UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM N-CSR
CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES
Investment Company Act file number 811-06501
Name of Fund: BlackRock MuniYield Michigan Quality Fund II, Inc. (MYM)
Fund Address: 100 Bellevue Parkway, Wilmington, DE 19809
Name and address of agent for service: John M. Perlowski, Chief Executive Officer, BlackRock MuniYield Michigan Quality Fund II, Inc., 55 East 52nd Street, New York, NY 10055
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (800) 882-0052, Option 4
Date of fiscal year end: 07/31/2011
Date of reporting period: 07/31/2011
Item 1 – Report to Stockholders
|
|
|
|
|
July 31, 2011 |
Annual Report
BlackRock MuniHoldings Quality Fund II, Inc. (MUE)
BlackRock MuniYield California Quality Fund, Inc. (MCA)
BlackRock MuniYield Michigan Quality Fund II, Inc. (MYM)
BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund, Inc. (MYN)
BlackRock MuniYield Quality Fund III, Inc. (MYI)
|
|
|
Not FDIC Insured § No Bank Guarantee § May Lose Value |
|
|
|
|
|
Table of Contents |
|
|
|
|
|
Page |
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
Annual Report: |
|
|
4 |
|
|
5 |
|
|
10 |
|
|
10 |
|
|
Financial Statements: |
|
|
11 |
|
|
34 |
|
|
35 |
|
|
36 |
|
|
38 |
|
|
39 |
|
|
44 |
|
|
52 |
|
|
53 |
|
|
Disclosure of Investment Advisory Agreements and Sub-Advisory Agreements |
54 |
|
58 |
|
|
59 |
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
ANNUAL REPORT |
JULY 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
Financial markets have been extremely volatile in the wake of the Standard & Poor’s downgrade of US Treasury debt. While the August 5 announcement was the catalyst for the market turmoil, weaker-than-expected economic data and Europe’s deepening financial crisis further compounded investor uncertainty as the future direction of the global economy became increasingly questionable. Although markets remain highly volatile and conditions are highly uncertain, BlackRock remains focused on finding opportunities in this environment.
The pages that follow reflect your mutual fund’s reporting period ended July 31, 2011. Accordingly, the below discussion is intended to provide you with additional perspective on the performance of your investments during that period.
During the summer of 2010, investors were in “risk-off” mode as the global economy was sputtering and the sovereign debt crisis was spreading across Europe. But markets were revived toward the end of the summer on positive economic news and robust corporate earnings. The global economy had finally gained traction and fear turned to optimism with the anticipation of a second round of quantitative easing (“QE2”) from the US Federal Reserve (the “Fed”). Stock markets rallied even though the European debt crisis continued and inflationary pressures loomed over emerging markets. Fixed income markets, however, saw yields move sharply upward (pushing prices down) especially on the long end of the historically steep yield curve. While high yield bonds benefited from the risk rally, most fixed income sectors declined in the fourth quarter. The tax-exempt municipal market faced additional headwinds as it became evident that the Build America Bond program would not be extended and municipal finance troubles abounded.
The new year brought spikes of volatility as political turmoil swept across the Middle East/North Africa region and as prices of oil and other commodities soared. Natural disasters in Japan disrupted industrial supply chains and concerns mounted over US debt and deficit issues. Equities quickly rebounded as investors chose to focus on the continuing stream of strong corporate earnings and positive economic data. Credit markets were surprisingly resilient in this environment and yields regained relative stability in 2011. The tax-exempt market saw relief from its headwinds and steadily recovered from its fourth-quarter lows. Equities, commodities and high yield bonds outpaced higher-quality assets as investors increased their risk tolerance.
However, longer-term headwinds had been brewing. Inflationary pressures intensified in emerging economies, many of which were overheating, and the European debt crisis continued to escalate. Markets were met with a sharp reversal in May when political unrest in Greece pushed the nation closer to defaulting on its debt. This development rekindled fears about the broader debt crisis and its further contagion among peripheral European countries. Concurrently, it became evident that the pace of global economic growth had slowed. Higher oil prices and supply chain disruptions finally showed up in economic data. In the final month of the reporting period, the prolonged debt ceiling debate in Washington, DC led to a loss of confidence in policymakers. Stocks generally declined from May through the end of the period, but 6- and 12-month returns through the end of July remained in positive territory. In bond markets, yields were volatile but generally moved lower for the period as a whole (pushing prices up). Continued low short-term interest rates kept yields on money market securities near their all-time lows.
|
|
|
Sincerely, |
|
|
|
|
|
Rob Kapito |
|
President, BlackRock Advisors, LLC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
“Although markets remain highly volatile and conditions are highly uncertain, BlackRock remains focused on finding opportunities in this environment.” |
|
|
|
Rob Kapito |
|
President, BlackRock Advisors, LLC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Returns as of July 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6-month |
|
12-month |
|
||
|
US large cap equities |
|
1.46 |
% |
|
19.65 |
% |
|
|
(S&P 500® Index) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US small cap equities |
|
2.63 |
|
|
23.92 |
|
|
|
(Russell 2000® Index) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
International equities |
|
0.93 |
|
|
17.17 |
|
|
|
(MSCI Europe, Australasia, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Far East Index) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Emerging market |
|
3.23 |
|
|
17.45 |
|
|
|
equities (MSCI Emerging |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Markets Index) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3-month Treasury |
|
0.07 |
|
|
0.14 |
|
|
|
bill (BofA Merrill Lynch |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3-Month Treasury |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bill Index) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US Treasury securities |
|
6.93 |
|
|
4.53 |
|
|
|
(BofA Merrill Lynch 10- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year US Treasury Index) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US investment grade |
|
4.23 |
|
|
4.44 |
|
|
|
bonds (Barclays |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital US Aggregate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bond Index) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax-exempt municipal |
|
6.27 |
|
|
3.24 |
|
|
|
bonds (Barclays Capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Bond Index) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US high yield bonds |
|
3.90 |
|
|
12.89 |
|
|
|
(Barclays Capital US |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate High Yield 2% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuer Capped Index) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Index performance is shown for illustrative purposes only. You cannot invest directly in an index. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
THIS PAGE NOT PART OF YOUR FUND REPORT |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the 12-Month Period Ended July 31, 2011 |
At the outset of the 12-month period, investor concerns were focused on the possibility of deflation and a double-dip in the US economy thus leading to a flatter municipal yield curve at that time as compared to July 31, 2011. From July through September 2010, rates moved lower (and prices higher) across the curve, reaching historic lows in August when the yield on 5-year issues touched 1.06%, the 10-year reached 2.18%, and the 30-year closed at 3.67%. However, the market took a turn in October amid a “perfect storm” of events that ultimately resulted in the worst quarterly performance for municipals since the Fed tightening cycle of 1994. Treasury yields lost support due to concerns over the US deficit and municipal valuations suffered a quick and severe setback as it became evident that the Build America Bond (“BAB”) program would expire at the end of 2010. The BAB program opened the taxable market to municipal issuers, which had successfully alleviated supply pressure in the traditional tax-exempt marketplace, bringing down yields in that space.
Towards the end of the fourth quarter 2010, news about municipal finance troubles mounted and damaged confidence among retail investors. From mid-November through year end, weekly outflows from municipal mutual funds averaged over $2.5 billion. Political uncertainty surrounding the midterm elections and tax policies along with the expiration of the BAB program exacerbated the situation. These conditions combined with seasonal illiquidity sapped willful market participation from the trading community. December brought declining demand with no comparable reduction in supply as issuers rushed their deals to market before the BAB program was retired. This supply-demand imbalance led to wider quality spreads and higher yields.
Demand is usually strong at the beginning of a new year, but retail investors continued to move away from municipal mutual funds in 2011. From mid-November, outflows persisted for 29 consecutive weeks, totaling $35.1 billion before the trend finally broke in June. Weak demand has been counterbalanced by lower supply in 2011. According to Thomson Reuters, year-to-date through July, new issuance was down 40% compared to the same period last year. Issuers have been reluctant to bring new deals to the market due to higher interest rates, fiscal policy changes and a reduced need for municipal borrowing. In this positive technical environment, the S&P/Investortools Main Municipal Bond Index gained 4.22% for the second quarter of 2011, its best second-quarter performance since 1992, and municipals outperformed most other fixed income asset classes for the quarter.
Municipals displayed an impressive degree of resiliency throughout the month of July as Moody’s Investors Service signaled that its potential downgrade of US government debt could also result in downgrades of a number of triple A-rated states and nearly 200 local general obligation issues. July also brought weaker US economic data. The housing market remained sluggish, fewer jobs were created and consumer confidence declined. US Treasury yields moved lower, dragging municipal yields down, which pushed bond prices up.
Overall, the municipal yield curve steepened during the period from July 31, 2010 to July 31, 2011. As measured by Thomson Municipal Market Data, yields on AAA quality-rated 30-year municipals rose 38 basis points (“bps”) to 4.35%, while yields for 5-year maturities rallied by 13 bps to 1.16%, and 10-year maturities increased by 10 bps to 2.67%. With the exception of the 2- to 5-year range, the yield spread between maturities increased over the past year, with the greatest increase seen in the 5- to 30-year range, where the spread widened by 51 bps, while overall the slope between 2- and 30-year maturities increased by 35 bps to 3.95%.
The fundamental picture for municipalities is improving as most states began their new fiscal year with a balanced budget. Austerity is the general theme across the country, while a small number of states continue to rely on the “kick the can” approach, using aggressive revenue projections and accounting gimmicks to close their shortfalls. As long as economic growth stays positive, tax receipts for states should continue to rise and lead to better credit fundamentals. BlackRock maintains a constructive view of the municipal market, recognizing that careful credit research and security selection remain imperative amid uncertainty in the economic environment.
|
|
|
|
|
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Index performance is shown for illustrative purposes only. You cannot invest directly in an index. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
ANNUAL REPORT |
JULY 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BlackRock MuniHoldings Quality Fund II, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fund Overview |
|
Effective November 9, 2010, BlackRock MuniHoldings Insured Fund II, Inc. changed its name to BlackRock MuniHoldings Quality Fund II, Inc.
BlackRock MuniHoldings Quality Fund II, Inc.’s (MUE) (the “Fund”) investment objective is to provide shareholders with current income exempt from federal income taxes. The Fund seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing primarily in long-term, investment grade municipal obligations exempt from federal income taxes (except that the interest may be subject to the federal alternative minimum tax). Under normal market conditions, the Fund invests at least 80% of its assets in municipal obligations with remaining maturities of one year or more at the time of investment. The Fund may invest directly in such securities or synthetically through the use of derivatives.
No assurance can be given that the Fund’s investment objective will be achieved.
|
|
|
Performance |
Effective November 9, 2010, the Fund’s investment policy was changed by the removal of the insurance investment policy that required at least 80% of Fund assets to be invested in insured municipal securities. Accordingly, the Fund was moved from the Lipper Insured Municipal Debt Funds (Leveraged) category into the Lipper General Municipal Debt Funds (Leveraged) category. During the period, Lipper combined these categories into one Lipper General & Insured Municipal Debt Funds (Leveraged) category. For the 12 months ended July 31, 2011, the Fund returned (6.38)% based on market price and 3.19% based on net asset value (“NAV”). For the same period, the closed-end Lipper General & Insured Municipal Debt Funds (Leveraged) category posted an average return of (2.24)% based on market price and 4.19% based on NAV. All returns reflect reinvestment of dividends. The Fund moved from a premium to NAV to a discount by period end, which accounts for the difference between performance based on price and performance based on NAV. The following discussion relates to performance based on NAV. The Fund’s holdings in spread sectors, including housing and health care bonds, enhanced performance as these sectors provided a relatively high degree of incremental income in the low interest rate environment. In addition, the Fund’s holdings of premium coupon bonds (6% or higher) and shorter-duration bonds (bonds with lower sensitivity to interest rate movements) performed well as long-term interest rates climbed toward the end of 2010 and into the early part of 2011. Conversely, the Fund’s exposure to bonds with longer duration (greater sensitivity to interest rate movements) and bonds with longer-dated maturities detracted from performance as the municipal yield curve steepened over the 12-month period. The surprise non-extension of the BAB program at the end of 2010 put additional upward pressure on the long end of the yield curve, where most of the BAB supply was issued.
The views expressed reflect the opinions of BlackRock as of the date of this report and are subject to change based on changes in market, economic or other conditions. These views are not intended to be a forecast of future events and are no guarantee of future results.
|
|
|
|
Fund Information |
|
|
Symbol on New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) |
MUE |
|
Initial Offering Date |
February 26, 1999 |
|
Yield on Closing Market Price as of July 31, 2011 ($12.46)1 |
7.08% |
|
Tax Equivalent Yield2 |
10.89% |
|
Current Monthly Distribution per Common Share3 |
$0.0735 |
|
Current Annualized Distribution per Common Share3 |
$0.8820 |
|
Leverage as of July 31, 20114 |
40% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
Yield on closing market price is calculated by dividing the current annualized distribution per share by the closing market price. Past performance does not guarantee future results. |
|
|
||
|
|
2 |
Tax equivalent yield assumes the maximum federal tax rate of 35%. |
|
|
||
|
|
3 |
The distribution rate is not constant and is subject to change. |
|
|
||
|
|
4 |
Represents Auction Market Preferred Shares (“AMPS”) and tender option bond trusts (“TOBs”) as a percentage of total managed assets, which is the total assets of the Fund, including any assets attributable to AMPS and TOBs, minus the sum of accrued liabilities. For a discussion of leveraging techniques utilized by the Fund, please see The Benefits and Risks of Leveraging on page 10. |
The table below summarizes the changes in the Fund’s market price and NAV per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7/31/11 |
|
7/31/10 |
|
Change |
|
High |
|
Low |
|
|||||
|
Market Price |
|
$ |
12.46 |
|
$ |
14.26 |
|
|
(12.62 |
)% |
$ |
14.63 |
|
$ |
10.87 |
|
|
Net Asset Value |
|
$ |
13.07 |
|
$ |
13.57 |
|
|
(3.68 |
)% |
$ |
14.04 |
|
$ |
11.62 |
|
The following charts show the sector and credit quality allocations of the Fund’s long-term investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sector Allocations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
7/31/11 |
|
7/31/10 |
|
||
|
County/City/Special District/School District |
|
26 |
% |
|
28 |
% |
|
|
Utilities |
|
23 |
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
Transportation |
|
19 |
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
Health |
|
9 |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
Corporate |
|
9 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
State |
|
9 |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
Housing |
|
2 |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
Education |
|
2 |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
Tobacco |
|
1 |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit Quality Allocations5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
7/31/11 |
|
7/31/10 |
|
||
|
AAA/Aaa |
|
16 |
% |
|
54 |
% |
|
|
AA/Aa |
|
62 |
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
A |
|
18 |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
BBB/Baa |
|
3 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
BB/Ba |
|
1 |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
Not Rated |
|
— |
|
|
1 |
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
Using the higher of Standard & Poor’s (“S&P’s”) or Moody’s Investors Service (“Moody’s”) ratings. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
The investment advisor has deemed certain of these non-rated securities to be of investment grade quality. As of July 31, 2010, the market value of these securities was $3,925,265, representing 1% of the Fund’s long-term investments. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT |
JULY 31, 2011 |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fund Summary as of July 31, 2011 |
BlackRock MuniYield California Quality Fund, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
Fund Overview |
|
Effective November 9, 2010, BlackRock MuniYield California Insured Fund, Inc. changed its name to BlackRock MuniYield California Quality Fund, Inc.
BlackRock MuniYield California Quality Fund, Inc.’s (MCA) (the “Fund”) investment objective is to provide shareholders with as high a level of current income exempt from federal and California income taxes as is consistent with its investment policies and prudent investment management. The Fund seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing at least 80% of its assets in municipal obligations exempt from federal income taxes (except that the interest may be subject to the federal alternative minimum tax) and California income taxes. Under normal market conditions, the Fund invests primarily in long-term municipal obligations that are investment grade quality at the time of investment. The Fund may invest directly in such securities or synthetically through the use of derivatives.
No assurance can be given that the Fund’s investment objective will be achieved.
|
|
|
Performance |
Effective November 9, 2010, the Fund’s investment policy was changed by the removal of the insurance investment policy that required at least 80% of Fund assets to be invested in insured municipal securities. Accordingly, the Fund was moved from the Lipper Single-State Insured Municipal Debt Funds category into the Lipper California Municipal Debt Funds category. For the 12 months ended July 31, 2011, the Fund returned (1.01)% based on market price and 4.21% based on NAV. For the same period, the closed-end Lipper California Municipal Debt Funds category posted an average return of (1.84)% based on market price and 3.16% based on NAV, while the closed-end Lipper Single-State Insured Municipal Debt Funds category posted an average return of (1.22)% based on market price and 3.22% based on NAV. All returns reflect reinvestment of dividends. The Fund’s discount to NAV, which widened during the period, accounts for the difference between performance based on price and performance based on NAV. The following discussion relates to performance based on NAV. The Fund’s slightly long duration posture benefited performance as bonds with longer maturities experienced the greatest price appreciation as the yield curve flattened amid the investor flight-to-quality in the latter half of the period. Increased exposure to inverse floating rate instruments (tender option bonds) while the municipal yield curve was historically steep boosted the Fund’s income accrual. Holdings of higher quality essential service revenue bonds had a positive impact on performance as investors favored these securities versus general obligation bonds and school district credits, which lagged due to budget concerns in California. Additionally, the Fund benefited from holding insured credits with relatively strong underlying issuers when monoline insurance company policies were losing their value to the retail marketplace. Conversely, some widening of credit spreads, especially among California school district and health care issues, had a negative impact on returns. In addition, the Fund’s cash reserves detracted as cash underperformed longer maturity coupon bonds as yields fell and spreads tightened. The Fund held short-call, high-coupon bonds, which have good defensive characteristics, but proved a drag on returns when rates fell.
The views expressed reflect the opinions of BlackRock as of the date of this report and are subject to change based on changes in market, economic or other conditions. These views are not intended to be a forecast of future events and are no guarantee of future results.
|
|
|
|
Fund Information |
|
|
|
|
|
Symbol on NYSE |
MCA |
|
Initial Offering Date |
October 30, 1992 |
|
Yield on Closing Market Price as of July 31, 2011 ($13.00)1 |
6.78% |
|
Tax Equivalent Yield2 |
10.43% |
|
Current Monthly Distribution per Common Share3 |
$0.0735 |
|
Current Annualized Distribution per Common Share3 |
$0.8820 |
|
Leverage as of July 31, 20114 |
41% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
Yield on closing market price is calculated by dividing the current annualized distribution per share by the closing market price. Past performance does not guarantee future results. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
Tax equivalent yield assumes the maximum federal tax rate of 35%. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
The distribution rate is not constant and is subject to change. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
Represents Variable Rate Demand Preferred Shares (“VRDP Shares”) and TOBs as a percentage of total managed assets, which is the total assets of the Fund, including any assets attributable to VRDP Shares and TOBs, minus the sum of accrued liabilities. For a discussion of leveraging techniques utilized by the Fund, please see The Benefits and Risks of Leveraging on page 10. |
The table below summarizes the changes in the Fund’s market price and NAV per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7/31/11 |
|
7/31/10 |
|
Change |
|
High |
|
Low |
|
|||||
|
Market Price |
|
$ |
13.00 |
|
$ |
14.02 |
|
|
(7.28 |
)% |
$ |
14.70 |
|
$ |
11.83 |
|
|
Net Asset Value |
|
$ |
14.31 |
|
$ |
14.66 |
|
|
(2.39 |
)% |
$ |
15.22 |
|
$ |
12.62 |
|
The following charts show the sector and credit quality allocations of the Fund’s long-term investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sector Allocations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
7/31/11 |
|
7/31/10 |
|
||
|
County/City/Special District/School District |
|
45 |
% |
|
55 |
% |
|
|
Utilities |
|
28 |
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
Education |
|
10 |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
Transportation |
|
8 |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
Health |
|
4 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
Corporate |
|
4 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
State |
|
1 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit Quality Allocations5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
7/31/11 |
|
7/31/10 |
|
||
|
AAA/Aaa |
|
11 |
% |
|
57 |
% |
|
|
AA/Aa |
|
79 |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
A |
|
10 |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
Using the higher of S&P’s or Moody’s ratings. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
ANNUAL REPORT |
JULY 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fund Summary as of July 31, 2011 |
BlackRock MuniYield Michigan Quality Fund II, Inc. |
|
|
|
Fund Overview |
Effective
November 9, 2010, BlackRock MuniYield Michigan Insured Fund II, Inc. changed
its name to BlackRock MuniYield Michigan Quality Fund II, Inc.
BlackRock
MuniYield Michigan Quality Fund II, Inc.’s (MYM) (the “Fund”) investment
objective is to provide shareholders with as high a level of current income
exempt from federal and Michigan income taxes as is consistent with its
investment policies and prudent investment management. The Fund seeks to
achieve its investment objective by investing at least 80% of its assets in
municipal obligations exempt from federal income taxes (except that the
interest may be subject to the federal alternative minimum tax) and Michigan
income taxes. Under normal market conditions, the Fund invests primarily in
long-term municipal obligations that are investment grade quality at the time
of investment. The Fund may invest directly in such securities or synthetically
through the use of derivatives.
No assurance can be given that the Fund’s investment objective will be achieved.
|
|
|
Performance |
Effective November 9, 2010, the Fund’s investment policy was changed by the removal of the insurance investment policy that required at least 80% of Fund assets to be invested in insured municipal securities. Accordingly, the Fund was moved from the Lipper Single-State Insured Municipal Debt Funds category into the Lipper Michigan Municipal Debt Funds category. For the 12 months ended July 31, 2011, the Fund returned (3.89)% based on market price and 4.74% based on NAV. For the same period, the closed-end Lipper Michigan Municipal Debt Funds category posted an average return of 0.18% based on market price and 4.12% based on NAV, while the closed-end Lipper Single-State Insured Municipal Debt Funds category posted an average return of (1.22)% based on market price and 3.22% based on NAV. All returns reflect reinvestment of dividends. The Fund’s discount to NAV, which widened during the period, accounts for the difference between performance based on price and performance based on NAV. The following discussion relates to performance based on NAV. The Fund’s slightly long duration posture benefited performance as bonds with longer maturities experienced the greatest price appreciation as the yield curve flattened amid the investor flight-to-quality in the latter half of the period. Exposure to inverse floating rate instruments (tender option bonds) while the municipal yield curve was historically steep boosted the Fund’s income accrual. The Fund’s holdings of higher quality essential service revenue bonds also had a positive impact on performance. Conversely, some widening of credit spreads, especially among Michigan and health care issues, had a negative impact on returns. In addition, the Fund’s cash reserves detracted as cash underperformed longer maturity coupon bonds as yields fell and spreads tightened.
The views expressed reflect the opinions of BlackRock as of the date of this report and are subject to change based on changes in market, economic or other conditions. These views are not intended to be a forecast of future events and are no guarantee of future results.
|
|
|
|
Fund Information |
|
|
|
|
|
Symbol on NYSE |
MYM |
|
Initial Offering Date |
February 28, 1992 |
|
Yield on Closing Market Price as of July 31, 2011 ($12.28)1 |
6.99% |
|
Tax Equivalent Yield2 |
10.75% |
|
Current Monthly Distribution per Common Share3 |
$0.0715 |
|
Current Annualized Distribution per Common Share3 |
$0.8580 |
|
Leverage as of July 31, 20114 |
37% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
Yield on closing market price is calculated by dividing the current annualized distribution per share by the closing market price. Past performance does not guarantee future results. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
Tax equivalent yield assumes the maximum federal tax rate of 35%. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
The distribution is not constant and is subject to change. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
Represents VRDP Shares and TOBs as a percentage of total managed assets, which is the total assets of the Fund, including any assets attributable to VRDP Shares and TOBs, minus the sum of accrued liabilities. For a discussion of leveraging techniques utilized by the Fund, please see The Benefits and Risks of Leveraging on page 10. |
The table below summarizes the changes in the Fund’s market price and NAV per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7/31/11 |
|
7/31/10 |
|
Change |
|
High |
|
Low |
|
|||||
|
Market Price |
|
$ |
12.28 |
|
$ |
13.67 |
|
|
(10.17 |
)% |
$ |
13.95 |
|
$ |
11.01 |
|
|
Net Asset Value |
|
$ |
13.53 |
|
$ |
13.82 |
|
|
(2.10 |
)% |
$ |
14.25 |
|
$ |
12.23 |
|
The following charts show the sector and credit quality allocations of the Fund’s long-term investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
Sector Allocations |
|||||||
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
7/31/11 |
|
7/31/10 |
|
||
|
County/City/Special District/School District |
|
|
23 |
% |
|
26 |
% |
|
Utilities |
|
|
17 |
|
|
12 |
|
|
Health |
|
|
14 |
|
|
15 |
|
|
State |
|
|
11 |
|
|
13 |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
11 |
|
|
12 |
|
|
Transportation |
|
|
11 |
|
|
12 |
|
|
Education |
|
|
9 |
|
|
8 |
|
|
Housing |
|
|
4 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
Credit Quality Allocations5 |
|||||||
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
7/31/11 |
|
7/31/10 |
|
||
|
AAA/Aaa |
|
|
2 |
% |
|
40 |
% |
|
AA/Aa |
|
|
69 |
|
|
27 |
|
|
A |
|
|
24 |
|
|
28 |
|
|
BBB/Baa |
|
|
3 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
Not Rated6 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
Using the higher of S&P’s or Moody’s ratings. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
The investment advisor has deemed certain of these non-rated securities to be of investment grade quality. As of July 31, 2011 and July 31, 2010, the market value of these securities was $5,295,911 and $4,382,645, each representing 2%, respectively, of the Fund’s long-term investments. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT |
JULY 31, 2011 |
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fund Summary as of July 31, 2011 |
BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund, Inc. |
|
|
|
Fund Overview |
Effective November 9, 2010, BlackRock MuniYield New York Insured Fund, Inc. changed its name to BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund, Inc.
BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund, Inc.’s (MYN) (the “Fund”) investment objective is to provide shareholders with as high a level of current income exempt from federal income taxes and New York State and New York City personal income taxes as is consistent with its investment policies and prudent investment management. The Fund seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing at least 80% of its assets in municipal obligations exempt from federal income taxes (except that the interest may be subject to the federal alternative minimum tax) and New York State and New York City personal income taxes. Under normal market conditions, the Fund invests primarily in long-term municipal obligations that are investment grade quality at the time of investment. The Fund may invest directly in such securities or synthetically through the use of derivatives.
No assurance can be given that the Fund’s investment objective will be achieved.
|
|
|
Performance |
Effective November 9, 2010, the Fund’s investment policy was changed by the removal of the insurance investment policy that required at least 80% of Fund assets to be invested in insured municipal securities. Accordingly, the Fund was moved from the Lipper Single-State Insured Municipal Debt Funds category into the Lipper New York Municipal Debt Funds category. For the 12 months ended July 31, 2011, the Fund returned (0.81)% based on market price and 3.36% based on NAV. For the same period, the closed-end Lipper New York Municipal Debt Funds category posted an average return of (0.55)% based on market price and 3.05% based on NAV, while the closed-end Lipper Single-State Insured Municipal Debt Funds category posted an average return of (1.22)% based on market price and 3.22% based on NAV. All returns reflect reinvestment of dividends. The Fund’s discount to NAV, which widened during the period, accounts for the difference between performance based on price and performance based on NAV. The following discussion relates to performance based on NAV. Yields on the long end of the municipal yield curve were ultimately higher at the close of the period than where they started. Therefore, positive performance came mostly from the Fund’s exposure to higher-yielding sectors including housing, health care and corporate/industrial development bonds, which provided incremental income. The Fund also benefited from its exposure to lower-quality bonds, which, in addition to offering higher embedded yields, experienced some price appreciation due to spread compression during the period. The Fund was most heavily invested in tax-backed credits, where performance was moderately positive during the period. Low exposure to the short end of the yield curve and high-quality pre-refunded bonds proved beneficial as performance was weak in those issues. Detracting from performance was the Fund’s allocation to Puerto Rico credits, which underperformed New York issues during the period. Low exposure to tobacco, the strongest performing sector, was a disadvantage. The Fund’s holdings of higher education bonds hindered returns; however, we increased exposure to the sector despite its recent underperformance as these holdings help diversify the portfolio and we believe they will benefit the Fund during periods of scarce new-issue supply. For most of the period, the Fund maintained a slightly long duration bias and exposure to the long end of the yield curve, which also detracted from performance.
The views expressed reflect the opinions of BlackRock as of the date of this report and are subject to change based on changes in market, economic or other conditions. These views are not intended to be a forecast of future events and are no guarantee of future results.
|
|
|
|
Fund Information |
|
|
|
|
|
Symbol on NYSE |
MYN |
|
Initial Offering Date |
February 28, 1992 |
|
Yield on Closing Market Price as of July 31, 2011 ($12.60)1 |
6.76% |
|
Tax Equivalent Yield2 |
10.40% |
|
Current Monthly Distribution per Common Share3 |
$0.071 |
|
Current Annualized Distribution per Common Share3 |
$0.852 |
|
Leverage as of July 31, 20114 |
38% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
Yield on closing market price is calculated by dividing the current annualized distribution per share by the closing market price. Past performance does not guarantee future results. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
Tax equivalent yield assumes the maximum federal tax rate of 35%. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
The distribution rate is not constant and is subject to change. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
Represents VRDP Shares and TOBs as a percentage of total managed assets, which is the total assets of the Fund, including any assets attributable to VRDP Shares and TOBs, minus the sum of accrued liabilities. For a discussion of leveraging techniques utilized by the Fund, please see The Benefits and Risks of Leveraging on page 10. |
The table below summarizes the changes in the Fund’s market price and NAV per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7/31/11 |
|
7/31/10 |
|
Change |
|
High |
|
Low |
|
|||||
|
Market Price |
|
$ |
12.60 |
|
$ |
13.57 |
|
|
(7.15 |
)% |
$ |
14.40 |
|
$ |
11.60 |
|
|
Net Asset Value |
|
$ |
13.44 |
|
$ |
13.89 |
|
|
(3.24 |
) % |
$ |
14.37 |
|
$ |
12.11 |
|
The following charts show the sector and credit quality allocations of the Fund’s long-term investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sector Allocations |
|||||||
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
7/31/11 |
|
7/31/10 |
|
||
|
Transportation |
|
|
29 |
% |
|
31 |
% |
|
County/City/Special District/School District |
|
|
28 |
|
|
29 |
|
|
Education |
|
|
11 |
|
|
7 |
|
|
State |
|
|
11 |
|
|
11 |
|
|
Utilities |
|
|
8 |
|
|
10 |
|
|
Health |
|
|
5 |
|
|
4 |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
4 |
|
|
5 |
|
|
Housing |
|
|
3 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
Tobacco |
|
|
1 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
Credit Quality Allocations5 |
|||||||
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
7/31/11 |
|
7/31/10 |
|
||
|
AAA/Aaa |
|
|
12 |
% |
|
44 |
% |
|
AA/Aa |
|
|
54 |
|
|
17 |
|
|
A |
|
|
21 |
|
|
34 |
|
|
BBB/Baa |
|
|
10 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
BB/Ba |
|
|
2 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
Not Rated |
|
|
16 |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
Using the higher of S&P’s or Moody’s ratings. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
The investment advisor has deemed certain of these non-rated securities to be of investment grade quality. As of July 31, 2011, the market value of these securities was $3,909,236, representing 1% of the Fund’s long-term investments. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
ANNUAL REPORT |
JULY 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fund Summary as of July 31, 2011 |
BlackRock MuniYield Quality Fund III, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fund Overview |
Effective November 9, 2010, BlackRock MuniYield Insured Fund, Inc. changed its name to BlackRock MuniYield Quality Fund III, Inc.
BlackRock MuniYield Quality Fund III, Inc.’s (MYI) (the “Fund”) investment objective is to provide shareholders with as high a level of current income exempt from federal income taxes as is consistent with its investment policies and prudent investment management. The Fund seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing at least 80% of its assets in municipal obligations exempt from federal income taxes (except that the interest may be subject to the federal alternative minimum tax). Under normal market conditions, the Fund invests primarily in long-term municipal obligations that are investment grade quality at the time of investment. The Fund may invest directly in such securities or synthetically through the use of derivatives.
|
|
|
No assurance can be given that the Fund’s investment objective will be achieved. |
|
|
|
Performance |
Effective November 9, 2010, the Fund’s investment policy was changed by the removal of the insurance investment policy that required at least 80% of Fund assets to be invested in insured municipal securities. Accordingly, the Fund was moved from the Lipper Insured Municipal Debt Funds (Leveraged) category into the Lipper General Municipal Debt Funds (Leveraged) category. During the period, Lipper combined these categories into one Lipper General & Insured Municipal Debt Funds (Leveraged) category. For the 12 months ended July 31, 2011, the Fund returned (8.12)% based on market price and 3.22% based on NAV. For the same period, the closed-end Lipper General & Insured Municipal Debt Funds (Leveraged) category posted an average return of (2.24)% based on market price and 4.19% based on NAV. All returns reflect reinvestment of dividends. The Fund moved from a premium to NAV to a discount by period end, which accounts for the difference between performance based on price and performance based on NAV. The following discussion relates to performance based on NAV. The Fund’s exposure to bonds with shorter maturities and shorter durations (lower sensitivity to interest rate movements) contributed positively to performance as yields on the short and intermediate parts of the municipal curve increased to a smaller degree than on the long end. Holdings of premium coupon bonds, which tend to be less sensitive to changes in interest rates, also had a positive impact. Conversely, the Fund’s overall long duration stance detracted from performance as interest rates increased for the period as a whole. Further, the Fund’s exposure to longer maturity bonds had a negative impact as the long end of the yield curve steepened during the period (i.e., long-term interest rates increased more than short and intermediate rates).
|
|
|
The views expressed reflect the opinions of BlackRock as of the date of this report and are subject to change based on changes in market, economic or other conditions. These views are not intended to be a forecast of future events and are no guarantee of future results. |
|
|
|
|
Fund Information |
|
|
|
|
|
Symbol on NYSE |
MYI |
|
Initial Offering Date |
March 27, 1992 |
|
Yield on Closing Market Price as of July 31, 2011 ($12.17)1 |
7.10% |
|
Tax Equivalent Yield2 |
10.92% |
|
Current Monthly Distribution per Common Share3 |
$0.072 |
|
Current Annualized Distribution per Common Share3 |
$0.864 |
|
Leverage as of July 31, 20114 |
39% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
Yield on closing market price is calculated by dividing the current annualized distribution per share by the closing market price. Past performance does not guarantee future results. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
Tax equivalent yield assumes the maximum federal tax rate of 35%. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
The distribution rate is not constant and is subject to change. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
Represents VRDP Shares and TOBs as a percentage of total managed assets, which is the total assets of the Fund, including any assets attributable to VRDP Shares and TOBs, minus the sum of accrued liabilities. For a discussion of leveraging techniques utilized by the Fund, please see The Benefits and Risks of Leveraging on page 10. |
The table below summarizes the changes in the Fund’s market price and NAV per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7/31/11 |
|
7/31/10 |
|
Change |
|
High |
|
Low |
|
|||||
|
Market Price |
|
$ |
12.17 |
|
$ |
14.17 |
|
|
(14.11% |
) |
$ |
14.56 |
|
$ |
11.21 |
|
|
Net Asset Value |
|
$ |
13.19 |
|
$ |
13.67 |
|
|
(3.51% |
) |
$ |
14.17 |
|
$ |
11.71 |
|
The following charts show the sector and credit quality allocations of the Fund’s long-term investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sector Allocations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7/31/11 |
|
|
7/31/10 |
|
|
|
Transportation |
|
27 |
% |
|
27 |
% |
|
|
County/City/Special District/School District |
|
24 |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
Utilities |
|
17 |
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
State |
|
10 |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
Education |
|
9 |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
Health |
|
7 |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
Housing |
|
5 |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
Corporate |
|
1 |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit Quality Allocations5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7/31/11 |
|
|
7/31/10 |
|
|
|
AAA/Aaa |
|
7 |
% |
|
46 |
% |
|
|
AA/Aa |
|
65 |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
A |
|
21 |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
BBB/Baa |
|
3 |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
Not Rated |
|
46 |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
Using the higher of S&P’s or Moody’s ratings. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
The investment advisor has deemed certain of these non-rated securities to be of investment grade quality. As of July 31, 2011, the market value of these securities was $20,992,023, representing 1% of the Fund’s long-term investments. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT |
JULY 31, 2011 |
9 |
|
|
|
|
The Funds may utilize leverage to seek to enhance the yield and NAV of their common shares (“Common Shares”). However, these objectives cannot be achieved in all interest rate environments.
To leverage, the Funds issue AMPS or VRDP Shares (collectively, “Preferred Shares”) which pay dividends at prevailing short-term interest rates, and invest the proceeds in long-term municipal bonds. In general, the concept of leveraging is based on the premise that the financing cost of assets to be obtained from leverage, which will be based on short-term interest rates, will normally be lower than the income earned by each Fund on its longer-term portfolio investments. To the extent that the total assets of each Fund (including the assets obtained from leverage) are invested in higher-yielding portfolio investments, each Fund’s holders of Common Shares (“Common Shareholders”) will benefit from the incremental net income.
To illustrate these concepts, assume a Fund’s Common Shares capitalization is $100 million and it issues Preferred Shares for an additional $50 million, creating a total value of $150 million available for investment in long-term municipal bonds. If prevailing short-term interest rates are 3% and long-term interest rates are 6%, the yield curve has a strongly positive slope. In this case, the Fund pays dividends on the $50 million of Preferred Shares based on the lower short-term interest rates. At the same time, the securities purchased by the Fund with assets received from the Preferred Shares issuance earn income based on long-term interest rates. In this case, the dividends paid to holders of Preferred Shares (“Preferred Shareholders”) are significantly lower than the income earned on the Fund’s long-term investments, and therefore the Common Shareholders are the beneficiaries of the incremental net income.
If short-term interest rates rise, narrowing the differential between short-term and long-term interest rates, the incremental net income pickup on the Common Shares will be reduced or eliminated completely. Furthermore, if prevailing short-term interest rates rise above long-term interest rates, the yield curve has a negative slope. In this case, the Fund pays dividends to Preferred Shareholders on the higher short-term interest rates whereas the Fund’s total portfolio earns income based on lower long-term interest rates.
Furthermore, the value of the Funds’ portfolio investments generally varies inversely with the direction of long-term interest rates, although other factors can influence the value of portfolio investments. In contrast, the redemption value of the Funds’ Preferred Shares does not fluctuate in relation to interest rates. As a result, changes in interest rates can influence the Funds’ NAV positively or negatively in addition to the impact on Fund performance from leverage from Preferred Shares discussed above.
The Funds may also leverage their assets through the use of TOBs, as described in Note 1 of the Notes to Financial Statements. TOB investments generally will provide the Funds with economic benefits in periods of declining short-term interest rates, but expose the Funds to risks during periods of rising short-term interest rates similar to those associated with Preferred Shares issued by the Funds, as described above. Additionally, fluctuations in the market value of municipal bonds deposited into the TOB trust may adversely affect each Fund’s NAV per share.
The use of leverage may enhance opportunities for increased income to the Funds and Common Shareholders, but as described above, it also creates risks as short- or long-term interest rates fluctuate. Leverage also will generally cause greater changes in the Funds’ NAVs, market prices and dividend rates than comparable portfolios without leverage. If the income derived from securities purchased with assets received from leverage exceeds the cost of leverage, each Fund’s net income will be greater than if leverage had not been used. Conversely, if the income from the securities purchased is not sufficient to cover the cost of leverage, each Fund’s net income will be less than if leverage had not been used, and therefore the amount available for distribution to Common Shareholders will be reduced. Each Fund may be required to sell portfolio securities at inopportune times or at distressed values in order to comply with regulatory requirements applicable to the use of leverage or as required by the terms of leverage instruments, which may cause a Fund to incur losses. The use of leverage may limit each Fund’s ability to invest in certain types of securities or use certain types of hedging strategies, such as in the case of certain restrictions imposed by ratings agencies that rate Preferred Shares issued by the Funds. Each Fund will incur expenses in connection with the use of leverage, all of which are borne by Common Shareholders and may reduce income to the Common Shares.
Under the Investment Company Act of 1940, the Funds are permitted to issue Preferred Shares in an amount of up to 50% of their total managed assets at the time of issuance. Under normal circumstances, each Fund anticipates that the total economic leverage from Preferred Shares and/or TOBs will not exceed 50% of its total managed assets at the time such leverage is incurred. As of July 31, 2011, the Funds had economic leverage from Preferred Shares and/or TOBs as a percentage of their total managed assets as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Percent
of |
|
MUE |
40% |
|
MCA |
41% |
|
MYM |
37% |
|
MYN |
38% |
|
MYI |
39% |
|
|
|
|
The Funds may invest in various derivative financial instruments, including financial futures contracts as specified in Note 2 of the Notes to Financial Statements, which may constitute forms of economic leverage. Such derivative financial instruments are used to obtain exposure to a market without owning or taking physical custody of securities or to hedge market and/or interest rate risks. Derivative financial instruments involve risks, including the imperfect correlation between the value of a derivative financial instrument and the underlying asset, possible default of the counterparty to the transaction or illiquidity of the derivative financial instrument. The Funds’ ability to use a derivative financial instrument successfully depends on the investment advisor’s ability to predict pertinent market movements accurately, which cannot be assured. The use of derivative financial instruments may result in losses greater than if they had not been used, may require a Fund to sell or purchase portfolio investments at inopportune times or for distressed values, may limit the amount of appreciation a Fund can realize on an investment, may result in lower dividends paid to shareholders or may cause a Fund to hold an investment that it might otherwise sell. The Funds’ investments in these instruments are discussed in detail in the Notes to Financial Statements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
ANNUAL REPORT |
JULY 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BlackRock MuniHoldings Quality Fund II, Inc. (MUE) |
|
|
(Percentages shown are based on Net Assets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Bonds |
|
Par |
|
Value |
|
||
|
Alabama — 3.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Birmingham Special Care Facilities Financing Authority, |
|
$ |
5,225 |
|
$ |
5,590,071 |
|
|
County of Jefferson Alabama, RB, Series A, |
|
|
3,580 |
|
|
3,242,513 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,832,584 |
|
|
Arizona — 0.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State of Arizona, COP, Department of Administration, |
|
|
1,175 |
|
|
1,229,720 |
|
|
Arkansas — 3.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Arkansas Development Finance Authority, Refunding RB, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.35%, 12/01/35 |
|
|
9,555 |
|
|
9,602,011 |
|
|
5.35%, 12/01/11 (a) |
|
|
1,560 |
|
|
1,602,276 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,204,287 |
|
|
California — 17.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
California Educational Facilities Authority, RB, University |
|
|
5,050 |
|
|
5,304,924 |
|
|
California Health Facilities Financing Authority, |
|
|
2,865 |
|
|
3,052,027 |
|
|
City of San Jose CA, AMT, 5.50%, 3/01/30 |
|
|
4,045 |
|
|
4,035,454 |
|
|
City of Sunnyvale California, Refunding RB, |
|
|
2,800 |
|
|
2,912,504 |
|
|
City of Vista California, COP, Refunding, Community |
|
|
2,995 |
|
|
2,789,783 |
|
|
County of Sacramento California, RB, Senior Series A |
|
|
3,500 |
|
|
3,558,205 |
|
|
Emery Unified School District, GO, Election of 2010, |
|
|
1,875 |
|
|
1,943,606 |
|
|
Los Angeles Community College District California, GO: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Election of 2001, Series A (NPFGC), |
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
5,119,700 |
|
|
Election of 2008, Series C, 5.25%, 8/01/39 |
|
|
2,500 |
|
|
2,628,125 |
|
|
Oceanside Unified School District California, GO, |
|
|
3,175 |
|
|
3,253,454 |
|
|
Port of Oakland, Refunding RB, Series M, AMT (NPFGC), |
|
|
2,220 |
|
|
2,223,929 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Bonds |
|
Par |
|
Value |
|
||
|
California (concluded) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redondo Beach Unified School District, GO, Election of |
|
$ |
2,670 |
|
$ |
2,823,632 |
|
|
Roseville Joint Union High School District California, |
|
|
2,985 |
|
|
3,025,686 |
|
|
San Bernardino Community College District, GO, |
|
|
2,165 |
|
|
2,416,660 |
|
|
San Francisco City & County Airports Commission, RB, |
|
|
1,250 |
|
|
1,252,475 |
|
|
State of California, GO, Refunding, Veterans, Series BZ, |
|
|
10 |
|
|
10,008 |
|
|
Stockton Public Financing Authority California, RB, |
|
|
2,430 |
|
|
1,705,714 |
|
|
Ventura County Community College District, GO, |
|
|
3,175 |
|
|
3,371,786 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,427,672 |
|
|
Colorado — 1.6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Colorado Health Facilities Authority, RB, Hospital, |
|
|
3,300 |
|
|
3,660,129 |
|
|
Colorado Housing & Finance Authority, Refunding RB, |
|
|
125 |
|
|
128,991 |
|
|
Regional Transportation District, COP, Series A, |
|
|
765 |
|
|
793,726 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,582,846 |
|
|
District of Columbia — 0.9% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
District of Columbia, RB, Deed Tax, Housing Production |
|
|
2,500 |
|
|
2,502,350 |
|
|
Florida — 13.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
City of Jacksonville, RB, Series A, 5.25%, 10/01/26 |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
2,170,540 |
|
|
County of Miami-Dade Florida, RB: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CAB, Sub-Series A (NPFGC), 5.00%, 10/01/37 (b) |
|
|
275 |
|
|
44,831 |
|
|
Miami International Airport, Series A, AMT (AGM), |
|
|
7,880 |
|
|
7,360,629 |
|
|
Miami International Airport, Series A, AMT (AGM), |
|
|
6,195 |
|
|
6,008,283 |
|
|
Series A, AMT (AGM), 5.00%, 10/01/33 |
|
|
4,220 |
|
|
3,992,584 |
|
|
|
|
Portfolio Abbreviations |
To simplify the listings of portfolio holdings in the Schedules of Investments, the names and descriptions of many of the securities have been abbreviated according to the following list:
|
|
|
|
ACA |
ACA Financial Guaranty Corp. |
|
AGC |
Assured Guaranty Corp. |
|
AGM |
Assured Guaranty Municipal Corp. |
|
AMBAC |
American Municipal Bond Assurance Corp. |
|
AMT |
Alternative Minimum Tax (subject to) |
|
ARB |
Airport Revenue Bonds |
|
BHAC |
Berkshire Hathaway Assurance Corp. |
|
BOCES |
Board of Cooperative Educational Services |
|
CAB |
Capital Appreciation Bonds |
|
COP |
Certificates of Participation |
|
EDA |
Economic Development Authority |
|
EDC |
Economic Development Corp. |
|
ERB |
Education Revenue Bonds |
|
FGIC |
Financial Guaranty Insurance Co. |
|
FHA |
Federal Housing Administration |
|
GAB |
Grant Anticipation Bonds |
|
GO |
General Obligation Bonds |
|
HDA |
Housing Development Authority |
|
HFA |
Housing Finance Agency |
|
HRB |
Housing Revenue Bonds |
|
IDRB |
Industrial Development Revenue Bonds |
|
ISD |
Independent School District |
|
LOC |
Letter of Credit |
|
LRB |
Lease Revenue Bonds |
|
MRB |
Mortgage Revenue Bonds |
|
NPFGC |
National Public Finance Guarantee Corp. |
|
PILOT |
Payment in Lieu of Taxes |
|
PSF-GTD |
Public School Fund-Guaranteed |
|
Q-SBLF |
Qualified School Bond Loan Fund |
|
RB |
Revenue Bonds |
|
SONYMA |
State of New York Mortgage Agency |
|
S/F |
Single-Family |
|
Syncora |
Syncora Guarantee |
|
VRDN |
Variable Rate Demand Notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Financial Statements. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT |
JULY 31, 2011 |
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Schedule of Investments (continued) |
BlackRock MuniHoldings Quality Fund II, Inc. (MUE) |
|
(Percentages shown are based on Net Assets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Bonds |
|
Par |
|
Value |
|
||
|
Florida (concluded) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jacksonville Port Authority, RB (AGC), 6.00%, |
|
$ |
3,625 |
|
$ |
3,661,214 |
|
|
Orange County School Board, COP, Series A (AGC), |
|
|
7,600 |
|
|
7,853,232 |
|
|
Tohopekaliga Water Authority, Refunding RB, Series A, |
|
|
6,965 |
|
|
7,203,133 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,294,446 |
|
|
Georgia — 2.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Augusta-Richmond County Georgia, RB (AGM), |
|
|
2,500 |
|
|
2,563,600 |
|
|
City of Atlanta Georgia, Refunding RB, Series B, AMT, |
|
|
910 |
|
|
916,770 |
|
|
Gwinnett County Hospital Authority, Refunding RB, |
|
|
3,425 |
|
|
3,462,058 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,942,428 |
|
|
Idaho — 0.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Idaho Housing & Finance Association, RB, S/F |
|
|
235 |
|
|
239,881 |
|
|
Illinois — 10.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chicago Board of Education Illinois, GO, Refunding, |
|
|
2,080 |
|
|
2,164,344 |
|
|
Chicago Transit Authority, RB, Federal Transit |
|
|
3,400 |
|
|
3,791,952 |
|
|
City of Chicago Illinois, RB, General, Third Lien: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series A, 5.75%, 1/01/39 |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
2,087,080 |
|
|
Series C (AGM), 5.25%, 1/01/35 |
|
|
2,035 |
|
|
2,069,534 |
|
|
City of Chicago Illinois, Refunding RB: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General, Third Lien, Series C, 6.50%, 1/01/41 |
|
|
9,085 |
|
|
9,998,133 |
|
|
Second Lien (NPFGC), 5.50%, 1/01/30 |
|
|
2,270 |
|
|
2,408,765 |
|
|
Railsplitter Tobacco Settlement Authority, RB: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.50%, 6/01/23 |
|
|
2,350 |
|
|
2,434,717 |
|
|
6.00%, 6/01/28 |
|
|
670 |
|
|
690,000 |
|
|
State of Illinois, RB, Build Illinois, Series B, |
|
|
4,000 |
|
|
4,226,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,871,325 |
|
|
Indiana — 3.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indiana Municipal Power Agency, RB, Series A (NPFGC), |
|
|
8,000 |
|
|
7,925,520 |
|
|
Indianapolis Local Public Improvement Bond Bank, |
|
|
2,370 |
|
|
2,478,499 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,404,019 |
|
|
Iowa — 0.6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Iowa Finance Authority, Refunding RB, Iowa Health |
|
|
1,710 |
|
|
1,774,621 |
|
|
Kansas — 0.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sedgwick & Shawnee Counties Kansas, MRB, |
|
|
1,415 |
|
|
1,437,612 |
|
|
Kentucky — 0.9% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kentucky Economic Development Finance Authority, RB, |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
1,030,960 |
|
|
Kentucky State Property & Buildings Commission, |
|
|
1,525 |
|
|
1,614,090 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,645,050 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Bonds |
|
Par |
|
Value |
|
||
|
Louisiana — 1.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Louisiana State Citizens Property Insurance Corp., RB, |
|
$ |
3,550 |
|
$ |
3,881,286 |
|
|
Michigan — 11.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
City of Detroit Michigan, RB: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Lien, Series B (NPFGC), 5.50%, 7/01/29 |
|
|
4,170 |
|
|
4,226,378 |
|
|
Senior Lien, Series B (AGM), 7.50%, 7/01/33 |
|
|
3,500 |
|
|
4,126,605 |
|
|
City of Detroit Michigan, Refunding RB: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Lien, Series C (BHAC), 5.75%, 7/01/27 |
|
|
2,600 |
|
|
2,748,616 |
|
|
Second Lien, Series E (BHAC), 5.75%, 7/01/31 |
|
|
5,060 |
|
|
5,318,769 |
|
|
Senior Lien, Series C-1 (AGM), 7.00%, 7/01/27 |
|
|
4,180 |
|
|
4,909,285 |
|
|
Senior Lien, Series C-2 (BHAC), 5.25%, 7/01/29 |
|
|
1,860 |
|
|
1,913,140 |
|
|
Hudsonville Public Schools, GO, School Building & Site |
|
|
3,420 |
|
|
3,469,282 |
|
|
Michigan State Building Authority, Refunding RB, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.25%, 10/15/24 |
|
|
1,440 |
|
|
1,562,530 |
|
|
5.25%, 10/15/25 |
|
|
750 |
|
|
808,050 |
|
|
Michigan Strategic Fund, Refunding RB, Detroit Edison |
|
|
750 |
|
|
737,850 |
|
|
Royal Oak Hospital Finance Authority Michigan, |
|
|
3,115 |
|
|
3,596,236 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,416,741 |
|
|
Minnesota — 0.7% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
City of Minneapolis Minnesota, Refunding RB, Fairview |
|
|
1,975 |
|
|
2,151,525 |
|
|
Nevada — 4.9% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clark County Water Reclamation District, GO, Series A, |
|
|
3,210 |
|
|
3,347,099 |
|
|
County of Clark Nevada, RB: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Las Vegas-McCarran International Airport, Series A |
|
|
4,565 |
|
|
4,589,468 |
|
|
Subordinate Lien, Series A-2 (NPFGC), |
|
|
6,595 |
|
|
6,456,703 |
|
|
Nevada Housing Division, Refunding RB, S/F Mortgage, |
|
|
95 |
|
|
96,554 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,489,824 |
|
|
New Jersey — 6.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New Jersey EDA, RB, Motor Vehicle Surcharge, Series A |
|
|
11,000 |
|
|
11,184,030 |
|
|
New Jersey Health Care Facilities Financing Authority, |
|
|
3,400 |
|
|
3,503,224 |
|
|
New Jersey Transportation Trust Fund Authority, RB, |
|
|
2,930 |
|
|
3,110,283 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,797,537 |
|
|
New York — 4.6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New York City Municipal Water Finance Authority, RB: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2009, Series EE, 5.25%, 6/15/40 |
|
|
6,930 |
|
|
7,247,810 |
|
|
Second Generation Resolution, Series EE, |
|
|
3,720 |
|
|
3,946,139 |
|
|
New York City Transitional Finance Authority, RB, Fiscal |
|
|
2,300 |
|
|
2,389,056 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,583,005 |
|
|
North Carolina — 0.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North Carolina HFA, RB, Home Ownership, Series 14A, |
|
|
970 |
|
|
970,737 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Financial Statements. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
ANNUAL REPORT |
JULY 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Schedule of Investments (continued) |
BlackRock MuniHoldings Quality Fund II, Inc. (MUE) |
|
(Percentages shown are based on Net Assets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Bonds |
|
Par |
|
Value |
|
||
|
Pennsylvania — 1.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Delaware River Port Authority, RB, Series D (AGM), |
|
$ |
3,000 |
|
$ |
3,012,150 |
|
|
Puerto Rico — 1.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., RB, First |
|
|
3,500 |
|
|
3,754,660 |
|
|
South Carolina — 6.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South Carolina State Housing Finance & Development |
|
|
640 |
|
|
649,299 |
|
|
South Carolina State Public Service Authority, RB: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Santee Cooper, Series A, 5.50%, 1/01/38 |
|
|
2,500 |
|
|
2,662,675 |
|
|
Series A (AMBAC), 5.00%, 1/01/42 |
|
|
15,000 |
|
|
15,226,950 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,538,924 |
|
|
Texas — 20.9% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
City of Austin Texas, Refunding RB, Series A (AGM): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.00%, 11/15/28 |
|
|
1,795 |
|
|
1,903,023 |
|
|
5.00%, 11/15/29 |
|
|
2,270 |
|
|
2,386,996 |
|
|
City of Houston Texas, Refunding RB, Combined, First |
|
|
6,700 |
|
|
7,456,430 |
|
|
Clifton Higher Education Finance Corp., Refunding RB, |
|
|
3,120 |
|
|
3,305,484 |
|
|
Dallas Area Rapid Transit, Refunding RB, Senior Lien, |
|
|
5,965 |
|
|
6,200,021 |
|
|
Harris County Health Facilities Development Corp., |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
1,107,580 |
|
|
Lubbock Cooper ISD Texas, GO, School Building (AGC), |
|
|
1,250 |
|
|
1,314,700 |
|
|
North Texas Tollway Authority, RB: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Special Projects System, Series A, 5.50%, |
|
|
5,480 |
|
|
5,815,211 |
|
|
System, First Tier, Series K-2 (AGC), 6.00%, 1/01/38 |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
1,052,460 |
|
|
North Texas Tollway Authority, Refunding RB, (NPFGC), |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.75%, 1/01/40 |
|
|
11,575 |
|
|
11,660,771 |
|
|
Series A, 5.13%, 1/01/28 |
|
|
3,425 |
|
|
3,497,130 |
|
|
Series A, 5.63%, 1/01/33 |
|
|
10,975 |
|
|
11,280,654 |
|
|
Series B, 5.75%, 1/01/40 |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
1,007,410 |
|
|
Tarrant County Cultural Education Facilities Finance |
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
3,186,270 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61,174,140 |
|
|
Utah — 1.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
City of Riverton Utah, RB, IHC Health Services, Inc., |
|
|
3,500 |
|
|
3,502,205 |
|
|
Virginia — 0.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Virginia Public School Authority, RB, School Financing, |
|
|
2,195 |
|
|
2,462,263 |
|
|
Washington — 1.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
City of Seattle Washington, Refunding RB, Series A, |
|
|
2,400 |
|
|
2,537,952 |
|
|
State of Washington, GO, Various Purpose, Series B, |
|
|
1,865 |
|
|
1,987,064 |
|
|
Washington Health Care Facilities Authority, Refunding |
|
|
670 |
|
|
686,047 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,211,063 |
|
|
Total Municipal Bonds — 121.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
355,334,901 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Bonds Transferred to |
|
Par |
|
Value |
|
||
|
Alabama — 1.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mobile Board of Water & Sewer Commissioners, RB |
|
$ |
3,750 |
|
$ |
3,821,287 |
|
|
California — 3.7% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
City of San Jose California, GO, Libraries, Parks, and |
|
|
3,805 |
|
|
3,868,585 |
|
|
San Diego Community College District California, |
|
|
1,486 |
|
|
1,523,733 |
|
|
Sequoia Union High School District California, GO, |
|
|
5,189 |
|
|
5,364,749 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,757,067 |
|
|
Colorado — 3.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Colorado Health Facilities Authority, RB, Catholic |
|
|
9,410 |
|
|
9,351,940 |
|
|
District of Columbia — 0.6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
District of Columbia Water & Sewer Authority, RB, |
|
|
1,700 |
|
|
1,950,161 |
|
|
Florida — 7.7% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
City of St. Petersburg Florida, Refunding RB (NPFGC), |
|
|
6,493 |
|
|
6,536,228 |
|
|
County of Miami-Dade Florida, GO, Building Better |
|
|
12,500 |
|
|
13,511,500 |
|
|
Lee County Housing Finance Authority, RB, Multi- |
|
|
2,235 |
|
|
2,463,775 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,511,503 |
|
|
Georgia — 2.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Augusta-Richmond County Georgia, RB (AGM) |
|
|
6,290 |
|
|
6,481,971 |
|
|
Illinois — 6.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chicago Illinois O’Hare International Airport, RB, |
|
|
15,000 |
|
|
14,803,350 |
|
|
City of Chicago Illinois, Refunding RB, Second Lien |
|
|
3,969 |
|
|
4,069,447 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,872,797 |
|
|
Kentucky — 0.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kentucky State Property & Building Commission, |
|
|
2,304 |
|
|
2,472,823 |
|
|
Massachusetts — 1.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Massachusetts School Building Authority, RB, |
|
|
4,994 |
|
|
5,190,046 |
|
|
Nevada — 6.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clark County Water Reclamation District, GO: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Limited Tax, 6.00%, 7/01/38 |
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
10,964,200 |
|
|
Series B, 5.50%, 7/01/29 |
|
|
8,247 |
|
|
8,963,496 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,927,696 |
|
|
New Jersey — 1.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New Jersey State Housing & Mortgage Finance |
|
|
3,941 |
|
|
4,048,433 |
|
|
New York — 2.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales Tax Asset Receivable Corp., RB, Series A |
|
|
6,751 |
|
|
7,257,202 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Financial Statements. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT |
JULY 31, 2011 |
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Schedule of Investments (concluded) |
BlackRock MuniHoldings Quality Fund II, Inc. (MUE) |
|
(Percentages shown are based on Net Assets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Bonds Transferred to |
|
Par |
|
Value |
|
||
|
Washington — 2.6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
City of Bellevue Washington, GO, Refunding (NPFGC), |
|
$ |
6,883 |
|
$ |
7,488,945 |
|
|
Total
Municipal Bonds Transferred to |
|
|
|
|
|
120,131,871 |
|
|
Total
Long-Term Investments |
|
|
|
|
|
475,466,772 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
Short-Term Securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Florida — 0.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jacksonville Health Facilities Authority, Refunding RB, |
|
|
1,015 |
|
|
1,015,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money Market — 4.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FFI Institutional Tax-Exempt Fund, 0.01% (f)(g) |
|
|
13,223,965 |
|
|
13,223,965 |
|
|
Total
Short-Term Securities |
|
|
|
|
|
14,238,965 |
|
|
Total Investments (Cost — $479,911,675*) — 166.9% |
|
|
|
|
|
489,705,737 |
|
|
Liabilities in Excess of Other Assets — (1.1)% |
|
|
|
|
|
(3,126,475 |
) |
|
Liability for TOB Trust Certificates, Including |
|
|
|
|
|
(62,221,114 |
) |
|
AMPS, at Redemption Value — (44.6)% |
|
|
|
|
|
(131,001,852 |
) |
|
Net Assets Applicable to Common Shares — 100.0% |
|
|
|
|
$ |
293,356,296 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
The cost and unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of investments as of July 31, 2011, as computed for federal income tax purposes, were as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate cost |
|
$ |
417,757,047 |
|
|
Gross unrealized appreciation |
|
$ |
13,726,346 |
|
|
Gross unrealized depreciation |
|
|
(3,960,590 |
) |
|
Net unrealized appreciation |
|
$ |
9,765,756 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
US government securities, held in escrow, are used to pay interest on this security, as well as to retire the bond in full at the date indicated, typically at a premium to par. |
|
|
|
|
(b) |
Represents a zero-coupon bond. Rate shown reflects the current yield as of report date. |
|
|
|
|
(c) |
When-issued security. Unsettled when-issued transactions were as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Counterparty |
|
Value |
|
Unrealized |
|
||
|
National Financial Services |
|
$ |
916,770 |
|
$ |
18,273 |
|
|
Stifel Nicolaus & Co. |
|
$ |
5,815,211 |
|
$ |
9,306 |
|
|
|
|
|
(d) |
Securities represent bonds transferred to a TOB in exchange for which the Fund acquired residual interest certificates. These securities serve as collateral in a financing transaction. See Note 1 of the Notes to Financial Statements for details of municipal bonds transferred to TOBs. |
|
|
|
|
(e) |
Variable rate security. Rate shown is as of report date and maturity shown is the date the principal owed can be recovered through demand. |
|
|
|
|
(f) |
Investments in companies considered to be an affiliate of the Fund during the year, for purposes of Section 2(a)(3) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, were as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Affiliate |
|
Shares
Held |
|
Net |
|
Shares
Held |
|
Income |
|
||||
|
FFI Institutional Tax-Exempt Fund |
|
|
17,366,850 |
|
|
(4,142,885 |
) |
|
13,223,965 |
|
$ |
18,387 |
|
|
|
|
|
(g) |
Represents the current yield as of report date. |
|
|
|
|
• |
Financial futures contracts sold as of July 31, 2011 were as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contracts |
|
Issue |
|
Exchange |
|
Expiration |
|
Notional |
|
Unrealized |
|
|||||
|
89 |
|
|
10-Year US Treasury Note |
|
|
Chicago Board of Trade |
|
|
September 2011 |
|
$ |
10,912,065 |
|
$ |
(274,122 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
• |
Fair Value Measurements — Various inputs are used in determining the fair value of investments and derivative financial instruments. These inputs are categorized in three broad levels for financial statement purposes as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
• |
Level 1 — price quotations in active markets/exchanges for identical assets and liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
• |
Level 2 — other observable inputs (including, but not limited to: quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in markets that are active, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the assets or liabilities (such as interest rates, yield curves, volatilities, prepayment speeds, loss severities, credit risks and default rates) or other market-corroborated inputs) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
• |
Level 3 — unobservable inputs based on the best information available in the circumstances, to the extent observable inputs are not available (including the Fund’s own assumptions used in determining the fair value of investments and derivative financial instruments) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The categorization of a value determined for investments and derivative financial instruments is based on the pricing transparency of the investment and derivative financial instrument and does not necessarily correspond to the Fund’s perceived risk of investing in those securities. For information about the Fund’s policy regarding valuation of investments and derivative financial instruments and other significant accounting policies, please refer to Note 1 of the Notes to Financial Statements. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following tables summarize the inputs used as of July 31, 2011 in determining the fair valuation of the Fund’s investments and derivative financial instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation Inputs |
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
|
Total |
|
||||
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Term Investments1 |
|
|
— |
|
$ |
475,466,772 |
|
|
— |
|
$ |
475,466,772 |
|
|
Short-Term Securities |
|
$ |
13,223,965 |
|
|
1,015,000 |
|
|
— |
|
|
14,238,965 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
13,223,965 |
|
$ |
476,481,772 |
|
|
— |
|
$ |
489,705,737 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
See above Schedule of Investments for values in each state or political subdivision. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation Inputs |
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
|
Total |
|
||||
|
Derivative Financial Instruments2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate contracts |
|
$ |
(274,122 |
) |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
$ |
(274,122 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
Derivative financial instruments are financial futures contracts, which are valued at the unrealized appreciation/depreciation on the instrument. |
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Financial Statements. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
ANNUAL REPORT |
JULY 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Schedule of Investments July 31, 2011 |
BlackRock MuniYield California Quality Fund, Inc. (MCA) |
|
|
(Percentages shown are based on Net Assets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Bonds |
|
Par |
|
Value |
|
||
|
California — 95.7% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate — 0.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
City of Chula Vista California, Refunding RB, San Diego |
|
$ |
2,435 |
|
$ |
2,623,932 |
|
|
County/City/Special District/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
School District — 42.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Arcadia Unified School District California, GO, Election |
|
|
7,925 |
|
|
7,981,822 |
|
|
Bay Area Governments Association, Refunding RB, |
|
|
255 |
|
|
259,149 |
|
|
City & County of San Francisco California, COP, |
|
|
3,895 |
|
|
3,972,277 |
|
|
County of Kern California, COP, Capital Improvements |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
2,164,160 |
|
|
Fairfield-Suisun Unified School District California, GO, |
|
|
2,500 |
|
|
2,615,700 |
|
|
Fremont Unified School District Alameda County |
|
|
10,755 |
|
|
11,194,449 |
|
|
Fresno Joint Powers Financing Authority California, RB, |
|
|
3,295 |
|
|
3,309,828 |
|
|
Grossmont Healthcare District, GO, Election of 2006, |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
2,173,980 |
|
|
Grossmont Union High School District, GO, Election of |
|
|
1,855 |
|
|
1,995,386 |
|
|
Lodi Unified School District, GO, Election of 2002 |
|
|
10,260 |
|
|
10,359,214 |
|
|
Los Angeles Community Redevelopment Agency |
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
10,268,200 |
|
|
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.00%, 7/01/27 |
|
|
5,240 |
|
|
5,480,568 |
|
|
5.00%, 7/01/35 |
|
|
6,825 |
|
|
6,941,298 |
|
|
Los Angeles Municipal Improvement Corp., Refunding |
|
|
1,515 |
|
|
1,523,348 |
|
|
Los Gatos Union School District California, GO, Election |
|
|
1,075 |
|
|
1,113,797 |
|
|
Murrieta Valley Unified School District Public Financing |
|
|
8,000 |
|
|
8,239,520 |
|
|
Orange County Sanitation District, COP, Series A, |
|
|
2,500 |
|
|
2,569,250 |
|
|
Orange County Water District, COP, Refunding, |
|
|
9,045 |
|
|
9,523,661 |
|
|
Orchard School District California, GO, Election of 2001, |
|
|
7,490 |
|
|
7,739,417 |
|
|
Oxnard Union High School District California, GO, |
|
|
9,645 |
|
|
10,280,220 |
|
|
Pittsburg Unified School District, GO, Election of 2006, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.50%, 8/01/34 |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
2,105,540 |
|
|
5.63%, 8/01/39 |
|
|
4,500 |
|
|
4,746,015 |
|
|
Port of Oakland, Refunding RB, Series M (FGIC), |
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
10,017,700 |
|
|
Redlands Unified School District California, GO, |
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
5,136,900 |
|
|
Riverside Unified School District California, GO, |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
2,023,560 |
|
|
Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency, Special |
|
|
4,350 |
|
|
4,461,099 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Bonds |
|
Par |
|
Value |
|
||
|
California (continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
County/City/Special District/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
School District (concluded) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
San Diego Community College District California, GO, |
|
$ |
7,115 |
|
$ |
7,334,356 |
|
|
San Diego County Water Authority, COP, Refunding, |
|
|
4,895 |
|
|
4,944,929 |
|
|
San Jose Financing Authority, RB, Convention Center |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.75%, 5/01/36 |
|
|
2,570 |
|
|
2,626,463 |
|
|
5.75%, 5/01/42 |
|
|
4,500 |
|
|
4,662,720 |
|
|
San Jose Redevelopment Agency California, Tax |
|
|
7,300 |
|
|
7,304,599 |
|
|
San Juan Unified School District, GO, Election of 2002 |
|
|
6,475 |
|
|
6,540,462 |
|
|
San Leandro Unified School District California, GO, |
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
3,173,010 |
|
|
San Marcos Unified School District, GO, Election of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.00%, 8/01/34 |
|
|
3,740 |
|
|
3,763,412 |
|
|
5.00%, 8/01/38 |
|
|
5,020 |
|
|
4,990,533 |
|
|
Snowline Joint Unified School District, COP, Refunding, |
|
|
5,600 |
|
|
6,042,400 |
|
|
Walnut Valley Unified School District, GO, Election of |
|
|
7,680 |
|
|
8,122,906 |
|
|
West Contra Costa Unified School District California, |
|
|
6,690 |
|
|
6,713,348 |
|
|
Westminster Redevelopment Agency California, Tax |
|
|
4,300 |
|
|
4,781,471 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
209,196,667 |
|
|
Education — 10.6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Anaheim City School District California, GO, Election of |
|
|
3,750 |
|
|
4,171,725 |
|
|
California State University, Refunding RB, Systemwide, |
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
19,612,800 |
|
|
Gavilan Joint Community College District, GO, Election |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.50%, 8/01/31 |
|
|
2,165 |
|
|
2,352,424 |
|
|
5.75%, 8/01/35 |
|
|
8,400 |
|
|
9,076,704 |
|
|
Riverside Community College District, GO, Election of |
|
|
8,750 |
|
|
8,890,525 |
|
|
University of California, RB, Limited Project, Series D: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(AGM), 5.00%, 5/15/37 |
|
|
2,775 |
|
|
2,758,877 |
|
|
(NPFGC), 5.00%, 5/15/37 |
|
|
5,500 |
|
|
5,468,045 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52,331,100 |
|
|
Health — 7.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ABAG Finance Authority for Nonprofit Corps, Sharp |
|
|
2,250 |
|
|
2,376,450 |
|
|
California Health Facilities Financing Authority, RB, |
|
|
3,965 |
|
|
4,058,970 |
|
|
California Health Facilities Financing Authority, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Catholic Healthcare West, Series A, |
|
|
2,130 |
|
|
2,240,803 |
|
|
Catholic Healthcare West, Series A, |
|
|
5,500 |
|
|
5,764,275 |
|
|
Sutter Health, Series B, 6.00%, 8/15/42 |
|
|
7,715 |
|
|
8,218,635 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Financial Statements. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT |
JULY 31, 2011 |
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Schedule of Investments (continued) |
BlackRock MuniYield California Quality Fund, Inc. (MCA) |
|
|
(Percentages shown are based on Net Assets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Bonds |
|
Par |
|
Value |
|
||
|
California (continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Health (concluded) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
California Statewide Communities Development |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Health Facility, Memorial Health Services, |
|
$ |
3,685 |
|
$ |
3,820,977 |
|
|
Sutter Health, 6.00%, 8/15/42 |
|
|
3,750 |
|
|
4,022,887 |
|
|
California Statewide Communities Development |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Catholic Healthcare West, Series D, |
|
|
865 |
|
|
892,706 |
|
|
Kaiser Permanente, Series A, 5.00%, 4/01/31 |
|
|
2,900 |
|
|
2,942,688 |
|
|
City of Newport Beach California, RB, Hoag Memorial |
|
|
1,820 |
|
|
1,973,044 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,311,435 |
|
|
Housing — 0.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
California Rural Home Mortgage Finance Authority, RB, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series A, 6.35%, 12/01/29 |
|
|
80 |
|
|
82,609 |
|
|
Series B, 6.25%, 12/01/31 |
|
|
55 |
|
|
55,622 |
|
|
County of San Bernardino California, Refunding RB, |
|
|
110 |
|
|
116,543 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
254,774 |
|
|
State — 1.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
California State Public
Works Board, RB, Department of |
|
|
3,670 |
|
|
3,918,129 |
|
|
San Mateo County Community
College District, GO, |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
1,027,050 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,945,179 |
|
|
Transportation — 13.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
City of San Jose California, RB, Series A-1, AMT, |
|
|
1,400 |
|
|
1,454,096 |
|
|
County of Orange California, RB, Series B, |
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
5,332,250 |
|
|
County of Sacramento California, RB, AMT: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior-Series B (AGM), 5.25%, 7/01/33 |
|
|
7,500 |
|
|
7,503,975 |
|
|
Subordinated and Passenger Facility Charges/ |
|
|
5,455 |
|
|
5,640,088 |
|
|
Los Angeles Department of Airports, RB, Series A, |
|
|
3,760 |
|
|
4,001,881 |
|
|
Los Angeles Harbor Department, RB, Series B, |
|
|
5,530 |
|
|
5,719,789 |
|
|
Port of Oakland, RB, Series K (FGIC), 5.75%, 11/01/29 |
|
|
11,405 |
|
|
11,407,281 |
|
|
San Francisco City & County Airports Commission, RB: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series E, 6.00%, 5/01/39 |
|
|
9,650 |
|
|
10,378,768 |
|
|
Special Facility Lease, SFO Fuel, Series A, AMT |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
1,001,980 |
|
|
Special Facility Lease, SFO Fuel, Series A, AMT |
|
|
985 |
|
|
986,064 |
|
|
San Francisco City & County Airports Commission, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.75%, 5/01/24 |
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
5,381,350 |
|
|
5.75%, 5/01/25 |
|
|
3,500 |
|
|
3,722,810 |
|
|
San Joaquin County Transportation Authority, RB, |
|
|
2,400 |
|
|
2,628,792 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65,159,124 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Bonds |
|
Par |
|
Value |
|
||
|
California (concluded) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Utilities — 20.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Anaheim Public Financing Authority, RB, Electric System |
|
$ |
5,000 |
|
$ |
5,204,300 |
|
|
City of Los Angeles California, Refunding RB, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.00%, 6/01/28 |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
2,117,020 |
|
|
5.00%, 6/01/32 |
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
3,114,870 |
|
|
Contra Costa Water District, Refunding RB, Series L |
|
|
4,135 |
|
|
4,249,457 |
|
|
Dublin-San Ramon Services District, Refunding RB, |
|
|
4,000 |
|
|
4,259,200 |
|
|
East Bay Municipal Utility District, RB, Series A (NPFGC), |
|
|
4,000 |
|
|
4,105,600 |
|
|
East Bay Municipal Utility District, Refunding RB, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.00%, 6/01/30 |
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
5,380,500 |
|
|
(AMBAC), 5.00%, 6/01/33 |
|
|
4,125 |
|
|
4,270,324 |
|
|
Imperial Irrigation District, Refunding RB, Electric |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.00%, 11/01/31 |
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
5,141,400 |
|
|
5.00%, 11/01/36 |
|
|
2,500 |
|
|
2,507,150 |
|
|
5.13%, 11/01/38 |
|
|
5,500 |
|
|
5,547,630 |
|
|
Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts Financing |
|
|
7,915 |
|
|
8,033,408 |
|
|
Los Angeles Department of Water & Power, RB, Power |
|
|
1,260 |
|
|
1,316,385 |
|
|
Orange County Sanitation District, COP, Series B (AGM), |
|
|
2,105 |
|
|
2,185,958 |
|
|
Oxnard Financing Authority, RB, Redwood Trunk Sewer & |
|
|
13,000 |
|
|
13,189,930 |
|
|
Sacramento County Water Financing Authority, RB, |
|
|
4,000 |
|
|
4,202,000 |
|
|
Sacramento Regional County Sanitation District, RB, |
|
|
7,070 |
|
|
7,400,028 |
|
|
San Diego County Water Authority, COP, Series A (AGM), |
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
3,053,160 |
|
|
San Diego Public Facilities Financing Authority, |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
1,042,770 |
|
|
San Francisco City & County Public Utilities |
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
10,200,400 |
|
|
Turlock Public Financing Authority California, RB, |
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
3,022,680 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
99,544,170 |
|
|
Total Municipal Bonds — 95.7% |
|
|
|
|
|
470,366,381 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal
Bonds Transferred to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
California — 71.7% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate — 5.6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District, Refunding |
|
|
19,630 |
|
|
20,335,502 |
|
|
University of California, RB, Series L, 5.00%, 5/15/40 |
|
|
7,398 |
|
|
7,330,562 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,666,064 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Financial Statements. |
||
|
|
||
|
16 |
ANNUAL REPORT |
JULY 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Schedule of Investments (continued) |
BlackRock MuniYield California Quality Fund, Inc. (MCA) |
|
|
(Percentages shown are based on Net Assets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Bonds Transferred to |
|
Par |
|
Value |
|
||
|
California (continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
County/City/Special
District/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Desert Community College
District California, GO, |
|
$ |
12,150 |
|
$ |
12,187,422 |
|
|
Fremont Unified School District Alameda County |
|
|
15,997 |
|
|
16,275,400 |
|
|
Los Angeles Community College District California, GO: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Election of 2001, Series A (AGM), 5.00%, 8/01/32 |
|
|
12,000 |
|
|
12,300,000 |
|
|
Election of 2001, Series A (NPFGC), |
|
|
26,438 |
|
|
27,070,449 |
|
|
Election of 2003, Series E (AGM), 5.00%, 8/01/31 |
|
|
7,497 |
|
|
7,680,687 |
|
|
Election of 2008, Series A, 6.00%, 8/01/33 |
|
|
9,596 |
|
|
10,690,670 |
|
|
Los Angeles Unified School
District California, GO, |
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
5,038,850 |
|
|
Ohlone Community College
District, GO, Series B (AGM), |
|
|
19,998 |
|
|
20,302,060 |
|
|
Poway Unified School
District, GO, Election of 2002, |
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
10,177,000 |
|
|
San Bernardino Community
College District California, |
|
|
7,550 |
|
|
7,639,921 |
|
|
San Diego County Water
Authority, COP, Series A (AGM), |
|
|
7,350 |
|
|
7,500,602 |
|
|
San Francisco Bay Area
Transit Financing Authority, |
|
|
10,497 |
|
|
10,676,017 |
|
|
San Jose Financing
Authority, Refunding RB, Civic |
|
|
11,400 |
|
|
11,405,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
158,944,778 |
|
|
Education — 6.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Los Rios Community College District, GO, Election of |
|
|
11,000 |
|
|
11,071,280 |
|
|
University of California, RB: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Limited Project, Series D (AGM), 5.00%, 5/15/41 |
|
|
8,000 |
|
|
7,901,680 |
|
|
Series O, 5.75%, 5/15/34 |
|
|
11,190 |
|
|
12,100,194 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,073,154 |
|
|
Utilities — 27.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Anaheim Public Financing Authority California, RB, |
|
|
3,568 |
|
|
3,576,741 |
|
|
City of Napa California, RB (AMBAC), 5.00%, 5/01/35 |
|
|
9,070 |
|
|
9,196,073 |
|
|
East Bay Municipal Utility District, RB, Sub-Series A |
|
|
15,000 |
|
|
15,293,550 |
|
|
East Bay Municipal Utility District, Refunding RB, |
|
|
7,990 |
|
|
8,172,092 |
|
|
Los Angeles Department of Water & Power, RB, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sub-Series A-1 (AGM), 5.00%, 7/01/31 |
|
|
5,007 |
|
|
5,103,687 |
|
|
Sub-Series A-1 (AGM), 5.00%, 7/01/37 |
|
|
13,525 |
|
|
13,669,427 |
|
|
Sub-Series A-1 (AMBAC), 5.00%, 7/01/37 |
|
|
5,029 |
|
|
5,082,999 |
|
|
Sub-Series A-2 (AGM), 5.00%, 7/01/35 |
|
|
7,500 |
|
|
7,594,275 |
|
|
Los Angeles Department of Water & Power, Refunding |
|
|
16,000 |
|
|
16,355,200 |
|
|
Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, RB: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series A, 5.00%, 7/01/37 |
|
|
15,000 |
|
|
15,385,650 |
|
|
Series B-1 (NPFGC), 5.00%, 10/01/33 |
|
|
7,175 |
|
|
7,270,206 |
|
|
Rancho Water District Financing Authority, Refunding |
|
|
9,277 |
|
|
9,430,150 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal
Bonds Transferred to |
|
Par |
|
Value |
|
||
|
California (concluded) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Utilities (concluded) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
San Diego
County Water Authority, COP, Refunding, |
|
$ |
8,510 |
|
$ |
8,690,242 |
|
|
San Diego County Water Authority, COP, Series A (AGM), |
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
10,177,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
134,997,492 |
|
|
Total
Municipal Bonds Transferred to |
|
|
|
|
|
352,681,488 |
|
|
Total
Long-Term Investments |
|
|
|
|
|
823,047,869 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-Term Securities |
|
Shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
BIF California Municipal Money Fund, 0.00% (c)(d) |
|
|
15,276,406 |
|
|
15,276,406 |
|
|
Total
Short-Term Securities |
|
|
|
|
|
15,276,406 |
|
|
Total Investments (Cost — $829,619,816*) — 170.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
838,324,275 |
|
|
Liabilities in Excess of Other Assets — (0.1)% |
|
|
|
|
|
(477,362 |
) |
|
Liability
for TOB Trust Certificates, Including |
|
|
|
|
|
(179,549,219 |
) |
|
VRDP Shares, at Liquidation Value — (33.9)% |
|
|
|
|
|
(166,500,000 |
) |
|
Net Assets Applicable to Common Shares — 100.0% |
|
|
|
|
$ |
491,797,694 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
The cost and unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of investments as of July 31, 2011, as computed for federal income tax purposes, were as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate cost |
|
|
|
|
$ |
649,529,307 |
|
|
Gross unrealized appreciation |
|
|
|
|
$ |
14,456,991 |
|
|
Gross unrealized depreciation |
|
|
|
|
|
(5,084,437 |
) |
|
Net unrealized appreciation |
|
|
|
|
$ |
9,372,554 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
When-issued security. Unsettled when-issued transactions were as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Counterparty |
|
Value |
|
Unrealized |
|
||
|
Bank of America Merrill Lynch |
|
$ |
10,200,400 |
|
$ |
300 |
|
|
|
|
|
(b) |
Securities represent bonds transferred to a TOB in exchange for which the Fund acquired residual interest certificates. These securities serve as collateral in a financing transaction. See Note 1 of the Notes to Financial Statements for details of municipal bonds transferred to TOBs. |
|
|
|
|
(c) |
Investments in companies considered to be an affiliate of the Fund during the year, for purposes of Section 2(a)(3) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, were as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Affiliate |
|
Shares
Held |
|
Net |
|
Shares
Held |
|
Income |
|
||||
|
BIF California Municipal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money Fund |
|
|
39,049,939 |
|
|
(23,773,533 |
) |
|
15,276,406 |
|
$ |
4,453 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(d) |
Represents the current yield as of report date. |
|
|
|
|
• |
For Fund compliance purposes,the Fund’s sector classifications refer to any one or more of the sector sub-classifications used by one or more widely recognized market indexes or ratings group indexes, and/or as defined by Fund management. These definitions may not apply for purposes of this report, which may combine such sector sub-classifications for reporting ease. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Financial Statements. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT |
JULY 31, 2011 |
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Schedule of Investments (concluded) |
BlackRock MuniYield California Quality Fund, Inc. (MCA) |
|
|
|
|
|
• |
Fair Value Measurements — Various inputs are used in determining the fair value of investments. These inputs are categorized in three broad levels for financial statement purposes as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
• |
Level 1 — price quotations in active markets/exchanges for identical assets and liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
• |
Level 2 — other observable inputs (including,but not limited to: quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in markets that are active, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the assets or liabilities (such as interest rates, yield curves, volatilities, prepayment speeds, loss severities, credit risks and default rates) or other market-corroborated inputs) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
• |
Level 3 — unobservable inputs based on the best information available in the circumstances, to the extent observable inputs are not available (including the Fund’s own assumptions used in determining the fair value of investments) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The categorization of a value determined for investments is based on the pricing transparency of the investment and does not necessarily correspond to the Fund’s perceived risk of investing in those securities. For information about the Fund’s policy regarding valuation of investments and other significant accounting policies, please refer to Note 1 of the Notes to Financial Statements. |
|
The following table summarizes the inputs used as of July 31, 2011 in determining the fair valuation of the Fund’s investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation Inputs |
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
|
Total |
|
||||
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Term Investments1 |
|
|
— |
|
$ |
823,047,869 |
|
|
— |
|
$ |
823,047,869 |
|
|
Short-Term Securities |
|
$ |
15,276,406 |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
$ |
15,276,406 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
15,276,406 |
|
$ |
823,047,869 |
|
|
— |
|
$ |
838,324,275 |
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
1 See above Schedule of Investments for values in each sector. |
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Financial Statements. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
ANNUAL REPORT |
JULY 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Schedule of Investments July 31, 2011 |
BlackRock MuniYield Michigan Quality Fund II, Inc. (MYM) |
|
|
(Percentages shown are based on Net Assets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Bonds |
|
Par |
|
Value |
|
||
|
Michigan — 137.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate — 11.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Delta County EDC, Refunding RB, Mead Westvaco- |
|
$ |
2,420 |
|
$ |
2,521,882 |
|
|
Dickinson County EDC Michigan, Refunding RB, |
|
|
2,500 |
|
|
2,527,250 |
|
|
Michigan Strategic Fund, Refunding RB, Detroit |
|
|
9,500 |
|
|
9,503,040 |
|
|
Monroe County EDC Michigan, Refunding RB, |
|
|
3,805 |
|
|
4,733,268 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,285,440 |
|
|
County/City/Special
District/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adrian City School District Michigan, GO (AGM), |
|
|
2,400 |
|
|
2,685,336 |
|
|
Allendale Public School District Michigan, GO, School |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
1,164,410 |
|
|
Bay City School District Michigan, GO, School |
|
|
1,110 |
|
|
1,119,724 |
|
|
Charter Township of Canton Michigan, GO, Capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.00%, 4/01/25 |
|
|
1,250 |
|
|
1,303,012 |
|
|
5.00%, 4/01/26 |
|
|
1,250 |
|
|
1,298,012 |
|
|
5.00%, 4/01/27 |
|
|
500 |
|
|
516,660 |
|
|
City of Oak Park Michigan, GO, Street Improvement |
|
|
600 |
|
|
616,032 |
|
|
Comstock Park Public Schools, GO, School Building & |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.50%, 5/01/36 |
|
|
450 |
|
|
462,618 |
|
|
5.50%, 5/01/41 |
|
|
830 |
|
|
851,987 |
|
|
County of Genesee Michigan, GO, Refunding, Series A |
|
|
400 |
|
|
432,460 |
|
|
County of Genesee Michigan, GO, Water Supply System |
|
|
500 |
|
|
502,335 |
|
|
County of Wayne Michigan, GO, Airport Hotel, Detroit |
|
|
1,180 |
|
|
1,106,203 |
|
|
Dearborn Brownfield Redevelopment Authority, GO, |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
2,064,760 |
|
|
Detroit City School District Michigan, GO, School |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series A, 5.38%, 5/01/13 (a) |
|
|
1,480 |
|
|
1,608,582 |
|
|
Series B, 5.00%, 5/01/28 |
|
|
1,900 |
|
|
1,868,118 |
|
|
Eaton Rapids Public Schools Michigan, GO, School |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
2,162,160 |
|
|
Gibraltar School District Michigan, GO, School |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.00%, 5/01/14 (a) |
|
|
3,065 |
|
|
3,429,398 |
|
|
5.00%, 5/01/28 |
|
|
585 |
|
|
595,191 |
|
|
Grand Blanc Community Schools Michigan, GO (NPFGC): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.63%, 5/01/17 |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
1,013,900 |
|
|
5.63%, 5/01/18 |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
1,013,900 |
|
|
5.63%, 5/01/19 |
|
|
1,100 |
|
|
1,115,290 |
|
|
Grand Rapids Building Authority Michigan, RB, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.50%, 10/01/12 |
|
|
535 |
|
|
567,854 |
|
|
5.50%, 10/01/12 |
|
|
130 |
|
|
137,983 |
|
|
Gull Lake Community School District, GO, Refunding |
|
|
615 |
|
|
600,880 |
|
|
Harper Creek Community School District Michigan, |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
1,073,980 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Bonds |
|
Par |
|
Value |
|
||
|
Michigan (continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
County/City/Special
District/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Harper Woods School District Michigan, GO, Refunding, |
|
$ |
10 |
|
$ |
10,073 |
|
|
Haslett Public School District Michigan, GO, |
|
|
1,275 |
|
|
1,292,621 |
|
|
Hudsonville Public Schools, GO, School Building & |
|
|
750 |
|
|
760,808 |
|
|
Jonesville Community Schools Michigan, GO, Refunding |
|
|
1,085 |
|
|
1,100,483 |
|
|
L’Anse Creuse Public Schools Michigan, GO, School |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.00%, 5/01/12 |
|
|
400 |
|
|
413,596 |
|
|
5.00%, 5/01/25 |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
1,046,610 |
|
|
5.00%, 5/01/26 |
|
|
1,050 |
|
|
1,092,273 |
|
|
5.00%, 5/01/35 |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
2,016,180 |
|
|
Lincoln Consolidated School District Michigan, GO, |
|
|
2,325 |
|
|
2,339,136 |
|
|
Livonia Public Schools School District Michigan, GO, |
|
|
500 |
|
|
509,420 |
|
|
Ludington Area School District Michigan, GO (NPFGC), |
|
|
1,440 |
|
|
1,540,022 |
|
|
Michigan State Building Authority, RB, Facilities |
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
3,158,640 |
|
|
New Haven Community Schools Michigan, GO, |
|
|
500 |
|
|
524,075 |
|
|
New Lothrop Area Public Schools Michigan, GO, |
|
|
1,200 |
|
|
1,210,884 |
|
|
Pontiac Tax Increment Finance Authority Michigan, |
|
|
640 |
|
|
673,325 |
|
|
Reed City Public Schools Michigan, GO, School |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
1,120,940 |
|
|
Rochester Community School District, GO (NPFGC), |
|
|
265 |
|
|
296,426 |
|
|
Southfield Public Schools Michigan, GO, School |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
1,120,940 |
|
|
Sparta Area Schools Michigan, GO, School Building & |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
1,117,430 |
|
|
Thornapple Kellogg School District Michigan, GO, |
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
1,526,895 |
|
|
Van Dyke Public Schools Michigan, GO, School |
|
|
750 |
|
|
779,558 |
|
|
Zeeland Public Schools Michigan, GO, School |
|
|
1,230 |
|
|
1,248,868 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54,209,988 |
|
|
Education — 11.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ferris State University, Refunding RB, General (AGM): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.50%, 10/01/23 |
|
|
1,360 |
|
|
1,401,534 |
|
|
4.50%, 10/01/24 |
|
|
1,595 |
|
|
1,626,262 |
|
|
4.50%, 10/01/25 |
|
|
1,405 |
|
|
1,420,638 |
|
|
Fraser Public School District, GO, School Building & |
|
|
1,255 |
|
|
1,301,761 |
|
|
Goodrich Area School District, GO, School Building & |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.50%, 5/01/32 |
|
|
400 |
|
|
420,620 |
|
|
5.50%, 5/01/36 |
|
|
800 |
|
|
823,664 |
|
|
5.50%, 5/01/41 |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
1,032,690 |
|
|
Michigan Higher Education Facilities Authority, RB, |
|
|
1,125 |
|
|
1,065,319 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Financial Statements. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT |
JULY 31, 2011 |
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Schedule of Investments (continued) |
BlackRock MuniYield Michigan Quality Fund II, Inc. (MYM) |
|
|
(Percentages shown are based on Net Assets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Bonds |
|
Par |
|
Value |
|
||
|
Michigan (continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Education (concluded) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michigan Higher Education Facilities Authority, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.85%, 6/01/12 |
|
$ |
550 |
|
$ |
575,102 |
|
|
5.90%, 6/01/12 |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
1,046,060 |
|
|
Michigan Higher Education Student Loan Authority, RB, |
|
|
500 |
|
|
475,400 |
|
|
Michigan State University, Refunding RB, General, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.00%, 2/15/40 |
|
|
3,770 |
|
|
3,830,169 |
|
|
5.00%, 2/15/44 |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
1,012,460 |
|
|
Saginaw Valley State University Michigan, Refunding RB, |
|
|
1,450 |
|
|
1,468,401 |
|
|
Western Michigan University, Refunding RB, General, |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
1,001,490 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,501,570 |
|
|
Health — 22.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dickinson County Healthcare System, Refunding RB |
|
|
2,170 |
|
|
2,178,506 |
|
|
Flint Hospital Building Authority Michigan, Refunding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.00%, 7/01/20 |
|
|
640 |
|
|
636,474 |
|
|
Series A, 5.38%, 7/01/20 |
|
|
385 |
|
|
366,982 |
|
|
Kalamazoo Hospital Finance Authority, RB, Bronson |
|
|
2,750 |
|
|
2,763,227 |
|
|
Kent Hospital Finance Authority Michigan, RB, Spectrum |
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
3,028,650 |
|
|
Michigan State Hospital Finance Authority, RB: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ascension Health Senior Credit Group, 5.00%, |
|
|
2,300 |
|
|
2,401,384 |
|
|
Hospital, MidMichigan Obligation Group, Series A |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
1,014,790 |
|
|
McLaren Health Care, Series C, 5.00%, 8/01/35 |
|
|
1,585 |
|
|
1,527,084 |
|
|
Mercy Health Services, Series R (AMBAC), 5.38%, |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
2,008,000 |
|
|
MidMichigan Obligation Group, Series A, 5.00%, |
|
|
380 |
|
|
379,187 |
|
|
Trinity Health Credit, Series A, 5.00%, 12/01/26 (a) |
|
|
145 |
|
|
172,459 |
|
|
Trinity Health Credit, Series A, 5.00%, 12/01/26 |
|
|
855 |
|
|
866,936 |
|
|
Trinity Health Credit, Series C, 5.38%, 12/01/30 |
|
|
1,765 |
|
|
1,773,348 |
|
|
Michigan State Hospital Finance Authority, Refunding RB: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.38%, 12/01/12 (a) |
|
|
185 |
|
|
197,465 |
|
|
5.38%, 12/01/23 |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
1,015,600 |
|
|
6.25%, 12/01/28 |
|
|
570 |
|
|
622,412 |
|
|
6.50%, 12/01/33 |
|
|
1,400 |
|
|
1,532,062 |
|
|
Hospital, Crittenton, Series A, 5.63%, 3/01/27 |
|
|
1,300 |
|
|
1,302,171 |
|
|
Hospital, Oakwood Obligation Group, Series A, |
|
|
400 |
|
|
411,800 |
|
|
Hospital, Oakwood Obligation Group, Series A, |
|
|
2,470 |
|
|
2,434,111 |
|
|
Hospital, Oakwood Obligation Group, Series A, |
|
|
3,340 |
|
|
2,987,764 |
|
|
Hospital, Sparrow Obligated, 5.00%, 11/15/31 |
|
|
1,595 |
|
|
1,524,357 |
|
|
McLaren Health Care, 5.75%, 5/15/38 |
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
1,536,240 |
|
|
Trinity Health Credit, Series D, 5.00%, 8/15/34 |
|
|
1,650 |
|
|
1,632,147 |
|
|
Michigan State Hospital Finance Authority, Refunding |
|
|
940 |
|
|
1,058,891 |
|
|
Royal Oak Hospital Finance Authority Michigan, |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
1,154,490 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,526,537 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Bonds |
|
Par |
|
Value |
|
||
|
Michigan (continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Housing — 6.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michigan State HDA, RB: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deaconess Tower AMT (Ginnie Mae), 5.25%, |
|
$ |
1,000 |
|
$ |
984,930 |
|
|
Series A, 4.75%, 12/01/25 |
|
|
2,675 |
|
|
2,674,839 |
|
|
Series A, 6.00%, 10/01/45 |
|
|
4,280 |
|
|
4,155,666 |
|
|
Series A (NPFGC), 5.30%, 10/01/37 |
|
|
20 |
|
|
19,999 |
|
|
Michigan State HDA, Refunding RB, Series A, 6.05%, |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
2,049,560 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,884,994 |
|
|
State — 11.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michigan Municipal Bond Authority, RB, State Clean |
|
|
750 |
|
|
793,665 |
|
|
Michigan Municipal Bond Authority, Refunding RB, Local |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.00%, 11/01/14 |
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
1,655,580 |
|
|
5.00%, 11/01/15 |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
1,117,050 |
|
|
5.00%, 11/01/16 |
|
|
500 |
|
|
568,445 |
|
|
5.38%, 11/01/24 |
|
|
125 |
|
|
135,876 |
|
|
Michigan State Building Authority, Refunding RB: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series A, 5.50%, 10/15/45 |
|
|
750 |
|
|
756,345 |
|
|
Series I, 6.25%, 10/15/38 |
|
|
2,350 |
|
|
2,511,140 |
|
|
Series I (AGC), 5.25%, 10/15/24 |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
2,170,180 |
|
|
Series I (AGC), 5.25%, 10/15/25 |
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
1,616,100 |
|
|
Series I (AGC), 5.25%, 10/15/26 |
|
|
400 |
|
|
429,464 |
|
|
Series II (NPFGC), 5.00%, 10/15/29 |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
2,000,680 |
|
|
Michigan Strategic Fund, RB, Cadillac Place Office |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
1,014,930 |
|
|
State of Michigan, RB, GAB (AGM), 5.25%, 9/15/27 |
|
|
3,250 |
|
|
3,432,520 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,201,975 |
|
|
Transportation — 15.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State of Michigan, Refunding RB (AGM), 5.25%, |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
1,149,830 |
|
|
Sturgis Building Authority, RB, Sturgis Hospital Project |
|
|
3,525 |
|
|
3,250,121 |
|
|
Wayne County Airport Authority, RB, Detroit Metropolitan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.25%, 12/01/25 |
|
|
4,475 |
|
|
4,465,737 |
|
|
5.25%, 12/01/26 |
|
|
3,700 |
|
|
3,653,713 |
|
|
5.00%, 12/01/34 |
|
|
5,200 |
|
|
4,598,568 |
|
|
Wayne County Airport Authority, Refunding RB, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.75%, 12/01/26 |
|
|
3,060 |
|
|
3,135,092 |
|
|
5.38%, 12/01/32 |
|
|
4,300 |
|
|
4,180,030 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,433,091 |
|
|
Utilities — 26.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
City of Detroit Michigan, RB: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Lien, Series B (AGM), 7.00%, 7/01/36 |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
2,295,540 |
|
|
Second Lien, Series B (NPFGC), 5.00%, |
|
|
1,780 |
|
|
1,936,978 |
|
|
Second Lien, Series B (NPFGC), 5.00%, 7/01/34 |
|
|
2,620 |
|
|
2,383,729 |
|
|
Senior Lien, Series A (AGM), 5.00%, 7/01/25 |
|
|
3,460 |
|
|
3,462,837 |
|
|
Senior Lien, Series A (NPFGC), 5.00%, 7/01/34 |
|
|
4,600 |
|
|
4,359,512 |
|
|
City of Detroit Michigan, Refunding RB, Second Lien, |
|
|
6,475 |
|
|
6,288,196 |
|
|
City of Grand Rapids Michigan, RB (FGIC), 5.00%, |
|
|
6,900 |
|
|
6,976,314 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Financial Statements. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
ANNUAL REPORT |
JULY 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Schedule of Investments (continued) |
BlackRock MuniYield Michigan Quality Fund II, Inc. (MYM) |
|
|
(Percentages shown are based on Net Assets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Bonds |
|
Par |
|
Value |
|
||
|
Michigan (concluded) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Utilities (concluded) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
City of Grand Rapids Michigan, Refunding RB, Series A |
|
$ |
1,500 |
|
$ |
1,777,350 |
|
|
City of Port Huron Michigan, RB, Water Supply: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.25%, 10/01/31 |
|
|
190 |
|
|
189,050 |
|
|
5.63%, 10/01/40 |
|
|
500 |
|
|
491,165 |
|
|
City of Saginaw Michigan, RB, Water Supply, Series A |
|
|
235 |
|
|
235,183 |
|
|
City of Wyoming Michigan, RB, Sewer System (NPFGC), |
|
|
5,300 |
|
|
5,377,221 |
|
|
Lansing Board of Water & Light, RB, Series A: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.00%, 7/01/31 |
|
|
2,600 |
|
|
2,679,924 |
|
|
5.00%, 7/01/37 |
|
|
1,270 |
|
|
1,285,812 |
|
|
5.50%, 7/01/41 |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
2,119,120 |
|
|
Michigan Municipal Bond Authority, RB, Clean Water |
|
|
760 |
|
|
829,418 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,687,349 |
|
|
Total Municipal Bonds in Michigan |
|
|
|
|
|
223,730,944 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guam — 1.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
County/City/Special District/School District — 0.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Territory of Guam, RB, Section 30, Series A, 5.63%, |
|
|
850 |
|
|
859,223 |
|
|
Utilities — 0.6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guam Power Authority, Refunding RB, Series A (AGM), |
|
|
955 |
|
|
942,575 |
|
|
Total Municipal Bonds in Guam |
|
|
|
|
|
1,801,798 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Puerto Rico — 6.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State — 5.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Puerto Rico Public Buildings Authority, Refunding |
|
|
1,200 |
|
|
1,265,844 |
|
|
Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., Refunding RB: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CAB, Series A (NPFGC), 5.26%, 8/01/43 (b) |
|
|
12,500 |
|
|
1,556,125 |
|
|
CAB, Series A (NPFGC), 4.96%, 8/01/46 (b) |
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
2,982,900 |
|
|
First Sub-Series C (AGM), 5.13%, 8/01/42 |
|
|
3,200 |
|
|
3,208,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,012,869 |
|
|
Transportation — 1.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Puerto Rico Highway & Transportation Authority, |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
2,119,920 |
|
|
Total Municipal Bonds in Puerto Rico |
|
|
|
|
|
11,132,789 |
|
|
Total Municipal Bonds — 144.9% |
|
|
|
|
|
236,665,531 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Bonds Transferred to |
|
Par |
|
Value |
|
||
|
Michigan — 10.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate — 4.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wayne State University, Refunding RB, General (AGM), |
|
$ |
7,790 |
|
$ |
7,917,912 |
|
|
County/City/Special District/School District — 2.6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lakewood Public Schools Michigan, GO, School |
|
|
3,970 |
|
|
4,201,689 |
|
|
Education — 3.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portage Public Schools Michigan, GO, School |
|
|
2,850 |
|
|
2,922,019 |
|
|
Saginaw Valley State University, Refunding RB, General |
|
|
2,500 |
|
|
2,570,550 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,492,569 |
|
|
Total
Municipal Bonds Transferred to |
|
|
|
|
|
17,612,170 |
|
|
Total
Long-Term Investments |
|
|
|
|
|
254,277,701 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-Term Securities |
|
Shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
BIF Michigan Municipal Money Fund, 0.00% (d)(e) |
|
|
3,018,268 |
|
|
3,018,268 |
|
|
Total
Short-Term Securities |
|
|
|
|
|
3,018,268 |
|
|
Total Investments (Cost — $256,318,284*) — 157.6% |
|
|
|
|
|
257,295,969 |
|
|
Other Assets Less Liabilities — 1.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
2,315,268 |
|
|
Liability for TOB Trust Certificates, Including |
|
|
|
|
|
(9,034,910 |
) |
|
VRDP Shares, at Liquidation Value — (53.5)% |
|
|
|
|
|
(87,300,000 |
) |
|
Net Assets Applicable to Common Shares– 100.0% |
|
|
|
|
$ |
163,276,327 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
The cost and unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of investments as of July 31, 2011, as computed for federal income tax purposes, were as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate cost |
|
$ |
247,286,807 |
|
|
Gross unrealized appreciation |
|
$ |
7,119,560 |
|
|
Gross unrealized depreciation |
|
|
(6,140,398 |
) |
|
Net unrealized appreciation |
|
$ |
979,162 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
US government securities, held in escrow, are used to pay interest on this security, as well as to retire the bond in full at the date indicated, typically at a premium to par. |
|
|
|
|
(b) |
Represents a zero-coupon bond. Rate shown reflects the current yield as of report date. |
|
|
|
|
(c) |
Securities represent bonds transferred to a TOB in exchange for which the Fund acquired residual interest certificates. These securities serve as collateral in a financing transaction. See Note 1 of the Notes to Financial Statements for details of municipal bonds transferred to TOBs. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Financial Statements. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT |
JULY 31, 2011 |
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Schedule of Investments (concluded) |
BlackRock MuniYield Michigan Quality Fund II, Inc. (MYM) |
|
|
|
|
(d) |
Investments in companies considered to be an affiliate of the Fund during the year, for purposes of Section 2(a)(3) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, were as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Affiliate |
|
Shares
Held |
|
Net |
|
Shares
Held |
|
Income |
|
||||
|
BIF Michigan Municipal Money Fund |
|
|
605,019 |
|
|
2,413,249 |
|
|
3,018,268 |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
(e) |
Represents the current yield as of report date. |
|
|
|
|
• |
For Fund compliance purposes,the Fund’s sector classifications refer to any one or more of the sector sub-classifications used by one or more widely recognized market indexes or ratings group indexes, and/or as defined by Fund management. These definitions may not apply for purposes of this report, which may combine such sector sub-classifications for reporting ease. |
|
|
|
|
• |
Financial futures contracts sold as of July 31,2011 were as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contracts |
|
Issue |
|
Exchange |
|
Expiration |
|
Notional |
|
Unrealized |
|
||
|
58 |
|
10-Year
US |
|
Chicago |
|
September |
|
$ |
7,111,234 |
|
$ |
(178,641 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
• |
Fair Value Measurements — Various inputs are used in determining the fair value of investments and derivative financial instruments. These inputs are categorized in three broad levels for financial statement purposes as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
• |
Level 1 — price quotations in active markets/exchanges for identical assets and liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
• |
Level 2 — other observable inputs (including,but not limited to: quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in markets that are active, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the assets or liabilities (such as interest rates, yield curves, volatilities, prepayment speeds, loss severities, credit risks and default rates) or other market-corroborated inputs) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
• |
Level 3 — unobservable inputs based on the best information available in the circumstances, to the extent observable inputs are not available (including the Fund’s own assumptions used in determining the fair value of investments and derivative financial instruments) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The categorization of a value determined for investments and derivative financial instruments is based on the pricing transparency of the investment and derivative financial instrument and does not necessarily correspond to the Fund’s perceived risk of investing in those securities. For information about the Fund’s policy regarding valuation of investments and derivative financial instruments and other significant accounting policies, please refer to Note 1 of the Notes to Financial Statements. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following tables summarize the inputs used as of July 31, 2011 in determining the fair valuation of the Fund’s investments and derivative financial instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation Inputs |
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
|
Total |
|
||||
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Term Investments1 |
|
|
— |
|
$ |
254,277,701 |
|
|
— |
|
$ |
254,277,701 |
|
|
Short-Term Securities |
|
$ |
3,018,268 |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
3,018,268 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
3,018,268 |
|
$ |
254,277,701 |
|
|
— |
|
$ |
257,295,969 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
See above Schedule of Investments for values in each sector. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation Inputs |
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
|
Total |
|
||||
|
Derivative Financial Instruments2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate contracts |
|
$ |
(178,641 |
) |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
$ |
(178,641 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
Derivative financial instruments are financial futures contracts, which are valued at the unrealized appreciation/depreciation on the instrument. |
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
ANNUAL REPORT |
JULY 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Schedule of Investments July 31, 2011 |
BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund, Inc. (MYN) |
|
|
(Percentages shown are based on Net Assets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Bonds |
|
Par |
|
Value |
|
||
|
New York — 115.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate — 5.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New York City Industrial Development Agency, Refunding |
|
$ |
1,500 |
|
$ |
1,542,525 |
|
|
New York Liberty Development Corp., RB, Goldman |
|
|
3,400 |
|
|
3,392,350 |
|
|
New York State Energy Research & Development |
|
|
4,750 |
|
|
4,824,147 |
|
|
Suffolk County Industrial Development Agency New York, |
|
|
4,625 |
|
|
4,614,825 |
|
|
Suffolk County Industrial Development Agency |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.15%, 10/01/11 |
|
|
9,170 |
|
|
9,257,849 |
|
|
6.25%, 10/01/12 |
|
|
6,470 |
|
|
6,889,450 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,521,146 |
|
|
County/City/Special
District/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amherst Development Corp., RB, University at Buffalo |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
1,825,380 |
|
|
City of Buffalo New York, GO, School, Series D (NPFGC), |
|
|
2,750 |
|
|
2,805,303 |
|
|
City of New York, GO, Series A-1, |
|
|
1,950 |
|
|
2,018,309 |
|
|
City of New York New York, GO, Refunding, Series 02-B |
|
|
70 |
|
|
70,381 |
|
|
City of New York New York, GO, Refunding, Series E, |
|
|
1,070 |
|
|
1,145,553 |
|
|
County of Onondaga New York, RB, Syracuse |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.00%, 12/01/30 |
|
|
1,190 |
|
|
1,263,982 |
|
|
5.00%, 12/01/36 |
|
|
1,150 |
|
|
1,182,672 |
|
|
Duchess County Resource Recovery Agency New York, |
|
|
1,700 |
|
|
1,733,320 |
|
|
Erie County Industrial Development Agency, RB: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
City of Buffalo Project (AGM), 5.75%, 5/01/20 |
|
|
1,900 |
|
|
1,979,325 |
|
|
School District of Buffalo Project, Series A, 5.25%, |
|
|
800 |
|
|
849,496 |
|
|
Erie County Industrial Development Agency, Refunding |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
1,055,390 |
|
|
Hudson Yards Infrastructure Corp., RB, Series A: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.00%, 2/15/47 |
|
|
750 |
|
|
685,950 |
|
|
(FGIC), 5.00%, 2/15/47 |
|
|
5,235 |
|
|
4,787,931 |
|
|
(NPFGC), 4.50%, 2/15/47 |
|
|
17,525 |
|
|
14,794,254 |
|
|
New York City Industrial Development Agency, RB: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Queens Baseball Stadium (AMBAC), 5.00%, |
|
|
11,800 |
|
|
10,122,040 |
|
|
Queens Baseball Stadium (AMBAC), 5.00%, |
|
|
5,250 |
|
|
4,442,287 |
|
|
Yankee Stadium (AGC), 6.38%, 1/01/39 |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
1,058,300 |
|
|
New York City Industrial Development Agency, RB, PILOT: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CAB, Yankee Stadium (AGC), 6.55%, 3/01/39 (c) |
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
983,950 |
|
|
CAB, Yankee Stadium (AGC), 6.50%, 3/01/43 (c) |
|
|
4,330 |
|
|
650,842 |
|
|
Queens Baseball Stadium (AMBAC), 5.00%, |
|
|
3,625 |
|
|
3,008,967 |
|
|
Yankee Stadium (FGIC), 5.00%, 3/01/46 |
|
|
9,650 |
|
|
8,660,682 |
|
|
Yankee Stadium (NPFGC), 5.00%, 3/01/36 |
|
|
2,750 |
|
|
2,555,218 |
|
|
New York City Transit Authority/Metropolitan Transit |
|
|
1,020 |
|
|
1,023,968 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Bonds |
|
Par |
|
Value |
|
||
|
New York (continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
County/City/Special
District/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New York City Transitional Finance Authority, RB: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2008, Series S-1, 4.50%, 1/15/38 |
|
$ |
1,700 |
|
$ |
1,614,235 |
|
|
Fiscal 2009, Series S-1 (AGC), 5.50%, 7/15/38 |
|
|
6,000 |
|
|
6,296,580 |
|
|
Fiscal 2009, Series S-4 (AGC), 5.50%, 1/15/39 |
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
1,579,575 |
|
|
Future Tax Secured, Series C (FGIC), 5.00%, |
|
|
12,395 |
|
|
12,458,586 |
|
|
Future Tax Secured, Series E (NPFGC), 5.25%, |
|
|
55 |
|
|
57,865 |
|
|
Future Tax Secured, Series E (NPFGC), 5.25%, |
|
|
2,445 |
|
|
2,625,979 |
|
|
Series S-2 (AGM), 5.00%, 1/15/37 |
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
5,076,200 |
|
|
Series S-2 (NPFGC), 4.25%, 1/15/34 |
|
|
5,980 |
|
|
5,565,048 |
|
|
New York City Transitional Finance Authority, Refunding |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
1,037,920 |
|
|
New York Convention Center Development Corp., RB, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.00%, 11/15/30 |
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
1,515,465 |
|
|
5.00%, 11/15/35 |
|
|
31,600 |
|
|
31,553,548 |
|
|
5.00%, 11/15/44 |
|
|
14,470 |
|
|
14,238,191 |
|
|
North Country Development Authority, Refunding RB |
|
|
840 |
|
|
908,922 |
|
|
Sales Tax Asset Receivable Corp., RB, Series A (AMBAC), |
|
|
11,200 |
|
|
11,496,352 |
|
|
Saint Lawrence County Industrial Development |
|
|
500 |
|
|
498,345 |
|
|
Syracuse Industrial Development Agency New York, RB, |
|
|
3,400 |
|
|
2,803,436 |
|
|
Town of Huntington New York, GO, Refunding (AMBAC): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.50%, 4/15/12 |
|
|
460 |
|
|
477,512 |
|
|
5.50%, 4/15/13 |
|
|
455 |
|
|
494,471 |
|
|
Town of North Hempstead New York, GO, Refunding, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.40%, 4/01/13 |
|
|
1,745 |
|
|
1,911,281 |
|
|
6.40%, 4/01/17 |
|
|
555 |
|
|
686,252 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
171,599,263 |
|
|
Education — 16.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
City of Troy New York, Refunding RB, Rensselaer |
|
|
5,725 |
|
|
5,610,214 |
|
|
Madison County Industrial Development Agency |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.00%, 7/01/30 |
|
|
5,410 |
|
|
5,556,936 |
|
|
5.00%, 7/01/35 |
|
|
2,675 |
|
|
2,710,979 |
|
|
New York City Industrial Development Agency, RB, |
|
|
7,000 |
|
|
6,988,940 |
|
|
New York City Industrial Development Agency, |
|
|
1,275 |
|
|
1,338,253 |
|
|
New York City Transitional Finance Authority, RB, |
|
|
5,500 |
|
|
5,852,385 |
|
|
New York City Trust for Cultural Resources, Refunding |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
1,052,840 |
|
|
New York State Dormitory Authority, LRB, State |
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
1,529,145 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT |
JULY 31, 2011 |
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Schedule of Investments (continued) |
BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund, Inc. (MYN) |
|
|
(Percentages shown are based on Net Assets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Bonds |
|
Par |
|
Value |
|
||
|
New York (continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Education (concluded) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New York State Dormitory Authority, RB: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convent of the Sacred Heart (AGM), 5.75%, |
|
$ |
2,075 |
|
$ |
2,182,360 |
|
|
Cornell University, Series A, 5.00%, 7/01/40 |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
1,033,400 |
|
|
Fordham University, Series A, 5.00%, 7/01/28 |
|
|
325 |
|
|
338,673 |
|
|
Fordham University, Series A, 5.50%, 7/01/36 |
|
|
1,550 |
|
|
1,617,378 |
|
|
General Purpose, Series A, 4.50%, 3/15/35 |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
1,957,160 |
|
|
Mount Sinai School of Medicine, 5.13%, 7/01/39 |
|
|
665 |
|
|
665,612 |
|
|
Mount Sinai School of Medicine at NYU (NPFGC), |
|
|
7,100 |
|
|
7,050,726 |
|
|
New School (AGM), 5.50%, 7/01/43 |
|
|
6,550 |
|
|
6,787,896 |
|
|
New York University, Series 1 (AMBAC), 5.50%, |
|
|
4,580 |
|
|
5,096,532 |
|
|
New York University, Series A (AMBAC), 5.00%, |
|
|
5,705 |
|
|
5,792,344 |
|
|
New York University, Series C, 5.00%, 7/01/38 |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
2,036,220 |
|
|
Rockefeller University, Series A1, 5.00%, |
|
|
2,500 |
|
|
2,518,950 |
|
|
State University Dormitory Facilities, Series A, |
|
|
5,200 |
|
|
5,355,688 |
|
|
Rensselaer County Industrial Development Agency |
|
|
1,255 |
|
|
1,259,204 |
|
|
Tompkins County Development Corp., RB, Ithaca |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.50%, 7/01/33 |
|
|
500 |
|
|
528,590 |
|
|
5.25%, 7/01/36 |
|
|
860 |
|
|
876,607 |
|
|
Trust for Cultural Resources, RB, Carnegie Hall, Series A: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.75%, 12/01/39 |
|
|
3,550 |
|
|
3,458,055 |
|
|
5.00%, 12/01/39 |
|
|
2,150 |
|
|
2,161,502 |
|
|
Trust for Cultural Resources, Refunding RB, American |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.00%, 7/01/36 |
|
|
4,750 |
|
|
4,797,357 |
|
|
5.00%, 7/01/44 |
|
|
500 |
|
|
503,625 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
86,657,571 |
|
|
Health — 8.7% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Duchess County Industrial Development Agency, RB, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.50%, 4/01/30 |
|
|
250 |
|
|
257,603 |
|
|
5.50%, 4/01/34 |
|
|
490 |
|
|
502,372 |
|
|
Monroe County Industrial Development Corp., RB, |
|
|
4,650 |
|
|
4,889,010 |
|
|
New York City Health & Hospital Corp., Refunding RB, |
|
|
2,200 |
|
|
2,227,412 |
|
|
New York City Industrial Development Agency, RB, |
|
|
7,970 |
|
|
8,237,075 |
|
|
New York State Dormitory Authority, MRB, Montefiore |
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
1,508,610 |
|
|
New York State Dormitory Authority, RB: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Healthcare, Series A, 5.00%, 3/15/38 |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
2,056,060 |
|
|
Hudson Valley Hospital (BHAC), 5.00%, 8/15/36 |
|
|
6,500 |
|
|
6,591,195 |
|
|
New York & Presbyterian Hospital (AGM), 5.25%, |
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
3,083,910 |
|
|
New York & Presbyterian Hospital (AGM), 5.00%, |
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
5,023,700 |
|
|
New York University Hospitals Center, Series A, |
|
|
3,450 |
|
|
3,561,538 |
|
|
New York University Hospitals Center, Series A, |
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
1,448,145 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Bonds |
|
Par |
|
Value |
|
||
|
New York (continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Health (concluded) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New York State Dormitory Authority, RB (concluded): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New York University Hospitals Center, Series A, |
|
$ |
1,100 |
|
$ |
1,132,065 |
|
|
North Shore-Long Island Jewish Health System, |
|
|
2,075 |
|
|
2,091,745 |
|
|
New York State Dormitory Authority, Refunding RB, |
|
|
2,900 |
|
|
2,885,268 |
|
|
Oneida County Industrial Development Agency |
|
|
720 |
|
|
733,716 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,229,424 |
|
|
Housing — 3.7% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Monroe County Industrial Development Agency, IDRB, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.13%, 2/01/20 |
|
|
995 |
|
|
1,001,587 |
|
|
6.25%, 2/01/31 |
|
|
1,125 |
|
|
1,130,422 |
|
|
New York City Housing Development Corp., RB, AMT: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series A-1-A, 5.00%, 11/01/30 |
|
|
750 |
|
|
717,757 |
|
|
Series A-1-A, 5.45%, 11/01/46 |
|
|
1,335 |
|
|
1,243,179 |
|
|
Series C, 5.00%, 11/01/26 |
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
1,507,875 |
|
|
Series C, 5.05%, 11/01/36 |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
1,880,360 |
|
|
Series H-1, 4.70%, 11/01/40 |
|
|
1,340 |
|
|
1,221,410 |
|
|
Series H-2-A, 5.20%, 11/01/35 |
|
|
840 |
|
|
803,149 |
|
|
Series H-2-A, 5.35%, 5/01/41 |
|
|
600 |
|
|
561,078 |
|
|
New York Mortgage Agency, Refunding RB, AMT: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Homeowner Mortgage, Series 97, 5.50%, 4/01/31 |
|
|
945 |
|
|
945,123 |
|
|
Series 133, 4.95%, 10/01/21 |
|
|
520 |
|
|
529,428 |
|
|
Series 143, 4.85%, 10/01/27 |
|
|
1,100 |
|
|
1,055,835 |
|
|
Series 143, 4.90%, 10/01/37 |
|
|
980 |
|
|
932,764 |
|
|
Series 143 (NPFGC), 4.85%, 10/01/27 |
|
|
2,485 |
|
|
2,443,824 |
|
|
New York State HFA, RB, St. Philips Housing, Series A, |
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
1,401,645 |
|
|
Yonkers Industrial Development Agency New York, RB, |
|
|
2,445 |
|
|
2,341,821 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,717,257 |
|
|
State — 8.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New York State Dormitory Authority, ERB, Series C, |
|
|
6,230 |
|
|
6,494,837 |
|
|
New York State Dormitory Authority, RB: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Master BOCES Program Lease (AGC), 5.00%, |
|
|
1,750 |
|
|
1,844,693 |
|
|
Mental Health Services Facilities, Series B, |
|
|
1,570 |
|
|
1,748,352 |
|
|
Mental Health Services Facilities, Series C, AMT |
|
|
6,460 |
|
|
6,504,897 |
|
|
School Districts Financing Program, Series A |
|
|
550 |
|
|
557,541 |
|
|
School Districts Financing Program, Series C |
|
|
4,050 |
|
|
4,096,858 |
|
|
School Districts Financing Program, Series E |
|
|
6,900 |
|
|
7,181,658 |
|
|
New York State Thruway Authority, RB: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second General, Series B, 5.00%, 4/01/27 |
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
1,585,440 |
|
|
Series A (AMBAC), 5.00%, 4/01/26 |
|
|
4,380 |
|
|
4,662,641 |
|
|
New York State Urban Development Corp., RB (NPFGC): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personal Income Tax, Series C-1, 5.00%, |
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
3,227,460 |
|
|
State Personal Income Tax, State Facilities, Series A-1, |
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
5,159,950 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,064,327 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 |
ANNUAL REPORT |
JULY 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Schedule of Investments (continued) |
BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund, Inc. (MYN) |
|
|
(Percentages shown are based on Net Assets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Bonds |
|
Par |
|
Value |
|
||
|
New York (continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tobacco — 1.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp. New York, RB, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series A-1 (AMBAC), 5.25%, 6/01/20 |
|
$ |
5,000 |
|
$ |
5,323,650 |
|
|
Series B-1C, 5.50%, 6/01/22 |
|
|
1,900 |
|
|
2,028,687 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,352,337 |
|
|
Transportation — 28.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hudson Yards Infrastructure Corp., RB: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(AGC), 5.00%, 2/15/47 |
|
|
4,300 |
|
|
4,112,262 |
|
|
Series A (AGM), 5.00%, 2/15/47 |
|
|
6,840 |
|
|
6,541,366 |
|
|
Series A (NPFGC), 5.00%, 2/15/47 |
|
|
550 |
|
|
525,987 |
|
|
Metropolitan Transportation Authority, RB: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series 2008C, 6.50%, 11/15/28 |
|
|
3,200 |
|
|
3,701,568 |
|
|
Transportation, Series D, 5.25%, 11/15/29 |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
1,053,280 |
|
|
Metropolitan Transportation Authority, Refunding RB: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series A, 5.13%, 1/01/29 |
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
3,016,650 |
|
|
Series A (AGM), 5.00%, 11/15/32 |
|
|
1,015 |
|
|
1,020,227 |
|
|
Series A (AGM), 5.75%, 11/15/32 |
|
|
29,300 |
|
|
30,452,662 |
|
|
Series A (NPFGC), 5.13%, 11/15/22 |
|
|
1,390 |
|
|
1,444,697 |
|
|
Series A (NPFGC), 5.25%, 11/15/31 |
|
|
2,500 |
|
|
2,516,575 |
|
|
Series B, 5.00%, 11/15/34 |
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
1,538,805 |
|
|
Series C (AGM), 5.13%, 7/01/12 (d) |
|
|
1,640 |
|
|
1,714,374 |
|
|
Transportation, Series F (NPFGC), 5.25%, |
|
|
6,235 |
|
|
6,636,783 |
|
|
Transportation, Series F (NPFGC), 5.00%, 11/15/31 |
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
5,017,650 |
|
|
New York State Thruway Authority, RB: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series F (AMBAC), 5.00%, 1/01/30 |
|
|
6,000 |
|
|
6,112,980 |
|
|
Series G (AGM), 4.75%, 1/01/29 |
|
|
7,250 |
|
|
7,458,655 |
|
|
Series G (AGM), 4.75%, 1/01/30 |
|
|
9,000 |
|
|
9,183,510 |
|
|
Series G (AGM), 5.00%, 1/01/30 |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
2,062,340 |
|
|
Series G (AGM), 5.00%, 1/01/32 |
|
|
1,030 |
|
|
1,054,988 |
|
|
Niagara Falls Bridge Commission, Refunding RB, |
|
|
1,900 |
|
|
2,030,872 |
|
|
Niagara Frontier Transportation Authority New York, RB, |
|
|
2,705 |
|
|
2,704,838 |
|
|
Port Authority of New York & New Jersey, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
116th Series, 4.13%, 9/15/32 |
|
|
2,700 |
|
|
2,605,635 |
|
|
124th Series, AMT (NPFGC), 5.00%, 8/01/36 |
|
|
500 |
|
|
500,000 |
|
|
163rd Series, 5.00%, 7/15/35 |
|
|
2,500 |
|
|
2,585,700 |
|
|
Port Authority of New York & New Jersey, RB, JFK |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.25%, 12/01/11 |
|
|
7,175 |
|
|
7,255,432 |
|
|
6.25%, 12/01/13 |
|
|
4,425 |
|
|
4,645,719 |
|
|
6.25%, 12/01/14 |
|
|
7,380 |
|
|
7,827,597 |
|
|
5.75%, 12/01/22 |
|
|
10,160 |
|
|
10,104,018 |
|
|
5.75%, 12/01/25 |
|
|
3,500 |
|
|
3,403,225 |
|
|
Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority, RB: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sub-Series A (NPFGC), 5.25%, 11/15/30 |
|
|
6,000 |
|
|
6,138,660 |
|
|
Subordinate Bonds (AMBAC), 5.00%, 11/15/28 |
|
|
2,465 |
|
|
2,509,715 |
|
|
Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority, Refunding RB, |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
2,053,960 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
149,530,730 |
|
|
Utilities — 10.7% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buffalo Sewer Authority New York, Refunding RB, |
|
|
2,275 |
|
|
2,389,091 |
|
|
Long Island Power Authority, RB, Series A (AMBAC), |
|
|
7,000 |
|
|
7,091,560 |
|
|
Long Island Power Authority, Refunding RB: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General, Series A (AGC), 6.00%, 5/01/33 |
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
1,656,135 |
|
|
General, Series B (AGM), 5.00%, 12/01/35 |
|
|
4,000 |
|
|
4,049,440 |
|
|
Series A (AGC), 5.75%, 4/01/39 |
|
|
1,015 |
|
|
1,089,663 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Bonds |
|
Par |
|
Value |
|
||
|
New York (concluded) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Utilities (concluded) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New York City Municipal Water Finance Authority, RB: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second General Resolution, Series HH, 5.00%, |
|
$ |
10,600 |
|
$ |
11,174,096 |
|
|
Series B, 5.00%, 6/15/36 |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
2,039,740 |
|
|
Series DD, 5.00%, 6/15/32 |
|
|
6,750 |
|
|
7,020,270 |
|
|
Series DD (AGM), 4.50%, 6/15/39 |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
966,040 |
|
|
Series G (AGM), 5.00%, 6/15/34 |
|
|
4,225 |
|
|
4,227,451 |
|
|
New York City Municipal Water Finance Authority, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second General Resolution, Fiscal 2011, |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
1,056,450 |
|
|
Series A (AGM), 4.25%, 6/15/39 |
|
|
500 |
|
|
465,365 |
|
|
Series A (NPFGC), 5.13%, 6/15/34 |
|
|
1,250 |
|
|
1,259,375 |
|
|
Series D (AGM), 5.00%, 6/15/37 |
|
|
9,000 |
|
|
9,126,090 |
|
|
New York State Environmental Facilities Corp., RB, |
|
|
2,100 |
|
|
2,179,485 |
|
|
New York State Environmental Facilities Corp., |
|
|
1,040 |
|
|
1,082,266 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56,872,517 |
|
|
Total Municipal Bonds in New York |
|
|
|
|
|
611,544,572 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guam — 1.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transportation — 0.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guam International Airport Authority, Refunding RB, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.25%, 10/01/21 |
|
|
2,240 |
|
|
2,243,539 |
|
|
5.25%, 10/01/22 |
|
|
2,050 |
|
|
2,052,460 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,295,999 |
|
|
Utilities — 0.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guam Power Authority, Refunding RB, Series A (AGM), |
|
|
1,380 |
|
|
1,362,046 |
|
|
Total Municipal Bonds in Guam |
|
|
|
|
|
5,658,045 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Puerto Rico — 13.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Housing — 0.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Puerto Rico Housing Finance Authority, Refunding RB, |
|
|
4,000 |
|
|
4,074,400 |
|
|
State — 7.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, GO, Refunding (NPFGC): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Public Improvement, Series A, 5.50%, 7/01/20 |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
2,164,660 |
|
|
Sub-Series C-7, 6.00%, 7/01/27 |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
2,106,160 |
|
|
Sub-Series C-7, 6.00%, 7/01/28 |
|
|
4,775 |
|
|
5,019,958 |
|
|
(AMBAC), 4.67%, 7/01/35 |
|
|
3,900 |
|
|
718,770 |
|
|
(AMBAC), 5.02%, 7/01/43 |
|
|
8,000 |
|
|
817,360 |
|
|
(FGIC), 4.62%, 7/01/31 |
|
|
22,030 |
|
|
5,712,599 |
|
|
Puerto Rico Convention Center Authority, RB, Series A |
|
|
4,000 |
|
|
3,787,360 |
|
|
Puerto Rico Highway & Transportation Authority, |
|
|
2,500 |
|
|
2,649,900 |
|
|
Puerto Rico Public Buildings Authority, Refunding RB, |
|
|
2,850 |
|
|
3,002,988 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Financial Statements. |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT |
JULY 31, 2011 |
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Schedule of Investments (continued) |
BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund, Inc. (MYN) |
|
|
(Percentages shown are based on Net Assets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Bonds |
|
Par |
|
Value |
|
||
|
Puerto Rico (concluded) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State (concluded) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., RB, First |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(AGM), 5.00%, 8/01/40 |
|
$ |
2,100 |
|
$ |
2,074,632 |
|
|
5.63%, 8/01/30 |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
2,073,520 |
|
|
5.75%, 8/01/37 |
|
|
7,150 |
|
|
7,329,536 |
|
|
Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., Refunding RB, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.76%, 8/01/41 (c) |
|
|
12,800 |
|
|
1,826,688 |
|
|
5.98%, 8/01/43 (c) |
|
|
4,000 |
|
|
497,960 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,782,091 |
|
|
Transportation — 3.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Puerto Rico Highway & Transportation Authority, RB: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series G (FGIC), 5.25%, 7/01/13 (d) |
|
|
655 |
|
|
716,963 |
|
|
Series G (FGIC), 5.25%, 7/01/21 |
|
|
345 |
|
|
349,226 |
|
|
Series Y (AGM), 6.25%, 7/01/21 |
|
|
6,275 |
|
|
7,136,369 |
|
|
Puerto Rico Highway & Transportation Authority, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series AA-1 (AGM), 4.95%, 7/01/26 |
|
|
6,190 |
|
|
6,261,000 |
|
|
Series CC (AGM), 5.50%, 7/01/29 |
|
|
2,500 |
|
|
2,686,775 |
|
|
Series D, 5.75%, 7/01/12 (d) |
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
3,150,450 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,300,783 |
|
|
Utilities — 1.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Puerto Rico Aqueduct & Sewer Authority, RB, Senior Lien, |
|
|
1,950 |
|
|
1,921,862 |
|
|
Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, RB, Series RR |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
1,017,040 |
|
|
Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Refunding RB, |
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
3,021,390 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,960,292 |
|
|
Total Municipal Bonds in Puerto Rico |
|
|
|
|
|
70,117,566 |
|
|
Total Municipal Bonds — 129.7% |
|
|
|
|
|
687,320,183 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
Municipal Bonds Transferred to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New York — 28.7% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
County/City/Special District/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
City of New York New York, GO: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series J, 5.00%, 5/15/23 |
|
|
6,750 |
|
|
7,254,292 |
|
|
Sub-Series C-3 (AGC), 5.75%, 8/15/28 |
|
|
14,400 |
|
|
16,144,416 |
|
|
New York State Dormitory Authority, RB, State University |
|
|
6,000 |
|
|
6,441,540 |
|
|
Sales Tax Asset Receivable Corp., RB, Series A (AMBAC): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.25%, 10/15/27 |
|
|
13,000 |
|
|
13,788,710 |
|
|
5.00%, 10/15/32 |
|
|
16,000 |
|
|
16,970,720 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60,599,678 |
|
|
Education — 1.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New York State Dormitory Authority, RB, New York |
|
|
6,498 |
|
|
6,615,863 |
|
|
State — 1.6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New York State Dormitory Authority, ERB, Series B, |
|
|
7,850 |
|
|
8,642,065 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Bonds Transferred to |
|
Par |
|
Value |
|
||
|
New York (concluded) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transportation — 13.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Metropolitan Transportation Authority, RB, Series A |
|
$ |
3,901 |
|
$ |
3,980,726 |
|
|
Metropolitan Transportation Authority, Refunding RB, |
|
|
8,460 |
|
|
8,503,569 |
|
|
New York State Thruway Authority, RB, Series G (AGM), |
|
|
16,000 |
|
|
16,388,160 |
|
|
New York State Thruway Authority, Refunding RB, |
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
10,164,300 |
|
|
Port Authority of New York & New Jersey, RB, |
|
|
2,500 |
|
|
2,549,800 |
|
|
Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority, Refunding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.25%, 11/15/23 |
|
|
7,000 |
|
|
7,316,890 |
|
|
5.00%, 11/15/32 |
|
|
19,677 |
|
|
19,815,713 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68,719,158 |
|
|
Utilities — 1.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New York City Municipal Water Finance Authority, RB: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2009, Series A, 5.75%, 6/15/40 |
|
|
4,094 |
|
|
4,500,277 |
|
|
Series FF-2, 5.50%, 6/15/40 |
|
|
2,759 |
|
|
2,951,772 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,452,049 |
|
|
Total
Municipal Bonds Transferred to |
|
|
|
|
|
152,028,813 |
|
|
Total
Long-Term Investments |
|
|
|
|
|
839,348,996 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-Term Securities |
|
Shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
BIF New York Municipal Money Fund, 0.00% (f)(g) |
|
|
14,521,616 |
|
|
14,521,616 |
|
|
Total
Short-Term Securities |
|
|
|
|
|
14,521,616 |
|
|
Total Investments (Cost — $847,207,797*)% — 161.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
853,870,612 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Assets Less Liabilities — 0.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
2,549,029 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liability for TOB Trust Certificates, Including |
|
|
|
|
|
(78,661,402 |
) |
|
VRDP Shares, at Liquidation Value — (46.7)% |
|
|
|
|
|
(247,700,000 |
) |
|
Net Assets Applicable to Common Shares– 100.0% |
|
|
|
|
$ |
530,058,239 |
|
|
|
|
|
* |
The cost and unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of investments as of July 31, 2011, as computed for federal income tax purposes, were as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate cost |
|
|
|
|
$ |
769,048,112 |
|
|
Gross unrealized appreciation |
|
|
|
|
$ |
23,401,442 |
|
|
Gross unrealized depreciation |
|
|
|
|
|
(17,193,746 |
) |
|
Net unrealized appreciation |
|
|
|
|
$ |
6,207,696 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
Variable rate security. Rate shown is as of report date. |
|
|
|
|
(b) |
When-issued security. Unsettled when-issued transactions were as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Counterparty |
|
Value |
|
Unrealized |
|
||
|
Citigroup Global Markets, Inc. |
|
$ |
2,018,309 |
|
$ |
4,914 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Financial Statements. |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
26 |
ANNUAL REPORT |
JULY 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Schedule of Investments (concluded) |
BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund, Inc. (MYN) |
|
|
|
|
(c) |
Represents a zero-coupon bond. Rate shown reflects the current yield as of report date. |
|
|
|
|
(d) |
US government securities, held in escrow, are used to pay interest on this security, as well as to retire the bond in full at the date indicated, typically at a premium to par. |
|
|
|
|
(e) |
Securities represent bonds transferred to a TOB in exchange for which the Fund acquired residual interest certificates. These securities serve as collateral in a financing transaction. See Note 1 of the Notes to Financial Statements for details of municipal bonds transferred to TOBs. |
|
|
|
|
(f) |
Investments in companies considered to be an affiliate of the Fund during the year, for purposes of Section 2(a)(3) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, were as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Affiliate |
|
Shares
Held |
|
Net |
|
Shares
Held |
|
Income |
|
||||
|
BIF New York Municipal |
|
|
8,174,307 |
|
|
6,347,309 |
|
|
14,521,616 |
|
$ |
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
(g) |
Represents the current yield as of report date. |
|
|
|
|
• |
For Fund compliance purposes,the Fund’s sector classifications refer to any one or more of the sector sub-classifications used by one or more widely recognized market indexes or ratings group indexes, and/or as defined by Fund management. These definitions may not apply for purposes of this report, which may combine such sector sub-classifications for reporting ease. |
|
|
|
|
• |
Financial futures contracts sold as of July 31, 2011 were as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contracts |
|
Issue |
|
Exchange |
|
Expiration |
|
Notional |
|
Unrealized |
|
||
|
146 |
|
30-Year
US |
|
Chicago |
|
September |
|
$ |
18,186,988 |
|
$ |
(519,262 |
) |
|
|
|
|
• |
Fair Value Measurements — Various inputs are used in determining the fair value of investments and derivative financial instruments. These inputs are categorized in three broad levels for financial statement purposes as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
• |
Level 1 — price quotations in active markets/exchanges for identical assets and liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
• |
Level 2 — other observable inputs (including, but not limited to: quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in markets that are active, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the assets or liabilities (such as interest rates, yield curves, volatilities, prepayment speeds, loss severities, credit risks and default rates) or other market-corroborated inputs) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
• |
Level 3 — unobservable inputs based on the best information available in the circumstances, to the extent observable inputs are not available (including the Fund’s own assumptions used in determining the fair value of investments and derivative financial instruments) |
The categorization of a value determined for investments and derivative financial instruments is based on the pricing transparency of the investment and derivative financial instrument and does not necessarily correspond to the Fund’s perceived risk of investing in those securities. For information about the Fund’s policy regarding valuation of investments and derivative financial instruments and other significant accounting policies, please refer to Note 1 of the Notes to Financial Statements.
The following tables summarize the inputs used as of July 31, 2011 in determining the fair valuation of the Fund’s investments and derivative financial instruments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation Inputs |
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
|
Total |
|
||||
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Term |
|
|
— |
|
$ |
839,348,996 |
|
|
— |
|
$ |
839,348,996 |
|
|
Short-Term |
|
$ |
14,521,616 |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
14,521,616 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
14,521,616 |
|
$ |
839,348,996 |
|
|
— |
|
$ |
853,870,612 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
See above Schedule of Investments for values in each sector. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation Inputs |
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
|
Total |
|
||||
|
Derivative Financial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate |
|
$ |
(519,262 |
) |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
$ |
(519,262 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
Derivative financial instruments are financial futures contracts, which are valued at the unrealized appreciation/depreciation on the instrument. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Financial Statements. |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT |
JULY 31, 2011 |
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Schedule of Investments July 31, 2011 |
BlackRock MuniYield Quality Fund III, Inc. (MYI) |
|
|
(Percentages shown are based on Net Assets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Bonds |
|
Par |
|
Value |
|
||
|
Alabama — 0.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Birmingham Special Care Facilities Financing Authority, |
|
$ |
3,605 |
|
$ |
3,856,881 |
|
|
Alaska — 1.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alaska Housing Finance Corp., RB, General Housing, |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
2,030,380 |
|
|
Borough of Matanuska-Susitna Alaska, RB, Goose |
|
|
10,150 |
|
|
11,503,198 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,533,578 |
|
|
Arizona — 1.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maricopa County & Phoenix Industrial Development |
|
|
1,670 |
|
|
1,702,883 |
|
|
Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power |
|
|
3,500 |
|
|
3,578,925 |
|
|
State of Arizona, COP, Department of Administration, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.00%, 10/01/27 |
|
|
3,725 |
|
|
3,850,942 |
|
|
5.25%, 10/01/28 |
|
|
1,600 |
|
|
1,674,512 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,807,262 |
|
|
California — 14.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alameda Corridor Transportation Authority, Refunding |
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
8,299,900 |
|
|
California Health Facilities Financing Authority, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
St. Joseph Health System, Series A, |
|
|
1,550 |
|
|
1,567,593 |
|
|
Sutter Health, Series B, 5.88%, 8/15/31 |
|
|
3,200 |
|
|
3,418,432 |
|
|
California HFA, RB, Home Mortgage, Series K, AMT, |
|
|
4,530 |
|
|
4,600,124 |
|
|
California State University, RB, Systemwide, Series A: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.50%, 11/01/39 |
|
|
1,525 |
|
|
1,560,594 |
|
|
(NPFGC), 5.00%, 11/01/32 |
|
|
9,865 |
|
|
9,825,836 |
|
|
California State University, Refunding RB, Systemwide, |
|
|
3,545 |
|
|
3,508,912 |
|
|
California Statewide Communities Development |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
St. Joseph Health System, Series E, |
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
4,899,250 |
|
|
Sutter Health, Series D, 5.05%, 8/15/38 |
|
|
500 |
|
|
487,745 |
|
|
City of Redding California, COP, Refunding, Series A |
|
|
1,900 |
|
|
1,938,456 |
|
|
City of San Jose California, RB, Series A-1, AMT, |
|
|
2,300 |
|
|
2,279,760 |
|
|
City of San Jose California, Refunding RB, Series A, AMT |
|
|
11,965 |
|
|
11,550,054 |
|
|
County of Sacramento California, RB, Senior Series A |
|
|
15,000 |
|
|
14,524,500 |
|
|
Dublin Unified School District California, GO, CAB, |
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
1,052,350 |
|
|
Fairfield-Suisun Unified School District California, GO, |
|
|
5,800 |
|
|
6,068,424 |
|
|
Los Angeles Community College District California, GO, |
|
|
1,200 |
|
|
1,230,000 |
|
|
Los Angeles Municipal Improvement Corp., RB, |
|
|
14,000 |
|
|
12,055,260 |
|
|
Mendocino-Lake Community College District, GO, |
|
|
1,485 |
|
|
1,501,870 |
|
|
Norwalk-La Mirada Unified School District California, |
|
|
7,620 |
|
|
1,204,112 |
|
|
Oceanside Unified School District California, GO, |
|
|
2,500 |
|
|
2,561,775 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Bonds |
|
Par |
|
Value |
|
||
|
California (concluded) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Port of Oakland, RB, Series K, AMT (NPFGC), |
|
$ |
3,645 |
|
$ |
3,645,729 |
|
|
Port of Oakland, Refunding RB, Series M (NPFGC), |
|
|
8,030 |
|
|
8,044,213 |
|
|
Riverside County Public Financing Authority, Tax |
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
7,818,700 |
|
|
San Bernardino Community College District, GO, |
|
|
2,165 |
|
|
2,190,785 |
|
|
San Joaquin County Transportation Authority, RB, |
|
|
1,830 |
|
|
2,004,454 |
|
|
San Marcos Unified School District, GO, Election of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.00%, 8/01/34 |
|
|
1,800 |
|
|
1,811,268 |
|
|
5.00%, 8/01/38 |
|
|
1,600 |
|
|
1,590,608 |
|
|
State of California, GO, Series 2007-2 (NPFGC), |
|
|
10 |
|
|
10,294 |
|
|
Stockton Public Financing Authority California, RB, |
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
4,805,850 |
|
|
Turlock Irrigation District, Refunding RB, |
|
|
2,300 |
|
|
2,369,782 |
|
|
West Valley-Mission Community College District, GO, |
|
|
3,600 |
|
|
3,663,720 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
132,090,350 |
|
|
District of Columbia — 1.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority, RB, Series B, |
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
10,015,100 |
|
|
Florida — 16.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Broward County School Board Florida, COP, Series A |
|
|
15,000 |
|
|
15,269,250 |
|
|
City of Orlando Florida, RB, Senior, 6th Cent Contract |
|
|
13,850 |
|
|
12,937,285 |
|
|
Collier County School Board, COP (AGM), |
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
5,308,200 |
|
|
County of Broward Florida, RB, Series A, |
|
|
2,250 |
|
|
2,363,580 |
|
|
County of Miami-Dade Florida, GO, Building Better |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series B, 6.38%, 7/01/28 |
|
|
6,000 |
|
|
6,693,480 |
|
|
Series B-1, 5.75%, 7/01/33 |
|
|
3,700 |
|
|
3,945,162 |
|
|
County of Miami-Dade Florida, RB: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Miami International Airport, AMT (NPFGC), |
|
|
7,500 |
|
|
7,594,125 |
|
|
Miami International Airport, AMT (NPFGC), |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
1,007,770 |
|
|
Miami International Airport, Series A, AMT (AGM), |
|
|
19,020 |
|
|
18,446,737 |
|
|
Water & Sewer System (AGM), 5.00%, 10/01/39 |
|
|
11,700 |
|
|
11,827,881 |
|
|
County of Miami-Dade Florida, Refunding RB: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Miami International Airport, AMT (AGC), |
|
|
11,000 |
|
|
9,910,450 |
|
|
Miami International Airport, Series A, |
|
|
2,800 |
|
|
2,809,632 |
|
|
Miami International Airport, Series A, AMT (AGC), |
|
|
2,100 |
|
|
1,926,246 |
|
|
Series C (BHAC), 6.00%, 10/01/23 |
|
|
20,095 |
|
|
23,136,378 |
|
|
Highlands County Health Facilities Authority, RB, |
|
|
1,750 |
|
|
1,854,073 |
|
|
Miami-Dade County School Board, COP, Refunding RB, |
|
|
1,390 |
|
|
1,435,328 |
|
|
Orange County School Board, COP, Series A (AGC), |
|
|
12,000 |
|
|
12,399,840 |
|
|
Sarasota County Public Hospital District, RB, Sarasota |
|
|
5,135 |
|
|
5,188,661 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
144,054,078 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Financial Statements. |
|
|
|
|
||
|
28 |
ANNUAL REPORT |
JULY 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Schedule of Investments (continued) |
BlackRock MuniYield Quality Fund III, Inc. (MYI) |
|
(Percentages shown are based on Net Assets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Bonds |
|
Par |
|
Value |
|
||
|
Georgia — 1.7% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
City of Atlanta Georgia, RB, General, Series B (AGM), |
|
$ |
12,500 |
|
$ |
12,644,375 |
|
|
Gwinnett County Hospital Authority, Refunding RB, |
|
|
2,275 |
|
|
2,299,615 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,943,990 |
|
|
Illinois — 17.6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chicago Board of Education Illinois, GO, Refunding, |
|
|
7,430 |
|
|
4,072,309 |
|
|
Chicago Park District, GO, Harbor Facilities, Series C, |
|
|
1,505 |
|
|
1,539,750 |
|
|
City of Chicago Illinois, ARB, General, Third Lien, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.25%, 1/01/27 |
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
10,024,300 |
|
|
6.00%, 1/01/27 |
|
|
26,230 |
|
|
26,796,306 |
|
|
City of Chicago Illinois, GO, CAB, City Colleges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.57%, 1/01/29 |
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
1,764,100 |
|
|
5.70%, 1/01/33 |
|
|
7,950 |
|
|
2,027,965 |
|
|
City of Chicago Illinois, GO, Refunding, Series B (AGM), |
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
5,150,400 |
|
|
City of Chicago Illinois, RB, O’Hare International Airport, |
|
|
9,000 |
|
|
9,391,860 |
|
|
City of Chicago Illinois, Refunding ARB, O’Hare |
|
|
16,400 |
|
|
16,076,920 |
|
|
County of Cook Illinois, GO, Refunding, Series A, 5.25%, |
|
|
3,700 |
|
|
3,843,079 |
|
|
Illinois Finance Authority, RB, Series A, 5.75%, 8/15/34 |
|
|
8,700 |
|
|
8,568,717 |
|
|
Illinois Finance Authority, Refunding RB, Northwestern |
|
|
5,250 |
|
|
5,604,847 |
|
|
Illinois Municipal Electric Agency, RB, Series A (NPFGC): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.00%, 2/01/35 |
|
|
21,200 |
|
|
21,230,316 |
|
|
5.25%, 2/01/35 |
|
|
15,000 |
|
|
15,178,500 |
|
|
Illinois State Toll Highway Authority, RB, Series B: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.50%, 1/01/33 |
|
|
4,000 |
|
|
4,130,720 |
|
|
(BHAC), 5.50%, 1/01/33 |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
2,095,640 |
|
|
Kane, Kendall, Etc. Counties Community College |
|
|
8,750 |
|
|
3,972,150 |
|
|
Metropolitan Pier & Exposition Authority, RB, CAB, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.75%, 6/15/32 |
|
|
14,000 |
|
|
4,062,380 |
|
|
6.00%, 12/15/34 |
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
2,410,200 |
|
|
Metropolitan Pier & Exposition Authority, Refunding RB, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.83%, 6/15/27 |
|
|
3,575 |
|
|
1,485,091 |
|
|
6.25%, 6/15/44 |
|
|
9,430 |
|
|
1,180,919 |
|
|
Railsplitter Tobacco Settlement Authority, RB, |
|
|
1,700 |
|
|
1,750,745 |
|
|
Regional Transportation Authority, RB, Series C (NPFGC), |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
1,229,420 |
|
|
State of Illinois, RB, Build Illinois, Series B, |
|
|
3,500 |
|
|
3,551,625 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
157,138,259 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Bonds |
|
Par |
|
Value |
|
||
|
Indiana — 3.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
City of Indianapolis Indiana, Refunding RB, Second |
|
$ |
5,000 |
|
$ |
5,261,100 |
|
|
Indiana Municipal Power Agency, RB: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series A (NPFGC), 5.00%, 1/01/37 |
|
|
4,750 |
|
|
4,752,042 |
|
|
Series B, 5.75%, 1/01/34 |
|
|
1,050 |
|
|
1,071,546 |
|
|
Series B, 6.00%, 1/01/39 |
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
5,306,650 |
|
|
Indianapolis Local Public Improvement Bond Bank, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.75%, 1/01/38 |
|
|
2,900 |
|
|
3,053,555 |
|
|
(AGC), 5.25%, 1/01/29 |
|
|
1,350 |
|
|
1,428,948 |
|
|
(AGC), 5.50%, 1/01/38 |
|
|
6,800 |
|
|
7,111,304 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,985,145 |
|
|
Iowa — 1.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Iowa Finance Authority, RB, Series A (AGC), |
|
|
12,650 |
|
|
13,083,389 |
|
|
Kentucky — 1.6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kentucky State Property & Buildings Commission, |
|
|
4,000 |
|
|
4,270,640 |
|
|
Louisville & Jefferson County Metropolitan Sewer |
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
10,256,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,527,240 |
|
|
Louisiana — 0.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New Orleans Aviation Board Louisiana, RB, New |
|
|
6,855 |
|
|
6,902,985 |
|
|
Massachusetts — 4.6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Massachusetts HFA, RB: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S/F Housing, Series 128, AMT (AGM), 4.88%, |
|
|
8,460 |
|
|
8,096,305 |
|
|
Series B, 7.00%, 12/01/38 |
|
|
3,440 |
|
|
3,782,658 |
|
|
Massachusetts HFA, Refunding RB: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Housing Development, Series B (NPFGC), |
|
|
1,835 |
|
|
1,834,963 |
|
|
Rental Housing, Series A, AMT (AGM), |
|
|
15,490 |
|
|
15,601,993 |
|
|
Series C, AMT, 5.35%, 12/01/42 |
|
|
3,100 |
|
|
3,017,106 |
|
|
Massachusetts Port Authority, Refunding RB, BOSFUEL |
|
|
9,925 |
|
|
9,037,506 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,370,531 |
|
|
Michigan — 9.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
City of Detroit Michigan, RB, Series B (AGM): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Lien, 6.25%, 7/01/36 |
|
|
1,075 |
|
|
1,170,761 |
|
|
Second Lien, 7.00%, 7/01/36 |
|
|
500 |
|
|
573,885 |
|
|
Senior Lien, 7.50%, 7/01/33 |
|
|
1,800 |
|
|
2,122,254 |
|
|
City of Detroit Michigan, Refunding RB: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Lien, Series C-1 (AGM), 7.00%, 7/01/27 |
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
1,761,705 |
|
|
Senior Lien, Series D (AGM), 5.00%, 7/01/23 |
|
|
9,085 |
|
|
9,187,297 |
|
|
Series C (NPFGC), 5.00%, 7/01/22 |
|
|
4,540 |
|
|
4,602,697 |
|
|
Series D (NPFGC), 5.00%, 7/01/33 |
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
4,732,300 |
|
|
Kalamazoo Hospital Finance Authority, RB, Bronson |
|
|
1,160 |
|
|
1,165,580 |
|
|
Lansing Board of Water & Light Utilities, RB, Series A, |
|
|
3,185 |
|
|
3,374,699 |
|
|
Michigan State Building Authority, Refunding RB, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series I, 6.25%, 10/15/38 |
|
|
3,125 |
|
|
3,339,281 |
|
|
Series I (AGC), 5.25%, 10/15/24 |
|
|
1,750 |
|
|
1,898,908 |
|
|
Series I (AGC), 5.25%, 10/15/25 |
|
|
3,250 |
|
|
3,501,550 |
|
|
Series I-A, 5.38%, 10/15/36 |
|
|
3,075 |
|
|
3,097,570 |
|
|
Series I-A, 5.38%, 10/15/41 |
|
|
1,900 |
|
|
1,913,946 |
|
|
Series II-A (AGM), 5.25%, 10/15/36 |
|
|
8,040 |
|
|
8,108,903 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Financial Statements. |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT |
JULY 31, 2011 |
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Schedule of Investments (continued) |
BlackRock MuniYield Quality Fund III, Inc. (MYI) |
|
(Percentages shown are based on Net Assets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Bonds |
|
Par |
|
Value |
|
||
|
Michigan (concluded) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michigan State HDA, RB, Series C, AMT, |
|
$ |
2,900 |
|
$ |
2,911,861 |
|
|
Michigan Strategic Fund, Refunding RB, Detroit Edison |
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
4,919,000 |
|
|
State of Michigan, RB, GAB (AGM): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.25%, 9/15/22 |
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
10,907,700 |
|
|
5.25%, 9/15/26 |
|
|
6,650 |
|
|
7,052,990 |
|
|
Wayne County Airport Authority, Refunding RB, AMT |
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
4,860,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81,203,387 |
|
|
Minnesota — 0.7% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
City of Minneapolis Minnesota, Refunding RB, Fairview |
|
|
5,500 |
|
|
5,991,590 |
|
|
Missouri — 0.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Missouri Housing Development Commission, RB, S/F |
|
|
55 |
|
|
56,598 |
|
|
Nevada — 4.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
City of Las Vegas Nevada, GO, Limited Tax, Performing |
|
|
2,250 |
|
|
2,442,443 |
|
|
County of Clark Nevada, RB: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Las Vegas-McCarran International Airport, Series A |
|
|
5,170 |
|
|
5,197,711 |
|
|
Subordinate Lien, Series A-2 (NPFGC), |
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
20,096,200 |
|
|
Las Vegas Convention & Visitors Authority, RB (AMBAC), |
|
|
8,500 |
|
|
7,994,335 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,730,689 |
|
|
New Jersey — 5.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New Jersey EDA, RB, Cigarette Tax, 5.75%, 6/15/34 |
|
|
4,000 |
|
|
3,818,760 |
|
|
New Jersey EDA, Refunding
RB, School Facilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(AMBAC), 5.50%, 9/01/24 |
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
11,032,800 |
|
|
(NPFGC), 5.50%, 9/01/28 |
|
|
1,685 |
|
|
1,835,841 |
|
|
New Jersey Higher Education Student Assistance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.50%, 12/01/25 |
|
|
1,250 |
|
|
1,284,638 |
|
|
5.50%, 12/01/26 |
|
|
1,800 |
|
|
1,835,406 |
|
|
5.75%, 12/01/28 |
|
|
200 |
|
|
204,836 |
|
|
5.88%, 12/01/33 |
|
|
6,475 |
|
|
6,556,973 |
|
|
New Jersey Transportation Trust Fund Authority, RB, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CAB, Series C (AGC), 5.72%, 12/15/25 (b) |
|
|
15,735 |
|
|
7,093,181 |
|
|
Series A, 5.25%, 6/15/30 |
|
|
6,150 |
|
|
6,394,770 |
|
|
Series A (NPFGC), 5.75%, 6/15/25 |
|
|
4,250 |
|
|
4,821,965 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,879,170 |
|
|
New York — 2.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
City of New York New York, GO, Series J, |
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
10,773,400 |
|
|
New York City Transitional Finance Authority, RB, Fiscal |
|
|
7,250 |
|
|
7,752,425 |
|
|
New York State Dormitory Authority, ERB, Series B, |
|
|
3,250 |
|
|
3,409,997 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,935,822 |
|
|
North Carolina — 0.6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North Carolina Medical Care Commission, RB, Novant |
|
|
6,175 |
|
|
5,249,182 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Bonds |
|
Par |
|
Value |
|
||
|
Ohio — 0.7% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
County of Lucas Ohio, Refunding RB, Promedica |
|
$ |
3,000 |
|
$ |
3,335,400 |
|
|
Ohio Higher Educational Facility Commission, |
|
|
2,450 |
|
|
2,407,003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,742,403 |
|
|
Pennsylvania — 2.9% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission, RB: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series A (AMBAC), 5.50%, 12/01/31 |
|
|
15,600 |
|
|
16,241,940 |
|
|
Sub-Series C (AGC), 6.25%, 6/01/38 |
|
|
5,695 |
|
|
6,298,613 |
|
|
Subordinate, Special Motor License Fund, |
|
|
2,575 |
|
|
2,868,756 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,409,309 |
|
|
Puerto Rico — 2.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Puerto Rico Public Buildings Authority, Refunding RB, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.00%, 7/01/27 |
|
|
3,720 |
|
|
3,924,116 |
|
|
6.00%, 7/01/28 |
|
|
2,750 |
|
|
2,897,620 |
|
|
Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., RB, First |
|
|
10,195 |
|
|
10,936,788 |
|
|
Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., Refunding RB: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CAB, Series A (NPFGC), 5.69%, 8/01/41 (b) |
|
|
7,500 |
|
|
1,070,325 |
|
|
First Sub-Series C, 6.00%, 8/01/39 |
|
|
1,180 |
|
|
1,238,540 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,067,389 |
|
|
South Carolina — 0.6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charleston Educational Excellence Finance Corp., RB, |
|
|
1,160 |
|
|
1,205,925 |
|
|
South Carolina Jobs-EDA, Refunding RB, Palmetto |
|
|
3,600 |
|
|
3,750,408 |
|
|
South Carolina State Housing Finance & Development |
|
|
340 |
|
|
344,940 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,301,273 |
|
|
Tennessee — 0.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tennessee Housing Development Agency, Refunding RB, |
|
|
1,415 |
|
|
1,415,354 |
|
|
Texas — 14.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
City of Houston Texas, RB, Combined, First Lien, Series A |
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
10,139,400 |
|
|
City of Houston Texas, Refunding RB, Combined, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.00%, 11/15/35 |
|
|
5,700 |
|
|
6,343,530 |
|
|
5.38%, 11/15/38 |
|
|
3,650 |
|
|
3,840,603 |
|
|
Dallas-Fort Worth International Airport Facilities |
|
|
15,000 |
|
|
15,037,200 |
|
|
Dallas ISD, GO, School Building (PSF-GTD), |
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
11,726,200 |
|
|
Grand Prairie ISD Texas, GO, Refunding, CAB, 6.59%, |
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
3,688,100 |
|
|
Harris County Hospital District, RB, Senior Lien, Series A |
|
|
6,500 |
|
|
6,552,650 |
|
|
Harris County-Houston Sports Authority, Refunding RB, |
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
4,412,400 |
|
|
Judson ISD Texas, GO, School Building (AGC), |
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
10,134,300 |
|
|
North Texas Tollway Authority, Refunding RB, First Tier: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series A, 6.00%, 1/01/28 |
|
|
6,275 |
|
|
6,764,575 |
|
|
System, Series A (NPFGC), 5.13%, 1/01/28 |
|
|
21,750 |
|
|
22,208,055 |
|
|
System, Series B (NPFGC), 5.75%, 1/01/40 |
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
10,074,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Financial Statements. |
|
|
|
|
||
|
30 |
ANNUAL REPORT |
JULY 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Schedule of Investments (continued) |
BlackRock MuniYield Quality Fund III, Inc. (MYI) |
|
|
(Percentages shown are based on Net Assets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Bonds |
|
Par |
|
Value |
|
||
|
Texas (concluded) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Texas Department of Housing & Community Affairs, |
|
$ |
3,880 |
|
$ |
3,899,206 |
|
|
Texas State Turnpike Authority, RB, First Tier, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.50%, 8/15/39 |
|
|
5,500 |
|
|
5,460,950 |
|
|
5.00%, 8/15/42 |
|
|
6,900 |
|
|
6,312,534 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
126,593,803 |
|
|
Utah — 2.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Utah Transit Authority, Refunding RB, CAB, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(AGC), 5.42%, 6/15/20 |
|
|
15,395 |
|
|
10,574,826 |
|
|
(NPFGC), 5.22%, 6/15/24 |
|
|
13,930 |
|
|
7,516,210 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,091,036 |
|
|
Vermont — 0.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vermont HFA, HRB, Series 12B, AMT (AGM), |
|
|
275 |
|
|
280,715 |
|
|
Vermont HFA, Refunding RB, Multiple Purpose, Series C, |
|
|
2,385 |
|
|
2,431,865 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,712,580 |
|
|
Washington — 3.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chelan County Public Utility District No. 1, RB, Chelan |
|
|
3,030 |
|
|
3,030,667 |
|
|
Radford Court Properties Washington, RB (NPFGC), |
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
10,004,400 |
|
|
Washington Health Care Facilities Authority, RB, Series A: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Providence Health & Services, 5.00%, 10/01/39 |
|
|
1,125 |
|
|
1,109,857 |
|
|
Providence Health & Services, 5.25%, 10/01/39 |
|
|
2,725 |
|
|
2,755,057 |
|
|
Providence Health System (NPFGC), 5.25%, |
|
|
5,575 |
|
|
5,623,335 |
|
|
Washington Health Care Facilities Authority, Refunding |
|
|
5,400 |
|
|
5,835,672 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,358,988 |
|
|
Wisconsin — 1.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wisconsin Health & Educational Facilities Authority, RB: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ascension Health Senior Credit Group, |
|
|
3,745 |
|
|
3,780,166 |
|
|
Froedtert & Community Health, Inc., |
|
|
3,500 |
|
|
3,512,880 |
|
|
SynergyHealth, Inc., 6.00%, 11/15/32 |
|
|
3,395 |
|
|
3,449,320 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,742,366 |
|
|
Total Municipal Bonds — 115.6% |
|
|
|
|
|
1,029,789,727 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Bonds Transferred to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Arizona — 1.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Arizona School Facilities Board, COP (AGC), |
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
10,635,400 |
|
|
California — 12.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alameda County Joint Powers Authority, Refunding RB, |
|
|
6,990 |
|
|
7,038,580 |
|
|
California State University, RB (AGM): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.00%, 11/01/37 |
|
|
18,435 |
|
|
18,247,274 |
|
|
Systemwide, Series A, 5.00%, 11/01/33 |
|
|
7,996 |
|
|
8,045,964 |
|
|
City of Riverside California, RB, Issue D (AGM), |
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
19,822,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Bonds Transferred to |
|
Par |
|
Value |
|
||
|
California (concluded) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foothill-De Anza Community College District, GO, |
|
$ |
7,500 |
|
$ |
7,570,350 |
|
|
Las Virgenes Unified School District California, GO, |
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
10,119,157 |
|
|
Los Angeles Community College District, GO, Election of |
|
|
5,248 |
|
|
5,846,460 |
|
|
Orange County Sanitation District, COP, Series B (AGM), |
|
|
10,780 |
|
|
10,987,623 |
|
|
San Diego Community College District California, GO, |
|
|
1,047 |
|
|
1,102,813 |
|
|
San Diego County Water Authority, COP, Refunding, |
|
|
9,370 |
|
|
9,568,457 |
|
|
San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District, RB (AGM), |
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
10,091,543 |
|
|
University of California, RB, Series O, 5.75%, 5/15/34 |
|
|
2,205 |
|
|
2,384,355 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110,824,976 |
|
|
Colorado — 0.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Colorado Health Facilities Authority, Refunding RB, |
|
|
2,469 |
|
|
2,547,569 |
|
|
Connecticut — 0.6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Connecticut State Health & Educational Facility |
|
|
5,010 |
|
|
5,274,127 |
|
|
District of Columbia — 0.9% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
District of Columbia, RB, Series A, 5.50%, 12/01/30 |
|
|
2,595 |
|
|
2,893,866 |
|
|
District of Columbia Water & Sewer Authority, RB, |
|
|
4,281 |
|
|
4,909,817 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,803,683 |
|
|
Florida — 3.6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
City of Tallahassee, RB, 5.00%, 10/01/32 |
|
|
3,300 |
|
|
3,352,305 |
|
|
Florida State Board of Education, GO, Series D, |
|
|
3,299 |
|
|
3,388,688 |
|
|
Highlands County Health Facilities Authority, RB, |
|
|
5,400 |
|
|
5,399,568 |
|
|
Miami-Dade County, RB, 5.00%, 7/01/31 |
|
|
19,800 |
|
|
20,092,248 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,232,809 |
|
|
Georgia — 1.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority, RB, Third |
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
10,004,700 |
|
|
Hawaii — 1.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Honolulu City & County Board of Water Supply, RB, |
|
|
9,830 |
|
|
9,987,083 |
|
|
Illinois — 2.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
City of Chicago, GO, Refunding, Series A (AGC), |
|
|
11,000 |
|
|
11,436,700 |
|
|
Illinois Finance Authority, RB, University of Chicago, |
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
11,232,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,669,400 |
|
|
Kentucky — 0.7% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kentucky State Property & Building Commission, |
|
|
5,985 |
|
|
6,422,916 |
|
|
Louisiana — 1.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State of Louisiana, RB, Series A (AGM), |
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
10,108,800 |
|
|
Nevada — 0.7% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clark County Water Reclamation District, GO, Series B: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.50%, 7/01/29 |
|
|
510 |
|
|
554,107 |
|
|
5.75%, 7/01/34 |
|
|
4,813 |
|
|
5,274,296 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,828,403 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Financial Statements. |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT |
JULY 31, 2011 |
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Schedule of Investments (continued) |
BlackRock MuniYield Quality Fund III, Inc. (MYI) |
|
|
(Percentages shown are based on Net Assets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Bonds Transferred to |
|
Par |
|
Value |
|
||
|
New Jersey — 1.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Garden State Preservation Trust, RB, Election of 2005, |
|
$ |
10,000 |
|
$ |
11,994,200 |
|
|
New York — 4.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New York City Municipal Water Finance Authority, RB, |
|
|
17,567 |
|
|
17,955,934 |
|
|
Port Authority of New York & New Jersey, RB, |
|
|
19,500 |
|
|
19,888,440 |
|
|
Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority, RB, General, |
|
|
4,500 |
|
|
4,741,920 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,586,294 |
|
|
North Carolina — 1.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North Carolina HFA, RB, Series 31-A, AMT, |
|
|
9,946 |
|
|
9,748,821 |
|
|
Ohio — 0.7% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Montgomery County, RB (AGM), 5.00%, 10/01/41 |
|
|
4,990 |
|
|
4,806,717 |
|
|
State of Ohio, RB, Cleveland Clinic Health, Series B, |
|
|
1,520 |
|
|
1,584,752 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,391,469 |
|
|
South Carolina — 0.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South Carolina State Housing Finance & Development |
|
|
4,658 |
|
|
4,774,231 |
|
|
Texas — 4.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Friendswood ISD Texas, GO, Schoolhouse (PSF-GTD), |
|
|
12,955 |
|
|
13,303,751 |
|
|
Houston ISD, GO, Schoolhouse (PSF-GTD), |
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
10,391,800 |
|
|
North East ISD, GO, 5.00%, 8/01/37 |
|
|
3,500 |
|
|
3,609,760 |
|
|
Texas State University Systems, Refunding RB, |
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
10,823,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,129,111 |
|
|
Virginia — 0.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
University of Virginia, Refunding RB, General, |
|
|
3,950 |
|
|
4,100,258 |
|
|
Washington — 6.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority, RB, |
|
|
16,770 |
|
|
17,467,129 |
|
|
County of King Washington, RB (AGM), 5.00%, 1/01/37 |
|
|
15,785 |
|
|
16,124,953 |
|
|
Port of Seattle Washington, Refunding RB, Series B, AMT |
|
|
20,565 |
|
|
20,649,946 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54,242,028 |
|
|
Wisconsin — 1.7% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State of Wisconsin, RB, 6.00%, 5/01/36 |
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
10,890,100 |
|
|
Wisconsin Health & Educational Facilities Authority, |
|
|
3,959 |
|
|
3,973,696 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,863,796 |
|
|
Total
Municipal Bonds Transferred to |
|
|
|
|
|
421,170,074 |
|
|
Total
Long-Term Investments |
|
|
|
|
|
1,450,959,801 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-Term Securities |
|
Shares |
|
Value |
|
||
|
FFI Institutional Tax-Exempt Fund, 0.01% (f)(g) |
|
|
4,703,282 |
|
$ |
4,703,282 |
|
|
Total
Short-Term Securities |
|
|
|
|
|
4,703,282 |
|
|
Total Investments (Cost — $1,434,925,359*) — 163.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
1,455,663,083 |
|
|
Other Assets Less Liabilities — 0.9% |
|
|
|
|
|
8,341,777 |
|
|
Liability for TOB Trust Certificates, Including |
|
|
|
|
|
(216,619,671 |
) |
|
VRDP Shares, at Liquidation Value — (40.0)% |
|
|
|
|
|
(356,400,000 |
) |
|
Net Assets Applicable to Common Shares — 100.0% |
|
|
|
|
$ |
890,985,189 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
The cost and unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of investments as of July 31, 2011, as computed for federal income tax purposes, were as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate cost |
|
$ |
1,221,272,654 |
|
|
Gross unrealized appreciation |
|
$ |
35,480,831 |
|
|
Gross unrealized depreciation |
|
|
(17,593,799 |
) |
|
Net unrealized appreciation |
|
$ |
17,887,032 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
Represents a step-up bond that pays an initial coupon rate for the first period and then a higher coupon rate for the following periods. Rate shown reflects the current yield as of report date. |
|
|
|
|
(b) |
Represents a zero-coupon bond. Rate shown reflects the current yield as of report date. |
|
|
|
|
(c) |
When-issued security. Unsettled when-issued transactions were as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Counterparty |
|
Value |
|
Unrealized |
|
||
|
Barclays Capital, Inc. |
|
$ |
2,369,782 |
|
$ |
6,256 |
|
|
|
|
|
(d) |
Variable rate security. Rate shown is as of report date. |
|
|
|
|
(e) |
Securities represent bonds transferred to a TOB in exchange for which the Fund acquired residual interest certificates. These securities serve as collateral in a financing transaction. See Note 1 of the Notes to Financial Statements for details of municipal bonds transferred to TOBs. |
|
|
|
|
(f) |
Investments in companies considered to be an affiliate of the Fund during the year, for purposes of Section 2(a)(3) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, were as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Affiliate |
|
Shares
Held |
|
Net |
|
Shares
Held |
|
Income |
|
||||
|
FFI Institutional Tax-Exempt Fund |
|
|
11,426,470 |
|
|
(6,723,188 |
) |
|
4,703,282 |
|
$ |
18,502 |
|
|
|
|
|
(g) |
Represents the current yield as of report date. |
|
|
|
|
• |
Financial futures contracts sold as of July 31, 2011 were as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contracts |
|
Issue |
|
Exchange |
|
Expiration |
|
Notional |
|
Unrealized |
|
||
|
465 |
|
10-Year |
|
Chicago
Board |
|
September |
|
$ |
57,012,476 |
|
$ |
(1,432,212 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Financial Statements. |
|
|
|
|
||
|
32 |
ANNUAL REPORT |
JULY 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Schedule of Investments (concluded) |
BlackRock MuniYield Quality Fund III, Inc. (MYI) |
|
|
|
|
|
• |
Fair Value Measurements — Various inputs are used in determining the fair value of investments and derivative financial instruments. These inputs are categorized in three broad levels for financial statement purposes as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
• |
Level 1 — price quotations in active markets/exchanges for identical assets and liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
• |
Level 2 — other observable inputs (including, but not limited to: quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in markets that are active, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the assets or liabilities (such as interest rates, yield curves, volatilities, prepayment speeds, loss severities, credit risks and default rates) or other market-corroborated inputs) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
• |
Level 3 — unobservable inputs based on the best information available in the circumstances, to the extent observable inputs are not available (including the Fund’s own assumptions used in determining the fair value of investments and derivative financial instruments) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The categorization of a value determined for investments and derivative financial instruments is based on the pricing transparency of the investment and derivative financial instrument and does not necessarily correspond to the Fund’s perceived risk of investing in those securities. For information about the Fund’s policy regarding valuation of investments and derivative financial instruments and other significant accounting policies, please refer to Note 1 of the Notes to Financial Statements. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following tables summarize the inputs used as of July 31, 2011 in determining the fair valuation of the Fund’s investments and derivative financial instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation Inputs |
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
|
Total |
|
||||
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Term Investments1 |
|
|
— |
|
$ |
1,450,959,801 |
|
|
— |
|
$ |
1,450,959,801 |
|
|
Short-Term Securities |
|
$ |
4,703,282 |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
4,703,282 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
4,703,282 |
|
$ |
1,450,959,801 |
|
|
— |
|
$ |
1,455,663,083 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
See above Schedule of Investments for values in each state or political subdivision. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation Inputs |
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
|
Total |
|
||||
|
Derivative Financial Instruments2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate contracts |
|
$ |
(1,432,212 |
) |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
$ |
(1,432,212 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
Derivative financial instruments are financial futures contracts, which are valued at the unrealized appreciation/depreciation on the instrument. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Financial Statements. |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT |
JULY 31, 2011 |
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 31, 2011 |
|
BlackRock |
|
BlackRock |
|
BlackRock |
|
BlackRock |
|
BlackRock |
|
|||||
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments at value — unaffiliated1 |
|
$ |
476,481,772 |
|
$ |
823,047,869 |
|
$ |
254,277,701 |
|
$ |
839,348,996 |
|
$ |
1,450,959,801 |
|
|
Investments at value — affiliated2 |
|
|
13,223,965 |
|
|
15,276,406 |
|
|
3,018,268 |
|
|
14,521,616 |
|
|
4,703,282 |
|
|
Cash pledged as collateral for financial futures contracts |
|
|
140,000 |
|
|
— |
|
|
94,000 |
|
|
350,400 |
|
|
726,000 |
|
|
Interest receivable |
|
|
5,128,946 |
|
|
12,098,422 |
|
|
2,982,452 |
|
|
9,486,391 |
|
|
16,900,896 |
|
|
Investments sold receivable |
|
|
612,706 |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
565,903 |
|
|
4,285,131 |
|
|
Deferred offering costs |
|
|
— |
|
|
575,752 |
|
|
321,969 |
|
|
839,124 |
|
|
1,248,487 |
|
|
TOB trust receivable |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
14,900,000 |
|
|
Income receivable — affiliated |
|
|
— |
|
|
335 |
|
|
— |
|
|
363 |
|
|
610 |
|
|
Prepaid expenses |
|
|
21,645 |
|
|
38,194 |
|
|
72,571 |
|
|
196,589 |
|
|
50,376 |
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
— |
|
|
92,598 |
|
|
— |
|
|
100,206 |
|
|
168,169 |
|
|
Total assets |
|
|
495,609,034 |
|
|
851,129,576 |
|
|
260,766,961 |
|
|
865,409,588 |
|
|
1,493,942,752 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank overdraft |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
59,807 |
|
|
85,668 |
|
|
31,341 |
|
|
Investments purchased payable |
|
|
6,931,116 |
|
|
10,200,100 |
|
|
— |
|
|
5,054,469 |
|
|
23,576,059 |
|
|
Income dividends payable — Common Shares |
|
|
1,649,096 |
|
|
2,525,548 |
|
|
844,210 |
|
|
2,801,198 |
|
|
4,862,265 |
|
|
Investment advisory fees payable |
|
|
209,747 |
|
|
354,321 |
|
|
109,918 |
|
|
362,003 |
|
|
611,951 |
|
|
Margin variation payable |
|
|
105,688 |
|
|
— |
|
|
57,093 |
|
|
301,125 |
|
|
552,188 |
|
|
Interest expense and fees payable |
|
|
38,180 |
|
|
126,805 |
|
|
23,686 |
|
|
46,598 |
|
|
116,274 |
|
|
Officer’s and Directors’ fees payable |
|
|
1,723 |
|
|
91,413 |
|
|
780 |
|
|
105,015 |
|
|
6,052 |
|
|
Offering costs payable |
|
|
— |
|
|
79,899 |
|
|
41,893 |
|
|
118,865 |
|
|
171,028 |
|
|
Other accrued expenses payable |
|
|
132,402 |
|
|
31,382 |
|
|
23,247 |
|
|
161,604 |
|
|
127,008 |
|
|
Total accrued liabilities |
|
|
9,067,952 |
|
|
13,409,468 |
|
|
1,160,634 |
|
|
9,036,545 |
|
|
30,054,166 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOB trust certificates |
|
|
62,182,934 |
|
|
179,422,414 |
|
|
9,030,000 |
|
|
78,614,804 |
|
|
216,503,397 |
|
|
VRDP Shares, at liquidation value of $100,000 per share3,4 |
|
|
— |
|
|
166,500,000 |
|
|
87,300,000 |
|
|
247,700,000 |
|
|
356,400,000 |
|
|
Total other liabilities |
|
|
62,182,934 |
|
|
345,922,414 |
|
|
96,330,000 |
|
|
326,314,804 |
|
|
572,903,397 |
|
|
Total Liabilities |
|
|
71,250,886 |
|
|
359,331,882 |
|
|
97,490,634 |
|
|
335,351,349 |
|
|
602,957,563 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AMPS at Redemption Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$25,000 per share liquidation preference, plus unpaid dividends3,4 |
|
|
131,001,852 |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
Net Assets Applicable to Common Shareholders |
|
$ |
293,356,296 |
|
$ |
491,797,694 |
|
$ |
163,276,327 |
|
$ |
530,058,239 |
|
$ |
890,985,189 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Assets Applicable to Common Shareholders Consist of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paid-in capital5 |
|
$ |
299,158,414 |
|
$ |
495,191,219 |
|
$ |
163,252,096 |
|
$ |
550,701,852 |
|
$ |
950,762,143 |
|
|
Undistributed net investment income |
|
|
5,432,633 |
|
|
7,842,146 |
|
|
2,555,428 |
|
|
9,225,192 |
|
|
15,431,895 |
|
|
Accumulated net realized loss |
|
|
(20,754,691 |
) |
|
(19,943,704 |
) |
|
(3,330,241 |
) |
|
(36,012,358 |
) |
|
(94,514,361 |
) |
|
Net unrealized appreciation/depreciation |
|
|
9,519,940 |
|
|
8,708,033 |
|
|
799,044 |
|
|
6,143,553 |
|
|
19,305,512 |
|
|
Net Assets Applicable to Common Shareholders |
|
$ |
293,356,296 |
|
$ |
491,797,694 |
|
$ |
163,276,327 |
|
$ |
530,058,239 |
|
$ |
890,985,189 |
|
|
Net asset value per Common Share |
|
$ |
13.07 |
|
$ |
14.31 |
|
$ |
13.53 |
|
$ |
13.44 |
|
$ |
13.19 |
|
|
1 Investments at cost — unaffiliated |
|
$ |
466,687,710 |
|
$ |
814,343,410 |
|
$ |
253,300,016 |
|
$ |
832,686,181 |
|
$ |
1,430,222,077 |
|
|
2 Investments at cost — affiliated |
|
$ |
13,223,965 |
|
$ |
15,276,406 |
|
$ |
3,018,268 |
|
$ |
14,521,616 |
|
$ |
4,703,282 |
|
|
3 AMPS/VRDP Shares outstanding, par value $0.10 per share |
|
|
5,240 |
|
|
1,665 |
|
|
873 |
|
|
2,477 |
|
|
3,564 |
|
|
4 AMPS/VRDP Shares authorized |
|
|
8,180 |
|
|
12,665 |
|
|
4,833 |
|
|
14,637 |
|
|
26,364 |
|
|
5 Common Shares outstanding, 200 million shares authorized,$0.10 par value |
|
|
22,436,683 |
|
|
34,361,200 |
|
|
12,069,721 |
|
|
39,453,493 |
|
|
67,531,463 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Financial Statements. |
||
|
|
||
|
34 |
ANNUAL REPORT |
JULY 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended July 31, 2011 |
|
BlackRock |
|
BlackRock |
|
BlackRock |
|
BlackRock |
|
BlackRock |
|
|||||
|
Investment Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
$ |
23,523,295 |
|
$ |
38,486,408 |
|
$ |
12,491,549 |
|
$ |
41,269,087 |
|
$ |
71,899,167 |
|
|
Income — affiliated |
|
|
18,387 |
|
|
11,579 |
|
|
— |
|
|
7,739 |
|
|
31,375 |
|
|
Total income |
|
|
23,541,682 |
|
|
38,497,987 |
|
|
12,491,549 |
|
|
41,276,826 |
|
|
71,930,542 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment advisory |
|
|
2,648,071 |
|
|
4,144,221 |
|
|
1,283,746 |
|
|
4,244,267 |
|
|
7,135,718 |
|
|
Liquidity fees |
|
|
— |
|
|
543,045 |
|
|
266,815 |
|
|
807,882 |
|
|
1,089,265 |
|
|
Remarketing fees on Preferred Shares |
|
|
196,976 |
|
|
241,560 |
|
|
122,449 |
|
|
357,332 |
|
|
525,553 |
|
|
Professional |
|
|
183,272 |
|
|
262,401 |
|
|
83,170 |
|
|
163,759 |
|
|
457,952 |
|
|
Accounting services |
|
|
72,218 |
|
|
103,028 |
|
|
35,391 |
|
|
98,488 |
|
|
139,494 |
|
|
Transfer agent |
|
|
50,107 |
|
|
71,148 |
|
|
47,771 |
|
|
78,945 |
|
|
121,296 |
|
|
Officer and Directors |
|
|
31,408 |
|
|
60,531 |
|
|
18,079 |
|
|
71,575 |
|
|
112,175 |
|
|
Custodian |
|
|
27,216 |
|
|
34,546 |
|
|
16,278 |
|
|
40,465 |
|
|
58,531 |
|
|
Printing |
|
|
23,056 |
|
|
23,980 |
|
|
11,455 |
|
|
34,458 |
|
|
56,531 |
|
|
Registration |
|
|
9,736 |
|
|
12,127 |
|
|
9,519 |
|
|
13,903 |
|
|
24,324 |
|
|
Miscellaneous |
|
|
68,251 |
|
|
91,752 |
|
|
69,348 |
|
|
90,891 |
|
|
124,208 |
|
|
Total expenses excluding interest expense, fees and amortization of offering costs |
|
|
3,310,311 |
|
|
5,588,339 |
|
|
1,964,021 |
|
|
6,001,965 |
|
|
9,845,047 |
|
|
Interest expense, fees and amortization of offering costs1 |
|
|
446,054 |
|
|
1,628,775 |
|
|
158,240 |
|
|
995,444 |
|
|
1,785,377 |
|
|
Total expenses |
|
|
3,756,365 |
|
|
7,217,114 |
|
|
2,122,261 |
|
|
6,997,409 |
|
|
11,630,424 |
|
|
Less fees waived by advisor |
|
|
(210,922 |
) |
|
(27,494 |
) |
|
(15,558 |
) |
|
(22,551 |
) |
|
(6,789 |
) |
|
Total expenses after fees waived |
|
|
3,545,443 |
|
|
7,189,620 |
|
|
2,106,703 |
|
|
6,974,858 |
|
|
11,623,635 |
|
|
Net investment income |
|
|
19,996,239 |
|
|
31,308,367 |
|
|
10,384,846 |
|
|
34,301,968 |
|
|
60,306,907 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized gain (loss) from: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments |
|
|
(4,633,291 |
) |
|
(2,704,315 |
) |
|
498,202 |
|
|
(5,246,110 |
) |
|
(4,990,012 |
) |
|
Financial futures contracts |
|
|
(778,680 |
) |
|
(1,908,563 |
) |
|
(507,035 |
) |
|
(1,784,553 |
) |
|
(3,839,962 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(5,411,971 |
) |
|
(4,612,878 |
) |
|
(8,833 |
) |
|
(7,030,663 |
) |
|
(8,829,974 |
) |
|
Net change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation on: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments |
|
|
(5,140,852 |
) |
|
(8,280,699 |
) |
|
(2,961,119 |
) |
|
(10,074,508 |
) |
|
(22,027,085 |
) |
|
Financial futures contracts |
|
|
(274,122 |
) |
|
89,999 |
|
|
(178,641 |
) |
|
(378,083 |
) |
|
(1,032,899 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(5,414,974 |
) |
|
(8,190,700 |
) |
|
(3,139,760 |
) |
|
(10,452,591 |
) |
|
(23,059,984 |
) |
|
Total realized and unrealized loss |
|
|
(10,826,945 |
) |
|
(12,803,578 |
) |
|
(3,148,593 |
) |
|
(17,483,254 |
) |
|
(31,889,958 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends to AMPS Shareholders From |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income |
|
|
(479,559 |
) |
|
(767,289 |
) |
|
(376,980 |
) |
|
(1,105,803 |
) |
|
(1,979,653 |
) |
|
Net Increase in Net Assets Applicable to Common Shareholders Resulting from Operations |
$ |
8,689,735 |
|
$ |
17,737,500 |
|
$ |
6,859,273 |
|
$ |
15,712,911 |
|
$ |
26,437,296 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 Related to TOBs and/or VRDP Shares. |
||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Financial Statements. |
||
|
|
||
|
ANNUAL REPORT |
JULY 31, 2011 |
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BlackRock
MuniHoldings |
|
BlackRock
MuniYield |
|
||||||||
|
|
|
Year Ended July 31, |
|
Year Ended July 31, |
|
||||||||
|
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets Applicable to Common Shareholders: |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
||||
|
Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income |
|
$ |
19,996,239 |
|
$ |
20,469,395 |
|
$ |
31,308,367 |
|
$ |
29,953,463 |
|
|
Net realized gain (loss) |
|
|
(5,411,971 |
) |
|
849,064 |
|
|
(4,612,878 |
) |
|
145,823 |
|
|
Net change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation |
|
|
(5,414,974 |
) |
|
27,313,334 |
|
|
(8,190,700 |
) |
|
39,396,178 |
|
|
Dividends to AMPS Shareholders from net investment income |
|
|
(479,559 |
) |
|
(546,058 |
) |
|
(767,289 |
) |
|
(982,980 |
) |
|
Net increase in net assets applicable to Common Shareholders resulting from operations |
|
|
8,689,735 |
|
|
48,085,735 |
|
|
17,737,500 |
|
|
68,512,484 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends to Common Shareholders From |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income |
|
|
(19,768,276 |
) |
|
(19,116,579 |
) |
|
(29,808,341 |
) |
|
(26,148,873 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Share Transactions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reinvestment of common dividends |
|
|
767,545 |
|
|
355,807 |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Assets Applicable to Common Shareholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total increase (decrease) in net assets applicable to Common Shareholders |
|
|
(10,310,996 |
) |
|
29,324,963 |
|
|
(12,070,841 |
) |
|
42,363,611 |
|
|
Beginning of year |
|
|
303,667,292 |
|
|
274,342,329 |
|
|
503,868,535 |
|
|
461,504,924 |
|
|
End of year |
|
$ |
293,356,296 |
|
$ |
303,667,292 |
|
$ |
491,797,694 |
|
$ |
503,868,535 |
|
|
Undistributed net investment income |
|
$ |
5,432,633 |
|
$ |
5,775,447 |
|
$ |
7,842,146 |
|
$ |
7,131,653 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BlackRock
MuniYield |
|
BlackRock
MuniYield |
|
||||||||
|
|
|
Year Ended July 31, |
|
Year Ended July 31, |
|
||||||||
|
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets Applicable to Common Shareholders: |
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
|||||
|
Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income |
|
$ |
10,384,846 |
|
$ |
11,008,565 |
|
$ |
34,301,968 |
|
$ |
35,629,645 |
|
|
Net realized gain (loss) |
|
|
(8,833 |
) |
|
953,727 |
|
|
(7,030,663 |
) |
|
100,524 |
|
|
Net change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation |
|
|
(3,139,760 |
) |
|
9,751,120 |
|
|
(10,452,591 |
) |
|
42,118,603 |
|
|
Dividends to AMPS Shareholders from net investment income |
|
|
(376,980 |
) |
|
(458,167 |
) |
|
(1,105,803 |
) |
|
(1,419,084 |
) |
|
Net increase in net assets applicable to Common Shareholders resulting from operations |
|
|
6,859,273 |
|
|
21,255,245 |
|
|
15,712,911 |
|
|
76,429,688 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends to Common Shareholders From |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Net investment income |
|
|
(10,355,821 |
) |
|
(9,842,858 |
) |
|
(33,574,394 |
) |
|
(27,710,788 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Share Transactions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reinvestment of common dividends |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
107,768 |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Assets Applicable to Common Shareholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total increase (decrease) in net assets applicable to Common Shareholders |
|
|
(3,496,548 |
) |
|
11,412,387 |
|
|
(17,753,715 |
) |
|
48,718,900 |
|
|
Beginning of year |
|
|
166,772,875 |
|
|
155,360,488 |
|
|
547,811,954 |
|
|
499,093,054 |
|
|
End of year |
|
$ |
163,276,327 |
|
$ |
166,772,875 |
|
$ |
530,058,239 |
|
$ |
547,811,954 |
|
|
Undistributed net investment income |
|
$ |
2,555,428 |
|
$ |
2,891,775 |
|
$ |
9,225,191 |
|
$ |
9,642,252 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Financial Statements. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
36 |
ANNUAL REPORT |
JULY 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
Statements of Changes in Net Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BlackRock
MuniYield |
|
||||
|
|
|
Year Ended July 31, |
|
||||
|
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets Applicable to Common Shareholders: |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
||
|
Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income |
|
$ |
60,306,907 |
|
$ |
60,126,026 |
|
|
Net realized loss |
|
|
(8,829,974 |
) |
|
(16,592 |
) |
|
Net change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation |
|
|
(23,059,984 |
) |
|
87,963,066 |
|
|
Dividends to AMPS Shareholders from net investment income |
|
|
(1,979,653 |
) |
|
(2,350,328 |
) |
|
Net increase in net assets applicable to Common Shareholders resulting from operations |
|
|
26,437,296 |
|
|
145,722,172 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends to Common Shareholders From |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income |
|
|
(58,264,384 |
) |
|
(51,624,188 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Share Transactions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reinvestment of common dividends |
|
|
2,578,449 |
|
|
514,005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Assets Applicable to Common Shareholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total increase (decrease) in net assets applicable to Common Shareholders |
|
|
(29,248,639 |
) |
|
94,611,989 |
|
|
Beginning of year |
|
|
920,233,828 |
|
|
825,621,839 |
|
|
End of year |
|
$ |
890,985,189 |
|
$ |
920,233,828 |
|
|
Undistributed net investment income |
|
$ |
15,431,895 |
|
$ |
15,893,163 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Financial Statements. |
||
|
|
||
|
ANNUAL REPORT |
JULY 31, 2011 |
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended July 31, 2011 |
|
BlackRock |
|
BlackRock |
|
BlackRock |
|
BlackRock |
|
BlackRock |
|
|||||
|
Cash Provided by Operating Activities |
||||||||||||||||
|
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations, excluding dividends to AMPS Shareholders |
|
$ |
9,169,294 |
|
$ |
18,504,789 |
|
$ |
7,236,253 |
|
$ |
16,818,714 |
|
$ |
28,416,949 |
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net increase in net assets resulting from operations to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Increase) decrease in interest receivable |
|
|
49,217 |
|
|
(1,897,710 |
) |
|
7,518 |
|
|
312,753 |
|
|
25,977 |
|
|
Increase in income receivable — affiliated |
|
|
— |
|
|
(37 |
) |
|
— |
|
|
(41 |
) |
|
(72 |
) |
|
(Increase) decrease in prepaid expenses |
|
|
(3,884 |
) |
|
(5,326 |
) |
|
(62,932 |
) |
|
(166,373 |
) |
|
1,734 |
|
|
(Increase) decrease in cash pledged as collateral for financial |
|
|
(140,000 |
) |
|
72,000 |
|
|
(94,000 |
) |
|
(190,400 |
) |
|
(437,400 |
) |
|
Increase in other assets |
|
|
— |
|
|
(11,149 |
) |
|
— |
|
|
(12,267 |
) |
|
(20,970 |
) |
|
Increase (decrease) in investment advisory fees payable |
|
|
2,424 |
|
|
4,637 |
|
|
(4,802 |
) |
|
(18,117 |
) |
|
(28,907 |
) |
|
Increase (decrease) in interest expense and fees payable |
|
|
(6,535 |
) |
|
36,012 |
|
|
18,494 |
|
|
(6,891 |
) |
|
(325 |
) |
|
Decrease in other affiliates payable |
|
|
(3,036 |
) |
|
(4,888 |
) |
|
(1,652 |
) |
|
(5,496 |
) |
|
(9,190 |
) |
|
Increase (decrease) in other accrued expenses payable |
|
|
51,981 |
|
|
(72,142 |
) |
|
(16,690 |
) |
|
23,936 |
|
|
(36,073 |
) |
|
Increase (decrease) in margin variation payable |
|
|
105,688 |
|
|
(30,188 |
) |
|
57,093 |
|
|
222,062 |
|
|
419,218 |
|
|
Increase (decrease) in Officer’s and Directors’ fees payable |
|
|
1,206 |
|
|
8,180 |
|
|
225 |
|
|
14,859 |
|
|
(143,489 |
) |
|
Net realized and unrealized loss on investments |
|
|
9,774,143 |
|
|
10,996,163 |
|
|
2,462,917 |
|
|
15,332,885 |
|
|
27,038,067 |
|
|
Amortization of premium and accretion of discount on investments |
|
|
1,154,597 |
|
|
2,887,466 |
|
|
205,136 |
|
|
1,399,087 |
|
|
(1,254,730 |
) |
|
Proceeds from sales of long-term investments |
|
|
110,894,106 |
|
|
213,407,539 |
|
|
43,940,440 |
|
|
157,048,429 |
|
|
174,785,422 |
|
|
Purchases of long-term investments |
|
|
(115,299,884 |
) |
|
(245,022,845 |
) |
|
(45,306,190 |
) |
|
(149,230,774 |
) |
|
(182,685,050 |
) |
|
Net proceeds from sales (purchases) of short-term securities |
|
|
4,242,885 |
|
|
23,773,533 |
|
|
2,586,751 |
|
|
(6,347,309 |
) |
|
6,723,188 |
|
|
Cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
19,992,202 |
|
|
22,646,034 |
|
|
11,028,561 |
|
|
35,195,057 |
|
|
52,794,349 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Used for Financing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash receipts from issuance of VRDP Shares |
|
|
— |
|
|
166,500,000 |
|
|
87,300,000 |
|
|
247,700,000 |
|
|
356,400,000 |
|
|
Cash payments on redemption of AMPS |
|
|
— |
|
|
(166,525,000 |
) |
|
(87,350,000 |
) |
|
(247,700,000 |
) |
|
(356,450,000 |
) |
|
Cash receipts from TOB trust certificates |
|
|
— |
|
|
27,909,993 |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
6,100,000 |
|
|
Cash payments for TOB trust certificates |
|
|
(510,000 |
) |
|
(19,625,000 |
) |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
(159,824 |
) |
|
Cash dividends paid to Common Shareholders |
|
|
(18,996,490 |
) |
|
(29,619,355 |
) |
|
(10,374,596 |
) |
|
(33,426,645 |
) |
|
(55,604,883 |
) |
|
Cash dividends paid to AMPS Shareholders |
|
|
(484,132 |
) |
|
(790,819 |
) |
|
(383,696 |
) |
|
(1,133,564 |
) |
|
(2,033,524 |
) |
|
Increase in deferred offering costs |
|
|
— |
|
|
(575,752 |
) |
|
(321,969 |
) |
|
(839,124 |
) |
|
(1,248,487 |
) |
|
Increase in offering costs payable |
|
|
— |
|
|
79,899 |
|
|
41,893 |
|
|
118,865 |
|
|
171,028 |
|
|
Increase (decrease) in bank overdraft |
|
|
(1,580 |
) |
|
— |
|
|
59,807 |
|
|
85,411 |
|
|
31,341 |
|
|
Cash used for financing activities |
|
|
(19,992,202 |
) |
|
(22,646,034 |
) |
|
(11,028,561 |
) |
|
(35,195,057 |
) |
|
(52,794,349 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in cash |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
Cash at beginning of year |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
Cash at end of year |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flow Information |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the year for interest and fees |
|
$ |
452,589 |
|
$ |
1,475,200 |
|
$ |
95,116 |
|
$ |
1,827,105 |
|
$ |
1,602,066 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncash Financing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital shares issued in reinvestment of dividends paid to |
|
$ |
767,545 |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
$ |
107,768 |
|
$ |
2,578,449 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
A Statement of Cash Flows is presented when a Fund has a significant amount of borrowing during the year, based on the average borrowing outstanding in relation to average total assets. |
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Financial Statements. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38 |
ANNUAL REPORT |
JULY 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BlackRock MuniHoldings Quality Fund II, Inc. (MUE) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended July 31, |
|
Period |
|
Year
Ended |
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
||||||
|
Per Share Operating Performance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net asset value, beginning of period |
|
$ |
13.57 |
|
$ |
12.27 |
|
$ |
12.84 |
|
$ |
13.72 |
|
$ |
14.15 |
|
$ |
14.23 |
|
|
Net investment income1 |
|
|
0.89 |
|
|
0.92 |
|
|
0.90 |
|
|
0.78 |
|
|
0.97 |
|
|
0.93 |
|
|
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) |
|
|
(0.49 |
) |
|
1.26 |
|
|
(0.71 |
) |
|
(0.91 |
) |
|
(0.45 |
) |
|
0.03 |
|
|
Dividends to AMPS Shareholders from net investment income |
|
|
(0.02 |
) |
|
(0.02 |
) |
|
(0.12 |
) |
|
(0.25 |
) |
|
(0.33 |
) |
|
(0.29 |
) |
|
Net increase (decrease) from investment operations |
|
|
0.38 |
|
|
2.16 |
|
|
0.07 |
|
|
(0.38 |
) |
|
0.19 |
|
|
0.67 |
|
|
Dividends to Common Shareholders from net investment income |
|
|
(0.88 |
) |
|
(0.86 |
) |
|
(0.64 |
) |
|
(0.50 |
) |
|
(0.62 |
) |
|
(0.75 |
) |
|
Net asset value, end of period |
|
$ |
13.07 |
|
$ |
13.57 |
|
$ |
12.27 |
|
$ |
12.84 |
|
$ |
13.72 |
|
$ |
14.15 |
|
|
Market price, end of period |
|
$ |
12.46 |
|
$ |
14.26 |
|
$ |
11.40 |
|
$ |
11.30 |
|
$ |
12.39 |
|
$ |
12.96 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Investment Return2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Based on net asset value |
|
|
3.19 |
% |
|
18.04 |
% |
|
1.58 |
% |
|
(2.41 |
)% 3 |
|
1.73 |
% |
|
5.19 |
% |
|
Based on market price |
|
|
(6.38 |
)% |
|
33.51 |
% |
|
7.24 |
% |
|
(4.89 |
)% 3 |
|
0.31 |
% |
|
(1.37 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratios to Average Net Assets Applicable to Common Shareholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses4 |
|
|
1.30 |
% |
|
1.28 |
% |
|
1.66 |
% |
|
1.55 |
%5 |
|
1.61 |
% |
|
1.64 |
% |
|
Total expenses after fees waived and paid indirectly4 |
|
|
1.23 |
% |
|
1.15 |
% |
|
1.45 |
% |
|
1.45 |
%5 |
|
1.54 |
% |
|
1.57 |
% |
|
Total expenses after fees waived and paid indirectly and excluding interest expense and fees4,6 |
|
|
1.07 |
% |
|
0.99 |
% |
|
1.04 |
% |
|
1.15 |
%5 |
|
1.17 |
% |
|
1.16 |
% |
|
Net investment income4 |
|
|
6.93 |
% |
|
6.92 |
% |
|
7.61 |
% |
|
6.74 |
%5 |
|
6.94 |
% |
|
6.70 |
% |
|
Dividends to AMPS Shareholders |
|
|
0.17 |
% |
|
0.18 |
% |
|
1.03 |
% |
|
2.19 |
%5 |
|
2.37 |
% |
|
2.10 |
% |
|
Net investment income to Common Shareholders |
|
|
6.76 |
% |
|
6.74 |
% |
|
6.58 |
% |
|
4.55 |
%5 |
|
4.57 |
% |
|
4.60 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets applicable to Common Shareholders, end of period (000) |
|
$ |
293,356 |
|
$ |
303,667 |
|
$ |
274,342 |
|
$ |
286,933 |
|
$ |
306,769 |
|
$ |
316,216 |
|
|
AMPS outstanding at $25,000 liquidation preference, end of period (000) |
|
$ |
131,000 |
|
$ |
131,000 |
|
$ |
131,000 |
|
$ |
145,300 |
|
$ |
204,500 |
|
$ |
204,500 |
|
|
Portfolio turnover |
|
|
24 |
% |
|
20 |
% |
|
37 |
% |
|
43 |
% |
|
43 |
% |
|
35 |
% |
|
Asset coverage per AMPS at $25,000 liquidation preference, end of period |
|
$ |
80,983 |
|
$ |
82,953 |
|
$ |
77,357 |
|
$ |
74,376 |
|
$ |
62,514 |
|
$ |
63,667 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
Based on average Common Shares outstanding. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
Total investment returns based on market value, which can be significantly greater or lesser than the net asset value, may result in substantially different returns. Where applicable, total investment returns exclude the effects of any sales charges and include the reinvestment of dividends and distributions. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
Aggregate total investment return. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
Do not reflect the effect of dividends to AMPS Shareholders. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
Annualized. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
Interest expense and fees relate to TOBs. See Note 1 of the Notes to Financial Statements for details of municipal bonds transferred to TOBs. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Financial Statements. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT |
JULY 31, 2011 |
39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Highlights |
BlackRock MuniYield California Quality Fund, Inc. (MCA) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended July 31, |
|
Period |
|
Year
Ended |
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
||||||
|
Per Share Operating Performance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net asset value, beginning of period |
|
$ |
14.66 |
|
$ |
13.43 |
|
$ |
13.86 |
|
$ |
14.63 |
|
$ |
15.09 |
|
$ |
14.82 |
|
|
Net investment income1 |
|
|
0.91 |
|
|
0.87 |
|
|
0.86 |
|
|
0.68 |
|
|
0.92 |
|
|
0.96 |
|
|
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) |
|
|
(0.37 |
) |
|
1.15 |
|
|
(0.51 |
) |
|
(0.75 |
) |
|
(0.42 |
) |
|
0.35 |
|
|
Dividends to AMPS Shareholders from net investment income |
|
|
(0.02 |
) |
|
(0.03 |
) |
|
(0.12 |
) |
|
(0.20 |
) |
|
(0.28 |
) |
|
(0.24 |
) |
|
Net increase (decrease) from investment operations |
|
|
0.52 |
|
|
1.99 |
|
|
0.23 |
|
|
(0.27 |
) |
|
0.22 |
|
|
1.07 |
|
|
Dividends to Common Shareholders from net investment income |
|
|
(0.87 |
) |
|
(0.76 |
) |
|
(0.66 |
) |
|
(0.50 |
) |
|
(0.68 |
) |
|
(0.80 |
) |
|
Capital changes with respect to issuance of AMPS |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
(0.00 |
)2 |
|
Net asset value, end of period |
|
$ |
14.31 |
|
$ |
14.66 |
|
$ |
13.43 |
|
$ |
13.86 |
|
$ |
14.63 |
|
$ |
15.09 |
|
|
Market price, end of period |
|
$ |
13.00 |
|
$ |
14.02 |
|
$ |
12.08 |
|
$ |
12.33 |
|
$ |
13.16 |
|
$ |
14.64 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Investment Return3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Based on net asset value |
|
|
4.21 |
% |
|
15.69 |
% |
|
3.03 |
% |
|
(1.54 |
)%4 |
|
1.76 |
% |
|
7.57 |
% |
|
Based on market price |
|
|
(1.01 |
) % |
|
23.00 |
% |
|
4.17 |
% |
|
(2.63 |
)%4 |
|
(5.65 |
)% |
|
9.22 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratio to Average Net Assets Applicable to Common Shareholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses5 |
|
|
1.50 |
% |
|
1.11 |
% |
|
1.40 |
% |
|
1.38 |
%6 |
|
1.53 |
% |
|
1.60 |
% |
|
Total expenses after fees waived and paid indirectly5 |
|
|
1.49 |
% |
|
1.10 |
% |
|
1.38 |
% |
|
1.36 |
%6 |
|
1.53 |
% |
|
1.59 |
% |
|
Total expenses after fees waived and paid indirectly and excluding interest expense, fees and amortization of offering costs5,7 |
|
|
1.15 |
% |
|
0.95 |
% |
|
1.02 |
% |
|
1.04 |
%6 |
|
1.03 |
% |
|
1.03 |
% |
|
Net investment income5 |
|
|
6.49 |
% |
|
6.10 |
% |
|
6.60 |
% |
|
6.15 |
%6 |
|
6.22 |
% |
|
6.46 |
% |
|
Dividends to AMPS Shareholders |
|
|
0.16 |
% |
|
0.20 |
% |
|
0.91 |
% |
|
1.78 |
%6 |
|
1.87 |
% |
|
1.62 |
% |
|
Net investment income to Common Shareholders |
|
|
6.33 |
% |
|
5.90 |
% |
|
5.69 |
% |
|
4.37 |
%6 |
|
4.35 |
% |
|
4.84 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets applicable to Common Shareholders, end of period (000) |
|
$ |
491,798 |
|
$ |
503,869 |
|
$ |
461,505 |
|
$ |
476,235 |
|
$ |
502,855 |
|
$ |
518,667 |
|
|
AMPS outstanding at $25,000 liquidation preference, end of period (000) |
|
|
— |
|
$ |
166,525 |
|
$ |
166,525 |
|
$ |
192,300 |
|
$ |
275,000 |
|
$ |
275,000 |
|
|
VRDP Shares outstanding at $100,000 liquidation value, end of period (000) |
|
$ |
166,500 |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
Portfolio turnover |
|
|
26 |
% |
|
30 |
% |
|
25 |
% |
|
25 |
% |
|
25 |
% |
|
27 |
% |
|
Asset coverage per AMPS at $25,000 liquidation preference, end of period |
|
|
— |
|
$ |
100,648 |
|
$ |
94,289 |
|
$ |
86,933 |
|
$ |
70,733 |
|
$ |
72,170 |
|
|
Asset coverage per VRDP Share at $100,000 liquidation value, end of period |
|
$ |
395,374 |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
Based on average Common Shares outstanding. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
Amount is less than $(0.01) per share. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
Total investment returns based on market value, which can be significantly greater or lesser than the net asset value, may result in substantially different returns. Where applicable, total investment returns exclude the effects of any sales charges and include the reinvestment of dividends and distributions. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
Aggregate total investment return. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
Do not reflect the effect of dividends to AMPS Shareholders. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
Annualized. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
Interest expense, fees and amortization of offering costs relate to TOBs and/or VRDP Shares. See Note 1 and Note 7 of the Notes to Financial Statements for details of municipal bonds transferred to TOBs and VRDP Shares, respectively. |
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Financial Statements. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40 |
ANNUAL REPORT |
JULY 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Highlights |
BlackRock MuniYield Michigan Quality Fund II, Inc. (MYM) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
Ended |
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
Year Ended July 31, |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
|||||||
|
Per Share Operating Performance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net asset value, beginning of period |
|
$ |
13.82 |
|
$ |
12.87 |
|
$ |
13.24 |
|
$ |
14.13 |
|
$ |
14.60 |
|
$ |
14.54 |
|
|
Net investment income1 |
|
|
0.86 |
|
|
0.91 |
|
|
0.93 |
|
|
0.70 |
|
|
0.97 |
|
|
0.97 |
|
|
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) |
|
|
(0.26 |
) |
|
0.90 |
|
|
(0.49 |
) |
|
(0.88 |
) |
|
(0.47 |
) |
|
0.13 |
|
|
Dividends to AMPS Shareholders from net investment income |
|
|
(0.03 |
) |
|
(0.04 |
) |
|
(0.14 |
) |
|
(0.21 |
) |
|
(0.29 |
) |
|
(0.26 |
) |
|
Net increase (decrease) from investment operations |
|
|
0.57 |
|
|
1.77 |
|
|
0.30 |
|
|
(0.39 |
) |
|
0.21 |
|
|
0.84 |
|
|
Dividends to Common Shareholders from net investment income |
|
|
(0.86 |
) |
|
(0.82 |
) |
|
(0.67 |
) |
|
(0.50 |
) |
|
(0.68 |
) |
|
(0.78 |
) |
|
Capital charges with respect to issuance of AMPS |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
(0.00 |
)2 |
|
Net asset value, end of period |
|
$ |
13.53 |
|
$ |
13.82 |
|
$ |
12.87 |
|
$ |
13.24 |
|
$ |
14.13 |
|
$ |
14.60 |
|
|
Market price, end of period |
|
$ |
12.28 |
|
$ |
13.67 |
|
$ |
11.58 |
|
$ |
11.63 |
|
$ |
12.61 |
|
$ |
13.97 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Investment Return3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Based on net asset value |
|
|
4.74 |
% |
|
14.62 |
% |
|
3.81 |
% |
|
(2.48 |
)%4 |
|
1.78 |
% |
|
6.09 |
% |
|
Based on market price |
|
|
(3.89 |
)% |
|
26.01 |
% |
|
6.34 |
% |
|
(4.01 |
)%4 |
|
(5.07 |
)% |
|
2.42 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratio to Average Net Assets Applicable to Common Shareholders |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Total expenses5 |
|
|
1.32 |
% |
|
1.08 |
% |
|
1.28 |
% |
|
1.48 |
%6 |
|
1.69 |
% |
|
1.65 |
% |
|
Total expenses after fees waived5 |
|
|
1.31 |
% |
|
1.07 |
% |
|
1.26 |
% |
|
1.45 |
%6 |
|
1.68 |
% |
|
1.64 |
% |
|
Total expenses after fees waived and excluding interest expense, fees and amortization of offering costs5,7 |
|
|
1.21 |
% |
|
1.03 |
% |
|
1.12 |
% |
|
1.14 |
%6 |
|
1.14 |
% |
|
1.13 |
% |
|
Net investment income5 |
|
|
6.46 |
% |
|
6.74 |
% |
|
7.43 |
% |
|
6.61 |
%6 |
|
6.77 |
% |
|
6.72 |
% |
|
Dividends to AMPS Shareholders |
|
|
0.23 |
% |
|
0.28 |
% |
|
1.15 |
% |
|
1.98 |
%6 |
|
2.05 |
% |
|
1.78 |
% |
|
Net investment income to Common Shareholders |
|
|
6.23 |
% |
|
6.46 |
% |
|
6.28 |
% |
|
4.63 |
%6 |
|
4.72 |
% |
|
4.94 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets applicable to Common Shareholders, end of period (000) |
|
$ |
163,276 |
|
$ |
166,773 |
|
$ |
155,360 |
|
$ |
159,759 |
|
$ |
170,559 |
|
$ |
176,216 |
|
|
AMPS outstanding at $25,000 liquidation preference, end of period (000) |
|
|
— |
|
$ |
87,350 |
|
$ |
87,350 |
|
$ |
87,350 |
|
$ |
99,000 |
|
$ |
99,000 |
|
|
VRDP Shares outstanding at $100,000 liquidation value, end of period (000) |
|
$ |
87,300 |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
Portfolio turnover |
|
|
18 |
% |
|
18 |
% |
|
9 |
% |
|
20 |
% |
|
10 |
% |
|
14 |
% |
|
Asset coverage per AMPS at $25,000 liquidation preference, end of period |
|
|
— |
|
$ |
72,733 |
|
$ |
69,467 |
|
$ |
70,730 |
|
$ |
68,076 |
|
$ |
69,507 |
|
|
Asset coverage per VRDP Share at $100,000 liquidation value, end of period |
|
$ |
287,029 |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
Based on average Common Shares outstanding. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
Amount is less than $(0.01) per share. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
Total investment returns based on market value, which can be significantly greater or lesser than the net asset value, may result in substantially different returns. Where applicable, total investment returns exclude the effects of any sales charges and include the reinvestment of dividends and distributions. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
Aggregate total investment return. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
Do not reflect the effect of dividends to AMPS Shareholders. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
Annualized. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
Interest expense, fees and amortization of offering costs relate to TOBs and/or VRDP Shares. See Note 1 and Note 7 of the Notes to Financial Statements for details of municipal bonds transferred to TOBs and VRDP Shares, respectively. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Financial Statements. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT |
JULY 31, 2011 |
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Highlights |
BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund, Inc. (MYN) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
Ended |
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
Year Ended July 31, |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
|||||||
|
Per Share Operating Performance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net asset value, beginning of period |
|
$ |
13.89 |
|
$ |
12.65 |
|
$ |
13.16 |
|
$ |
13.94 |
|
$ |
14.40 |
|
$ |
14.26 |
|
|
Net investment income1 |
|
|
0.87 |
|
|
0.90 |
|
|
0.87 |
|
|
0.66 |
|
|
0.84 |
|
|
0.92 |
|
|
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) |
|
|
(0.44 |
) |
|
1.08 |
|
|
(0.61 |
) |
|
(0.77 |
) |
|
(0.38 |
) |
|
0.23 |
|
|
Dividends to AMPS Shareholders from net investment income |
|
|
(0.03 |
) |
|
(0.04 |
) |
|
(0.13 |
) |
|
(0.19 |
) |
|
(0.27 |
) |
|
(0.24 |
) |
|
Net increase (decrease) from investment operations |
|
|
0.40 |
|
|
1.94 |
|
|
0.13 |
|
|
(0.30 |
) |
|
0.19 |
|
|
0.91 |
|
|
Dividends to Common Shareholders from net investment income |
|
|
(0.85 |
) |
|
(0.70 |
) |
|
(0.64 |
) |
|
(0.48 |
) |
|
(0.65 |
) |
|
(0.77 |
) |
|
Capital charges with respect to issuance of AMPS |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
(0.00 |
)2 |
|
Net asset value, end of period |
|
$ |
13.44 |
|
$ |
13.89 |
|
$ |
12.65 |
|
$ |
13.16 |
|
$ |
13.94 |
|
$ |
14.40 |
|
|
Market price, end of period |
|
$ |
12.60 |
|
$ |
13.57 |
|
$ |
11.36 |
|
$ |
11.80 |
|
$ |
12.80 |
|
$ |
14.10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Investment Return3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Based on net asset value |
|
|
3.36 |
% |
|
16.15 |
% |
|
2.29 |
% |
|
(1.86 |
)%4 |
|
1.66 |
% |
|
6.71 |
% |
|
Based on market price |
|
|
(0.81 |
)% |
|
26.36 |
% |
|
2.44 |
% |
|
(4.16 |
)%4 |
|
(4.67 |
)% |
|
13.13 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratio to Average Net Asset Applicable to Common Shareholders |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Total expenses5 |
|
|
1.34 |
% |
|
1.11 |
% |
|
1.34 |
% |
|
1.48 |
%6 |
|
1.64 |
% |
|
1.56 |
% |
|
Total expenses after fees waived5 |
|
|
1.33 |
% |
|
1.10 |
% |
|
1.32 |
% |
|
1.46 |
%6 |
|
1.63 |
% |
|
1.56 |
% |
|
Total expenses after fees waived and excluding interest expense, fees and amortization of offering costs5,7 |
|
|
1.14 |
% |
|
1.00 |
% |
|
1.06 |
% |
|
1.04 |
%6 |
|
1.04 |
% |
|
1.03 |
% |
|
Net investment income5 |
|
|
6.55 |
% |
|
6.69 |
% |
|
7.11 |
% |
|
6.36 |
%6 |
|
5.96 |
% |
|
6.50 |
% |
|
Dividends to AMPS Shareholders |
|
|
0.21 |
% |
|
0.27 |
% |
|
1.09 |
% |
|
1.82 |
%6 |
|
1.88 |
% |
|
1.68 |
% |
|
Net investment income to Common Shareholders |
|
|
6.34 |
% |
|
6.42 |
% |
|
6.02 |
% |
|
4.54 |
%6 |
|
4.08 |
% |
|
4.82 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets applicable to Common Shareholders, end of period (000) |
|
$ |
530,058 |
|
$ |
547,812 |
|
$ |
499,093 |
|
$ |
518,912 |
|
$ |
549,910 |
|
$ |
567,954 |
|
|
AMPS outstanding at $25,000 liquidation preference, end of period (000) |
|
|
— |
|
$ |
247,700 |
|
$ |
247,700 |
|
$ |
259,475 |
|
$ |
304,000 |
|
$ |
304,000 |
|
|
VRDP Shares outstanding at $100,000 liquidation preference, end of period (000) |
|
$ |
247,700 |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
Portfolio turnover |
|
|
18 |
% |
|
7 |
% |
|
22 |
% |
|
17 |
% |
|
25 |
% |
|
43 |
% |
|
Asset coverage per AMPS at $25,000 liquidation preference, end of period |
|
|
— |
|
$ |
80,293 |
|
$ |
75,376 |
|
$ |
75,011 |
|
$ |
70,242 |
|
$ |
71,725 |
|
|
Asset coverage per VRDP Share at $100,000 liquidation value, end of period |
|
$ |
313,992 |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
Based on average Common Shares outstanding. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
Amount is less than $(0.01) per share. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
Total investment returns based on market value, which can be significantly greater or lesser than the net asset value, may result in substantially different returns. Where applicable, total investment returns exclude the effects of any sales charges and include the reinvestment of dividends. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
Aggregate total investment return. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
Do not reflect the effect of dividends to AMPS Shareholders. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
Annualized. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
Interest expense, fees and amortization of offering costs relate to TOBs and/or VRDP shares. See Note 1 and Note 7 of the Notes to Financial Statements for details of municipal bonds transferred to TOBs and VRDP shares, respectively. |
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Financial Statements. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42 |
ANNUAL REPORT |
JULY 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Highlights |
BlackRock MuniYield Quality Fund III, Inc. (MYI) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
Ended |
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
Year Ended July 31, |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
|||||||
|
Per Share Operating Performance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net asset value, beginning of period |
|
$ |
13.67 |
|
$ |
12.27 |
|
$ |
12.86 |
|
$ |
14.57 |
|
$ |
15.30 |
|
$ |
15.27 |
|
|
Net investment income1 |
|
|
0.89 |
|
|
0.89 |
|
|
0.87 |
|
|
0.70 |
|
|
1.04 |
|
|
0.98 |
|
|
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) |
|
|
(0.48 |
) |
|
1.31 |
|
|
(0.66 |
) |
|
(1.69 |
) |
|
(0.79 |
) |
|
0.46 |
|
|
Dividends and distributions to AMPS Shareholders from: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income |
|
|
(0.03 |
) |
|
(0.03 |
) |
|
(0.12 |
) |
|
(0.22 |
) |
|
(0.31 |
) |
|
(0.25 |
) |
|
Net realized gain |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
(0.04 |
) |
|
Net increase (decrease) from investment operations |
|
|
0.38 |
|
|
2.17 |
|
|
0.09 |
|
|
(1.21 |
) |
|
(0.06 |
) |
|
1.15 |
|
|
Dividends and distributions to Common Shareholders from: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income |
|
|
(0.86 |
) |
|
(0.77 |
) |
|
(0.68 |
) |
|
(0.50 |
) |
|
(0.67 |
) |
|
(0.78 |
) |
|
Net realized gain |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
(0.34 |
) |
|
Total dividends and distributions to Common Shareholders |
|
|
(0.86 |
) |
|
(0.77 |
) |
|
(0.68 |
) |
|
(0.50 |
) |
|
(0.67 |
) |
|
(1.12 |
) |
|
Net asset value, end of period |
|
$ |
13.19 |
|
$ |
13.67 |
|
$ |
12.27 |
|
$ |
12.86 |
|
$ |
14.57 |
|
$ |
15.30 |
|
|
Market price, end of period |
|
$ |
12.17 |
|
$ |
14.17 |
|
$ |
12.12 |
|
$ |
12.22 |
|
$ |
13.04 |
|
$ |
14.36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Investment Return2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Based on net asset value |
|
|
3.22 |
% |
|
18.19 |
% |
|
1.70 |
% |
|
(8.22 |
)%3 |
|
(0.06 |
)% |
|
8.09 |
% |
|
Based on market price |
|
|
(8.12 |
)% |
|
24.03 |
% |
|
5.72 |
% |
|
(2.55 |
)%3 |
|
(4.70 |
)% |
|
5.38 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratio to Average Net Assets Applicable to Common Shareholders |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Total expenses4 |
|
|
1.32 |
% |
|
1.11 |
% |
|
1.46 |
% |
|
1.64 |
%5 |
|
1.71 |
% |
|
1.67 |
% |
|
Total expenses after fees waived and paid indirectly4 |
|
|
1.32 |
% |
|
1.11 |
% |
|
1.45 |
% |
|
1.63 |
%5 |
|
1.71 |
% |
|
1.67 |
% |
|
Total expenses after fees waived and paid indirectly and excluding interest expense, fees and amortization of offering costs4,6 |
|
|
1.12 |
% |
|
0.97 |
% |
|
1.06 |
% |
|
1.06 |
%5 |
|
1.03 |
% |
|
1.02 |
% |
|
Net investment income4 |
|
|
6.85 |
% |
|
6.73 |
% |
|
7.52 |
% |
|
6.51 |
%5 |
|
6.94 |
% |
|
6.52 |
% |
|
Dividends to AMPS Shareholders |
|
|
0.22 |
% |
|
0.26 |
% |
|
1.04 |
% |
|
2.03 |
%5 |
|
2.06 |
% |
|
1.67 |
% |
|
Net investment income to Common Shareholders |
|
|
6.63 |
% |
|
6.47 |
% |
|
6.48 |
% |
|
4.48 |
%5 |
|
4.88 |
% |
|
4.85 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets applicable to Common Shareholders, end of period (000) |
|
$ |
890,985 |
|
$ |
920,234 |
|
$ |
825,622 |
|
$ |
865,447 |
|
$ |
980,741 |
|
$ |
1,030,048 |
|
|
AMPS outstanding at $25,000 liquidation preference, end of period (000) |
|
|
— |
|
$ |
356,450 |
|
$ |
358,625 |
|
$ |
377,175 |
|
$ |
570,000 |
|
$ |
570,000 |
|
|
VRDP Shares outstanding at $100,000 liquidation value, end of period (000) |
|
$ |
356,400 |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
Portfolio turnover |
|
|
12 |
% |
|
13 |
% |
|
30 |
% |
|
70 |
% |
|
117 |
% |
|
95 |
% |
|
Asset coverage per AMPS at $25,000 liquidation preference, end of period |
|
|
— |
|
$ |
89,545 |
|
$ |
82,559 |
|
$ |
82,381 |
|
$ |
68,039 |
|
$ |
70,198 |
|
|
Asset coverage per VRDP Share at $100,000 liquidation value, end of period |
|
$ |
349,996 |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
Based on average Common Shares outstanding. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
Total investment returns based on market value, which can be significantly greater or lesser than the net asset value, may result in substantially different returns. Where applicable, total investment returns exclude the effects of any sales charges and include the reinvestment of dividends and distributions. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
Aggregate total investment return. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
Do not reflect the effect of dividends to AMPS Shareholders. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
Annualized. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
Interest expense, fees and amortization of offering costs relate to TOBs and/or VRDP shares. See Note 1 and Note 7 of the Notes to Financial Statements for details of municipal bonds transferred to TOBs and VRDP shares, respectively. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Financial Statements. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT |
JULY 31, 2011 |
43 |
|
|
|
|
1. Organization and Significant Accounting Policies:
BlackRock MuniHoldings Quality Fund II, Inc. (“MUE”), formerly BlackRock MuniHoldings Insured Fund II, Inc., BlackRock MuniYield California Quality Fund, Inc. (“MCA”), formerly BlackRock MuniYield California Insured Fund, Inc., BlackRock MuniYield Michigan Quality Fund II, Inc. (“MYM”), formerly BlackRock MuniYield Michigan Insured Fund II, Inc., BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund, Inc. (“MYN”), formerly BlackRock MuniYield New York Insured Fund, Inc. and BlackRock MuniYield Quality Fund III, Inc. (“MYI”), formerly BlackRock MuniYield Insured Fund, Inc., (collectively, the “Funds”), are registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), as non-diversified, closed-end management investment companies. The Funds are organized as Maryland corporations. The Funds’ financial statements are prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“US GAAP”), which may require management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The Funds determine and make available for publication the NAV of their Common Shares on a daily basis.
The following is a summary of significant accounting policies followed by the Funds:
Valuation: US GAAP defines fair value as the price the Funds would receive to sell an asset or pay to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The Funds fair value their financial instruments at market value using independent dealers or pricing services under policies approved by each Fund’s Board of Directors (the “Board”). Municipal investments (including commitments to purchase such investments on a “when-issued” basis) are valued on the basis of prices provided by dealers or pricing services. In determining the value of a particular investment, pricing services may use certain information with respect to transactions in such investments, quotations from dealers, pricing matrixes, market transactions in comparable investments and information with respect to various relationships between investments. Financial futures contracts traded on exchanges are valued at their last sale price. Investments in open-end registered investment companies are valued at net asset value each business day. Short-term securities with remaining maturities of 60 days or less may be valued at amortized cost, which approximates fair value.
In the event that application of these methods of valuation results in a price for an investment which is deemed not to be representative of the market value of such investment or is not available, the investment will be valued in accordance with a policy approved by the Board as reflecting fair value (“Fair Value Assets”). When determining the price for Fair Value Assets, the investment advisor and/or the sub-advisor seeks to determine the price that each Fund might reasonably expect to receive from the current sale of that asset in an arm’s-length transaction. Fair value determinations shall be based upon all available factors that the investment advisor and/or sub-advisor deems relevant. The pricing of all Fair Value Assets is subsequently reported to the Board or a committee thereof.
Zero-Coupon Bonds: The Funds may invest in zero-coupon bonds, which are normally issued at a significant discount from face value and do not provide for periodic interest payments. Zero-coupon bonds may experience greater volatility in market value than similar maturity debt obligations which provide for regular interest payments.
Forward Commitments and When-Issued Delayed Delivery Securities: The Funds may purchase securities on a when-issued basis and may purchase or sell securities on a forward commitment basis. Settlement of such transactions normally occurs within a month or more after the purchase or sale commitment is made. The Funds may purchase securities under such conditions with the intention of actually acquiring them, but may enter into a separate agreement to sell the securities before the settlement date. Since the value of securities purchased may fluctuate prior to settlement, the Funds may be required to pay more at settlement than the security is worth. In addition, the Funds are not entitled to any of the interest earned prior to settlement. When purchasing a security on a delayed delivery basis, the Funds assume the rights and risks of ownership of the security, including the risk of price and yield fluctuations. In the event of default by the counterparty, the Funds’ maximum amount of loss is the unrealized appreciation of unsettled when-issued transactions, which is shown in the Schedules of Investments.
Municipal Bonds Transferred to TOBs: The Funds leverage their assets through the use of TOBs. A TOB is established by a third party sponsor forming a special purpose entity, into which one or more funds, or an agent on behalf of the funds, transfers municipal bonds. Other funds managed by the investment advisor may also contribute municipal bonds to a TOB into which a Fund has contributed bonds. A TOB typically issues two classes of beneficial interests: short-term floating rate certificates, which are sold to third party investors, and residual certificates (“TOB Residuals”), which are generally issued to the participating funds that made the transfer. The TOB Residuals held by a Fund include the right of a Fund (1) to cause the holders of a proportional share of the short-term floating rate certificates to tender their certificates at par, including during instances of a rise in short-term interest rates, and (2) to transfer, within seven days, a corresponding share of the municipal bonds from the TOB to a Fund. The TOB may also be terminated without the consent of a Fund upon the occurrence of certain events as defined in the TOB agreements. Such termination events may include the bankruptcy or default of the municipal bond, a substantial downgrade in credit quality of the municipal bond, the inability of the TOB to obtain quarterly or annual renewal of the liquidity support agreement, a substantial decline in market value of the municipal bond or the inability to remarket the short-term floating rate certificates to third party investors. During the year ended July 31, 2011, no TOBs that the Funds participated in were terminated without the consent of the Funds.
The cash received by the TOB from the sale of the short-term floating rate certificates, less transaction expenses, is paid to a Fund, which typically invests the cash in additional municipal bonds. Each Fund’s transfer of the municipal bonds to a TOB is accounted for as a secured borrowing, therefore the municipal bonds deposited into a TOB are presented in the Funds’ Schedules of Investments and the proceeds from the issuance of the short-term floating rate certificates are shown as TOB trust certificates under other liabilities in the Statements of Assets and Liabilities.
Interest income, including amortization and accretion of premiums and discounts, from the underlying municipal bonds is recorded by the Funds on an accrual basis. Interest expense incurred on the secured borrowing and other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44 |
ANNUAL REPORT |
JULY 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
Notes to Financial Statements (continued) |
expenses related to remarketing, administration and trustee services to a TOB are shown as interest expense, fees and amortization of offering costs in the Statements of Operations. The short-term floating rate certificates have interest rates that generally reset weekly and their holders have the option to tender certificates to the TOB for redemption at par at each reset date. At July 31, 2011, the aggregate value of the underlying municipal bonds transferred to TOBs, the related liability for TOB trust certificates and the range of interest rates on the liability for TOB trust certificates were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underlying |
|
Liability
for |
|
Range
of |
|
|||
|
MUE |
|
$ |
120,131,871 |
|
$ |
62,182,934 |
|
|
0.08% – 0.22 |
% |
|
MCA |
|
$ |
352,681,488 |
|
$ |
179,422,414 |
|
|
0.08% – 0.22 |
% |
|
MYM |
|
$ |
17,612,170 |
|
$ |
9,030,000 |
|
|
0.11% – 0.21 |
% |
|
MYN |
|
$ |
152,028,813 |
|
$ |
78,614,804 |
|
|
0.08% – 0.22 |
% |
|
MYI |
|
$ |
421,170,074 |
|
$ |
216,503,397 |
|
|
0.08% – 0.22 |
% |
For the year ended July 31, 2011, the Funds’ average TOB trust certificates outstanding and the daily weighted average interest rate, including fees, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
TOB |
|
Daily
Weighted |
|
||
|
MUE |
|
$ |
62,340,516 |
|
|
0.72 |
% |
|
MCA |
|
$ |
180,828,284 |
|
|
0.75 |
% |
|
MYM |
|
$ |
9,030,000 |
|
|
0.66 |
% |
|
MYN |
|
$ |
78,614,804 |
|
|
0.73 |
% |
|
MYI |
|
$ |
196,251,853 |
|
|
0.70 |
% |
Should short-term interest rates rise, the Funds’ investments in TOBs may adversely affect the Funds’ net investment income and dividends to Common Shareholders. Also, fluctuations in the market values of municipal bonds deposited into the TOB may adversely affect the Funds’ net asset values per share.
Segregation and Collateralization: In cases in which the 1940 Act and the interpretive positions of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) require that the Funds either deliver collateral or segregate assets in connection with certain investments (e.g., financial futures contracts), the Funds will, consistent with SEC rules and/or certain interpretive letters issued by the SEC, segregate collateral or designate on their books and records cash or liquid securities having a market value at least equal to the amount that would otherwise be required to be physically segregated. Furthermore, based on requirements and agreements with certain exchanges and third party broker-dealers, each party to such transactions has requirements to deliver/deposit securities as collateral for certain investments.
Investment Transactions and Investment Income: For financial reporting purposes, investment transactions are recorded on the dates the transactions are entered into (the trade dates). Realized gains and losses on investment transactions are determined on the identified cost basis. Dividend income is recorded on the ex-dividend dates. Interest income, including amortization and accretion of premiums and discounts on debt securities, is recognized on the accrual basis.
Dividends and Distributions: Dividends from net investment income are declared and paid monthly. Distributions of capital gains are recorded on the ex-dividend dates. The amount and timing of dividends and distributions are determined in accordance with federal income tax regulations, which may differ from US GAAP. Dividends and distributions to AMPS and VRDP Shareholders are accrued and determined as described in Note 7.
Income Taxes: It is each Fund’s policy to comply with the requirements of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, applicable to regulated investment companies and to distribute substantially all of its taxable income to its shareholders. Therefore, no federal income tax provision is required.
Each Fund files US federal and various state and local tax returns. No income tax returns are currently under examination. The statute of limitations on the Funds’ US federal tax returns remains open for each of the four periods ended July 31, 2011. The statutes of limitations on each Fund’s state and local tax returns may remain open for an additional year depending upon the jurisdiction. Management does not believe there are any uncertain tax positions that require recognition of a tax liability.
Recent Accounting Standard: In May 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued amended guidance to improve disclosure about fair value measurements which will require the following disclosures for fair value measurements categorized as Level 3: quantitative information about the unobservable inputs and assumptions used in the fair value measurement, a description of the valuation policies and procedures and a narrative description of sensitivity of the fair value measurement to changes in unobservable inputs and the interrelationships between those unobservable inputs. In addition, the amounts and reasons for all transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 will be required to be disclosed. The amended guidance is effective for financial statements for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Management is evaluating the impact of this guidance on the Funds’ financial statements and disclosures.
Deferred Compensation and BlackRock Closed-End Share Equivalent Investment Plan: Under the deferred compensation plan approved by each Fund’s Board, independent Directors (“Independent Directors”) may defer a portion of their annual complex-wide compensation. Deferred amounts earn an approximate return as though equivalent dollar amounts had been invested in common shares of certain other BlackRock Closed-End Funds selected by the Independent Directors. This has approximately the same economic effect for the Independent Directors as if the Independent Directors had invested the deferred amounts directly in certain other BlackRock Closed-End Funds.
The deferred compensation plan is not funded and obligations thereunder represent general unsecured claims against the general assets of each Fund. Each Fund may, however, elect to invest in common shares of certain other BlackRock Closed-End Funds selected by the Independent Directors in order to match its deferred compensation obligations. Investments to cover each Fund’s deferred compensation liability, if any, are included in other assets in the Statements of Assets and Liabilities. Dividends and distributions from the BlackRock Closed-End Fund investments under the plan are included in income — affiliated in the Statements of Operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT |
JULY 31, 2011 |
45 |
|
|
|
|
|
Notes to Financial Statements (continued) |
Offering Costs: Certain Funds incurred costs in connection with its issuance of VRDP Shares, which were recorded as a deferred charge and will be amortized over the 30-year life of the VRDP Shares with the exception of upfront fees paid to the liquidity provider which are amortized over the life of the liquidity agreement. Amortization of these costs is included in interest expense, fees and amortization of offering costs in the Statements of Operations.
Other: Expenses directly related to a Fund are charged to that Fund. Other operating expenses shared by several funds are pro rated among those funds on the basis of relative net assets or other appropriate methods.
The Funds have an arrangement with the custodians whereby fees may be reduced by credits earned on uninvested cash balances, which, if applicable, are shown as fees paid indirectly in the Statements of Operations. The custodians impose fees on overdrawn cash balances, which can be offset by accumulated credits earned or may result in additional custody charges.
2. Derivative Financial Instruments:
The Funds engage in various portfolio investment strategies using derivative contracts both to increase the returns of the Funds and to economically hedge, or protect, their exposure to certain risks such as interest rate risk. These contracts may be transacted on an exchange.
Losses may arise if the value of the contract decreases due to an unfavorable change in the market rates or values of the underlying instrument or if the counterparty does not perform under the contract. Counterparty risk related to exchange-traded financial futures contracts is deemed to be minimal due to the protection against defaults provided by the exchange on which these contracts trade.
Financial Futures Contracts: The Funds purchase or sell financial futures contracts and options on financial futures contracts to gain exposure to, or economically hedge against, changes in interest rates (interest rate risk). Financial futures contracts are agreements between the Funds and the coun-terparty to buy or sell a specific quantity of an underlying instrument at a specified price and at a specified date. Depending on the terms of the particular contract, futures contracts are settled either through physical delivery of the underlying instrument on the settlement date or by payment of a cash settlement amount on the settlement date. Pursuant to the contract, the Funds agree to receive from or pay to the broker an amount of cash equal to the daily fluctuation in value of the contract. Such receipts or payments are known as margin variation and are recorded by the Funds as unrealized appreciation or depreciation. When the contract is closed, the Funds record a realized gain or loss equal to the difference between the value of the contract at the time it was opened and the value at the time it was closed. The use of financial futures contracts involves the risk of an imperfect correlation in the movements in the price of financial futures contracts, interest rates and the underlying assets.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative Financial Instruments Categorized by Risk Exposure: |
|||||||||||||||
|
Fair Values of Derivative Financial Instruments as of July 31, 2011 |
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
Liability Derivatives |
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
MUE |
|
MYM |
|
MYN |
|
MYI |
|
||||
|
|
|
Statement
of |
|
Value |
|
||||||||||
|
Interest rate |
|
Net
unrealized |
|
$ |
274,122 |
|
$ |
178,641 |
|
$ |
519,262 |
|
$ |
1,432,212 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
Includes cumulative appreciation/depreciation on financial futures contracts as reported in the Schedules of Investments. Only current day’s margin variation is reported within the Statements of Assets and Liabilities. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
The Effect of Derivative Financial Instruments in the
Statements of Operations |
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
Net Realized Loss From |
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
MUE |
|
MCA |
|
MYM |
|
MYN |
|
MYI |
|
|||||
|
Interest rate contracts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial futures contracts |
|
$ |
(778,680 |
) |
$ |
(1,908,563 |
) |
$ |
(507,035 |
) |
$ |
(1,784,553 |
) |
$ |
(3,839,962 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Change in Unrealized Appreciation/Depreciation on |
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
MUE |
|
MCA |
|
MYM |
|
MYN |
|
MYI |
|
|||||
|
Interest rate contracts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial futures contracts |
|
$ |
(274,122 |
) |
$ |
89,999 |
|
$ |
(178,641 |
) |
$ |
(378,083 |
) |
$ |
(1,032,899 |
) |
For the year ended July 31, 2011, the average quarterly balances of outstanding derivative financial instruments were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MUE |
|
MCA |
|
MYM |
|
MYN |
|
MYI |
|
|||||
|
Financial futures contracts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average number of contracts sold |
|
|
48 |
|
|
43 |
|
|
29 |
|
|
91 |
|
|
234 |
|
|
Average notional value of contracts sold |
|
$ |
5,809,373 |
|
$ |
5,036,833 |
|
$ |
3,496,257 |
|
$ |
11,069,643 |
|
$ |
28,178,482 |
|
3. Investment Advisory Agreement and Other Transactions with Affiliates:
The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. (“PNC”) and Barclays Bank PLC (“Barclays”) are the largest stockholders of BlackRock, Inc. (“BlackRock”). Due to the ownership structure, PNC is an affiliate of the Funds for 1940 Act purposes, but Barclays is not.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46 |
ANNUAL REPORT |
JULY 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
Notes to Financial Statements (continued) |
Each Fund entered into an Investment Advisory Agreement with BlackRock Advisors, LLC (the “Manager”), the Funds’ investment advisor, an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of BlackRock, to provide investment advisory and administration services. The Manager is responsible for the management of each Fund’s portfolio and provides the necessary personnel, facilities, equipment and certain other services necessary to the operations of each Fund. For such services, each Fund pays the Manager a monthly fee based on a percentage of each Fund’s average daily net assets at the following annual rates:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MUE |
|
|
0.55 |
% |
|
MCA |
|
|
0.50 |
% |
|
MYM |
|
|
0.50 |
% |
|
MYN |
|
|
0.50 |
% |
|
MYI |
|
|
0.50 |
% |
Average daily net assets are the average daily value of each Fund’s total assets minus the sum of its accrued liabilities.
The Manager voluntarily agreed to waive its investment advisory fees by the amount of investment advisory fees each Fund pays to the Manager indirectly through its investment in affiliated money market funds, however the Manager does not waive its investment advisory fees by the amount of investment advisory fees paid through each Fund’s investment in other affiliated investment companies, if any. These amounts are shown as, or included in, fees waived by advisor in the Statements of Operations. For the year ended July 31, 2011, the amounts waived were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MUE |
|
$ |
6,399 |
|
|
MCA |
|
$ |
27,494 |
|
|
MYM |
|
$ |
15,558 |
|
|
MYN |
|
$ |
22,551 |
|
|
MYI |
|
$ |
6,789 |
|
The Manager, for MUE, voluntarily agreed to waive its investment advisory fee on the proceeds of the Preferred Shares and TOBs that exceed 35% of net assets applicable to Common Shareholders. This amount is included in fees waived by advisor in the Statements of Operations. For the year ended July 31, 2011, the waiver was $204,523.
The Manager entered into a sub-advisory agreement with BlackRock Investment Management, LLC (“BIM”), an affiliate of the Manager. The Manager pays BIM for services it provides, a monthly fee that is a percentage of the investment advisory fees paid by each Fund to the Manager.
For the year ended July 31, 2011, the Funds reimbursed the Manager for certain accounting services, which are included in accounting services in the Statements of Operations. The reimbursements were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MUE |
|
$ |
4,036 |
|
|
MCA |
|
$ |
6,906 |
|
|
MYM |
|
$ |
2,097 |
|
|
MYN |
|
$ |
6,968 |
|
|
MYI |
|
$ |
11,733 |
|
Effective January 1, 2011, the Funds no longer reimburse the manager for accounting services.
Certain officers and/or directors of the Funds are officers and/or directors of BlackRock or its affiliates. The Funds reimburse the Manager for compensation paid to the Funds’ Chief Compliance Officer.
4. Investments:
Purchases and sales of investments, excluding short-term securities, for the year ended July 31, 2011 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
Purchases |
|
Sales |
|
||
|
MUE |
|
$ |
122,231,000 |
|
$ |
110,778,170 |
|
|
MCA |
|
$ |
255,222,945 |
|
$ |
213,407,539 |
|
|
MYM |
|
$ |
45,306,190 |
|
$ |
43,940,440 |
|
|
MYN |
|
$ |
154,285,243 |
|
$ |
157,198,206 |
|
|
MYI |
|
$ |
205,225,952 |
|
$ |
175,801,459 |
|
5. Income Tax Information:
Reclassifications: US GAAP requires that certain components of net assets be adjusted to reflect permanent differences between financial and tax reporting. These reclassifications have no effect on net assets or net asset values per share. The following permanent differences as of July 31, 2011 attributable to amortization methods on fixed income securities, non-deductible expenses, the expiration of capital loss carryforwards, distributions received from a regulated investment company and the sale of bonds received from TOBs were reclassified to the following accounts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
MUE |
|
MCA |
|
MYM |
|
MYN |
|
MYI |
|
|||||
|
Paid-in capital |
|
$ |
(98,708 |
) |
$ |
(2,469,567 |
) |
$ |
(13,730 |
) |
$ |
(20,680 |
) |
$ |
(1,889,574 |
) |
|
Undistributed net investment income |
|
$ |
(91,218 |
) |
$ |
(22,244 |
) |
$ |
11,608 |
|
$ |
(38,831 |
) |
$ |
(524,138 |
) |
|
Accumulated net realized loss |
|
$ |
189,926 |
|
$ |
2,491,811 |
|
$ |
2,122 |
|
$ |
59,511 |
|
$ |
2,413,712 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT |
JULY 31, 2011 |
47 |
|
|
|
|
|
Notes to Financial Statements (continued) |
The tax character of distributions paid during the fiscal years ended July 31, 2011 and July 31, 2010 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
MUE |
|
MCA |
|
MYM |
|
MYN |
|
MYI |
|
|||||
|
Tax-exempt income |
|
7/31/2011 |
|
$ |
20,247,835 |
|
$ |
30,858,325 |
|
$ |
10,831,892 |
|
$ |
35,091,230 |
|
$ |
60,629,946 |
|
|
|
|
7/31/2010 |
|
|
19,662,637 |
|
|
27,131,853 |
|
|
10,301,025 |
|
|
29,129,872 |
|
|
53,974,516 |
|
|
Ordinary income |
|
7/31/2011 |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
20,062 |
|
|
Total distributions |
|
7/31/2011 |
|
$ |
20,247,835 |
|
$ |
30,858,325 |
|
$ |
10,831,892 |
|
$ |
35,091,230 |
|
$ |
60,650,008 |
|
|
|
|
7/31/2010 |
|
$ |
19,662,637 |
|
$ |
27,131,853 |
|
$ |
10,301,025 |
|
$ |
29,129,872 |
|
$ |
53,974,516 |
|
As of July 31, 2011, the tax components of accumulated net earnings (losses) were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
MUE |
|
MCA |
|
MYM |
|
MYN |
|
MYI |
|
|||||
|
Undistributed tax-exempt income |
|
$ |
5,427,287 |
|
$ |
7,716,673 |
|
$ |
2,243,983 |
|
$ |
8,909,585 |
|
$ |
13,128,512 |
|
|
Undistributed ordinary income |
|
|
31 |
|
|
6,085 |
|
|
220,123 |
|
|
6,575 |
|
|
53,015 |
|
|
Capital loss carryforwards |
|
|
(15,209,455 |
) |
|
(12,736,427 |
) |
|
(2,271,374 |
) |
|
(28,974,669 |
) |
|
(79,971,678 |
) |
|
Net unrealized gains (losses)* |
|
|
3,980,019 |
|
|
1,620,144 |
|
|
(168,501 |
) |
|
(585,105 |
) |
|
7,013,197 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
(5,802,118 |
) |
$ |
(3,393,525 |
) |
$ |
24,231 |
|
$ |
(20,643,614 |
) |
$ |
(59,776,954 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
The differences between book-basis and tax-basis net unrealized gains (losses) were attributable primarily to the tax deferral of losses on wash sales, the tax deferral of losses on straddles, amortization methods for premiums and discounts on fixed income securities, the realization for tax purposes of unrealized gains/losses on certain futures contracts, the deferral of post-October capital losses for tax purposes, the treatment of residual interests in TOBs and the deferral of compensation to directors. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Expires July 31, |
|
MUE |
|
MCA |
|
MYM |
|
MYN |
|
MYI |
|
|||||
|
2012 |
|
$ |
259,900 |
|
$ |
2,675,948 |
|
$ |
1,194,375 |
|
$ |
16,583,200 |
|
|
— |
|
|
2014 |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
3,107,506 |
|
$ |
1,213,491 |
|
|
2015 |
|
|
— |
|
|
1,362,395 |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
5,979,955 |
|
|
2016 |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
823,067 |
|
|
2,330,288 |
|
|
25,066,903 |
|
|
2017 |
|
|
8,936,425 |
|
|
2,753,866 |
|
|
253,932 |
|
|
2,295,738 |
|
|
21,251,301 |
|
|
2018 |
|
|
6,013,130 |
|
|
5,944,218 |
|
|
— |
|
|
3,370,191 |
|
|
26,460,028 |
|
|
2019 |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
1,287,746 |
|
|
— |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
15,209,455 |
|
$ |
12,736,427 |
|
$ |
2,271,374 |
|
$ |
28,974,669 |
|
$ |
79,971,678 |
|
Under the recently enacted Regulated Investment Company Modernization Act of 2010, capital losses incurred by the Fund after July 31, 2011 will not be subject to expiration. In addition, these losses must be utilized prior to the losses incurred in pre-enactment taxable years.
6. Concentration, Market and Credit Risk:
MCA, MYM and MYN invest a substantial amount of their assets in issuers located in a single state or limited number of states. Please see the Schedules of Investments for concentrations in specific states.
Many municipalities insure repayment of their bonds, which may reduce the potential for loss due to credit risk. The market value of these bonds may fluctuate for other reasons, including market perception of the value of such insurance, and there is no guarantee that the insurer will meet its obligation.
In the normal course of business, the Funds invest in securities and enter into transactions where risks exist due to fluctuations in the market (market risk) or failure of the issuer of a security to meet all its obligations (issuer credit risk). The value of securities held by the Funds may decline in response to certain events, including those directly involving the issuers whose securities are owned by the Funds; conditions affecting the general economy; overall market changes; local, regional or global political, social or economic instability; and currency and interest rate and price fluctuations. Similar to issuer credit risk, the Funds may be exposed to counterparty credit risk, or the risk that an entity with which the Funds have unsettled or open transactions may fail to or be unable to perform on its commitments. The Funds manage counterparty credit risk by entering into transactions only with counterparties that they believe have the financial resources to honor their obligations and by monitoring the financial stability of those counterparties. Financial assets, which potentially expose the Funds to market, issuer and counterparty credit risks, consist principally of financial instruments and receivables due from counterparties. The extent of the Funds’ exposure to market, issuer and coun-terparty credit risks with respect to these financial assets is generally approximated by their value recorded in the Funds’ Statements of Assets and Liabilities, less any collateral held by the Funds.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48 |
ANNUAL REPORT |
JULY 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
Notes to Financial Statements (continued) |
As of July 31, 2011, MUE and MCA invested a significant portion of their assets in securities in the County/City/Special District/School District and Utilities sectors. MYI invested a significant portion of its assets in securities in the Transportation, County/City/Special District/School District and Utilities sectors. MYM invested a significant portion of its assets in securities in the County/City/Special District/School District sector. MYN and MYI invested a significant portion of its assets in securities in the Transportation and County/City/Special District/School District sectors. Changes in economic conditions affecting the County/City/Special District/School District, Transportation and Utilities sectors would have a greater impact on the Funds and could affect the value, income and/or liquidity of positions in such securities.
7. Capital Share Transactions:
Each Fund is authorized to issue 200 million shares, par value $0.10 for MUE, MCA, MYM and MYI and par value $0.05 for MYM and MYN, all of which were initially classified as Common Shares. The par value for each Fund’s Common Shares is $0.10. Each Fund’s Board is authorized, however, to reclassify any unissued shares of Common Shares without approval of Common Shareholders.
|
|
|
Common Shares |
|
|
|
For the years shown, shares issued and outstanding increased by the following amounts as a result of dividend reinvestment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
Year
Ended |
|
Year
Ended |
|
||
|
MUE |
|
|
57,701 |
|
|
26,556 |
|
|
MYN |
|
|
7,531 |
|
|
— |
|
|
MYI |
|
|
190,432 |
|
|
37,906 |
|
Shares issued and outstanding remained constant for MCA and MYM for the years ended July 31, 2011 and July 31, 2010.
|
|
|
AMPS |
|
|
|
The AMPS are redeemable at the option of MUE, in whole or in part, on any dividend payment date at their liquidation preference per share plus any accumulated and unpaid dividends whether or not declared. The AMPS are also subject to mandatory redemption at their liquidation preference plus any accumulated and unpaid dividends, whether or not declared, if certain requirements relating to the composition of the assets and liabilities of MUE, as set forth in MUE’s Articles Supplementary (the “Governing Instrument”) are not satisfied. |
From time to time in the future, MUE may effect repurchases of its AMPS at prices below their liquidation preference as agreed upon by the Fund and seller. MUE also may redeem its AMPS from time to time as provided in the applicable Governing Instrument. MUE intends to effect such redemptions and/or repurchases to the extent necessary to maintain applicable asset coverage requirements or for such other reasons as the Board may determine.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
Series |
|
AMPS |
|
Effective |
|
Reset |
|
|||||
|
MUE |
|
|
A |
|
|
1,345 |
|
|
0.12 |
% |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
B |
|
|
1,345 |
|
|
0.12 |
% |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
C |
|
|
2,550 |
|
|
0.12 |
% |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
Series |
|
Low |
|
High |
|
Average |
|
||||
|
MUE |
|
A1 |
|
|
0.11 |
% |
|
0.50 |
% |
|
0.35 |
% |
|
|
|
|
B1 |
|
|
0.11 |
% |
|
0.50 |
% |
|
0.35 |
% |
|
|
|
|
C1 |
|
|
0.11 |
% |
|
0.50 |
% |
|
0.35 |
% |
|
|
MCA |
|
A1 |
|
|
0.35 |
% |
|
0.46 |
% |
|
0.40 |
% |
|
|
|
|
B1 |
|
|
0.35 |
% |
|
0.50 |
% |
|
0.41 |
% |
|
|
|
|
C1 |
|
|
0.35 |
% |
|
0.50 |
% |
|
0.41 |
% |
|
|
|
|
D1 |
|
|
0.37 |
% |
|
0.50 |
% |
|
0.41 |
% |
|
|
|
|
E1 |
|
|
0.35 |
% |
|
0.50 |
% |
|
0.41 |
% |
|
|
|
|
F2 |
|
|
1.43 |
% |
|
1.56 |
% |
|
1.47 |
% |
|
|
MYM |
|
A1 |
|
|
0.32 |
% |
|
0.50 |
% |
|
0.41 |
% |
|
|
|
|
B1 |
|
|
0.31 |
% |
|
0.50 |
% |
|
0.40 |
% |
|
|
|
|
C2 |
|
|
1.35 |
% |
|
1.56 |
% |
|
1.47 |
% |
|
|
MYN |
|
A1 |
|
|
0.38 |
% |
|
0.50 |
% |
|
0.41 |
% |
|
|
|
|
B1 |
|
|
0.37 |
% |
|
0.50 |
% |
|
0.41 |
% |
|
|
|
|
C1 |
|
|
0.35 |
% |
|
0.50 |
% |
|
0.41 |
% |
|
|
|
|
D1 |
|
|
0.35 |
% |
|
0.50 |
% |
|
0.41 |
% |
|
|
|
|
E1 |
|
|
0.38 |
% |
|
0.50 |
% |
|
0.41 |
% |
|
|
|
|
F2 |
|
|
1.42 |
% |
|
1.56 |
% |
|
1.47 |
% |
|
|
MYI |
|
A1 |
|
|
0.31 |
% |
|
0.46 |
% |
|
0.39 |
% |
|
|
|
|
B1 |
|
|
0.27 |
% |
|
0.46 |
% |
|
0.39 |
% |
|
|
|
|
C1 |
|
|
0.35 |
% |
|
0.50 |
% |
|
0.42 |
% |
|
|
|
|
D1 |
|
|
0.34 |
% |
|
0.50 |
% |
|
0.41 |
% |
|
|
|
|
E1 |
|
|
0.27 |
% |
|
0.50 |
% |
|
0.40 |
% |
|
|
|
|
F1 |
|
|
0.35 |
% |
|
0.47 |
% |
|
0.41 |
% |
|
|
|
|
G1 |
|
|
0.24 |
% |
|
0.50 |
% |
|
0.40 |
% |
|
|
|
|
H2 |
|
|
1.32 |
% |
|
1.56 |
% |
|
1.46 |
% |
|
|
|
|
I2 |
|
|
1.37 |
% |
|
1.56 |
% |
|
1.47 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
The maximum applicable rate on this series of AMPS is the higher of 110% of the AA commercial paper rate or 110% of 90% of the Kenny S&P 30-day High Grade Index rate divided by 1.00 minus the marginal tax rate. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
The maximum applicable rate on this series of AMPS is the higher of 110% plus or times (i) the Telerate/BAA LIBOR or (ii) 90% of the Kenny S&P 30-day High Grade Index rate divided by 1.00 minus the marginal tax rate. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT |
JULY 31, 2011 |
49 |
|
|
|
|
|
Notes to Financial Statements (continued) |
Since February 13, 2008, the AMPS of the Funds failed to clear any of their auctions. As a result, the AMPS dividend rates were reset to the maximum applicable rate, which ranged from 0.11% to 1.56% for the year ended July 31, 2011. A failed auction is not an event of default for the Funds but it has a negative impact on the liquidity of AMPS. A failed auction occurs when there are more sellers of a Fund’s AMPS than buyers. A successful auction for the Funds’ AMPS may not occur for some time, if ever, and even if liquidity does resume, AMPS Shareholders may not have the ability to sell the AMPS at their liquidation preference.
MUE may not declare dividends or make other distributions on Common Shares or purchase any such shares if, at the time of the declaration, distribution or purchase, asset coverage with respect to the outstanding AMPS is less than 200%.
MUE pays commissions of 0.15% on the aggregate principal amount of all shares that fail to clear their auctions and 0.25% on the aggregate principal amount of all shares that successfully clear their auctions. Certain broker dealers have individually agreed to reduce commissions for failed auctions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
Series |
|
Redemption |
|
Shares |
|
Aggregate |
|
||||
|
MCA |
|
|
A |
|
|
6/06/11 |
|
|
1,090 |
|
$ |
27,250,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
B |
|
|
5/16/11 |
|
|
1,090 |
|
$ |
27,250,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
C |
|
|
5/18/11 |
|
|
969 |
|
$ |
24,225,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
D |
|
|
5/13/11 |
|
|
1,211 |
|
$ |
30,275,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
E |
|
|
5/13/11 |
|
|
1,211 |
|
$ |
30,275,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
F |
|
|
5/12/11 |
|
|
1,090 |
|
$ |
27,250,000 |
|
|
MYM |
|
|
A |
|
|
5/31/11 |
|
|
1,941 |
|
$ |
48,525,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
B |
|
|
6/08/11 |
|
|
1,200 |
|
$ |
30,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
C |
|
|
6/09/11 |
|
|
353 |
|
$ |
8,825,000 |
|
|
MYN |
|
|
A |
|
|
5/24/11 |
|
|
1,385 |
|
$ |
34,625,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
B |
|
|
5/10/11 |
|
|
1,385 |
|
$ |
34,625,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
C |
|
|
5/16/11 |
|
|
2,282 |
|
$ |
57,050,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
D |
|
|
5/18/11 |
|
|
1,597 |
|
$ |
39,925,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
E |
|
|
5/19/11 |
|
|
1,793 |
|
$ |
44,825,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
F |
|
|
5/13/11 |
|
|
1,466 |
|
$ |
36,650,000 |
|
|
MYI |
|
|
A |
|
|
6/23/11 |
|
|
1,376 |
|
$ |
34,400,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
B |
|
|
6/30/11 |
|
|
1,376 |
|
$ |
34,400,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
C |
|
|
6/09/11 |
|
|
1,376 |
|
$ |
34,400,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
D |
|
|
6/16/11 |
|
|
1,376 |
|
$ |
34,400,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
E |
|
|
6/09/11 |
|
|
2,502 |
|
$ |
62,550,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
F |
|
|
6/07/11 |
|
|
1,501 |
|
$ |
37,525,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
G |
|
|
6/14/11 |
|
|
1,501 |
|
$ |
37,525,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
H |
|
|
6/10/11 |
|
|
1,625 |
|
$ |
40,625,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
I |
|
|
6/06/11 |
|
|
1,625 |
|
$ |
40,625,000 |
|
The Funds financed the AMPS redemptions with the proceeds received from the issuance of VRDP Shares.
AMPS issued and outstanding remained constant for the years ended July 31, 2011 and July 31, 2010 for MUE.
|
|
|
VRDP Shares |
|
|
|
MCA, MYM, MYN and MYI issued Series W-7 VRDP Shares, $100,000 liquidation value per share, in a privately negotiated offering. The VRDP Shares were offered to qualified institutional buyers as defined pursuant to Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933 and include a liquidity feature that allows the VRDP Shareholders to have their shares purchased by the liquidity provider in the event of a failed remarketing. The Funds are required to redeem the VRDP Shares owned by the liquidity provider after six months of continuous, unsuccessful remarketing. The Funds entered into a fee agreement with the liquidity provider that required an initial commitment and per annum liquidity fee which is shown as liquidity fees in the Statements of Operations. The VRDP Shares issued for the year ended July 31, 2011 were as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
Series |
|
Issue |
|
Shares |
|
Maturity |
|
||||
|
MCA |
|
|
W-7 |
|
|
4/21/11 |
|
|
1,665 |
|
5/01/41 |
|
|
|
MYM |
|
|
W-7 |
|
|
5/19/11 |
|
|
873 |
|
6/01/41 |
|
|
|
MYN |
|
|
W-7 |
|
|
4/21/11 |
|
|
2,477 |
|
5/01/41 |
|
|
|
MYI |
|
|
W-7 |
|
|
5/19/11 |
|
|
3,564 |
|
6/01/41 |
|
|
Dividends on the VRDP Shares are set weekly at a rate established by a remarketing agent. Subject to certain conditions, VRDP Shares may be redeemed, in whole or in part, at any time at the option of each Fund. Each Fund also may redeem the VRDP Shares if it fails to maintain certain asset coverage requirements and such failure is not cured timely. The redemption price per share is equal to the liquidation value per share. All of the Funds’ VRDP Shares have successfully remarketed since issuance, with an annualized dividend rate of 0.23% for MCA and MYN and 0.25% for MYM and MYI for the year ended July 31, 2011. For financial reporting purposes, the liquidation value of VRDP Shares is recorded as a liability in the Statements of Assets and Liabilities. Unpaid dividends are included in interest expense and fees payable in the Statements of Assets and Liabilities, and the dividends paid on the VRDP Shares are included as a component of interest expense, fees and amortization of offering costs in the Statements of Operations. Dividends paid to holders of VRDP Shares are classified as tax-exempt income for tax-reporting purposes.
The holders of Preferred Shares have voting rights equal to the holders of Common Shares (one vote per share) and will vote together with holders of Common Shares (one vote per share) as a single class. However, the holders of Preferred Shares, voting as a separate class, are also entitled to elect two Directors for each Fund. In addition, the 1940 Act requires that along with approval by shareholders that might otherwise be required, the approval of the holders of a majority of any outstanding Preferred Shares, voting separately as a class would be required to (a) adopt any plan of reorganization that would adversely affect the Preferred Shares, (b) change a Fund’s sub-classification as a closed-end investment company or change its fundamental investment restrictions or (c) change its business so as to cease to be an investment company.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50 |
ANNUAL REPORT |
JULY 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
Notes to Financial Statements (concluded) |
8. Subsequent Events:
Management’s evaluation of the impact of all subsequent events on the Funds’ financial statements was completed through the date the financial statements were issued and the following items were noted:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common |
|
|
|
MUE |
|
$ |
0.0735 |
|
|
MCA |
|
$ |
0.0735 |
|
|
MYM |
|
$ |
0.0715 |
|
|
MYN |
|
$ |
0.0710 |
|
|
MYI |
|
$ |
0.0720 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
Series |
|
Dividends |
|
||
|
MUE AMPS |
|
|
A |
|
$ |
5,595 |
|
|
|
|
|
B |
|
$ |
5,407 |
|
|
|
|
|
C |
|
$ |
10,430 |
|
|
MCA VRDP |
|
|
W-7 |
|
$ |
46,894 |
|
|
MYM VRDP |
|
|
W-7 |
|
$ |
26,070 |
|
|
MYN VRDP |
|
|
W-7 |
|
$ |
69,763 |
|
|
MYI VRDP |
|
|
W-7 |
|
$ |
106,432 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT |
JULY 31, 2011 |
51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of |
|
BlackRock MuniHoldings Quality Fund II, Inc., |
|
BlackRock MuniYield California Quality Fund, Inc., |
|
BlackRock MuniYield Michigan Quality Fund II, Inc., |
|
BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund, Inc., |
|
and BlackRock MuniYield Quality Fund III, Inc.: |
We have audited the accompanying statements of assets and liabilities of BlackRock MuniHoldings Quality Fund II, Inc. (formerly BlackRock MuniHold-ings Insured Fund II, Inc.), BlackRock MuniYield California Quality Fund, Inc. (formerly BlackRock MuniYield California Insured Fund, Inc.), BlackRock MuniYield Michigan Quality Fund II, Inc. (formerly BlackRock MuniYield Michigan Insured Fund II, Inc.), BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund, Inc. (formerly BlackRock MuniYield New York Insured Fund, Inc.), and BlackRock MuniYield Quality Fund III, Inc. (formerly BlackRock MuniYield Insured Fund, Inc.) (collectively, the “Funds”), including the schedules of investments, as of July 31, 2011, and the related statements of operations and cash flows for the year then ended, the statements of changes in net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the periods presented. These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Funds’ management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement. The Funds are not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of their internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Funds’ internal control over financial reporting.Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of July 31, 2011, by correspondence with the custodians and brokers; where replies were not received from brokers, we performed other auditing procedures. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial positions of BlackRock MuniHoldings Quality Fund II, Inc., BlackRock MuniYield California Quality Fund, Inc., BlackRock MuniYield Michigan Quality Fund II, Inc., BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund, Inc., and BlackRock MuniYield Quality Fund III, Inc. as of July 31, 2011, the results of their operations and their cash flows for the year then ended, the changes in their net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of periods presented, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Deloitte & Touche
LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
September 28, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52 |
ANNUAL REPORT |
JULY 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes the taxable per share distributions paid by MYI during the taxable year ended July 31, 2011.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
Payable |
|
Ordinary |
|
||
|
Common Shareholders |
|
|
12/31/2010 |
|
$ |
0.000284 |
|
|
AMPS Shareholders: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series A |
|
|
12/9/2010 |
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
Series B |
|
|
12/16/2010 |
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
Series C |
|
|
12/23/2010 |
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
Series D |
|
|
12/2/2010 |
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
Series E |
|
|
12/9/2010 |
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
Series F |
|
|
12/21/2010 |
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
Series G |
|
|
12/7/2010 |
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
Series H |
|
|
12/3/2010 |
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
|
Series I |
|
|
12/6/2010 |
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
Additionally, all ordinary income distributions are comprised of interest related dividends for non-US residents and are eligible for exemption from US withholding tax for nonresident aliens and foreign corporations. |
All other net investment income distributions paid by MYI during the taxable year ended July 31, 2011 qualify as tax-exempt interest dividends for federal income tax purposes.
All of the net investment income distributions paid by MUE, MCA, MYM and MYN during the taxable year ended July 31, 2011 qualify as tax-exempt interest dividends for federal income tax purposes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT |
JULY 31, 2011 |
53 |
|
|
|
|
|
Disclosure of Investment Advisory Agreements and Sub-Advisory Agreements |
The Boards of Directors (each, a “Board,” collectively, the “Boards,” and the members of which are referred to as “Board Members”) of BlackRock Muni-Holdings Quality Fund II, Inc. (“MUE”), BlackRock MuniYield California Quality Fund, Inc. (“MCA”), BlackRock MuniYield Michigan Quality Fund II, Inc. (“MYM”), BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund, Inc. (“MYN”) and BlackRock MuniYield Quality Fund III, Inc. (“MYI” and together with MUE, MCA, MYM and MYN, each a “Fund,” and, collectively, the “Funds”) met on April 14, 2011 and May 12–13, 2011 to consider the approval of each Fund’s investment advisory agreement (each, an “Advisory Agreement”) with BlackRock Advisors, LLC (the “Manager”), each Fund’s investment advisor. The Board of each Fund also considered the approval of the sub-advisory agreement (each, a “Sub-Advisory Agreement”) between the Manager and BlackRock Investment Management, LLC (the “Sub-Advisor”), with respect to each Fund. The Manager and the Sub-Advisor are referred to herein as “BlackRock.” The Advisory Agreements and the Sub-Advisory Agreements are referred to herein as the “Agreements.”
Activities and Composition of the Board
Each Board consists of eleven individuals, nine of whom are not “interested persons” of such Fund as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “1940 Act”) (the “Independent Board Members”). The Board Members are responsible for the oversight of the operations of the Funds and perform the various duties imposed on the directors of investment companies by the 1940 Act. The Independent Board Members have retained independent legal counsel to assist them in connection with their duties. The Chairman of the Board is an Independent Board Member. Each Board has established five standing committees: an Audit Committee, a Governance and Nominating Committee, a Compliance Committee, a Performance Oversight Committee and an Executive Committee, each of which is composed of Independent Board Members (except for the Executive Committee, which also has one interested Board Member) and is chaired by an Independent Board Member. The Board of MUE has also established a Committee on Auction Market Preferred Shares. In addition, the Board of each of MCA, MYM, MYN and MYI had established a Committee on Auction Market Preferred Shares prior to the redemption of all of its Fund’s outstanding auction market preferred shares. Further, each Board established an ad hoc committee, the Joint Product Pricing Committee, which consisted of Independent Board Members and the directors/trustees of the boards of certain other BlackRock-managed funds, who were not “interested persons” of their respective funds.
The Agreements
Pursuant to the 1940 Act, the Boards are required to consider the continuation of the Agreements on an annual basis. In connection with this process, the Boards assessed, among other things, the nature, scope and quality of the services provided to the Funds by BlackRock, its personnel and its affiliates, including investment management, administrative and shareholder services, oversight of fund accounting and custody, marketing services, risk oversight, compliance program and assistance in meeting applicable legal and regulatory requirements.
The Boards, acting directly and through their respective committees, considered at each of their meetings, and from time to time as appropriate, factors that are relevant to its annual consideration of the renewal of the Agreements, including the services and support provided by BlackRock to the Funds and their shareholders. Among the matters the Boards considered were: (a) investment performance for one-, three- and five-year periods, as applicable, against peer funds, and applicable benchmarks, if any, as well as senior management’s and portfolio managers’ analysis of the reasons for any over performance or underperformance against their peers and/or benchmark, as applicable; (b) fees, including advisory and other amounts paid to BlackRock and its affiliates by the Funds for services such as call center and fund accounting; (c) Fund operating expenses and how BlackRock allocates expenses to the Funds; (d) the resources devoted to, risk oversight of, and compliance reports relating to, implementation of the Funds’ investment objectives, policies and restrictions; (e) the Funds’ compliance with its Code of Ethics and other compliance policies and procedures; (f) the nature, cost and character of non-investment management services provided by BlackRock and its affiliates; (g) BlackRock’s and other service providers’ internal controls and risk and compliance oversight mechanisms; (h) BlackRock’s implementation of the proxy voting policies approved by the Boards; (i) execution quality of portfolio transactions; (j) BlackRock’s implementation of the Funds’ valuation and liquidity procedures; (k) an analysis of contractual and actual management fee ratios for products with similar investment objectives across the open-end fund, closed-end fund and institutional account product channels, as applicable; (l) BlackRock’s compensation methodology for its investment professionals and the incentives it creates; and (m) periodic updates on BlackRock’s business.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54 |
ANNUAL REPORT |
JULY 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disclosure of Investment Advisory Agreements and Sub-Advisory Agreements (continued) |
Board Considerations in Approving the Agreements
The Approval Process: Prior to the April 14, 2011 meeting, the Boards requested and received materials specifically relating to the Agreements. The Boards are engaged in a process with BlackRock to review periodically the nature and scope of the information provided to better assist their deliberations. The materials provided in connection with the April meeting included (a) information independently compiled and prepared by Lipper, Inc. (“Lipper”) on Fund fees and expenses and the investment performance of the Funds as compared with a peer group of funds as determined by Lipper and a customized peer group selected by BlackRock (collectively, “Peers”); (b) information on the profitability of the Agreements to BlackRock and a discussion of fall-out benefits to BlackRock and its affiliates and significant shareholders; (c) a general analysis provided by BlackRock concerning investment management fees (a combination of the advisory fee and the administration fee, if any) charged to other clients, such as institutional clients and open-end funds, under similar investment mandates, as applicable; (d) the impact of economies of scale; (e) a summary of aggregate amounts paid by each Fund to BlackRock and (f) if applicable, a comparison of management fees to similar BlackRock closed-end funds, as classified by Lipper.
At an in-person meeting held on April 14, 2011, the Boards reviewed materials relating to their consideration of the Agreements. As a result of the discussions that occurred during the April 14, 2011 meeting, and as a culmination of the Boards’ year-long deliberative process, the Boards presented BlackRock with questions and requests for additional information. BlackRock responded to these requests with additional written information in advance of the May 12–13, 2011 Board meeting.
At an in-person meeting held on May 12–13, 2011, each Board, including the Independent Board Members, unanimously approved the continuation of the Advisory Agreement between the Manager and its Fund and the Sub-Advisory Agreement between the Manager and the Sub-Advisor with respect to its Fund, each for a one-year term ending June 30, 2012. In approving the continuation of the Agreements, the Boards considered: (a) the nature, extent and quality of the services provided by BlackRock; (b) the investment performance of the Funds and BlackRock; (c) the advisory fee and the cost of the services and profits to be realized by BlackRock and its affiliates from their relationship with the Funds; (d) economies of scale; (e) fall-out benefits to BlackRock as a result of its relationship with the Funds; and (f) other factors deemed relevant by the Board Members.
The Boards also considered other matters they deemed important to the approval process, such as services related to the valuation and pricing of Fund portfolio holdings, direct and indirect benefits to BlackRock and its affiliates and significant shareholders from their relationship with Funds and advice from independent legal counsel with respect to the review process and materials submitted for the Boards’ review. The Boards noted the willingness of BlackRock personnel to engage in open, candid discussions with the Boards. The Boards did not identify any particular information as controlling, and each Board Member may have attributed different weights to the various items considered.
A. Nature, Extent and Quality of the Services Provided by BlackRock: The Boards, including the Independent Board Members, reviewed the nature, extent and quality of services provided by BlackRock, including the investment advisory services and the resulting performance of the Funds. Throughout the year, the Boards compared Fund performance to the performance of a comparable group of closed-end funds and/or the performance of a relevant benchmark, if any. The Boards met with BlackRock’s senior management personnel responsible for investment operations, including the senior investment officers. Each Board also reviewed the materials provided by its Fund’s portfolio management team discussing Fund performance and the Fund’s investment objective, strategies and outlook.
The Boards considered, among other factors, the number, education and experience of BlackRock’s investment personnel generally and their Funds’ portfolio management teams, investments by portfolio managers in the funds they manage, BlackRock’s portfolio trading capabilities, BlackRock’s use of technology, BlackRock’s commitment to compliance, BlackRock’s credit analysis capabilities, BlackRock’s risk analysis capabilities and BlackRock’s approach to training and retaining portfolio managers and other research, advisory and management personnel. The Boards engaged in a review of BlackRock’s compensation structure with respect to their Funds’ portfolio management teams and BlackRock’s ability to attract and retain high-quality talent and create performance incentives.
In addition to advisory services, the Boards considered the quality of the administrative and non-investment advisory services provided to the Funds. BlackRock and its affiliates provide the Funds with certain administrative and other services (in addition to any such services provided to the Funds by third parties) and officers and other personnel as are necessary for the operations of the Funds. In addition to investment advisory services, BlackRock and its affiliates provide the Funds with other services, including (i) preparing disclosure documents, such as the prospectus and the statement of additional information in connection with the initial public offering and periodic shareholder reports; (ii) preparing communications with analysts to support secondary market trading of the Funds; (iii) assisting with daily accounting and pricing; (iv) preparing periodic filings with regulators and stock exchanges; (v) overseeing and coordinating the activities of other service providers; (vi) organizing Board meetings and preparing the materials for such Board meetings; (vii) providing legal and compliance support; and (viii) performing other administrative functions necessary for the operation of the Funds, such as tax reporting, fulfilling regulatory filing requirements and call center services. The Boards reviewed the structure and duties of BlackRock’s fund administration, accounting, legal and compliance departments and considered BlackRock’s policies and procedures for assuring compliance with applicable laws and regulations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT |
JULY 31, 2011 |
55 |
|
|
|
|
|
Disclosure of Investment Advisory Agreements and Sub-Advisory Agreements (continued) |
B. The Investment Performance of the Funds and BlackRock: The Boards, including the Independent Board Members, also reviewed and considered the performance history of their Funds. In preparation for the April 14, 2011 meeting, the Boards worked with BlackRock and Lipper to develop a template for, and was provided with reports independently prepared by Lipper, which included a comprehensive analysis of each Fund’s performance. The Boards also reviewed a narrative and statistical analysis of the Lipper data that was prepared by BlackRock, which analyzed various factors that affect Lipper’s rankings. In connection with their review, each Board received and reviewed information regarding the investment performance of its Fund as compared to funds in that Fund’s applicable Lipper category and a customized peer group selected by BlackRock. The Boards were provided with a description of the methodology used by Lipper to select peer funds. The Boards and each Board’s Performance Oversight Committee regularly review, and meet with Fund management to discuss, the performance of the Funds throughout the year.
The Board of MYI noted that MYI performed below the median of its Customized Lipper Peer Group Composite in each of the one-, three- and five-year periods reported. The Board of MYI and BlackRock reviewed and discussed the reasons for MYI’s underperformance during these periods compared with its Peers. The Board of MYI was informed that, among other things, there were three primary factors that impacted performance: exposure to the long-end of the municipal curve, which underperformed as the yield curve steepened out; an overweight of spread product during a period of significant widening of credit spreads; and the underperformance of municipal cash relative to MYI’s Bond Market Association hedges (which were completely unwound in the 4th quarter of 2008).
The Board of MCA noted that MCA performed below the median of its Customized Lipper Peer Group Composite in the one- and five-year periods reported, but that MCA performed at or above the median of its Customized Lipper Peer Group Composite in the three-year period reported. The Board of MCA and BlackRock reviewed and discussed the reasons for MCA’s under-performance during the one- and five-year periods compared with its Peers. The Board was informed that, among other things, slightly longer duration exposure fared poorly in the volatile environment that characterized the last quarter of 2010.
The Board of MYN noted that MYN performed below the median of its Customized Lipper Peer Group Composite in each of the one-, three- and five-year periods reported. The Board of MYN and BlackRock reviewed and discussed the reasons for MYN’s underperformance during these periods compared with its Peers. The Board of MYN was informed that, among other things, longer term performance continues to suffer from MYN’s poor total return experienced during the financial crisis of 2007–2008. During this period MYN was weighted heavily in longer dated and discount coupon bonds. This exposure to longer duration bonds, in the long end of the yield curve, caused underperformance as yields rose and the curve steepened.
The Board of each of MYI, MCA and MYN and BlackRock discussed BlackRock’s strategy for improving its Fund’s performance and BlackRock’s commitment to providing the resources necessary to assist its Fund’s portfolio managers and to improve its Fund’s performance.
The Board of each of MUE and MYM noted that, in general, its Fund performed better than its respective Peers in that its Fund’s performance was at or above the median of its respective Customized Lipper Peer Group Composite in two of the one-, three- and five-year periods reported.
The Boards noted that BlackRock has made changes to the organization of the overall fixed income group management structure designed to result in a strengthened leadership team.
C. Consideration of the Advisory/Management Fees and the Cost of the Services and Profits to be Realized by BlackRock and its Affiliates from their Relationship with the Fund: Each Board, including the Independent Board Members, reviewed its Fund’s contractual management fee ratio compared with the other funds in its Lipper category. It also compared the Fund’s total expense ratio, as well as actual management fee ratio, to those of other funds in its Lipper category. The Boards considered the services provided and the fees charged by BlackRock to other types of clients with similar investment mandates, including separately managed institutional accounts.
The Boards received and reviewed statements relating to BlackRock’s financial condition and profitability with respect to the services it provided the Funds. The Boards were also provided with a profitability analysis that detailed the revenues earned and the expenses incurred by BlackRock for services provided to the Funds. The Boards reviewed BlackRock’s profitability with respect to the Funds and other funds the Boards currently oversee for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to available aggregate profitability data provided for the years ended December 31, 2009, and Decem-ber 31, 2008. The Boards reviewed BlackRock’s profitability with respect to other fund complexes managed by the Manager and/or its affiliates. The Boards reviewed BlackRock’s assumptions and methodology of allocating expenses in the profitability analysis, noting the inherent limitations in allocating costs among various advisory products. The Boards recognized that profitability may be affected by numerous factors including, among other things, fee waivers and expense reimbursements by the Manager, the types of funds managed, expense allocations and business mix, and the difficulty of comparing profitability as a result of those factors.
The Boards noted that, in general, individual fund or product line profitability of other advisors is not publicly available. The Boards considered BlackRock’s overall operating margin, in general, compared to the operating margin for leading investment management firms whose operations include advising closed-end funds, among other product types. That data indicates that operating margins for BlackRock, in general and with respect to its registered funds, are generally consistent with margins earned by similarly situated publicly traded competitors. In addition, the Boards considered, among other things, certain third party data comparing BlackRock’s operating margin with that of other publicly-traded asset management firms. That third party data indicates that larger asset bases do not, in themselves, translate to higher profit margins.
In addition, the Boards considered the cost of the services provided to the Funds by BlackRock, and BlackRock’s and its affiliates’ profits relating to the management of the Funds and the other funds advised by BlackRock and its affiliates. As part of its analysis, the Boards reviewed BlackRock’s methodology in allocating its costs to the management of the Funds. The Boards also
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56 |
ANNUAL REPORT |
JULY 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disclosure of Investment Advisory Agreements and Sub-Advisory Agreements (concluded) |
considered whether BlackRock has the financial resources necessary to attract and retain high-quality investment management personnel to perform its obligations under the Agreements and to continue to provide the high quality of services that is expected by the Boards.
Each Board noted that its Fund’s contractual management fee ratio (a combination of the advisory fee and the administration fee, if any) was lower than or equal to the median contractual management fee ratio paid by the Fund’s Peers, in each case before taking into account any expense reimbursements or fee waivers.
D. Economies of Scale: Each Board, including the Independent Board Members, considered the extent to which economies of scale might be realized as the assets of its Fund increase. Each Board also considered the extent to which its Fund benefits from such economies and whether there should be changes in the advisory fee rate or structure in order to enable the Fund to participate in these economies of scale, for example through the use of breakpoints in the advisory fee based upon the asset level of the Fund. Based on the ad hoc Joint Product Pricing Committees’ and the Boards’ review and consideration of this issue, the Boards concluded that closed-end funds are typically priced at scale at a fund’s inception; therefore, the implementation of breakpoints was not necessary.
The Boards noted that most closed-end funds do not have fund level breakpoints because closed-end funds generally do not experience substantial growth after the initial public offering. The Boards noted that only one closed-end fund in the Fund Complex has breakpoints in its advisory fee structure.
E. Other Factors Deemed Relevant by the Board Members: The Boards, including the Independent Board Members, also took into account other ancillary or “fall-out” benefits that BlackRock or its affiliates and significant shareholders may derive from their respective relationships with the Funds, both tangible and intangible, such as BlackRock’s ability to leverage its investment professionals who manage other portfolios and risk management personnel, an increase in BlackRock’s profile in the investment advisory community, and the engagement of BlackRock’s affiliates as service providers to the Funds, including for securities lending services. The Boards also considered BlackRock’s overall operations and its efforts to expand the scale of, and improve the quality of, its operations. The Boards also noted that BlackRock may use and benefit from third party research obtained by soft dollars generated by certain registered fund transactions to assist in managing all or a number of its other client accounts. The Boards further noted that BlackRock’s funds may invest in affiliated ETFs without any offset against the management fees payable by the funds to BlackRock.
In connection with its consideration of the Agreements, the Boards also received information regarding BlackRock’s brokerage and soft dollar practices. The Boards received reports from BlackRock which included information on brokerage commissions and trade execution practices throughout the year.
The Boards noted the competitive nature of the closed-end fund marketplace and that shareholders are able to sell their Fund shares in the secondary market if they believe that the Fund’s fees and expenses are too high or if they are dissatisfied with the performance of the Fund.
Conclusion
Each Board, including the Independent Board Members, unanimously approved the continuation of the Advisory Agreement between the Manager and its Fund for a one-year term ending June 30, 2012 and the Sub-Advisory Agreement between the Manager and the Sub-Advisor, with respect to its Fund, for a one-year term ending June 30, 2012. As part of its approval, the Boards considered the detailed review of BlackRock’s fee structure, as it applies to the Funds, conducted by the ad hoc Joint Product Pricing Committee. Based upon their evaluations of all of the aforementioned factors in their totality, the Boards, including the Independent Board Members, were satisfied that the terms of the Agreements were fair and reasonable and in the best interest of the Funds and their shareholders. In arriving at their decision to approve the Agreements, the Boards did not identify any single factor or group of factors as all-important or controlling, but considered all factors together, and different Board Members may have attributed different weights to the various factors considered. The Independent Board Members were also assisted by the advice of independent legal counsel in making these determinations. The contractual fee arrangements for the Funds reflect the results of several years of review by the Board Members and predecessor Board Members, and discussions between such Board Members (and predecessor Board Members) and BlackRock. As a result, the Board Members’ conclusions may be based in part on their consideration of these arrangements in prior years.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT |
JULY 31, 2011 |
57 |
|
|
|
|
Pursuant to each Fund’s Dividend Reinvestment Plan (the “Reinvestment Plan”), Common Shareholders are automatically enrolled to have all distributions of dividends and capital gains reinvested by BNY Mellon Shareowner Services for MYM and MYN and Computershare Trust Company, N.A. for MUE, MCA and MYI (individually, the “Reinvestment Plan Agent” or together, the “Reinvestment Plan Agents”) in the respective Fund’s shares pursuant to the Reinvestment Plan. Shareholders who do not participate in the Reinvestment Plan will receive all distributions in cash paid by check and mailed directly to the shareholders of record (or if the shares are held in street or other nominee name, then to the nominee) by the Reinvestment Plan Agent, which serves as agent for the shareholders in administering the Reinvestment Plan.
After the Funds declare a dividend or determine to make a capital gain distribution, the Reinvestment Plan Agent will acquire shares for the participants’ account, depending upon the following circumstances, either (i) through receipt of unissued but authorized shares from the Fund (“newly issued shares”) or (ii) by purchase of outstanding shares on the open market or on the Fund’s primary exchange. If, on the dividend payment date, the NAV is equal to or less than the market price per share plus estimated brokerage commissions (such condition often referred to as a “market premium”), the Reinvestment Plan Agent will invest the dividend amount in newly issued shares on behalf of the participants. The number of newly issued shares to be credited to each participant’s account will be determined by dividing the dollar amount of the dividend by the NAV on the date the shares are issued. However, if the NAV is less than 95% of the market price on the dividend payment date, the dollar amount of the dividend will be divided by 95% of the market price on the payment date. If, on the dividend payment date, the NAV is greater than the market value per share plus estimated brokerage commissions (such condition often referred to as a “market discount”), the Reinvestment Plan Agent will invest the dividend amount in shares acquired on behalf of the participants in open market purchases. If the Reinvestment Plan Agents are unable to invest the full dividend amount in open market purchases, or if the market discount shifts to a market premium during the purchase period, the Reinvestment Plan Agents will invest any un-invested portion in newly issued shares.
Participation in the Reinvestment Plan is completely voluntary and may be terminated or resumed at any time without penalty by notice if received and processed by the Reinvestment Plan Agent prior to the dividend record date; otherwise such termination or resumption will be effective with respect to any subsequently declared dividend or other distribution.
The Reinvestment Plan Agent’s fees for the handling of the reinvestment of dividends and distributions will be paid by each Fund. However, each participant will pay a pro rata share of brokerage commissions incurred with respect to the Reinvestment Plan Agent’s open market purchases in connection with the reinvestment of dividends and distributions. The automatic reinvestment of dividends and distributions will not relieve participants of any federal income tax that may be payable on such dividends or distributions.
Each Fund reserves the right to amend or terminate the Reinvestment Plan. There is no direct service charge to participants in the Reinvestment Plan; however, each Fund reserves the right to amend the Reinvestment Plan to include a service charge payable by the participants. Participants that request a sale of shares through Computershare Trust Company, N.A. are subject to a $2.50 sales fee and a $0.15 per share sold brokerage commission. Participants that request a sale of shares through BNY Mellon Shareowner Services are subject to a $0.02 per share sold brokerage commission. All correspondence concerning the Reinvestment Plan should be directed to the respective Reinvestment Plan Agent: BNY Mellon Shareowner Services, P.O. Box 358035, Pittsburgh, PA 15252-8035, Telephone: (866) 216-0242 for shareholders of MYM and MYN or Computershare Trust Company, N.A., P.O. Box 43078, Providence, RI 02940-3078, Telephone: (800) 699-1BFM or overnight correspondence should be directed to the Reinvestment Plan Agent at 250 Royall Street, Canton, MA 02021 for shareholders of MUE, MCA and MYI.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58 |
ANNUAL REPORT |
JULY 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name, Address |
|
Position(s) |
|
Length |
|
Principal Occupation(s) During Past Five Years |
|
Number of BlackRock- |
|
Public |
|
Independent Directors1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Richard E.
Cavanagh |
|
Chairman of |
|
Since |
|
Trustee, Aircraft Finance Trust from 1999 to 2009; Director, The Guardian Life Insurance Company of America since 1998; Trustee, Educational Testing Service from 1997 to 2009 and Chairman thereof from 2005 to 2009; Senior Advisor, The Fremont Group since 2008 and Director thereof since 1996; Adjunct Lecturer, Harvard University since 2007; President and Chief Executive Officer, The Conference Board, Inc. (global business research organization) from 1995 to 2007. |
|
95 RICs consisting of |
|
Arch Chemical (chemical and allied products) |
|
Karen P.
Robards |
|
Vice Chairperson |
|
Since |
|
Partner of Robards & Company, LLC (financial advisory firm) since 1987; Co-founder and Director of the Cooke Center for Learning and Development (a not-for-profit organization) since 1987; Director of Care Investment Trust, Inc. (health care real estate investment trust) from 2007 to 2010; Director of Enable Medical Corp. from 1996 to 2005; Investment Banker at Morgan Stanley from 1976 to 1987. |
|
95 RICs consisting of |
|
AtriCure, Inc. (medical devices) |
|
Michael J.
Castellano |
|
Director and |
|
Since |
|
Managing Director and Chief Financial Officer of Lazard Group LLC from 2001 to 2011; Chief Financial Officer of Lazard Ltd from 2004 to 2011; Director, Support Our Aging Religions (non-profit) since 2009; Director, National Advisory Board of Church Management at Villanova University since 2010. |
|
95 RICs consisting of |
|
None |
|
Frank J.
Fabozzi |
|
Director and |
|
Since |
|
Editor of and Consultant for The Journal of Portfolio Management since 1986; Professor of Finance, EDHEC Business School since 2011; Professor in the Practice of Finance and Becton Fellow, Yale University School of Management from 2006 to 2011; Adjunct Professor of Finance and Becton Fellow, Yale University from 1994 to 2006. |
|
95 RICs consisting of |
|
None |
|
Kathleen
F. Feldstein |
|
Director |
|
Since |
|
President of Economics Studies, Inc. (private economic consulting firm) since 1987; Chair, Board of Trustees, McLean Hospital from 2000 to 2008 and Trustee Emeritus thereof since 2008; Member of the Board of Partners Community Healthcare, Inc. from 2005 to 2009; Member of the Corporation of Partners HealthCare since 1995; Trustee, Museum of Fine Arts, Boston since 1992; Member of the Visiting Committee to the Harvard University Art Museum since 2003; Director, Catholic Charities of Boston since 2009. |
|
95 RICs consisting of |
|
The McClatchy Company (publishing); BellSouth (telecommunications); Knight Ridder (publishing) |
|
James T.
Flynn |
|
Director and |
|
Since |
|
Chief Financial Officer of JPMorgan & Co., Inc. from 1990 to 1995. |
|
95 RICs consisting of |
|
None |
|
Jerrold B.
Harris |
|
Director |
|
Since |
|
Trustee, Ursinus College since 2000; Director, Troemner LLC (scientific equipment) since 2000; Director of Delta Waterfowl Foundation since 2001; President and Chief Executive Officer, VWR Scientific Products Corporation from 1990 to 1999. |
|
95 RICs consisting of |
|
BlackRock Kelso Capital Corp. (business development company) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT |
JULY 31, 2011 |
59 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Officers and Directors (continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name, Address |
|
Position(s) |
|
Length |
|
Principal Occupation(s) During Past Five Years |
|
Number of BlackRock- |
|
Public |
|
Independent Directors1 (concluded) |
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
R. Glenn
Hubbard |
|
Director |
|
Since |
|
Dean, Columbia Business School since 2004; Columbia faculty member since 1988; Co-Director, Columbia Business School’s Entrepreneurship Program from 1997 to 2004; Chairman, US Council of Economic Advisers under the President of the United States from 2001 to 2003; Chairman, Economic Policy Committee of the OECD from 2001 to 2003. |
|
95 RICs consisting of |
|
ADP (data and |
|
W. Carl
Kester |
|
Director and |
|
Since |
|
George Fisher Baker Jr. Professor of Business Administration, Harvard Business School; Deputy Dean for Academic Affairs from 2006 to 2010; Chairman of the Finance Department, Harvard Business School from 2005 to 2006; Senior Associate Dean and Chairman of the MBA Program of Harvard Business School from 1999 to 2005; Member of the faculty of Harvard Business School since 1981. |
|
95 RICs consisting of |
|
None |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
Directors serve until their resignation, removal or death, or until December 31 of the year in which they turn 72. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
Date shown is the earliest date a person has served for the Funds covered by this annual report. Following the combination of Merrill Lynch Investment Managers, L.P. (“MLIM”) and BlackRock, Inc. (“BlackRock”) in September 2006, the various legacy MLIM and legacy BlackRock Fund boards were realigned and consolidated into three new Fund boards in 2007. As a result, although the chart shows directors as joining the Fund’s board in 2007, each director first became a member of the board of directors of other legacy MLIM or legacy BlackRock Funds as follows: Richard E. Cavanagh, 1994; Frank J. Fabozzi, 1988; Kathleen F. Feldstein, 2005; James T. Flynn, 1996; Jerrold B. Harris, 1999; R. Glenn Hubbard, 2004; W. Carl Kester, 1995 and Karen P. Robards, 1998. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interested Directors3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Paul L.
Audet |
|
Director |
|
Since |
|
Senior Managing Director, BlackRock, Inc., and Head of BlackRock’s Real Estate business from 2008 to 2011; Member of BlackRock’s Global Operating and Corporate Risk Management Committees and of the BlackRock Alternative Investors Executive Committee and Investment Committee for the Private Equity Fund of Funds business since 2008; Head of BlackRock’s Global Cash Management business from 2005 to 2010; Acting Chief Financial Officer of BlackRock from 2007 to 2008; Chief Financial Officer of BlackRock from 1998 to 2005; Senior Vice President of Finance at PNC Bank Corp. and Chief Financial Officer of the Investment Management and Mutual Fund Processing businesses from 1996 to 1998 and Head of PNC’s Mergers & Acquisitions unit from 1992 to 1998; Member of PNC’s Corporate Asset-Liability Committee and Marketing Committees from 1992 to 1998; Chief Financial Officer of PNC’s eastern operations from 1991 to 1992; Senior Vice President of First Fidelity Bancorporation, responsible for the Corporate Finance, Asset-Liability Committee, and Mergers & Acquisitions functions from 1986 to 1991. |
|
95 RICs consisting of |
|
None |
|
Henry
Gabbay |
|
Director |
|
Since |
|
Consultant, BlackRock, Inc. from 2007 to 2008; Managing Director, BlackRock, Inc. from 1989 to 2007; Chief Administrative Officer, BlackRock Advisors, LLC from 1998 to 2007; President of BlackRock Funds and BlackRock Bond Allocation Target Shares from 2005 to 2007; Treasurer of certain closed-end funds in the BlackRock fund complex from 1989 to 2006. |
|
162 RICs consisting of |
|
None |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
Mr. Audet is an “interested person,” as defined in the 1940 Act, of the Funds based on his position with BlackRock, Inc. and its affiliates. Mr. Gabbay is an “interested person” of the Funds based on his former positions with BlackRock, Inc. and its affiliates as well as his ownership of BlackRock, Inc. and The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. securities. Directors serve until their resignation, removal or death, or until December 31 of the year in which they turn 72. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
60 |
ANNUAL REPORT |
JULY 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Officers and Directors (concluded) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name, Address |
|
Position(s) |
|
Length |
|
Principal Occupation(s) During Past Five Years |
|
Funds Officers1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John M.
Perlowski |
|
President and |
|
Since |
|
Managing Director of BlackRock, Inc. since 2009; Global Head of BlackRock Fund Administration since 2009; Managing Director and Chief Operating Officer of the Global Product Group at Goldman Sachs Asset Management, L.P. from 2003 to 2009; Treasurer of Goldman Sachs Mutual Funds from 2003 to 2009 and Senior Vice President thereof from 2007 to 2009; Director of Goldman Sachs Offshore Funds from 2002 to 2009; Director of Family Resource Network (charitable foundation) since 2009. |
|
Anne
Ackerley |
|
Vice |
|
Since |
|
Managing Director of BlackRock, Inc. since 2000; President and Chief Executive Officer of the BlackRock-advised funds from 2009 to 2011; Vice President of the BlackRock-advised funds from 2007 to 2009; Chief Operating Officer of BlackRock’s Global Client Group since 2009; Chief Operating Officer of BlackRock’s U.S. Retail Group from 2006 to 2009; Head of BlackRock’s Mutual Fund Group from 2000 to 2006. |
|
Brendan
Kyne |
|
Vice |
|
Since |
|
Managing Director of BlackRock, Inc. since 2010; Director of BlackRock, Inc. from 2008 to 2009; Head of Product Development and Management for BlackRock’s US Retail Group since 2009, Co-head thereof from 2007 to 2009; Vice President of BlackRock, Inc. from 2005 to 2008. |
|
Neal
Andrews |
|
Chief |
|
Since |
|
Managing Director of BlackRock, Inc. since 2006; Senior Vice President and Line of Business Head of Fund Accounting and Administration at PNC Global Investment Servicing (US) Inc. from 1992 to 2006. |
|
Jay Fife |
|
Treasurer |
|
Since |
|
Managing Director of BlackRock, Inc. since 2007 and Director of BlackRock, Inc. in 2006; Assistant Treasurer of the MLIM and Fund Asset Management, L.P.-advised funds from 2005 to 2006; Director of MLIM Fund Services Group from 2001 to 2006. |
|
Brian
Kindelan |
|
Chief Compliance |
|
Since |
|
Chief Compliance Officer of the BlackRock-advised funds since 2007; Managing Director and Senior Counsel of BlackRock, Inc. since 2005. |
|
Ira P.
Shapiro |
|
Secretary |
|
Since |
|
Managing Director of BlackRock, Inc. since 2009; Managing Director and Associate General Counsel of Barclays Global Investors from 2008 to 2009 and Principal thereof from 2004 to 2008. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
1 |
Officers of the Funds serve at the pleasure of the Board of Directors. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
Ms. Ackerley was President and Chief Executive Officer from 2009 to 2011. |
|
|
|
|
|
Investment Advisor |
|
|
|
BlackRock Advisors, LLC |
|
Wilmington, DE 19809 |
|
|
|
Sub-Advisor |
|
|
|
BlackRock Investment Management, LLC |
|
Princeton, NJ 08540 |
|
|
|
Custodians |
|
|
|
State Street Bank and Trust Company3 |
|
Boston, MA 02101 |
|
|
|
The Bank of New York Mellon4 |
|
New York, NY 10286 |
|
|
|
Transfer Agents |
|
|
|
Common Shares: |
|
|
|
Computershare Trust Company, N.A. 3 |
|
Providence, RI 02490 |
|
|
|
BNY Mellon Shareowner Services4 |
|
Jersey City, NJ 07310 |
|
|
|
AMPS Auction Agent |
|
|
|
BNY Mellon Shareowner
Services |
|
|
|
VRDP Tender and Paying Agent |
|
|
|
The Bank of New York Mellon |
|
|
|
VRDP Remarketing Agent |
|
|
|
Citigroup Global Markets
Inc. |
|
|
|
Accounting Agent |
|
|
|
State Street Bank and
Trust Company |
|
|
|
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm |
|
|
|
Deloitte & Touche LLP |
|
|
|
Legal Counsel |
|
|
|
Skadden, Arps, Slate,
Meagher & Flom LLP |
|
|
|
Address of the Funds |
|
|
|
100 Bellevue Parkway |
|
|
|
|
3 |
For MUE, MCA and MYI. |
|
|
|
|
4 |
For MYM and MYN. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
Effective April 14, 2011, Michael J. Castellano became Director of the Funds and Member of the Audit Committee. |
|
|
|
||
|
|
Effective July 28, 2011, Richard S. Davis resigned as Director of the Funds, and Paul L. Audet became Director of the Funds. |
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT |
JULY 31, 2011 |
61 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proxy Results |
The Annual Meeting of Shareholders was held on July 28, 2011 for shareholders of record on May 31, 2011 to elect director nominees for each Fund. There were no broker non-votes with regard to any of the Funds.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paul L. Audet |
|
Michael J. Castellano |
|
Richard E. Cavanagh |
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
Votes For |
|
Votes |
|
Abstain |
|
Votes For |
|
Votes |
|
Abstain |
|
Votes For |
|
Votes |
|
Abstain |
|
|
MUE |
|
17,441,209 |
|
487,265 |
|
0 |
|
17,439,099 |
|
489,375 |
|
0 |
|
17,436,092 |
|
492,382 |
|
0 |
|
|
MCA |
|
27,843,603 |
|
931,501 |
|
0 |
|
27,759,460 |
|
1,015,644 |
|
0 |
|
27,811,765 |
|
963,339 |
|
0 |
|
|
MYM |
|
9,936,504 |
|
386,628 |
|
0 |
|
9,936,794 |
|
386,338 |
|
0 |
|
9,936,794 |
|
386,338 |
|
0 |
|
|
MYN |
|
32,095,337 |
|
1,051,678 |
|
0 |
|
31,959,190 |
|
1,187,825 |
|
0 |
|
32,187,240 |
|
959,775 |
|
0 |
|
|
MYI |
|
59,857,132 |
|
2,020,552 |
|
0 |
|
59,564,552 |
|
2,313,132 |
|
0 |
|
59,648,356 |
|
2,229,328 |
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Frank J. Fabozzi1 |
|
Kathleen F. Feldstein |
|
James T. Flynn |
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
Votes For |
|
Votes |
|
Abstain |
|
Votes For |
|
Votes |
|
Abstain |
|
Votes For |
|
Votes |
|
Abstain |
|
|
MUE |
|
2,234 |
|
5 |
|
0 |
|
17,428,792 |
|
499,682 |
|
0 |
|
17,423,900 |
|
504,574 |
|
0 |
|
|
MCA |
|
1,375 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
27,621,850 |
|
1,153,254 |
|
0 |
|
27,650,379 |
|
1,124,725 |
|
0 |
|
|
MYM |
|
668 |
|
70 |
|
0 |
|
9,900,954 |
|
422,178 |
|
0 |
|
9,926,765 |
|
396,367 |
|
0 |
|
|
MYN |
|
2,068 |
|
402 |
|
0 |
|
31,792,195 |
|
1,354,820 |
|
0 |
|
32,068,498 |
|
1,078,517 |
|
0 |
|
|
MYI |
|
2,549 |
|
35 |
|
0 |
|
59,591,252 |
|
2,286,431 |
|
0 |
|
59,738,498 |
|
2,139,186 |
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Henry Gabbay |
|
Jerrold B. Harris |
|
R. Glenn Hubbard |
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
Votes For |
|
Votes |
|
Abstain |
|
Votes For |
|
Votes |
|
Abstain |
|
Votes For |
|
Votes |
|
Abstain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MUE |
|
17,441,191 |
|
487,283 |
|
0 |
|
17,437,676 |
|
490,798 |
|
0 |
|
17,433,923 |
|
494,551 |
|
0 |
|
|
MCA |
|
27,774,157 |
|
1,000,947 |
|
0 |
|
27,702,395 |
|
1,072,709 |
|
0 |
|
27,836,956 |
|
938,148 |
|
0 |
|
|
MYM |
|
9,933,084 |
|
390,048 |
|
0 |
|
9,925,144 |
|
397,988 |
|
0 |
|
9,933,374 |
|
389,758 |
|
0 |
|
|
MYN |
|
32,267,141 |
|
879,874 |
|
0 |
|
31,965,634 |
|
1,181,381 |
|
0 |
|
32,129,590 |
|
1,017,425 |
|
0 |
|
|
MYI |
|
59,894,606 |
|
1,983,078 |
|
0 |
|
59,797,889 |
|
2,079,795 |
|
0 |
|
59,651,457 |
|
2,226,227 |
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. Carl Kester1 |
|
Karen P. Robards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
Votes For |
|
Votes |
|
Abstain |
|
Votes For |
|
Votes |
|
Abstain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MUE |
|
2,234 |
|
5 |
|
0 |
|
17,443,791 |
|
484,683 |
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MCA |
|
1,375 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
27,732,448 |
|
1,042,656 |
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MYM |
|
668 |
|
70 |
|
0 |
|
9,899,334 |
|
423,798 |
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MYN |
|
2,068 |
|
402 |
|
0 |
|
32,255,358 |
|
891,657 |
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MYI |
|
2,549 |
|
35 |
|
0 |
|
59,918,093 |
|
1,959,591 |
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
Voted on by holders of preferred shares only. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
62 |
ANNUAL REPORT |
JULY 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional Information (continued) |
|
|
|
Dividend Policy |
The Funds’ dividend policy is to distribute all or a portion of their net investment income to their shareholders on a monthly basis. In order to provide shareholders with a more stable level of dividend distributions, the Funds may at times pay out less than the entire amount of net investment income earned in any particular month and may at times in any particular month pay out such accumulated but undistributed income in addition to net investment income earned in that month. As a result, the dividends paid by the Funds for any particular month may be more or less than the amount of net investment income earned by the Funds during such month. The Funds’ current accumulated but undistributed net investment income, if any, is disclosed in the Statements of Assets and Liabilities, which comprises part of the financial information included in this report.
|
|
|
General Information |
On June 10, 2010, the Manager announced that MUE, MCA and MYI received demand letters from a law firm on behalf of MUE’s, MCA’s and MYI’s Common Shareholders. The demand letter alleges that the Manager and MUE’s, MCA’s and MYI’s officers and Board of Directors (the “Board”) breached their fiduciary duties by redeeming at par certain of MUE’s, MCA’s and MYI’s Preferred Shares, and demanded that the Board take action to remedy those alleged breaches. In response to the demand letter, the Board established a Demand Review Committee (the “Committee”) of the Independent Directors to investigate the claims made in the demand letter with the assistance of independent counsel. Based upon its investigation, the Committee recommended that the Board reject the demand specified in the demand letter. After reviewing the findings of the Committee, the Board unanimously adopted the Committee’s recommendation and unanimously voted to reject the demand.
On August 11, 2010, the Manager announced that a shareholder derivative complaint was filed on August 3, 2010 in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York County with respect to MCA and MYI, which had previously received a demand letter from a law firm on behalf of each fund’s common shareholders. The complaint was filed against the Manager, BlackRock, Inc., MCA, MYI and certain of the directors, officers and portfolio managers (collectively, the “BlackRock Parties”) in connection with the redemption of auction-market preferred shares, auction rate preferred securities, auction preferred shares and auction rate securities (collectively, “AMPS”). The complaint alleges, among other things, that the BlackRock Parties breached their fiduciary duties to the common shareholders of MCA and MYI (the “Shareholders”) by redeeming AMPS at their liquidation preference and alleges that such redemptions caused losses to the Shareholders. The plaintiffs are seeking monetary damages for the alleged losses suffered and to enjoin MCA and MYI from future redemptions of AMPS at their liquidation preference. The BlackRock Parties believe that the claims asserted in the complaint are without merit and intend to vigorously defend themselves in the litigation.
The Funds do not make available copies of their Statements of Additional Information because the Funds’ shares are not continuously offered, which means that the Statement of Additional Information of each Fund has not been updated after completion of the respective Fund’s offerings and the information contained in each Fund’s Statement of Additional Information may have become outdated.
During the period there were no material changes in the Funds’ investment objectives or policies or to the Funds’ charters or by-laws that would delay or prevent a change of control of the Funds that were not approved by the shareholders or in the principal risk factors associated with investment in the Funds. There have been no changes in the persons who are primarily responsible for the day-to-day management of the Funds’ portfolios.
Quarterly performance, semi-annual and annual reports and other information regarding the Funds may be found on BlackRock’s website, which can be accessed at http://www.blackrock.com. This reference to BlackRock’s website is intended to allow investors public access to information regarding the Funds and does not, and is not intended to, incorporate BlackRock’s website in this report.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT |
JULY 31, 2011 |
63 |
|
|
|
|
|
Additional Information (continued) |
|
|
|
General Information (concluded) |
Electronic Delivery
Electronic copies of most financial reports are available on the Funds’ web-site or shareholders can sign up for e-mail notifications of quarterly statements, annual and semi-annual reports by enrolling in the Funds’ electronic delivery program.
Shareholders Who Hold Accounts with Investment Advisors, Banks or Brokerages:
Please contact your financial advisor to enroll. Please note that not all investment advisors, banks or brokerages may offer this service.
Householding
The Funds will mail only one copy of shareholder documents, including annual and semi-annual reports and proxy statements, to shareholders with multiple accounts at the same address. This practice is commonly called “householding” and is intended to reduce expenses and eliminate duplicate mailings of shareholder documents. Mailings of your shareholder documents may be householded indefinitely unless you instruct us otherwise. If you do not want the mailing of these documents to be combined with those for other members of your household, please call (800) 441-7762.
Availability of Quarterly Schedule of Investments
Each Fund files its complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the SEC for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. The Funds’ Forms N-Q are available on the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov and may also be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. Information on how to access documents on the SEC’s website without charge may be obtained by calling (800) SEC-0330. Each Fund’s Forms N-Q may also be obtained upon request and without charge by calling (800) 441-7762.
Availability of Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures
A description of the policies and procedures that the Funds use to determine how to vote proxies relating to portfolio securities is available (1) without charge, upon request, by calling (800) 441-7762; (2) at http://www.blackrock.com; and (3) on the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov.
Availability of Proxy Voting Record
Information about how the Funds voted proxies relating to securities held in the Funds’ portfolios during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30 is available upon request and without charge (1) at http://www.blackrock.com or by calling (800) 441-7762 and (2) on the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov.
Availability of Fund Updates
BlackRock will update performance and certain other data for the Funds on a monthly basis on its website in the “Closed-end Funds” section of http://www.blackrock.com. Investors and others are advised to periodically check the website for updated performance information and the release of other material information about the Funds.
|
|
|
Fund Certification |
The Funds are listed for trading on the NYSE and have filed with the NYSE their annual chief executive officer certification regarding compliance with the NYSE’s listing standards. The Funds filed with the SEC the certification of its chief executive officer and chief financial officer required by section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64 |
ANNUAL REPORT |
JULY 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional Information (continued) |
|
|
|
Board Approvals |
On September 1, 2010, the Board of each Fund approved changes to certain investment policies of the Funds.
Historically, under normal market conditions, each Fund has been required to invest at least 80% of its assets in municipal bonds either (i) insured under an insurance policy purchased by the Fund or (ii) insured under an insurance policy obtained by the issuer of the municipal bond or any other party. In September 2008, the Funds adopted an amended investment policy of purchasing only municipal bonds insured by insurance providers with claims-paying abilities rated investment grade at the time of investment (the “Insurance Investment Policy”).
Following the onset of the credit and liquidity crises, the claims-paying ability rating of most of the municipal bond insurance providers was lowered by the rating agencies. These downgrades called into question the long-term viability of the municipal bond insurance market, which had the potential to severely limit the ability of the Manager to manage the Funds under the Insurance Investment Policy.
As a result, on September 1, 2010, the Manager recommended, and the Boards approved, the removal of the Insurance Investment Policy. As a result of this investment policy change, the Funds are not required to dispose of assets currently held within the Funds. The Funds will maintain, and have no current intention to amend, their investment policy of, under normal market conditions, generally investing in municipal obligations rated investment grade at the time of investment.
As each Fund increases the amount of its assets that are invested in municipal obligations that are not insured, the Fund’s shareholders will be exposed to the risk of the failure of such securities’ issuers to pay interest and repay principal and will not have the benefit of protection provided under municipal bond insurance policies. As a result, shareholders will be more dependent on the analytical ability of the Manager to evaluate the credit quality of issuers of municipal obligations in which the Fund invests. The Boards believe that the amended investment policy is in the best interests of each Fund and its shareholders because it believes that the potential benefits from increased flexibility outweigh the potential increase in risk from the lack of insurance policies provided by weakened insurance providers. Of course, the new investment policy cannot assure that each Fund will achieve its investment objective.
As disclosed in each Fund’s prospectus, each Fund is required to provide shareholders 60 days notice of a change to the Insurance Investment Policy. Accordingly, a notice describing the changes discussed above was mailed to shareholders of record as of September 1, 2010. The new investment policy took effect on November 9, 2010. The Manager has been gradually repositioning each Fund’s portfolios over time, and during such period, each Fund may continue to hold a substantial portion of its assets in insured municipal bonds. At this time, the repositioning of each Fund’s portfolio is still taking place, and the Funds will continue to be subject to risks associated with investing a substantial portion of their assets in insured municipal bonds until the repositioning is complete. No action is required by shareholders of the Funds in connection with this change.
In connection with this change in non-fundamental policy, each of the Funds underwent a name change to reflect its new portfolio characteristics. Each Fund continues to trade on the New York Stock Exchange under its current ticker symbol.
The approved changes did not alter any Fund’s investment objective.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT |
JULY 31, 2011 |
65 |
|
|
|
|
|
Additional Information (concluded) |
|
|
|
BlackRock Privacy Principles |
BlackRock is committed to maintaining the privacy of its current and former fund investors and individual clients (collectively, “Clients”) and to safeguarding their non-public personal information. The following information is provided to help you understand what personal information BlackRock collects, how we protect that information and why in certain cases we share such information with select parties.
If you are located in a jurisdiction where specific laws, rules or regulations require BlackRock to provide you with additional or different privacy-related rights beyond what is set forth below, then BlackRock will comply with those specific laws, rules or regulations.
BlackRock obtains or verifies personal non-public information from and about you from different sources, including the following: (i) information we receive from you or, if applicable, your financial intermediary, on applications, forms or other documents; (ii) information about your transactions with us, our affiliates, or others; (iii) information we receive from a consumer reporting agency; and (iv) from visits to our websites.
BlackRock does not sell or disclose to non-affiliated third parties any non-public personal information about its Clients, except as permitted by law or as is necessary to respond to regulatory requests or to service Client accounts. These non-affiliated third parties are required to protect the confidentiality and security of this information and to use it only for its intended purpose.
We may share information with our affiliates to service your account or to provide you with information about other BlackRock products or services that may be of interest to you. In addition, BlackRock restricts access to non-public personal information about its Clients to those BlackRock employees with a legitimate business need for the information. BlackRock maintains physical, electronic and procedural safeguards that are designed to protect the non-public personal information of its Clients, including procedures relating to the proper storage and disposal of such information.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66 |
ANNUAL REPORT |
JULY 31, 2011 |
|
This report is transmitted to shareholders only. It is not a prospectus. Past performance results shown in this report should not be considered a representation of future performance. The Funds have leveraged their Common Shares, which creates risks for Common Shareholders, including the likelihood of greater volatility of net asset value and market price of the Common Shares and the risk that fluctuations in short-term dividend rates of the AMPS, currently set at the maximum reset rate as a result of failed auctions, may reduce the Common Shares’ yield. Statements and other information herein are as dated and are subject to change.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#MHMYINS5-7/11 |
|
|
Item 2 – |
Code of Ethics – The registrant (or the “Fund”) has adopted a code of ethics, as of the end of the period covered by this report, applicable to the registrant’s principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions. During the period covered by this report, there have been no amendments to or waivers granted under the code of ethics. A copy of the code of ethics is available without charge at www.blackrock.com. |
|
|
|
|
Item 3 – |
Audit Committee Financial Expert – The registrant’s board of directors (the “board of directors”), has determined that (i) the registrant has the following audit committee financial experts serving on its audit committee and (ii) each audit committee financial expert is independent: |
|
|
|
|
|
Frank J. Fabozzi |
|
|
James T. Flynn |
|
|
W. Carl Kester |
|
|
Karen P. Robards |
|
|
|
|
|
The registrant’s board of directors has determined that W. Carl Kester and Karen P. Robards qualify as financial experts pursuant to Item 3(c)(4) of Form N-CSR. |
|
|
|
|
|
Prof. Kester has a thorough understanding of generally accepted accounting principles, financial statements and internal control over financial reporting as well as audit committee functions. Prof. Kester has been involved in providing valuation and other financial consulting services to corporate clients since 1978. Prof. Kester’s financial consulting services present a breadth and level of complexity of accounting issues that are generally comparable to the breadth and complexity of issues that can reasonably be expected to be raised by the registrant’s financial statements. |
|
|
|
|
|
Ms. Robards has a thorough understanding of generally accepted accounting principles, financial statements and internal control over financial reporting as well as audit committee functions. Ms. Robards has been President of Robards & Company, a financial advisory firm, since 1987. Ms. Robards was formerly an investment banker for more than 10 years where she was responsible for evaluating and assessing the performance of companies based on their financial results. Ms. Robards has over 30 years of experience analyzing financial statements. She also is a member of the audit committee of one publicly held company and a non-profit organization. |
|
|
|
|
|
Under applicable securities laws, a person determined to be an audit committee financial expert will not be deemed an “expert” for any purpose, including without limitation for the purposes of Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933, as a result of being designated or identified as an audit committee financial expert. The designation or identification as an audit committee financial expert does not impose on such person any duties, obligations, or liabilities greater than the duties, obligations, and liabilities imposed on such person as a member of the audit committee and board of directors in the absence of such designation or identification. The designation or identification of a person as an audit committee financial expert does not affect the duties, obligations, or liability of any other member of the audit committee or board of directors. |
|
Item 4 – |
Principal Accountant Fees and Services |
|
|
|
|
|
The following table presents fees billed by Deloitte & Touche LLP (“D&T”) in each of the last two fiscal years for the services rendered to the Fund: |
|
|
(a) Audit Fees |
(b) Audit-Related Fees1 |
(c) Tax Fees2 |
(d) All Other Fees3 |
||||
|
Entity Name |
Current |
Previous |
Current |
Previous |
Current |
Previous |
Current |
Previous |
|
BlackRock MuniYield Michigan Quality Fund II, Inc. |
$29,800 |
$28,800 |
$1,000 |
$3,500 |
$10,800 |
$6,100 |
$0 |
$0 |
|
|
The following table presents fees billed by D&T that were required to be approved by the registrant’s audit committee (the “Committee”) for services that relate directly to the operations or financial reporting of the Fund and that are rendered on behalf of BlackRock Advisors, LLC (“Investment Adviser” or “BlackRock”) and entities controlling, controlled by, or under common control with BlackRock (not including any sub-adviser whose role is primarily portfolio management and is subcontracted with or overseen by another investment adviser) that provide ongoing services to the Fund (“Fund Service Providers”): |
|
|
Current Fiscal Year End |
Previous Fiscal Year End |
|
(b) Audit-Related Fees1 |
$0 |
$0 |
|
(c) Tax Fees2 |
$0 |
$0 |
|
(d) All Other Fees3 |
$3,030,000 |
$2,950,000 |
1 The nature of the services includes assurance and related services reasonably related to the performance of the audit of financial statements not included in Audit Fees.
2 The nature of the services includes tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning.
3 The nature of the services includes a review of the Fund’s compliance procedures and attestation thereto.
|
|
(e)(1) Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures: |
|
|
|
|
|
The Committee has adopted policies and procedures with regard to the pre-approval of services. Audit, audit-related and tax compliance services provided to the registrant on an annual basis require specific pre-approval by the Committee. The Committee also must approve other non-audit services provided to the registrant and those non-audit services provided to the Investment Adviser and Fund Service Providers that relate directly to the operations and the financial reporting of the registrant. Certain of these non-audit services that the Committee believes are a) consistent with the SEC’s auditor independence rules and b) routine and recurring services that will not impair the independence of the independent accountants may be approved by the Committee without consideration on a specific case-by-case basis (“general pre-approval”). The term of any general pre-approval is 12 months from the date of the pre-approval, unless the Committee provides for a different period. Tax or other non-audit services provided to the registrant which have a direct impact on the operations or financial reporting of the registrant will only be deemed pre-approved provided that any individual project does not exceed $10,000 attributable to the registrant or $50,000 per project. For this purpose, multiple projects will be aggregated to determine if they exceed the previously mentioned cost levels. |
|
|
Any proposed services exceeding the pre-approved cost levels will require specific pre-approval by the Committee, as will any other services not subject to general pre-approval (e.g., unanticipated but permissible services). The Committee is informed of each service approved subject to general pre-approval at the next regularly scheduled in-person board meeting. At this meeting, an analysis of such services is presented to the Committee for ratification. The Committee may delegate to the Committee Chairman the authority to approve the provision of and fees for any specific engagement of permitted non-audit services, including services exceeding pre-approved cost levels. |
|
|
|
|
|
(e)(2) None of the services described in each of Items 4(b) through (d) were approved by the Committee pursuant to the de minimis exception in paragraph (c)(7)(i)(C) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X. |
|
|
|
|
|
(f) Not Applicable |
|
|
|
|
|
(g) The aggregate non-audit fees paid to the accountant for services rendered by the accountant to the registrant, the Investment Adviser and the Fund Service Providers were: |
|
Entity Name |
Current Fiscal Year End |
Previous Fiscal Year End |
|
BlackRock MuniYield Michigan Quality Fund II, Inc. |
$11,800 |
$20,377 |
|
|
Additionally, SAS No. 70 fees for the current and previous fiscal years of $3,030,000 and $2,950,000, respectively, were billed by D&T to the Investment Adviser. |
|
|
|
|
|
(h) The Committee has considered and determined that the provision of non-audit services that were rendered to the Investment Adviser, and the Fund Service Providers that were not pre-approved pursuant to paragraph (c)(7)(ii) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X is compatible with maintaining the principal accountant’s independence. |
|
|
|
|
Item 5 – |
Audit Committee of Listed Registrants |
|
|
(a) |
The following individuals are members of the registrant’s separately-designated standing audit committee established in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78c(a)(58)(A)): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael Castellano |
|
|
|
Frank J. Fabozzi |
|
|
|
James T. Flynn |
|
|
|
W. Carl Kester |
|
|
|
Karen P. Robards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b) |
Not Applicable |
|
Item 6 – |
Investments |
|
|
(a) The registrant’s Schedule of Investments is included as part of the Report to Stockholders filed under Item 1 of this Form. |
|
|
(b) Not Applicable due to no such divestments during the semi-annual period covered since the previous Form N-CSR filing. |
|
Item 7 – |
Disclosure of Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures for Closed-End Management Investment Companies – The board of directors has delegated the voting of proxies for the Fund’s portfolio securities to the Investment Adviser pursuant to the Investment Adviser’s proxy voting guidelines. Under these guidelines, the Investment Adviser will vote proxies related to Fund securities in the best interests of the Fund and its stockholders. From time to time, a vote may present a conflict between the interests of the Fund’s stockholders, on the one hand, and those of the Investment Adviser, or any affiliated person of the Fund or the Investment Adviser, on the other. In such event, provided that the Investment Adviser’s Equity Investment Policy Oversight Committee, or a sub-committee thereof (the “Oversight Committee”) is aware of the real or potential conflict or material non-routine matter and if the Oversight Committee does not reasonably believe it is able to follow its general voting guidelines (or if the particular proxy matter is not addressed in the guidelines) and vote impartially, the Oversight Committee may retain an independent fiduciary to advise the Oversight Committee on how to vote or to cast votes on behalf of the Investment Adviser’s clients. If the Investment Adviser determines not to retain an independent fiduciary, or does not desire to follow the advice of such independent fiduciary, the Oversight Committee shall determine how to vote the proxy after consulting with the Investment Adviser’s Portfolio Management Group and/or the Investment Adviser’s Legal and Compliance Department and concluding that the vote cast is in its client’s best interest notwithstanding the conflict. A copy of the Fund’s Proxy Voting Policy and Procedures are attached as Exhibit 99.PROXYPOL. Information on how the Fund voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30 is available without charge, (i) at www.blackrock.com and (ii) on the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov. |
|
|
|
|
Item 8 – |
Portfolio Managers of Closed-End Management Investment Companies – as of July 31, 2011. |
|
|
(a)(1) |
The registrant is managed by a team of investment professionals comprised of F. Howard Downs, Director at BlackRock, Theodore R. Jaeckel, Jr., CFA, Managing Director at BlackRock, and Walter O’Connor, Managing Director at BlackRock. Each is a member of BlackRock’s municipal tax-exempt management group. Each is jointly responsible for the day-to-day management of the registrant’s portfolio, which includes setting the registrant’s overall investment strategy, overseeing the management of the registrant and/or selection of its investments. Messrs. Downs, Jaeckel and O’Connor have been members of the registrant’s portfolio management team since 2008, 2006 and 2006, respectively. |
|
Portfolio Manager |
Biography |
|
F. Howard Downs |
Director of BlackRock since 2004; Vice President of BlackRock, Inc. from 1999 to 2004. |
|
Theodore R. Jaeckel, Jr. |
Managing Director at BlackRock since 2006; Managing Director of Merrill Lynch Investment Managers, L.P. (“MLIM”) from 2005 to 2006; Director of MLIM from 1997 to 2005. |
|
Walter O’Connor |
Managing Director of BlackRock since 2006; Managing Director of MLIM from 2003 to 2006; Director of MLIM from 1998 to 2003. |
|
|
(a)(2) |
As of July 31, 2011: |
(ii) Number of Other Accounts Managed and Assets by Account Type |
(iii) Number of Other Accounts and Assets for Which Advisory Fee is Performance-Based |
|||||||
|
(i) Name of Portfolio Manager |
Other Registered Investment Companies |
Other Pooled Investment Vehicles |
Other Accounts |
Other Registered Investment Companies |
Other Pooled Investment Vehicles |
Other Accounts |
||
|
F. Howard Downs |
8 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
|
|
$1.5 Billion |
$0 |
$93.57 Million |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
||
|
Theodore R. Jaeckel, Jr. |
65 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
|
|
$20.39 Billion |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
||
|
Walter O’Connor |
64 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
|
|
$19.23 Billion |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
||
|
|
(iv) |
Potential Material Conflicts of Interest |
|
|
BlackRock, Inc. has built a professional working environment, firm-wide compliance culture and compliance procedures and systems designed to protect against potential incentives that may favor one account over another. BlackRock, Inc. has adopted policies and procedures that address the allocation of investment opportunities, execution of portfolio transactions, personal trading by employees and other potential conflicts of interest that are designed to ensure that all client accounts are treated equitably over time. Nevertheless, BlackRock, Inc. furnishes investment management and advisory services to numerous clients in addition to the Fund, and BlackRock, Inc. may, consistent with applicable law, make investment recommendations to other clients or accounts (including accounts which are hedge funds or have performance or higher fees paid to BlackRock, Inc., or in which portfolio managers have a personal interest in the receipt of such fees), which may be the same as or different from those made to the Fund. In addition, BlackRock, Inc., its affiliates and significant shareholders and any officer, director, shareholder or employee may or may not have an interest in the securities whose purchase and sale BlackRock, Inc. recommends to the Fund. BlackRock, Inc., or any of its affiliates or significant shareholders, or any officer, director, shareholder, employee or any member of their families may take different actions than those recommended to the Fund by BlackRock, Inc. with respect to the same securities. Moreover, BlackRock, Inc. may refrain from rendering any advice or services concerning securities of companies of which any of BlackRock, Inc.’s (or its affiliates’ or significant shareholders’) officers, directors or employees are directors or officers, or companies as to which BlackRock, Inc. or any of its affiliates or significant shareholders or the officers, directors and employees of any of them has any substantial economic interest or possesses material non-public information. Certain portfolio managers also may manage accounts whose investment strategies may at times be opposed to the strategy utilized for a fund. It should also be noted that a portfolio manager may be managing hedge fund and/or long only accounts, or may be part of a team managing hedge fund and/or long only accounts, subject to incentive fees. Such portfolio managers may therefore be entitled to receive a portion of any incentive fees earned on such accounts. Additional portfolio managers may in the future manage other such accounts or funds and may be entitled to receive incentive fees. |
|
|
As a fiduciary, BlackRock, Inc. owes a duty of loyalty to its clients and must treat each client fairly. When BlackRock, Inc. purchases or sells securities for more than one account, the trades must be allocated in a manner consistent with its fiduciary duties. BlackRock, Inc. attempts to allocate investments in a fair and equitable manner among client accounts, with no account receiving preferential treatment. To this end, BlackRock, Inc. has adopted policies that are intended to ensure reasonable efficiency in client transactions and provide BlackRock, Inc. with sufficient flexibility to allocate investments in a manner that is consistent with the particular investment discipline and client base, as appropriate. |
|
|
(a)(3) |
As of July 31, 2011: |
|
|
Portfolio Manager Compensation Overview |
|
|
|
|
|
BlackRock’s financial arrangements with its portfolio managers, its competitive compensation and its career path emphasis at all levels reflect the value senior management places on key resources. Compensation may include a variety of components and may vary from year to year based on a number of factors. The principal components of compensation include a base salary, a performance-based discretionary bonus, participation in various benefits programs and one or more of the incentive compensation programs established by BlackRock. |
|
|
|
|
|
Base compensation. Generally, portfolio managers receive base compensation based on their position with the firm. |
|
|
|
|
|
Discretionary Incentive Compensation. Discretionary incentive compensation is a function of several components: the performance of BlackRock, Inc., the performance of the portfolio manager’s group within BlackRock, the investment performance, including risk-adjusted returns, of the firm’s assets under management or supervision by that portfolio manager relative to predetermined benchmarks, and the individual’s performance and contribution to the overall performance of these portfolios and BlackRock. In most cases, these benchmarks are the same as the benchmark or benchmarks against which the performance of the Fund or other accounts managed by the portfolio managers are measured. BlackRock’s Chief Investment Officers determine the benchmarks against which the performance of funds and other accounts managed by each portfolio manager is compared and the period of time over which performance is evaluated. With respect to the portfolio managers, such benchmarks include a combination of market-based indices (e.g., Barclays Capital Municipal Bond Index), certain customized indices and certain fund industry peer groups. |
|
|
|
|
|
Among other things, BlackRock’s Chief Investment Officers make a subjective determination with respect to each portfolio manager’s compensation based on the performance of the Funds and other accounts managed by each portfolio manager relative to the various benchmarks. |
|
|
|
|
|
Performance of fixed income funds is measured on both a pre-tax and after-tax basis over various time periods including 1-, 3- and 5-year periods, as applicable. With respect to the performance of the other listed Index and Multi-Asset Funds, performance is measured on, among other things, a pre-tax basis over various time periods including 1-, 3- and 5-year periods, as applicable. |
|
|
Distribution of Discretionary Incentive Compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
Discretionary incentive compensation is distributed to portfolio managers in a combination of cash and BlackRock, Inc. restricted stock units which vest ratably over a number of years. For some portfolio managers, discretionary incentive compensation is also distributed in deferred cash awards that notionally track the returns of select BlackRock investment products they manage and that vest ratably over a number of years. The BlackRock, Inc. restricted stock units, upon vesting, will be settled in BlackRock, Inc. common stock. Typically, the cash bonus, when combined with base salary, represents more than 60% of total compensation for the portfolio managers. Paying a portion of annual bonuses in stock puts compensation earned by a portfolio manager for a given year “at risk” based on BlackRock’s ability to sustain and improve its performance over future periods. Providing a portion of annual bonuses in deferred cash awards that notionally track the BlackRock investment products they manage provides direct alignment with investment product results. |
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Term Incentive Plan Awards — From time to time long-term incentive equity awards are granted to certain key employees to aid in retention, align their interests with long-term shareholder interests and motivate performance. Equity awards are generally granted in the form of BlackRock, Inc. restricted stock units that, once vested, settle in BlackRock, Inc. common stock. Messrs. Downs, Jaeckel and O’Connor have each received long-term incentive awards. |
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred Compensation Program — A portion of the compensation paid to eligible BlackRock employees may be voluntarily deferred into an account that tracks the performance of certain of the firm’s investment products. Each participant in the deferred compensation program is permitted to allocate his deferred amounts among various BlackRock investment options. Messrs. Downs, Jaeckel and O’Connor have each participated in the deferred compensation program. |
|
|
|
|
|
Other compensation benefits. In addition to base compensation and discretionary incentive compensation, portfolio managers may be eligible to receive or participate in one or more of the following incentive savings plans. BlackRock, Inc. has created a variety of incentive savings plans in which BlackRock, Inc. employees are eligible to participate, including a 401(k) plan, the BlackRock Retirement Savings Plan (RSP), and the BlackRock Employee Stock Purchase Plan (ESPP). The employer contribution components of the RSP include a company match equal to 50% of the first 8% of eligible pay contributed to the plan capped at $5,000 per year, and a company retirement contribution equal to 3-5% of eligible compensation. The RSP offers a range of investment options, including registered investment companies and collective investment funds managed by the firm. BlackRock contributions follow the investment direction set by participants for their own contributions or, absent participant investment direction, are invested into an index target date fund that corresponds to, or is closest to, the year in which the participant attains age 65. The ESPP allows for investment in BlackRock, Inc. common stock at a 5% discount on the fair market value of the stock on the purchase date. Annual participation in the ESPP is limited to the purchase of 1,000 shares or a dollar value of $25,000. Each portfolio manager is eligible to participate in these plans. |
|
|
(a)(4) |
Beneficial Ownership of Securities – As of July 31, 2011. |
|
Portfolio Manager |
Dollar Range of Equity Securities |
|
F. Howard Downs |
None |
|
Theodore R. Jaeckel, Jr. |
None |
|
Walter O’Connor |
None |
|
|
(b) Not Applicable |
|
Item 9 – |
Purchases of Equity Securities by Closed-End Management Investment Company and Affiliated Purchasers – Not Applicable due to no such purchases during the period covered by this report. |
|
|
|
|
Item 10 – |
Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders – There have been no material changes to these procedures. |
|
|
|
|
Item 11 – |
Controls and Procedures |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) – The registrant’s principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, have concluded that the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 30a-3(c) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”)) are effective as of a date within 90 days of the filing of this report based on the evaluation of these controls and procedures required by Rule 30a-3(b) under the 1940 Act and Rule 13a-15(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. |
|
|
|
|
|
(b) – There were no changes in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 30a-3(d) under the 1940 Act) that occurred during the second fiscal quarter of the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. |
|
|
|
|
Item 12 – |
Exhibits attached hereto |
|
|
|
|
|
(a)(1) – Code of Ethics – See Item 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a)(2) – Certifications – Attached hereto |
|
|
|
|
|
(a)(3) – Not Applicable |
|
|
|
|
|
(b) – Certifications – Attached hereto |
|
|
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. |
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
BlackRock MuniYield Michigan Quality Fund II, Inc. |
||
|
|
|
||
| By: | /s/ John M. Perlowski | ||
| John M. Perlowski | |||
| Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) of | |||
| BlackRock MuniYield Michigan Quality Fund II, Inc. | |||
| Date: October 4, 2011 | |||
| Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated. | |||
| By: | /s/ John M. Perlowski | ||
| John M. Perlowski | |||
| Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) of | |||
| BlackRock MuniYield Michigan Quality Fund II, Inc. | |||
| Date: October 4, 2011 | |||
| By: | /s/ Neal J. Andrews | ||
| Neal J. Andrews | |||
| Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer) of | |||
| BlackRock MuniYield Michigan Quality Fund II, Inc. | |||
| Date: October 4, 2011 | |||