Use these links to rapidly review the document
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy
Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. )
Filed by the Registrant ý | ||
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o |
||
Check the appropriate box: |
||
o |
Preliminary Proxy Statement |
|
o |
Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) |
|
ý |
Definitive Proxy Statement |
|
o |
Definitive Additional Materials |
|
o |
Soliciting Material under §240.14a-12 |
GROUP 1 AUTOMOTIVE, INC. | ||||
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter) |
||||
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant) |
||||
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box): |
||||
ý |
No fee required. |
|||
o |
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. |
|||
(1) | Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: |
|||
(2) | Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: |
|||
(3) | Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): |
|||
(4) | Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: |
|||
(5) | Total fee paid: |
|||
o |
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. |
|||
o |
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. |
|||
(1) |
Amount Previously Paid: |
|||
(2) | Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: |
|||
(3) | Filing Party: |
|||
(4) | Date Filed: |
April 10, 2014
Dear Fellow Stockholder:
You are cordially invited to attend our 2014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders which will be held on Tuesday, May 20, 2014 at 10:00 a.m. Central Daylight Time at our Sterling McCall Lexus dealership located at 10025 Southwest Freeway, Houston, TX 77074.
At this year's meeting, we will ask you to elect two Class III directors, approve, on a non-binding advisory basis, our executive compensation, approve our 2014 Long Term Incentive Plan, and ratify Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accountants. In addition, there will be a report on the Company's business and financial performance during the past year.
We are pleased to again take advantage of the Securities and Exchange Commission rules that allow companies to furnish proxy materials to their stockholders primarily over the Internet. We believe this process expedites stockholders' receipt of proxy materials, lowers the costs of our Annual Meeting and helps conserve natural resources. Accordingly, we are mailing many of our stockholders a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials which contains instructions on how to access the proxy materials online, vote online and obtain a paper copy of our proxy materials. In certain instances, we are mailing the proxy materials to our stockholders, unless they have consented online to receive electronic copies of proxy materials for future meetings.
Your vote is very important. We encourage you to sign and return your proxy card, or use telephone or Internet voting prior to the meeting, so that your shares of Group 1 common stock will be represented and voted at the meeting.
We hope you will be able to join us at our Annual Meeting in Houston on May 20th.
Sincerely,
John L. Adams Chairman of the Board |
Earl J. Hesterberg President & Chief Executive Officer |
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
OF GROUP 1 AUTOMOTIVE, INC.
Date: | May 20, 2014 | |
Time: | 10:00 a.m. | |
Place: | Sterling McCall Lexus 10025 Southwest Freeway Houston, TX 77074 |
Matters to be voted on:
Stockholders of record at the close of business on March 24, 2014, will be entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting and at any adjournments or postponements thereof. A list of stockholders will be available and may be inspected during normal business hours for a period of at least 10 days prior to the Annual Meeting at the offices of Group 1, 800 Gessner, Suite 500, Houston, Texas 77024. The list of stockholders will also be available for your review at the Annual Meeting. In the event there are not sufficient votes for a quorum or to approve the foregoing proposals at the time of the Annual Meeting, the Annual Meeting may be adjourned in order to permit further solicitation of proxies.
The proxy materials, including this Notice of Annual Meeting, the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials ("Notice of Internet Availability"), the proxy statement, a proxy card or voting instruction card, and our Annual Report to Stockholders for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 are being distributed and made available on or about April 10, 2014. In accordance with rules approved by the Securities and Exchange Commission, beginning on or about April 10, 2014, we mailed the Notice of Internet Availability to certain beneficial owners of our common stock and stockholders of record containing instructions on how to access the proxy materials and vote online. In addition, the proxy materials were mailed to certain beneficial owners of our common stock and stockholders of record on or about April 10, 2014.
Your vote is important. We urge you to review the accompanying materials carefully and to vote by telephone or Internet as promptly as possible. Alternatively, you may request a proxy card, which you may complete, sign and return by mail.
By Order of the Board of Directors, | ||
Beth Sibley Corporate Secretary |
Houston,
Texas
April 10, 2014
IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS
FOR THE STOCKHOLDER MEETING TO BE HELD ON MAY 20, 2014
The Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders, our Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting and our Annual Report to Stockholders for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 are available at http://www.proxyvote.com.
This summary highlights information contained elsewhere in this proxy statement. This summary does not contain all of the information that you should consider, and you should read the entire proxy statement carefully before voting.
This proxy statement is being distributed and made available on or about April 10, 2014 in connection with the solicitation of proxies by the Board of Directors of Group 1 Automotive, Inc. for use at our 2014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
Annual Meeting of Stockholders:
Time & Date: | 10:00 a.m., May 20, 2014 | |
Place: | Sterling McCall Lexus 10025 Southwest Freeway Houston, TX 77074 |
|
Record date: | March 24, 2014 | |
Voting: | Stockholders as of the record date are entitled to vote. Each share of common stock is entitled to one vote for each director nominee and one vote for each of the proposals to be voted on. All elections of directors shall be decided by plurality vote. In plurality voting, the nominees who receive the highest number of votes are elected. All other matters submitted to the stockholders shall be decided by the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast with respect to the matter presented. |
Compensation and Corporate Governance Highlights
2014 Proxy Statement i
Voting Matters and Board Recommendations:
Management Proposals: | Board's Recommendation |
Page (for more detail) |
&zwsp; | |||||
Election of Class III Director Nominees | FOR Each Director Nominee | 17 | ||||||
Approval, on a Non-Binding Advisory Basis, of our Executive Compensation | FOR | 24 | ||||||
Approval of Group 1 Automotive, Inc. 2014 Long Term Incentive Plan | FOR | 25 | ||||||
Ratification of Ernst & Young as Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm | FOR | 36 |
Class III Director Nominees (Proposal 1)
The following table provides summary information about our nominees for election to the Board of Directors. Additional information for all of our directors, including the nominees, may be found beginning on page 17.
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Nominee |
|
Age |
|
Director Since |
Occupation |
Committee Memberships(1) |
Other Boards | &zwsp; | |||||||
|
Lincoln Pereira |
54 | 2013 | Regional Vice President, Brazil, Group 1 Automotive, Inc. and Chairman, UAB Motors Participações, Ltda. | FRM | Boa Vista Servicos S.A. São Paulo Chamber of Commerce Associação Brasileira dos Concessionários Nissan Associação Brasileira dos Concessionários BMW Associação Brasileira do Distribuidores Toyota |
||||||||||
|
Stephen D. Quinn |
58 | 2002 | Retired General Partner & Managing Director, Goldman Sachs & Co. | I, AC FRM (Chair) NGC |
Zions Bancorporation |
The Board recommends a vote "FOR" each Class III director nominee.
In 2011, our stockholders indicated a preference for an annual "Say-on-Pay" vote. At last year's Annual Meeting of stockholders, our stockholders approved the compensation of our named executive officers with a substantial majority of our stockholders (95% of votes cast) voting in favor. In evaluating this year's "Say-on-Pay" proposal, we recommend that you review our CD&A, which explains how and why the Compensation Committee arrived at its executive compensation actions and decisions for 2013.
ii 2014 Proxy Statement
Executive Compensation Advisory Vote (Proposal 2)
We are asking our stockholders to approve, on a non-binding advisory basis, the compensation of our Named Executive Officers. We believe that our compensation policies and practices are effective in achieving our Company's goals of rewarding sustained financial and operating performance, leadership excellence and aligning the executives' long-term interests with those of our stockholders. Our compensation philosophy is to set the fixed compensation of our Named Executive Officers competitively for their demonstrated skills and industry experience. Our variable compensation, both annual and long-term, reflects the results of performance against a combination of quantitative and subjective measures. The Compensation Committee targets the median of the market for all elements of pay, including base salary, annual incentive, long-term incentives and appropriate perquisites.
Type | Form | Terms | &zwsp; | |||||
Cash | Salary | Set annually based on market conditions, peer data and other factors | ||||||
Cash | Annual Incentive | Linked to financial-based and mission-based goals, but discretionary factors are also considered | ||||||
Equity | Long-Term Incentive Awards | Restricted stock with restrictions lapsing over a five-year period: 0%-40%-20%-20%-20%, to reward performance and promote retention of certain key employees | ||||||
Other |
Employment Agreements and Severance and Change of Control Arrangements |
Change of Control payment equal to 30 months base salary for our President/CEO and our Senior Vice President/CFO and 15 months base salary for our Vice President/General Counsel, plus prior year's pro rata annual bonus Under certain circumstances (as more fully described on pages 61-62), our CEO and his spouse will receive continued medical coverage for a period up to 36 months |
||||||
Other | Deferred Compensation Plan | Allows deferral of up to 50% base salary and 100% of incentive bonus | ||||||
Other |
Perquisites |
Demonstrator vehicle(s) and/or vehicle allowance Our CEO may use our Company aircraft for up to 40 hours of personal use, provided he reimburses us based on the published standard industry fare level valuation method; we pay for club membership privileges that are used for business and personal purposes by our CEO |
||||||
Other | Benefits | On same terms as other employees, including our employee stock purchase plan | ||||||
Other | Indemnification Agreements | Indemnification for our Named Executive Officers provided the executive was acting in good faith and in the best interest of our Company |
2014 Proxy Statement iii
Set forth below is the 2013 compensation for each Named Executive Officer.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Name and Principal Position |
|
Salary ($) |
|
Bonus ($) |
|
Stock Awards(1) ($) |
|
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($) |
|
Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings ($) |
|
All Other Compensation ($) |
|
Total ($) |
&zwsp; | |||||||||
|
Earl J. Hesterberg |
1,000,000 | | 2,583,900 | 666,667 | 135,860 | 259,173 | 4,645,600 | |||||||||||||||||
|
John C. Rickel |
550,000 | | 861,300 | 366,667 | 160,859 | 27,039 | 1,965,865 | |||||||||||||||||
|
Darryl M. Burman |
415,000 | | 574,200 | 166,000 | 14,950 | 28,667 | 1,198,817 | |||||||||||||||||
|
Peter C. DeLongchamps |
430,000 | 50,000 | 631,620 | 172,000 | 44,871 | 27,076 | 1,355,566 | |||||||||||||||||
|
J. Brooks O'Hara |
300,200 | | 516,780 | 106,571 | 25,336 | 18,862 | 967,749 |
The Board recommends a vote "FOR" the
non-binding advisory
approval of our executive compensation.
Approval of the Group 1 Automotive, Inc. 2014 Long Term Incentive Plan (Proposal 3)
We award long-term equity incentive grants to our key employees for retention purposes. We are asking our stockholders to approve the Group 1 Automotive, Inc. 2014 Long Term Incentive Plan. We believe that long-term equity compensation is an important retention tool, and directly ties the interests of our executive officers and key employees to the interests of our stockholders. Additional details concerning our long-term equity compensation plan can be found on page 25.
The Board recommends a vote "FOR" approval of the
Group 1 Automotive, Inc. 2014 Long Term Incentive Plan.
iv 2014 Proxy Statement
Ratification of Ernst & Young LLP as Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for 2014 (Proposal 4)
As a matter of good corporate governance, we are asking our stockholders to ratify the selection of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2014. Set forth below is summary information with respect to Ernst & Young's fees for services provided in 2012 and 2013.
|
||||||||||
|
Type of Fees |
|
2012 ($) |
|
2013 ($) |
&zwsp; | ||||
|
Audit Fees |
1,165,150 | 1,909,493 | |||||||
|
Audit Related Fees |
| 631,880 | |||||||
|
Tax Fees |
172,140 | 526,780 | |||||||
|
All Other Fees |
2,200 | 2,200 | |||||||
|
Total |
1,339,490 | 3,070,353 |
The Board recommends a vote "FOR" ratification of
Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2014.
2014 Proxy Statement v
800 Gessner, Suite 500
Houston, TX 77024
Proxy Statement
This proxy statement is being furnished to you in connection with the solicitation of proxies by the Board of Directors ("our Board" or the "Board") of Group 1 Automotive, Inc. ("Group 1" or "our Company") for use at our 2014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the "Annual Meeting"), and at any adjournment or postponement thereof. Proxy materials or a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials ("Notice of Internet Availability") were first sent to stockholders on or about April 10, 2014.
2014 Annual Meeting Date and Location
Our Annual Meeting will be held at Sterling McCall Lexus, 10025 Southwest Freeway, Houston, TX 77074, on Tuesday, May 20, 2014, at 10:00 a.m., Central Daylight Time, or at such other time and place to which the meeting may be adjourned.
References in this proxy statement to the Annual Meeting also refer to any adjournments, postponements or changes in location of the meeting, to the extent applicable.
The proxy materials, including this proxy statement, the Notice of Annual Meeting, the Notice of Internet Availability, a proxy card or voting instruction card, and our Annual Report to Stockholders for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 are being distributed and made available on or about April 10, 2014. In accordance with rules approved by the Securities and Exchange Commission, beginning on or about April 10, 2014, we mailed the Notice of Internet Availability to certain beneficial owners of our common stock and stockholders of record containing instructions on how to access the proxy materials and vote online. In addition, the proxy materials were mailed to certain beneficial owners of our common stock and stockholders of record on or about April 10, 2014.
The Notice of Internet Availability provides instructions on how to inform us to send future proxy materials to you electronically by e-mail or in printed form by mail. If you choose to receive future proxy materials by e-mail, you will receive an e-mail next year with instructions containing a link to those materials and a link to the proxy voting site. Your election to receive proxy materials by e-mail or printed form will remain in effect until you terminate it.
Choosing to receive future proxy materials by e-mail will allow us to provide you with the information you need in a timelier manner, save us the cost of printing and mailing documents to you, and conserve natural resources.
2014 Proxy Statement 1
Questions and Answers
What is the purpose of the meeting?
At our Annual Meeting, stockholders will act upon the matters outlined in the notice of meeting, including the election of two Class III directors, the approval, on a non-binding advisory basis, of our executive compensation, the approval of the Group 1 Automotive, Inc. 2014 Long Term Incentive Plan, the ratification of Ernst & Young LLP
as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2014, and the consideration of any other matters properly presented at the meeting. In addition, senior management will report on our business and financial performance during fiscal year 2013 and respond to your questions.
Who is entitled to vote at the meeting?
Only our stockholders as of 5:00 p.m., Central Daylight Time, on March 24, 2014 (the record date) are entitled to receive notice of the Annual Meeting and to vote at the meeting. On March 24, 2014,
there were 24,184,978 shares of Group 1 common stock issued and outstanding and entitled to vote at the meeting.
You are entitled to one vote for each share of Group 1 common stock you owned at 5:00 p.m.,
Central Daylight Time, on March 24, 2014, on all matters presented at the meeting.
What is the difference between a stockholder of record and a beneficial owner or "street name" holder?
If your shares are registered directly in your name with our registrar and transfer agent, American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC, you are considered a stockholder of record with respect to
those shares. If your shares are held in a brokerage account or by a bank or other nominee, you are considered the "beneficial owner" of those shares, and your shares are held in "street name."
If you are a stockholder of record, you may vote in person at the Annual Meeting or by proxy using any of the following methods:
envelope. Your proxy card must be received by the Company before the voting polls close at the Annual Meeting.
If you vote by Internet or telephone, do not return your proxy card. The telephone and Internet voting procedures are designed to authenticate stockholders' identities, to allow stockholders to give their voting instructions and to confirm that stockholders' instructions have been recorded properly. Submitting your proxy by Internet or telephone will not affect your right to vote in person should you decide to attend the Annual Meeting. If you want to vote in person at the meeting, you must request a ballot. For directions to the Annual Meeting of Stockholders, visit www.sterlingmccalllexus.com/HoursAndDirections.
2 2014 Proxy Statement
Questions and Answers
Please do not return the Notice of Internet Availability. The Notice of Internet Availability is not a valid proxy.
If you hold your shares in street name, you will receive instructions from your broker, bank or other nominee describing how to vote your shares. Beneficial owners voting by telephone or Internet are subject to the same deadlines as described
above for holders of record. If you want to vote in person, you must obtain a legal proxy from your broker, bank or other nominee and bring it to the meeting.
If you hold common stock in BOTH street name and as a stockholder of record, YOU MUST VOTE SEPARATELY for each position of common stock.
Can I change my vote or revoke my proxy?
If you are a stockholder of record, you can revoke your proxy prior to the completion of voting at the Annual Meeting by:
Suite 500, Houston, Texas 77024 no later than May 19, 2014; or
Only your latest dated proxy we receive prior to the Annual Meeting will be counted. Further, your attendance at the Annual Meeting will not automatically revoke your proxy.
If you are a street name stockholder you must follow the instructions of your broker, bank or other nominee to revoke your voting instructions. You may also vote in person at the Annual Meeting if you obtain a legal proxy from your broker, bank or other nominee.
What is the effect of broker non-votes and abstentions and what vote is required to approve each proposal?
If you hold your shares in "street name," you will receive instructions from your broker, bank or other nominee describing how to vote your shares. If you do not instruct your broker, bank or other nominee how to vote your shares, they may vote your shares as they decide as to each routine matter under the rules of the New York Stock Exchange.
If you do not provide specific voting instructions to your broker on non-routine matters, your broker may not cast a vote on the proposal, resulting in a broker non-vote. Although any broker non-vote
would be counted as present at the meeting for purposes of determining a quorum, it would be treated as not entitled to vote with respect to non-routine matters. If you are a beneficial owner holding shares through a broker, bank or other nominee and you do not vote on certain matters, your broker may cast a vote on your behalf for Proposal No. 4, but not Proposals No. 1, 2, or 3.
Abstentions occur when stockholders are present at the Annual Meeting but fail to vote or voluntarily withhold their vote for any of the matters upon which the stockholders are voting.
2014 Proxy Statement 3
Questions and Answers
The table below describes the vote required for approval of each matter to be brought before the meeting, as well as the treatment of abstentions and broker non-votes as to each matter.
Proposal No. |
Vote Required |
Treatment of Abstentions |
Treatment of Broker Non-Votes |
|||||||
1 | Each nominee must receive the affirmative vote of a plurality of the votes cast. Class III nominees with the most votes are elected, subject to our majority voting policy described below | Not applicable | Not taken into account | |||||||
2 | The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the votes cast | Not applicable | Not taken into account | |||||||
3 | The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast | Against | Not taken into account | |||||||
4 | The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the votes cast | Not applicable | Not applicable |
The Company's majority voting policy requires any director nominee in an uncontested election who receives a greater number of votes "withheld" than votes "for" his or her election to tender his or her resignation promptly following the certification of the election results. The Nominating/Governance Committee of the Board will consider all of the relevant facts and circumstances and make a recommendation to the Board with respect to whether to accept the resignation. Within 90 days, the Board is required to take action with respect to the recommendation and to promptly disclose its decision. The majority voting policy is more fully described in "Information about Our Board of Directors and Its Committees Majority Voting Policy."
Our Board has appointed Earl J. Hesterberg, our President and Chief Executive Officer, and John C. Rickel, our Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, as the management proxy holders for the Annual Meeting. If you are a stockholder of record, your shares will be voted by the management proxy holders in accordance with the instructions on the proxy card you submit by mail, or the instructions provided for any proxy submitted by telephone or Internet, as applicable. For stockholders who have their shares voted by duly submitting a proxy by mail, telephone or Internet, the management proxy holders will vote all shares represented by such valid proxies as our Board recommends, unless a stockholder appropriately specifies otherwise.
How does the Board recommend I vote?
Our Board of Directors recommends that you vote your shares "FOR" each of the Class III director nominees; "FOR" the approval, on a non-binding advisory basis, of our executive compensation; "FOR" approval of the Group 1 Automotive, Inc.
2014 Long Term Incentive Plan; and "FOR" the ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2014.
A quorum will be present if the holders of a majority of the shares of common stock entitled to vote are present in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting. Our independent inspector
of election, Broadridge Financial Solutions will determine whether or not a quorum is present. There must be a quorum for the Annual Meeting to be held. Proxies received but marked as
4 2014 Proxy Statement
Questions and Answers
abstentions or broker non-votes will be included in the calculation of votes considered to be present at the Annual Meeting.
If less than a quorum is represented at the meeting, a majority of the shares so represented may adjourn the meeting from time to time without further notice, and the persons named as proxies will vote the proxies they have been authorized at the Annual Meeting in favor of such an adjournment.
In the event a quorum is present at the Annual Meeting but sufficient votes to approve any of the items proposed by our Board have not been received, the persons named as proxies may
propose one or more adjournments of the meeting to permit further solicitation of proxies. A stockholder vote may be taken on one or more of the proposals in this proxy statement prior to such adjournment if sufficient proxies have been received and it is otherwise appropriate. Any adjournment will require the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of those shares of common stock represented at the meeting in person or by proxy. If a quorum is present, the persons named as proxies will vote the proxies they have been authorized to vote on any other business properly before the meeting in favor of such an adjournment.
Who will bear the cost of soliciting votes for the Annual Meeting?
We have engaged Alliance Advisors to assist with the solicitation of proxies for a fee not to exceed $5,000, plus reimbursement for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses. We will bear all expenses of soliciting proxies. We may reimburse brokerage firms, custodians, nominees, fiduciaries and other persons representing beneficial owners of our common stock for their reasonable expenses in
forwarding solicitation material to such beneficial owners. Directors, officers and employees of Group 1 may also solicit proxies in person or by other means of communication. Such directors, officers and employees will not be additionally compensated but may be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses in connection with such solicitation.
We have engaged Broadridge Financial Solutions to tabulate the votes and to serve as inspector of election at the Annual Meeting for a fee of approximately $3,500. Broadridge will separately tabulate For, Against and Withhold votes,
abstentions and broker non-votes. Broadridge will also certify the election results and perform any other acts required by the Delaware General Corporation Law.
May I propose actions for consideration at next year's annual meeting of stockholders or nominate individuals to serve as directors?
You may submit proposals for consideration at future stockholder meetings, including director nominations. Please read "Stockholder Proposals for 2015 Annual Meeting" for information regarding
the submission of stockholder proposals and director nominations for consideration at next year's Annual Meeting.
2014 Proxy Statement 5
The Board of Directors and Corporate Governance
We are committed to good corporate governance which includes the highest standards of professional and personal conduct. Our Board has adopted several governance documents to guide the operation and direction of our Board and its committees, which include our Corporate Governance Guidelines, Code of Ethics, Code of Conduct and charters for the Audit Committee,
Compensation Committee, Nominating/Governance Committee and Finance/Risk Management Committee. Each of these documents is available on our website at www.group1auto.com and stockholders may obtain a printed copy, free of charge, by sending a written request to Group 1 Automotive, Inc., 800 Gessner, Suite 500, Houston, TX 77024, Attn: Corporate Secretary.
6 2014 Proxy Statement
Information About Our Board of Directors and Its Committees
In 2013, the Board held 14 meetings and acted by unanimous written consent four times. Committees of the Board held a combined total of 22 meetings. Each director attended 95% or more of the aggregate of all meetings of the Board and the committees on which he or she served during 2013, and, except for one director who was unable to attend one Board meeting, attendance at such meetings was 100% for all directors. Under our Corporate Governance Guidelines, our directors are encouraged to attend the Annual Meeting of our stockholders. All of the then-sitting directors
attended our 2013 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. We currently expect all of our directors standing for election to be present at the 2014 Annual Meeting.
Our Board and each of its committees annually conduct a self-evaluation to assess, and identify opportunities to improve, their respective performance. The Nominating/Governance Committee leads our Board in its annual self-evaluation.
The Nominating/Governance Committee's charter provides that the committee will annually assess the leadership structure of the Board and recommend a structure to the Board for approval. In 2013, the Nominating/Governance Committee conducted that assessment, and determined that having an independent director serve as non-executive Chairman of the Board continues to be in the best interest of our stockholders at this time. Our Chief Executive Officer is responsible for setting our strategic direction and providing day-to-day leadership, while the Chairman of the
Board sets the agenda for Board meetings, presides over meetings of the full Board and provides guidance to our Chief Executive Officer. We believe this structure ensures a greater role for the independent directors in the oversight of our Company and active participation of the independent directors in setting agendas and establishing priorities and procedures for the work of our Board. We discuss our directors' qualifications and characteristics under "Proposals to be Voted on by Stockholders Proposal 1 Election of Directors Board of Directors."
Our Nominating/Governance Committee is responsible for identifying and recommending to our Board qualified individuals to be nominated to serve on our Board. Our Board's objective is to select individuals that have a demonstrated record of integrity, sound business judgment, leadership, objectivity, independence of mind, and commitment. In selecting potential Board candidates, our Board seeks independent directors
who represent a mix of backgrounds and experiences that will enhance the quality of our Board's deliberations and decisions. Board membership should reflect diversity in its broadest sense, including persons diverse in perspectives, personal and professional experiences, geography, gender, and ethnicity. This process has resulted in a Board that is comprised of highly qualified directors that reflect diversity as we define it.
Independence of the Members of our Board
The Board has analyzed the independence of each director. It has affirmatively determined that Ms. Raff and Messrs. Adams, Lataif, Quinn, Strange and Watson (all of our non-employee directors) are independent directors under the New
York Stock Exchange's listing standards. As part of its analysis, the Board determined that none of these directors has a material relationship with our Company. Mr. Hesterberg was determined not to be independent because he is our President and
2014 Proxy Statement 7
Information About Our Board of Directors and Its Committees
Chief Executive Officer, and Mr. Pereira, who was appointed to the Board following our acquisition of UAB Motors Participações, S.A. ("UAB"), was determined not to be independent because he is our Regional Vice President, Brazil and the Chairman of UAB.
We have in the past, and may, in the future, make donations to various charitable organizations. From
time to time, some of our directors, officers and employees have been, and in the future may be, affiliated with such charities. During the annual independence review, our Board determined that any such affiliations did not impact the independence of our directors.
Under our majority voting policy, in an uncontested election of directors, any nominee who receives a greater number of votes "withheld" than votes "for" his or her election will, promptly following the certification of the stockholder vote, tender his or her written resignation to the Board for consideration by the Nominating/Governance Committee. The Nominating/Governance Committee will consider the resignation and will make a recommendation to the Board concerning whether to accept or reject it.
In determining its recommendation to the Board, the Nominating/Governance Committee will consider all factors it considers relevant, which may include:
Under our majority voting policy, the Board will take formal action on the recommendation no later than 90 days following the certification of the results of the stockholders' meeting. In considering the recommendation, the Board will consider the information, factors and alternatives considered by the Nominating and Governance Committee and any additional information that the Board considers relevant. The Company will promptly disclose the Board's decision whether to accept or reject the director's tendered resignation. If applicable, the Board will also disclose the reason or reasons for rejecting the tendered resignation.
Executive Sessions of our Board
The independent directors meet in executive session at each regularly scheduled meeting of our Board. Mr. Adams, our non-executive Chairman of the Board, presides over these meetings and is
responsible for preparing an agenda for the meetings of the independent directors in executive session.
Our Board, as a whole and through its committees, has broad responsibility for the oversight of risk management as well as specific risk management accountability for governance, overall operational risk, executive compensation, Chief Executive Officer succession planning and our system of
internal controls, including financial reporting. In its risk management role, our Board has the responsibility to satisfy itself that our risk management processes and controls are adequate and functioning as designed and that our business
8 2014 Proxy Statement
Information About Our Board of Directors and Its Committees
is conducted wisely and in compliance with proper governance and applicable laws and regulations.
Much of our Board's oversight work is delegated to various committees, which meet regularly and report back to the full Board. All committees have significant roles in carrying out the risk oversight and management function. Each committee is comprised entirely of independent directors, except the Finance/Risk Management Committee, and is responsible for overseeing risks associated with its respective area of responsibility as further detailed below.
affect our financial statements and proposed audit adjustments. Further, the Audit Committee chair routinely meets between formal Audit Committee meetings with our chief financial officer, corporate controller, director of internal audit and our independent registered public accounting firm.
In addition to reports from its committees, our Board receives regular reports directly from the officers responsible for oversight of particular risks
2014 Proxy Statement 9
Information About Our Board of Directors and Its Committees
within our Company. Specifically, our officers report to our Board regarding the Enterprise Risk Management Program that management has implemented to assess, manage and monitor areas of risk that are significant to our business, including safety and risk, strategic planning and operational risk, financial and accounting risk, and governance, regulatory and legislative risk. Risk profiles are updated annually to insure that all risks continue to be identified. Our officers also report to our Board on which risks management has
assessed as the most significant, together with management's plans to mitigate those risks. Further, our outside counsel reports in person to our Board periodically on an as-needed basis to keep our directors informed concerning legal risks and other legal matters involving our Company. Finally, we have robust internal audit systems in place to review adherence to policies and procedures, which are supported by a separate internal audit department.
Our Board has established four standing committees to assist it in discharging its responsibilities: the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee, the Nominating/Governance Committee and the Finance/Risk Management Committee. The following chart reflects the current membership of each committee:
Name |
Audit Committee |
Compensation Committee |
Nominating/ Governance Committee |
Finance/Risk Management Committee |
&zwsp; | |||||||
John L. Adams | M | M | M | |||||||||
Earl J. Hesterberg | M | |||||||||||
Louis E. Lataif | M | M | C | |||||||||
Lincoln Pereira | M | |||||||||||
Stephen D. Quinn | M | M | C | |||||||||
Beryl Raff | M | M | ||||||||||
J. Terry Strange | C | M | M | |||||||||
Max P. Watson, Jr. | C | M | M |
M Member
C Chairman
Each of the committee charters is available on our website at www.group1auto.com and stockholders may obtain printed copies, free of charge, by sending a written request to Group 1 Automotive, Inc., 800 Gessner, Suite 500, Houston, TX 77024, Attn: Corporate Secretary.
Pursuant to its charter, the purposes and responsibilities of our Audit Committee include:
10 2014 Proxy Statement
Information About Our Board of Directors and Its Committees
In addition to, and in connection with, the purposes and responsibilities described above, the Audit Committee is directly responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of the work of our independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee also reviews our annual and quarterly financial statements and confirms the independence of our independent registered public accounting firm.
While the Audit Committee has the responsibilities and powers set forth in its charter, it is not the duty of the Audit Committee to plan or conduct audits, to determine that our financial statements are complete and accurate, or to determine that such statements are in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States and other applicable rules and regulations. Our management is responsible for the preparation of our financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States and our internal controls. Our independent registered public accounting firm is responsible for the audit work on our financial
statements. It is also not the duty of the Audit Committee to conduct investigations or to assure compliance with laws and regulations and our policies and procedures. Our management is responsible for compliance with laws and regulations and compliance with our policies and procedures.
The Audit Committee, whose members consisted of Mr. Strange (Chairman), Mr. Adams, Mr. Lataif and Mr. Quinn, held eight meetings during 2013. Mr. Strange also serves on the Audit Committees of New Jersey Resources Corporation, Newfield Exploration Company and SLM Corporation. Our Board has determined that Mr. Strange's simultaneous service on these other Audit Committees and our Audit Committee does not impair his ability to serve effectively on our Audit Committee.
All members of the Audit Committee are independent as that term is defined in the New York Stock Exchange's listing standards and by Rule 10A-3 promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act"). Our Board has determined that each member of the Audit Committee is financially literate and that Mr. Strange has the necessary accounting and financial expertise to serve as Chairman. Our Board has also determined that Mr. Strange is an "audit committee financial expert" following a determination that Mr. Strange met the criteria for such designation under the SEC's rules and regulations. For information regarding Mr. Strange's business experience, please read "Proposals to be Voted on by Stockholders Proposal 1 Election of Directors Board of Directors."
The Report of the Audit Committee is set forth on page 38 of this proxy statement.
2014 Proxy Statement 11
Information About Our Board of Directors and Its Committees
Pursuant to its charter, the purposes of our Compensation Committee are to:
In connection with these purposes, our Board has entrusted the Compensation Committee with the overall responsibility for establishing, implementing and monitoring the compensation for our senior corporate officers (our executive officers and officers that report directly to our Chief Executive Officer). The Compensation Committee reviews and approves the compensation of our senior corporate officers and makes appropriate adjustments based on Company performance, achievement of predetermined goals and changes in an officer's duties and responsibilities. The Compensation Committee also approves all employment agreements related to the senior corporate officers and approves recommendations regarding equity awards for all employees. Together with management, and any counsel or other advisors deemed appropriate by the Compensation Committee, the Compensation
Committee typically reviews and discusses the particular executive compensation matter presented and makes a final determination, with the exception of compensation matters relating to our Chief Executive Officer. In the case of our Chief Executive Officer, the Compensation Committee reviews and discusses the particular compensation matter (together with our management and any counsel or other advisors deemed appropriate) and formulates a recommendation. The Compensation Committee's Chairman then generally reports the Compensation Committee's recommendation for approval by the full Board or, in certain cases, by the independent directors.
In general, executive compensation matters are presented to the Compensation Committee or raised with the Compensation Committee in one of the following ways: (1) at the request of the Compensation Committee Chairman or another Compensation Committee member or member of our Board, (2) in accordance with the Compensation Committee's agenda, which is reviewed by the Compensation Committee members and other directors on an annual basis, (3) by our Chief Executive Officer or Vice President of Human Resources or (4) by the Compensation Committee's outside compensation consultant.
The Compensation Committee works with the management team, our Chief Executive Officer and our Vice President of Human Resources to implement and promote our executive compensation strategy. The most significant aspects of management's involvement in this process are:
12 2014 Proxy Statement
Information About Our Board of Directors and Its Committees
Our Chief Executive Officer is instrumental to this process. Specifically, the Chief Executive Officer assists the Compensation Committee by:
In addition, our Vice President of Human Resources is involved in the executive compensation process by:
Under its charter, the Compensation Committee has the sole authority to retain and terminate any compensation consultant to be used to assist in the evaluation of the compensation of our senior corporate officers and our directors and also has the sole authority to approve the consultant's fees and other retention terms. To the extent permitted by applicable law, the Compensation Committee may delegate some or all of its authority to subcommittees as it deems appropriate.
During 2013, the Compensation Committee engaged Pearl Meyer & Partners ("PM&P") to conduct a compensation analysis which involved the comparison of long-term, short-term and total compensation of our Named Executive Officers with a selected group of peer companies. We generally compare compensation data at the 25th, 50th and 75th percentiles of the market and engage PM&P to review our analysis. While we do not think it is appropriate to establish
compensation based solely on benchmarking, we believe that this practice is useful for two reasons. First, our compensation practices must be competitive in order to attract and retain executives with the ability and experience necessary to provide leadership and to deliver strong performance to our stockholders. Second, benchmarking allows us to assess the reasonableness of our compensation practices. This process allows us to achieve one of our primary objectives of maintaining competitive compensation to ensure retention when justified and rewarding the achievement of Company objectives so as to align with stockholder interest. PM&P is an independent compensation consulting firm and does not provide any other services to us outside of matters pertaining to executive officer and director compensation. PM&P reports directly to the Compensation Committee, which is the sole party responsible for determining the scope of services performed by PM&P and the directions given to PM&P regarding the performance of such services.
In February 2014, the Compensation Committee considered the independence of PM&P in light of new SEC rules and listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange. The Compensation Committee requested and received a letter from PM&P addressing the consulting firm's independence, including the following factors: (1) other services provided to us by the consultant; (2) fees paid by us as a percentage of the consulting firm's total revenue; (3) policies or procedures maintained by the consulting firm that are designed to prevent a conflict of interest; (4) any business or personal relationships between the individual consultants involved in the engagement and a member of the Compensation Committee; (5) any company stock owned by the individual consultants involved in the engagement; and (6) any business or personal relationships between our executive officers and the consulting firm or the individual consultants involved in the engagement. The letter highlighted three additional factors that supported their independence: (1) PM&P has regular discussions with only the
2014 Proxy Statement 13
Information About Our Board of Directors and Its Committees
Compensation Committee (or select members of the Compensation Committee) present and where PM&P interacts with management, it is at the Compensation Committee Chair's request and/or with the Chair's knowledge and approval, (2) PM&P has not provided any gifts, benefits, or donations to our Company or received any gifts, benefits, or donations from our Company and (3) PM&P is bound by strict confidentiality and information sharing protocols. The Compensation Committee discussed these considerations, among other things, and concluded that the work of PM&P did not raise any conflict of interest.
All members of the Compensation Committee are independent as that term is defined in the New York Stock Exchange's listing standards. The Compensation Committee, whose members consisted of Mr. Watson (Chairman), Mr. Adams, Mr. Lataif, Ms. Raff and Mr. Strange, held five meetings during 2013.
The Report of the Compensation Committee is set forth on page 54 of this proxy statement.
Nominating/Governance Committee
Pursuant to its charter, the purposes of our Nominating/Governance Committee are to:
In connection with these purposes, the Nominating/Governance Committee actively seeks individuals qualified to become members of our Board, seeks to implement the independence
standards required by law, applicable listing standards, our Restated Certificate of Incorporation, our Amended and Restated Bylaws and our Corporate Governance Guidelines, and identifies the qualities and characteristics necessary for an effective Chief Executive Officer.
In considering candidates for our Board, the Nominating/ Governance Committee will consider the entirety of each candidate's credentials. There is currently no set of specific minimum qualifications that must be met by a nominee recommended by the Nominating/Governance Committee, as different factors may assume greater or lesser significance at particular times and the needs of our Board may vary in light of its composition and the Nominating/Governance Committee's perceptions about future issues and needs. However, while the Nominating/Governance Committee does not maintain a formal list of qualifications, in making its evaluation and recommendation of candidates, the Nominating/Governance Committee may consider, among other factors, diversity, age, skill, experience in the context of the needs of our Board, independence qualifications, moral character and whether prospective nominees have relevant business and financial experience or have industry or other specialized expertise.
The Nominating/Governance Committee may consider candidates for our Board from any
14 2014 Proxy Statement
Information About Our Board of Directors and Its Committees
reasonable source, including from a search firm engaged by the Nominating/Governance Committee or stockholder recommendations, provided that the procedures set forth below are followed. The Nominating/Governance Committee does not intend to alter the manner in which it evaluates candidates based on whether the candidate is recommended by a stockholder or not. However, in evaluating a candidate's relevant business experience, the Nominating/Governance Committee may consider previous experience as a member of our Board. Any invitation to join our Board must be extended by our Board as a whole, by the Chairman of the Nominating/Governance Committee and by the Chairman of the Board.
Stockholders or a group of stockholders may recommend potential candidates for consideration by the Nominating/Governance Committee. For additional information on such requests and the applicable timing, please see "Stockholder Proposals for 2015 Annual Meeting."
In addition to the purposes described above, our Board has entrusted the Nominating/Governance Committee with the responsibility for establishing,
implementing and monitoring the compensation for our directors. The Nominating/Governance Committee establishes, reviews and approves the compensation of our directors and makes appropriate adjustments based on Company performance, duties and responsibilities of the directors and competitive environment. The Nominating/Governance Committee's primary objectives in establishing and implementing director compensation are to:
All members of the Nominating/Governance Committee are independent as defined under the New York Stock Exchange's listing standards. The Nominating/Governance Committee, whose members consisted of Mr. Lataif (Chairman), Mr. Quinn, Ms. Raff and Mr. Watson, held four meetings during 2013.
Finance/Risk Management Committee
Pursuant to its charter, the purposes of our Finance/Risk Management Committee are to:
In connection with these purposes, the Finance/Risk Management Committee reviews periodically our financial status and capital structure and can authorize finance-related activities within limits prescribed by our Board. The Finance/Risk Management Committee reviews with management the status of current litigation matters and regularly reports to our Board on litigation and contingent liabilities. The Finance/Risk Management Committee also consults with management on matters that could have a significant financial impact on our Company and reviews our financial policies and procedures, our compliance with
2014 Proxy Statement 15
Information About Our Board of Directors and Its Committees
material debt instruments and our significant banking relationships. In addition, the Finance/Risk Management Committee reviews and assesses periodically the risk exposure of our operations and plans and strategies for insurance programs, and authorizes risk management-related activities within limits prescribed by our Board. The Finance/Risk Management Committee also provides direction for the assessment of future capital spending and acquisition opportunities and reviews capital expenditure plans, including significant acquisitions and dispositions of businesses and assets and other specific capital projects.
In 2011, at the request of the Finance/Risk Management Committee, management developed and presented to the Board a robust Enterprise Risk Management Program, concentrating primarily in four principal areas that are significant to our business: (1) safety and risk; (2) strategic planning and operational risk; (3) financial and accounting risk; and (4) governance, regulatory and legislative
risk. Risk profiles are updated annually to insure that all risks continue to be identified. Management updates the Finance/Risk Management Committee as new risks are identified, and the steps taken to mitigate such risks. On an annual basis, management reviews the testing results with the full Board and steps taken to mitigate new risks which have been identified.
All members of the Finance/Risk Management Committee, except for Mr. Hesterberg, our President and Chief Executive Officer and Mr. Pereira, our Regional Vice President, Brazil, are independent as defined under the New York Stock Exchange's listing standards. The Finance/Risk Management Committee, whose members consisted of Mr. Quinn (Chairman), Mr. Adams, Mr. Hesterberg, Mr. Pereira, Mr. Strange and Mr. Watson, held four meetings during 2013. Mr. Pereira was appointed to the Finance/Risk Management Committee in February 2013.
Our Board welcomes communications from our stockholders and other interested parties. Stockholders and any other interested parties may send communications to our Board, to any committee of our Board, to the non-executive Chairman of the Board (who presides over the executive sessions of our independent and non-management directors), or to any director in particular, to:
c/o
Group 1 Automotive, Inc.
800 Gessner, Suite 500
Houston, Texas 77024
Any correspondence addressed to our Board, to any committee of our Board, to the non-executive Chairman of the Board, or to any one of the directors in care of our offices is required to be forwarded to the addressee or addressees without review by any person to whom such correspondence is not addressed.
16 2014 Proxy Statement
Proposal 1 Election of Directors
Our Restated Certificate of Incorporation provides for a classified Board. The directors are divided into three classes, with each class serving for a period of three years. As a result, the stockholders elect approximately one-third of the members of our Board annually.
The board is currently composed of eight directors. Following the Annual Meeting, the board size will be seven members as one current director, Louis E. Lataif, has reached the Company's mandatory retirement age for non-management directors. The Nominating/Governance Committee is conducting a search for qualified board candidates and will recommend to the full board, based on the results of that search, any later changes to the board size. At the upcoming stockholders meeting, stockholders may vote for only two nominees, either in person or by proxy.
Based on the recommendation from the Nominating/Governance Committee, our Board has nominated Stephen D. Quinn and Lincoln da Cunha Pereira Filho for election as Class III directors to serve until the 2017 Annual Meeting and until their successors have been elected and qualified, or until their earlier resignation or removal. Each nominee is currently a director. Mr. Quinn was most recently elected to our Board by the stockholders in 2011. On February 28, 2013, in connection with the completion of the Company's acquisition of UAB Motors Participações S.A. ("UAB"), the Company entered into a Stockholders Agreement (the "Stockholders Agreement") with former shareholders of UAB (the "UAB Shareholders"). Pursuant to the terms of the Stockholders Agreement, the UAB Shareholders have the right to designate one director to the Board so long as certain stock ownership of the Company is maintained. Mr. Pereira is currently the UAB Shareholders' designee to the Board.
The term for our Class I directors expires in 2015 and the term for our Class II directors expires in 2016.
Stockholders may not cumulate their votes in the election of our directors. Each nominee has consented to being named as a nominee in this proxy statement and has indicated a willingness to serve if elected. However, if a nominee should become unable or unwilling to serve for any reason (which we do not anticipate), proxies may be voted for another person nominated as a substitute by our Board, or our Board may reduce its size.
Under Delaware law and our Amended and Restated Bylaws, a plurality of the votes cast is required for the election of directors. This means that the director nominee with the most votes for a particular Board position is elected for that position. You may vote "for" or "withheld" with respect to the election of directors. Only votes "for" or "withheld" are counted in determining whether a plurality has been cast in favor of a director. Abstentions are not counted for purposes of the election of directors.
Our majority voting policy requires, in an uncontested election, any nominee for director who receives a greater number of votes "withheld" from his or her election than votes "for" to promptly tender his or her resignation following certification of the election results. The Nominating/Governance Committee will promptly consider the resignation and a range of possible responses based on the circumstances that led stockholders to withhold votes, if known, and make a recommendation to the Board. The Board will act on the committee's recommendation within 90 days following certification of the results of the election.
Our Board of Directors Recommends a Vote "FOR" the Election of Each of the Class III Nominees for Director.
2014 Proxy Statement 17
Proposal 1 Election of Directors
The following table sets forth certain information, as of the date of this proxy statement, regarding our director nominees and other directors whose terms extend beyond the Annual Meeting.
|
||||||||||||
|
|
Position and Offices with Group 1 |
|
Director Since |
|
Age | &zwsp; | |||||
|
Class I Directors |
|||||||||||
|
Earl J. Hesterberg |
Director, President and Chief Executive Officer | 2005 | 60 | ||||||||
|
Beryl Raff |
Director | 2007 | 63 | ||||||||
|
Class II Directors |
|||||||||||
|
John L. Adams |
Director, Chairman of the Board | 1999 | 69 | ||||||||
|
J. Terry Strange |
Director | 2003 | 70 | ||||||||
|
Max P. Watson, Jr. |
Director | 2001 | 68 | ||||||||
|
Class III Nominees |
|||||||||||
|
Lincoln Pereira |
Director, Regional Vice President, Brazil | 2013 | 54 | ||||||||
|
Stephen D. Quinn |
Director | 2002 | 58 |
Our Board believes that each of our directors is highly qualified to serve as a member of our Board. Each of our directors has contributed to the mix of skills, core competencies and qualifications of our Board. Our directors are highly educated and have diverse backgrounds and talents and extensive track records of success in what we believe are highly relevant positions with some of the most reputable organizations in the world. Our Board has also considered the fact that all of our directors have worked for, or served on the boards of directors of, a variety of companies in a wide range of industries. Many of our directors also have served as directors of Group 1 for many years and benefit from an intimate knowledge of
our operations and corporate philosophy. Our Board believes that through their varying backgrounds, our directors bring a wealth of experiences and new ideas to our Board.
Described on the following pages are the principal occupations, positions and directorships for at least the past five years of our director nominees and other directors whose terms extend beyond the Annual Meeting, as well as certain information regarding their individual experience, qualifications, attributes and skills that led our Board to conclude that they should serve on our Board. There are no family relationships among any of our directors or executive officers.
18 2014 Proxy Statement
Proposal 1 Election of Directors
Skills and Qualifications of our Board of Directors
The following table includes the breadth and variety of business experience that each of our director nominees and other directors with terms extending beyond the Annual Meeting brings to our Board.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Name |
Automotive |
Retail & Marketing |
Board Experience |
Public Company Experience |
Executive Leadership |
Financial Expertise |
Advanced Degree |
CEO or Similar Role |
International | &zwsp; | |||||||||||
|
John L. Adams |
ü | ü | ü | ü | ü | ü | |||||||||||||||
|
Earl J. Hesterberg |
ü | ü | ü | ü | ü | ü | ü | ü | |||||||||||||
|
Lincoln Pereira |
ü | ü | ü | ü | ü | ü | ü | ü | |||||||||||||
|
Stephen D. Quinn |
ü | ü | ü | ü | ü | ü | |||||||||||||||
|
Beryl Raff |
ü | ü | ü | ü | ü | ü | |||||||||||||||
|
J. Terry Strange |
ü | ü | ü | ü | ü | ü | ü | ||||||||||||||
|
Max P. Watson, Jr. |
ü | ü | ü | ü | ü |
Nominees for Election at the Annual Meeting to Term Expiring 2017 (Class III Directors)
Lincoln Pereira | ||
Mr. Pereira has served as one of our directors since February 2013. Mr. Pereira has served as our Regional Vice President, Brazil since March 2013 and has served as chairman of our subsidiary, UAB Motors Participações S.A. (which we acquired in February 2013), since 2007. From 1999 to 2005, Mr. Pereira served as a legal representative of United Auto do Brasil Ltda, a public auto group operating in São Paulo and controlled by United Auto Group. From 1995 through 2005, Mr. Pereira practiced law with Cunha Pereira Advogados, representing professional athletes and international race car drivers. He was also co-founder and a major shareholder in Cunha Pereira Negócios Imobiliários, a local Brazilian real estate company, and in 1999, he founded Atrium Telecomunicações Ltda, a provider of local exchange telecommunication services. Atrium was sold to Telefonica of Spain in December 2004, and Mr. Pereira founded E-Vertical Tecnologia, a leading provider of high tech facilities management services to commercial properties. From 1978 through 1995, Mr. Pereira held numerous positions with various banks, both in Brazil and abroad. Mr. Pereira serves on the Board of Boa Vista Servicos S.A.-SCPC, the second largest credit bureau in Brazil, is Vice Chairman of the Board of the São Paulo Chamber of Commerce (ACSP), serves as Chairman of the Associação Brasileira dos Concessionários Nissan (ABCN), and serves as a Director of the Associação Brasileira dos Concessionários BMW and Associação Brasileira do Distribuidores Toyota. He is also a Chapter Sponsorship Officer of YPO-WPO São Paulo, a not-for-profit, global network of young chief executives connected around the shared mission of becoming Better Leaders Through Education and Idea Exchange.TM Mr. Pereira received his LL.B. from Faculdade de Direito do Largo de São Francisco. Mr. Pereira has extensive automotive retailing and manufacturer relations experience, as well as legal, finance, business and management expertise. He also has a deep understanding of the Brazilian finance, trade and legal sectors. As chairman of UAB, Mr. Pereira has dealt with many of the major issues that we deal with today. Mr. Pereira's experience and expertise in these matters make him well qualified to serve as a member of the Board. |
2014 Proxy Statement 19
Proposal 1 Election of Directors
Stephen D. Quinn | ||
Mr. Quinn has served as one of our directors since May 2002. Mr. Quinn joined Goldman, Sachs & Co., a full-service global investment banking and securities firm, in August 1981 where he specialized in corporate finance. From 1990 until his retirement in 2001, Mr. Quinn served as a General Partner and Managing Director of Goldman, Sachs & Co., a multi-bank holding company that operates approximately 500 banking offices in 10 states. Mr. Quinn also serves on the Board of Directors, the Audit Committee and the Risk Oversight Committee of Zions Bancorporation. Mr. Quinn holds degrees from Brigham Young University and Harvard University Graduate School of Business. Mr. Quinn was selected to serve as a director on our Board due to his valuable financial expertise and extensive experience with capital markets transactions. His judgment in assessing business strategies and the accompanying risks, is an invaluable resource for our business model. Mr. Quinn also has significant historical knowledge of our Company as a result of his role at Goldman Sachs, an underwriter for our initial public offering. The Board believes his experience and expertise in these matters make him well qualified to serve as a member of the Board. |
Directors Whose Terms Extend Beyond the Annual Meeting
Class I Directors
Earl J. Hesterberg | ||
Mr. Hesterberg has served as our President and Chief Executive Officer and as a director since April 2005. Prior to joining us, Mr. Hesterberg had served as Group Vice President, North America Marketing, Sales and Service for Ford Motor Company, a global manufacturer and distributor of cars, trucks and automotive parts, since October 2004. From July 1999 to September 2004, he served as Vice President, Marketing, Sales and Service for Ford of Europe, and from 1999 until 2005, he served on the supervisory board of Ford Werke AG. Mr. Hesterberg has also served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Gulf States Toyota, an independent regional distributor of new Toyota vehicles, parts and accessories. He has also held various senior sales, marketing, general management, and parts and service positions with Nissan Motor Corporation in U.S.A. and Nissan Europe, both of which are wholly-owned by Nissan Motor Co., Ltd., a global provider of automotive products and services. Mr. Hesterberg serves on the Board of Directors of Stage Stores, Inc., a national retail clothing chain with over 800 stores located in 39 states where he is a member of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee and Chairman of the Compensation Committee. Mr. Hesterberg also serves on the Board of Trustees of Davidson College. Mr. Hesterberg received his BA in Psychology at Davidson College in 1975 and his MBA from Xavier University in 1978. As our President and Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Hesterberg sets the strategic direction of our Company under the guidance of our Board. He has extensive senior executive management experience in the automotive industry. His successful leadership of our Company and extensive knowledge of the automotive industry provides our Board with a unique perspective on the opportunities and challenges we face. His knowledge and handling of the day-to-day issues affecting our business provide our Board with invaluable information necessary to direct the business and affairs of Group 1. |
20 2014 Proxy Statement
Proposal 1 Election of Directors
Beryl Raff | ||
Ms. Raff has served as one of our directors since June 2007. Since April 2009, she has served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Helzberg Diamond Shops, Inc., a retail and online jewelry retailer, and a wholly owned subsidiary of Berkshire Hathaway Inc. Ms. Raff served as Executive Vice President-General Merchandising Manager from 2005 through 2009, and as Senior Vice President from 2001 through 2005, for the fine jewelry division of J.C. Penney Company, Inc., a holding company for J.C. Penney Corporation, Inc., a retailer of apparel and home furnishings. Ms. Raff serves on the Advisory Board of Jewelers Circular Keystone, a trade publication and industry authority, and on the Executive Board of Jewelers Vigilance Committee, a non-profit organization focused on legal and regulatory issues facing the jewelry industry. Ms. Raff is also a Director of the NACD Heartland Chapter, a non-profit organization dedicated to excellence in board leadership. From 2001 through February 2011, Ms. Raff served on the Board of Directors, the Corporate Governance Committee and the Compensation Committee (which she chaired from 2008 to 2011) of Jo-Ann Stores, Inc., a national specialty retailer of craft, sewing and decorating products. Ms. Raff received her BS in Business Administration from Boston University and her MBA from Drexel University. Ms. Raff was selected to serve as a director on our Board due to her extensive knowledge of the retail industry and her business and management expertise from her position as an executive officer and director of several companies. She has experience with profit and loss management responsibility, sales and marketing, strategic planning and compensation and risk management, all of which provide extensive perspectives to offer as a director of Group 1. Her previous service on other boards provides us with important perspectives on key corporate governance matters. Ms. Raff has also demonstrated commitment to civic works and to corporate social responsibility. The Board believes her experience and expertise in these matters make her well qualified to serve as a member of the Board. |
2014 Proxy Statement 21
Proposal 1 Election of Directors
Class II Directors
John L. Adams | ||
Mr. Adams has served as non-executive Chairman of the Board since April 2005 and as one of our directors since November 1999. Mr. Adams served as Executive Vice President of Trinity Industries, Inc., one of North America's largest manufacturers of transportation, construction and industrial products, from January 1999 through June 2005. He served as Vice Chairman of Trinity Industries from July 2005 through March 2007. Before joining Trinity Industries, Mr. Adams spent 25 years in various positions with Texas Commerce Bank N.A. and its successor, Chase Bank of Texas, National Association. From 1997 to 1998, Mr. Adams was Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Chase Bank of Texas. Mr. Adams serves on the Board of Directors, the Corporate Governance and Directors Nominating Committee and is Chairman of the Finance and Risk Management Committee of Trinity Industries, Inc. and on the Board of Directors and Audit Committee of Dr Pepper Snapple Group, Inc., a refreshment beverage business. Mr. Adams also serves on the Board of Directors of the Children's Medical Center of Dallas, the University of Texas Chancellor's Council, and the McCombs School of Business Advisory Board and President's Development Board. Mr. Adams received his BBA and JD from the University of Texas. Mr. Adams' extensive financial and executive management experience provides him with the necessary skills to be Chairman of our Board. As a result of his experience, he has dealt with many of the major issues we deal with today, such as financial, strategic planning, compensation, management development, acquisitions, capital allocation, government and stockholder relations. Mr. Adams' public company board service has also given him exposure to different industries and approaches to governance and other key issues. Through his years of service, he has developed in-depth knowledge of the retail automotive industry generally and our Company in particular. The Board believes his experience and expertise in these matters make him well qualified to serve as a member of the Board. |
22 2014 Proxy Statement
Proposal 1 Election of Directors
J. Terry Strange | ||
Mr. Strange has served as one of our directors since October 2003. In 2002, Mr. Strange retired from KPMG, LLP, an independent accounting firm, where he served from 1996 to 2002 as Vice Chairman, Managing Partner of U.S. Audit Practice and head of KPMG's internal risk management program. Mr. Strange served as Global Managing Partner of Audit Business and a member of KPMG's International Executive Committee from 1998 to 2002. During his 34-year career at KPMG, his work included interaction with the Financial Accounting Standards Board and the SEC, testifying before both bodies on issues impacting the auditing profession and SEC registrants. Mr. Strange serves on the Boards of Directors and the Audit Committees of New Jersey Resources Corporation, a retail and wholesale energy service provider, and on the Board of Directors, Audit Committee and as Chairman of the Nominating and Governance Committee of Newfield Exploration Company, an oil and gas exploration and production company. In addition, Mr. Strange serves on the Board of Directors, Risk Committee and as Chairman of the Audit and Compliance Committee of BBVA Compass. Mr. Strange also serves in a volunteer role on the Finance Committee of the National Cutting Horse Association, an equestrian organization that promotes and stages cutting horse events. Mr. Strange received his BA and MBA in Accounting from the University of North Texas. Mr. Strange has a valuable financial background based on his education and work experiences. He was selected to serve as a director on our Board due to his extensive background in public accounting, auditing, and risk management. He possesses particular knowledge and experience in a variety of financial and accounting areas, including specific experience in auditing and internal risk management. His previous and current board positions on other publicly-traded companies have provided extensive years of audit committee experience, including as chair. His extensive knowledge and experience with accounting practices, policies and rulemaking from his 34-year career at KPMG LLP, is especially important in his role as Chairman of the Audit Committee and as our "audit committee financial expert." The Board believes his experience and expertise in these matters make him well qualified to serve as a member of the Board. |
||
Max P. Watson, Jr. |
||
Mr. Watson has served as one of our directors since May 2001. Mr. Watson served as President and Chief Executive Officer of BMC Software, Inc., a provider of enterprise management solutions, from April 1990 to January 2001. He served as Chairman of the Board of Directors of BMC from January 1992 until his retirement in April 2001. Mr. Watson serves on the Board of Trustees of Texas Children's Hospital and as Chairman of the Quality and Safety Committee. From January 2007 through December 2008, Mr. Watson served as Chairman of the Board of Trustees of Texas Children's Hospital. He also serves on the Board of Directors of Scenic Houston, an organization dedicated to preserving and enhancing the visual character of Houston. Mr. Watson received his degree from Louisiana Tech University. Mr. Watson was selected to serve on our Board due to his extensive business and management expertise from his position with a large global publicly-traded company. As a former chairman, president and chief executive officer, Mr. Watson has experience running a large publicly-traded company, which dealt with many of the major issues that we deal with today, including financial, strategic planning, technology, compensation, management development, acquisitions, capital allocation, government and stockholder relations. The Board believes his experience and expertise in these matters make him well qualified to serve as a member of the Board. |
2014 Proxy Statement 23
Proposal 2 Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation
Pursuant to Section 14A of the Exchange Act, our stockholders are entitled to cast a vote at the Annual Meeting to approve, on a non-binding advisory basis, the compensation of our Named Executive Officers, as disclosed in this proxy statement. As an advisory vote, Proposal 2 is not binding on our Board or its Compensation Committee, will not overrule any previous decisions made by our Board or its Compensation Committee, or require our Board or its Compensation Committee to take any future or remedial action. Although the vote is non-binding, the Compensation Committee will take into account the outcome of the vote when considering future executive compensation decisions.
Our Board recognizes that executive compensation is an important matter for our stockholders. As described in detail in the "Compensation Discussion and Analysis" ("CD&A") section of this proxy statement, the Compensation Committee is tasked with the implementation of our executive compensation philosophy. The core of that philosophy has been and continues to be to pay our executive officers compensation that is competitive with amounts paid by our peer companies based on individual and Company performance. In particular, the Compensation Committee strives to attract, retain and motivate talented executives, to reward past performance measured against established goals and provide incentives for future performance, and to align executives' long-term interests with the interests of our stockholders. To do so, the Compensation Committee uses a combination of short- and long-term incentive compensation to reward near-term performance and to encourage our executives' commitment to our long-range, strategic business goals. It is always the intention of the Compensation Committee that our executive officers be compensated competitively and in a manner that is consistent with our strategy, sound corporate governance principles, and stockholder interests and concerns. Our Board believes that our compensation policies and practices are effective in achieving our Company's goals of rewarding sustained financial and operating performance, leadership excellence and aligning the executives' long-term interests with those of our stockholders.
We believe that it is appropriate to seek the views of stockholders on the design and effectiveness of our executive compensation program, and we value your opinion. Based on the stockholder vote on the frequency of an advisory vote on executive compensation that took place at our 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, our Board determined to hold the vote on executive compensation annually until the next stockholder vote on the frequency of such advisory vote, which will be no later than the Company's 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. Thus, the stockholder advisory vote to approve executive compensation currently takes place annually, and the next such vote will take place at our 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
As described in the CD&A, we believe our compensation program is effective, appropriate and strongly aligned with the long-term interests of our stockholders and that the total compensation package provided to our Named Executive Officers (including potential payouts upon a termination or change of control) is consistent with market practice. We also believe our executive compensation is reasonable and not excessive. As you consider this Proposal 2, we urge you to read the CD&A section of this proxy statement for additional details on executive compensation, including the more detailed information about our compensation philosophy and objectives and the past compensation of our Named Executive Officers, and to review the tabular disclosures regarding our Named Executive Officers' compensation together with the accompanying narrative disclosures in the "Executive Compensation" section of this proxy statement.
In light of these reasons, we are recommending that our stockholders vote "FOR" the following resolution:
"RESOLVED, that the compensation paid to our Company's Named Executive Officers, as disclosed pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, compensation tables and narrative discussion, is hereby Approved."
Our Board of Directors Recommends a Vote "FOR" the Approval, on an Advisory Basis, of Our Executive Compensation.
24 2014 Proxy Statement
Proposal 3 Approval of the Group 1 Automotive, Inc. 2014 Long Term Incentive Plan
General
On March 25, 2014, our Board of Directors, upon the recommendation of its Compensation Committee, unanimously approved and adopted the Group 1 Automotive, Inc. 2014 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the "Plan"), subject to approval of our stockholders at our annual meeting. The Plan will become effective as of the date of approval by our stockholders and will replace the Group 1 Automotive, Inc. 2007 Long Term Incentive Plan (as amended and restated effective as of March 11, 2010) (the "Prior Plan"). We use stock awards as part of our compensation program to attract and retain employees and directors and to motivate these persons to achieve objectives related to our overall goal of increasing stockholder value. If stockholders approve the Plan, all future stock and stock-based awards to our employees and directors will be made from the Plan, and we will not grant any additional awards under the Prior Plan.
The reasons we believe stockholders should approve the Plan and a summary description of the Plan are set forth below. The summary is qualified in its entirety by the full text of the Plan, which is attached to this proxy statement as Appendix A.
Why We Believe You Should Vote to Approve the Plan
Maintain our Ability to Grant Stock-Based Compensation
We believe our future success depends on our ability to attract, motivate and retain high-quality employees and directors and that the ability to provide stock and stock-based awards is critical to achieving this success. We have grown
significantly since we expanded into the United Kingdom in 2009 and the additional shares will help us incentivize employees within our larger organization. We would be at a severe competitive disadvantage if we could not use stock-based awards to recruit and compensate employees.
We believe that equity compensation motivates employees to create stockholder value because the value employees realize from equity compensation is based on our stock performance. Equity compensation also aligns the goals and objectives of our employees with the interests of our stockholders and promotes a focus on long-term value creation because our equity compensation awards are subject to vesting criteria.
If approved, the Plan's share reserve will increase the number of shares that we may currently issue pursuant to equity awards by an additional 1,200,000 shares. The remaining shares reserved for issuance under the Plan will equal (i) the number of shares that remain available for issuance of future award grants under the Prior Plan as of the effective date of the Plan, plus (ii) the number of shares subject to awards granted under the Prior Plan that are outstanding as of the effective date of the Plan to the extent any such award lapses or terminates without all shares subject to that award being issued to the holder of such award or without such holder receiving a cash settlement of such award. The number and kind of shares available under the Plan are subject to adjustment for stock dividends and stock splits and in certain other situations as further described in the Plan. If the Plan is approved, no further award grants will be made under the Prior Plan.
2014 Proxy Statement 25
Proposal 3 Approval of the Group 1 Automotive, Inc. 2014 Long Term Incentive
Plan
The following table includes aggregated information regarding awards outstanding under the Prior Plan as of February 28, 2014, the number of shares available for future awards under the Prior Plan as of that date and the proposed number of additional shares that would be issuable under the Plan.
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
Number of Shares |
|
As a Percentage of Shares Outstanding(1) |
&zwsp; | ||||
|
Outstanding full-value awards (restricted stock awards and phantom stock awards)(2) |
1,099,332 | 4.5% | |||||||
|
Total shares of our common stock available for future award grants under the Prior Plan |
590,034 | 2.4% | (3) | ||||||
|
Proposed additional shares of our common stock available for future issuance under the Plan |
1,200,000 | 4.9% | (4) |
In 2011, 2012 and 2013, we granted awards under the Prior Plan covering 351,236 shares, 336,524 shares and 324,886 shares, respectively, of our common stock. Based upon the methodology used by Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS), which assigns a greater weight to full-value awards than to stock option awards, the compensation consultant to our Compensation Committee determined that our "burn rate" for each of 2011, 2012 and 2013 (which represents the rate at which our equity award grants under the Prior Plan diluted our stockholders) was 3.96%, 3.89% and 3.08%, respectively, for an average three-year burn rate of 3.65%. Our ISS three-year average burn rate is higher than the three-year average burn rate for other companies within the Company's Global
Industry Classification Standard (GICS) (which companies had an average three-year burn rate of 2.41% based on the ISS methodology) but is lower than the ISS burn rate limit of 4.16% for companies in the Company's GICS.
In determining the number of shares to request for approval under the Plan, our Compensation Committee worked with our management team and its compensation consultant to evaluate a number of factors, including our share usage under the Prior Plan, the dilution of our stockholders that will occur if the Plan is adopted and criteria expected to be used by institutional proxy advisory firms in evaluating our proposal for the Plan.
26 2014 Proxy Statement
Proposal 3 Approval of the Group 1 Automotive, Inc. 2014 Long Term Incentive
Plan
Based on our historic grant rates, we anticipate that the 590,034 shares that remained available for issuance as of February 28, 2014 for future award grants under the Prior Plan would last for up to two years. We anticipate that the additional 1,200,000 shares requested in connection with approval of the Plan will last for up to an additional four years based on historic grant rates and that our total share reserve under the Plan would last for up to six years; however, these shares could last for a shorter period of time if actual grant rates exceed historic grant rates. As noted in "Summary of the Plan" below, our Compensation Committee would retain full discretion under the Plan to determine the number and amount of awards to be granted under the Plan, subject to the terms of the Plan, and future benefits or amounts that may be received by participants under the Plan are not determinable at this time. Since our last request for additional shares at our 2010 annual meeting, our Company has grown significantly and our annual revenues have increased by 97%. Future growth in the number of our dealerships and employees could impact the rate at which our Compensation Committee grants awards under the Plan.
We believe that we have demonstrated our commitment to sound equity compensation practices. We recognize that equity compensation awards dilute stockholder equity and, therefore, we have carefully managed our equity incentive compensation. Our equity compensation practices are targeted to be competitive and consistent with market practices, and we believe our historical share usage has been responsible and mindful of stockholder interests.
In evaluating this Proposal 3, stockholders should consider the factors set forth under "Plan Highlights" and the "Summary of the Plan" below.
Approval of Material Terms for Code Section 162(m) Purposes
The Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"), limits to $1 million per year the deduction allowed for federal income tax purposes for compensation paid to the Chief Executive Officer and certain other highly compensated
executive officers of public companies (the "Deduction Limit"). However, there are exceptions to the Deduction Limit, including an exception for compensation paid under a stockholder-approved plan that meets certain requirements for "qualified performance-based compensation." Generally, compensation attributable to stock options and stock appreciation rights is deemed to satisfy the "qualified performance-based compensation" requirement if:
The Plan has been designed to permit the Compensation Committee, in its discretion, to grant qualifying exempt "performance-based" compensation under the Plan, and our stockholders are being asked to approve the material terms of the Plan to permit the Compensation Committee to grant such awards. For the Plan, these material terms are described in "Summary of the Plan" below in the subsections entitled "Eligibility," "Shares Subject to the Plan" (which sets forth individual award limits) and "Performance Awards."
We believe that awards intended and structured as such by the Compensation Committee will meet the requirements for "performance-based" compensation under Section 162(m), and that the amount of ordinary income to the participant with respect to such awards generally will be allowed as a deduction to us for federal income tax purposes. Although the Plan is designed to permit the Compensation Committee to limit the impact of Section 162(m), the Compensation Committee also believes that the tax deduction is only one of several relevant considerations in setting
2014 Proxy Statement 27
Proposal 3 Approval of the Group 1 Automotive, Inc. 2014 Long Term Incentive
Plan
compensation. The Compensation Committee believes that the tax deduction limitation should not be permitted to compromise the Company's ability to design and maintain executive compensation arrangements that will attract and retain the executive talent to compete successfully. Accordingly, achieving the desired flexibility in the design and delivery of awards under the Plan may result in compensation that is not deductible for federal income tax purposes.
Plan Highlights
The Plan authorizes our Compensation Committee to grant equity-based compensation awards in the form of stock options, restricted stock awards, performance awards, phantom stock awards and bonus awards for the purpose of incentivizing employees, directors and consultants who provide services to the Company and its affiliates. Some of the key features of the Plan that reflect our commitment to effective management of incentive compensation are set forth below and are described more fully under the heading "Summary of the Plan" and in the Plan itself, a copy of which is attached as Appendix A to this proxy statement.
Plan Limits. The maximum number of shares that may be issued under the Plan is limited to:
The number and kind of shares available under the Plan are subject to adjustment for stock dividends and stock splits and in certain other situations as further described in the Plan.
Independent Committee. The Plan will be administered by our Compensation Committee, which is composed entirely of independent
directors who qualify as "outside directors" within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Code and "Non-Employee Directors" within the meaning of SEC Rule 16b-3 promulgated under the Exchange Act.
No Discounted Stock Options or Stock Appreciation Rights. The Plan requires that the purchase price for stock options or stock appreciation rights be at least 100% of the per share fair market value on the date of grant (outside of options assumed in certain corporate transactions described in the Plan).
No Liberal Share Counting. The Plan does not permit us to use "liberal share counting" methods, such as adding back to the shares of common stock available for issuance under the Plan shares that were used to pay the exercise price of stock options or to cover withholding obligations.
No Repricing. We have never repriced any underwater stock options or stock appreciation rights, and the Plan prohibits any repricing of stock options or stock appreciation rights (outside of certain corporate transactions or adjustment events described in the Plan) or cancellation of underwater stock options or stock appreciation rights for consideration, in each case without approval by our stockholders.
Dividends and Dividend Equivalents. The Plan provides that restricted stock awards granted under the Plan may receive dividends and other full-value awards may receive dividend equivalents; however, stock options and stock appreciation rights granted under the Plan may not provide for dividends or dividend equivalents. The Plan further provides that any dividends or dividend equivalents that become payable with respect to an award that remains subject to performance-vesting conditions will be subject to the same performance-vesting conditions that apply to the underlying award.
Summary of the Plan
The following section summarizes the material terms of the Plan. The summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to the Plan, which is attached as Appendix A to this proxy statement.
28 2014 Proxy Statement
Proposal 3 Approval of the Group 1 Automotive, Inc. 2014 Long Term Incentive
Plan
Purpose. The Plan is designed to align our employees' and directors' long-term interests with those of our stockholders by allowing these individuals the potential to develop and maintain a significant equity ownership position in the Company.
Awards. The Plan provides for the grant of any or all of the following types of awards:
Any stock option granted in the form of an incentive stock option must satisfy the applicable requirements of Section 422 of the Code. Awards may be made to the same person on more than one occasion and may be granted singly, in combination or in tandem as determined by the Compensation Committee.
Term. The Plan will become effective as of the date of approval by our stockholders. No awards will be made after the calendar day that immediately precedes the tenth anniversary of the effective date of the Plan, but previously granted awards may continue beyond that date in accordance with their terms.
Administration. The Plan is administered by the Compensation Committee. Subject to the terms of the Plan, the Compensation Committee has sole authority and discretion to:
Eligibility. Under the Plan, the Compensation Committee may only grant awards to persons who, at the time of grant, are our employees, employees of our affiliates, consultants who provide services to us or our affiliates and non-employee members of our Board of Directors. In light of the Compensation Committee's discretion, the actual number of individuals who will receive an award under the Plan cannot be determined in advance. During our 2013 fiscal year, approximately 170 employees, no consultants and 6 non-employee directors participated in the Prior Plan.
Shares Subject to the Plan. The maximum number of shares of our common stock that may be issued pursuant to the Plan is equal to (i) 1,200,000 shares, plus (ii) the number of shares that remain available for issuance for future award grants under the Prior Plan as of the effective date of the Plan, plus (iii) the number of shares subject to awards that are outstanding as of the effective date of the Plan to the extent any such award lapses or terminates without all shares subject to that award being issued to the holder of such award or without such holder receiving a cash settlement of such award. To the extent an award granted under the Plan lapses or otherwise terminates without the delivery of shares of our common stock (or if any shares of common stock issued or delivered pursuant to an award granted under the Plan are forfeited by the holder of such award), then the shares of our common stock covered by such award (or portion thereof that lapses, terminates or is forfeited) will again be available for awards granted under the Plan. Common stock tendered or otherwise used in payment of the exercise price of an option, withheld to satisfy a tax withholding obligation or
2014 Proxy Statement 29
Proposal 3 Approval of the Group 1 Automotive, Inc. 2014 Long Term Incentive
Plan
repurchased by us with proceeds from the exercise of an option will not be added to the maximum share limit under the Plan.
Subject to stockholder approval, the maximum number of shares of our common stock that may be subject to incentive stock options is 1,200,000 shares. The following limitations apply with respect to awards granted under the Plan (including any award that is intended to qualify as "performance-based" compensation within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Code):
The number and kind of shares available under the Plan and the individual share limits under the Plan are subject to adjustment for stock dividends and stock splits and in certain other situations as further described in the Plan. Any shares of our common stock delivered pursuant to an award may consist, in whole or in part, of authorized and unissued shares or previously issued shares of our common stock reacquired by us. Awards granted under the Plan (other than incentive stock options, which are subject to special rules described below) may not be transferred other than (i) by will or the laws of descent and distribution, (ii) pursuant to a qualified domestic relations order or (iii) with the consent of the Compensation Committee. However, the Compensation Committee may not approve the transfer of any award granted under the Plan if the holder of the award is to receive any consideration in connection with the transfer.
Stock Options. The Plan provides for two types of options: incentive stock options and non-statutory stock options. The Compensation Committee is authorized to grant options to eligible participants
(which in the case of incentive stock options are only individuals who are employed by us or one of our subsidiaries at the time of grant) subject to the terms and conditions set forth below:
The purchase price per share of our common stock will be determined by the Compensation Committee. However, the purchase price per share of our common stock will not be less than the fair market value of a share of our common stock on the date of the grant of such option regardless of whether such option is an incentive stock option or a non-statutory stock option. Further, the purchase price of any incentive stock option granted to an employee who possesses more than 10% of the total combined voting power of all classes of our stock or of any of our subsidiaries within the meaning of Section 422(b)(6) of the Code must be at least 110% of the fair market value of a share of our common stock at the time such option is granted. The purchase price or portion thereof shall be paid in full in the manner prescribed by the Compensation Committee.
The Compensation Committee determines the term of each option; provided, however, that no option may have a term that exceeds 10 years and any incentive stock option granted to an employee who possesses more than 10% of the total combined voting power of all classes of our stock or of any of our subsidiaries within the meaning of Section 422(b)(6) of the Code must not be exercisable after the expiration of five years from the date of grant. The Compensation Committee also determines the time at which an option may be exercised in whole or in part, and the method by which payment of the exercise price with respect thereto may be made or deemed to have been made. Permitted forms of payment include cash, shares of our common stock, the withholding of shares that would otherwise be issued upon the exercise of the option, a combination of the foregoing or, to the extent permitted by law, by other methods as may be approved by the Compensation Committee, including "cashless exercise" procedures that permit a concurrent sale of option shares by the participant with proceeds
30 2014 Proxy Statement
Proposal 3 Approval of the Group 1 Automotive, Inc. 2014 Long Term Incentive
Plan
sufficient to pay the exercise price and related taxes remitted to the Company.
Option awards may include the right to surrender the optioned shares in exchange for a payment in the amount of the fair market value of the shares for which the option is surrendered over the exercise price for such shares (a "stock appreciation right"). Stock appreciation rights granted in connection with incentive stock options are exercisable only when the fair market value of the common stock exceeds the exercise price therefore specified under the option. The term of each stock appreciation right may not exceed 10 years from the date of grant.
Restricted Stock Awards. The Compensation Committee is authorized to grant restricted stock awards to eligible individuals. Pursuant to a restricted stock award, shares of our common stock will be issued or delivered to the holder without any cash payment to us, except to the extent otherwise provided by the Compensation Committee or required by law; provided, however, that the shares will be subject to certain restrictions on the disposition thereof and certain obligations to forfeit the shares to us as may be determined in the discretion of the Compensation Committee. The forfeiture restrictions on a restricted stock award may lapse based upon achievement of performance criteria (including criteria intended to qualify as "performance based" compensation within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Code), continued service with the Company or its affiliates, the occurrence of an event or satisfaction of any other condition or any combination of the foregoing.
We retain custody of the shares of our common stock issued pursuant to a restricted stock award until the disposition and forfeiture restrictions lapse. The holder may not sell, transfer, pledge, exchange, hypothecate, or otherwise dispose of the shares until the expiration of the restriction period. However, upon the issuance to the holder of shares of our common stock pursuant to a restricted stock award, except for the foregoing restrictions, the holder will have all the rights of one of our stockholders with respect to the shares,
including the right to vote the shares and to receive all dividends and other distributions paid with respect to the shares, provided that any dividends that are payable with respect to a performance-vested restricted stock award will be deferred and paid contingent upon satisfaction of the vesting criteria applicable to the underlying award.
Performance Awards. The Compensation Committee may, in its sole discretion, grant performance awards under the Plan that may be paid in cash, shares of common stock, or a combination thereof as determined by the Compensation Committee. Performance awards may include awards that are intended to qualify as "performance based" compensation within the meaning of Section 162(m) and awards that are not intended to so qualify. The performance criteria upon which the payment or vesting of a performance award intended to qualify for exemption under Section 162(m) must be based on one or more, or a combination, of the following metrics (which (i) may be absolute, relative to one or more other companies, relative to one or more indexes and may be contingent upon our future performance or the performance of any of our affiliates, divisions or departments and (ii) may include relative or growth achievement regarding such metrics):
2014 Proxy Statement 31
Proposal 3 Approval of the Group 1 Automotive, Inc. 2014 Long Term Incentive
Plan
With respect to awards intended to qualify for exemption under Section 162(m), each such performance metric will define in an objective manner the extent to which the performance criteria for a performance period has been achieved and, unless otherwise determined by the Compensation Committee at the time of grant, the applicable performance metrics will exclude the effects of certain designated items identified at the time of grant. In the case of performance awards that are not intended to qualify for exemption under Section 162(m), the Compensation Committee will designate the performance criteria as it will determine it its sole discretion.
The Compensation Committee may also provide at grant for the payment of dividend equivalents with respect to performance awards, provided that payment of dividend equivalents shall in all cases be deferred and contingent upon vesting of the underlying performance award.
Phantom Stock Awards. The Compensation Committee is authorized to grant phantom stock awards under the Plan, which may include grants of stock appreciation rights. These are awards of rights to receive shares of our common stock (or the fair market value thereof), or rights to receive amounts equal to share appreciation over a specific period of time. These awards vest over a period of time established by the Compensation Committee, without satisfaction of any performance criteria or objectives. The Compensation Committee may, in its discretion, require payment or other conditions of the recipient of a phantom
stock award. A phantom stock award may include a stock appreciation right that is granted independently of a stock option. Payment of a phantom stock award may be made in cash, shares of our common stock, or a combination thereof. The Compensation Committee may also provide at grant for the payment of dividend equivalents with respect to phantom stock awards.
Bonus Stock Awards. The Compensation Committee is authorized to grant bonus stock awards under the Plan. Bonus stock awards are unrestricted shares of our common stock that are subject to such terms and conditions as the Compensation Committee may determine and they need not be subject to performance criteria or objectives or forfeiture. The Compensation Committee determines the purchase price, if any, for awards of bonus stock.
Adjustments. The number and kind of shares covered by outstanding awards under the Plan and, if applicable, the prices per share applicable thereto, are subject to adjustment in the event of merger, consolidation, liquidation, reorganization, recapitalization, reclassification, stock dividend, spin-off, split-up, stock split, reverse stock split or other distribution with respect to the shares of common stock, or any similar corporate transaction or event. The permitted adjustments are only those the Compensation Committee determines are appropriate to reflect the occurrence of the transaction or event, including but not limited to adjustments in the number and kind of securities reserved for issuance; in the award limits on individual awards; in the performance goals of any outstanding awards; and to the number and kind of securities subject to outstanding awards; and, if applicable, to the grant amounts, exercise prices or of the awards. Any such adjustments will be made in a manner consistent with the requirements of Section 409A of the Code and, (i) in the case of incentive stock options, any such adjustments will be made in a manner consistent with the requirements of Section 424(a) of the Code and (ii) in the case of performance-vested awards intended to qualify for
32 2014 Proxy Statement
Proposal 3 Approval of the Group 1 Automotive, Inc. 2014 Long Term Incentive
Plan
exemption under 162(m), in a manner consistent with such provision.
Corporate Change. Individual award agreements will set forth the treatment of awards granted under the Plan in the event of a corporate change. The Plan provides that, unless defined otherwise in an applicable award agreement, a corporate change occurs if:
Accelerated Vesting. Subject to 162(m) and Section 409A as applicable, the terms of awards granted under the Plan may include accelerated vesting or lapse of forfeiture restrictions, as applicable, including (1) by virtue of the retirement, death or disability of a participant or (2) in the event of a corporate change where either (A) within a specified period of time a participant is involuntarily terminated for reasons other than for cause or terminates his or her employment for good reason or (B) such awards are not assumed or converted into replacement awards in a corporate change in a manner described in the applicable award agreement. Subject to Sections 409A and 162(m) of the Code, the Compensation Committee may also provide for accelerated vesting, lapse of forfeiture restrictions, and waiver of any performance, service, or other limitation with respect to any outstanding award granted under the Plan, including upon a termination of employment by reason of death, disability, retirement, or upon a corporate change.
Tax Withholding. A participant will be responsible for payment of any taxes required by law to be
withheld from an award or an amount paid in satisfaction of an award, which will be paid by the participant on or prior to the payment or other event that results in taxable income in respect of an award. The award agreement will specify the manner in which the withholding obligation shall be satisfied with respect to the particular type of award; provided, that, if shares of common stock are withheld from delivery upon exercise of an option or a stock appreciation right, the fair market value of the shares withheld will not exceed the minimum amount of tax for which withholding is required.
Amendment. Our Board of Directors in its discretion may terminate the Plan at any time with respect to any shares for which an award has not theretofore been made. Our Board of Directors has the right to alter or amend the Plan or any part thereof from time to time, and the Compensation Committee has the right to prospectively or retroactively amend the terms of any award; provided that no change in any award theretofore made may be made which would impair the rights of the recipient of the award without the consent of such recipient and provided, further, that our Board of Directors may not, without approval of our stockholders, amend the Plan to increase the maximum aggregate number of shares of our common stock that may be issued under the Plan or the benefits otherwise accrued to participants under the Plan, increase the maximum number of shares of common stock that may be issued under the Plan through incentive stock options or change the class of individuals eligible to receive awards under the Plan or amend outstanding stock options or stock appreciation rights to lower the applicable purchase price or substitute cash or other awards for any such underwater stock option or stock appreciation right. Further, to the extent stockholder approval of an amendment to the Plan is necessary to satisfy the requirements of Rule 16b-3 or any securities exchange listing requirements of the New York Stock Exchange or other securities exchange on which the common stock is then listed, no amendment will be effective unless and until so approved by our stockholders.
2014 Proxy Statement 33
Proposal 3 Approval of the Group 1 Automotive, Inc. 2014 Long Term Incentive Plan
Non-U.S. Participants. To facilitate grants under the Plan to participants who are foreign nationals or who provide services outside of the United States, the Compensation Committee may provide for special terms for awards to such participants as the Compensation Committee may consider necessary or appropriate to accommodate differences in local law, tax policy or custom. The Compensation Committee may also approve supplements to the Plan (including sub-plans) to govern such awards.
United States Federal Income Tax Aspects of the Plan
The following is a brief summary of some of the federal income tax consequences of certain transactions under the Plan based on federal income tax laws in effect on January 1, 2014. This summary, which is presented for the information of stockholders considering how to vote on this proposal and not for Plan participants, is not intended to be complete and does not describe federal taxes other than income taxes (such as Medicare and Social Security taxes), state, local or foreign tax consequences.
Non-Statutory Stock Options and Stock Appreciation Rights. As a general rule, no federal income tax is imposed on the optionee upon the grant of a non-statutory stock option such as those under the Plan (whether or not including a stock appreciation right). Generally, upon the exercise of a non-statutory stock option, the optionee will be treated as receiving compensation taxable as ordinary income in the year of exercise in an amount equal to the excess of the fair market value of the shares on the date of exercise over the option price paid for the shares. In the case of the exercise of a stock appreciation right, the optionee will be treated as receiving compensation taxable as ordinary income in the year of exercise in an amount equal to the cash received plus the fair market value of the shares distributed to the optionee. Upon a subsequent disposition of the shares received upon exercise of a non-statutory stock option, any appreciation after the date of exercise should qualify as capital gain.
Incentive Stock Options. The incentive stock options under the Plan are intended to constitute "incentive stock options" within the meaning of Section 422 of the Code. Incentive stock options are subject to special federal income tax treatment. No federal income tax is imposed on the optionee upon the grant or the exercise of an incentive stock option if the optionee does not dispose of shares acquired pursuant to the exercise within the two-year period beginning on the date the option was granted or within the one-year period beginning on the date the option was exercised (collectively, the "holding period"). With respect to an incentive stock option, the difference between the fair market value of the stock on the date of exercise and the exercise price must be included in the optionee's alternative minimum taxable income.
Upon disposition of the shares received upon exercise of an incentive stock option after the holding period, any appreciation of the shares above the exercise price should constitute capital gain. If an optionee disposes of shares acquired pursuant to his or her exercise of an incentive stock option prior to the end of the holding period, the optionee will be treated as having received, at the time of disposition, compensation taxable as ordinary income. The amount treated as compensation is the excess of the fair market value of the shares at the time of exercise (or in the case of a sale in which a loss would be recognized, the amount realized on the sale if less) over the exercise price. Any amount realized in excess of the fair market value of the shares at the time of exercise would be treated as short-term or long-term capital gain, depending on the holding period of the shares.
Restricted Stock Awards. An employee who has been granted restricted stock under the Plan will not realize taxable income at the time of grant, assuming that the restrictions constitute a substantial risk of forfeiture for federal income tax purposes. Upon expiration of the forfeiture restrictions (i.e., as shares become vested), the holder will realize ordinary income in an amount equal to the excess of the fair market value of the shares at such time over the amount, if any, paid
34 2014 Proxy Statement
Proposal 3 Approval of the Group 1 Automotive, Inc. 2014 Long Term Incentive
Plan
for the shares Dividends paid to the holder during the period that the forfeiture restrictions apply will also be compensation to the employee. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the recipient of restricted stock may elect to be taxed at the time of grant of the restricted stock based upon the fair market value of the shares on the date of the award, in which case:
Performance Awards and Phantom Stock Awards. An individual who has been granted a performance award or a phantom stock award generally will not realize taxable income at the time of grant. Whether a performance award or phantom stock award is paid in cash or shares of our common stock, the individual will have taxable compensation. The measure of such income will be the amount of any cash paid and the fair market value of any shares of our common stock either at the time the performance award or the phantom stock award is paid or at the time any restrictions on the shares (including restrictions under Section 16(b) of the Exchange Act) subsequently lapse, depending on the nature, if any, of the restrictions imposed and whether the individual elects to be taxed without regard to any such restrictions.
Bonus Stock Awards. An individual who has been granted a bonus stock award will realize taxable income at the time of the grant.
Tax Consequences to the Company or its Subsidiaries. To the extent that a participant recognizes ordinary income in the circumstances described above, the Company or the subsidiary for which the participant performs services will be entitled to a corresponding deduction, provided
that, among other things, the income meets the test of reasonableness, is an ordinary and necessary business expense, is not an "excess parachute payment" within the meaning of Section 280G of the Code and is not disallowed by the $1 million limitation on certain executive compensation under Section 162(m) of the Code. In this regard, certain types of awards under the Plan cannot qualify as performance-based awards under Section 162(m), and in other cases awards may fail to qualify if all requirements for qualification are not met in connection with such awards.
Registration with the SEC
We intend to file a Registration Statement on Form S-8 relating to the issuance of shares of common stock under the Plan with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933 as soon as practicable after approval of the Plan by our stockholders.
New Plan Benefits
The specific individuals who will be granted awards under the Plan and the type and amount of any such awards will be based on the discretion of the Compensation Committee, subject to annual limits on the maximum awards that may be awarded to any individual as described above. Accordingly, future awards to be received by or allocated to particular individuals under the Plan are not presently determinable.
Vote Required
This proposed amendment of the Plan is contingent upon receiving the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of our common stock cast with respect to the proposal. Abstentions will be counted as votes cast against the proposal and broker non-votes will not be counted as votes cast with respect to the proposal under applicable rules of the New York Stock Exchange.
Our Board of Directors Unanimously Recommends a Vote "FOR" Approval of the Group 1 Automotive, Inc. 2014 Long Term Incentive Plan.
2014 Proxy Statement 35
Proposal 4 Ratification of the Appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Audit Committee has appointed Ernst & Young, LLP ("Ernst & Young") as independent registered public accounting firm of Group 1 for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2014. We have been advised by Ernst & Young that the firm has no relationship with Group 1 or its subsidiaries
other than that arising from the firm's engagement as auditors, tax advisors and consultants. Representatives of Ernst & Young will be present at the Annual Meeting and will have the opportunity to make a statement and respond to appropriate questions from stockholders.
Set forth below is a summary of certain fees billed by Ernst & Young, which has served as our independent registered public accounting firm since 2002, for services related to the fiscal years ended December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2013. In determining the independence of Ernst & Young, the Audit Committee considered whether the provision of non-audit services is compatible with maintaining Ernst & Young's independence.
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
2012 ($) |
|
2013 ($) |
&zwsp; | ||||
|
Audit Fees(1) |
1,165,150 | 1,909,493 | |||||||
|
Audit Related Fees(2) |
| 631,880 | |||||||
|
Tax Fees(3) |
172,140 | 526,780 | |||||||
|
All Other Fees(4) |
2,200 | 2,200 | |||||||
|
Total |
1,339,490 | 3,070,353 |
36 2014 Proxy Statement
Proposal 4 Ratification of the Appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as
our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The increases in the Audit Fees, Audit Related Fees and Tax Fees reflected in the table above are related principally to the Brazilian acquisitions in 2013. Approximately $500,000 of the increase in Audit Fees between 2012 and 2013 relates to audits of Brazilian operations acquired in 2013. The 2013 Audit Related Fees consisted of due diligence services associated with the Brazilian acquisitions. Tax Fees for 2013 included $375,000 for tax planning and advice related to the acquisition of our Brazilian operations.
The Audit Committee considers whether the provision of these services is compatible with maintaining Ernst & Young's independence, and has determined such services for fiscal 2012 and 2013 were compatible. All of the services described above were pre-approved by the Audit Committee pursuant to paragraph (c)(7)(ii)(C) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X under the Exchange Act, to the extent that rule was applicable during fiscal 2012 and 2013.
The Audit Committee has established a policy requiring pre-approval by the Audit Committee of all services (audit and non-audit) to be provided to us by our independent registered public accounting firm. In accordance with this policy, the Audit Committee has given its annual approval for the provision of audit services by Ernst & Young, and has also given its approval for up to a year in advance for the provision by Ernst & Young of particular categories or types of audit-related, tax
and permitted non-audit services, in each case subject to a specific budget. Any proposed services to be provided by the independent registered public accounting firm not covered by one of these approvals, including proposed services exceeding pre-approved budget levels, requires special pre-approval by the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee does not delegate its responsibilities to pre-approve services performed by the independent registered public accounting firm to management. All of above-listed services were pre-approved pursuant to this policy.
The ratification of our Audit Committee's appointment of Ernst & Young as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2014 requires our receiving the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of our common stock cast with respect to the proposal. Although ratification is not required, our Board is submitting the selection of Ernst & Young to our stockholders for ratification as a matter of good corporate practice. If the selection is not ratified, the Audit Committee will consider whether it is appropriate to select another independent registered public accounting firm. Even if the selection is ratified, the Audit Committee in its discretion may select a different independent registered public accounting firm at any time during the year if it determines that such a change would be in our best interest and the best interest of our stockholders.
Our Board of Directors Recommends a Vote "FOR" Ratification of the Appointment of Ernst & Young LLP As Our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for the Fiscal Year Ending December 31, 2014.
2014 Proxy Statement 37
The Audit Committee is appointed by the Board of Directors to assist the Board of Directors in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities relating to our accounting policies, reporting policies, internal controls, compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, and the integrity of Group 1's financial reports. The Audit Committee manages the relationship with its independent registered public accounting firm which is ultimately accountable to the Audit Committee. The Board of Directors, upon the recommendation of its Nominating/Governance Committee, has determined that each member of the Audit Committee has the requisite independence and other qualifications for audit committee membership under New York Stock Exchange corporate governance listing standards, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the Audit Committee Charter and the Group 1 Automotive, Inc. Corporate Governance Guidelines.
The Audit Committee acts under a written charter adopted and approved by the Board of Directors. The Audit Committee reviews and reassesses the adequacy of the Charter on an annual basis. Based on the recommendation of the Audit Committee, the Board of Directors approved the Audit Committee Charter at a regularly scheduled meeting in February 2014. The Audit Committee Charter is posted on our website, www.group1auto.com, and you may obtain a printed copy of the Audit Committee Charter by sending a written request to Group 1 Automotive, Inc., 800 Gessner, Suite 500, Houston, TX 77024, Attn: Corporate Secretary.
The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed with management and Ernst & Young LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm, our audited financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2013. The Audit Committee has also discussed with Ernst & Young LLP the matters required to be discussed by Statement on Auditing Standards No. 16 "Communication with Audit Committees," as amended, issued by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board.
Ernst & Young LLP submitted to the Audit Committee the written disclosures and the letter required by Rule 3526 of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, Communication with Audit Committees Concerning Independence. The Audit Committee discussed with Ernst & Young LLP such firm's independence. The Audit Committee has also considered whether the provision of non-audit services to our Company by Ernst & Young LLP is compatible with maintaining their independence.
Based on the review and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the audited financial statements referred to above be included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, for filing with the SEC.
Respectfully submitted by the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of Group 1,
J. Terry Strange (Chairman) John L. Adams Louis E. Lataif Stephen D. Quinn |
38 2014 Proxy Statement
Except as described under the heading "Executive Compensation Narrative Disclosure to Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Plan-Based Awards" below, our executive officers serve at the discretion of our Board. The following table sets forth certain information as of the date of this proxy statement regarding our executive officers:
|
|||||||||
|
Name |
|
Age | Position | &zwsp; | ||||
|
Earl J. Hesterberg |
60 | President and Chief Executive Officer | ||||||
|
John C. Rickel |
52 | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer | ||||||
|
Darryl M. Burman |
55 | Vice President and General Counsel | ||||||
|
Peter C. DeLongchamps |
53 | Vice President, Financial Services and Manufacturer Relations | ||||||
|
J. Brooks O'Hara |
58 | Vice President, Human Resources |
Mr. Hesterberg's biographical information may be found on page 20 of this proxy statement.
John C. Rickel | ||
Mr. Rickel was appointed Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer in December 2005. From 1984 until joining Group 1, Mr. Rickel held a number of executive and managerial positions of increasing responsibility with Ford Motor Company, a global manufacturer and distributor of cars, trucks and automotive parts. He most recently served as Controller, Ford Americas, where he was responsible for the financial management of Ford's western hemisphere automotive operations. Immediately prior to that, he was Chief Financial Officer of Ford Europe, where he oversaw all accounting, financial planning, information services, tax and investor relations activities. From 2002 to 2004, Mr. Rickel was Chairman of the Board of Directors of Ford Russia, and a member of the Board of Directors and the Audit Committee of Ford Otosan, a publicly traded automotive company located in Turkey and owned 41% by Ford. Mr. Rickel received his BSBA and MBA from The Ohio State University. |
||
Darryl M. Burman |
||
Mr. Burman has served as Vice President and General Counsel since December 2006. From September 2005 to December 2006, Mr. Burman was a partner and head of the corporate and securities practice in the Houston office of Epstein Becker Green Wickliff & Hall, P.C. From September 1995 until September 2005, Mr. Burman served as the head of the corporate and securities practice of Fant & Burman, L.L.P. in Houston, Texas. Mr. Burman currently serves as a Director of the Texas General Counsel Forum Houston Chapter. Mr. Burman holds a degree from the University of South Florida and a J.D. from South Texas College of Law. |
||
|
2014 Proxy Statement 39
Executive Officers
Peter C. DeLongchamps | ||
Mr. DeLongchamps has served as Vice President, Financial Services and Manufacturer Relations since January 2012. He previously served as Vice President, Manufacturer Relations and Public Affairs from January 2006 through December 2011, and as Vice President, Manufacturer Relations from July 2004 through December 2005. Mr. DeLongchamps began his automotive retailing career in 1980, having served as District Manager for General Motors Corporation and Regional Operations Manager for BMW of North America, as well as various other management positions in the automotive industry. Immediately prior to joining the Company in 2004, Mr. DeLongchamps was President of Advantage BMW, a Houston-based automotive retailer. Mr. DeLongchamps also serves on the Board of Directors of Junior Achievement of Southeast Texas. Mr. DeLongchamps received his BBA from Baylor University. |
||
J. Brooks O'Hara |
||
Mr. O'Hara has served as Vice President, Human Resources since February 2000. From 1997 until joining Group 1, Mr. O'Hara was Corporate Manager of Organizational Development at Valero Energy Corporation, an integrated refining and marketing company. Prior to joining Valero, Mr. O'Hara served for a number of years as Vice President of Administration and Human Resources at Gulf States Toyota, an independent regional distributor of new Toyota vehicles, parts and accessories. Mr. O'Hara is a certified Senior Professional in Human Resources (SPHR) and serves on the Board of the Houston Chapter of the American Red Cross. Mr. O'Hara received his BS in Marketing from Florida State University and his MBA from the University of St. Thomas. |
40 2014 Proxy Statement
2013 Compensation Discussion and Analysis
This Compensation Discussion and Analysis provides a detailed description of our executive compensation philosophy and programs, the compensation decisions the Compensation Committee has made under those programs and the factors considered in making those decisions. The Compensation Discussion and Analysis focuses on the compensation of our Named Executive Officers for 2013, who were:
Business and Financial Highlights
In 2013, Group 1 delivered record setting financial results and increased our operational presence in a strengthening automotive sales environment. Our results included:
As discussed in greater detail below, our compensation plans are designed to reward our Named Executive Officers for the achievement of these results for our Company and our stockholders.
Compensation and Corporate Governance Actions
The Committee continuously reviews best practices in executive compensation and has made several adjustments to elements of our compensation programs over the past several years to further
align our executive compensation structure with our stockholders' interests and current governance practices, including:
2014 Proxy Statement 41
2013 Compensation Discussion and Analysis
"Best Practices" Compensation and Corporate Governance Actions
Non-Executive Chairman of the Board |
Clawback Provisions |
|
No Excise Tax Gross-ups |
Average Board Attendance of 95% during 2013 |
|
Say on Pay Advisory Vote Conducted Annually |
No Stockholder Rights Plan (Poison Pill) |
|
Robust Stock Ownership Guidelines for our Officers and Directors |
Company Policy Prohibits Pledging and Hedging of Group 1 Common Stock |
|
Executive Sessions of Independent Directors at Each Regularly Scheduled Meeting |
Nominating/Governance, Compensation and Audit Committees Comprised Solely of Independent Directors |
|
Independent Compensation Consultant retained by our Compensation Committee, who does not perform any other work for our Company |
Director Resignation Policy for Directors who receive a Majority Withheld Vote in an uncontested Director Election |
Role of the Compensation Committee, its Consultant and Management
Our Board has entrusted the Committee with overall responsibility for establishing, implementing and monitoring our executive compensation program. Our Chief Executive Officer and Vice President of Human Resources also play a role in the implementation of the executive compensation process, by overseeing the performance and dynamics of the executive team and generally keeping the Committee informed. All final decisions regarding our Named Executive Officers' compensation remain with the Committee, except in the case of our Chief Executive Officer where the independent members of the Board makes all decisions with the benefit of recommendations from the Committee.
The Committee has historically engaged Pearl Meyer & Partners ("PM&P") to serve as its compensation consultant and to advise on executive compensation matters. In 2013, PM&P
was engaged to conduct a competitive compensation analysis for the Named Executive Officers. During that time, PM&P reviewed compensation data for our peer companies in comparison to our current compensation practices and made recommendations to the Committee. The Committee retains PM&P directly, although in carrying out assignments PM&P may interact with our management when necessary and appropriate. PM&P does not provide any services to our Company other than its consulting services to the Committee, and the Committee determined that no conflict of interest exists between PM&P and our Company. Please see "Information About our Board of Directors and Committee Compensation Committee" for additional information on the role of the Committee, its consultant and management in setting executive compensation.
Objectives of Our Executive Compensation Program
Compensation Philosophy
The Committee believes that the most effective executive compensation program is one designed to recruit, retain and motivate capable leadership and reward those individuals upon the achievement of their personal and departmental
objectives as well as upon our Company's achievement of specific annual, long-term and strategic goals. The Committee evaluates both market competitiveness and individual and Company performance to ensure that we maintain our ability to attract, retain and motivate talented employees in key positions and that overall
42 2014 Proxy Statement
2013 Compensation Discussion and Analysis
compensation remains competitive relative to compensation paid by our peer companies. By maintaining competitive compensation and rewarding for performance, the Committee strives to support our overall business objectives and provide our stockholders with a superior rate of return over time.
Our strategic business focus during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 consisted of the following objectives:
Our Named Executive Officers' individual or departmental goals for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 generally consisted of one or more of the following criteria, which provide support for our business objectives:
Stockholder Input on Executive Compensation Matters
In accordance with applicable law and as described in more detail in Proposal 2 above, our stockholders have the right to vote, on an advisory non-binding basis, on the approval of the compensation of our Named Executive Officers at specified intervals (the "say-on-pay vote"). Stockholders last voted on this matter at the 2013 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, and in accordance with a vote at the 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders on the frequency of say-on-pay votes, stockholders currently will vote on such compensation every year.
At our 2013 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, 95% of the shares voted on the say-on-pay vote were in favor of the compensation paid to our Named Executive Officers. The Compensation Committee believes this vote strongly endorses the compensation philosophy, policies and practices of the Company and, therefore, it did not make any significant changes in the structure of our executive compensation program as a result of this say-on-pay vote. The Compensation Committee will continue to consider on an annual basis the vote results for say-on-pay proposals when making compensation decisions for our Named Executive Officers.
In addition to such consideration given to the results of the say-on-pay vote, at various times throughout the year the Compensation Committee considers any input it may receive from stockholders and other stakeholders, and more general developments in executive compensation principles, in the development and implementation of the Company's executive compensation philosophy, policies and programs. For additional information on the say-on-pay vote with respect to the compensation paid to our executive officers in 2013, see Proposal 2 above.
Market Analysis
We again engaged PM&P to conduct an independent market-based analysis of our executive compensation program in 2013. The market analysis process involved the comparison
2014 Proxy Statement 43
2013 Compensation Discussion and Analysis
of long-term, short-term and total compensation with a selected group of peer companies ("Peer Companies"). Compensation data was compared at the 25th, 50th and 75th percentiles of the market.
While we do not think it is appropriate to establish compensation based solely on benchmarking, we believe that this practice can be useful for two reasons. First, our compensation practices must be competitive in order to attract and retain executives with the ability and experience necessary to provide leadership and to deliver strong performance to our stockholders. Second, benchmarking allows us to assess the reasonableness of our compensation practices. This process allows us to achieve one of our primary objectives of maintaining competitive compensation to ensure retention and assists in aligning compensation with stockholder interests.
As was the case in 2013, our Peer Companies typically include all of the publicly-traded automotive consolidators and specialty retailers associated with automotive sales, and automotive parts and service against whom we most directly compete for executive talent. The list of our Peer Companies is periodically reviewed and updated by the Committee. Our 2013 Peer Companies were:
Advance Auto Parts, Inc. |
LKQ Corp. |
|
Asbury Automotive Group, Inc. |
O'Reilly Automotive, Inc. |
|
AutoNation, Inc. |
Penske Automotive Group, Inc. |
|
AutoZone, Inc. |
The Pep Boys Manny, Moe & Jack |
|
CarMax, Inc. |
Rush Enterprises, Inc. |
|
Genuine Parts Co. |
Sonic Automotive, Inc. |
|
Lithia Motors, Inc. |
When evaluating the compensation data and making compensation decisions, the Committee has taken into consideration the variance in revenue size among the entities comprising our Peer Companies. Additionally, the Committee has considered other differences between us and our Peer Companies such as corporate structure, tenure of officers, variance in scope of duties for each officer and other factors when calculating a benchmarking value. This value is used as the basis of comparison of compensation provided by
us and our Peer Companies. However, any application of benchmarking data is tempered by our basic staffing philosophy, which is to remain as lean as practical. This guiding principle results in certain of our executive officers having a broad range of job responsibilities, which, at certain of our Peer Companies, may be divided among multiple executive officers. The Committee's use of benchmarking for specific compensation components is described in more detail below.
Tally Sheets
In 2013, compensation tally sheets for the Named Executive Officers were prepared by our Compensation Manager and reviewed by the Committee. This review consists of a twelve month summary of cash compensation earned, employee benefits provided, stock granted (with value at grant), and value of stock released (with value at release). Total shares and present value of unvested restricted stock is also presented for review. In addition to the PM&P benchmarking analysis, information from these tally sheets was also considered by the Committee in making compensation decisions for the Named Executive Officers, as well as guiding the design of cash and non-cash compensation and benefit programs. The Committee specifically used tally sheets in the following contexts for each Named Executive Officer:
44 2014 Proxy Statement
2013 Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Our compensation program for executive officers includes annual cash compensation and long-term equity-based compensation. Annual cash compensation consists of annual base salary and payments under our annual cash incentive plan. From time to time, as circumstances may warrant, the Committee may also elect to make discretionary cash bonus awards to executive officers. Our long-term equity-based compensation consists of equity awards made under our long term incentive plan.
In addition, our Named Executive Officers are eligible to (i) participate in our health and welfare plans, our Employee Stock Purchase Plan and our retirement plans (401(k) Savings Plan and Deferred Compensation Plan), (ii) receive a vehicle allowance and/or demonstrator vehicle(s), depending on the position held, and (iii) receive perquisites and other personal benefits as described under "Other Benefits" below.
Base Salary
Design. We provide our Named Executive Officers with an annual base salary to compensate them for services rendered during the year. Our goal is to set base salaries for our Named Executive Officers at levels that are competitive with comparable companies for the skills, experience and requirements of similar positions, using benchmarking as previously discussed, in order to attract and retain top talent. In order to achieve this goal, we have generally sought to provide base salaries that fall near the 50th percentile of our Peer Companies. We believe that this range supports competitive compensation and ensures retention. In order to ensure that each officer is appropriately compensated, the Committee, when setting base salaries, considers individual performance, tenure and experience and our financial performance in addition to the compensation review of the Peer Companies. Individual base salary levels are generally reviewed each November and are adjusted as appropriate based on an analysis of current market salary levels at the Peer Companies, individual
performance and experience and our financial performance.
Results. Effective January 1, 2013, the base salaries for Messrs. Rickel, Burman, DeLongchamps and O'Hara were $550,000, $415,000, $430,000 and $300,200, respectively, which was approximately a 4% increase for Messrs. Burman, DeLongchamps and O'Hara, and approximately a 5% increase for Mr. Rickel from the prior year. In determining the base salaries for 2013, the Committee reviewed their salaries using the criteria described above and determined to make the increases to position them closer to the 50th percentile of the Named Executive Officers of our Peer Companies. Mr. Hesterberg's base salary of $1,000,000 has not been increased since he joined us in April 2005.
Compensation Changes for Fiscal 2014. In November 2013, the Committee elected to increase base salaries for Messrs. Rickel, Burman, DeLongchamps and O'Hara, effective January 1, 2014. In determining the base salaries for 2014, the Committee reviewed their salaries using the criteria described above in an effort to position them closer to the 50th percentile of the Named Executive Officers of our Peer Companies. Accordingly, the 2014 base salaries of Messrs. Rickel, Burman, DeLongchamps and O'Hara were increased by approximately 3% to $566,500, $427,500, $443,000 and $309,200 respectively. No adjustment was made to the base salary of Mr. Hesterberg.
Discretionary Bonus Awards
In recognition of his individual efforts in connection with our record setting financial results in 2013, the Committee approved a special, one-time $50,000 bonus to Mr. DeLongchamps, which was paid in February 2014. The size of this bonus was not determined by a financial performance metric, but related to superior performance relative to our finance and insurance product sales and profit growth for 2013, and was based on the judgment of the Committee.
2014 Proxy Statement 45
2013 Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Annual Incentive Compensation Plan
Annual cash incentive awards are intended to align our annual performance and results with the compensation paid to persons who are most responsible for such performance, and to motivate and reward achievement of Company and individual or departmental performance objectives. Meaningful, performance-related goals are established so that attaining or exceeding the performance targets is not assured, requires significant effort by each of our Named Executive Officers, and if accomplished, contributes to the ongoing overall improvement and success of the Company.
For 2013, the annual incentive compensation plan was based upon achievement of financial and individual, or departmental, goals approved at the beginning of the year by the Committee. The financial and mission-based portions of the annual incentive awards could be awarded independently so that achievement of one was not predicated on the achievement of the other. There is, however, a minimum earnings per share goal established by the Committee at the beginning of each year which has to be achieved before any incentive award is paid.
The following is a description of the 2013 performance metrics under the plan:
Financial Goal. For 2013, the financial goal portion of our annual cash incentive plan was based on achievement of diluted earnings per share ("EPS") in relation to total new vehicles sold in the United States as reported by J.D. Power and Associates. Diluted earnings per share is generally defined as our net income divided by the sum of the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period plus all dilutive potential common stock. Under the 2013 annual incentive compensation plan, the Committee could, in its sole discretion, adjust the Company's EPS when determining achievement of the financial goal metric for extraordinary or unusual items that would be included in our annual operating results,
but not typically considered at the time the targets were set, such as stock repurchases, certain asset impairments or extraordinary dilutive events which materially affect EPS.
The Committee believed that EPS was the best metric for our financial goal portion of the plan because it incentivizes our executive officers to maximize stockholder return and only rewards executive officers if our stockholders are rewarded. Further, no payments would be made under the financial goal portion of the award unless a threshold level of EPS was achieved. In addition, and as detailed more fully in the table below, if total new vehicle sales in the United States were above 15 million in 2013, the level of EPS achieved by the Company would need to increase in order for the financial goal portion of the award to be earned by executive officers. The threshold, target and maximum levels of performance for the EPS metric set by the Committee for 2013 were as follows:
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
EPS Target |
&zwsp; | |||||||||
|
2013 New Vehicle Sales U.S. |
|
Threshold |
|
Target |
|
Maximum | &zwsp; | |||||
|
Less than 15.0 million |
$ | 4.81 | $ | 4.93 | $ | 5.04 | ||||||
|
Greater than 15.0 million but less than 15.5 million |
$ | 4.93 | $ | 5.04 | $ | 5.15 | ||||||
|
Greater than or equal to 15.5 million |
$ | 5.04 | $ | 5.15 | $ | 5.27 |
Mission-based Goals. Mission-based goals typically include four to six specific goals that are normally related to the individual's functional area and are established at the beginning of each fiscal year jointly by the executive officer and our Chief Executive Officer and reviewed by the Committee, or in the case of the Chief Executive Officer, by the Chief Executive Officer, the Committee and the Board. These goals are integral toward achieving key business objectives, such as those listed on page 43 which help improve our financial performance, promote corporate efficiencies and contribute to the growth of our Company. In 2013, the following mission-based goals were assigned to each of our Named Executive Officers:
46 2014 Proxy Statement
2013 Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Name | Individual/Departmental Performance Targets | &zwsp; | ||||||
Earl J. Hesterberg | | Continue significant external growth domestically and abroad | ||||||
| Integrate Brazil acquisition into Company operations | |||||||
| Continue to leverage technology and processes | |||||||
| Achieve Same Store Selling, General & Administrative target | |||||||
John C. Rickel | | Integrate Brazil acquisition into Group 1 Accounting and Reporting Systems | ||||||
| Contain 2013 "capital expenditure" spending within approved levels | |||||||
| Complete accounting standardization and consolidation | |||||||
| Expand the Company's Credit Facility to meet near term growth needs | |||||||
| Achieve Same Store Selling, General & Administrative target | |||||||
Darryl M. Burman | | Analyze costs and establish procedures to reduce risks associated with Texas Workers' Compensation claims | ||||||
| Develop segregated Company real estate department | |||||||
| Integrate international legal matters into existing legal reporting | |||||||
| Complete significant domestic and international acquisitions of dealership franchises and real estate and integrate international legal reporting into reporting requirements of ultimate parent entity | |||||||
| Achieve Same Store Selling, General & Administrative target | |||||||
Peter C. DeLongchamps | | Continued focus on relationships with manufacturers and investment community | ||||||
| Maintain capital expenditure projects within budget | |||||||
| Maintain minimum vehicle service contract penetration rate | |||||||
| Finalize contracts with extended service agreement company to grow the vehicle service contract penetration | |||||||
| Achieve F&I growth target per retail unit | |||||||
| Achieve Same Store Selling, General & Administrative target | |||||||
J. Brooks O'Hara | | Implement recruiting initiatives with field Human Resources to fill dealership level positions | ||||||
| Select and implement enhanced employee benefit administration system | |||||||
| Streamline field payroll structure and processes to reduce expense and improve efficiency | |||||||
| Achieve Same Store Selling, General & Administrative target |
For 2013, the Committee decided that at achievement of threshold or target performance for EPS, each of the performance metrics financial and mission-based should be weighted 50%, with the award payout based on 100% of base salary for Messrs. Hesterberg and Rickel and 60% of base salary for Messrs. Burman, DeLongchamps and O'Hara. The Committee also determined that: (i) if the threshold EPS goal was attained, the executive officers would receive one-third of the financial goal portion of their award; and (ii) if the
target EPS goal was attained, the executive officers would receive two-thirds of the financial goal portion of their award. In addition, the Committee decided that for 2013 as long as earnings per share was at least $4.09, the mission-based portion of the award would be payable from 0% to 100%.
The Committee also decided that at achievement of maximum level of performance for EPS, the total possible cash incentive plan payout for each
2014 Proxy Statement 47
2013 Compensation Discussion and Analysis
executive should be increased and such increase would be entirely attributable to the financial performance metric. As such, the executive officers would be eligible to receive the same mission-based award discussed above, however Messrs. Hesterberg, Burman, DeLongchamps and O'Hara would receive 150% of the financial portion of their awards as otherwise described above and Mr. Rickel would receive 130% of the financial portion of his award as otherwise described above. As a result, assuming all mission-based goals were attained, the following table sets forth the threshold, target and maximum annual incentive compensation plan potential payouts for 2013, as a percentage of base salary. The target performance level was set such that, if attained, the total cash compensation paid to our executive officers would approximate the median paid to executive officers at our Peer Companies.
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
2013 Incentive Payout as a % of Base Salary |
&zwsp; | |||||||||
|
Named Executive Officer |
|
Threshold Performance |
|
Target Performance |
|
Maximum Performance |
&zwsp; | |||||
|
Earl J. Hesterberg |
67 | % | 83 | % | 125 | % | ||||||
|
John C. Rickel |
67 | % | 83 | % | 115 | % | ||||||
|
Darryl M. Burman |
40 | % | 50 | % | 75 | % | ||||||
|
Peter C. DeLongchamps |
40 | % | 50 | % | 75 | % | ||||||
|
J. Brooks O'Hara |
40 | % | 50 | % | 75 | % |
Results. For 2013, we achieved the threshold level of our financial goal (EPS) after adjustments were made for extraordinary or unusual circumstances. The Committee, in exercising its authority to adjust actual performance criteria as a result of extraordinary or unusual items affecting operating results, elected to take into consideration two matters that lowered EPS financial results. When the Committee set 2013 financial objectives for the Company, it did not anticipate or make adjustment in advance for:
common stock in recognition of the obligation to issue additional shares upon any conversion event, or
The Committee does not believe that the dilutive effect of increasing the number of shares outstanding or the decision to expand into an emerging market should adversely affect employees with compensation tied to EPS financial objectives. As a result, after taking into consideration that the total stockholder return for 2013 was 15.6%, the Committee made adjustments for the extraordinary or unusual items. The adjustments increased the adjusted EPS calculation to $5.06, an increase of $0.09 which, when taking into account the 15.6 million vehicle units sold in the U.S. for the full year (as reported by J.D. Power and Associates), resulted in the financial goal portion of the annual incentive compensation being paid at the threshold level.
In connection with its review of the performance of our Chief Executive Officer, the Committee determined that he had achieved all of his 2013 mission-based goals. Following extensive discussion with our Chief Executive Officer regarding his evaluation of the performance of our Named Executive Officers, the Committee determined that Messrs. Rickel, Burman and DeLongchamps met or surpassed their individual and departmental goals, resulting in 100% payout of the mission-based payout, and Mr. O'Hara achieved all but one of his assigned goals, resulting in 85% of his mission-based payout. In making these determinations, the Committee specifically considered each executive's leadership in achieving each of the goals. Based on the Committee's evaluation of the performance of each of our Named Executive Officers, it determined the degree to which each officer had achieved his
48 2014 Proxy Statement
2013 Compensation Discussion and Analysis
goals and the following amounts of incentive compensation were paid:
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Annual Incentive Compensation Plan |
&zwsp; | ||||||||||||||
|
Named Executive Officer |
|
2013 Mission Based Award Earned $ |
|
2013 Financial Based Award Earned $ |
|
2013 Incentive Payout as a % of Base Salary $ |
|
Amount Paid $ |
&zwsp; | ||||||
|
Earl J. Hesterberg |
500,000 | 166,667 | 67 | 666,667 | |||||||||||
|
John C. Rickel |
275,000 | 91,667 | 67 | 366,667 | |||||||||||
|
Darryl M. Burman |
124,500 | 41,500 | 40 | 166,000 | |||||||||||
|
Peter C. DeLongchamps |
129,000 | 43,000 | 40 | 172,000 | |||||||||||
|
J. Brooks O'Hara |
76,551 | 30,020 | 36 | 106,571 |
Long-Term Equity Incentive Compensation
Design. To align the compensation of our corporate officers with the attainment of our business goals and an increase in stockholder value, we award long-term equity incentive grants to our executive officers as part of our total compensation package. These awards have been made pursuant to the Group 1 Automotive, Inc. 2007 Long Term Incentive Plan.
We believe that restricted stock or restricted stock units, subject to time-based vesting requirements, appropriately aligns management's interests with those of our Company and our stockholders, while helping to motivate and retain key members of our management team.
When determining the size of the awards, we typically consider amounts that would provide our executive officers with long-term incentive opportunities that, when combined with base salary and annual cash incentive opportunities, result in total direct compensation within the 50th to 75th percentile of our Peer Companies. We then take into account individual performance, the position and value of the Named Executive Officer to our Company, experience and length of service to us, our desire to incentivize the officer to remain with our Company, and the amount of equity previously awarded to the officer.
Vesting of these awards is intended to facilitate retention, and the shares vest over a five-year period with the restrictions relating to the awards
lapsing 40% after two years and 20% in each year thereafter. Since 2008, our vesting provisions have been based on the passage of time. Under the terms of the current award agreements, in the event of death or disability of any employee with unvested awards, all granted but unvested awards will automatically vest.
In addition, in the event of a "qualified retirement", which is a retirement after a minimum of ten years of service with our Company and the executive attaining the age of 63, upon satisfaction of a two year non-compete and certain non-disclosure covenants, all unvested shares of restricted stock or restricted stock units held by the executive officer as of his retirement date will vest.
2013 Awards. In February 2013, the Committee reviewed the tally sheets and the competitive analysis prepared by PM&P to determine how each Named Executive Officer's base and total compensation compared to their peers and in order to assess all elements of each executive's pay relative to total compensation. The Committee also considered each executive's current equity position for purposes of reward and retention and considered other factors, such as size of previous awards, contribution to corporate results, leadership and Company performance during the year when making the decision as to the size of the equity award for each Named Executive Officer. Based on the analysis and review described above, on February 27, 2013, the Committee granted the following restricted stock awards to the Named Executive Officers: Mr. Hesterberg (45,000 shares), Mr. Rickel (15,000 shares), Mr. Burman (10,000 shares), Mr. DeLongchamps (11,000 shares) and Mr. O'Hara (9,000 shares).
For more information on the 2013 equity awards, please see the section entitled "Executive Compensation Grants of Plan Based Awards".
Compensation Changes for Fiscal 2014. The Committee has made no material changes to our long-term incentive compensation strategy for fiscal 2014.
2014 Proxy Statement 49
2013 Compensation Discussion and Analysis
401(k) Plan
We maintain the Group 1 Automotive, Inc. 401(k) Savings Plan (the "401(k) Savings Plan") to assist all employees in providing for their retirement. Matching contributions may be in the form of cash or shares of our common stock or a combination of both, as determined by the Committee. All of our matches have been in cash for all employees. Amounts that we contributed to each Named Executive Officer's 401(k) Savings Plan account are disclosed within the Summary Compensation Table below.
Employee Stock Purchase Plan
Generally, under the Group 1 Automotive, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan, all employees, including our Named Executive Officers, are offered the opportunity to purchase up to $25,000 annually of our common stock at a 15% discount to market, provided that the maximum number of shares that may be purchased by an employee shall not exceed 3,000 shares of common stock per quarter. This is an additional equity incentive we offer to all of our employees to further promote their interest in enhancing stockholder value. These shares may not be sold by the employee for a minimum of six months following purchase.
Deferred Compensation Plan
The Group 1 Automotive, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan ("Deferred Compensation Plan") is designed as a retention tool for our corporate and regional officers, dealership general managers, other key employees and non-employee directors. It allows participants the opportunity to accumulate additional savings for retirement on a tax-deferred basis. Participants can choose from various defined investment options in which the deferred compensation is notionally invested. Pursuant to the Deferred Compensation Plan, certain corporate officers, including our Named Executive Officers, may defer up to 50% of their base salary and up to 100% of their incentive compensation. For a more detailed discussion of the Deferred Compensation Plan, please see the section entitled "Executive Compensation Nonqualified Deferred Compensation."
Other Benefits
Health and Welfare Benefits. Our Named Executive Officers are eligible to participate in our standard medical, dental, vision, disability insurance and life insurance plans to meet their health and welfare needs. These benefits are provided so as to assure that we are able to maintain a competitive position in terms of attracting and retaining executive officers and other employees. This is a fixed component of compensation and the benefits are provided on a non-discriminatory basis to all of our full-time employees.
Vehicle Allowance. Our Chief Executive Officer, under his employment agreement, is provided with two vehicles for his use. Our senior vice president and Chief Financial Officer receives a vehicle allowance of $15,000 per year and the use of one vehicle. Vice presidents are provided with a vehicle allowance of $11,300 per year, a vehicle, or in certain limited cases, both. While our Committee reviews the vehicle allowances periodically, we have not modified these amounts since 2005.
Other Perquisites and Personal Benefits. We provide certain Named Executive Officers with perquisites and other personal benefits that the Committee believes are reasonable and consistent with our overall compensation programs and philosophy. These benefits are provided in order to enable us to attract and retain these executives. For example, we pay for club membership privileges that are used primarily for business but also for occasional personal purposes by our Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Hesterberg. In addition, we own a fractional interest in an aircraft which is primarily used for business purposes. However, we make a portion of our time available to Mr. Hesterberg for personal use during the year. In 2013, Mr. Hesterberg was allowed a maximum of 40 flight hours for personal use; however, his actual personal usage was 30.7 hours. Mr. Hesterberg reimburses us for his personal use based on the published standard industry fare level valuation method. We provide this benefit to Mr. Hesterberg because it optimizes the use of his time and is consistent with similar benefits provided by our Peer Companies.
50 2014 Proxy Statement
2013 Compensation Discussion and Analysis
We maintain employment and other compensatory agreements with certain Named Executive Officers to ensure they will perform their roles for an extended period of time. Certain provisions contained in these agreements, such as non-competition and non-solicitation provisions, as well as change in control payments, are essential to retaining our talent and protecting our stockholders. We believe that it is appropriate to compensate individuals to refrain from working with competitors following termination, and that compensation enhances the enforceability of such agreements. These agreements and our severance terminology are described in more detail elsewhere in this proxy statement. Please read "Executive Compensation Narrative Disclosure to Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table Employment, Incentive Compensation and Non-Compete Agreements." These agreements provide for severance compensation to be paid if the officer's employment is terminated under certain conditions, such as following a corporate change, involuntary termination, termination by us for "cause," death or disability, each as defined in the applicable executive's agreement.
The employment and other compensatory agreements between our Company and our Named Executive Officers and the related severance
provisions are designed to meet the following objectives:
Corporate Change. In certain limited scenarios, the potential for merger or being acquired may be in the best interests of our stockholders. As a result, we provide severance compensation to certain Named Executive Officers if the officer's employment is terminated following a corporate change transaction. Our intent is to promote the ability of the officer to act in the best interests of our stockholders even though his or her employment could be terminated as a result of the transaction. However, as previously discussed, we do not provide any excise tax gross-ups to any of our Named Executive Officers.
Termination without Cause. If we terminate the employment of certain corporate officers "without cause" as defined in the applicable agreement, we are obligated to pay the officer certain compensation and other benefits as described in greater detail in "Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control" below. We believe these payments are appropriate because the terminated officer is bound by confidentiality, non-solicitation and non-compete provisions ranging from one to two years after termination. Both parties have mutually agreed to a severance package that would be in place prior to any termination event. This provides us with more flexibility to make a change in senior management if such a change is in the best interests of our Company and its stockholders.
Hedging and Pledging Prohibitions
Our Directors and Named Executive Officers are prohibited from engaging in "short sales" of our stock or otherwise hedging the risk of ownership of our stock. We have also adopted a policy that
prohibits our directors and officers from pledging their Company stock, or engaging in any other transaction of a similar nature that has the effect of using Group 1 securities as collateral.
2014 Proxy Statement 51
2013 Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Policy on Payment or Recoupment of Performance-Based Cash Bonuses and Performance-Based Stock Bonuses in the Event of Certain Restatements ("Clawbacks")
The Committee has adopted a policy on payment or recoupment of performance-based cash bonuses and performance-based stock bonuses in the event of certain restatements, excluding those required by a change in generally accepted accounting principles, which provides that we will require the payment or reimbursement (to the extent permitted by governing law) of all or a portion of any performance-based cash or performance-based stock bonus where: (a) the payment was predicated upon the achievement of certain financial results that were subsequently the subject of a material restatement and (b) a higher or lower payment would have been made to the
employee based upon the restated financial results. In each of these instances, we will, to the extent practicable: (a) either make a payment of, or seek to recover, the cash amount by which the individual employee's annual performance-based bonus was recalculated based on the restated financial results; provided that we will not pay or seek to recover bonuses paid more than three years prior to the date the applicable restatement is disclosed; (b) cause the award or cancellation of any performance-based stock awards; and (c) seek reimbursement of any unearned gains realized on the vesting of performance-based stock attributable to such awards.
Our Board has adopted Stock Ownership Guidelines that apply to our Named Executive Officers, as well as other officers within our Company. The guidelines require our Named Executive Officers to maintain a minimum number of shares of our common stock while they are employed by us. The guidelines reinforce the
importance of aligning the longer-term interests of our executive officers with the interests of our stockholders and are expressed in terms of the dollar value of their equity holdings as a multiple of each Named Executive Officer's base salary. In February 2014, the Board increased the Stock Ownership Guidelines, as follows:
Name |
Prior Stock Ownership Guidelines |
Current Stock Ownership Guidelines |
&zwsp; | |||||
Earl J. Hesterberg | 4 × annual base salary | 6 × annual base salary | ||||||
John C. Rickel | 2 × annual base salary | 3 × annual base salary | ||||||
Darryl M. Burman | 1 × annual base salary | 2 × annual base salary | ||||||
Peter C. DeLongchamps | 1 × annual base salary | 2 × annual base salary | ||||||
J. Brooks O'Hara | 1 × annual base salary | 2 × annual base salary |
The dollar value of stock ownership is based on base salary times a multiple divided by the previous 36-month average stock price as calculated on December 31st of each year. Unvested restricted stock awards are counted towards each Named Executive Officer's ownership
requirement. Stock ownership levels should be achieved by each officer within five years of the adoption of these guidelines, or within five years of the individual's appointment as an officer. Each of our Named Executive Officers is in compliance with current guidelines.
52 2014 Proxy Statement
2013 Compensation Discussion and Analysis
In conducting our executive compensation programs, the Committee considers the effects of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, which denies publicly held companies a tax deduction for annual compensation in excess of $1 million paid to their chief executive officer or any of their three other most highly compensated corporate officers, other than the chief financial officer, who are employed on the last day of a given year, unless their compensation is based on performance criteria that are established by a compensation committee which is made up of outside directors and approved, as to their material terms, by their stockholders. The Committee
considers its primary goal to design compensation strategies that further the best interests of our stockholders. In certain cases, it may determine that the amount of tax deductions lost is not significant when compared to the potential opportunity a compensation program provides for creating long-term stockholder value. The Committee therefore retains the ability to evaluate the performance of our executive officers and to pay appropriate compensation, even if some of it may be non-deductible, to ensure competitive levels of total compensation is paid to certain individuals.
We have reviewed our compensation policies and practices for all employees, including executive officers, and determined that our compensation programs are not reasonably likely to cause behaviors that would have a material adverse effect on our Company. Moreover, we believe that several design features of our compensation programs and policies reduce the likelihood of excessive risk-taking:
We believe that, for all employees, our compensation programs do not encourage excessive risk and instead encourage behaviors that support sustainable value creation.
2014 Proxy Statement 53
Report of the Compensation Committee
During the last fiscal year, and this year in preparation for the filing of this proxy statement with the SEC, the Committee:
Respectfully submitted by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors,
Max P. Watson, Jr. (Chairman) John L. Adams Louis E. Lataif Beryl Raff J. Terry Strange |
54 2014 Proxy Statement
2013 Summary Compensation Table
The following table summarizes, with respect to our Named Executive Officers, information relating to the compensation earned for services rendered in all capacities. Our Named Executive Officers consist of our five current executive officers, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Name and Principal Position |
|
Year |
|
Salary(1) ($) |
|
Bonus ($) |
|
Stock Awards(2) ($) |
|
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($) |
|
Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings(3) ($) |
|
All Other Compensation(4) ($) |
|
Total ($) |
&zwsp; | ||||||||||
|
Earl J. Hesterberg |
2013 | 1,000,000 | | 2,583,900 | 666,667 | 135,860 | 259,173 | 4,645,600 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
President and Chief |
2012 | 1,000,000 | | 2,467,350 | 1,250,000 | 108,611 | 242,084 | 5,068,045 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Executive Officer |
2011 | 1,000,000 | | 2,015,750 | 1,000,000 | 78,285 | 243,145 | 4,337,180 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
John C. Rickel |
2013 | 550,000 | | 861,300 | 366,667 | 160,859 | 27,039 | 1,965,865 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Senior Vice President and |
2012 | 525,000 | 50,000 | 822,450 | 603,750 | 165,333 | 25,262 | 2,191,795 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Chief Financial Officer |
2011 | 500,000 | 20,000 | 564,410 | 500,000 | 78,389 | 24,983 | 1,687,782 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Darryl M. Burman |
2013 | 415,000 | | 574,200 | 166,000 | 14,950 | 28,667 | 1,198,817 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Vice President and |
2012 | 400,000 | 50,000 | 548,300 | 300,000 | 7,964 | 29,307 | 1,335,571 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
General Counsel |
2011 | 380,000 | 10,000 | 362,835 | 228,000 | 1,342 | 27,086 | 1,009,263 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Peter C. DeLongchamps |
2013 | 430,000 | 50,000 | 631,620 | 172,000 | 44,871 | 27,076 | 1,355,566 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Vice President, Financial |
2012 | 417,000 | | 548,300 | 312,750 | 34,869 | 25,097 | 1,338,016 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Services, Manufacturer Relations and Public Affairs |
2011 | 402,000 | 20,000 | 362,835 | 241,200 | 25,366 | 24,108 | 1,075,509 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
J. Brooks O'Hara |
2013 | 300,200 | | 516,780 | 106,571 | 25,336 | 18,862 | 967,749 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Vice President, Human |
2012 | 290,206 | | 493,470 | 217,650 | 26,479 | 18,800 | 1,046,599 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Resources |
2011 | 280,200 | 5,000 | 362,835 | 168,120 | 19,196 | 18,650 | 854,001 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Name |
|
Year |
|
401(k) Savings Plan Matching Contribution ($) |
|
Automobile Allowance ($) |
|
Use of Demonstrator Vehicle(a) ($) |
|
Airplane Use(b) ($) |
|
Club Membership and Dues ($) |
|
Total ($) |
&zwsp; | |||||||||
|
Earl J. Hesterberg |
2013 | 7,650 | | 20,851 | 220,504.30 | 10,132.32 | 259,173 | |||||||||||||||||
|
John C. Rickel |
2013 | 7,650 | 15,000 | 4,389 | | | 27,039 | |||||||||||||||||
|
Darryl M. Burman |
2013 | 7,540 | 11,300 | 9,828 | | | 28,667 | |||||||||||||||||
|
Peter C. DeLongchamps |
2013 | 7,650 | 11,300 | 8,125 | | | 27,076 | |||||||||||||||||
|
J. Brooks O'Hara |
2013 | 7,562 | 11,300 | | | | 18,862 |
2014 Proxy Statement 55
Executive Compensation
Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 2013
The following table provides information concerning each grant of an award made to our Named Executive Officers under our annual incentive compensation plan and 2007 Long Term Incentive Plan, including awards that have been transferred, during 2013:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
Possible Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards(1) |
|
All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of |
|
Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option |
&zwsp; | |||||||||||||||||
|
Name |
|
Grant Date |
|
Approval Date |
|
Threshold ($) |
|
Target ($) |
|
Maximum ($) |
|
Stock or Units (#) |
|
Awards ($) |
&zwsp; | |||||||||
|
Earl J. Hesterberg |
| | | 833,333 | 1,250,000 | | | |||||||||||||||||
|
02/27/2013 | 02/27/2013 | | | | 45,000 | 2,583,900 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
John C. Rickel |
| | | 458,333 | 632,500 | | | |||||||||||||||||
|
02/27/2013 | 02/27/2013 | | | | 15,000 | 861,300 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Darryl M. Burman |
| | | 207,500 | 311,250 | | | |||||||||||||||||
|
02/27/2013 | 02/27/2013 | | | | 10,000 | 574,200 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Peter C. DeLongchamps |
| | | 215,000 | 322,500 | | | |||||||||||||||||
|
02/27/2013 | 02/27/2013 | | | | 11,000 | 631,620 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
J. Brooks O'Hara |
| | | 150,100 | 225,150 | | | |||||||||||||||||
|
02/27/2013 | 02/27/2013 | | | | 9,000 | 516,780 |
Narrative Disclosure to Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table
The following is a discussion of material factors we believe are necessary to an understanding of the information disclosed in the Summary Compensation Table and the Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table for 2013.
Employment, Incentive Compensation and Non-Compete Agreements
Earl J. Hesterberg. Effective September 8, 2010, we entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Hesterberg. Mr. Hesterberg's annual base salary under the employment agreement is $1,000,000, subject to increase by the Compensation Committee from time to time. Subject to the terms and conditions of the
56 2014 Proxy Statement
Executive Compensation
agreement, we have agreed to employ Mr. Hesterberg through December 31, 2015. At that time, the employment agreement will automatically convert to a month-to-month relationship terminable at any time by either employer or employee for any reason upon 180 days advance written notice.
John C. Rickel. Effective January 1, 2009, we entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Rickel. Subject to the terms and conditions of the agreement, we agreed to employ Mr. Rickel through December 31, 2010. Mr. Rickel's employment agreement automatically renews for successive one-year periods unless either party prior to the expiration of the term provides 60 days prior written notice of termination to the other party. Provisions of Mr. Rickel's employment agreement related to termination and change in control are discussed in "Potential Payments on Termination or Change in Control" beginning on page 61 of this proxy statement.
Darryl M. Burman. Effective December 1, 2009, we entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Burman. Subject to the terms and conditions of the agreement, we agreed to employ Mr. Burman through November 30, 2011. Mr. Burman's employment agreement automatically renews for successive one-year periods unless either party prior to the expiration of the term provides 60 days prior written notice of termination to the other
party. Provisions of Mr. Burman's employment agreement related to termination and change in control are discussed in "Potential Payments on Termination or Change in Control" beginning on page 61 of this proxy statement.
Messrs. Hesterberg, Rickel and Burman are also entitled to participate, on the same basis generally as our other employees, in all general employee benefit plans and programs that are made available to all or substantially all of our employees. In addition, Mr. Hesterberg is entitled to the use of two demonstrator vehicles of his choice, Mr. Rickel is entitled to one demonstrator vehicle of his choice and a vehicle allowance totaling $1,250 per month, and Mr. Burman is entitled to one demonstrator vehicle of his choice and a vehicle allowance totaling $941.66 per month.
All incentive compensation awards payable to Messrs. Hesterberg, Rickel and Burman will be determined by the Committee in its sole discretion in accordance with the terms of our annual incentive compensation program, and all payments pursuant to this program shall be made on or before March 15th of the year following the year of service to which the incentive compensation relates.
We have not entered into an employment or non-compete agreement with Mr. DeLongchamps or Mr. O'Hara.
2014 Proxy Statement 57
Outstanding Equity Awards at December 31, 2013
The following table provides information concerning restricted stock awards for our Named Executive Officers. As of December 31, 2013, none of our Named Executive Officers had any stock options.
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
Stock Awards |
&zwsp; | |||||||||
|
Name |
|
Grant Date(1) |
|
Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#) |
|
Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested(2) ($) |
&zwsp; | |||||
|
Earl J. Hesterberg |
11/11/2009 | 8,000 | 568,160 | |||||||||
|
09/08/2010 | 48,000 | 3,408,960 | ||||||||||
|
03/08/2011 | 30,000 | 2,130,600 | ||||||||||
|
03/02/2012 | 45,000 | 3,195,900 | ||||||||||
|
02/27/2013 | 45,000 | 3,195,900 | ||||||||||
|
John C. Rickel |
03/12/2009 | 4,000 | 284,080 | |||||||||
|
11/11/2009 | 5,000 | 355,100 | ||||||||||
|
11/10/2010 | 4,800 | 340,896 | ||||||||||
|
03/08/2011 | 8,400 | 596,568 | ||||||||||
|
03/02/2012 | 15,000 | 1,065,300 | ||||||||||
|
02/27/2013 | 15,000 | 1,065,300 | ||||||||||
|
Darryl M. Burman |
11/11/2009 | 3,000 | 213,060 | |||||||||
|
11/10/2010 | 2,000 | 142,040 | ||||||||||
|
03/08/2011 | 5,400 | 383,508 | ||||||||||
|
03/02/2012 | 10,000 | 710,200 | ||||||||||
|
02/27/2013 | 10,000 | 710,200 | ||||||||||
|
Peter C. DeLongchamps |
11/11/2009 | 2,400 | 170,448 | |||||||||
|
11/10/2010 | 2,000 | 142,040 | ||||||||||
|
03/08/2011 | 5,400 | 383,508 | ||||||||||
|
03/02/2012 | 10,000 | 710,200 | ||||||||||
|
02/27/2013 | 11,000 | 781,220 | ||||||||||
|
J. Brooks O'Hara |
11/11/2009 | 2,400 | 170,448 | |||||||||
|
11/10/2010 | 2,000 | 142,040 | ||||||||||
|
03/08/2011 | 5,400 | 383,508 | ||||||||||
|
03/02/2012 | 9,000 | 639,180 | ||||||||||
|
02/27/2013 | 9,000 | 639,180 | ||||||||||
|
58 2014 Proxy Statement
Executive Compensation
The following table provides information relating to the vesting of restricted stock during 2013 on an aggregated basis for each of our Named Executive Officers. Our Named Executive Officers currently do not have stock options.
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
Stock Awards |
&zwsp; | ||||||
|
Name |
|