and other countries, except for prohibitions on
the provision of financial aid or capital to certain individuals
and in connection with banned weapons-related transactions to
Belarus, Burma/Myanmar, Iran, Ivory Coast, Democratic Republic
of the Congo, Lebanon, Liberia, Democratic Peoples
Republic of Korea, Somalia, Sudan, Uzbekistan and Zimbabwe.
Germany also imposes certain restrictions on the movement of
capital to Iraq, as well as the provision of financial aid or
capital to the Taliban and Al Qaeda. Similar provisions have
been imposed with regard to certain individuals in order to
support the mandate of the International Criminal Tribunal for
the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY). These restrictions
were established to coincide with resolutions adopted by the
United Nations and the European Union.
More information can be found in German at:
http://www.bundesbank.de/finanzsanktionen/finanzsanktionen
allgemein.php.
For statistical purposes, with some exceptions, every
corporation or individual residing in Germany must report to the
German Central Bank any payment received from or made to a
non-resident corporation or individual if the payment exceeds
12,500 (or the equivalent in a foreign currency).
Additionally, corporations and individuals residing in Germany
must report to the German Central Bank any claims of a resident
corporation or individual against, or liabilities payable to, a
non-resident corporation or individual exceeding an aggregate of
5.0 million (or the equivalent in a foreign currency)
at the end of any calendar month.
Neither German law nor our Articles of Association restrict the
right of non-resident or foreign owners of shares to hold or
vote the shares.
Change of Control
Provisions
The credit facility executed by Infineon Technologies AG in
September 2004 contains a so-called change of control clause
(for further information please refer to the Notes to the
Consolidated Financial Statements under No. 22). In the
event of a takeover, the lenders are entitled to terminate the
credit facility and to demand repayment of any outstanding sums.
A change of control for this purpose shall be assumed if a third
party or a group acting in concert obtains control over Infineon
Technologies AG.
The subordinated convertible notes issued by our company as
guarantor through its subsidiary Infineon Technologies Holding
B.V. in June 2003 with a nominal value of 700 million
due in 2010 and the subordinated exchangeable notes issued by
our company as guarantor through its subsidiary Infineon
Technologies Investment B.V. in September 2007 with a nominal
value of 215 million due in 2010 (for further
information see note 22 to our consolidated financial
statements), each contain a change of control clause, which
grants the note holders an early redemption option in the event
of a change of control (as defined).
In addition, some of the cross-license agreements and
development agreements of our company contain change of control
clauses pursuant to which the counterparty is entitled to
terminate the agreement which require the other partys
approval of the change of control.
We have also entered into change of control provisions with the
members of the Management Board, which are designed to protect
the members of the Management Board and to contribute to their
independence in the event of a change of control. For further
information see Management
Compensation Compensation of the Management
Board Commitments to the Management Board upon
Termination of Employment.
120
Documents on
Display
Our company is subject to the reporting requirements of the
U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
Exchange Act). In accordance with these
requirements, we file reports and other information with the
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. These materials,
including this annual report and the exhibits thereto, may be
inspected and copied at the SECs Public Reference Room at
100 F Street, N.E., Washington, DC 20549, and at
the SECs regional offices in Chicago, Illinois and New
York, NY. The public may obtain information on the operation of
the SECs Public Reference Room by calling the SEC in the
United States at
1-800-SEC-0330.
The SEC also maintains a web site at
http://www.sec.gov
that contains reports and other information regarding
registrants. Material filed by us with the SEC can also be
inspected at the offices of the New York Stock Exchange at
20 Broad Street, New York, New York 10005 and at the
offices of Deutsche Bank as depositary for our ordinary shares,
at 60 Wall Street, New York, NY 10005.
Controls and
Procedures
Disclosure
Controls and Procedures
Our management, with the participation of our chief executive
officer and chief financial officer, evaluated the effectiveness
of our companys disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in
Rules 13a-15(e)
and
15d-15(e)
under the Exchange Act) as of September 30, 2008. Based on
this evaluation, our chief executive officer and chief financial
officer concluded that, as of September 30, 2008, our
companys disclosure controls and procedures were
(1) designed to ensure that material information relating
to Infineon, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to our chief executive officer and chief financial officer
by others within those entities, particularly during the period
in which this report was being prepared, and (2) effective,
in that they provide reasonable assurance that information
required to be disclosed by Infineon in the reports that it
files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed,
summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the
SECs rules and forms.
Managements
Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial
Reporting
Our management is also responsible for establishing and
maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting.
Internal control over financial reporting is defined in
Rule 13a-15(f)
or 15d-15(f)
promulgated under the Exchange Act as a process designed by, or
under the supervision of, our chief executive and chief
financial officers and effected by our board, management and
other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, and includes
those policies and procedures that:
|
|
|
|
|
pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail
accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions
of the assets of our company;
|
|
|
|
provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as
necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and
that receipts and expenditures of our company are being made
only in accordance with authorizations of management and board
of our company; and
|
|
|
|
provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely
detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our
companys assets that could have a material effect on our
financial statements.
|
Our management assessed the effectiveness of our internal
control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2008.
In making this assessment, our management used the criteria set
forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the
Treadway Commission (COSO) in the Internal Control Integrated
Framework. Based on our assessment, management concluded that,
as of September 30, 2008, our internal control over
financial reporting is effective based on those criteria.
121
The effectiveness of the Companys internal control over
financial reporting as of September 30, 2008 has been
audited by our independent registered public accounting firm,
KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft (formerly KPMG
Deutsche-Treuhand Aktiengesellschaft
Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft). Their report thereon
appears on
page F-2
of this Annual Report on
Form 20-F.
Changes in
Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting
No change in our internal control over financial reporting
occurred during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Limitations
There are inherent limitations to the effectiveness of any
system of disclosure and internal controls, including the
possibilities of faulty judgments in decision-making, simple
error or mistake, fraud, the circumvention of controls by
individual acts or the collusion of two or more people, or
management override of controls. Accordingly, even an effective
disclosure and internal control system can provide only
reasonable assurance with respect to disclosures and financial
statement preparation. Furthermore, because of changes in
conditions, the effectiveness of a disclosure and internal
control system may vary over time.
Audit Committee
Financial Expert
Our Supervisory Board has determined that Mr. Kley and
Dr. Luther are audit committee financial
experts, as such term is defined by the regulations of the
Securities and Exchange Commission issued pursuant to
Section 407 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and are
independent, as such term is defined in
Rule 10A-3
under the Exchange Act.
Code of
Ethics
We have adopted a code of ethics (as a part of our
Business Conduct Guidelines) that applies to all of
our employees worldwide, including our principal executive
officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting
officer within the meaning of Item 16B of
Form 20-F.
These guidelines provide rules and conduct guidelines aimed at
ensuring high ethical standards throughout our organization. You
may obtain a copy of our code of ethics, at no cost, by writing
to us at Infineon Technologies AG, Am Campeon 1-12, D-85579
Neubiberg, Germany, Attention: Legal Department.
Principal
Accountant Fees and Services
Audit Fees. KPMG, our independent auditors,
charged us an aggregate of 5.9 million in the 2007
fiscal year and 5.2 million in the 2008 fiscal year
in connection with professional services rendered for the audit
of our annual consolidated financial statements and of internal
control over financial reporting and services normally provided
by them in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or
other compliance engagements. These services consisted of
quarterly review engagements and the annual audit.
Audit-Related Fees. In addition to the amounts
described above, KPMG charged us an aggregate of
0.6 million in the 2007 fiscal year and
1.3 million in the 2008 fiscal year for assurance and
related services in connection with the performance of the audit
of our annual consolidated financial statements. These services
consisted of transaction and accounting advisory services, IT
system audits and services related to the transition to IFRS.
Tax Fees. In addition to the amounts described
above, KPMG charged us an aggregate of less than
0.1 million in the 2007 fiscal year and less than
0.1 million in the 2008 fiscal year for professional
services related primarily to tax compliance.
122
All Other Fees. Fees of 0.1 million
were charged by KPMG in 2007 fiscal year and
0 million in 2008 fiscal year for other services.
The above services fall within the scope of audit and permitted
non-audit services within the meaning of section 201 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Our Investment, Finance and Audit
Committee has pre-approved KPMGs performance of these
audit and permitted non-audit services and set limits on the
types of services and the maximum cost of these services in any
fiscal year. KPMG reports to our Investment, Finance and Audit
Committee on a quarterly basis on the type and extent of
non-audit services provided during the period and compliance
with these criteria.
Exemptions from
the Listing Standards for Audit Committees
As permitted by the rules of the Securities and Exchange
Commission, our audit committee includes one member who is a
non-executive employee of our company and who is named to our
Supervisory Board pursuant to the German law on employee
co-determination. We believe that our reliance on this exemption
from the listing standards for audit committees does not
materially adversely affect the ability of our audit committee
to act independently.
Material
Contracts
This section provides a summary of material contracts not in the
ordinary course of business to which we are a party and that
have been entered into during the two immediately preceding
fiscal years. The agreements described below, or English
translations thereof, where applicable, have been filed as
exhibits to this Annual Report on
Form 20-F.
Our Annual Reports on
Form 20-F
for the 2000 to 2007 fiscal years contain summaries of
additional material contracts entered into prior to
October 1, 2007, some of which may still be in effect.
Commercial
Agreements
The descriptions of our joint venture and strategic alliance
agreements set out under the headings Business
Manufacturing Manufacturing joint venture and
Business Strategic Alliances and Other
Collaborations and at note 16 to our consolidated
financial statements for the year ended September 30, 2008
are incorporated herein by reference.
Related Party
Transactions
In addition, please see Related-Party Transactions and
Relationships for a summary of contracts with certain of our
related parties.
123
GLOSSARY
|
|
|
200-millimeter manufacturing, 300-millimeter manufacturing |
|
The size refers to the diameter of the wafers being processed in
a front-end fab. |
|
|
|
|
3G |
|
See UMTS. |
|
x-nanometer technology |
|
The size refers to the structure size of the manufacturing
process used in a front-end fab. |
|
A-GPS |
|
Assisted Global Positioning System. GPS uses a network of
satellites to triangulate a receivers position and provide
latitude and longitude coordinates. Assisted GPS, or A-GPS, is a
technology that uses an assistance server to cut down the time
needed to find the location. |
|
ADSL, ADSL2, ADSL2+ |
|
Asymmetric Digital Subscriber Line. A form of Digital Subscriber
Line (see xDSL) in which the bandwidth available for
downloading data is significantly larger than for uploading
data. This technology is well suited for web browsing and client
server applications as well as for emerging applications such as
video on demand. There are different ADSL standards deployed
differing in the downstream and upstream rates. |
|
analog |
|
A continuous representation of phenomena in terms of points
along a scale, each point merging imperceptibly into the next.
Analog signals vary continuously over a range of values. Real
world phenomena, such as heat and pressure, are analog. See also
digital. |
|
ASIC |
|
Application Specific Integrated Circuit. A logic or mixed-signal
circuit designed for a specific use and for a specific customer. |
|
ASSP |
|
Application Specific Standard Product. A logic or mixed-signal
circuit designed for a specific application market, and sold to
more than one customer, and thus, standard. |
|
Back-end |
|
The packaging, assembly and testing stages of the semiconductor
manufacturing process, which take place after electronic
circuits are imprinted on silicon wafers in the front-end
process. |
|
Baseband IC |
|
The baseband IC is an essential part of a cell phone. It
includes a digital signal processor, a microcontroller, some
on-chip memory, interfaces to several external devices, and
mixed-signal functionality like coder/decoder for speaker and
microphone. |
|
Bit |
|
A unit of information; a computational quantity (binary pulse)
that can take one of two values, such as true and false or 0 and
1; also the smallest unit of storage sufficient to hold one bit. |
|
Broadband |
|
Any network technology that combines and sorts multiple,
independent network frequencies onto a single cable. Commonly
used to refer to high-bandwidth copper or fiber cables with a
bandwidth of 1 Mbit per second and above. |
|
CAT-iq |
|
Cordless Advanced Technology internet and quality.
CAT-iq was created by DECT forum, and allows to the standard
cordless DECT phones to be used for VoIP. It is a technology
made to bring together broadband internet and telephony. This
convergence is also part of the fixed mobile
convergence. |
124
|
|
|
Chip cards |
|
Cards that contain an IC. Frequently used for telephone cards,
debit cards, SIM cards, social cards, identification cards and
PayTV cards. |
|
CMOS |
|
Complementary Metal Oxide Substrate technology. A process
technology that uses complementary MOS transistors (NMOS and
PMOS) to make a chip that will consume relatively low power and
permit a high level of integration. |
|
CO |
|
Central Office. A common carrier switching office in which
users lines terminate. The nerve center of a telephone
system. |
|
Contactless chip card |
|
In contrast to contact-based chip cards, contactless chip cards
communicate with the card reader through induction technology.
Contactless cards require only close proximity to an antenna to
complete transaction. |
|
CODEC |
|
Coder/Decoder. Hardware used to code and decode digital signals. |
|
CPE |
|
Customer Premises Equipment. CPE is telephone or other service
provider equipment, that is located on the customers
premises (physical location) rather than on the providers
premises or in between. |
|
DDR2 |
|
A memory device with a DDR2 interface and clocked with a
400 MHz clock. |
|
DECT |
|
Digital Enhanced Cordless Telecommunications. A standard used
for pan-European digital cordless telephones. |
|
Digital |
|
The representation of data by a series of bits or discrete
values such as 0 and 1. See also analog. |
|
DIMM |
|
Dual In-line Memory Module. A memory module with contact rows on
both sides.There are different standards which differ in form
factor and interface specification. |
|
|
|
FB-DIMM: Fully Buffered DIMM. Often used in servers and
workstations. |
|
|
|
SO-DIMM: Small outline DIMM. Often used in notebooks. |
|
|
|
Micro-DIMM: Memory module with a small form factor. Often used
in
sub-notebooks. |
|
|
|
VLP-DIMM: Very low-profile DIMM. Often used in server racks. |
|
|
|
Registered DIMM: Using a register (also called buffer) between
the memory module and the memory controller. Often used in
servers and workstations. |
|
Discrete semiconductors |
|
Semiconductor devices that involve only a single device like a
transistor or a diode. |
|
DigRF |
|
A digital interface intended for the cellular market. The DigRF
standard specifies a digital serial interface between the RF
transceiver and the baseband chip, which replaces the analog
interface in previous generation mobile handset architectures. |
|
DRAM |
|
Dynamic Random Access Memory. The most common type of solid
state memory. Each bit of information is stored as an amount of
electrical charge in a storage cell consisting of a capacitor
and a transistor. The capacitor discharges gradually due to
leakage and the |
125
|
|
|
|
|
memory cell loses the information stored. To preserve the
information, the memory has to be refreshed periodically and is
therefore referred to as dynamic. DRAM is a
widespread memory technology because of its high packing density
and consequently low price. |
|
DSL |
|
See xDSL. |
|
DVB-C, DVB-H, DVB-S, DVB-T |
|
Digital Video Broadcasting. There are different standards
available:
DVB-C = Digital Video Broadcasting Cable;
DVB-H = Digital Video Broadcasting Handheld;
DVB-S = Digital Video Broadcasting Satellite;
DVB-T = Digital Video Broadcasting Terrestrial. |
|
ECC |
|
Error Correction code. An error-correcting code is an algorithm
for expressing a sequence of numbers such that any errors which
are introduced can be detected and corrected (within certain
limitations) based on the remaining numbers. ECC is used in
computer systems for data transfer between the CPU and the
memory as well as in almost any kind of telecommunication
systems. |
|
EDGE |
|
Enhanced Data rate for GSM Evolution. Also referred to as 2.75G,
where GSM is 2G, GPRS is 2.5G and UMTS is 3G. |
|
Embedded DRAM, Embedded flash |
|
A process technology that combines DRAM or flash, respectively,
and logic functions on a single chip. |
|
Ethernet |
|
A protocol for high speed communications, principally used for
LAN networks. |
|
Fab |
|
A semiconductor fabrication facility, in which the front-end
manufacturing process takes place. (see also
Front-end.) |
|
Flash memory |
|
A type of non-volatile memory that can be erased and
reprogrammed. See NAND. |
|
FlexRay |
|
FlexRay is a new automotive network communications protocol. It
is positioned above CAN (controller area network) and MOST
(media oriented systems transport) in terms of both performance
and price. |
|
Front-end |
|
The wafer processing stage of the semiconductor manufacturing
process, in which electronic circuits are imprinted onto raw
silicon wafers. This is followed by the packaging, assembly and
testing stages, which comprise the back-end process. |
|
Foundry |
|
A semiconductor manufacturer that makes chips for third parties. |
|
GDDR3, GDDR5 |
|
Graphic Double Data Rate. Third or fifth generation,
respectively. |
|
Gigabit (Gbit) |
|
Approximately one billion bits; precisely 2 to the power of 30
bits. |
|
GPRS |
|
General Packet Radio Services. A packet based wireless
communication service that promises data rates from 56 up to
114 Kbps and continuous connection to the Internet for
mobile phone and computer users. GPRS is based on GSM
communication. |
|
GSM |
|
Global System for Mobile communication. A digital mobile
telephone system that is the de facto wireless telephone
standard in Europe and widely used in other parts of the world.
GSM digitizes and compresses data, then sends it down a channel
with two other streams of user |
126
|
|
|
|
|
data, each in its own time slot. It operates at either the
900 MHz or 1800 MHz frequency band. |
|
HSDPA, HSUPA, HSPA, HSxPA |
|
High-Speed Downlink Packet Access, High-Speed Uplink Packet
Access. HSDPA and HSUPA are 3G (third generation) mobile
telephony communications protocols in the High-Speed Packet
Access (HSPA; sometimes referred to as HSxPA) family, which
allows networks based on Universal Mobile Telecommunications
System (see also UMTS) to have higher data transfer
speeds and capacity. Current HSDPA deployments support down-link
speeds of 1.8 Mbit/s, 3.6 Mbit/s, 7.2 Mbit/s and 14.4
Mbit/s. HSUPA deployments support up-link speeds of up to 5.76
Mbit/s. |
|
IC |
|
Integrated Circuit. A semiconductor device consisting of many
interconnected transistors and other components like resistors,
capacitors and diodes. |
|
ISDN |
|
Integrated Services Digital Network. A type of online connection
that speeds up data transmission by handling information in a
digital form. Traditional modem communications translate a
computers digital data into an analog wave form and send
the signal, which then must be converted back to an analog
signal. ISDN can be thought of as a direct digital connection. |
|
ISO |
|
International Standards Organization. The international
organization responsible for developing and maintaining
worldwide standards for manufacturing, environmental protection,
computers, data communications, and many other fields. |
|
LDMOS |
|
Laterally Diffused MOS transistor. LDMOS transistors are widely
used in RF/microwave power amplifiers for base-stations where
the requirement is for high output power. |
|
MCU |
|
Microcontroller Unit. An MCU is a single chip that contains a
processor, RAM, ROM, clock and I/O control unit. Hundreds of
millions of MCUs are used in myriad devices ranging from
automobiles, industrial applications to consumer electronics. |
|
Megabit (Mbit) |
|
Approximately one million bits; precisely 2 to the power of 20
bits. |
|
Memory |
|
Any device that can store data in machine-readable format. |
|
Microcontroller |
|
A microprocessor combined with memory and interfaces integrated
on a single circuit and intended to operate as an embedded
system. |
|
Micron (m) |
|
A metric unit of linear measure which equals one millionth of a
meter. A human hair is about 100 microns in diameter. There are
1000 microns in 1 millimeter. |
|
Mixed-signal IC |
|
An integrated circuit that includes both analog and digital
signal processing circuitry on a single semiconductor die.
Typically, mixed-signal chips perform some whole function of
sub-function
in a larger assembly such as the radio subsystem of a cell
phone. They often contain an entire
system-on-a-chip. |
|
MOSFET |
|
Metal-Oxide-Substrate Field Effect Transistor. A traditional
metal oxide substrate (MOS) structure is
obtained by depositing a layer of silicon dioxide
(SiO2;
referred to as oxide) and a layer of metal |
127
|
|
|
|
|
(polycrystalline silicon is commonly used instead of metal) on
top of the wafer base material (referred to as substrate).The
MOSFET is a device used to amplify or switch electronic signals.
It is by far the most common field-effect transistor in both
digital and analog circuits. |
|
NAND |
|
NAND flash architecture is one of two flash technologies (the
other being NOR) used in memory cards. It is also used in USB
flash drives, MP3 players, and provides the image storage for
digital cameras. NAND is best suited to flash devices requiring
high capacity data storage. |
|
Nanometer (nm) |
|
A metric unit of linear measure which equals one billionth of a
meter. There are 1000 nanometers in 1 micron. |
|
Non-volatile memory |
|
A memory storage device whose contents are preserved when its
power is off. Most common types are NAND flash and NOR flash. |
|
ODM |
|
Original Device Manufacturer. A company which manufactures a
product which ultimately will be branded by another firm for
sale. |
|
OHSAS |
|
Occupational Health and Safety Assessment Series. The discipline
concerned with protecting the safety, health and welfare of
employees, organizations, and others affected by the work they
undertake (such as customers, suppliers, and members of the
public). |
|
PBX |
|
Private Branch eXchange. A telephone exchange that is owned by a
private business, as opposed to one owned by a common carrier or
by a telephone company. |
|
PDA |
|
Personal Digital Assistant. A term used to refer to any small
mobile hand-held device that provides computing and information
storage and retrieval capabilities for personal or business use,
often for keeping schedule calendars and address book
information handy. |
|
PFC |
|
Perfluorinated Compounds. Compounds derived from hydrocarbons by
replacement of hydrogen atoms by fluorine atoms. |
|
PHY |
|
Physical Layer. A part of the electrical or mechanical interface
to the physical medium. For example, the PHY determines how to
put a stream of bits from the upper (data link) layer on to the
pins for a parallel printer interface or network line card. |
|
RAM |
|
Random access memory. A type of data storage device for which
the order of access to different locations does not affect the
speed of access. This is in contrast to, for example, a magnetic
disk or magnetic tape where it is much quicker to access data
sequentially because accessing a non sequential location
requires physical movement of the storage medium rather than
electronic switching. |
|
REACH |
|
Registration, Evaluation and Authorization of Chemicals. A
framework for regulation of chemicals in the European Union. |
|
RF transceiver |
|
Radio-frequency transceiver. A high-frequency used in mobile
telecommunications. The term radio frequency refers to
electromagnetic waves having characteristics such that, if the
current is input to an antenna, an electromagnetic field is
generated suitable for wireless broadcasting and/or
communications. |
128
|
|
|
RFID |
|
Radio frequency identification. Systems that read or write data
to RF tags that are present in a radio frequency field projected
from RF reading/writing equipment. Data may be contained in one
or more bits for the purpose of providing identification and
other information relevant to the object to which the tag is
attached. It incorporates the use of electromagnetic, or
electrostatic coupling in the radio frequency portion of the
spectrum to communicate to or from a tag through a variety of
modulation schemes. |
|
Semiconductor |
|
Generic name for devices, such as transistors and integrated
circuits, that control the flow of electrical signals. More
generally a material, typically crystalline, that can be altered
to allow electrical current to flow or not flow in a pattern.
The most common semiconductor material for use in integrated
circuits is silicon. |
|
Server |
|
A computer that provides some service for other computers
connected to it via a network. The most common example is a file
server which has a local disk and services requests from remote
clients to read and write files on that disk. |
|
Silicon |
|
A type of semiconducting material used to make a wafer. Silicon
is the most widely used semiconductor material in the
semiconductor industry (other than Germanium) as a base material. |
|
SIM card |
|
Subscriber identification module card. Used in mobile handsets
for subscriber authentication. |
|
SLIC |
|
Subscriber line interface circuit. A circuit in a telephone
company switch to which a customers telephone line is
connected. |
|
SO-DIMM |
|
Small-Outline Dual In-line Memory Module. See also
DIMM. |
|
SoC |
|
System-on-a-chip.
The packaging of all the necessary electronic circuit and parts
for a system (such as a cell phone or digital
camera) on a single IC. |
|
SRAM |
|
Static RAM. A type of memory that is more expensive and much
faster than DRAM but has much lower power consumption than DRAM.
SRAM are used in cell phones because of low power consumption
and in PCs as a fast first-level memory buffer. |
|
Structure size |
|
A measurement (generally in micron or nanometer) of the width of
the smallest patterned feature on a semiconductor chip. |
|
T/E |
|
T1/E1, T3/E3. A data transmission technology based on copper
wires. Various speed classes are available: T1: 1,544 Mbit/s;
E1:
2,048 Mbit/s;
T3: 44,736 Mbit/s; E3: 34,368 Mbit/s. The T standards are
prevalent in NAFTA. The E standards are European standards. |
|
Telematics |
|
The combination of telecommunications and data processing. |
|
UMTS |
|
Universal Mobile Telecommunications Service. A so-called
third-generation (3G),
broadband, packet based transmission of text, digitized voice,
video, and multimedia at data rates up to two megabits per
second (Mbps), that is based on the GSM communication standard.
UMTS aims to offer a consistent set of services to mobile
computer and phone users no matter where they are located in the
world. |
129
|
|
|
VDSL |
|
Very high bit-rate Digital Subscriber Line. A form of digital
subscriber line similar to ADSL but providing higher speeds at
reduced distances. See also xDSL. |
|
VoIP |
|
Voice Over Internet Protocol. The routing of voice conversations
over the Internet or any other
IP-based
network. |
|
Wafer |
|
A disk made of a semiconducting material such as silicon,
currently usually either 150-millimeters or 200-millimeters or
300-millimeters in diameter, used to form the substrate of a
chip. A finished wafer may contain several thousand chips. |
|
WDCT |
|
Worldwide Digital Cordless Telecommunications. |
|
xDSL |
|
Digital Subscriber Line (where x represents the type
of technology, e.g. ADSL, VDSL, SHDSL). A family of digital
telecommunications protocols designed to allow high speed data
communication over existing copper telephone lines between
end-users and the telephone company. See also ADSL
and VDSL. |
|
Yield |
|
When used in connection with manufacturing, the ratio of the
number of usable products to the total number of produced
products. |
130
INFINEON
TECHNOLOGIES AG AND SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Prepared in accordance with US.
GAAP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
|
|
F-2
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended
September 30, 2006, 2007 and 2008
|
|
|
F-3
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2007 and
2008
|
|
|
F-4
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders Equity for the
years ended
September 30, 2006, 2007 and 2008
|
|
|
F-5
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended
September 30, 2006, 2007 and 2008
|
|
|
F-6
|
|
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
|
F-7
|
|
F-1
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC
ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Supervisory Board of Infineon Technologies AG:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
Infineon Technologies AG and subsidiaries (the Company) as of
September 30, 2008 and 2007, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, shareholders equity, and cash
flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended
September 30, 2008. We also have audited the Companys
internal control over financial reporting as of
September 30, 2008, based on criteria established in
Internal ControlIntegrated Framework issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission
(COSO). The Companys management is responsible for these
consolidated financial statements, for maintaining effective
internal control over financial reporting, and for its
assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting, included in the accompanying
Managements Annual Report on Internal Control Over
Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion
on these consolidated financial statements and an opinion on the
Companys internal control over financial reporting based
on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement and whether effective internal
control over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audits of the consolidated financial statements
included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the
amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing
the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, and evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial
reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal
control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a
material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design
and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the
assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We
believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinions.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a
process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. A companys
internal control over financial reporting includes those
policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance
of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions
are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of
management and directors of the company; and (3) provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements. Because of its inherent limitations,
internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or
detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of
effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that
controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions,
or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures
may deteriorate.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred
to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial
position of the Company as of September 30, 2008 and 2007,
and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of
the years in the three-year period ended September 30,
2008, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles. Also in our opinion, the Company has maintained, in
all material respects, effective internal control over financial
reporting as of September 30, 2008, based on criteria
established in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework
issued by COSO.
Munich, Germany
December 23, 2008
KPMG AG
Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft
(previously
KPMG Deutsche Treuhand-Gesellschaft
Aktiengesellschaft
Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft)
F-2
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Operations
For the years ended September 30, 2006, 2007 and 2008
(in millions, except for share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
Notes
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( millions)
|
|
|
( millions)
|
|
|
( millions)
|
|
|
($ millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,114
|
|
|
|
4,074
|
|
|
|
4,321
|
|
|
|
6,084
|
|
Cost of goods sold
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
2,805
|
|
|
|
2,702
|
|
|
|
2,823
|
|
|
|
3,975
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,309
|
|
|
|
1,372
|
|
|
|
1,498
|
|
|
|
2,109
|
|
|
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
816
|
|
|
|
768
|
|
|
|
755
|
|
|
|
1,063
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
520
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
569
|
|
|
|
801
|
|
Restructuring charges
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
181
|
|
|
|
255
|
|
Other operating expense (income), net
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
Operating (loss) income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(86
|
)
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
(50
|
)
|
|
|
(71
|
)
|
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(67
|
)
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
Equity in earnings (losses) of associated companies, net
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Other non-operating (expense) income, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(41
|
)
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
Minority interests
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income before income taxes, discontinued operations, and
extraordinary loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(203
|
)
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
(74
|
)
|
|
|
(105
|
)
|
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
(47
|
)
|
|
|
(69
|
)
|
|
|
(61
|
)
|
|
|
(85
|
)
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(250
|
)
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
(135
|
)
|
|
|
(190
|
)
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
(296
|
)
|
|
|
(2,987
|
)
|
|
|
(4,206
|
)
|
|
|
Loss before extraordinay loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(268
|
)
|
|
|
(333
|
)
|
|
|
(3,122
|
)
|
|
|
(4,396
|
)
|
|
|
Extraordinary loss, net of tax
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(268
|
)
|
|
|
(368
|
)
|
|
|
(3,122
|
)
|
|
|
(4,396
|
)
|
|
|
Basic and diluted loss per share from continuing operations
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
(0.34
|
)
|
|
|
(0.05
|
)
|
|
|
(0.18
|
)
|
|
|
(0.25
|
)
|
|
|
Basic and diluted loss per share from discontinued operations,
net of tax
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
|
(0.40
|
)
|
|
|
(3.98
|
)
|
|
|
(5.60
|
)
|
|
|
Basic and diluted loss per share for extraordinary loss, net of
tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted loss per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.36
|
)
|
|
|
(0.49
|
)
|
|
|
(4.16
|
)
|
|
|
(5.86
|
)
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
F-3
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Balance Sheets
September 30, 2007 and 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
Notes
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( millions)
|
|
|
( millions)
|
|
|
($ millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,073
|
|
|
|
749
|
|
|
|
1,055
|
|
Marketable securities
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
210
|
|
|
|
143
|
|
|
|
201
|
|
Trade accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
620
|
|
|
|
589
|
|
|
|
829
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
598
|
|
|
|
663
|
|
|
|
934
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
303
|
|
|
|
379
|
|
|
|
534
|
|
Assets held for disposal
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
5,653
|
|
|
|
2,224
|
|
|
|
3,131
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,491
|
|
|
|
4,773
|
|
|
|
6,721
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
1,462
|
|
|
|
1,311
|
|
|
|
1,846
|
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
362
|
|
|
|
510
|
|
Long-term investments
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
Restricted cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
108
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
446
|
|
|
|
402
|
|
|
|
566
|
|
Pension assets
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
154
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,753
|
|
|
|
7,083
|
|
|
|
9,974
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and shareholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term debt and current maturities
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
260
|
|
|
|
207
|
|
|
|
291
|
|
Trade accounts payable
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
596
|
|
|
|
488
|
|
|
|
687
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
379
|
|
|
|
410
|
|
|
|
577
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
326
|
|
|
|
435
|
|
|
|
612
|
|
Liabilities held for disposal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,897
|
|
|
|
2,091
|
|
|
|
2,945
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,468
|
|
|
|
3,643
|
|
|
|
5,129
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
1,149
|
|
|
|
1,051
|
|
|
|
1,480
|
|
Pension liabilities
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Long-term accrued liabilities
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
141
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,806
|
|
|
|
4,862
|
|
|
|
6,846
|
|
|
|
Minority interests
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
1,033
|
|
|
|
457
|
|
|
|
644
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ordinary share capital
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
1,499
|
|
|
|
1,499
|
|
|
|
2,111
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,864
|
|
|
|
5,872
|
|
|
|
8,268
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,148
|
)
|
|
|
(5,274
|
)
|
|
|
(7,426
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
(301
|
)
|
|
|
(333
|
)
|
|
|
(469
|
)
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,914
|
|
|
|
1,764
|
|
|
|
2,484
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,753
|
|
|
|
7,083
|
|
|
|
9,974
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
F-4
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders Equity
For the years ended September 30, 2006, 2007 and 2008
(in millions of Euro, except for share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
minimum
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pension
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
liability/
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issued
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
|
|
|
currency
|
|
|
Defined
|
|
|
gains (loss)
|
|
|
gains (losses) on
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ordinary shares
|
|
|
paid-in
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
translation
|
|
|
benefit
|
|
|
on
|
|
|
cash flow
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
capital
|
|
|
deficit
|
|
|
adjustment
|
|
|
plans
|
|
|
securities
|
|
|
hedges
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of October 1, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
747,569,359
|
|
|
|
1,495
|
|
|
|
5,800
|
|
|
|
(1,512
|
)
|
|
|
(58
|
)
|
|
|
(84
|
)
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
5,629
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(268
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(268
|
)
|
Other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(69
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
(74
|
)
|
|
|
Total comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(342
|
)
|
|
|
Issuance of ordinary shares:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise of stock options
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
39,935
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
Balance as of September 30, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
747,609,294
|
|
|
|
1,495
|
|
|
|
5,828
|
|
|
|
(1,780
|
)
|
|
|
(127
|
)
|
|
|
(87
|
)
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
5,315
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(368
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(368
|
)
|
Other comprehensive (loss) income
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(105
|
)
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
Total comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(393
|
)
|
|
|
Issuance of ordinary shares:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise of stock options
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
2,119,341
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
Deferred compensation, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Adjustment to initially apply SFAS 158, net of tax
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(48
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(48
|
)
|
|
|
Balance as of September 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
749,728,635
|
|
|
|
1,499
|
|
|
|
5,864
|
|
|
|
(2,148
|
)
|
|
|
(232
|
)
|
|
|
(45
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
4,914
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,122
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,122
|
)
|
Other comprehensive (loss) income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
Total comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,154
|
)
|
|
|
Issuance of ordinary shares:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise of stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,450
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
Deferred compensation, net Adjustment to initially apply
FIN 48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
Balance as of September 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
749,742,085
|
|
|
|
1,499
|
|
|
|
5,872
|
|
|
|
(5,274
|
)
|
|
|
(268
|
)
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
1,764
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
F-5
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
For the years ended September 30, 2006, 2007 and
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
( millions)
|
|
|
( millions)
|
|
|
( millions)
|
|
|
($ millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
(268
|
)
|
|
|
(368
|
)
|
|
|
(3,122
|
)
|
|
|
(4,396
|
)
|
Less: Net loss from discontinued operations
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
296
|
|
|
|
2,987
|
|
|
|
4,206
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to cash provided by operating
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
702
|
|
|
|
609
|
|
|
|
542
|
|
|
|
763
|
|
Acquired in-process research and development
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
Recovery of doubtful accounts
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Loss (gains) on sales of marketable securities
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Gains on sales of businesses and interests in subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
(79
|
)
|
|
|
(111
|
)
|
Gains on disposals of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
Equity in losses (earnings) of associated companies
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
Minority interests
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
Impairment charges
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
135
|
|
|
|
190
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade accounts receivable
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(59
|
)
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
|
|
(65
|
)
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
Trade accounts payable
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
(95
|
)
|
|
|
(77
|
)
|
|
|
(108
|
)
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
|
|
(89
|
)
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
Other assets and liabilities
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
(55
|
)
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities from continuing
operations
|
|
|
677
|
|
|
|
227
|
|
|
|
535
|
|
|
|
753
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities from
discontinued operations
|
|
|
326
|
|
|
|
980
|
|
|
|
(659
|
)
|
|
|
(928
|
)
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
|
1,003
|
|
|
|
1,207
|
|
|
|
(124
|
)
|
|
|
(175
|
)
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of marketable securities available for sale
|
|
|
(317
|
)
|
|
|
(75
|
)
|
|
|
(574
|
)
|
|
|
(808
|
)
|
Proceeds from sales of marketable securities available for sale
|
|
|
693
|
|
|
|
341
|
|
|
|
601
|
|
|
|
846
|
|
Proceeds from sales of businesses and interests in subsidiaries
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
246
|
|
|
|
122
|
|
|
|
172
|
|
Business acquisitions, net of cash acquired
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(45
|
)
|
|
|
(353
|
)
|
|
|
(497
|
)
|
Investment in associated and related companies
|
|
|
117
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(142
|
)
|
Purchases of intangible assets, and other assets
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
(115
|
)
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
Purchases of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
(640
|
)
|
|
|
(498
|
)
|
|
|
(312
|
)
|
|
|
(439
|
)
|
Proceeds from sales of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities from continuing operations
|
|
|
(52
|
)
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
(620
|
)
|
|
|
(873
|
)
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities from
discontinued operations
|
|
|
(801
|
)
|
|
|
(847
|
)
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(853
|
)
|
|
|
(867
|
)
|
|
|
(616
|
)
|
|
|
(867
|
)
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in short-term debt
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(68
|
)
|
|
|
(96
|
)
|
Net change in related party financial receivables and payables
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
347
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt
|
|
|
356
|
|
|
|
245
|
|
|
|
149
|
|
|
|
210
|
|
Principal repayments of long-term debt
|
|
|
(56
|
)
|
|
|
(744
|
)
|
|
|
(226
|
)
|
|
|
(318
|
)
|
Change in restricted cash
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of ordinary shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of shares to minority interest
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend payments to minority interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(71
|
)
|
|
|
(80
|
)
|
|
|
(113
|
)
|
Capital contributions
|
|
|
(483
|
)
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities from continuing operations
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
(214
|
)
|
|
|
(230
|
)
|
|
|
(324
|
)
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities from
discontinued operations
|
|
|
773
|
|
|
|
(307
|
)
|
|
|
337
|
|
|
|
475
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
762
|
|
|
|
(521
|
)
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
151
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
912
|
|
|
|
(181
|
)
|
|
|
(633
|
)
|
|
|
(891
|
)
|
Effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash and cash
equivalents
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
|
|
|
1,148
|
|
|
|
2,040
|
|
|
|
1,819
|
|
|
|
2,560
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year
|
|
|
2,040
|
|
|
|
1,819
|
|
|
|
1,181
|
|
|
|
1,663
|
|
Less: Cash and cash equivalents at end of year from discontinued
operations
|
|
|
932
|
|
|
|
746
|
|
|
|
432
|
|
|
|
608
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year from continuing
operations
|
|
|
1,108
|
|
|
|
1,073
|
|
|
|
749
|
|
|
|
1,055
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
F-6
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
|
|
1.
|
Description of
Business and Basis of Presentation
|
Description of
Business
Infineon Technologies AG and its subsidiaries (collectively,
Infineon or the Company) design,
develop, manufacture and market a broad range of semiconductors
and complete system solutions used in a wide variety of
microelectronic applications, including computer systems,
telecommunication systems, consumer goods, automotive products,
industrial automation and control systems, and chip card
applications. The Companys products include standard
commodity components, full-custom devices, semi-custom devices
and application-specific components for memory, analog, digital
and mixed-signal applications. The Company has operations,
investments and customers located mainly in Europe, Asia and
North America. Effective May 1, 2006, substantially all of
the memory products-related assets and liabilities, operations
and activities of the Company were contributed to Qimonda AG
(Qimonda), a stand-alone legal company (the
Formation). References in these consolidated
financial statements to Infineon Logic relate to the
Company excluding Qimonda.
Basis of
Presentation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been
prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America
(U.S. GAAP). Infineon Technologies AG is
incorporated in Germany. The German Commercial Code
(Handelsgesetzbuch or HGB)
requires the Company to prepare consolidated financial
statements in accordance with HGB accounting principles and
regulations. Pursuant to these requirements, in addition to the
U.S. GAAP consolidated financial statements contained
herein the Company prepared consolidated financial statements in
accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards
(IFRS) and its interpretations issued by the
International Accounting Standards Board (IASB), as
adopted by the European Union (EU) and additionally
with requirements as set forth in section 315a
paragraph 1 of HGB. The fiscal year-end for the Company is
September 30. Beginning with the first quarter of the 2009
fiscal year, the Company will prepare its primary financial
statements according to IFRS. For periods prior to the 2009
fiscal year, the Company prepared its primary financial
statements according to U.S. GAAP. As part of its
transition to IFRS, the Company has published IFRS consolidated
financial statements for the 2007 and 2008 fiscal year as
supplemental information.
All amounts herein are shown in Euro (or )
except where otherwise stated. The accompanying consolidated
balance sheet as of September 30, 2008, and the
consolidated statements of operations and cash flows for the
year then ended are also presented in U.S. dollars
($), solely for the convenience of the reader, at
the rate of 1 = $1.4081, the Federal Reserve noon buying
rate on September 30, 2008. The U.S. dollar
convenience translation amounts have not been audited.
Certain amounts in prior year consolidated financial statements
and notes have been reclassified to conform to the current year
presentation. Gains and losses from sales of investments in
marketable debt and equity securities, previously reported as
part of the operating segments EBIT, have been
reclassified to the Corporate and Eliminations segment. In
addition, during the second quarter of the 2008 fiscal year the
Company committed to a plan to dispose of Qimonda. As a result,
the historical results of Qimonda are reported as discontinued
operations for all periods presented, and its assets and
liabilities have been classified as held for disposal for all
periods presented.
|
|
2.
|
Summary of
Significant Accounting Policies
|
The following is a summary of significant accounting policies
followed in the preparation of the accompanying consolidated
financial statements.
F-7
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Basis of
Consolidation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the
accounts of Infineon Technologies AG and its significant
subsidiaries that are directly or indirectly controlled on a
consolidated basis. Control is generally conveyed by ownership
of the majority of voting rights. Additionally, the Company
evaluates its relationships with entities to identify whether
they are variable interest entities (VIEs), and to
assess whether it is the primary beneficiary of such entities.
If the determination is made that the Company is the primary
beneficiary, then that entity is included in the consolidated
financial statements. VIEs are entities for which either the
equity investment at risk is not sufficient to permit the entity
to finance its activities without additional subordinated
financial support, the investors lack an essential
characteristic of a controlling financial interest, or the
investors economic interests are disproportionate to the
attached voting rights and substantially all of the
entitys activities involve or are conducted for an
investor with disproportionately few voting rights.
Investments in companies in which the Company has the ability to
exercise significant influence over operating and financial
policies, generally through an ownership interest of
20 percent or more and that are not controlled by the
Company (Associated Companies) are accounted for
using the equity method of accounting (see note 16). The
equity in earnings of Associated Companies with fiscal year ends
that differ by not more than three months from the
Companys fiscal year end are recorded on a lag. Other
equity investments (Related Companies), generally in
which the Company has an ownership interest of less than
20 percent, are recorded at cost. The effects of all
significant intercompany transactions are eliminated.
The Company group, including entities held for disposal,
consists of the following numbers of entities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Associated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
entities
|
|
|
companies
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
September 30, 2007
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
Disposals
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2008
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reporting and
Foreign Currency
The Companys reporting currency is the Euro, and therefore
the accompanying consolidated financial statements are presented
in Euro.
The assets and liabilities of foreign subsidiaries with
functional currencies other than the Euro are translated using
period-end exchange rates, while the revenues and expenses of
such subsidiaries are translated using average exchange rates
during the period. Differences arising from the translation of
assets and liabilities in comparison with the translations
reported in the previous periods are included in other
comprehensive income (loss) and reported as a separate component
of shareholders equity.
The exchange rates of the primary currencies (1.00 quoted
into currencies specified below) used in the preparation of the
accompanying consolidated financial statements are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange Rate
|
|
|
Annual average
|
|
|
|
September 28,
|
|
|
September 29,
|
|
|
exchange rate
|
|
Currency:
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
U.S. dollar
|
|
|
1.4180
|
|
|
|
1.4349
|
|
|
|
1.3339
|
|
|
|
1.5052
|
|
Japanese yen
|
|
|
163.2900
|
|
|
|
152.3000
|
|
|
|
158.7997
|
|
|
|
161.6773
|
|
F-8
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Segment
Reporting
Reporting of operating segments is based on those segments
reported internally to the entitys chief operating
decision-maker for purposes of allocating resources and
assessing performance. Each of the segments has a segment
manager reporting directly to the Companys Management
Board, who has been identified as the relevant Chief Operating
Decision Maker (CODM) (see note 35).
Revenue
Recognition
Sales
Revenue from products sold to customers is recognized, pursuant
to U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
(SEC) Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB)
104, Revenue Recognition, when persuasive
evidence of an arrangement exists, the price is fixed or
determinable, shipment is made and collectibility is reasonably
assured. The Company records reductions to revenue for estimated
product returns and allowances for discounts, volume rebates and
price protection, based on actual historical experience, at the
time the related revenue is recognized. In general, returns are
permitted only for quality-related reasons within the applicable
warranty period. The Company records a provision for warranty
costs as a charge to cost of sales, based on historical
experience of warranty costs incurred as a percentage of net
sales, because the Companys management believes that this
is a reasonable estimate of potential losses to be incurred
within the warranty period.
In accordance with business practice in the semiconductor
industry, distributors can, in certain cases, apply for price
protection. Price protection programs allow distributors to
apply for a price protection credit on unsold inventory in the
event the Company reduces the standard list price of the
products included in such inventory. The authorization of the
distributors refund remains fully within the control of
the Company. The Company calculates the provision for price
protection in the same period the related revenue is recorded
based on historical price trends and sales rebates, analysis of
credit memo data, specific information contained in the price
protection agreement, and other factors known at the time. The
historical price trend represents the difference between the
invoiced price and the standard list price to the distributor.
The short outstanding inventory period, the visibility into the
standard inventory pricing for standard products, and the long
distributor pricing history have enabled the Company to reliably
estimate price protection provisions at the end of the period.
In addition, distributors can, in certain cases, also apply for
stock rotation and scrap allowances. Allowances for stock
rotation returns are accrued based on expected stock rotation as
per the contractual agreement. Distributor scrap allowances are
accrued based on the contractual agreement and, upon
authorization of the claim, reimbursed up to a certain maximum
of the average inventory value. In some cases, rebate programs
are offered to specific customers or distributors whereby the
customer or distributor may apply for a rebate upon achievement
of a defined sales volume. Distributors are also partially
compensated for commonly defined cooperative advertising on a
case-by-case
basis.
License
Income
License income is recognized when earned and realizable (see
note 5). Lump sum payments are generally non-refundable and
are deferred where applicable and recognized over the period in
which the Company is obliged to provide additional service.
Pursuant to Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue
No. 00-21,
Revenue Arrangements with Multiple
Deliverables, revenues from contracts with multiple
elements are recognized as each element is earned based on the
relative fair value of each element and when there are no
undelivered elements that are essential to the functionality of
the delivered elements and when the amount is not contingent
upon delivery of the undelivered elements. Royalties are
recognized as earned.
F-9
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Grants
Grants for capital expenditures include both tax-free government
grants and taxable grants for investments in property, plant and
equipment. Grants receivable are established when a legal right
for the grant exists and the criteria for receiving the grant
have been met. Tax-free government grants are deferred and
recognized over the remaining useful life of the related asset.
Taxable grants are deducted from the acquisition costs of the
related asset and thereby reduce depreciation expense in future
periods. Certain taxable grants reduce the related expense.
Grants that are related to items in income are presented as a
reduction of the related expense in the consolidated statements
of operations.
Product-related
Expenses
Shipping and handling costs associated with product sales are
included in cost of sales. Expenditures for advertising, sales
promotion and other sales-related activities are expensed as
incurred. Provisions for estimated costs related to product
warranties are generally made at the time the related sale is
recorded, based on estimated failure rates and claim history.
Research and development costs are expensed as incurred.
Income
Taxes
Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability
method pursuant to Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
(SFAS) No. 109, Accounting for Income
Taxes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are
recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to
differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of
existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases.
Valuation allowances are recorded to reduce deferred tax assets
to an amount that is more-likely-than-not to be realized in the
future. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using
enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the
years in which those temporary differences are expected to be
recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and
liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in
the period that includes the enactment date. Investment tax
credits are accounted for under the flow-through method.
Effective October 1, 2007, the Company adopted FASB
Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty
in Income Taxes an Interpretation of FASB Statement
No. 109 (FIN 48), and related
guidance. FIN 48 clarifies the accounting and reporting for
uncertainties in income tax law and prescribes a comprehensive
model for the financial statement recognition, measurement,
presentation and disclosure of uncertain tax positions taken or
expected to be taken in income tax returns. FIN 48 contains
a two-step approach to recognizing and measuring uncertain tax
positions accounted for in accordance with
SFAS No. 109. The first step is to evaluate the tax
position for recognition by determining if the weight of
available evidence indicates that it is more likely than not
that the position will be sustained on audit, including
resolution of any related appeals or litigation processes. The
second step is to measure the tax benefit as the largest amount
that is more than 50 percent likely of being realized upon
ultimate settlement. As a result of the implementation of
FIN 48, the Company recorded a charge to retained earnings
of 4 million as of October 1, 2007 (see
note 9).
Prior to October 1, 2007 the Company determined tax
contingencies in accordance with SFAS No. 5,
Accounting for Contingencies. The Company
recorded estimated tax liabilities to the extent the
contingencies were probable and could be reasonably estimated.
Share-based
Compensation
The Company has equity-settled share-based compensation plans.
F-10
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Pursuant to SFAS No. 123 (revised
2004) Share-Based Payment, the Company
accounts for share-based compensation using the fair value
recognition provision. Under this provision, share-based
compensation cost is measured at the grant date, based on the
fair value of the award, and is recognized as expense over the
period during which the employee is required to provide service
in exchange for the award. See note 27 for further
information on share-based compensation.
Issuance of
shares by Subsidiaries or Associated Companies
Gains or losses arising from the issuances of shares by
subsidiaries or Associated Companies, due to changes in the
Companys proportionate share of the value of the
issuers equity, are recognized in earnings pursuant to
SAB Topic 5:H, Accounting for Sales of Stock by a
Subsidiary.
Cash and Cash
Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents represent cash, deposits and liquid
short-term investments with original maturities of three months
or less. Cash equivalents as of September 30, 2007 and 2008
were 1,023 million and 697 million,
respectively, and consisted mainly of bank term deposits and
fixed income securities with original maturities of three months
or less.
Restricted
Cash
Restricted cash includes collateral deposits used as security
under arrangements for deferred compensation, business
acquisitions, construction projects, leases and financing (see
note 34).
Marketable
Securities and Investments
The Companys marketable securities are classified as
available-for-sale and are stated at fair value as determined by
the most recently traded price of each security at the balance
sheet date. Unrealized gains and losses are included in
accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of applicable
income taxes. Realized gains or losses and declines in value, if
any, judged to be other-than-temporary on available-for-sale
securities are reported in other non-operating (expense) income,
net. For the purpose of determining realized gains and losses,
the cost of securities sold is based on specific identification.
The Company assesses declines in the value of marketable
securities and investments to determine whether such decline is
other-than-temporary, thereby rendering the marketable security
or investment impaired. This assessment is made by considering
available evidence including changes in general market
conditions, specific industry and investee data, the length of
time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than
cost, and the Companys intent and ability to hold the
marketable security or investment for a period of time
sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value.
Inventories
Inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market, cost
being generally determined on the basis of an average method.
Cost consists of purchased component costs and manufacturing
costs, which comprise direct material and labor costs and
applicable indirect costs.
Property,
Plant and Equipment
Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost less
accumulated depreciation and impairment. Spare parts,
maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred. Depreciation
expense is recognized using the straight-line method.
Construction in progress includes advance payments for
construction of fixed assets. Land and construction in progress
are not depreciated. The cost of construction of certain
long-term assets includes capitalized interest, which is
amortized over the estimated useful life of the
F-11
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
related asset. During each of the fiscal years ended
September 30, 2007 and 2008 capitalized interest was
0. The estimated useful lives of assets are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
Buildings
|
|
|
10-25
|
|
Technical equipment and machinery
|
|
|
3-10
|
|
Other plant and office equipment
|
|
|
1-10
|
|
Leases
The Company is a lessee of property, plant and equipment. All
leases where the Company is lessee that meet certain specified
criteria intended to represent situations where the substantive
risks and rewards of ownership have been transferred to the
lessee are accounted for as capital leases pursuant to
SFAS No. 13, Accounting for Leases,
and related interpretations. All other leases are accounted for
as operating leases.
Goodwill and
Other Intangible Assets
The Company accounts for business combinations using the
purchase method of accounting pursuant to
SFAS No. 141, Business
Combinations. Intangible assets acquired in a purchase
method business combination are recognized and reported apart
from goodwill, pursuant to the criteria specified by
SFAS No. 141.
Intangible assets consist primarily of purchased intangible
assets, such as licenses and purchased technology, which are
recorded at acquisition cost, and goodwill resulting from
business acquisitions, representing the excess of purchase price
over fair value of net assets acquired. Intangible assets other
than goodwill are amortized on a straight-line basis over the
estimated useful lives of the assets ranging from 3 to
10 years. Pursuant to SFAS No. 142,
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,
goodwill is not amortized, but instead tested for impairment at
least annually in accordance with the provisions of
SFAS No. 142. The Company tests goodwill annually for
impairment in the fourth quarter of the fiscal year, whereby if
the carrying amount of a reporting unit with goodwill exceeds
its fair value, the amount of impairment is determined as the
excess of recorded goodwill over the fair value of goodwill. The
determination of fair value of the reporting units and related
goodwill requires considerable judgment by management.
Impairment of
Long-lived Assets
The Company reviews long-lived assets, including property, plant
and equipment and intangible assets subject to amortization, for
impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate
that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable.
Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a
comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to future net cash
flows expected to be generated by the asset. If such assets are
considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is
measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the
assets exceeds the fair value of the assets. Estimated fair
value is generally based on either market value, appraised value
or discounted estimated future cash flows. Considerable
management judgment is necessary to estimate discounted future
cash flows.
Financial
Instruments
The Company operates internationally, giving rise to exposure to
changes in foreign currency exchange rates. The Company uses
financial instruments, including derivatives such as foreign
currency forward and option contracts as well as interest rate
swap agreements, to reduce this risk based on the net
F-12
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
exposure to the respective currency. The Company applies
SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities, as amended, which
provides guidance on accounting for derivative instruments,
including certain derivative instruments embedded in other
contracts, and for hedging activities. Derivative financial
instruments are recorded at their fair value and included in
other current assets or other current liabilities. Changes in
fair value of undesignated derivatives that relate to operations
are recorded as part of cost of sales, while undesignated
derivatives relating to financing activities are recorded in
other non-operating income (expense), net. Changes in fair value
of derivatives designated as fair value hedges and the related
changes in the hedged item are reflected in earnings. Changes in
the fair value of derivatives designated as cash flow hedges
are, to the extent effective, deferred in accumulated other
comprehensive income and subsequently reclassified to earnings
when the hedging transaction is reflected in earnings and, to
the extent ineffective, included in earnings immediately. The
fair value of derivative and other financial instruments is
discussed in note 32.
Pension
Plans
The measurement of pension-benefit liabilities is based on
actuarial computations using the
projected-unit-credit
method in accordance with SFAS No. 87,
Employers Accounting for Pensions. The
assumptions used to calculate pension liabilities and costs are
shown in note 31. Prior to the adoption of the recognition
provision of SFAS No. 158, Employers
Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement
Plans an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87,
88, 106, and 132(R), changes in the amount of the
projected benefit obligation or plan assets resulting from
experience different from that assumed and from changes in
assumptions could result in gains or losses not yet recognized
in the Companys consolidated financial statements.
Amortization of an unrecognized net gain or loss is included as
a component of the Companys net periodic benefit plan cost
for a year if, as of the beginning of the year, that
unrecognized net gain or loss exceeds 10 percent of the
greater of the projected benefit obligation or the fair value of
that plans assets. In that case, the amount of
amortization recognized by the Company is the resulting excess
divided by the average remaining service period of the active
employees expected to receive benefits under the plan.
Effective September 30, 2007, the Company adopted the
recognition provision of SFAS No. 158, whereby the
Company recognizes the overfunded or underfunded status of its
defined benefit postretirement plans as an asset or liability in
its consolidated statement of financial position. Changes in the
funded status will be recognized in the year in which the
changes occur through other comprehensive income. The
incremental effects of the adoption of the recognition provision
on the individual line items of the September 30, 2007
consolidated balance sheet are shown in note 31.
The Company also records a liability for amounts payable under
the provisions of its various defined contribution plans.
Discontinued
Operations
Discontinued operations are reported when a component of an
entity comprising operations and cash flows that can be clearly
distinguished, operationally and for financial reporting
purposes, from the rest of the entity is classified as held for
sale or has been disposed of, the operations and cash flows of
the component will be (or have been) eliminated from the ongoing
operations of the entity and the entity will not have any
significant continuing involvement in the operations of the
component after the disposal transaction.
Use of
Estimates
The preparation of the accompanying consolidated financial
statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions
that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure
F-13
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
of contingent amounts and liabilities at the date of the
financial statements and reported amounts of revenues and
expenses during the reporting period. Actual amounts could
differ materially from such estimates made by management.
During the quarter ended March 31, 2007, the Company
entered into agreements with Molstanda Vermietungsgesellschaft
mbH (Molstanda) and a financial institution.
Molstanda is the owner of a parcel of land located in the
vicinity of the Companys headquarters south of Munich.
Pursuant to FASB Interpretation No. 46 (revised December
2003), Consolidation of Variable Interest
Entities an interpretation of ARB
No. 51 (FIN 46R), the Company
determined that Molstanda is a variable interest entity since it
does not have sufficient equity to demonstrate that it could
finance its activities without additional financial support, and
as a result of the agreements the Company became its primary
beneficiary. Accordingly, the Company consolidated the assets
and liabilities of Molstanda beginning in the 2007 fiscal year.
Since Molstanda is not considered a business pursuant to
FIN 46R, the 35 million excess in fair value of
liabilities assumed and consolidated of 76 million,
over the fair value of the newly consolidated identifiable
assets of 41 million, was recorded as an
extraordinary loss during the second quarter of the 2007 fiscal
year. Due to the Companys cumulative loss situation, no
tax benefit was provided on this loss. The Company subsequently
acquired the majority of the outstanding capital of Molstanda
during the fourth quarter of the 2007 fiscal year. In August
2007, the Company entered into an agreement to sell part of the
acquired parcel of land to a third-party developer-lessor in
connection with the construction and lease of Qimondas new
headquarters office in the south of Munich.
On July 31, 2007, the Company acquired Texas Instruments
Inc.s (TI) DSL Customer Premises Equipment
(CPE) business for cash consideration of
45 million. The purchase price is subject to an
upward or downward contingent consideration adjustment of up to
$16 million, based on revenue targets of the CPE business
during the nine months following the acquisition date. The
Company plans to continue supporting the acquired product
portfolio and existing customer designs while leveraging the
acquired experience in future product generations. The results
of operations of the CPE business have been included in the
consolidated financial statements starting August 1, 2007.
On October 24, 2007, the Company completed the acquisition
of the mobility products business of LSI Corporation
(LSI) for cash consideration of
316 million ($450 million) plus transaction
costs and a contingent performance-based payment of up to
$50 million, in order to further strengthen its activities
in the field of communications. The contingent performance-based
payment is based on the relevant revenues in the measurement
period following the completion of the transaction and ending
December 31, 2008. The mobility products business develops
semiconductors and software for mobile phone platform solutions.
The assets acquired and liabilities assumed were recorded at
their estimated fair values as of the date of acquisition. The
excess of the purchase price over the estimated fair values of
the underlying assets acquired and liabilities assumed was
allocated to goodwill.
On April 28, 2008, the Company acquired Primarion, Inc.,
Torrance, California (Primarion) for cash
consideration of 32 million ($50 million) plus a
contingent performance-based payment of up to $30 million.
Primarion designs, manufactures and markets digital power
integrated circuits (ICs) for computing, graphics
and communication applications. The contingent performance-based
payment is based on the relevant revenues in the measurement
period beginning July 1, 2008 and ending June 30,
2009. The assets acquired and liabilities assumed were recorded
at their estimated fair values as of the date of acquisition.
The excess of the purchase price over the estimated fair values
of the underlying assets acquired and liabilities assumed was
allocated to goodwill.
F-14
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
The following table summarizes the Companys business
acquisitions during the years ended September 30, 2007 and
2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
CPE
|
|
|
LSI
|
|
|
Primarion
|
|
Acquisition Date
|
|
July 2007
|
|
|
October 2007
|
|
|
April 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automotive,
|
|
|
|
Communication
|
|
|
Communication
|
|
|
Industrial &
|
|
Segment
|
|
Solutions
|
|
|
Solutions
|
|
|
Multimarket
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Intangible assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Technology
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
Other non-current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets acquired
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
308
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities assumed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
307
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In-process research & development
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid (purchase consideration)
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
321
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The consolidated statements of operations include the results of
the acquired businesses from the acquisition date. The Company
engaged an independent third party to assist in the valuation of
net assets acquired. Based on discounted estimated future cash
flows over the respective estimated useful life, an amount of
14 million was allocated to purchased in-process
research and development and expensed as research and
development during the 2008 fiscal year, because such costs are
not capitalized under U.S. GAAP. The acquired intangible
assets consist of technology assets of 55 million and
customer relationship assets of 73 million, each with
a weighted average estimated useful life of six years, and other
intangible assets of 13 million with a weighted
average estimated useful life of less than one year. The
goodwill amounts are expected to be deductible for tax purposes.
Pro forma financial information relating to these acquisitions
is not material either individually or in the aggregate to the
results of operations and financial position of the Company and
has been omitted.
|
|
4.
|
Divestitures and
Discontinued Operations
|
Polymer
Optical Fiber
On June 29, 2007, the Company sold its Polymer Optical
Fiber (POF) business, based in Regensburg, Germany,
to Avago Technologies Ltd. (Avago). The POF business
operates in the market for automotive multimedia infotainment
networks and transceivers for safety systems. As a result of the
sale, the Company realized a gain before tax of
17 million which was recorded in other operating
expense (income), net during the 2007 fiscal year.
High Power
Bipolar Business
On September 28, 2007, the Company entered into a joint
venture agreement with Siemens AG (Siemens).
Effective September 30, 2007, the Company contributed all
assets and liabilities of its high
F-15
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
power bipolar business (including licenses, patents, and
front-end and back-end production assets) to a newly formed
legal entity called Infineon Technologies Bipolar
GmbH & Co. KG (Bipolar) and Siemens
subsequently acquired a 40 percent interest in Bipolar for
37 million. The transaction received regulatory
approval and subsequently closed on November 30, 2007. As a
result of the sale, the Company realized a gain before tax of
27 million which was recorded in other operating
expense (income), net during the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2008. The joint venture agreement grants
Siemens certain contractual participating rights which inhibit
the Company from exercising control over Bipolar. Accordingly,
the Company accounts for the retained interest in Bipolar under
the equity method of accounting.
Hard Disk
Drive Business
On April 25, 2008, the Company sold its hard disk drive
(HDD) business to LSI for cash consideration of
60 million ($95 million). The HDD business
designs, manufactures and markets semiconductors for HDD
devices. The Company transferred its entire HDD activities,
including customer relationships, as well as know-how to LSI,
and granted LSI a license for intellectual property. The
transaction did not encompass the sale of significant assets or
transfer of employees. As a result of this transaction, the
Company realized a gain before tax of 41 million
which was recorded in other operating expense (income), net
during the 2008 fiscal year.
BAW
Business
On August 11, 2008, the Company sold its bulk acoustic wave
filter business (BAW) to Avago for cash
consideration of 21 million and entered into a supply
agreement through December 2009. The BAW business designs,
manufactures and markets cellular duplexers for N-CDMA and
W-CDMA applications and filters for GPS. The total consideration
received was allocated to the elements of the transaction on a
relative fair value basis. As a result, the Company realized a
gain before tax of 11 million which was recorded in
other operating expense (income), net during the 2008 fiscal
year, and deferred 6 million which will be realized
over the term of the supply agreement.
Qimonda
In conjunction with the Formation, Infineon Logic entered into
contribution agreements and various other service agreements
with Qimonda. In cases where physical contribution (ownership
transfer) of assets and liabilities was not feasible or cost
effective, the monetary value was transferred in the form of
cash or debt. The contribution agreements include provisions
pursuant to which Qimonda agreed to indemnify Infineon against
any claim (including any related expenses) arising in connection
with the liabilities, contracts, offers, incomplete
transactions, continuing obligations, risks, encumbrances,
guarantees and other matters relating to the memory products
business that were transferred to it as part of the Formation.
In addition, the contribution agreements provide for
indemnification of Infineon Logic with respect to certain
existing and future legal claims and potential restructuring
costs. With the exception of the securities and certain patent
infringement and antitrust claims identified in note 34
Qimonda is obligated to indemnify Infineon against any liability
arising in connection with claims relating to the memory
products business described in that section. Liabilities and
risks relating to the securities class action litigation,
including court costs, will be equally shared by Infineon Logic
and Qimonda, but only with respect to the amount by which the
total amount payable exceeds the amount of the corresponding
accrual that Infineon Logic transferred to Qimonda at Formation.
On August 9, 2006 Qimonda completed its IPO on the New York
Stock Exchange through the issuance of 42 million ordinary
shares which are traded as American Depositary Shares
(ADSs) under the symbol QI.
Subsequently, Infineon sold 6.3 million Qimonda ADSs upon
exercise of the underwriters
over-allotment
option. As a result, the Companys ownership interest in
Qimonda decreased to 85.9 percent.
F-16
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
On September 25, 2007, Infineon sold an additional
28.75 million Qimonda ADSs, which further reduced the
Companys ownership interest in Qimonda to
77.5 percent.
On September 26, 2007, Infineon Technologies Investment
B.V., a wholly owned subsidiary of Infineon Technologies AG,
issued notes exchangeable into ADSs of Qimonda in the amount of
215 million. The coupon of the three-year
exchangeable note is 1.375 percent per year. The exchange
price is 10.48 for each Qimonda ADS, corresponding to an
exchange premium of 35 percent. If all noteholders exercise
their exchange rights, Infineon would deliver 20.5 million
Qimonda ADSs, equivalent to approximately 6.0 percent of
Qimondas share capital (see notes 22 and 25).
During the 2008 fiscal year, the Company committed to a plan to
dispose of Qimonda. As a result, the results of Qimonda are
reported as discontinued operations in the Companys
consolidated statements of operations for all periods presented,
and the assets and liabilities of Qimonda have been reclassified
as held for disposal in the consolidated balance sheets for all
periods presented. In addition, the Company recorded after-tax
write-downs totaling 1,303 million, in order to
remeasure Qimonda to its estimated current fair value less costs
to sell. Pursuant to SFAS No. 144, Accounting
for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-lived Assets,
the recognition of depreciation expense ceased as of
March 31, 2008.
Market prices for DRAM have experienced extremely significant
declines since the beginning of the 2007 calendar year. As a
result of this intense pricing pressure, Qimonda continued to
incur significant losses during the 2008 fiscal year, which are
reflected in loss from discontinued operations, net of
income tax in the Companys consolidated statements
of operations. During the 2008 fiscal year, the Company also
recorded material write-downs to the carrying value of
Qimondas assets to reflect them at current fair value less
costs to sell. Infineon does not intend to make any further
capital contributions to Qimonda and has repeatedly announced
that it is seeking to dispose of its remaining 77.5 percent
interest in that company.
In order to address the ongoing adverse market conditions in the
memory products industry and to better enable it to meet its
current obligations in the short term, Qimonda has intensively
explored operational and strategic alternatives to raise and
conserve cash. In furtherance of these goals, on
October 13, 2008 Qimonda announced a global restructuring
and cost-reduction program that is intended to reposition
Qimonda in the market and substantially increase its
efficiencies through a wide-ranging realignment of its business.
As a part of this program, Qimonda also announced that it had
agreed to sell its 35.6 percent interest in Inotera
Memories Inc. to Micron Technology, Inc. for US$400 million
(approximately 296 million) in cash. This transaction
closed in November 2008.
On December 21, 2008, the Company, the German Free State of
Saxony, and Qimonda jointly announced a financing package for
Qimonda. The package includes a 150 million loan from
the German Free State of Saxony, a 100 million loan
from a state bank in Portugal and a 75 million loan
from Infineon Logic. In addition to this financing package,
Qimonda has announced that it expects to receive guarantees
totaling 280 million from the Federal Government of
Germany and the Free State of Saxony. Based on such guarantees,
Qimonda has announced that it is already in advanced
negotiations regarding the financing of 150 million.
The availability of the total financing package is contingent
upon successful completion of the relevant state, federal and
European Commission approval procedures as well as final
agreement on the detailed terms and conditions of the
transaction.
There can be no assurance that the operational, strategic, and
financial measures described above will enable Qimonda to
continue to meet its obligations, or that Qimonda will be
successful in implementing any further operational or strategic
initiatives to adequately address its financial condition. There
can also be no assurance that Infineon will be successful in
disposing of its remaining interest in Qimonda. In the event
that Qimondas ongoing operational and strategic efforts
fail to generate adequate cash or to result in desired
operational efficiencies and resulting cash savings, Qimonda may
have difficulty meeting its
F-17
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
obligations as they come due. In such a case, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company would be
materially adversely affected.
In the event that Qimonda were to be unable to meet its
obligations, Infineon may be exposed to certain significant
liabilities related to the Qimonda business, including pending
antitrust and securities law claims, the potential repayment of
governmental subsidies received, and employee-related
contingencies. Qimonda has accrued approximately
70 million in connection with the antitrust matters
and anticipated defense costs in connection with the securities
law matters. Given the uncertainty of the timing, nature, scope
or success of any specific claim, Infineon is unable to
meaningfully quantify its total potential exposure in respect of
these matters, but Infineon is aware that such exposure, were it
to arise, is likely to be material.
On November 7, 2008, the New York Stock Exchange
(NYSE) notified Qimonda that it was not in
compliance with the NYSEs continued listing standards
because the average closing price of its ADSs had been below
$1.00 over a consecutive
30-day
trading period. Over the
12-month
period ended November 19, 2008, Qimondas share price
fell 98 percent, from $8.62 to $0.11. Qimonda has notified
the NYSE that it intends to regain compliance with this listing
standard. If Qimonda cannot do so by May 7, 2009, however,
the NYSE has indicated that it will commence suspension and
delisting procedures against Qimonda.
ALTIS
ALTIS Semiconductor S.N.C., Essonnes, France (ALTIS)
is a joint venture between the Company and International
Business Machines Corporation, New York, USA (IBM),
with each having equal voting representation. The Company is
ALTIS primary beneficiary and fully consolidates it in
accordance with FIN 46R. In August 2007, the Company and
IBM signed an agreement in principle to divest their respective
shares in ALTIS via a sale to Advanced Electronic Systems AG
(AES). Pursuant to SFAS No. 144, the
assets and liabilities of ALTIS were classified as held for
disposal in the consolidated balance sheet as of
September 30, 2007, and the recognition of depreciation
expense ceased as of August 1, 2007. As of
September 30, 2008, negotiations with AES have not
progressed as previously anticipated and could not be completed.
Despite the fact that negotiations are ongoing with additional
parties, the outcome of these negotiations is uncertain. As a
result, the Company reclassified the disposal groups
assets and liabilities previously classified as held for sale
into held and used in the consolidated balance sheet as of
September 30, 2008. Upon reclassification, an adjustment of
59 million was recorded in loss from continuing
operations, resulting from the measurement of the disposal group
at the lower of its carrying amount before being classified as
held for sale, adjusted for any depreciation and amortization
expense that would have been recognized had the disposal group
been continuously classified as held and used, and its fair
value at the date of the reclassification.
F-18
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
At September 30, 2007 and 2008, the carrying amounts of the
major classes of assets and liabilities classified as held for
disposal were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
746
|
|
|
|
432
|
|
Marketable securities
|
|
|
265
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
397
|
|
|
|
180
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
659
|
|
|
|
289
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
2,350
|
|
|
|
2,059
|
|
Long-term investments
|
|
|
628
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
608
|
|
|
|
551
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
5,653
|
|
|
|
3,527
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Write-down
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,303
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets classified as held for disposal
|
|
|
5,653
|
|
|
|
2,224
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term debt and current maturities
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
346
|
|
Trade accounts payable
|
|
|
780
|
|
|
|
533
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
147
|
|
|
|
219
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
227
|
|
|
|
427
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
615
|
|
|
|
566
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities held for disposal
|
|
|
1,897
|
|
|
|
2,091
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The results of Qimonda presented in the consolidated statements
of operations as discontinued operations for the years ended
September 30, 2006, 2007 and 2008, consist of the following
components:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
|
3,815
|
|
|
|
3,608
|
|
|
|
1,785
|
|
Costs and expenses
|
|
|
(3,719
|
)
|
|
|
(3,894
|
)
|
|
|
(3,324
|
)
|
Loss on measurement to fair value less costs to sell
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,303
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, before tax
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
(286
|
)
|
|
|
(2,842
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
(114
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
(145
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
(296
|
)
|
|
|
(2,987
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-19
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Summary financial information for the divested businesses
(through the date of divestiture) for the years ended
September 30, 2006, 2007 and 2008, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Sales:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
POF
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bipolar
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
|
|
HDD
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
BAW
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
234
|
|
|
|
226
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBIT:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
POF
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Bipolar
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
HDD
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
BAW
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on sale before tax:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
POF
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bipolar
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
HDD
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
BAW
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the years ended September 30, 2006, 2007 and 2008,
the Company recognized revenues related to license and
technology transfer fees of 21 million,
20 million, and 54 million, respectively,
which are included in net sales in the accompanying consolidated
statements of operations. Included in these amounts are
previously deferred license fees of 1 million,
1 million, and 1 million which were
recognized as revenue pursuant to SAB 104 in the years
ended September 30, 2006, 2007 and 2008, respectively,
since the Company had fulfilled all of its obligations and the
amounts were realized.
The Company has received economic development funding from
various governmental entities, including grants for the
construction of manufacturing facilities, as well as grants to
subsidize research and development activities and employee
training. Grants and subsidies included in the accompanying
consolidated financial statements during the fiscal years ended
September 30, 2006, 2007 and 2008, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
Included in the consolidated statements of operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
62
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
122
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-20
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Deferred government grants amounted to 37 million and
31 million as of September 30, 2007 and 2008,
respectively. The amounts of grants receivable as of
September 30, 2007 and 2008 were 25 million and
25 million, respectively.
|
|
7.
|
Supplemental
Operating Cost Information
|
The costs of services and materials are as follows for the years
ended September 30:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
Raw materials, supplies and purchased goods
|
|
|
852
|
|
|
790
|
|
|
813
|
Purchased services
|
|
|
912
|
|
|
776
|
|
|
822
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1,764
|
|
|
1,566
|
|
|
1,635
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personnel expenses are as follows for the years ended September
30:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
Wages and salaries
|
|
|
1,316
|
|
|
1,317
|
|
|
1,475
|
Social levies
|
|
|
223
|
|
|
237
|
|
|
242
|
Pension expense (note 31)
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1,570
|
|
|
1,588
|
|
|
1,734
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other operating expense (income), net was as follows for the
years ended September 30:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Gains on sales of businesses and interests in subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
Goodwill and intangible assets impairment charges
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
Long-lived asset impairment charges
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(122
|
)
|
Litigation settlement charges, net of recoveries (note 34)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other operating (expense) income, net
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
(43
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Litigation settlement charges refer to the settlement of an
antitrust investigation by the U.S. Department of Justice
and related settlements with customers (see note 34).
Total rental expenses under operating leases amounted to
135 million, 115 million and
98 million for the years ended September 30,
2006, 2007 and 2008, respectively.
F-21
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
The average number of employees by geographic region was as
follows for the years ended September 30:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
Germany
|
|
|
11,384
|
|
|
10,553
|
|
|
10,085
|
Other Europe
|
|
|
5,872
|
|
|
5,604
|
|
|
5,280
|
North America
|
|
|
601
|
|
|
540
|
|
|
845
|
Asia/Pacific
|
|
|
12,009
|
|
|
12,905
|
|
|
13,094
|
Japan
|
|
|
156
|
|
|
151
|
|
|
161
|
Other
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Infineon
|
|
|
30,063
|
|
|
29,774
|
|
|
29,465
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Qimonda
|
|
|
11,003
|
|
|
12,775
|
|
|
12,990
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
41,066
|
|
|
42,549
|
|
|
42,455
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the 2006 fiscal year, restructuring plans were announced
to downsize the workforce at ALTIS and the Companys chip
card back-end activities in order to maintain competitiveness
and reduce cost. As part of these restructuring measures, the
Company agreed upon plans to terminate approximately
390 employees and recorded restructuring charges in the
2007 fiscal year.
During the 2007 fiscal year, restructuring measures were taken
by the Company, mainly as a result of the insolvency of one of
its largest mobile phone customers, BenQ Mobile GmbH &
Co. OHG, and in order to further streamline certain research and
development locations. Approximately 280 jobs were affected
worldwide, of which approximately 120 were in the German
locations Munich, Salzgitter and Nuremberg.
To address rising risks in the current market environment,
adverse currency trends and below benchmark margins, the Company
implemented the IFX10+ cost-reduction program in the third
quarter of the 2008 fiscal year. The IFX10+ program includes
measured target areas including product portfolio management,
manufacturing costs reduction, value chain optimization, process
efficiency, reorganization of the Companys structure along
its target markets, and reductions in workforce. Approximately
10 percent of Infineon Logics worldwide workforce is
expected to be impacted by IFX10+.
During the years ended September 30, 2006, 2007 and 2008,
charges of 23 million, 45 million and
181 million, respectively, were recognized as a
result of the above-mentioned restructuring initiatives.
The development of the restructuring liability during the fiscal
year ended September 30, 2008 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Restructuring
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
Liability
|
|
|
Charges, net
|
|
|
Payments
|
|
|
Liability
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Employee terminations
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
170
|
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
|
172
|
|
Other exit costs
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
181
|
|
|
|
(43
|
)
|
|
|
182
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-22
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes,
extraordinary loss, and minority interest is attributable to the
following geographic locations for the years ended
September 30, 2006, 2007 and 2008, as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Germany
|
|
|
(318
|
)
|
|
|
(150
|
)
|
|
|
(208
|
)
|
Foreign
|
|
|
122
|
|
|
|
196
|
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes,
extraordinary loss, and minority interest
|
|
|
(196
|
)
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
(88
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense (benefit) from continuing operations for the
years ended September 30, 2006, 2007 and 2008, was as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Current taxes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Germany
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred taxes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Germany
|
|
|
(42
|
)
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income taxes from continuing operations for the years
ended September 30, 2006, 2007 and 2008 were allocated as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
Shareholders equity, for other comprehensive loss (income)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys corporate statutory tax rate in Germany is
25 percent in the 2006 and 2007. Additionally, a solidarity
surcharge of 5.5 percent is levied. The trade tax rate is
11 percent in 2006 and 2007. The combined statutory tax
rate was 37 percent in 2006 and 2007.
On August 17, 2007 the Business Tax Reform Act 2008 was
enacted in Germany including several changes to the taxation of
German business activities, including a reduction of the
Companys combined statutory corporate and trade tax rate
in Germany to 28 percent, which comprises corporate tax of
15 percent plus a solidarity surcharge of 5.5 percent
and trade tax of 12 percent. Most of the changes came into
effect for the Company in its 2008 fiscal year. Pursuant to
SFAS No. 109, the Company recorded a deferred tax
charge of 28 million as of September 30, 2007,
reflecting the reduction in value of the Companys deferred
tax assets in Germany upon enactment.
F-23
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Effective October 1, 2007, the Company adopted FIN 48
(see note 2). The total amount of gross unrecognized tax
benefits from uncertain tax positions, is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Balance as of October 1, 2007
|
|
|
138
|
|
Additions based on tax positions related to the current year
|
|
|
1
|
|
Additions for tax positions of prior years
|
|
|
124
|
|
Reductions for tax positions of prior years
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Settlements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of September 30, 2008
|
|
|
261
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The additions for tax positions of prior years relate mainly to
filing of amended tax returns for prior periods. Uncertain tax
positions, which, if recognized, would favorably affect the
Companys effective tax rate amount to
68 million and 83 million as of
September 30, 2007 and 2008, respectively.
The Company has accrued interest and penalties related to income
tax liabilities of 4 million as of October 1,
2007. During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008, the
Company recognized accrued interest and penalties related to
income tax liabilities in an amount of 3 million.
Interest and penalties related to income tax liabilities are
included in interest expense, net and other non-operating income
(expense), net, respectively.
The Companys German and foreign tax returns are
periodically examined by tax authorities, and several entities
of the consolidated group are currently subject to such an
examination. Generally, the Companys German tax returns
from fiscal year 2002 onwards remain subject to examination by
tax authorities. Although the timing of the resolution of tax
authority examinations is uncertain, it is reasonably possible
that the balance of gross unrecognized tax benefits could change
within the next 12 months as a result of such ongoing and
future examinations.
A reconciliation of income taxes for the fiscal years ended
September 30, 2006, 2007 and 2008, determined using the
German corporate tax rate plus trade taxes, net of federal
benefit, for a combined statutory rate of 37 percent for
2006 and 2007 and 28 percent for 2008 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Expected expense (benefit) for income taxes
|
|
|
(76
|
)
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
Increase in available tax credits
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(103
|
)
|
Non-taxable investment income
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Tax rate differential
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(59
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
Non deductible expenses
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
Change in German tax rate
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in valuation allowance
|
|
|
161
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
185
|
|
Other
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual provision for income taxes
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the 2006 fiscal year, the Company reached an agreement with
German tax authorities on certain tax matters relating to prior
years. As a result, the timing of the deductibility of certain
temporary differences was revised, which led to an increase in
the valuation allowance for the 2006 fiscal year in the amount
of 50 million.
F-24
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Deferred income tax assets and liabilities as of
September 30, 2007 and 2008 relate to the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
134
|
|
|
|
152
|
|
Deferred income
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
Net operating loss and tax credit carry-forwards
|
|
|
1,131
|
|
|
|
1,199
|
|
Other items
|
|
|
179
|
|
|
|
210
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross deferred tax assets
|
|
|
1,470
|
|
|
|
1,581
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
(846
|
)
|
|
|
(1,013
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets, net
|
|
|
624
|
|
|
|
568
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
Accrued liabilities and pensions
|
|
|
(110
|
)
|
|
|
(103
|
)
|
Other items
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
(177
|
)
|
|
|
(155
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets, net
|
|
|
447
|
|
|
|
413
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred income tax assets and liabilities presented in the
accompanying consolidated balance sheets as of
September 30, 2007 and 2008, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
Non-current
|
|
|
446
|
|
|
|
402
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
Non-current
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets, net
|
|
|
447
|
|
|
|
413
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At September 30, 2008, the Company had in Germany tax loss
carry-forwards of 3,029 million (relating to both
trade and corporate tax, plus an additional loss carry-forward
applicable only to trade tax of 1,231 million). In
connection with the Formation of Qimonda, the net operating
losses related to the memory products segment have been retained
by Infineon Technologies AG. In other jurisdictions the Company
had tax loss carry-forwards of 102 million and tax
effected credit carry-forwards of 175 million. Such
tax loss carry-forwards and tax effected credit carry-forwards
are generally limited to use by the particular entity that
generated the loss or credit and do not expire under current
law. The benefit for tax credits is accounted for on the
flow-through method when the individual legal entity is entitled
to the claim.
Pursuant to SFAS No. 109, the Company has assessed its
deferred tax asset and the need for a valuation allowance. Such
an assessment considers whether it is more likely than not that
some portion or all of the deferred tax assets may not be
realized. The assessment requires considerable judgment on the
part of management, with respect to, among other factors,
benefits that could be realized from available tax strategies
and future taxable income, as well as other positive and
negative factors. The ultimate realization of deferred tax
assets is dependent upon the Companys ability to generate
the appropriate character of future taxable income sufficient to
utilize loss carry-forwards or tax credits before their
F-25
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
expiration. Since the Company had incurred a cumulative loss in
certain tax jurisdictions over a three-year period as of
September 30, 2008, which is significant evidence that the
more likely than not criterion is not met pursuant to the
provisions of SFAS No. 109, the impact of forecasted
future taxable income is excluded from such an assessment. For
these tax jurisdictions, the assessment was therefore only based
on the benefits that could be realized from available tax
strategies and the reversal of temporary differences in future
periods. As a result of this assessment, the Company increased
the deferred tax asset valuation allowance as of
September 30, 2006, 2007 and 2008 by
161 million, 58 million, and
185 million, respectively, to reduce the deferred tax
asset to an amount that is more likely than not expected to be
realized in future.
The changes in valuation allowance for deferred tax assets
during the years ended September 30, 2007 and 2008 were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of the year
|
|
|
1,017
|
|
|
|
846
|
|
Applicable to continuing operations
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
185
|
|
Change in tax rate
|
|
|
(264
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment in corresponding net operating loss carry-forward
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of the year
|
|
|
846
|
|
|
|
1,013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the 2007 and 2008 fiscal years, the Company recorded
adjustments to certain net operating loss carry-forwards mainly
as a result of tax assessment reconciliations and adjustments in
connection with the adoption of FIN 48. As the adjustments
were made in jurisdictions in which the Company is in cumulative
loss positions, such adjustments were recorded directly to the
valuation allowance and approximated 35 million and
18 in the 2007 and 2008 fiscal years, respectively.
The Company did not provide for income taxes or foreign
withholding taxes on cumulative earnings of foreign subsidiaries
as of September 30, 2007 and 2008, as these earnings are
intended to be indefinitely reinvested in those operations. It
is not practicable to estimate the amount of unrecognized
deferred tax liabilities for these undistributed foreign
earnings.
The Company reorganized certain businesses in different tax
jurisdictions which resulted in deferred intercompany
transactions. As of September 30, 2007 and 2008, deferred
tax charges related to these transactions amounted to
56 million and 47 million, respectively,
of which 50 million and 41 million,
respectively are non-current (see note 17).
|
|
10.
|
Earnings (Loss)
Per Share
|
Basic earnings (loss) per share (EPS) is calculated
by dividing net loss by the weighted average number of ordinary
shares outstanding during the year. Diluted EPS is calculated by
dividing net income by the sum of the weighted average number of
ordinary shares outstanding plus all additional ordinary shares
that would have been outstanding if potentially dilutive
instruments or ordinary share equivalents had been issued.
F-26
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
The computation of basic and diluted EPS for the years ended
September 30, 2006, 2007 and 2008, is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Numerator ( in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations
|
|
|
(250
|
)
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
(135
|
)
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
(296
|
)
|
|
|
(2,987
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before extraordinary loss
|
|
|
(268
|
)
|
|
|
(333
|
)
|
|
|
(3,122
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Extraordinary loss, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
(268
|
)
|
|
|
(368
|
)
|
|
|
(3,122
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator (shares in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average shares outstanding basic and diluted
|
|
|
747.6
|
|
|
|
748.6
|
|
|
|
749.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted loss per share (in ):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations
|
|
|
(0.34
|
)
|
|
|
(0.05
|
)
|
|
|
(0.18
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
|
(0.40
|
)
|
|
|
(3.98
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before extraordinary loss
|
|
|
(0.36
|
)
|
|
|
(0.45
|
)
|
|
|
(4.16
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Extraordinary loss, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
(0.36
|
)
|
|
|
(0.49
|
)
|
|
|
(4.16
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The weighted average of potentially dilutive instruments that
were excluded from the diluted loss per share computations,
because the exercise price was greater than the average market
price of the ordinary shares during the period or were otherwise
not dilutive, includes 46.7 million, 41.2 million and
34.3 million shares underlying employee stock options for
the years ended September 30, 2006, 2007 and 2008,
respectively. Additionally, 86.5 million, 74.7 million
and 65.0 million ordinary shares issuable upon the
conversion of the convertible subordinated notes for the years
ended September 30, 2006, 2007 and 2008, respectively, were
not included in the computation of diluted earnings (loss) per
share as their impact would have been antidilutive.
F-27
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
11.
|
Marketable
Securities
|
Marketable securities at September 30, 2007 and 2008
consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Foreign government securities
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
Floating rate notes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed term deposits
|
|
|
220
|
|
|
|
211
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
159
|
|
|
|
149
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
Other debt securities
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt securities
|
|
|
243
|
|
|
|
239
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
164
|
|
|
|
156
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
Equity securities
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total marketable securities
|
|
|
247
|
|
|
|
244
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
158
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reflected as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketable securities
|
|
|
219
|
|
|
|
210
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
154
|
|
|
|
143
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
Other assets (note 17)
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total marketable securities
|
|
|
247
|
|
|
|
244
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
158
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized losses relating to securities held for more than
12 months as of September 30, 2007 and 2008, were
9 million and 11 million respectively.
Realized gains (losses) on sales of marketable securities are
reflected as other non-operating income (expense), net and were
as follows for the years ended September 30:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Realized gains
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized gains (losses), net
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2008, there were no significant fixed
term deposits with contractual maturities between three and
twelve months.
Debt securities as of September 30, 2008 had the following
remaining contractual maturities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Less than 1 year
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Between 1 and 5 years
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
More than 5 years
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt securities
|
|
|
164
|
|
|
|
156
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual maturities may differ due to call or prepayment rights.
F-28
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
12.
|
Trade Accounts
Receivable, net
|
Trade accounts receivable at September 30, 2007 and 2008
consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Third party trade
|
|
|
583
|
|
|
|
590
|
|
Associated and Related Companies trade
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade accounts receivable, gross
|
|
|
651
|
|
|
|
618
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
620
|
|
|
|
589
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Activity in the allowance for doubtful accounts for the years
ended September 30, 2007 and 2008 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts at beginning of year
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
Recovery of bad debt, net
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts at end of year
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories at September 30, 2007 and 2008 consist of the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Raw materials and supplies
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
Work-in-process
|
|
|
354
|
|
|
|
372
|
|
Finished goods
|
|
|
185
|
|
|
|
232
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Inventories
|
|
|
598
|
|
|
|
663
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other current assets at September 30, 2007 and 2008 consist
of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
VAT and other tax receivables
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
Grants receivable (note 6)
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
Associated and Related Companies financial and other
receivables
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
Third party financial and other receivables
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
Receivable from German banks deposit protection fund
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
121
|
|
Financial instruments (note 32)
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
License fees receivable
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
Employee receivables
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
Other
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other current assets
|
|
|
303
|
|
|
|
379
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-29
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Cash and cash equivalents and marketable securities in the
amount of 121 million were reclassified to accounts
receivable from the German banks deposit protection fund
as of September 30, 2008.
|
|
15.
|
Property, Plant
and Equipment, net
|
A summary of activity for property, plant and equipment for the
years ended September 30, 2007 and 2008, is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Technical
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
equipment
|
|
|
Other plant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land and
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
and office
|
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
buildings
|
|
|
machinery
|
|
|
equipment
|
|
|
in progress
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2007
|
|
|
687
|
|
|
|
4,655
|
|
|
|
1,416
|
|
|
|
144
|
|
|
|
6,902
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
189
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
321
|
|
Impairments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
Disposals
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
(158
|
)
|
|
|
(109
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(287
|
)
|
Reclassifications
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
(135
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Transfers(1)
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
Foreign currency effects
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2008
|
|
|
713
|
|
|
|
4,812
|
|
|
|
1,375
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
6,964
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated depreciation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2007
|
|
|
(440
|
)
|
|
|
(3,733
|
)
|
|
|
(1,267
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,440
|
)
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
(365
|
)
|
|
|
(103
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(497
|
)
|
Disposals
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
149
|
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
273
|
|
Reclassifications
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfers(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
Foreign currency effects
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2008
|
|
|
(450
|
)
|
|
|
(3,949
|
)
|
|
|
(1,254
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,653
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Book value September 30, 2007
|
|
|
247
|
|
|
|
922
|
|
|
|
149
|
|
|
|
144
|
|
|
|
1,462
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Book value September 30, 2008
|
|
|
263
|
|
|
|
863
|
|
|
|
121
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
1,311
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Amounts shown as transfers in the
year ended September 30, 2008 relate primarily to assets of
the ALTIS disposal group that were reclassified into held and
used.
|
F-30
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
16.
|
Long-term
Investments
|
Investments in Related Companies principally relate to
investment activities aimed at strengthening the Companys
future intellectual property potential.
A summary of activity for long-term investments for the years
ended September 30, 2007 and 2008, is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in
|
|
|
Investment in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Associated
|
|
|
Related
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Companies
|
|
|
Companies
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Disposals
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
Impairments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Reclassifications
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
Disposals
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
Impairments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Equity in earnings
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Reclassifications
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2008
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On September 28, 2007, Infineon entered into a joint
venture agreement with Siemens, whereby the Company contributed
its high power bipolar business to the newly formed legal entity
Bipolar, and Siemens subsequently acquired a 40 percent
interest in Bipolar. The joint venture agreement grants Siemens
certain contractual participating rights which inhibit the
Company from exercising control over Bipolar. Accordingly, the
Company accounted for the retained interest in Bipolar of
60 percent under the equity method of accounting (see
note 4).
The Company recognized impairment charges related to certain
investments for which the carrying value exceeded the fair value
on an other-than-temporary basis of 13 million,
2 million, and 2 million during the years
ended September 30, 2006, 2007 and 2008, respectively.
There was no goodwill included in the amount of long-term
investments at September 30, 2007 and 2008, respectively.
For the Associated Companies as of September 30, 2008, the
aggregate summarized financial information for the fiscal years
2006, 2007 and 2008, is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-31
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
Non-current assets
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(28
|
)
|
Non-current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other non-current assets at September 30, 2007 and 2008
consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Deferred tax charges (note 9)
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
Marketable securities (note 11)
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
Long-term receivables
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
Employee receivables
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Associated and Related Companies financial and other
receivables
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
Other
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-32
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
A summary of activity for intangible assets for the years ended
September 30, 2007 and 2008 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
Intangibles
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2006
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
357
|
|
|
|
386
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
Impairment charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Disposals
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(45
|
)
|
|
|
(51
|
)
|
Foreign currency effects
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2007
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
326
|
|
|
|
379
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
171
|
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
319
|
|
Impairment charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
Transfers(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Foreign currency effects
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2008
|
|
|
225
|
|
|
|
471
|
|
|
|
696
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated amortization:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(299
|
)
|
|
|
(299
|
)
|
Amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
Disposals
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
Foreign currency effects
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(290
|
)
|
|
|
(290
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(45
|
)
|
|
|
(45
|
)
|
Disposals
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(334
|
)
|
|
|
(334
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying value September 30, 2006
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying value September 30, 2007
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying value September 30, 2008
|
|
|
225
|
|
|
|
137
|
|
|
|
362
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Amounts shown as transfers in the
year ended September 30, 2008 relate primarily to assets of
the ALTIS disposal group that were reclassified into held and
used.
|
The estimated aggregate amortization expense relating to other
intangible assets for each of the five succeeding fiscal years
is as follows: 2009 31 million; 2010
28 million; 2011 28 million; 2012
26 million; and 2013 23 million.
During the years ended September 30, 2006, 2007 and 2008,
the Company recognized intangible assets impairment charges of
32 million, 2 million, and
8 million respectively.
During the year ended September 30, 2006, partially as a
result of the insolvency of one of the Companys largest
mobile phone customers, BenQ Mobile GmbH & Co. OHG,
the Company concluded that sufficient indicators existed to
require an assessment of whether the carrying values of goodwill
and certain other intangible assets principally in reporting
units within the Communication Solutions segment might not be
recoverable. Recoverability of these intangible assets was
measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of the assets to
the future net cash flows expected to be generated by the
assets.
F-33
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Impairments of 38 million were recognized in other
operating expense (income), net, representing the amount by
which the carrying amount of the assets exceeded their fair
value.
During the years ended September 30, 2007 and 2008, the
Company did not recognize any impairments of goodwill.
|
|
19.
|
Trade Accounts
Payable
|
Trade accounts payable at September 30, 2007 and 2008
consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Third party trade
|
|
|
527
|
|
|
|
473
|
|
Associated and Related Companies trade
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
596
|
|
|
|
488
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued liabilities at September 30, 2007 and 2008 consist
of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Personnel costs
|
|
|
284
|
|
|
|
327
|
|
Warranties and licenses
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
Other
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
379
|
|
|
|
410
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A tabular reconciliation of the changes in the aggregate product
warranty liability for the year ended September 30, 2008 is
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Balance as of September 30, 2007
|
|
|
41
|
|
Accrued during the year
|
|
|
16
|
|
Settled or released during the year
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of September 30, 2008
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-34
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
21.
|
Other Current
Liabilities
|
Other current liabilities at September 30, 2007 and 2008
consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Deferred income
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
VAT and other taxes payable
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Obligations to employees
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
197
|
|
Deferred government grants (note 6)
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
Financial instruments (note 32)
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
Settlement for anti-trust related matters (note 34)
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
Associated and Related Companies financial and other
payables
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Other
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
326
|
|
|
|
435
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other deferred income includes amounts relating to license
income (see note 5) and deferred revenue. The
non-current portion is included in other liabilities (see
note 24).
Debt at September 30, 2007 and 2008 consists of the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Short-term debt and current maturities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans payable to banks, weighted average rate 5.1%
|
|
|
127
|
|
|
|
139
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
|
133
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total short-term debt and current maturities
|
|
|
260
|
|
|
|
207
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchangeable subordinated notes, 1.375%, due 2010
|
|
|
215
|
|
|
|
215
|
|
Convertible subordinated notes, 5.0%, due 2010
|
|
|
695
|
|
|
|
597
|
|
Loans payable to banks:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unsecured term loans, weighted average rate 4.82%,
due 2009 2013
|
|
|
214
|
|
|
|
217
|
|
Secured term loans, weighted average rate 2.45%, due 2013
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Notes payable to governmental entity, due 2010
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt
|
|
|
1,149
|
|
|
|
1,051
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term loans payable to banks consist primarily of
borrowings under the terms of short-term borrowing arrangements.
On September 26, 2007, the Company (as guarantor), through
its subsidiary Infineon Technologies Investment B.V. (as
issuer), issued 215 million in exchangeable
subordinated notes due 2010 at par in an underwritten offering
to institutional investors in Europe. The notes accrue interest
at 1.375 percent per year. The notes are exchangeable into
a maximum of 20.5 million Qimonda ADSs, at an exchange
price of 10.48 per ADS any time during the exchange
period, as defined, through maturity, corresponding to an
exchange premium of 35 percent. The notes are unsecured and
rank pari passu with all present and future unsecured
subordinated obligations of the issuer. The noteholders have a
negative pledge relating to future capital market indebtedness,
as defined, and an early redemption option in the event of a
change of
F-35
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
control, as defined. The Company may, at its option, redeem the
outstanding notes in whole, but not in part, at the principal
amount thereof together with accrued interest to the date of
redemption, if the issuer has determined that, as a result of a
publicly announced transaction, there is a substantial
likelihood that the aggregate ownership of the share capital of
Qimonda by the issuer, the guarantor and any of their respective
subsidiaries will be less than 50 percent plus one share.
In addition, the Company may, at its option, redeem the
outstanding notes in whole, but not in part, at their principal
amount together with interest accrued to the date of redemption,
if the share price of the ADSs on each of 15 trading days during
a period of 30 consecutive trading days commencing on or after
August 31, 2009, exceeds 130 percent of the exchange
price. The exchangeable notes are listed on the Frankfurt Stock
Exchange. At September 30, 2008, unamortized debt issuance
costs amounted to 4 million. Concurrently with this
transaction, the Company loaned an affiliate of J.P. Morgan
Securities Inc. 3.6 million Qimonda ADSs ancillary to the
placement of the exchangeable subordinated notes. The affiliate
of J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. sold these ADSs as part of
the Qimonda ADSs sale on September 25, 2007. On
October 25, 2007, 1.3 million Qimonda ADSs that had
been borrowed were returned to the Company and the remaining
2.3 million Qimonda ADSs were returned to the Company on
January 4, 2008.
On June 5, 2003, the Company (as guarantor), through its
subsidiary Infineon Technologies Holding B.V. (as issuer),
issued 700 million in convertible subordinated notes
due 2010 at par in an underwritten offering to institutional
investors in Europe. The notes are convertible, at the option of
the holders of the notes, into a maximum of 68.4 million
ordinary shares of the Company, at a conversion price of
10.23 per share through maturity. The notes accrue
interest at 5.0 percent per year. The notes are unsecured
and rank pari passu with all present and future unsecured
subordinated obligations of the issuer. The noteholders have a
negative pledge relating to future capital market indebtedness,
as defined. The noteholders have an early redemption option in
the event of a change of control, as defined. A corporate
reorganization resulting in a substitution of the guarantor
shall not be regarded as a change of control, as defined. The
Company may redeem the convertible notes after three years at
their principal amount plus interest accrued thereon, if the
Companys share price exceeds 125 percent of the
conversion price on 15 trading days during a period of 30
consecutive trading days. The convertible notes are listed on
the Luxembourg Stock Exchange. On September 29, 2006 the
Company (through the issuer) irrevocably waived its option to
pay a cash amount in lieu of the delivery of shares upon
conversion. During the 2008 fiscal year, the Company repurchased
a notional amount of 100 million of its convertible
subordinated notes due 2010. The transaction resulted in a net
gain of 2 million before tax, which was recognized in
interest expense, net. The repurchase was made out of available
cash. At September 30, 2008, the outstanding notional
amount was 600 million and unamortized debt issuance
costs amounted to 3 million.
Concurrently with the issuance of $248 million in
convertible notes due 2013 by Qimonda (as guarantor) through its
subsidiary Qimonda Finance LLC (as issuer) on February 12,
2008, Infineon loaned Credit Suisse International
20.7 million Qimonda ADSs ancillary to the placement of the
convertible notes, which remained outstanding as of
September 30, 2008.
In September 2004, the Company executed a
$400/400 million syndicated credit facility with a
five-year term, which was subsequently reduced to
$345/300 million in August 2006. The facility
consists of two tranches. Tranche A is a term loan
originally intended to finance the expansion of the Richmond,
Virginia, manufacturing facility. In January 2006, the Company
drew $345 million under Tranche A, on the basis of a
repayment schedule that foresees equal installments falling due
in March and September each year. At September 30, 2008,
$125 million was outstanding under Tranche A.
Tranche B, which is a multicurrency revolving facility to
be used for general corporate purposes, remained undrawn at
September 30, 2008. The facility has customary financial
covenants, and drawings bear interest at market-related rates
that are linked to financial performance. The lenders of this
credit facility have been granted a negative pledge relating to
the future financial indebtedness of the Company with certain
permitted encumbrances.
F-36
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
The Company has established independent financing arrangements
with several financial institutions, in the form of both short-
and long-term credit facilities, which are available for various
funding purposes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nature of financial
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
Institution
|
|
Purpose/intended
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term
|
|
Commitment
|
|
use
|
|
facility
|
|
|
Drawn
|
|
|
Available
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Short-term
|
|
firm commitment
|
|
general corporate purposes, working capital, guarantees
|
|
|
504
|
|
|
|
139
|
|
|
|
365
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term
|
|
no firm commitment
|
|
working capital, cash management
|
|
|
176
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
176
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term(1)
|
|
firm commitment
|
|
project finance
|
|
|
307
|
|
|
|
307
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
987
|
|
|
|
446
|
|
|
|
541
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Including current maturities.
|
At September 30, 2008, the Company was in compliance with
its debt covenants under the relevant facilities.
Interest expense for the years ended September 30, 2006,
2007 and 2008 was 65 million, 77 million
and 71 million, respectively.
Aggregate amounts of debt maturing subsequent to
September 30, 2008 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal year ending September 30,
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
207
|
|
2010
|
|
|
861
|
|
2011
|
|
|
82
|
|
2012
|
|
|
68
|
|
2013
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1,258
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23.
|
Long-term Accrued
Liabilities
|
Long-term accrued liabilities at September 30, 2007 and
2008 consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Asset retirement obligations
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
Post-retirement benefits
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Personnel costs
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-37
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Other non-current liabilities at September 30, 2007 and
2008 consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Deferred income
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
Deferred government grants (note 6)
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
Settlement for antitrust related matters (note 34)
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
Deferred compensation
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
Other
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ALTIS is a joint venture between the Company and IBM, with each
having equal voting representation. In December 2005, the
Company further amended its agreements with IBM in respect of
the ALTIS joint venture and began to fully consolidate ALTIS,
whereby IBMs 50 percent ownership interest is
reflected as minority interest (see note 4).
Effective May 1, 2006, the Company contributed
substantially all of the operations of its memory products
segment, including the assets and liabilities that were used
exclusively for these operations, to Qimonda, a stand-alone
legal company. On August 9, 2006, Qimonda completed an
initial public offering on the New York Stock Exchange through
the issuance of 42 million ADSs which are traded under the
symbol QI, for an offering price of $13 per ADS. In
addition, the Company sold 6.3 million Qimonda ADSs upon
exercise of the underwriters over-allotment option. As a
result of these transactions, the Company reduced its
shareholding in Qimonda to 85.9 percent. During the fourth
quarter of the 2007 fiscal year, Infineon sold an additional
28.75 million Qimonda ADSs (including underwriters
over-allotment option), further reducing its ownership interest
in Qimonda to 77.5 percent. The minority investors
ownership interest in Qimonda of 22.5 percent as of
September 30, 2007 and 2008 is reflected as minority
interest (see note 4).
|
|
26.
|
Ordinary Share
Capital
|
As of September 30, 2008 the Company had 749,742,085
registered ordinary shares, notional value of 2.00 per
share, outstanding. During the years ended September 30,
2007 and 2008 the Company increased its share capital by
4 million and 0 million, respectively, by
issuing 2,119,341 and 13,450 ordinary shares, respectively, in
connection with the Companys Long-Term Incentive Plans.
Authorized and
Conditional Share Capital
In addition to the issued share capital, the Companys
Articles of Association authorize the Management Board to
increase the ordinary share capital with the Supervisory
Boards consent by issuing new shares. As of
September 30, 2008, the Management Board may use these
authorizations to issue new shares as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Through January 19, 2009, Authorized Share Capital
II/2004 in an aggregate nominal amount of up to
30 million to issue shares to employees (in which
case the pre-emptive rights of existing shareholders are
excluded).
|
|
|
|
Through February 14, 2012, Authorized Share Capital
2007 in an aggregate nominal amount of up to
224 million to issue shares for cash, where the
pre-emptive rights of shareholders may be
|
F-38
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
|
|
|
partially excluded, or in connection with business combinations
(contributions in kind), where the pre-emptive rights of
shareholders may be excluded for all shares.
|
The Company has conditional capital of up to an aggregate
nominal amount of 92 million (Conditional Share
Capital I), of up to an aggregate nominal amount of
29 million (Conditional Share Capital III) and
up to an aggregate nominal amount of 24.5 million
(Conditional Share Capital IV/2006) that may be used to issue up
to 72.6 million new registered shares in connection with
the Companys long-term incentive plans (see note 27).
These shares will have dividend rights from the beginning of the
fiscal year in which they are issued.
The Company has conditional capital of up to an aggregate
nominal amount of 152 million (Conditional Share
Capital 2002) that may be used to issue up to
76 million new registered shares upon conversion of debt
securities, issued in June 2003 and which may be converted at
any time until May 22, 2010 (see note 22). These
shares will have dividend rights from the beginning of the
fiscal year in which they are issued.
The Company has further conditional capital of up to an
aggregate nominal amount of 248 million (Conditional
Share Capital 2007) that may be used to issue up to
124 million new registered shares upon conversion of debt
securities which may be issued before February 14, 2012.
These shares will have dividend rights from the beginning of the
fiscal year in which they are issued.
The Company has further conditional capital of up to an
aggregate nominal amount of 150 million (Conditional
Share Capital 2008) that may be used to issue up to
75 million new registered shares upon conversion of debt
securities which may be issued before February 13, 2013.
These shares will have dividend rights from the beginning of the
fiscal year in which they are issued.
Dividends
Under the German Stock Corporation Act (Aktiengesetz),
the amount of dividends available for distribution to
shareholders is based on the level of earnings
(Bilanzgewinn) of the ultimate parent, as determined in
accordance with the HGB. All dividends must be approved by
shareholders.
The ordinary shareholders meeting held in February 2008 did not
authorize a dividend for the 2007 fiscal year. No earnings are
available for distribution as a dividend for the 2008 fiscal
year, since Infineon Technologies AG on a stand-alone basis as
the ultimate parent incurred a cumulative loss
(Bilanzverlust) as of September 30, 2008.
Subject to market conditions, Infineon intends to retain future
earnings for investment in the development and expansion of its
business.
|
|
27.
|
Share-based
Compensation
|
In 1999, the Companys shareholders approved a long-term
incentive plan (LTI 1999 Plan), which provided for
the granting of non-transferable options to acquire ordinary
shares over a future period. Under the terms of the LTI 1999
Plan, the Company could grant up to 48 million options over
a five-year period. The exercise price of each option equals
120 percent of the average closing price of the
Companys stock during the five trading days prior to the
grant date. Granted options vest at the latter of two years from
the grant date or the date on which the Companys stock
reaches the exercise price for at least one trading day. Options
expire seven years from the grant date.
In 2001, the Companys shareholders approved the
International Long-Term Incentive Plan (LTI 2001
Plan) which replaced the LTI 1999 Plan. Options previously
issued under the LTI 1999 Plan remain unaffected as to terms and
conditions; however, no additional options may be issued under
the LTI 1999 Plan. Under the terms of the LTI 2001 Plan, the
Company could grant up to 51.5 million options over a five-
F-39
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
year period. The exercise price of each option equals
105 percent of the average closing price of the
Companys stock during the five trading days prior to the
grant date. Granted options have a vesting period of between two
and four years, subject to the Companys stock reaching the
exercise price on at least one trading day, and expire seven
years from the grant date.
Under the LTI 2001 Plan, the Companys Supervisory Board
decided annually within 45 days after publication of the
financial results how many options to grant to the Management
Board. The Management Board, within the same period, decided how
many options to grant to eligible employees.
In 2006, the Companys shareholders approved the Stock
Option Plan 2006 (SOP 2006) which replaced the
LTI 2001 Plan. Under the terms of SOP 2006, the Company can
grant up to 13 million options over a three-year period.
The exercise price of each option equals 120 percent of the
average closing price of the Companys stock during the
five trading days prior to the grant date. Granted options are
only exercisable if the price of a share exceeds the trend of
the comparative index Philadelphia Semiconductor Index
(SOX) for at least three consecutive days on at
least one occasion during the life of the option. Granted
options have a vesting period of three years, subject to the
Companys stock reaching the exercise price on at least one
trading day, and expire six years from the grant date.
Under the SOP 2006, the Supervisory Board will decide
annually within a period of 45 days after publication of
the annual results or the results of the first or second
quarters of a fiscal year, but no later than two weeks before
the end of the quarter, how many options to grant to the
Management Board. During that same period the Management Board
may grant options to other eligible employees.
At the discretion of the Company, exercised options of the LTI
2001 Plan and SOP 2006 can be satisfied with shares either
by issuing shares from the Conditional Share Capital
I and Conditional Share Capital III for
the LTI 2001 Plan or from the Conditional Share Capital
III and Conditional Share Capital IV/2006 for
the SOP 2006 or by transferring shares held by the Company.
A summary of the status of the LTI 1999 Plan, the LTI 2001 Plan,
and the SOP 2006 as of September 30, 2008, and changes
during the fiscal year then ended are presented below (options
in millions, exercise price in euro, intrinsic value in millions
of euro):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average
|
|
|
average
|
|
|
Aggregated
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
exercise
|
|
|
remaining life
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
|
options
|
|
|
price
|
|
|
(in years)
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Outstanding at September 30, 2007
|
|
|
39.4
|
|
|
|
16.17
|
|
|
|
2.99
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited and expired
|
|
|
(6.2
|
)
|
|
|
37.44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at September 30, 2008
|
|
|
33.2
|
|
|
|
12.30
|
|
|
|
2.28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested and expected to vest, net of estimated forfeitures at
September 30, 2008
|
|
|
30.6
|
|
|
|
12.32
|
|
|
|
2.28
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at September 30, 2008
|
|
|
26.5
|
|
|
|
12.89
|
|
|
|
1.83
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options with an aggregate fair value of 51 million,
32 million and 26 million vested during
the fiscal years ended September 30, 2006, 2007 and 2008,
respectively. Options with a total intrinsic value of 0,
6 million and 0 were exercised during the
fiscal years ended September 30, 2006, 2007 and 2008,
respectively.
F-40
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Changes in the Companys unvested options for the fiscal
year ended September 30, 2008 are summarized as follows
(options in millions, fair values in euro, intrinsic value in
millions of euro):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
average
|
|
|
Aggregated
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
average
|
|
|
remaining life
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
|
options
|
|
|
grant date fair value
|
|
|
(in years)
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Unvested at September 30, 2007
|
|
|
13.6
|
|
|
|
3.50
|
|
|
|
4.77
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(6.5
|
)
|
|
|
4.04
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
|
3.23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unvested at September 30, 2008
|
|
|
6.7
|
|
|
|
2.96
|
|
|
|
4.05
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unvested options expected to vest
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
|
|
3.30
|
|
|
|
4.03
|
|
|
|
|
|
The fair value of each option grant issued pursuant to the 1999
and 2001 Long-Term Incentive Plans was estimated on the grant
date using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. Prior to the
adoption of SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004), Infineon
relied on historical volatility measures when estimating the
fair value of stock options granted to employees. Following the
implementation of SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004),
Infineon uses a combination of implied volatilities from traded
options on Infineons ordinary shares and historical
volatility when estimating the fair value of stock options
granted to employees, as it believes that this methodology
better reflects the expected future volatility of its stock. The
expected life of options granted was estimated based on
historical experience.
The fair value of each option grant issued pursuant to the Stock
Option Plan 2006 was estimated on the grant date using a Monte
Carlo simulation model. This model takes into account vesting
conditions relating to the performance of the SOX and its impact
on stock option fair value. The Company uses a combination of
implied volatilities from traded options on Infineons
ordinary shares and historical volatility when estimating the
fair value of stock options granted to employees, as it believes
that this methodology better reflects the expected future
volatility of its stock. The expected life of options granted
was estimated using the Monte Carlo simulation model.
Beginning on the date of adoption of SFAS No. 123
(revised 2004), forfeitures are estimated based on historical
experience; prior to the date of adoption, forfeitures were
recorded as they occurred. The risk-free rate is based on
treasury note yields at the time of grant for the estimated life
of the option. Infineon has not made any dividend payments
during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008.
The following weighted-average assumptions were used in the fair
value calculation during the fiscal years ended
September 30, 2006, and 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Weighted-average assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
3.08
|
%
|
|
|
3.91
|
%
|
Expected volatility, underlying shares
|
|
|
43
|
%
|
|
|
40
|
%
|
Expected volatility, SOX index
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36
|
%
|
Forfeiture rate, per year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.40
|
%
|
Dividend yield
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
Expected life in years
|
|
|
5.07
|
|
|
|
3.09
|
|
Weighted-average fair value per option at grant date in
|
|
|
3.19
|
|
|
|
2.03
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2008, there was a total of
4 million in unrecognized compensation expense
related to unvested stock options of Infineon, which is expected
to be recognized over a weighted-average period of less than one
year.
F-41
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Share-Based
Compensation Expense
Share-based compensation expense was allocated as follows for
the fiscal years ended September 30, 2006, 2007 and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Compensation expense recognized:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total share-based compensation expense
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share-based compensation effect on basic and diluted loss per
share in
|
|
|
(0.03
|
)
|
|
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash received from stock option exercises was
19 million and 0 during the fiscal years ended
September 30, 2007 and 2008, respectively. The amount of
share-based compensation expense which was capitalized and
remained in inventories for the fiscal years ended
September 30, 2006, 2007 and 2008 was immaterial.
Share-based compensation expense does not reflect any income tax
benefits, since stock options are granted in tax jurisdictions
where the expense is not deductible for tax purposes.
|
|
28.
|
Other
Comprehensive Loss
|
The changes in the components of other comprehensive loss for
the years ended September 30, 2006, 2007 and 2008 are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pretax
|
|
|
effect
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Pretax
|
|
|
effect
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Pretax
|
|
|
effect
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Unrealized (losses) gains on securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized holding (losses) gains
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
Reclassification adjustment for losses (gains) included in net
income or loss
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized (losses) gains, net
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
Unrealized gains (losses) on cash flow hedges
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Additional minimum pension liability/Defined benefit plans
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
(69
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(69
|
)
|
|
|
(105
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(105
|
)
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(74
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(74
|
)
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-42
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
29.
|
Supplemental Cash
Flow Information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Cash paid for:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
Non-cash investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Molstanda (note 3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(41
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Molstanda (note 3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company has transactions in the normal course of business
with Associated and Related Companies (Related
Parties). The Company purchases certain of its raw
materials, especially chipsets, from, and sells certain of its
products to, Related Parties. Purchases and sales to Related
Parties are generally based on market prices or manufacturing
cost plus a
mark-up.
Transactions between the Company and ALTIS subsequent to the
consolidation of ALTIS during the first quarter of the 2006
fiscal year are no longer reflected as Related Party
transactions (see notes 16 and 25). Also, on April 3,
2006, Siemens disposed of its remaining shareholding in the
Company. Transactions between the Company and Siemens subsequent
to this date are no longer reflected as Related Party
transactions.
Related Party receivables consist primarily of trade, financial,
and other receivables from Associated and Related Companies, and
totaled 194 million and 80 million as of
September 30, 2007 and 2008, respectively. At
September 30, 2007, current financial and other receivables
from Associated and Related Companies included a revolving term
loan of 52 million due from ALTIS.
Related Party payables consist primarily of trade, financial,
and other payables from Associated and Related Companies, and
totaled 81 million and 21 million as of
September 30, 2007 and 2008, respectively.
Related Party receivables and payables as of September 30,
2007 and 2008 have been segregated first between amounts owed by
or to companies in which the Company has an ownership interest,
and second based on the underlying nature of the transactions.
Trade receivables and payables include amounts for the purchase
and sale of products and services. Financial and other
receivables and payables represent amounts owed relating to
loans and advances and accrue interest at interbank rates.
Sales to Related Parties, consisting primarily of sales to
Siemens group companies and Associated and Related Companies,
totaled 366 million, 57 million, and
1 million in the 2006, 2007 and 2008 fiscal years,
respectively. Included therein were sales to Siemens group
companies totaling 316 million in the 2006 fiscal
year and 0 in the 2007 and 2008 fiscal years.
Purchases from Related Parties, consisting primarily of
purchases from Siemens group companies and Associated and
Related Companies, totaled 200 million,
47 million, and 148 million in the 2006,
2007 and 2008 fiscal years, respectively. Included therein were
purchases from Siemens group companies totaling
74 million in the 2006 fiscal year and 0 in the
2007 and 2008 fiscal years.
Pension benefits provided by the Company are currently organized
primarily through defined benefit pension plans which cover a
significant portion of the Companys employees. Plan
benefits are principally
F-43
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
based upon years of service. Certain pension plans are based on
salary earned in the last year or last five years of employment,
while others are fixed plans depending on ranking (both salary
level and position). The measurement date for the Companys
pension plans is June 30.
In February 2007, the Company transferred the majority of its
existing domestic (German) pension plans into a new Infineon
pension plan with effect from October 1, 2006. Under the
new plan, employee benefits are predominantly based on
contributions made by the Company, although defined benefit
provisions are retained. The plan qualifies as a defined benefit
plan and, accordingly, the change from the previous defined
benefit plans is treated as a plan amendment pursuant to
SFAS No. 87. In comparison to the existing domestic
pension obligation, the additional impact on projected benefit
obligation consists of unrecognized prior service cost of
approximately 4 million (of which less than
1 million related to Infineon and
4 million related to Qimonda) and is reflected as a
separate component of accumulated other comprehensive income
(see note 28), and will be amortized as part of net
periodic pension cost over the expected years of future service.
As a result of the adoption of SFAS No. 158 as of the
end of the fiscal year ended September 30, 2007, the
Company recognizes the overfunded or underfunded status of a
defined benefit postretirement plan as an asset or liability in
its consolidated balance sheets and recognized the change in
that funded status in the year in which the changes occur
through comprehensive income (Recognition
Provision). Actuarial gains and losses and unrecognized
prior service costs are to be recognized as a component of other
comprehensive income, net of tax.
The following table summarizes the incremental effect as of
September 30, 2007 resulting from the initial adoption of
SFAS No. 158.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Before adoption of
|
|
|
initially apply
|
|
|
After adoption of
|
|
|
|
SFAS No. 158
|
|
|
SFAS No. 158
|
|
|
SFAS No. 158
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Prepaid pension costs
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
(56
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Current deferred income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Intangible asset
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current pension asset
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Current pension liability
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension liabilities
|
|
|
(42
|
)
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
F-44
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Information with respect to the Companys pension plans for
the years ended September 30, 2006, 2007 and 2008 is
presented for German (Domestic) plans and non-German
(Foreign) plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
|
plans
|
|
|
plans
|
|
|
plans
|
|
|
plans
|
|
|
plans
|
|
|
plans
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Accumulated benefit obligation end of year
|
|
|
(337
|
)
|
|
|
(58
|
)
|
|
|
(325
|
)
|
|
|
(44
|
)
|
|
|
(288
|
)
|
|
|
(44
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in projected benefit obligation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Projected benefit obligation beginning of year
|
|
|
(333
|
)
|
|
|
(79
|
)
|
|
|
(390
|
)
|
|
|
(71
|
)
|
|
|
(342
|
)
|
|
|
(73
|
)
|
Service cost
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
Actuarial gains (losses)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Divestitures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan additions and amendments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Plan transfers to Qimonda
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
Curtailments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency effects
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Projected benefit obligation end of year
|
|
|
(390
|
)
|
|
|
(71
|
)
|
|
|
(342
|
)
|
|
|
(73
|
)
|
|
|
(299
|
)
|
|
|
(78
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in fair value of plan assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value at beginning of year
|
|
|
176
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
257
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
342
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
Contributions and transfers
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Actual return on plan assets
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Plan transfers from/to Qimonda
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency effects
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value at end of year
|
|
|
257
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
342
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
314
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funded status
|
|
|
(133
|
)
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
(42
|
)
|
Unrecognized actuarial (gains) losses
|
|
|
136
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Unrecognized prior service cost (benefit)
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post measurement date contributions
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net asset (liability) recognized
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
(42
|
)
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
(43
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The above amounts are recognized as follows in the accompanying
consolidated balance sheets as of September 30:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
|
plans
|
|
|
plans
|
|
|
plans
|
|
|
plans
|
|
|
plans
|
|
|
plans
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Prepaid pension cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible asset
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current pension asset
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current pension liability
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Pension liabilities
|
|
|
(65
|
)
|
|
|
(43
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(41
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive (income) loss
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net asset (liability) recognized
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
(42
|
)
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
(43
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-45
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
The amounts recognized in other comprehensive loss as of
September 30, 2008, showing separately the amounts arising
during the period and reclassification adjustments of other
comprehensive income (loss) as a result of being recognized as
components of net periodic benefit cost for the period, are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrecognized actuarial losses
|
|
|
Unrecognized prior service
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive
|
|
|
|
(gains)
|
|
|
cost (benefits)
|
|
|
income (loss)
|
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
|
plans
|
|
|
plans
|
|
|
plans
|
|
|
plans
|
|
|
plans
|
|
|
plans
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
Additions
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
6
|
|
Reclassification adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of the year
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The amounts in accumulated other comprehensive loss that are
expected to be recognized as components of the net periodic
benefit cost in the 2009 fiscal year are actuarial gains in an
amount of less than 1 million and prior service cost
in an amount of 1 million.
Information for pension plans with projected benefit obligations
and accumulated benefit obligations in excess of plan assets are
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
|
plans
|
|
|
plans
|
|
|
plans
|
|
|
plans
|
|
|
plans
|
|
|
plans
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Projected benefit obligation
|
|
|
390
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
Fair value of plan assets
|
|
|
257
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
Accumulated benefit obligation
|
|
|
337
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
Fair value of plan assets
|
|
|
257
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
The weighted-average assumptions used in calculating the
actuarial values for the pension plans are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
Foreign
|
|
Domestic
|
|
Foreign
|
|
Domestic
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
plans
|
|
plans
|
|
plans
|
|
plans
|
|
Plans
|
|
plans
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
4.8%
|
|
|
5.3%
|
|
|
5.5%
|
|
|
5.6%
|
|
|
6.5%
|
|
|
6.1%
|
Rate of compensation increase
|
|
|
2.5%
|
|
|
1.8%
|
|
|
2.5%
|
|
|
2.3%
|
|
|
2.5%
|
|
|
2.8%
|
Projected future pension increases
|
|
|
1.8%
|
|
|
2.2%
|
|
|
1.8%
|
|
|
2.7%
|
|
|
2.0%
|
|
|
2.9%
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
6.5%
|
|
|
6.9%
|
|
|
6.1%
|
|
|
6.9%
|
|
|
6.5%
|
|
|
7.0%
|
Discount rates are established based on prevailing market rates
for high-quality fixed-income instruments that, if the pension
benefit obligation were settled at the measurement date, would
provide the necessary future cash flows to pay the benefit
obligation when due. The Company believes short-term changes in
interest rates should not affect the measurement of the
Companys long-term obligation.
Investment
Strategies
The investment approach of the Companys pension plans
involves employing a sufficient level of flexibility to capture
investment opportunities as they occur, while maintaining
reasonable parameters to ensure that prudence and care are
exercised in the execution of the investment program. The
Companys pension plans assets are invested with
several investment managers. The plans employ a mix of active
and passive investment management programs. Considering the
duration of the underlying liabilities, a
F-46
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
portfolio of investments of plan assets in equity securities,
debt securities and other assets is targeted to maximize the
long-term return on assets for a given level of risk. Investment
risk is monitored on an ongoing basis through periodic portfolio
reviews, meetings with investment managers and annual liability
measurements. Investment policies and strategies are
periodically reviewed to ensure the objectives of the plans are
met considering any changes in benefit plan design, market
conditions or other material items.
Expected
Long-term Rate of Return on Plan Assets
Establishing the expected rate of return on pension assets
requires judgment. The Companys approach in determining
the long-term rate of return for plan assets is based upon
historical financial market relationships that have existed over
time, the types of investment classes in which pension plan
assets are invested, long-term investment strategies, as well as
the expected compounded return the Company can reasonably expect
the portfolio to earn over appropriate time periods.
The Company reviews the expected long-term rate of return
annually and revises it as appropriate. Also, the Company
periodically commissions detailed asset/liability studies to be
performed by third-party professional investment advisors and
actuaries.
Plan Asset
Allocation
As of September 30, 2007 and 2008 the percentage of plan
assets invested and the targeted allocation in major asset
categories are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Targeted Allocation
|
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
|
plans
|
|
|
plans
|
|
|
plans
|
|
|
plans
|
|
|
plans
|
|
|
plans
|
|
|
Equity securities
|
|
|
37%
|
|
|
|
60%
|
|
|
|
34%
|
|
|
|
47%
|
|
|
|
36%
|
|
|
|
47%
|
|
Debt securities
|
|
|
34%
|
|
|
|
22%
|
|
|
|
36%
|
|
|
|
16%
|
|
|
|
31%
|
|
|
|
17%
|
|
Other
|
|
|
29%
|
|
|
|
18%
|
|
|
|
30%
|
|
|
|
37%
|
|
|
|
33%
|
|
|
|
36%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100%
|
|
|
|
100%
|
|
|
|
100%
|
|
|
|
100%
|
|
|
|
100%
|
|
|
|
100%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys asset allocation targets for its pension plan
assets are based on its assessment of business and financial
conditions, demographic and actuarial data, funding
characteristics, related risk factors, market sensitivity
analysis and other relevant factors. The overall allocation is
expected to help protect the plans funded status while
generating sufficiently stable real returns (i.e., net of
inflation) to meet current and future benefit payment needs. Due
to active portfolio management, the asset allocation may differ
from the target allocation up to certain limits for different
classes. As a matter of policy, the Companys pension plans
do not invest in shares of Infineon.
F-47
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
The components of net periodic pension cost for the years ended
September 30, 2006, 2007 and 2008 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
|
plans
|
|
|
plans
|
|
|
Plans
|
|
|
plans
|
|
|
plans
|
|
|
plans
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Amortization of unrecognized prior service (cost) benefits
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of unrecognized actuarial gains (losses)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Curtailment gain recognized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic pension cost (note 7)
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The prior service costs relating to the pension plans are
amortized in equal amounts over the expected years of future
service of each active employee who is expected to receive
benefits from the pension plans.
Unrecognized gains or losses are included in the net pension
cost for the year, if as of the beginning of the year, the
unrecognized net gains or losses exceed 10 percent of the
greater of the projected benefit obligation or the market value
of the plan assets. The amortization is the excess divided by
the average remaining service period of active employees
expected to receive benefits under the plan.
Actuarial gains (losses) amounted to (3) million,
78 million and 59 million for the fiscal
years ended September 30, 2006, 2007 and 2008,
respectively. The increase in actuarial gains in the 2007 and
2008 fiscal year was primarily the result of the increase in the
discount rate used to determine the benefit obligation.
It is not planned nor anticipated that any plan assets will be
returned to any business entity during the next fiscal year.
The effect of employee terminations in connection with the
Companys restructuring plans (see note 8), on the
Companys pension obligation is reflected as a curtailment
in the years ended September 30, 2006, 2007 and 2008
pursuant to the provisions of SFAS No. 88
Employers Accounting for Settlements and Curtailments
of Defined Benefit Pension Plans and for Termination
Benefits.
The future benefit payments, which reflect future service, as
appropriate, that are expected to be paid from the
Companys pension plan for the next five fiscal years and
thereafter are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
Years ending September 30,
|
|
plans
|
|
|
plans
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
2010
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
2011
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
2012
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
2013
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
139
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
32.
|
Financial
Instruments
|
The Company periodically enters into derivative financial
instruments, including foreign currency forward and option
contracts as well as interest rate swap agreements. The
objective of these transactions
F-48
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
is to reduce the impact of interest rate and exchange rate
fluctuations on the Companys foreign currency denominated
net future cash flows. The Company does not enter into
derivatives for trading or speculative purposes.
The euro equivalent notional amounts in millions and fair values
of the Companys derivative instruments as of
September 30, 2007 and 2008 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
Notional
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Notional
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
amount
|
|
value
|
|
|
amount
|
|
value
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Forward contracts sold:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. dollar
|
|
|
260
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
213
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
Japanese yen
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
Singapore dollar
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
Malaysian ringgit
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
Norwegian krone
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forward contracts purchased:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. dollar
|
|
|
283
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
157
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
Japanese yen
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
Singapore dollar
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
Great Britain pound
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
Malaysian ringgit
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
|
Norwegian krone
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
Other currencies
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency Options sold:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. dollar
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
177
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
Currency Options purchased:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. dollar
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
1
|
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
|
700
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
123
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company enters into derivative instruments, primarily
foreign exchange forward contracts, to hedge significant
anticipated U.S. dollar cash flows from operations. During
the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008, the Company
designated as cash flow hedges certain foreign exchange forward
contracts and foreign exchange options related to highly
probable forecasted sales denominated in U.S. dollars. The
Company did not record any ineffectiveness for these hedges for
the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008. However, it
excluded differences between spot and forward rates and the time
value from the assessment of hedge effectiveness and included
this component of financial instruments gain or loss as
part of cost of goods sold. It is estimated that
4 million of the net losses recognized directly in
other comprehensive income as of September 30, 2008 will be
reclassified into earnings during the 2009 fiscal year. All
foreign exchange derivatives designated as cash flow hedges held
as of September 30, 2008 have maturities of six months or
less. Foreign exchange derivatives entered into by the Company
to offset exposure to anticipated cash flows that do not meet
the requirements for applying hedge accounting are marked to
market at each reporting period with unrealized gains and losses
recognized in earnings. For the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2007 and 2008, no gains or losses were
reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income as a
result of the discontinuance of foreign currency cash flow
hedges resulting from a determination that it was probable that
the original forecasted transaction would not occur.
For the fiscal years ended September 30, 2006, 2007 and
2008, net gains (losses) related to foreign currency derivatives
and foreign currency transactions included in determining net
income (loss) amounted to (11) million,
3 million and 15 million, respectively.
F-49
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Fair values of financial instruments are determined using quoted
market prices or discounted cash flows. The fair value of the
Companys unsecured term loans and interest-bearing notes
payable approximate their carrying values as their interest
rates approximate those which could be obtained currently. At
September 30, 2008, the subordinated convertible and
exchangeable notes, both due 2010, were trading at a
12.07 percent and a 12.34 percent discount to par,
respectively, based on quoted market values. The fair values of
the Companys cash and cash equivalents, receivables and
payables, as well as related-party receivables and payables and
other financial instruments approximated their carrying values
due to their short-term nature. Marketable securities are
recorded at fair value (see note 11).
The financial risks of the Company consist mainly of risks
related to raise enough capital, interest rate risks, liquidity
risks and currency exchange risks. Financial instruments that
expose the Company to credit risk consist primarily of trade
receivables, cash equivalents, marketable securities and
financial derivatives.
Concentrations of credit risks with respect to trade receivables
are limited by the large number of geographically diverse
customers that make up the Companys customer base. The
Company controls credit risk through credit approvals, credit
limits and monitoring procedures, as well as comprehensive
credit evaluations for all customers.
The credit risk with respect to cash equivalents, marketable
securities and financial derivatives is limited by transactions
with a number of large international financial institutions,
with pre-established limits. The Company does not believe that
there is significant risk of non-performance by these
counterparties because the Company monitors their credit risk
and limits the financial exposure and the amounts of agreements
entered into with any one financial institution.
The Companys currency exchange risk is mainly caused by
the U.S. Dollar and the Japanese Yen. Generally the
Companys policy with respect to limiting short-term
foreign currency exposure is to economically hedge at least
75 percent of its estimated net exposure for the initial
two-month period, at least 50 percent of its estimated net
exposure for the third month and, depending on the nature of the
underlying transactions, a significant portion thereafter. An
unfavorable development of the Euro to U.S. dollar rate
could negatively affect the operative results of the Company.
In order to remain competitive, the Company must continue to
make substantial investments in process technology and research
and development. Portions of these investments might not be
recoverable if these research and development efforts fail to
gain market acceptance or if markets significantly deteriorate.
Due to the high-technology nature of the Companys
operations, intellectual property is an integral part of the
Companys business. The Company has intellectual property
which it has self-developed, purchased or licensed from third
parties. The Company is exposed to infringements by others of
such intellectual property rights. Conversely, the Company is
exposed to assertions by others of infringement by the Company
of their intellectual property rights.
Additionally, the Company faces risks in connection with claims
relating to alleged defective or faulty products, claims
relating to the alleged transgression of environmental rules or
regulations and other general liability claims. Regardless of
the outcome of these claims, the Company may incur substantial
costs in defending itself against these claims. Infineon intends
to exert substantial efforts in defending itself vigorously
against such claims including the support of internal and
external experts. For more details about current legal issues
see note 34.
F-50
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
The quick pace of technological change coupled with the
possibility of delays in the introduction of new products in the
market could lead to a significant curtailment of our business
which could in turn lead to a loss of customer relationships.
High price pressure and associated risks continue to affect the
Companys business. As a substantial volume of the
Companys products may be purchased by a select number of
customers, operational results may also be dependent upon their
success in the marketplace. The Company reacts to such
developments by constantly seeking to widen its customer base.
The Company, through its use of third-party foundry and joint
venture arrangements, uses a significant portion of
manufacturing capacity that is outside of its direct control. As
a result, the Company is reliant upon such other parties for the
timely and uninterrupted supply of products and is to a certain
degree exposed to risks relating to price variations.
See also note 4 for additional risks related to Qimonda.
|
|
34.
|
Commitments and
Contingencies
|
Litigation and
Investigations
In September 2004, the Company entered into a plea agreement
with the Antitrust Division of the U.S. Department of
Justice (DOJ) in connection with its investigation
into alleged antitrust violations in the DRAM industry. Pursuant
to this plea agreement, the Company agreed to plead guilty to a
single count of conspiring with other unspecified DRAM
manufacturers to fix the prices of DRAM products between
July 1, 1999 and June 15, 2002, and to pay a fine of
$160 million. The fine plus accrued interest is being paid
in equal annual installments through 2009. The Company has a
continuing obligation to cooperate with the DOJ in its ongoing
investigation of other participants in the DRAM industry. The
price-fixing charges related to DRAM sales to six Original
Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) customers that
manufacture computers and servers. The Company has entered into
settlement agreements with five of these OEM customers and is
considering the possibility of a settlement with the remaining
OEM customer, which purchased only a very small volume of DRAM
products from the Company. The Company has secured individual
settlements with eight direct customers in addition to those OEM
customers.
Subsequent to the commencement of the DOJ investigation, a
number of putative class action lawsuits were filed against the
Company, its U.S. subsidiary Infineon Technologies North
America Corporation (IF North America) and other
DRAM suppliers, alleging price-fixing in violation of the
Sherman Act and seeking treble damages in unspecified amounts,
costs, attorneys fees, and an injunction against the
allegedly unlawful conduct. In September 2002, the Judicial
Panel on Multi-District Litigation ordered that these federal
cases be transferred to the U.S. District Court for the
Northern District of California for coordinated or consolidated
pre-trial proceedings as part of a Multi District Litigation
(MDL). In September 2005, the Company and IF North
America entered into a definitive settlement agreement with
counsel for the class of direct U.S. purchasers of DRAM
(granting an opportunity for individual class members to opt out
of the settlement). In November 2006, the court approved the
settlement agreement and entered final judgment and dismissed
the claims with prejudice.
In April 2006, Unisys Corporation (Unisys) filed a
complaint against the Company and IF North America, among
other DRAM suppliers, alleging state and federal claims for
price-fixing and seeking recovery as both a direct and indirect
purchaser of DRAM. The complaint was filed in the Northern
District of California and has been related to the MDL
proceeding described above. In October 2007, the court denied a
motion of the Company, IF North America, and the other
defendants to dismiss the Unisys complaint.
F-51
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
In February and March 2007, four more cases were filed by All
American Semiconductor, Inc., Edge Electronics, Inc., Jaco
Electronics, Inc., and DRAM Claims Liquidation Trust, by its
Trustee, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. The All American Semiconductor
complaint alleges claims for price-fixing under the Sherman Act.
The Edge Electronics, Jaco Electronics and DRAM Claims
Liquidation Trust complaints allege state and federal claims for
price-fixing. All four cases were filed in the Northern District
of California and have been related to the MDL described above.
All defendants have filed joint motions for summary judgment and
to exclude plaintiffs principal expert in all of these
cases, which have been scheduled for hearing on
December 17, 2008.
Sixty-four additional cases were filed through October 2005 in
numerous federal and state courts throughout the United States.
Each of these state and federal cases (except for one relating
to foreign purchasers, described below) purports to be on behalf
of a class of individuals and entities who indirectly purchased
DRAM in the United States during specified time periods
commencing in or after 1999 (the Indirect U.S. Purchaser
Class). The complaints variously allege violations of the
Sherman Act, Californias Cartwright Act, various other
state laws, unfair competition law, and unjust enrichment and
seek treble damages in generally unspecified amounts,
restitution, costs, attorneys fees and injunctions against
the allegedly unlawful conduct.
The foreign purchasers case referred to above was dismissed with
prejudice and without leave to amend in March 2006; the
plaintiffs have appealed to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.
On August 14, 2008, the Ninth Circuit issued its decision
affirming the dismissal of this action. 23 of the state and
federal court cases were subsequently ordered transferred to the
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
for coordinated and consolidated pretrial proceedings as part of
the MDL proceeding described above. 19 of the 23 transferred
cases are currently pending in the MDL litigation. The pending
California state cases were coordinated and transferred to
San Francisco County Superior Court for pre-trial
proceedings. The plaintiffs in the indirect purchaser cases
outside California agreed to stay proceedings in those cases in
favor of proceedings on the indirect purchaser cases pending as
part of the MDL pre-trial proceedings.
On January 29, 2008, the district court in the MDL
proceedings entered an order granting in part and denying in
part the defendants motion for judgment on the pleadings
directed at several of the claims. Plaintiffs filed a Third
Amended Complaint on February 27, 2008. On March 28,
2008, the court granted plaintiffs leave to immediately appeal
its decision to the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. On
June 26, 2008, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals issued an
order agreeing to hear the appeal and the parties submitted a
stipulation and proposed order to that effect. The district
court stayed proceedings pending the Court of Appeals
decision whether to accept the appeal and scheduled a hearing
for October 30, 2008 to decide whether the stay should
remain in place until the appeal is decided.
In July 2006, the New York state attorney general filed an
action in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District
of New York against the Company, IF North America and several
other DRAM manufacturers on behalf of New York governmental
entities and New York consumers who purchased products
containing DRAM beginning in 1998. The plaintiffs allege
violations of state and federal antitrust laws arising out of
the same allegations of DRAM price-fixing and artificial price
inflation practices discussed above, and seek recovery of actual
and treble damages in unspecified amounts, penalties, costs
(including attorneys fees) and injunctive and other
equitable relief. In October 2006, this action was made part of
the MDL proceeding described above. In July 2006, the attorney
generals of Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado,
Delaware, Florida, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Iowa, Louisiana,
Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi,
Nebraska, Nevada, New Mexico, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma,
Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Utah,
Vermont, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia and Wisconsin filed
a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Northern
District of California against the Company, IF North America and
several other DRAM manufacturers on behalf of governmental
entities, consumers and businesses in each of those states who
purchased products containing DRAM
F-52
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
beginning in 1998. In September 2006, the complaint was amended
to add claims by the attorneys general of Kentucky, Maine, New
Hampshire, North Carolina, the Northern Mariana Islands and
Rhode Island. This action is based on state and federal law
claims relating to the same alleged anticompetitive practices in
the sale of DRAM and plaintiffs seek recovery of actual and
treble damages in unspecified amounts, penalties, costs
(including attorneys fees) and injunctive and other
relief. In October 2006, the Company joined the other defendants
in filing motions to dismiss several of the claims alleged in
these two actions. In August 2007, the court entered orders
granting the motions in part and denying the motions in part.
Amended complaints in both actions were filed on October 1,
2007. On April 15, 2008, the court issued two orders in the
New York and multistate attorneys general cases on the
defendants motions to dismiss. The order in the New York
action denied the defendants motion to dismiss. The order
in the multistate attorney generals case partly dismissed and
partly granted the motion. On May 13, 2008, the Company
answered the complaint by the State of New York and the
multistate complaint. On September 15, 2008, the Company
filed an amended answer to the multistate complaint. Between
June 25, 2007 and April 28, 2008, the state attorneys
general of six states, Alaska, Delaware, Ohio, New Hampshire,
Texas and Vermont, filed requests for dismissal of their claims.
Plaintiffs California and New Mexico filed a joint motion for
class certification seeking to certify classes of all public
entities within both states. On September 5, 2008, the
Court entered an order denying both states motions for
class certification. On September 15, 2008, the New York
State Attorney General filed a motion for judgment on the
pleadings regarding certain defendants affirmative
defenses to New Yorks amended complaint. A hearing for the
motion was scheduled for December 17, 2008.
In April 2003, the Company received a request for information
from the European Commission (the Commission) to
enable the Commission to assess the compatibility with the
Commissions rules on competition of certain practices of
which the Commission has become aware in the European market for
DRAM products. In light of its plea agreement with the DOJ, the
Company made an accrual during the 2004 fiscal year for an
amount representing the probable minimum fine that may be
imposed as a result of the Commissions investigation. Any
fine actually imposed by the Commission may be significantly
higher than the reserve established, although the Company cannot
more accurately estimate the amount of the actual fine. The
Company is fully cooperating with the Commission in its
investigation.
In May 2004, the Canadian Competition Bureau advised IF North
America that it, its affiliates and present and past directors,
officers and employees are among the targets of a formal inquiry
into an alleged conspiracy to prevent or lessen competition
unduly in the production, manufacture, sale or supply of DRAM,
contrary to the Canadian Competition Act. No formal steps (such
as subpoenas) have been taken by the Competition Bureau to date.
The Company is fully cooperating with the Competition Bureau in
its inquiry.
Between December 2004 and February 2005, two putative class
proceedings were filed in the Canadian province of Quebec, and
one was filed in each of Ontario and British Columbia against
the Company, IF North America and other DRAM manufacturers on
behalf of all direct and indirect purchasers resident in Canada
who purchased DRAM or products containing DRAM between July 1999
and June 2002, seeking damages, investigation and administration
costs, as well as interest and legal costs. Plaintiffs primarily
allege conspiracy to unduly restrain competition and to
illegally fix the price of DRAM.
Between September and November 2004, seven securities class
action complaints were filed against the Company and current or
former officers in U.S. federal district courts, later
consolidated in the Northern District of California, on behalf
of a putative class of purchasers of the Companys
publicly-traded securities who purchased them during the period
from March 2000 to July 2004 (the Securities
Class Actions). The consolidated amended complaint
alleges violations of the U.S. securities laws and asserts
that the defendants made materially false and misleading public
statements about the Companys historical and projected
financial results and competitive position because they did not
disclose the Companys alleged participation in DRAM
price-fixing activities and that, by fixing the price of DRAM,
F-53
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
defendants manipulated the price of the Companys
securities, thereby injuring its shareholders. The plaintiffs
seek unspecified compensatory damages, interest, costs and
attorneys fees. In September 2006, the court dismissed the
complaint with leave to amend. In October 2006, the plaintiffs
filed a second amended complaint. In March 2007, pursuant to a
stipulation agreed with the defendants, the plaintiffs withdrew
the second amended complaint and were granted a motion for leave
to file a third amended complaint. Plaintiffs filed a third
amended complaint in July 2007. A hearing was held on
November 19, 2007. On January 25, 2008, the court
entered into an order granting in part and denying in part the
defendants motions to dismiss the Securities
Class Action complaint. The court denied the motion to
dismiss with respect to plaintiffs claims under
§§ 10(b) and 20(a) of the U.S. Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and dismissed the claim under
§ 20A of the act with prejudice. On August 13,
2008 the court denied a motion of the Company for summary
judgment based on the statute of limitations. On August 25,
2008, the Company filed a motion for judgment on the pleadings
against foreign purchasers, i.e., proposed class members who are
neither residents nor citizens of the United States who bought
securities of the Company on an exchange outside the United
States. On August 25, 2008, the plaintiffs also filed a
motion to certify the class. A hearing on both motions is
scheduled for December 15, 2008.
The Companys directors and officers insurance
carriers have denied coverage in the Securities
Class Actions and the Company filed suit against the
carriers in December 2005 and August 2006. The Companys
claims against one D&O insurance carrier were finally
dismissed in May 2007. The claim against the other insurance
carrier is still pending.
In April 2007, Lin Packaging Technologies, Ltd.
(Lin) filed a lawsuit against the Company, IF
North America and an additional DRAM manufacturer in the
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas,
alleging that certain DRAM products infringe two Lin patents. In
November 2007, the parties settled and the case was dismissed.
On October 31, 2007,
Wi-LAN Inc.
filed suit in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern
District of Texas against Westell Technolgies, Inc. and 16 other
defendants, including the Company and IF North America. The
complaint alleges infringement of three U.S. patents by
certain wireless products compliant with the IEEE 802.11
standards and certain ADSL products compliant with the ITU G.992
standards, in each case supplied by certain of the defendants.
On January 25, 2008, the Company and IF North America filed
an answer and counterclaim.
Wi-LANs
answer to the counterclaim was filed on March 20, 2008. On
April 1, 2008, the Court granted the Companys and
other non-US defendants stipulated motion to dismiss
without prejudice with respect to such non-US defendants. On
July 29, 2008 the court determined the trial date and the
date for the Markman-Hearing on the construction of
essential terms of the asserted patents. The trial date is
January 4, 2011; the Markman-Hearing is scheduled for
September 1, 2010.
In October 2007, CIF Licensing LLC, New Jersey, USA
(CIF), a member of the General Electric Group, filed
suit in the Civil Court of Düsseldorf, Germany against
Deutsche Telekom AG (DTAG) alleging infringement of
four European patents in Germany by certain CPE-modems and
ADSL-systems (the CIF Suit). DTAG has given
third-party notice to its suppliers which include
customers of Infineon to the effect that a
declaratory judgment of patent infringement would be legally
binding on the suppliers. Since January 2008, various suppliers
also gave their suppliers including
Infineon third-party notice. On January 28,
2008, Infineon became a party in the suit on the side of DTAG.
CIF then filed suit against Infineon alleging indirect
infringement of one of the four European patents. DTAG, most of
its suppliers and most of their suppliers have formed a joint
defense group. Infineon is contractually obliged to indemnify
and/or to
pay damages to its customers upon different conditions and to
different extents, depending on the terms of the specific
contracts. By July 16, 2008, DTAG and all the parties who
joined the CIF suit in Düsseldorf had filed their answer to
the complaint. At the same time, DTAG, Ericsson AB, Texas
Instruments Inc., Nokia Siemens Networks and the Company partly
jointly and partly separately filed actions of invalidity before
the Federal Patent Court in Munich with respect to all four
patents. Concerning the lawsuit in Düsseldorf, CIF must
reply by March 9, 2009 and DTAG and the parties who joined
the
F-54
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
lawsuit on the side of DTAG must respond by September 28,
2009. A court hearing is scheduled for November and December
2009.
On April 12, 2008, Third Dimension Semiconductor Inc. filed
suit in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of
Texas against the Company and IF North America. The complaint
alleges infringement of 3 U.S. patents by certain products,
including power semiconductor devices sold under the name
CoolMOS. On May 20, 2008, Third Dimension
Semiconductor Inc. filed an amended complaint adding one more
U.S. patent to the lawsuit. On September 19, 2008, the
Company and IF North America filed an answer and counterclaim.
On April 18, 2008, LSI filed a complaint with the
U.S. International Trade Commission to investigate an
alleged infringement by 18 parties of one LSI patent (the
ITC Case). On June 6, 2008, LSI filed a motion
to amend such complaint to add Qimonda and four other
respondents to the investigation. In addition, LSI filed a
lawsuit in the Eastern District of Texas on the same patent
against all respondents in the ITC Case, including Qimonda (see
note 36).
Accruals and
the Potential Effect of these Lawsuits
Liabilities related to legal proceedings are recorded when it is
probable that a liability has been incurred and the associated
amount can be reasonably estimated. Where the estimated amount
of loss is within a range of amounts and no amount within the
range is a better estimate than any other amount, the minimum
amount is accrued. As of September 30, 2008, Infineon Logic
had accrued liabilities in the amount of 37 million
related to the DOJ and European antitrust investigations and the
direct and indirect purchaser litigation and settlements
described above, as well as for legal expenses for the DOJ
related and securities class action complaints. In addition, as
of September 30, 2008, Qimonda had accrued
36 million in connection with these matters. Under
the contribution agreement in connection with the carve-out of
the Qimonda business, Qimonda is required to indemnify the
Company, in whole or in part, for any claim (including any
related expenses) arising in connection with the liabilities,
contracts, offers, uncompleted transactions, continuing
obligations, risks, encumbrances and other liabilities the
Company incurs in connection with the antitrust actions and the
Securities Class Action described above.
As additional information becomes available, the potential
liability related to these matters will be reassessed and the
estimates revised, if necessary. These accrued liabilities would
be subject to change in the future based on new developments in
each matter, or changes in circumstances, which could have a
material adverse effect on the Companys financial
condition and results of operations.
An adverse final resolution of the investigations or lawsuits
described above could result in significant financial liability
to, and other adverse effects on, the Company, which would have
a material adverse effect on its results of operations,
financial condition and cash flows. In each of these matters,
the Company is continuously evaluating the merits of the
respective claims and defending itself vigorously or seeking to
arrive at alternative resolutions in the best interest of the
Company, as it deems appropriate. Irrespective of the validity
or the successful assertion of the claims described above, the
Company could incur significant costs with respect to defending
against or settling such claims, which could have a material
adverse effect on its results of operations, financial condition
and cash flows.
The Company is subject to various other lawsuits, legal actions,
claims and proceedings related to products, patents,
environmental matters, and other matters incidental to its
businesses. The Company has accrued a liability for the
estimated costs of adjudication of various asserted and
unasserted claims existing as of the balance sheet date. Based
upon information presently known to management, the Company does
not believe that the ultimate resolution of such other pending
matters will have a material adverse effect on the
Companys financial position, although the final resolution
of such matters could have a material adverse effect on the
Companys results of operations or cash flows in the period
of settlement.
F-55
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Contractual
Commitments
The following table summarizes the Companys commitments
with respect to external parties as of September 30,
2008(1):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period
|
|
|
|
|
Less
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
than
|
|
1-2
|
|
2-3
|
|
3-4
|
|
4-5
|
|
After
|
|
|
Total
|
|
1 year
|
|
years
|
|
years
|
|
years
|
|
years
|
|
5 years
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
Contractual commitments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating lease payments
|
|
|
776
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
465
|
Unconditional purchase commitments
|
|
|
634
|
|
|
594
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Commitments
|
|
|
1,410
|
|
|
669
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
469
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Certain payments of obligations or
expirations of commitments that are based on the achievement of
milestones or other events that are not date-certain are
included for purposes of this table based on estimates of the
reasonably likely timing of payments or expirations in the
particular case. Actual outcomes could differ from those
estimates.
|
The Company has capacity reservation agreements with certain
Associated Companies and external foundry suppliers for the
manufacturing and testing of semiconductor products. These
agreements generally are greater than one year in duration and
are renewable. Under the terms of these agreements, the Company
has agreed to purchase a portion of their production output
based, in part, on market prices.
Purchases under these agreements are recorded as incurred in the
normal course of business. The Company assesses its anticipated
purchase requirements on a regular basis to meet customer demand
for its products. An assessment of losses under these agreements
is made on a regular basis in the event that either budgeted
purchase quantities fall below the specified quantities or
market prices for these products fall below the specified prices.
Other
Contingencies
The following table summarizes the Companys contingencies
with respect to external parties, other than those related to
litigation, as of September 30,
2008(1):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expirations by Period
|
|
|
|
|
Less
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
than
|
|
1-2
|
|
2-3
|
|
3-4
|
|
4-5
|
|
After
|
|
|
Total
|
|
1 year
|
|
years
|
|
years
|
|
years
|
|
years
|
|
5 years
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
Maximum potential future payments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantees(2)
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
64
|
Contingent
government
grants(3)
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contingencies
|
|
|
144
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Certain expirations of contingencies that are based on the
achievement of milestones or other events that are not
date-certain are included for purposes of this table based on
estimates of the reasonably likely timing of expirations in the
particular case. Actual outcomes could differ from those
estimates.
|
|
(2)
|
Guarantees are mainly issued for the payment of import duties,
rentals of buildings, and contingent obligations related to
government grants received.
|
|
(3)
|
Contingent government grants refer to amounts previously
received, related to the construction and financing of certain
production facilities, which are not otherwise guaranteed and
could be refundable if the total project requirements are not
met.
|
On a group-wide basis the Company has guarantees outstanding to
external parties of 199 million as of
September 30, 2008 (of which 97 million are
guarantees of Infineon Logic and 102 million are
guarantees of Qimonda). In addition, the Company, as parent
company, has in certain customary
F-56
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
circumstances guaranteed the settlement of certain of its
consolidated subsidiaries obligations to third parties.
Such third party obligations are reflected as liabilities in the
consolidated financial statements by virtue of consolidation. As
of September 30, 2008, such guarantees, principally
relating to certain consolidated subsidiaries third-party
debt, totaled 1,578 million, of which
1,062 million are guarantees of Infineon Logic and
516 million are guarantees of Qimonda. Of these total
guarantees 988 million relates to convertible and
exchangeable notes issued, of which 815 million
relates to convertible and exchangeable notes issued by Infineon
Logic and 173 million relates to convertible notes
issued by Qimonda.
The Company has received government grants and subsidies related
to the construction and financing of certain of its production
facilities. These amounts are recognized upon the attainment of
specified criteria. Certain of these grants have been received
contingent upon the Company maintaining compliance with certain
project-related requirements for a specified period after
receipt. The Company is committed to maintaining these
requirements. Nevertheless, should such requirements not be met,
as of September 30, 2008, a maximum of
330 million of these subsidies could be refundable
(of which 283 million relate to Qimonda).
On December 23, 2003, the Company entered into a long-term
operating lease agreement with MoTo Objekt Campeon
GmbH & Co. KG (MoTo) to lease an office
complex constructed by MoTo south of Munich, Germany. The office
complex, called Campeon, enables the Company to centralize the
majority of its Munich-area employees in one central physical
working environment. MoTo was responsible for the construction,
which was completed in the second half of 2005. The Company has
no obligations with respect to financing MoTo and has provided
no guarantees related to the construction. The Company occupied
Campeon under an operating lease arrangement in October 2005 and
completed the gradual move of its employees to this new location
in the 2006 fiscal year. The complex was leased for a period of
20 years. After year 15, the Company has a non-bargain
purchase option to acquire the complex or otherwise continue the
lease for the remaining period of five years. Pursuant to the
agreement, the Company placed a rental deposit of
75 million in escrow, which was included in
restricted cash as of September 30, 2008. Lease payments
are subject to limited adjustment based on specified financial
ratios related to the Company. The agreement was accounted for
as an operating lease, in accordance with SFAS No. 13,
with monthly lease payments expensed on a straight-line basis
over the lease term.
The Company through certain of its sales and other agreements
may, in the normal course of business, be obligated to indemnify
its counterparties under certain conditions for warranties,
patent infringement or other matters. The maximum amount of
potential future payments under these types of agreements is not
predictable with any degree of certainty, since the potential
obligation is contingent on conditions that may or may not occur
in future, and depends on specific facts and circumstances
related to each agreement. Historically, payments made by the
Company under these types of agreements have not had a material
adverse effect on the Companys business, results of
operations or financial condition. A tabular reconciliation of
the changes in the aggregate product warranty liability for the
year ended September 30, 2008 is presented in note 20.
|
|
35.
|
Operating Segment
and Geographic Information
|
The Company has reported its operating segment and geographic
information in accordance with SFAS No. 131,
Disclosure about Segments of an Enterprise and Related
Information.
The Companys reported organizational structure became
effective on May 1, 2006, following the legal separation of
its memory products business into the stand-alone legal entity,
Qimonda. Furthermore, effective March 31, 2008, the results
of Qimonda are reported as discontinued operations in the
Companys consolidated statements of operations for all
periods presented, and the assets and liabilities of Qimonda are
classified as held for disposal in the consolidated balance
sheets for all periods presented.
F-57
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
As a result, the Company operates primarily in two operating
segments: Automotive, Industrial & Multimarket, and
Communication Solutions. Further, certain of the Companys
remaining activities for product lines sold, for which there are
no continuing contractual commitments subsequent to the
divestiture date, as well as new business activities also meet
the SFAS No. 131 definition of an operating segment,
but do not meet the requirements of a reportable segment as
specified in SFAS No. 131. Accordingly, these segments
are combined and disclosed in the Other Operating
Segments category pursuant to SFAS No. 131.
Following the completion of the Qimonda carve-out, certain
corporate overhead expenses are no longer apportioned to Qimonda
and are instead allocated to Infineons logic segments. In
addition, Other Operating Segments includes net sales and
earnings that Infineon Logics 200-millimeter production
facility in Dresden recorded from the sale of wafers to Qimonda
under a foundry agreement. The Corporate and Eliminations
segment reflects the elimination of these net sales and
earnings. Furthermore, effective October 1, 2007, raw
materials and work-in-process of the common production front-end
facilities, and raw materials of the common back-end facilities,
are no longer under the control or responsibility of any of the
operating segment managers, but rather of the operations
management. The operations management is responsible for the
execution of the production schedule, volume and units.
Accordingly, this inventory is no longer attributed to the
operating segments, but is included in the Corporate and
Eliminations segment. Only
work-in-process
of the back-end facilities and finished goods are attributed to
the operating segments. Also effective October 1, 2007, the
Company records gains and losses from sales of investments in
marketable debt and equity securities in the Corporate and
Eliminations segment. The segments results of operations
of prior periods have been reclassified to be consistent with
the revised reporting structure and presentation, as well as to
facilitate analysis of current and future operating segment
information.
The accounting policies of the segments are substantially the
same as described in the summary of significant accounting
policies (see note 2). The Companys Management Board,
has been collectively identified as the CODM. The CODM makes
decisions about resources to be allocated to the segments and
assesses their performance using revenues and EBIT. The CODM
does not review asset information by segment nor does he
evaluate the segments on these criteria on a regular basis,
except that the CODM is provided with information regarding
certain inventories on an operating segment basis. The Company
does, however, allocate depreciation and amortization expense to
the operating segments based on production volume and product
mix using standard costs. Information with respect to the
Companys operating segments follows:
Automotive,
Industrial & Multimarket
The Automotive, Industrial & Multimarket segment
designs, develops, manufactures and markets semiconductors and
complete system solutions primarily for use in automotive,
industrial and security applications, and applications with
customer-specific product requirements.
Communication
Solutions
The Communication Solutions segment designs, develops,
manufactures and markets a wide range of ICs, other
semiconductors and complete system solutions for wireline and
wireless communication applications.
Other Operating
Segments
Remaining activities for certain product lines that have been
disposed of, as well as other business activities, are included
in the Other Operating Segments.
F-58
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Selected segment data for the years ended September 30,
2006, 2007 and 2008 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Net sales:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automotive, Industrial & Multimarket
|
|
|
2,839
|
|
|
|
3,017
|
|
|
|
2,963
|
|
Communication
Solutions(1)
|
|
|
1,205
|
|
|
|
1,051
|
|
|
|
1,360
|
|
Other
Operating
Segments(2)
|
|
|
310
|
|
|
|
219
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Corporate and
Eliminations(3)
|
|
|
(240
|
)
|
|
|
(213
|
)
|
|
|
(102
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
4,114
|
|
|
|
4,074
|
|
|
|
4,321
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Includes sales of 0, 30 million and
10 million for the fiscal years ended
September 30, 2006, 2007, and 2008, respectively, from
sales of wireless communication applications to Qimonda.
|
|
(2)
|
Includes sales of 256 million, 189 million
and 79 million for the fiscal years ended
September 30, 2006, 2007 and 2008, respectively, from sales
of wafers from Infineon Logics 200-millimeter facility in
Dresden to Qimonda under a foundry agreement.
|
|
(3)
|
Includes the elimination of sales of 256 million,
219 million and 89 million for the fiscal
years ended September 30, 2006, 2007 and 2008,
respectively, since these sales are not expected to be part of
the Qimonda disposal plan.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
EBIT:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automotive, Industrial & Multimarket
|
|
|
240
|
|
|
|
291
|
|
|
|
315
|
|
Communication Solutions
|
|
|
(234
|
)
|
|
|
(165
|
)
|
|
|
(73
|
)
|
Other Operating Segments
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
Corporate and Eliminations
|
|
|
(146
|
)
|
|
|
(77
|
)
|
|
|
(287
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
(136
|
)
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
(48
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjust: Interest expense, net
|
|
|
(67
|
)
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
Extraordinary loss, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income before income taxes, discontinued operations, and
extraordinary loss
|
|
|
(203
|
)
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
(74
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Depreciation and Amortization:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automotive, Industrial & Multimarket
|
|
|
411
|
|
|
|
401
|
|
|
|
341
|
|
Communication Solutions
|
|
|
246
|
|
|
|
186
|
|
|
|
186
|
|
Other Operating Segments
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
Corporate and Eliminations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
702
|
|
|
|
609
|
|
|
|
542
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from investments accounted for using the equity method in
the amount of 0 and 4 million was realized in
the Automotive, Industrial and Multimarket segment during the
years ended September 30, 2007 and 2008, respectively. None
of the remaining reportable segments had income from investments
accounted for using the equity method during any of the periods
presented.
F-59
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Inventories:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automotive, Industrial & Multimarket
|
|
|
264
|
|
|
|
307
|
|
|
|
335
|
|
Communication Solutions
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
166
|
|
Other Operating Segments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate and Eliminations
|
|
|
208
|
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
162
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
580
|
|
|
|
598
|
|
|
|
663
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2006, 2007 and 2008, all inventories
were attributed to the respective operating segment, since they
were under the direct control and responsibility of the
respective operating segment managers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Goodwill:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automotive, Industrial & Multimarket
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
Communication Solutions
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
211
|
|
Other Operating Segments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate and Eliminations
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
225
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consistent with the Companys internal management
reporting, certain items are included in Corporate and
Eliminations and are not allocated to the operating segments.
These include certain corporate headquarters costs, certain
incubator and early stage technology investment costs,
non-recurring gains and specific strategic technology
initiatives. Additionally, restructuring charges and employee
share-based compensation expense are included in Corporate and
Eliminations and not allocated to the operating segments for
internal or external reporting purposes, since they arise from
corporate directed decisions not within the direct control of
segment management. Furthermore, legal costs associated with
intellectual property and product matters are recognized by the
segments when paid, which can differ from the period originally
recognized by Corporate and Eliminations. The Company allocates
excess capacity costs based on a foundry model, whereby such
allocations are reduced based upon the lead time of order
cancellation or modification. Any unabsorbed excess capacity
costs are included in Corporate and Eliminations. Significant
components of Corporate and Eliminations EBIT for the
years ended September 30, 2006, 2007 and 2008 are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Corporate and Eliminations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unabsorbed excess capacity costs
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
Restructuring charges (note 8)
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
(45
|
)
|
|
|
(181
|
)
|
Share-based compensation expense (note 27)
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
Impairment charges
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(59
|
)
|
Other, net
|
|
|
(48
|
)
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
(146
|
)
|
|
|
(77
|
)
|
|
|
(287
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-60
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
The following is a summary of net sales and of property, plant
and equipment by geographic area for the years ended September
30:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Net sales:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Germany
|
|
|
1,010
|
|
|
|
907
|
|
|
|
924
|
|
Other Europe
|
|
|
933
|
|
|
|
888
|
|
|
|
818
|
|
North America
|
|
|
535
|
|
|
|
564
|
|
|
|
503
|
|
Asia/Pacific
|
|
|
1,324
|
|
|
|
1,450
|
|
|
|
1,800
|
|
Japan
|
|
|
209
|
|
|
|
213
|
|
|
|
198
|
|
Other
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
4,114
|
|
|
|
4,074
|
|
|
|
4,321
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Germany
|
|
|
624
|
|
|
|
383
|
|
|
|
434
|
|
Other Europe
|
|
|
494
|
|
|
|
446
|
|
|
|
316
|
|
North America
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
Asia/Pacific
|
|
|
556
|
|
|
|
623
|
|
|
|
549
|
|
Japan
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Other
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1,684
|
|
|
|
1,462
|
|
|
|
1,311
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from external customers are based on the
customers billing location. Regional employment data is
provided in note 7.
No single customer accounted for more than 10 percent of
the Companys sales during the fiscal years ended
September 30, 2006, 2007 or 2008.
The Company defines EBIT as earnings (loss) before income (loss)
from discontinued operations, interest and taxes. The
Companys management uses EBIT, among other measures, to
establish budgets and operational goals, to manage the
Companys business and to evaluate its performance. The
Company reports EBIT because it believes that it provides
investors with meaningful information about the operating
performance of the Company and especially about the performance
of its separate operating segments. Because many operating
decisions, such as allocations of resources to individual
projects, are made on a basis for which the effects of financing
the overall business and of taxation are of marginal relevance,
management finds a metric that excludes the effects of interest
on financing and tax expense useful. In addition, in measuring
operating performance, particularly for the purpose of making
internal decisions, such as those relating to personnel matters,
it is useful for management to consider a measure that excludes
items over which the individuals being evaluated have minimal
control, such as enterprise-level taxation and financing.
Various
Matters
Subsequent to September 30, 2008, the Company repurchased
notional amounts of 95 million and
22 million of its exchangeable subordinated notes due
2010 and its convertible subordinated notes due 2010,
respectively. The repurchases were made out of available cash.
F-61
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Effective October 1, 2008, the Company is organized into
the following five operating segments: Automotive, Chip
Card & Security, Industrial & Multimarket,
Wireline Communications and Wireless Solutions.
On October 3, 2008, approximately 95 California schools,
political subdivisions and public agencies that were previously
putative class members of the multistate attorney general
complaint described in note 34 filed suit in California
Superior Court against the Company, IF North America, and
several other DRAM manufacturers alleging DRAM price-fixing and
artificial price inflation in violation of California state
antitrust and consumer protection laws arising out of the
alleged practices described in note 34. The plaintiffs seek
recovery of actual and treble damages in unspecified amounts,
restitution, costs (including attorneys fees) and
injunctive and other equitable relief. The Company and Infineon
Technologies North America have agreed to accept service of
process as of November 19, 2008 in exchange for an extended
period of time to respond to the complaint. The current response
date is February 12, 2009.
On October 7, 2008, the Company and Third Dimension
Semiconductor Inc. signed a Settlement and License Agreement and
on October 21, 2008 filed a joint motion to dismiss the
patent infringement case brought against the Company.
On October 13, 2008, Qimonda announced that it had entered
into a share purchase agreement to sell its 35.6 percent
stake in Inotera Memories, Inc., to Micron Technology, Inc., for
cash proceeds of $400 million. The sale of the Inotera
stake occurred in two equal tranches, on October 20, 2008
and November 26, 2008.
In the litigation led by LSI (see note 34), the court in
the Eastern District of Texas stayed the case on June 20,
2008 while the ITC Case is pending. On October 17, 2008,
Qimonda became a party to the ITC Case.
On October 21, 2008, the Company learned that the European
Commission had commenced an investigation involving the
Companys Chip Card & Security Division for
alleged violations of antitrust laws. The investigation is in
its very early stages, and the Company is assessing the facts
and monitoring the situation carefully.
On October 30, 2008, the district court in the MDL
proceedings entered an order staying the indirect purchaser
proceedings in the Northern District of California during the
period that the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals considers the
appeal on the decision of the district court to dismiss certain
claims of the plaintiffs.
On November 12, 2008, Volterra Semiconductor Corporation
filed suit against Primarion, Inc., IF North America and
Infineon Technologies AG in the United States District Court for
the Northern District of California for alleged infringement of
five U.S. patents by certain products offered by Primarion.
F-62
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
On November 25, 2008, Infineon Technologies AG, Infineon
Technologies Austria AG and IF North America filed suit in the
United States District Court for the District of Delaware
against Fairchild Semiconductor International, Inc. and
Fairchild Semiconductor Corporation (collectively
Fairchild) regarding (1) a complaint for patent
infringement by certain products of Fairchild and (2) a
complaint for declaratory judgment of non-infringement and
invalidity of certain patents of Fairchild against the
allegation of infringement of those patents by certain products
of Infineon. Fairchild has filed a counterclaim in Delaware for
a declaratory judgment on (1) infringement by Infineon of
those patents which are the subject of Infineons complaint
for declaratory judgment and (2) non-infringement and
invalidity of those patents which are the subject of
Infineons complaint for infringement. Fairchild has
further filed another patent infringement suit against Infineon
Technologies AG and IF North America in the United States
District Court for the District of Maine alleging that certain
products of Infineon infringe on two other patents of Fairchild
which are not part of the Delaware lawsuit.
On December 5, 2008, the Company received a request for
information from the European Commission regarding DRAM turnover
data for its 2001 fiscal year.
Qimonda
On December 21, 2008, the Company, the German Free State of
Saxony, and Qimonda jointly announced a financing package for
Qimonda (see note 4).
F-63
SIGNATURES
The registrant hereby certifies that it meets all of the
requirements for filing on
Form 20-F
and that it has duly caused and authorized the undersigned to
sign this annual report on its behalf.
December 29, 2008
Neubiberg, Germany
Infineon Technologies AG
Peter Bauer
Member of the Management Board and
Chief Executive Officer
/s/ Dr. Marco Schröter
Dr. Marco Schröter
Member of the Management Board and
Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit Index
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
Filing Date
|
|
SEC File
|
Number
|
|
Description of Exhibit
|
|
Form
|
|
Number
|
|
with SEC
|
|
Number
|
|
1.1
|
|
Articles of Association (as of February 2008) (English
translation)
|
|
Filed herewith.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
Rules of Procedure for the Management Board (as of November
2007) (English translation)
|
|
Filed herewith.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
Rules of Procedure for the Supervisory Board (as of November
2007) (English translation)
|
|
Filed herewith.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
Rules of Procedure for the Investment Finance and Audit
Committee of the Supervisory Board (as of November 2007)
(English translation)
|
|
Filed herewith.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
The total amount of long-term debt securities of Infineon
Technologies AG authorized under any instrument does not exceed
10% of the total assets of the group on a consolidated basis.
Infineon Technologies AG hereby agrees to furnish to the SEC,
upon its request, a copy of any instrument defining the rights
of holders of long-term debt of Infineon Technologies AG or of
its subsidiaries for which consolidated or unconsolidated
financial statements are required to be filed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
Patent Cross License Agreement between Infineon and Siemens AG,
dated as of February 11, 2000
|
|
F-1
|
|
|
|
February 18, 2000
|
|
333-11508
|
4.9
|
|
Shareholder Agreement of ALTIS Semiconductor between Infineon
Technologies Holding France and Compagnie IBM France, dated as
of June 24, 1999
|
|
F-1
|
|
|
|
February 18, 2000
|
|
333-11508
|
4.18()
|
|
Joint Venture Agreement between Infineon and Nanya Technology
Corporation, executed on November 13, 2002
|
|
20-F
|
|
4.38
|
|
December 4, 2002
|
|
1-15000
|
4.19()
|
|
Amendments No 1, 2 and 3 to the Joint Venture Agreement between
Infineon and Nanya Technology Corporation, executed on
November 13, 2002
|
|
20-F
|
|
4.19
|
|
November 23, 2005
|
|
1-15000
|
4.19.1()
|
|
Amendment No. 4 to the Joint Venture Agreement between
Infineon and Nanya Technology Corporation, executed on
November 13, 2002
|
|
Filed as exhibit 10(i)(I) to the registration statement on form
F-1 of Qimonda AG dated August 8, 2006 (file 333-135913) and
incorporated herein by reference
|
4.20
|
|
Terms and Conditions of 5% Guaranteed Subordinated Convertible
Notes due 2010 in the aggregate nominal amount of EUR
700,000,000 (the 2010 Notes) issued on June 5,
2003 by Infineon Technologies Holding B.V.
|
|
20-F
|
|
4.30
|
|
November 21, 2003
|
|
1-15000
|
4.21
|
|
Undertaking for Granting of Conversion Rights from Infineon to
JPMorgan Chase Bank for the benefit of the holders of the 2010
Notes, dated June 2, 2003
|
|
20-F
|
|
4.31
|
|
November 21, 2003
|
|
1-15000
|
4.22
|
|
Subordinated Guarantee of Infineon, as Guarantor, in favor of
the holders of 2010 Notes, dated June 2, 2003
|
|
20-F
|
|
4.32
|
|
November 21, 2003
|
|
1-15000
|
4.23
|
|
Loan Agreement dated June 2, 2003, between Infineon
Technologies Holding B.V., as Issuer, and Infineon
|
|
20-F
|
|
4.33
|
|
November 21, 2003
|
|
1-15000
|
4.24
|
|
Assignment Agreement dated June 2, 2003, among Infineon
Technologies Holding B.V., Infineon and JPMorgan Chase Bank for
the benefit of the holders of the 2010 Notes
|
|
20-F
|
|
4.34
|
|
November 21, 2003
|
|
1-15000
|
4.25()
|
|
Amendment 1, dated June 26, 2003, to Shareholder Agreement
of ALTIS Semiconductor between Infineon Technologies Holding
France and Compagnie IBM France, dated as of June 24, 1999
|
|
20-F
|
|
4.35
|
|
November 21, 2003
|
|
1-15000
|
4.25.1()
|
|
Amendment 2 effective as of December 31, 2005 to
Shareholder Agreement of ALTIS Semiconductor between Infineon
Technologies Holding France and IBM XXI SAS dated as of
June 24, 1999.
|
|
20-F
|
|
4.25.1
|
|
November 30, 2006
|
|
1-15000
|
4.25.2
|
|
Framework Agreement dated as of August 8, 2007 among
GlobalInformService, International Business Machines Corporation
and Infineon Technologies AG, related to ALTIS Semiconductor
|
|
20-F
|
|
4.25.2
|
|
December 7, 2007
|
|
1-15000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
Filing Date
|
|
SEC File
|
Number
|
|
Description of Exhibit
|
|
Form
|
|
Number
|
|
with SEC
|
|
Number
|
|
4.26()
|
|
Real Estate Leasing Contract between MoTo Object CAMPEON
GmbH & Co. KG and Infineon dated as of
December 23, 2003, with Supplementary Agreements No 1 and 2
(English translation)
|
|
20-F
|
|
4.28
|
|
November 26, 2004
|
|
1-15000
|
4.27.1
|
|
Contribution Agreement (Einbringungsvertrag) between
Infineon Technologies AG and Qimonda AG, dated as of
April 25, 2006, and addendum thereto, dated as of
June 2, 2006 (English translation).
|
|
Filed as exhibit 10(i)(A) to the registration statement on
form F-1
of Qimonda AG dated August 4, 2006
(file 333-135913)
and incorporated herein by reference
|
4.27.2
|
|
Contribution Agreement (Einbringungsvertrag) between
Infineon Holding B.V. and Qimonda AG, dated as of May 4,
2006 (English translation).
|
|
Filed as exhibit 10(i)(B) to the registration statement on
form F-1
of Qimonda AG dated August 4, 2006
(file 333-135913)
and incorporated herein by reference
|
4.27.3
|
|
Addenda No. 2 and 3 to Contribution Agreement
(Einbringungsvertrag) between Infineon Technologies AG
and Qimonda AG, dated as of April 25, 2006 (English
translation).
|
|
Filed as exhibit 4(i)(W) to the annual report on form 20-F of
Qimonda AG dated November 21, 2006 (file 1-32972) and
incorporated herein by reference
|
4.27.5
|
|
Master Loan Agreement between Qimonda AG and Infineon
Technologies Holding B.V., dated April 28, 2006.
|
|
Filed as exhibit 10(i)(D) to the registration statement on
form F-1
of Qimonda AG dated July 21, 2006
(file 333-135913)
and incorporated herein by reference
|
4.27.6
|
|
Global Services Agreement between Infineon Technologies AG and
Qimonda AG, effective May 1, 2006.
|
|
Filed as exhibit 10(i)(E) to the registration statement on
form F-1
of Qimonda AG dated July 21, 2006
(file 333-135913)
and incorporated herein by reference
|
4.27.7
|
|
Master IT Cost Sharing Agreement by and between Infineon
Technologies AG and Qimonda AG, effective May 1, 2006.
|
|
Filed as exhibit 10(i)(Q) to the registration statement on
form F-1
of Qimonda AG dated July 28, 2006
(file 333-135913)
and incorporated herein by reference
|
4.28.1
|
|
Terms and Conditions of the 1.375% Guaranteed Subordinated Notes
due 2010 in the aggregate nominal amount of EUR 215,000,000 (the
2007/2010 Notes) issued by Infineon Technologies
Investment B.V., on September 26, 2007.
|
|
20-F
|
|
4.28.1
|
|
December 7, 2007
|
|
1-15000
|
4.28.2
|
|
Subordinated Guarantee by Infineon Technologies AG in Favor of
the Holders of the 2007/2010 Notes
|
|
20-F
|
|
4.28.2
|
|
December 7, 2007
|
|
1-15000
|
4.29
|
|
Asset Purchase Agreement by and between LSI Corporation and
Infineon Technologies AG dated as of August 20, 2007.
|
|
Filed as exhibit 2.1 to the current report on form 8-K of LSI
Corporation dated October 30, 2007 (file 001-10317) and
incorporated herein by reference. Infineon Technologies AG
agrees to furnish supplementally a copy of any omitted schedule
to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.
|
8
|
|
List of Significant Subsidiaries and Associated Companies of
Infineon
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Additional Information Organizational
Structure
|
12.1
|
|
Certification of chief executive officer pursuant to Exchange
Act
Rule 13a-14(a)
|
|
Filed herewith.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.2
|
|
Certification of chief financial officer pursuant to Exchange
Act
Rule 13a-14(a)
|
|
Filed herewith.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
Certificate pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002
|
|
Filed herewith.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.1
|
|
Consent of KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft
|
|
Filed herewith.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Confidential treatment requested as
to certain portions, which portions have been filed separately
with the Securities and Exchange Commission
|