f8k061009_iconicbrnds.htm
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON,
D.C. 20549
FORM
8-K
CURRENT
REPORT
Pursuant
to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities
Exchange Act of 1934
Date of
report (Date of earliest event reported): June 10,
2009
ICONIC
BRANDS, INC.
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in Charter)
Nevada
|
000-53162
|
13-4362274
|
(State
or other jurisdiction of
incorporation
or organization)
|
(Commission
File No.)
|
(IRS
Employee Identification
No.)
|
1174
Route 109
Lindenhurst,
NY 11757
(Address
of Principal Executive Offices)
(631)
991-3174
(Issuer
Telephone number)
1921
Denver West Court, Suite 2022
Golden,
Colorado 80401
(301)
278-7500
(Former
name or former address, if changed since last report)
Check the
appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously
satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following
provisions (see General Instruction A.2. below):
o Written
communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR
230.425)
o Soliciting
material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.14a-12)
o Pre-commencement
communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.14d-2(b))
o Pre-commencement
communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.13e-4(c))
CAUTIONARY
NOTE REGARDING FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS
The
Current Report on Form 8-K contains forward looking statements that involve
risks and uncertainties, principally in the sections entitled "Description of
Business,” “Risk Factors,” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations.” All statements other
than statements of historical fact contained in this Current Report on Form 8-K,
including statements regarding future events, our future financial performance,
business strategy and plans and objectives of management for future operations,
are forward-looking statements. We have attempted to identify
forward-looking statements by terminology including “anticipates,” “believes,”
“can,” “continue,” “could,” “estimates,” “expects,” “intends,” “may,” “plans,”
“potential,” “predicts,” “should,” or “will” or the negative of these terms or
other comparable terminology. Although we do not make forward looking
statements unless we believe we have a reasonable basis for doing so, we cannot
guarantee their accuracy. These statements are only predictions and
involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, including the
risks outlined under “Risk Factors” or elsewhere in this Current Report on Form
8-K, which may cause our or our industry’s actual results, levels of activity,
performance or achievements expressed or implied by these forward-looking
statements. Moreover, we operate in a very competitive and rapidly
changing environment. New risks emerge from time to time and it is
not possible for us to predict all risk factors, nor can we address the impact
of all factors on our business or the extent to which any factor, or combination
of factors, may cause our actual results to differ materially from those
contained in any forward-looking statements.
We have
based these forward-looking statements largely on our current expectations and
projections about future events and financial trends that we believe may affect
our financial condition, results of operations, business strategy, short term
and long term business operations, and financial needs. These
forward-looking statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that
could cause our actual results to differ materially from those reflected in the
forward looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to
such differences include, but are not limited to, those discussed in this
Current Report on Form 8-K, and in particular, the risks discussed below and
under the heading “Risk Factors” and those discussed in other documents we file
with the Securities and Exchange Commission that are incorporated into this
Current Report on Form 8-K by reference. The following discussion
should be read in conjunction with our annual report on Form 10-K and our
quarterly reports on Form 10-Q incorporated into this Current Report on Form 8-K
by reference, and the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto
included in our annual and quarterly reports. We undertake no
obligation to revise or publicly release the results of any revision to these
forward-looking statements. In light of these risks, uncertainties
and assumptions, the forward-looking events and circumstances discussed in this
Current Report on Form 8-K may not occur and actual results could differ
materially and adversely from those anticipated or implied in the
forward-looking statement.
You
should not place undue reliance on any forward-looking statement, each of which
applies only as of the date of this Current Report on Form
8-K. Before you invest in our common stock, you should be aware that
the occurrence of the events described in the section entitled “Risk Factors”
and elsewhere in this Current Report on Form 8-K could negatively affect our
business, operating results, financial condition and stock
price. Except as required by law, we undertake no obligation to
update or revise publicly any of the forward-looking statements after the date
of this Current Report on Form 8-K to conform our statements to actual results
or changed expectations.
Item 1.01 Entry Into A Material Definitive
Agreement
As more
fully described in Item 2.01 below, on June 10, 2009, Iconic Brands, Inc.
(formerly, Paw Spa, Inc.) (“we,” “Iconic Brands” or the “Company”) entered into
an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) with Paw Spa
Acquisition, Inc., a Nevada corporation which is a wholly owned subsidiary of
the Company (the “Merger Sub”), Harbrew Imports Ltd. Corp., a Florida
corporation (“Harbrew Florida”), and Harbrew Imports, Ltd. a New York
corporation which is a wholly owned subsidiary of Harbrew Florida (“Harbrew New
York”, together with Harbrew Florida, collectively referred to as “Harbrew”),
pursuant to which the Company issued to Merger Sub a total of 27,151,984 shares
(the “Merger Shares”) of common stock, par value $0.00001 per share, of the
Company (the “Common Stock”) at the closing of the transactions contemplated by
the Merger Agreement (the “Closing”). The closing of the transaction
took place on June 10, 2009 (the “Closing Date”). Pursuant to the terms of the
Merger Agreement, each share of Harbrew Florida’s common stock issued and
outstanding immediately prior to the Closing was converted into one share of the
Company’s common stock and the remaining Merger Shares were issued to creditors
of Harbrew in settlement of their debts. After the merger, Harbrew
New York continued as the surviving company under the laws of the state of New
York and became the wholly owned subsidiary of the Company (the “Merger
Transaction”).
Prior to
the Closing of the Merger Transaction, Harbrew had 295 shareholders (the
“Harbrew Shareholders”). In addition, Mr. Richard J. DeCicco was the
sole director and the Chief Executive Officer of Harbrew and William S. Blacker
was the Chief Financial Officer of Harbrew.
As a
result of the Merger Transaction, Harbrew New York merged with and into the
Merger Sub with Harbrew New York becoming the surviving entity and, as a result,
Harbrew New York became a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company.
As a
further condition of the Merger Transaction, the current officers and directors
of the Company resigned effective 10 days after the Closing Date and Richard
DeCicco and Bill Blacker were appointed as the new officers and directors of the
Company.
The
Merger Agreement contains customary terms and conditions for a transaction of
this type, including representations, warranties and covenants, as well as
provisions describing the merger consideration, the process of exchanging the
consideration and the effect of the merger.
As a
condition to the Merger Agreement, Harbrew also settled an amount outstanding
with its largest lender, Capstone Capital Group I, LLC
(“Capstone”). The parties entered into a termination agreement (the
“Termination Agreement”) whereby Capstone agreed to forgive the $2,833,205 it
was owed under a PO Financing Agreement in exchange for: (i) a $500,000 7%
unsecured promissory note (the “Promissory Note”); (ii) 1,000,000 shares of
Common Stock; (iii) $1,833,205 worth of Series B Preferred Stock; and (iv) a
3-year warrant to purchase up to 1,000,000 shares of Common Stock at an exercise
price of $0.50 per shares. A copy of the Termination Agreement is
attached as Exhibit 10.1. A copy of the Promissory Note is attached
as Exhibit 10.2. A copy of the Certificate of Designations for the
Series B Convertible Preferred Stock is attached as Exhibit 3.4.
Additionally,
in connection with the Merger Agreement, Harbrew New York also converted a
majority of the Promissory Notes (the “Old Notes”) that were previously issued
to certain noteholders in 2007 and 2008. Most of the Old Notes
had a 5-year maturity period and a conversion feature where the holders could
convert the Old Notes into common stock at a price of $0.50 per
share. As of the date of the Closing, the Company had the aggregate
principal amount of $2,670,647 in Old Notes. Pursuant to an Agreement
to Convert the Promissory Notes, the Company offered the noteholders: (a) shares
of Common Stock of the Company convertible at $0.50 per share; (b) a 5-year
warrant to purchase 100% of the shares of common stock issuable upon conversion
of the Old Notes at an exercise price of $1.00 per share, and (c) a 5-year
warrant to purchase 100% of the shares of common stock issuable upon conversion
of the Old Notes at an exercise price of $1.50 per share. As part of
the Merger Transaction, a total amount of $2,203,154 of the outstanding Old
Notes agreed to convert their notes to common stock and the Company issued a
total of 4,406,307 shares of Common Stock in satisfaction of those
notes. Immediately following the Closing, there are Old Notes
outstanding in the amount of $467,493 which will continue to accrue
interest. A copy of the Conversion Agreement is attached hereto as
Exhibit 10.2.
As part
of the Merger Transaction and in accordance with Harbrew’s licensing of Danny
Devito’s Premium Limoncello (as discussed herein), the Company also entered into
certain consulting agreements (the “Consulting Agreements”) with Merger Sub,
Harbrew New York and Danny Devito and his affiliates (the “Consultants”),
pursuant to which the Company issued a total of 2,086,973 shares of Common
Stock, as part of the Merger Shares, which is equal to 4.62% of the outstanding
common stock of he Company to Danny DeVito and his affiliates for consulting
services.
This
transaction is discussed more fully in Section 2.01 of this Current
Report. This brief discussion is qualified by reference to the
provisions of the agreements above which are attached to this report as
exhibits.
Item 2.01 Completion of Acquisition or
Disposition of Assets
CLOSING
OF MERGER TRANSACTION
As
described in Item 1.01 above, on June 10, 2009, we acquired Harbrew New York in
accordance with the Merger Agreement. The closing of the transaction
took place on June 10, 2009 (the “Closing Date”). On the Closing
Date, pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement, we issued to Merger Sub a
total of 27,151,984 shares of Common Stock at the Closing. Each share
of Harbrew Florida’s common stock issued and outstanding immediately prior to
the Closing was converted into one share of our common stock and the remaining
Merger Shares were issued to creditors of Harbrew in settlement of their
debts. After the merger, Harbrew New York continued as the surviving
company under the laws of the state of New York and became the wholly owned
subsidiary of the Company.
Prior to
the Closing, Harbrew Florida owned 100% of the issued and outstanding capital
stock of Harbrew New York and had 295 shareholders. Pursuant to the
Merger Agreement, the shareholders of Harbrew Florida exchanged their shares of
Harbrew Florida for shares of the Company on a one-to-one basis.
As part
of the Merger Transaction, on June 10, 2009, Harbrew entered into a Termination
Agreement with Capstone, pursuant to which certain financing agreements between
Harbrew and Capstone, dated January 22, 2007 (the “PO Financing Agreement”) were
terminated and the amount owed under the PO Financing Agreements was paid in the
following manners:
·
|
$500,000
was paid pursuant to the terms of the unsecured promissory note
bearing interest at the rate of seven percent (7%) per annum which was
delivered to Capstone on the effective date of the Termination Agreement
(the “Promissory Note”).
|
·
|
$500,000
worth of Common Stock of the Company (which is equal to 1,000,000 shares
of Common Stock) was issued to Capstone at an issue price of $0.50 per
share; and
|
·
|
$1,833,205
worth of Series B Preferred Stock of the Company (which is equal to
916,603 shares of Series B Preferred Stock) was issued to
Capstone. The Class B Preferred Stock has a value of $2.00 per
share.
|
Additionally,
in connection with the Merger Agreement, Harbrew New York also converted a
majority of the Promissory Notes (the “Old Notes”) that were previously issued
to certain noteholders in 2007 and 2008. Most of the Old Notes had a
5-year maturity period and a conversion feature where the holders could convert
the Old Notes into common stock at a price of $0.50 per share. As of
the date of the Closing, the Company had the aggregate principal amount of
$2,670,647 in Old Notes. Pursuant to an Agreement to Convert the
Promissory Notes, the Company offered the noteholders: (a) shares of Common
Stock of the Company convertible at $0.50 per share; (b) a 5-year warrant to
purchase 100% of the shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of the Old
Notes at an exercise price of $1.00 per share, and (c) a 5-year warrant to
purchase 100% of the shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of the Old
Notes at an exercise price of $1.50 per share. As part of the Merger
Transaction, a total amount of $2,203,154 of the outstanding Old Notes agreed to
convert their notes to common stock and the Company issued a total of 4,406,307
shares of Common Stock in satisfaction of those notes. Immediately
following the Closing, there are Old Notes outstanding in the amount of $467,493
which will continue to accrue interest. A copy of the Conversion
Agreement is attached hereto as Exhibit 10.2.
As part
of the Merger Transaction and in accordance with Harbrew’s licensing of Danny
Devito’s Premium Limoncello (as discussed herein), the Company also entered into
certain consulting agreements (the “Consulting Agreements”) with Merger Sub,
Harbrew New York and Danny Devito and his affiliates (the “Consultants”),
pursuant to which the Company issued a total of 2,086,973 shares of Common
Stock, as part of the Merger Shares, which is equal to 4.62% of the outstanding
common stock of he Company to Danny DeVito and his affiliates for consulting
services.
The
Registrant was a “shell company” (as such term is defined in Rule 12b-2 under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”))
immediately before the completion of the Merger. Accordingly,
pursuant to the requirements of Item 2.01(a)(f) of Form 8-K, set forth below is
the information that would be required if the Company were filing a general form
for registration of securities on Form 10-SB under the Exchange Act, reflecting
the Company’s common stock, which is the only class of its securities subject to
the reporting requirements of Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act
upon consummation of the Merger, with such information reflecting the Company
and its securities upon consummation of the Merger.
BUSINESS
DESCRIPTION
OF BUSINESS
Iconic
Brands was incorporated in the State of Nevada on October 21, 2005. Our plan was
to provide mobile grooming and spa services for cats and dogs. Our services were
going to include bathing, hair cutting and styling, brushing/combing, flea
and tick treatments, nail maintenance and beautification, ear cleaning, teeth
cleaning, hot oil treatments, and massage. The pricing for these services vary
based on the size of the animal, packaged service specials, and required travel
necessary. We did not have any business operations and failed not generate any
revenues. We planned to provide an assigned groomer with a properly
equipped van capable of providing all necessary services to our clients,
however, we were not able to successfully start this business. We
abandoned this business, as we lacked sufficient capital resources, and entered
into the Merger Transaction.
BUSINESS
DEVELOPMENT OF HARBREW
Overview
Harbrew
New York, is a company incorporated under the laws of New York. Harbrew is a
brand owner of self-developed alcoholic beverages and is in the business of
importing and wholesaling spirits and wine to distributors in the United States
both on a national basis and to retail licensees both on and off premise in New
York, through its wholesale license.
Business
Harbrew
New York, is a company incorporated under the laws of New York. Harbrew is a
brand owner of self-developed alcoholic beverages and is in the business of
importing and wholesaling spirits and wine to distributors in the United States
both on a national basis and to retail licensees both on and off premise in New
York, through its wholesale license. Harbrew is federally licensed, maintaining
licenses to both import and sell to wholesale licensed distributors in 51
markets in the United States. In addition to the federal import and wholesale
licenses, it maintains a federal customs bonded facility license for our
premises in Lindenhurst, New York. Within the licensing category, it also
maintains a New York State wholesale license and a New York State
warehousing license, permitting the company to warehouse products of other
companies.
Harbrew’s
objective is to continue to build a unique portfolio of global brands, with a
primary focus on increasing brand case sales. To achieve this end, Harbrew is
focusing on penetrating select markets. The company believes that the key
national markets in the United States for its products are New York, Florida,
Texas, California, Illinois and Massachusetts. Harbrew intends to vigorously
market our brands by utilizing a combination of both traditional and
non-traditional media, Internet-specific methods and campaigns. Currently, the
company’s marketing is focused on the key national markets.
History
and Corporate Organization
Prior to
the consummation of the Merger Agreement, Harbrew New York was a wholly-owned
subsidiary of Harbrew Florida. Harbrew Florida was incorporated in
the state of Florida on January 4, 2007, under the former name Stassi Harbrew
Imports Corp., pursuant to the Bankruptcy Court Approved Reorganization Plan for
the Stassi Interaxx, Inc. (“Stassi”) reorganization confirmed on December 20,
2006. On May 17, 2007, Harbrew Florida acquired Harbrew New York, a New York
corporation incorporated on September 8, 1999 engaged in importing and
wholesaling spirits, wine and beer. As a result, Harbrew New York
became a wholly-owned subsidiary of Harbrew Florida.
THE
MERGER
On June
10, 2009, Merger Sub, Harbrew Florida, Harbrew New York and we entered into a
Merger Agreement which resulted in Harbrew New York becoming our wholly owned
subsidiary (the “Merger”). The Merger was accomplished by means of a
Merger Agreement in which Harbrew New York merged with and into Merger Sub and
each share of Harbrew’s common stock issued and outstanding immediately prior to
the closing of the Merger was converted into one share of Iconic Brands’ common
stock. Under the terms of the Merger Agreement and as a result of the
Merger:
·
|
Harbrew
New York became our wholly owned subsidiary;
|
|
|
·
|
In
exchange for all of the shares of Harbrew common stock, each share of
Harbrew’s common stock issued and outstanding immediately prior to the
closing of the Merger was converted into one share of Iconic Brands’
common stock;
|
This
transaction closed on June 10, 2009.
OUR
BRANDS
Harbrew
markets specific beverage brands nationally and internationally. Some of the
major brands marketed by us include:
·
|
Danny
DeVito’s Premium Limoncello
|
Limoncello
is a popular Italian after-dinner drink, traditionally served ice-cold. Danny
DeVito’s Premium Limoncello is a lemon liqueur produced in Southern Italy,
mainly in the region around the Gulf of Naples, the Amalfi coast and the Islands
of Ischia and Capri, but also in Sicily, Sardinia and the Maltese island of
Gozo. Danny DeVito’s Premium Limoncello is produced exclusively using lemons
from Sorrento, Italy, which are harvested and immediately processed in a
distillery situated on the Sorrento peninsula. At the October 2007 International
Review of Spirits competition, this product was awarded a “Gold Medal” with 90
points and earned a rating of “Exceptional.” This international competition is
run by the Beverage Tasting Institute of Chicago, an independent
corporation.
Harbrew
believes that, in the U.S. market, the potential of our Limoncello drink has
been virtually untapped. It also believes that Danny DeVito’s Premium Limoncello
is the first “branded” product in an “unbranded” category. Harbrew has an
exclusive perpetual license agreement with Seven Cellos, LLC, Danny DeVito’s
company, and, in accordance with that agreement, net profits are shared between
us and Seven Cellos, LLC. For the terms of that agreement, see “License
Agreements” below.
·
|
Glen
Master Single Malt Scotch Whisky
|
Glen
Master Single Malt Scotch Whisky is a collection of single malt Scotch whiskies.
Hand picked, rather than randomly chosen, the Glen Master range of whiskies is
the result of hours of expert nosing. The character of Scotch whisky is
influenced by many factors, but prime among these is the quality of the cask and
the storage conditions in which the whisky has been matured. Bottled at ambient
temperature, the original style is enhanced with all the color coming naturally
from the wood, as the whisky matures over the years. Judging when the whisky has
reached its peak of perfection is a rare expertise that we believe the makers of
Glen Master Single Malt Scotch Whisky possess.
·
|
St.
Andrews “The Champion” Whisky
|
St.
Andrews “The Champion” Whisky is a 21-year old blended Scotch whisky that comes
in a limited number decanter with each box individually numbered. St. Andrews
Beverages Limited, considered a master blender in the industry, has selected
high quality malts and grain whiskies to create a marriage between these
ingredients. The Champion received 86 points and was awarded a “Silver Medal” at
the January 2005 International Review of Spirits competition, run by the
Beverage Tasting Institute of Chicago. St Andrews whiskies, both single malt and
blended, fit into our family of brands.
·
|
Bench
5 and Bench 15 Premium Scotch
Whisky
|
Bench 5
Premium Scotch whisky is marketed as a well-matured and rounded five-year old
Scotch whisky with a smooth mellow flavor. Our “celebrity brand partner” for
this Scotch is Johnny Bench, the hall of fame catcher. Following in the
footsteps of Bench 5, we also introduced Bench 15 Premium Scotch whisky, a
15-year old Scotch whisky.
The
territory and years remaining on the term of each of our brand’s exclusivity are
as follows:
Brand
|
|
Territory
|
|
Remaining
Term
|
|
|
|
|
|
Danny
DeVito’s Premium Limoncello
|
|
Worldwide
|
|
unlimited
|
|
|
|
|
|
St.
Andrews “The Champion” Scotch Whisky
|
|
North
America
|
|
5
years
|
Bench
5 and 15 Scotch Whisky
|
|
Worldwide
|
|
unlimited
|
Glen
Master Single Malt Scotch
|
|
Worldwide
|
|
unlimited
|
Each of
the above licenses is renewable by its terms.
GROWTH
STRATEGY
Our
objective is to continue to build a unique portfolio of global brands aimed at
the premium market, with a primary focus on increasing both total and individual
brand case sales. To achieve this, we intend to focus on the
following:
·
|
Increase market penetration of
existing brands. The utilization of the existing distribution
relationships, sales expertise and targeted marketing activities to
achieve growth and gain additional market share for the brands with retail
stores, bars, restaurants and, ultimately, with the end consumers in the
United States; adding experienced salespeople in selected markets;
increase sales to national chain accounts and begin to penetrate
international markets.
|
·
|
Build brand awareness through
marketing, advertising and promotional activities. Building brand
campaigns that emphasize the “Gold Medal” awards from the Beverage Tasting
Institute of Chicago using advertising firms, billboards, print
advertisements and in-store promotional materials, to increase consumer
brand awareness.
|
·
|
Selectively add new brands to
the portfolio. We intend to continue developing new brands and
pursuing strategic relationships, joint ventures and, to a lesser extent,
acquisitions, to selectively expand the portfolio of brands. In
particular, we will focus on our demonstrated ability to partner with
celebrities to create unique brands that reflect each celebrity’s image
within their marketplace.
|
MARKETING
STRATEGY
We are in
the process of building our brands into the United States market. To achieve
this end, we are focusing on penetrating select markets with the intention of
influencing the remainder of the country as a result. We believe that the key
national markets in the United States for our products are New York, Florida,
Texas, California, Illinois and Massachusetts. We believe that creating brand
awareness — both awareness of the brands, as well as the appropriate impression
associated with them — in these select markets is of the utmost importance, as
these markets tend to be the opinion leaders for the country.
We intend
to vigorously market our brands by utilizing a combination of both traditional
media and non-traditional, Internet-specific methods and campaigns. Initially,
marketing is focused on the key national markets. Our marketing campaigns have
four separate marketing objectives:
·
|
Create
each brand, its placement and value in the
marketplace;
|
·
|
Ensure
a steady interest among distributors, wholesalers and both categories of
retail outlets;
|
·
|
Create
brand awareness and appetite in the mind of the consuming public;
and
|
·
|
Penetrate
throughout all key markets within the United
States.
|
DIRECT
SALES STRATEGY
Within
the spirits distribution industry, the key mode of sales generation is tied to a
direct sales force for both the importer and distributor business lines. We
intend to increase our sales staff by adding four new sales people to our New
York sales force. These salespeople will not only sell in the New York
metropolitan market, but will assist in our national exposure
efforts.
During
the next 12 months, we intend to dedicate additional people both to the New York
sales force, as well as defined personnel for the national efforts. This
national sales force will target distributors in the key markets, as well as
large secondary markets in the cities of Atlanta, Philadelphia, Dallas and
Houston, among others.
DISTRIBUTION
NETWORK
We
believe that our distribution network and New York State wholesale license are
among our competitive strengths. We believe that the rapid introduction of Danny
DeVito’s Premium Limoncello in the major markets with subsequent re-orders
during the holiday season reinforces and further bolsters our confidence in our
ability to bring new brands to market and quickly establish them as brands of
choice. Additionally, we believe the awards given by the Beverage Tasting
Institute of Chicago for Danny DeVito’s Premium Limoncello confirms our ability
to not only develop new products, but to recognize the value of brands
selected.
Domestic
Distribution
General. Importers of
distilled spirits in the United States must sell their products through a
three-tier distribution system. An imported brand is first sold to a U.S.
importer, which then sells it to a network of distributors, or wholesalers,
covering the United States, in either “open” states or “control states. In the
31 open states, the distributors are generally large, privately-held companies.
In the 19 control states, the states themselves function as the distributor, and
suppliers like our company are regulated by these states. The distributors and
wholesalers, in turn, sell to the individual liquor retailers, such as liquor
stores, restaurants, bars, supermarkets and other outlets in the states in which
they are licensed to sell beverage alcohol. In larger states such as New York,
more than one distributor may handle a brand in separate geographical areas. We
are a licensed wholesaler in the state of New York, which gives us a competitive
advantage in bringing a product to this large market in the shortest time
possible. In control states, where liquor sales are controlled by the state
governments, importers must sell their products directly to the state liquor
authorities, which also act as the distributors and either maintain control over
the retail outlets or license the retail sales function to private companies,
while maintaining strict control over pricing and profit.
Importation. We own most of
our brands or, by contract, have the exclusive right to act as the U.S. importer
of the brands in our portfolio. We have both the federal importer and wholesaler
license required by the Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau, a division of
the U.S. Department of the Treasury, and a wholesale liquor license issued by
New York State. For those states in which we do not have a wholesale license, we
use the services of distributors who have the proper licenses to distribute our
products.
Wholesalers and Distributors.
In the United States, we are required by law to use state licensed distributors
or, in the control states, state-owned agencies performing this function, to
sell our brands to the various retail outlets. As a result, we are dependent on
them not only for sales, but also for product placement and retail store
penetration. We do not have distribution agreements or minimum sales
requirements with any of our U.S. alcohol distributors and they are under no
obligation to place our products or market our brands. In addition, all of them
also distribute the products and brands of our competitors. To that end, the
fostering and maintaining of relationships with the distributors is a key to
introducing and maintaining product placements and growth within each
marketplace.
PUBLIC
RELATIONS, ADVERTISING AND TRADE SHOWS
We intend
to engage a public relations firm to ensure proper press coverage in spirits
industry trade publications. Our public relations efforts will target
influential retail outlets, such as popular clubs and restaurants, as well as
very specific “image makers,” who have influence on popular trends.
We pursue
a selective advertising campaign to promote our brands in appropriate trade
magazines such as Market Watch, Wine Spectator, Wine Enthusiast, Penthouse, US
magazine, People, Vanity Fair (November and December 2008) and Details (November
and December 2008), as well as select influential consumer magazines, such as
New York, Time-Out and InStyle, and the city’s high-volume tabloid newspapers.
In future years, these print campaigns will be augmented by radio and outdoor
buys in key marketplaces. We believe that these placements represent value-added
purchases as they have lower cost per thousand page impressions (CPMs) and can
more fully illustrate the value and quality of our products.
We intend
to expand on our interactive and integrated corporate website,
www.iconicbrandsusa.com, to include a fully interactive demonstration of our
brands, highlighting all the specific advantages of our offerings. We are
pursuing a method by which a “virtual store” can be established to aid the
distributors and retail customers in placing orders and helping them to monitor
their inventories of our products.
Trade
shows are and will remain an integral part of our marketing concept for the
purpose of attracting both distributors and wholesalers. In particular,
marketing investments are budgeted for several industry-specific expositions. We
believe that by attending these annual events, it will aid in establishing our
brands and our company as an emergent leader for the industry.
BONDED
WAREHOUSE
By
maintaining our own bonded warehousing facilities, we gain added flexibility in
managing our inventory. Bonded warehouses carry different classifications. One
classification allows a bonded warehouse proprietor/company to only warehouse
the product that is owned by the proprietor/company and not the property of
other companies. The other classification allows a bonded warehouse
proprietor/company to both warehouse the product that is owned by the
proprietor/company and the property of other companies. We maintain both levels
of this license. We believe the fact that one’s inventory is in its own facility
where the primary business is conducted gives our company flexibility. We can
move product from an “In Bond” condition to a “Tax Paid” condition under our own
timeline due to our direct control of the inventory under our company’s own
roof. Another advantage of a company having its own bonded warehouse and being
in the import and distribution of alcoholic beverages is the company from time
to time will run marketing programs that require the product to be enhanced by
adding what is referred to as a “value added component” to it. One such example
is the addition of gift packaging and then marketing the product as a
value-added gift pack. Without a bonded warehouse license under its own control,
a company seeking to offer such value-added gift pack would not only have to pay
an outside co-packer to perform the manipulation, but would have to pay the
federal FET tax in advance of shipping the product to distributors or the
trade.
Another
advantage is the positive impact having a bonded warehouse has on the company’s
cash flow. The company will keep the majority or bulk of the inventory it
possesses in an “In Bond” condition until such time as it needs the inventory
for sale. The company would then instruct its custom broker to pay the duty on a
designated amount of inventory and move the inventory from an “In Bond” status
to a “Tax Paid” condition. This process actually gives the company an additional
ten or more days of cash flow until the ACH, the automatic transfer of the tax
from the company’s account to the federal government. The federal excise tax can
significantly impact a company’s cash flow in terms of actual dollars. On a
standard nine-liter case of 80 proof Scotch Whiskey, which costs a company
approximately $50 per case, the federal excise tax is approximately $30 per
case.
LICENSE
AGREEMENTS
On April
26, 2007, we entered into an exclusive License Agreement with Seven Cellos, LLC,
pursuant to which we were granted a limited license to certain rights in and to
Danny DeVito’s name, likeness and biography for use by us in connection with
Danny DeVito’s Premium Limoncello. The term of the agreement continues in
perpetuity unless the agreement is terminated upon prior notice. In
consideration for the license, we agreed to pay royalties as follows: 5% of net
profits to Behr Abrahamson & Kaller, LLP and a payment of 50% of the
remaining net profits to Danny DeVito. In addition, we granted a warrant to
purchase 100,000 shares of our Common Stock to Mr. DeVito, for an exercise price
equal to the lower of $1.00 per share or 85% of the 30-day average bid and ask
price prior to exercise. We also granted a warrant to Behr Abrahamson to
purchase 20,000 shares of our Common Stock for an exercise price equal to the
lower of $1.00 per share or 85% of the 30-day average bid and ask price prior to
exercise. Danny DeVito agreed to use reasonable efforts to be available for a
reasonable number of promotional appearances during each consecutive 12-month
period, the duration of which will not exceed two days. Pursuant to the
agreement, Mr. DeVito granted us a right of first refusal for a period of five
years to license any other liquor, spirit or alcoholic beverage which Danny may
determine to endorse or develop. A condition precedent to Danny DeVito’s
performance under the agreement is our applying for a trademark for the brand
name “Danny DeVito’s Premium Limoncello,” with Danny DeVito being designated as
a 50% co-owner of the such trademark. We applied for the trademark on April 10,
2007 (trademark application number 377/152,934), which application is currently
being reviewed by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
Pursuant
to the Merger Agreement, we entered into an Addendum to the License Agreement
whereby we granted Danny Devito the right to receive notice and provide his
prior written consent for any material contract that we enter into. Failure to
obtain such consent will permit Danny Devito to terminate the License
Agreement. A copy of the Addendum to the License Agreement Attached
as Exhibit 10.4.
MANUFACTURING
AGREEMENTS
In August
2007, we entered into an Exclusive Manufacturing Agreement with Fagema Sorrento
Delizie Di De Luca Antonino and Scala Antonino, an Italian corporation. The term
of the agreement is for five years from August 18, 2007, and it automatically
renews for additional, consecutive five-year terms unless either party gives
written notice at least 90 days prior to the end of the then current term. In
return for Fagema Sorrento Delizie Di De Luca Antonino and Scala Antonino’s
manufacture and shipping of Danny DeVito’s Premium Limoncello, we pay between
$65 and $68 per case of 12 750-ml. bottles. This is an exclusive contract where
Fagema Sorrento Delizie Di De Luca Antonino and Scala Antonino is bound to not
manufacture or sell Danny DeVito’s Premium Limoncello to anyone other than us,
and we are bound to not purchase Danny DeVito’s Premium Limoncello from any
other manufacturer.
COMPETITION
We
compete on the basis of the strength of our quality, price, brand recognition
and distribution. The premium brands compete with other alcoholic beverages for
consumer purchases and for shelf space in retail stores, restaurant presence and
wholesaler attention. In addition to the six major companies listed below, we
compete with numerous international producers and distributors of beverage
alcohol products, many of which have greater resources than are currently
available to us. According to Beverage Media, over the past ten years, the U.S.
distilled spirits industry has undergone dramatic consolidation and realignment
of brands and brand ownership. The number of major spirit importers in the
United States has significantly declined due to mergers and brand ownership
changes and consolidation. While historically there were a substantial number of
companies owning one or more major brands, today there are six major companies:
Diageo PLC, Pernod Ricard SA, Bacardi Ltd., Brown-Forman Corp., Fortune Brands
Inc. and Constellation Brands. We believe that we are in a better position to
partner with small to mid-size brands in that we can make quicker decisions and
move to market faster than these larger organizations.
GOVERNMENT
REGULATION
We hold
several federal beverage alcohol permits and are subject to the jurisdiction of
the Federal Alcohol Administration Act (27 C.F.R. Parts 19, 26, 27, 28, 29, 31,
71 and 252), U.S. Customs Laws (U.S.C. Title 19), Internal Revenue Code of 1986
( Subtitles E and F), and the Alcoholic Beverage Control Laws of all 50 states.
The Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau of the United States Treasury
Department regulate the spirits industry with respect to production, blending,
bottling, sales and advertising and transportation of alcohol products. Each
state regulates the advertising, promotion, transportation, sales and
distribution of alcohol products within its jurisdiction. We are required to
conduct business in the United States only with holders of licenses to import,
warehouse, transport, distribute and sell spirits.
Labeling
of spirits is also regulated in many markets, varying from health warning labels
to importer identification, alcohol strength and other consumer information.
Specific warning statements related to risks of drinking beverage products are
required to be included on all beverage alcohol products sold in the United
States.
In the
so-called control states, the state liquor commissions act in place of
distributors and decide which products are to be purchased and offered for sale
in their respective states. Products are selected for purchase and sale through
listing procedures that are generally made available to new products only at
periodically-scheduled listing interviews. Products not selected for listings
can only be purchased by consumers through special orders, if at all. The
following states are control states: Alabama, Idaho, Iowa, Maine, Michigan,
Mississippi, Montana, New Hampshire, North Carolina, Ohio, Oregon, Pennsylvania,
Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia and Wyoming. In addition,
Montgomery County in Maryland is a controlled county. The distribution of
alcohol-based beverages is also subject to extensive taxation at both the
federal and state level.
The
industry is subject to regulations that limit or preclude certain persons with
criminal records from serving as our officers or directors. Certain regulations
prohibit parties with consumer outlet ownership from becoming officers,
directors or substantial shareholders. We believe that we are in material
compliance with all applicable federal, state and other regulations. We operate
in a highly regulated industry which may be subject to more stringent
interpretations of existing regulations. Future costs of compliance with changes
in regulations could be significant.
We are
primarily an importer of distilled spirits produced outside the United States.
Adverse effects of regulatory changes are more likely to materially affect
earnings and our competitive market position rather than capital expenditures.
Capital expenditures in the spirits industry are normally associated with either
production facilities or brand acquisition costs. Because we are not a U.S.
producer, changes in regulations affecting production facility operations may
indirectly affect the costs of the brands we purchase for resale, but we would
not anticipate any resulting material adverse impact upon our capital
expenditures.
Our
industry is dominated by global conglomerates with international brands.
Therefore, to the extent that more restrictive marketing and sales regulations
are adopted in the future, or excise taxes and customs duties are increased, our
earnings could be materially adversely affected. Large international
conglomerates have far greater financial resources than we do and would be
better able to absorb increased compliance costs.
EMPLOYEES
As of
June 15, 2009, we have 10 full-time employees. Our employees are not represented
by any collective bargaining agreement, and we have never experienced a work
stoppage. We believe we have good relations with our employees. Following our
planned funding and expansion later this year, we intend to hire an additional 5
employees. These employees will perform functions in the areas of in-house
compliance, accounting, sales, marketing, warehousing and
deliveries.
RISK
FACTORS
You
should carefully consider the risks described below together with all of the
other information included in this report before making an investment decision
with regard to our securities. The statements contained in or
incorporated into this offering that are not historic facts are forward-looking
statements that are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual
results to differ materially from those set forth in or implied by
forward-looking statements. If any of the following risks actually occurs, our
business, financial condition or results of operations could be harmed. In that
case, the trading price of our common stock could decline, and you may lose all
or part of your investment.
Risks
Related To Our Business
We
have experienced net losses, and we may not be profitable in the
future.
We
experienced net losses of $3,679,333 and $3,395,185 for the year ended December
31, 2008 and 2007. If we fail to achieve consistent profitability, that failure
could have a negative effect on our financial condition.
Our
Operating History Does Not Afford Investors a Sufficient History on Which to
Base an Investment Decision.
We are a
development stage company. There can be no assurance that at this
time we will operate profitably or that we will have adequate working capital to
meet our obligations as they become due. Management believes that our
success will depend in large part on our ability to successfully market our
products.
Investors
must consider the risks and difficulties frequently encountered by early stage
companies, particularly in rapidly evolving markets. Such risks include the
following:
·
|
competition;
|
·
|
need
for acceptance of products;
|
·
|
ability
to continue to develop and extend our brand identity;
|
·
|
ability
to anticipate and adapt to a competitive
market;
|
·
|
ability
to effectively manage rapidly expanding operations;
|
·
|
amount
and timing of operating costs and capital expenditures relating to
expansion of our business, operations, and
infrastructure;
|
·
|
ability
to provide superior customer service; and
|
·
|
dependence
upon key personnel.
|
We cannot
be certain that our business strategy will be successful or that we will
successfully address these risks. In the event that we do not successfully
address these risks, our business, prospects, financial condition, and results
of operations could be materially and adversely affected.
If
We Are Unable to Obtain Additional Funding, Our Business Operations Will be
Harmed and If We Do Obtain Additional Financing, Our Then Existing Shareholders
May Suffer Substantial Dilution.
There is
no assurance that we will not incur debt in the future, that we will have
sufficient funds to repay any indebtedness or that we will not default on our
debt obligations, jeopardizing our business viability. Furthermore,
we may not be able to borrow or raise additional capital in the future to meet
our needs or to otherwise provide the capital necessary to conduct our business.
There can be no assurance that financing will be available in amounts or on
terms acceptable to us, if at all. The inability to obtain additional capital
will restrict our ability to grow and may reduce our ability to continue to
conduct business operations. If we are unable to obtain additional financing, we
will likely be required to curtail our marketing and development plans and
possibly cease our operations. Any additional equity financing may involve
substantial dilution to our then existing shareholders.
We
expend significant time and may need to incur significant expense in attracting
and maintaining key distributors.
Our
marketing and sales strategy will rely on the performance of our independent
distributors and our ability to attract additional distributors. We have entered
into written agreements with certain of our distributors for varying terms and
duration; however, most of our distribution relationships are informal (based
solely on purchase orders) and are terminable by either party at will. In
addition, despite the terms of the written agreements with certain of our
significant distributors, we have no assurance as to the level of performance
under those agreements, or that those agreements will not be terminated. There
is also no assurance that we will be able to maintain our current distribution
relationships or establish and maintain successful relationships with
distributors in new geographic distribution areas. Moreover, there is the
additional possibility that we will have to incur significant expenses to
attract and maintain key distributors in one or more of our geographic
distribution areas in order to profitably exploit our geographic markets. We may
not have sufficient working capital to allow us to do so.
The
nature of our business requires us to develop and maintain relationships with
other firms.
We depend
on relationships with third parties for product development, research
facilities, distilling facilities, bottling, distribution and low-cost
marketing. Because of these relationships, we do not expect to invest heavily in
fixed assets or factories. We will need to maintain and develop relationships
with additional manufacturers as we add products to our product mix. Our success
depends on the ability of our producers to deliver high quality products to us
with favorable pricing terms. There can be no assurance, however, that we will
be able to develop and maintain relationships which provide us the services and
facilities we require. If we fail to develop and maintain such relationships, we
may be forced to curtail our operations, which could have a material adverse
effect on the results of our operations.
We
rely heavily on our independent distributors, and this could affect our ability
to efficiently and profitably distribute and market our products, and maintain
our existing markets and expand our business into other geographic
markets.
Our
ability to establish a market for our brands and products in new geographic
distribution areas, as well as maintain and expand our existing markets, is
dependent on our ability to establish and maintain successful relationships with
reliable independent distributors strategically positioned to serve those areas.
Many of our larger distributors sell and distribute competing products,
including non-alcoholic and alcoholic beverages, and our products may represent
a small portion of their business. To the extent that our distributors are not
focused on selling our products or do not expend sufficient efforts in managing
and selling our products, our sales will be adversely affected. Our ability to
maintain our distribution network and attract additional distributors will
depend on a number of factors, many of which are outside our control, including,
but not limited to, (i) the level of demand for our brands and products in a
particular distribution area; (ii) our ability to price our products at levels
competitive with those offered by competing products; and (iii) our ability to
deliver products in the quantity and at the time ordered by
distributors.
Our
inability to achieve any of these factors in a geographic distribution area will
have a material adverse effect on our relationships with our distributors in
that particular geographic area, thus limiting our ability to maintain and
expand our market, which will likely adversely effect our revenues and financial
results.
If
we do not maintain the continued service of our executive officers, our business
operations may be affected.
Our
success is substantially dependent on the performance of our executive officers
and key employees. Given our early stage of development, we are
dependent on our ability to retain and motivate high quality
personnel. Although we believe we will be able to engage qualified
personnel for such purposes, an inability to do so could materially adversely
affect our ability to market, sell, and enhance our products. The
loss of one or more of our key employees or our inability to hire and retain
other qualified employees, including but not limited to development staff, new
media staff, mobile staff and corporate office support staff, could have a
material adverse effect on our business.
We
may incur liabilities that we might be unable to repay in the
future
We may
have liabilities to affiliated or unaffiliated lenders. These
liabilities would represent fixed costs which would be required to be paid
regardless of the level of our business or profitability. There is no
assurance that we will be able to pay all of our
liabilities. Furthermore, we are always subject to the risk of
litigation from customers, suppliers, employees, and others because of the
nature of its business, including but not limited to consumer
lawsuits. Litigation can cause us to incur substantial expenses and,
if cases are lost, judgments, and awards can add to our costs.
We
may need to raise additional capital, which may not be available on acceptable
terms or at all.
We may be
required to raise additional funds, particularly if we are unable to generate
positive cash flow as a result of our operations. There can be
no assurance that financing will be available in amounts or on terms acceptable
to us, if at all. The inability to obtain additional capital may
reduce our ability to continue to conduct business operations. If we
are unable to obtain additional financing, we will likely be required to curtail
our marketing plans. Any additional equity financing may involve
substantial dilution to our then existing shareholders.
If We Are Unable to Obtain
Additional Funding, Our Business Operations Will be Harmed and If We Do Obtain
Additional Financing, Our Then Existing Shareholders May Suffer Substantial
Dilution.
We will
require additional funds to support working capital requirements, advertise and
promote existing brands and acquire and build new brands, while reducing current
level of debt. Additional capital will be required to effectively support
the operations and to otherwise implement our overall business
strategy. There can be no assurance that financing will be available
in amounts or on terms acceptable to us, if at all. The inability to obtain
additional capital will restrict our ability to grow and may reduce our ability
to continue to conduct business operations. If we are unable to obtain
additional financing, we will likely be required to curtail our marketing and
development plans and possibly cease our operations. Any additional equity
financing may involve substantial dilution to our then existing
shareholders.
We
face strong competition that could prevent us from adding new customers or
expanding our existing customer relationships.
The
market for liquor and spirits is intensely competitive, subject to rapid change
and significantly affected by new product introductions, pricing strategies and
other market activities of industry participants Historically there were a
substantial number of companies owning one or more brands, today, there are six
major companies: Diageo, Pernod Ricard, Bacardi, Brown-Foreman, Future Brands
and Constellation Brands.
We
may not be able to protect adequately the trade secrets and confidential
information that we disclose to our employees.
We rely
upon trade secrets, technical know-how and continuing technological innovation
to develop and maintain our competitive position. Competitors,
through their independent discovery (or improper means, such as unauthorized
disclosure or industrial espionage), may come to know our proprietary
information. We generally require employees and consultants to execute
confidentiality and assignment-of-inventions agreements. These agreements
typically provide that all materials and confidential information developed by
or made known to the employee or consultant during his, her or its relationship
with us are to be kept confidential and that all inventions arising out of the
employee’s or consultant’s relationship with us are our exclusive
property. Our employees and consultants may breach these agreements
and in some instances we may not have an adequate
remedy. Additionally, in some instances, we may have failed to
require that employees and consultants execute confidentiality and
assignment-of-inventions agreements.
We may be affected by government
regulations in the United States, which may delay or hinder its ability to
provide services and products.
We
operate in a highly regulated industry which may be subject to more stringent
interpretations of existing regulations. We are primarily an importer
of distilled spirits produced outside the United States. We believe that adverse
effects of regulatory changes are more likely to materially affect earnings and
our competitive market position rather than capital expenditures. Capital
expenditures in the spirits industry are normally associated with either
production facilities or brand acquisition costs .Because we are not a U.S.
producer, changes in regulations affecting production facility operations may
indirectly affect the costs of the brands we purchase for resale, but we would
not anticipate any resulting material adverse impact upon our capital
expenditures.
Our
industry is dominated by global conglomerates with international brands.
Therefore, to the extent that new more restrictive marketing and sales
regulations are put forth, or excise taxes and customs duties are increased, our
earnings could be materially adversely affected. Large international
conglomerates have far greater financial resources than we do and would be
better able to absorb increased compliance costs.
We
believe we are in material compliance with all applicable federal, state and
other regulations. However, future costs of compliance with changes in
regulations could be significant.
Our
management has limited experience in managing and operating a public company.
Any failure to comply or adequately comply with federal securities laws, rules
or regulations could subject us to fines or regulatory actions, which may
materially adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial
condition.
Our
current management has no experience managing and operating a public company and
relies in many instances on the professional experience and advice of third
parties including its consultants, attorneys and accountants. Failure to comply
or adequately comply with any laws, rules, or regulations applicable to our
business may result in fines or regulatory actions, which may materially
adversely affect our business, results of operation, or financial
condition.
Risks
related to our Common Stock
Ownership
interest in our common stock is concentrated in a small group and may conflict
with our other future stockholders who may be unable to influence management and
exercise control over our business.
Our
officers and directors, in the aggregate, beneficially own approximately 38.3%
of our outstanding common stock. As
a result, our principal stockholders, officers and directors, acting together,
have the ability to control substantially all matters submitted to our
stockholders for approval, including:
·
|
election
of our board of directors;
|
·
|
removal
of any of our directors;
|
·
|
amendment
of our certificate of incorporation or bylaws; and
|
·
|
adoption
of measures that could delay or prevent a change in control or impede a
merger, takeover or other business combination involving
us.
|
As a
result of their ownership and positions, our principal stockholders, directors
and executive officers collectively are able to influence all matters requiring
stockholder approval, including the election of directors and approval of
significant corporate transactions. In addition, sales of significant amounts of
shares held by our principal stockholders, directors and executive officers, or
the prospect of these sales, could adversely affect the market price of our
common stock. Their stock ownership may discourage a potential acquirer from
making a tender offer or otherwise attempting to obtain control of us, which in
turn could reduce our stock price or prevent our stockholders from realizing a
premium over our stock price.
Our
shares of common stock are very thinly traded, and the price may not reflect our
value and there can be no assurance that there will be an active market for our
shares of common stock either now or in the future.
Our
shares of common stock are very thinly traded, and the price if traded may not
reflect our value. There can be no assurance that there will be an
active market for our shares of common stock either now or in the
future. The market liquidity will be dependent on the perception of
our operating business and any steps that our management might take to bring us
to the awareness of investors. There can be no assurance given that
there will be any awareness generated. Consequently, investors may
not be able to liquidate their investment or liquidate it at a price that
reflects the value of the business. If a more active market should
develop, the price may be highly volatile. Because there may be a low
price for our shares of common stock, many brokerage firms may not be willing to
effect transactions in the securities. Even if an investor finds a
broker willing to effect a transaction in the shares of our common stock, the
combination of brokerage commissions, transfer fees, taxes, if any, and any
other selling costs may exceed the selling price. Further, many
lending institutions will not permit the use of such shares of common stock as
collateral for any loans.
We
may be subject to the penny stock rules which will make the shares of our common
stock more difficult to sell.
Sales
of our currently issued and outstanding stock may become freely tradable
pursuant to Rule 144 and may dilute the market for your shares and have a
depressive effect on the price of the shares of our common stock.
A
substantial majority of our outstanding shares of common stock are "restricted
securities" within the meaning of Rule 144 under the Securities Act. As
restricted shares, these shares may be resold only pursuant to an effective
registration statement or under the requirements of Rule 144 or other applicable
exemptions from registration under the Act and as required under applicable
state securities laws. Rule 144 provides in essence that a person who
has held restricted securities for a period of at least one year may, under
certain conditions, sell every three months, in brokerage transactions, a number
of shares that does not exceed the greater of 1% of a company's outstanding
shares of common stock or the average weekly trading volume during the four
calendar weeks prior to the sale (the four calendar week rule does not apply to
companies quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board). There is no limit on the
amount of restricted securities that may be sold by a non-affiliate after the
restricted securities have been held by the owner for a period of two years or
more and such owner has not been an affiliate for the 90 day period prior to
sale. A sale under Rule 144 or under any other exemption from the
Act, if available, or pursuant to subsequent registrations of our shares of
common stock, may have a depressive effect upon the price of our shares of
common stock in any active market that may develop.
AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The
following discussion is an overview of the important factors that management
focuses on in evaluating our business, financial condition and operating
performance and should be read in conjunction with the financial statements
included in this Current Report on Form 8-K. This discussion contains
forward-looking statements that involve risks and
uncertainties. Actual results could differ materially from those
anticipated in these forward looking statements as a result of any number of
factors, including those set forth under the section entitled “Risk Factors” and
elsewhere in this Current Report on Form 8-K.
OUR
BUSINESS
Prior to
the consummation of the Merger Agreement, Harbrew New York was a wholly-owned
subsidiary of Harbrew Florida. Harbrew Florida was incorporated in
the state of Florida on January 4, 2007, under the former name Stassi Harbrew
Imports Corp., pursuant to the Bankruptcy Court Approved Reorganization Plan for
the Stassi Interaxx, Inc. (“Stassi”) reorganization confirmed on December 20,
2006. On May 17, 2007, Harbrew Florida acquired Harbrew New York, a New York
corporation incorporated on September 8, 1999 engaged in importing and
wholesaling spirits, wine and beer. As a result, Harbrew New York
became a wholly-owned subsidiary of Harbrew Florida.
On June
10, 2009, Merger Sub, Harbrew Florida, Harbrew New York and we entered into a
Merger Agreement which resulted in Harbrew New York becoming our wholly owned
subsidiary (the “Merger”). The Merger was accomplished by means of a
Merger Agreement in which Harbrew New York merged with and into Merger Sub and
each share of Harbrew’s common stock issued and outstanding immediately prior to
the closing of the Merger was converted into one share of Iconic Brands’ common
stock. Under the terms of the Merger Agreement and as a result of the
Merger:
·
|
Harbrew
New York became our wholly owned subsidiary;
|
|
|
·
|
In
exchange for all of the shares of Harbrew common stock, each share of
Harbrew’s common stock issued and outstanding immediately prior to the
closing of the Merger was converted into one share of Iconic Brands’
common stock;
|
This
transaction closed on June 10, 2009.
Prior to
the merger on June 10, 2009, we had no assets, liabilities, or business
operations. Accordingly, the merger has been treated for accounting
purposes as a recapitalization by the accounting acquirer, Harbrew New York, and
the financial statements reflect the assets, liabilities, and operations of
Harbrew New York from its inception on September 8, 1999 to June 10, 2009 and us
thereafter. References to our company are with respect to Harbrew New
York to June 10, 2009 and us thereafter.
We are in
the business of importing and wholesaling spirits, wine and beer to distributors
in the United States on a national basis and to retail licensees both on and off
premise in New York, through our wholesale license. We are federally
licensed, maintaining licenses to both import and sell to wholesale licensed
distributors in 51 markets in the United States. In addition to the
federal import and wholesale licenses, we maintain a federal customs bonded
facility license for our premises in Lindenhurst, New York. Within
the licensing category, we also maintain a New York State wholesale license and
a New York State warehousing license, permitting us to warehouse products of
other companies.
RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
Results of Operations for
the Period ended March 31, 2009 Compared to the Period ended March 31,
2008
The
following tables set forth key components of our results of operations for the
periods indicated, in dollars, and key components of our revenue for the period
indicated, in dollars. The discussion following the table is based on these
results.
|
|
Three
Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March
31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
$ |
83,937 |
|
|
$ |
512,048 |
|
Cost
of goods sold
|
|
|
65,361 |
|
|
|
417,041 |
|
Gross
profit
|
|
|
18,576 |
|
|
|
95,007 |
|
Selling,
general and administrative expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling,
marketing and promotion
|
|
|
92,425 |
|
|
|
67,700 |
|
Administrative
compensation and benefits
|
|
|
181,344 |
|
|
|
226,624 |
|
Professional
fees
|
|
|
149,150 |
|
|
|
70,114 |
|
Occupancy
and warehousing
|
|
|
76,562 |
|
|
|
67,897 |
|
Travel
and entertainment
|
|
|
25,050 |
|
|
|
16,761 |
|
Office
|
|
|
12,515 |
|
|
|
5,735 |
|
Licenses
and permits
|
|
|
1,270 |
|
|
|
6,020 |
|
Other
|
|
|
5,207 |
|
|
|
5,228 |
|
Total
|
|
|
543,523 |
|
|
|
466,079 |
|
Income
(loss) from operations
|
|
|
(524,947 |
) |
|
|
(371,072 |
) |
Interest
expense
|
|
|
(198,272 |
) |
|
|
(316,916 |
) |
Income
(loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
(723,219 |
) |
|
|
(687,988 |
) |
Income
taxes
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Net
income (loss)
|
|
$ |
(723,219 |
) |
|
$ |
(687,988 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales:
Sales
decreased by $428,111, or 83.6%, from $512,048 for the period ended March 31,
2008 to $83,937 for the period ended March 31, 2009. This decrease in
sales reflects the Company’s re-focus on its celebrity branded products as it
directs resources to its organically developed brand portfolio as opposed to the
distribution of the products of others.
Cost of goods
sold:
Cost of
revenue increased by $351,680, or 84.3%, from $417,041 for the period ended
March 31, 2008 to $65,361 for the period ended March 31, 2009. This decrease in
COGS is consistent with the decrease in sales for the period as the Company
shifts its focus and resources towards its organically developed brand
portfolio
Gross profit:
Gross
profit decreased by $76,431, or 80.4%, from $95,007 for the period ended March
31, 2008 to $18,576 for the period ended March 31, 2009 mainly due to the
decrease in sales as the Company refocuses its resources to its organically
developed brands.
Selling,
general and administrative expenses:
Selling
general and administrative expenses for the period ended March 31, 2009 and 2008
were $543,523 and $466,079, respectively, an increase of $77,444, or 16.6%. The
increase was due to professional fees incurred in connection with financing
activities.
Income
(loss) from Operations:
Loss from
operations was $524,947 for the period ended March 31, 2009 and $371,072 for the
period ended March 31, 2008. The increase in the loss from operations
for the period resulted from the decrease in sales and the increase in expenses
as previously described.
Interest
Expense:
Interest
expense for the period ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 was $198,272 and $316,916,
respectively, a decrease of $118,644, or 37.4%. The decrease in interest expense
for the period was a result of a rate reset by our largest
creditor.
Net
Income (loss):
Net loss
was $723,219 for the period ended March 31, 2009, compared to $687,988 for the
period ended March 31, 2008, an increase of $35,231, or 5.1%. The slight
increase in the net loss for the period was a result of decreased sales,
professional fees incurred relating to financing activities, and an interest
rate reset by our largest creditor.
Results of Operations for
the Year ended December 31, 2008 Compared to the Year ended December 31,
2007
The
following tables set forth key components of our results of operations for the
periods indicated, in dollars, and key components of our revenue for the period
indicated, in dollars. The discussion following the table is based on these
results.
Harbrew
Imports LTD. Corp and Subsidiary
Consolidated
Statements of operations
|
|
Year
Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Sales
|
|
$ |
1,565,520 |
|
|
$ |
1,658,312 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost
of goods sold
|
|
|
1,163,042 |
|
|
|
1,078,644 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
profit
|
|
|
402,478 |
|
|
|
579,668 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling,
general and administrative expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, marketing
and promotion
|
|
|
455,700 |
|
|
|
938,241 |
|
Administrative
compensation and benefits
|
|
|
1,327,161 |
|
|
|
998,468 |
|
Professional
fees
|
|
|
492,492 |
|
|
|
315,855 |
|
Occupancy and
warehousing
|
|
|
233,187 |
|
|
|
457,570 |
|
Travel and
entertainment
|
|
|
227,670 |
|
|
|
223,357 |
|
Bad
debts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
146,040 |
|
Office
|
|
|
40,741 |
|
|
|
61,314 |
|
Licenses and
permits
|
|
|
37,254 |
|
|
|
56,410 |
|
Other
|
|
|
39,979 |
|
|
|
26,538 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2,854,184 |
|
|
|
3,223,793 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
(loss) from operations
|
|
|
(2,451,706 |
) |
|
|
(2,644,125 |
) |
Interest
income
|
|
|
3,305 |
|
|
|
2,499 |
|
Interest
expense
|
|
|
(1,230,932 |
) |
|
|
(603,559 |
) |
Merger
fee
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(150,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
(loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
(3,679,333 |
) |
|
|
(3,395,185 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
taxes
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income (loss)
|
|
$ |
(3,679,333 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,395,185 |
) |
Sales:
Sales
decreased by $92,792, or 5.6%, from $1,658,312 for the year ended December 31,
2007 to $1,565,520 for the year ended December 31, 2008. The decrease in sales
for the year ended December 31, 2008 as compared to the year ended December 31,
2007 was a result of the Company’s re-focus on its celebrity branded products as
it directs resources to its organically developed brand portfolio as opposed to
distributing the products of others.
Cost of goods
sold:
Cost of
revenue increased by $84,398, or 7.8%, from $1,078,644 for the year ended
December 31, 2007 to $1,163,042 for the year ended December 31, 2008. Although,
there was a slight decrease in sales from the prior period, the Company also
incurred a higher cost of goods for its Limoncello brand related to it being
certified kosher by the Orthodox Union. Furthermore, some of the
products which the Company sold as a distributor for brands owed by others had
less of a profit margin.
Gross profit:
Gross
profit decreased by $177,190, or 30.6%, from $579,668 for the year ended
December 31, 2007 to $402,478 for the year ended December 31,
2008. This was due to the decrease in sales and the slight increase
in cost of goods sold for the period.
Selling,
general and administrative expenses:
Selling
general and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2008 and
2007 were $2,854,184 and $3,223,793, respectively, a decrease of $369,609, or
11.5%. The decrease was due to the fact that for the period ended December 31,
2007 significant marketing and promotion expenses were incurred related to the
launch of the Company’s Limoncello brand. These same expenses were not incurred
during the period ended December 31, 2008.
Income
(loss) from Operations:
Loss from
operations was $2,451,706 for the year ended December 31, 2008 and $2,644,125
for the year ended December 31, 2007. This decrease was a result of a
reduction of marketing and promotion expenses for the period ended December 31,
2008.
Interest
Expense:
Interest
expense for the year ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 was $1,230,932 and
$603,559, respectively, an increase of $627,373, or 104%. This related to
interest on the Company’s borrowings from its asset based lender and also the
retroactive change in interest due the holders of its convertible
notes.
Net
Income (loss):
Net loss
was $3,679,333 for the year ended December 31, 2008, compared to $3,395,185 for
the year ended December 31, 2007, an increase of $284,148, or 8.4%. The increase
in net loss resulted from a decrease in sales, increase in cost of goods sold,
and increase in interest expense for the period ended December 31,
2008.
LIQUIDITY
AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
As of
March 31, 2009, we had negative working capital of $5,634,732 compared to
negative working capital of $3,067,080 at March 31, 2008. Our balance of cash
and cash equivalents at March 31, 2009 was $631.
As of
December 31, 2008, we had negative working capital of $5,013,393 compared to
negative working capital of $2,539,703 at December 31, 2007. Our balance of cash
and cash equivalents at December 31, 2008 was $10,970.
Our
primary uses of cash have been for selling and marketing expenses, employee
compensation, new product development and working capital. The main sources of
cash have been from the financing of purchase orders and the factoring of
accounts receivable. In addition, we issued convertible notes and promissory
notes to bridge the gap between our primary lender and our working capital
requirements. All funds received have been expended in the furtherance of
growing the business and establishing the brand portfolios. The following trends
are reasonably likely to result in a material decrease in our liquidity over the
near to long term:
·
|
An
increase in working capital requirements to finance higher level of
inventories and accounts
receivable,
|
·
|
Addition
of administrative and sales personnel as the business
grows,
|
·
|
Increases
in advertising, public relations and sales promotions for existing and new
brands as the company expands within existing markets or enters new
markets,
|
·
|
Development
of new brands to complement our current celebrity portfolio,
and
|
·
|
The
cost of being a public company and the continued increase in costs due to
governmental compliance activities.
|
Net
Cash Used in Operating Activities
A
substantial portion of our available cash has been used to fund operating
activities. In general, these cash funding requirements are based on operating
losses, driven principally by our sizeable investment in selling and marketing,
and general expenses. The business has incurred significant losses since
inception.
For the
period ended March 31, 2009, net cash used in operating activities was $188,087,
consisting primarily of losses from operations of $723,219, offset by a non-cash
charge for stock-based compensation of $89,507, decreases in receivables of
$454,657, decreases in inventories of $63,351 and increases in accrued expenses
of $244,538. The uses of cash consisted of a reduction in accounts payable of
$56,679, and an increase in prepaid expenses and other current assets (excluding
non-cash stock-based compensation) of $20,334.
For the
year ended December 31, 2008, net cash used in operating activities was
$1,579,707, consisting primarily of losses from operations of $3,679,333, offset
by a non-cash charge for stock-based compensation of $640,873, decreases in
receivables of $7,116, decreases in inventories of $580,919 and increases in
accrued expenses of $611,974. The uses of cash consisted of a reduction in
accounts payable of $236,276, and an increase in prepaid expenses and other
current assets (excluding non-cash stock-based compensation) of
$76,952.
Net
Cash Used in Investing Activities
For the
period ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, net cash used in investing activities was
$5,149 and $0, respectively.
For the
year ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, net cash used in investing activities was
$0 and $6,994, respectively, in the latter case reflecting small investments in
office equipment.
Net
Cash Provided by Financing Activities
For the
period ended March 31, 2009, funds provided from financing activities amounted
to $(193,277). The negative number represents the raise of $100,000 through the
sale of Common Stock, and $293,277 repayment of debt.
For the
year ended December 31, 2008, funds provided from financing activities amounted
to $1,547,013. The funds consisted of the issuance of 7% convertible
notes in the principal amount of $150,000, 9% convertible debentures in the
principal amount of $105,000 and interim loan convertible promissory notes in
the principal amount of $1,000,000; loans from Richard DeCicco, President of
Harbrew, in the amount of $136,040 and a loan from an individual lender in the
amount of $15,000. Offsetting these sources of funds were repayments to Capstone
Business Credit, LLC, our purchase order financier, of $300,889, and the
repayment of $100,000 due on our 10% notes.
We
anticipate that we will need to make significant expenditures during the next 12
months, contingent upon raising capital. These anticipated
expenditures are for advertising, marketing, promotional items, overhead and
working capital purposes. We cannot assure you that financing will be available
in amounts or on terms acceptable to us, if at all. We anticipate that we will
require up to $7,500,000 for funding our plan of operations for the next
twelve months, depending on revenues, if any, from operations.
By
adjusting our operations and development to the level of capitalization, we
believe we have sufficient capital resources to meet projected cash flow
deficits. However, if during that period or thereafter, we are not
successful in generating sufficient liquidity from operations or in raising
sufficient capital resources, on terms acceptable to us, this could have a
material adverse effect on our business, results of operations liquidity and
financial condition.
We will
still need additional investments in order to continue operations to cash flow
break even. We are seeking additional investments, but we cannot guarantee that
we will be able to obtain such investments. Financing transactions
may include the issuance of equity or debt securities, obtaining credit
facilities, or other financing mechanisms. However, the lack of a trading price
of our common stock and a downturn in the U.S. stock and debt markets could make
it more difficult to obtain financing through the issuance of equity or debt
securities. Even if we are able to raise the funds required, it is possible that
we could incur unexpected costs and expenses, fail to collect significant
amounts owed to us, or experience unexpected cash requirements that would force
us to seek alternative financing. Further, if we issue additional equity or debt
securities, stockholders may experience additional dilution or the new equity
securities may have rights, preferences or privileges senior to those of
existing holders of our common stock. If additional financing is not available
or is not available on acceptable terms, we will have to curtail our
operations.
Impact
of Inflation
We expect
to be able to pass inflationary increases for raw materials and other costs on
to our customers through price increases, as required, and do not expect
inflation to be a significant factor in our business.
Seasonality
Although
our operating history is limited, we do not believe our products are
seasonal.
OFF-BALANCE
SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
There are
no off-balance sheet arrangements between us and any other entity that have, or
are reasonably likely to have, a current or future effect on our financial
condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of
operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that is
material to stockholders.
CRITICAL
ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The
discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are
based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.
The preparation of these consolidated financial statements requires us to make
estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities,
revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities. On an on-going basis, we evaluate our estimates based on historical
experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable
under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making
judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not
readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these
estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
A summary
of significant accounting policies is included in Note 2 to the audited
consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2008.
Management believes that the application of these policies on a consistent basis
enables us to provide useful and reliable financial information about our
Company's operating results and financial condition.
MANAGEMENT
Appointment
of New Directors
Effective
10 days after the Closing Date of the Merger Agreement, we appointed Richard J.
DeCicco as our new director to our board, President and CEO, and hired William
S. Blacker as our CFO and Senior Vice President of Finance and
Administration. Furthermore, concurrent with the appointment of the
new officers and directors, Mr. Edd Cockerill, our former Chief Executive
Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Director, resigned from these
positions.
The
following table sets forth the names, ages, and positions of our new executive
officers and directors effective 10 days after the Closing Date. Executive
officers are elected annually by our Board of Directors. Each
executive officer holds his office until he resigns, is removed by the Board, or
his successor is elected and qualified. Directors are elected
annually by our stockholders at the annual meeting. Each director
holds his office until his successor is elected and qualified or his earlier
resignation or removal.
NAME
|
AGE
|
POSITION
|
|
|
|
Richard
J. DeCicco
|
52
|
Chairman,
President and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
|
William
S. Blacker
|
65
|
Chief
Financial Officer and Senior Vice President of Finance and
Administration
|
A brief
biography of each officer and director are more fully described in Item
5.02(c). The information therein is hereby incorporated in this
section by reference.
Our
wholly-owned subsidiary, Harbrew New York, entered into employment contracts
with Richard J. DeCicco on January 23, 2008 and with William S. Blacker on
October 1, 2007.
Richard
DeCicco’s term of employment is for a term of five (5) years (commencing January
23, 2008) and he is entitled to a salary of $265,000 for
2009. Additionally, Mr. DeCicco shall be entitled to medical,
disability and dental insurance, retirement benefits and a Company provided
automobile. Lastly, Mr. DeCicco is entitled to the grant of 1,000,000
options of which 200,000 shall vest each year Mr. DeCicco is employed with the
Company.
Bill
Blacker’s term of employment is three (3) years (commencing October 1, 2007) and
he is entitled to a salary of $150,000 for the first year and a raise of 5% per
annum. As a sign-on incentive, Mr. Blacker is entitled to the grant
of 100,000 options for each year of employment with an exercise price of $0.50
per share for the first 100,000 options, $0.75 per share for the second year
options, and $1.00 for the third year options. Additionally, Mr. Blacker shall
be entitled to medical, disability and dental insurance, retirement benefits and
an automobile allowance of $350 per month.
Family
Relationships
There are
no family relationships between any of our directors or executive officers and
any other directors or executive officers.
Code
of Ethics
We
currently do not have a code of ethics that applies to our officers, employees
and directors, including our Chief Executive Officer and senior executives,
however, we intend to adopt one in the near future.
Conflicts
of Interest
Certain
potential conflicts of interest are inherent in the relationships between our
officers and directors, and us.
From time
to time, one or more of our affiliates may form or hold an ownership interest in
and/or manage other businesses both related and unrelated to the type of
business that we own and operate. These persons expect to continue to
form, hold an ownership interest in and/or manage additional other businesses
which may compete with ours with respect to operations, including financing and
marketing, management time and services and potential
customers. These activities may give rise to conflicts between or
among the interests of us and other businesses with which our affiliates are
associated. Our affiliates are in no way prohibited from undertaking
such activities, and neither we nor our shareholders will have any right to
require participation in such other activities.
Further,
because we intend to transact business with some of our officers, directors and
affiliates, as well as with firms in which some of our officers, directors or
affiliates have a material interest, potential conflicts may arise between the
respective interests of us and these related persons or entities. We
believe that such transactions will be effected on terms at least as favorable
to us as those available from unrelated third parties.
With
respect to transactions involving real or apparent conflicts of interest, we
have adopted policies and procedures which require that: (i) the fact of the
relationship or interest giving rise to the potential conflict be disclosed or
known to the directors who authorize or approve the transaction prior to such
authorization or approval, (ii) the transaction be approved by a majority of our
disinterested outside directors, and (iii) the transaction be fair and
reasonable to us at the time it is authorized or approved by our
directors.
EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION
Summary
Compensation Table
The
following table sets forth all cash compensation paid by Iconic Brands, for the
year ended December 31, 2008 and 2007. The table below sets forth the
positions and compensations for each person at Iconic Brands.
Name
and Principal Position
|
Year
|
Salary
|
Bonus
($)
|
Stock
Award
($)
|
Option
Award
($)
|
Non-Equity
Incentive Plan Compensation Earnings ($)
|
Non-Qualified
Deferred Compensation Earnings ($)
|
All
other Compensation
($)
|
Total
($)
|
Edd
Cockerill, former
|
2008
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Chairman
and CEO (1) |
2007
|
5,000
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Richard
J. DeCicco, President, CEO
|
2008
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
and
Director (2) |
2007
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
William
S. Blacker, CFO and Senior Vice President Finance and
|
2008
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
Administration
(2) |
2007
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
(1)
|
On
June 10, 2009, we acquired Harbrew in the Merger Transaction and in
connection with the change of control contemplated by the Merger
Transaction, Edd Cockerill tendered his resignation from the board of
directors and from all offices held in the Company, effective 10 days
after the Closing.
|
|
|
(2)
|
In
connection with the Merger Transaction on June 10, 2009, Richard J.
DeCicco was appointed as the sole director, President and CEO of the
Company, and William S. Blacker was elected as the CFO and Senior Vice
President of Finance and Administration of the Company effective 10 days
after the Closing. Therefore, these two individuals did not
receive any compensation from us during fiscal years 2007 and
2008.
|
Option
Grants
We do not
maintain any equity incentive or stock option plan. Accordingly, we
did not grant options to purchase any equity interests to any employees or
officers, and no stock options are issued or outstanding to any
officers. We do, however, anticipate adopting a non-qualified stock
option plan where we will be granting our officers options to purchase shares of
common stock pursuant to the terms of their employment
agreements. But, no such plan has been finalized or
adopted.
PRINCIPAL
STOCKHOLDERS
The
following table sets forth certain information regarding our common stock
beneficially owned on June 15, 2009, for (i) each stockholder known to be the
beneficial owner of 5% or more of our outstanding common stock, (ii) each
executive officer and director, and (iii) all executive officers and directors
as a group.
|
|
Title
of Class, Amount, Nature and
Percentage
of Beneficial Ownership(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
Stock(2)
|
|
|
Series A Preferred Stock
(3)
|
|
|
Percent
of Combined Voting
Power
of All Classes (4)
|
|
Name
and Address of Beneficial Owner
|
|
No.
of
Shares
|
|
|
Percent
of
Class
|
|
|
No.
of
Shares
|
|
|
Percent
Of
Class
|
|
Richard
DeCicco
|
|
|
15,981,319
|
|
|
|
37.24%
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
66.7%
|
|
|
|
79%
|
|
Donald
Chadwell
|
|
|
2,592,982
|
|
|
|
6.04%
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
2%
|
|
William
S. Blacker
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*%
|
|
Edd
Cockerill
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
All
executive officers and directors, as a group (2 person)
|
|
|
16,081,319
|
|
|
|
37.48%
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
66.7%
|
|
|
|
79%
|
|
* less
than 1%
|
(1)
|
Unless
otherwise indicated, the persons or entities identified herein have sole
voting and investment power with respect to the shares shown as
beneficially held by them, subject to community property laws where
applicable.
|
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
Applicable
percentage of ownership is based on 42,908,984 shares of Common Stock
outstanding as of June 15, 2009. Beneficial ownership is determined in
accordance with the rules of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 and
generally includes voting or investment power with respect to such
securities. Shares of Common Stock subject to securities exercisable for
or convertible into shares of Common Stock that are currently exercisable
or exercisable within sixty (60) days are deemed to be beneficially owned
by the person holding such options, warrants, rights, conversion
privileges or similar obligations, for the purpose of computing the
percentage of ownership of such person, but are not treated as outstanding
for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other
person.
|
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
Applicable
percentage ownership is based on one (1) share of Series A Preferred Stock
outstanding as of June 15, 2009 and calculated by taking the voting power
of the Series A as included with the class of Common
Stock.
|
|
|
|
|
(4)
|
Applicable
percentage of combined voting power is based on (i) 42,908,984 shares of
Common Stock, and (ii) one (1) shares of Series A Preferred Stock, which
votes together as a single class with the Common Stock on all matters
subject to stockholder approval and has voting power equal to two (2)
votes for every share of Common Stock
outstanding.
|
DESCRIPTION
OF SECURITIES
As of
June 15, 2009, our authorized capital stock consists of 100,000,000 shares of
common stock, par value $0.00001 per share, and 100,000,000 shares of preferred
stock, par value $0.00001 per share. As of June 15, 2009 and
immediately after Closing, an aggregate of 42,908,984 shares of Common Stock
were outstanding, including shares issued pursuant to the
Closing. There are 916,604 shares of Preferred Stock issued and
outstanding of which 1 share is Series A Preferred Stock and 916,603 shares are
Series B Preferred Stock.
Common
Stock
Subject
to preferences that may apply to shares of preferred stock outstanding at the
time, the holders of outstanding shares of Common Stock are entitled to receive
dividends out of assets legally available at times and in amounts as our board
of directors may determine. Each stockholder is entitled to one vote
for each share of Common Stock held on all matters submitted to a vote of the
stockholders. Cumulative voting is not provided for in our articles
of incorporation, or any amendments thereto, which means that the majority of
the shares voted can elect all of the directors then standing for
election. The Common Stock is not entitled to preemptive rights and
is not subject to conversion or redemption. Upon the occurrence of a
liquidation, dissolution or winding-up, the holders of shares of Common Stock
are entitled to share ratably in all assets remaining after payment of
liabilities and satisfaction of preferential rights of any outstanding preferred
stock. There are no sinking fund provisions applicable to the Common
Stock. The outstanding shares of Common Stock are, and the shares of
Common Stock to be issued upon conversion of the Warrants will be, fully paid
and non-assessable.
Preferred
Stock
The
Company’s certificate of incorporation authorizes the issuance of 100,000,000
shares of preferred stock $0.00001 par value with designations, rights and
preferences determined from time to time by our board of directors. Our board of
directors is empowered, without stockholder approval, to issue up to 100,000,000
shares of preferred stock with voting, liquidation, conversion, or other rights
that could adversely affect the rights of the holders of the common
stock.
Among
other rights, our board of directors may determine, without further vote or
action by our stockholders:
·
|
the
number of shares and the designation of the
series;
|
·
|
whether
to pay dividends on the series and, if so, the dividend rate, whether
dividends will be cumulative and, if so, from which date or dates, and the
relative rights of priority of payment of dividends on shares of the
series;
|
·
|
whether
the series will have voting rights in addition to the voting rights
provided by law and, if so, the terms of the voting
rights;
|
·
|
whether
the series will be convertible into or exchangeable for shares of any
other class or series of stock and, if so, the terms and conditions of
conversion or exchange;
|
·
|
whether
or not the shares of the series will be redeemable and, if so, the dates,
terms and conditions of redemption and whether there will be a sinking
fund for the redemption of that series and, if so, the terms and amount of
the sinking fund; and
|
·
|
the
rights of the shares of the series in the event of our voluntary or
involuntary liquidation, dissolution or winding up and the relative rights
or priority, if any, of payment of shares of the
series.
|
Preferred
stock could be used to dilute a potential hostile acquirer. Accordingly,
any future issuance of preferred stock or any rights to purchase preferred
shares may have the effect of making it more difficult for a third party to
acquire control of us. This may delay, defer or prevent a change of control in
our company or an unsolicited acquisition proposal. The issuance of preferred
stock also could decrease the amount of earnings attributable to, and assets
available for distribution to, the holders of our common stock and could
adversely affect the rights and powers, including voting rights, of the holders
of our common stock.
In
connection with the Merger Transaction, we have designated two (2) classes of
preferred stock as follow:
Series
A Preferred Stock
On June
10, 2009, the Board of Directors designated up to one (1) share of series A
preferred stock, par value $0.00001 per share (the “Series A Preferred Stock”)
with such designations, powers, preferences and rights, qualifications,
limitations and restrictions as set forth in the Certificate of Designation of
Series A Preferred Stock included in the Article of Amendment to the Articles of
Incorporation. A copy of the Certificate of Designation for the
Series A Preferred Stock is attached as Exhibit 3.3.
The one
share of Series A Preferred Stock was issued to Richard DeCicco, the President,
Chief Executive Officer and Director of the Company.
The
holder of the share of Series A Preferred Stock shall vote together with the
holders of the Common Stock and shall have two (2) votes for every share of
Common Stock Deemed Outstanding (as defined below) and entitled to a vote on all
matters submitted to the shareholders. “Common Stock Deemed
Outstanding” shall mean the number of shares of Common Stock actually
outstanding (not including shares of Common Stock held in the treasury of the
Corporation), plus (x) the maximum total number of shares of Common Stock
issuable upon the exercise of the Options, as of the date of such issuance or
grant of such Options, if any, and (y) the maximum total number of shares of
Common Stock issuable upon conversion or exchange of Convertible Securities, as
of the date of issuance of such Convertible Securities, if any.
The
holder of the share of Series A Preferred Stock does not have any conversion or
dividend rights.
Series
B Preferred Stock
On June
10, 2009, the Board of Directors designated up to 1,000,000 share of series B
preferred stock, par value $0.00001 per share (the “Series B Preferred Stock”)
with such designations, powers, preferences and rights, qualifications,
limitations and restrictions as set forth in the Certificate of Designation of
Series B Preferred Stock included in the Article of Amendment to the Articles of
Incorporation. The stated value amount of the Series B Preferred Stock is Two
Dollars ($2) per share. A copy of the Certificate of Designation for the Series
A Preferred Stock is attached as Exhibit 3.3.
The
Company issued 916,603 shares of Series B Preferred Stock to Capstone pursuant
to the Termination Agreement.
Holders
of Series B Preferred Stock may at their option convert all or any portion of
their shares of Series B Preferred Stock into Common Stock of the Company at any
time or from time to time. The conversion price is Two Dollars ($2) per share,
provided, however, if the market price shall be less than Two Dollars ($2) per
shares at any one or more conversion date then the Series B Conversion Price
shall be equal to 100% of the VWAP per share of Common Stock, as traded on any
National Securities Exchange, for the twenty (20) Trading Days immediately prior
to the conversion date, or such other dollar amount (or fraction thereof) into
which such Series B Conversion Price may be adjusted.
Holders
of the Series B Preferred Stock shall vote together as a separate class on all
matters which impact the rights, value or conversion terms, or ranking of the
Series B Preferred Stock, as provided herein. Except as set forth
above, the Series B Preferred Stock shall not vote on any matter submitted to
the stockholders of the Company and holder(s) of the Series B Preferred Stock
shall have no other voting rights.
In
addition, the holders of the Series B Preferred Stock are entitled to
liquidation preference and piggy-back registration rights.
Warrants
or Options
At the
Closing of the Merger Transaction, we issued three classes of warrants: (a) a
five (5) year warrant to purchase 100% of the shares of Common Stock issuable
upon conversion of the Old Notes exercisable at a price of $1.00 per share (the
“Class A Warrant”), and (b) a five (5) year warrant to purchase 100% of the
shares of Common Stock issuable upon conversion of the Old Notes exercisable at
a price of $1.50 per share (the “Class B Warrant”); and (c) a Class C Warrant to
Capstone pursuant to the Termination Agreement which is a three (3) year warrant
to purchase 1,000,000 shares of Common Stock at an exercise price of $0.50 per
share.
Convertible
Notes
We have
$446,846 worth of 7% convertible promissory notes that were entered into in
2007. These notes are convertible into Common Stock at a conversion
price of $0.50 per share. At Closing, a total of $2,203,154 worth of
the convertible notes converted into 4,406,307 shares of Common
Stock. There are still, however, $446,846 of the convertible notes
outstanding that can convert into 893,692 shares of Common Stock.
MARKET
FOR COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
Our
Common Stock is traded on the Over-The-Counter Bulletin Board (“OTCBB”) under
the symbol “ICNB.OB.” There is, however, no public trading market for
our common stock.
Holders
As of
June 15, 2009, 42,908,984 shares of Common Stock are issued and
outstanding. There are approximately 325 shareholders of our Common
Stock.
Transfer
Agent and Registrar
Island
Stock Transfer Corp. is currently the transfer agent and registrar for our
Common Stock. Its address is 100 Second Avenue South, Suite 104N, St.
Petersburg, FL 33701. Its phone number is (727)
289-0010.
Dividend
Policy
Any
future determination as to the declaration and payment of dividends on shares of
our Common Stock will be made at the discretion of our board of directors out of
funds legally available for such purpose. We are under no contractual
obligations or restrictions to declare or pay dividends on our shares of Common
Stock. In addition, we currently have no plans to pay such
dividends. However, even if we wish to pay dividends, because our
cash flow is dependent on dividend distributions from our affiliated entities in
PRC, we may be restricted from distributing dividends to our holders of shares
of our common stock in the future if at the time we are unable to obtain
sufficient dividend distributions from and of Iconic Brands. Our board of
directors currently intends to retain all earnings for use in the business for
the foreseeable future. See “Risk Factors.”
Equity Compensation Plan
Information
The
following table sets forth certain information as of June 15, 2009, with respect
to compensation plans under which our equity securities are authorized for
issuance:
|
|
(a)
|
(b)
|
(c)
|
|
|
_________________
|
_________________
|
_________________
|
|
|
Number
of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants
and rights
|
Weighted-average
exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights
|
Number
of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity
compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column
(a))
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
compensation
|
None
|
|
|
|
Plans
approved by
|
|
|
|
|
Security
holders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
compensation
|
None
|
|
|
|
Plans
not approved
|
|
|
|
|
By
security holders
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
LEGAL
PROCEEDINGS
From time
to time, we may become involved in various lawsuits and legal proceedings which
arise in the ordinary course of business. Litigation is subject to
inherent uncertainties, and an adverse result in these or other matters may
arise from time to time that may harm our business.
On or
about January 24, 2008, Connecticut Container Corp., a wholesale distributor of
packaging materials, initiated litigation against us in the Supreme Court of the
State of New York in Nassau County (Docket No. 1458/08). The
plaintiff had demanded payment of an aggregate of $31,693 in connection with
certain amounts allegedly owed by us. On August 7, 2008, we settled
the litigation for the full amount. We agreed to pay one-half of such amount on
each of August 20, 2008 and September 20, 2008. We paid $24,500 and
due to non-payment of the remaining amount a judgment for $7,443 was issued
against us by the court.
On
February 14, 2008, Chester Stewart, an individual, initiated a lawsuit in the
State of Connecticut Superior Court (Docket No. D.N. HHD CV08-5018180S) alleging
breach of a promissory note in the amount of $100,000. We have
retained counsel and are defending the action. Negotiations continue
and we have responded to all allegations as of the filing date of this
report.
On or
about July 24, 2008, Elite Marketing Concepts, a wholesale distributor of wine,
initiated litigation against us in the Supreme Court of New York in
Nassau County (Docket No. 08-009338). The plaintiff has demanded
payment in the amount of $32,270 for goods sold and delivered to us by the
plaintiff. On August 15, 2008, we reached an agreement to pay Elite
$29,000 in two equal payments. We paid the first $14,500 and due to
non-payment a judgment was issued against us on June 5, 2009 in the amount of
$9,679.
On
October 23, 2008, Thermo Plastic Tech, Inc., a manufacturer of thermo plastic
material, initiated litigation against us in the Superior Court of New Jersey
Law Division, Civil Part, Union County (Docket No. UNN-L-3062-08). The
plaintiff has demanded payment in the amount of $30,292 for goods sold and
delivered to us by the plaintiff. The court issued a judgment against us in the
amount of $30,292.
On
November 11, 2008, Albea, S.P.A d/b/a/ Agribon SRL, a wine maker in Italy,
initiated litigation against us in the Supreme Court of the State of New York in
Nassau County (Docket No. 08-20104). The plaintiff has demanded payment in the
amount of 22,260 Euros (approximately $29,574). On April 29, 2009, the court
issued a judgment against us in the amount of $33,593.
We
believe that the ultimate resolution of these matters will not have a material
adverse effect on our financial condition or operations. Apart from the legal
proceedings noted in the previous paragraphs, we are not party to any legal
proceedings, nor are we aware of any contemplated or pending legal proceedings
against us.
INDEMNIFICATION
OF OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS
The
General Corporation Law of Nevada provides that directors, officers, employees
or agents of Nevada corporations are entitled, under certain circumstances, to
be indemnified against expenses (including attorneys’ fees) and other
liabilities actually and reasonably incurred by them in connection with any suit
brought against them in their capacity as a director, officer, employee or
agent, if they acted in good faith and in a manner they reasonably believed to
be in or not opposed to the best interests of the corporation, and with respect
to any criminal action or proceeding, if they had no reasonable cause to believe
their conduct was unlawful. This statute provides that directors, officers,
employees and agents may also be indemnified against expenses (including
attorneys’ fees) actually and reasonably incurred by them in connection with a
derivative suit brought against them in their capacity as a director, if they
acted in good faith and in a manner they reasonably believed to be in or not
opposed to the best interests of the corporation, except that no indemnification
may be made without court approval if such person was adjudged liable to the
corporation.
Our
by-laws provide that we shall indemnify our officers and directors in any
action, suit or proceeding unless such officer or director shall be adjudged to
be derelict in his or her duties.
CHANGES
AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS
Webb
& Company, P.A. (“Webb & Co.”) has served as our independent auditor in
connection with the audits of our fiscal years ended November 30, 2008 and 2007,
and review of the subsequent interim period through February 28,
2009. In connection with this Merger, our board of directors
recommended and approved the appointment of Michael T. Studer CPA P.C.
(“Studer”) as the independent auditor for Iconic Brands and
Harbrew.
During
the fiscal years ended November 30, 2008 and 2007 and through the date hereof,
neither us nor anyone acting on our behalf consulted Studer with respect to (i)
the application of accounting principles to a specified transaction, either
completed or proposed, or the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on
Iconic Brands’ financial statements, and neither a written report was provided
to us or oral advice was provided that Studer concluded was an important factor
considered by us in reaching a decision as to the accounting, auditing or
financial reporting issue; or (ii) any matter that was the subject of a
disagreement or reportable events set forth in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation
S-K.
For a
more detailed discussion of our change in auditor, please refer to Item 4.01,
below.
Item 3.02 Unregistered Sales of Equity
Securities.
Pursuant
to the Merger Agreement, on June 10, 2009, we issued 27,151,984 shares of our
Common Stock to individuals and entities as designated by Harbrew and certain
creditors of Harbrew in exchange for 100% of the outstanding shares of Harbrew.
The 27,151,984 shares of Common Stock consist: (i) 24,592 shares issued to
Harbrew Florida shareholders; (ii) 2,086,973 shares issued to Danny Devito and
its affiliates for consultant services; (iii) 4,406,307 shares issued to
noteholders in consideration for the conversion of the Old Notes; (iv) 1,000,000
shares issued to Capstone pursuant to the Termination Agreement; and (v)
19,634,112 shares issued to Harbrew management and employees as
compensation. Such
securities were not registered under the Securities Act of 1933. The
issuance of these shares was exempt from registration, pursuant to Section 4(2)
of the Securities Act of 1933.
Pursuant
to the Termination Agreement on June 10, 2009, we issued a $500,000 7%
Promissory Note to Capstone. We also issued $1,833,205 worth of our
Class B Preferred (which is equal to 916,603 shares of Series B Preferred Stock)
to Capstone. The Class B Preferred Stock shall have a value of $2.00 per
share. These
securities are issued in reliance on the exemption under Section 4(2) of the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Act”). These securities qualified for
exemption under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 since the issuance
securities by us did not involve a public offering. The offering was not a
“public offering” as defined in Section 4(2) due to the insubstantial number of
persons involved in the deal, size of the offering, manner of the offering and
number of securities offered. We did not undertake an offering in which we sold
a high number of securities to a high number of investors. In addition, these
shareholders had the necessary investment intent as required by Section 4(2)
since they agreed to and received share certificates bearing a legend stating
that such securities are restricted pursuant to Rule 144 of the 1933 Securities
Act. This restriction ensures that these securities would not be immediately
redistributed into the market and therefore not be part of a “public offering.”
Based on an analysis of the above factors, we have met the requirements to
qualify for exemption under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 for this
transaction.
Item
4.01 Changes in Registrant’s Certifying Accountant.
(a)
Dismissal of Previous Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm.
i
|
On
June 10, 2009, we dismissed Webb & Company, P.A. (“Webb & Co.”) as
our independent registered public accounting firm. The Board of Directors
(the “Board”) of the Company approved such resignation on June 10,
2009.
|
ii
|
The
Company’s Board of Directors participated in and approved the decision to
change our independent registered public accounting
firm.
|
iii
|
Webb
& Co.’s reports on the financial statements of the Company for the
years ended November 30, 2008 and 2007 did not contain an adverse opinion
or a disclaimer of opinion, nor were they qualified or modified as to
uncertainty, audit scope, or
accounting principles, except for an explanatory paragraph regarding the
Company’s ability to continue as a going
concern.
|
iv
|
In
connection with the audit and review of the financial statements of the
Company through June 10, 2009, there were no disagreements on any matter
of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosures, or
auditing scope or procedures, which disagreements if not resolved to their
satisfaction would have caused them to make reference in connection with
Webb & Co.’s opinion to the subject matter of the
disagreement.
|
v
|
In
connection with the audited financial statements of the Company for the
years ended November 30, 2008 and 2007 and interim unaudited financial
statement through June 10, 2009, there have been no reportable events with
the Company as set forth in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation
S-K.
|
vi
|
The
Company provided Webb & Co. with a copy of this Current Report on Form
8-K and requested that Webb & Co. furnish it with a letter addressed
to the SEC stating whether or not they agree with the above
statements. The Company has received the requested letter from Webb
& Co., and a copy of such letter is filed as Exhibit 16.1 to this
Current Report Form 8-K.
|
i
|
On
June 10, 2009, the Board appointed Michael T. Studer CPA P.C. (“Studer”)
as the Company’s new independent registered public accounting firm. The
decision to engage Studer was approved by the Company’s Board of Directors
on June 10, 2009.
|
ii
|
Prior
to June 10, 2009, the Company did not consult with Studer regarding (1)
the application of accounting principles to a specified transactions, (2)
the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on the Company’s
financial statements, (3) written or oral advice was provided that would
be an important factor considered by the Company in reaching a decision as
to an accounting, auditing or financial reporting issues, or (4) any
matter that was the subject of a disagreement between the Company and its
predecessor auditor as described in Item 304(a)(1)(iv) or a reportable
event as described in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation
S-K.
|
Item 5.01 Changes in Control of
Registrant.
As
explained more fully in Item 2.01, in connection with the Merger Agreement, on
June 10, 2009, we issued 27,151,984 shares of our Common Stock to entities
designated by Harbrew in exchange for the transfer of 100% of the outstanding
shares of Harbrew capital stock to us. As such, immediately following
the Merger, the entities designated by Harbrew hold approximately 63.3% of the
total combined voting power of all classes of our outstanding stock entitled to
vote.
In
connection with the Closing of the Merger Transaction, and as explained more
fully in the above Item 2.01 under the section titled “Management” and below in
Item 5.02 of this Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 10, 2009, Mr. Edd
Cockerill resigned as a member of our board of directors effective 10 days after
the Closing Date. Further, effective 10 days after the Closing Date
and in connection with the resignation of Mr. Cockerill, Richard J.
DeCicco (the “New Director”) was appointed as member of our board of
directors. Finally, effective 10 days after the Closing Date, our New
Director appointed Richard J. DeCicco as our President and Chief Executive
Officer, William S. Blacker as our Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice
President Finance and Administration.
Item 5.02 Departure of Directors or Principal
Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Principal
Officers.
(a) Resignation
of Directors
Effective
10 days following the Closing Date, Edd Cockerill resigned as the sole member of
our board of directors. There were no disagreements between him and us or any
officer or director of the Company.
(b) Resignation
of Officers
Effective
10 days following the Closing Date, Edd Cockerill resigned as our President,
Treasurer, and Secretary.
(c) Appointment
of Directors
Effective
10 days following the Closing Date, the following person was appointed as member
of the Board of Directors:
NAME
|
AGE
|
POSITION
|
Richard
J. DeCicco
|
52
|
Chairman
|
The
business background descriptions of the newly appointed director are as
follows:
Richard J. DeCicco has served
as our President and Secretary and as a director since May 2007. Mr.
DeCicco served as President of Harbrew New York since its inception in September
1999. For more than 30 years, he has been a senior executive and
thought leader in the wine and spirits industry. In addition to
having been the national provider for The Paddington Corporation brands through
the 1990s, Mr. DeCicco pioneered what is now known within the field as Value
Added Packaging. Mr. DeCicco’s creativity, market savvy and brand
development knowledge has dramatically increased sales and brand recognition for
Bailey’s, SKYY and J&B Scotch.
Family
Relationships
There are
no family relationships between the officers or directors of the
Company.
(d) Appointment of
Officers
Effective
10 days after the Closing Date, the newly appointed director described above in
Item 5.02(c) appointed the following persons as our executive officers, with the
respective titles as set forth opposite his or her name
below:
NAME
|
AGE
|
POSITION
|
Richard
J. DeCicco
|
52
|
President
and Chief Executive Officer
|
William
S. Blacker
|
65
|
Chief
Financial Officer and Senior Vice President of Finance and
Administration
|
Please
see Section 5.02(c) of this current report for all officers who are also
directors, whose information is herein incorporated by reference.
The
business background descriptions of the newly appointed officer who is not also
director are as follows:
William S. Blacker has served
as our Chief Financial Officer and Vice President of Finance and Administration
since October 2007. Previously, from November 2002 to September 2007,
Mr. Blacker served as the Senior Vice President of the Israel Humanitarian
Foundation, a non-profit organization, where he was responsible for treasury and
accounting functions. From 1999 through 2002, Mr. Blacker served as
Vice President at Harbor Industries (U.S) Ltd., a spirits
company. Mr. Blacker received a B.S. degree in Accounting from Long
Island University and completed an Executive Program at Columbia
University.
(e)
Employment Agreements of the Executive Officers
The
Company assumed the employment agreement between Harbrew New
York, Richard J. DeCicco and William S. Blacker on June 10,
2009.
Item 5.03 Amendments to Articles of
Incorporation or Bylaws; Change in Fiscal Year
Pursuant
to the Merger Agreement, on May 7, 2009 we filed with the Secretary of State for
the State of Nevada a Certificate of Amendment to our Certificate of
Incorporation changing our name to “Iconic Brands, Inc.” to better reflect our
business plan. A copy of the Certificate of Amendment to Articles of
Incorporation is attached hereto as Exhibit 3.2.
On June
10, 2009, pursuant to the Merger Agreement, the Board of Directors adopted a
resolution by unanimous written consent changing its fiscal year end from
November 30 to December 31. This change was made to be
consistent with the fiscal year of the merging company, Harbrew New York, that
is now our wholly-owned subsidiary and the operating company.
On June
10, 2009, we filed with the Secretary of State for the State of Nevada a
Certificate of Amendment to our Certificate of Incorporation designating the
rights of our Series A Preferred Stock. A copy of the Certificate of
Designation for our Series A Preferred Stock is attached hereto as Exhibit
3.3.
On June
10, 2009, we filed with the Secretary of State for the State of Nevada a
Certificate of Amendment to our Certificate of Incorporation designating the
rights of our Series B Convertible Preferred Stock. A copy of the
Certificate of Designation for our Series B Preferred Stock is attached hereto
as Exhibit 3.4.
Item 5.06 Change In Shell Company
Status
As
explained more fully in Item 2.01 above, we were a “shell company” (as such term
is defined in Rule 12b-2 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended)
immediately before the Closing of the Merger. As a result of the
Merger, Harbrew became our wholly owned subsidiary and became our main
operational business. Consequently, we believe that the Merger has
caused us to cease to be a shell company. For information about the
Merger, please see the information set forth above under Item 2.01 of this
Current Report on Form 8-K which information is incorporated herein by
reference.
Item 9.01 Financial Statement and
Exhibits.
(a)
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF BUSINESS ACQUIRED.
The
Audited Consolidated Financial Statements of Harbrew as of December 31, 2007 and
2008 are filed as Exhibit 99.1 to this current report and are incorporated
herein by reference.
The
Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements of Harbrew as of March 31, 2009 and
2008 are filed as Exhibit 99.2 to this current report and are incorporated
herein by reference.
(b)
PRO FORMA FINANCIAL INFORMATION.
None.
(c)
SHELL COMPANY TRANSACTIONS
Reference
is made to Items 9.01(a) and 9.01(b) and the exhibits referred to therein
which are incorporated herein by reference.
(d)
EXHIBITS
Exhibit No.
|
|
Description
|
2.1
|
|
Agreement
and Plan of Merger, dated June 10, 2009, among the Company, Merger Sub,
Harbrew Florida and Harbrew New York
|
3.1
|
|
Articles
of Incorporation of the Company as filed with the Secretary of State of
Nevada on October 21, 2005
(incorporated
herein by reference to the SB-2 Registration Statement filed on November
30, 2007)
|
3.2
|
|
Certificate
of Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation changing the corporate name
filed with the Secretary of State of Nevada
|
3.3
|
|
Certificate
of Designations for the Series A Preferred Stock, filed with the Secretary
of State of Nevada on June 10, 2009
|
3.4
|
|
Certificate
of Designations for the Series B Preferred Stock, filed with the Secretary
of State of Nevada on June 10, 2009
|
3.5
|
|
Certificate
of Merger between Paw Spa Acquisition, Inc. and Harbrew New York filed in
Nevada
|
3.6
|
|
Certificate
of Merger between Paw Spa Acquisition, Inc. and Harbrew New York filed in
New York
|
10.1
|
|
Termination
Agreement by and between Harbrew Imports, Ltd., Capstone Business Credit,
LLC and Capstone Capital Group I, LLC, dated June 10,
2009
|
10.2
|
|
7%
Unsecured Promissory Note
|
10.3
|
|
Form
of Conversion Agreement
|
10.4
|
|
Addendum
to License Agreement with Seven Cellos, LLC
|
16.1
|
|
Letter
from Webb & Company, P.A.
|
99.1
|
|
The
Audited Consolidated Financial Statements of Harbrew as of December 31,
2008 and 2007
|
99.2
|
|
The
Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements of Harbrew as of March 31,
2009 and 2008
|
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has
duly caused this Report on Form 8-K to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned hereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
ICONIC
BRANDS, INC.
|
|
|
Date: June
15, 2009
|
By:
|
/s/ Richard DeCicco
|
|
|
Richard
DeCicco
President,
Chief Executive Officer and Director
|
|
|
|
Date: June
15, 2009
|
By:
|
/s/ William S. Blacker
|
|
|
William
S. Blacker
Senior
Vice President of Finance and Administration
&
Chief Financial Officer
|
-30-