UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
(RULE 14a-101)
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(Amendment No. )
Filed by the Registrant ☒ Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ☐
Check the appropriate box:
☐ | Preliminary Proxy Statement | |||
☐ | Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) | |||
☒ | Definitive Proxy Statement | |||
☐ | Definitive Additional Materials | |||
☐ | Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12 | |||
Paychex, Inc. | ||||
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter) | ||||
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant) | ||||
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box): | ||||
☒ | No fee required. | |||
☐ | Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. | |||
(1) | Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
| |||
| ||||
(2) | Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
| |||
| ||||
(3) | Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
| |||
| ||||
(4) | Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
| |||
| ||||
(5) | Total fee paid: | |||
| ||||
☐ | Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. | |||
☐ | Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. | |||
(1) | Amount Previously Paid:
| |||
| ||||
(2) | Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
| |||
| ||||
(3) | Filing Party:
| |||
| ||||
(4) | Date Filed:
| |||
|
Paychex Shapes Bolder, Brighter Futures for Businesses
Mobile
Solutions
HR Centric
Compliance Confidence
getting it right
Scalable & agile
Growing the business
2017
PROXY
STATEMENT
AND NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
PAYCHEX ®
Our Purpose
We provide our clients the freedom to succeed.
Our Mission
We will be the leading provider of payroll, human resource, and employee benefit services by being an essential partner with Americas businesses.
Our Values
We act with uncompromising integrity.
We provide outstanding service and build trusted relationships.
We drive innovation in products and services and continually improve processes.
We work in partnership and support each other.
We are personally accountable and deliver on commitments.
We treat each other with respect and dignity.
About Paychex
Paychex, Inc. (NASDAQ: PAYX) is a leading provider of integrated human capital management solutions for payroll, human resources, retirement, and insurance services. By combining its innovative software-as-a-service technology and mobility platform with dedicated, personal service, Paychex empowers small- and medium-sized business owners to focus on the growth and management of their business. Backed by 45 years of industry expertise, Paychex serves approximately 605,000 payroll clients across more than 100 locations and pays one out of every 12 American private sector employees. Learn more about Paychex by visiting www.paychex.com, and stay connected on Twitter and LinkedIn.
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
ANNUAL MEETING INFORMATION
|
The principal business of the 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the Annual Meeting) will be:
1. To elect ten nominees to the Board of Directors for a term of one year;
2. To hold an advisory vote to approve named executive officer compensation;
3. To hold an advisory vote on the frequency of future advisory votes on named executive officer compensation;
4. To ratify the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP to serve as our independent registered public accounting firm; and
5. To transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment thereof.
Stockholders are cordially invited to attend the Annual Meeting. Stockholders of record at the close of business on August 14, 2017 will be entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting and at any adjournments or postponements thereof.
If you are unable to attend the Annual Meeting, you will be able to listen to the meeting via the Internet. We will broadcast the Annual Meeting as a live webcast through our website. Please note that you will not be able to vote or ask questions through the webcast. The webcast will be accessible at http://investor.paychex.com/webcasts and will remain available for replay for approximately one month following the meeting.
By Order of the Board of Directors Stephanie L. Schaeffer Corporate Secretary
September 8, 2017 | |
Wednesday, October 11, 2017
10:00 a.m. Eastern Time*
The Strong One Manhattan Square Rochester, NY 14607
* A continental breakfast will be available from 9:00 a.m. 10:00 a.m. Eastern Time
|
Important notice regarding the availability of proxy materials for the
2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on October 11, 2017:
Paychex, Inc.s Proxy Statement and Annual Report for the year ended May 31, 2017 are available at
http://investor.paychex.com/annual-report.aspx.
Welcome to the Paychex, Inc. 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders
VOTE YOUR SHARES
HOW TO VOTE
Your vote is very important and we hope that you will attend the Annual Meeting. You are eligible to vote if you were a stockholder of record at the close of business on August 14, 2017. Please read the proxy statement and vote right away using any of the following methods.
Stockholders of Record:
|
|
|
| |||||||||
VOTE BY INTERNET Visit the website listed on your proxy card. |
VOTE BY TELEPHONE Call the telephone number listed on your proxy card.
|
VOTE BY MAIL Sign, date, and return your proxy card in the enclosed envelope. |
VOTE VIA MOBILE DEVICE Scan this QR code. |
Make sure to have your proxy card or voting instruction card in hand and follow the instructions.
Beneficial Stockholders:
If you are a beneficial stockholder, you will receive instructions from your bank, broker, or other nominee that you must follow in order for your shares to be voted. Many of these institutions offer telephone and online voting. If you wish to vote in person at the Annual Meeting, you will need to obtain a legal proxy from your bank, broker, or other nominee to present when voting.
1 | ||||
3 | ||||
3 | ||||
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED MAY 31, 2017 |
9 | |||
13 | ||||
14 | ||||
15 | ||||
15 | ||||
16 | ||||
16 | ||||
18 | ||||
18 | ||||
Governance and Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation |
19 | |||
19 | ||||
20 | ||||
PROPOSAL 2: ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION |
21 | |||
23 | ||||
24 | ||||
42 | ||||
42 | ||||
45 | ||||
47 | ||||
48 | ||||
Potential Payments upon Termination or Change In Control Fiscal 2017 |
50 | |||
52 | ||||
PROPOSAL 4: RATIFICATION OF SELECTION OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM |
54 | |||
54 | ||||
56 | ||||
57 | ||||
A-1 | ||||
B-1 |
Proxy Summary |
This summary highlights information contained elsewhere in this proxy statement. This summary does not contain all of the information that you should consider and you should read the entire proxy statement before voting. For more complete information regarding the performance of Paychex, Inc. (the Company or Paychex) for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2017 (fiscal 2017), please review the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal 2017.
Paychex, Inc. 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders
|
October 11, 2017 10:00 a.m., Eastern Time |
|
The Strong |
Meeting Agenda and Voting Matters
Item |
Management Proposal | Board Vote Recommendation |
Page Reference (for more detail) | |||
Proposal 1 |
Election of directors for a one-year term | FOR each director nominee | 3 | |||
Proposal 2 |
Advisory vote to approve named executive officer compensation | FOR | 21 | |||
Proposal 3 |
Advisory vote on the frequency of future advisory votes on named executive officer compensation | ONE YEAR | 23 | |||
Proposal 4 |
Ratification of the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP to serve as our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm | FOR | 54 |
Fiscal 2017 Business Highlights
For the fiscal year ended May 31, | |||||||||||||||
$ in millions, except per share amounts |
2017 | 2016 | % Change | ||||||||||||
Service revenue |
$ | 3,101 | $ | 2,906 | 7 | % | |||||||||
Operating income |
$ | 1,240 | $ | 1,147 | 8 | % | |||||||||
Net income |
$ | 817 | $ | 757 | 8 | % | |||||||||
Stock price (high/low) (1) |
$ | 63.03/$52.78 | $ | 54.78/$41.59 | 15%/27 | % | |||||||||
Stock price as of fiscal year end |
$ | 59.23 | $ | 54.22 | 9 | % |
(1) | Based on 52-week high and low sale prices as reported on the NASDAQ Global Select Market as of May 31, 2017 and 2016. |
Paychex has also focused on returning value to our stockholders and continued with shareholder-friendly actions during fiscal 2017. In July 2016, the Company increased its quarterly dividend by 10% to $0.46 per share. In July 2017, the Company again increased its quarterly dividend by $0.04 per share, or 9%, to $0.50 per share. The Company continued to repurchase its common stock opportunistically and in fiscal 2017 repurchased 2.9 million shares for $166.2 million.
Paychex, Inc. 2017 Proxy Statement 1 |
Proxy Summary |
Pay-for-Performance
Key features of the executive compensation program that tie compensation to the Companys performance are:
| A significant portion of annual compensation is at risk based on performance. For the President and Chief Executive Officer, 89% of his total target compensation is at risk. On average for other named executive officers (NEOs), 85% of their total target compensation is at risk. |
| Variable compensation is comprised of an annual cash incentive program and longer-term equity-based incentives. For the annual cash incentive for fiscal 2017, results for certain performance metrics were less than target, resulting in payouts below target. |
| Annual grants of performance shares in July 2015 reached the end of the two-year performance period in May 2017. Achievement was slightly below target. The shares earned are restricted for an additional one-year period. |
For more information on compensation for our NEOs and how it ties to performance, refer to the Compensation Discussion and Analysis and Named Executive Officer Compensation sections of this proxy statement.
Additional Information
Please refer to the Frequently Asked Questions section beginning on page 57 for important information about proxy materials, voting, Annual Meeting procedures, Company documents, communications, and the deadlines to submit stockholder proposals for the 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. Additionally, questions may be directed to Investor Relations at (800) 828-4411 or by written request to 911 Panorama Trail South, Rochester, NY 14625, Attention: Investor Relations. General information regarding the meeting and links to key documents can be found on the 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders web page at http://investor.paychex.com/annual-meeting.aspx.
Paychex, Inc. 2017 Proxy Statement 2 |
Election of Directors |
Paychex, Inc.
911 Panorama Trail South
Rochester, NY 14625
Paychex, Inc. (Paychex, the Company, we, us, or our), a Delaware corporation, is furnishing this proxy statement to stockholders in connection with the solicitation of proxies on behalf of the Board of Directors of the Company (the Board) for the 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the Annual Meeting). This proxy statement summarizes information concerning the matters to be presented at the Annual Meeting and related information to help stockholders make an informed vote. Distribution of this proxy statement and a form of proxy to stockholders is scheduled to begin on or about September 8, 2017.
PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS FOR A ONE-YEAR TERM
Proposal Snapshot
What am I voting on?
Stockholders are being asked to elect ten director nominees for a one-year term. This section includes information about the Board and each director nominee.
Voting Recommendation
The Board recommends a vote FOR each of the ten director nominees.
The Board is elected by the stockholders to oversee the overall success of the Company, review its operational and financial capabilities, and periodically assess its long-term strategic objectives. The Board serves as the ultimate decision-making body of the Company, except for those matters reserved to stockholders. The Board selects and oversees the members of senior management, who are charged by the Board with conducting the day-to-day business of the Company. The Board acts as an advisor to senior management and ultimately monitors managements performance.
Election Process
The Companys By-Laws provide for the annual election of directors. The By-Laws provide that each director shall be elected by a majority of the votes cast for the director at any meeting held for the election of directors at which a quorum is present. If a nominee that is an incumbent director does not receive a required majority of the votes cast, the director shall offer to tender his or her resignation to the Board. The Governance and Compensation Committee (the G&C Committee) shall consider such offer and will make a recommendation to the Board on whether to accept or reject the resignation, or whether other action should be taken. The Board will consider the G&C Committees recommendation and will determine whether to accept such offer.
2017 Nominees for Director
At the 2017 Annual Meeting, there are ten nominees for election as director, as listed on the following pages. Each of the nominees is a current member of the Board. The ten persons listed have been nominated for election to the Board by the Companys G&C Committee. The nominees, with the exception of Mr. Golisano and Mr. Mucci, are independent under both the NASDAQ Stock Market (NASDAQ) and Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) director independence standards. If elected, each nominee will hold office until his or her successor is elected and has qualified or until his or her earlier resignation or removal. We believe that all of the nominees will be available to serve as a director. However, if any nominee should become unable to serve, the persons named in the enclosed proxy may exercise discretionary authority to vote for substitute nominees proposed by the Board.
Paychex, Inc. 2017 Proxy Statement 3 |
Election of Directors |
The Board believes that the combination of the various qualifications, skills, and experience of the 2017 director nominees will continue to contribute to an effective and well-functioning Board. We have provided biographical information on each of the nominees. Included within this information, we identify and describe the key experience, qualifications, and skills our directors bring to the Board that are important in light of our business and structure.
The Board recommends the election of each of the director nominees identified on the following pages. Unless otherwise directed, the persons named in the enclosed proxy will vote the proxy FOR the election of each of these director nominees.
Summary of Director Nominees
Our Board is composed of accomplished professionals, with diverse areas of expertise, who are well-equipped to oversee the success of the business and effectively represent the interests of stockholders. The G&C Committee believes that all directors should: possess the highest personal and professional ethics; share the values of the Company; have relevant experience; be accomplished in their field; and show innovative and sound business judgment. The Board has identified particular qualifications, attributes, skills, and experience that are important to be represented on the Board as a whole, in light of the Companys business and current needs. The Board believes the combination of the various qualifications, attributes, skills, and experience of the director nominees contribute to a well-functioning and effective Board.
Paychex, Inc. 2017 Proxy Statement 4 |
Election of Directors |
B. Thomas Golisano Founder and Chairman of the Board of Paychex, Inc.
|
Age 75
Director since 1979
Board Committees: Executive
Current Public Company Directorships: Twinlab Consolidated Holdings, Inc.
|
Mr. Golisano founded Paychex in 1971 and is Chairman of the Board of the Company. He served as President and Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of the Company until October 2004. He serves on the board of trustees of the Rochester Institute of Technology. Mr. Golisano serves as a director of numerous non-profit organizations and private companies, and is founder and member of the board of trustees of the B. Thomas Golisano Foundation.
|
|||
SPECIFIC QUALIFICATIONS AND SKILLS: The Board has concluded that Mr. Golisano is qualified to lead the Board due to his relevant executive leadership experience and extensive knowledge of the operations of the Company. These skills were attained through his role of founder and former Chief Executive Officer of Paychex.
|
||||
Thomas F. Bonadio Managing Partner of The Bonadio Group
|
||||
Age 68
Director since January 2017
Board Committees: Audit Corporate Development Advisory
Current Public Company Directorships: CurAegis Technologies (formerly Torvec, Inc.) |
Mr. Bonadio is the founder of The Bonadio Group, the largest independent provider of accounting, business advisory, and financial services in New York State outside of Manhattan. Mr. Bonadio has experience serving on publicly traded boards and is currently a director and chair of the audit committee for CurAegis Technologies, formerly Torvec, Inc. He also previously served as a director and audit committee chair for Conceptus, Inc. which is now a wholly owned subsidiary of Bayer AH of Germany, until June 2013.
|
|||
SPECIFIC QUALIFICATIONS AND SKILLS: The Board has concluded that Mr. Bonadio is qualified to serve as a director of the Company due to his strong background in finance and business, his entrepreneurial experience, and his knowledge of the Certified Public Accountant community. Mr. Bonadio is a successful entrepreneur whose experience building his own business is representative of many clients Paychex serves today. He also brings a high degree of financial literacy obtained from his years in the financial services industry, and his ability to assess financial performance of other companies through the review and understanding of financial statements. This financial expertise is a great benefit to the Board and its committees.
|
||||
Joseph G. Doody Vice Chairman of Staples, Inc.
|
||||
Age 65
Director since 2010
Board Committees: Audit
Current Public Company Directorships: Casella Waste Systems, Inc. Virtusa Corporation |
Mr. Doody has served as Vice Chairman of Staples, Inc., an office products company, since February 2014. Previously with Staples, Inc., he served as President, North American Commercial, from January 2013 until February 2014, and President, North American Delivery, from March 2002 to January 2013. Mr. Doody will be retiring from Staples, Inc. effective September 30, 2017. Mr. Doody has experience serving on other public boards, including Casella Waste Systems, Inc. and Virtusa Corporation, which he joined in February 2017. Mr. Doody is Chair of the Foundation Board at the College of Brockport.
|
|||
SPECIFIC QUALIFICATIONS AND SKILLS: The Board has concluded that Mr. Doody is qualified to serve as a director of the Company due to his significant leadership and international experience. His management of a large division of a multinational company enables him to provide our Board with important operational expertise. In addition, his deep knowledge of small- to medium-sized businesses brings a thorough understanding of the risks and opportunities affecting the Companys clients and potential clients. Mr. Doody also has extensive experience in strategic planning and business development, which allows him to provide valuable input into the Companys plans for market growth.
|
||||
Paychex, Inc. 2017 Proxy Statement 5 |
Election of Directors |
David J.S. Flaschen Investor and Advisor
|
||||
Age 61
Director since 1999
Board Committees: Audit (Chair) Investment Corporate Development Advisory G&C
Current Public Company Directorships: Informa plc (London Stock Exchange)
|
Mr. Flaschen is an investor and advisor to a number of private companies providing business, marketing, and information services. Mr. Flaschen is also the co-founder of Tap Quality, LLC, which specializes in mobile and Internet lead generation for the solar energy industry, and Regrub, LLC, a Smashburger franchisee group in the United States (U.S.) From 2005 to 2011, he was a partner with Castanea Partners, a private equity investment firm. Mr. Flaschen is a director of various private companies and of Informa plc, a public company which is traded on the London Stock Exchange.
|
|||
SPECIFIC QUALIFICATIONS AND SKILLS: The Board has concluded that Mr. Flaschen is qualified to serve as a director of the Company as a result of his extensive executive experience in information and marketing services. Over the course of his career, Mr. Flaschen has worked internationally with a number of businesses, including Thomson Financial and AC Nielson. He also brings a high degree of financial literacy obtained from his years in the financial services industry, and his ability to assess financial performance of other companies through review and understanding of financial statements. This financial expertise is a great benefit to the Board and its committees.
|
||||
Phillip Horsley Founder of Horsley Bridge Partners
|
||||
Age 78
Director since 2011 (previously served from 1982-2009, reappointed in 2011)
Board Committees: Investment G&C
Current Public Company Directorships: None
|
Mr. Horsley is the founder of Horsley Bridge Partners, a leading manager of private equity investments for institutional clients. The firm was founded in 1983 and Mr. Horsley served there until his retirement in 2010.
|
|||
SPECIFIC QUALIFICATIONS AND SKILLS: The Board has concluded that Mr. Horsley is qualified to serve as a director of the Company due to his strong background in finance and business and his expertise in investment management. His investment experience is particularly valuable in Investment Committee decisions. In addition, Mr. Horsley has acquired an extensive knowledge of the Companys history and operating environment via his long-term relationship with the Company.
|
||||
Grant M. Inman Founder and General Partner of Inman Investment Management
|
||||
Age 75
Director since 1983
Board Committees: Investment (Chair) Audit G&C
Current Public Company Directorships: None
|
Mr. Inman is the founder and General Partner of Inman Investment Management, a private investment company formed in 1998. Mr. Inman is a trustee of the University of California, Berkeley Foundation and is also a director of several private companies. Mr. Inman was the independent lead director for Lam Research Corporation until November 2015.
|
|||
SPECIFIC QUALIFICATIONS AND SKILLS: The Board has concluded that Mr. Inman is qualified to serve as a director of the Company due to his strong background in finance and business, and his entrepreneurial experience. His expertise in assessing financial performance of other companies is also beneficial. In addition, Mr. Inmans tenure on the Board provides him with extensive knowledge of the Company. Mr. Inman brings a diverse perspective to the Board from his experience in venture capital and investment.
|
||||
Paychex, Inc. 2017 Proxy Statement 6 |
Election of Directors |
Martin Mucci President and Chief Executive Officer of Paychex, Inc.
|
||||
Age 57
Director since 2010
Board Committees: Executive (Chair) Corporate Development Advisory
Current Public Company Directorships: None |
Mr. Mucci has served as President and CEO of the Company since September 2010. Mr. Mucci joined the Company in 2002 as Senior Vice President (SVP), Operations. Prior to joining Paychex, he held senior level positions with Frontier Communications, a telecommunications company, including President of Telephone Operations and CEO of Frontier Telephone of Rochester, over the course of his 20-year career. Mr. Mucci was a member of the Board of Directors of Cbeyond, Inc. until it was purchased by Birch Communications in July 2014. He is a member of the Upstate New York Regional Advisory Board of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York and is a Trustee Emeritus of St. John Fisher College.
|
|||
SPECIFIC QUALIFICATIONS AND SKILLS: The Board has concluded that Mr. Mucci is qualified to serve as a director of the Company because he provides day-to-day leadership as the current CEO of Paychex, giving him extensive knowledge of the Company, its operations, challenges, and opportunities. In addition, Mr. Muccis educational background provides him with strong financial literacy.
|
||||
Joseph M. Tucci Founder and Co-Chief Executive Officer and Co-Chairman of GTY Technology Holdings, Inc.
|
||||
Age 70
Director since 2000
Lead Independent Director
Board committees: G&C (Chair) Executive
Current Public Company Directorships: Motorola Solutions, Inc. |
Mr. Tucci is the founder of GTY Technology Holdings Inc., a special purpose acquisitions company, and has been its Co-Chief Executive Officer and Co-Chairman since September 2016. He has been Chairman of Bridge Growth Partners, LLC, a private equity firm based in New York, since October 2016. Mr. Tucci was the former Chairman of the Board of Directors and CEO of EMC Corporation. He was EMCs Chairman from January 2006 and CEO from January 2001 until September 2016, when Dell Technologies acquired the company. He was Chairman of the Board of Directors for VMWare, Inc. from 2007 through September 2016. He has served on the Board of Directors of Motorola Solutions, Inc. since May 2017, and serves on the boards of various academic and community organizations.
|
|||
SPECIFIC QUALIFICATIONS AND SKILLS: The Board has concluded that Mr. Tucci is qualified to serve as a director of the Company due to his extensive executive leadership experience as Chief Executive Officer of EMC Corporation. Mr. Tucci has spent over 40 years in the technology industry in senior roles at large, complex, and global technology companies. His experience leading EMC through a period of dramatic revitalization, growth and market share gains, and new product introductions enables him to share knowledge of the challenges a company faces due to rapid changes in the marketplace.
|
||||
Paychex, Inc. 2017 Proxy Statement 7 |
Election of Directors |
Joseph M. Velli Retired Financial Services and Technology Executive
|
||||
Age 59
Director since 2007
Board committees: Investment Executive Corporate Development Advisory (Chair) G&C
Current Public Company Directorships: Computershare Ltd. (Australian Stock Exchange) (Remuneration Committee Chairman) |
Mr. Velli previously served as Senior Executive Vice President of The Bank of New York and as a member of the Senior Policy Committee. During his 22-year tenure with The Bank of New York, Mr. Vellis responsibilities included heading Global Issuer Services, Global Custody and related Investor Services, Global Liquidity Services, Pension and 401(k) Services, Consumer and Retail Banking, Correspondent Clearing, and Securities Services. Most recently, he served as Chairman and CEO of ConvergEx Group, LLC, a provider of brokerage, software products and technology services from 2006 to December 2013, and continued to serve on the ConvergEx Board until May 2014. From time to time, he also provides advisory services to private equity firms. Mr. Velli currently serves on the Board of Directors of Computershare Ltd. and he joined the Scivantage Board in January 2016. Mr. Velli served on the Board of Directors of E*TRADE Financial Corporation and E*TRADE Bank until October 2014. Mr. Velli was appointed to the board of trustees for William Paterson University in June 2017.
|
|||
SPECIFIC QUALIFICATIONS AND SKILLS: The Board has concluded that Mr. Velli is qualified to serve as a director of the Company due to his extensive experience with securities servicing, capital markets, business to business, marketing, and mergers and acquisitions matters, as well as his public board experience. He plays a key role in the Boards discussions of the Companys investments and liquidity. Mr. Velli has extensive experience with acquisitions and business services, providing valuable insights on potential growth opportunities for the Company.
|
||||
Kara Wilson Chief Marketing Officer of Rubrik, Inc.
|
||||
Age 47
Director since July 2017
Board committees: Audit
Current Public Company Directorships: None |
Ms. Wilson is Chief Marketing Officer at Rubrik, Inc., a cloud data management company, since June 2017. She has 20+ years experience in driving go-to-market strategies for large, medium, and hyper-growth start ups. She has held marketing leadership roles with some of the technology industrys most influential companies, including Cisco, SAP, SuccessFactors, PeopleSoft/Oracle, Okta, and FireEye. Prior to Rubrik, Ms. Wilson was Executive Vice President and Chief Marketing Officer of cyber security company FireEye, where she helped launch the most successful security initial public offering in market history and was responsible for the companys global marketing initiatives including corporate, product, and technical marketing, global communications, and field enablement. Ms. Wilson is a graduate of the University of California, Berkeley.
|
|||
SPECIFIC QUALIFICATIONS AND SKILLS: The Board has concluded that Ms. Wilson is qualified to serve as a director of the Company due to her extensive experience in driving go-to-market strategies for enterprise technology companies. The Board can leverage Ms. Wilsons marketing experience to help Paychex with the development and execution of go-to-market strategies to effectively differentiate the Company in a highly competitive and constantly evolving industry. Ms. Wilson has experience at global companies and can provide insight on any expansion of the Companys global presence.
|
||||
Paychex, Inc. 2017 Proxy Statement 8 |
Director Compensation |
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED MAY 31, 2017
Director compensation is set by the G&C Committee and approved by the Board. The Boards authority cannot be delegated to another party. The Companys management does not play a role in setting Board compensation. The Company compensates the independent directors of the Board using a combination of cash and equity-based compensation. Martin Mucci, President and CEO, receives no compensation for his services as director. Rather, the compensation received by Mr. Mucci in his role as President and CEO is shown in the Fiscal 2017 Summary Compensation Table, contained in the Named Executive Officer Compensation section of this proxy statement.
Board compensation is approved by the G&C Committee in January for the upcoming calendar year. In January 2017, the annual cash retainer applicable to all independent directors was increased from $75,000 to $80,000. The Audit Committee Chair and G&C Committee Chair annual retainers were each increased by $2,000 to $22,000 and $14,500, respectively. In addition, a $2,000 annual retainer was established for both the Investment Committee Chair and the Corporate Development Advisory Committee Chair. In January 2017, the total estimated value of equity-based compensation for independent directors was increased from approximately $125,000 to approximately $130,000. These changes to Board compensation were made based on a review of Peer Group benchmarking information provided to the G&C Committee by its independent compensation consultant.
Mr. Golisano, who is not an independent director, receives an annual retainer of $300,000 for his services as Chairman of the Board, paid in quarterly installments.
The table below presents the total compensation received from the Company by all directors except Mr. Mucci for fiscal year ended May 31, 2017 (fiscal 2017).
Name (a) |
Fees Earned (b) |
Stock Awards (c) |
Option Awards (d) |
Total | ||||||||||||||||
B. Thomas Golisano | $ | 300,000 | $ | | $ | | $ | 300,000 | ||||||||||||
Thomas F. Bonadio (1) | $ | 47,500 | $ | 32,456 | $ | 32,149 | $ | 112,105 | ||||||||||||
Joseph G. Doody | $ | 87,500 | $ | 65,983 | $ | 59,991 | $ | 213,474 | ||||||||||||
David J.S. Flaschen | $ | 126,000 | $ | 65,983 | $ | 59,991 | $ | 251,974 | ||||||||||||
Phillip Horsley | $ | 90,000 | $ | 65,983 | $ | 59,991 | $ | 215,974 | ||||||||||||
Grant M. Inman | $ | 101,000 | $ | 65,983 | $ | 59,991 | $ | 226,974 | ||||||||||||
Pamela A. Joseph (2) | $ | 72,500 | $ | 65,983 | $ | 59,991 | $ | 198,474 | ||||||||||||
Joseph M. Tucci | $ | 99,750 | $ | 65,983 | $ | 59,991 | $ | 225,724 | ||||||||||||
Joseph M. Velli | $ | 101,000 | $ | 65,983 | $ | 59,991 | $ | 226,974 |
(1) | Mr. Bonadio was appointed to the Board in January 2017. |
(2) | Ms. Joseph resigned from the Board in March 2017. |
Paychex, Inc. 2017 Proxy Statement 9 |
Director Compensation |
Fees Earned or Paid in Cash (Column (b))
The amounts reported in this column reflect the annual cash compensation paid to the directors during fiscal 2017, whether or not such fees were deferred. Annual cash compensation for directors is comprised solely of annual retainers, which are paid in quarterly installments. These retainers are paid for participation on the Board with separate retainers for committee membership. In addition to their committee membership retainers, the committee chairs (with the exception of the Executive Committee) receive additional retainers in recognition for their time contributed in preparation for committee meetings. The annual retainers in effect for calendar years 2017 and 2016 are as follows:
Compensation Element |
2017 |
2016 | ||||||||
Annual cash retainer, applicable to all independent directors | $ | 80,000 | $ | 75,000 | ||||||
Audit Committee member annual retainer | $ | 10,000 | $ | 10,000 | ||||||
G&C Committee member annual retainer | $ | 7,500 | $ | 7,500 | ||||||
Investment Committee member annual retainer | $ | 5,000 | $ | 5,000 | ||||||
Executive Committee member annual retainer | $ | 5,000 | $ | 5,000 | ||||||
Corporate Development Advisory Committee member annual retainer | $ | 5,000 | $ | 5,000 | ||||||
Audit Committee Chair annual retainer (1) | $ | 22,000 | $ | 20,000 | ||||||
G&C Committee Chair annual retainer (1) | $ | 14,500 | $ | 12,500 | ||||||
Corporate Development Advisory Committee Chair annual retainer (1) | $ | 2,000 | $ | | ||||||
Investment Committee Chair annual retainer (1) | $ | 2,000 | $ | |
(1) | The committee Chair receives the Chair annual retainer in addition to the respective committee retainer. |
Equity Awards: Stock Awards (Column (c)) and Option Awards (Column (d))
The amounts reported in these columns reflect the grant-date fair value of restricted stock awards and stock option awards, respectively, granted to each director, and do not reflect whether the recipient has actually received a financial gain from these awards (such as a lapse in the restrictions on a restricted stock award or by exercising stock options). For fiscal 2017, the equity-based compensation structure for independent directors was based on a total value of approximately $125,000 per director, with approximately 50% awarded in the form of stock options and 50% in the form of restricted stock. In July 2016, all independent directors, with the exception of Mr. Bonadio, received an annual equity award under the Paychex, Inc. 2002 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended and restated October 14, 2015 (the 2002 Plan) as follows:
Restricted Stock Awards | Stock Option Awards | |||||||
Grant Date | July 7, 2016 | July 7, 2016 | ||||||
Exercise Price | NA | $60.59 | ||||||
Quantity | 1,089 | 10,220 | ||||||
Fair Value (1) | $60.59 | $5.87 | ||||||
Vesting Schedule | On the first anniversary of the date of grant. | On the first anniversary of the date of grant. | ||||||
Certain Restrictions | Shares may not be sold during the directors tenure as a member of the Board, except as necessary to satisfy tax obligations. | n/a | ||||||
Other (2) | Upon the discretion of the Board, unvested shares may be accelerated in whole or in part for certain events including, but not limited to, director retirement. | Unvested options outstanding upon the retirement of a Board member will be canceled. |
(1) | The fair value of restricted stock awards is determined based on the closing price of the underlying common stock on the date of grant. The fair value of stock option awards is determined using a Black-Scholes option pricing model. The assumptions used in determining the July 7, 2016 fair value of $5.87 per share for these stock options were: risk-free rate of 1.3%; dividend yield of 3.6%; volatility factor of 0.18; and expected option term life of 6.5 years. |
(2) | Retirement eligibility for this purpose begins at age 55 or older with ten years of service as a member of the Board. |
Paychex, Inc. 2017 Proxy Statement 10 |
Director Compensation |
Mr. Bonadio received a prorated equity award, granted January 15, 2017, upon his appointment to the Board. He received 528 restricted stock awards at a fair value of $61.47 per share and 4,404 stock options with an exercise price of $61.47 per share and a fair value of $7.30 per share. All other terms of these awards are consistent with the July 2016 annual equity grants to the independent directors. The assumptions used in determining the January 15, 2017 fair value of $7.30 per share for his stock options were: risk-free rate of 2.3%; dividend yield of 3.3%; volatility factor of 0.17; and expected option term life of 6.5 years.
As of May 31, 2017, each independent director had the following equity awards outstanding:
Director | Restricted Stock Outstanding (Shares) |
Stock Options Outstanding (Shares) | ||||||||
Thomas F. Bonadio | 528 | 4,404 | ||||||||
Joseph G. Doody | 1,089 | 21,709 | ||||||||
David J.S. Flaschen | 1,089 | 85,171 | ||||||||
Phillip Horsley | 1,089 | 71,235 | ||||||||
Grant M. Inman | 1,089 | 78,921 | ||||||||
Pamela A. Joseph (1) | | 68,701 | ||||||||
Joseph M. Tucci | 1,089 | 97,421 | ||||||||
Joseph M. Velli | 1,089 | 91,421 |
(1) | Ms. Joseph resigned from the Board in March 2017. |
Deferred Compensation Plan
We maintain a non-qualified and unfunded deferred compensation plan in which all independent directors are eligible to participate. Directors may elect to defer up to 100% of their Board cash compensation. The Company does not contribute to this plan. Gains and losses are credited based on the participants selection of a variety of designated investment choices, which the participant may change at any time. We do not match any participant deferral or guarantee a certain rate of return. The interest rates earned on these investments are not above-market or preferential. Refer to the Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation table and discussion within the Named Executive Officer Compensation section of this proxy statement for a listing of investment funds available to participants and the annual rates of return on those funds. During fiscal 2017, no independent directors deferred compensation under the plan.
Benefits
We reimburse each director for expenses associated with attendance at Board and committee meetings.
Stock Ownership Guidelines
The G&C Committee set stock ownership guidelines for our independent directors with a value of five times his or her annual Board retainer, not including any committee or committee chair retainers. The ownership guidelines were established to provide long-term alignment with stockholders interests. The independent directors are expected to attain the ownership guideline within five years after the later of first becoming a director or the initial adoption of the guideline. Directors must hold underlying stock received through restricted stock awards until their service on the Board is complete, with the exception of those shares sold as necessary to satisfy tax obligations. For the purpose of achieving the ownership guideline, restricted stock awarded to the directors is included. All independent directors are currently compliant with the stock ownership guidelines.
Paychex, Inc. 2017 Proxy Statement 11 |
Director Compensation |
Prohibition on Hedging or Speculating In Company Stock
Directors must adhere to strict standards with regards to trading in Paychex stock. Also, the Company prohibits directors from hedging Paychex stock. They may not, among other things:
| speculatively trade in Paychex stock; |
| short sell any securities of the Company; or |
| buy or sell puts or calls on the Companys securities. |
Pledging of Company Stock
The Company has a pledging policy for all Paychex directors, officers, and employees. This policy prohibits pledging Company securities as collateral for a loan or a line of credit without obtaining prior Company approval. Approval may be granted when the individual clearly demonstrates the intent and financial capacity to satisfy the obligations without resort to the pledged securities and where the total pledge represents no more than 25% of the pledgors beneficial ownership interest in the Company. The Companys pledging policy is posted on the Companys website at http://investor.paychex.com/governance.
Paychex, Inc. 2017 Proxy Statement 12 |
Beneficial Ownership |
BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP OF PAYCHEX COMMON STOCK
The following table contains information, as of July 31, 2017, on the beneficial ownership of the Companys common stock by:
| each principal stockholder known to be a beneficial owner of more than 5% of the Companys common stock. This includes any group as that term is used in Section 13(d)(3) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act); |
| each director and nominee for director; |
| each of the Companys named executive officers (NEOs); and |
| all directors, NEOs, and executive officers of the Company as a group. |
Under the rules of the SEC, beneficial ownership is deemed to include shares for which the individual, directly or indirectly, has or shares voting or disposition power, whether or not they are held for the individuals benefit, and includes shares that may be acquired within 60 days by exercise of options. This information is based upon reports filed by such persons with the SEC.
Name | Amount of Shares Owned (1) |
Non-vested Shares of Restricted Stock (2) |
Stock Options Exercisable by September 29, 2017 (3) |
Total Shares Beneficially Owned |
Percent of Class | ||||||||||||||||||||
Principal Shareholders: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
B. Thomas Golisano (4),(5),(6) 1 Fishers Road Pittsford, NY 14534 |
37,930,131 | | | 37,930,131 | 10.5 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
BlackRock, Inc. (7) 55 East 52nd Street New York, NY 10055 |
|
25,127,647 |
| | |
25,127,647 |
|
6.9 |
% | ||||||||||||||||
Vanguard Group Inc. (8) PO Box 2600 V26 Valley Forge, PA 19482-2600 |
|
23,043,348 |
| | |
23,043,348 |
6.4 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Directors: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
B. Thomas Golisano (4),(5),(6) | 37,930,131 | | | 37,930,131 | 10.5 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
Thomas F. Bonadio | 9,700 | 1,667 | | 11,367 | * | * | |||||||||||||||||||
Joseph G. Doody | 13,393 | 1,139 | 21,709 | 36,241 | * | * | |||||||||||||||||||
David J.S. Flaschen | 38,998 | 1,139 | 85,171 | 125,308 | * | * | |||||||||||||||||||
Phillip Horsley (6) | 108,951 | 1,139 | 71,235 | 181,325 | * | * | |||||||||||||||||||
Grant M. Inman (6) | 211,309 | 1,139 | 78,921 | 291,369 | * | * | |||||||||||||||||||
Martin Mucci | 210,668 | 71,745 | 1,365,952 | 1,648,365 | * | * | |||||||||||||||||||
Joseph M. Tucci | 47,621 | 1,139 | 91,421 | 140,181 | * | * | |||||||||||||||||||
Joseph M. Velli | 21,624 | 1,139 | 91,421 | 114,184 | * | * | |||||||||||||||||||
Kara Wilson | | 1,139 | | 1,139 | * | * | |||||||||||||||||||
Named Executive Officers: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Martin Mucci | 210,668 | 71,745 | 1,365,952 | 1,648,365 | * | * | |||||||||||||||||||
Efrain Rivera | 44,551 | 16,804 | 383,488 | 444,843 | * | * | |||||||||||||||||||
Mark A. Bottini | 37,487 | 15,529 | 279,205 | 332,221 | * | * | |||||||||||||||||||
John B. Gibson | 12,340 | 15,418 | 215,383 | 243,141 | * | * | |||||||||||||||||||
Michael E. Gioja (5) | 45,556 | 15,418 | 309,092 | 370,066 | * | * | |||||||||||||||||||
All directors, NEOs, and executive officers of the Company as a group (17 persons) | 38,819,198 | 166,270 | 3,505,965 | 42,491,433 | 11.7 | % |
Paychex, Inc. 2017 Proxy Statement 13 |
Beneficial Ownership |
** | Indicates that percentage is less than 1%. |
(1) | This column reflects shares held of record and Company shares owned through a bank, broker, or other holder of record. For executive officers, this also includes shares owned through the Paychex, Inc. 401(k) Incentive Retirement Plan (the 401(k) Plan). |
(2) | This column includes restricted stock awards to independent directors and executive officers that have not yet vested. These non-vested restricted stock awards have voting and dividend rights, and thus are included in beneficial ownership. |
(3) | This column includes shares that may be acquired upon exercise of options, which are exercisable on or prior to September 29, 2017. Under SEC rules, shares that may be acquired within 60 days are included in beneficial ownership. |
(4) | Included in shares beneficially owned for Mr. Golisano are 278,068 shares owned by the B. Thomas Golisano Foundation, of which Mr. Golisano is a member of the foundations six-member board of trustees. Mr. Golisano disclaims beneficial ownership of these shares. |
(5) | Mr. Golisano has 7,750,295 shares pledged as security and Mr. Gioja has 6,700 shares pledged as security. |
(6) | Included in shares beneficially owned are shares held in the names of family members, trusts, or other entities: Mr. Golisano 64,791 shares; Mr. Horsley 107,862 shares; and Mr. Inman 136,949 shares. |
(7) | Beneficial ownership is based on information as of June 30, 2017 contained in the Form 13F filed with the SEC on August 10, 2017 by BlackRock, Inc., including notice that it has, along with certain institutional investment managers for which it is the parent holding company, sole voting power as to 22,084,763 shares and sole dispositive power as to 25,127,647 shares. |
(8) | Beneficial ownership is based on information as of June 30, 2017 contained in the Form 13F filed with the SEC on August 11, 2017 by Vanguard Group Inc., including notice that it has sole voting power as to 481,342 shares, sole dispositive power as to 22,463,755 shares, shared voting power as to 96,274 shares, and shared dispositive power as to 579,593 shares. |
SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires directors, executive officers, and beneficial owners of more than 10% of the Companys common stock to file reports of their ownership and changes in their ownership of the Companys equity securities with the SEC. Based solely on our review of information supplied to the Company and filings made with the SEC, the Company believes that during fiscal 2017, its directors, executive officers, and greater than 10% beneficial owners have complied in a timely manner with all applicable Section 16 filing requirements.
Paychex, Inc. 2017 Proxy Statement 14 |
Corporate Governance |
The Board recognizes the fundamental principle that good corporate governance is critical to organizational success and the protection of stockholder value. As such, the Board has adopted a set of Corporate Governance Guidelines as a statement of principles guiding the Boards conduct. These principles are intended to be interpreted in the context of all applicable laws and the Companys Restated Certificate of Incorporation, By-Laws, as amended, and other governing documents. A copy of these guidelines can be found on our website at: http://investor.paychex.com/governance.
The Boards current leadership structure is comprised of:
| Chairman of the Board and non-independent director (Mr. Golisano); |
| the President and CEO as a non-independent director (Mr. Mucci); |
| an independent director serving as Lead Independent Director (Mr. Tucci); and |
| Audit, G&C, Corporate Development Advisory, and Investment committees led by independent directors. |
The Board believes this structure provides a well-functioning and effective balance between strong Company leadership and appropriate safeguards and oversight by independent directors. The Board currently separates the role of Chairman of the Board from the CEO. We believe that the Company is best served by having a Chairman who has in-depth knowledge of the Companys operations and the industry, but is not involved in the day-to-day operations of the Company. Mr. Golisanos extensive experience as founder and former CEO qualifies him to lead the Board, particularly as it focuses on strategic risks and opportunities facing the Company.
Our Lead Independent Director has responsibility for conducting regularly scheduled executive sessions of the independent directors and such other responsibilities as the independent directors may assign. Regularly scheduled executive sessions of the members of the Board, without members of management present, are held at each regularly-scheduled Board meeting. As appropriate, matters presented to the Board by the G&C Committee are reviewed and discussed in executive session by the independent directors.
The Board and its standing committees that meet regularly conduct performance self-evaluations at least annually to assess the qualifications, attributes, skills, and experience represented on the Board and to determine whether the Board and its committees are functioning effectively.
Paychex, Inc. 2017 Proxy Statement 15 |
Corporate Governance |
One of the most important functions of the Board is oversight of risks inherent in the operation of the Companys business. Senior management is responsible for the day-to-day management of risks facing the Company. The Board implements its risk oversight function both as a whole and through delegation to Board committees. The Board is responsible for ensuring an appropriate culture of risk management exists within the Company, overseeing the Companys aggregate risk profile, and monitoring how the Company addresses specific risks. The Board receives regular reports from officers on particular risks to the Company, reviews the Companys strategic plan, and regularly communicates with its committees.
The Board committees, which meet regularly and report back to the full Board, play significant roles in carrying out the risk management function. In general, the committees oversee the following risks:
Committee
|
Primary Risk Oversight Area
| |
Audit Committee |
Risk related to financial statement accuracy and reporting;
Internal controls;
Legal, regulatory, and compliance risks;
Information security, technology, and privacy and data protection; and
Other operational and fraud risks.
| |
Investment Committee |
Risk related to investing activities.
| |
G&C Committee |
Risks arising from the Companys compensation policies and practices for all employees and non-employee directors; and
Governance structure and processes including succession planning, director independence, and related-person transactions.
|
The G&C Committee regularly reviews the risks and rewards associated with our compensation programs. The programs are designed with features that mitigate risk without diminishing the incentive nature of the compensation. As part of its risk oversight, the G&C Committee conducts an annual assessment of risks arising from the Companys compensation programs. The G&C Committee reviewed such programs with its independent compensation consultant. The G&C Committees assessment included identification of risk with the various forms of compensation, the inherent risk in performance-based compensation metrics, and existing risk mitigation controls. Risk mitigation includes, but is not limited to, the balance of fixed and variable compensation, the balance of short- and long-term compensation, stock ownership guidelines, level of oversight, and controls over financial reporting. Based on this review, the G&C Committee concluded that the Companys compensation policies and procedures are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.
Our Corporate Governance Guidelines require that our Board meet at least four times per year. The Board held four meetings in fiscal 2017. To the extent practicable, directors are expected to attend all Board meetings and meetings of the committees on which they serve. During fiscal 2017, each director attended 100% of the meetings of the full Board, and 90% or more of the total of the Board meetings and committee meetings on which the director served. Directors are expected to attend the Companys Annual Meetings of Stockholders. All of our then-current directors attended the 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. All directors are independent within the meaning of applicable SEC and NASDAQ director independence standards, with the exception of Mr. Golisano and Mr. Mucci.
Paychex, Inc. 2017 Proxy Statement 16 |
Corporate Governance |
The Board has established five standing committees with the following responsibilities and director assignments:
Audit Committee | ||
Committee Members: (1) David J.S. Flaschen (Chair) (2) Thomas F. Bonadio (2), (3) Joseph G. Doody Grant M. Inman Pamela A. Joseph (4)
6 Meetings in fiscal 2017 |
Serve as an independent and objective party to monitor the Companys financial reporting process, internal control system, and financial risk management processes.
Review the performance and independence of the Companys independent accountants and internal audit department.
Provide an open avenue of communication among the independent accountants, financial and senior management, the internal auditors, and the Board.
Review significant risk exposures and processes to monitor, control, and report such exposures, periodically reporting on such information to the Board.
|
Executive Committee | ||
Committee Members: Martin Mucci (Chair) B. Thomas Golisano Pamela A. Joseph (4) Joseph M. Velli
0 Meetings in fiscal 2017 |
Exercise all the powers and authority of the Board, except as limited by law, between Board meetings and when the Board is not in session. |
Investment Committee | ||
Committee Members: Grant M. Inman (Chair) David J.S. Flaschen Phillip Horsley Joseph M. Velli
2 Meetings in fiscal 2017 |
Review the Companys investment policies and strategies, and the performance of the Companys investment portfolios.
Determine that the investment portfolios are managed in compliance with the established investment policy. |
Governance and Compensation Committee | ||
Committee Members: (6) Joseph M. Tucci (Chair) David J.S. Flaschen Phillip Horsley Grant M. Inman Joseph M. Velli
3 Meetings in fiscal 2017 |
Evaluate and determine compensation for the directors, CEO, and senior executive officers.
Provide general oversight with respect to governance of the Board, including periodic review and assessment of corporate governance policies.
Evaluate compensation policies to determine if they have risk that is reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.
Identify, evaluate, and recommend to the Board candidates for nomination for election to the Board.
Review annually the independence of directors. |
Corporate Development Advisory Committee | ||
Committee Members: Joseph M. Velli (Chair) Thomas F. Bonadio (3) David J.S. Flaschen Pamela A. Joseph (4) Martin Mucci
2 Meetings in fiscal 2017 |
Review and provide guidance to management and the Board with respect to the Companys acquisition or divestiture opportunities, as appropriate, and review related strategy.
Authority to approve acquisitions or divestitures in accordance with the parameters set by the Board, to the extent permitted by law and the Companys By-Laws. |
Paychex, Inc. 2017 Proxy Statement 17 |
Corporate Governance |
(1) | All members of the Audit Committee meet the independence, experience, and other applicable NASDAQ listing requirements and applicable SEC rules regarding independence. |
(2) | Mr. Flaschen and Mr. Bonadio qualify as an Audit Committee Financial Expert, as defined by applicable SEC rules. |
(3) | Mr. Bonadio was appointed to the Audit Committee and the Corporate Development Advisory Committee upon his appointment to the Board in January 2017. |
(4) | Ms. Joseph resigned from the Board and the respective committees she served on in March 2017. |
(5) | Mr. Tucci was appointed to the Executive Committee in March 2017. |
(6) | All members of the G&C Committee meet the NASDAQ independence criteria. |
The Audit, Investment, G&C, and Corporate Development Advisory Committees responsibilities are more fully described in each committees charter adopted by the Board, which are accessible on the Companys website at http://investor.paychex.com/governance.
The G&C Committee is responsible for recommending candidates to the full Board to either fill vacancies or stand for election at each annual meeting of stockholders. The committee follows the Boards Nomination Policy, which is included in the G&C Committee Charter. The Board does not have a formal policy regarding diversity. However, the Board has determined that it is necessary for the continued success of the Company to ensure that the Board is composed of individuals having a variety of complementary experience, education, training, and relationships relevant to the then-current needs of the Board and the Company.
In evaluating candidates for nomination to the Board, including candidates for nomination recommended by a stockholder, the Nomination Policy requires G&C Committee members to consider the contribution that a candidate for nomination would be expected to make to the Board and the Company. This is based upon the current composition and needs of the Board, and the candidates demonstrated business judgment, leadership abilities, integrity, prior experience, education, training, relationships, and other factors that the Board determines relevant. In identifying candidates for nomination to fill vacancies created by the expiration of the term of any incumbent director, the Nomination Policy requires G&C Committee members to determine whether such incumbent director is willing to stand for re-election and, if so, to take into consideration the value to the Board and to the Company of their continuity and familiarity with the Companys business. The Board has previously used a third-party search firm to identify director candidates and the G&C Committee is authorized by its charter to continue this practice.
The Nomination Policy requires the G&C Committee to consider candidates for nomination to the Board recommended by any reasonable source, including stockholders. Stockholders who wish to do so may recommend candidates for nomination by identifying such candidates and providing relevant biographical information in written communications to the Chairman of the G&C Committee in accordance with the policy described in the section entitled Communications with the Board of Directors.
Policy on Transactions with Related Persons
Related persons include our executive officers, directors, director nominees, and holders of more than 5% of the Companys common stock, as well as their immediate family members. It is generally the Companys practice to avoid transactions with related persons. However, there may be occasions when a transaction with a related person is in the best interest of the Company. The Companys policies and procedures for review and approval of related-person transactions appear in the Companys Standards of Conduct, Conflict of Interest, and Employment of Relatives Standards, which are internally distributed, and in the Companys Code of Business Ethics and Conduct, which is posted on the Companys website at http://investor.paychex.com/governance.
Officers are required to disclose any potential conflicts of interest or related-person transactions, which include: certain financial interests in or relationships with any supplier, customer, partner, subcontractor, or competitor; and engaging in any activity that could create the appearance of a conflict of interest, including financial involvement or dealings with employees or representatives of the types of entities listed above. Annually, officers and directors complete a Directors and Officers Questionnaire, within which they provide information regarding whether the individual or any member of their immediate family had any interest in any actual or proposed transaction with the Company or any of its subsidiaries where the amount involved exceeded $120,000. The individuals are also asked about any other economic relationships that might be conflicts of
Paychex, Inc. 2017 Proxy Statement 18 |
Corporate Governance |
interest. The responses are reviewed by our Financial Reporting and Legal Departments to determine if a conflict of interest exists related to any such transaction. For officers, the Companys Chief Financial Officer (CFO) oversees the review of such transactions.
Members of the Board are required to disclose to the Chairman of the Board or the Chairman of the G&C Committee any situation that involves, or may reasonably be expected to involve, a conflict of interest with the Company. This includes engaging in any conduct or activities that would impair the Companys relationship with any person or entity with which the Company has or proposes to enter into a business or contractual relationship.
The Financial Reporting department annually reviews the Companys listing of related persons for determination of potential related-person transactions that should be disclosed in the Companys periodic reports to the SEC or under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) and SEC rules or proxy materials under SEC rules. The G&C Committee is required to consider all questions of possible conflicts of interest of Board members and executive officers, including review and approval of transactions of the Company in excess of $120,000 in which a director, executive officer, or an immediate family member of a director or executive officer has an interest. The factors considered by the G&C Committee in their review, include: the business objective of the transaction; the individuals involvement in the transaction; whether the transaction would impact the judgment of the officer or director to act in the best interest of the Company; and any other matters the G&C Committee deems appropriate. For fiscal 2017, no instances of conflict or non-compliance have occurred. Should a conflict of interest be identified, relevant information and circumstances would be reviewed to determine if action is required relative to continuing the arrangement.
For fiscal 2017, the following transactions in excess of $120,000 were identified and communicated to the G&C Committee:
| Mr. Tucci, a member of our Board, was the Chairman of the Board, CEO, and President of EMC Corporation until September 2016. During fiscal 2017, the Company purchased through negotiated transactions approximately $0.6 million of data processing equipment and software from EMC Corporation. Mr. Tucci was not personally involved in the negotiation of these transactions. |
| Mr. Doody, a member of our Board, is the Vice Chairman of Staples, Inc. During fiscal 2017, the Company purchased through negotiated transactions approximately $2.9 million of office supplies from Staples, Inc. Mr. Doody was not personally involved in the negotiation of these transactions. |
Governance and Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
None of the members of the G&C Committee were at any time during fiscal 2017, or at any other time, an officer or employee of the Company. Mr. Tucci, a member of the Board, is Chairman of the G&C Committee, and is also a former executive of EMC Corporation. As previously noted, the Company purchases data processing equipment and software from EMC Corporation. During fiscal 2017, no member of the G&C Committee or Board was an executive officer of another entity on whose Compensation Committee or Board of Directors an executive officer of Paychex served.
Communications with the Board of Directors
The Board has established procedures to enable stockholders and other interested parties to communicate in writing with the Board, including the chair of any standing committee of the Board. Written communications should be clearly marked and mailed to:
Stockholder and Other Interested Parties Board Communication
Paychex, Inc.
911 Panorama Trail South
Rochester, New York 14625-2396
Attention: Corporate Secretary
In the case of communications intended for committee chairs, the specific committee must be identified. Any such communications that do not identify a standing committee will be forwarded to the Board. The Corporate Secretary will promptly forward all stockholder and other interested party communications to the Board or to the appropriate standing committee of the Board, as the case may be.
Paychex, Inc. 2017 Proxy Statement 19 |
Code of Ethics |
CODE OF BUSINESS ETHICS AND CONDUCT
The Company has a Code of Business Ethics and Conduct that applies to all of its directors, officers, and employees. The Company requires all of its directors, officers, and employees to adhere to this code in addressing legal and ethical issues that they encounter in the course of doing their work. This code requires our directors, officers, and employees to avoid conflicts of interest, comply with all laws and regulations, conduct business in an honest and ethical manner, and otherwise act with integrity and in the Companys best interest. All newly hired employees are required to certify that they have reviewed and understand this code. In addition, each year all employees are reminded of and asked to affirmatively acknowledge their obligation to follow the code. The Code of Business Ethics and Conduct is available for review on the Companys website at http://investor.paychex.com/governance. The Company intends to disclose any amendment to, or waiver from, a provision of its Code of Business Ethics and Conduct that relates to any element of the code of ethics definition enumerated in Item 406 of Regulation S-K by posting such information on its website at the address specified above.
Paychex, Inc. 2017 Proxy Statement 20 |
Say-on-Pay Vote |
PROPOSAL 2: ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION
Proposal Snapshot
| What am I voting on? |
Stockholders are being asked to approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of our NEOs as described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis (CD&A) and the Named Executive Officer Compensation sections of this proxy statement.
| Voting Recommendation |
The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR the advisory vote approving the NEO compensation, as disclosed in this proxy statement.
We are asking our stockholders to provide advisory approval of the compensation of our NEOs. This proposal, commonly known as a say-on-pay proposal, gives our stockholders an opportunity to express their views on the overall compensation of our NEOs and the philosophy, policies, and practices as described in this proxy statement. Our stockholders are currently given the opportunity to vote, on a non-binding, advisory basis, on say-on-pay proposals annually, with the next opportunity to vote on such a proposal being the 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. Before you vote, we encourage you to read the CD&A and Named Executive Officer Compensation sections of this proxy statement, which provide detailed information on the Companys compensation policies and practices, and overall compensation of our NEOs.
Compensation Programs Highlights
Our executive compensation programs are designed to attract, motivate, and retain highly qualified NEOs, who are critical to our success. We strongly believe that our executive compensation both pay opportunities and pay actually realized should be tied to Company performance. Under our compensation programs, the NEOs are rewarded for the achievement of specific annual and longer-term strategic and financial goals of the Company. Some key aspects of our compensation programs that you should consider are:
| NEO compensation is evaluated and determined by our G&C Committee, which is entirely comprised of independent directors. This committee utilizes the services of an independent consultant to advise them on matters of executive compensation. |
| Our executive compensation program is designed to implement core compensation principles, including alignment with stockholders interests, long-term value creation, and pay-for-performance. A significant portion of pay is at risk where the amount realized will be dependent on achievement of financial targets or, in the case of certain time-vested equity awards, the value of the Companys stock. |
| A mix of annual and long-term incentive programs creates a balance between short-term and long-term focus, reducing risk in the compensation programs. |
| Our equity-based, long-term incentive awards include a mix of options, time-based restricted stock awards, and performance-based awards. |
In addition, we have responsible compensation practices that ensure consistent leadership and decision-making, certain of which are intended to mitigate risk. These include:
| Stock ownership guidelines for directors and executive officers, designed to align the directors and executives long-term financial interests with those of our stockholders. |
| Prohibition of hedging of the Companys stock for both directors and executive officers. |
| Prohibition of pledging Company stock as collateral without prior approval by the Company. |
| A long-standing insider trading policy. |
| Certain recoupment, non-compete, and other forfeiture provisions within our Annual Officer Performance Incentive Program (the annual incentive program) and equity-based compensation agreements. These allow the Company to cancel all or any outstanding portion of equity awards and recoup the gross value of any payouts under the annual incentive program, vested restricted shares, or profits from exercises of options. |
Paychex, Inc. 2017 Proxy Statement 21 |
Say-on-Pay Vote |
Results of the 2016 Say-on-Pay Vote
At the 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders held on October 12, 2016, approximately 97% of the total stockholder votes cast were in favor of the Companys NEO compensation as presented in our 2016 proxy statement. The G&C Committee considered this favorable outcome and believed it conveyed our stockholders support of the committees decisions and the existing executive compensation programs. As we evaluated our compensation practices and talent needs throughout fiscal 2017, we remained mindful of the strong support for our compensation policies and practices communicated by our stockholders at the last annual meeting. As a result, the G&C Committee retained the core design of our executive compensation programs as it believes the program continues to attract, retain, and provide appropriate incentive for senior management.
Advisory Vote
The G&C Committee, along with the Board, believe that the policies, procedures, and amounts of compensation discussed here, and described further in this proxy statement, are effective in achieving the desired goals of aligning our executive compensation structure with the interests of our stockholders. To indicate approval of our NEO compensation, a majority of the shares present in person or by proxy and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting must be voted for the proposal.
This say-on-pay vote is advisory and therefore is not binding on the Company, the G&C Committee, or our Board. Our Board values the opinions of our stockholders and, to the extent that there is any significant vote against the NEO compensation as disclosed in this proxy statement, will consider our stockholders concerns and the G&C Committee will evaluate whether actions are necessary to address these concerns.
The Board recommends a vote FOR the proposal to approve the NEO compensation on an advisory basis, as disclosed in this proxy statement.
Paychex, Inc. 2017 Proxy Statement 22 |
Frequency of Say-on-Pay Vote |
PROPOSAL 3: ADVISORY VOTE ON THE FREQUENCY OF FUTURE ADVISORY VOTES ON NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION
Proposal Snapshot
| What am I voting on? |
Stockholders are being asked to vote on the frequency of future say-on-pay votes, as provided in Proposal 3.
| Voting Recommendation |
The Board of Directors recommends a vote of ONE YEAR for the frequency with which stockholders will have an opportunity to cast an advisory vote on the compensation of the Companys NEOs as set forth in the Companys proxy statement.
In addition to the advisory say-on-pay vote, we are seeking a stockholder advisory vote on the frequency of future say-on-pay votes, as provided here in Proposal 3. Stockholders may indicate how often they would prefer a say-on-pay advisory vote to occur: every year, every two years, or every three years. In addition, stockholders may abstain from voting. The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act requires the Company to hold the advisory vote on the frequency of say-on-pay votes at least once every six years.
After careful consideration, our Board has determined that a vote on say-on-pay every year is the most appropriate for the Company at this time, and recommends that stockholders vote for the Company to hold annual advisory votes on executive compensation, as decisions on executive compensation are made annually. We believe that an annual advisory say-on-pay vote allows us to obtain frequent and timely input from our stockholders regarding corporate governance and executive compensation philosophy, policies, and practices.
The option of every year, every two years, or every three years that receives the vote of the holders of a majority of the voting power entitled to vote will be the frequency for the advisory say-on-pay vote that has been selected by the stockholders. However, as this is an advisory vote, it is not binding on the Company, the G&C Committee, or the Board. The Board will take into account the opinion of our stockholders when determining which frequency for future say-on-pay votes is best suited to the Company.
The Board recommends a vote of ONE YEAR for the frequency with which to hold an advisory vote on NEO compensation.
Paychex, Inc. 2017 Proxy Statement 23 |
CD&A |
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
The CD&A provides you with a description of our executive compensation policies and programs, the decisions made by the G&C Committee regarding executive compensation, and the factors contributing to those decisions. This discussion focuses on the compensation of our NEOs for fiscal 2017, who were:
Name
|
Title
| |
Martin Mucci
|
President and Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer)
| |
Efrain Rivera
|
Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, and Treasurer (principal financial officer)
| |
Mark A. Bottini
|
Senior Vice President, Sales
| |
John B. Gibson
|
Senior Vice President, Service
| |
Michael E. Gioja
|
Senior Vice President, Information Technology and Product Development
|
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
||||
|
|
25
|
| |
Business and Financial Highlights
|
|
25
|
| |
How Pay is Tied to Company Performance
|
|
28
|
| |
Highlights of Executive Compensation Practices
|
|
31
|
| |
|
|
32
|
| |
Summary of Fiscal 2017 Elements of Compensation
|
|
32
|
| |
Fiscal 2017 Compensation Results
|
|
32
|
| |
|
|
36
|
| |
Prohibition on Hedging or Speculating in Company Stock
|
|
37
|
| |
|
|
37
|
| |
Recoupment, Non-Compete, and Other Forfeiture Provisions
|
|
37
|
| |
|
|
37
|
| |
|
|
38
|
| |
|
|
38
|
| |
|
|
38
|
| |
Role of the Compensation Consultant
|
|
38
|
| |
Role of Governance and Compensation Committee and Management
|
|
39
|
| |
|
|
39
|
| |
|
|
41
|
| |
Impact of the Internal Revenue Code
|
|
41
|
| |
THE GOVERNANCE AND COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT
|
|
41
|
|
Paychex, Inc. 2017 Proxy Statement 24 |
CD&A |
Business and Financial Highlights
Our mission is to be the leading provider of payroll, human resource (HR) and employee benefit services by being an essential partner with Americas businesses. We believe success in this mission will lead to strong long-term financial performance.
Our executive compensation is tied to financial and operational performance and is intended to drive sustained, long-term increases in stockholder value. We delivered solid financial results for fiscal 2017. Reported financial results for fiscal 2017 and the respective growth percentages compared to the fiscal year ended May 31, 2016 (fiscal 2016) were as follows:
For the fiscal year ended May 31,
|
||||||||||||
$ in millions, except per share amounts
|
2017
|
2016
|
% Change
|
|||||||||
Payroll service revenue |
$1,779 | $1,730 | 3% | |||||||||
Human Resource Services revenue |
1,322 | 1,176 | 12% | |||||||||
Total service revenue |
3,101 | 2,906 | 7% | |||||||||
Interest on funds held for clients |
51 | 46 | 10% | |||||||||
Total revenue |
$3,152 | $2,952 | 7% | |||||||||
Operating income |
$1,240 | $1,147 | 8% | |||||||||
Operating income, net of certain items (1) |
$1,189 | $1,101 | 8% | |||||||||
Net income |
$ 817 | $ 757 | 8% | |||||||||
Adjusted net income (1) |
$ 799 | $ 736 | 9% | |||||||||
Diluted earnings per share |
$ 2.25 | $ 2.09 | 8% | |||||||||
Adjusted diluted earnings per share (1) |
$ 2.20 | $ 2.03 | 8% | |||||||||
Operating cash flows |
$ 960 | $1,018 | (6%) |
(1) | Operating income, net of certain items, is a non-GAAP measure used as one of the performance metrics in the Companys executive compensation program. Adjusted net income and adjusted diluted earnings per share are non-GAAP measures reported for fiscal 2017 and fiscal 2016 which exclude the impact of certain discrete tax items recognized in the respective periods. Refer to the discussion of non-GAAP measures and a reconciliation to the related GAAP measures in Appendix A. |
Paychex, Inc. 2017 Proxy Statement 25 |
CD&A |
Fiscal 2017 Actions Related to Long-Term Strategy: The table below discusses fiscal 2017 performance as it relates to the key areas of focus that comprise the Companys long-term strategy.
Strategy Focus
|
Fiscal 2017 Summary of Accomplishments
| |||
Flexible, convenient service |
We have been engaged in a complete re-alignment of our service organization to allow greater flexibility and customization of the service clients receive. This effort was completed at the end of fiscal 2017. This project included the creation of multi-product service centers and 24/7 dedicated service centers. As part of this initiative, there has been a reallocation of client service specialists and clients among different service organizations. This movement contributed to a slight decrease in client retention, which was approximately 81% for fiscal 2017. This was only slightly down from the near-record-high level in fiscal 2016.
| |||
Solid sales execution |
In fiscal 2017, new sales were challenged by tough comparisons to a strong fiscal 2016. In fiscal 2016, we had a particularly strong sales year across many products, driven by an increased demand for outsourcing of HR and payroll solutions including our own Affordable Care Act product in the mid-market. Our fiscal 2017 mid-market payroll sales declined from the high level of activity experienced in fiscal 2016, impacting the number and size of clients sold.
| |||
Industry-leading, integrated technology |
We continue to focus on our Paychex Flex® platform, our cloud-based human capital management (HCM) suite of services and mobility offerings. In fiscal 2017, we announced a shift to mobile-first design of our HCM suite. Mobile-first technology is based on a simplified approach that adapts to any device. We now have mobile-first technology throughout our HCM suite, which we believe differentiates us in the market. We believe this leading-edge technology, along with our personalized, flexible service, help our clients stay more connected to their employees and their businesses.
We completed enhancements to our time and attendance service portfolio, with the addition of Paychex FlexTM Time Essentials, the TrueShiftTM time clock, and a new advanced scheduling feature within our Paychex FlexTM Time module. In the area of HR analytics, Paychex Flex now presents function-focused analytics in context throughout the platform. The enhanced data analytics and reports assist HR leaders with making more informed business decisions. Paychex Flex continues to receive positive recognition in the marketplace.
| |||
Comprehensive suite of value-added HCM services |
We offer a complete suite of HCM services, which help manage the employer/employee relationship through all phases of the employee life cycle. One recent enhancement to our full-service Paychex Employer Shared Responsibility offering is an all-new online dashboard for ease of predictive employer workforce analysis and risk monitoring, as well as year-end reporting.
| |||
Continued service penetration |
We continue to see client growth in our HR Services portfolio including retirement services, insurance services, time and attendance, and our comprehensive HR outsourcing services. The number of client worksite employees served within our comprehensive HR outsourcing solutions achieved a milestone of over one million worksite employees during fiscal 2017. We are constantly evolving to enhance our competitive position and focus on showcasing the value proposition of our full-suite of HCM solutions.
| |||
Strategic acquisitions |
We continuously evaluate opportunities for acquisitions where there is a strategic fit. In fiscal 2016, we acquired Advance Partners, a leading provider of payroll funding and outsourcing services for the temporary staffing industry. This acquisition has exceeded expectations in its contribution to our results of operations since acquisition.
|
Paychex, Inc. 2017 Proxy Statement 26 |
CD&A |
Return to Stockholders: The value we return to our stockholders is very important to us. During fiscal 2017, we returned over $800 million to our stockholders through dividends and repurchases of outstanding shares of our common stock.
| |||||||||
Since 2013, Paychex | |||||||||
has returned | |||||||||
over $3.5 billion | |||||||||
to its stockholders. | |||||||||
Paychex, Inc. 2017 Proxy Statement 27 |
CD&A |
The following chart shows how a $100 investment in the Companys common stock on May 31, 2012 would have grown to $235 as of May 31, 2017, with dividends reinvested quarterly. The chart also compares the total stockholder return on the Companys common stock to the same investment in the S&P 500 Index over the same period, with dividends reinvested quarterly. For Paychex, this represents a cumulative return of of 135%, or 19% on an annualized basis.
For more information about our fiscal 2017 business results, see the section of our Fiscal 2017 Annual Report on Form 10-K (Form 10-K) titled Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
How Pay is Tied to Company Performance
Our executive compensation programs are designed to ensure that the interests of the Companys senior leaders are appropriately aligned with those of its stockholders by rewarding performance that meets established business and individual goals. Key features of the program that tie to Company performance are:
| A significant portion of our NEO annual compensation is at risk based on performance. For fiscal 2017, variable pay represented 89% of total target compensation for our CEO, and 85% of total target compensation on average for our other NEOs. |
| Variable compensation is comprised of an annual cash incentive program and longer-term equity-based incentives. Annual grants of performance shares provide the opportunity for restricted stock to be awarded if pre-established financial goals are met for a two-year performance period. Time-vested stock options and restricted stock awards provide value based on our stock price performance. |
| Target compensation for the annual incentive program and annual grants of performance shares is established at the beginning of the performance period by the G&C Committee. NEOs have an opportunity to earn actual compensation that varies from target based on achievement against pre-established performance metrics. |
| Performance targets incorporated into our executive compensation programs include the metrics of service revenue (a measure of business growth) and operating income, net of certain items (our measure of profitability) for our annual performance-based compensation. Operating income, net of certain items is a non-GAAP measure. Refer to Appendix A for a discussion of this measure and a reconciliation to the related GAAP measure of operating income. |
| The financial measures used as performance targets are linked directly to our annual and longer-term strategic business plans that are reviewed and approved by the Board. |
| In July 2016, the committee implemented special Long-Term Incentive Plan (LTIP) awards in the form of non-qualified performance-based stock options and performance-based restricted stock. These awards were made to reward the executives for achieving long-term financial goals. The stock options and restricted stock vest after four years based on achievement against goals established for the fiscal year ending May 31, 2020 (fiscal 2020). These are special awards geared toward this long-term achievement and are not part of the annually recurring awards of long-term, equity-based compensation. The performance metrics for these LTIP awards are service revenue, operating income, net of certain items, and diluted earnings per share. |
Paychex, Inc. 2017 Proxy Statement 28 |
CD&A |
The pay mix at target for our CEO and the average for other NEOs for fiscal 2017 is displayed below.
|
|
The following illustrates the trend in Company performance, based on two of our key financial metrics, and the total reported compensation of our CEO (excluding the LTIP awards) over the last three years.
(1) | Operating income, net of certain items, is a non-GAAP measure. Refer to the discussion regarding this non-GAAP measure and a reconciliation to the related GAAP measure of operating income in Appendix A. |
(2) | CEO total compensation as reflected in this chart is equal to the amounts reported in the Summary Compensation Table included in the Named Executive Officer section of this and prior years proxy statements, with the exception of the amount for fiscal 2017. For fiscal 2017, this chart excludes the impact of the special LTIP awards in the form of non-qualified performance stock options and performance-based restricted stock granted during that year. |
Amounts realized in fiscal 2017 related to performance-based compensation programs for fiscal 2017 and prior years included the following:
| Payouts under the annual incentive program for fiscal 2017 were earned at 73% of target for the CEO and an average of 70% of target for the SVPs. Achievement was measured against financial targets established at the beginning of fiscal 2017. |
| The two-year performance period for the annual grants of performance shares in July 2015 ended on May 31, 2017. The financial targets were set at the beginning of this two-year period. Achievement against these targets resulted in restricted shares earned at 96% of target. |
Refer to the section entitled Elements of Compensation and the subsections of Annual Officer Performance Incentive Program and Equity-Based Compensation within this CD&A for a more detailed discussion of variable compensation, performance targets established, and actual results against those targets.
A significant portion of reported compensation is an incentive for future performance and realizable only if the Company meets or exceeds the applicable performance measures, or is based on the Companys stock price performance. Long-term equity-based incentives make up the largest component of pay for the NEOs. For the CEO, Mr. Mucci, this accounts for 75% of his target compensation for fiscal 2017. The main difference between reported compensation in the Summary
Paychex, Inc. 2017 Proxy Statement 29 |
CD&A |
Compensation Table and compensation realized is in the value of equity awards. In reported compensation, equity-based awards are included in the year granted at grant-date fair value. The amount that can be realized upon exercise of stock options or vesting of restricted stock awards can differ significantly from the amounts initially reported in the year of grant.
The following table illustrates how the equity-based awards granted to Mr. Mucci in the last three fiscal years were tracking as of May 31, 2017.
Intrinsic Value as of May 31, 2017 (3) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fiscal Year |
Awards | Value Reported at Grant Date (1) |
Value Realized Through May 31, 2017 (2) |
Vested Shares |
Unvested Shares (4) |
Total Intrinsic Value Not Yet Realized |
Increase/ (Decrease) in Realized and Unrealized Value Since Grant Date |
|||||||||||||||||||
2015 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock Options | $ | 1,105,472 | $ | | $ | 1,711,910 | $ | 1,711,927 | $ | 3,423,837 | 210 | % | ||||||||||||||
Restricted Stock | $ | 753,602 | $ | 655,170 | $ | | $ | 356,802 | $ | 356,802 | 34 | % | ||||||||||||||
Performance Shares | $ | 1,879,113 | $ | | $ | | $ | 3,165,192 | $ | 3,165,192 | 68 | % | ||||||||||||||
2016 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock Options | $ | 1,069,161 | $ | | $ | 615,747 | $ | 1,847,253 | $ | 2,463,000 | 130 | % | ||||||||||||||
Restricted Stock | $ | 742,640 | $ | 320,879 | $ | | $ | 619,664 | $ | 619,664 | 27 | % | ||||||||||||||
Performance Shares | $ | 1,855,384 | $ | | $ | | $ | 2,398,815 | $ | 2,398,815 | 29 | % | ||||||||||||||
2017 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock Options | $ | 1,191,049 | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | (100 | %) | ||||||||||||||
Restricted Stock | $ | 874,697 | $ | | $ | | $ | 851,550 | $ | 851,550 | (3 | %) | ||||||||||||||
Performance Shares | $ | 2,209,835 | $ | | $ | | $ | 2,289,062 | $ | 2,289,062 | 4 | % | ||||||||||||||
LTIP Performance Stock Options | $ | 1,151,732 | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | (100 | %) | ||||||||||||||
LTIP Performance Restricted Stock | $ | 1,290,661 | $ | | $ | | $ | 1,425,962 | $ | 1,425,962 | 10 | % |
(1) | The value reported at grant date represents the amounts reported in the Summary Compensation Table for the respective fiscal year. These values were reported at grant-date fair value of the award. |
(2) | The value realized through May 31, 2017 represents the value realized on stock option exercises or vesting of restricted stock and performance shares. Mr. Mucci has not exercised any stock options granted in the fiscal year ended May 31, 2015 (fiscal 2015), fiscal 2016, and fiscal 2017. The value reflected for restricted stock is the stock price on the date shares vested multiplied by the number of shares that vested during the period between date of grant and May 31, 2017. |
(3) | Intrinsic value not yet realized for stock options is based on the closing stock price of $59.23 per share as of May 31, 2017 less the exercise price for the respective grants. In those instances when the outstanding options are out of the money (the option exercise price is greater than the closing price), no value is provided. Intrinsic value for restricted stock and performance shares is based on the closing stock price of $59.23 per share as of May 31, 2017 multiplied by the number of shares not yet vested. |
(4) | The intrinsic value of unvested shares remains at risk as these awards are currently not exercisable. |
Paychex, Inc. 2017 Proxy Statement 30 |
CD&A |
Highlights of Executive Compensation Practices
The Board maintains governance standards and oversight of our executive compensation policies and practices. The following governance practices were in place during fiscal 2017, and these practices, among other elements of our compensation programs, aid in mitigating risk associated with our compensation programs.
WHAT WE DO
☑ Pay for performance. As previously discussed, a significant portion of executive pay is not guaranteed, but rather tied to key financial metrics that are disclosed to our stockholders.
☑ Mitigate undue risk in compensation programs. The executive compensation program includes features that reduce the possibility of the NEOs, either individually or as a group, making excessively risky business decisions that could maximize short-term results at the expense of longer-term value.
☑ Balance of short-term and long-term incentives. Our incentive programs provide an appropriate balance of annual and longer-term incentives.
☑ Capped award payouts. Amounts or shares that can be earned under the annual incentive program, as well as under the longer-term performance share and LTIP performance-based stock option and restricted stock awards, are capped.
☑ Share ownership guidelines. There are restrictions on sales of vested awards until a NEO has attained ownership of the Companys stock as follows: CEO five times base salary; SVPs three times base salary; and Vice Presidents (VPs) two times base salary.
☑ Include double-trigger change in control provisions. Our Change in Control Plan for officers is a double-trigger arrangement, requiring change in control and a subsequent termination of employment.
☑ Include recoupment, non-compete, and other forfeiture provisions in our equity-award provisions and annual incentive program. Our annual incentive program and equity-based compensation agreements contain certain recoupment, non-compete, and other forfeiture provisions that will allow the Company to cancel all or any outstanding portion of equity awards and recover the payouts under the annual incentive program, gross value of any vested restricted shares, or profits from exercises of options.
☑ Utilize an independent compensation consulting firm. The G&C Committee benefits from its utilization of an independent compensation consulting firm, which provides no other services to the Company.
|
WHAT WE DONT DO
☒ No employment agreements. We do not have employment contracts for our NEOs. Employment of all of our executive officers is at will.
☒ No significant perquisites. The benefits our NEOs receive in the form of health insurance, life insurance, and Company matching contributions to the 401(k) Plan are the same benefits generally available to all of our employees.
☒ No hedging, pledging, or short sales transactions permitted. Our executive officers, including NEOs, and directors are prohibited from engaging in any hedging or other similar types of transactions with respect to the Companys common stock. Pledging is prohibited without prior Company approval and not for more than 25% of the pledgors total beneficial ownership.
☒ No dividends or dividend equivalents on unearned performance-based awards. Performance share awards and LTIP performance-based restricted stock awards do not earn or pay dividends until the shares are earned. |
Refer to the remainder of this CD&A for a detailed discussion of the overall compensation philosophy, practice, and analysis of elements of the compensation awarded to our NEOs as provided in the Fiscal 2017 Summary Compensation Table, included in the Named Executive Officer Compensation section of this proxy statement.
Paychex, Inc. 2017 Proxy Statement 31 |
CD&A |
We use a combination of compensation elements, including base salary, annual incentive program, and equity-based awards delivered under our 2002 Plan. Each element and the related compensation decisions and results for fiscal 2017 are discussed below.
Summary of Fiscal 2017 Elements of Compensation
(1) | Operating income, net of certain items, is a non-GAAP measure. Refer to Appendix A for a discussion of this measure and a reconciliation to the related GAAP measure of operating income. |
Fiscal 2017 Compensation Results
Base Salary
We pay base salary to attract talented executives and to provide a fixed base of cash compensation. Base salaries are reviewed annually. Our practice is to make targeted base salary increases as determined necessary based on performance, market information, and scope of responsibilities.
In fiscal 2017, Mr. Mucci received a $50,000 increase in base salary to $950,000 based on his tenure as CEO and to bring him more in line with the median of our Peer Group. In addition, Mr. Rivera and Mr. Gioja were given targeted increases in base salary to bring them more in line with the median of our Peer Group.
Paychex, Inc. 2017 Proxy Statement 32 |
CD&A |
Annual Officer Performance Incentive Program
The annual incentive program was established to motivate NEOs to meet the financial goals set by the Company as presented to its stockholders, while maintaining alignment with stockholders interests. The G&C Committee set a goal for net income of $500 million for fiscal 2017 as the minimum performance hurdle for the NEOs to be eligible for payout under the program. The Company achieved this net income goal for fiscal 2017. The annual incentive program is intended to comply with section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the Code) for NEOs affected by the $1 million limitation on deductible compensation. Upon achievement of the minimum eligible performance, payouts under our annual incentive program are determined based upon the satisfaction of certain quantitative and qualitative components.
The quantitative component consists of certain predetermined performance targets, which are established at the beginning of each fiscal year, and are typically based on the Board-approved fiscal year financial plan. The targets for payout are established by the G&C Committee with consultation of management. The performance targets established are intended to provide a balance between growing revenue and managing expenses. Once a target is determined, it is set for the year and is normally not changed. For extraordinary circumstances, the G&C Committee reserves the right to apply discretion and make changes.
The qualitative component of the annual incentive program consists of individual-specific qualitative goals established at the beginning of the fiscal year based on functions and responsibilities unique to the individual. The CEO can potentially receive up to 20% of base salary and all other NEOs can potentially receive up to 10% of base salary. The assessment of these goals is subjective and is not always based on quantifiable financial measurements. The G&C Committee may determine, at its sole discretion, whether satisfactory achievement has occurred, regardless of achievement against the pre-established individual goals. At its discretion for fiscal 2017, the G&C Committee individually evaluated each NEO and determined the specific percentage of the qualitative portion to award each NEO as presented on the following page. The qualitative component of the annual incentive program is not considered material to the overall compensation for each NEO.
The weight given each quantitative performance target is determined by the G&C Committee when the targets are established, and this weight varies for each NEO based on the individuals position. Each of the performance targets applicable to a NEOs annual incentive program provide the NEO an opportunity to earn a percentage of their annualized base salary based on achievement at threshold, target, and maximum. The total percentage of base salary for all performance measures that the NEOs have the opportunity to earn are as follows:
Quantitative Component |
Qualitative Component | |||||||||||||||||||
Position | Threshold | Target | Maximum | |||||||||||||||||
CEO | 45.0 | % | 110.0 | % | 175.0 | % | 20.0 | % | ||||||||||||
SVP-Sales | 45.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 155.0 | % | 10.0 | % | ||||||||||||
SVP-Other | 37.5 | % | 85.0 | % | 132.5 | % | 10.0 | % |
Thresholds are set as the floor with any achievement below threshold resulting in no payout for the respective performance metric. Maximums are set as a ceiling on the amount of payout a NEO can receive for each performance metric. For fiscal 2017, some of the quantitative component percentages of base pay for the CEO and the SVPs were changed to better align with the Companys strategic goals.
The performance metrics for the fiscal 2017 annual incentive program for the NEOs were established as follows:
Fiscal 2017 Year-over-Year Growth Rates |
% of Plan Dollars | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bonus Objectives (1) | Threshold | Target | Maximum | Threshold | Target | Maximum | Achievement as a % of Target | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Service revenue | 3 | % | 8 | % | 10 | % | 96.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 102.0 | % | 99.1 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Operating income, net of certain items (2) | 3 | % | 8 | % | 10 | % | 96.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 102.0 | % | 100.3 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Annualized new business revenue (3) | 3 | % | 10 | % | 13 | % | 94.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 103.0 | % | See | (4) |
(1) | The annual incentive program allows for certain adjustments to metrics as reported in our consolidated financial statements. |
(2) | Operating income, net of certain items, is a non-GAAP measure. Refer to Appendix A for a discussion of this measure and a reconciliation to the related GAAP measure of operating income. |
(3) | Annualized new business revenue is the approximate amount of revenue to be earned over the first twelve-month period, from the sale in the current fiscal year, of certain payroll, HR, and insurance services to new clients and new product sales to existing clients. This measure is not directly calculated from our audited financial statements, as reported service revenue also includes recurring revenue from pre-existing clients. This metric is set to provide incentive for executives to strive to exceed the target, given the relationship to recurring revenue. |
Paychex, Inc. 2017 Proxy Statement 33 |
CD&A |
(4) | Achievement for annualized new business revenue was below threshold attainment for fiscal 2017. Therefore, there was no payout related to this performance metric under the annual incentive program. |
Each performance objective, along with the target percentage of base salary that can be earned for that metric, and the actual payout percentage is set forth below, in accordance with calculations per the program.
Mr. Mucci | Mr. Rivera | Mr. Bottini | Mr. Gibson and Mr. Gioja | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bonus Objectives | % of Base Salary at Target |
% of Base Salary Achieved (1) |
% of Base Salary at Target |
% of Base Salary Achieved (1) |
% of Base Salary at Target |
% of Base Salary Achieved (1) |
% of Base Salary at Target |
% of Base Salary Achieved (1) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Service revenue | 35.0 | % | 31.0 | % | 27.5 | % | 24.4 | % | 30.0 | % | 26.6 | % | 27.5 | % | 24.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating income, net of certain items (2) | 45.0 | % | 48.4 | % | 32.5 | % | 35.1 | % | 35.0 | % | 37.7 | % | 32.5 | % | 35.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Annualized new business revenue | 30.0 | % | | % | 25.0 | % | | % | 35.0 | % | | % | 25.0 | % | | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total quantitative annual incentive | 110.0 | % | 79.4 | % | 85.0 | % | 59.5 | % | 100.0 | % | 64.3 | % | 85.0 | % | 59.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Qualitative (3) | 20.0 | % | 16.0 | % | 10.0 | % | 10.0 | % | 10.0 | % | 7.0 | % | 10.0 | % | 8.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total | 130.0 | % | 95.4 | % | 95.0 | % | 69.5 | % | 110.0 | % | 71.3 | % | 95.0 | % | 67.5 | % |
(1) | If the actual achievement under a given performance metric is between two thresholds (e.g. between threshold and target or between target and maximum), then the percentage of base salary achieved would be calculated based on a straight-line interpolation of the achievement level above threshold or target, as appropriate, for such performance metric. |
(2) | Operating income, net of certain items, is a non-GAAP measure. Refer to Appendix A for a discussion of this measure and a reconciliation to the related GAAP measure of operating income. |
(3) | The NEOs have an opportunity to earn a percentage of base salary based on individual-specific qualitative goals related to the functions and responsibilities unique to the individual. The G&C Committee may determine, at its sole discretion, whether satisfactory achievement has occurred, regardless of achievement against the pre-established individual goals. |
The actual achievement translated to incentive payments for our NEOs is as follows:
Annualized Base Salary (1) |
Minimum Potential Payout (2) |
Maximum Potential Payout (2) |
% of Base Salary Achieved |
Actual Incentive Compensation Earned (3) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Martin Mucci | $ | 950,000 | $ | | $ | 1,852,500 | 95.4 | % | $ | 906,680 | |||||||||||||||
Efrain Rivera | $ | 500,000 | $ | | $ | 712,500 | 69.5 | % | $ | 347,650 | |||||||||||||||
Mark A. Bottini | $ | 450,000 | $ | | $ | 742,500 | 71.3 | % | $ | 320,625 | |||||||||||||||
John B. Gibson | $ | 425,000 | $ | | $ | 605,625 | 67.5 | % | $ | 287,003 | |||||||||||||||
Michael E. Gioja | $ | 450,000 | $ | | $ | 641,250 | 67.5 | % | $ | 303,885 |
(1) | This represents the NEOs annualized base salary as of May 31, 2017. It may differ from base salary paid for fiscal 2017 reflected in the Summary Compensation Table, contained in the Named Executive Officer Compensation section of this proxy statement, due to timing of salary increases, start dates, etc. |
(2) | These columns represent the range of payout that each NEO has the opportunity to earn. The minimum potential payout indicates that no payout is earned if achievement is below threshold. The maximum potential payout is based on the percentage of base salary that each NEO can earn for maximum achievement. |
(3) | Actual incentive compensation earned is calculated as annualized base salary multiplied by the percentage of base salary achieved, and is provided in the 2017 Summary Compensation Table, contained in the Named Executive Officer Compensation section of this proxy statement. |
Equity-Based Compensation
To align our NEOs interests with the long-term interests of our stockholders, the Company grants equity awards under the 2002 Plan. Annual grants of equity awards to the NEOs are approved during the regularly scheduled meeting of the G&C Committee in July. Historically, the July meeting has been scheduled to occur approximately two weeks after the release of our fiscal year-end earnings and upcoming fiscal year financial guidance. Our trading black-out period normally lifts on the third business day following such release of information. The G&C Committee anticipates continuing its granting practice. The G&C Committee may also grant equity awards to individuals upon hire or promotion to executive officer positions. These equity awards are not granted during any trading black-out periods. Recipients are notified shortly after G&C Committee
Paychex, Inc. 2017 Proxy Statement 34 |
CD&A |
approval of their grant, noting the number of stock options, shares of restricted stock, target performance shares and goals, the vesting schedule, and exercise price. Any sales restrictions or other terms of the award are also communicated at that time.
Annually, the G&C Committee reviews the NEO compensation of our Peer Group to determine the desired pay range for our officers. See the Compensation Decision Process section later in this CD&A for further information on the Committees process for determining total compensation, including equity awards. This review, along with each officers individual performance and potential, determine the total compensation. The quantity of equity awards is based on an estimated total value as determined by the G&C Committee in conjunction with their total compensation review and evaluation.
In July 2016, the G&C Committee made an annual equity grant that was a blend of stock options, time-vested restricted stock, and performance shares. The award value was split as follows:
This annual distribution provides for 80% of the total equity compensation value to be performance-based, consistent with the G&C Committees total compensation determination. The value delivered may be adjusted by the G&C Committee at its discretion for individual performance and future potential considerations. For our July 2016 annual grants, the G&C Committee determined the estimated total value to be approximately: $4,300,000 for the CEO; $1,000,000 for the CFO; $900,000 for the Sales SVP; and $850,000 for the other SVPs. These changes were made to better align internal pay equity and adjust them to market.
In July 2016, the G&C Committee approved special LTIP awards (not part of the annual equity grants) to focus the senior leadership team on the strategic plan related to the long-term growth of the Company. These awards are comprised of non-qualified performance stock options and performance-based restricted stock. The number of stock options and restricted shares to be earned will be based on achievement compared to pre-established targets for fiscal 2020. Targets are established for financial reporting measures of service revenue, operating income, net of certain items, and diluted earnings per share. The performance-based restricted stock does not earn dividends or have voting rights during the performance period.
The following equity-based compensation was granted in July 2016 for all NEOs:
NEO | Performance Shares (at Target) |
Stock Awards (1) |
Time-Based Restricted Stock Awards (2) |
LTIP Performance Stock |
LTIP Performance Restricted Stock Awards (4) (at Target) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Martin Mucci | 38,647 | 208,590 | 14,377 | 196,541 | 24,075 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Efrain Rivera | 9,009 | 48,622 | 3,351 | 98,270 | 12,037 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Mark A. Bottini | 8,108 | 43,760 | 3,016 | 98,270 | 12,037 | ||||||||||||||||||||
John B. Gibson | 7,657 | 41,329 | 2,849 | 98,270 | 12,037 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Michael E. Gioja | 7,657 | 41,329 | 2,849 | 98,270 | 12,037 |
(1) | Stock option awards vest 25% per year over 4 years and have a term of 10 years. |
(2) | Time-based restricted stock awards vest 1/3 per year over 3 years. |
(3) | LTIP performance stock options vest based on achievement against targets for fiscal 2020 and have a term of 10 years. |
(4) | LTIP performance-based restricted stock awards vest based on achievement against targets for fiscal 2020. |
Paychex, Inc. 2017 Proxy Statement 35 |
CD&A |
Performance Shares
Performance shares are designed to provide variable compensation that is focused on longer-term results. Performance shares have a two-year performance period to determine the number of restricted shares to be issued. The NEO must serve for one additional year for the restrictions to lapse. The performance targets as approved by the Board are based on service revenue and operating income, net of certain items, as projected in the strategic planning process. The G&C Committee established performance targets intended to be appropriately challenging at all levels, including the threshold level, but attainable with increasing difficulty for each level beyond threshold. The threshold level was expected to be appropriately challenging but achievable under normal circumstances. The target level would be achieved if the Company performed as expected under our strategic plan for the two-year period. The maximum level would be achievable only with exceptional performance.
The two-year performance period for performance shares granted in July 2015 was completed at the end of fiscal 2017. The shares earned were based on achievement against pre-established targets for the performance period as follows:
Performance Goal ($ In Millions) |
Two-Year Performance Targets Established | Actual Achievement | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold | Target | Maximum | ($) | % of Target | |||||||||||||||||||||
Service revenue (1) | $ | 5,694 | $ | 5,993 | $ | 6,173 | $ | 5,943 | 99 | % | |||||||||||||||
Operating income, net of certain items (2) | $ | 2,158 | $ | 2,272 | $ | 2,340 | $ | 2,268 | 100 | % | |||||||||||||||
Percent of plan | 95 | % | 100 | % | 103 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
Payout as a percent of target | 60 | % | 100 | % | 150 | % | 96 | % |
(1) | Service revenue as calculated under the performance award agreement excludes the impact of acquisitions occurring after the grant date. Refer to Appendix B for a reconciliation of service revenue as calculated for the performance period to service revenue reported in our consolidated financial statements. |
(2) | Operating income, net of certain items, is a non-GAAP measure. In addition, this measure as calculated under the performance award agreement excludes the impact of business acquisitions during the performance period. Refer to Appendix B for a description of this non-GAAP measure and a reconciliation of the amount for the performance period to the related GAAP measure of operating income. |
Achievement for service revenue was slightly below target and operating income, net of certain items, was on target. As a result of their performance against these pre-established goals, in July 2017 our NEOs received restricted shares at a quantity of 96% of the target level. The restrictions on these shares will lapse after an additional one-year service period. These performance shares, granted in July 2015, were reflected at grant-date fair value in the NEO compensation for fiscal 2016 in the Summary Compensation Table, contained in the Named Executive Officer Compensation section of this proxy statement.
LTIP Non-Qualified Performance Stock Options and Performance-Based Restricted Stock
In July 2016, the NEOs received LTIP awards in the form of non-qualified performance stock options and performance-based restricted stock. These stock options and restricted stock will vest dependent on achievement against pre-established targets for fiscal 2020. The LTIP was granted to incent the executives to work toward achievement of longer-term strategic goals. The performance metrics are service revenue, operating income, net of certain items, and diluted earnings per share and were established based on the Companys long-term strategic plan.
The G&C Committee has established stock ownership guidelines, as follows:
Position | Requirement | ||||
CEO | 5X base salary | ||||
SVPs | 3X base salary | ||||
VPs | 2X base salary |
For any awards granted after July 2011, there are restrictions on sales of such vested awards until the officer has attained the applicable stock ownership level. The ownership guidelines were established to provide long-term alignment with stockholders interests. For the purposes of achieving the ownership guideline, unvested restricted stock awarded to the executive officers is included. All officers are currently compliant with the guidelines.
Paychex, Inc. 2017 Proxy Statement 36 |
CD&A |
Prohibition on Hedging or Speculating In Company Stock
NEOs, along with all employees of the Company, must adhere to strict standards with regards to trading in Paychex stock. Also, the Company prohibits executive officers from hedging Paychex stock. They may not, among other things:
| speculatively trade in the Companys stock; |
| short sell any securities of the Company; or |
| buy or sell puts or calls on the Companys securities. |
The Company maintains a pledging policy for all Paychex directors, officers, and employees. This policy prohibits pledging Company securities as collateral for a loan or a line of credit without obtaining prior Company approval. Approval may be granted when the individual clearly demonstrates the intent and financial capacity to satisfy the obligations without resort to the pledged securities and where the pledge represents no more than 25% of the pledgors beneficial ownership of the Company securities. The Companys pledging policy is posted on its website at http://investor.paychex.com/governance.
Recoupment, Non-Compete, and Other Forfeiture Provisions
The Company retains the right to clawback on any incentive payment or award under any policy adopted by the Company implementing Section 10D of the Exchange Act and any regulations promulgated or national securities exchange listing conditions adopted with respect thereto. In the annual incentive program, the Company retains the right to recoup all or a portion of the payouts made under the annual incentive program if those payouts were based on financial statements that are subsequently subject to restatement and where fraud or misconduct was involved. The Company will, to the extent permitted by governing law, require reimbursement of a portion of any compensation received where:
| the payment was predicated upon the achievement of certain financial results that were subsequently the subject of a substantial restatement; |
| the participant engaged in fraud or misconduct that caused or partially caused the need for the substantial restatement; and |
| a lower payment would have been made based upon the restated financial results. |
In each such instance, the Company will, to the extent practicable, seek to recover the amount by which the individual participants compensation for the relevant period exceeded the lower payment that would have been made based on the restated financial results, plus a reasonable rate of interest.
Our equity-based compensation agreements state that following termination of employment, certain benefits (including equity-based compensation) will be forfeited if the NEO engages in activities adverse to the Company. These activities include:
| competition with the Company during a specified period after termination of employment; |
| solicitation of the Companys clients or employees during a specified period after termination of employment; |
| breach of confidentiality either during or after employment; or |
| engaging in conduct which is detrimental to the Company during the NEOs employment with the Company. |
Should any of these activities occur, the Company may cancel all or any outstanding portion of the equity awards subject to this provision, and recover the gross value of any vested restricted shares, including all dividends. In the case of non-qualified stock options, the Company may suspend the NEOs right to exercise the option and/or may declare the option forfeited. In addition, the Company may seek to recover all profits from certain prior exercises as liquidated damages and pursue other available legal remedies.
Our NEOs receive benefits in the form of vacation, health insurance, life insurance, Company matching contributions to the 401(k) Plan when such contributions are in effect, and other benefits, which are generally available to all our employees. We do not provide our NEOs with pension arrangements, post-retirement health coverage, or other similar benefits, with the exception of access to a non-qualified and unfunded deferred compensation plan.
Paychex, Inc. 2017 Proxy Statement 37 |
CD&A |
We offer a non-qualified and unfunded deferred compensation plan to our NEOs. The deferred compensation plan is intended to supplement the NEOs 401(k) Plan account. Due to limitations on the 401(k) Plan accounts placed by the Internal Revenue Service, this plan allows for further savings toward retirement for the NEOs and functions similarly to the 401(k) Plan account. Refer to the Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation discussion included in the Named Executive Officer Compensation section of this proxy statement for more information on how our deferred compensation plan functions.
Executives of the Company are covered by a Change in Control Plan. Upon involuntary termination by the Company without cause or a voluntary termination by the participant for good reason, within 12 months following a Change in Control, the executive becomes entitled to certain severance benefits. Such severance benefits are conditioned upon the execution of a general release in favor of the Company.
Cause means the participants dereliction of duty to the Company, conviction for a felony, or willful misconduct that has a substantial adverse effect on the Company. Good reason means a significant change to the duties, authority, or position that were assigned immediately before the change in control including: the reduction in or removal of any material duties, authority, or position within the Company; assignment of duties inconsistent with the participants position, authorities, or responsibilities; material reduction to base salary, annual incentive, or other elements of total compensation; relocation of the participants principal workplace to an area outside of a 50-mile-radius, or the failure of a successor company to assume or adopt the Change in Control Plan. Refer to the Potential Payments upon Termination or Change In Control discussion within the Named Executive Office Compensation section of this proxy statement for further information.
Role of the Compensation Consultant
As outlined in its charter, the G&C Committee has the authority to retain consultants and advisers, at the Companys expense, to assist in the discharge of the committees duties. The G&C Committee can retain and dismiss such consultants and advisers at any time. The G&C Committees consultants report directly to the committee and have direct access to the committee through the G&C Committees Chair. The G&C Committee requires that any consultant it retains cannot be utilized by management for other purposes. Although management, particularly the VP of Human Resources and Organizational Development, may work closely with the consultant, the consultant is ultimately accountable to the G&C Committee on matters related to executive compensation.
The G&C Committee retains the services of Steven Hall & Partners (Steven Hall) as its independent compensation consultant. Steven Hall has not provided any other services to the Company prior to or subsequent to being retained as the compensation consultant to the G&C Committee. The G&C Committee was solely responsible for the decision to retain Steven Hall as its consultant. Steven Hall advises the G&C Committee on matters of NEO compensation, assists with analysis and research, and provides updates on evolving best practices in compensation. While Steven Hall may express an opinion on compensation matters, the G&C Committee is solely responsible for setting the type and amount of compensation for NEOs.
The G&C Committee recognizes that it is essential to receive objective advice from its compensation consultant. The G&C Committee closely examines the procedures and safeguards that Steven Hall takes to ensure that the compensation consulting services are objective. The G&C Committee has assessed the independence of Steven Hall pursuant to SEC rules and concluded that Steven Halls work for the G&C Committee does not raise any conflict of interest. In making this assessment, the following factors were taken into consideration:
| that the compensation consultant reports directly to the G&C Committee, and the G&C Committee has the sole power to terminate or replace its compensation consultant at any time; |
| the compensation consultant does not provide any other services to the Company; |
| whether aggregate fees paid by the Company to the compensation consultant, as a percentage of the total revenue of the compensation consultant, are material to the compensation consultant; |
| the compensation consultants policies and procedures designed to prevent conflicts of interest; |
| any business or personal relationships between the compensation consultant, on one hand, and any member of the G&C Committee or executive officer, on the other hand; and |
| whether the compensation consultant owns any shares of the Companys stock. |
Paychex, Inc. 2017 Proxy Statement 38 |
CD&A |
Role of Governance and Compensation Committee and Management
As part of the G&C Committees responsibility to evaluate and determine NEO compensation, on an annual basis the G&C Committee:
| reviews the companies in our Peer Group, a group of companies with comparable financial information or who are direct competitors of Paychex, for any changes; |
| reviews base salaries for adjustments, if any; |
| establishes and approves the performance targets and payouts under incentive-based programs and awards; |
| grants equity awards under our 2002 Plan; and |
| considers the impact of section 162(m) of the Code. |
The G&C Committee continues to review each of the elements of compensation annually to ensure that compensation is appropriate and competitive to attract and retain a high-performing executive team. The G&C Committee targets to maintain performance-based pay as a percentage of total target compensation of over 70% for the CEO and over 60% for the other NEOs. Additionally, the G&C Committee targets the value of long-term compensation to be approximately 60% for the CEO and 50% for the other NEOs. For fiscal 2017 the percentages of total target compensation that were performance-based were higher due to the inclusion of the special LTIP awards.
The G&C Committee, in making its decisions, targets an equitable mix of compensation. It utilizes various sources of information to evaluate our NEO compensation, including, but not limited to:
| compensation consultant reports and analysis; |
| benchmarking information with NEOs at Peer Group companies for all compensation elements; and |
| internal management reports, including a three-year history of total compensation for all officers and a summary for the upcoming fiscal year of total cash compensation and equity awards for all officers. |
The G&C Committee strives for our NEOs compensation to be in line with our Peer Group. The information provided by the compensation consultant indicates whether our compensation package, if target performance is achieved, is comparable to the median compensation of our Peer Group, given current competitive practices, overall best practices, and other compensation and benefit trends.
Management reports are used to evaluate compensation recommendations and the impact to total compensation for each individual. They are also used to view a complete picture of the trend of compensation to executive officers, both as a team and as individuals. This facilitates discussion that more accurately details individual officer compensation, noting differences that reflect officer tenure, performance, and position in the management structure.
The G&C Committee uses these management updates along with peer information, where available, as tools to evaluate executive compensation. This information is reviewed in a subjective manner. There is no implied direct or formulaic linkage between peer information and the G&C Committees compensation decisions.
Our CEO and our VP of Human Resources and Organizational Development provide recommendations to the G&C Committee on design elements for compensation. These individuals, and from time to time invited guests including other officers, will be in attendance at the meetings of the G&C Committee to present and respond to questions on current or proposed plan design. Annually, our CEO reviews achievement of the recently completed fiscal years plan and also presents recommendations regarding: salary for each of the NEOs (other than himself), the upcoming fiscal years annual incentive program structure, and equity awards. Management is excluded from executive sessions of the G&C Committee where final decisions on compensation are made, particularly those on our CEOs performance and compensation. Executive sessions occur at each meeting of the G&C Committee.
In addition to many other factors that affect compensation decisions, the G&C Committee takes into account the compensation practices of our Peer Group, where available, in formulating our compensation program. The G&C Committee assesses total compensation at the median of the Peer Group, even though Paychex performs above the median of its Peer Group in certain financial categories as shown in the charts that follow. Peer Group comparisons were available for the positions of CEO and CFO, and both Mr. Mucci and Mr. Rivera have total compensation that falls below the median total compensation of the Peer Group. For the remaining NEOs, compensation was compared to the average NEO compensation, excluding the CEO and CFO positions, for the Peer Group. These results were below the median total compensation of our
Paychex, Inc. 2017 Proxy Statement 39 |
CD&A |
Peer Group. Peer Group benchmarking is not the sole determining factor in the G&C Committees decisions on compensation, and the G&C Committee reserves the discretion to adjust compensation based on other factors as previously discussed. The Peer Group companies are not necessarily limited to the markets in which Paychex does business. The Peer Group is comprised of the following industries or segments: a direct competitor in the HCM industry, financial transaction management companies, and business services and outsourcing companies.
Our current Peer Group consists of the following companies:
Peer Group | |||
Alliance Data Systems Corporation |
Intuit Inc. | ||
Automatic Data Processing, Inc. |
Moodys Corporation | ||
Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. |
Robert Half International Inc. | ||
DST Systems, Inc. |
TD AMERITRADE Holding Corporation | ||
Equifax, Inc. |
The Dun & Bradstreet Corporation | ||
Fiserv, Inc. |
The Western Union Company | ||
Global Payments Inc. |
Total System Services, Inc. | ||
H&R Block, Inc. |
(1) | Based on the most recent completed fiscal year for each company in the Peer Group. |
The G&C Committee annually reviews and approves the selection of Peer Group companies, adjusting the group from year to year based upon our business and changes in the Peer Group companies business or the comparability of their metrics. The Peer Group may also be adjusted in the event of mergers, acquisitions, or other significant economic changes. The Peer Group was adjusted for fiscal 2017. The Brinks Company and Iron Mountain Incorporated were removed from the Peer Group for fiscal 2017 and were replaced with Alliance Data Systems Corporation and Equifax, Inc., as they are more closely aligned with the Paychex business.
Paychex, Inc. 2017 Proxy Statement 40 |
CD&A |
It is the responsibility of the G&C Committee to evaluate Mr. Muccis performance annually and determine his total compensation. Mr. Mucci receives compensation based on his leadership role and the overall performance of the Company. Mr. Muccis compensation for fiscal 2017, as reflected in the Summary Compensation Table included in the Named Executive Officer Compensation section of this proxy statement, is as follows:
| Base salary of $950,000. |
| Payout under the annual incentive program at 73% of target. |
| Annual equity award grants comprised of 38,647 performance shares at target, 208,590 stock options with vesting pro rata over four years, and 14,377 shares of time-based restricted stock with vesting pro rata over three years. |
| Mr. Mucci was granted special LTIP awards in the form of 196,541 non-qualified performance stock options and 24,075 performance-based restricted stock, at target achievement, with achievement determined based on comparisons to pre-established targets for fiscal 2020. |
Mr. Muccis compensation for fiscal 2017 remained below median when compared to that of the CEOs within our Peer Group. The G&C Committee continually assesses his compensation and in July 2016 approved an increase in Mr. Muccis base salary of 6% to $950,000 and an increase in total annual equity award value of 14% to approximately $4,300,000 to bring his compensation closer to the median of our Peer Group.
Impact of the Internal Revenue Code
Section 162(m) of the Code generally limits the tax deductibility of compensation paid to certain officers to $1 million per year, unless specified requirements are met. The G&C Committee has carefully considered the impact of this provision as one factor among others in structuring NEO compensation. At this time, it is the G&C Committees intention to continue to compensate all NEOs based on overall performance. The G&C Committee expects that most compensation paid to NEOs will qualify as a tax-deductible expense, but makes no representation as to the deductibility of any item of NEO compensation.
THE GOVERNANCE AND COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT
The Governance and Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis included in the Proxy Statement with management. Based on such review and discussion, the G&C Committee recommends to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in the Proxy Statement and the Companys Form 10-K for fiscal 2017.
The Governance and Compensation Committee:
Joseph M. Tucci, Chairman
David J.S. Flaschen
Phillip Horsley
Grant M. Inman
Joseph M. Velli
Paychex, Inc. 2017 Proxy Statement 41 |
NEO Compensation |
NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION
The following information details compensation for our NEOs for fiscal 2017. In fiscal 2017, special LTIP awards were approved in the form of non-qualified performance stock options and performance-based restricted stock and are focused on longer-term strategic goals. The grant-date fair value of these awards, assuming target achievement, is included in the option awards and stock awards columns in the Summary Compensation Table below for fiscal 2017. These awards may vest based on achievement compared to pre-established targets for fiscal 2020. The LTIP is not part of the annual compensation decisions and significantly impacted reported compensation for fiscal 2017. The following table shows the impact of the LTIP on fiscal 2017 reported compensation:
Name | Reported Compensation |
Total LTIP |
Reported Compensation Excluding LTIP |
Year- over-Year Change % | ||||||||||
Martin Mucci | $ | 8,580,500 | $ | 2,442,393 | $ | 6,138,107 | 6% | |||||||
Efrain Rivera | $ | 3,071,673 | $ | 1,221,166 | $ | 1,850,507 | 5% | |||||||
Mark A. Bottini | $ | 2,900,361 | $ | 1,221,166 | $ | 1,679,195 | (7%) | |||||||
John B. Gibson | $ | 2,791,554 | $ | 1,221,166 | $ | 1,570,388 | (6%) | |||||||
Michael E. Gioja | $ | 2,828,546 | $ | 1,221,166 | $ | 1,607,380 | (4%) |
The grant-date fair value related to the LTIP grants and the annual stock option and stock award grants, which together make up the total of each type of awards shown in the Summary Compensation Table, are as follows:
Name | LTIP Option Award |
Annual Option Award |
Total Option Awards |
LTIP Restricted Stock Award |
Annual Restricted Stock Award |
Annual Performance Share Award |
Total Stock Awards | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Martin Mucci | $ | 1,151,732 | $ | 1,191,049 | $ | 2,342,781 | $ | 1,290,661 | $ | 874,697 | $ | 2,209,835 | $ | 4,375,193 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Efrain Rivera | $ | 575,862 | $ | 277,632 | $ | 853,494 | $ | 645,304 | $ | 203,875 | $ | 515,135 | $ | 1,364,314 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Mark A. Bottini | $ | 575,862 | $ | 249,870 | $ | 825,732 | $ | 645,304 | $ | 183,493 | $ | 463,615 | $ | 1,292,412 | |||||||||||||||||||||
John Gibson | $ | 575,862 | $ | 235,989 | $ | 811,851 | $ | 645,304 | $ | 173,333 | $ | 437,827 | $ | 1,256,464 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Michael E. Gioja | $ | 575,862 | $ | 235,989 | $ | 811,851 | $ | 645,304 | $ | 173,333 | $ | 437,827 | $ | 1,256,464 |
FISCAL 2017 SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
The table below presents the total compensation paid or earned by each of the NEOs.
Name and Principal Position (a) |
Fiscal Year (b) |
Salary (c) |
Bonus (d) |
Stock Awards (e) |
Option Awards (f) |
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation (g) |
All Other Compensation (h) |
Total (i) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Martin Mucci President and CEO |
|
2017
|
|
$
|
943,846
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
4,375,193
|
|
$
|
2,342,781
|
|
$
|
906,680
|
|
$
|
12,000
|
|
$
|
8,580,500
|
| ||||||||||||||||
|
2016
|
|
$
|
900,000
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
2,598,024
|
|
$
|
1,069,161
|
|
$
|
1,203,210
|
|
$
|
12,000
|
|
$
|
5,782,395
|
| |||||||||||||||||
|
2015
|
|
$
|
893,231
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
2,632,715
|
|
$
|
1,105,472
|
|
$
|
1,265,580
|
|
$
|
11,750
|
|
$
|
5,908,748
|
| |||||||||||||||||
Efrain Rivera Senior Vice President, CFO, and Treasurer |
|
2017
|
|
$
|
496,923
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
1,364,314
|
|
$
|
853,494
|
|
$
|
347,650
|
|
$
|
9,292
|
|
$
|
3,071,673
|
| ||||||||||||||||
|
2016
|
|
$
|
475,000
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
588,854
|
|
$
|
242,344
|
|
$
|
454,670
|
|
$
|
9,105
|
|
$
|
1,769,973
|
| |||||||||||||||||
|
2015
|
|
$
|
468,846
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
596,747
|
|
$
|
250,574
|
|
$
|
423,178
|
|
$
|
9,281
|
|
$
|
1,748,626
|
| |||||||||||||||||
Mark A. Bottini Senior Vice President, Sales |
|
2017
|
|
$
|
450,000
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
1,292,412
|
|
$
|
825,732
|
|
$
|
320,625
|
|
$
|
11,592
|
|
$
|
2,900,361
|
| ||||||||||||||||
|
2016
|
|
$
|
450,000
|
|
$
|
75,000
|
|
$
|
588,854
|
|
$
|
242,344
|
|
$
|
442,440
|
|
$
|
11,411
|
|
$
|
1,810,049
|
| |||||||||||||||||
|
2015
|
|
$
|
446,923
|
|
$
|
75,000
|
|
$
|
596,747
|
|
$
|
250,574
|
|
$
|
422,190
|
|
$
|
11,617
|
|
$
|
1,803,051
|
| |||||||||||||||||
John B. Gibson Senior Vice President, Service |
|
2017
|
|
$
|
425,000
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
1,256,464
|
|
$
|
811,851
|
|
$
|
287,003
|
|
$
|
11,236
|
|
$
|
2,791,554
|
| ||||||||||||||||
|
2016
|
|
$
|
421,923
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
588,854
|
|
$
|
242,344
|
|
$
|
406,810
|
|
$
|
8,976
|
|
$
|
1,668,907
|
| |||||||||||||||||
|
2015
|
|
$
|
393,846
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
596,747
|
|
$
|
250,574
|
|
$
|
356,360
|
|
$
|
7,029
|
|
$
|
1,604,556
|
| |||||||||||||||||
Michael E. Gioja Senior Vice President, Information Technology and Product Development |
|
2017
|
|
$
|
446,923
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
1,256,464
|
|
$
|
811,851
|
|
$
|
303,885
|
|
$
|
9,423
|
|
$
|
2,828,546
|
| ||||||||||||||||
|
2016
|
|
$
|
425,000
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
588,854
|
|
$
|
242,344
|
|
$
|
406,810
|
|
$
|
10,446
|
|
$
|
1,673,454
|
| |||||||||||||||||
|
2015
|
|
$
|
421,923
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
596,747
|
|
$
|
250,574
|
|
$
|
374,383
|
|
$
|
10,823
|
|
$
|
1,654,450
|
| |||||||||||||||||
Paychex, Inc. 2017 Proxy Statement 42 |
NEO Compensation |
Salary (Column (c))
The amounts reported in this column reflect the base salary paid to the NEOs during the fiscal year.
Bonus (Column (d))
The amounts reported in this column reflect a discretionary bonus of $75,000 to Mr. Bottini for fiscal 2016 and fiscal 2015 for strong sales performance.
Stock Awards (Column (e))
The amounts in this column include the grant date fair value of time-based restricted stock awards, annual performance shares, and performance-based restricted stock (LTIP) granted during the respective fiscal year, and do not reflect whether the recipient has actually realized a financial gain from such awards (such as lapse in the restrictions on a restricted stock award).
Time-Based Restricted Stock Awards
The fair value of the time-based restricted stock awards is determined based on the closing price of the underlying common stock on the date of grant. The resulting fair values were $60.84 per share, $47.32 per share, and $41.70 per share for the restricted stock awards granted annually in July of fiscal years 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively. Refer to the Grants of Plan-Based Awards For Fiscal 2017 table included in this proxy statement for further information on restricted stock awards granted in fiscal 2017.
Performance Shares
Performance share awards are reflected in the table assuming target achievement. The grant date fair value of these awards at target achievement, as reflected in the table, and also at maximum achievement is as follows:
Fiscal 2017 | Fiscal 2016 | Fiscal 2015 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Target | Maximum | Target | Maximum | Target | Maximum | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Martin Mucci | $ | 2,209,835 | $ | 3,314,782 | $ | 1,855,384 | $ | 2,783,098 | $ | 1,879,113 | $ | 2,818,689 | ||||||||||||||||||
Efrain Rivera | $ | 515,135 | $ | 772,731 | $ | 420,537 | $ | 630,849 | $ | 425,944 | $ | 638,916 | ||||||||||||||||||
Mark A. Bottini | $ | 463,615 | $ | 695,423 | $ | 420,537 | $ | 630,849 | $ | 425,944 | $ | 638,916 | ||||||||||||||||||
John B. Gibson | $ | 437,827 | $ | 656,769 | $ | 420,537 | $ | 630,849 | $ | 425,944 | $ | 638,916 | ||||||||||||||||||
Michael E. Gioja | $ | 437,827 | $ | 656,769 | $ | 420,537 | $ | 630,849 | $ | 425,944 | $ | 638,916 |
These awards have a two-year performance period, followed by an additional year of service required. The fair value of these awards is determined based on the closing price of the underlying common stock on the date of grant, adjusted for the present value of expected dividends over the performance period, as dividends are not earned during the two-year performance period. The resulting fair value was $57.18 per share, $43.98 per share, and $38.68 per share for performance shares awarded in fiscal years 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively.
LTIP Performance-Based Restricted Stock
LTIP performance-based restricted stock awards granted July 6, 2016 are reflected in the table assuming target achievement. The grant-date fair value of these awards at target achievement, as reflected in the table, and also at maximum achievement is as follows:
Fiscal 2017 | ||||||||||
Target | Maximum | |||||||||
Martin Mucci | $ | 1,290,661 | $ | 1,936,018 | ||||||
Efrain Rivera | $ | 645,304 | $ | 967,982 | ||||||
Mark A. Bottini | $ | 645,304 | $ | 967,682 | ||||||
John B. Gibson | $ | 645,304 | $ | 967,682 | ||||||
Michael E. Gioja | $ | 645,304 | $ | 967,682 |
Paychex, Inc. 2017 Proxy Statement 43 |
NEO Compensation |
These awards have a four-year performance period with achievement determined based on comparisons to pre-established targets for fiscal 2020. The fair value of these awards is determined based on the closing price of the underlying common stock on the date of grant, adjusted for the present value of expected dividends over the performance period, as dividends are not earned during the performance period. The resulting fair value was $53.61 per share for LTIP performance-based restricted stock awarded in fiscal 2017.
Option Awards (Column (f))
The amounts in this column reflect the grant date fair value for stock options granted during the respective fiscal years and do not reflect whether the recipient has actually realized a financial gain from such awards (such as by exercising stock options).
Stock Option Awards
The fair values for the annual grants of time-vested stock options were determined using a Black-Scholes option pricing model. The assumptions and resulting per share fair value for option grants included in the amounts disclosed are as follows:
July 2016 |
July 2015 |
July 2014 |
||||||||||
Risk-Free Interest Rate | 1.2 | % | 1.9 | % | 2.1 | % | ||||||
Dividend Yield | 3.6 | % | 3.6 | % | 3.7 | % | ||||||
Volatility Factor | 0.18 | 0.18 | 0.21 | |||||||||
Expected Option Term Life in Years | 6.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 | |||||||||
Fair Value | $ | 5.71 | $ | 5.17 | $ | 5.66 |
LTIP Performance Non-Qualified Stock Options
An LTIP grant was made in July 2016 in the form of non-qualified performance stock options in order to encourage the executives in achieving longer-term strategic goals. Achievement will be determined based on comparisons to pre-established targets for fiscal 2020. The fair value was determined using a Black-Scholes option pricing model for the July 2020 potential vesting tranche. The assumptions and resulting fair value for the potential vesting tranche included in the amounts disclosed are: a risk-free interest rate of 1.2%; dividend yield of 3.6%; volatility factor of 0.18; expected option term life of 6.5 years; and a fair value of $5.86 per share.
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation (Column (g))
The amounts in this column are the amounts earned under the annual incentive program. These amounts were paid in July following the applicable fiscal year end. Refer to the discussion in the CD&A Elements of Compensation, subsection Annual Officer Performance Incentive Program for information on performance targets and achievement against those targets to determine the amount earned under this program for fiscal 2017.
All Other Compensation (Column (h))
The amounts reported in this column include the Company matching contributions under the 401(k) Plan.
Paychex, Inc. 2017 Proxy Statement 44 |
NEO Compensation |
GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS FOR FISCAL 2017
The table below presents estimated possible payouts under the Companys annual incentive program for fiscal 2017 based on achievement of performance objectives at various levels for the Company and individual NEOs. It also summarizes equity awards granted during fiscal 2017 to each of the NEOs. This information does not set forth the actual payout awarded to the NEOs for fiscal 2017.
Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards |
Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards |
All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock or Units |
All Other Option Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Options |
Exercise or Base Price of Option Awards |
Grant- Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Name (a) |
Grant Type (b) |
Grant Date (c) |
Threshold ($) (d) |
Target ($) (e) |
Maximum ($) (f) |
Threshold (#) (g) |
Target (#) (h) |
Maximum (#) (i) |
(#) (j) |
(#) (k) |
($/Sh) (l) |
($) (m) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Martin Mucci | Annual Incentive Program | 7/6/2016 | $ | 617,500 | $ | 1,235,000 | $ | 1,852,500 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Restricted Stock | 7/6/2016 | 14,377 | $ | 874,697 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Performance Shares | 7/6/2016 | 23,188 | 38,647 | 57,971 | $ | 2,209,835 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock Options | 7/6/2016 | 208,590 | $ | 60.84 | $ | 1,191,049 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LTIP Performance Restricted Stock | 7/6/2016 | 14,445 | 24,075 | 36,113 | $ | 1,290,661 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LTIP Performance Stock Options | 7/6/2016 | 117,925 | 196,541 | 294,812 | $ | 60.84 | $ | 1,151,732 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Efrain Rivera | Annual Incentive Program | 7/6/2016 | $ | 237,500 | $ | 475,000 | $ | 712,500 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Restricted Stock | 7/6/2016 | 3,351 | $ | 203,875 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Performance Shares | 7/6/2016 | 5,405 | 9,009 | 13,514 | $ | 515,135 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock Options | 7/6/2016 | 48,622 | $ | 60.84 | $ | 277,632 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LTIP Performance Restricted Stock | 7/6/2016 | 7,222 | 12,037 | 18,056 | $ | 645,304 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LTIP Performance Stock Options | 7/6/2016 | 58,962 | 98,270 | 147,405 | $ | 60.84 | $ | 575,862 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mark A. Bottini | Annual Incentive Program | 7/6/2016 | $ | 247,500 | $ | 495,000 | $ | 742,500 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Restricted Stock | 7/6/2016 | 3,016 | $ | 183,493 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Performance Shares | 7/6/2016 | 4,865 | 8,108 | 12,162 | $ | 463,615 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock Options | 7/6/2016 | 43,760 | $ | 60.84 | $ | 249,870 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LTIP Performance Restricted Stock | 7/6/2016 | 7,222 | 12,037 | 18,056 | $ | 645,304 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LTIP Performance Stock Options | 7/6/2016 | 58,962 | 98,270 | 147,405 | $ | 60.84 | $ | 575,862 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
John B. Gibson | Annual Incentive Program | 7/6/2016 | $ | 201,875 | $ | 403,750 | $ | 605,625 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Restricted Stock | 7/6/2016 | 2,849 | $ | 173,333 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Performance Shares | 7/6/2016 | 4,594 | 7,657 | 11,486 | $ | 437,827 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock Options | 7/6/2016 | 41,329 | $ | 60.84 | $ | 235,989 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LTIP Performance Restricted Stock | 7/6/2016 | 7,222 | 12,037 | 18,056 | $ | 645,304 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LTIP Performance Stock Options | 7/6/2016 | 58,962 | 98,270 | 147,405 | $ | 60.84 | $ | 575,862 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Michael E. Gioja | Annual Incentive Program | 7/6/2016 | $ | 213,750 | $ | 427,500 | $ | 641,250 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Restricted Stock | 7/6/2016 | 2,849 | $ | 173,333 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Performance Shares | 7/6/2016 | 4,594 | 7,657 | 11,486 | $ | 437,827 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock Options | 7/6/2016 | 41,329 | $ | 60.84 | $ | 235,989 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LTIP Performance Restricted Stock | 7/6/2016 | 7,222 | 12,037 | 18,056 | $ | 645,304 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LTIP Performance Stock Options | 7/6/2016 | 58,962 | 98,270 | 147,405 | $ | 60.84 | $ | 575,862 |
Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards
(Columns (d), (e), and (f))
The amounts in these columns consist of possible payouts under our annual incentive program for fiscal 2017. The amounts actually earned by each NEO for fiscal 2017 are reported as Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation in the Fiscal 2017 Summary Compensation Table.
Paychex, Inc. 2017 Proxy Statement 45 |
NEO Compensation |
Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards
(Columns (g), (h), and (i))
The amounts in these columns consist of performance shares, LTIP performance stock options, and LTIP performance-based restricted stock granted during fiscal 2017 under the 2002 Plan. The performance share targets are over a two-year performance period. At the end of the performance period, actual shares earned will be determined and will be restricted with an additional one-year service requirement. Once the performance period is completed, the NEOs will have voting rights and earn dividends on the underlying restricted shares earned. Dividends earned during the one-year service period on restricted shares earned are paid at the time of vesting. Upon death or disability, a pro-rata portion of actual performance shares earned for the performance period will be received based on number of days from the beginning of the performance period until the date of death or disability out of the total number of days in the performance period.
The LTIP performance stock options and LTIP performance-based restricted stock will vest if targets for fiscal 2020 are met. For both these components, there is a threshold, target, and maximum. During the performance period, the NEOs will not have voting rights or earn dividends on the underlying shares. Upon death or disability, any unvested portion of the award will be forfeited and immediately cancelled.
All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock or Units (Column (j))
The amounts in this column consist of time-based restricted stock granted in fiscal 2017 under the 2002 Plan. All shares underlying these awards are restricted in that they are not transferable until they vest. One-third of these shares vest annually over a three-year period from the date of grant, provided the NEO is an employee of the Company on the vest date. Upon death or disability, these shares fully vest. The NEOs have voting rights and earn dividends on the underlying shares. Dividends are paid at the time of vesting.
All Other Option Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Options (Column (k))
The amounts in this column consist of time-based stock options granted in fiscal 2017 under the 2002 Plan. These stock options have an exercise price equal to the closing stock price on the date of grant, have a term of ten years, and vest 25% per annum over a four-year period from the date of grant, provided the NEO is an employee of the Company on the vesting date. Upon death or disability, all unvested options fully vest.
Grant-Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards (Column (m))
The amounts in this column represent the aggregate grant-date fair value of restricted stock, performance shares, stock options, LTIP performance stock options, and LTIP performance-based restricted stock granted in fiscal 2017 under the 2002 Plan as follows:
| The fair value of the time-based restricted stock awards was $60.84 per share, and was equal to the closing price of the underlying common stock on the date of grant. |
| The fair value of the performance shares was based on achievement at target and was $57.18 per share. This was equal to the closing price of the underlying common stock on the date of grant less the present value of expected dividends over the performance period, as dividends are not earned during the performance period. |
| The fair value of the annual stock option grant was $5.71 per share, and was determined using a Black-Scholes option pricing model. |
| The fair value of the LTIP performance-based restricted stock was based on achievement at target and was $53.61 per share. This was equal to the closing price of the underlying common stock on the date of grant less the present value of expected dividends over the performance period, as dividends are not earned during the performance period. |
| The fair value of the LTIP performance stock options was based on achievement at target and was $5.86 per share. This was determined using a Black-Scholes option pricing model. |
Paychex, Inc. 2017 Proxy Statement 46 |
NEO Compensation |
OPTION EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED IN FISCAL 2017
The following table provides information about the value realized by the NEOs upon the exercise of options and the lapsing of the restrictions on restricted stock awards during fiscal 2017. Certain columns in this table and the presentation of information on an award-by-award basis are not required by the rules relating to executive compensation disclosures and are not a substitute for the information required by Item 402 of SEC Regulation S-K, but rather are intended to provide additional information that stockholders may find useful.
Option Awards | Stock Awards | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Name (a) |
Date of (b) |
Number of Shares Acquired on Exercise (#) (c) |
Value Realized ($) (d) |
Date of (e) |
Number of Shares Acquired on Lapsing (#) (f) |
Value (g) |
||||||||||||||||||
Martin Mucci | 7/10/2008 | 40,000 | $ | 1,147,299 | 7/10/2013 | 70,951 | $ | 4,351,425 | ||||||||||||||||
7/9/2009 | 25,965 | $ | 847,605 | 7/9/2014 | 6,024 | $ | 369,452 | |||||||||||||||||
7/8/2015 | 5,232 | $ | 320,879 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Efrain Rivera | | | $ | | 7/10/2013 | 16,082 | $ | 986,309 | ||||||||||||||||
7/9/2014 | 1,365 | $ | 83,715 | |||||||||||||||||||||
7/8/2015 | 1,186 | $ | 72,737 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Mark A. Bottini | 10/17/2011 | 35,000 | $ | 1,118,196 | 7/10/2013 | 16,082 | $ | 986,309 | ||||||||||||||||
7/9/2014 | 1,365 | $ | 83,715 | |||||||||||||||||||||
7/8/2015 | 1,186 | $ | 72,737 | |||||||||||||||||||||
John B. Gibson | | | $ | | 7/10/2013 | 16,082 | $ | 986,309 | ||||||||||||||||
7/9/2014 | 1,365 | $ | 83,715 | |||||||||||||||||||||
7/8/2015 | 1,186 | $ | 72,737 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Michael E. Gioja | 7/6/2011 | 6,190 | $ | 178,829 | 7/10/2013 | 16,082 | $ | 986,309 | ||||||||||||||||
7/11/2012 | 24,726 | $ | 718,722 | 7/9/2014 | 1,365 | $ | 83,715 | |||||||||||||||||
7/8/2015 | 1,186 | $ | 72,737 |
Value Realized on Exercise (Column (d))
The amounts in this column represent the difference between the market price of a share of the Companys common stock as of the date of exercise and the exercise price of the option for all options exercised.
Value Realized on Lapse (Column (g))
The amounts in this column are based on the closing stock price of the Companys common stock on the date of lapse.
Paychex, Inc. 2017 Proxy Statement 47 |
NEO Compensation |
OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AS OF MAY 31, 2017
The following table presents the equity awards made to NEOs which were outstanding as of May 31, 2017.
Option Awards | Stock Awards | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Name (a) |
Option Grant Date (b) |
Number of (c) |
Number of (d) |
Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Unearned Options (#) (e) |
Option Exercise Price ($) (f) |
Option Expiration Date (g) |
Total Potential Current Value of Outstanding Options ($) (h) |
Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#) (i) |
Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested ($) (j) |
Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other That Have Not Vested (#) (k) |
Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested ($) (l) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Martin Mucci | 7/6/2016 | | | 117,925 | $60.84 | 7/5/2026 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7/6/2016 | | 208,590 | | $60.84 | 7/5/2026 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7/8/2015 | 51,700 | 155,101 | | $47.32 | 7/8/2025 |