e10vq
FORM 10-Q
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
(Mark one)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 0-22462
Gibraltar Industries, Inc.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
16-1445150 |
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
incorporation or organization)
|
|
Identification No.) |
3556 Lake Shore Road, P.O. Box 2028, Buffalo, New York 14219-0228
(Address of principal executive offices)
(716) 826-6500
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to
be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to
file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted
on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be
submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this
chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See
definition of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting
company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o |
|
Accelerated filer þ |
|
Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicated by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act.). Yes o No þ
As of November 1, 2010, the number of common shares outstanding was: 30,297,303.
GIBRALTAR INDUSTRIES, INC.
INDEX
2
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
GIBRALTAR INDUSTRIES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(in thousands, except per share data)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
182,061 |
|
|
$ |
190,520 |
|
|
$ |
531,360 |
|
|
$ |
547,661 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
150,758 |
|
|
|
145,803 |
|
|
|
431,576 |
|
|
|
446,392 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
31,303 |
|
|
|
44,717 |
|
|
|
99,784 |
|
|
|
101,269 |
|
Selling, general, and administrative expense |
|
|
25,840 |
|
|
|
26,437 |
|
|
|
80,226 |
|
|
|
77,101 |
|
Intangible asset impairment (recovery) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(177 |
) |
|
|
25,501 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations |
|
|
5,463 |
|
|
|
18,280 |
|
|
|
19,735 |
|
|
|
(1,333 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
|
(4,746 |
) |
|
|
(7,050 |
) |
|
|
(16,483 |
) |
|
|
(17,435 |
) |
Equity in partnerships income and other income |
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
164 |
|
|
|
163 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before taxes |
|
|
750 |
|
|
|
11,286 |
|
|
|
3,416 |
|
|
|
(18,605 |
) |
(Benefit of) provision for income taxes |
|
|
(592 |
) |
|
|
3,668 |
|
|
|
602 |
|
|
|
(7,298 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
|
|
1,342 |
|
|
|
7,618 |
|
|
|
2,814 |
|
|
|
(11,307 |
) |
Discontinued operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before taxes |
|
|
(236 |
) |
|
|
(4,298 |
) |
|
|
(30,697 |
) |
|
|
(18,411 |
) |
Benefit of income taxes |
|
|
(91 |
) |
|
|
(1,592 |
) |
|
|
(11,330 |
) |
|
|
(7,086 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations |
|
|
(145 |
) |
|
|
(2,706 |
) |
|
|
(19,367 |
) |
|
|
(11,325 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
1,197 |
|
|
$ |
4,912 |
|
|
$ |
(16,553 |
) |
|
$ |
(22,632 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per share Basic: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
|
$ |
(0.38 |
) |
Loss from discontinued operations |
|
|
(0.00 |
) |
|
|
(0.09 |
) |
|
|
(0.64 |
) |
|
|
(0.37 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
$ |
(0.55 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.75 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding Basic |
|
|
30,325 |
|
|
|
30,158 |
|
|
|
30,295 |
|
|
|
30,126 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per share Diluted: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
|
$ |
(0.38 |
) |
Loss from discontinued operations |
|
|
(0.00 |
) |
|
|
(0.09 |
) |
|
|
(0.63 |
) |
|
|
(0.37 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
$ |
(0.54 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.75 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding Diluted |
|
|
30,442 |
|
|
|
30,338 |
|
|
|
30,442 |
|
|
|
30,126 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
3
GIBRALTAR INDUSTRIES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
48,315 |
|
|
$ |
23,596 |
|
Accounts receivable, net of reserve of $3,673 and $3,853 in
2010 and 2009, respectively |
|
|
96,222 |
|
|
|
71,782 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
85,230 |
|
|
|
86,296 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
17,006 |
|
|
|
25,513 |
|
Assets of discontinued operations |
|
|
5,307 |
|
|
|
44,938 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
252,080 |
|
|
|
252,125 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant, and equipment, net |
|
|
165,833 |
|
|
|
174,704 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
393,640 |
|
|
|
392,704 |
|
Acquired intangibles |
|
|
78,141 |
|
|
|
82,182 |
|
Investment in partnership |
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
2,474 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
17,133 |
|
|
|
17,811 |
|
Assets of discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
52,942 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
906,954 |
|
|
$ |
974,942 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Shareholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
65,571 |
|
|
$ |
47,383 |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
42,676 |
|
|
|
38,757 |
|
Current maturities of long-term debt |
|
|
408 |
|
|
|
408 |
|
Liabilities of discontinued operations |
|
|
4,547 |
|
|
|
22,468 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
113,202 |
|
|
|
109,016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
206,706 |
|
|
|
256,874 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
52,552 |
|
|
|
51,818 |
|
Other non-current liabilities |
|
|
19,818 |
|
|
|
16,791 |
|
Liabilities of discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,217 |
|
Shareholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; authorized: 10,000,000
shares; none outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value; authorized 50,000,000 shares;
30,516,197 and 30,295,084 shares issued at September
30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively |
|
|
305 |
|
|
|
303 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
231,284 |
|
|
|
227,362 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
287,429 |
|
|
|
303,982 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(2,037 |
) |
|
|
(2,230 |
) |
Cost of 218,894 and 150,903 common shares held in treasury
at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively |
|
|
(2,305 |
) |
|
|
(1,191 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
514,676 |
|
|
|
528,226 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
906,954 |
|
|
$ |
974,942 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
4
GIBRALTAR INDUSTRIES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Cash Flows from Operating Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(16,553 |
) |
|
$ |
(22,632 |
) |
Loss from discontinued operations |
|
|
(19,367 |
) |
|
|
(11,325 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
|
|
2,814 |
|
|
|
(11,307 |
) |
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by
operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
19,916 |
|
|
|
19,535 |
|
Intangible asset impairment (recovery) |
|
|
(177 |
) |
|
|
25,501 |
|
Provision for deferred income taxes |
|
|
375 |
|
|
|
(10,749 |
) |
Equity in partnerships income |
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
(55 |
) |
Stock compensation expense |
|
|
3,599 |
|
|
|
3,426 |
|
Non-cash charges to interest expense |
|
|
3,762 |
|
|
|
2,797 |
|
Other non-cash adjustments |
|
|
1,026 |
|
|
|
3,224 |
|
Increase (decrease) in cash resulting from changes in: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
(24,824 |
) |
|
|
1,269 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
(187 |
) |
|
|
44,077 |
|
Other current assets and other assets |
|
|
7,341 |
|
|
|
(4,780 |
) |
Accounts payable |
|
|
19,048 |
|
|
|
3,174 |
|
Accrued expenses and other non-current liabilities |
|
|
6,984 |
|
|
|
7,454 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities of continuing operations |
|
|
39,654 |
|
|
|
83,566 |
|
Net cash provided by operating activities of discontinued operations |
|
|
14,774 |
|
|
|
28,026 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
54,428 |
|
|
|
111,592 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Investing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net proceeds from sale of business |
|
|
29,164 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net proceeds from sale of property and equipment |
|
|
271 |
|
|
|
269 |
|
Additional consideration for acquisitions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,354 |
) |
Purchase of investment in partnership |
|
|
(1,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property, plant, and equipment |
|
|
(6,347 |
) |
|
|
(7,443 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities of continuing operations |
|
|
22,088 |
|
|
|
(11,528 |
) |
Net cash used in investing activities of discontinued operations |
|
|
(436 |
) |
|
|
(629 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
|
|
21,652 |
|
|
|
(12,157 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Financing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt payments |
|
|
(58,967 |
) |
|
|
(122,172 |
) |
Proceeds from long-term debt |
|
|
8,559 |
|
|
|
30,948 |
|
Purchase of treasury stock at market prices |
|
|
(1,114 |
) |
|
|
(627 |
) |
Payment of deferred financing fees |
|
|
(164 |
) |
|
|
(2,292 |
) |
Payment of dividends |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,499 |
) |
Excess tax benefit from stock compensation |
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net proceeds from issuance of common stock |
|
|
270 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(51,361 |
) |
|
|
(95,642 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
24,719 |
|
|
|
3,793 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year |
|
|
23,596 |
|
|
|
11,308 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
48,315 |
|
|
$ |
15,101 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
5
GIBRALTAR INDUSTRIES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
(in thousands)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
Paid-In |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Treasury Stock |
|
|
Shareholders |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Loss |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Equity |
|
Balance at December 31, 2009 |
|
|
30,295 |
|
|
$ |
303 |
|
|
$ |
227,362 |
|
|
$ |
303,982 |
|
|
$ |
(2,230 |
) |
|
|
151 |
|
|
$ |
(1,191 |
) |
|
$ |
528,226 |
|
Net loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,553 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,553 |
) |
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,064 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,064 |
) |
Adjustment to post-retirement health
care liability |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Adjustment to retirement benefit
liability, net of taxes of $33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50 |
|
Reclassification of unrealized loss on
interest rate swap, net of tax of $693 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,206 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,206 |
|
Issuance of restricted stock |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,599 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,599 |
|
Net settlement of restricted stock units |
|
|
187 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
(1,114 |
) |
|
|
(1,114 |
) |
Stock options exercised |
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
270 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
270 |
|
Excess tax benefit from stock
compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2010 |
|
|
30,516 |
|
|
$ |
305 |
|
|
$ |
231,284 |
|
|
$ |
287,429 |
|
|
$ |
(2,037 |
) |
|
|
219 |
|
|
$ |
(2,305 |
) |
|
$ |
514,676 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
6
GIBRALTAR INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
1. CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared by Gibraltar
Industries, Inc. (the Company) without audit. In the opinion of management, all
adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments and accruals) necessary to
present fairly the financial position at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the
results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009,
the statements of cash flow for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, and
the statement of shareholders equity for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 have
been included therein in accordance with U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
rules and regulations and prepared using the same accounting principles as are used for
our annual audited financial statements.
Certain information and footnote disclosures, including significant accounting policies
normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America, have been condensed or
omitted in accordance with the prescribed SEC rules. It is suggested that these
consolidated financial statements be read in conjunction with the consolidated
financial statements and footnotes included in the Companys Annual Report to
Shareholders for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed on Form 10-K.
The consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2009 has been derived from the audited
consolidated financial statements at that date, restated for discontinued operations,
but does not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally
accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. Certain 2009 amounts
have been reclassified to conform to the 2010 presentation.
The results of operations for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2010
are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year.
2. RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In February 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting
Standards Update (Update) 2010-09, Subsequent Events (Topic 855) Amendments to
Certain Recognition and Disclosure Requirements. Update 2010-09 removes the
requirement for SEC filers to disclose the date through which an entity has evaluated
subsequent events. However, the disclosure exemption does not relieve management of an
SEC filer from its responsibility to evaluate subsequent events through the date on
which financial statements are issued. Update 2010-09 became effective for the Company
for the fourth quarter of 2009. The adoption of the provisions of the Update did not
have a material impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
In July 2010, the FASB issued Update 2010-20, Receivables (Topic 310) Disclosures
about the Credit Quality of Financing Receivables and the Allowance for Credit Losses.
Update 2010-20 requires additional disclosure to assist financial statement users in
assessing an entitys credit risk exposures and evaluating the adequacy of its
allowance for credit losses. Update 2010-20 affects all entities with financing
receivables, excluding short-term trade accounts receivables or receivables measures at
fair value or lower of cost or fair value. The Company is required to adopt all of the
provisions of Update 2010-20 related to disclosures of financing receivables as of
December 31, 2010. The financing receivables disclosures related to activity that
occurs during a reporting period are required to be adopted by the Company during the
three months ending March 31, 2011. The Company does not believe the provisions of
this guidance will have a significant impact on the Companys consolidated financial
position, cash flows, or results of operations.
7
3. INVENTORIES
Inventories consist of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Raw material |
|
$ |
34,172 |
|
|
$ |
34,478 |
|
Work-in-process |
|
|
4,840 |
|
|
|
4,868 |
|
Finished goods |
|
|
46,218 |
|
|
|
46,950 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total inventories |
|
$ |
85,230 |
|
|
$ |
86,296 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. ACQUISITIONS
In 2006, the Company acquired all of the outstanding stock of Home Impressions, Inc.
(Home Impressions). As part of the purchase agreement with the former owners of Home
Impressions, the Company was required to pay additional consideration based upon the
operating results of Home Impressions. The Company paid $4,354,000 of such additional
consideration during the nine months ended September 30, 2009. These additional
consideration payments were recorded as additional goodwill. The Company has made the
final contingent payment due under the purchase agreement and no further additional
consideration payments are expected.
5. GOODWILL AND RELATED INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Goodwill
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the nine months ended September 30,
2010 are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
392,704 |
|
Impairment recovery |
|
|
177 |
|
Goodwill acquired |
|
|
1,352 |
|
Foreign currency translation |
|
|
(593 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Balance as of September 30, 2010 |
|
$ |
393,640 |
|
|
|
|
|
The goodwill balances as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 are net of
accumulated impairment losses of $58,831,000 and $59,008,000, respectively, which were
generated during the year ended December 31, 2009. An adjustment to the impairment
charges was recognized during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 as described
below.
As described in Note 6 of the consolidated financial statements, the Company entered
into a membership interest purchase agreement on May 24, 2010 to acquire a 10%
membership interest in Structural Soft, LLC. The Companys investment in Structural
Soft, LLC exceeded its applicable share of the investees net assets at the date the
membership interest was purchased and resulted in equity method goodwill of
approximately $1,352,000. Equity method goodwill is not amortized or tested for
impairment with the Companys other goodwill. The Company reviews the equity method
goodwill for impairment when indicators of impairment exist and would recognize an
impairment loss when there is a loss in the value of the equity method investment which
is deemed to be other than a temporary decline.
Based on lower than forecasted sales volumes during 2009, revised long-term growth
expectations, and a book value of equity in excess of market capitalization, the
Company concluded there were indicators of goodwill impairment requiring interim
impairment tests for its eleven reporting units as of March 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009.
As of September 30, 2010, the Company concluded that no new indicators of goodwill
impairment existed and an interim test was not performed.
8
Step one of the goodwill impairment tests as of March 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009
consisted of comparing the fair value of a reporting unit, determined using estimated
discounted cash flows, with its carrying amount including goodwill. The fair value of
each reporting unit with goodwill was estimated using a weighted average cost of capital
(WACC) between 12.0% and 12.6%. The WACC was calculated based upon the capital
structure of eight market participants in the Companys peer group. A third-party
forecast of housing starts was utilized to prepare the estimated cash flows.
As of the March 31, 2009 goodwill impairment test, one reporting unit had a carrying
amount exceeding the reporting units fair value due to a decrease in projected revenues
to be generated by the reporting unit. Therefore, the Company initiated step two of the
goodwill impairment test which involved calculating the implied fair value of goodwill
by allocating the fair value of the reporting unit to its assets and liabilities other
than goodwill and comparing it to the carrying amount of goodwill. As a result of step
two of the goodwill impairment test, the Company estimated that the implied fair value
of goodwill for the reporting unit was less than its carrying value by $25,501,000,
which was recorded as an impairment charge during the three months ended March 31, 2009.
All other reporting units with goodwill had an estimated fair value in excess of their
carrying value as of the March 31, 2009 goodwill impairment test. All reporting units
with goodwill had an estimated fair value in excess of their carrying value as of the
June 30, 2009 goodwill impairment test.
The Company recorded goodwill impairment charges of $33,507,000 during the three months
ended December 31, 2009 based on estimates used to determine a preliminary allocation
of fair value under the second step of the annual goodwill impairment test. During the
three months ended March 31, 2010, the Company finalized the determination of fair
value for intangible assets which led to a $177,000 decrease in the goodwill impairment
estimated during the fourth quarter of 2009. The Company recorded the adjustment to
the impairment charge and recognized an increase in operating income during the three
months ended March 31, 2010.
The Company will continue to monitor impairment indicators and financial results in
future periods. If cash flows change or if the market value of the Companys stock
does not increase, there may be additional impairment charges. Impairment charges
could be based on factors such as the Companys stock price, forecasted cash flows,
assumptions used, control premiums, or other variables.
Acquired Intangible Assets
Acquired intangible assets consist of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Carrying |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Gross Carrying |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Estimated Life |
|
Trademark |
|
$ |
40,585 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
40,612 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
indefinite |
Trademark |
|
|
2,115 |
|
|
|
(867 |
) |
|
|
2,115 |
|
|
|
(744 |
) |
|
|
2 to 15 years |
|
Unpatented Technology |
|
|
5,732 |
|
|
|
(2,188 |
) |
|
|
5,732 |
|
|
|
(1,795 |
) |
|
|
5 to 20 years |
|
Customer Relationships |
|
|
47,860 |
|
|
|
(15,918 |
) |
|
|
48,086 |
|
|
|
(12,910 |
) |
|
|
5 to 15 years |
|
Non-Competition Agreements |
|
|
2,800 |
|
|
|
(1,978 |
) |
|
|
2,799 |
|
|
|
(1,713 |
) |
|
|
5 to 10 years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
99,092 |
|
|
$ |
(20,951 |
) |
|
$ |
99,344 |
|
|
$ |
(17,162 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes the acquired intangible asset amortization expense
for the three and nine months ended September 30 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
Three months ended September 30 |
|
$ |
1,304 |
|
|
$ |
1,308 |
|
Nine months ended September 30 |
|
$ |
3,887 |
|
|
$ |
3,888 |
|
9
Amortization expense related to acquired intangible assets for the remainder of
fiscal 2010 and the next five years thereafter is estimated as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
$ |
1,271 |
|
2011 |
|
$ |
5,085 |
|
2012 |
|
$ |
4,961 |
|
2013 |
|
$ |
4,670 |
|
2014 |
|
$ |
3,790 |
|
2015 |
|
$ |
3,683 |
|
6. EQUITY METHOD INVESTMENT
On May 24, 2010, the Company entered into a membership interest purchase agreement to
acquire a 10% membership interest in Structural Soft, LLC. Structural Soft, LLC is a
developer of software used in the design of residential construction projects. The
investment is accounted for using the equity method of accounting, under which the
Companys share of the earnings of the investee is recognized in income as earned and
distributions are credited against the investment when received. The Companys
proportionate share in the net assets of Structural Soft, LLC was approximately $127,000
at September 30, 2010.
7. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Two members of the Companys Board of Directors, Gerald S. Lippes and Arthur A. Russ,
Jr., are partners in law firms that provide legal services to the Company. For the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, the Company incurred expense of $161,000
and $813,000, respectively, for legal services from these firms. The Company incurred
$340,000 and $875,000 of expense for legal services from these firms during the three
and nine months ended September 30, 2009, respectively. Of the amounts incurred during
the nine months ended September 30, 2010, $176,000 related to the sale of the Processed
Metal Products business and was recognized as a component of discontinued operations.
All other amounts incurred during the 2010 and 2009 periods were expensed as a component
of selling, general, and administrative expenses. At September 30, 2010 and December
31, 2009, the Company had $151,000 and $160,000, respectively, recorded in accounts
payable for amounts due to these law firms.
A member of the Companys Board of Directors, Robert E. Sadler, Jr., is a member of the
Board of Directors of M&T Bank Corporation, one of the eleven participating lenders
which have committed capital under the Companys Third Amended and Restated Credit
Agreement dated July 24, 2009 (the Senior Credit Agreement). As of September 30, 2010
and December 31, 2009, the Senior Credit Agreement provided the Company with a
revolving credit facility with availability up to $200 million. See Note 8 to the
consolidated financial statements for the amounts outstanding on the revolving credit
facility as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009.
10
8. LONG-TERM DEBT
Long-term debt consists of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Revolving credit facility |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
50,000 |
|
Senior Subordinated 8% Notes recorded
net of unamortized discount of $2,110
and $2,350 at September 30, 2010 and
December 31, 2009, respectively |
|
|
201,890 |
|
|
|
201,650 |
|
Other debt |
|
|
5,224 |
|
|
|
5,632 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt |
|
|
207,114 |
|
|
|
257,282 |
|
Less current maturities |
|
|
408 |
|
|
|
408 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt |
|
$ |
206,706 |
|
|
$ |
256,874 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Standby letters of credit of $13,699,000 have been issued under the Senior Credit
Agreement to third parties on behalf of the Company as of September 30, 2010. These
letters of credit reduce the amount otherwise available under the revolving credit
facility. As of September 30, 2010, the Company had $104,275,000 of availability under
the revolving credit facility.
Borrowings under the Senior Credit Agreement are secured by the trade receivables,
inventory, personal property and equipment, and certain real property of the Companys
significant domestic subsidiaries. The Senior Credit Agreement provides for a
revolving credit facility and letters of credit in an aggregate amount that do not
exceed the lesser of (i) $200 million or (ii) a borrowing base determined by reference
to the trade receivables, inventories, and property, plant, and equipment of the
Companys significant domestic subsidiaries. The revolving credit facility is
committed through August 30, 2012. The Senior Credit Agreement also provided a term
loan originally aggregating $58,730,000, which was subsequently repaid in full during
2009.
Borrowings under the revolving credit facility bear interest at a variable rate based
upon the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR), with a LIBOR floor of 1.50%, plus 3.25%
or, at the Companys option, an alternate base rate. The revolving credit facility also
carries an annual facility fee of 0.50% on the entire facility, whether drawn or
undrawn, and fees on outstanding letters of credit which are payable quarterly.
Borrowings under the term loan bore interest at LIBOR, with a LIBOR floor of 1.50%, plus
3.75% or, at the Companys option, an alternate base rate.
On a trailing four-quarter basis, the Senior Credit Agreement includes a single
financial covenant that requires the Company to maintain a minimum fixed charge
coverage ratio of 1.25 to 1.00 at the end of each quarter. As of September 30, 2010,
the Company was in compliance with this financial covenant. The Senior Credit
Agreement contains other provisions and events of default that are customary for
similar agreements and may limit the Companys ability to take various actions. The
Companys significant domestic subsidiaries have guaranteed the obligations under the
Senior Credit Agreement.
On December 8, 2005, the Company issued $204,000,000 of Senior Subordinated 8% Notes
(8% Notes), due December 1, 2015, at a discount to yield 8.25%. The 8% Notes are
guaranteed by certain existing and future domestic subsidiaries and are not subject to
any sinking fund requirements.
9. DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES
The Company is exposed to certain risks relating to its ongoing business operations.
The primary risk managed by using derivative instruments is interest rate risk.
Interest rate swaps are entered into to manage interest rate risk associated with the
Companys variable-rate borrowings. During the three and nine months ended September
30, 2010 and 2009, the Company had an interest rate swap outstanding with a notional
amount of $57,500,000, which expires on December 22, 2010. The Company designated its
interest rate swap as a cash flow hedge at inception.
11
In connection with the execution of the Companys Third Amended and Restated Credit
Agreement dated July 24, 2009, the Company de-designated the swap as a hedge and
beginning in the third quarter of 2009 all changes in the fair value of the swap were
prospectively recorded in earnings as increases or decreases to interest expense.
During the second half of 2009 and the first quarter of 2010, the Company amortized
amounts remaining in accumulated other comprehensive loss related to the swap to
interest expense.
On February 1, 2010, the Company sold the majority of the assets of the Process Metal
Products business as disclosed in Note 13 of the consolidated financial statements.
The Company used the proceeds from the sale together with cash generated from
operations to repay all remaining variable-rate debt during the three months ended
March 31, 2010. Accordingly, all losses previously deferred in accumulated other
comprehensive loss related to the interest rate swap were reclassified to interest
expense during the three months ended March 31, 2010. Changes in the fair value of the
swap continued to be recorded in earnings and will be until the swap expires.
FASB Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging,
requires assets or liabilities to be recognized in the consolidated balance sheet at
fair value for all derivative instruments. The determination of the fair value of the
interest rate swap is disclosed in Note 12. As of September 30, 2010 and December 31,
2009, the Company recorded liabilities of $688,000 and $2,564,000, respectively, as an
accrued expense on the consolidated balance sheets for the interest rate swap.
As noted above, all losses reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive
loss related to the interest rate swap were reclassified into earnings as interest
expense during the three months ended March 31, 2010. Additionally, changes in the fair
value of the interest rate swap were recorded in current earnings as interest expense or
income during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010.
During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, the effective portion of the
gain or loss on the interest rate swap was reported as a component of other
comprehensive income and reclassified into earnings as interest expense accrued on the
applicable variable-rate borrowings. Gains or losses on the interest rate swap
representing hedge ineffectiveness were recognized in current earnings as interest
expense or income during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009.
The following table summarizes the gains and losses recorded in interest expense and
other comprehensive income as a result of the interest rate swap for the three and nine
months ended September 30 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Adjustments to interest expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss reclassified from accumulated other
comprehensive income |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
490 |
|
|
$ |
1,899 |
|
|
$ |
1,519 |
|
Loss from changes in the fair value of the
ineffective portion of the interest rate
swap |
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
755 |
|
|
|
170 |
|
|
|
759 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loss included in interest expense |
|
$ |
54 |
|
|
$ |
1,245 |
|
|
$ |
2,069 |
|
|
$ |
2,278 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments to other comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized loss reclassified to interest
expense, net of taxes |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
311 |
|
|
$ |
302 |
|
|
$ |
954 |
|
Unrealized loss reclassified to interest
expense, net of taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
904 |
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized loss from changes in the fair
value of the effective portion of the
interest rate swap, net of taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(44 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain included in other comprehensive income |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
311 |
|
|
$ |
1,206 |
|
|
$ |
910 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
10. EMPLOYEE RETIREMENT AND OTHER POST-RETIREMENT BENEFIT PLANS
The following tables present the components of net periodic pension and other
post-retirement benefit costs charged to expense for the three and nine months ended
September 30 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Benefit |
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
20 |
|
|
$ |
28 |
|
|
$ |
60 |
|
|
$ |
83 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
128 |
|
|
|
132 |
|
Amortization of unrecognized prior service cost |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit costs |
|
$ |
91 |
|
|
$ |
88 |
|
|
$ |
271 |
|
|
$ |
265 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Post-retirement Benefits |
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
18 |
|
|
$ |
10 |
|
|
$ |
54 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
170 |
|
|
|
191 |
|
Amortization of unrecognized prior service cost |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(14 |
) |
Loss amortization |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
Curtailment benefit |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit costs Net periodic
benefit costs |
|
$ |
60 |
|
|
$ |
93 |
|
|
$ |
181 |
|
|
$ |
280 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11. EQUITY-BASED COMPENSATION
Equity-based payments to employees and directors, including grants of stock options,
restricted stock units, and restricted stock, are recognized in the statements of
operations based on the grant date fair value of the award. The Company uses the
straight-line method of attributing the value of stock-based compensation expense over
the vesting periods. Stock compensation expense recognized during the period is based
on the value of the portion of equity-based awards that is ultimately expected to vest
during the period. Vesting requirements vary for directors, executives, and key
employees with a range that typically equals three to four years.
The Gibraltar Industries, Inc. 2005 Equity Incentive Plan (the Plan) is an incentive compensation plan that allows the Company to grant equity-based incentive compensation awards to eligible participants to provide them an additional incentive to promote the
business of the Company, to increase their proprietary interest in the success of the Company, and to encourage them to remain in the Companys employ. Awards under the
plan may be in the form of options, restricted shares, restricted units, performance shares, performance stock units, and rights. The Plan provides for the issuance of up
to 3,000,000 shares of common stock. Of the total number of shares of common stock issuable under the Plan, the aggregate number of shares which may be issued in
connection with grants of incentive stock options and rights cannot exceed 900,000 shares. Vesting terms and award life are governed by the award document.
13
The following table provides the number of restricted stock units (that will convert to shares upon vesting) and non-qualified stock options that were issued during the nine
months ended September 30 along with the weighted average grant date fair value of each
type of award:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Grant Date |
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Grant Date |
|
Awards |
|
Awards |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Awards |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Restricted Stock Units |
|
|
169,867 |
|
|
$ |
16.80 |
|
|
|
280,696 |
|
|
$ |
11.92 |
|
Restricted Shares |
|
|
6,000 |
|
|
$ |
12.74 |
|
|
|
6,000 |
|
|
$ |
7.92 |
|
Non-qualified Stock Options |
|
|
131,000 |
|
|
$ |
4.62 |
|
|
|
146,850 |
|
|
$ |
5.88 |
|
In September 2009, the Company awarded 905,000 performance stock units. As of
September 30, 2010, 884,667 of the originally awarded performance stock units remain
outstanding after forfeitures and re-issuances. The final number of performance stock
units earned will be determined based on the Companys total stockholder returns
relative to a peer group for three separate performance periods, consisting of the
years ending December 31, 2009, 2010, and 2011. The performance stock units earned
will be converted to cash based on the trailing 90-day closing price of the Companys
common stock as of the last day of the third performance period and will be paid in
January 2012. During the first performance period consisting of the year ended
December 31, 2009, participants earned 34% of the targeted 295,000 performance stock
units, or 100,300 units.
The cost of the performance stock awards will be accrued over the vesting period which
ends December 31, 2011. As of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the value of
the performance stock units accrued was based on a weighted average fair value of $4.15
and $13.73 per unit awarded, respectively. The fair value per unit awarded was
estimated using the actual performance stock units earned during the first performance
period ended December 31, 2009, an estimate of the number of units expected to be earned
during the remaining performance periods ending December 31, 2010 and 2011, and the
estimated trailing 90-day closing price of the Companys stock as of December 31, 2011
discounted to present value. The following table summarizes the compensation expense
recognized from the change in fair value and vesting of performance stock units awarded
for the three and nine months ended September 30 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
Three months ended September 30 |
|
$ |
59 |
|
|
$ |
97 |
|
Nine months ended September 30 |
|
$ |
42 |
|
|
$ |
97 |
|
The Management Stock Purchase Plan (MSPP) is an integral component of the Plan
and provides participants the ability to defer a portion of their salary, their annual
bonus under the Management Incentive Compensation Plan, and Directors fees. The
deferral is converted to restricted stock units and credited to an account together with
a company-match in restricted stock units equal to a percentage of the deferral amount.
The account is converted to cash at the trailing 200-day average closing price of the
Companys stock and payable to the participants upon a termination of their service to
the Company. The matching portion vests only if the participant has reached their
sixtieth (60th) birthday. If a participant terminates their service to the
Company prior to age sixty (60), the match is forfeited. Upon termination, the account
is converted to a cash account that accrues interest at 2% over the then current
ten-year U.S. Treasury note rate. The account is then paid out in five equal annual
cash installments.
The fair value of restricted stock units held in the MSPP equals the trailing 200-day
closing price of the Companys common stock as of the last day of the period. During
the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, 144,536 and 119,036 restricted stock
units, respectively, including the company-match, were credited to participant accounts.
At September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the value of the restricted stock units in
the MSPP was $12.32 and $10.52 per unit, respectively. At September 30, 2010 and
December 31, 2009, 448,497 and 303,961 restricted stock units, including the
company-match, were credited to participant accounts including 41,106 and 33,368,
respectively, of unvested restricted stock units.
14
12. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
FASB ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, defines fair value, sets
out a framework for measuring fair value, and requires certain disclosures about fair
value measurements. A fair value measurement assumes that the transaction to sell an
asset or transfer a liability occurs in the principal market for the asset or liability
or, in the absence of a principal market, the most advantageous market for the asset or
liability. Fair value is defined based upon an exit price model.
Topic 820 establishes a valuation hierarchy for disclosure of the inputs used to measure
fair value. This hierarchy prioritizes the inputs into three broad levels as follows.
Level 1 inputs are quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or
liabilities. Level 2 inputs are quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in
active markets or inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly
or indirectly through market corroboration, for substantially the full term of the
financial instrument. Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs based on our own
assumptions used to measure assets and liabilities at fair value. A financial asset or
liabilitys classification within the hierarchy is determined based on the lowest level
input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
The following table provides the assets and liabilities carried at fair value measured
on a recurring basis as of September 30, 2010 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Liability) |
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
Interest rate swap |
|
$ |
(688 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(688 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
Interest rate swaps are over-the-counter securities with no quoted readily available
Level 1 inputs and, therefore, are measured at fair value using inputs that are
directly observable in active markets and are classified within Level 2 of the
valuation hierarchy, using the income approach adjusted for the creditworthiness of the
parties involved in the transaction. See Note 9 for a description of where changes in
the fair value of the interest rate swap are recorded within the Companys consolidated
financial statements.
The Company applied the provisions of Topic 820 during the goodwill impairment tests
performed as of March 31, 2009, June 30, 2009, and October 31, 2009. Step one of the
goodwill impairment test consists of determining a fair value for each of the Companys
eleven reporting units. The fair value for the Companys reporting units cannot be
determined using readily available quoted Level 1 inputs or Level 2 inputs that are
observable in active markets. Therefore, the Company used two valuation techniques to
estimate the fair values of its reporting units, using Level 3 inputs. The Company used
an income approach consisting of a discounted cash flow model and a market approach
consisting of an earnings multiple applied to forecasted earnings. The Company used
significant estimates and judgmental factors in both valuation models. The key
estimates and factors used in the valuation models include revenue growth rates and
profit margins based on internal forecasts, terminal value, and the weighted-average
cost of capital used to discount future cash flows. As a result of the goodwill
impairment test performed during the three months ended March 31, 2009, the Company
recognized a goodwill impairment charge for one reporting unit to value goodwill at its
implied fair value. The fair value measurements of the reporting units under the step
one and step two analyses included unobservable inputs defined above that are classified
as Level 3 inputs. As of September 30, 2010, the Company concluded that no new
indicators of goodwill impairment existed and an interim test was not performed.
However, during the first quarter of 2010, the Company recorded a recovery of the
intangible asset impairment recognized as a result of the October 31, 2009 goodwill
impairment test. See Note 5 of the consolidated financial statements for additional
disclosure related to the results of the Companys 2009 goodwill impairment tests. The
Company made no non-recurring fair value measurements during the nine months ended
September 30, 2010.
The Companys financial instruments primarily consist of cash and cash equivalents,
accounts receivable, notes receivable, accounts payable, long-term debt, and interest
rate swaps. The carrying values for our financial instruments approximate fair value
with the exception, at times, of long-term debt. At September 30, 2010, the fair value
of outstanding debt was $212,284,000 compared to its carrying value of $207,114,000.
The fair value of the Companys Senior Subordinated 8% Notes was estimated based on
quoted market prices.
15
13. DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
On February 1, 2010, the Company sold the majority of the assets of the Processed Metal
Products business. The assets were sold for $29,164,000, net of a working capital
adjustment of $936,000. This transaction finalized the Companys exit from the steel
processing business and established the Company solely as a manufacturer and distributor
of products for building markets. The Company incurred an after-tax loss of $19,451,000
from the transaction, net of $11,424,000 of tax benefits. In connection with the sale
of the assets of the Processed Metal Products business, the Company recorded a
contingent liability for an amount due to exit an underfunded multi-employer pension
plan. The amount due is expected to be finalized during the fourth quarter of 2010.
Accordingly, the liability was established based on our best estimate of the amount due.
The Company did not sell certain real estate held by the Processed Metal Products
business and the receivables generated from the operation of the business prior to its
sale. Subsequent to February 1, 2010, the Company collected these receivables net of
uncollectible amounts. As of September 30, 2010, the remaining property, plant, and
equipment were classified as assets of discontinued operations on the balance sheet.
During 2007, the Company committed to a plan to dispose of the assets of its bath
cabinet manufacturing business. Certain assets of this business have not been disposed
of as of September 30, 2010 and the Company continues to incur costs related to those
assets.
The results of operations for the Processed Metal Products business and the bath
cabinet manufacturing business have been classified as discontinued operations in the
consolidated financial statements for all periods presented.
The Company allocates interest to its discontinued operations in accordance with FASB
ASC Subtopic 205-20, Presentation of Financial Statements Discontinued Operations.
Components of the loss from discontinued operations, including the interest allocated to
discontinued operations, for the three and nine months ended September 30 are as follows
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
34,632 |
|
|
$ |
16,575 |
|
|
$ |
99,389 |
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
(236 |
) |
|
|
(38,117 |
) |
|
|
(16,189 |
) |
|
|
(115,626 |
) |
Loss on sale of business |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30,875 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Interest expense allocation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(813 |
) |
|
|
(208 |
) |
|
|
(2,174 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations before taxes |
|
$ |
(236 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,298 |
) |
|
$ |
(30,697 |
) |
|
$ |
(18,411 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14. EXIT ACTIVITY COSTS AND ASSET IMPAIRMENTS
The Company has focused on being the low-cost provider of its products by reducing
operating costs and implementing lean manufacturing initiatives, which have in part led
to the consolidation of its facilities and production lines. The Company consolidated
six facilities during 2009 in this effort. During this process, the Company has
incurred exit activity costs, including contract termination costs, severance costs, and
other moving and closing costs. During 2010, the Company continued to incur exit
activity costs for the facilities consolidated in previous years and some other ongoing
restructuring activities. Ongoing restructuring activities in 2010 resulted in $774,000
of asset impairment charges for product lines the Company will no longer offer. As of
September 30, 2010, the Company expects to incur approximately $300,000 to $400,000 of
additional exit activity costs related to contract termination costs and severance costs
related to two leased facilities that will be closed during the fourth quarter of 2010.
Other than these two facilities, the Company has not identified any other specific
facilities to close or consolidate as of September 30, 2010 and, therefore, does not
expect to incur any other material exit activity costs for future restructuring
activities. However, if future opportunities for cost savings are
identified, other facility consolidations and closings will be
considered.
16
The following table provides a summary of where the exit activity costs and asset
impairments were recorded in the statement of operations for the three and nine months
ended September 30 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
$ |
436 |
|
|
$ |
1,125 |
|
|
$ |
905 |
|
|
$ |
1,705 |
|
Selling, general, and administrative expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
695 |
|
|
|
159 |
|
|
|
763 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total exit activity costs and asset impairments |
|
$ |
436 |
|
|
$ |
1,820 |
|
|
$ |
1,064 |
|
|
$ |
2,468 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table reconciles the beginning and ending liability for exit activity
costs relating to the Companys facility consolidation efforts (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Accrued costs as of January 1 |
|
$ |
1,813 |
|
|
$ |
1,121 |
|
Exit activity costs recognized |
|
|
290 |
|
|
|
2,468 |
|
Cash payments |
|
|
(1,154 |
) |
|
|
(1,275 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued costs as of September 30 |
|
$ |
949 |
|
|
$ |
2,314 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15. INCOME TAXES
The following table summarizes the provision for (benefit of) income taxes for
continuing operations for the three and nine months ended September 30 and the
applicable effective tax rates (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
(Benefit of)
provision for income taxes |
|
$ |
(592 |
) |
|
$ |
3,668 |
|
|
$ |
602 |
|
|
$ |
(7,298 |
) |
|
Effective tax rate |
|
|
(78.9 |
)% |
|
|
32.5 |
% |
|
|
17.6 |
% |
|
|
39.2 |
% |
|
The Companys provision for (benefit of) income taxes in interim periods is computed by
applying forcasted annual effective tax rates to income or loss before income taxes for
the interim period. In addition, non-recurring or discrete items, including interest on
prior year tax liabilities, are recorded during the period in which they occur. To the
extent that actual income or loss before taxes for the full year differs from the
forecast estimates applied at the end of the most recent interim period, the actual tax
rate recognized for the year ending December 31, 2010 could be materially different from
the forecasted rate used for the nine months ended September 30, 2010.
A change in forecasted earnings caused a significant change in the forecasted annual
effective tax rate during the three months ended September 30, 2010. As a result, the
Company recognized a tax benefit for continuing operations during the three months
ended September 30, 2010 due to the change in the year-to-date provision for income
taxes. The provision for income taxes for continuing operations for the nine months
ended September 30, 2010 is based on the most recent estimate of the income tax
provision forecasted for the full year. Small changes in the Companys forecasted
earnings could have a significant impact on the Companys effective tax rate for the
full year as a result of pre-tax earnings being near break-even, non-deductible
permanent items, and certain state taxes.
The provision for income taxes for continuing operations for the three months ended
September 30, 2009 resulted in an effective tax rate of 33%. This tax rate was less
than the U.S. federal statutory tax rate of 35% due to the impact of non-deductible
permanent differences on the then forecasted annual pre-tax loss. The effective tax
rate of 39% for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 was higher than the U.S.
federal statutory tax rate due to state taxes and the tax benefit of adjustments made
to the Companys reserve for uncertain tax positions.
17
16. NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE
Basic income (loss) per share is based on the weighted average number of common shares
outstanding. Diluted income (loss) per share is based on the weighted average number
of common shares outstanding, as well as dilutive potential common shares which, in the
Companys case, comprise shares issuable under its equity compensation plans described
in Note 11 of the consolidated financial statements. The treasury stock method is used
to calculate dilutive shares, which reduces the gross number of dilutive shares by the
number of shares purchasable from the proceeds of the options assumed to be exercised
and the unrecognized expense related to the restricted stock and restricted stock unit
awards assumed to have vested.
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share
for the three and nine months ended September 30:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Numerator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing
operations |
|
$ |
1,342,000 |
|
|
$ |
7,618,000 |
|
|
$ |
2,814,000 |
|
|
$ |
(11,307,000 |
) |
Loss from discontinued operations |
|
|
(145,000 |
) |
|
|
(2,706,000 |
) |
|
|
(19,367,000 |
) |
|
|
(11,325,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) available to
common stockholders |
|
$ |
1,197,000 |
|
|
$ |
4,912,000 |
|
|
$ |
(16,553,000 |
) |
|
$ |
(22,632,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for basic income (loss)
per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares
outstanding |
|
|
30,325,114 |
|
|
|
30,157,572 |
|
|
|
30,294,630 |
|
|
|
30,125,746 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for diluted income
(loss) per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares
outstanding |
|
|
30,325,114 |
|
|
|
30,157,572 |
|
|
|
30,294,630 |
|
|
|
30,125,746 |
|
Common stock options and
restricted stock |
|
|
116,695 |
|
|
|
180,726 |
|
|
|
147,202 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares and
conversions |
|
|
30,441,809 |
|
|
|
30,338,298 |
|
|
|
30,441,832 |
|
|
|
30,125,746 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the nine months ended September 30, 2009, all stock options, unvested restricted
stock, and unvested restricted stock units were anti-dilutive and, therefore, not
included in the dilutive loss per share calculation. The number of weighted average
stock options, unvested restricted stock, and unvested restricted stock units that were
not included in the dilutive loss per share calculation because the effect would have
been anti-dilutive was 163,586 shares for the nine months ended September 30, 2009.
18
17. COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
Total comprehensive income (loss) consists of the following for the three and nine
months ended September 30 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
1,197 |
|
|
$ |
4,912 |
|
|
$ |
(16,553 |
) |
|
$ |
(22,632 |
) |
Other comprehensive income (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
|
|
4,151 |
|
|
|
2,135 |
|
|
|
(1,064 |
) |
|
|
6,771 |
|
Adjustment to post-retirement health
care liability, net of tax |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
Adjustment to retirement benefit
liability, net of tax |
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassification of unrealized loss on
interest rate swaps, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
311 |
|
|
|
1,206 |
|
|
|
910 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income |
|
|
4,169 |
|
|
|
2,448 |
|
|
|
193 |
|
|
|
7,698 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income (loss) |
|
$ |
5,366 |
|
|
$ |
7,360 |
|
|
$ |
(16,360 |
) |
|
$ |
(14,934 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The cumulative balance of each component of accumulated other comprehensive loss, net
of tax, is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unamortized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign |
|
|
Minimum |
|
|
Post- |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
Currency |
|
|
Pension |
|
|
Retirement |
|
|
(Loss) Gain |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
Translation |
|
|
Liability |
|
|
Health Care |
|
|
on Interest |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
|
Adjustment |
|
|
Adjustment |
|
|
Costs |
|
|
Rate Swaps |
|
|
Loss |
|
Balance at December 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
(623 |
) |
|
$ |
(19 |
) |
|
$ |
(382 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,206 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,230 |
) |
Current period change |
|
|
(1,064 |
) |
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1,206 |
|
|
|
193 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2010 |
|
$ |
(1,687 |
) |
|
$ |
31 |
|
|
$ |
(381 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(2,037 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18. SEGMENT INFORMATION
FASB ASC Topic 280, Segment Reporting, establishes the principles for reporting
information about operating segments in financial statements. Previously, the Company
reported certain financial information for two reporting segments, Building Products
and Processed Metal Products. On February 1, 2010, the Company sold the majority of
the assets of the Processed Metal Products segment as discussed in Note 13 of the
consolidated financial statements. As a result of this divestiture and consideration
of the principles of Topic 280, the Company determined that it now has only one
reporting segment for external reporting purposes. Prior period financial information
included herein has been reclassified to reflect the financial position and results of
operations as one segment.
19. SUPPLEMENTAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION
The following information sets forth the consolidating summary financial statements of
the issuer (Gibraltar Industries, Inc.) and guarantors, which guarantee the Senior
Subordinated 8% Notes due December 1, 2015, and the non-guarantors. The guarantors are
wholly owned subsidiaries of the issuer and the guarantees are full, unconditional,
joint and several.
Investments in subsidiaries are accounted for by the parent using the equity method of
accounting. The guarantor subsidiaries and non-guarantor subsidiaries are presented on
a combined basis. The principal elimination entries eliminate investments in
subsidiaries and intercompany balances and transactions.
19
GIBRALTAR INDUSTRIES, INC.
CONSOLIDATING STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2010
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gibraltar |
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
Non-Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Industries, Inc. |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Total |
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
161,000 |
|
|
$ |
25,165 |
|
|
$ |
(4,104 |
) |
|
$ |
182,061 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
133,061 |
|
|
|
22,208 |
|
|
|
(4,511 |
) |
|
|
150,758 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,939 |
|
|
|
2,957 |
|
|
|
407 |
|
|
|
31,303 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general, and administrative expense |
|
|
(312 |
) |
|
|
23,781 |
|
|
|
2,371 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,840 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
|
312 |
|
|
|
4,158 |
|
|
|
586 |
|
|
|
407 |
|
|
|
5,463 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(4,343 |
) |
|
|
(406 |
) |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,746 |
) |
Equity in partnerships income and other income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income before taxes |
|
|
(4,031 |
) |
|
|
3,776 |
|
|
|
598 |
|
|
|
407 |
|
|
|
750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Benefit of) provision for income taxes |
|
|
(1,702 |
) |
|
|
914 |
|
|
|
196 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(592 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income from continuing operations |
|
|
(2,329 |
) |
|
|
2,862 |
|
|
|
402 |
|
|
|
407 |
|
|
|
1,342 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations before taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(236 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(236 |
) |
Benefit of income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(91 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(91 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(145 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(145 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in earnings from subsidiaries |
|
|
3,119 |
|
|
|
402 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,521 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
790 |
|
|
$ |
3,119 |
|
|
$ |
402 |
|
|
$ |
(3,114 |
) |
|
$ |
1,197 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
GIBRALTAR INDUSTRIES, INC.
CONSOLIDATING STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2009
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gibraltar |
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
Non-Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Industries, Inc. |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Total |
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
170,168 |
|
|
$ |
23,605 |
|
|
$ |
(3,253 |
) |
|
$ |
190,520 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
128,136 |
|
|
|
20,376 |
|
|
|
(2,709 |
) |
|
|
145,803 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,032 |
|
|
|
3,229 |
|
|
|
(544 |
) |
|
|
44,717 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general, and administrative expense |
|
|
(137 |
) |
|
|
24,310 |
|
|
|
2,264 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,437 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations |
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
17,722 |
|
|
|
965 |
|
|
|
(544 |
) |
|
|
18,280 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest (expense) income |
|
|
(4,335 |
) |
|
|
(2,715 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,050 |
) |
Equity in partnerships income and other income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income before taxes |
|
|
(4,198 |
) |
|
|
15,063 |
|
|
|
965 |
|
|
|
(544 |
) |
|
|
11,286 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Benefit of) provision for income taxes |
|
|
(1,637 |
) |
|
|
4,883 |
|
|
|
422 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,668 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income from continuing operations |
|
|
(2,561 |
) |
|
|
10,180 |
|
|
|
543 |
|
|
|
(544 |
) |
|
|
7,618 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations before taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,298 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,298 |
) |
Benefit of income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,592 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,592 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,706 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,706 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in earnings from subsidiaries |
|
|
8,017 |
|
|
|
543 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,560 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
5,456 |
|
|
$ |
8,017 |
|
|
$ |
543 |
|
|
$ |
(9,104 |
) |
|
$ |
4,912 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
GIBRALTAR INDUSTRIES, INC.
CONSOLIDATING STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2010
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gibraltar |
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
Non-Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Industries, Inc. |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Total |
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
466,665 |
|
|
$ |
77,976 |
|
|
$ |
(13,281 |
) |
|
$ |
531,360 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
377,219 |
|
|
|
67,123 |
|
|
|
(12,766 |
) |
|
|
431,576 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
89,446 |
|
|
|
10,853 |
|
|
|
(515 |
) |
|
|
99,784 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general, and administrative expense |
|
|
201 |
|
|
|
72,551 |
|
|
|
7,474 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80,226 |
|
Intangible asset impairment recovery |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(177 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(177 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income from operations |
|
|
(201 |
) |
|
|
17,072 |
|
|
|
3,379 |
|
|
|
(515 |
) |
|
|
19,735 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest (expense) income |
|
|
(13,022 |
) |
|
|
(3,471 |
) |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,483 |
) |
Equity in partnerships income and other income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
149 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
164 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income before taxes |
|
|
(13,223 |
) |
|
|
13,750 |
|
|
|
3,404 |
|
|
|
(515 |
) |
|
|
3,416 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Benefit of) provision for income taxes |
|
|
(5,335 |
) |
|
|
4,851 |
|
|
|
1,086 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
602 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income from continuing operations |
|
|
(7,888 |
) |
|
|
8,899 |
|
|
|
2,318 |
|
|
|
(515 |
) |
|
|
2,814 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations before taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30,697 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30,697 |
) |
Benefit of income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,330 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,330 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19,367 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19,367 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in earnings from subsidiaries |
|
|
(8,150 |
) |
|
|
2,318 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,832 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income |
|
$ |
(16,038 |
) |
|
$ |
(8,150 |
) |
|
$ |
2,318 |
|
|
$ |
5,317 |
|
|
$ |
(16,553 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22
GIBRALTAR INDUSTRIES, INC.
CONSOLIDATING STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2009
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gibraltar |
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
Non-Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Industries, Inc. |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Total |
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
491,945 |
|
|
$ |
66,372 |
|
|
$ |
(10,656 |
) |
|
$ |
547,661 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
396,791 |
|
|
|
59,407 |
|
|
|
(9,806 |
) |
|
|
446,392 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
95,154 |
|
|
|
6,965 |
|
|
|
(850 |
) |
|
|
101,269 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general, and administrative expense |
|
|
(184 |
) |
|
|
69,854 |
|
|
|
7,431 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
77,101 |
|
Intangible asset impairment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,501 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,501 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations |
|
|
184 |
|
|
|
(201 |
) |
|
|
(466 |
) |
|
|
(850 |
) |
|
|
(1,333 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest (expense) income |
|
|
(12,994 |
) |
|
|
(4,448 |
) |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17,435 |
) |
Equity in partnerships income and other income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
154 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
163 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before taxes |
|
|
(12,810 |
) |
|
|
(4,495 |
) |
|
|
(450 |
) |
|
|
(850 |
) |
|
|
(18,605 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit of income taxes |
|
|
(4,983 |
) |
|
|
(2,285 |
) |
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,298 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations |
|
|
(7,827 |
) |
|
|
(2,210 |
) |
|
|
(420 |
) |
|
|
(850 |
) |
|
|
(11,307 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations before taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18,411 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18,411 |
) |
Benefit of income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,086 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,086 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,325 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,325 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in earnings from subsidiaries |
|
|
(13,955 |
) |
|
|
(420 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,375 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(21,782 |
) |
|
$ |
(13,955 |
) |
|
$ |
(420 |
) |
|
$ |
13,525 |
|
|
$ |
(22,632 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
GIBRALTAR INDUSTRIES, INC.
CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEETS
SEPTEMBER 30, 2010
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gibraltar |
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
Non-Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Industries, Inc. |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Total |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
31,770 |
|
|
$ |
16,545 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
48,315 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
80,229 |
|
|
|
15,993 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96,222 |
|
Intercompany balances |
|
|
24,793 |
|
|
|
870 |
|
|
|
(25,663 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories |
|
|
|
|
|
|
77,208 |
|
|
|
8,022 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85,230 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
5,335 |
|
|
|
11,295 |
|
|
|
376 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,006 |
|
Assets of discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,307 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,307 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
30,128 |
|
|
|
206,679 |
|
|
|
15,273 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
252,080 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant, and equipment, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
151,206 |
|
|
|
14,627 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
165,833 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
360,710 |
|
|
|
32,930 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
393,640 |
|
Acquired intangibles |
|
|
|
|
|
|
67,394 |
|
|
|
10,747 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78,141 |
|
Investment in partnership |
|
|
|
|
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
127 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
3,793 |
|
|
|
13,339 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,133 |
|
Investment in subsidiaries |
|
|
688,085 |
|
|
|
55,425 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(743,510 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
722,006 |
|
|
$ |
854,880 |
|
|
$ |
73,578 |
|
|
$ |
(743,510 |
) |
|
$ |
906,954 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Shareholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
55,779 |
|
|
$ |
9,792 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
65,571 |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
5,440 |
|
|
|
34,266 |
|
|
|
2,970 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,676 |
|
Current maturities of long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
408 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
408 |
|
Liabilities of discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,547 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,547 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
5,440 |
|
|
|
95,000 |
|
|
|
12,762 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
113,202 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
201,890 |
|
|
|
4,816 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
206,706 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
47,577 |
|
|
|
4,975 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52,552 |
|
Other non-current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,402 |
|
|
|
416 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,818 |
|
Shareholders equity |
|
|
514,676 |
|
|
|
688,085 |
|
|
|
55,425 |
|
|
|
(743,510 |
) |
|
|
514,676 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
722,006 |
|
|
$ |
854,880 |
|
|
$ |
73,578 |
|
|
$ |
(743,510 |
) |
|
$ |
906,954 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
GIBRALTAR INDUSTRIES, INC.
CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEETS
DECEMBER 31, 2009
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gibraltar |
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
Non-Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Industries, Inc. |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Total |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
10,105 |
|
|
$ |
13,491 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
23,596 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
59,569 |
|
|
|
12,213 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71,782 |
|
Intercompany balances |
|
|
21,321 |
|
|
|
5,734 |
|
|
|
(27,055 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories |
|
|
|
|
|
|
79,461 |
|
|
|
6,835 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
86,296 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
6,132 |
|
|
|
17,523 |
|
|
|
1,858 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,513 |
|
Assets of discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,938 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,938 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
27,453 |
|
|
|
217,330 |
|
|
|
7,342 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
252,125 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant, and equipment, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
158,406 |
|
|
|
16,298 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
174,704 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
359,182 |
|
|
|
33,522 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
392,704 |
|
Acquired intangibles |
|
|
|
|
|
|
70,287 |
|
|
|
11,895 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82,182 |
|
Investment in partnership |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,474 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,474 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
4,335 |
|
|
|
13,473 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,811 |
|
Assets of discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
52,942 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52,942 |
|
Investment in subsidiaries |
|
|
699,448 |
|
|
|
53,368 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(752,816 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
731,236 |
|
|
$ |
927,462 |
|
|
$ |
69,060 |
|
|
$ |
(752,816 |
) |
|
$ |
974,942 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Shareholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
39,235 |
|
|
$ |
8,148 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
47,383 |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
1,360 |
|
|
|
35,312 |
|
|
|
2,085 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,757 |
|
Current maturities of long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
408 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
408 |
|
Liabilities of discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,468 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,468 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
1,360 |
|
|
|
97,423 |
|
|
|
10,233 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
109,016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
201,650 |
|
|
|
55,224 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
256,874 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,751 |
|
|
|
5,067 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,818 |
|
Other non-current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,399 |
|
|
|
392 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,791 |
|
Liabilities of discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,217 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,217 |
|
Shareholders equity |
|
|
528,226 |
|
|
|
699,448 |
|
|
|
53,368 |
|
|
|
(752,816 |
) |
|
|
528,226 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
731,236 |
|
|
$ |
927,462 |
|
|
$ |
69,060 |
|
|
$ |
(752,816 |
) |
|
$ |
974,942 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
GIBRALTAR INDUSTRIES, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2010
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gibraltar |
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
Non-Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Industries, Inc. |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Total |
|
Cash Flows from Operating Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities of continuing
operations |
|
$ |
(8,353 |
) |
|
$ |
44,015 |
|
|
$ |
3,992 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
39,654 |
|
Net cash provided by operating activities of discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,774 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,774 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities |
|
|
(8,353 |
) |
|
|
58,789 |
|
|
|
3,992 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54,428 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Investing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net proceeds from sale of business |
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,164 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,164 |
|
Net proceeds from sale of property and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
267 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
271 |
|
Purchases of investment in partnership |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,000 |
) |
Purchases of property, plant, and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,994 |
) |
|
|
(353 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,347 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities of continuing
operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,437 |
|
|
|
(349 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,088 |
|
Net cash used in investing activities of discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(436 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(436 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,001 |
|
|
|
(349 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,652 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Financing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt payments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(58,967 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(58,967 |
) |
Proceeds from long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,559 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,559 |
|
Intercompany financing |
|
|
9,197 |
|
|
|
(8,608 |
) |
|
|
(589 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of treasury stock at market prices |
|
|
(1,114 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,114 |
) |
Payment of deferred financing fees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(164 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(164 |
) |
Excess tax benefit from stock compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55 |
|
Net proceeds from issuance of common stock |
|
|
270 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
270 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
8,353 |
|
|
|
(59,125 |
) |
|
|
(589 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(51,361 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,665 |
|
|
|
3,054 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,719 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,105 |
|
|
|
13,491 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,596 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
31,770 |
|
|
$ |
16,545 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
48,315 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26
GIBRALTAR INDUSTRIES, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2009
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gibraltar |
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
Non-Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Industries, Inc. |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Total |
|
Cash Flows from Operating Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities of continuing operations |
|
$ |
(8,616 |
) |
|
$ |
87,079 |
|
|
$ |
5,103 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
83,566 |
|
Net cash provided by operating activities of discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,026 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,026 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities |
|
|
(8,616 |
) |
|
|
115,105 |
|
|
|
5,103 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
111,592 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Investing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional consideration for acquisitions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,354 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,354 |
) |
Purchases of property, plant, and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,663 |
) |
|
|
(780 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,443 |
) |
Net proceeds from sale of property and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
240 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
269 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities of continuing operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,777 |
) |
|
|
(751 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,528 |
) |
Net cash used in investing activities of discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(629 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(629 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,406 |
) |
|
|
(751 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,157 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Financing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt reduction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(122,172 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(122,172 |
) |
Proceeds from long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,948 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,948 |
|
Intercompany financing |
|
|
10,742 |
|
|
|
(7,891 |
) |
|
|
(2,851 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payment of deferred financing fees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,292 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,292 |
) |
Payment of dividends |
|
|
(1,499 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,499 |
) |
Purchase of treasure stock at market prices |
|
|
(627 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(627 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
8,616 |
|
|
|
(101,407 |
) |
|
|
(2,851 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(95,642 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,292 |
|
|
|
1,501 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,793 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,781 |
|
|
|
9,527 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,308 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4,073 |
|
|
$ |
11,028 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
15,101 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations
Certain information set forth herein, other than historical statements, contains
forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation
Reform Act of 1995 that are based, in whole or in part, on current expectations,
estimates, forecasts, and projections about the Companys business, and managements
beliefs about future operations, results, and financial position. These statements are
not guarantees of future performance and are subject to a number of risk factors,
uncertainties, and assumptions. Risk factors that could affect these statements
include, but are not limited to, the following: the availability of raw materials and
the effects of changing raw material prices on the Companys results of operations;
energy prices and usage; changing demand for the Companys products and services;
changes in the liquidity of the capital and credit markets; risks associated with the
integration of acquisitions; and changes in interest or tax rates. In addition, such
forward-looking statements could also be affected by general industry and market
conditions, as well as general economic and political conditions. The Company
undertakes no obligation to update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result
of new information, future events or otherwise, except as may be required by applicable
law or regulation.
Overview
Gibraltar is a leading manufacturer and distributor of products for building markets.
Our products provide structural and architectural enhancements for residential homes,
and to a lesser extent, to low-rise retail, other commercial and professional
buildings, and a wide-variety of other building structures. These products include
structural connectors, grating and expanded metal products, ventilation products,
mailboxes, metal roofing and accessories, rain-carrying systems, trims, flashings, and
drywall corner bead. We serve customers throughout North America and Europe. We
operate 48 facilities in 22 states, Canada, England, Germany, and Poland, giving us a
broad platform for just-in-time delivery and support to our customers.
Our strategy is to position Gibraltar as the low-cost provider and market share leader
in product areas that offer the opportunity for sales growth and margin enhancement
over the long-term. We focus on operational excellence including lean initiatives
throughout the Company to position Gibraltar as our customers low-cost provider of our
products. We continuously seek to improve our on-time delivery, quality, and service
to position Gibraltar as a preferred supplier to our customers. We also strive to
develop new products, enter new markets, expand market share in the residential
markets, and further penetrate domestic and international building markets to
strengthen our product leadership positions.
On February 1, 2010, Gibraltar completed the sale of the majority of the assets of the
Processed Metal Products business. The completion of this transaction finalized our
exit from the steel processing business. This strategic initiative began in 2005 and
included the sale of the steel strapping business in 2006, the 2007 sale of the Hubbell
Steel business, and the 2008 sale of the SCM powdered metal business. This transition
is an ongoing part of our objective to build a company with optimal operating
characteristics and improve shareholder value. We now are solely focused on the
manufacture and distribution of building products where the Company has historically
generated its highest operating margins.
The economic turmoil impacting the United States and the rest of the world continued to
negatively impact the key end markets we served during the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2010 and 2009. Consequently, our sales volume for these periods was
below historical levels. Despite the continued downturn in building markets, we
generated positive earnings during the first nine months of 2010 as a result of the
costs we have removed from our business.
28
As noted above, we have taken a number of steps to position the Company as a low-cost
provider of our products. Our focus has been on achieving operational excellence
through lean initiatives and the consolidation of facilities. We closed or consolidated
six facilities during 2009 after closing and consolidating numerous others in 2007 and
2008. In response to the negative impact of the significant economic downturn which
began in the fourth quarter of 2008, we have continued to aggressively reduce costs
throughout the Company to adjust to decreased sales volumes and maximize cash flows
generated from operating activities. As a result, we believe our break-even point has
decreased significantly from 2008.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, we made net payments of $50 million on
debt outstanding under our revolving credit facility provided by the Third Amended and
Restated Credit Agreement dated July 24, 2009 (the Senior Credit Agreement). As a
result of these repayments, we do not have any amounts outstanding under our revolving
credit facility and the amount available under this facility increased by $35 million
from December 31, 2009 to $104 million as of September 30, 2010. The significant
positive cash flows generated from continuing operations during the past two years and
from the sale of the Processed Metal Products business allowed us to make significant
repayments on our long-term debt since December 31, 2008. During this period we have
decreased our outstanding debt by $149 million from $356 million as of December 31,
2008 to $207 million as of September 30, 2010, a 42% decrease. Additionally, the
Company has increased its cash on hand to $48 million as of September 30, 2010 from $24
million as of December 31, 2009.
Results of Operations
Three Months Ended September 30, 2010 Compared to the Three Months Ended September 30,
2009
The following table sets forth selected results of operations data and its percentage
of net sales for the three months ended September 30 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
182,061 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
190,520 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
Cost of sales |
|
|
150,758 |
|
|
|
82.8 |
|
|
|
145,803 |
|
|
|
76.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
31,303 |
|
|
|
17.2 |
|
|
|
44,717 |
|
|
|
23.5 |
|
Selling, general, and administrative expense |
|
|
25,840 |
|
|
|
14.2 |
|
|
|
26,437 |
|
|
|
13.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
|
5,463 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
18,280 |
|
|
|
9.6 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(4,746 |
) |
|
|
(2.6 |
) |
|
|
(7,050 |
) |
|
|
(3.7 |
) |
Equity in partnerships income (1) |
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before taxes |
|
|
750 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
11,286 |
|
|
|
5.9 |
|
(Benefit of) provision for income taxes |
|
|
(592 |
) |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
3,668 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
|
1,342 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
7,618 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
Discontinued operations, net of taxes (2) |
|
|
(145 |
) |
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
(2,706 |
) |
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
1,197 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
% |
|
$ |
4,912 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Equity in partnerships income represents our proportional interest in the
income of our May 2010 investment in a software company and our steel pickling
joint venture which was sold in February 2010 as well as other income. |
|
(2) |
|
Discontinued operations represent the loss, net of income taxes,
attributable to our processed metal products and bath cabinet manufacturing
businesses which we sold in February 2010 and August 2007, respectively. |
Net sales decreased by $8.4 million, or 4.4%, to $182.1 million for the three
months ended September 30, 2010 from net sales of $190.5 million for the three months
ended September 30, 2009. The decrease in net sales from the prior year was the net
result of a 7.0% decrease in volume partially offset by a 2.6% increase in pricing
offered to customers. The lower volume was primarily due to the slow recovery
in the economy which did not generate an increase in the demand for our products used
in the building markets. As previously noted, the economic downturn continues to have
a negative impact on the residential and commercial construction markets and demand for
our products remains low compared to historical levels. The higher
selling prices were primarily a result of increased commodity costs for steel, aluminum, and
resins.
29
Our gross margin also decreased to 17.2% for the three months ended September 30, 2010
from 23.5% for the three months ended September 30, 2009. The decrease in gross margin
from the prior year was attributable to a less-favorable alignment of material costs to
customer selling prices during the current year compared to the previous year. During
the third quarter of 2010, raw material costs declined from earlier
in the year and we experienced increased competitive pressures on
pricing. These factors led to a decline
in gross margins as we sold inventory purchased at higher costs
during the previous quarter. In contrast, reduced raw material costs
experienced in the first half of 2009 allowed us to significantly
improve gross margins during the three months ended
September 30, 2009. The impact of material cost fluctuations experienced during the third
quarter of 2010 compared to the prior year
offset the cost reduction initiatives we implemented over the past two years to align
our cost structure to a lower level of sales volume. We continue to implement lean
manufacturing initiatives to further reduce our costs and improve efficiencies. We
believe these cost cutting measures will lead to much improved gross margins in future
periods when the economy recovers and our sales volume increases.
Selling, general, and administrative expenses decreased by $0.6 million, or 2.3%, to
$25.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010 from $26.4 million for the
three months ended September 30, 2009. The $0.6 million decrease was primarily the
result of a $0.7 million decrease in the amount of restructuring charges recognized
during the third quarter of 2010 compared to the prior year along with initiatives put
in place to reduce costs. These cost reductions were partially offset by a $0.3
million increase in depreciation related to new enterprise resource planning systems
implemented during 2009 and 2010.
Interest expense decreased $2.3 million to $4.7 million for the three months ended
September 30, 2010 from $7.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009.
During the third quarter of 2009, we recognized $1.2 million of interest expense to
write off deferred financing costs as a result of amending our Senior Credit Agreement.
Additionally, we repaid all of our variable-rate debt in February 2010 which decreased
the amount of interest paid during the third quarter of 2010 compared to the prior
year. We have reduced debt outstanding by $58.3 million, or 22.0%, to $207.1 million
as of September 30, 2010 from $265.4 million as of September 30, 2009 through debt
repayments.
We recognized a benefit of income taxes for the three months ended September 30, 2010
of $0.6 million compared with a provision for income taxes of $3.7 million, an
effective rate of 32.5% for the same period in 2009. A change in forecasted earnings
caused a significant change in the forecasted annual effective tax rate during the
three months ended September 30, 2010. As a result, we recognized a tax benefit during
the three months ended September 30, 2010 due to the change in the year-to-date
provision for income taxes. Small changes in our forecasted earnings could have a
significant impact on our effective tax rate for the full year as a result of our
pre-tax earnings approximating break-even, non-deductible permanent items, and certain
state taxes. The effective tax rate for the three months ended September 30, 2009 was
less than the U.S. federal statutory tax rate of 35% due to the impact of
non-deductible permanent differences on the forecasted annual pre-tax loss.
30
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010 Compared to the Nine Months Ended September
30, 2009
The following table sets forth selected results of operations data and its percentage
of net sales for the nine months ended September 30 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
531,360 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
547,661 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
Cost of sales |
|
|
431,576 |
|
|
|
81.2 |
|
|
|
446,392 |
|
|
|
81.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
99,784 |
|
|
|
18.8 |
|
|
|
101,269 |
|
|
|
18.5 |
|
Selling, general, and administrative expense |
|
|
80,226 |
|
|
|
15.1 |
|
|
|
77,101 |
|
|
|
14.1 |
|
Intangible asset impairment (recovery) |
|
|
(177 |
) |
|
|
(0.0 |
) |
|
|
25,501 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations |
|
|
19,735 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
(1,333 |
) |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
|
(16,483 |
) |
|
|
(3.1 |
) |
|
|
(17,435 |
) |
|
|
(3.2 |
) |
Equity in partnerships income (1) |
|
|
164 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
163 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before taxes |
|
|
3,416 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
(18,605 |
) |
|
|
(3.4 |
) |
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes |
|
|
602 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
(7,298 |
) |
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
|
|
2,814 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
(11,307 |
) |
|
|
(2.1 |
) |
Discontinued operations, net of taxes (2) |
|
|
(19,367 |
) |
|
|
(3.6 |
) |
|
|
(11,325 |
) |
|
|
(2.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(16,553 |
) |
|
|
(3.1 |
)% |
|
$ |
(22,632 |
) |
|
|
(4.1 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Equity in partnerships income represents our proportional interest in the income
of our May 2010 investment in a software company and our steel pickling joint venture
which was sold in February 2010 as well as other income. |
|
(2) |
|
Discontinued operations represent the loss, net of income taxes,
attributable to our processed metal products and bath cabinet manufacturing
businesses which we sold in February 2010 and August 2007, respectively. |
Net sales decreased by $16.3 million, or 3.0%, to $531.4 million for the nine
months ended September 30, 2010 from net sales of $547.7 million for the nine months
ended September 30, 2009. The decrease in sales from the prior year was primarily the
net result of a 3.7% decrease in unit volume partially offset by a
0.7% increase in pricing offered to customers. Sales volume decreased during the nine
months ended September 30, 2010 compared to the same period in
2009 primarily due to inclement
weather during the first quarter of 2010 experienced by the majority of the U.S.
markets we serve and the slow recovery in the economy which did not generate an
increase in the demand for our products used in the building markets. As previously
noted, the economic downturn continues to have a negative impact on the residential and
commercial construction markets and demand for our products remain low compared to
historical levels. The small increase in pricing was aligned to fluctuations in commodity
costs for steel, aluminum, and resins.
Despite the decrease in net sales during the first nine months of 2010 from the
comparable period in the prior year, gross margin increased to 18.8% for the nine
months ended September 30, 2010 from 18.5% for the nine months ended September 30,
2009. The increase in gross margin was a direct result of cost reduction initiatives
we put in place during 2009 and 2010. The commodity markets for our raw materials,
which principally include steel, aluminum, and resins, experienced a precipitous
decline in costs during the first half of 2009 and then have generally risen during the
second half of 2009 and throughout the first six months of 2010. As a result, our
prices have been consistently aligned to our costs during the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 which contributed to similar gross margins throughout the year.
During 2009, the significant decline in commodity prices led to lower gross margins in
the first six months of the year and a significant improvement during the third quarter
of 2009.
Selling, general, and administrative expenses increased by $3.1 million, or 4.0%, to
$80.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 from $77.1 million for the
nine months ended September 30, 2009. The $3.1 million increase was primarily the net
result of a $4.0 million increase in variable incentive compensation as a result of
improved working capital management plus the effect of the Companys appreciating stock
price on vested stock-based awards in 2010 compared to 2009 along with a $0.6 million
increase in depreciation expense related to new enterprise resource planning systems.
This was partially offset by a $1.0 million reduction in bad
debt expense and other cost reductions. We implemented a number of cost reduction
initiatives during the past two years that included restructuring the business and
staff reductions.
31
During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, we recorded a $0.2 million intangible
asset impairment recovery to reconcile the preliminary impairment charge recorded
during the fourth quarter of 2009 to its final amount, leading to an increase in income
from operations for this period. We recorded a $25.5 million intangible asset
impairment charge during the nine months ended September 30, 2009 as a result of a
decrease in our long-term projection of revenue and cash flow to be generated by one of
our reporting units.
Interest expense decreased $0.9 million to $16.5 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 from $17.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009. We
repaid all of our variable-rate debt during the nine months ended September 30, 2010
which decreased the amount of interest paid during the first nine months of 2010
compared to the prior year. We have reduced debt outstanding by $58.3 million, or
22.0%, to $207.1 million as of September 30, 2010 from $265.4 million as of September
30, 2009 through debt repayments. Additionally, during the nine months ended September
30, 2009, we recognized $1.2 million of interest expense to write off deferred
financing costs as a result of amending our Senior Credit Agreement. However, these
decreases in interest were offset by a $0.4 million increase in the amount of interest
expense recognized from reclassifying the remaining amounts deferred in accumulated
other comprehensive income related to our interest rate swap. As a result of repaying
all of our variable rate debt, the losses previously deferred within accumulated other
comprehensive income were all recognized in earnings during the nine months ended
September 30, 2010.
The provision for income taxes for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 was $0.6
million, an effective tax rate of 17.6%, compared with a benefit from income taxes of
$7.3 million, an effective rate of 39.2% for the same period in 2009. A change in
forecasted earnings caused a significant change in the forecasted annual effective tax
rate during the three months ended September 30, 2010. The provision for income taxes
for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 reflects the most recent estimate of the
income tax provision forecasted for the full year. Small changes in our forecasted
earnings could have a significant impact on our effective tax rate for the full year as
a result of our pre-tax earnings approximating break-even, non-deductible permanent
items, and certain state taxes. The effective tax rate for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 was higher than the U.S. federal statutory tax rate due to state
taxes and the tax benefit of adjustments made to the Companys reserve for uncertain
tax positions partially offset by the impact of non-deductible permanent differences.
Outlook
After an expected seasonally-slow start to 2010, we experienced improving order levels
in March and April and expected stronger results in the seasonally-strong second and
third quarters of 2010. However, the expiration of the federal tax credit for
first-time homebuyers, high unemployment, weakening consumer confidence, and other
factors negatively affecting the housing market have lowered order levels since May of
this year. Looking ahead to the fourth quarter, which is historically our slowest
period, we anticipate the normal seasonal slowing of our business coupled with an
uncertain economic outlook as a result of the conditions described above. Over the
long-term, we believe that the fundamentals of the building markets are positive and
believe that the aggressive actions taken to streamline and improve the efficiency of
our business have reduced our break-even point and positioned the Company to generate
marked improvements in profitability when economic and market conditions return to
historical levels.
32
Liquidity and Capital Resources
General
Our principal capital requirements are to fund our operations, including working
capital, the purchase and funding of capital improvements to our businesses and their
facilities, and to fund acquisitions. During the next twelve months, with the
uncertainty in the general economy and related effects on building markets, we will
continue to focus on maintaining adequate liquidity to meet our principal capital
requirements. As noted below in the Cash Flows section of Item 2 of this Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q, we have been successful in generating positive cash flows from our
operating activities to fund our capital requirements during the past two years. In
the future, we expect to continue our aggressive cost reduction initiatives and sustain
strong working capital management to continue to generate positive cash flow.
As of September 30, 2010, our liquidity of $152.6 million consisted of $48.3 million of
cash and $104.3 million of availability under our revolving credit facility. We
believe that the availability of funds under the Senior Credit Agreement together with
the cash generated from operations should be sufficient to provide the Company with the
liquidity and capital resources necessary to support our principal capital requirements
during the next twelve months.
Our Senior Credit Agreement provides the Company with liquidity and capital resources
for use by our U.S. operations. Historically, our foreign operations generated cash
flow from operations sufficient to invest in working capital and to purchase and fund
capital improvements to their businesses and facilities. As of September 30, 2010, our
foreign subsidiaries held $16.5 million of cash. We believe cash held by our foreign
subsidiaries provides our foreign operations with the necessary liquidity to meet their
future obligations and allows the foreign business units to reinvest in their
operations and could eventually be used to grow our business internationally through
additional acquisitions.
Over the long-term, we expect that future obligations, including strategic business
opportunities such as acquisitions, may be financed through a number of sources,
including internally available cash resources, new debt financing, the issuance of
equity securities, or any combination of the above. Any potential acquisitions are
evaluated on the basis of our ability to enhance our existing products, operations, or
capabilities, as well as provide access to new products, markets, and customers.
These expectations are forward-looking statements based upon currently available
information and may change if conditions in the credit and equity markets further
deteriorate or other circumstances change. To the extent that operating cash flows are
lower than current levels or sources of financing are not available or available at
acceptable terms, our future liquidity may be adversely affected.
33
Cash Flows
The following table sets forth selected cash flow data for the nine months ended
September 30 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Cash provided by (used in): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities of continuing operations |
|
$ |
39,654 |
|
|
$ |
83,566 |
|
Investing activities of continuing operations |
|
|
22,088 |
|
|
|
(11,528 |
) |
Financing activities of continuing operations |
|
|
(51,361 |
) |
|
|
(95,642 |
) |
Discontinued operations |
|
|
14,338 |
|
|
|
27,397 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
24,719 |
|
|
$ |
3,793 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the Companys operating cash flows
from continuing operations totaled $39.7 million and was primarily the result of net
income from continuing operations of $2.8 million, non-cash charges including
depreciation, amortization, and stock compensation of $28.3 million, and $8.4 million
of cash generated from a net decrease in assets and liabilities. Net cash provided by
operating activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 was $83.6 million and
was primarily the result of a net decrease in assets and liabilities of $51.2 million,
depreciation and amortization of $19.5 million, and a non-cash goodwill impairment
charge of $25.5 million offset by a net loss from continuing operations of $11.3
million and a $10.7 million adjustment to the provision for deferred income taxes
related to the impairment charge.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the Company decreased its working
capital along with other long-term assets and liabilities from December 31, 2009
resulting in $8.4 million of cash flow. Cash flows generated from the decrease in
working capital and other net assets were primarily a result of an increase in accounts
payable and accrued liabilities of $26.0 million and a decrease in other assets of $7.3
million offset by an increase in accounts receivable of $24.8 million. The increases
in accounts payable and accounts receivable were a result of increased manufacturing
activity and sales volume during the last month of the third quarter as compared to the
last month of the fourth quarter. The increased manufacturing activity and sales
volume were a direct result of the seasonality that impacts our business. Inventory
levels did not increase significantly from December 31, 2009 to September 30, 2010
despite increased manufacturing activity to support increased demand for our products
due to the seasonality described above. We were able to keep inventory levels low
through our continued focus on lean initiatives and inventory management which have led
to an increase in inventory turnover during 2010 compared to the previous year. The
accrued liabilities account increased from December 31, 2010 as a result of increased
accruals for incentive compensation and deferred compensation plans. In addition, the
other asset balance has decreased from December 31, 2009 as a result of receiving a tax
refund related to a tax loss generated during 2009.
Net cash provided by investing activities of continuing operations for the nine months
ended September 30, 2010 was $22.1 million consisting of $29.2 million of cash flow
generated from the sale of our Processed Metal Products business offset by capital
expenditures of $6.3 million and a $1.0 million investment in a software company. Cash
used in investing activities during the nine months ended September 30, 2009 of $11.5
million consisted of capital expenditures of $7.4 million and $4.4 million of
additional consideration paid for a previous acquisition offset by proceeds from the
sale of property, plant, and equipment.
Net cash used in financing activities from continuing operations for the nine months
ended September 30, 2010 was $51.4 million, consisting primarily of $50.4 million of
net payments on long-term debt and payments of tax withholdings for stock issued to
employees from the vesting of restricted stock units. Net cash used in financing
activities from continuing operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 was
$95.6 million, consisting primarily of net payments of $91.2 million on long-term debt,
payments of $2.3 million for deferred financing costs, and dividend payments of $1.5
million. Payments of long-term debt made during 2010 and 2009 were the result of cash
flows generated from operations and the sale of the Processed Metal Products business
offset by other investing activities. We have made net payments on long-term debt
outstanding in the amount of $149.3 million since December 31, 2008.
34
Senior Credit Agreement and Senior Subordinated Notes
Borrowings under the Senior Credit Agreement are secured by the trade receivables,
inventory, personal property and equipment, and certain real property of the Companys
significant domestic subsidiaries. The Senior Credit Agreement provides for a revolving
credit facility and letters of credit in an aggregate amount that does not exceed the
lesser of (i) $200 million or (ii) a borrowing base determined by reference to the trade
receivables, inventories, and property, plant, and equipment of the Companys
significant domestic subsidiaries. The Senior Credit Agreement also provided a term
loan originally aggregating $58.7 million which was subsequently repaid in full during
2009. The revolving credit facility is committed through August 30, 2012. Borrowings
on the revolving credit facility bear interest at a variable interest rate based upon
the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR), with a LIBOR floor of 1.50% plus 3.25%, or at
the Companys option, an alternate base rate. The revolving credit facility also
carries an annual facility fee of 0.50% on the entire facility, whether drawn or
undrawn, and fees on outstanding letters of credit which are payable quarterly. As of
September 30, 2010, we had $104.3 million of availability under the revolving credit
facility.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, we made net payments of $50.0 million
on the revolving credit facility and have not had any borrowings under the Senior Credit
Agreement since May 3, 2010. We had outstanding letters of credit of $13.7 million as
of September 30, 2010.
The Companys $204.0 million of Senior Subordinated 8% Notes (8% Notes) were issued in
December 2005 at a discount to yield 8.25%. Provisions of the 8% Notes include, without
limitation, restrictions on indebtedness, liens, and distributions from restricted
subsidiaries, asset sales, affiliate transactions, dividends, and other restricted
payments. Dividend payments are subject to annual limits of $0.25 per share and $10
million. After December 1, 2010, the 8% Notes are redeemable at the option of the
Company, in whole or in part, at the redemption price (as defined in the Senior
Subordinated 8% Notes Indenture), which declines annually from 104% to 100% on and after
December 1, 2013. In the event of a Change in Control (as defined in the Senior
Subordinated 8% Notes Indenture), each holder of the 8% Notes may require the Company to
repurchase all or a portion of such holders 8% Notes at a purchase price equal to 101%
of the principal amount thereof. As of September 30, 2010, we had $201.9 million, net
of discount, of our 8% Notes outstanding.
Each of our significant domestic subsidiaries has guaranteed the obligations under the
Senior Credit Agreement. Debt outstanding under the Senior Credit Agreement and the
related guarantees are secured by a first priority security interest (subject to
permitted liens as defined in the Senior Credit Agreement) in substantially all the
tangible and intangible assets of our Company and our material domestic subsidiaries,
subject to certain exceptions, and a pledge of 100% of the stock of our significant
domestic subsidiaries and a pledge of 65% of the voting stock of our foreign
subsidiaries. The 8% Notes are guaranteed by each of our significant domestic
subsidiaries.
On a trailing four-quarter basis, the Senior Credit Agreement includes a single
financial covenant that requires the Company to maintain a minimum fixed charge coverage
ratio (as defined in the Senior Credit Agreement) of 1.25 to 1.00 at the end of each
quarter. As of September 30, 2010, the Company was in compliance with the minimum fixed
charge coverage ratio covenant. The Senior Credit Agreement contains other provisions
and events of default that are customary for similar agreements and may limit the
Companys ability to take various actions. The Senior Subordinated 8% Notes Indenture
also contains provisions that limit additional borrowings based on the Companys
consolidated coverage ratio.
Off Balance Sheet Financing Arrangements
The Company does not have any off balance sheet financing arrangements.
Contractual Obligations
Our contractual obligations have not changed materially from the disclosures included in
Item 7 of the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.
35
Critical Accounting Policies
The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make
decisions based upon estimates, assumptions, and factors it considers relevant to the
circumstances. Such decisions include the selection of applicable principles and the
use of judgment in their application, the results of which could differ from those
anticipated.
Our most critical accounting policies include valuation of accounts receivable,
valuation of inventory including lower-of-cost-or-market, allocation of purchase price
to acquisition-related assets and liabilities, valuation of goodwill and other
long-lived assets, and accounting for income taxes and deferred tax assets and
liabilities, which are described in Item 7 of the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2009.
There have been no changes in our critical accounting policies in the current year.
However, we are providing enhanced disclosures regarding our critical accounting policy
for the valuation of goodwill and other long-lived assets below in response to recent
comment letters received from the SEC.
Goodwill and Other Indefinite-lived Intangible Asset Impairment Testing
Our goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible asset balances of $393.6 million and $40.6
million as of September 30, 2010, respectively, are subject to impairment testing. We
test goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment on an annual basis
as of October 31 and at interim dates when indicators of impairment are present.
Indicators of impairment could include a significant long-term adverse change in
business climate, poor indicators of operating performance, or a sale or disposition of
significant portion of a reporting unit.
During 2010, we concluded that no new indicators of impairment existed at interim dates
and did not perform any interim impairment tests related to goodwill and
indefinite-lived intangible assets. We will test goodwill and other indefinite-lived
intangible assets for impairment during the fourth quarter of 2010 at the annual test
date. The most recent impairment analysis was completed as of October 31, 2009. As a
result of the October 31, 2009 impairment test, the Company recognized an intangible
asset impairment charge of $34.6 million for the three months ended December 31, 2009
and recognized $60.1 million of intangible asset impairment charges for the year ended
December 31, 2009. Goodwill and other indefinite-lived assets were tested for
impairment at two interim dates during 2009: March 31 and June 30.
We test goodwill for impairment at the reporting unit level. We identify our reporting
units by assessing whether the components of our operating segments constitute
businesses for which discrete financial information is available and segment management
regularly reviews the operating results of those components. As of the October 31,
2009 impairment test, we identified 11 reporting units with goodwill.
The goodwill impairment test consists of comparing the fair value of a reporting unit
with its carrying amount including goodwill. If the carrying amount of the reporting
unit exceeds the reporting units fair value, the implied fair value of goodwill is
compared to the carrying amount of goodwill. An impairment loss is recognized for the
amount by which the carrying amount of goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of
goodwill.
36
The following table sets forth the amount of goodwill allocated to each reporting unit
tested for goodwill impairment prior to any impairment charges, the percentage by which
the estimated fair value of each reporting unit exceeded its carrying value, any
impairment losses recognized, and the remaining goodwill allocated to each reporting
unit after any impairment charges as of the October 31, 2009 goodwill impairment test
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage By |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill Allocated |
|
|
Which Estimated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill Allocated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To Reporting Unit |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
To Reporting Unit |
|
|
|
Reporting |
|
|
Before Impairment |
|
|
Exceeds Carrying |
|
|
Impairment |
|
|
After Impairment |
|
|
|
Unit |
|
|
Charges |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Charges |
|
|
Charges |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
|
$ |
120,621 |
|
|
|
12% |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
120,621 |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
|
|
111,499 |
|
|
|
20% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
111,499 |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
|
|
49,277 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
(16,980 |
) |
|
|
32,297 |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
|
|
26,912 |
|
|
|
24% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,912 |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
|
|
26,738 |
|
|
|
27% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,738 |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
|
|
22,631 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
(11,882 |
) |
|
|
10,749 |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
|
|
22,197 |
|
|
|
21% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,197 |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
|
|
19,569 |
|
|
|
11% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,569 |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
|
|
18,261 |
|
|
|
4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,261 |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
|
|
4,468 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
(4,468 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
|
|
3,589 |
|
|
|
14% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,589 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
$ |
425,762 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(33,330 |
) |
|
$ |
392,432 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys October 31, 2009 impairment analysis included significant
assumptions in both steps one and two of the impairment test. To estimate the fair
value of the reporting units as a part of step one of the impairment test, the Company
used two valuation techniques: an income approach and a market approach. The income
approach included a discounted cash flow model relying on significant assumptions
consisting of revenue growth rates and profit margins based on internal forecasts,
terminal value, and the weighted average cost of capital (WACC) used to discount future
cash flows. The market approach consisted of applying an Earnings Before Interest,
Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization (EBITDA) multiple to the forecasted EBITDA to be
generated in 2009 and 2010. The market approach also relied on significant assumptions
consisting of revenue growth rates and profit margins based on internal forecasts and
the EBITDA multiple selected from an analysis of peer companies.
37
The following table sets forth the compound annual revenue growth rate for the
five-year period used to forecast cash flows and the average operating margin for the
forecasted periods compared to actual operating margins generated over the long-term
which we estimated to be the five-year and ten-month period ended October 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual Operating |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compound Annual |
|
|
|
|
|
Margins For The Period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue Growth Rate |
|
|
|
|
|
Between January 1, |
|
|
Reporting |
|
For Forecasted Annual |
|
Operating Margin For |
|
2004 and October 31, |
|
|
Unit |
|
Periods |
|
Forecasted Periods |
|
2009 (1) |
|
|
|
#1 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
12 |
%(2) |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
20 |
% |
|
|
21 |
% |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
|
|
18 |
% |
|
|
16 |
% |
|
|
12 |
%(2) |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
|
|
15 |
% |
|
|
10 |
% |
|
|
13 |
% |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
13 |
% |
|
|
13 |
% |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
13 |
% |
|
|
4 |
%(2) |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
10 |
% |
|
|
8 |
%(2) |
|
|
|
#8 |
|
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
10 |
% |
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
|
#9 |
|
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
5 |
%(3) |
|
|
|
#10 |
|
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
3 |
%(4) |
|
|
|
#11 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
4 |
%(5) |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Operating margins presented exclude restructuring charges incurred by each
reporting unit. |
|
(2) |
|
The operating margins presented for reporting units #1, #3, #6, and #7
only include operating results generated since the date the reporting units were
acquired in 2005, 2007, 2007, and 2006, respectively. |
|
(3) |
|
This reporting unit made an incremental acquisition in 2007 including a
product line with significantly higher margins than the existing product lines it
offers. As a result, we believe forecasted operating margins will exceed prior
results. |
|
(4) |
|
All goodwill allocated to this reporting unit was impaired as a result of
the October 31, 2009 goodwill impairment test. |
|
(5) |
|
This reporting units operations were restructured in 2007. The reporting
unit has since generated operating margins over 8%. |
We analyzed third-party forecasts of housing starts and other macroeconomic
indicators that impact the Companys reporting units to provide a reasonable estimate
of revenue growth in future periods. Our analysis of third-party forecasts noted that
housing starts were projected to grow at a compound annual growth rate of 24% from 2009
to 2014. Therefore, we considered these forecasts in developing each reporting units
growth rates over the next five years depending on the level of correlation between
housing starts and net sales for each reporting unit. The correlation between housing
starts and net sales was based on an analysis of historical housing starts and our
historical revenue. We concluded that this approach provided a reasonable estimate of
long-term revenue growth and cash flows for our reporting units.
The operating margins we used to estimate future cash flows were consistent with
long-term margins generated by the reporting units while they have been owned and
operated by the Company as shown in the table above. The reporting units where
forecasted operating margins exceed long-term operating margins generated by the
reporting unit were for reporting units that were recently acquired and, therefore, the
long-term operating margins were more significantly impacted by the economic turmoil
that began in the fourth quarter of 2008. Additionally, the Company took strategic
actions to consolidate facilities, reduce costs, and restructure these business units
to become more profitable as the economy recovers. These actions led to increased
costs and lower operating margins in the short term. Based on our understanding of
these reporting units and the actions taken by management to restructure the businesses
for improved growth and profitability, we concluded that the long-term cash flows
forecasted for all of the Companys reporting units were reasonable.
38
Net sales and operating margins for the short period subsequent to the October 31,
2009 goodwill impairment test have continued to lag behind historic averages for each
of the reporting units as a result of seasonality which negatively impacts our sales
volume during winter months and macroeconomic factors. Housing starts and other
economic activity indicators have not met third-party forecasts as the economy has not
recovered as strongly as expected during the end of 2009 and into 2010. However,
projections for housing starts have not changed significantly in the longer term as the
most recent third-party forecasts we received show housing starts projections to grow at
a compound annual growth rate of 24% from 2009 to 2014. As a result, we do not believe
the operating results subsequent to October 31, 2009, our goodwill impairment test
date, would lead us to significantly change the assumptions used in the discounted cash
flow model.
In addition to revenue growth and operating margin forecasts, the discounted cash flow
model used to estimate the fair value of each reporting unit also uses assumptions for
the amount of working capital needed to support each business unit. We forecasted
modest improvement in working capital management for future periods at each reporting
unit based on past performance. The Company experienced a significant reduction in
days of working capital from 96 days for the year ended December 31, 2007 to 76 days
for the year ended December 31, 2009 and has further reduced days of working capital
during 2010. We have been able to significantly improve our working capital management
through lean initiatives, efficiency improvements, and facility consolidations. We
believe continued improvement in our ability to manage working capital will allow us to
increase the cash flow generated from each reporting unit.
The terminal value of each reporting unit was based on the last year of forecasted cash
flows in our discounted cash flow model. We made an assumption that cash flows would
grow 3% each year thereafter based on our approximation of gross domestic product
growth in the North American and European markets served by the Company. This
assumption was based on a third-party forecast of future economic growth over the
long-term and it has not changed significantly from the October 31, 2009 goodwill
impairment test date.
The discounted cash flow model uses the WACC to discount cash flows in the forecasted
period and to discount the terminal value to present value. To determine the WACC, we
used a standard valuation method, the capital asset pricing model, based on readily
available and current market data of peer companies considered market participants.
Acknowledging the risk inherent in the reporting units ability to achieve the
long-term forecasted cash flows, in applying the income approach we increased the WACC
of each reporting unit based upon each reporting units past operating performance and
their relative ability to achieve the forecasted cash flows. As a result of these
analyses, we assigned a WACC between 12.2% and 12.9% for each reporting unit.
The EBITDA multiple used in the market approach to determine the fair value of each
reporting unit was applied to the forecasted EBITDA to be generated during 2009 and
2010. The market approach relies on significant assumptions consisting of revenue
growth rates and profit margins based on internal forecasts and the EBITDA multiple
selected from an analysis of peer companies considered market participants. The
revenue growth rates and profit margins used in the market approach were the same
projections used in the discounted cash flows model as described above. The EBITDA
multiples were established by analyzing each peer companies total invested capital in
proportion to EBITDA derived from each peer companies most recently reported earnings.
Similar to the WACC analysis, we assessed the risk of each reporting unit achieving
its forecasts with consideration given to how each reporting unit has performed
historically compared to forecasts. As a result of these analyses, we assigned an
EBITDA multiple between 4.6 and 6.0 for 2009 EBITDA forecasts and 6.0 and 7.5 for 2010
EBITDA forecasts.
39
As noted above, we used two valuation techniques that are commonly accepted in the
valuation community to estimate a fair value for each reporting unit. The estimated
fair value for each reporting unit was calculated using a weighted average between the
calculated amounts determined under the income approach and the market approach. We
weighted the income approach more heavily (67%) as the technique uses a long-term
approach that considers the expected operating profit of each reporting unit during
periods where housing starts and other macroeconomic indicators are nearer historical
averages. The market approach (33%) values the reporting units using 2009 and 2010
EBITDA values which were forecasted using estimated housing starts of 576,000 and
900,000, respectively. Housing starts have historically approximated 1.5 million each
year. We believe the income approach considers the expected recovery in the
residential building market better than the market approach. Therefore, we concluded
that the income approach more accurately estimated the fair value of the reporting
units as it considers earnings potential during a longer term and does not use the
short-term perspective used by the market approach. Accordingly, we concluded that the
market participants who execute transactions to sell or buy a business in the current
economic environment would place greater emphasis on the income approach.
The following table sets forth the Companys estimated fair value and carrying value
for each reporting unit as of October 31, 2009 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reporting |
|
|
Estimated Fair |
|
|
Carrying Value After |
|
|
Unit |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Impairment Charges |
|
|
|
#1 |
|
|
$ |
247,382 |
|
|
$ |
221,759 |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
|
|
125,711 |
|
|
|
104,792 |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
|
|
83,979 |
|
|
|
82,968 |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
|
|
57,239 |
|
|
|
46,194 |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
|
|
58,861 |
|
|
|
46,254 |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
|
|
75,958 |
|
|
|
71,070 |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
|
|
51,479 |
|
|
|
42,657 |
|
|
|
#8 |
|
|
|
19,137 |
|
|
|
17,224 |
|
|
|
#9 |
|
|
|
32,249 |
|
|
|
30,968 |
|
|
|
#10 |
|
|
|
10,906 |
|
|
|
11,536 |
|
|
|
#11 |
|
|
|
12,729 |
|
|
|
11,154 |
|
|
Others |
|
|
|
(97,704 |
) |
|
|
91,680 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
$ |
677,926 |
|
|
$ |
778,256 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Debt |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
245,384 |
|
|
Equity (Net Book Value) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
532,872 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
778,256 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Others category includes reporting units without goodwill allocated to them and
unallocated corporate cash out flows. The estimated fair value of these other reporting
units is negative as a result of including the present value of the unallocated corporate
cash out flows. Unallocated corporate cash out flows include executive compensation and
other administrative costs. The Company has grown substantially through acquisitions and
our strategy is to allow business unit management to operate the business units autonomous
of corporate management. For example, each business unit has its own accounting, marketing,
purchasing, information technology, and executive functions. As a result, we believe a
market participant would not consider unallocated corporate cash flows when valuing each
reporting unit and these cash flows have been properly excluded from the valuation of the
reporting units.
40
Step two of the impairment analysis involved estimating the implied fair value of
goodwill by allocating the fair value of each reporting unit to its assets and liabilities
other than goodwill and comparing the implied fair value of goodwill to its carrying value.
The step two analyses relied on a number of significant assumptions to determine the fair
value of inventory; property, plant, and equipment; and intangible assets for each reporting
unit. The significant assumptions used in the determination of the fair value of inventory
included the determination of the market value of raw materials, the estimated costs to
complete work-in-process inventory, and the estimated selling prices for finished goods
inventories. The assumptions we employed in determining the fair values of these inventory
components were based primarily on historical gross margins and selling costs generated by
the reporting units and we believe this to be a reasonable basis for estimating the fair
value of inventories as of the impairment test date. The fair value of property, plant, and
equipment was determined using standard valuation methodologies including market and cost
approaches. These valuations were based on market data gathered for similar assets sold in
the markets in which the reporting units property, plant, and equipment are located and
based on the highest and best use from a market participant perspective. Third-party
appraisals were commissioned where appropriate to assist in estimating the fair value of the
reporting units property, plant, and equipment. The overall condition and age of the
assets, current replacement cost, current market demand for the assets, and other factors
were considered in the determination of the fair value of the assets. The fair value of
intangible assets was also determined using standard valuation methodologies including the
relief-from-royalty method and excess earnings method. These methods primarily employed
the use of future cash flows to determine the fair value of the applicable intangible
assets. The future cash flows used to determine the fair vales of these intangible assets
were derived from step one of the goodwill impairment analysis as described above. The
discount rate used in the valuation of intangible assets was derived from the WACC used in
step one of the goodwill impairment analysis. Based on the analysis described above, we
concluded the assumptions underlying step two of our impairment analysis were reasonable and
appropriate.
In addition to the analyses described above, we performed a reconciliation of the total
estimated fair values of the reporting units to our market capitalization as of October 31,
2009 to support the reasonableness of the fair value estimates used in our October 31, 2009
impairment analysis. The following calculation provides this reconciliation and the
resulting control premium determined as of our October 31, 2009 impairment analysis (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Per The |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 31, 2009 |
|
|
Estimated Market |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment Analysis |
|
|
Capitalization |
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Fair Value of Reporting Units |
|
$ |
677,926 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Net Debt as of October 31, 2009 |
|
|
(245,384 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Outstanding as of October 31,
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,140 |
|
|
|
|
|
Average Stock Price from October 26,
2009 to November 9, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
12.36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value of Equity |
|
$ |
432,542 |
|
|
$ |
372,530 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Control Premium |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Despite the difference between our net book value and the estimated fair value of
equity, all reporting units with goodwill had fair values in excess of their carrying
value. The difference between our net book value and the estimated fair value of
equity is the result of the negative future cash flows associated with our unallocated
corporate net assets net of reporting units without goodwill allocated to them
described above. Although the Companys book value of equity exceeds its market
capitalization, we deemed the control premium as of the October 31, 2009 impairment
analysis to be reasonable based upon recent comparable transactions to acquire the
control of similar businesses in our industry. Accordingly, we concluded the estimated
fair value of each reporting unit was reasonably estimated.
41
We test our intangible assets for impairment by comparing the fair value of the
indefinite-lived intangible asset, determined using a discounted cash flow model, with
its carrying amount. An impairment loss would be recognized for the carrying amount in
excess of its fair value. We recognized impairment charges for indefinite-lived
intangible assets as a result of our October 31, 2009 impairment test. No impairment
of our indefinite-lived intangible assets was recognized during the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2010.
Related Party Transactions
Two members of the Companys Board of Directors, Gerald S. Lippes and Arthur A. Russ,
Jr., are partners in law firms that provide legal services to the Company. For the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, the Company incurred expense of $161,000
and $813,000, respectively, for legal services from these firms. The Company incurred
$340,000 and $875,000 of expense for legal services from these firms during the three
and nine months ended September 30, 2009, respectively. Of the amounts incurred during
the nine months ended September 30, 2010, $176,000 related to the sale of the Processed
Metal Products business and was recognized as a component of discontinued operations.
All other amounts incurred during the 2010 and 2009 periods were expensed as a component
of selling, general, and administrative expenses. At September 30, 2010 and December
31, 2009, the Company had $151,000 and $160,000, respectively, recorded in accounts
payable for amounts due to these law firms.
A member of the Companys Board of Directors, Robert E. Sadler, Jr., is a member of the
Board of Directors of M&T Bank Corporation, one of the eleven participating lenders
which have committed capital to our $200 million revolving credit facility in the
Companys Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated July 24, 2009 (the Senior
Credit Agreement). All amounts outstanding under the revolving credit facility were
repaid in full as of September 30, 2010. At December 31, 2009, $50,000,000 was
outstanding on the revolving credit facility. During 2010, the largest aggregate amount
of principal outstanding under the revolving credit facility was $50,000,000. The
aggregate amount of principal and interest paid during the nine months ended September
30, 2010 was $58,559,000 and $317,000, respectively, for amounts outstanding under the
revolving credit facility.
Borrowings under the Senior Credit Agreement bear interest at a variable rate based upon
the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR), with a LIBOR floor of 1.50% plus 3.25% for
revolving credit facility borrowings or, at the Companys option, an alternate base
rate. The revolving credit facility also carries an annual facility fee of 0.50% on the
entire facility, whether drawn or undrawn, and fees on outstanding letters of credit
which are payable quarterly.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In February 2010, the Financial Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards
Update (Update) 2010-09, Subsequent Events (Topic 855) Amendments to Certain
Recognition and Disclosure Requirements. Update 2010-09 removes the requirement for
SEC filers to disclose the date through which an entity has evaluated subsequent events.
However, the disclosure exemption does not relieve management of an SEC filer from its
responsibility to evaluate subsequent events through the date on which financial
statements are issued. Update 2010-09 became effective for the Company for the fourth
quarter of 2009. The adoption of the provisions of the Update did not have a material
impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
42
In July 2010, the FASB issued Update 2010-20, Receivables (Topic 310) Disclosures
about the Credit Quality of Financing Receivables and the Allowance for Credit Losses.
Update 2010-20 requires additional disclosure to assist financial statement users in
assessing an entitys credit risk exposures and evaluating the adequacy of its allowance
for credit losses. Update 2010-20 affects all entities with financing receivables,
excluding short-term trade accounts receivables or receivables measures at fair value or
lower of cost or fair value. The Company is required to adopt all of the provisions of
Update 2010-20 related to disclosures of financing receivables as of December 31, 2010.
The financing receivables disclosures related to activity that occurs during a reporting
period are required to be adopted by the Company during the three months ending March
31, 2011. The Company does not believe the provisions of this guidance will have a
significant impact on the Companys consolidated financial position, cash flows, or
results of operations.
43
Item 3. Qualitative and Quantitative Disclosures About Market Risk
In the ordinary course of business, the Company is exposed to various market risk
factors, including changes in general economic conditions, competition, and raw
materials pricing and availability. In addition, the Company is exposed to market risk,
primarily related to its long-term debt. To manage interest rate risk, the Company uses
both fixed and variable interest rate debt. The Company also entered into an interest
rate swap agreement that converted a portion of its variable interest rate debt to fixed
interest rate debt. At the time we entered into the interest rate swap agreement, $57.5
million of variable interest rate borrowings had been effectively converted to fixed
interest rate debt pursuant to this agreement. In connection with the execution of the
Senior Credit Agreement on July 24, 2009, the subsequent repayment of all variable
interest rate debt under the Senior Credit Agreement during the first quarter of 2010,
and based on the Companys prospective assessment of the effectiveness of the interest
rate swap, beginning in the third quarter of 2009 the Company deemed the swap to be
ineffective in offsetting variability in future interest payments on its variable
interest rate borrowings. The interest rate swap agreement is scheduled to expire
December 22, 2010. There have been no material changes to the Companys exposure to
market risk since December 31, 2009, other than the subsequent repayment of all variable
interest rate debt as noted above.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Company maintains a system of disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). The Companys
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, President and Chief Operating
Officer, and Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer evaluated the
effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls as of the end of the period covered
in this report. Based upon that evaluation and the definition of disclosure controls
and procedures contained in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, the Companys Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, President
and Chief Operating Officer, and Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer have
concluded that as of the end of such period the Companys disclosure controls and
procedures were effective.
(b) Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
One of the Companys business units implemented a new enterprise resource planning
system, Syteline, during the three months ended September 30, 2010. We consider the
implementation of a new enterprise resource planning system to be a change in the
Companys internal control over financial reporting that materially affects, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
We expect the completion of the system implementation at the respective business unit
will enhance our internal controls as follows:
|
a) |
|
The new enterprise resource planning system was designed to
generate reports and other information used to account for transactions and
reduce the number of manual processes employed by the business unit; |
|
|
b) |
|
The new enterprise resource planning system is technologically
advanced and increases the amount of application controls used to process
data; and |
|
|
c) |
|
The business unit designed improved processes and implemented
improved procedures in connection with the implementation. |
There have been no other changes in the Companys internal control over financial
reporting (as defined by Rule 13a-15(f)) that occurred during the period covered by
this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q that have materially affected the Companys internal
control over financial reporting.
44
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
Not applicable.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
In addition to the other information set forth in this report, you should
carefully consider the risks discussed in Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors in our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 and the
updates to these risks in Part II, Item 1A. Risk Factors in our Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2010. These risks and
uncertainties have the potential to materially affect our business, financial
condition, results of operation, cash flows, and future prospects. Additional
risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem
immaterial may materially adversely impact our business, financial condition, or
operating results.
As a result of the sale of the majority of assets of our Processed Metal Products
business on February 1, 2010, we have updated a number of our risk factors in our
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2009. Other
than these updates, we do not believe that there have been any material changes to
the risk factors previously disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2009.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Not applicable.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
Not applicable.
Item 4. (Removed and Reserved)
Item 5. Other Information
Not applicable.
45
Item 6. Exhibits
6(a) Exhibits
|
a. |
|
Exhibit 31.1 Certification of Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002. |
|
|
b. |
|
Exhibit 31.2 Certification of President and Chief
Operating Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002. |
|
|
c. |
|
Exhibit 31.3 Certification of Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002. |
|
|
d. |
|
Exhibit 32.1 Certification of the Chairman of the Board
and Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Title 18, United States Code,
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002. |
|
|
e. |
|
Exhibit 32.2 Certification of the President and Chief
Operating Officer pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
f. |
|
Exhibit 32.3 Certification of the Senior Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to Title 18, United States Code,
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002. |
|
|
g. |
|
Exhibit 101.INS XBRL Instance Document * |
|
|
h. |
|
Exhibit 101.SCH XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document * |
|
|
i. |
|
Exhibit 101.CAL XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document * |
|
|
j. |
|
Exhibit 101.LAB XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document * |
|
|
k. |
|
Exhibit 101.PRE XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document * |
|
|
l. |
|
Exhibit 101.DEF XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document * |
* Submitted electronically with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. |
46
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GIBRALTAR INDUSTRIES, INC.
(Registrant) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Brian J. Lipke
Brian J. Lipke
|
|
|
|
|
Chairman of the Board and |
|
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Henning N. Kornbrekke
Henning N. Kornbrekke
|
|
|
|
|
President and Chief Operating Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Kenneth W. Smith
Kenneth W. Smith
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Vice President and |
|
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
Date: November 4, 2010
47