As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 31, 2004

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

AMENDMENT NO. 4 TO

FORM S-11

     Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the public: As soon as practicable following effectiveness of this Registration Statement.

     If this form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. o

     If this form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. o

     If this form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. o

     If delivery of the prospectus is expected to be made pursuant to Rule 434, check the following box. o

The Registrant hereby amends this Registration Statement on such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective date until the Registrant files a further amendment that specifically states that this Registration Statement will thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 or until the Registration Statement becomes effective on such date as the Commission, acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may determine.

The information in this prospectus is not complete and may be changed. We may not sell these securities until the registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is effective. This prospectus is not an offer to sell these securities, and it is not soliciting an offer to buy these securities in any state where the offer or sale is not permitted.

SUBJECT TO COMPLETION, DATED AUGUST 31, 2004

Hartman Commercial Properties REIT
Maximum Offering of 11,000,000 Common Shares of Beneficial Interest
Minimum Offering of 200,000 Common Shares of Beneficial Interest
Minimum Purchase of 100 Shares ($1,000) in Most States

     Hartman Commercial Properties REIT is a Maryland real estate investment trust that was originally organized in 1998 as a Texas real estate investment trust under the name Hartman Commercial Properties REIT. We invest in and operate retail, industrial and office properties located primarily in the Houston and San Antonio, Texas metropolitan areas. We intend to expand our investments to retail, industrial and office properties located in major metropolitan cities in the United States, principally in the Southern United States. As of June 30, 2004, we owned 33 real estate properties.

     We are offering up to 10,000,000 common shares of beneficial interest and a minimum of 200,000 common shares of beneficial interest on a best efforts basis at a price of $10.00 per share. We also are offering up to 1,000,000 common shares of beneficial interest to be issued under our dividend reinvestment plan at a purchase price of $9.50 per share. The shares will be offered to investors on a best efforts basis. This offering will terminate on or before    , 2006.

     * Selling commissions of up to 7.0% of gross offering proceeds will be paid for sales through participating broker-dealers; however, no selling commissions will be paid with respect to shares sold by D.H. Hill Securities, LLP, our dealer manager, without the involvement of participating broker-dealers, and no selling commissions will be paid in connection with purchases pursuant to our dividend reinvestment plan. We anticipate that approximately 50% of the shares sold pursuant to this offering will not be subject to selling commissions. A reduction in selling commissions will increase the amount of proceeds of this offering available for us to invest in real property.

     Investing in our common shares involves a high degree of risk. You should purchase common shares only if you can afford a complete loss. See “Risk Factors” beginning on page 17. The most significant risks relating to your investment include the following:

     Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Attorney General of the State of New York nor any other state securities regulator has approved or disapproved of these securities or determined if this prospectus is truthful or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.

     No one is authorized to make any statement about this offering different from those that appear in this prospectus. The use of projections or forecasts in this offering is prohibited. Any representation to the contrary and any predictions, written or oral, as to the amount or certainty of any present or future cash benefit or tax consequence that may flow from an investment in this offering is not permitted.

     The dealer manager of this offering is D.H. Hill Securities, LLP. The dealer manager is not required to sell any specific number or dollar amount of our common shares but will use its best efforts to sell the shares offered hereby. Your subscription payments will be placed in an account held by the escrow agent, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., and will be held in trust for your benefit, pending release to us. If we do not sell at least $2.0 million in shares by    , 2005, which is one year from the date of this prospectus, your funds in the escrow account will be returned to you, and we will stop selling shares.

The date of this prospectus is      , 2004

TABLE OF CONTENTS

i

ii

iii

iv

v

vi

SUITABILITY STANDARDS

     An investment in our company involves significant risk and is only suitable for persons who have adequate financial means, desire a relatively long-term investment and who will not need immediate liquidity from their investment.

     In consideration of these factors, we have established suitability standards for investors in this offering and subsequent purchasers of our shares. These suitability standards require that a purchaser of shares have, excluding the value of a purchaser’s home, furnishings and automobiles, either:

     In addition, we will not sell shares to investors in the states named below unless they meet special suitability standards:

     Arizona, Michigan, New Jersey, New Mexico, North Carolina, Tennessee and Texas – Investors must have either (1) a net worth of at least $225,000, or (2) gross annual income of at least $60,000 and a net worth of at least $60,000.

     Kansas – Investors must have either (1) a net worth of at least $225,000 and a net worth of at least 10 times their investment in us, or (2) gross annual income of at least $60,000 and a net worth of at least $60,000.

     Maine – Investors must have either (1) a net worth of at least $225,000, or (2) gross annual income of at least $50,000 and a net worth of at least $50,000.

     California, Ohio and Oklahoma – In addition to the suitability requirements described above, investors must have a net worth of at least 10 times their investment in us.

     For purposes of determining suitability of an investor, net worth in all cases should be calculated excluding the value of an investor’s home, furnishings and automobiles. In the case of sales to fiduciary accounts, these suitability standards must be met by the fiduciary account, by the person who directly or indirectly supplied the funds for the purchase of the shares if such person is the fiduciary or by the beneficiary of the account.

     Those selling shares on our behalf must make every reasonable effort to determine that the purchase of shares in this offering is a suitable and appropriate investment for each shareholder based on information provided by the shareholder regarding the shareholder’s financial situation and investment objectives. See “Plan of Distribution – Suitability Standards” for a detailed discussion of the determinations regarding suitability that we require of all those selling shares on our behalf.

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THIS OFFERING

     Below we have provided answers to some of the more frequently asked questions relating to an offering of this type. Please see the remainder of this prospectus for more detailed information about this offering.

Q: What is a REIT?

1

Q: What is Hartman Commercial Properties REIT?

Q: What is the experience of your executive officers and trustees?

2

Q: Who is Hartman Management, L.P.?

Q: In what types of real property will you invest?

Q: May you invest in anything other than real property?

Q: How are you different from your competitors who offer unlisted REIT shares to the public?

Q: Who will choose the investments you make?

3

Q: How will Hartman Management select potential properties for acquisition?

Q: How many properties do you currently own?

Q: Do you intend to acquire some of your properties in joint ventures?

Q: What steps do you take to make sure you invest in environmentally compliant property?

Q: What will be the terms of your leases?

4

Q: How will you own your real estate properties?

Q: What is an “UPREIT”?

Q: If I buy shares, will I receive dividends and how often?

Q: How do you calculate the payment of dividends to shareholders?

Q: May I reinvest my dividends in shares of Hartman Commercial Properties REIT?

Q: Will the dividends I receive be taxable as ordinary income?

5

Q: What will you do with the money raised in this offering?

Q: What kind of offering is this?

Q: How does a “best efforts” offering work?

Q: How long will this offering last?

Q: Who can buy shares?

Q: May I make an investment through my IRA, SEP or other tax-deferred account?

6

Q: Have you arranged for a custodian for investments made through IRA, SEP or other tax-deferred accounts?

Q: Is there any minimum investment required?

Q: How do I subscribe for shares?

Q: What happens if you don’t sell at least 200,000 shares?

Q: If I buy shares in this offering, how may I later sell them?

7

Q: What are your exit strategies?

Q: Who is the transfer agent?

Q: Will I be notified of how my investment is doing?

Q: When will I receive my detailed tax information?

Q: Who can help answer my questions?

Hartman Commercial Properties REIT
Attn: Investor Relations
1450 West Sam Houston Parkway North, Suite 100
Houston, Texas 77043
(713) 467-2222

8

PROSPECTUS SUMMARY

     This prospectus summary highlights selected information contained elsewhere in this prospectus. Because it is a summary, this section does not contain all of the information that is important to your decision whether to invest in our common shares. To understand this offering fully, you should read the entire prospectus carefully, including the “Risk Factors” section and the financial statements.

Hartman Commercial Properties REIT

     Hartman Commercial Properties REIT is a Maryland real estate investment trust. We invest in and operate retail, industrial and office properties located primarily in the Houston and San Antonio metropolitan areas. We intend to expand our investments to retail, office and industrial properties located in major metropolitan cities in the United States, principally in the Southern United States. We conduct substantially all of our operations and activities through Hartman REIT Operating Partnership, L.P., which we refer to elsewhere in this prospectus as Hartman OP or the Operating Partnership. We are the sole general partner of Hartman OP and, as of August 27, 2004, we owned 6,648,658.37 OP Units in Hartman OP, which represented 53.37% of all outstanding OP Units on such date. The term “OP Units” refers to the units of partnership interest of Hartman OP. We owned 33 commercial properties as of June 30, 2004, primarily consisting of retail centers, industrial and office properties. Our properties are typically leased to a variety of tenants under long-term leases. Some tenants are national companies; others are local businesses. Our business and properties are more fully described in the “Description of Real Estate and Operating Data” section of this prospectus.

     We have made an election to be taxed as a REIT. Consequently, we generally are not subject to federal income tax on income that we distribute to our shareholders. Under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, REITs are subject to numerous organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement that they distribute at least 90% of their taxable income for all future years beginning with 2001. We refer to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, as the “Internal Revenue Code” in this prospectus. If we fail to qualify for taxation as a REIT in any year, our income will be taxed at regular corporate rates, and we may be precluded from qualifying for treatment as a REIT for the four-year period following our failure to qualify. Even if we continue to qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes, we may still be subject to state and local taxes on our income and property and to federal income and excise taxes on our undistributed income. We encourage you to read the section of this prospectus titled “Federal Income Tax Considerations” for more information about how we are taxed.

     Our office is located at 1450 West Sam Houston Parkway North, Suite 100, Houston, Texas 77043. Our telephone number is (713) 467-2222.

Our Advisor

     Our advisor is Hartman Management, a Texas limited partnership. Hartman Management manages our day-to-day operations and identifies acquisitions and investments on our behalf. Hartman Management also manages our portfolio of properties. We sometimes refer to Hartman Management as our property manager in this prospectus.

Our Management

     We operate under the direction of our board of trustees, the members of which are accountable to our shareholders and us as fiduciaries. Our board of trustees, including a majority of our independent trustees, must approve certain matters set forth in our Articles of Amendment and Restatement (sometimes referred to herein as the “charter” or the “Declaration of Trust”). We have six members on our board of trustees. Four of the trustees are independent of Hartman Management and have responsibility for reviewing its performance. Our trustees are elected annually by our shareholders. Although we have executive officers who will manage our operation, we do not have any paid employees. Hartman Management has employees whom it compensates out of the fees we pay to it. Except with respect to share purchase rights and options to purchase common shares that may be granted to our executive officers, only our non-employee trustees are compensated for their services to us.

9

Terms of The Offering

     We are offering up to 10,000,000 common shares of beneficial interest to the public at $10.00 per share. We are also offering up to 1,000,000 shares pursuant to our dividend reinvestment plan at $9.50 per share. We plan to offer common shares of beneficial interest until the earlier of          , 2006 or the date we sell all 11,000,000 shares in this offering. However, we may terminate this offering at any time prior to such termination date. This offering must be registered, or exempt from registration, in every state in which we offer or sell shares. Generally, such registrations are for a period of one year. Therefore, we may have to stop selling shares in any state in which the registration is not renewed annually. If 200,000 shares, exclusive of shares sold to residents of either New York or Pennsylvania, are not sold by          , 2005, this offering will be terminated and subscribers’ funds will be returned promptly. Funds in escrow will be invested in short-term, highly liquid or other authorized investments that can be readily sold or otherwise disposed of for cash without any dissipation of the offering proceeds invested. After the initial 200,000 shares, exclusive of shares sold to residents of either New York or Pennsylvania, are sold, subscription proceeds will continue to be held in escrow until investors are admitted as shareholders, except that subscribers residing in Pennsylvania may not be admitted until subscriptions have been received and accepted for $5,475,000 and subscribers residing in New York may not be admitted until subscriptions, other than subscriptions from residents of Pennsylvania, have been received for $2,500,000. We intend to admit new shareholders monthly. Each time new investors are admitted, we will hold such investment proceeds in our account until we withdraw funds for the acquisition of investments, or the payment of fees and expenses.

Summary Risk Factors

     An investment in our common shares is subject to significant risks that are described in more detail in the “Risk Factors” and “Conflicts of Interest” sections of this prospectus, which begin on pages 17 and 59, respectively. If we are unable to effectively manage the impact of these risks, we may not meet our investment objectives and, therefore, you may lose some or all of your investment. The following is a summary of the risks that we believe are most relevant to an investment in our common shares:

10

Description of Properties, Investments and Borrowing

     As of June 30, 2004, we owned 33 commercial properties. We have not contracted to acquire any investments with the proceeds of this offering, nor has our advisor identified any assets in which there is a reasonable probability that we will invest. Although all of our properties are retail, industrial or office properties located in the Houston and San Antonio, Texas metropolitan areas, we will seek to invest in retail, office and industrial properties located in major metropolitan cities throughout the United States, principally in the Southern United States. All acquisitions of properties will be evaluated for tenant creditworthiness and the reliability and stability of the properties’ future income and capital appreciation within a seven to ten-year holding period. In addition, we may acquire interests in other entities with similar real property investments. Our properties may be acquired, developed and operated by us alone or jointly with another party. We may enter into one or more joint ventures for the acquisition of properties with certain of our affiliates, other third parties, including the present and future real estate limited partnerships sponsored by our advisor. We may also serve as mortgage lender to these joint ventures or other Hartman real estate programs.

     Our charter permits us to incur indebtedness of up to 300.0% of our net asset value as of the date of any borrowing. However, our board of trustees has adopted a policy that we will generally limit our aggregate borrowing to 50.0% of the aggregate value of our assets as of the date of any borrowing, unless substantial justification exists that borrowing a greater amount is in our best interests. Our policy limitation does not apply to individual properties. As a result, it can be expected that, with respect to the acquisition of one or more of our properties, we may incur indebtedness of more than 50.0% of the asset value of the property acquired. We expect to borrow up to 50.0% of our aggregate asset value if interest rates and loan terms are favorable. Our board of trustees must review our aggregate borrowing at least quarterly. Our charter further provides that we may borrow in excess of 300.0% of our aggregate asset value only if approved by our independent trustees, in which event we must disclose the justification for such excess borrowing in our next quarterly report to shareholders.

11

Estimated Use of Proceeds of This Offering

     We estimate that we will use at least 89.5% of the proceeds of this offering to invest in properties and for general working capital purposes, but our estimate is based on the number of shares we sell in this offering through our dealer manager without the involvement of participating broker-dealers since the commissions that would otherwise be payable for such sales will be retained and used to invest in properties. If actual sales are a lower proportion of total shares sold, then the percentage of the proceeds that will be so available will be lower. On the date of this prospectus, we had not identified any particular properties that we intend to acquire with the proceeds of this offering. We will use the remainder of the offering proceeds to pay selling commissions, fees and expenses related to this offering and fees and expenses related to the selection and acquisition of properties. You should read the “Estimated Use of Proceeds” section of this prospectus for further detail regarding the use of the proceeds of this offering.

Investment Objectives

     Our investment objectives are:

     To achieve these objectives, we intend to increase net income from our operations through selective acquisitions and sophisticated and professional management of our properties. We intend to hold our properties until we determine that they should be sold, which we expect to be generally seven to ten years from the date of acquisition. To the extent that any of our properties are sold, we may reinvest the net proceeds of such sale in additional properties or distribute such net proceeds to equity holders. See the “Investment Objectives and Criteria” section of this prospectus for a more complete description of our business and objectives.

Dividend Policy

     We have paid regular dividends to our shareholders since our inception, and we intend to continue to pay regular dividends. Dividends will be determined by our board of trustees and will be dependent upon a number of factors. To maintain our qualification to be taxed as a REIT, we are required to distribute at least 90% of our taxable income. We expect to continue to pay dividends on a monthly basis, and to pay such dividends to investors in this offering after we have sold the minimum offering amount and have admitted our initial investors. Please see the “Description of Shares — Dividends” section of this prospectus for a description of our dividend policy and a table showing all dividends we made prior to June 30, 2004.

Conflicts of Interest

     We have no paid employees. Hartman Management directs, supervises and manages our day-to-day activities in accordance with an advisory agreement. Hartman Management also supervises our property acquisitions. Allen R. Hartman is the president and sole owner of Hartman Management. Mr. Hartman is also our president and is a member of our board of trustees.

     Hartman Management, as our advisor, will experience conflicts of interest in connection with the management of our business affairs, including the following:

12

     See the “Conflicts of Interest” section of this prospectus for a detailed discussion of the various conflicts of interest relating to your investment, as well as the procedures that we have established to resolve a number of these potential conflicts.

     The following chart shows the ownership structure of the various Hartman entities that are affiliated with Hartman Management:

13

Prior Offering Summary

     Our founder, Allen R. Hartman, has previously sponsored 17 privately offered real estate limited partnerships over the last 20 years. As of November 30, 2003, Mr. Hartman had raised approximately $120 million from approximately 1,100 investors in these real estate programs. Neither Mr. Hartman, nor any of our other affiliates, have previously sponsored or organized a publicly offered REIT. The “Prior Performance Summary” section of this prospectus contains a discussion of the programs sponsored by Mr. Hartman from January 1, 1995 to date. Certain statistical data relating to such programs with investment objectives similar to ours is also provided in the “Prior Performance Tables” included as Appendix A to this prospectus. Our prior performance, and the prior performance of the other programs previously sponsored by Mr. Hartman, are not necessarily indicative of the results that we will achieve. Therefore, you should not assume that you will experience returns, if any, comparable to those experienced by our shareholders in the past or by investors in other prior Hartman real estate programs.

Compensation to Hartman Management and Its Affiliates

     Hartman Management and its affiliates will receive compensation and fees for services relating to this offering and the investment and management of our assets. The most significant items of compensation are summarized in the following table:

14

     There are many additional conditions and restrictions on the amount of compensation that Hartman Management and its affiliates may receive. There are also some smaller items of compensation and expense reimbursements that Hartman Management may receive. For a more detailed explanation of these fees and expenses payable to Hartman Management and its affiliates, see the “Estimated Use of Proceeds” section of this prospectus and the “Management Compensation” section of this prospectus.

Dividend Reinvestment Plan

     You may participate in our dividend reinvestment plan, pursuant to which you may have the dividends you receive from us reinvested in our common shares. The purchase price per share under our dividend reinvestment plan will be $9.50. If you participate in our dividend reinvestment plan, you will be taxed on income attributable to the reinvested dividends. Your participation in our dividend reinvestment plan would mean that you would have to rely solely on sources other than our dividends from which to pay such taxes. As a result, you may have a tax liability without receiving cash dividends to pay such liability. We may terminate the dividend reinvestment plan in our discretion at any time upon ten days notice to plan participants.

Share Redemption Program

     After you have held your shares for a minimum of one year, our share redemption program may provide an opportunity for you to redeem your shares. We will limit the number of shares redeemed pursuant to our share redemption program as follows: (1) during any 12-month period, we will not redeem in excess of 5.0% of the number of our common shares outstanding at the beginning of such 12-month period; and (2) funding for the redemption of shares will be dependent upon whether we have sufficient excess cash to repurchase shares. Funds available for redemptions generally will be limited to 1.0% of our operating cash flow from the previous fiscal year, plus any proceeds from our dividend reinvestment plan. The funds we may set aside for our share redemption program may not be sufficient to accommodate all requests made in any year. For three years after we complete this offering, the redemption price for purchases under our share redemption program will be $9.50 per share. Thereafter, the redemption price will equal 95.0% of our per share value as estimated by Hartman Management or another financial advisor evaluation firm we choose for this purpose. The share redemption program has different rules if shares are being redeemed in connection with the death of a shareholder. See “Description of Shares – Share Redemption Program” for more information about our share redemption program. Our board of trustees may amend or terminate the share redemption program at any time.

Hartman REIT Operating Partnership, L.P.

     We own our existing investments, and generally intend to own our additional investments, through Hartman REIT Operating Partnership, L.P. (Hartman OP or the Operating Partnership) or subsidiaries thereof, or other operating partnerships. This structure is sometimes referred to as an Umbrella Partnership Real Estate Investment Trust, or UPREIT. We may, however, own investments directly or through other entities. We are the sole general partner of Hartman OP. As of June 30, 2004, Hartman OP had 416 limited partners. The UPREIT

15

structure enables us to acquire real estate properties in exchange for limited partnership units in Hartman OP. This structure also enables sellers of properties to transfer their properties to Hartman OP in exchange for units of Hartman OP and defer gain recognition for tax purposes with respect to such transfers. At present, we have no plans to acquire any specific properties in exchange for units of Hartman OP. The holders of units in Hartman OP may have their units exchanged for cash or our common shares under certain circumstances described in the section of this prospectus captioned “The Operating Partnership Agreement.”

ERISA Considerations

     The section of this prospectus entitled “Investment by Tax-Exempt Entities and ERISA Considerations” describes the effect the purchase of shares will have on individual retirement accounts (IRAs) and retirement plans subject to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (ERISA), and/or the Internal Revenue Code. ERISA is a federal law that regulates the operation of certain tax-advantaged retirement plans. Any retirement plan trustee or individual considering purchasing shares for a retirement plan or an IRA should read carefully the section of this prospectus captioned “Investment by Tax-Exempt Entities and ERISA Considerations.”

Description of Shares

  General

     Generally, your investment will be recorded on our books only, and we will issue a certificate evidencing ownership of our common shares only to shareholders who make a written request to us. If you wish to transfer your shares, you will be required to send an executed transfer form to us, along with a fee to cover reasonable transfer costs, in an amount as determined by our board of trustees. We will provide the required form to you upon request.

  Shareholder Voting Rights and Limitations

     We will hold annual meetings of our shareholders for the purpose of electing our trustees and conducting other business matters that may be presented at such meetings. We may also call a special meeting of shareholders from time to time for the purpose of conducting certain matters. You are entitled to one vote for each common share you own at any of these meetings.

  Restriction on Share Ownership

     Our charter contains a restriction on ownership of the shares that prevents any one person from owning more than 9.8% in value of our outstanding shares or more than 9.8% in value or number (whichever is more restrictive) of our outstanding common shares. These restrictions are designed to enable us to comply with share accumulation restrictions imposed on REITs by the Internal Revenue Code. For a more complete description of the shares, including restrictions on the ownership of shares, please see the “Description of Shares” section of this prospectus.

16

RISK FACTORS

     Your purchase of shares involves a number of risks. You should specifically consider the following before making your investment decision.

Risks Related to an Investment in Hartman Commercial Properties REIT

There is no public trading market for your shares; therefore, it will be difficult for you to sell your shares.

     There is no current public market for the shares. Therefore, you should purchase the shares only as a long-term investment. The suitability standards described in this prospectus also apply to potential subsequent purchasers of our shares. If you are able to find a buyer for your shares, you may not sell your shares to such buyer unless the buyer meets the suitability standards applicable to him or her, including any suitability standards imposed by such potential purchaser’s state of residence. Our charter also imposes restrictions on the ownership of common shares that will apply to potential transferees that may inhibit your ability to sell your shares. Moreover, except for requests for redemptions by the estate, heir or beneficiary of a deceased shareholder, our board of trustees may reject any request for redemption of shares or amend, suspend or terminate our share redemption program at any time. Therefore, it will be difficult for you to sell your shares promptly or at all. You may not be able to sell your shares in the event of an emergency, and, if you are able to sell your shares, you may have to sell them at a substantial discount. It is also likely that your shares would not be accepted as the primary collateral for a loan. See “Suitability Standards,” “Plan of Distribution – Suitability Standards,” “Description of Shares – Restrictions on Transfer” and “– Share Redemption Program” elsewhere herein for a more complete discussion on the restrictions on your ability to transfer your shares.

If we, through Hartman Management, are unable to find suitable investments, then we may not be able to achieve our investment objectives or pay dividends.

     Our ability to achieve our investment objectives and to pay dividends is dependent upon the performance of Hartman Management, our advisor, in the acquisition of our investments, the selection of tenants and the determination of any financing arrangements. You must rely entirely on the management ability of Hartman Management and the oversight of our board of trustees. We cannot be sure that Hartman Management will be successful in obtaining suitable investments on financially attractive terms or that, if it makes investments on our behalf, our objectives will be achieved. If we, through Hartman Management, are unable to find suitable investments, we will hold the proceeds of this offering in an interest-bearing account, invest the proceeds in short-term, investment-grade investments or, ultimately, liquidate. In such an event, our ability to pay dividends to our shareholders would be adversely affected.

We may suffer from delays in locating suitable investments, which could adversely affect the return on your investment.

     We could suffer from delays in locating suitable investments, particularly as a result of our reliance on our advisor at times when management of our advisor is simultaneously seeking to locate suitable investments for other Hartman programs. Delays we encounter in the selection, acquisition and development of properties could adversely affect your returns. In addition, where we acquire properties prior to the start of construction or during the early stages of construction, it will typically take several months to complete construction and rent available space. Therefore, you could suffer delays in the distribution of cash dividends attributable to those particular properties. In addition, if we are unable to invest our offering proceeds in income-producing real properties in a timely manner, our ability to pay dividends to our shareholders would be adversely affected. As of the date of this prospectus, we have not identified specific properties that we will purchase with the proceeds of this offering. Because we are conducting this offering on a “best efforts” basis over several months, our ability to commit to purchase specific properties will be partially dependent on our ability to raise sufficient funds for such acquisitions. We may be delayed in making investments due to delays in the sale of our shares, delays in negotiating or obtaining the necessary purchase documentation, delays in locating suitable investments and other factors. We will invest all proceeds we receive from this offering in short-term, highly-liquid investments until we use such funds for acquisitions. We expect that the income we earn on these temporary investments will be lower than the rate of return associated with our historical dividends. Therefore, the temporary investment of proceeds from this offering for an extended time may result in a lower rate of return for shareholders.

17

Our accumulated deficit may negatively impact our ability to fund our working capital needs or our ability to pay dividends.

     As of June 30, 2004, we had an accumulated deficit of $5.0 million. Historically, we have paid dividends to our shareholders in excess of our cash flow. If this were to continue, we may be unable to fund our working capital needs. Alternatively, we may be required to reduce or suspend the payment of dividends to our shareholders.

You will not have the opportunity to evaluate our investments before we make them.

     Because we have not identified any investments that we may make with the proceeds of this offering, this offering is considered to be a “blind pool” offering and we are not able to provide you with information to evaluate our investments prior to acquisition. We will seek to invest substantially all of the offering proceeds available for investment, after the payment of fees and expenses, in the acquisition of properties. In addition, we will make or invest in mortgage loans or participations therein if our advisor determines, due to the state of the real estate market or in order to diversify our investment portfolio or otherwise, that such investments are advantageous to us. Our management intends to limit such mortgage investments to 15.0% of our total investment portfolio unless our management determines that prevailing economic or portfolio circumstances require otherwise. However, we are not limited to such investments. We have established policies relating to the creditworthiness of tenants, managers and borrowers, but our board of trustees will have wide discretion in implementing these policies, and you will not have the opportunity to evaluate potential tenants, managers or borrowers. For a more detailed discussion of our investment policies, see “Investment Objectives and Criteria – Acquisition and Investment Policies.”

Our shares in this offering are being sold by our dealer manager, D.H. Hill Securities, LLP, on a “best efforts” basis. Because of the “best efforts” nature of this offering, there is no guarantee that we will be able to raise the minimum offering amount.

     Our dealer manager, D.H. Hill Securities, LLP, is selling our shares on a “best efforts” basis, whereby the brokers participating in the offering are only required to use their best efforts to sell our shares and have no firm commitment or obligation to purchase any of the shares. As a result, we cannot assure you as to the amount of proceeds that will be raised in this offering or that we will achieve sales of the minimum offering amount. If we do not achieve sales of the minimum offering amount, we will return all funds held in our escrow account and we will stop selling shares. In the event the offering terminates before we have sold a minimum of 200,000 shares to subscribers who are not residents of either New York or Pennsylvania, escrow expenses may be deducted from the total amount of interest earned on the funds deposited in the escrow account. Funds returned to subscribers will include interest earned, less escrow expenses. However, with respect to subscriptions received from investors in states where deductions are prohibited, the subscriber will be paid his or her pro rata portion of interest earned on subscription proceeds deposited in the escrow account without any deduction for expenses.

If we are unable to raise substantially more than the minimum offering amount, we will be limited in the number and type of investments we may make and the value of your investment in us will fluctuate with the performance of the specific investments we make.

     If we are unable to raise substantially more than the minimum offering amount, we will make fewer investments resulting in less diversification in terms of the number of investments owned, the geographic regions in which our investments are located and the types of investments that we make. In such event, the likelihood of our profitability being affected by the performance of any one of our investments will increase. For example, in the event we only raise the minimum amount of $2.0 million, we may be able to invest in only one additional property. If we only are able to one invest in one additional property, we would not achieve significant diversification of our assets. Additionally, we are not limited in the number or size of our investments or the percentage of net proceeds we may dedicate to a single investment. Your investment in our shares will be subject to greater risk to the extent that we lack a diversified portfolio of investments. In addition, if we are unable to raise substantially more than the minimum offering amount, our fixed operating expenses, as a percentage of gross income, would be higher, and our financial condition and ability to pay dividends could be adversely affected.

18

Because of the lack of geographic diversification of our portfolio, an economic downturn in the Houston and San Antonio, Texas metropolitan areas could adversely impact our operations and ability to pay dividends to our shareholders.

     All of our assets and revenues are currently derived from properties located in the Houston and San Antonio, Texas metropolitan areas. Our results of operation are directly contingent on our ability to attract financially sound commercial tenants. If Houston or San Antonio experiences a significant economic downturn, our ability to locate and/or retain financially sound tenants may decrease. Likewise, we may be required to lower our rental rates to attract desirable tenants in such an environment. Consequently, because of the lack of geographic diversity among our current assets, if Houston or San Antonio experiences an economic downturn, our operations and ability to pay dividends to our shareholders could be adversely impacted.

This is the first publicly offered REIT sponsored by Mr. Hartman, and the prior performance of private real estate investment programs sponsored by affiliates of Mr. Hartman may not be an indication of our future results.

     Although Mr. Hartman and other members of our advisor’s management have significant experience in the acquisition, finance, management and development of commercial real estate, this is the first publicly offered REIT sponsored by Mr. Hartman. Accordingly, the prior performance of real estate investment programs sponsored by affiliates of Mr. Hartman and our advisor may not be indicative of our future results. Presently, our advisor is funded by Mr. Hartman. If our capital resources, or those of our advisor, are insufficient to support our operations, we will not be successful.

     To be successful in this market, we must, among other things:

     We cannot guarantee that we will succeed in achieving these goals, and our failure to do so could cause you to lose all or a portion of your investment.

If we lose or are unable to obtain key personnel, our ability to implement our investment strategies could be delayed or hindered.

     Our success depends to a significant degree upon the continued contributions of certain executive officers and other key personnel, including Allen R. Hartman. We do not have an employment agreement with Mr. Hartman, and we cannot guarantee that he will remain affiliated with us. If Mr. Hartman or any of the key personnel of Hartman Management were to cease their affiliation with us, our operating results could suffer. We have not purchased “key person” life insurance on the life of Mr. Hartman. We believe that our future success depends, in large part, upon our advisor’s ability to retain and hire highly skilled managerial, operational and marketing personnel. Competition for such personnel is intense, and we cannot assure you that our advisor will be successful in attracting and retaining such skilled personnel. If we lose or are unable to obtain the services of key personnel, our ability to implement our investment strategies could be delayed or hindered.

Our rights, and the rights of our shareholders, to recover claims against our officers, trustees and our advisor are limited.

     Our charter limits the liability of our trustees and officers to us and our shareholders for monetary damages to the maximum extent permitted under Maryland law. In addition, our charter, in the case of our trustees, officers, employees and agents, and the advisory agreement, in the case of our advisor, require us to indemnify our trustees, officers, employees and

19

agents and our advisor and its affiliates for actions taken by them in good faith and without negligence or misconduct. As a result, our shareholders and we may have more limited rights against our trustees, officers, employees and agents, and our advisor and its affiliates, than might otherwise exist under common law. In addition, we may be obligated to fund the defense costs incurred by our trustees, officers, employees and agents or our advisor in some cases. See the section captioned “Management – Limited Liability and Indemnification of Trustees, Officers, Employees and Other Agents” elsewhere herein.

We may need to incur borrowings to meet REIT minimum distribution requirements.

     In order to maintain our qualification as a REIT, we are required to distribute to our shareholders at least 90% of our annual net taxable income (excluding any net capital gain). In addition, the Internal Revenue Code will subject us to a 4% nondeductible excise tax on the amount, if any, by which certain distributions paid by us with respect to any calendar year are less than the sum of (i) 85% of our ordinary income for that year, (ii) 95% of our capital gain net income for that year and (iii) 100% of our undistributed taxable income from prior years. Although we intend to pay dividends to our shareholders in a manner that allows us to meet the foregoing distribution requirement and avoid this 4% excise tax, we cannot assure you that we will always be able to do so.

     Our income consists almost solely of our share of Hartman OP’s income, and the cash available for distribution by us to our shareholders consists of our share of cash distributions made by Hartman OP. Because we are the sole general partner of Hartman OP, our trustees will determine the amount of any distributions made by it. The trustees may consider a number of factors in making such distributions, including:

     Differences in timing between the actual receipt of income and actual payment of deductible expenses and the inclusion of such income and deduction of such expenses when determining our taxable income, as well as the effect of nondeductible capital expenditures and the creation of reserves or required debt amortization payments, could require us to borrow funds on a short-term or long-term basis to meet the REIT distribution requirements and to avoid the 4% excise tax described above. In such circumstances, we might need to borrow funds to avoid adverse tax consequences even if our management believes that the then prevailing market conditions generally are not favorable for such borrowings or that such borrowings would not be advisable in the absence of such tax consideration.

An increase in market interest rates may have an adverse effect on our ability to sell shares in this offering.

     One of the factors that investors may consider in deciding whether to buy our shares is our dividend rate as a percentage of our share price, relative to market interest rates. If market interest rates increase, prospective investors may desire a higher dividend on our shares or seek securities paying higher dividends or interest. The value of an investment in our shares to prospective investors likely will be based primarily on the income and return that we derive from our properties and our related distributions to shareholders, and not from the market value or underlying appraised value of the properties themselves. If interest rates rise without an increase in our dividend rate, potential investors may require a higher dividend yield on our shares as market rates on interest-bearing securities, such as bonds, rise. Rising interest rates may make an investment in our shares less attractive and may have an adverse effect on our ability to sell shares in this offering.

We expect to acquire or develop several properties with the proceeds of this offering that, if unsuccessful, could adversely impact our ability to pay dividends to our shareholders.

     We expect to acquire or develop several properties with the proceeds of this offering. The acquisition of additional properties will subject us to risks associated with managing the properties, including tenant retention and tenant defaults of lease obligations. A larger portfolio of properties will also generate additional operating expenses. Specific examples of risks that could relate to acquisitions include:

20

     To the extent that we acquire a property that needs substantial renovation or repositioning, it will bear certain risks including:

     In the case of an unsuccessful acquisition or redevelopment project, our loss could exceed our investment in such project, which could adversely impact our ability to pay dividends to our shareholders.

Our use of borrowings to fund acquisitions and improvements on properties could result in foreclosures and unexpected debt service expenses upon refinancing.

     We have relied on borrowings to fund acquisitions and we expect to continue to rely on borrowings and other external sources of financing to fund the costs of property acquisitions, capital expenditures and other items. As of June 30, 2004, we had aggregate debt of $49.0 million secured by our assets. Accordingly, we are subject to the risk that our cash flow will not sufficiently cover required debt service payments.

     If we cannot meet our required mortgage payment obligations, the property or properties subject to such mortgage indebtedness could be foreclosed upon by or otherwise transferred to our lender, with a consequent loss of income and asset value to us. The interest rates attributable to the debt are adjustable and could rise substantially over the term of the mortgages. Additionally, we may be required to refinance our debt subject to “lump sum” or “balloon” payment maturities or on other terms less favorable than the original loan or at a time we would otherwise prefer to not refinance such debt. A refinancing on such terms or at such times could increase our debt service payments, which could adversely impact the cash we would have available for distribution to our shareholders.

     Our organizational documents permit us to borrow up to 300% of our net asset value as of the date of any borrowing. Our board of trustees has adopted a policy that we will generally limit our aggregate borrowing to 50.0% of the aggregate value of our assets as of the date of any borrowing, unless substantial justification exists that borrowing a greater amount is in our best interests. If we increase our use of financing, we would become subject to an increased risk of default and an increase in debt service requirements. These risks could also adversely affect our financial condition and results of our operations and, consequently, our ability to pay dividends to our shareholders.

We operate in a competitive business and many of our competitors have greater resources and operating flexibility than we do.

     Numerous real estate companies that operate in the Houston and San Antonio, Texas metropolitan areas compete with us in developing and acquiring office, retail and industrial properties and seeking tenants to occupy such properties. Moreover, as we seek to expand our investments and operations into other geographic locations and other asset types, we will encounter significantly more competition from entities that have more financial and other resources, and more operating experience, than us or our advisor. Such competition could adversely affect our business. In addition, the number of entities and the amount of funds competing for suitable investments may increase. Any such increase would result in increased demand for these assets and therefore increased prices paid for them. If we pay higher prices for properties and other investments, our profitability will be reduced and you may experience a lower return on your investment.

Approximately 35.0% of our gross leasable area is subject to leases that expire prior to December 31, 2005.

     As of December 31, 2003, 35.0% of the aggregate gross leasable area of our properties is subject to leases that expire prior to December 31, 2005. We are subject to the risk that:

21

     If any of these risks materialize, our cash flow and ability to pay dividends could be adversely affected.

We depend on tenants for our revenue and on anchor tenants to attract non-anchor tenants.

     As rental income from real property comprises substantially all of our income, the inability of a single major tenant or a number of smaller tenants to meet their obligations would adversely affect our income. Tenants may have the right to terminate their leases upon the occurrence of certain customary events of default or, in some cases, if the lease held by an anchor tenant or other principal tenant of the property expires, is terminated or the property subject to the lease is vacated, even if rent continues to be paid under the lease. The weakening of a significant tenant’s financial condition or the loss of an anchor tenant may adversely affect our cash flow and amounts available for distribution to our shareholders.

The bankruptcy or insolvency of major tenants would adversely impact our operations.

     As of December 31, 2003, the five largest tenants of our properties generated approximately 6.7% of the combined rent of our properties. The bankruptcy or insolvency of a major tenant or a number of small tenants would have an adverse impact on our income and dividends. Generally, under bankruptcy law, a tenant has the option of continuing or terminating any unexpired lease. If the tenant continues its current lease, the tenant must cure all defaults under the lease and provide adequate assurance of its future performance under the lease. If the tenant terminates the lease, our claim for breach of the lease (absent collateral securing the claim) will be treated as a general unsecured claim. General unsecured claims are the last claims paid in a bankruptcy, and funds may not be available to pay such claims. As of June 30, 2004, none of our major tenants were in bankruptcy or had materially defaulted on their lease. However, any of our tenants could become insolvent or declare bankruptcy in the future.

We may be subject to risks as the result of joint ownership of real estate with third parties.

     We may invest in properties and assets jointly with other persons or entities. Joint ownership of properties, under certain circumstances, may involve risks not otherwise present, including:

We may have difficulty selling our real estate investments, which may have an adverse impact on our ability to pay dividends.

     Equity real estate investments are relatively illiquid. We have a limited ability to vary our portfolio in response to changes in economic or other conditions. The real estate market is affected by many factors, such as general economic conditions, availability of financing, interest rates and other factors, including supply and demand, that are beyond our control. We cannot predict whether we will be able to sell any property for the price or on the terms set by us, or whether any price or other terms offered by a prospective purchaser would be acceptable to us. We cannot predict the length of time needed to find a willing purchaser and to close the sale of a property. We are especially vulnerable to these risks because all but one of our current properties are located in one geographical location. In addition, mortgage payments and, to the extent a property is not occupied entirely by tenants subject to triple net leases, certain significant expenditures such as real estate taxes and maintenance costs generally are not reduced when circumstances cause a reduction in income from the investment. The occurrence of such events would adversely affect our income and ability to pay dividends to our shareholders.

22

It is likely that you will not have the benefit of an independent due diligence review in connection with this offering.

     Although some of our selected dealers may perform an independent due diligence review in connection with this offering, our dealer manager is not expected to perform a due diligence review and it is likely that you will not have the benefit of an independent due diligence review and investigation of the type normally performed by unaffiliated, independent underwriters in connection with the offering of securities. Further, any due diligence investigation of us by the dealer manager cannot be considered to be an independent review and, therefore, may not be as meaningful as a review conducted by an independent broker-dealer or investment banker.

We established the offering price on an arbitrary basis.

     Our board of trustees determined the selling price of the common shares, and such price bears no relationship to any established criteria for valuing issued or outstanding shares.

Provisions in our charter may discourage a takeover attempt.

     To maintain our qualification as a REIT, no less than six individuals, as defined in the Internal Revenue Code to include certain entities, can own, actually or constructively, more than 50% in value of our issued and outstanding shares at any time during the last half of a taxable year. Attribution rules in the Internal Revenue Code determine if any individual or entity actually or constructively owns our shares under this requirement. Additionally, at least 100 persons must beneficially own our shares during at least 335 days of a taxable year. Also, rent from “related party tenants” is not qualifying income for purposes of the gross income tests of the Internal Revenue Code. To help insure that we meet these tests, our charter restricts the acquisition and ownership of our shares.

     Our charter, with certain exceptions, authorizes our trustees to take such actions as are necessary and desirable to preserve our qualification as a REIT. Unless exempted by our board of trustees, no person may own more than 9.8% in value of our outstanding shares or more than 9.8% in value or number (whichever is more restrictive) of our outstanding common shares. Our board of trustees may not grant such an exemption to any proposed transferee whose ownership of in excess of the foregoing limits would result in the termination of our status as a REIT. See “Description of Shares – Restrictions on Transfer.” These restrictions on transferability and ownership will not apply if our board of trustees determines that it is no longer in our best interests to continue to qualify as a REIT. These ownership limits could delay, defer or prevent a transaction or a change in control that might involve a premium price for our common shares or otherwise be in the best interest of our shareholders. See “Description of Shares – Restrictions on Transfer.”

     Our charter authorizes us to issue additional authorized but unissued common shares or preferred shares. In addition, our board of trustees, without any action by our shareholders, may amend our charter to increase or decrease the aggregate number of shares or the number of shares of any class or series that we have authority to issue, and our board of trustees may classify or reclassify any unissued common shares or preferred shares and may set the preferences, rights and other terms of the classified or reclassified shares. See “Description of Shares – Common Shares” and “– Power to Issue Additional Common Shares and Preferred Shares.” Although our board of trustees has no intention to do so at the present time, it could establish a series of preferred shares that could delay, defer or prevent a transaction or a change in control that might involve a premium price for our common shares or otherwise be in the best interest of our shareholders.

     Our Declaration of Trust and bylaws also contain other provisions that may delay, defer or prevent a transaction or a change in control that might involve a premium price for our common shares or otherwise be in the best interest of our shareholders. See “Description of Shares – Provisions of Maryland Law and of Our Charter and Bylaws – Board of Trustees,” “– Control Share Acquisitions” and “– Advance Notice of Trustee Nominations and New Business.”

You may experience immediate dilution and could suffer additional dilution as the result of the conversion of OP Units and issuances of additional shares.

     Purchasers of our common shares in this offering may experience immediate dilution in the net tangible book value of the common shares from the offering price. The public offering price of $10.00 per common share exceeds our pro forma net tangible book value of $7.77 per share after this offering. As of the date of this prospectus, and on a pro forma basis assuming this offering had been completed on August 27, 2004, you would have incurred immediate dilution of $2.23 per common share,

23

or 22.3%. See the “Dilution” section of this prospectus. As of August 27, 2004, Hartman OP had 12,456,995.47 OP Units outstanding after giving effect to the reorganization, 5,808,337.10 of which are not owned by us. These OP Units are convertible, on a one-to-one basis, into our common shares. Shareholders could experience further dilution upon the future conversion of OP Units into common shares. See “Dilution.”

     In addition, existing shareholders and potential investors in this offering do not have preemptive rights to any shares issued by us in the future. Our charter currently has authorized 450,000,000 shares of beneficial interest, of which 400,000,000 shares are designated as common shares and 50,000,000 shares are designated as preferred shares. Subject to any limitations set forth under Maryland law, our board of trustees may increase the number of authorized shares of beneficial interest, increase or decrease the number of designated shares, or reclassify any unissued shares without the necessity of obtaining shareholder approval. All of such shares may be issued in the discretion of our board of trustees. Therefore, in the event that we (1) sell shares in this offering or sell additional shares in the future, including those issued pursuant to the dividend reinvestment plan, (2) sell securities that are convertible into our common shares, (3) issue our common shares in a private offering of securities to institutional investors, (4) issue our common shares upon the exercise of the options granted to our independent trustees or employees of Hartman Management or its affiliates, or (5) issue common shares to sellers of properties acquired by us in connection with an exchange of units of partnership interest in Hartman OP, existing shareholders and investors purchasing shares in this offering will likely experience dilution of their equity investment in us. Because the units of partnership interest in Hartman OP may be exchanged for our common shares, any merger, exchange or conversion between Hartman OP and another entity ultimately could result in the issuance of a substantial number of shares of our common shares, thereby diluting the percentage ownership interest of other shareholders. Because of these and other reasons described in this “Risk Factors” section, you should not expect to be able to own a significant percentage of our shares.

Complying with REIT requirements may cause us to forego otherwise attractive opportunities.

     To qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes, we must continually satisfy tests concerning, among other things, the sources of our income, the nature and diversification of our assets, the amounts we distribute to our shareholders and the ownership of our shares. We may be required to pay dividends to our shareholders at disadvantageous times or when we do not have funds readily available for distribution. Thus, compliance with the REIT requirements may hinder our ability to operate solely on the basis of maximizing profits.

Complying with REIT requirements may force us to liquidate otherwise attractive investments.

     To qualify as a REIT, we must also ensure that at the end of each calendar quarter at least 75% of the value of our assets consists of cash, cash items, government securities and qualified REIT real estate assets. The remainder of our investment in securities (other than government securities and qualified real estate assets) generally cannot include more than 10% of the outstanding voting securities of any one issuer or more than 10% of the total value of the outstanding securities of any one issuer. In addition, in general, no more than 5% of the value of our assets (other than government securities and qualified real estate assets) can consist of the securities of any one issuer, and no more than 20% of the value of our total securities can be represented by securities of one or more taxable REIT subsidiaries. If we fail to comply with these requirements at the end of any calendar quarter, we must correct such failure within 30 days after the end of the calendar quarter to avoid losing our REIT status and suffering adverse tax consequences. As a result, we may be required to liquidate otherwise attractive investments.

Risks Related to Conflicts of Interest

     We will be subject to conflicts of interest arising out of our relationships with our advisor and its affiliates, including the material conflicts discussed below. The “Conflicts of Interest” section of this prospectus provides a more detailed discussion of the conflicts of interest between us and our advisor and its affiliates, and our policies to reduce or eliminate potential conflicts.

Hartman Management will face conflicts of interest relating to the purchase and leasing of properties, and such conflicts may not be resolved in our favor.

     We may be buying properties at the same time as one or more of the other Hartman programs managed by officers and employees of Hartman Management are buying properties. There is a risk that Hartman Management will choose a property

24

that provides lower returns to us than a property purchased by another Hartman program. We cannot be sure that officers and employees acting on behalf of Hartman Management and on behalf of managers of other Hartman programs will act in our best interests when deciding whether to allocate any particular property to us. In addition, we may acquire properties in geographic areas where other Hartman programs own properties. If one of the other Hartman programs attracts a tenant that we are competing for, we could suffer a loss of revenue due to delays in locating another suitable tenant. You will not have the opportunity to evaluate the manner in which these conflicts of interest are resolved before or after making your investment. Similar conflicts of interest may apply if our advisors determine to make or purchase mortgage loans or participations in mortgage loans on our behalf, since other Hartman programs may be competing with us for such investments.

Our advisor may face a conflict of interest when allocating personnel and resources between our operations and the operations of other entities it manages.

     Mr. Hartman strategically directs our day-to-day operations through our advisor, which he owns and controls, pursuant to the terms of an advisory agreement. Mr. Hartman also controls other entities that own properties managed by our advisor. Our advisor’s personnel will not devote their efforts full-time to the property management of our portfolio of properties, but will devote a material amount of their time to the management of the business of these other property-owning entities controlled by Mr. Hartman but otherwise unaffiliated with us. From time to time, our advisor may have a conflict of interest in allocating its personnel between our operations and the operations of other entities controlled by Mr. Hartman. The failure of our advisor to adequately perform services for, or allocate resources to, us because of its obligations to these other entities could adversely affect our business and the returns we receive from our investments.

Certain of our officers and trustees face conflicts of interests relating to the positions they hold with other entities.

     Certain of our officers and trustees are also officers and trustees of Hartman Management and other entities controlled by Mr. Hartman. These individuals owe fiduciary duties to these other entities and their security holders and these duties may from time to time conflict with the fiduciary duties such individuals owe to our shareholders and us.

Allen R. Hartman controls other entities that compete with us for his time as well as tenants and acquisition opportunities.

     Mr. Hartman is not restricted from acquiring, operating, managing or developing real estate through entities other than us. We expect that Mr. Hartman will continue to develop, own or operate real estate that he feels does not conform to our investment strategy in or through other entities. Mr. Hartman currently controls and/or operates four other entities that collectively own twelve properties in the Houston and San Antonio metropolitan areas. Mr. Hartman spends a material amount of time managing these properties and other assets unrelated to our business. To varying degrees, we compete with these entities for tenants. Mr. Hartman may have conflicts of interest when seeking to allocate tenant and acquisition opportunities between us and other entities he controls. We encourage you to read the “Conflicts of Interest – Certain Relationships and Related Transactions” section of this prospectus for a further discussion of these topics.

Hartman Management will face conflicts of interest relating to joint ventures, which could result in a disproportionate benefit to a Hartman program or third party other than us.

     We are likely to enter into joint ventures with other Hartman programs, as well as third parties for the acquisition, development or improvement of properties. We may also purchase and develop properties in joint ventures or in partnerships, co-tenancies or other co-ownership arrangements with the sellers of the properties, affiliates of the sellers, developers or other persons. Such investments may involve risks not otherwise present with other methods of investment in real estate, including, for example:

25

Actions by such a co-venturer, co-tenant or partner might have the result of subjecting the property to liabilities in excess of those contemplated and may have the effect of reducing your returns.

     Hartman Management or its affiliates may have advisory and management arrangements with other Hartman programs, and thus, it is likely that they will encounter opportunities to acquire or sell properties to the benefit of one of the Hartman programs, but not others. Hartman Management or its affiliates may make decisions to buy or sell certain properties, which decisions might disproportionately benefit a Hartman program other than us. In such event, our results of operations and ability to pay dividends to our shareholders could be adversely affected.

     In the event that we enter into a joint venture with any other Hartman program or joint venture, Hartman Management may have a conflict of interest when determining when and whether to buy or sell a particular real estate property, and you may face certain additional risks. For example, other Hartman public real estate programs may never have an active trading market. Therefore, if we become listed on a national exchange, we may develop more divergent goals and objectives from such joint venturers with respect to the resale of properties in the future. In addition, in the event we joint venture with a Hartman program that has a term shorter than ours, the joint venture may be required to sell its properties at the time of the other Hartman program’s liquidation. We may not desire to sell the properties at such time. Although the terms of any joint venture agreement between us and another Hartman program would grant us a right of first refusal to buy such properties, we may not have sufficient funds to exercise our right of first refusal under these circumstances.

     Since Allen R. Hartman and his affiliates may control us as well as other Hartman real estate programs, agreements and transactions among the parties with respect to any joint venture between or among such parties will not have the benefit of arm’s-length negotiation of the type normally conducted between unrelated co-venturers. Under these joint venture arrangements, neither co-venturer may have the power to control the venture, and under certain circumstances, an impasse could be reached regarding matters pertaining to the joint venture, which might have a negative influence on the joint venture and decrease potential returns to you. In the event that a co-venturer has a right of first refusal to buy out the other co-venturer, it may be unable to finance such buy-out at that time. It may also be difficult for us to sell our interest in any such joint venture or partnership or as a co-tenant in property. In addition, to the extent that our co-venturer, partner or co-tenant is an affiliate of Hartman Management, certain conflicts of interest will exist. For a more detailed discussion, see “Conflicts of Interest – Joint Ventures with Affiliates of Hartman Management.”

Hartman Management will face conflicts of interest relating to the incentive fee structure under our advisory agreement, which could result in actions that are not necessarily in the long-term best interests of our shareholders.

     Under our advisory agreement, Hartman Management is entitled to fees that are structured in a manner intended to provide incentives to our advisor to perform in our best interests and in the best interests of our shareholders. However, because our advisor does not maintain a significant equity interest in us and is entitled to receive substantial minimum compensation regardless of performance, our advisor’s interests are not wholly aligned with those of our shareholders. In that regard, our advisor could be motivated to recommend riskier or more speculative investments in order for us to generate the specified levels of performance or sales proceeds that would entitle our advisor to fees. In addition, our advisor’s entitlement to fees upon the sale of our assets and to participate in sale proceeds could result in our advisor recommending sales of our investments at the earliest possible time at which sales of investments would produce the level of return that would entitle the advisor to compensation relating to such sales, even if continued ownership of those investments might be in our best long-term interest. Our advisory agreement requires us to pay a performance-based termination fee to our advisor in the event that we terminate the advisor prior to the listing of our shares for trading on an exchange or, absent such listing, in respect of its participation in net sales proceeds. To avoid paying this fee, our independent trustees may decide against terminating the advisory agreement prior to our listing of our shares or disposition of our investments even if, but for the termination fee, termination of the advisory agreement would be in our best interest. In addition, the requirement to pay the fee to the advisor at termination could cause us to make different investment or disposition decisions than we would otherwise make, in order to satisfy our obligation to pay the fee to the terminated advisor. Moreover, our advisor has the right to terminate the advisory agreement upon a change of control and thereby trigger the payment of the performance fee, which could have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing the change of control.

26

There is no separate counsel for our affiliates and us, which could result in conflicts of interest.

     Morris, Manning & Martin, LLP acts as legal counsel to us and is also expected to represent our advisor and some of its affiliates from time to time. There is a possibility in the future that the interests of the various parties may become adverse and, under the Code of Professional Responsibility of the legal profession, Morris, Manning & Martin, LLP may be precluded from representing any one or all of such parties. If any situation arises in which our interests appear to be in conflict with those of our advisor or its affiliates, additional counsel may be retained by one or more of the parties to assure that their interests are adequately protected. Moreover, should such a conflict not be readily apparent, Morris, Manning & Martin, LLP may inadvertently act in derogation of the interest of the parties that could affect our and, therefore, our shareholders’ ability to meet our investment objectives.

Our UPREIT structure may result in potential conflicts of interest.

     Persons holding OP Units have the right to vote on certain amendments to the Agreement of Limited Partnership of Hartman OP, as well as on certain other matters. Persons holding such voting rights may exercise them in a manner that conflicts with the interests of our shareholders. As the general partner of Hartman OP, we have fiduciary duties to the limited partners of Hartman OP, the discharge of which may conflict with interests of our shareholders.

We have acquired a majority of our properties from entities controlled by Mr. Hartman.

     We acquired 28 of the 33 properties we owned as of June 30, 2004 from entities controlled by Mr. Hartman. We acquired these properties by either paying cash, issuing our shares or issuing OP Units. No third parties were retained to represent or advise these selling entities or us, and the transactions were not conducted on an “arms’-length” basis.

     Mr. Hartman had interests that differed from, and in certain cases conflicted with, his co-investors in these entities. Mr. Hartman received the following as a result of such transactions:

     As of June 30, 2004, an affiliate of Mr. Hartman owed us approximately $3.7 million in connection with properties contributed to the Operating Partnership by such affiliate.

     Mr. Hartman might not have been able to negotiate all of these benefits if the transactions were negotiated at arm’s length. Further, Mr. Hartman (neither personally nor in his capacity as a general partner) did not make any representations or warranties in regard to the properties or the selling entities in the operative documents executed in order to consummate the transactions. Consequently, we essentially acquired the properties on an “as is” basis. Therefore, we will bear the risk associated with any characteristics or deficiencies of our properties unknown at the closing of the acquisitions that may affect the valuation or revenue potential of the properties.

Risks Related to Our Business in General

Our charter permits our board of trustees to issue capital shares with terms that may subordinate the rights of the holders of our current common shares or discourage a third party from acquiring us.

     Our charter permits our board of trustees to issue up to 450,000,000 shares of beneficial interest. Our board of trustees may classify or reclassify any unissued common shares or preferred shares and establish the preferences, conversion or other rights, voting powers, restrictions, limitations as to dividends and other distributions, qualifications, or terms or conditions of redemption of any such shares. Thus, our board of trustees could authorize the issuance of such shares with terms and conditions that could subordinate the rights of the holders of our common shares or have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in control of us, including an extraordinary transaction (such as a merger, tender offer or sale

27

of all or substantially all of our assets) that might provide a premium price for holders of our common shares. See “Description of Shares – Power to Issue Additional Common Shares and Preferred Shares.”

Maryland law prohibits certain business combinations, which may make it more difficult for us to be acquired.

     Under Maryland law, “business combinations” between a Maryland real estate investment trust and an interested shareholder or an affiliate of an interested shareholder are prohibited for five years after the most recent date on which the interested shareholder becomes an interested shareholder. These business combinations include a merger, consolidation, share exchange, or, in circumstances specified in the statute, an asset transfer or issuance or reclassification of equity securities. An interested shareholder is defined as:

     A person is not an interested shareholder under the statute if the board of trustees approved in advance the transaction by which he or she otherwise would have become an interested shareholder. However, in approving a transaction, the board of trustees may provide that its approval is subject to compliance, at or after the time of approval, with any terms and conditions determined by the board.

     After the five-year prohibition, any business combination between the Maryland real estate investment trust and an interested shareholder generally must be recommended by the board of trustees of the trust and approved by the affirmative vote of at least:

     These super-majority vote requirements do not apply if the trust’s common shareholders receive a minimum price, as defined under Maryland law, for their shares in the form of cash or other consideration in the same form as previously paid by the interested shareholder for its shares.

     The statute permits various exemptions from its provisions, including business combinations that are exempted by the board of trustees prior to the time that the interested shareholder becomes an interested shareholder. Pursuant to the statute, our board of trustees has exempted any business combination involving an interested shareholder. Consequently, the five-year prohibition and the super-majority vote requirements will not apply to business combinations between any of them and us. As a result, an interested shareholder may be able to enter into business combinations with us that may not be in the best interest of our shareholders, without compliance with the super-majority vote requirements and the other provisions of the statute.

     Should our board of trustees opt in to it, the business combination statute may discourage others from trying to acquire control of us and increase the difficulty of consummating any offer. For a more detailed discussion of the Maryland laws governing us and the ownership of our shares of common shares, see the section of this prospectus captioned “Description of Shares.”

Your investment return may be reduced if we are required to register as an investment company under the Investment Company Act.

     We are not registered as an investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (Investment Company Act). If we were obligated to register as an investment company, we would have to comply with a variety of substantive requirements under the Investment Company Act imposing, among other things:

28

     In order to maintain our exemption from regulation under the Investment Company Act, we must engage primarily in the business of buying real estate, and these investments must be made within a year after the offering ends. If we are unable to invest a significant portion of the proceeds of this offering in properties within one year of the termination of the offering, we may avoid being required to register as an investment company by temporarily investing any unused proceeds in government securities with low returns. This would reduce the cash available for distribution to investors and possibly reduce the value of your investment in us.

     To maintain compliance with the Investment Company Act exemption, we may be unable to sell assets we would otherwise want to sell and may need to sell assets we would otherwise wish to retain. In addition, we may have to acquire additional income or loss generating assets that we might not otherwise have acquired or may have to forgo opportunities to acquire interests in companies that we would otherwise want to acquire and would be important to our investment strategy. If we were required to register as an investment company but failed to do so, we would be prohibited from engaging in our business, and criminal and civil actions could be brought against us. In addition, our contracts would be unenforceable unless a court was to require enforcement, and a court could appoint a receiver to take control of us and liquidate our business.

You are bound by the majority vote on matters on which you are entitled to vote.

     You may vote on certain matters at any annual or special meeting of shareholders, including the election of trustees. However, you will be bound by the majority vote on matters requiring approval of a majority of the shareholders even if you do not vote with the majority on any such matter.

Shareholders have limited control over changes in our policies and operations.

     Our board of trustees determines our major policies, including our policies regarding financing, growth, debt capitalization, REIT qualification and distributions. Our board of trustees may amend or revise these and other policies without a vote of the shareholders. Under the Maryland General Corporation Law and our charter, our shareholders have a right to vote only on the following:

All other matters are subject to the discretion of our board of trustees.

You are limited in your ability to sell your shares pursuant to our share redemption program.

     Any shareholder requesting repurchase of their shares pursuant to our share redemption program will be required to certify to us that such shareholder acquired the shares by either (i) a purchase directly from us or (ii) a transfer from the original subscriber by way of a bona fide gift not for value to, or for the benefit of, a member of the subscriber’s immediate or extended family or through a transfer to a custodian, trustee or other fiduciary for the account of the subscriber or his/her immediate or extended family in connection with an estate planning transaction, including by bequest or inheritance upon death or by

29

operation of law. Our share redemption program contains restrictions that may limit your ability to transfer your shares to us. Shares will be redeemed on a first-come, first-served basis, with a priority given to redemptions upon the death of a shareholder. During any 12-month period, we will not redeem in excess of 5.0% of the number of our common shares outstanding at the beginning of such 12-month period. In addition, the cash available for redemption generally will be limited to 1.0% of the operating cash flow from the previous fiscal year, plus any proceeds from our dividend reinvestment plan. Further, our board of trustees reserves the right to reject any request for redemption or to terminate, suspend, or amend the share redemption program at any time. Therefore, in making a decision to purchase our shares, you should not assume that you will be able to sell any of your shares back to us pursuant to our share redemption program. However, subject to the limitations described in this prospectus, we will redeem shares upon the request of the estate, heir or beneficiary of a deceased shareholder. For a more detailed description of our share redemption program, see “Description of Shares – Share Redemption Program.”

If you are able to resell your shares to us pursuant to our redemption program, you will likely receive substantially less than the fair market value for your shares.

     Other than redemptions following the death of a shareholder, for three years after we complete this offering, the purchase price for shares we repurchase under our redemption program will be $9.50 per share. Thereafter, the redemption price will equal 95.0% of our per share value, as estimated by Hartman Management or another financial evaluation firm we choose for this purpose. Accordingly, you would likely receive less by selling your shares back to us than you would receive if our investments were sold for their estimated values and such proceeds were distributed in our liquidation. Even if you have your shares purchased by a subsequent third-party purchaser, you will likely receive substantially less than the fair market value of your shares.

Payment of fees to Hartman Management and its affiliates will reduce cash available for investment and dividends.

     Hartman Management and its affiliates will perform services for us in connection with the offer and sale of the shares, the selection and acquisition of our investments, and the management and leasing of our properties, the servicing our mortgage loans and the administration of our other investments. They will be paid substantial fees for these services, which will reduce the amount of cash available for investment in properties or payment of dividends to shareholders. For a more detailed discussion of these fees, see “Management Compensation.”

There can be no assurance that we will be able to pay or maintain cash dividends or that dividends will increase over time.

     There are many factors that can affect the availability and timing of cash dividends to shareholders. Dividends will be based principally on cash available from our properties, real estate securities, mortgage loans and other investments. The amount of cash available for dividends will be affected by many factors, such as our ability to buy properties as offering proceeds become available, the yields on securities of other real estate programs that we invest in, and our operating expense levels, as well as many other variables. Actual cash available for dividends may vary substantially from estimates. We can give no assurance that we will be able to pay or maintain dividends or that dividends will increase over time. Nor can we give any assurance that rents from the properties will increase, that the securities we buy will increase in value or provide constant or increased dividends over time, or that future acquisitions of real properties, mortgage loans or our investments in securities will increase our cash available for dividends to shareholders. Our actual results may differ significantly from the assumptions used by our board of trustees in establishing the dividend rate to shareholders. For a description of the factors that can affect the availability and timing of cash dividends to shareholders, see the section of this prospectus captioned “Description of Shares – Dividends.”

Adverse economic and geopolitical conditions could negatively affect our returns and profitability.

     Recent geopolitical events have exacerbated the general economic slowdown experienced by the nation as a whole and the local economies where our properties may be located. The length and severity of any economic downturn cannot be predicted. The following market and economic challenges may impact negatively our operating results:

30

Our operations could be negatively affected to the extent that an economic downturn is prolonged or becomes more severe.

We are uncertain of our sources for funding of future capital needs, which could adversely affect the value of our investments.

     Substantially all of the gross proceeds of the offering will be used to buy real estate and to pay various fees and expenses. If these reserves are insufficient to meet our cash needs, we may have to obtain financing from either affiliated or unaffiliated sources to fund our cash requirements. Our existing working capital line of credit expires in June 2005 and our revolving loan that provides a source of borrowing for our acquisition of properties expires in December 2005. Accordingly, in the event that we develop a need for additional capital in the future for the improvement of our properties or for any other reason, we may be required to identify sources for such funding. We cannot assure you that sufficient funding will be available or, if available, will be available on economically feasible terms or on terms acceptable to us.

General Risks Related to Investments in Real Estate

Your investment will be directly affected by general economic and regulatory factors we cannot control or predict.

     We only own commercial real estate. Investments in real estate typically involve a high level of risk as the result of factors we cannot control or predict. One of the risks of investing in real estate is the possibility that our properties will not generate income sufficient to meet operating expenses or will generate income and capital appreciation, if any, at rates lower than those anticipated or available through investments in comparable real estate or other investments. The following factors may affect income from properties and yields from investments in properties and are generally outside of our control:

     Some or all of the foregoing factors may affect our properties, which could adversely affect our operations and ability to pay dividends to shareholders.

31

Properties that have significant vacancies could be difficult to sell, which could diminish the return on your investment.

     A property may incur vacancies either by the continued default of tenants under their leases or the expiration of tenant leases. If vacancies continue for a long period of time, we may suffer reduced revenues resulting in less cash dividends to be distributed to our shareholders. In addition, the resale value of the property could be diminished because the market value of a particular property will depend principally upon the value of the leases of such property.

If we set aside insufficient working capital or are unable to secure funds for future tenant improvements, we may be required to defer necessary property improvements, which could adversely impact our ability to pay cash dividends to our shareholders.

     When tenants do not renew their leases or otherwise vacate their space, it is usual that, in order to attract replacement tenants, we will be required to expend substantial funds for tenant improvements and tenant refurbishments to the vacated space. If we have insufficient working capital reserves, we will have to obtain financing from other sources. Because the vast majority of our leases will provide for tenant reimbursement of operating expenses, we do not anticipate that we will establish a permanent reserve for maintenance and repairs for our properties. However, to the extent that we have insufficient funds for such purposes, we may establish reserves for maintenance and repairs of our properties from gross proceeds of this offering, out of cash flow generated by operating properties or out of non-liquidating net sale proceeds. If these reserves or any reserves otherwise established are insufficient to meet our cash needs, we may have to obtain financing from either affiliated or unaffiliated sources to fund our cash requirements. We cannot assure you that sufficient financing will be available or, if available, will be available on economically feasible terms or on terms acceptable to us. Additional borrowing for working capital purposes will increase our interest expense, and therefore our financial condition and our ability to pay cash dividends to our shareholders may be adversely affected. In addition, we may be required to defer necessary improvements to our properties that may cause our properties to suffer from a greater risk of obsolescence or a decline in value, or a greater risk of decreased cash flow as a result of fewer potential tenants being attracted to our properties. If this happens, we may not be able to maintain projected rental rates for effected properties, and our results of operations may be negatively impacted.

Uninsured losses relating to real property or excessively expensive premiums for insurance coverage may adversely affect your returns.

     Hartman Management will attempt to ensure that all of our properties are adequately insured to cover casualty losses. However, there are types of losses, generally catastrophic in nature, such as losses due to wars, acts of terrorism, earthquakes, floods, hurricanes, pollution or environmental matters, that are uninsurable or not economically insurable, or may be insured subject to limitations, such as large deductibles or co-payments. Insurance risks associated with potential terrorism acts could sharply increase the premiums we pay for coverage against property and casualty claims. Additionally, mortgage lenders in some cases have begun to insist that commercial property owners purchase specific coverage against terrorism as a condition for providing mortgage loans. It is uncertain whether such insurance policies will be available, or available at reasonable cost, which could inhibit our ability to finance or refinance our properties. In such instances, we may be required to provide other financial support, either through financial assurances or self-insurance, to cover potential losses. We cannot assure you that we will have adequate coverage for such losses. In the event that any of our properties incurs a casualty loss that is not fully covered by insurance, the value of our assets will be reduced by any such uninsured loss. In addition, other than any reserves we may establish, we have no source of funding to repair or reconstruct any uninsured damaged property, and we cannot assure you that any such sources of funding will be available to us for such purposes in the future. Also, to the extent we must pay unexpectedly large insurance premiums, we could suffer reduced earnings that would result in less cash dividends to be distributed to shareholders.

Our operating results may be negatively affected by potential development and construction delays and resultant increased costs and risks.

     We may invest some or all of the proceeds available for investment in the acquisition and development of properties upon which we will develop and construct improvements at a fixed contract price. We will be subject to risks relating to uncertainties associated with re-zoning for development and environmental concerns of governmental entities and/or community groups and our builder’s ability to control construction costs or to build in conformity with plans, specifications and timetables. The builder’s failure to perform may necessitate legal action by us to rescind the purchase or the construction contract or to compel performance. Performance may also be affected or delayed by conditions beyond the builder’s control. Delays in completion of construction could also give tenants the right to terminate preconstruction leases for space at a newly

32

developed project. We may incur additional risks when we make periodic progress payments or other advances to such builders prior to completion of construction. These and other such factors can result in increased costs of a project or loss of our investment. In addition, we will be subject to normal lease-up risks relating to newly constructed projects. Furthermore, we must rely upon projections of rental income and expenses and estimates of the fair market value of property upon completion of construction when agreeing upon a price to be paid for the property at the time of acquisition of the property. If our projections are inaccurate, we may pay too much for a property, and our return on our investment could suffer.

     In addition, we may invest in unimproved real property. Returns from development of unimproved properties are also subject to risks and uncertainties associated with re-zoning the land for development and environmental concerns of governmental entities and/or community groups. Although our intention is to limit any investment in unimproved property to property we intend to develop, your investment nevertheless is subject to the risks associated with investments in unimproved real property.

Uncertain market conditions relating to the future disposition of properties could adversely affect the return on your investment.

     We intend to hold the various real properties in which we invest until such time as Hartman Management determines that a sale or other disposition appears to be advantageous to achieve our investment objectives or until it appears that such objectives will not be met. Otherwise, Hartman Management, subject to approval of our board of trustees, may exercise its discretion as to whether and when to sell a property, and we will have no obligation to sell properties at any particular time, except upon our liquidation if we do not list the shares within twelve years of the termination of this offering. We cannot predict with any certainty the various market conditions affecting real estate investments that will exist at any particular time in the future. Although we generally intend to hold properties for seven to ten years from the date of acquisition, due to the uncertainty of market conditions that may affect the future disposition of our properties, we cannot assure you that we will be able to sell our properties at a profit in the future. Accordingly, the extent to which you will receive cash dividends and realize potential appreciation on our real estate investments will be dependent upon fluctuating market conditions.

The costs of compliance with environmental laws and other governmental laws and regulations may adversely affect our income and the cash available for any dividends.

     All real property and the operations conducted on real property are subject to federal, state and local laws and regulations relating to environmental protection and human health and safety. These laws and regulations generally govern wastewater discharges, air emissions, the operation and removal of underground and above-ground storage tanks, the use, storage, treatment, transportation and disposal of solid and hazardous materials, and the remediation of contamination associated with disposals. Some of these laws and regulations may impose joint and several liability on tenants, owners or operators for the costs of investigation or remediation of contaminated properties, regardless of fault or the legality of the original disposal. In addition, the presence of these substances, or the failure to properly remediate these substances, may adversely affect our ability to sell or rent such property or to use the property as collateral for future borrowing.

     Some of these laws and regulations have been amended so as to require compliance with new or more stringent standards as of future dates. Compliance with new or more stringent laws or regulations or stricter interpretation of existing laws may require material expenditures by us. We cannot assure you that future laws, ordinances or regulations will not impose any material environmental liability, or that the current environmental condition of our properties will not be affected by the operations of the tenants, by the existing condition of the land, by operations in the vicinity of the properties, such as the presence of underground storage tanks, or by the activities of unrelated third parties. In addition, there are various local, state and federal fire, health, life-safety and similar regulations that we may be required to comply with, and which may subject us to liability in the form of fines or damages for noncompliance.

Discovery of previously undetected environmentally hazardous conditions may adversely affect our operating results.

     Under various federal, state and local environmental laws, ordinances and regulations, a current or previous owner or operator of real property may be liable for the cost of removal or remediation of hazardous or toxic substances on, under or in such property. The costs of removal or remediation could be substantial. Such laws often impose liability whether or not the owner or operator knew of, or was responsible for, the presence of such hazardous or toxic substances. Environmental laws also may impose restrictions on the manner in which property may be used or businesses may be operated, and these restrictions may require substantial expenditures. Environmental laws provide for sanctions in the event of noncompliance and

33

may be enforced by governmental agencies or, in certain circumstances, by private parties. Certain environmental laws and common law principles could be used to impose liability for release of and exposure to hazardous substances, including asbestos-containing materials into the air, and third parties may seek recovery from owners or operators of real properties for personal injury or property damage associated with exposure to released hazardous substances. The cost of defending against claims of liability, of compliance with environmental regulatory requirements, of remediating any contaminated property, or of paying personal injury claims could materially adversely affect our business, assets or results of operations and, consequently, amounts available for payments of dividends to you.

Our properties may contain or develop harmful mold, which could lead to liability for adverse health effects and costs of remediating the problem.

     When excessive moisture accumulates in buildings or on building materials, mold growth may occur, particularly if the moisture problem remains undiscovered or is not addressed over a period of time. Some molds may produce airborne toxins or irritants. Concern about indoor exposure to mold has been increasing as exposure to mold may cause a variety of adverse health effects and symptoms, including allergic or other reactions. As a result, the presence of significant mold at any of our properties could require us to undertake a costly remediation program to contain or remove the mold from the affected property. In addition, the presence of significant mold could expose us to liability from our tenants, their employees and others if property damage or health concerns arise.

Our costs associated with complying with the Americans with Disabilities Act may affect cash available for dividends.

     Our properties may be subject to the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, as amended (Disabilities Act). Under the Disabilities Act, all places of public accommodation are required to comply with federal requirements related to access and use by disabled persons. The Disabilities Act has separate compliance requirements for “public accommodations” and “commercial facilities” that generally require that buildings and services be made accessible and available to people with disabilities. The Disabilities Act’s requirements could require removal of access barriers and could result in the imposition of injunctive relief, monetary penalties or, in some cases, an award of damages. We will attempt to acquire properties that comply with the Disabilities Act or place the burden on the seller or other third party, such as a tenant, to ensure compliance with the Disabilities Act. However, we cannot assure you that we will be able to acquire properties or allocate responsibilities in this manner. If we cannot, our funds used for Disabilities Act compliance may affect cash available for dividends and the amount of dividends to you, if any.

If we sell properties by providing financing to purchasers, we will bear the risk of default by the purchaser.

     If we decide to sell any of our properties, we intend to use our best efforts to sell them for cash. However, in some instances we may sell our properties by providing financing to purchasers. When we provide financing to purchasers, we will bear the risk of default by the purchaser and will be subject to remedies provided by law, which could negatively impact our cash dividends to shareholders. There are no limitations or restrictions on our ability to take purchase money obligations. We may, therefore, take a purchase money obligation secured by a mortgage as a partial payment for the purchase price. The terms of payment to us generally will be affected by custom in the area where the property being sold is located and the then-prevailing economic conditions. If we receive promissory notes or other property in lieu of cash from property sales, the distribution of the proceeds of sales to our shareholders, or their reinvestment in other assets, will be delayed until the promissory notes or other property are actually paid, sold, refinanced or otherwise disposed of. In some cases, we may receive initial down payments in cash and other property in the year of sale in an amount less than the selling price and subsequent payments will be spread over a number of years. If any purchaser defaults under a financing arrangement with us, it could negatively impact our ability to pay cash dividends to our shareholders.

Risks Associated with Debt Financing

We may incur mortgage indebtedness and other borrowings, which may increase our business risks.

     If it is determined to be in our best interests, we may, in some instances, acquire real properties by using either existing financing or borrowing new funds. In addition, we may incur or increase our mortgage debt by obtaining loans secured by some or all of our real properties to obtain funds to acquire additional real properties. We may also borrow funds if necessary to satisfy the requirement that we distribute to shareholders as dividends at least 90.0% of our annual REIT taxable

34

income, or otherwise as is necessary or advisable to assure that we maintain our qualification as a REIT for federal income tax purposes.

     We may incur mortgage debt on a particular real property if we believe the property’s projected cash flow is sufficient to service the mortgage debt. However, if there is a shortfall in cash flow, then the amount available for dividends to shareholders may be affected. In addition, incurring mortgage debt increases the risk of loss because defaults on indebtedness secured by a property may result in foreclosure actions initiated by lenders and our loss of the property securing the loan that is in default. For tax purposes, a foreclosure of any of our properties would be treated as a sale of the property for a purchase price equal to the outstanding balance of the debt secured by the mortgage. If the outstanding balance of the debt secured by the mortgage exceeds our tax basis in the property, we would recognize taxable income on foreclosure, but would not receive any cash proceeds. We may give full or partial guarantees to lenders of mortgage debt to the entities that own our properties. When we give a guaranty on behalf of an entity that owns one of our properties, we will be responsible to the lender for satisfaction of the debt if it is not paid by such entity. If any mortgages contain cross-collateralization or cross-default provisions, there is a risk that more than one real property may be affected by a default. If any of our properties are foreclosed upon due to a default, our ability to pay cash dividends to our shareholders will be adversely affected.

If mortgage debt is unavailable at reasonable rates, we may not be able to finance the properties, which could reduce the number of properties we can acquire and the amount of cash dividends we can make.

     If we place mortgage debt on properties, we run the risk of being unable to refinance the properties when the loans come due, or of being unable to refinance on favorable terms. If interest rates are higher when the properties are refinanced, we may not be able to finance the properties and our income could be reduced. If this occurs, it would reduce cash available for payment of dividends to our shareholders, and it may prevent us from raising capital by issuing more shares or prevent us from borrowing more money.

Lenders may require us to enter into restrictive covenants relating to our operations, which could limit our ability to pay dividends to our shareholders.

     In connection with obtaining certain financing, a lender could impose restrictions on us that affect our ability to incur additional debt and our dividend and operating policies. Loan documents we enter into may contain negative covenants that may limit our ability to further mortgage the property, to discontinue insurance coverage, replace Hartman Management as our advisor or impose other limitations. Any such restriction or limitation may have an adverse effect on our operations.

If we enter into financing arrangements involving balloon payment obligations, it may adversely affect our ability to pay dividends.

     Some of our financing arrangements may require us to make a lump-sum or “balloon” payment at maturity. Our ability to make a balloon payment at maturity is uncertain and may depend upon our ability to obtain additional financing or our ability to sell the property. At the time the balloon payment is due, we may or may not be able to refinance the balloon payment on terms as favorable as the original loan or sell the property at a price sufficient to make the balloon payment. The effect of a refinancing or sale could affect the rate of return to shareholders and the projected time of disposition of our assets. In addition, payments of principal and interest made to service our debts may leave us with insufficient cash to make the distributions that we are required to pay to maintain our qualification as a REIT. Any of these results would have a significant, negative impact on your investment.

Risks Associated with Section 1031 Exchange Transactions

We may have increased exposure to liabilities from litigation as a result of any participation by us in Section 1031 Exchange Transactions.

     We may enter into transactions that qualify for like-kind exchange treatment under Section 1031 of the Internal Revenue Code (Section 1031 Exchange Transactions). Section 1031 Exchange Transactions are commonly structured as the acquisition of real estate owned in co-tenancy arrangements with persons (1031 Participants) in tax pass-through entities, including single member limited liability companies or similar entities (Hartman Exchange LLCs). There are significant tax and securities disclosure risks associated with the related private placement offerings of co-tenancy interests to 1031

35

Participants, including lawsuits by such 1031 Participants. Changes in tax laws may adversely affect Section 1031 Exchange Transactions or cause such transactions not to achieve their intended value. It is currently anticipated that the operating partnership would receive fees in connection with any Section 1031 Exchange Transaction and, as such, we may be named in or otherwise required to defend against any such lawsuits brought by 1031 Participants. Any amounts we are required to expend for any such litigation claims may reduce the amount of funds available for payment of dividends to our shareholders. In addition, disclosure of any such litigation may adversely affect our ability to raise additional capital in the future through the sale of our shares. For a more detailed discussion of Section 1031 Exchange Transactions, see “Investment Objectives and Criteria – Section 1031 Exchange Transactions.”

We will be subject to risks associated with co-tenancy arrangements that otherwise may not be present in a real estate investment.

     If we enter into Section 1031 Exchange Transactions, it is anticipated that at the closing of each property to be acquired by a Hartman Exchange LLC, the operating partnership will enter into a contractual arrangement providing that, in the event that the Hartman Exchange LLC is unable to sell all of the co-tenancy interests in that particular property by the completion of its private placement offering, the operating partnership would purchase, at the Hartman Exchange LLC’s cost, any co-tenancy interests remaining unsold. Accordingly, in the event that a Hartman Exchange LLC is unable to sell all co-tenancy interests in one or more of its properties, the operating partnership will be required to purchase the unsold co-tenancy interests in such property or properties and, thus, will be subject to the risks of ownership of properties in a co-tenancy arrangement with unrelated third parties.

     Ownership of co-tenancy interests involves risks generally not otherwise present with an investment in real estate such as the following:

Actions by a co-tenant might have the result of subjecting the property to liabilities in excess of those contemplated and may have the effect of reducing your returns.

     In the event that our interests become adverse to those of the other co-tenants in a Section 1031 Exchange Transaction, it is not likely that we would have the contractual right to purchase the co-tenancy interests from the other co-tenants. Even if we are given the opportunity to purchase such co-tenancy interests in the future, we cannot guarantee that we will have sufficient funds available at the time to purchase co-tenancy interests from the 1031 Participants.

     In addition, we may desire to sell our co-tenancy interests in a given property at a time when the other co-tenants in such property do not desire to sell their interests. Therefore, we may not be able to sell our interest in a property at the time we would like to sell. In addition, it is anticipated that it will be much more difficult to find a willing buyer for our co-tenancy interests in a property than it would be to find a buyer for a property we owned outright.

Our participation in the Section 1031 Exchange Transactions may limit our ability to borrow funds in the future, which could adversely affect the value of our investments.

     We may enter into Section 1031 Exchange Transaction agreements that contain obligations to acquire unsold co-tenancy interests in properties may be viewed by institutional lenders as a contingent liability against our cash or other assets, which may limit our ability to borrow funds in the future. Further, such obligations may be viewed by our lenders in such a manner as to limit our ability to borrow funds based on regulatory restrictions on lenders limiting the amount of loans they can make to any one borrower.

36

Federal Income Tax Risks

If we failed to qualify as a REIT, our operations and dividends to shareholders would be adversely impacted.

     We intend to continue to operate so as to qualify as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code. A REIT generally is not taxed at the corporate level on income it currently distributes to its shareholders. Qualification as a REIT involves the application of highly technical and complex rules for which there are only limited judicial or administrative interpretations. The determination of various factual matters and circumstances not entirely within our control may affect our ability to continue to qualify as a REIT. In addition, new legislation, new regulations, administrative interpretations or court decisions could significantly change the tax laws with respect to qualification as a REIT or the federal income tax consequences of such qualification.

     If we were to fail to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year:

     We encourage you to read the “Federal Income Tax Considerations” section of this prospectus for further discussion of the tax issues related to this offering.

If Hartman OP was classified as a “publicly-traded partnership” under the Internal Revenue Code, our operations and dividends to shareholders could be adversely affected.

     We structured Hartman OP so that it would be classified as a partnership for federal income tax purposes. In this regard, the Internal Revenue Code generally classifies “publicly traded partnerships” (as defined in Section 7704 of the Internal Revenue Code) as associations taxable as corporations (rather than as partnerships), unless substantially all of their taxable income consists of specified types of passive income. In order to minimize the risk that the Internal Revenue Code would classify Hartman OP as a “publicly traded partnership” for tax purposes, we placed certain restrictions on the transfer and/or redemption of partnership units in Hartman OP. If the Internal Revenue Service were to assert successfully that Hartman OP is a “publicly traded partnership,” and substantially all of Hartman OP’s gross income did not consist of the specified types of passive income, the Internal Revenue Code would treat Hartman OP as an association taxable as a corporation.

     These topics are discussed in greater detail in the “Federal Income Tax Considerations — Tax Aspects of Our Operating Partnership” section of this prospectus. In such event, the character of our assets and items of gross income would change and would prevent us from continuing to qualify as a REIT. In addition, the imposition of a corporate tax on Hartman OP would reduce our amount of cash available for payment of dividends by us to you. See the “Federal Income Tax Considerations” section of this prospectus.

Dividends to tax-exempt investors may be classified as unrelated business tax income.

     Neither dividend distributions nor income from the sale of common shares should generally constitute unrelated business taxable income to a tax-exempt investor, provided that our shares are not predominately held by qualified employee pension trusts. However, the Internal Revenue Code may classify our dividends to a tax-exempt investor as unrelated business tax income in the event such investor incurs debt in order to acquire common shares. We encourage you to read the “Investment by Tax-Exempt Entities and ERISA Considerations” section of this prospectus for further discussion of this issue if you are a tax-exempt investor.

37

Investors subject to ERISA must address special consideration when determining whether to acquire common shares.

     The Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended, is referred to in this prospectus as “ERISA.” Fiduciaries of a pension, profit-sharing or other employee benefit plan subject to ERISA should consider whether an investment in our common shares:

     We intend that Hartman OP will satisfy the “real estate operating company” exception to the plan assets regulations promulgated pursuant to ERISA and that we will satisfy the “venture capital operating company” exception to the plan assets regulations promulgated pursuant to ERISA. Consequently, our assets should not be treated as plan assets of an investing plan subject to ERISA. We cannot assure you, however, that these exceptions will apply to our assets and, if not, our assets our may be treated as plan assets of investing plan subject to ERISA.

Certain fees paid to Hartman OP may affect our REIT status.

     In connection with any Section 1031 Exchange Transactions, Hartman OP would enter into a number of contractual arrangements with Hartman Exchange LLCs that will, in effect, guarantee the sale of the co-tenancy interests being offered by any Hartman Exchange LLC. In consideration for entering into these agreements, Hartman OP will be paid fees which could be characterized by the Internal Revenue Service as non-qualifying income for purposes of satisfying the “income tests” required for REIT qualification. If this fee income were, in fact, treated as non-qualifying, and if the aggregate of such fee income and any other non-qualifying income in any taxable year ever exceeded 5.0% of our gross income for such year, we could lose our REIT status for that taxable year and the four ensuing taxable years. As set forth above, we will use all reasonable efforts to structure our activities in a manner intended to satisfy the requirements for our continued qualification as a REIT. Our failure to qualify as a REIT would adversely affect your return on your investment.

Recharacterization of the Section 1031 Exchange Transactions may result in taxation of income from a prohibited transaction, which would diminish our cash dividends to our shareholders.

     In the event that the Internal Revenue Service were to recharacterize the Section 1031 Exchange Transactions such that Hartman OP, rather than Hartman Exchange LLC, is treated as the bona fide owner, for tax purposes, of properties acquired and resold by a Hartman Exchange LLC in connection with the Section 1031 Exchange Transactions, such characterization could result in the fees paid to Hartman OP by a Hartman Exchange LLC as being deemed income from a prohibited transaction, in which event the fee income paid to us in connection with the Section 1031 Exchange Transactions would be subject to a 100.0% tax. If this occurs, our ability to pay cash dividends to our shareholders will be adversely affected.

You may have tax liability on dividends that you elect to reinvest in our common shares.

     If you participate in our dividend reinvestment plan, you will be deemed to have received, and for income tax purposes will be taxed on, the amount reinvested in common shares. As a result, unless you are a tax-exempt entity, you may have to use funds from other sources to pay your tax liability on the value of the common shares received.

In certain circumstances, we may be subject to federal and state income taxes as a REIT, which would reduce our cash available for payment of dividends to our shareholders.

     Even if we maintain our status as a REIT, we may become subject to federal income taxes and related state taxes. For example, if we have net income from a “prohibited transaction,” such income will be subject to a 100.0% tax. We may not be able to make sufficient distributions to avoid excise taxes applicable to REITs. We may also decide to retain income we earn from the sale or other disposition of our property and pay income tax directly on such income. In that event, our shareholders

38

would be treated as if they earned that income and paid the tax on it directly. However, shareholders that are tax-exempt, such as charities or qualified pension plans, would have no benefit from their deemed payment of such tax liability. We may also be subject to state and local taxes on our income or property, either directly or at the level of the operating partnership or at the level of the other companies through which we indirectly own our assets. Any federal or state taxes paid by us will reduce our cash available for payment of dividends to our shareholders.

We may be subject to adverse legislative or regulatory tax changes that could adversely impact our ability to sell shares in this offering.

     At any time, the federal income tax laws governing REITs or the administrative interpretations of those laws may be amended. Any of those new laws or interpretations may take effect retroactively and could adversely affect the taxation of us or of you as a shareholder. On May 23, 2003, the President signed the Jobs and Growth Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2003, which we refer to as the Jobs and Growth Tax Act. Effective for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2002, the Jobs and Growth Tax Act will generally reduce the maximum rate of tax applicable to individuals on the dividend income from regular C corporations from 38.6% to 15.0%. This will reduce substantially the so-called “double taxation” (that is, taxation at both the corporate and shareholder levels) that has generally applied to corporations that are not taxed as REITs. Generally, dividends from REITs will not qualify for the dividend tax reduction because, as a result of the dividends paid deduction to which REITs are entitled, REITs generally do not pay corporate level tax on income that they distribute to shareholders. The implementation of the Jobs and Growth Tax Act could cause individual investors to view stocks of non-REIT corporations are more attractive relative to shares of REITs than was the case previously because the dividends paid by non-REIT corporations would be subject to lower tax rates for the individual. Due to the very recent enactment of this legislation, we cannot predict whether in fact this will occur or, if it occurs, what the impact will be on our ability to sell shares in this offering.

There are special considerations that apply to pension or profit-sharing trusts or IRAs investing in our shares.

     If you are investing the assets of a pension, profit-sharing, 401(k), Keogh or other qualified retirement plan or the assets of an IRA in our common shares, you should satisfy yourself that, among other things:

     For a more complete discussion of the foregoing issues and other risks associated with an investment in shares by retirement plans, please see the “Investment by Tax-Exempt Entities and ERISA Considerations” section of this prospectus.

Equity participation in mortgage loans may result in taxable income and gains from these properties, which could adversely impact our REIT status.

     If we participate under a mortgage loan in any appreciation of the properties securing the mortgage loan or its cash flow and the Internal Revenue Service characterizes this participation as “equity,” we might have to recognize income, gains and other items from the property. This could affect our ability to maintain our status as a REIT.

Forward-Looking Statements

     This prospectus contains certain “forward-looking statements” regarding our plans and objectives, including, among other things:

39

     Forward-looking statements are typically identified by the use of terms such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “expect,” “intend,” “plan,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “believe,” “continue,” “predict,” “potential” or the negative of such terms and other comparable terminology. These statements are only predictions and are not historical facts. Actual events or results may differ materially.

     The forward-looking statements included herein are based on our historical performance, current expectations, plans, estimates and beliefs that involve numerous risks and uncertainties. Assumptions relating to the foregoing involve judgments with respect to, among other things, future economic, competitive and market conditions and future business decisions, all of which are difficult or impossible to predict accurately and many of which are beyond our control. Any of the assumptions underlying the forward-looking statements could be inaccurate and, therefore, we cannot assure you that the forward-looking statements included in this prospectus will prove to be accurate.

     In light of the significant uncertainties inherent in the forward-looking statements included in this prospectus, including, without limitation, the risks set forth in the “Risk Factors” section, the inclusion of such information should not be regarded as a representation by us or any other person that the objectives and plans set forth in this prospectus will be achieved. We caution you that forward-looking statements are not guarantees and that the actual results could differ materially from those expressed or implied in the forward-looking statements.

     You should rely only on the information contained in this prospectus. We have not authorized anyone to provide you with information different than that contained in this prospectus. We are offering to sell, and seeking offers to buy, our shares only in jurisdictions where such offers and sales are permitted.

40

ESTIMATED USE OF PROCEEDS

     The following table sets forth information about how we intend to use the proceeds raised in this offering, assuming that we sell either the minimum offering of 200,000 shares, exclusive of shares sold to residents of either New York or Pennsylvania, or the maximum offering of 11,000,000 shares pursuant to this offering. Many of the figures set forth below represent management’s best estimate since they cannot be precisely calculated at this time. For the maximum offering figures, we assume that we would sell 50% of the shares through our dealer manager’s distribution channel in which no other participating broker-dealer is involved, and the commissions that would otherwise be payable with respect to such sales would be retained and used by us for investments. We expect that at least 89.5% of the money that shareholders invest will be used to buy real estate. The remaining approximately 10.5% will be used to pay expenses and fees, including the payment of fees to Hartman Management, our advisor, and D.H. Hill Securities, LLP (D.H. Hill Securities), our dealer manager. Our fees and expenses, as listed below, include the following:

41

     Until invested as permitted in our charter, substantially all of the net proceeds of this offering and, thereafter, our working capital reserves, may be invested in short-term, highly-liquid investments including, but not limited to, government obligations, bank certificates of deposit, short-term debt obligations and interest-bearing accounts.

42

DILUTION

     Dilution is the amount by which the offering price paid by purchasers of common shares sold in this offering exceeds the net tangible book value per share on August 27, 2004. On August 27, 2004, we had 7,010,146 issued and outstanding common shares after giving effect to our reorganization as a Maryland real estate investment trust and our concurrent recapitalization and a net tangible book value of $39,007,908. Therefore, each common share after giving effect to our reorganization and recapitalization has a net tangible book value of $5.56. The net tangible book value per common share is determined by subtracting our total liabilities and minority interests from the value of all our total tangible assets (total assets less deferred costs adjusted for minority interests) and dividing the difference by the total number of our common shares outstanding.

     Assuming that, on August 27, 2004,

our pro forma net tangible book value would have been $139,770,408, or $7.76 per share. This would have represented an immediate increase in net tangible book value of $2.20 per share to existing shareholders and an immediate dilution of $2.24 per share (or 22.4%) to new investors. The following table illustrates this per share dilution in both monetary and percentage terms:

     The following table summarizes, on a pro forma basis as of August 27, 2004, the differences in the number of common shares purchased from us, the total consideration paid and the average price per share paid by our existing shareholders and by the new investors purchasing the common shares in this offering and under our dividend reinvestment plan:

43

MANAGEMENT

General Information About Us

     We are a Maryland real estate investment trust formed on December 31, 2003 for the purpose of merging with Hartman Commercial Properties REIT, a Texas real estate investment trust organized on August 20, 1998. The sole purpose of the merger was to change our state of domicile to Maryland. As a result of the merger, we are governed by the laws of the state of Maryland.

     We were initially organized under the laws of the state of Texas by Allen R. Hartman. Mr. Hartman is currently our president and secretary, and is a member of our board of trustees. Concurrently with our reorganization as a Maryland real estate investment trust on July 28, 2004, our shareholders approved a recapitalization of our outstanding equity such that each common share of beneficial interest outstanding was exchanged for 1.42857 common shares of beneficial interest. The recapitalization had no effect on the economic interests of our shareholders in us.

     We have a perpetual duration. Our charter permits us to be terminated upon the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares entitled to vote and the approval of a majority of the entire board of trustees. Our bylaws require us to conduct annual meetings of our shareholders for the purpose of electing our board of trustees, each of whom will serve for a one year term, and to conduct any other proper business as may come before the shareholders.

     We operate under the direction of our board of trustees, the members of which serve in a fiduciary capacity to the company and are accountable to our shareholders as fiduciaries. The board is responsible for the management and control of our affairs. The board has retained Hartman Management to manage our day-to-day affairs and the acquisition and disposition of our investments, subject to the board’s supervision. Our initial Declaration of Trust was reviewed and ratified by unanimous vote of our board of trustees, including the independent trustees, at their initial meeting on December 30, 2003. The Declaration of Trust was subsequently amended and restated by unanimous vote of the trustees, including the independent trustees, on April 27, 2004 and by the vote of our shareholders on June 4, 2004.

     Our Declaration of Trust and bylaws provide that the number of our trustees may be established by a majority of the entire board of trustees. However, the board of trustees must always have at least three members and, under our bylaws, no more than fifteen members. We currently have a total of six members on our board. The Declaration of Trust also provides that a majority of the trustees must be independent trustees. An “independent trustee” is a person who is not one of our officers or employees or an officer, director or employee of Hartman Management or its affiliates and has not otherwise been affiliated with such entities for the previous two years and does not own or during the previous two years has not owned, an interest in Hartman Management or its affiliates. Of our six current trustees, four are considered independent trustees. Each trustee must have at least three years of relevant experience demonstrating the knowledge and experience required to successfully acquire and manage the type of assets being acquired by us. At least one of the independent trustees must have at least three years of relevant real estate experience. At least one of our independent trustees, Samuel C. Hathorn, satisfies this requirement.

     Each trustee will serve until the next annual meeting of shareholders and until his successor has been duly elected and qualifies. Although the number of trustees may be increased or decreased, a decrease will not have the effect of shortening the term of any incumbent trustee.

     Any trustee may resign at any time and may be removed with or without cause by the shareholders upon the affirmative vote of not less than a majority of all the votes entitled to be cast at a meeting properly called for the purpose of the proposed removal. The notice of the meeting will indicate that the purpose, or one of the purposes, of the meeting is to determine if the trustee shall be removed. Neither our advisor, any member of our board of trustees nor any of their affiliates may vote or consent on matters submitted to the shareholders regarding the removal of our advisor or any trustee after we accept any subscriptions for the purchase of shares in this offering. In determining the requisite percentage in interest required to approve such a matter after we accept any subscriptions for the purchase of shares in this offering, any shares owned by such persons will not be included.

     A vacancy created by an increase in the number of trustees or the death, resignation, removal, adjudicated incompetence or other incapacity of a trustee may be filled only by a vote of a majority of the remaining trustees and any

44

trustee so elected will serve for the remainder of the full term of the trusteeship in which such vacancy occurred. Independent trustees shall nominate replacements for vacancies in the independent trustee positions. If at any time there are no trustees in office, successor trustees shall be elected by the shareholders. Each trustee will be bound by the Declaration of Trust and the bylaws.

     Our trustees serve in a fiduciary capacity to the company and are accountable to our shareholders as fiduciaries. Generally speaking, this means that our trustees must perform their duties in good faith and in a manner each trustee believes to be in our best interest as well as the best interest of our shareholders. Further, trustees must act with such care as a prudent person in a similar position would use under similar circumstances, including exercising reasonable inquiry, when taking actions.

     However, the trustees are not required to devote all of their time to our business and are only required to devote the time to our affairs as their duties require. The trustees will meet quarterly or more frequently if necessary. We do not expect that the trustees will be required to devote a substantial portion of their time to discharge their duties as our trustees. Consequently, in the exercise of their responsibilities, the trustees will be relying heavily on our advisor. Our trustees shall have a fiduciary duty to our shareholders to supervise the relationship between our advisor and us. The board is empowered to fix the compensation of all officers that it selects and approve the payment of compensation to trustees for services rendered to us in any other capacity.

     In addition to the investment policies set forth in our Declaration of Trust, our board of trustees has established written policies on investments and acquisitions, development, borrowing and transactions with affiliates, which are set forth in this prospectus. The trustees may establish further written policies on such matters or amend our current policies at any time. The board shall monitor our administrative procedures, investment operations and performance to ensure that the policies are fulfilled and are in the best interest of the shareholders. We will follow the policies on investments and borrowings set forth in this prospectus unless and until they are modified in accordance with our Declaration of Trust.

     As described below, the conflicts committee of our board of trustees is also responsible for reviewing our fees and expenses with sufficient frequency to determine that the expenses incurred are in the best interest of our shareholders. In anticipation of this offering, on                    , 2004 we entered into an amended and restated property management agreement (Management Agreement). All future amendments to the Management Agreement and all other agreements or transactions between Hartman Management and us must be approved by the conflicts committee, which is composed solely of independent trustees. Additionally, the conflicts committee must approve all material transactions between us and any entities affiliated with Mr. Hartman. See “Conflicts of Interest — Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.”

     In addition, a majority of the trustees, including a majority of the independent trustees, who are not otherwise interested in the transaction must approve all transactions between us and Hartman Management or its affiliates. The independent trustees will also be responsible for reviewing the performance of Hartman Management and determining that the compensation to be paid to Hartman Management is reasonable in relation to the nature and quality of services to be performed and that the provisions of the advisory agreement are being carried out. Specifically, the independent trustees will consider factors such as:

45

Committees of the Board of Trustees

     Our entire board of trustees considers all major decisions concerning our business. However, our board has established committees so that certain functions can be addressed in more depth than may be possible at a full board meeting. The board of trustees has established two permanent committees, each comprised solely of independent trustees: the Audit Committee and the Conflicts Committee.

Audit Committee

     The audit committee will meet on a regular basis at least once a year. The current audit committee members are Chris A. Minton, Samuel C. Hathorn, and Chand Vyas. Our board of trustees has determined that Chris A. Minton, chairman and certified public accountant, is the “audit committee financial expert,” as defined by the rules of the SEC. The audit committee’s primary functions are to assist the board of trust managers in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities by reviewing the financial information to be provided to the shareholders and others, the system of internal controls which management has established, and the audit and financial reporting process.

Conflicts Committee

     The board of trustees has established a conflicts committee to review specific matters that the board believes may involve conflicts of interest. The conflicts committee also determines if the resolution of the conflict of interest is fair and reasonable to us. The current conflicts committee members are Jack L. Mahaffey and Chand Vyas. The members of the conflicts committee may not be officers or employees of us or any of our affiliates (including Hartman Management). Each of the members of the conflicts committee is “independent” under the rules set by the SEC.

Executive Officers and Trustees

     We have provided below certain information about our executive officers and trustees.

     Allen R. Hartman has been our president, secretary and a member of our board of trustees since our formation in 1998. He is also the sole limited partner of our advisor and property manager, Hartman Management, L.P., as well as the president, secretary, sole trustee and sole shareholder of the general partner of Hartman Management. Since 1984, Mr. Hartman, as an individual general partner, has been the sponsor of 17 private limited and general partnerships that have invested in commercial real estate in Houston, Texas. Mr. Hartman has over 30 years of experience in the commercial real estate industry. From 1978 to 1983, Mr. Hartman owned and operated residential rental properties. From 1972 to 1978, Mr. Hartman worked as an independent contractor in the real estate construction industry. In 1978, Mr. Hartman formed Hartman Investment Properties (a Texas sole proprietorship) to develop, acquire, manage, and lease commercial real estate ventures.

     Robert W. Engel has been our Chief Financial Officer and a member of our board of trustees since 2000, and is the controller of Hartman Management. Mr. Engel is a graduate from the University of Texas with a BBA with highest honors with a major in Accounting. Mr. Engel is a CPA and holds memberships in the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, and the Texas Society of Certified Public Accountants. Mr. Engel is also a CPM, with membership in the Institute of Real Estate Management, and a CCIM as a member of the CCIM Institute. He is a licensed real estate broker in the State of Texas. From 1991 to 1999, Mr. Engel served as vice president and controller for Reignquest/Fred Rizk Construction Company.

46

     Chand Vyas has been a member of our board of trustees since 2002. Mr. Vyas is the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of EPS Technology, a global information technology and business process outsourcing company that he founded in 2000. From 1982 until 1998, Mr. Vyas served as Chief Executive Officer of Ziegler Coal Holding Company, where he led a buyout of Ziegler from its parent company, Houston Natural Gas, in 1985. In subsequent years, under Mr. Vyas’ leadership, Ziegler grew many fold through acquisitions including the purchase of Old Ben Coal from British Petroleum as well as Shell Mining Company from Shell Oil. Ziegler Coal Holding Company went public in 1994 with the largest initial public offering underwritten during that year’s third quarter.

     Jack L. Mahaffey has been a member of our board of trustees since 2000. Mr. Mahaffey served as the President of Shell Mining Co. from 1984 until 1991. Since his retirement in 1991, Mr. Mahaffey has managed his personal investments. Mr. Mahaffey graduated from Ohio State University with a B.S. and M.S. in Petroleum Engineering and served in the United States Air Force. He is a former board member of the National Coal Association and the National Coal Council.

     Samuel C. Hathorn has been a member of our board of trustees since 2000. Mr. Hathorn has been in the home building and land development business for over thirty years. He has held both divisional and senior management positions with three different large publicly held home builders/developers during his real estate career. For the last twenty-one years, Mr. Hathorn has been a senior executive with Weyerhaeuser Real Estate Company (WRECO), a wholly owned subsidiary of Weyerhaeuser Company (NYSE). Since 1984, Mr. Hathorn has been President and Chief Executive Officer of Trendmaker Homes, the Houston, Texas based home building and land development subsidiary of WRECO. Mr. Hathorn is a licensed CPA in the State of California and holds a Bachelor of Science degree in accounting. He currently serves as a director of National Beverage Corp. (AMEX).

     Chris A. Minton has been a member of our board of trustees since 2000. Mr. Minton was employed by Lockheed Martin for 35 years and was a Vice-President of Lockheed’s Technology Services Group from 1993 until 1995. While employed at Lockheed, he supervised the business operations of six operating companies that employed over 30,000 people. Since his retirement from Lockheed in 1995, Mr. Minton has managed his personal investments and served as a consultant to a privately held aircraft mechanics school and to a Lockheed Martin subsidiary company. Mr. Minton graduated from Villanova University with a Bachelors Degree, and he is a licensed C.P.A. (retired status) in the State of Texas. He has been awarded the Gold Knight of Management award for achievements as a professional manager by the National Management Association.

Compensation of Trustees

     We pay our independent trustees an annual fee of $5,000, $1,000 for each meeting attended, and $1,000 per quarter for committee meetings attended, payable (at the option of the trustee) in either cash or by issuing such trustees common shares of beneficial interest. Although we have not granted any awards under our equity compensation plans to any of our trustees, the compensation committee may also grant options to purchase common shares or other incentive awards to members of the board. All trustees are reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with attendance at meetings of the board of trustees. If a trustee is also an officer of Hartman Management, we do not pay separate compensation for services rendered as a trustee.

Provisions Applicable to Our Equity Compensation Plans

     In no event shall an option be granted to a trustee or executive officer if the shares available for purchase subject to such grant, when added to all other shares available for purchase and all other shares purchased pursuant to other issued and outstanding options, would exceed 10.0% of the issued and outstanding shares of common shares determined as of the date of grant of such option. Except as otherwise provided in an option agreement, if a change of control occurs and the agreements effectuating the change of control do not provide for the assumption or substitution of all options granted under our equity compensation plans, options granted under the non-assumed plan shall terminate and be forfeited immediately upon the occurrence of the change of control. However, the board in its sole and absolute discretion, may, with respect to any or all of such options, take any or all of the following actions to be effective as of the date of the change of control (or as of any other date fixed by the board occurring within the 30-day period immediately preceding the date of the change of control, but only if such action remains contingent upon the change of control), such date being referred to herein as the “Action Effective Date”:

47

     If the number of our outstanding shares is changed into a different number or kind of shares or securities through a reorganization or merger in which we are the surviving entity, or through a combination, recapitalization or otherwise, an appropriate adjustment will be made in the number and kind of shares that may be issued pursuant to exercise of options granted under our equity compensation plans. A corresponding adjustment to the exercise price of such options granted prior to any change will also be made. Any such adjustment, however, will not change the total payment, if any, applicable to the portion of the options or warrants not exercised, but will change only the exercise price for each share.

     Stock options and warrants generally will be granted with an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the underlying shares on the date of grant. Fair market value for purposes of our equity compensation plans is defined generally to mean:

Limited Liability and Indemnification of Trustees, Officers, Employees and Other Agents

     We are permitted to limit the liability of our trustees, officers, employees and other agents, and to indemnify them, only to the extent permitted by Maryland law and our Declaration of Trust. In addition, the Securities and Exchange Commission takes the position that indemnification against liabilities arising under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (Securities Act), is against public policy and unenforceable.

     Maryland law permits us to include in our Declaration of Trust a provision limiting the liability of our trustees and officers to us and our shareholders for money damages, except for liability resulting from (a) actual receipt of an improper benefit or profit in money, property or services or (b) active and deliberate dishonesty established by a final judgment and that is material to the cause of action. Our Declaration of Trust contains a provision that eliminates trustees’ and officers’ liability to the maximum extent permitted by Maryland law.

     Maryland law permits a Maryland real estate investment trust to indemnify and advance expenses to its trustees, officers, employees and agents to the same extent as permitted for directors and officers of Maryland corporations. Maryland law permits a corporation to indemnify its present and former directors and officers, among others, against judgments, penalties, fines, settlements and reasonable expenses actually incurred by them in connection with any proceeding to which they may be made a party by reason of their service in those or other capacities unless it is established that:

48

     However, a Maryland corporation may not indemnify for an adverse judgment in a suit by or in the right of the corporation or for a judgment of liability on the basis that personal benefit was improperly received, unless in either case a court orders indemnification and then only for expenses.

     Our Declaration of Trust provides that we will indemnify and hold harmless a trustee, officer, employee, agent, advisor or affiliate against any and all losses or liabilities reasonably incurred by such trustee, officer, employee, agent, advisor or affiliate in connection with or by reason of any act or omission performed or omitted to be performed on our behalf in such capacity. However, our Declaration of Trust limits our ability to indemnify our trustees, officers, employees, agents, advisor and affiliates for losses arising from our operation by requiring that the following additional conditions are met:

     Indemnification of the trustees, officers, employees, agents, our advisor or affiliates will not be allowed for liabilities arising from or out of a violation of state or federal securities laws, unless one or more of the following conditions are met:

     Our Declaration of Trust provides that the advancement of our funds to our trustees, officers, employees, agents, advisor or affiliates for legal expenses and other costs incurred as a result of any legal action for which indemnification is being sought is permissible only if all of the following conditions are satisfied:

The Advisor and Property Manager

     Hartman Management employs personnel, in addition to the individuals listed above, who have extensive experience in selecting and managing similar to the properties sought to be acquired by us.

49

     All of our day-to-day operations are managed and performed by Hartman Management. It also manages our portfolio of properties. Some of our trustees and officers are also directors and officers of Hartman Management. The trustees and executive officers of our advisor are as follows:

     The backgrounds of Messrs. Hartman and Engel are described in the “Management – Executive Officers and Trustees” section of this prospectus. Below is a brief description of the other executive officers of Hartman Management:

     John Crossin is the Director of Leasing and Acquisitions for Hartman Management. In this capacity, he is responsible for acquiring and leasing retail, office and warehouse space through the prospecting and closing of individual tenants and by directing a staff of agents and lead generators. Mr. Crossin has a degree in finance from Scranton Jesuit University and did graduate work in business management at Temple University in Philadelphia. Mr. Crossin joined Hartman Management in 2001. Mr. Crossin has more than twenty-five years of experience in the leasing, sale and marketing of commercial real estate including office, retail and industrial properties with C.B. Richard Ellis and Grubb & Ellis, national real estate management companies, and Crossin & Company, a Houston-based real estate company. Mr. Crossin joined Hartman Management in January 2001. For the previous five years, Mr. Crossin served as President of Crossin & Co., a commercial real estate corporate advisory firm based in Houston, Texas.

     Terry L. Henderson is the Chief Financial Officer of Hartman Management. Mr. Henderson joined Hartman Management in 2003. His responsibilities include the various financial and administrative, including legal liaison and risk management functions, of Hartman Management. Mr. Henderson is a Certified Public Accountant and a member of various professional CPA organizations. He holds a Bachelor of Business Administration in Accounting from Texas Tech University. Prior to joining Hartman Management, Mr. Henderson was the Chief Financial Officer for Senterra Real Estate Group in Houston, Texas from 1990 to 2003.

     Valarie L. King is the Director of Property Management. In this capacity, she is responsible for all property management activities. Mrs. King is a mentor and coach for a staff of nine property managers. She oversees the day-to-day operations of the properties as well as a maintenance team of nine employees to ensure that labor time is efficiently managed. Additionally, Mrs. King performs quarterly property inspections, oversees monthly collections and is responsible for negotiating our leases and lease renewals. She is responsible for the preparation of annual budgets and meeting budget expectations. Mrs. King has 15 years of property management experience in Houston, Texas. Ms. King joined Hartman Management in 2000. From 1986 until 1989, she was Property Manager at Helmsley Spear National Realty, a New York-based company, where she was responsible for running the Houston office, including property management, leasing and construction.

The Advisory Agreement

     Under the terms of the advisory agreement, Hartman Management will use its reasonable efforts to present to us investment opportunities to provide a continuing and suitable investment program consistent with our investment policies and objectives as adopted by our board of trustees. The advisory agreement calls for Hartman Management to provide for our day-to-day management and to retain property managers, subject to the authority of our board of trustees, and to perform other duties including the following:

50

     The fees payable to Hartman Management under the advisory agreement are described in detail in the “Management Compensation” section of this prospectus. We also describe in that section our obligation to reimburse Hartman Management for organization and offering expenses, administrative and management services and payments made by Hartman Management to third parties in connection with potential acquisitions.

     The term of the advisory agreement ends after one year and may be renewed for an unlimited number of successive one-year periods upon mutual consent of Hartman Management and us. Additionally, either party may terminate without penalty the advisory agreement upon 60 days written notice.

     Hartman Management and its affiliates expect to engage in other business ventures and, as a result, their resources will not be dedicated exclusively to our business. However, pursuant to the advisory agreement, Hartman Management must devote sufficient resources to our administration to discharge its obligations. Hartman Management may assign the advisory agreement to an affiliate upon our approval. We may assign or transfer the advisory agreement to a successor entity.

     Hartman Management and its officers, employees and affiliates expect to engage in other business ventures and, as a result, their resources will not be dedicated exclusively to our business. However, pursuant to the advisory agreement, Hartman Management must devote sufficient resources to our administration to discharge its obligations.

The Property Management Agreement

     We entered into a property and partnership management agreement with Hartman Management in January 1999. Since that time, Hartman Management has managed our day-to-day operations and our portfolio of properties. In anticipation of this offering, on                    , 2004, we entered into the Management Agreement, which governs the relationship between Hartman OP and Hartman Management.

     This summary is provided to illustrate the material functions that Hartman Management will perform for us as our property manager, and it is not intended to include all of the services that may be provided to us by third parties. Under the terms of the Management Agreement, Hartman Management undertakes to use its best efforts to manage, operate, maintain and lease properties in a diligent, careful and vigilant manner. In its performance of this undertaking, Hartman Management, either directly or indirectly by engaging an affiliate, shall, subject to the authority of the board:

51

     The Management Agreement automatically renews for successive one-year terms, unless it is terminated by either party in writing at least 30 days prior to the expiration of a pervious term. In addition, the agreement can be terminated at any time upon 30 days written notice if there is a showing of misconduct, negligence, or malfeasance by Hartman Management in the performance of its duties thereunder. The agreement may also be terminated if Hartman Management is adjudicated as bankrupt or insolvent, if Hartman Management files a petition seeking reorganization, readjustment, arrangement, composition or similar relief, or if Hartman Management institutes proceedings to be adjudicated a voluntary bankrupt or insolvent. It will be the duty of our board of trustees to evaluate the performance of our advisor before entering into or renewing this agreement. The criteria used in such evaluation will be reflected in the minutes of such meeting. The compensation we pay Hartman Management under this agreement is summarized in the “Management Compensation” section of this prospectus.

     Hartman Management may not enter into any contract with any third party in relation to the services it provides under the Management Agreement without our consent.

     Each year we will agree on an operating budget with Hartman Management for the operation of our properties. Hartman Management must use diligence and employ all reasonable efforts to ensure that actual costs do not exceed the applicable approved budget items.

     Our advisor will promulgate leasing guidelines for use by Hartman Management in evaluating prospective tenants and lease terms for our properties. Hartman Management will have the authority to enter into leases for our properties consistent with these guidelines without the requirement to obtain further approval of our advisor or board of trustees.

     Hartman Management will be indemnified and held harmless from and against any and all claims, losses and fines related to the properties and from liability for damage to the properties and injuries to or the death of any person, except for liabilities and losses resulting from the gross negligence, willful misconduct and/or unlawful acts of Hartman Management.

     Hartman Management must indemnify us from and against all claims or liability for any injury or damage to any person or property for which Hartman Management is responsible occurring in, on, or about the properties.

     Hartman Management may subcontract on-site property management to other management companies which will also be authorized to lease our properties consistent with the leasing guidelines promulgated by our advisor. In any event, Hartman Management will directly manage all financial aspects of property management. To the extent Hartman Management directly performs on-site management, it will hire, direct and establish policies for employees who will have direct responsibility for such property’s operations, including resident managers and assistant managers, as well as building and maintenance personnel. For any properties for which the on-site management is subcontracted, Hartman Management will approve all personnel of such subcontractor and establish policies for such properties’ operations. Hartman Management will also direct the purchase of equipment and supplies and will supervise all maintenance activity.

     The management fees to be paid to Hartman Management will cover, without additional expense to us, the property manager’s general overhead costs such as its expenses for rent and utilities.

     The principal office of Hartman Management is located at 1450 West Sam Houston Parkway North, Suite 100, Houston, Texas 77043.

The Dealer Manager

     D.H. Hill Securities, our dealer manager, is a member firm of the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. (NASD). D.H. Hill Securities was organized in June 1996 and will provide certain wholesaling, sales, promotional and

52

marketing assistance services to us in connection with the distribution of the shares offered pursuant to this prospectus. It may also sell shares at the retail level. D.H. Hill Securities is not an affiliate of either Hartman Management or us. However, some employees of D.H. Hill Securities are also employees of Hartman Management, and may perform services on behalf of Hartman Management that are unrelated to the offering of our common shares of beneficial interest.

     D.H. Hill Securities is a Texas limited liability partnership with principal offices located at 19747 US Hwy 59 North, Suite 101, Humble, Texas 77338. In order to facilitate this offering, D.H. Hill Securities will maintain a branch office in our offices. D.H. Hill Securities will not pay us any rental fee for use of our offices, however we will deduct a nominal rental fee from the dealer manager fees we will pay D.H. Hill Securities.

     Robert W. Engel and Richard A. Vaughan are both employees of D.H. Hill Securities and employees of Hartman Management. Messrs. Engel and Vaughan will have a significant amount of influence on D.H. Hill Securities’ day-to-day operations in its capacity as dealer manager for us. The background of Mr. Engel is described in the “Management — Executive Officers and Trustees” section of this prospectus.

     Richard A. Vaughan is Vice President and Director of Investor Services for Hartman Management. Mr. Vaughan is responsible for raising capital, through Hartman Management’s broker-dealer network, in order to fund property acquisitions for the entities that Hartman Management manages, for other investor services, and for Hartman Management’s advertising and public relations. Mr. Vaughan has more than 30 years of experience in the financial services and products industry. Prior to joining Hartman Management, Mr. Vaughan held senior positions with national responsibilities for a major financial services firm, and held a senior marketing and management position with a large international financial services firm.

Management Decisions

     Allen R. Hartman is responsible for the management decisions of Hartman Management and its affiliates, including the selection of investment properties to be recommended to our board of trustees, the negotiation for these investments, and the property management and leasing of these investment properties. Hartman Management seeks to invest in commercial properties that satisfy our investment objectives, typically retail, industrial and office properties. Our board of trustees, including a majority of our independent trustees, must approve all acquisitions of real estate properties.

53

MANAGEMENT COMPENSATION

     Although we have executive officers who will manage our operation, we do not have any paid employees. Except with respect to options to purchase common shares that may be granted to our executive officers, only our non-employee trustees will be compensated for their services to us as described in the “Management – Compensation of Trustees” section above. The following table summarizes all of the compensation and fees we will pay to D.H. Hill Securities, Hartman Management and its affiliates, including amounts to reimburse their costs of providing services, during the various phases of our organization and operation.

54

55

56

     Our independent trustees will determine, from time to time but at least annually, that our total fees and expenses are reasonable in light of our investment performance, net assets, net income and the fees and expenses of other comparable unaffiliated REITs. Each such determination will be reflected in the minutes of our board of trustees. Our independent trustees shall also supervise the performance of our advisor and the compensation that we pay to it to determine that the provisions of our advisory agreement are being carried out. Each such determination will be recorded in the minutes of our board of trustees and based on the factors set forth below and other factors that the independent trustees deem relevant:

     Because Hartman Management and its affiliates are entitled to differing levels of compensation for undertaking different transactions on our behalf such as the property management fees for operating our properties and the subordinated participation in net sale proceeds, our advisor has the ability to affect the nature of the compensation it receives by undertaking different transactions. However, Hartman Management is obligated to exercise good faith and integrity in all its dealings with respect to our affairs pursuant to the advisory agreement. See the “Management – The Advisory Agreement” section of this prospectus. Because these fees or expenses are payable only with respect to certain transactions or services, they may not be recovered by Hartman Management or its affiliates by reclassifying them under a different category.

57

OWNERSHIP OF SHARES

     The following table shows, as of August 27, 2004, the amount of our common shares beneficially owned (unless otherwise indicated) by (1) any person who is known by us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5.0% of the outstanding shares of common shares, (2) our trustees, (3) our executive officers, and (4) all of our trustees and executive officers as a group. The table also shows this ownership information assuming all outstanding OP Units are converted into shares of our common shares. The table gives effect to our reorganization as a Maryland real estate investment trust and our concurrent recapitalization on July 28, 2004. See “Management — General Information About Us” for a more detailed discussion of our reorganization and recapitalization.

     As of August 27, 2004, we had 7,010,146 common shares outstanding after giving effect to the reorganization and recapitalization. After this offering, assuming all 10,000,000 shares offered by this prospectus are sold to the public and all 1,000,000 shares offered under our dividend reinvestment plan are sold, 18,010,146 common shares would be outstanding, assuming no other shares are issued during this offering. As of August 27, 2004, there were also 12,456,995.47 OP Units outstanding after giving effect to the reorganization and recapitalization, each convertible into our common shares of beneficial interest on a one-for-one basis. As a result of our recapitalization, OP Units were automatically adjusted so that they would continue to be exchangeable for our common shares on a one-for-one basis. The recapitalization, therefore, had no effect on the ownership percentage of any shareholder.

58

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

     We are subject to various conflicts of interest arising out of our relationship with Hartman Management, our advisor, and its affiliates, including conflicts related to the arrangements pursuant to which Hartman Management and its affiliates will be compensated by us. Some of the conflicts of interest in our transactions with our advisor and its affiliates, and the corporate governance measures we adopted to address these conflicts, are described below.

Interests in Other Real Estate Programs

     Hartman Management and its partners, officers, employees or affiliates are advisors or general partners of other Hartman programs, including partnerships that have investment objectives similar to ours, and we expect that they will organize other such programs in the future. Hartman Management and such officers, employees or affiliates have legal and financial obligations with respect to these programs that are similar to their obligations to us.

     As described in the “Prior Performance Summary,” Allen R. Hartman and his affiliates have sponsored other privately offered real estate programs with substantially similar investment objectives as ours, and which are still operating and may acquire additional properties in the future. Conflicts of interest may arise between these entities and us.

     Mr. Hartman or his affiliates may acquire, for their own account or for private placement, properties that Mr. Hartman deems not suitable for purchase by us, whether because of the greater degree of risk, the complexity of structuring inherent in such transactions, financing considerations or for other reasons, including properties with potential for attractive investment returns.

Property Acquisitions From Entities Controlled by Mr. Hartman

     The following table compares the price we paid for all properties we acquired from affiliates of Mr. Hartman and the original purchase price paid by the applicable seller.