e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010
Commission File Number: 001 31524
BROOKFIELD HOMES CORPORATION
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
(State or Other Jurisdiction of
Incorporation or Organization)
|
|
37-1446709
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.) |
|
|
|
8500 Executive Park Avenue
Suite 300
Fairfax, Virginia
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
|
|
22031
(Zip Code) |
(703) 270-1700
(Registrants Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject
to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its Web
site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405
of Regulation S-T during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
(Check one):
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o
|
|
Accelerated filer þ |
Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act).
As of November 1, 2010 the registrant had outstanding 29,655,691 shares of its common stock, $0.01
par value per share.
INDEX
BROOKFIELD HOMES CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PART I. |
|
FINANCIAL INFORMATION |
|
PAGE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 1. |
|
Financial Statements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Operations Three Months and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders Equity Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows Three Months and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 2. |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 3. |
|
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 4. |
|
Controls and Procedures |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PART II. |
|
OTHER INFORMATION |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 1. |
|
Legal Proceedings |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 1A. |
|
Risk Factors |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 2. |
|
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 3. |
|
Defaults Upon Senior Securities |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 4. |
|
Removed and Reserved |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 5. |
|
Other Information |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 6. |
|
Exhibits |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SIGNATURES |
|
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EXHIBITS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
|
Item 1. |
|
Financial Statements |
BROOKFIELD HOMES CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(all dollar amounts are in thousands of U.S. dollars)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
Note |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Housing and land inventory |
|
2, 13 |
|
$ |
854,012 |
|
|
$ |
835,263 |
|
Investments in unconsolidated entities |
|
3 |
|
|
129,318 |
|
|
|
92,477 |
|
Receivables and other assets |
|
4 |
|
|
19,014 |
|
|
|
61,744 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
5 |
|
|
7,351 |
|
|
|
7,485 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
8 |
|
|
39,075 |
|
|
|
40,112 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,048,770 |
|
|
$ |
1,037,081 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Project specific and other financings |
|
6 |
|
$ |
392,060 |
|
|
$ |
381,567 |
|
Accounts payable and other liabilities |
|
7 |
|
|
126,950 |
|
|
|
122,190 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
|
|
519,010 |
|
|
|
503,757 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other interests in consolidated subsidiaries |
|
10 |
|
|
43,873 |
|
|
|
47,011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments, contingent liabilities and other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock 10,000,000 shares authorized, 9,999,440 shares issued
(December 31, 2009 10,000,000 shares issued) |
|
11 |
|
|
249,675 |
|
|
|
249,688 |
|
Common stock 200,000,000 shares authorized, 32,075,780 shares issued
(December 31, 2009 32,073,781 shares issued) |
|
|
|
|
321 |
|
|
|
321 |
|
Additional paid-in-capital |
|
|
|
|
142,861 |
|
|
|
142,106 |
|
Treasury stock, at cost 2,420,089 shares (December 31, 2009
3,671,482 shares) |
|
|
|
|
(110,807 |
) |
|
|
(166,113 |
) |
Retained earnings |
|
|
|
|
197,353 |
|
|
|
252,994 |
|
Noncontrolling interest |
|
10 |
|
|
6,484 |
|
|
|
7,317 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity |
|
|
|
|
485,887 |
|
|
|
486,313 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,048,770 |
|
|
$ |
1,037,081 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to financial statements
1
BROOKFIELD HOMES CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(all dollar amounts are in thousands of U.S. dollars, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
Note |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Housing |
|
|
|
$ |
63,753 |
|
|
$ |
88,402 |
|
|
$ |
199,749 |
|
|
$ |
205,814 |
|
Land |
|
|
|
|
10,834 |
|
|
|
10,141 |
|
|
|
16,180 |
|
|
|
25,009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74,587 |
|
|
|
98,543 |
|
|
|
215,929 |
|
|
|
230,823 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct Cost of Sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Housing |
|
|
|
|
(52,994 |
) |
|
|
(75,767 |
) |
|
|
(166,017 |
) |
|
|
(182,657 |
) |
Land |
|
|
|
|
(8,500 |
) |
|
|
(8,579 |
) |
|
|
(12,654 |
) |
|
|
(20,801 |
) |
Impairment of housing and land inventory and
write-off of option deposits |
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,580 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17,738 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,093 |
|
|
|
4,617 |
|
|
|
37,258 |
|
|
|
9,627 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expense |
|
|
|
|
(12,559 |
) |
|
|
(11,504 |
) |
|
|
(38,692 |
) |
|
|
(36,778 |
) |
(Loss) / equity in earnings from unconsolidated entities |
|
3 |
|
|
(228 |
) |
|
|
(535 |
) |
|
|
(285 |
) |
|
|
1,593 |
|
Impairment of investments in unconsolidated entities |
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,268 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,886 |
) |
Other (expense) / income |
|
10, 13(c) |
|
|
(799 |
) |
|
|
(1,035 |
) |
|
|
769 |
|
|
|
9,915 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss Before Income Taxes |
|
|
|
|
(493 |
) |
|
|
(9,725 |
) |
|
|
(950 |
) |
|
|
(28,529 |
) |
Income tax (expense) / recovery |
|
|
|
|
(179 |
) |
|
|
6,169 |
|
|
|
(256 |
) |
|
|
12,373 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Loss |
|
|
|
|
(672 |
) |
|
|
(3,556 |
) |
|
|
(1,206 |
) |
|
|
(16,156 |
) |
Less net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest and
other interests in consolidated subsidiaries |
|
|
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
2,646 |
|
|
|
778 |
|
|
|
5,124 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss attributable to Brookfield Homes
Corporation |
|
|
|
$ |
(552 |
) |
|
$ |
(910 |
) |
|
$ |
(428 |
) |
|
$ |
(11,032 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss Per Share attributable to Brookfield Homes
Corporation Common Shareholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
12 |
|
$ |
(0.19 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.22 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.53 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.73 |
) |
Diluted |
|
12 |
|
$ |
(0.19 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.22 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.53 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.73 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
12 |
|
|
29,655 |
|
|
|
26,777 |
|
|
|
28,894 |
|
|
|
26,770 |
|
Diluted |
|
12 |
|
|
29,655 |
|
|
|
26,777 |
|
|
|
28,894 |
|
|
|
26,770 |
|
See accompanying notes to financial statements
2
BROOKFIELD HOMES CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
(all dollar amounts are in thousands of U.S. dollars)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Common Stock |
|
$ |
321 |
|
|
$ |
321 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Opening balance |
|
|
249,688 |
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock issuance, net of issuance costs of $312 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
249,688 |
|
Conversion of preferred stock |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance |
|
|
249,675 |
|
|
|
249,688 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional Paid-in-Capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Opening balance |
|
|
142,106 |
|
|
|
141,286 |
|
Adjustment to stock-based compensation plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
145 |
|
Stock option compensation costs |
|
|
742 |
|
|
|
468 |
|
Conversion of preferred stock |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance |
|
|
142,861 |
|
|
|
141,899 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Opening balance |
|
|
(166,113 |
) |
|
|
(238,957 |
) |
Stock option exercises |
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
Dividend |
|
|
55,213 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance |
|
|
(110,807 |
) |
|
|
(238,891 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained Earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Opening balance |
|
|
252,994 |
|
|
|
356,981 |
|
Net loss attributable to Brookfield Homes Corporation |
|
|
(428 |
) |
|
|
(11,032 |
) |
Preferred stock dividends |
|
|
(10,000 |
) |
|
|
(3,500 |
) |
Treasury stock issued |
|
|
(45,213 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance |
|
|
197,353 |
|
|
|
342,449 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Brookfield Homes Corporation stockholders equity |
|
$ |
479,403 |
|
|
$ |
495,466 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncontrolling Interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Opening balance |
|
$ |
7,317 |
|
|
$ |
2,888 |
|
Net loss (Note 10) |
|
|
(1,132 |
) |
|
|
(431 |
) |
Contributions |
|
|
299 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance |
|
$ |
6,484 |
|
|
$ |
2,460 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Stockholders Equity |
|
$ |
485,887 |
|
|
$ |
497,926 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to financial statements
3
BROOKFIELD HOMES CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(all dollar amounts are in thousands of U.S. dollars)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Cash Flows From / (Used in) Operating Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(672 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,556 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,206 |
) |
|
$ |
(16,156 |
) |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash from
operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributed / (undistributed) income from unconsolidated
entities |
|
|
254 |
|
|
|
859 |
|
|
|
306 |
|
|
|
(1,362 |
) |
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
(1,843 |
) |
|
|
(3,160 |
) |
|
|
1,037 |
|
|
|
(9,556 |
) |
Impairment of housing and land inventory and write-off
of option deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,580 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,738 |
|
Impairment of investments in unconsolidated entities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,268 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,886 |
|
Stock option compensation costs |
|
|
314 |
|
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
742 |
|
|
|
468 |
|
Other changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Increase) / decrease in receivables and other assets |
|
|
(436 |
) |
|
|
(4,529 |
) |
|
|
42,730 |
|
|
|
58,769 |
|
(Increase) / decrease in housing and land inventory |
|
|
(8,925 |
) |
|
|
17,235 |
|
|
|
(20,688 |
) |
|
|
17,267 |
|
Increase / (decrease) in accounts payable and other liabilities |
|
|
2,678 |
|
|
|
10,136 |
|
|
|
10,979 |
|
|
|
(11,484 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) / provided by operating activities |
|
|
(8,630 |
) |
|
|
27,909 |
|
|
|
33,900 |
|
|
|
68,570 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows From / (Used in) Investing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments in unconsolidated entities |
|
|
(29,153 |
) |
|
|
(2,705 |
) |
|
|
(41,733 |
) |
|
|
(5,638 |
) |
Distribution from unconsolidated entities |
|
|
1,314 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
1,320 |
|
|
|
1,790 |
|
Decrease / (increase) in restricted cash |
|
|
134 |
|
|
|
(7,483 |
) |
|
|
134 |
|
|
|
(7,483 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(27,705 |
) |
|
|
(10,176 |
) |
|
|
(40,279 |
) |
|
|
(11,331 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows From / (Used in) Financing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net borrowings / (repayments) under revolving project specific
and other financings |
|
|
38,778 |
|
|
|
(18,588 |
) |
|
|
10,493 |
|
|
|
(304,496 |
) |
Net (distributions) / contributions to noncontrolling interest |
|
|
(2,443 |
) |
|
|
325 |
|
|
|
(4,207 |
) |
|
|
1,003 |
|
Preferred stock issuance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
250,000 |
|
Preferred stock issuance costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(312 |
) |
Preferred stock dividends paid in cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,500 |
) |
Exercise of stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) / provided by financing activities |
|
|
36,335 |
|
|
|
(18,197 |
) |
|
|
6,379 |
|
|
|
(57,239 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(464 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
464 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Cash Flow Information |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid |
|
$ |
7,185 |
|
|
$ |
8,723 |
|
|
$ |
22,925 |
|
|
$ |
27,707 |
|
Income taxes recovered |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
323 |
|
|
$ |
42,766 |
|
|
$ |
61,023 |
|
See accompanying notes to financial statements
4
BROOKFIELD HOMES CORPORATION
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Tabular amounts in thousands of U.S. dollars except per share amounts)
|
|
|
Note 1. |
|
Significant Accounting Policies |
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Basis of Presentation |
Brookfield Homes Corporation (the Company or Brookfield Homes) was incorporated on August 28,
2002 in Delaware and thereafter acquired all the California and Washington D.C. area land
development and homebuilding operations of Brookfield Properties Corporation. The Company began
trading on the New York Stock Exchange on January 7, 2003, under the symbol BHS.
These unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP) and include the
consolidated accounts of Brookfield Homes and its subsidiaries and investments in unconsolidated
entities and variable interest entities in which the Company is the primary beneficiary.
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with
U.S. GAAP for interim financial information. Since they do not include all of the information and
footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements, they should be read in
conjunction with the Companys consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto
included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.
In the opinion of management, all adjustments necessary for fair presentation of the accompanying
unaudited consolidated financial statements have been made.
The Company historically has experienced, and expects to continue to experience, variability in
quarterly results. The consolidated statements of operations for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2010 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and
accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates and assumptions.
|
|
|
(b) |
|
Recent Accounting Pronouncements |
In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued guidance now incorporated in
Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 810, Consolidation (formerly Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards SFAS 167) amending the consolidation guidance applicable to
variable interest entities and the definition of a variable interest entity, and requiring enhanced
disclosure to provide more information about a companys involvement in a variable interest entity.
This guidance also requires ongoing assessments of whether an enterprise is the primary beneficiary
of a variable interest entity. This guidance is effective for the Companys fiscal year beginning
January 1, 2010. The Company has adopted this guidance in its unaudited consolidated financial
statements. See Notes 2 and 3 for disclosure regarding its impact on the consolidated financial
statements.
Certain prior period amounts in the consolidated balance sheet have been reclassified to conform
with the September 30, 2010 presentation. Specifically, consolidated land inventory not owned,
which had previously been shown as a separate line, is now shown as a component of housing and land
inventory. Other revolving financings, which had previously been shown as a separate line, is now
shown as a component of project specific and other financings. These reclassifications had no
impact on the Companys results from operations.
5
BROOKFIELD HOMES CORPORATION
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Tabular amounts in thousands of U.S. dollars except per share amounts)
|
|
|
Note 2. |
|
Housing and Land Inventory |
Housing and land inventory includes homes completed and under construction and lots ready for
construction, model homes and land under and held for development which will be used in the
Companys homebuilding operations or sold as building lots to other homebuilders. The following
summarizes the components of housing and land inventory:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Housing inventory |
|
$ |
328,684 |
|
|
$ |
359,132 |
|
Model homes |
|
|
24,123 |
|
|
|
32,542 |
|
Land and land under development |
|
|
501,205 |
|
|
|
443,589 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
854,012 |
|
|
$ |
835,263 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company capitalizes interest which is expensed as housing units and building lots are
sold. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, interest incurred and capitalized by
the Company was $7.2 million and $22.9 million, respectively (2009 $8.7 million and $27.7
million, respectively). Capitalized interest expensed as direct cost of sales for the same periods
was $4.8 million and $13.7 million, respectively (2009 $8.0 million and $16.6 million,
respectively).
No impairment charges were recognized related to the Companys housing and land inventory during
the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 (2009 $1.9 million and $10.1 million,
respectively).
In the ordinary course of business, the Company has entered into a number of option contracts to
acquire land or lots in the future in accordance with specific terms and conditions and the Company
will advance deposits to secure these
rights. Effective for the Companys fiscal year beginning January 1, 2010, the Company is no longer
required to follow quantitative guidance determining the primary beneficiary of a variable interest
entity (VIE), but is required by ASC Topic 810 Consolidation to qualitatively assess whether it
is the primary beneficiary based on whether it has the power over the significant activities of the
VIE and an obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits that could be potentially
significant to the VIE. The Company has evaluated its option contracts in accordance with this
revised guidance and determined that for those entities considered to be VIEs, it is the primary
beneficiary of options with an aggregate exercise price of $25.3 million (December 31, 2009
$25.4 million), which are required to be consolidated. In these cases, the only asset recorded is
the Companys exercise price for the option to purchase included in housing and land inventory,
with an increase in accounts payable and other liabilities of $25.3 million (December 31, 2009
$25.4 million) for the assumed third party investment in the VIE. Where the land sellers are not
required to provide the Company financial information related to the VIE, certain assumptions by
the Company were required in its assessment as to whether or not it is the primary beneficiary.
Housing and land inventory includes non-refundable deposits and other entitlement costs totaling
$50.6 million (December 31, 2009 $42.6 million) in connection with options that are not required
to be consolidated in terms of the guidance incorporated in ASC Topic 810 Consolidation (formerly
FASB Interpretation (FIN) No. 46(R)). The total exercise price of these options is $205.5 million
(December 31, 2009 $156.9 million) including the non-refundable deposits identified above. The
number of lots which the Company has obtained an option to purchase, excluding those already
consolidated and those held through unconsolidated entities, and their respective dates of expiry
and exercise price are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number |
|
|
Total |
|
Year of Expiry |
|
of Lots |
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
2010 |
|
|
561 |
|
|
$ |
11,963 |
|
2011 |
|
|
901 |
|
|
|
71,836 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
5,435 |
|
|
|
121,694 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,897 |
|
|
$ |
205,493 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
BROOKFIELD HOMES CORPORATION
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Tabular amounts in thousands of U.S. dollars except per share amounts)
The Company holds agreements for a further 4,561 acres of longer term land, with
non-refundable deposits and other entitlement costs of $5.5 million, which is included in housing
and land inventory that may provide additional lots upon obtaining entitlements with an aggregate
exercise price of $36.0 million. However, given that the Company is in the
initial stage of land entitlement, the Company has concluded that at this time the level of
uncertainty in entitling these properties does not warrant including them in the above totals.
Investments in housing and land unconsolidated entities include $28.4 million of the Companys
share of non-refundable deposits and other entitlement costs in connection with 1,987 lots under
option. The Companys share of the total exercise price of these options is $87.0 million.
|
|
|
Note 3. |
|
Investments in Housing and Unconsolidated entities |
The Company participates in nine unconsolidated entities in which it has less than a controlling
interest. Summarized condensed financial information on a combined 100% basis of the unconsolidated
entities follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Housing and land inventory |
|
$ |
271,714 |
|
|
$ |
235,864 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
31,677 |
|
|
|
6,722 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
303,391 |
|
|
$ |
242,586 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Project specific financings |
|
$ |
31,725 |
|
|
$ |
52,175 |
|
Accounts payable and other liabilities |
|
|
22,508 |
|
|
|
14,082 |
|
Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brookfield Homes interest |
|
|
129,318 |
|
|
|
92,477 |
|
Others interest |
|
|
119,840 |
|
|
|
83,852 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
303,391 |
|
|
$ |
242,586 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Revenue and Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
3,065 |
|
|
$ |
4,895 |
|
|
$ |
11,115 |
|
|
$ |
8,233 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
(3,635 |
) |
|
|
(4,864 |
) |
|
|
(13,589 |
) |
|
|
(7,814 |
) |
Other income / (expense) |
|
|
(57 |
) |
|
|
(5,098 |
) |
|
|
2,970 |
|
|
|
(6,129 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) / income |
|
$ |
(627 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,067 |
) |
|
$ |
496 |
|
|
$ |
(5,710 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Companys share of net (loss) / income |
|
$ |
(228 |
) |
|
$ |
(535 |
) |
|
$ |
(285 |
) |
|
$ |
1,593 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of investments in housing and land
unconsolidated entities |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(1,268 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(12,886 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In reporting the Companys share of net (loss) / income, all inter-company profits or losses
from unconsolidated entities are eliminated on lots purchased by the Company from the
unconsolidated entities. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, the difference
between the Companys share of the net (loss) / income of its investments in unconsolidated
entities and equity in earnings from unconsolidated entities primarily arises from differences in
accounting policies followed by unconsolidated entities.
During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, in accordance with ASC Topic 323
Investments Equity Method and Joint Ventures (formerly Accounting Principles Board 18) and ASC
Topic 360 Property, Plant and Equipment (formerly SFAS 144), the Company recognized impairment
charges of nil (September 30, 2009 $1.3 million and $12.9 million).
7
BROOKFIELD HOMES CORPORATION
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Tabular amounts in thousands of U.S. dollars except per share amounts)
Unconsolidated entities in which the Company has a noncontrolling interest are accounted for using
the equity method. In addition, the Company has performed an evaluation of its existing
unconsolidated entity relationships by applying the provisions of ASC Topic 810 Consolidation
(formerly SFAS 160).
The Company and/or its unconsolidated entity partners have provided varying levels of guarantees of
debt in its unconsolidated entities. At September 30, 2010, the Company had completion guarantees
of nil (December 31, 2009 $7.9 million) and limited maintenance guarantees of $13.1 million
(December 31, 2009 $15.3 million) with respect to debt in its unconsolidated entities.
|
|
|
Note 4. |
|
Receivables and Other Assets |
The components of receivables and other assets included in the Companys balance sheet are
summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Proceeds and escrow receivables |
|
$ |
3,642 |
|
|
$ |
1,414 |
|
Refundable deposits |
|
|
917 |
|
|
|
4,815 |
|
Notes receivable |
|
|
2,425 |
|
|
|
2,425 |
|
Prepaid expenses |
|
|
1,122 |
|
|
|
2,970 |
|
Miscellaneous receivables |
|
|
9,053 |
|
|
|
5,261 |
|
Swap contract (Note 13 (d)) |
|
|
990 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
865 |
|
|
|
4,857 |
|
Taxes receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
19,014 |
|
|
$ |
61,744 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At September 30, 2010, the Company had restricted cash of $7.4 million (December 31, 2009 $7.5
million). During 2009, the Company entered into a total return swap transaction (see Note 13(d))
which required the Company to maintain cash deposits as collateral equivalent to 1,022,987 shares
at $7.31 per share, the prevailing share price at the date of the transaction. During August 2010,
the total return swap matured and the Company entered into a new total return swap transaction (see
Note 13(d)) which requires the Company to maintain cash deposits as collateral equivalent to
1,022,987 shares at $7.18 per share, the prevailing share price at the date of the transaction.
|
|
|
Note 6. |
|
Project Specific and Other Financings |
Project specific financings of $217.1 million (December 31, 2009 $231.6 million) are revolving
in nature, bear interest at floating rates with a weighted average rate of 3.9% as at September 30,
2010 (December 31, 2009 4.2%) and are secured by housing and land inventory. The weighted
average rate was calculated as of the end of each period, based upon the amount of debt outstanding
and the related interest rates applicable on that date.
Project specific financings mature as follows: 2010 $73.0 million; 2011 $134.3 million; and
2012 $9.8 million.
The Companys project specific financings require Brookfield Homes Holdings Inc., a wholly-owned
subsidiary of the Company, to maintain a tangible net worth of at least $250 million, a net debt to
capitalization ratio of no greater than 65% and a net debt to tangible net worth of no greater than
2.50 to 1. As of September 30, 2010, the Company was in compliance with all of its covenants.
Other financings of $175.0 million (December 31, 2009 $150.0 million) consist of amounts drawn
on two unsecured revolving credit facilities due to subsidiaries of the Companys largest
stockholder, Brookfield Asset Management Inc.
The revolving operating facility is in a principal amount not to exceed $100.0 million, matures
December 2011 and bears interest at LIBOR plus 3.5% per annum. During the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2010, interest of $1.0 million and $2.9 million, respectively, was incurred
related to this facility (2009 $0.9 million and $5.1 million, respectively). As at September 30,
2010, $100.0 million was drawn on this facility.
8
BROOKFIELD HOMES CORPORATION
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Tabular amounts in thousands of U.S. dollars except per share amounts)
The revolving acquisition and operating facility is in a principal amount not to exceed $100.0
million, matures December 2012 and initially bears interest at 12% per annum. This facility is
available for the acquisition of housing and land assets and for operations. During the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2010, interest of
$1.4 million and $4.2 million, respectively, was incurred related to this facility (2009 $1.1 million and $2.0
million, respectively). As at September 30, 2010, $75.0 million was drawn on this facility.
The covenants with respect to these facilities are to maintain a minimum stockholders equity of
$300.0 million and a consolidated net debt to book capitalization ratio of no greater than 70%. As
of September 30, 2010, the Company and Brookfield Homes Holdings Inc. were in compliance with all
of their covenants with respect to these facilities.
|
|
|
Note 7. |
|
Accounts Payable and Other Liabilities |
The components of accounts payable and other liabilities included in the Companys balance sheet
are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Trade payables and cost to complete accruals |
|
$ |
39,748 |
|
|
$ |
37,518 |
|
Warranty costs (Note 13 (b)) |
|
|
13,309 |
|
|
|
13,126 |
|
Customer deposits |
|
|
3,653 |
|
|
|
3,357 |
|
Stock-based compensation (Note 9) |
|
|
6,880 |
|
|
|
5,878 |
|
Accrued and deferred compensation |
|
|
1,257 |
|
|
|
3,268 |
|
Swap contracts (Note 13 (c), (d)) |
|
|
19,632 |
|
|
|
14,192 |
|
Loans from other interests in consolidated subsidiaries |
|
|
12,211 |
|
|
|
17,118 |
|
Consolidated land option contracts |
|
|
25,290 |
|
|
|
25,434 |
|
Other |
|
|
4,970 |
|
|
|
2,299 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
126,950 |
|
|
$ |
122,190 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying
amounts of the assets
and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts for income tax purposes. The
temporary differences
that give rise to the net deferred tax asset are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Differences relating to properties |
|
$ |
17,592 |
|
|
$ |
23,388 |
|
Compensation deductible for tax purposes when paid. |
|
|
3,373 |
|
|
|
2,641 |
|
Differences relating to derivative instruments |
|
|
7,084 |
|
|
|
5,235 |
|
Loss carry-forward |
|
|
11,026 |
|
|
|
8,848 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
39,075 |
|
|
$ |
40,112 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at September 30, 2010, the Company had no unrecognized tax asset or liability (December 31,
2009 nil).
In accordance with the provisions of ASC Topic 740 Income Taxes, the Company assesses, at each
reporting period, its ability to realize its deferred tax asset. In determining the need for a
valuation allowance at September 30, 2010, the Company considered the following significant
factors: an assessment of recent years profitability and losses, adjusted to reflect the effects
of changes to the Companys capital structure that have resulted in a significant reduction in the
amount of interest-bearing debt; the Companys expectation of profits based on margins and volumes
expected to be realized (which are based on current pricing and volume trends) and including the
effects of reduced interest expense due to the reduction in the amount of interest-bearing debt;
the financial support of the Companys largest stockholder as evidenced by the credit facilities in
place; and the long period of 10 to 20 years or more in all significant operating jurisdictions
before the expiry of net operating losses, noting further that a substantial portion of the
deferred tax asset is composed of deductible temporary differences that are not subject to an
expiry period until realized under tax law. The
9
BROOKFIELD HOMES CORPORATION
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Tabular amounts in thousands of U.S. dollars except per share amounts)
Companys tax effected loss carry-forwards of $11.0 million expire between the years 2028 and 2029 and based on
the more likely than not standard in the guidance and the weight of available evidence, the Company
does not believe a valuation allowance against its deferred tax asset is necessary. However, the
recognition of deferred tax assets is based upon an estimate of future results and differences
between the expected and actual financial performance of the Company could require all or a portion
of the deferred tax asset to be expensed. The Company will continue to evaluate the need for a
valuation allowance in future reporting periods.
|
|
|
Note 9. |
|
Stock Based Compensation |
Option Plan
Brookfield Homes grants options to purchase shares of the Companys common stock at the market
price of the shares on the day the options are granted. The Companys 2009 stock option plan
authorizes a maximum of three million shares for issuance. The fair value of the Companys stock
option awards is estimated at the grant date using a Black-Scholes option-pricing model that uses
the assumptions noted in the table below. The fair value of the Companys stock option awards is
expensed over the vesting period of the stock options. Expected volatility is based on historical
volatility of the Companys common stock. The risk-free rate for periods within the contractual
life of the stock option award is based on the yield curve of a zero-coupon U.S. Treasury bond with
a maturity equal to the expected term of the stock option award granted. The Company uses
historical data to estimate stock option exercises and forfeitures within its valuation model. The
expected term of stock option awards granted for some participants is derived from historical
exercise experience under the Companys share-based payment plan and represents the period of time
that stock option awards granted are expected to be outstanding. The expected term of stock options
granted for the remaining participants is derived by
using the simplified method.
During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, the Company granted a total of nil and
285,000 new stock options, respectively, to eligible employees which are subject to graded vesting.
The significant weighted average assumptions relating to the valuation of the Companys stock
options granted during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
Dividend yield |
|
|
|
|
Volatility rate |
|
|
66% |
|
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
3.69% |
|
Expected option life (years) |
|
|
7.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
The total compensation costs recognized in income related to the Companys stock options
during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 was an expense of $0.3 million and $0.7
million, respectively (2009 $0.1 million and $0.3 million, respectively).
The following table sets out the number of common shares that employees of the Company may acquire
under options granted under the Companys stock option plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Exercise Price Range |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
Per Share |
|
|
|
$1.74 $2.65 |
|
|
³$7.34 |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
Outstanding, December 31, 2009 |
|
|
1,591,000 |
|
|
|
564,000 |
|
|
|
2,155,000 |
|
|
$ |
10.21 |
|
Granted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
285,000 |
|
|
|
285,000 |
|
|
$ |
7.34 |
|
Exercised |
|
|
(38,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(38,000 |
) |
|
$ |
2.46 |
|
Cancelled |
|
|
(24,000 |
) |
|
|
(35,000 |
) |
|
|
(59,000 |
) |
|
$ |
6.16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, September 30, 2010 |
|
|
1,529,000 |
|
|
|
814,000 |
|
|
|
2,343,000 |
|
|
$ |
10.09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercisable at September 30, 2010 |
|
|
117,000 |
|
|
|
390,000 |
|
|
|
507,000 |
|
|
$ |
26.39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
BROOKFIELD HOMES CORPORATION
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Tabular amounts in thousands of U.S. dollars except per share amounts)
At September 30, 2010, the aggregate intrinsic value of options currently exercisable is $0.7
million and the aggregate intrinsic value of options outstanding is $3.8 million.
A summary of the status of the Companys unvested options included in equity as of September 30,
2010 and changes during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Per Share |
|
Unvested options outstanding, December 31, 2009. |
|
|
1,815,800 |
|
|
$ |
1.51 |
|
Granted |
|
|
285,000 |
|
|
$ |
5.00 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(206,800 |
) |
|
$ |
1.11 |
|
Cancelled |
|
|
(58,000 |
) |
|
$ |
3.44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unvested options outstanding, September 30, 2010 |
|
|
1,836,000 |
|
|
$ |
2.30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At September 30, 2010, there was $2.4 million of unrecognized expense related to unvested
options, which is expected to be recognized over the remaining weighted average period of 2.9
years.
Deferred Share Unit Plan
The Company has adopted a Deferred Share Unit Plan (DSUP) under which certain of its executive
officers and directors may, at their option, receive all or a portion of their annual bonus awards
or retainers, respectively, in the form of deferred share units. The Company may also make
additional grants of units to its executives and directors pursuant
to the DSUP. As of September 30, 2010, the Company had granted 1,213,993 units under the DSUP, of
which 872,824 were outstanding at September 30, 2010, and of which 537,430 units are currently
vested and 335,394 vest over the next five years.
In addition, the Company has adopted a Senior Operating Management Deferred Share Unit Plan
(MDSUP), under which certain senior operating management employees receive a portion of their
annual compensation in the form of deferred share units. As of September 30, 2010, the Company had
granted 73,374 units under the MDSUP, all of which were vested and outstanding at September 30,
2010.
The liability of $6.9 million (December 31, 2009 $5.9 million) which relates to 859,148 units
under the DSUP and MDSUP is included in accounts payable and other liabilities. The remaining
87,050 units vest during the years ending December 31, 2011 to 2014. The financial statement impact
for the DSUP and MDSUP for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 was expense of $1.8
million and $1.1 million, respectively (2009 expense of
$2.0 million and $2.1 million, respectively).
The following table sets out changes in and the number of deferred share units that executives,
directors and senior operating management may redeem under the Companys DSUP and MDSUP:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
Outstanding, December 31, 2009 |
|
|
936,109 |
|
Granted |
|
|
23,846 |
|
Redeemed |
|
|
(13,757 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, September 30, 2010 |
|
|
946,198 |
|
|
|
|
|
11
BROOKFIELD HOMES CORPORATION
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Tabular amounts in thousands of U.S. dollars except per share amounts)
|
|
|
Note 10. |
|
Other Interests in Consolidated Subsidiaries and Noncontrolling Interest |
Other interests in consolidated subsidiaries includes ownership interests of certain business unit
presidents of the Company totaling $43.9 million (December 31, 2009 $47.0 million). In the event
a business unit president (Minority Member) of the Company is no longer employed by an affiliate
of the Company, the Company has the right to purchase the Minority Members interest and the
Minority Member has the right to require the Company to purchase their interest. Should such rights
be exercised, the purchase price will be based on the then estimated bulk sales value of the
business units net assets.
The following table reflects the changes in the Companys other interests in consolidated
subsidiaries for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and the year ended December 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Other interests in consolidated subsidiaries, beginning of period |
|
$ |
47,011 |
|
|
$ |
49,839 |
|
Net loss attributable to other interests in consolidated subsidiaries |
|
|
(778 |
) |
|
|
(4,316 |
) |
(Distributions to) / Contributions from other interests in consolidated subsidiaries |
|
|
(2,360 |
) |
|
|
1,488 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other interests in consolidated subsidiaries, end of period |
|
$ |
43,873 |
|
|
$ |
47,011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncontrolling interest includes third party investments in consolidated entities of $6.5
million (December 31, 2009 $7.3 million).
In accordance with ASC Topic 810 Consolidation (formerly SFAS 160), noncontrolling interest has
been classified as
a component of total equity and the net loss on the consolidated statements of operations has been
adjusted to include the net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest which for the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2010 was nil (2009 $0.4 million) and other interests in
consolidated subsidiaries which for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 was $0.1
million and $0.8 million, respectively (2009 $2.2 million and $4.7 million, respectively). The
Company has recorded $1.1 million of income for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 relating
to the forfeiture of another members interest in a consolidated entity, which has been included in
other (expense) / income.
The Company granted rights to its common stockholders of record on April 3, 2009 to subscribe for
10,000,000 shares of 8% convertible preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share at a subscription
price of $25 per share. On April 27, 2009, the stockholders of the Company fully subscribed for the
10.0 million shares of convertible preferred stock. The shares of convertible preferred stock are
convertible into shares of common stock at a conversion rate of 3.571428571 shares of common stock
per share of convertible preferred stock, which is equivalent to a conversion price of $7.00 per
share, subject to future adjustment. Dividends on the convertible preferred stock are fully
cumulative, without interest, from the date of original issuance of the convertible preferred stock
and will be payable semi-annually in arrears, at the Companys election, in cash, shares of common
stock or a combination of cash and common stock. The Companys Board of Directors paid a stock
dividend of 1,213,393 common shares utilizing treasury stock to the preferred stockholders on June
30, 2010. There were no preferred stock dividends in arrears for the period ended September 30,
2010. The convertible preferred stock is perpetual and does not have a maturity date; however,
beginning June 30, 2014, if the 90-day volume weighted average market price of the common stock is
greater than $14 per share, the Company may, at its option, require all preferred stock to be
automatically converted into common shares.
12
BROOKFIELD HOMES CORPORATION
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Tabular amounts in thousands of U.S. dollars except per share amounts)
Basic and diluted loss per share for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009
were calculated as follows (in thousands except per share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Numerator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss attributable to Brookfield
Homes Corporation |
|
$ |
(552 |
) |
|
$ |
(910 |
) |
|
$ |
(428 |
) |
|
$ |
(11,032 |
) |
Less: Preferred stock dividends |
|
|
(5,000 |
) |
|
|
(5,000 |
) |
|
|
(15,000 |
) |
|
|
(8,500 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss attributable to common stockholders |
|
$ |
(5,552 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,910 |
) |
|
$ |
(15,428 |
) |
|
$ |
(19,532 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic average common shares outstanding |
|
|
29,655 |
|
|
|
26,777 |
|
|
|
28,894 |
|
|
|
26,770 |
|
Net effect of stock options assumed to be
exercised |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dilutive effect of preferred stock assumed to
be converted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted average shares outstanding |
|
|
29,655 |
|
|
|
26,777 |
|
|
|
28,894 |
|
|
|
26,770 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic loss per share |
|
$ |
(0.19 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.22 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.53 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.73 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted loss per share |
|
$ |
(0.19 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.22 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.53 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.73 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, options to purchase 2.3 million (2009
2.2 million) common shares were outstanding and anti-dilutive and were excluded from the
computation of diluted earnings per share. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010
and 2009, approximately 10.0 million preferred shares convertible into 35.7 million common shares
were outstanding and anti-dilutive and were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per
share.
|
|
|
Note 13. |
|
Commitments, Contingent Liabilities and Other |
(a) The Company is party to various legal actions arising in the ordinary course of its business.
Management believes that none of these actions, either individually or in the aggregate, will have
a material adverse effect on the financial condition, results of operations or cash flows of the
Company.
(b) When selling a home, the Companys subsidiaries provide customers with a limited warranty. The
Company estimates the costs that may be incurred under each limited warranty and records a
liability in the amount of such costs
at the time the revenue associated with the sale of each home is recognized. In addition, the
Company has insurance in place where its subsidiaries are subject to the respective warranty
statutes in the State where the Company conducts business which range up to ten years for latent
construction defects. Factors that affect the Companys warranty liability include the number of
homes sold, historical and anticipated rates of warranty claims, and cost per claim. The Company
periodically assesses the adequacy of its recorded warranty liabilities and adjusts the amounts as
necessary. The
following table reflects the changes in the Companys warranty liability for the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 and 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Balance, at beginning of period |
|
$ |
13,126 |
|
|
$ |
13,123 |
|
Payments and other adjustments made during the period |
|
|
(1,420 |
) |
|
|
(1,723 |
) |
Warranties issued during the period |
|
|
1,603 |
|
|
|
1,556 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period |
|
$ |
13,309 |
|
|
$ |
12,956 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
BROOKFIELD HOMES CORPORATION
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Tabular amounts in thousands of U.S. dollars except per share amounts)
(c) The Company is exposed to financial risk that arises from fluctuations in interest rates.
The interest bearing assets and liabilities of the Company are mainly at floating rates and,
accordingly, their fair values approximate cost. The Company would be negatively impacted on
balance, if interest rates were to increase. From time to time, the Company enters into interest
rate swap contracts. As at September 30, 2010, the Company had five interest rate swap contracts
outstanding totaling $150.0 million at an average rate of 4.8% per annum. The contracts expire
between 2011 and 2017. At September 30, 2010, the fair market value of the contracts was a
liability of $19.6 million (December 31, 2009 liability of $14.2 million) and was included in
accounts payable and other liabilities. Expense of $2.1 million and
$5.4 million was recognized during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010,
respectively, (2009 expense of $1.2 million and income of $8.0 million, respectively) and was
included in other income / (expense). All interest rate swaps are recorded at fair market value and
are presented in the consolidated statements of operations because hedge accounting has not been
applied.
The fair value measurements for the interest rate swap contracts are determined based on notional
amounts, terms to maturity, and the USD LIBOR rates. The LIBOR rates vary depending on the term to
maturity and the conditions set out in the underlying swap agreements.
(d) The Company is exposed to financial risk that arises from fluctuations in its common stock
price. To hedge against future deferred share unit payments, in August 2009, the Company entered
into a total return swap transaction at an average cost of $7.31 per share on 1,022,987 shares,
which matured in August 2010. In August 2010, the Company entered into a new total return swap
transaction at an average cost of $7.18 per share on 1,022,987 shares, maturing in August 2011. At
September 30, 2010, the fair market value of the total return swap was an asset of $1.0 million and
was included in receivables and other assets (December 31, 2009 liability of $0.7 million
included in accounts payable and other liabilities). Income of $1.4 and $0.1 million was recognized
during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, respectively, (2009 income of $2.8
million and $2.6 million, respectively) and was included in selling, general and administrative
expense. This income for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2010 was partially
offset by expense of $1.8 million and $1.1 million, respectively, relating to the Companys
stock-based compensation plans. The total return swap is recorded at fair market value and is
recorded through the consolidated statements of operations because hedge accounting has not been
applied. See Note 14 for additional disclosure.
|
|
|
Note 14. |
|
Fair Value Measurements |
ASC Topic 820 Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (formerly SFAS 157) provides a framework
for measuring fair value, expands disclosures about fair value measurements and establishes a fair
value hierarchy which requires a company to prioritize the use of observable inputs and minimize
the use of unobservable inputs in measuring fair value.
The Companys financial assets are measured at fair value on a recurring basis and are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements |
|
|
Using Significant |
|
|
Observable Inputs (Level 2) |
Interest rate swap contracts at September 30, 2010
|
|
$ |
(19,632 |
) |
|
|
|
The fair value measurements for the interest rate swap contracts are determined based on
notional amounts, terms to maturity, and the USD LIBOR rates. The LIBOR rates vary depending on the
term to maturity and the conditions set out in the underlying swap agreements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements |
|
|
Using Significant |
|
|
Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) |
Equity swap contract at September 30, 2010
|
|
$ |
990 |
|
|
|
|
The fair value measurement for the equity swap contract is determined based on the notional
amount, stock price, the number of underlying shares and the three month USD LIBOR rate. The
Company performed a sensitivity analysis of the estimated fair value and the impact to the
consolidated financial statements using alternative reasonably likely assumptions on September 30,
2010 and the impact to the consolidated financial statements was nominal.
14
BROOKFIELD HOMES CORPORATION
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Tabular amounts in thousands of U.S. dollars except per share amounts)
The fair value measurements for housing and land inventory were determined by comparing the
carrying amount of an asset to its expected future cash flows. To arrive at the estimated fair
value of housing and land inventory deemed to be impaired during the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2010, the Company estimated the cash flow for the life of each project. Specifically,
project by project, the Company evaluated the margins on home sales that have been closed, margins
on sales contracts which are in backlog, estimated margins with regard to future home sales over
the life of the projects, as well as estimated margins with respect to future land sales. The
Company evaluated and continues to evaluate projects where inventory is turning over more slowly
than expected or whose average sales price and margins are declining and are expected to continue
to decline. These projections take into account the specific business plans for each project and
managements best estimate of the most probable set of economic conditions anticipated to prevail
in the market area. Such projections generally assume current home selling prices, with cost
estimates and sales rates for short-term projects consistent with recent sales activity. For
longer-term projects, planned sales rates for 2010 and 2011 assume recent sales activity and
normalized sales rates beyond 2011. If the future undiscounted cash flows are less than the
carrying amount, the asset is considered to be impaired and is then written down to fair value less
estimated selling costs.
There are several factors that could lead to changes in the estimate of future cash flows for a
given project. The most significant of these include the sales pricing levels actually realized by
the project, the sales rate, and the costs incurred to construct the homes. The sales pricing
levels are often inter-related with sales rates for a project, as a price reduction usually results
in an increase in the sales rate. Further, pricing is heavily influenced by the competitive
pressures facing a given community from both new homes and existing homes, including foreclosures.
The Company has reviewed all of its projects for impairment in accordance with the provisions of
ASC Topic 360 Property, Plant and Equipment (formerly SFAS 144) and ASC Topic 820 Fair Value
Measurements and Disclosures (formerly SFAS 157). For the three and nine months ended September
30, 2010, no impairment charges have been recognized. For the three months ended September 30,
2009, housing and land inventory on one project with a carrying amount of $5.0 million was written
down to its fair value of $3.1 million, resulting in an impairment charge of $1.9 million, which
was included impairment and write-off of option deposits. For the nine months ended September 30,
2009, housing and land inventory on four projects with a carrying amount of $37.9 million was
written down to its fair value of $27.8 million, resulting in an impairment charge of $10.1
million, which was included in impairment of housing and land inventory and write-off of option
deposits.
|
|
|
Note 15. |
|
Segment Information |
As defined in ASC Topic 280, Segmented Reporting, the Company has five operating segments. The
Company has four reportable segments: Northern California, Southland / Los Angeles, San Diego /
Riverside, and the Washington D.C. Area.
The Company is a land developer and residential homebuilder. The Company is organized and manages
its business based on the geographical areas in which it operates. Each of the Companys segments
specialize in lot entitlement and development and the construction of single-family and
multi-family homes. The Company evaluates performance and allocates capital based primarily on
return on assets together with a number of other risk factors. Earnings performance is measured
using segment operating income. The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those
referred to in Note 1, Significant Accounting Policies.
15
BROOKFIELD HOMES CORPORATION
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Tabular amounts in thousands of U.S. dollars except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Northern California. |
|
$ |
27,148 |
|
|
$ |
23,112 |
|
|
$ |
44,298 |
|
|
$ |
59,192 |
|
Southland / Los Angeles. |
|
|
12,698 |
|
|
|
17,076 |
|
|
|
60,153 |
|
|
|
43,305 |
|
San Diego / Riverside |
|
|
8,714 |
|
|
|
25,222 |
|
|
|
39,340 |
|
|
|
50,869 |
|
Washington D.C. Area |
|
|
26,027 |
|
|
|
32,488 |
|
|
|
68,618 |
|
|
|
65,926 |
|
Corporate and Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
645 |
|
|
|
3,520 |
|
|
|
11,531 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Revenues |
|
$ |
74,587 |
|
|
$ |
98,543 |
|
|
$ |
215,929 |
|
|
$ |
230,823 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment Income / (Loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Northern California |
|
$ |
2,397 |
|
|
$ |
347 |
|
|
$ |
3,806 |
|
|
$ |
1,037 |
|
Southland / Los Angeles. |
|
|
(96 |
) |
|
|
245 |
|
|
|
3,938 |
|
|
|
(6,663 |
) |
San Diego / Riverside |
|
|
(309 |
) |
|
|
1,292 |
|
|
|
2,229 |
|
|
|
(7,930 |
) |
Washington D.C. Area |
|
|
2,314 |
|
|
|
(6,455 |
) |
|
|
6,398 |
|
|
|
(9,778 |
) |
Corporate and Other |
|
|
(4,799 |
) |
|
|
(5,154 |
) |
|
|
(17,321 |
) |
|
|
(5,195 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before Income Taxes |
|
$ |
(493 |
) |
|
$ |
(9,725 |
) |
|
$ |
(950 |
) |
|
$ |
(28,529 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Housing and Land Assets: 1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Northern California |
|
$ |
226,672 |
|
|
$ |
201,164 |
|
Southland / Los Angeles |
|
|
146,469 |
|
|
|
122,504 |
|
San Diego / Riverside |
|
|
331,936 |
|
|
|
336,458 |
|
Washington D.C. Area |
|
|
234,414 |
|
|
|
226,768 |
|
Corporate and Other |
|
|
43,839 |
|
|
|
40,846 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
983,330 |
|
|
$ |
927,740 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1) |
|
Consists of housing and land inventory including investments in unconsolidated
entities. |
The following tables set forth additional financial information relating to the Companys
reportable segments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Equity / (Loss) in Earnings from Unconsolidated Entities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Northern California |
|
$ |
25 |
|
|
$ |
(125 |
) |
|
$ |
1,312 |
|
|
$ |
1,965 |
|
San Diego / Riverside |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Washington D.C. Area |
|
|
(253 |
) |
|
|
(312 |
) |
|
|
(620 |
) |
|
|
(172 |
) |
Corporate and Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(98 |
) |
|
|
(976 |
) |
|
|
(200 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
(228 |
) |
|
$ |
(535 |
) |
|
$ |
(285 |
) |
|
$ |
1,593 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of Housing and Land Inventory |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Southland / Los Angeles |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,600 |
|
Washington D.C. Area |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,301 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,959 |
|
Corporate and Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,279 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,179 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
9,580 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
17,738 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of Investments in Unconsolidated Entities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
San Diego / Riverside |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
9,243 |
|
Washington D.C. Area |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,390 |
|
Corporate and Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
253 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
253 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,268 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
12,886 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
BROOKFIELD HOMES CORPORATION
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Tabular amounts in thousands of U.S. dollars except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Investments in Unconsolidated Entities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Northern California |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Southland / Los Angeles |
|
|
69,528 |
|
|
|
48,050 |
|
San Diego / Riverside |
|
|
2,879 |
|
|
|
2,694 |
|
Washington D.C. Area |
|
|
45,754 |
|
|
|
34,971 |
|
Corporate and Other |
|
|
11,157 |
|
|
|
6,762 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
129,318 |
|
|
$ |
92,477 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 16. |
|
Subsequent Events |
On October 5, 2010, the Company announced that it had entered into a definitive agreement with
Brookfield Properties Corporation (Brookfield Office Properties) to combine the Company and the
North American residential land and housing divisions of Brookfield Office Properties (BPO
Residential) into Brookfield Residential Properties Inc. (Brookfield Residential).
Completion of the transaction is subject to regulatory approval in the United States and Canada,
the approval of the holders of a majority of the Companys outstanding common stock and other
customary closing conditions. Brookfield Asset Management Inc. beneficially owns, through
Brookfield Residential, sufficient shares to approve the transaction and has agreed to vote in
favor of the transaction at the Companys stockholders meeting.
On October 12, 2010, Brookfield Residential filed a registration statement with the U.S. Securities
and Exchange Commission, which includes a proxy statement / prospectus and other relevant documents
concerning the proposed transaction.
17
|
|
|
Item 2. |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations |
This discussion includes forward-looking statements that reflect our current views with
respect to future events and financial performance and that involve risks and uncertainties. Our
actual results, performance or achievements could differ materially from those anticipated in the
forward-looking statements as a result of certain factors including risks discussed in
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Forward-Looking Statements and Item 1A Risk Factors elsewhere in this report and in our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.
Forward-Looking Statements
This quarterly report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the
United States federal securities laws. The words may, believe, will, anticipate, expect,
planned estimate, project, future, and other expressions that are predictions of or
indicate future events and trends and that do not relate to historical matters identify
forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q
include, among others, statements with respect to:
|
|
ability to create shareholder value; |
|
|
|
business goals and strategy; |
|
|
|
our financial and lot position; |
|
|
|
strategies for shareholder value creation; |
|
|
|
effect of challenging conditions on us; |
|
|
|
factors affecting our competitive position within the homebuilding industry; |
|
|
|
ability to generate sufficient cash flow from our assets in 2010, 2011 and 2012 to repay maturing
project specific and other financings; |
|
|
|
the visibility of our future cash flow; |
|
|
|
expected backlog and closings; |
|
|
|
sufficiency of our access to capital resources; |
|
|
|
the timing of the effect of interest rate changes on our cash flows; |
|
|
|
the effect on our business of existing lawsuits; |
|
|
|
the potential combination with BPO Residential; and |
|
|
|
whether or not our letters of credit or performance bonds will be drawn upon. |
Reliance should not be placed on forward-looking statements because they involve known and unknown
risks, uncertainties and other factors, which may cause the actual results to differ materially
from the anticipated future results expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements.
Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those set forward in the
forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to:
|
|
changes in general economic, real estate and other conditions; |
|
|
|
mortgage rate and availability changes; |
|
|
|
availability of suitable undeveloped land at acceptable prices; |
|
|
|
adverse legislation or regulation; |
|
|
|
ability to obtain necessary permits and approvals for the development of our land; |
|
|
|
availability of labor or materials or increases in their costs; |
|
|
|
ability to develop and market our master-planned communities successfully; |
|
|
|
ability to obtain regulatory approvals; |
|
|
|
confidence levels of consumers; |
|
|
|
ability to raise capital on favorable terms; |
|
|
|
our debt and leverage; |
|
|
|
adverse weather conditions and natural disasters; |
|
|
|
relations with the residents of our communities; |
|
|
|
risks associated with increased insurance costs or unavailability of adequate coverage; |
|
|
|
ability to obtain surety bonds; |
|
|
|
competitive conditions in the homebuilding industry, including product and pricing pressures; |
|
|
|
ability to retain our executive officers; |
|
|
|
relationships with our affiliates; |
|
|
|
failure to obtain any required regulatory and shareholder approvals with respect to a
transaction; and |
|
|
|
additional risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond our control, referred to in this
Form 10-Q and our other SEC filings. |
18
Except as required by law, we undertake no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking
statements whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. However, any
further disclosures made on related subjects in subsequent reports on Forms 10-K, 10-Q and 8-K
should be consulted.
Overview
In the first quarter, we were encouraged by the improvement in sales and closings. However, since
then, selling communities have seen a drop in the number of visits from potential homebuyers, which
we believe is a result of expired government stimulus programs, together with continued uncertain
economic conditions, which have negatively impacted homebuyer confidence. The United States
homebuilding industry continues to face a number of challenges with home foreclosures and tight
credit standards continuing to have an effect on inventory and new home sale rates and prices.
Despite these challenging conditions, we believe the risk is mitigated by our assets which are
largely located in geographic areas with a constrained supply of lots and which have demonstrated
strong economic characteristics over the long term. The supply of finished lots has been depleted
substantially over the last few years and negligible development has occurred since 2006. As a
result, we believe our strong financial position and owning entitled and/or developed lots in
supply-constrained markets places us in a solid position as the markets improve.
Through the activities of our operating subsidiaries, we entitle and develop land for our own
communities and sell lots to third parties. We also design, construct and market single and
multi-family homes primarily to move-up homebuyers.
We operate in the following geographic regions which are presented as our reportable segments:
Northern California (San Francisco Bay Area and Sacramento), Southland / Los Angeles, San Diego /
Riverside and Washington, D.C. Area. Our other operations that do not meet the quantitative
thresholds for separate disclosure in our consolidated financial statements under U.S. GAAP are
included in Corporate and Other.
Our goal is to maximize the total return on our common stockholders equity over the long term. We
plan to achieve this by actively managing our assets and creating value on the lots we own or
control.
The 26,510 lots that we control provide a strong foundation for our future operations and
visibility on our future cash flow. We believe we add value to the lots we control through
entitlements, development and the construction of homes. In allocating capital to our operations we
generally limit our capital at risk on unentitled land by optioning such land positions. Option
contracts for the purchase of land permit us to control lots for an extended period of time.
Operating in markets with higher price points and catering to move-up buyers, our average home
selling price for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 of $515,000 was well in excess of the
national average sales price. We also sell serviced and unserviced lots to other homebuilders,
generally on an opportunistic basis where we can redeploy capital to an asset providing higher
returns. The number of lots we sell may vary significantly from period to period due to the timing
and nature of such sales which are also affected by local market conditions.
Our housing and land inventory and investments in unconsolidated entities together comprised 94% of
our total assets of $1,049 million at September 30, 2010. In addition, we had $65 million in other
assets. Other assets consist of restricted cash of $7 million, deferred taxes of $39 million and
receivables and other assets of $19 million.
As at September 30, 2010, the market capitalization of our common stock was $243 million, compared
to the book value of our common stock of $230 million. Market capitalization will vary depending on
market sentiment and may not have a relationship to the underlying value of a share of our common
stock over the longer term.
On October 5, 2010, we and Brookfield Properties Corporation (Brookfield Office Properties)
announced that we had entered into a definitive agreement to combine our company and the North
American residential land and housing division of Brookfield Office Properties (BPO Residential).
In connection with the merger, each of our outstanding shares of common stock will be converted
into 0.764900530 common shares of a new public company, Brookfield Residential Properties Inc.
(Brookfield Residential), an Ontario, Canada corporation, plus a cash amount in lieu of
fractional shares. In addition, each share of our outstanding 8% convertible preferred stock will
be converted in the merger into one 8% convertible preferred share of Brookfield Residential with
the same terms and conditions in all material respects as the terms and conditions of our 8%
convertible preferred stock, except that they will be convertible into approximately 0.2 million
Brookfield Residential common shares following closing to reflect the common stock exchange ratio
referenced above.
19
Following successful completion of the transaction, it is expected that our stockholders will hold
approximately 49% of the outstanding common shares of Brookfield Residential, and shareholders of
Brookfield Office Properties will own approximately 51% of such common shares. It is expected that
following the closing of the transaction, Brookfield Asset Management will beneficially own between
66% and 91% of the Brookfield Residential common shares on a fully-diluted basis,
Completion of the transaction is subject to regulatory approval in the United States and Canada,
the approval of the holders of a majority of our outstanding common stock and other customary
closing conditions. Brookfield Asset Management Inc. beneficially owns, through Brookfield
Residential, sufficient shares to approve the transaction and has agreed to vote in favor of the
transaction at our stockholders meeting. On October 12, 2010, Brookfield Residential filed a
registration statement with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, which includes a proxy
statement / prospectus and other relevant documents concerning the proposed transaction.
20
Results of Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected Financial Information (Unaudited) |
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
($US millions) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Housing |
|
$ |
64 |
|
|
$ |
89 |
|
|
$ |
200 |
|
|
$ |
206 |
|
Land |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
216 |
|
|
|
231 |
|
Direct cost of sales |
|
|
(62 |
) |
|
|
(84 |
) |
|
|
(179 |
) |
|
|
(203 |
) |
Impairment of housing and land inventory and write-offs
of option deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin / (loss) |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expense |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
(39 |
) |
|
|
(37 |
) |
Equity in earnings from unconsolidated entities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
Impairment from housing unconsolidated entities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
Other (expense) / income |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(28 |
) |
Income tax recovery |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(16 |
) |
Less net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss attributable to Brookfield Homes Corporation |
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(11 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment Information |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Housing revenue ($US millions): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Northern California |
|
$ |
27 |
|
|
$ |
23 |
|
|
$ |
44 |
|
|
$ |
59 |
|
Southland / Los Angeles |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
San Diego / Riverside |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
Washington D.C. Area |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
Corporate and Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
64 |
|
|
$ |
89 |
|
|
$ |
200 |
|
|
$ |
206 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land revenues ($US millions): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Northern California |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Southland / Los Angeles |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
San Diego / Riverside |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
Washington D.C. Area |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Corporate and Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
11 |
|
|
$ |
10 |
|
|
$ |
16 |
|
|
$ |
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin / (loss) ($US millions): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Northern California |
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
8 |
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
Southland / Los Angeles |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
San Diego / Riverside |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
Washington D.C. Area |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Corporate and Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
13 |
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
$ |
37 |
|
|
$ |
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of housing and land inventory and
write-offs of option deposits ($US millions): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Northern California |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Southland / Los Angeles |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
San Diego / Riverside |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Washington D.C. Area |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
Corporate and Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
10 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Home closings (units): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Northern California |
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
73 |
|
Southland / Los Angeles |
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
131 |
|
|
|
115 |
|
San Diego / Riverside |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
80 |
|
Washington D.C. Area |
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
139 |
|
|
|
159 |
|
Corporate and Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated total |
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
190 |
|
|
|
388 |
|
|
|
433 |
|
Unconsolidated entitles |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
192 |
|
|
|
389 |
|
|
|
435 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average selling price ($US): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Northern California |
|
$ |
1,131,000 |
|
|
$ |
746,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,080,000 |
|
|
$ |
811,000 |
|
Southland / Los Angeles |
|
|
529,000 |
|
|
|
388,000 |
|
|
|
459,000 |
|
|
|
377,000 |
|
San Diego / Riverside |
|
|
545,000 |
|
|
|
522,000 |
|
|
|
544,000 |
|
|
|
498,000 |
|
Washington D.C. Area |
|
|
447,000 |
|
|
|
373,000 |
|
|
|
390,000 |
|
|
|
376,000 |
|
Corporate and Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
645,000 |
|
|
|
440,000 |
|
|
|
635,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated average |
|
|
651,000 |
|
|
|
465,000 |
|
|
|
515,000 |
|
|
|
475,000 |
|
Unconsolidated entities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
891,000 |
|
|
|
796,000 |
|
|
|
891,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
$ |
651,000 |
|
|
$ |
468,000 |
|
|
$ |
516,000 |
|
|
$ |
477,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Housing & Land |
|
|
Unconsolidated Entities |
|
|
Total Units |
|
|
|
Owned(1) |
|
|
Options |
|
|
Owned |
|
|
Options |
|
|
Sept 30, 2010 |
|
Lots controlled (units at end of period): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Northern California |
|
|
3,298 |
|
|
|
4,950 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,248 |
|
Southland / Los Angeles |
|
|
938 |
|
|
|
582 |
|
|
|
590 |
|
|
|
1,987 |
|
|
|
4,097 |
|
San Diego / Riverside |
|
|
8,680 |
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,932 |
|
Washington D.C. Area |
|
|
2,627 |
|
|
|
1,165 |
|
|
|
1,187 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,979 |
|
Corporate and Other |
|
|
196 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
254 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,739 |
|
|
|
6,897 |
|
|
|
1,887 |
|
|
|
1,987 |
|
|
|
26,510 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes proportionate share of lots under option related to unconsolidated entities. |
Three Months and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010 Compared with Three Months and Nine
Months Ended September 30, 2009
Net Loss
Net loss was $1 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, an increase in net
income of
$2 million and $15 million, respectively, when compared to the same periods in 2009. The increase
in net income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 primarily related to a
decrease of $11 million and $31 million, respectively, in impairments on our housing and land
assets and investments in unconsolidated entities, partially offset by a reduction in income of $1
million and $13 million, respectively, from interest rate swap contracts as well as a reduction of
$6 million and $12 million, respectively, in income tax recovery.
Results of Operations
Company-wide: Housing revenue was $64 million and $200 million for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2010, a decrease of $25 million and $6 million, respectively, when compared to the
same periods in 2009. The decrease in housing revenue was primarily due to 94 and 46 fewer home
closings in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, partially offset by an increase in
the overall average selling price per home.
Housing revenues were net of incentives of $5 million and $14 million for the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2010, compared to $12 million and $32 million, respectively, for the same
periods in 2009.
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
Incentives |
|
|
% of Gross |
|
|
Incentives |
|
|
% of Gross |
|
($ millions) |
|
Recognized |
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
Recognized |
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Northern California |
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
|
8 |
% |
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
|
10 |
% |
Southland / Los Angeles |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
San Diego / Riverside |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Washington D.C. Area |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
Corporate and Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
|
7 |
% |
|
$ |
12 |
|
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
Incentives |
|
|
% of Gross |
|
|
Incentives |
|
|
% of Gross |
|
($ millions) |
|
Recognized |
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
Recognized |
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Northern California |
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
|
10 |
% |
|
$ |
18 |
|
|
|
23 |
% |
Southland / Los Angeles |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
San Diego / Riverside |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Washington D.C. Area |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
Corporate and Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
14 |
|
|
|
7 |
% |
|
$ |
32 |
|
|
|
13 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land revenue totaled $11 million and $16 million for the three and nine months ended September
30, 2010, an increase of $1 million and a decrease of $9 million, respectively, when compared to
the same periods in 2009. Our land revenues may vary significantly from period to period due to the
timing and nature of land sales and such revenues are also affected by local market conditions.
Gross margin was $13 million and $37 million for the three and nine months ended September 30,
2010, compared with
$5 million and $10 million, respectively, for the same periods in 2009. The increases in gross
margin during the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2010 were primarily a result of
a decrease in impairment charges.
During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, we did not recognize any impairment
charges or option write-offs compared to impairment charges of $10 million and $18 million for the
same periods in 2009. The impairment charges for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009
related to owned lots in our Southland / Los Angeles and Washington D.C. Area reportable segments.
Forty-three projects were tested for impairment charges and option write-offs for the nine months
ended September 30, 2010 and no impairment charges or option write-offs were required. The
locations of these projects tested were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Projects |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Northern California. |
|
|
7 |
|
Southland / Los Angeles. |
|
|
4 |
|
San Diego / Riverside |
|
|
14 |
|
Washington D.C. Area |
|
|
16 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
|
|
Northern California: Housing revenue was $27 million and $44 million for the three and nine
months ended
September 30, 2010, a decrease of $4 million and $15 million, respectively, when compared to the
same periods in 2009. The gross margin for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 was
$5 million and $8 million, compared with $3 million and $5 million, respectively, for the same
periods in 2009.
Southland / Los Angeles: Housing revenue was $13 million and $60 million for the three and nine
months ended
September 30, 2010, a decrease of $4 million and an increase of $17 million, respectively, when
compared to the same periods in 2009. The gross margin for the three and nine months ended September
30, 2010 was $2 million and $9 million compared with $2 million and nil respectively, for the same
periods in 2009.
San Diego / Riverside: Housing revenue was $9 million and $38 million for the three and nine months
ended
September 30, 2010, a decrease of $9 million and $2 million, respectively, when compared to the
same periods in 2009. Land revenue was nil and $2 million for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2010, compared with $7 million and $11 million, respectively, for the same periods in
2009. The gross margin for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 was $2 million and $7
million, compared with $4 million and $8 million, respectively, for the same periods in 2009.
23
Washington D.C. Area: Housing revenue was $15 million and $54 million for the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2010, a decrease of $15 million and $6 million, respectively, when compared to
the same periods in 2009. Land revenue was $11 million and $14 million for the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2010, compared with $3 million and $6 million, respectively, for the
same periods in 2009. The gross margin for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 was
$4 million and $13 million, compared with a gross loss of $2 million and gross margin of
$3 million, respectively, for the same periods in 2009.
Selling, general and administrative expense was $13 million and $39 million for the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2010, compared to $12 million and $37 million, respectively, for the
same periods in 2009. The general and administrative expense for the nine months ended September
30, 2010 included a charge of $1 million related to a restructuring of our benefit plans. The
components of the expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 are
summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
($ millions) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expense |
|
$ |
8 |
|
|
$ |
8 |
|
|
$ |
25 |
|
|
$ |
23 |
|
Sales and marketing expense |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
Stock compensation |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Change in fair value of equity swap contract |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
13 |
|
|
$ |
12 |
|
|
$ |
39 |
|
|
$ |
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in earnings from unconsolidated entities for the three and nine months ended September
30, 2010 was
nil and nil compared with nil and income of $2 million, respectively, for the same periods in 2009.
We did not record any impairment charges related to our investments in unconsolidated entities for
the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010.
Other expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 totaled expense of $1 million
and income of
$1 million, respectively, a decrease of nil and $9 million, respectively, when compared to the same
periods in 2009. The components of other income for the three and nine months ended September 30,
2010 and 2009 are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
($ millions) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in fair value of interest rate swap contracts |
|
$ |
(2 |
) |
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
$ |
(5 |
) |
|
$ |
8 |
|
Other |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The fair value measurement of our interest rate swap contracts are determined based on
notional amounts, terms to maturity, and the USD LIBOR rates. The (expense) / income due to the
change in fair value is included in our Corporate and Other segment.
Sales Activity
Net new home orders for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 totaled 87 units and 372
units, a decrease of 121 units and 255 units, respectively, when compared to the same periods in
2009. We were selling from 20 active communities at September 30, 2010 compared to 29 at September
30, 2009, a 31% decline. The net new home orders for the three and nine months ended September 30,
2010 and 2009 by reportable segment were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Northern California |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
119 |
|
Southland / Los Angeles |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
180 |
|
San Diego / Riverside |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
119 |
|
Washington D.C. Area |
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
149 |
|
|
|
207 |
|
Corporate and Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated total |
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
206 |
|
|
|
371 |
|
|
|
625 |
|
Unconsolidated entities |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
208 |
|
|
|
372 |
|
|
|
627 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
Net new orders for any period represent the aggregate of all homes ordered by customers, net
of cancellations.
Our backlog, which represents the number of new homes subject to pending sales contracts, at
September 30, 2010 and 2009 by reportable segment are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Backlog |
|
|
Backlog |
|
|
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
Units |
|
|
$ millions |
|
|
Units |
|
|
$ millions |
|
Northern California |
|
|
19 |
|
|
$ |
21 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
$ |
51 |
|
Southland / Los Angeles |
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
San Diego / Riverside |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
Washington D.C. Area |
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
Corporate and Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated total |
|
|
169 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
325 |
|
|
|
162 |
|
Unconsolidated entities |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
170 |
|
|
$ |
81 |
|
|
|
326 |
|
|
$ |
162 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We expect 170 units of our backlog to close subject to any future cancellations that may
occur. The cancellation rates for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 by
reportable segment are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
Units |
|
|
% |
|
|
Units |
|
|
% |
|
|
Units |
|
|
% |
|
|
Units |
|
|
% |
|
Northern California |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
50 |
% |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
16 |
% |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
27 |
% |
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
14 |
% |
Southland / Los Angeles |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
San Diego / Riverside |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
Washington D.C. Area |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
Corporate and other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
26 |
% |
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
16 |
% |
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
19 |
% |
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
16 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
There have been no significant changes to our critical accounting policies and estimates during the
nine
months ended September 30, 2010 compared to those disclosed in Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included in our Annual Report on Form
10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2009. Even though our critical accounting policies have not changed
significantly during the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the following provides additional
disclosures about our deferred tax asset and our derivative financial instruments valuation process
related to housing and land inventory and option deposits.
Carrying Values
In accordance with the Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 360 Property, Plant and
Equipment (formerly Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) 144), housing and land
assets we own directly and through unconsolidated entities are reviewed for recoverability on a
regular basis and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of
an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability is measured by comparing the carrying amount of an
asset to future undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. To arrive at the
estimated fair value of housing and land inventory impaired, we estimate the cash flow for the life
of each project. Specifically, on a housing project, we evaluate the margins on homes that have
been closed, margins on sales contracts which are in backlog and estimated margins with regard to
future home sales over the life of the project. On a land project, we estimate the timing of future
land sales, the estimated revenue per lot, as well as estimated margins with respect to future land
sales. For the housing and land inventory, we continuously evaluate projects where inventory is
turning over slower than expected or whose average sales price and margins are declining and are
expected to continue to decline. These projections take into account the specific business plans
for each project and managements best estimate of the most probable set of economic conditions
anticipated to prevail in the market area. Such projections generally assume current home selling
prices, cost estimates and sales rates for short-term projects are consistent with recent sales
activity. For longer-term projects, planned sales rates for 2010 and 2011 assume recent sales
activity and normalized sales rates beyond 2011. We identify potentially impaired housing and land
projects based on these quantitative factors as well as qualitative factors obtained from the local
market areas. If the future undiscounted cash flows are less than the carrying amount, the asset is
considered to be impaired and is then written down to fair value less estimated selling costs using
a discounted cash flow methodology which incorporates market participant assumptions.
25
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, we recorded no impairment charges compared
to $2 million and $10 million, respectively, during the same periods in 2009. The impairment
charges taken during the nine months ended September 30, 2009 were on 175 lots or one project
located in Southland / Los Angeles, 6 lots and a commercial site or two projects in the Washington
D.C. Area and 18 lots or one project located in the Corporate and Other reportable segments. The
impairment charges related to finished homes, construction in progress and land on which we intend
to build homes in the future. The lots impaired represent all of the lots within a project that are
deemed to be impaired. In light of the current market conditions, we have reviewed and continue to
review, during each reporting period, all of our assets for indicators of impairment. The
impairment charges recorded were estimated based on market conditions and assumptions made by
management at the time the charges were recorded, which may differ materially from actual results
if market conditions or our assumptions change. We have also entered into a number of option
contracts to acquire land or lots in the future in accordance with specific terms and conditions. A
majority of our option contracts require a non-refundable cash deposit based on a percentage of the
purchase price of the property. The option contracts are recorded at cost. In determining whether
to pursue an option contract, we estimate the option primarily based upon the expected cash flows
from the optioned property. If our intent is to no longer pursue an option contract, we record a
charge to earnings of the deposit amounts and any other related pre-acquisition entitlement costs
in the period the decision is made.
Income Taxes
Income taxes are accounted for in accordance with ASC Topic 740 Income Taxes (formerly SFAS 109).
Under ASC Topic 740, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on differences
between financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities, and are measured by using
enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those differences are
expected to reverse.
In accordance with the provisions of ASC Topic 740, we assess, on a quarterly basis, our ability to
realize our deferred tax asset. In determining the need for a valuation allowance, we consider the
following significant factors: an assessment of recent years profitability and losses which
considers the nature, frequency and severity of current and cumulative losses adjusted to reflect
the effects of changes to our capital structure that have resulted in a significant reduction in
the amount of interest bearing debt; our forecasts or expectation of profits based on margins and
volumes expected to be realized (which are based on current pricing and volume trends) and
including the effects of reduced interest expense; the financial support of our largest stockholder
as evidenced by the revolving credit facilities, the long duration of ten to twenty years or more
in all significant operating jurisdictions before the expiry of net operating losses, and we take
into consideration that a substantial portion of the deferred tax asset comprised of deductible
temporary differences that are not subject to an expiry period until realized under tax law.
However, the recognition of deferred tax assets is based upon assumptions about the future
including an estimate of future results, and differences between the expected and actual financial
performance could require all or a portion of the deferred tax asset to be expensed. We will
continue to evaluate the need for a valuation allowance in future periods. At September 30, 2010
and December 31, 2009, our deferred tax asset was $39 million and $40 million, respectively. Based
on the more likely than not standard in the guidance and the weight of available evidence, we do
not believe a valuation allowance against the deferred tax asset at September 30, 2010 is
necessary.
Derivative Financial Instruments
We revalue our total return swap contract each reporting period. The fair value of the total return
swap contract is determined based on the notional amount, stock price, the number of underlying
shares and the three months USD LIBOR rate. We performed a sensitivity analysis of the estimated
fair value and the impact to the financial statements using alternative reasonably likely
assumptions on September 30, 2010 and the impact to the financial statements was nominal. However,
future fluctuations in share price could have a significant impact on net income.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Financial Position
Our assets as of September 30, 2010 totaled $1,049 million, an increase of $12 million compared to
December 31, 2009. The increase was due primarily to an increase of $19 million in our housing and
land assets and an increase of
$37 million in our investments in unconsolidated entities, offset by a decrease in receivables and
other assets as a result of the receipt of cash tax refunds of $43 million. Our housing and land
inventory and investments in unconsolidated entities are our most significant assets with a
combined book value of $983 million, or approximately 94% of our total assets. Our housing and land
assets include homes completed and under construction and lots ready for construction, model homes
and land under and held for development.
26
Our total debt as of September 30, 2010 was $392 million, an increase of $10 million from December
31, 2009. Total debt as of September 30, 2010 consisted of $217 million of project specific
financings and $175 million drawn on facilities with subsidiaries of our largest stockholder,
Brookfield Asset Management Inc. Our project specific financings represent construction and
development loans that are used to fund the operations of our communities. As new homes are
constructed, we arrange further loan facilities with our lenders. Our major project specific
lenders are Wells Fargo, Housing Capital Corporation, Bank of America and M&T Bank.
Interest charged under project specific and other financings include LIBOR and prime rate pricing
options. As of September 30, 2010, the average interest rate on our project specific and other
financings was 5.3%, with stated maturities as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ millions) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2012 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Northern California |
|
$ |
7 |
|
|
$ |
20 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
27 |
|
Southland / Los Angeles |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36 |
|
San Diego / Riverside |
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
102 |
|
Washington D.C. Area |
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43 |
|
Corporate / Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
184 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
$ |
72 |
|
|
$ |
235 |
|
|
$ |
85 |
|
|
$ |
392 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
143 |
|
|
$ |
180 |
|
|
$ |
59 |
|
|
$ |
382 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The debt maturing in 2010, 2011 and 2012 is expected to be repaid from home and/or lot
deliveries over this period or extended. During the current period proceeds from housing and land
deliveries exceeded the corresponding debt repayments made during the period. During the nine
months ended September 30, 2010, in the normal course of operations we extended repayment terms on
$65 million of debt originally maturing in 2010 and now maturing in 2011. Additionally, as of
September 30, 2010, we had project specific debt of $80 million that is available to complete land
development and construction activities. The Cash Flow section below discloses future available
capital resources should proceeds from our future home closings not be sufficient to repay our debt
obligations.
Other financings includes $100 million on an unsecured revolving operating facility and $75 million
on an unsecured revolving acquisition and operating facility, both with subsidiaries of our largest
stockholder, Brookfield Asset Management Inc. The revolving operating facility matures December
2011, bears interest at LIBOR plus 3.50% and was fully drawn upon at September 30, 2010. The
revolving acquisition and operating facility is in a principal amount not to exceed $100 million.
This facility matures December 2012, initially bears interest at 12% and could be fully drawn upon
without violation of any covenants.
Cash Flow
Our principal uses of working capital include home construction, purchases of land and land
development. Cash flows for each of our communities depend upon the applicable stage of the
development cycle and can differ substantially from reported earnings. Early stages of development
require significant cash outlays for land acquisitions, site approvals and entitlements,
construction of model homes, roads, certain utilities and other amenities and general landscaping.
As these costs are capitalized, earnings reported for financial statement purposes during such
early stages may significantly exceed cash flows. Later, cash flows can exceed earnings reported
for financial statement purposes, as cost of sales includes charges for substantial amounts of
previously expended costs.
We believe we currently have sufficient access to capital resources and will continue to use our
available capital resources to fund our operations. Our future capital resources include cash flow
from operations, borrowings under project and other credit facilities and proceeds from potential
future debt issues or equity offerings, if required.
Cash provided by our operating activities during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 totaled
$34 million compared with $69 million for the same period in 2009. During the nine months ended
September 30, 2010, our operating cash flow was positively impacted by the receipt of cash tax
refunds of $43 million (September 30, 2009 $61 million), an increase in accounts payable and other liabilities offset by an increase in our
housing and land assets due to the purchase of new projects for $24 million.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, 389 homes were delivered and 215 lots were sold.
As a result, cash flow from operations was positively affected by these closings and lot sales.
27
A summary of our lots owned, directly or through our share of unconsolidated entities, excluding
lot options, and their stage of development at September 30, 2010 compared with December 31, 2009
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Housing units, including models |
|
|
590 |
|
|
|
361 |
|
Finished lots |
|
|
1,432 |
|
|
|
1,710 |
|
Lots commenced grading |
|
|
2,033 |
|
|
|
1,991 |
|
Raw lots |
|
|
13,571 |
|
|
|
8,685 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,626 |
|
|
|
12,747 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash used in our investing activities in unconsolidated entities for the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 was
$40 million, an increase of $29 million when compared with $11 million for the same period in 2009.
The increase was primarily a result of investment in the acquisition of lots and land development
expenditures in our unconsolidated entities.
Cash from our financing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 was $6 million
compared with
cash used of $57 million for the same period in 2009. The cash from financing activities in the
nine months ended September 30, 2010 was primarily used for acquisitions.
Contractual Obligations and Other Commitments
Our contractual obligations and other commitments have not changed materially from those reported
in Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Conditions and Results of Operations in our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009.
A total of $307 million of our project specific and other financings mature prior to the end of
2011. The debt maturing in 2010 and 2011 is expected to be repaid from home and /or lot deliveries
over this period or extended. Our net debt to total capitalization ratio as of September 30, 2010,
which we define as total interest-bearing debt less cash divided by total interest-bearing debt
less cash plus equity and other interests in consolidated subsidiaries was 43%, compared to 42% at
December 31, 2009. For a description of the specific risks facing us if, for any reason, we are
unable to meet these obligations, refer to the section of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2009 entitled Risk Factors Our debt and leverage could adversely affect
our financial condition.
Our project specific financings require Brookfield Homes Holdings Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary
of our company, to maintain a tangible net worth of at least $250 million, a net indebtedness to
capitalization ratio of no greater than 65% and a net indebtedness to tangible net worth ratio of
no greater than 2.50 to 1. At September 30, 2010, we were in compliance with all our project
specific financing covenants. The following are computations of the most restrictive of Brookfield
Homes Holdings Inc.s tangible net worth, net indebtedness to capitalization ratio, and net
indebtedness to tangible net worth ratio covenants:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual as of |
|
|
|
Covenant |
|
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
Tangible net worth ($US millions). |
|
$ |
250 |
|
|
$ |
517 |
|
Net indebtedness to capitalization |
|
|
65% |
|
|
|
50% |
|
Net indebtedness to tangible net worth |
|
|
2.50 to 1 |
|
|
|
0.94 to 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At September 30, 2010, our revolving operating facility with a subsidiary of Brookfield Asset
Management Inc. required us to maintain minimum stockholders equity of $300 million and a
consolidated net debt to book capitalization ratio of no greater than 70%. At September 30, 2010,
we were in compliance with all our covenants. The following are computations of Brookfield Homes
Corporations minimum stockholders equity and net debt to capitalization ratio covenants:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual as of |
|
|
|
Covenant |
|
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
Minimum stockholders equity ($US millions) |
|
$ |
300 |
|
|
$ |
486 |
|
Net debt to capitalization |
|
|
70% |
|
|
|
43% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
In the ordinary course of business, we use land and lot option contracts and unconsolidated
entities to acquire control of land to mitigate the risk of declining land values. Option contracts
for the purchase of land permit us to control the land for an extended period of time, until
options expire and/or we are ready to sell or develop the land for home construction. This reduces
our financial risk associated with land holdings. As of September 30, 2010, we had $56 million of
primarily non-refundable option deposits and advanced costs. The total exercise price of these
options was $205 million.
Pursuant to the guidance now incorporated in ASC Topic 810 Consolidation (formerly FIN 46(R)), as
described in Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Form 10-Q,
we have consolidated $25 million of our option contracts. Please see Note 2 for additional
information about our lot options.
We also own 1,887 lots and control under option 1,987 lots through our proportionate share of
unconsolidated entities. As of September 30, 2010, our investment in unconsolidated entities
totaled $129 million. We have provided varying levels of guarantees of debt in our unconsolidated
entities. As of September 30, 2010, we had completion guarantees of nil and limited maintenance
guarantees of $13 million with respect to debt in our unconsolidated entities. During the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2010 we did not make any loan re-margin repayments on the debt in
our unconsolidated entities. Please see Note 3 to our consolidated financial statements included
elsewhere in the Form 10-Q for additional information about our investments in unconsolidated
entities.
We obtain letters of credit, performance bonds and other bonds to support our obligations with
respect to the development of our projects. The amount of these obligations outstanding at any time
varies in accordance with our development activities. If these letters of credit or bonds are drawn
upon, we will be obligated to reimburse the issuer of the letter of credit or bonds. As of
September 30, 2010, we had $8 million in letters of credit outstanding and
$126 million in performance bonds for these purposes. The costs to complete related to
our letters of credit and performance bonds are $5 million and $57 million, respectively. We do not
believe that any of these letters of credit or bonds is likely to be drawn upon.
|
|
|
Item 3. |
|
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk |
Exchange Rates
We conduct business in U.S. dollars only, so we are not exposed to currency risks.
Interest Rates
We are exposed to financial risks that arise from the fluctuations in interest rates. Our interest
bearing assets and liabilities are mainly at floating rates, so we would be negatively affected, on
balance, if interest rates increase. In addition at September 30, 2010, we have interest rate swap
contracts totaling $150 million at an average rate of 4.8% per annum. Based on our net debt levels
as of September 30, 2010, a 1% change up or down in interest rates would have either a negative or
positive effect of approximately $2 million on our cash flows.
Our interest rate swaps are not designated as hedges under ASC Topic 815 (formerly SFAS 133)
Derivatives and Hedging. We are exposed to market risk associated with changes in the fair values
of the swaps, and such changes must be reflected in our consolidated statements of operations. As
of September 30, 2010, the fair value of the interest rate swaps totaled a liability of $20
million.
|
|
|
Item 4. |
|
Controls and Procedures |
As of the end of our fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2010, an evaluation of the
effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a 15(e) and 15d
15(e) of the United States Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act)) was
carried out under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer (CEO)
and Chief Financial Officer (CFO). Based upon that evaluation, the CEO and CFO have concluded
that as of the end of such fiscal quarter, our disclosure controls and procedures are effective:
(i) to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit
under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods
specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms; and (ii) to ensure that
information required to be disclosed in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act
is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our CEO and CFO, to allow timely
decisions regarding required disclosure.
29
It should be noted that while our management, including the CEO and CFO, believe our disclosure
controls and procedures provide a reasonable level of assurance that such controls and procedures
are effective, they do not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures or internal controls
will prevent all error and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived or operated,
can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are
met.
There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended
September 30, 2010, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our
internal control over financial reporting.
|
|
|
PART II. |
|
OTHER INFORMATION |
|
|
|
Item 1. |
|
Legal Proceedings |
We are party to various legal actions arising in the ordinary course of our business. We
believe that none of these actions, either individually or in the aggregate, will have a material
adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.
There have been no material changes in our risk factors from those disclosed in our Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009.
|
|
|
Item 2. |
|
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds |
Our Board of Directors approved a share repurchase program that allows us to repurchase in
aggregate up to $144 million of our outstanding common shares of which the remaining amount
approved for repurchase at September 30, 2010 was approximately $49 million.
During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, we did not repurchase any shares of our
common stock.
|
|
|
Item 3. |
|
Defaults Upon Senior Securities |
None.
|
|
|
Item 4. |
|
Removed and Reserved |
|
|
|
Item 5. |
|
Other Information |
None.
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger and
Contribution dated October 4, 2010 Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 2.1 of the Registrants Current Report
on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on October 8, 2010 |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Rule 13a 14(a) certification by Ian G. Cockwell, President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Rule 13a 14(a) certification by Craig J. Laurie, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350 |
30
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, on
this 3rd day of
November, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
BROOKFIELD HOMES CORPORATION
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ CRAIG J. LAURIE
|
|
|
|
Craig J. Laurie |
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
31
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
Description |
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger and
Contribution dated October 4, 2010 Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 2.1 of the Registrants Current Report
on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on October 8, 2010 |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Rule 13a 14(a) certification by Ian G. Cockwell, President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Rule 13a 14(a) certification by Craig J. Laurie, Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350 |