For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2006

Commission File Number 0-24634

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

DELAWARE	22-3181095
(State or other jurisdiction	(I.R.S. Employer
of incorporation)	Identification No.)

(Address of principal executive offices)

(Registrant's telephone number)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the past 12 months (or such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large Accelerated Filer o   Accelerated Filer o  Non-Accelerated Filer x

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

o Yes x No

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date: As of October 31, 2006 there were 8,392,000 shares of common stock outstanding.

 

 

PART I.	FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.	Financial Statements
	See pages 3-15
Item 2.	Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
	See pages 16-24
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
	See page 25
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures
	See page 25
PART II.	OTHER INFORMATION
	See pages 26

		September 30,						December 31,
				2006						2005
		Unaudited						Audited
ASSETS
CASH AND EQUIVALENTS			$	6,865					$	4,469
ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE - net of allowance for doubtful
accounts of $231 in 2006 and $225 in 2005				2,587						1,950
DUE FROM CLEARING BROKER				391						154
DUE FROM BROKER				19,599						15,591
MARKETABLE SECURITIES				5,006						9,492
FIXED ASSETS - at cost (net of accumulated depreciation)				1,987						1,701
EXCESS OF COST OVER NET ASSETS ACQUIRED - net				1,900						1,900
OTHER ASSETS				765						950
TOTAL			$	39,100					$	36,207
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
LIABILITIES
Accounts payable and accrued expenses			$	5,103					$	3,707
Note payable - bank				859						1,137
Trading securities sold, but not yet purchased				9,172						8,223
Net deferred income tax liabilities				452						959
Other liabilities, including income taxes				839						632
Total liabilities				16,425						14,658
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Common stock - $.01 par value; 60,000,000 shares
authorized; issued and outstanding - 8,392,000 shares
in 2006 and 8,380,000 shares in 2005				84						84
Additional paid-in capital				10,183						10,136
Retained earnings				12,213						10,374
Accumulated other comprehensive income				195						955
Total stockholders’ equity				22,675						21,549
TOTAL			$	39,100					$	36,207

 

				2006				2005
	SERVICE FEES AND REVENUE
	Market Data Services		$	16,408			$	17,544
	ECN Services			11,113				5,371
	Broker-Dealer Commissions			5,321				4,470
	Total			32,842				27,385
	COSTS, EXPENSES AND OTHER:
	Direct operating costs (includes depreciation and amortization
	of $445,000 and $496,000 in 2006 and 2005, respectively)			23,882				19,164
	Selling and administrative expenses (includes depreciation and
	amortization of $69,000 and $102,000 in 2006 and 2005, respectively)			8,027				9,434
	Rent expense - related party			473				465
	Marketing and advertising			162				223
	Gain on arbitrage trading			(973	)			(572	)
	Gain on sale of marketable securities - Innodata and Edgar Online			(1,777	)			(1,061	)
	Interest income			(282	)			(161	)
	Interest expense			265				381
	Total			29,777				27,873
	INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE INCOME TAXES			3,065				(488	)
	INCOME TAXES (BENEFIT)			1,226				(195	)
	NET INCOME (LOSS)		$	1,839			$	(293	)
	BASIC AND DILUTED NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE			$.22				$(.03	)
	WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF SHARES OUTSTANDING			8,379				9,474
	ADJUSTED DILUTIVE SHARES OUTSTANDING			8,389				9,474

(Unaudited)

																								Accumulated
		Number										Additional												Other						Stock-						Compre-
		of				Common						Paid-in						Retained						Comprehensive						holders’						hensive
		Shares				Stock						Capital						Earnings						Income						Equity						Income
BALANCE, JANUARY 1, 2006			8,380				$	84					$	10,136					$	10,374					$	955					$	21,549
Net income																				1,839												1,839					$	1,839
Purchase and retirement of treasury stock			(6	)										(20	)																	(20	)
Exercise of stock options			18											56																		56
Tax effect of stock options exercised														11																		11
Reclassification adjustment for gain
on marketable securities - net of taxes																										(946	)					(946	)					(946	)
Unrealized gain on marketable securities -
net of taxes																										186						186						186
Comprehensive income																																					$	1,079
BALANCE, SEPTEMBER 30, 2006			8,392				$	84					$	10,183					$	12,213					$	195					$	22,675

     

 

 

				2006				2005
	CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
	Net income (loss)		$	1,839			$	(293	)
	Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided
	by (used in) operating activities:
	Depreciation and amortization			514				598
	Tax effect of stock options exercised			11				-
	Gain on sale of Innodata and Edgar Online common stock			(1,777	)			(1,061	)
	Other			2				51
	Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
	Accounts receivable and due from clearing broker			(874	)			59
	Due from broker			(4,008	)			23,678
	Marketable securities			3,207				5,100
	Other assets			415				(15	)
	Accounts payable and accrued expenses			1,396				(975	)
	Trading securities sold, but not yet purchased			949				(25,821	)
	Other liabilities, including income taxes			(24	)			(2,200	)
	Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities			1,650				(879	)
	CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
	Purchase of fixed assets			(808	)			(562	)
	Investment in private company			(150	)			(100	)
	Proceeds from sale of Innodata and Edgar Online common stock			1,787				1,074
	Proceeds from sale of equipment			-				8
	Net cash provided by investing activities			829				420
	CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
	Net (payments) proceeds from note payable - bank			(278	)			1,269
	Net proceeds from contributions to employee savings program			161				100
	Purchase of treasury stock			(20	)			(3,676	)
	Proceeds from exercise of stock options			56				-
	Net cash used in financing activities			(81	)			(2,307	)
	EFFECT OF EXCHANGE RATE DIFFERENCES ON CASH			(2	)			(7	)
	NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH			2,396				(2,773	)
	CASH AND EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF PERIOD			4,469				6,818
	CASH AND EQUIVALENTS, END OF PERIOD		$	6,865			$	4,045
	SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
	Cash paid for:
	Interest		$	265			$	381
	Income taxes			698				1,943

 

1.

In the opinion of the Company, the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments (consisting of only normal recurring items) necessary to present fairly the financial position as of September 30, 2006, and the results of operations for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2006 and 2005 and of cash flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005. The results of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 are not necessarily indicative of results that may be expected for any other interim period or for the full year.

These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2005 included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K. The accounting policies used in preparing these financial statements is the same as those described in the December 31, 2005 financial statements.

Certain reclassifications of prior year amounts were made to conform to the 2006 presentation. There was no effect on reported income.

2.

The Company charges all costs incurred to establish the technological feasibility of a product or product enhancement to research and development expense. Research and development expenses, included in direct operating costs, were approximately $119,000 and $167,000 for the nine months and $40,000 and $55,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively.

3.	Advertising costs, included in selling and administrative expenses and charged to operations when incurred, were $162,000 and $223,000 for the nine months and $23,000 and $52,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively.

4.	Marketable securities consists of the following (in thousands):

			September 30,							December 31,
				2006								2005
	Edgar Online - Available for sale securities - at market			$	-							$	734
	Innodata - Available for sale securities - at market				648								1,193
	Arbitrage trading securities - at market				4,358								7,565
	Marketable securities			$	5,006							$	9,492
	Arbitrage trading securities sold but not yet purchased - at market			$	9,172							$	8,223

During the nine months ended September 30, 2006, the Company sold its remaining shares of Edgar Online, Inc. (“EOL”), an Internet-based supplier of business, financial and competitive intelligence derived from U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission data. At December 31, 2005, the Company owned 403,498 shares of EOL. The Company carried the investment at $734,000, the market value at December 31, 2005. The difference between the cost of $5,000 and fair market value of these securities, net of $292,000 in deferred taxes, or $437,000 was classified as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income included in stockholders’ equity at December 31, 2005.

The Company owns 337,798 shares of Innodata, a provider of digital content outsourcing services. The Company carries the investment at $648,000 the market value at September 30, 2006. The difference between the cost of $324,000 and fair market value of these securities, net of $129,000 in deferred taxes, or $195,000 is classified as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income included in stockholders' equity as of September 30, 2006. At December 31, 2005, the Company owned 344,548 shares of Innodata. The Company carried the investment at $1,193,000, the market value at December 31, 2005. The difference between the cost of $329,000 and fair market value of these securities, net of $346,000 in deferred taxes, or $518,000 is classified as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income included in stockholders’ equity at December 31, 2005.

As of September 30, 2006, trading securities had a long market value of $4,358,000 with a cost of $4,395,000, or a net unrealized loss of $37,000. Securities sold but not yet purchased, had a short market value of $9,172,000 with a cost/short proceeds of $9,234,000, or a net unrealized gain of $62,000. The Company expects that its September 30, 2006 positions will be closed during the fourth quarter of 2006 and that other positions with the same strategy will be established. The Company pledged its holdings in Innodata as collateral for its trading accounts. In addition, the Company's Chairman pledged approximately 1.8 million shares of his holdings in the Company's common stock as collateral for these accounts. The Company is paying its Chairman at the rate of 2% per annum on the value of the collateral pledged. Such payments aggregated $30,000 and $34,000 for the nine months and $12,000 and $11,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively.

The Company recognized gains from arbitrage trading of $973,000 and $572,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The Company recognized gains from arbitrage trading of $407,000 and $381,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively.

At December 31, 2005, trading securities had a long market value of $7,565,000 with a cost of $7,567,000, or a net unrealized loss of $2,000. Securities sold but not yet purchased, had a short market value of $8,223,000 with a cost/short proceeds of $8,253,000, or a net unrealized gain of $30,000.

In connection with the arbitrage trading activity, the Company incurs margin loans. The Company is exposed to interest rate change market risk with respect to these margin loans. The level of trading in the arbitrage trading account is partially dependent on the margin value of Track Data common stock pledged by its CEO, and Innodata common stock, which is used as collateral. The market value of such securities is dependent on future market conditions for these companies over which the Company has little or no control.

5.

The Company has a line of credit with a bank up to a maximum of $3 million. The line is collateralized by the assets of the Company and is guaranteed by its Chairman. Interest is charged at 1.75% above the bank’s prime rate and is due on demand. The Company may borrow up to 80% of eligible market data service receivables, as defined, and is required to maintain a compensating balance of 10% of the outstanding loans ($86,000 at September 30, 2006). At September 30, 2006, the Company had borrowings of $859,000 under the line. Additional borrowings available on the line of credit at September 30, 2006 were $193,000 based on these formulas.

6.

Earnings (Loss) Per Share--Basic earnings (loss) per share is based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding without consideration of potential common stock. Diluted earnings per share are based on the weighted average number of common and potential dilutive common shares outstanding. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006, the Company had 817,000 and 925,000 stock options outstanding, respectively, and for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005, the Company had 1,192,000 stock options outstanding, respectively, that were not included in the dilutive calculation because the exercise price was greater than the average market price of the common stock for the period. There was no effect on earnings per share as a result of potential dilution. The calculation takes into account the shares that may be issued upon exercise of stock options, reduced by the shares that may be repurchased with the funds received from the exercise, based on the average price during the period.

Earnings (loss) per share (in thousands, except per share):

		Three Months Ended								Nine Months  Ended
		September 30,								September 30,
		2006				2005				2006				2005
Net income (loss)		$	224			$	(274	)		$	1,839			$	(293	)
Weighted average common shares outstanding			8,379				9,295				8,379				9,474
Dilutive effect of outstanding options			31				-				10				-
Adjusted for dilutive computation			8,410				9,295				8,389				9,474
Basic income (loss) per share			$.03				$(.03	)			$.22				$(.03	)
Diluted income (loss) per share			$.03				$(.03	)			$.22				$(.03	)

7.

Accounting for Stock Options--Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) 148, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation - Transition and Disclosure,” requires disclosure in the summary of significant accounting policies of the effects of an entity's accounting policy with respect to stock-based employee compensation on reported net income (loss) and per share amounts in annual and interim financial statements. At September 30, 2006, the Company had seven stock-based employee compensation plans of which there were outstanding awards exercisable into 1,000,000 shares of common stock. Until December 31, 2005, the Company accounted for those plans under the recognition and measurement principles of Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees” and related Interpretations. No stock-based employee compensation cost is reflected in the statement of operations, as all options granted under those plans had an exercise price equal to or greater than the market value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant.

Commencing January 1, 2006, the Company was required to adopt SFAS 123(R), “Share-Based Payment,” using the modified prospective transition method. The adoption of the new requirements will result in compensation charges to the Company’s statement of operations for the fair value of options granted to employees after December 31, 2005, as well as the compensation cost for the portion of outstanding awards for which the requisite service had not yet been rendered as of December 31, 2005. At December 31, 2005, all of the Company's outstanding stock options were fully vested and the Company made no option grants during the nine months ended September 30, 2006. The Company expects that the adoption of this statement may have a material impact on net income (loss) and earnings (loss) per share in future periods upon issuance of new awards.

The following table illustrates the effect on net income (loss) and net income (loss) per share as if the Company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” to stock-based employee compensation prior to January 1, 2006:

		Three Months						Nine Months
		Ended September 30,						Ended September 30,
			2005						2005
		(in thousands, except earnings per share)
Net loss, as reported			$	(274	)				$	(293	)
Deduct: Total stock-based employee compensation
expense determined under fair value based method for
all awards, net of related tax effects				(46	)					(172	)
Net loss, as adjusted			$	(320	)				$	(465	)
Loss per share:
Basic and diluted --as reported			$(.03		)				$(.03		)
Basic and diluted --as adjusted			$(.03		)				$(.05		)

8.

Segment Information--The Company is a financial services company that provides real-time financial market data, fundamental research, charting and analytical services to institutional and individual investors through dedicated telecommunication lines and the Internet. The Company also disseminates news and third-party database information from more than 100 sources worldwide. The Company owns Track Data Securities Corp. (“TDSC”), a registered securities broker-dealer and member of the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. (“NASD”). The Company provides a proprietary, fully integrated Internet-based online trading and market data system, proTrack, for the professional institutional traders, and myTrack and myTrack Pro, for the individual trader. The Company also operates Track ECN, an electronic communications network that enables traders to display and match limit orders for stocks. The Company's operations are classified in three business segments: (1) market data services and trading, including ECN services, to the institutional professional investment community, and (2) Internet-based online trading and market data services to the non-professional individual investor community, and (3) arbitrage trading. See Note 4.

The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in Note A, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in the Company’s financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2005 included in Form 10-K. Segment data includes charges allocating corporate overhead to each segment. The Company has not disclosed asset information by segment as the information is not produced internally. Substantially all long-lived assets are located in the U.S. The Company's business is predominantly in the U.S. Revenues and net income from international operations are not material.

9.

Transactions with Clearing Broker and Customers--The Company conducts business through a clearing broker which settles all trades for the Company, on a fully disclosed basis, on behalf of its customers. The Company earns commissions as an introducing broker for the transactions of its customers. In the normal course of business, the Company's customer activities involve the execution of various customer securities transactions. These activities may expose the Company to off-balance-sheet risk in the event the customer or other broker is unable to fulfill its contracted obligations and the Company has to purchase or sell the financial instrument underlying the obligation at a loss.

The Company's customer securities activities are transacted on either a cash or margin basis. In margin transactions, the clearing broker extends credit to the Company's customers, subject to various regulatory margin requirements, collateralized by cash and securities in the customers' accounts. However, the Company is required to either obtain additional collateral or to sell the customer's position if such collateral is not forthcoming. The Company is responsible for any losses on such margin loans, and has agreed to indemnify its clearing broker for losses that the clearing broker may sustain from the customer accounts introduced by the Company. At September 30, 2006, the Company had $10.9 million in margin credit extended to its customers. The Company believes it is unlikely it will have to make material payments under the indemnification agreement and has not recorded any contingent liability in the Consolidated Financial Statements.

The Company and its clearing broker seek to control the risks associated with customer activities by requiring customers to maintain margin collateral in compliance with various regulatory and internal guidelines. The Company and its clearing broker monitor required margin levels daily and, pursuant to such guidelines, require the customer to deposit additional collateral or to reduce positions when necessary.

 

As of September 30, 2006, TDSC was required to maintain minimum net capital, in accordance with SEC rules, of approximately $1 million and had total net capital of $3,581,000, or approximately $2,581,000 in excess of minimum net capital requirements.

If TDSC fails to maintain the required net capital it may be subject to suspension or revocation of registration by the SEC and suspension or expulsion by the NASD and other regulatory bodies, which ultimately could require TDSC's liquidation. In addition, a change in the net capital rules, the imposition of new rules, a specific operating loss, or any unusually large charge against net capital could limit those operations of TDSC that require the intensive use of capital and could limit its ability to expand its business.

11.	Comprehensive income (loss) is as follows (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended										Nine Months Ended
		September 30,										September 30,
		2006				2005						2006				2005
Net income (loss)		$	224			$	(274	)				$	1,839			$	(293	)
Reclassification adjustment for
gain on marketable securities
- net of taxes			(2	)			(4	)					(946	)			(464	)
Unrealized (loss) gain on marketable
securities-net of taxes			(125	)			(78	)					186				(1,196	)
Comprehensive income (loss)		$	97			$	(356	)				$	1,079			$	(1,953	)

12.

In May, 2006, the Company purchased a non-dilutable 15% interest in SFB Market Systems, Inc. (“SFB”) for $150,000 cash. The Company may be required to pay up to an additional $100,000 in the event SFB achieves certain sales projections between December, 2006 and October, 2007. SFB is a privately held company that provides an online centralized securities symbol management system and related equity and option information for updating and loading of master files. The Company currently has a representative on SFB’s four member Board of Directors. The Company accounts for its investment in SFB under the cost method, and is included in other assets in the balance sheet as of September 30, 2006.

13.

The Company leases its executive office facilities in Brooklyn from a limited partnership owned by the Company’s Chairman and members of his family. The Company paid the partnership rent of $158,000 and $157,000 for the three months and $473,000 and $465,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The lease provided for the Company to pay $630,000 per annum through April 1, 2006. The Company is presently paying at the same rate without a new lease. This lease is expected to be renewed for another one-year period.

In April 2006, the Company's Chairman formed a private limited partnership of which he is the general partner for the purpose of operating a hedge fund for trading in certain options strategies. The Company has no financial interest in or commitments related to, the hedge fund. The hedge fund opened a trading account with the Company's broker-dealer. The Company charged commissions to the hedge fund totaling $55,000 and $31,000 for the nine and three months ended September 30, 2006, respectively.

14.

On June 14, 2005, the SEC filed a civil complaint against Barry Hertz, the Company's Chairman and CEO, in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York in Brooklyn alleging violations of various provisions of the federal securities laws in connection with certain transactions in the Company’s stock owned by others. The SEC seeks various remedies including an injunction, disgorgement of profits and an order barring Mr. Hertz from serving as an officer or director of a public company. Mr. Hertz has denied wrongdoing and filed a motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. The SEC has filed a cross-motion for partial summary judgment. The motions for summary judgment and partial summary judgment have been denied by the Court.

The operations of TDSC, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, are subject to reviews by regulators within its industry, which include the SEC and the NASD. In the past, certain reviews have resulted in the Company incurring fines and required the Company to change certain of its internal control and operating procedures. Ongoing and future reviews may result in the Company incurring additional fines and changes in its internal control and operating procedures. Management does not expect any ongoing reviews to have a material affect on the Company's financial position or statement of operations.

15.	In November, 2005, the Board of Directors authorized the purchase of up to 1 million shares from time to time in market purchases or in negotiated transactions. As of September 30, 2006, the Company had purchased approximately 6,000 shares for $20,000 pursuant to such authorization.

16.

In September 2005, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) 154, “Accounting Changes and Error Corrections, a replacement of APB Opinion No. 20, Accounting Changes, and Statement No. 3, Reporting Accounting Changes in Interim Financial Statements.” SFAS 154 changes the requirements for the accounting for and reporting of a change in accounting principle. Previously, most voluntary changes in accounting principles required recognition via a cumulative effect adjustment within net income of the period of the change. SFAS 154 requires retrospective application to prior periods’ financial statements, unless it is impracticable to determine either the period-specific effects or the cumulative effect of the change. SFAS 154 is effective for accounting changes made in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005; however, SFAS 154 does not change the transition provisions of any existing accounting pronouncements. The adoption of SFAS 154 did not have an impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In November 2005, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position FAS 115-1 and FAS 124-1, “The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to Certain Investments” (“FSP 115-1”), which provides guidance on determining when investments in certain debt and equity securities are considered impaired, whether that impairment is other-than-temporary, and on measuring such impairment loss. FSP 115-1 also includes accounting considerations subsequent to the recognition of an other-than temporary impairment and requires certain disclosures about unrealized losses that have not been recognized as other-than-temporary impairments. FSP 115-1 is required to be applied to reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2005. The adoption of FSP 115-1 did not have an impact on the Company’s consolidated financial condition or results of operations.

In June 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes-an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109.” This Interpretation prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return, and provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and transition.  This Interpretation is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. The Company is assessing the impact of this Interpretation on its financial statements, but does not expect it to have a material affect.

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, "Fair Value Measurements" ("SFAS 157"). SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. It codifies the definitions of fair value included in other authoritative literature; clarifies and, in some cases, expands on the guidance for implementing fair value measurements; and increases the level of disclosure required for fair value measurements. Although SFAS 157 applies to (and amends) the provisions of existing authoritative literature, it does not, of itself, require any new fair value measurements, nor does it establish valuation standards. SFAS 157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal years. This statement will be effective for the Company's fiscal year beginning January 2008. The Company will evaluate the impact of adopting SFAS 157, but does not expect that it will have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In September 2006, the staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108 ("SAB 108") which provides interpretive guidance on how the effects of the carryover or reversal of prior year misstatements should be considered in quantifying a current year misstatement. SAB 108 becomes effective in 2007. Adoption of SAB 108 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Track Data Corporation (the “Company”) is a Delaware corporation that was formed in 1981. The Company maintains offices in the U.S. and Europe, with executive offices located at 95 Rockwell Place, Brooklyn, New York 11217. Its telephone number is 212-943-4555 or 718-522-7373.

The Company is a financial services company that provides real-time financial market data, fundamental research, charting and analytical services to institutional and individual investors through dedicated telecommunication lines and the Internet. The Company also disseminates news and third-party database information from more than 100 sources worldwide. The Company owns Track Data Securities Corp. ("TDSC"), a registered securities broker-dealer and member of the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. The Company provides a proprietary, fully integrated Internet-based online trading and market data system, proTrack, for the professional institutional traders, and myTrack and myTrack Pro, for the individual trader. The Company also operates Track ECN, an electronic communications network that enables traders to display and match limit orders for stocks. The Company's operations are classified in three business segments: (1) Professional Market -- Market data services and trading, including ECN services, to the institutional professional investment community, (2) Non-Professional Market -- Internet-based online trading and market data services to the non-professional individual investor community, and (3) Arbitrage trading.

 

The Company's Professional Market segment revenues from the institutional market data services experienced significant declines since 2001 from a combination of staffing reductions in the securities industry, the use by customers of internally developed services, or lower priced services offered by the Company or other vendors. This trend has continued in 2006. Track ECN has recently been successful in attracting new subscribers. Profit margins are very low in this business and significant volume is necessary to have an impact on the results of operations. In addition, Track ECN had been dependent on Nasdaq's trading platform to display and execute most of its subscriber orders until October 23, 2006, when Nasdaq fully implemented its new trading platform and pricing that forced Track ECN to operate elsewhere. Track ECN initially moved all its business to the NASDs Alternative Display Facility (ADF). It currently displays orders on the ADF and on the National Stock Exchange (NSX). There have been start up issues on the ADF, and the new system on the NSX has not been fully implemented at this time. There has been a significant decline in volume since the move. Regulation NMS which will require best price for Nasdaq stocks has been a major help in Track ECN establishing direct connectivity to major market makers and takers of liquidity. Further, it is anticipated that Track ECN will be able to offer listed business to its subscribers. Until recent regulatory changes, Track ECN was unable to offer its subscribers any payment for adding liquidity in listed stocks. The Company commenced self-clearing of its ECN business at the end of the third quarter of 2005 in an effort to decrease costs associated with ECN revenues. Although TDSC has approval from NASD-R for “clearing” of its Track ECN business, it is a limited approval for it to submit two sided trade data respecting trades which were executed by broker-dealers on the Track ECN. TDSC submits this data to the National Securities Clearing Corporation so that the actual trading counterparties can compare, clear and settle their trades and, except in the case of a rare error, TDSC “drops out” of the clearing process. This effort to "self-clear" was a step to reduce costs of having a third party handle this function.

The Non-Professional Market segment revenues have been inconsistent month to month but were higher in the second quarter when compared to the same period in the prior year. The Company is attempting to grow revenues in this segment, principally through marketing alliances and limited advertising to attract new customers, and by offering additional services to existing customers. The Company presently offers trading of U.S. based stocks, options and e-mini futures.

The trading and market data services for both segments require the Company to maintain a market data ticker plant on a 24/7 basis, as well as all back office trading functions. The Company's focus is to increase revenues in both segments, as the underlying costs of maintaining the operations and back office will not increase commensurate with any revenue increase, allowing greater operating margins on incremental revenues.

The Company engages in arbitrage trading activity. The Company's trading strategy consists principally of establishing hedged positions consisting of stocks and options. The Company is subject to market risk in attempting to establish a hedged position, as the market prices could change, precluding a profitable hedge. In these instances, any positions that were established for this hedge would be immediately sold, usually resulting in small losses. If the hedged positions are successfully established at the prices sought, the positions generally stay until the next option expiration date, resulting in small gains, regardless of market value changes in these securities. While virtually all positions are liquidated at option expiration date, certain stock positions remain. The liquidation of these positions generally results in small profits or losses. From time to time, losses may result from certain dividends that may have to be delivered on positions held, as well as from certain corporate restructurings and mergers that may not have been taken into account when the positions were originally established.

In connection with the arbitrage trading activity, the Company incurs margin loans. The Company is exposed to interest rate change market risk with respect to these margin loans. The level of trading in the arbitrage trading account is partially dependent on the margin value of Track Data common stock pledged by its CEO, and Innodata common stock, which is used as collateral. The market value of such securities is dependent on future market conditions for these companies over which the Company has little or no control.

Revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005 were $10,323,000 and $8,798,000, respectively, an increase of 17%. The Company’s Professional Market segment had revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005 of $7,375,000 and $6,013,000, respectively, an increase of 23% for this segment. The Company’s Non-Professional Market segment had revenues of $2,948,000 and $2,785,000, respectively, for the three months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, an increase of 6% for this segment. Increased revenues were from the Company’s Track ECN; however, ECN revenues have low margins compared to higher margins lost from a reduction of market data service revenues. Track ECN has recently been successful in attracting new subscribers. At the end of October, 2006, Nasdaq implemented changes in its systems and pricing that forced Track ECN to move its business to the NASD’s ADF facility and to the NSX whose new system is not fully operational at this time. Track ECN cannot determine what effect these moves will have in the long term, but it likely will result in potentially significant short term declines in revenue. Since 2001, the Company has experienced a decline in revenues from its market data services to the Professional Market segment due principally to staffing reductions in the securities industry, the use by customers of internally developed services, or lower priced services that are offered by the Company or other vendors. This trend has continued in 2006, negatively impacting revenues and profits. The increase in the Company’s Non-professional segment was principally due to increased revenue in the retail brokerage business.

Direct operating costs were $7,568,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2006 and $6,123,000 for the similar period in 2005, an increase of 24%. Direct operating costs as a percentage of revenues were 73% in 2006 and 70% in 2005. Without giving effect to unallocated depreciation, amortization expense and costs directly allocated to the Arbitrage segment, the Company’s Professional Market segment had $5,754,000 and $4,424,000 of direct costs for the three months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively, an increase of 30%. Direct operating costs as a percentage of revenues for the Professional segment were 78% in 2006 and 74% in 2005. The dollar and percentage increase is due to the increased ECN revenues and the lower profit margins realized on Track ECN business. The Company commenced self-clearing of its ECN operations at the end of the third quarter of 2005 which has since reduced clearing costs. The Company’s Non-Professional Market segment had $1,618,000 and $1,483,000 in direct costs for the three months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively, an increase of 9%. Direct operating costs as a percentage of revenues for the Non-Professional segment were 55% in 2006 and 53% in 2005. Certain direct operating costs are allocated to each segment based on revenues. Direct operating costs include direct payroll, direct telecommunication costs, computer supplies, depreciation, equipment lease expense and the amortization of software development costs, costs of clearing, back office payroll and other direct broker-dealer expenses and ECN customer commissions and clearing.

Selling and administrative expenses were $2,610,000 and $3,163,000 in the 2006 and 2005 periods, respectively, a decrease of 17%. Selling and administrative expenses as a percentage of revenues was 25% in 2006 and 36% in 2005. The dollar and percentage decrease was principally due to decreased salaries and professional fees totaling $370,000. Without giving effect to unallocated depreciation, amortization expense and costs directly allocated to the Arbitrage segment, selling and administrative expenses for the Professional Market segment were $1,885,000 and $2,261,000 in the 2006 and 2005 periods, respectively, a decrease of 17%. For the Professional Market segment selling and administrative expenses as a percentage of revenues was 26% in 2006 and 38% in 2005. Selling and administrative expenses for the Non-Professional segment were $701,000 and $869,000 in the 2006 and 2005 periods, respectively, a decrease of 19%. For the Non-Professional segment selling and administrative expense as a percentage of revenue was 24% in 2006 and 31% in 2005. Certain selling and administrative expenses are allocated to each segment based on revenues.

The Professional Market segment realized a loss of $376,000 in 2006 compared to a loss of $827,000 before unallocated amounts and income taxes in 2005. The Non-Professional Market segment realized income of $560,000 in 2006 and $381,000 in 2005 before unallocated amounts and income taxes. The Arbitrage segment realized income of $346,000 in 2006 compared to $195,000 in 2005 before unallocated amounts and income taxes.

Net interest income in 2006 was $1,000 compared to net interest expense of $146,000 in 2005. The decrease in interest expense in 2006 is due principally to reduced levels of margin debt in connection with the Company's arbitrage trading program.

As a result of the above-mentioned factors, the Company realized income before taxes of $373,000 in the 2006 period compared to a loss of $456,000 in 2005.

The Company realized net income of $224,000 in 2006 compared to a net loss of $274,000 in 2005.

Revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005 were $32,842,000 and $27,385,000, respectively, an increase of 20%. The Company’s Professional Market segment had revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005 of $23,536,000 and $18,637,000, respectively, an increase of 26% for this segment. The Company’s Non-Professional Market segment had revenues of $9,306,000 and $8,748,000, respectively, for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, an increase of 6% for this segment. The increase in revenues was attributable to the Company’s Track ECN which increased from $5,371,000 to $11,113,000; however, ECN revenues have low margins compared to higher margins lost from reduced market data services. Track ECN has recently been successful in attracting new subscribers. See the discussion of ECN revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2006 for recent changes. Since 2001, the Company has experienced a decline in revenues from its market data services to the Professional Market segment due principally to staffing reductions in the securities industry, the use by customers of internally developed services, or lower priced services that are offered by the Company or other vendors. This trend has continued in 2006, negatively impacting revenues and profits.

Direct operating costs were $23,882,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and $19,164,000 for the similar period in 2005, an increase of 25%. Direct operating costs as a percentage of revenues were 73% in 2006 and 70% in 2005. Without giving effect to unallocated depreciation, amortization expense and costs directly allocated to the Arbitrage segment, the Company’s Professional Market segment had $18,302,000 and $13,899,000 of direct costs for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively, an increase of 32%. Direct operating costs as a percentage of revenues for the Professional segment were 78% in 2006 and 75% in 2005. The dollar and percentage increase is due to the increased ECN revenues and the lower profit margins realized on Track ECN business. The Company commenced self-clearing of its ECN operations at the end of the third quarter of 2005 which has since reduced clearing costs. The Professional Market segment includes a credit in 2005 of $370,000 for telecommunication costs recognized in prior periods. The Company’s Non-Professional Market segment had $4,993,000 in 2006 and $4,623,000 in direct costs for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively, an increase of 8%. Direct operating costs as a percentage of revenues for the Non-Professional segment were 54% in 2006 and 53% in 2005. Certain direct operating costs are allocated to each segment based on revenues.

Selling and administrative expenses were $8,027,000 and $9,434,000 in the 2006 and 2005 periods, respectively, a decrease of 15%. Selling and administrative expenses as a percentage of revenues was 24% in 2006 and 34% in 2005. The dollar and percentage decrease was principally due to decreased salaries and professional fees totaling $1,176,000. Without giving effect to unallocated depreciation, amortization expense and costs directly allocated to the Arbitrage segment, selling and administrative expenses for the Professional Market segment were $5,670,000 and $6,433,000 in the 2006 and 2005 periods, respectively, a decrease of 12%. For the Professional Market segment selling and administrative expenses as a percentage of revenues was 24% in 2006 and 35% in 2005. The 2005 period includes a reversal of a judgment on sales taxes assessed of $245,000. Selling and administrative expenses for the Non-Professional segment were $2,288,000 and $2,900,000 in the 2006 and 2005 periods, respectively, a decrease of 21%. For the Non-Professional segment selling and administrative expense as a percentage of revenue was 25% in 2006 and 33% in 2005. Certain selling and administrative expenses are allocated to each segment based on revenues.

The Professional Market segment realized a loss of $852,000 in 2006 compared to a loss of $2,210,000 before unallocated amounts and income taxes in 2005. The Non-Professional Market segment realized income of $1,807,000 in 2006 and $1,053,000 in 2005 before unallocated amounts and income taxes. The Arbitrage segment realized income of $821,000 in 2006 compared to income of $215,000 in 2005 before unallocated amounts and income taxes.

In 2006 and 2005, the Company recognized gains of $1,777,000 and $1,061,000, respectively, from the sale of shares of Innodata and Edgar Online common stock.

Net interest income in 2006 was $17,000 compared to net interest expense of $220,000 in 2005. The decrease in interest expense in 2006 is due principally to reduced levels of margin debt in connection with the Company's arbitrage trading program.

As a result of the above-mentioned factors, the Company realized income before taxes of $3,065,000 in the 2006 period compared to a loss of $488,000 in 2005.

The Company realized net income of $1,839,000 in 2006 compared to a net loss of $293,000 in 2005.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2006, cash provided by operating activities was $1,650,000 compared to cash used in operating activities of $879,000 in 2005. The increase in 2006 was principally due to increased income from operations and reduced payments of liabilities. Cash flows provided by investing activities in 2006 was $829,000 compared to $420,000 in 2005. The increase was due principally to sales of Innodata and Edgar Online common stock. Cash flows used in financing activities was $81,000 in 2006 and $2,307,000 in 2005. The decrease was due to significantly reduced purchases of treasury stock in 2006.

The Company has a line of credit with a bank up to a maximum of $3 million. The line is collateralized by the assets of the Company and is guaranteed by its Chairman. Interest is charged at 1.75% above the bank’s prime rate and is due on demand. The Company may borrow up to 80% of eligible market data service receivables as defined, and is required to maintain a compensating balance of 10% of the outstanding loans. At September 30, 2006, the Company had borrowings of $859,000 under the line. Additional borrowings available on the line of credit at September 30, 2006 were $193,000 based on these formulas.

The Company has significant positions in stocks and options and receives significant proceeds from the sale of trading securities sold but not yet purchased under the arbitrage trading strategy described in Note 4 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. The Company expects that its September 30, 2006 positions will be closed during the fourth quarter of 2006 and that other positions with the same strategy will be established. The level of trading activity is partially dependent on the value of the shares of Track Data pledged by its CEO, and Innodata common stock that is held as collateral.

In November, 2005, the Board authorized the purchase of up to 1 million shares from time to time in market purchases or in negotiated transactions. As of September 30, 2006, the Company purchased approximately 6,000 shares for $20,000 pursuant to such authorization. No major capital expenditures are anticipated beyond the normal replacement of equipment and additional equipment to meet customer requirements. The Company believes that borrowings available under the Company’s line of credit, its present cash position, including cash available in its Arbitrage trading, and any cash that may be generated from operations are sufficient for the Company’s cash requirements for the next 12 months.

The Company’s broker-dealer subsidiary, TDSC, is subject to a minimum net capital requirement of $1 million by the NASD. TDSC operations are subject to reviews by regulators within its industry, which include the SEC and the NASD. In the past, certain reviews have resulted in the Company incurring fines and required the Company to change certain of its internal control and operating procedures. Ongoing and future reviews may result in the Company incurring additional fines and changes in its internal control and operating procedures. Management does not expect any ongoing reviews to have a material affect on the Company's financial position or statement of operations.

In connection with an acquisition of a 15% interest in SFB Market Systems, Inc, the Company may be required to pay up to an additional $100,000 in the event SFB achieves certain sales projections.

The Company is subject to legal proceedings and claims that arise in the ordinary course of its business. In the opinion of management, the amount of ultimate liability with respect to these actions will not materially affect the Company's financial position.

In connection with the Company's broker-dealer operations, certain customer securities activities are transacted on a margin basis. The Company's clearing broker extends credit to the Company's customers, subject to various regulatory margin requirements, collateralized by cash and securities in the customers' accounts. In the event of a decline in the market value of the securities in a margin account, the Company is required to either obtain additional collateral from the customer or to sell the customer's position if such collateral is not forthcoming. The Company is responsible for any losses on such margin loans, and has agreed to indemnify its clearing broker for losses that the clearing broker may sustain from the customer accounts introduced by the Company. The Company and its clearing broker seek to control the risks associated with customer activities by monitoring required margin levels daily and, pursuant to such guidelines, requiring the customer to deposit additional collateral or to reduce positions when necessary. At September 30, 2006, the Company had $10.9 million in margin credit extended to its customers. The Company believes it is unlikely it will have to make material payments under the indemnification agreement and has not recorded any contingent liability in the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

At December 31, 2005, the Company had operating lease obligations aggregating $1,328,000 pursuant to which payments are due as follows: $609,000 in 2006; $277,000 in 2007; $212,000 in 2008; $154,000 in 2009; and $76,000 in 2010. There are no significant changes in such commitments as of September 30, 2006. In addition, the Company had $859,000 due on demand under its line of credit financing with a bank at September 30, 2006.

In connection with the Company's broker-dealer operations, certain customer securities activities are transacted on a margin basis. The Company is responsible for any losses on such margin loans, and has agreed to indemnify its clearing broker for losses that the clearing broker may sustain from the customer accounts introduced by the Company.

Critical accounting policies are defined as those that are reflective of significant judgments and uncertainties, and potentially result in materially different results when different assumptions are utilized. We believe that our principal critical accounting policies are described below. For a detailed discussion on the application of these and other accounting policies, see Note A of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2005 included in Form 10-K.

The Company recognizes revenue from market data and ECN services as services are performed. Billings in advance of services provided are recorded as unearned revenues. All other revenues collected in advance of services are deferred until services are rendered. The Company earns commissions as an introducing broker and for licensing its trading system for the transactions of its customers. Commissions and related clearing expenses are recorded on a trade-date basis as securities transactions occur.

For ECN services, transaction fees are earned on a per trade basis, based on shares transacted, and are recognized as transactions occur. For each transaction executed, there is an associated liquidity payment or routing charge paid. Pursuant to Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) Issue No. 99-19, “Reporting Revenue Gross as a Principal versus Net as an Agent” (“EITF 99-19”), the Company records such expenses as liquidity payments or routing charges in the consolidated statements of operations.

Arbitrage marketable securities transactions are recorded on trade date. Gains and losses are recognized based on closed transactions and the difference between market value and cost at balance sheet date.

The Company classifies its investment in Innodata as available for sale securities. The Company carries this investment at fair value, based on quoted market prices, and unrealized gains and losses, net of taxes, are included in accumulated other comprehensive income, which is reflected as a separate component of stockholders' equity. Realized gains and losses are recognized in the consolidated statement of income when realized. The Company reviews this holding on a regular basis to evaluate whether or not such security has experienced an other-than-temporary decline in fair value. If the Company believes that an other-than-temporary decline exists in the marketable securities, the equity investment is written down to market value and an investment loss is recorded in the condensed consolidated statement of income.

In assessing the recoverability of the Company's goodwill and other intangibles, the Company must make assumptions regarding estimated undiscounted expected future cash flows to be generated by the assets to determine the fair value of the respective assets. If these estimated cash flows and related assumptions change in the future, the Company may be required to record an impairment charge in the condensed consolidated statement of income.

In June 2005, the FASB issued SFAS 154, “Accounting Changes and Error Corrections, a replacement of APB Opinion No. 20, Accounting Changes, and Statement No. 3, Reporting Accounting Changes in Interim Financial Statements.” SFAS 154 changes the requirements for the accounting for and reporting of a change in accounting principle. Previously, most voluntary changes in accounting principles required recognition via a cumulative effect adjustment within net income of the period of the change. SFAS 154 requires retrospective application to prior periods’ financial statements, unless it is impracticable to determine either the period-specific effects or the cumulative effect of the change. SFAS 154 is effective for accounting changes made in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005; however, SFAS 154 does not change the transition provisions of any existing accounting pronouncements. The adoption of SFAS 154 did not have an impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In November 2005, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position FAS 115-1 and FAS 124-1, “The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to Certain Investments” (“FSP 115-1”), which provides guidance on determining when investments in certain debt and equity securities are considered impaired, whether that impairment is other-than-temporary, and on measuring such impairment loss. FSP 115-1 also includes accounting considerations subsequent to the recognition of an other-than temporary impairment and requires certain disclosures about unrealized losses that have not been recognized as other-than-temporary impairments. FSP 115-1 is required to be applied to reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2005. The adoption of FSP 115-1 did not have an impact on the Company’s consolidated financial condition or results of operations.

In June 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes-an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109.” This Interpretation prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return, and provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and transition.  This Interpretation is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006.  The Company is assessing the impact of this Interpretation on its financial statements, but does not expect it to have a material affect.

In September 2006, the staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108 ("SAB 108") which provides interpretive guidance on how the effects of the carryover or reversal of prior year misstatements should be considered in quantifying a current year misstatement. SAB 108 becomes effective in 2007. Adoption of SAB 108 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

To date, inflation has not had a significant impact on the Company’s operations. The Company’s revenues are not affected by seasonality.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

The Company is exposed to interest rate change market risk with respect to its credit facility with a financial institution, which is priced based on the prime rate of interest. At September 30, 2006, there was $859,000 outstanding under the credit facility. Changes in the prime interest rate during fiscal 2006 will have a positive or negative effect on the Company's interest expense. Such exposure will increase should the Company maintain higher levels of borrowing during 2006. Assuming debt remains constant, a 1% change in interest rates would not be material to the Company’s interest expense.

The Company has significant positions in stocks and options and receives significant proceeds from the sale of trading securities sold but not yet purchased under the abitrage trading strategy described in Note 4 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. In connection with the arbitrage trading activity, the Company incurs margin loans. The Company is exposed to interest rate change market risk with respect to these margin loans. Such exposure will increase should the Company maintain higher levels of borrowing. The level of trading in the arbitrage trading account is partially dependent on the value of Track Data common stock pledged by its CEO, and Innodata common stock, which is used as collateral. The market value of such securities is dependent on future market conditions for these companies over which the Company has little or no control. If the stock collateral is not available, the Company will decrease its trading or seek additional collateral.

The Company conducts business through a clearing broker, which settles all trades for the Company, on a fully disclosed basis, on behalf of its customers. The Company earns commissions as an introducing broker for the transactions of its customers. In the normal course of business, the Company's customer activities involve the execution of various customer securities transactions. These activities may expose the Company to off-balance-sheet risk in the event the customer or other broker is unable to fulfill its contracted obligations and the Company has to purchase or sell the financial instrument underlying the obligation at a loss. At September 30, 2006, the Company had $10.9 million in margin credit extended to its customers.

An evaluation has been carried out under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and the operation of our "disclosure controls and procedures" (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) as of September 30, 2006 (“Evaluation Date”). Based on such evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of the Evaluation Date, the disclosure controls and procedures are reasonably designed and effective to ensure that (i) information required to be disclosed by us in the reports we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms, and (ii) such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

 

PART II.

OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.

Legal Proceedings. Not Applicable

Item 1a.

Risk Factors. There were no material changes from Risk Factors disclosed in the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005.

Item 2.

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

Total Number

of Shares

Number of

Purchased as

Maximum Number

Shares of

Average

Part of

of Shares That May

Period

Common Stock

Price Paid

Publicly

Yet be Purchased

Purchased

Purchased

Per Share

Announced Plans

Under the Plans

July, 2006

August, 2006

September, 2006

Total

None

None

993,501

On November 1, 2005, the Board of Directors approved a buy back of up to 1,000,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock in market or privately negotiated transactions from time to time.

Item 3.

Defaults upon Senior Securities. Not Applicable

Item 4.

Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders. Not Applicable

Item 5.

Other Information. Not Applicable

Item 6.

Exhibits.

31.1

Certification of Barry Hertz pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

31.2

Certification of Martin Kaye pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

32

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

TRACK DATA CORPORATION

Date:	11/10/06		/s/ Barry Hertz
			Barry Hertz
			Chairman of the Board
			Chief Executive Officer
Date:	11/10/06		/s/ Martin Kaye
			Martin Kaye
			Chief Operating Officer
			Principal Financial Officer