Edgar Filing: SHILOH INDUSTRIES INC

SHLO 1.31.2014 10-Q

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549

______________________________________________________

FORM 10-Q

______________________________________________________



x	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended January 31, 2014



¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission file number 0-21964

______________________________________________________

SHILOH INDUSTRIES, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

______________________________________________________



Delaware	51-0347683
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

880 Steel Drive, Valley City, Ohio 44280

(Address of principal executive offices—zip code)

(330) 558-2600

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

N/A

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

______________________________________________________

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.



Large accelerated filer	¨	Accelerated filer	¨	Non-accelerated filer	¨	Smaller Reporting Company	x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x

Number of shares of Common Stock outstanding as of February 25, 2014 was 17,136,784.

Table of Contents

INDEX



		Page
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION (Unaudited)
Item 1.	Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements:
	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets	3
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income	4
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income	5
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows	6
	Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	7
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	18
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	29
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 5.	Other Information	30
Item 6.	Exhibits	31

Table of Contents

PART I— FINANCIAL INFORMATION


Item 1.	Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

SHILOH INDUSTRIES, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Dollar amounts in thousands)



	January 31, 2014			October 31, 2013
	(Unaudited)			October 31, 2013
ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents	$	1,023		$	398
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $294 and $341 at January 31, 2014 and October 31, 2013, respectively	98,977			116,837
Related-party accounts receivable	2,060			673
Inventories, net	48,645			42,924
Deferred income taxes	2,828			2,829
Prepaid expenses	3,804			3,095
Other assets	23			23
Total current assets	157,360			166,779
Property, plant and equipment, net	197,835			197,874
Goodwill	6,768			6,768
Intangible assets, net	17,060			17,605
Deferred income taxes	328			—
Other assets	2,708			2,927
Total assets	$	382,059		$	391,953
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current debt	$	771		$	882
Accounts payable	77,736			87,977
Accrued income taxes	1,530			1,666
Other accrued expenses	24,407			26,416
Total current liabilities	104,444			116,941
Long-term debt	116,726			119,384
Long-term benefit liabilities	21,331			21,287
Deferred income taxes	1,048			969
Other liabilities	2,286			2,223
Total liabilities	245,835			260,804
Commitments and contingencies
Stockholders’ equity:
Preferred stock, $.01 per share; 5,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued and outstanding at January 31, 2014 and October 31, 2013, respectively	—			—
Common stock, par value $.01 per share; 25,000,000 shares authorized; 17,131,784 and 17,031,316 shares issued and outstanding at January 31, 2014 and October 31, 2013, respectively	171			170
Paid-in capital	66,855			66,312
Retained earnings	95,688			90,749
Accumulated other comprehensive loss: Pension related liability, net	(26,490		)	(26,082		)
Total stockholders’ equity	136,224			131,149
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	382,059		$	391,953

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

SHILOH INDUSTRIES, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(Amounts in thousands, except per share data)

(Unaudited)



	Three Months Ended January 31,
	2014			2013
Revenues	$	183,539		$	145,383
Cost of sales	165,693			134,645
Gross profit	17,846			10,738
Selling, general and administrative expenses	10,945			6,614
Asset recovery, net of impairments	(1,120		)	(7		)
Operating income	8,021			4,131
Interest expense	886			430
Interest income	3			6
Other expense	18			23
Income before income taxes	7,120			3,684
Provision for income taxes	2,181			1,101
Net income	$	4,939		$	2,583
Earnings per share:
Basic earnings per share	$	0.29		$	0.15
Basic weighted average number of common shares	17,113			16,988
Diluted earnings per share	$	0.29		$	0.15
Diluted weighted average number of common shares	17,208			17,040

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

SHILOH INDUSTRIES, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(Dollar amounts in thousands)

(Unaudited)



			Three Months Ended January 31,
			2014			2013
Net income			$	4,939		$	2,583
Other comprehensive income, net of tax:
	Defined benefit pension plans & other postretirement benefits
		Actuarial net loss	(540		)	—
		Asset net loss	(386		)	—
		Recognized gain	269			—
		Income tax - benefit	249			—
	Total defined benefit pension plans & other post retirement benefits, net of tax		(408		)	—
Comprehensive income, net			$	4,531		$	2,583

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

SHILOH INDUSTRIES, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Dollar amounts in thousands)

(Unaudited)



	Three Months Ended January 31,
	2014			2013
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income	$	4,939		$	2,583
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization	6,419			4,252
Asset recovery, net of impairments	(1,120		)	(7		)
Amortization of deferred financing costs	261			75
Deferred income taxes	—			5
Stock-based compensation expense	150			187
Gain on sale of assets	(127		)	—
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable	16,473			6,908
Inventories	(5,721		)	1,265
Prepaids and other assets	(734		)	(283		)
Payables and other liabilities	(14,508		)	(17,477		)
Accrued income taxes	(136		)	808
Net cash provided by (used for) operating activities	5,896			(1,684		)
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Capital expenditures	(3,781		)	(5,769		)
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired	—			(62,684		)
Proceeds from sale of assets	1,253			7
Net cash used for investing activities	(2,528		)	(68,446		)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Payment of dividends	—			(4,226		)
Payment of capital lease	(16		)	—
Proceeds from long-term borrowings	2,600			78,850
Repayments of long-term borrowings	(5,618		)	(4,300		)
Payment of deferred financing costs	(16		)	(307		)
Proceeds from exercise of stock options	307			79
Net cash provided by (used for) financing activities	(2,743		)	70,096
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents	625			(34		)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period	398			174
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	1,023		$	140
Supplemental Cash Flow Information:
Cash paid for interest	$	772		$	331
Cash paid for income taxes	$	2,168		$	61

Non-cash Investing and Financing Activities:
Equipment acquired under capital lease	$	467		$	—

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

SHILOH INDUSTRIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)

Note 1—Basis of Presentation

The condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared by Shiloh Industries, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the “Company”), without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. The information furnished in the condensed consolidated financial statements includes normal recurring adjustments and reflects all adjustments, which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation of such financial statements. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("GAAP") have been condensed or omitted pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Although the Company believes that the disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading, these condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and the notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2013.

Revenues and operating results for the three months ended January 31, 2014 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year.

Prior Year Reclassification

Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform with current year presentation.

Note 2—New Accounting Standards

In February 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the "FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2013-02, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220) - "Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income," effective for annual and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2012. The new accounting rules require all U.S. public companies to report the effect of items reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income on the respective line items of net income, net of tax, either on the face of the financial statements where net income is presented or in a tabular format in the notes to the financial statements. Effective February 1, 2013, the Company adopted ASU No. 2013-02. The new accounting rules expand the disclosure of other comprehensive income and had no impact on the Company's results of operations and financial condition.

The new accounting standard, "Comprehensive Income", became effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011, which for the Company was the first quarter ended January 31, 2013. This standard requires that other comprehensive income be presented as either a separate statement, or as an addition to the statement of income and prohibits the presentation of other comprehensive income in the statement of shareholders' equity. The Company has adopted this new guidance and it did not have a material impact on the condensed consolidated financial statements.

In December 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-11, Balance Sheet (Topic 210) - "Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities". This ASU requires companies to disclose both gross and net information about instruments and transactions eligible for offset in the statement of financial position as well as instruments and transactions subject to an agreement similar to a master netting arrangement. This guidance is effective retrospectively for interim and annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013. The Company has adopted this new guidance and it did not have a material impact on the condensed consolidated financial statements or its related disclosures.

Note 3—Acquisitions

Albany-Chicago Company LLC

On December 28, 2012, the Company, through a wholly-owned subsidiary, entered into and consummated the transactions contemplated by a Membership Interest Purchase Agreement, dated December 28, 2012 (the "Purchase Agreement"), among the subsidiary and all of the equity owners of Albany-Chicago Company LLC ("Pleasant Prairie"), a producer of aluminum die cast and machined parts for the motor vehicle industry.

Table of Contents

The Company acquired Pleasant Prairie in order to further our investment in light weighting technologies and expand the diversity of our customer base, product offering and geographic footprint. Pleasant Prairie's results of operations are reflected in the Company's condensed consolidated statements of income from the acquisition date.

The aggregate fair value of consideration transferred in connection with the Purchase Agreement was $56,390, consisting of $56,792, ($56,337 net of cash acquired) in cash on the date of acquisition. Of this amount, $3,000 in cash was placed into escrow, and serves as security for any indemnification claims made by the Company under the Purchase Agreement. Subsequent to the acquisition date, $381 of working capital adjustments were paid during the second quarter of fiscal 2013 to the seller, a reduction in purchase price of $850 as a result of a settlement agreement on asset valuation for tax purposes occurred during the third quarter of fiscal 2013, which was taken out of the escrow balance, and a working capital adjustment of $67 paid to the seller during the third quarter of fiscal 2013. During the first quarter of fiscal 2014, certain settlements occurred resulting in $1,000 in escrow funds being returned to the Company for settlement of excess tooling expenses and was included in the Company's operating results and $200 in escrow funds being released to the sellers for volumes on certain programs exceeding agreed levels, leaving a remaining escrow balance of $950.

The acquisition of Pleasant Prairie has been accounted for using the acquisition method in accordance with the FASB Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") Topic 805, Business Combinations. Assets acquired and liabilities assumed were recorded at their estimated fair values as of the acquisition date. The fair values of identifiable intangible assets were based on valuations using the income approach and estimates provided by management. The excess of the purchase price over the estimated fair values of the tangible assets, identifiable intangible assets and assumed liabilities was recorded as goodwill. The allocation of the purchase price is based upon a valuation of certain assets acquired and liabilities assumed. The final purchase price allocation was as follows:




Cash and cash equivalents	$	455
Accounts receivable	9,195
Inventory	2,711
Prepaid assets and other	1,851
Property, plant and equipment	26,100
Goodwill	5,492
Intangible assets	16,056
Other non-current assets	67
Accounts payable and other	(5,537		)
Net assets acquired	$	56,390

The Company utilized a third party to assist in the fair value determination of certain components of the purchase price allocation, namely property, plant and equipment and intangible assets.

The Company believes the amount of goodwill resulting from the purchase price allocation is attributable to the workforce of the acquired business (which is not eligible for separate recognition as an identifiable intangible asset) and the synergies expected after the Company's acquisition of Pleasant Prairie. All of the goodwill was allocated to the Company's Pleasant Prairie subsidiary. The total amount of goodwill expected to be deductible for tax purposes is $14,291 and is estimated to be deductible over approximately 15 years.

Of the $16,056 of acquired intangible assets, $13,462 was assigned to customers that have a useful life of approximately 13 years, $1,850 was assigned to trade names with an estimated useful life of approximately 15 years, and $744 was assigned to non-competition agreements with an estimated useful life of approximately 2 years. The fair values assigned to identifiable intangible assets acquired has been determined primarily by using the income approach, which discounts expected future cash flows to present value using estimates and assumptions determined by management. The Company utilized a third party to assist in assigning a fair value to acquired intangible assets. The total amount of identifiable intangible assets expected to be deductible for tax purposes is $16,056 and is estimated to be deductible over approximately 15 years.

Table of Contents

Atlantic Tool & Die - Alabama, Inc.

On December 13, 2012, the Company, through a wholly owned subsidiary, acquired certain assets of Atlantic Tool & Die - Alabama, Inc. (“Anniston”), a metal stamping, welding and value added assembly company. The fair value of consideration paid for the acquired assets was $6,347. The Company acquired Anniston in order to expand the diversity of our customer base and the availability of desired assets. The results of operations for Anniston are included in the Company's condensed consolidated financial statements from the date of acquisition.

The acquisition of Anniston has been accounted for using the acquisition method in accordance with the FASB ASC Topic 805, Business Combinations. Assets acquired and liabilities assumed were recorded at their estimated fair values as of the acquisition date. The allocation of the purchase price is based upon a valuation of certain assets acquired and liabilities assumed.

The Company utilized a third party to assist in the fair value determination of certain components of the final purchase price allocation, namely fixed assets and intangible assets. The Company acquired typical working capital items of inventories and other assets, net of certain employee benefit liabilities assumed, of $1,214, and property, plant and equipment of $5,361, resulting in a bargain purchase gain of $228. The Company was able to realize a gain on the acquisition as a result of the Company's ability to favorably negotiate the settlement of certain assumed liabilities, which was recognized in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2013.

Contech Castings, LLC

On June 11, 2013, the Company, through a wholly-owned subsidiary, entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement (the “Contech Agreement”), with Contech Castings, LLC (“Contech”) and its subsidiary Contech Casting Real Estate Holdings, LLC (“Contech Real Estate” and together with Contech, “Contech Sellers”). Contech is engaged in the business of die casting and machining motor vehicle parts and further producing engineered high pressure aluminum die cast and machined parts for the motor vehicle industry, and Contech Real Estate owned the real property used by Contech in its business. The acquisition closed on August 2, 2013. Under the terms of the Contech Agreement, the Company acquired the assets of the business located at the purchased facilities and assumed certain specified liabilities from the Contech Sellers for $42,187, after adjustments in working capital, certain assumed liabilities and amounts of capital expenditures. Of this amount, $3,825 in cash was placed into escrow, and serves as security for any indemnification claims made by the Company under the Contech Agreement.

The Company acquired Contech's businesses in order to further our investment in light weighting technologies, expand our capabilities in aluminum die casting machining and expand the diversity of our customer base, product offering and geographic footprint. Contech's results of operations are reflected in the Company's consolidated statements of income from the acquisition date.

Table of Contents

The acquisition of Contech has been accounted for using the acquisition method in accordance with the FASB ASC Topic 805, Business Combinations. Assets acquired and liabilities assumed were recorded at their estimated fair values as of the acquisition date. The fair values of identifiable intangible assets were based on valuations using the income approach and estimates provided by management. The excess of the purchase price over the estimated fair values of the tangible assets, identifiable intangible assets and assumed liabilities was recorded as goodwill. The allocation of the purchase price is based upon a valuation of certain assets acquired and liabilities assumed. The preliminary purchase price allocation was as follows:




Accounts receivable	$	2,126
Inventory	1,529
Prepaid assets and other	170
Property, plant and equipment	39,956
Goodwill	1,276
Intangible assets	2,898
Accounts payable and other	(5,768		)
Net assets acquired	$	42,187

The purchase price allocation is provisional, pending completion of the valuation of acquired intangible assets, property, plant and equipment, and inventories. The Company is utilizing a third party to assist in the fair value determination of certain components of the purchase price allocation, namely property, plant and equipment and intangible assets. The final valuation may change the allocation of the purchase price, which could affect the fair values assigned to the assets.

The Company believes the amount of goodwill resulting from the purchase price allocation is attributable to the workforce of the acquired business (which is not eligible for separate recognition as an identifiable intangible asset) and the synergies expected after the Company's acquisition of Contech. The total amount of goodwill expected to be deductible for tax purposes is $1,276 and is estimated to be deductible over approximately 15 years.

Of the $2,898 of acquired intangible assets, $25 was assigned to trade names with an estimated useful life of approximately 3 months, $166 was assigned to trademarks with an estimated useful life of approximately 10 years, and $2,707 was assigned to developed technologies with an estimated useful life of 5 years. The Company utilized a third party to assist in assigning a fair value to acquired intangible assets. The total amount of identifiable intangible assets expected to be deductible for tax purposes is $2,898 and is estimated to be deductible over approximately 15 years.

Pro Forma Consolidated Results

The following supplemental pro forma information presents the actual financial results for the three months ended January 31, 2014, and pro forma financial results for the three months ended January 31, 2013 as if the Pleasant Prairie acquisition had occurred on November 1, 2012. The pro forma results do not include any anticipated cost synergies, costs or other effects of the integration of Pleasant Prairie. Accordingly, such pro forma amounts are not necessarily indicative of the results that actually would have occurred had the acquisition been completed on the dates indicated, nor are they indicative of the future operating results of the combined company. In addition, the pro forma information includes amortization expense related to intangible assets acquired of approximately $383 for the three months ended January 31, 2013. Pro forma information related to the Anniston and Contech acquisitions are not included in the table below as their financial results were not considered to be significant to the Company's operating results for the periods presented.



Pro forma consolidated results	Three Months Ended January 31,
(in thousands, except for per share data):	2014		2013
Revenue	$	183,539	$	155,633
Net income	$	4,939	$	2,310
Basic earnings per share	$	0.29	$	0.14
Diluted earnings per share	$	0.29	$	0.14

Table of Contents

Note 4—Asset Impairment and Recoveries

Asset recoveries of $1,120 were recorded during the first three months of fiscal 2014 and impairment recoveries of $7 were recorded during the first three months of fiscal 2013 for cash received upon sales of assets from the Company's former Mansfield Blanking facility, which were impaired in fiscal 2010.

Note 5—Related Party Receivables

The Company had related party receivable balances for the period ended January 31, 2014 and October 31, 2013 of $2,060 and $673, respectively, due from MTD Products Inc. and its affiliates.

Note 6—Inventories

Inventories consist of the following:



	January 31, 2014		October 31, 2013
Raw materials	$	18,457	$	16,827
Work-in-process	9,952		7,742
Finished goods	10,844		9,573
Total material	39,253		34,142
Tooling	9,392		8,782
Total inventory	$	48,645	$	42,924

Total cost of inventory is net of reserves to reduce certain inventory from cost to net realizable value. Such reserves aggregated $100 and $853 at January 31, 2014 and October 31, 2013, respectively.

Customer reimbursed tooling inventories totaling $9,392 increased $610 from October 31, 2013, for tooling related to new program awards that go into production over the next two years.

Note 7—Property, Plant and Equipment

Property, plant and equipment consist of the following:



	January 31, 2014		October 31, 2013
Land and improvements	$	11,229	$	11,050
Buildings and improvements	110,800		109,977
Machinery and equipment	415,477		411,847
Furniture and fixtures	11,722		11,568
Construction in progress	27,211		28,982
Total, at cost	576,439		573,424
Less: Accumulated depreciation	378,604		375,550
Property, plant and equipment, net	$	197,835	$	197,874

Depreciation expense was $5,874 and $4,140 for the periods ended January 31, 2014 and January 31, 2013, respectively.

Table of Contents

Note 8—Goodwill and Intangible Assets

Goodwill

The following table reflects the carrying value of goodwill for the respective periods:



	January 31, 2014		October 31, 2013
Goodwill	$	6,768	$	6,768

Intangible Assets

The following table reflects intangible assets and related accumulated amortization:




	January 31, 2014
	Useful Life	Cost		Accumulated Amortization			Net
Trade Name (Albany-Chicago)	15 years	$	1,850	$	(134	)	$	1,716
Non-compete (Albany-Chicago)	2 years	744		(403		)	341
Customer Relationships (Albany-Chicago)	13 years	13,462		(1,053		)	12,409
Trade Name (Contech)	0.25 years	25		(25		)	—
Trademark (Contech)	10 years	166		(8		)	158
Developed Technology (Contech)	5 years	2,707		(271		)	2,436
		$	18,954	$	(1,894	)	$	17,060




	October 31, 2013
	Useful Life	Cost		Accumulated Amortization			Net
Trade Name (Albany-Chicago)	15 years	$	1,850	$	(103	)	$	1,747
Non-compete (Albany-Chicago)	2 years	744		(310		)	434
Customer Relationships (Albany-Chicago)	13 years	13,462		(771		)	12,691
Trade Name (Contech)	0.25 years	25		(25		)	—
Trademark (Contech)	10 years	166		(4		)	162
Developed Technology (Contech)	5 years	2,707		(136		)	2,571
		$	18,954	$	(1,349	)	$	17,605

Total amortization expense was $545 and $112 for the periods ended January 31, 2014 and January 31, 2013, respectively. Amortization expense related to intangible assets for the fiscal years ending is estimated to be as follows:



Remainder of 2014	$	1,635
2015	1,779
2016	1,717
2017	1,717
2018	1,582
Thereafter	8,630
	$	17,060

Table of Contents

Note 9—Financing Arrangements

Debt consists of the following:



	January 31, 2014		October 31, 2013
Credit Agreement —interest rate at 1.89% and 1.95% at January 31, 2014 and October 31, 2013, respectively	$	114,500	$	117,400
Equipment security note	2,343		2,461
Capital lease obligation	451		—
Insurance broker financing agreement	203		405
Total debt	117,497		120,266
Less: Current debt	771		882
Total long-term debt	$	116,726	$	119,384

The weighted average interest rate of all debt was 1.95% and 1.91% for the three months ended January 31, 2014 and January 31, 2013, respectively.

On October 25, 2013, the Company entered into a Credit Agreement (the “Credit Agreement”) with Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, Swing Line Lender and L/C Issuer, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated and J.P. Morgan Securities, LLC as Joint Lead Arrangers and Joint Book Managers, The PrivateBank and Trust Company, Compass Bank and RBS Citizens, N.A., as Co-Documentation Agents, and the other lender parties thereto. The Company's domestic subsidiaries have guaranteed certain of the Company's obligations under the Agreement.

The Credit Agreement has a five-year term and provides for a $300 million secured revolving line of credit, which may be increased up to an additional $100 million subject to the Company’s compliance with the terms of the Credit Agreement and pro forma compliance with certain financial covenants, notice to the Administrative Agent and the Company obtaining commitments for such increase. Funds borrowed from the Credit Agreement were used to payoff borrowed funds under the Company's prior credit agreement.

Borrowings under the Credit Agreement bear interest, at LIBOR plus the applicable rate as referenced in the Credit Agreement or at the option of the Company the highest of (a) the Federal Funds Rate plus 0.50%, (b) the rate of interest in effect for such day as publicly announced from time to time by Bank of America, N.A. as its prime rate or (c) the Eurocurrency Rate plus 1.00%. In addition to interest charges, the Company will pay in arrears a quarterly commitment fee ranging from 0.20% - 0.35% based on the Company’s daily revolving exposure.

The Credit Agreement contains customary restrictive and financial covenants, including covenants regarding the Company’s outstanding indebtedness and maximum leverage and interest coverage ratios. The Credit Agreement also contains standard provisions relating to conditions of borrowing. In addition, the Credit Agreement contains customary events of default, including the non-payment of obligations by the Company and the bankruptcy of the Company. If an event of default occurs, all amounts outstanding under the Credit Agreement may be accelerated and become immediately due and payable. The Company was in compliance with the financial covenants as of January 31, 2014, and October 31, 2013.

On December 30, 2013, the Company entered into a First Amendment Agreement (the “First Amendment”) amending the Agreement.

The First Amendment permits the incurrence of state or local Governmental Authority bonds as part of a government tax incentive program, the proceeds of which are used to finance or refinance the acquisition, construction, equipping or improvement of facilities or property used by the Company, subject to a cap of $30 million and certain other terms and conditions, and was executed in connection with the issuance of certain Development Authority of Jefferson, Georgia Taxable Industrial Development Revenue Bonds (Jefferson Blanking Inc.) Series 2013 with a principal amount not exceeding $8 million.

After considering letters of credit of $2,441 that the Company has issued, available funds under the Agreement were $183,059 at January 31, 2014.

Borrowings under the Agreement are collateralized by a first priority security interest in substantially all of the tangible and intangible property of the Company and its domestic subsidiaries and 65% of the stock of foreign subsidiaries.

Table of Contents

In July 2013, the Company entered into a finance agreement with an insurance broker for various insurance policies that bears interest at a fixed rate of 2.15% requiring an initial down payment of $186 due with the first monthly payment of $68. The monthly payments extend through April 2014. As of January 31, 2014, $203 remained outstanding under this agreement.

On September 2, 2013, the Company entered into an equipment security note that bears interest at a fixed rate of 2.47% and requires monthly payments of $44 through September 2018. As of January 31, 2014, $2,343 remained outstanding under this agreement and $480 was classified as current debt and $1,863 was classified as long term debt in the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheets.

On December 27, 2013, the Company entered into a master lease agreement with The Huntington National Bank for machinery and equipment. The lease bears interest at a fixed rate of 3.054% and requires monthly payments of $8 through November 2018. As of January 31, 2014, $451 remained outstanding under this agreement and $88 was classified as current debt and $363 was classified as long term debt in the Company's condensed consolidated balance sheets.

Scheduled repayments under the terms of the Agreement including repayments of other debt for the next five years are listed below:



Twelve Months ended January 31,	Credit Agreement		Equipment Security Note		Capital Lease Obligation		Other Debt		Total
2014	$	—	$	480	$	88	$	203	$	771
2015	—		492		91		—		583
2016	—		504		94		—		598
2017	—		516		97		—		613
2018	114,500		351		81		—		114,932
Total	$	114,500	$	2,343	$	451	$	203	$	117,497

Table of Contents

Note 10—Pension and Other Post-Retirement Benefit Matters

The components of net periodic benefit cost for the three months ended January 31, 2014 and 2013 are as follows:



	Pension Benefits						Other Post-Retirement Benefits
	Three Months Ended January 31,						Three Months Ended January 31,
	2014			2013			2014		2013
Interest cost	$	937		$	815		$	10	$	8
Expected return on plan assets	(1,070		)	(934		)	—		—
Recognized net actuarial loss	269			348			10		12
Net periodic benefit cost	$	136		$	229		$	20	$	20

As part of a strategy to remove pension liability risk and reduce premium payments to the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, the Company elected to allow lump sum distributions from the defined benefit pension plans. The FASB requires a special accounting charge for settling pension obligations in this manner. The Company records an estimated settlement charge at the time of the lump sun payments based on the discount rate in effect at the time.

The Company made contributions of $952 to the defined benefit pension plans during the three months ended January 31, 2014. The Company expects contributions to be $3,425 for the remainder of fiscal 2014.

Note 11—Equity Matters

For the Company, FASB ASC Topic 718 “Compensation – Stock Compensation” affects the stock options that have been granted and requires the Company to expense share-based payment (“SBP”) awards with compensation cost for SBP transactions measured at fair value. The Company has elected to use the simplified method of calculating the expected term of the stock options and historical volatility to compute fair value under the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The risk-free rate for periods within the contractual life of the option is based on the U.S. zero coupon Treasury yield in effect at the time of grant. Forfeitures have been estimated based upon the Company’s historical experience.

1993 Key Employee Stock Incentive Plan

The Company maintains the Amended and Restated 1993 Key Employee Stock Incentive Program (as amended and restated December 12, 2002 and December 10, 2009) (the “Incentive Plan”), which authorizes grants to officers and other key employees of the Company and its subsidiaries of (i) stock options that are intended to qualify as incentive stock options, (ii) nonqualified stock options and (iii) restricted stock awards. An aggregate of 2,700,000 shares of Common Stock, subject to adjustment upon occurrence of certain events to prevent dilution or expansion of the rights of participants that might otherwise result from the occurrence of such events, was reserved for issuance pursuant to the Incentive Plan. An individual’s award of stock options is limited to 500,000 shares in a five-year period.

Non-qualified stock options, incentive stock options and restricted stock awards have been granted to date and all options have been granted at the market price at the date of grant. Options expire over a period not to exceed ten years from the date of grant and vest ratably over a three year period. Restricted stock awards vest ratably over a four year period. Incentive stock options have not been granted in fiscal 2013 or during the first quarter of 2014. On December 19, 2013, 67,000 shares of restricted stock were granted to several employees determined by the chief executive officer as incentives for future performance. The market value of the Company's stock on the date of award was $20.64.

Table of Contents

Activity in the Company’s stock option plan for the three months ended January 31, 2014 and 2013 was as follows:



	Number of Shares		Weighted Average Exercise Price Per Share	Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (Years)	Aggregate Intrinsic Value
Options outstanding at November 1, 2012	362,085		$9.99
Options:
Granted	—		$0.00
Exercised	(13,667	)	$5.58
Canceled	(6,500	)	$7.45
Outstanding at January 31, 2013	341,918		$10.21	6.54	$734
Options exercisable at January 31, 2013	267,585		$10.20	6.09	$621

Options outstanding at November 1, 2013	236,134		$9.93
Options:
Granted	—		$0.00
Exercised	(33,468	)	$9.18
Canceled	(8,333	)	$8.10
Outstanding at January 31, 2014	194,333		$10.13	5.68	$962
Options exercisable at January 31, 2014	184,666		$10.24	5.56	$894

At January 31, 2014 the exercise price of all of the Company's stock option grants was higher than the market value of the Company's stock and at January 31, 2013, the exercise price of some of the Company’s stock option grants was higher than the market value of the Company’s stock. These grants are excluded from the computation of aggregate intrinsic value of the Company’s outstanding and exercisable stock options.

For the three months ended January 31, 2014 and 2013, the Company recorded compensation expense related to stock options currently vesting, effectively reducing income before taxes by $83 and $114, respectively. For the first quarter of fiscal 2014, there was no impact on earnings per share and for the first quarter of fiscal 2013 the impact on earnings per share was a reduction of $0.01 per share basic and diluted. The total compensation cost related to unvested awards not yet recognized is expected to be a combined total of $67 over the next two fiscal years. For the three months ended January 31, 2014 and 2013, the total compensation cost related to the restricted stock currently vested was $67 and $73, respectively. The total estimated compensation cost related to the non-vested restricted stock is $339 over the next two fiscal years.

Table of Contents

Earnings per Share

Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net income available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of shares of Common Stock outstanding during the period. In addition, the shares of Common Stock issuable pursuant to stock options outstanding under the Incentive Plan are included in the diluted earnings per share calculation to the extent they are dilutive. For the three months ended January 31, 2014, 118,572 stock awards were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share because they were anti-dilutive. For the three months ended January 31, 2013, 329,906 stock awards were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share because they were anti-dilutive. The following is a reconciliation of the numerator and denominator of the basic and diluted earnings per share computation for net income per share:



(Shares in thousands)	Three Months Ended January 31,
	2014		2013
Net income available to common stockholders	$	4,939	$	2,583
Basic weighted average shares	17,113		16,988
Effect of dilutive securities:
Stock options	95		52
Diluted weighted average shares	17,208		17,040
Basic income per share	$	0.29	$	0.15
Diluted income per share	$	0.29	$	0.15

Comprehensive Income

Comprehensive income for the three months ended January 31, 2014 and 2013 was $4,531 and $2,583, respectively. Beginning with the first quarter of fiscal year 2014, the pension plan will be remeasured on a quarterly basis. Comprehensive income includes an adjustment of $249 to estimated deferred taxes associated with the pension adjustments included in accumulated other comprehensive income.

Note 12—Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, trade receivables and payables approximate fair value because of the short maturity of those instruments. The carrying value of the Company’s debt is considered to approximate the fair value of these instruments based on the borrowing rates currently available to the Company for loans with similar terms and maturities.

Note 13—Commitments and Contingencies

The Company is from time to time involved in legal proceedings, claims or investigations. In the opinion of management, the Company’s liability or recovery, if any, under pending litigation and claims would not materially affect its financial condition, results of operations or cash flow.

Table of Contents


Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

General

The Company provides lightweighting and noise, vibration and harshness (NVH) solutions to automotive, commercial vehicle and other industrial markets through its imaginative thinking and advanced capabilities. Shiloh delivers these solutions through the design, engineering and manufacturing of first operation precision blanks, engineered welded blanks, complex stampings, modular assemblies, highly engineered aluminum die casting and machined components and its patented ShilohCore™ acoustic laminate metal solution. In addition, Shiloh is a designer and engineer of precision tools and dies, welding and assembly equipment for use in its blanking, welded blank, stamping and die casting operations and for sale to original equipment manufacturers ("OEMs") and, as a Tier II supplier, to Tier I automotive part manufacturers who in turn supply OEMs.

The Company also builds modular assemblies, which include components used in the structural and powertrain systems of a vehicle. Structural systems include bumper beams, door impact beams, steering column supports, chassis components and structural underbody modules. Powertrain systems consist of deep draw components, such as oil pans, transmission pans, valve covers and casting transmission components. Additionally, the Company provides a variety of intermediate steel processing services, such as oiling, leveling, cutting-to-length, multi-blanking, slitting, edge trimming of hot and cold-rolled steel coils and inventory control services for automotive and steel industry customers. The Company has seventeen wholly-owned subsidiaries at locations in Alabama, Georgia, Indiana, Kentucky, Michigan, Ohio, Tennessee, Wisconsin, and Mexico.

The products that the Company produces supply many models of vehicles manufactured by nearly all OEMs that produce vehicles in North America. As a result, the Company’s revenues are dependent upon the North American production of automobiles and light trucks of the traditional domestic manufacturers, such as Chrysler, Ford, and General Motors and the Asian OEMs (defined as Honda, Hyundai, Renault/Nissan, Subaru, and Toyota) and BMW, Daimler, Tesla and Volkswagen. According to industry statistics (published by IHS Automotive), production volumes for the three months ended January 31, 2014 and 2013 were as follows:



	Three Months Ended January 31,
	2014	2013	Increase (Decrease)		% Increase (Decrease)
	(Number of Vehicles in Thousands)
Traditional domestic manufacturers	2,085	1,992	93		4.7	%
Asian OEM's	1,424	1,360	64		4.7	%
Other OEM's	270	296	(26	)	(8.8	)%
Total	3,779	3,648	131		3.6	%

Another significant factor affecting the Company’s revenues is the Company’s ability to successfully bid on and win the production and supply of parts for models that will be newly introduced to the market by the OEMs. These new model introductions typically go through a start of production phase with build levels that are higher than normal because the consumer supply network is filled to ensure adequate supply to the market, resulting in an increase in the Company’s revenues for related parts at the beginning of the cycle.

The Company operates in an extremely competitive industry, driven by global vehicle production volumes. Business is typically awarded to the supplier offering the most favorable combination of cost, quality, technology and service. Customers continue to demand periodic cost reductions that require the Company to assess, redefine and improve operations, products, and manufacturing capabilities to maintain and improve profitability. Management continues to develop and execute initiatives to meet challenges of the industry and to achieve its strategy for sustainable global profitable growth.

Capacity utilization levels are very important to profitability because of the capital-intensive nature of the Company’s operations. We continue to adapt our capacity to meet customer demand, both expanding capabilities in growth areas as well as reallocating capacity between manufacturing facilities as needs arise. We deploy new technologies to differentiate our products from our competitors' and to achieve higher quality and productivity. The Company believes that it has sufficient capacity to meet its current and expected manufacturing needs.

Table of Contents

The significant majority of the steel purchased by the Company’s stamping and engineered welded blank operations is purchased through the customers’ resale steel programs. Under these programs, the customer negotiates the price for steel with the steel suppliers. The Company pays for the steel based on these negotiated prices and passes on those costs to the customer. Although the Company takes ownership of the steel, the customers are responsible for all steel price fluctuations under these programs. The Company also purchases steel directly from domestic primary steel producers and steel service centers. Domestic steel pricing has generally been flat over the most recent quarters based on open capacity with the steel producers with nominal increases in demand. The Company blanks and processes steel for some of its customers on a toll processing basis. Under these arrangements, the Company charges a tolling fee for the operations that it performs without acquiring ownership of the steel and being burdened with the attendant costs of ownership and risk of loss. Revenues from operations involving directly owned steel include a component of raw material cost whereas toll processing revenues do not.

For the Company's aluminum die casting operations, the cost of aluminum may be handled in two ways. The primary method used by the Company is to secure quarterly aluminum purchase commitments based on customer releases and then pass the quarterly price changes to those customers utilizing published metal indices. The second method used by the Company is to adjust prices monthly based on a referenced metal index plus additional material cost spreads agreed to by the Company and its customers.

Engineered scrap metal is a planned by-product of the Company’s processing operations and is accounted for in our quoted cost to each customer. Net proceeds from the disposition of scrap metal contribute to gross margin by offsetting the increases in the cost of metal and the attendant costs of quality and availability. Changes in the price of metal may impact the Company’s results of operations because raw material costs are the largest component of cost of sales in processing directly owned metal. The Company actively manages its exposure to changes in the price of metal and, in most instances, can pass along the price fluctuations of metal to its customers.

Table of Contents

Recent Trends and General Economic Conditions Affecting the Automotive Industry

Our business and operating results are directly affected by the relative strength of the North American automotive industry, which is driven by the macro-economic factors that impact consumer income and confidence levels, housing sales, gasoline prices, automobile discount and incentive offers and perceptions about global economic stability. The automotive industry remains susceptible to these factors that impact consumer spending habits and could adversely impact consumer demand for vehicles.

The production of cars and light trucks for fiscal year 2014 in North America according to industry forecasts (published by IHS Automotive in February 2014) is currently predicted to increase to approximately 16,758,000 units, which reflects an improvement of 4.2% over fiscal year 2013’s vehicle production of approximately 16,086,000 units. The improved vehicle production reflects an improvement in economic conditions and consumer demand in North America.

The Company closely monitors the customer release volumes as the overall economic environment in North America reflects improvement and there is evidence that the U.S. economy is strengthening. However, the U.S. government fiscal policy could impact levels of unemployment and consumer confidence, which could adversely impact consumer demand for vehicles.

Table of Contents

Critical Accounting Policies

Preparation of the Company’s financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the condensed consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. The Company believes its estimates and assumptions are reasonable; however, actual results and the timing of the recognition of such amounts could differ from those estimates. The Company has identified the following items as critical accounting policies and estimates utilized by management in the preparation of the Company’s financial statements. These estimates were selected because of inherent imprecision that may result from applying judgment to the estimation process. The expenses and accrued liabilities or allowances related to these policies are initially based on the Company’s best estimates at the time they are recorded. Adjustments are charged or credited to income and the related balance sheet account when actual experience differs from the expected experience underlying the estimates. The Company makes frequent comparisons of actual experience and expected experience in order to mitigate the likelihood that material adjustments will be required.

Revenue Recognition. The Company recognizes revenue from the sales of products when there is evidence of a sales agreement, the delivery of goods has occurred, the sales price is fixed or determinable and collectability of revenue is reasonably assured. The Company records revenues upon shipment of product to customers and transfer of title under standard commercial terms. Price adjustments, including those arising from resolution of quality issues, price and quantity discrepancies, surcharges for fuel and/or steel and other commercial issues are recognized in the period when management believes that such amounts become probable, based on management’s estimates.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts. The Company evaluates the collectability of accounts receivable based on several factors. In circumstances when the Company is aware of a specific customer’s inability to meet its financial obligations, a specific allowance for doubtful accounts is recorded against amounts due to reduce the net recognized receivable to the amount the Company reasonably believes will be collected. Additionally, a general allowance for doubtful accounts is estimated based on historical write-offs and the current financial condition of customers. The financial condition of the Company’s customers is dependent on, among other things, the general economic environment, which may substantially change. This variability may affect the recoverability of amounts due to the Company from its customers.

The Company carefully assesses the risks posed by each of its customers and considers compliance with terms and conditions, aging of the customer accounts, intelligence learned through contact with customer representatives and its net account receivable / account payable position with customers, if applicable, in establishing the allowance.

Inventory Reserves. Inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined on the first-in, first-out basis. Where appropriate, standard cost systems are used to determine cost and the standards are adjusted as necessary to ensure they approximate actual costs. Estimates of lower of cost or market value of inventory are based upon current economic conditions, historical sales quantities and patterns, and in some cases, the specific risk of loss on specifically identified inventories.

The Company values inventories on a regular basis to identify inventories on hand that may be obsolete or in excess of current future projected market demand. For inventory deemed to be obsolete, the Company provides a reserve for the full value of the inventory, net of estimated realizable value. Inventory that is in excess of current and projected use is reduced by an allowance to a level that approximates future demand. Additional inventory reserves may be required if actual market conditions differ from management’s expectations.

The Company continues to monitor purchases of inventory to insure that receipts coincide with shipments, thereby reducing the economic risk of holding excessive levels of inventory that could result in long holding periods or in unsalable inventory leading to losses in conversion.

Income Taxes. The Company utilizes the asset and liability method in accounting for income taxes. Income tax expense includes U.S. and international income taxes minus tax credits and other incentives that will reduce tax expense in the year they are claimed. Deferred taxes are recognized at currently enacted tax rates for temporary differences between the financial accounting and income tax basis of assets and liabilities and operating losses and tax credit carryforwards. Valuation allowances are recorded to reduce net deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized. The Company assesses both positive and negative evidence when measuring the need for a valuation allowance. Evidence typically assessed includes the operating results for the most recent three-year period and, to a lesser extent because of inherent uncertainty, the expectations of future profitability, available tax planning strategies, the time period over which the temporary differences will reverse and taxable income in prior carryback years if carryback is permitted under the tax law. The calculation of the Company’s tax liabilities also involves dealing with uncertainties in the application of complex tax laws and regulations. The Company recognizes liabilities for uncertain income

Table of Contents

tax positions based on the Company’s estimate of whether, and the extent to which, additional taxes will be required. The Company reports interest and penalties related to uncertain income tax positions as income taxes.

Business Combinations. The Company includes the results of operations of the businesses that it acquires as of the respective dates of acquisition. The Company allocates the fair value of the purchase price of its acquisitions to the tangible assets acquired, and liabilities assumed, based on their estimated fair values. The excess of the fair values of these identifiable assets and liabilities is recorded as goodwill.

Impairment of Long-lived Assets. The Company has historically performed an annual impairment analysis of long-lived assets. However, when significant events, which meet the definition of a “triggering event” in the context of assessing asset impairments, occur within the industry or within the Company’s primary customer base, an interim impairment analysis is performed. The analysis consists of reviewing the next five years outlook for sales, profitability, and cash flow for each of the Company’s manufacturing plants and for the Company overall. The five-year outlook considers known sales opportunities for which purchase orders exist, potential sale opportunities that are under development, third party forecasts of North American car builds (published by IHS Automotive), and the potential sales that could result from new manufacturing process additions and lastly, strategic geographic localities that are important to servicing the automotive industry. All of this data is collected as part of our annual planning process and is updated with more current Company specific and industry data when an interim period impairment analysis is deemed necessary. In concluding the impairment analysis, the Company incorporates a sensitivity analysis by probability weighting the achievement of the forecasted cash flows by plant and achievements of cash flows that are 20% greater and less than the forecasted amounts.

The property, plant and equipment included in the analysis for each plant represents factory facilities devoted to the Company’s manufacturing processes and the related equipment within each plant needed to perform and support those processes. The property, plant and equipment of each plant form each plant’s asset group and typically certain key assets in the group form the primary processes at that plant that generate revenue and cash flow for that facility. Certain key assets have a life of ten to twelve years and the remainder of the assets in the asset group are shorter-lived assets that support the key processes. When the analysis indicates that estimated future undiscounted cash flows of a plant are less than the net carrying value of the long-lived assets of such plant, to the extent that the assets cannot be redeployed to another plant to generate positive cash flow, the Company will record an impairment charge, reducing the net carrying value of the fixed assets (exclusive of land and buildings, the fair value of which would be assessed through appraisals) to zero. Alternative courses of action to recover the carrying amount of the long-lived asset group are typically not considered due to the limited-use nature of the equipment and the full utilization of their useful life. Therefore, the equipment is of limited value in a used-equipment market. The depreciable lives of the Company’s fixed assets are generally consistent between years unless the assets are devoted to the manufacture of a customized automotive part and the equipment has limited reapplication opportunities. If the production of that part concludes earlier than expected, the asset life is shortened to fully amortize its remaining value over the shortened production period.

The Company cannot predict the occurrence of future impairment-triggering events. Such events may include, but are not limited to, significant industry or economic trends and strategic decisions made in response to changes in the economic and competitive conditions impacting the Company’s business. See Note 4 to the condensed consolidated financial statements for a discussion of the impairment recoveries recorded in fiscal years 2014 and 2013. The Company continues to assess impairment to long-lived assets based on expected orders from the Company’s customers and current business conditions.

The key assumptions related to the Company’s forecasted operating results could be adversely impacted by, among other things, decreases in estimated North American car builds during the forecast period, the inability of the Company or its major customers to maintain their respective forecasted market share positions, the inability of the Company to achieve the forecasted levels of operating margins on parts produced, and a deterioration in property values associated with manufacturing facilities.

Intangible Assets. Intangible assets with definitive lives are amortized over their estimated useful lives. The Company amortizes its acquired intangible assets with definitive lives on a straight-line basis over periods ranging from three months to fifteen years. See Note 8 to the condensed consolidated financial statements for a description of the current intangible assets and their estimated amortization expense. Amortization of trade names, trademarks, developed technologies, customer relationships and non-compete agreements is included within selling, general, and administrative expenses in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income.

Goodwill. Goodwill, which represents the excess cost over the fair value of the net assets of businesses acquired, was approximately $6,768 as of January 31, 2014, or 2% of our total assets.

In accordance with Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") 350, Intangibles-Goodwill and Other," we assess goodwill for impairment on an annual basis. Such assessment can be done on a qualitative or quantitative basis. To qualitatively assess the

Table of Contents

likelihood of goodwill being impaired, we consider the following factors at the reporting unit level: the excess of fair value over carrying value as of the last impairment test, the length of time since the last fair value measurement, the carrying value, market and industry metrics, actual performance compared to forecasted performance, and our current outlook on the business. If the qualitative assessment indicated it is more likely than not that goodwill is impaired, we will perform quantitative impairment testing at the reporting unit level.

To quantitatively test goodwill for impairment, we estimate the fair value of a reporting unit and compare the fair value to the carrying value. If the carrying value exceeds the fair value, then a possible impairment of goodwill may exist and further evaluation is required. Fair values are based on the cash flow projected in the reporting units' strategic plans and long-range planning forecasts, discounted at a risk-adjusted rate of return. Revenue growth rates included in the plans are generally based on industry specific data and known awarded business. The projected profit margins assumptions included in the plans are based in the current cost structure and anticipated productivity improvements. If different assumptions were used in the plans, the related cash flows used in measuring fair value could be different and impairment of goodwill might be required to be recorded.

Group Insurance and Workers’ Compensation Accruals. The Company is primarily self-insured for group insurance and workers’ compensation claims and reviews these accruals on a monthly basis to adjust the balances as determined necessary. The Company is fully insured for workers' compensation at one of its locations. For the self insured plans, the Company reviews historical claims data and lag analysis as the primary indicators of the accruals.

Additionally, the Company reviews specific large insurance claims to determine whether there is a need for additional accrual on a case-by-case basis. Changes in the claim lag periods and the specific occurrences could materially impact the required accrual balance period-to-period. The Company carries excess insurance coverage for group insurance and workers’ compensation claims exceeding a range of $160-170 and $100-500 per plan year, respectively, dependent upon the location where the claim is incurred. At January 31, 2014 and October 31, 2013, the amount accrued for group insurance and workers’ compensation claims was $3,931 and $3,625, respectively. The self-insurance reserves established are a result of safety statistics, changes in employment levels, number of open and active workers’ compensation cases, and group insurance plan design features. The Company does not self-insure for any other types of losses.

Share-Based Payments. The Company records compensation expense for the fair value of nonvested stock option awards and restricted stock awards over the remaining vesting period. The Company has elected to use the simplified method to calculate the expected term of the stock options outstanding at five to six years and has utilized historical weighted average volatility. The Company determines the volatility and risk-free rate assumptions used in computing the fair value using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, in consultation with an outside third party. The expected term for the restricted stock award is between one to four years.

The Black-Scholes option valuation model requires the input of highly subjective assumptions, including the expected life of the stock-based award and stock price volatility. The assumptions used are management’s best estimates, but the estimates involve inherent uncertainties and the application of management judgment. As a result, if other assumptions had been used, the recorded stock-based compensation expense could have been materially different from that depicted in the financial statements. In addition, the Company has estimated a 20% forfeiture rate. If actual forfeitures materially differ from the estimate, the share-based compensation expense could be materially different.

The restricted stock was valued based upon the closing date of the grant of the stock. In addition, the Company has estimated a 20% forfeiture rate. If actual forfeitures materially differ from the estimate, the share-based compensation expense could be materially different.

Pension and Other Post-Retirement Costs and Liabilities. The Company has recorded significant pension and other post-retirement benefit liabilities that are developed from actuarial valuations. The determination of the Company’s pension liabilities requires key assumptions regarding discount rates used to determine the present value of future benefit payments and the expected return on plan assets. The discount rate is also significant to the development of other post-retirement liabilities. The Company determines these assumptions in consultation with, and after input from, its actuaries.

The discount rate reflects the estimated rate at which the pension and other post-retirement liabilities could be settled at the end of the year. The Company uses the Principal Pension Discount Yield Curve ("Principal Curve") as the basis for determining the discount rate for reporting pension and retiree medical liabilities. The Principal Curve has several advantages to other methods, including: transparency of construction, lower statistical errors, and continuous forward rates for all years. At October 31, 2013, the resulting discount rate from the use of the Principal Curve was 4.50%, a increase of 0.75% from a year earlier that resulted in an increase of the benefit obligation of approximately $4,470. A change of 25 basis points in the discount rate at October 31, 2013 would increase or decrease expense on an annual basis by approximately $3.

Table of Contents

The assumed long-term rate of return on pension assets is applied to the market value of plan assets to derive a reduction to pension expense that approximates the expected average rate of asset investment return over ten or more years. A decrease in the expected long-term rate of return will increase pension expense whereas an increase in the expected long-term rate will reduce pension expense. Decreases in the level of plan assets will serve to increase the amount of pension expense whereas increases in the level of actual plan assets will serve to decrease the amount of pension expense. Any shortfall in the actual return on plan assets from the expected return will increase pension expense in future years due to the amortization of the shortfall, whereas any excess in the actual return on plan assets from the expected return will reduce pension expense in future periods due to the amortization of the excess. A change of 25 basis points in the assumed rate of return on pension assets at October 31, 2013 would increase or decrease pension assets by approximately $154.

The Company’s investment policy for assets of the plans is to maintain an allocation generally of 0% to 70% in equity securities, 0% to 70% in debt securities, and 0% to 10% in real estate. Equity security investments are structured to achieve an equal balance between growth and value stocks. The Company determines the annual rate of return on pension assets by first analyzing the composition of its asset portfolio. Historical rates of return are applied to the portfolio. The Company’s investment advisors and actuaries review this computed rate of return. Industry comparables and other outside guidance are also considered in the annual selection of the expected rates of return on pension assets.

For the twelve months ended October 31, 2013, the actual return on pension plans’ assets for all of the Company’s plans approximated 16.66%, which is above the expected rate of return on plan assets of 7.50% used to derive pension expense. The long term expected rate of return takes into account years with exceptional gains and years with exceptional losses.

Actual results that differ from these estimates may result in more or less future Company funding into the pension plans than is planned by management. Based on current market investment performance, the Company anticipates that contributions to the Company’s defined benefit plans will decrease in fiscal 2014, and that pension expense will decrease in fiscal 2014.

Table of Contents

Results of Operations

Three Months Ended January 31, 2014 Compared to Three Months Ended January 31, 2013

REVENUES. Sales for the first quarter of fiscal 2014 were $183,539, an increase of $38,156 from last year’s first quarter sales of $145,383, or 26.2%. Of the increased sales, approximately $12,000 came from an increase in the production volumes of the North American car and light truck manufacturers along with sales from new program launches. According to industry statistics, North American car and light truck production in the first quarter of fiscal 2014 increased 3.6% from production levels in the first quarter of fiscal 2013. Sales of engineered scrap driven by increased production volumes along with improved scrap prices resulted in increased sales of approximately $2,030. Sales from the strategic acquisitions completed in fiscal 2013 increased sales by approximately $24,120 during the three months ended January 31, 2014.

GROSS PROFIT. Gross profit for the first quarter of fiscal 2014 was $17,846 compared to gross profit of $10,738 in the first quarter of fiscal 2013, an increase of $7,108. Gross profit as a percentage of sales was 9.7% in the first quarter of fiscal 2014 and 7.4% in the first quarter of fiscal 2013. Gross profit in the first quarter of fiscal 2014 was favorably impacted by approximately $3,070 from the increased sales volume, and includes the $1,000 benefit from the Pleasant Prairie escrow settlement related to tooling expenses. A favorable change in sales mix during the first quarter of fiscal 2014 compared to the first quarter of 2013 resulted in a gross margin increase of approximately $3,510. Manufacturing expenses increased by approximately $2,830 in the first quarter of 2014 compared to the first quarter of 2013. Personnel and personnel related expenses increased in proportion to the increased revenues by approximately $2,120 as the Company's workforce was increased in anticipation of increased production volumes, planning for future launches, and planning for further increases in North American vehicle production volumes. Expenses for repairs and maintenance and manufacturing supplies increased by approximately $950 in the first quarter of fiscal 2014 compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2013. Expenses for depreciation and other fixed costs were reduced by approximately $240 in the first quarter of fiscal 2014 compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2013. Gross profit was favorably impacted by approximately $3,360 by the businesses acquired during 2013.

SELLING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES. Selling, general and administrative expenses support the growth in sales opportunities, new technologies, new product launches and acquisition activities. Expenses of $10,945 in the first quarter of fiscal 2014 were $4,331 more than expenses of $6,614 in the same period of the prior year. As a percentage of sales, these expenses were 6.0% of sales in the first quarter of fiscal 2014 and 4.5% in the first quarter of fiscal 2013. The increase reflects our investment in additional personnel and related expenses, including personnel from the businesses acquired, of approximately $2,300, an increase of approximately $1,480 from investments in new technology and increases in other administrative expenses. As a result of the acquisitions, selling, general and administrative expenses increased by approximately $550, consisting of approximately $410 from the amortization of intangible assets acquired and approximately $140 in other administrative expenses.

ASSET RECOVERIES. Asset recoveries of $1,120 were recorded during the first three months of fiscal 2014 and impairment recoveries of $7 were recorded during the first three months of fiscal 2013 for cash received upon sales of assets from the Company's former Mansfield Blanking facility, which were impaired in fiscal 2010.

INTEREST EXPENSE. Interest expense for the first quarter of fiscal 2014 was $886, compared to interest expense of $430 during the first quarter of fiscal 2013. The increase in interest expense was the result of higher average borrowing of funds for funding acquisition activities. Borrowed funds averaged $118,881 during the first quarter of fiscal 2014 and the weighted average interest rate was 1.95%. In the first quarter of fiscal 2013, borrowed funds averaged $58,600 and the weighted average interest rate of debt was 1.91%.

OTHER EXPENSE. Other expense, net was $18 for the first quarter of fiscal 2014 and $23 in the first quarter of fiscal 2013. Both are the result of currency transaction losses realized by the Company's Mexican subsidiary.

PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES. The provision for income taxes in the first quarter of fiscal 2014 was an expense of $2,181 on income before taxes of $7,120 for an effective tax rate of 30.6%. The provision for income taxes in the first quarter of fiscal 2013 was an expense of $1,101 on income before taxes of $3,684 for an effective tax rate of 29.9%. The estimated effective tax rate for the first quarter of fiscal 2014 has slightly increased compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2013 primarily because the research credit, which expired at the end of 2013, and was offset by the Company’s Mexican subsidiary generating larger profits in first quarter of fiscal 2014 compared to first quarter of fiscal 2013. Effective January 1, 2014, Mexico passed certain tax law changes which management has reviewed and determined that there would be no material effect.

NET INCOME. Net income for the first quarter of fiscal 2014, improved 91.2% compared to the first quarter of 2013 and was $4,939, or $0.29 per share, diluted. Net income for first the quarter of fiscal 2013 was $2,583, or $0.15 per share, diluted.

Table of Contents

Liquidity and Capital Resources

On December 30, 2013, the Company entered into a First Amendment Agreement (the “First Amendment”) amending the Agreement.

After considering letters of credit of $2,441 that the Company has issued, available funds under the Agreement were $183,059 at January 31, 2014.

Table of Contents

Scheduled repayments under the terms of the Agreement including repayments of other debt for the next five years are listed below:



Twelve Months ended January 31,	Credit Agreement		Equipment Security Note		Capital Lease Obligation		Other Debt		Total
2014	$	—	$	480	$	88	$	203	$	771
2015	—		492		91		—		583
2016	—		504		94		—		598
2017	—		516		97		—		613
2018	114,500		351		81		—		114,932
Total	$	114,500	$	2,343	$	451	$	203	$	117,497

At January 31, 2014, total debt was $117,497 and total equity was $136,224, resulting in a capitalization rate of 46.3% debt, 53.7% equity. Current assets were $157,360 and current liabilities were $104,444 resulting in positive working capital of $52,916.

For the three months ended January 31, 2014, operations generated $10,522 of cash flow compared to $7,095 in the first quarter of 2013.

Changes in operating assets and liabilities since October 31, 2013 were a use of funds of $4,626. During the first quarter of fiscal 2014, accounts receivable and related party receivables increased by $16,473, inventory increased by $5,721 and accounts payable decreased by $10,241.

Cash capital expenditures in the first three months of fiscal 2014 were $3,781. The Company had unpaid capital expenditures of approximately $1,593, and such amounts are included in accounts payable and excluded from capital expenditures in the accompanying condensed consolidated statement of cash flows. Total estimated capital expenditures for fiscal 2014 are approximately $37,000, subject to change based on business conditions.

The Company continues to closely monitor the business conditions affecting the automotive industry. In addition, the Company closely monitors its working capital position to insure adequate funds for operations. The Company anticipates that funds from operations will be adequate to meet the obligations under the Agreement through maturity of the Agreement in October 2018, as well as pension contributions totaling $4,377 during fiscal 2014, capital expenditures for fiscal 2014 and scheduled payments for the equipment security note, capital lease and repayment of the other other debt of $203.

Effect of Inflation, Deflation

Inflation generally affects the Company by increasing the interest expense of floating rate indebtedness and by increasing the cost of labor, equipment and raw materials. The level of inflation has not had a material effect on the Company's financial results for the past three years.

In periods of decreasing prices, deflation occurs and may also affect the Company's results of operations. With respect to steel purchases, the Company's purchases of steel through customers' resale steel programs protects recovery of the cost of steel through the selling price of the Company's products. For non-resale steel purchases, the Company coordinates the cost of steel purchases with the related selling price of the product. For the Company's aluminum die casting business, the cost of aluminum is handled in one of two ways. The primary method used by the Company is to secure quarterly aluminum purchase commitments based on customer releases and then pass the quarterly price changes to those customers utilizing published metal indexes. The second method used by the Company is to adjust prices monthly, based on a referenced metal index plus additional material cost spreads agreed to by the Company and its customers.

Table of Contents

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

Certain statements made by the Company in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q regarding earnings or general belief in the Company’s expectations of future operating results are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. In particular, forward-looking statements are statements that relate to the Company’s operating performance, events or developments that the Company believes or expects to occur in the future, including those that discuss strategies, goals, outlook, or other non-historical matters, or that relate to future sales, earnings expectations, cost savings, awarded sales, volume growth, earnings or general belief in the Company’s expectations of future operating results. The forward-looking statements are made on the basis of management’s assumptions and expectations. As a result, there can be no guarantee or assurance that these assumptions and expectations will in fact occur. The forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to materially differ from those contained in the statements. Some, but not all, of the risks include the ability of the Company to accomplish its strategic objectives with respect to implementing its sustainable business model; the ability to obtain future sales; changes in worldwide economic and political conditions, including adverse effects from terrorism or related hostilities; costs related to legal and administrative matters; the Company’s ability to realize cost savings expected to offset price concessions; the Company's ability to successfully integrate acquired businesses; inefficiencies related to production and product launches that are greater than anticipated; changes in technology and technological risks; increased fuel and utility costs; work stoppages and strikes at the Company’s facilities and that of the Company’s customers; the Company’s dependence on the automotive and heavy truck industries, which are highly cyclical; the dependence of the automotive industry on consumer spending, which is subject to the impact of domestic and international economic conditions, including increased energy costs affecting car and light truck production, and regulations and policies regarding international trade; financial and business downturns of the Company’s customers or vendors, including any production cutbacks or bankruptcies; increases in the price of, or limitations on the availability of, steel, the Company’s primary raw material, or decreases in the price of scrap steel; the successful launch and consumer acceptance of new vehicles for which the Company supplies parts; the occurrence of any event or condition that may be deemed a material adverse effect under the Agreement; pension plan funding requirements; and other factors, uncertainties, challenges and risks detailed in the Company’s other public filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Any or all of these risks and uncertainties could cause actual results to differ materially from those reflected in the forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements reflect management’s analysis only as of the date of the filing of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. The Company undertakes no obligation to publicly revise these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances that arise after the date hereof. In addition to the disclosures contained herein, readers should carefully review risks and uncertainties contained in other documents the Company files from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Table of Contents


Item 4.	Controls and Procedures

The Company maintains a set of disclosure controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms. As of January 31, 2014, an evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Principal Executive Officer (“PEO”) and Principal Financial Officer (“PFO”), of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) or Rule 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The Company’s PEO and PFO concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of January 31, 2014.

On December 28, 2012, the Company acquired the business and related assets of Albany-Chicago Company, LLC, which operated under its own set of systems and internal controls. The Company is substantially complete with the incorporation of the acquired operations as they relate to internal controls as of the end of the first quarter of fiscal 2014. The Company anticipates completing the incorporation of the acquired operations as they relate to internal controls, into its control environment during the second quarter of fiscal 2014.

On August 2, 2013, the Company acquired the business and related assets of Contech Castings, LLC, which operated under its own set of systems and internal controls. The Company is maintaining those systems and much of the internal control environment until such time that it is able to incorporate the acquired processes into the Company's own control environment. The Company expects to be complete with the incorporation of the acquired operations, as they relate to systems and internal controls, into its control environment during the second quarter of fiscal 2014.

There were no other changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the first quarter of fiscal 2014 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Table of Contents

Part II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 5. Other Information

None

Table of Contents


Item 6.	Exhibits



10.1		First Amendment to the Credit Agreement, dated December 30, 2013, among Shiloh Industries, Inc., Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, Swing Line Lender and L/C Issuer, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated and J.P. Morgan Securities, LLC as Joint Lead Arrangers and Joint Book Managers, The PrivateBank and Trust Company, Compass Bank and RBS Citizens, N.A., as Co-Documentation Agents, and the other lender parties thereto.

31.1		Principal Executive Officer’s Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2		Principal Financial Officer’s Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.1		Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.



	SHILOH INDUSTRIES, INC.

	By:	/s/ Ramzi Hermiz
		Ramzi Hermiz
		President and Chief Executive Officer

	By:	/s/ Thomas M. Dugan
		Thomas M. Dugan
		Vice President of Finance and Treasurer

Date: February 26, 2014

Table of Contents

EXHIBIT INDEX



31.1		Principal Executive Officer’s Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2		Principal Financial Officer’s Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.1		Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.