ENS - 10K 3.31.2015
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
|
| |
ý | Annual report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2015 or |
|
| |
¨ | Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the transition period from to |
Commission file number: 001-32253
ENERSYS
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
| | |
Delaware | | 23-3058564 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
2366 Bernville Road
Reading, Pennsylvania 19605
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: 610-208-1991
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
|
| | |
Title of each class | | Name of each exchange on which registered |
Common Stock, $0.01 par value per share | | New York Stock Exchange |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. ý YES ¨ NO
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. ¨ YES ý NO
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. ý YES ¨ NO
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (Section 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). YES ý NO ¨
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (Section 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
|
| | |
Large accelerated filer x | | Accelerated filer ¨ |
Non-accelerated filer ¨ | | Smaller reporting company ¨ |
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | | |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). ¨ YES ý NO
State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates at September 28, 2014: $2,713,445,337 (1) (based upon its closing transaction price on the New York Stock Exchange on September 26, 2014).
| |
(1) | For this purpose only, “non-affiliates” excludes directors and executive officers. |
Common stock outstanding at May 22, 2015: 44,460,340 Shares of Common Stock
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the registrant’s definitive Proxy Statement for its Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on July 30, 2015 are incorporated by reference in Part III of this Annual Report.
CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (the “Reform Act”) provides a safe harbor for forward-looking statements made by or on behalf of EnerSys. EnerSys and its representatives may, from time to time, make written or verbal forward-looking statements, including statements contained in EnerSys' filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission and its reports to stockholders. Generally, the inclusion of the words “anticipates,” “believe,” “expect,” “future,” “intend,” “estimate,” “anticipate,” “will,” “plans,” or the negative of such terms and similar expressions identify statements that constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that are intended to come within the safe harbor protection provided by those sections. All statements addressing operating performance, events, or developments that EnerSys expects or anticipates will occur in the future, including statements relating to sales growth, earnings or earnings per share growth, and market share, as well as statements expressing optimism or pessimism about future operating results, are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Reform Act. The forward-looking statements are and will be based on management’s then-current beliefs and assumptions regarding future events and operating performance and on information currently available to management, and are applicable only as of the dates of such statements.
Forward-looking statements involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Although we do not make forward-looking statements unless we believe we have a reasonable basis for doing so, we cannot guarantee their accuracy. Actual results may differ materially from those expressed in these forward-looking statements due to a number of uncertainties and risks, including the risks described in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and other unforeseen risks. You should not put undue reliance on any forward-looking statements. These statements speak only as of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, even if subsequently made available by us on our website or otherwise, and we undertake no obligation to update or revise these statements to reflect events or circumstances occurring after the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Our actual results may differ materially from those contemplated by the forward-looking statements for a number of reasons, including the following factors:
| |
• | general cyclical patterns of the industries in which our customers operate; |
| |
• | the extent to which we cannot control our fixed and variable costs; |
| |
• | the raw materials in our products may experience significant fluctuations in market price and availability; |
| |
• | certain raw materials constitute hazardous materials that may give rise to costly environmental and safety claims; |
| |
• | legislation regarding the restriction of the use of certain hazardous substances in our products; |
| |
• | risks involved in our operations such as disruption of markets, changes in import and export laws, environmental regulations, currency restrictions and local currency exchange rate fluctuations; |
| |
• | our ability to raise our selling prices to our customers when our product costs increase; |
| |
• | the extent to which we are able to efficiently utilize our global manufacturing facilities and optimize our capacity; |
| |
• | general economic conditions in the markets in which we operate; |
| |
• | competitiveness of the battery markets throughout the world; |
| |
• | our timely development of competitive new products and product enhancements in a changing environment and the acceptance of such products and product enhancements by customers; |
| |
• | our ability to adequately protect our proprietary intellectual property, technology and brand names; |
| |
• | litigation and regulatory proceedings to which we might be subject; |
| |
• | changes in our market share in the geographic business segments where we operate; |
| |
• | our ability to implement our cost reduction initiatives successfully and improve our profitability; |
| |
• | quality problems associated with our products; |
| |
• | our ability to implement business strategies, including our acquisition strategy, manufacturing expansion and restructuring plans; |
| |
• | our acquisition strategy may not be successful in locating advantageous targets; |
| |
• | our ability to successfully integrate any assets, liabilities, customers, systems and management personnel we acquire into our operations and our ability to realize related revenue synergies and cost savings within expected time frames; |
| |
• | potential goodwill impairment charges, future impairment charges and fluctuations in the fair values of reporting units or of assets in the event projected financial results are not achieved within expected time frames; |
| |
• | our debt and debt service requirements which may restrict our operational and financial flexibility, as well as imposing unfavorable interest and financing costs; |
| |
• | our ability to maintain our existing credit facilities or obtain satisfactory new credit facilities; |
| |
• | adverse changes in our short- and long-term debt levels under our credit facilities; |
| |
• | our exposure to fluctuations in interest rates on our variable-rate debt; |
| |
• | our ability to attract and retain qualified management and personnel; |
| |
• | our ability to maintain good relations with labor unions; |
| |
• | credit risk associated with our customers, including risk of insolvency and bankruptcy; |
| |
• | our ability to successfully recover in the event of a disaster affecting our infrastructure; |
| |
• | terrorist acts or acts of war, could cause damage or disruption to our operations, our suppliers, channels to market or customers, or could cause costs to increase, or create political or economic instability; and |
| |
• | the operation, capacity and security of our information systems and infrastructure. |
This list of factors that may affect future performance is illustrative, but by no means exhaustive. Accordingly, all forward-looking statements should be evaluated with the understanding of their inherent uncertainty.
EnerSys
Annual Report on Form 10-K
For the Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2015
Index
|
| | |
| Page |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Item 1. | | |
| | |
Item 1A. | | |
| | |
Item 1B. | | |
| | |
Item 2. | | |
| | |
Item 3. | | |
| | |
Item 4. | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
Item 5. | | |
| | |
Item 6. | | |
| | |
Item 7. | | |
| | |
Item 7A. | | |
| | |
Item 8. | | |
| | |
Item 9. | | |
| | |
Item 9A. | | |
| | |
Item 9B. | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
Item 10. | | |
| | |
Item 11. | | |
| | |
Item 12. | | |
| | |
Item 13. | | |
| | |
Item 14. | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
Item 15. | | |
| | |
| | |
PART I
Overview
EnerSys (the “Company,” “we,” or “us”) is the world’s largest manufacturer, marketer and distributor of industrial batteries. We also manufacture, market and distribute related products such as chargers, power equipment, outdoor cabinet enclosures and battery accessories, and we provide related after-market and customer-support services for industrial batteries. We market and sell our products globally to over 10,000 customers in more than 100 countries through a network of distributors, independent representatives and our internal sales force.
We operate and manage our business in three geographic regions of the world—Americas, EMEA and Asia, as described below. Our business is highly decentralized with manufacturing locations throughout the world. More than half of our manufacturing capacity is located outside of the United States, and approximately 60% of our net sales were generated outside of the United States. The Company has three reportable segments based on geographic regions, defined as follows:
| |
• | Americas, which includes North and South America, with our segment headquarters in Reading, Pennsylvania, USA; |
| |
• | EMEA, which includes Europe, the Middle East and Africa, with our segment headquarters in Zurich, Switzerland; and |
| |
• | Asia, which includes Asia, Australia and Oceania, with our segment headquarters in Singapore. |
We have two primary product lines: reserve power and motive power products. Net sales classifications by product line are as follows:
| |
• | Reserve power products are used for backup power for the continuous operation of critical applications in telecommunications systems, uninterruptible power systems, or “UPS” applications for computer and computer-controlled systems, and other specialty power applications, including security systems, premium starting, lighting and ignition applications, in switchgear, electrical control systems used in electric utilities, large-scale energy storage, energy pipelines, in commercial aircraft, satellites, military aircraft, submarines, ships and tactical vehicles. Reserve power products also include thermally managed cabinets and enclosures for electronic equipment and batteries. |
| |
• | Motive power products are used to provide power for electric industrial forklifts used in manufacturing, warehousing and other material handling applications as well as mining equipment, diesel locomotive starting and other rail equipment. |
Additionally, see Note 22 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for information on segment reporting.
Fiscal Year Reporting
In this Annual Report on Form 10-K, when we refer to our fiscal years, we state “fiscal” and the year, as in “fiscal 2015”, which refers to our fiscal year ended March 31, 2015. The Company reports interim financial information for 13-week periods, except for the first quarter, which always begins on April 1, and the fourth quarter, which always ends on March 31. The four quarters in fiscal 2015 ended on June 29, 2014, September 28, 2014, December 28, 2014, and March 31, 2015, respectively. The four quarters in fiscal 2014 ended on June 30, 2013, September 29, 2013, December 29, 2013, and March 31, 2014, respectively.
History
EnerSys and its predecessor companies have been manufacturers of industrial batteries for over 125 years. Morgan Stanley Capital Partners teamed with the management of Yuasa, Inc. in late 2000 to acquire from Yuasa Corporation (Japan) its reserve power and motive power battery businesses in North and South America. We were incorporated in October 2000 for the purpose of completing the Yuasa, Inc. acquisition. On January 1, 2001, we changed our name from Yuasa, Inc. to EnerSys to reflect our focus on the energy systems nature of our businesses.
In 2004, EnerSys completed its initial public offering (the “IPO”). The Company’s registration statement (SEC File No. 333-115553) for its IPO was declared effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) and the Company’s common stock commenced trading on the New York Stock Exchange, under the trading symbol “ENS”.
Key Developments
There have been several key stages in the development of our business, which explain to a significant degree our results of operations over the past several years.
In March 2002, we acquired the reserve power and motive power business of the Energy Storage Group of Invensys plc. (“ESG”). Our successful integration of ESG provided global scale in both the reserve and motive power markets. The ESG acquisition also provided us with a further opportunity to reduce costs and improve operating efficiency that, among other initiatives, led to closing underutilized manufacturing plants, distribution facilities, sales offices and eliminating other redundant costs, including staff.
During fiscal years 2003 through 2014, we made twenty-five acquisitions around the globe. There were no acquisitions in fiscal 2015.
In fiscal 2013, we announced our plans to construct a new battery manufacturing facility in Yangzhou, Jiangsu Province, People’s Republic of China (the "PRC") for the production of industrial batteries for Chinese and international markets. The new 440,000 square foot facility began operations during the second half of fiscal 2015 and will provide capacity to meet growing customer demand in these markets.
Our Customers
We serve over 10,000 customers in over 100 countries, on a direct basis or through our distributors. We are not overly dependent on any particular end market. Our customer base is highly diverse and no single customer accounts for more than 5% of our revenues.
Our reserve power customers consist of both global and regional customers. These customers are in diverse markets including telecom, UPS, electric utilities, security systems, emergency lighting, premium starting, lighting and ignition applications and space satellites. In addition, we sell our aerospace and defense products in numerous countries, including the governments of the U.S., Germany and the U.K. and to major defense and aviation original equipment manufacturers (“OEMs”).
Our motive power products are sold to a large, diversified customer base. These customers include material handling equipment dealers, OEMs and end users of such equipment. End users include manufacturers, distributors, warehouse operators, retailers, airports, mine operators and railroads.
Distribution and Services
We distribute, sell and service reserve and motive power products throughout the world, principally through company-owned sales and service facilities, as well as through independent manufacturers’ representatives. Our company-owned network allows us to offer high-quality service, including preventative maintenance programs and customer support. Our warehouses and service locations enable us to respond quickly to customers in the markets we serve. We believe that the extensive industry experience of our sales organization results in strong long-term customer relationships.
Manufacturing and Raw Materials
We manufacture and assemble our products at manufacturing facilities located in the Americas, EMEA and Asia. With a view toward projected demand, we strive to optimize and balance capacity at our battery manufacturing facilities globally, while simultaneously minimizing our product cost. By taking a global view of our manufacturing requirements and capacity, we believe we are better able to anticipate potential capacity bottlenecks and equipment and capital funding needs.
The primary raw materials used to manufacture our products include lead, plastics, steel and copper. We purchase lead from a number of leading suppliers throughout the world. Because lead is traded on the world’s commodity markets and its price fluctuates daily, we periodically enter into hedging arrangements for a portion of our projected requirements to reduce the volatility of our costs.
Competition
The industrial battery market is highly competitive both among competitors who manufacture and sell industrial batteries and among customers who purchase industrial batteries. Our competitors range from development stage companies to large domestic and international corporations. Certain of our competitors produce energy storage products utilizing technologies that
we do not possess at this time. We compete primarily on the basis of reputation, product quality, reliability of service, delivery and price. We believe that our products and services are competitively priced.
Americas
We believe that we have the largest market share in the Americas industrial battery market. We compete principally with Exide Technologies, East Penn Manufacturing and New Power in both the reserve and motive products markets; and also C&D Technologies Inc., NorthStar Battery, SAFT and EaglePicher (OM Group) in the reserve products market.
EMEA
We believe that we have the largest market share in the European industrial battery market. Our primary competitors are Exide Technologies, Hoppecke, FIAMM, SAFT as well as Chinese producers in the reserve products market; and Exide Technologies, Hoppecke and Midac in the motive products market.
Asia
We have a small share of the fragmented Asian industrial battery market. We compete principally with GS-Yuasa, Shin-Kobe and Zibo Torch in the motive products market; and Coslight, Amara Raja, Narada, Leoch, Exide Industries and China Shoto in the reserve products market.
Warranties
Warranties for our products vary geographically and by product type and are competitive with other suppliers of these types of products. Generally, our reserve power product warranties range from one to twenty years and our motive power product warranties range from one to seven years. The length of our warranties is varied to reflect regional characteristics and competitive influences. In some cases, our warranty period may include a pro rata period, which is typically based around the design life of the product and the application served. Our warranties generally cover defects in workmanship and materials and are limited to specific usage parameters.
Intellectual Property
We have numerous patents and patent licenses in the United States and other jurisdictions but do not consider any one patent to be material to our business. From time to time, we apply for patents on new inventions and designs, but we believe that the growth of our business will depend primarily upon the quality of our products and our relationships with our customers, rather than the extent of our patent protection.
We believe we are leaders in thin plate pure lead technology ("TPPL"). Some aspects of this technology may be patented in the future. In any event, we believe that a significant capital investment would be required by any party desiring to produce products using TPPL technology for our markets.
We own or possess exclusive and non-exclusive licenses and other rights to use a number of trademarks in various jurisdictions. We have obtained registrations for many of these trademarks in the United States and other jurisdictions. Our various trademark registrations currently have durations of approximately 10 to 20 years, varying by mark and jurisdiction of registration and may be renewable. We endeavor to keep all of our material registrations current. We believe that many such rights and licenses are important to our business by helping to develop strong brand-name recognition in the marketplace.
Seasonality
Our business generally does not experience significant quarterly fluctuations in net sales as a result of weather or other trends that can be directly linked to seasonality patterns, but historically our fourth quarter is our best quarter with higher revenues and generally more working days and our second quarter is the weakest due to the summer holiday season in Western Europe and Americas.
Product and Process Development
Our product and process development efforts are focused on the creation and optimization of new battery products using existing technologies, which, in certain cases, differentiate our stored energy solutions from that of our competition. We allocate our resources to the following key areas:
| |
• | the design and development of new products; |
| |
• | optimizing and expanding our existing product offering; |
| |
• | waste and scrap reduction; |
| |
• | production efficiency and utilization; |
| |
• | capacity expansion without additional facilities; and |
| |
• | quality attribute maximization. |
Employees
At March 31, 2015, we had approximately 9,500 employees. Of these employees, approximately 31% were covered by collective bargaining agreements. Employees covered by agreements that did not exceed twelve months were approximately 7% of the total workforce. The average term of these agreements is two years, with the longest term being five years.
We consider our employee relations to be good. We did not experience any significant labor unrest or disruption of production during fiscal 2015 except for a temporary shut down at one of our plants in the PRC.
Environmental Matters
In the manufacture of our products throughout the world, we process, store, dispose of and otherwise use large amounts of hazardous materials, especially lead and acid. As a result, we are subject to extensive and evolving environmental, health and safety laws and regulations governing, among other things: the generation, handling, storage, use, transportation and disposal of hazardous materials; emissions or discharges of hazardous materials into the ground, air or water; and the health and safety of our employees. In addition, we are required to comply with the regulation issued from the European Economic Union called Registration, Evaluation, Authorization and Restriction of Chemicals or “REACH,” that came into force on June 1, 2007. Under the regulation, companies which manufacture or import more than one ton of a covered chemical substance per year are required to register it in a central database administered by the European Chemicals Agency. REACH requires a registration over a period of 11 years. Compliance with these laws and regulations results in ongoing costs. Failure to comply with these laws and regulations, or to obtain or comply with required environmental permits, could result in fines, criminal charges or other sanctions by regulators. From time to time, we have had instances of alleged or actual noncompliance that have resulted in the imposition of fines, penalties and required corrective actions. Our ongoing compliance with environmental, health and safety laws, regulations and permits could require us to incur significant expenses, limit our ability to modify or expand our facilities or continue production and require us to install additional pollution control equipment and make other capital improvements. In addition, private parties, including current or former employees, can bring personal injury or other claims against us due to the presence of, or their exposure to, hazardous substances used, stored, transported or disposed of by us or contained in our products.
Sumter, South Carolina
We currently are responsible for certain environmental obligations at our former battery facility in Sumter, South Carolina, that predate our ownership of this facility. This battery facility was closed in 2001 and is separate from our current metal fabrication facility in Sumter. We have a reserve for this facility that totaled $2.9 million as of March 31, 2015. Based on current information, we believe this reserve is adequate to satisfy our environmental liabilities at this facility.
Environmental and safety certifications
Thirteen of our facilities in the Americas, EMEA and Asia are certified to ISO 14001 standards. ISO 14001 is a globally recognized, voluntary program that focuses on the implementation, maintenance and continual improvement of an environmental management system and the improvement of environmental performance. Two facilities in Europe and one in Africa are certified to OHSAS 18001 standards. OHSAS 18001 is a globally recognized occupational health and safety management systems standard.
Quality Systems
We utilize a global strategy for quality management systems, policies and procedures, the basis of which is the ISO 9001:2008 standard, which is a worldwide recognized quality standard. We believe in the principles of this standard and reinforce this by requiring mandatory compliance for all manufacturing, sales and service locations globally that are registered to the ISO 9001 standard. This strategy enables us to provide consistent quality products and services to meet our customers’ needs.
Available Information
We file annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements and other information with the SEC. These filings are available to the public on the Internet at the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov. You may also read and copy any document we file with the SEC at the SEC’s public reference room, located at 100 F Street, N.E., Room 1580, Washington, D.C. 20549. Please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information on the public reference room.
Our Internet address is http://www.enersys.com. We make available free of charge on http://www.enersys.com our annual, quarterly and current reports, and amendments to those reports, as soon as reasonably practical after we electronically file such material with, or furnish it to, the SEC.
The following risks and uncertainties, as well as others described in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, could materially and adversely affect our business, our results of operations and financial conditions and could cause actual results to differ materially from our expectations and projections. Stockholders are cautioned that these and other factors, including those beyond our control, may affect future performance and cause actual results to differ from those which may, from time to time, be anticipated. There may be additional risks that are not presently material or known. See “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements.” All forward-looking statements made by us or on our behalf are qualified by the risks described below.
We operate in an extremely competitive industry and are subject to pricing pressures.
We compete with a number of major international manufacturers and distributors, as well as a large number of smaller, regional competitors. Due to excess capacity in some sectors of our industry and consolidation among industrial battery purchasers, we have been subjected to significant pricing pressures. We anticipate continued competitive pricing pressure as foreign producers are able to employ labor at significantly lower costs than producers in the U.S. and Western Europe, expand their export capacity and increase their marketing presence in our major Americas and European markets. Several of our competitors have strong technical, marketing, sales, manufacturing, distribution and other resources, as well as significant name recognition, established positions in the market and long-standing relationships with OEMs and other customers. In addition, certain of our competitors own lead smelting facilities which, during periods of lead cost increases or price volatility, may provide a competitive pricing advantage and reduce their exposure to volatile raw material costs. Our ability to maintain and improve our operating margins has depended, and continues to depend, on our ability to control and reduce our costs. We cannot assure you that we will be able to continue to control our operating expenses, to raise or maintain our prices or increase our unit volume, in order to maintain or improve our operating results.
The uncertainty in global economic conditions could negatively affect the Company’s operating results.
Our operating results are directly affected by the general global economic conditions of the industries in which our major customer groups operate. Our business segments are highly dependent on the economic and market conditions in each of the geographic areas in which we operate. Our products are heavily dependent on the end markets that we serve and our operating results will vary by geographic segment, depending on the economic environment in these markets. Sales of our motive power products, for example, depend significantly on demand for new electric industrial forklift trucks, which in turn depends on end-user demand for additional motive capacity in their distribution and manufacturing facilities. The uncertainty in global economic conditions varies by geographic segment, and can result in substantial volatility in global credit markets, particularly in the United States, where we service the vast majority of our debt. These conditions affect our business by reducing prices that our customers may be able or willing to pay for our products or by reducing the demand for our products, which could in turn negatively impact our sales and earnings generation and result in a material adverse effect on our business, cash flow, results of operations and financial position.
Government reviews, inquiries, investigations, and actions could harm our business or reputation.
As we operate in various locations around the world, our operations in certain countries are subject to significant governmental scrutiny and may be adversely impacted by the results of such scrutiny. The regulatory environment with regard to our business is evolving, and officials often exercise broad discretion in deciding how to interpret and apply applicable regulations. From time to time, we receive formal and informal inquiries from various government regulatory authorities, as well as self-regulatory organizations, about our business and compliance with local laws, regulations or standards. Any determination that our operations or activities, or the activities of our employees, are not in compliance with existing laws, regulations or standards could result in the imposition of substantial fines, interruptions of business, loss of supplier, vendor or other third-party relationships, termination of necessary licenses and permits, or similar results, all of which could potentially harm our business and/or reputation. Even if an inquiry does not result in these types of determinations, regulatory authorities could cause us to incur substantial costs or require us to change our business practices in a manner materially adverse to our business, and it potentially could create negative publicity which could harm our business and/or reputation.
Accelerated conversion or required repurchase of Convertible Notes could adversely affect the Company’s liquidity.
On May 7, 2015, the Company announced that it had called for redemption all of our senior unsecured 3.375% convertible notes (the "Convertible Notes") on June 8, 2015, at a price equal to $1,000.66 per $1,000 original principal amount of Convertible Notes, which is equal to 100% of the accreted principal amount of the Convertible Notes being repurchased, plus accrued and unpaid interest. Additionally, the holders are now permitted to convert their Convertible Notes at their option on or before June 5, 2015. The conversion rate, as of May 7, 2015, of the Convertible Notes is 25.1086 shares of the Company's common stock per one thousand dollars in principal amount of the Convertible Notes. It is the Company's current intent to settle the principal amount of any conversions in cash and any additional conversion consideration in cash, shares of EnerSys common stock or a combination of cash and shares. The Company has also offered to purchase all outstanding Convertible Notes in cash at a purchase price of $1,000 original principal amount of Convertible Notes, with such offer expiring on May 29, 2015. As of March 31, 2015, the Company has $172.3 million of Convertible Notes outstanding. In anticipation of the redemption, conversion or repurchase of the Convertible Notes, on April 23, 2015, the Company issued its $300 million 5% Senior Secured Notes due 2023 (the "Notes").
To the extent that our existing domestic cash balances and cash flow from operations, together with borrowing capacity under our existing credit facilities, are insufficient to satisfy any such settlement or optional put or conversion, the Company may require additional financing from other sources. Redemption of the Convertible Notes and settling any Convertible Notes entirely or partly in cash upon conversion may have an adverse effect on our liquidity and reduce our borrowing capacity under our credit facility. This may impair our ability to react to changes in the industrial battery business, our ability to invest in our manufacturing and distribution facilities and research and development and our ability to take advantage of acquisition or other business opportunities.
Reliance on third party relationships and derivative agreements could adversely affect the Company’s business.
We depend on third parties, including suppliers, distributors, lead toll operators, freight forwarders, insurance brokers, commodity brokers, major financial institutions and other third party service providers, for key aspects of our business, including the provision of derivative contracts to manage risks of (a) lead cost volatility, (b) foreign currency exposures and (c) interest rate volatility. Failure of these third parties to meet their contractual, regulatory and other obligations to the Company or the development of factors that materially disrupt our relationships with these third parties could expose us to the risks of business disruption, higher lead costs, unfavorable foreign currency rates and higher expenses, which could have a material adverse effect on our business.
Our operating results could be adversely affected by changes in the cost and availability of raw materials.
Lead is our most significant raw material and is used along with significant amounts of plastics, steel, copper and other materials in our manufacturing processes. We estimate that raw material costs account for over half of our cost of goods sold. The costs of these raw materials, particularly lead, are volatile and beyond our control. Additionally, availability of the raw materials used to manufacture our products may be limited at times resulting in higher prices and/or the need to find alternative suppliers. Furthermore, the cost of raw materials may also be influenced by transportation costs. Volatile raw material costs can significantly affect our operating results and make period-to-period comparisons extremely difficult. We cannot assure you that we will be able to either hedge the costs or secure the availability of our raw material requirements at a reasonable level or, even with respect to our agreements that adjust pricing to a market-based index for lead, pass on to our customers the increased costs of our raw materials without affecting demand or that limited availability of materials will not impact our production
capabilities. Our inability to raise the price of our products in response to increases in prices of raw materials or to maintain a proper supply of raw materials could have an adverse effect on our revenue, operating profit and net income.
Our operations expose us to litigation, tax, environmental and other legal compliance risks.
We are subject to a variety of litigation, tax, environmental, health and safety and other legal compliance risks. These risks include, among other things, possible liability relating to product liability matters, personal injuries, intellectual property rights, contract-related claims, government contracts, taxes, health and safety liabilities, environmental matters and compliance with U.S. and foreign laws, competition laws and laws governing improper business practices. We or one of our business units could be charged with wrongdoing as a result of such matters. If convicted or found liable, we could be subject to significant fines, penalties, repayments or other damages (in certain cases, treble damages). As a global business, we are subject to complex laws and regulations in the U.S. and other countries in which we operate. Those laws and regulations may be interpreted in different ways. They may also change from time to time, as may related interpretations and other guidance. Changes in laws or regulations could result in higher expenses and payments, and uncertainty relating to laws or regulations may also affect how we conduct our operations and structure our investments and could limit our ability to enforce our rights.
In the area of taxes, changes in tax laws and regulations, as well as changes in related interpretations and other tax guidance could materially impact our tax receivables and liabilities and our deferred tax assets and tax liabilities. Additionally, in the ordinary course of business, we are subject to examinations by various authorities, including tax authorities. In addition to ongoing investigations, there could be additional investigations launched in the future by governmental authorities in various jurisdictions and existing investigations could be expanded. The global and diverse nature of our operations means that these risks will continue to exist and additional legal proceedings and contingencies will arise from time to time. Our results may be affected by the outcome of legal proceedings and other contingencies that cannot be predicted with certainty.
In the manufacture of our products throughout the world, we process, store, dispose of and otherwise use large amounts of hazardous materials, especially lead and acid. As a result, we are subject to extensive and changing environmental, health and safety laws and regulations governing, among other things: the generation, handling, storage, use, transportation and disposal of hazardous materials; remediation of polluted ground or water; emissions or discharges of hazardous materials into the ground, air or water; and the health and safety of our employees. Compliance with these laws and regulations results in ongoing costs. Failure to comply with these laws or regulations, or to obtain or comply with required environmental permits, could result in fines, criminal charges or other sanctions by regulators. From time to time we have had instances of alleged or actual noncompliance that have resulted in the imposition of fines, penalties and required corrective actions. Our ongoing compliance with environmental, health and safety laws, regulations and permits could require us to incur significant expenses, limit our ability to modify or expand our facilities or continue production and require us to install additional pollution control equipment and make other capital improvements. In addition, private parties, including current or former employees, could bring personal injury or other claims against us due to the presence of, or exposure to, hazardous substances used, stored or disposed of by us or contained in our products.
Certain environmental laws assess liability on owners or operators of real property for the cost of investigation, removal or remediation of hazardous substances at their current or former properties or at properties at which they have disposed of hazardous substances. These laws may also assess costs to repair damage to natural resources. We may be responsible for remediating damage to our properties that was caused by former owners. Soil and groundwater contamination has occurred at some of our current and former properties and may occur or be discovered at other properties in the future. We are currently investigating and monitoring soil and groundwater contamination at several of our properties, in most cases as required by regulatory permitting processes. We may be required to conduct these operations at other properties in the future. In addition, we have been and in the future may be liable to contribute to the cleanup of locations owned or operated by other persons to which we or our predecessor companies have sent wastes for disposal, pursuant to federal and other environmental laws. Under these laws, the owner or operator of contaminated properties and companies that generated, disposed of or arranged for the disposal of wastes sent to a contaminated disposal facility can be held jointly and severally liable for the investigation and cleanup of such properties, regardless of fault.
Changes in environmental and climate laws or regulations, could lead to new or additional investment in production designs and could increase environmental compliance expenditures. Changes in climate change concerns, or in the regulation of such concerns, including greenhouse gas emissions, could subject us to additional costs and restrictions, including increased energy and raw materials costs. Additionally, we cannot assure you that we have been or at all times will be in compliance with environmental laws and regulations or that we will not be required to expend significant funds to comply with, or discharge liabilities arising under, environmental laws, regulations and permits, or that we will not be exposed to material environmental, health or safety litigation.
Also, the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (“FCPA”) and similar worldwide anti-bribery laws in non-U.S. jurisdictions generally prohibit companies and their intermediaries from making improper payments to non-U.S. officials for the purpose of obtaining or retaining business. The FCPA applies to companies, individual directors, officers, employees and agents. Under the FCPA, U.S. companies may be held liable for actions taken by strategic or local partners or representatives. The FCPA also imposes accounting standards and requirements on publicly traded U.S. corporations and their foreign affiliates, which are intended to prevent the diversion of corporate funds to the payment of bribes and other improper payments. Certain of our customer relationships outside of the U.S. are with governmental entities and are therefore subject to such anti-bribery laws. Our policies mandate compliance with these anti-bribery laws. Despite meaningful measures that we undertake to facilitate lawful conduct, which include training and internal control policies, these measures may not always prevent reckless or criminal acts by our employees or agents. As a result, we could be subject to criminal and civil penalties, disgorgement, further changes or enhancements to our procedures, policies and controls, personnel changes or other remedial actions. Violations of these laws, or allegations of such violations, could disrupt our operations, involve significant management distraction and result in a material adverse effect on our competitive position, results of operations, cash flows or financial condition.
There is also a regulation to improve the transparency and accountability concerning the supply of minerals coming from the conflict zones in and around the Democratic Republic of Congo. New U.S. legislation includes disclosure requirements regarding the use of conflict minerals mined from the Democratic Republic of Congo and adjoining countries and procedures regarding a manufacturer’s efforts to prevent the sourcing of such conflict minerals. The implementation of these requirements could affect the sourcing and availability of minerals used in the manufacture of our products. As a result, there may only be a limited pool of suppliers who provide conflict-free metals, and we cannot assure you that we will be able to obtain products in sufficient quantities or at competitive prices. Future regulations may become more stringent or costly and our compliance costs and potential liabilities could increase, which may harm our business.
We are exposed to exchange rate risks, and our net earnings and financial condition may suffer due to currency translations.
We invoice our foreign sales and service transactions in local and foreign currencies and translate net sales using actual exchange rates during the period. We translate our non-U.S. assets and liabilities into U.S. dollars using current exchange rates as of the balance sheet dates. Because a significant portion of our revenues and expenses are denominated in foreign currencies, changes in exchange rates between the U.S. dollar and foreign currencies, primarily the euro, British pound, Polish zloty, Chinese renminbi, Mexican peso and Swiss franc may adversely affect our revenue, cost of goods sold and operating margins. For example, foreign currency depreciation against the U.S. dollar will reduce the value of our foreign revenues and operating earnings as well as reduce our net investment in foreign subsidiaries. Approximately 60% of net sales were generated outside of the United States for the last three fiscal years.
Most of the risk of fluctuating foreign currencies is in our EMEA segment, which comprised approximately 40% of our net sales during the last three fiscal years. The euro is the dominant currency in our EMEA operations. In the event that one or more European countries were to replace the euro with another currency, our sales into such countries, or into Europe generally, would likely be adversely affected until stable exchange rates are established.
The translation impact from currency fluctuations on net sales and operating earnings in our Americas and Asia segments are not as significant as our EMEA segment, as a substantial majority of these net sales and operating earnings are in U.S. dollars or foreign currencies that have been closely correlated to the U.S. dollar.
If foreign currencies depreciate against the U.S. dollar, it would make it more expensive for our non-U.S. subsidiaries to purchase certain of our raw material commodities that are priced globally in U.S. dollars, while the related revenue will decrease when translated to U.S. dollars. Significant movements in foreign exchange rates can have a material impact on our results of operations and financial condition. We periodically engage in hedging of our foreign currency exposures, but cannot assure you that we can successfully hedge all of our foreign currency exposures or do so at a reasonable cost.
We quantify and monitor our global foreign currency exposures. Our largest foreign currency exposure is from the purchase and conversion of U.S. dollar based lead costs into local currencies in Europe. Additionally, we have currency exposures from intercompany financing and intercompany and third party trade transactions. On a selective basis, we enter into foreign currency forward contracts and purchase option contracts to reduce the impact from the volatility of currency movements; however, we cannot be certain that foreign currency fluctuations will not impact our operations in the future.
If we are unable to effectively hedge against currency fluctuations, our operating costs and revenues in our non-U.S. operations may be adversely affected, which would have an adverse effect on our operating profit and net income.
Our international operations may be adversely affected by actions taken by foreign governments or other forces or events over which we may have no control.
We currently have significant manufacturing and/or distribution facilities outside of the United States, in Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Bulgaria, Canada, the Czech Republic, France, Germany, India, Italy, Malaysia, Mexico, PRC, Poland, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, Tunisia and the United Kingdom. We may face political instability, economic uncertainty, and/or difficult labor relations in our foreign operations. We also may face barriers in the form of long-standing relationships between potential customers and their existing suppliers, national policies favoring domestic manufacturers and protective regulations including exchange controls, restrictions on foreign investment or the repatriation of profits or invested capital, changes in export or import restrictions and changes in the tax system or rate of taxation in countries where we do business. We cannot assure you that we will be able to successfully develop and expand our international operations and sales or that we will be able to overcome the significant obstacles and risks of our international operations. This may impair our ability to compete with battery manufacturers who are based in such foreign countries or who have long established manufacturing or distribution facilities or networks in such countries.
Our failure to introduce new products and product enhancements and broad market acceptance of new technologies introduced by our competitors could adversely affect our business.
Many new energy storage technologies have been introduced over the past several years. For certain important and growing markets, such as aerospace and defense, lithium-based battery technologies have a large and growing market share. Our ability to achieve significant and sustained penetration of key developing markets, including aerospace and defense, will depend upon our success in developing or acquiring these and other technologies, either independently, through joint ventures or through acquisitions. If we fail to develop or acquire, and manufacture and sell, products that satisfy our customers’ demands, or we fail to respond effectively to new product announcements by our competitors by quickly introducing competitive products, then market acceptance of our products could be reduced and our business could be adversely affected. We cannot assure you that our lead-acid products will remain competitive with products based on new technologies.
We may not be able to adequately protect our proprietary intellectual property and technology.
We rely on a combination of copyright, trademark, patent and trade secret laws, non-disclosure agreements and other confidentiality procedures and contractual provisions to establish, protect and maintain our proprietary intellectual property and technology and other confidential information. Certain of these technologies, especially TPPL technology, are important to our business and are not protected by patents. Despite our efforts to protect our proprietary intellectual property and technology and other confidential information, unauthorized parties may attempt to copy or otherwise obtain and use our intellectual property and proprietary technologies. If we are unable to protect our intellectual property and technology, we may lose any technological advantage we currently enjoy and may be required to take an impairment charge with respect to the carrying value of such intellectual property or goodwill established in connection with the acquisition thereof. In either case, our operating results and net income may be adversely affected.
Relocation of our customers’ operations could adversely affect our business.
The trend by a number of our North American and Western European customers to move manufacturing operations and expand their businesses in faster growing and low labor-cost markets may have an adverse impact on our business. As our customers in traditional manufacturing-based industries seek to move their manufacturing operations to these locations, there is a risk that these customers will source their energy storage products from competitors located in those territories and will cease or reduce the purchase of products from our manufacturing plants. We cannot assure you that we will be able to compete effectively with manufacturing operations of energy storage products in those territories, whether by establishing or expanding our manufacturing operations in those lower-cost territories or acquiring existing manufacturers.
We may fail to implement our cost reduction initiatives successfully and improve our profitability.
We must continue to implement cost reduction initiatives to achieve additional cost savings in future periods. We cannot assure you that we will be able to achieve all of the cost savings that we expect to realize from current or future initiatives. In particular, we may be unable to implement one or more of our initiatives successfully or we may experience unexpected cost increases that offset the savings that we achieve. Given the continued competitive pricing pressures experienced in our industry, our failure to realize cost savings would adversely affect our results of operations.
Quality problems with our products could harm our reputation and erode our competitive position.
The success of our business will depend upon the quality of our products and our relationships with customers. In the event that our products fail to meet our customers’ standards, our reputation could be harmed, which would adversely affect our marketing and sales efforts. We cannot assure you that our customers will not experience quality problems with our products.
We offer our products under a variety of brand names, the protection of which is important to our reputation for quality in the consumer marketplace.
We rely upon a combination of trademark, licensing and contractual covenants to establish and protect the brand names of our products. We have registered many of our trademarks in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office and in other countries. In many market segments, our reputation is closely related to our brand names. Monitoring unauthorized use of our brand names is difficult, and we cannot be certain that the steps we have taken will prevent their unauthorized use, particularly in foreign countries where the laws may not protect our proprietary rights as fully as in the U.S. We cannot assure you that our brand names will not be misappropriated or utilized without our consent or that such actions will not have a material adverse effect on our reputation and on our results of operations.
We may fail to implement our plans to make acquisitions or successfully integrate them into our operations.
As part of our business strategy, we have grown, and plan to continue growing, by acquiring other product lines, technologies or facilities that complement or expand our existing business. There is significant competition for acquisition targets in the industrial battery industry. We may not be able to identify suitable acquisition candidates or negotiate attractive terms. In addition, we may have difficulty obtaining the financing necessary to complete transactions we pursue. In that regard, our credit facilities restrict the amount of additional indebtedness that we may incur to finance acquisitions and place other restrictions on our ability to make acquisitions. Exceeding any of these restrictions would require the consent of our lenders. We may be unable to successfully integrate any assets, liabilities, customers, systems and management personnel we acquire into our operations and we may not be able to realize related revenue synergies and cost savings within expected time frames. Our failure to execute our acquisition strategy could have a material adverse effect on our business. We cannot assure you that our acquisition strategy will be successful or that we will be able to successfully integrate acquisitions we do make.
Any acquisitions that we complete may dilute stockholder ownership interests in EnerSys, may have adverse effects on our financial condition and results of operations and may cause unanticipated liabilities.
Future acquisitions may involve the issuance of our equity securities as payment, in part or in full, for the businesses or assets acquired. Any future issuances of equity securities would dilute stockholder ownership interests. In addition, future acquisitions might not increase, and may even decrease our earnings or earnings per share and the benefits derived by us from an acquisition might not outweigh or might not exceed the dilutive effect of the acquisition. We also may incur additional debt or suffer adverse tax and accounting consequences in connection with any future acquisitions.
The failure or security breach of critical computer systems could seriously affect our sales and operations.
We operate a number of critical computer systems throughout our business that can fail for a variety of reasons. If such a failure were to occur, we may not be able to sufficiently recover from the failure in time to avoid the loss of data or any adverse impact on certain of our operations that are dependent on such systems. This could result in lost sales and the inefficient operation of our facilities for the duration of such a failure.
In addition, our computer systems are essential for the exchange of information both within the company and in communicating with third parties. Despite our efforts to protect the integrity of our systems and network as well as sensitive, confidential or personal data or information, our facilities and systems and those of our third-party service providers may be vulnerable to security breaches, theft, misplaced or lost data, programming and/or human errors that could potentially lead to the compromising of sensitive, confidential or personal data or information, improper use of our systems, software solutions or networks, unauthorized access, use, disclosure, modification or destruction of information, defective products, production downtimes and operational disruptions, which in turn could adversely affect our reputation, competitiveness, and results of operations.
Our ability to maintain adequate credit facilities.
Our ability to continue our ongoing business operations and fund future growth depends on our ability to maintain adequate credit facilities and to comply with the financial and other covenants in such credit facilities or to secure alternative sources of
financing. However, such credit facilities or alternate financing may not be available or, if available, may not be on terms favorable to us. If we do not have adequate access to credit, we may be unable to refinance our existing borrowings and credit facilities when they mature and to fund future acquisitions, and this may reduce our flexibility in responding to changing industry conditions.
Our indebtedness could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
As of March 31, 2015, we had $515.9 million of total consolidated debt (including capital lease obligations and net of the discount on the Convertible Notes). On April 23, 2015, the Company also issued $300 million of Notes. This level of debt could:
| |
• | increase our vulnerability to adverse general economic and industry conditions, including interest rate fluctuations, because a portion of our borrowings bear, and will continue to bear, interest at floating rates; |
| |
• | require us to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash flow from operations to debt service payments, which would reduce the availability of our cash to fund working capital, capital expenditures or other general corporate purposes, including acquisitions; |
| |
• | limit our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and industry; |
| |
• | restrict our ability to introduce new products or new technologies or exploit business opportunities; |
| |
• | place us at a disadvantage compared with competitors that have proportionately less debt; |
| |
• | limit our ability to borrow additional funds in the future, if we need them, due to financial and restrictive covenants in our debt agreements; |
| |
• | have a material adverse effect on us if we fail to comply with the financial and restrictive covenants in our debt agreements; and |
| |
• | dilute share ownership percentage if the Company does not settle the Convertible Notes, including any optional conversions, solely in cash. |
There can be no assurance that we will continue to declare cash dividends at all or in any particular amounts.
During fiscal 2015, we announced the declaration of a quarterly cash dividend of $0.175 per share of common stock for quarters ended June 29, 2014, September 28, 2014, December 28, 2014 and March 31, 2015. On May 7, 2015, we announced a fiscal 2016 first quarter cash dividend of $0.175 per share of common stock. Future payment of a regular quarterly cash dividend on our common shares will be subject to, among other things, our results of operations, cash balances and future cash requirements, financial condition, statutory requirements of Delaware law, compliance with the terms of existing and future indebtedness and credit facilities, and other factors that the Board of Directors may deem relevant. Our dividend payments may change from time to time, and we cannot provide assurance that we will continue to declare dividends at all or in any particular amounts. A reduction in or elimination of our dividend payments could have a negative effect on our share price.
We depend on our senior management team and other key employees, and significant attrition within our management team or unsuccessful succession planning could adversely affect our business.
Our success depends in part on our ability to attract, retain and motivate senior management and other key employees. Achieving this objective may be difficult due to many factors, including fluctuations in global economic and industry conditions, competitors’ hiring practices, cost reduction activities, and the effectiveness of our compensation programs. Competition for qualified personnel can be very intense. We must continue to recruit, retain and motivate senior management and other key employees sufficient to maintain our current business and support our future projects. We are vulnerable to attrition among our current senior management team and other key employees. A loss of any such personnel, or the inability to recruit and retain qualified personnel in the future, could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, certain key members of our senior management team are at or nearing retirement age. If we are unsuccessful in our succession planning efforts, the continuity of our business and results of operations could be adversely affected.
|
| |
ITEM 1B. | UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS |
None.
The Company’s worldwide headquarters is located in Reading, Pennsylvania. Geographic headquarters for our Americas, EMEA and Asia segments are located in Reading, Pennsylvania, Zurich, Switzerland and Singapore, respectively. The Company owns approximately 80% of its manufacturing facilities and distribution centers worldwide. The following sets forth the Company’s principal owned or leased facilities by business segment:
Americas: Sylmar, California; Longmont, Colorado; Hays, Kansas; Richmond, Kentucky; Warrensburg, Missouri; Cleveland, Ohio; Horsham, Pennsylvania; Sumter, South Carolina; Ooltewah, Tennessee and Spokane, Washington in the United States; Monterrey and Tijuana in Mexico; Buenos Aires, Argentina and Sao Paulo, in Brazil.
EMEA: Targovishte, Bulgaria; Hostomice, Czech Republic; Arras, France; Hagen and Zwickau in Germany; Bielsko-Biala, Poland; Newport and Culham in the United Kingdom; Port Elizabeth, South Africa; and Tunis, Tunisia.
Asia: Jiangsu, Chongqing and Yangzhou in the PRC and Andhra Pradesh in India.
We consider our plants and facilities, whether owned or leased, to be in satisfactory condition and adequate to meet the needs of our current businesses and projected growth. Information as to material lease commitments is included in Note 9 - Leases to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
From time to time, we are involved in litigation incidental to the conduct of our business. See Litigation and Other Legal Matters in Note 18 - Commitments, Contingencies and Litigation to the Consolidated Financial Statements, which is incorporated herein by reference.
|
| |
ITEM 4. | MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES |
Not applicable.
PART II
|
| |
ITEM 5. | MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES |
Market Information
The Company’s common stock has been listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “ENS” since it began trading on July 30, 2004. Prior to that time, there had been no public market for our common stock. The following table sets forth, on a per share basis for the periods presented, the range of high, low and closing prices of the Company’s common stock.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Quarter Ended | | High Price | | Low Price | | Closing Price | | Dividends Declared |
March 31, 2015 | | $ | 66.89 |
| | $ | 57.47 |
| | $ | 64.24 |
| | $ | 0.175 |
|
December 28, 2014 | | 63.39 |
| | 50.63 |
| | 61.78 |
| | 0.175 |
|
September 28, 2014 | | 70.00 |
| | 57.88 |
| | 60.07 |
| | 0.175 |
|
June 29, 2014 | | 71.94 |
| | 62.72 |
| | 68.91 |
| | 0.175 |
|
March 31, 2014 | | $ | 74.17 |
| | $ | 64.46 |
| | $ | 69.29 |
| | $ | 0.125 |
|
December 29, 2013 | | 71.75 |
| | 59.40 |
| | 70.09 |
| | 0.125 |
|
September 29, 2013 | | 61.17 |
| | 48.99 |
| | 60.55 |
| | 0.125 |
|
June 30, 2013 | | 51.79 |
| | 42.37 |
| | 49.04 |
| | 0.125 |
|
Holders of Record
As of May 22, 2015, there were approximately 390 record holders of common stock of the Company. Because many of these shares are held by brokers and other institutions on behalf of stockholders, the Company is unable to estimate the total number of stockholders represented by these record holders.
Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities
During the three fiscal years ended March 31, 2015, we did not issue any unregistered securities.
Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers
The following table summarizes the number of shares of common stock we purchased from participants in our equity incentive plans as well as repurchases of common stock authorized by the Board of Directors. As provided by the Company’s equity incentive plans, (a) vested options outstanding may be exercised through surrender to the Company of option shares or vested options outstanding under the Company’s equity incentive plans to satisfy the applicable aggregate exercise price (and any withholding tax) required to be paid upon such exercise and (b) the withholding tax requirements related to the vesting and settlement of restricted stock units and market share units may be satisfied by the surrender of shares of the Company’s common stock.
Purchases of Equity Securities
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Period | | (a) Total number of shares (or units) purchased | | | | (b) Average price paid per share (or unit) | | (c) Total number of shares (or units) purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs | | (d) Maximum number (or approximate dollar value) of shares (or units) that may be purchased under the plans or programs(1)(2) |
December 29, 2014-January 25, 2015 | | 353,150 |
| | | | $ | 59.44 |
| | 353,150 |
| | $ | 16,580,995 |
|
January 26, 2015-February 22, 2015 | | 59,819 |
| | | | 59.55 |
| | 59,494 |
| | 13,019,061 |
|
February 23, 2015-March 31, 2015 | | 74,141 |
| | | | 64.97 |
| | 73,588 |
| | — |
|
Total | | 487,110 |
| | | | $ | 60.29 |
| | 486,232 |
| | |
| |
(1) | The Company's Board of Directors has authorized the Company to repurchase up to such number of shares as shall equal the dilutive effects of any equity-based award granted during such fiscal year under the 2010 Equity Incentive Plan and the number of shares exercised through stock option awards during such fiscal year. This repurchase program was exhausted for fiscal 2015. |
| |
(2) | The Company’s Board of Directors authorized the Company to repurchase up to $190 million of its common stock, which expired on March 31, 2015. |
STOCK PERFORMANCE GRAPH
The following graph compares the changes in cumulative total returns on EnerSys’ common stock with the changes in cumulative total returns of the New York Stock Exchange Composite Index, a broad equity market index, and the total return on a selected peer group index. The peer group selected is based on the standard industrial classification codes (“SIC Codes”) established by the U.S. government. The index chosen was “Miscellaneous Electrical Equipment and Suppliers” and comprises all publicly traded companies having the same three-digit SIC Code (369) as EnerSys.
The graph was prepared assuming that $100 was invested in EnerSys’ common stock, the New York Stock Exchange Composite Index and the peer group (duly updated for changes) on March 31, 2010.
*$100 invested on 3/31/10 in stock or index, including reinvestment of dividends.
|
| |
ITEM 6. | SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Fiscal Year Ended March 31, |
| | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2013 | | 2012 | | 2011 |
| | (In thousands, except share and per share data) |
Consolidated Statements of Income: | | | | | | | | | | |
Net sales | | $ | 2,505,512 |
| | $ | 2,474,433 |
| | $ | 2,277,559 |
| | $ | 2,283,369 |
| | $ | 1,964,462 |
|
Cost of goods sold | | 1,864,601 |
| | 1,844,813 |
| | 1,708,203 |
| | 1,770,664 |
| | 1,514,618 |
|
Gross profit | | 640,911 |
| | 629,620 |
| | 569,356 |
| | 512,705 |
| | 449,844 |
|
Operating expenses | | 358,381 |
| | 344,421 |
| | 312,324 |
| | 297,806 |
| | 259,217 |
|
Restructuring and other exit charges | | 11,436 |
| | 27,326 |
| | 7,164 |
| | 4,988 |
| | 6,813 |
|
Impairment of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangibles | | 23,946 |
| | 5,179 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Legal proceedings charge / (reversal of legal accrual, net of fees) | | (16,233 | ) | | 58,184 |
| | — |
| | (900 | ) | | — |
|
Operating earnings | | 263,381 |
| | 194,510 |
| | 249,868 |
| | 210,811 |
| | 183,814 |
|
Interest expense | | 19,644 |
| | 17,105 |
| | 18,719 |
| | 16,484 |
| | 22,038 |
|
Charges related to refinancing | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 8,155 |
|
Other (income) expense, net | | (5,602 | ) | | 13,658 |
| | 916 |
| | 3,068 |
| | 2,177 |
|
Earnings before income taxes | | 249,339 |
| | 163,747 |
| | 230,233 |
| | 191,259 |
| | 151,444 |
|
Income tax expense | | 67,814 |
| | 16,980 |
| | 65,275 |
| | 47,292 |
| | 38,018 |
|
Net earnings | | 181,525 |
| | 146,767 |
| | 164,958 |
| | 143,967 |
| | 113,426 |
|
Net gains (losses) attributable to noncontrolling interests | | 337 |
| | (3,561 | ) | | (1,550 | ) | | (36 | ) | | — |
|
Net earnings attributable to EnerSys stockholders | | $ | 181,188 |
| | $ | 150,328 |
| | $ | 166,508 |
| | $ | 144,003 |
| | $ | 113,426 |
|
Net earnings per common share attributable to EnerSys stockholders: | | | | | | | | | | |
Basic | | $ | 3.97 |
| | $ | 3.17 |
| | $ | 3.47 |
| | $ | 2.95 |
| | $ | 2.30 |
|
Diluted | | $ | 3.77 |
| | $ | 3.02 |
| | $ | 3.42 |
| | $ | 2.93 |
| | $ | 2.27 |
|
Weighted-average number of common shares outstanding: | | | | | | | | | | |
Basic | | 45,606,317 |
| | 47,473,690 |
| | 48,022,005 |
| | 48,748,205 |
| | 49,376,132 |
|
Diluted | | 48,052,729 |
| | 49,788,155 |
| | 48,635,449 |
| | 49,216,035 |
| | 50,044,246 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Fiscal Year Ended March 31, |
| | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2013 | | 2012 | | 2011 |
| | (In thousands) |
Consolidated cash flow data: | | | | | | | | | | |
Net cash provided by operating activities | | $ | 194,471 |
| | $ | 193,621 |
| | $ | 244,400 |
| | $ | 204,196 |
| | $ | 76,459 |
|
Net cash used in investing activities | | (59,616 | ) | | (232,005 | ) | | (55,092 | ) | | (72,420 | ) | | (91,661 | ) |
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities | | (59,313 | ) | | 21,562 |
| | (95,962 | ) | | (79,382 | ) | | (82,677 | ) |
Other operating data: | | | | | | | | | | |
Capital expenditures | | 63,625 |
| | 61,995 |
| | 55,286 |
| | 48,943 |
| | 59,940 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | As of March 31, |
| | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2013 | | 2012 | | 2011 |
| | (In thousands) |
Consolidated balance sheet data: | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 268,921 |
| | $ | 240,103 |
| | $ | 249,348 |
| | $ | 160,490 |
| | $ | 108,869 |
|
Working capital | | 800,047 |
| | 719,297 |
| | 685,403 |
| | 611,372 |
| | 554,164 |
|
Total assets | | 2,163,047 |
| | 2,321,858 |
| | 1,987,867 |
| | 1,924,955 |
| | 1,828,387 |
|
Total debt, including capital leases, excluding discount on the Convertible Notes | | 515,925 |
| | 322,300 |
| | 178,489 |
| | 256,101 |
| | 253,400 |
|
Total EnerSys stockholders’ equity | | 1,038,900 |
| | 1,246,402 |
| | 1,169,401 |
| | 1,032,195 |
| | 974,331 |
|
|
| |
ITEM 7. | MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
The following discussion and analysis of our results of operations and financial condition for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, should be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements and the notes to those statements included in Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Our discussion contains forward-looking statements based upon current expectations that involve risks and uncertainties, such as our plans, objectives, opinions, expectations, anticipations and intentions and beliefs. Actual results and the timing of events could differ materially from those anticipated in those forward-looking statements as a result of a number of factors. See “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements,” “Business” and “Risk Factors,” sections elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. In the following discussion and analysis of results of operations and financial condition, certain financial measures may be considered “non-GAAP financial measures” under the SEC rules. These rules require supplemental explanation and reconciliation, which is provided in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
EnerSys’ management uses the non-GAAP measures, EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA, in its computation of compliance with loan covenants. These measures, as used by EnerSys, adjust net earnings determined in accordance with GAAP for interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, and certain charges or credits as permitted by our credit agreements, that were recorded during the periods presented.
EnerSys’ management uses the non-GAAP measures,"primary working capital" and "primary working capital percentage" (see definition in “Overview” below) along with capital expenditures, in its evaluation of business segment cash flow and financial position performance.
These non-GAAP disclosures have limitations as analytical tools, should not be viewed as a substitute for cash flow or operating earnings determined in accordance with GAAP, and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for analysis of the Company’s results as reported under GAAP, nor are they necessarily comparable to non-GAAP performance measures that may be presented by other companies. This supplemental presentation should not be construed as an inference that the Company’s future results will be unaffected by similar adjustments to operating earnings determined in accordance with GAAP.
Overview
EnerSys (the “Company,” “we,” or “us”) is the world’s largest manufacturer, marketer and distributor of industrial batteries. We also manufacture, market and distribute products such as battery chargers, power equipment, battery accessories, and outdoor equipment enclosure solutions. Additionally, we provide related aftermarket and customer-support services for our products. We market our products globally to over 10,000 customers in more than 100 countries through a network of distributors, independent representatives and our internal sales force.
We operate and manage our business in three geographic regions of the world—Americas, EMEA and Asia, as described below. Our business is highly decentralized with manufacturing locations throughout the world. More than half of our manufacturing capacity is located outside the United States, and approximately 60% of our net sales were generated outside the United States. The Company has three reportable business segments based on geographic regions, defined as follows:
| |
• | Americas, which includes North and South America, with our segment headquarters in Reading, Pennsylvania, USA; |
| |
• | EMEA, which includes Europe, the Middle East and Africa, with our segment headquarters in Zurich, Switzerland; and |
| |
• | Asia, which includes Asia, Australia and Oceania, with our segment headquarters in Singapore. |
We evaluate business segment performance based primarily upon operating earnings exclusive of highlighted items. Highlighted items are those that the Company deems are not indicative of ongoing operating results, including those charges that the Company incurs as a result of restructuring activities and those charges and credits that are not directly related to ongoing business segment performance. All corporate and centrally incurred costs are allocated to the business segments based principally on net sales. We evaluate business segment cash flow and financial position performance based primarily upon capital expenditures and primary working capital levels (see definition of primary working capital in “Liquidity and Capital Resources” below). Although we monitor the three elements of primary working capital (receivables, inventory and payables), our primary focus is on the total amount due to the significant impact it has on our cash flow.
Our management structure, financial reporting systems, and associated internal controls and procedures, are all consistent with our three geographic business segments. We report on a March 31 fiscal year-end. Our financial results are largely driven by the following factors:
| |
• | global economic conditions and general cyclical patterns of the industries in which our customers operate; |
| |
• | changes in our selling prices and, in periods when our product costs increase, our ability to raise our selling prices to pass such cost increases through to our customers; |
| |
• | the extent to which we are able to efficiently utilize our global manufacturing facilities and optimize our capacity; |
| |
• | the extent to which we can control our fixed and variable costs, including those for our raw materials, manufacturing, distribution and operating activities; |
| |
• | changes in our level of debt and changes in the variable interest rates under our credit facilities; and |
| |
• | the size and number of acquisitions and our ability to achieve their intended benefits. |
We have two primary product lines: reserve power products and motive power products. Net sales classifications by product line are as follows:
| |
• | Reserve power products are used for backup power for the continuous operation of critical applications in telecommunications systems, uninterruptible power systems, or “UPS” applications for computer and computer-controlled systems, and other specialty power applications, including security systems, premium starting, lighting and ignition applications, in switchgear, electrical control systems used in electric utilities, large-scale energy storage, energy pipelines, in commercial aircraft, satellites, military aircraft, submarines, ships and tactical vehicles. Reserve power products also include thermally managed cabinets and enclosures for electronic equipment and batteries. |
| |
• | Motive power products are used to provide power for electric industrial forklifts used in manufacturing, warehousing and other material handling applications as well as mining equipment, diesel locomotive starting and other rail equipment. |
Current Market Conditions
Economic Climate
Recent indicators continue to suggest a mixed trend in economic activity among the different geographical regions. Economic activity continues to strengthen in North America while EMEA is experiencing limited growth. Our Asia region is experiencing the fastest growth of any region in which we do business.
Volatility of Commodities and Foreign Currencies
Our most significant commodity and foreign currency exposures are related to lead and the euro. Historically, volatility of commodity costs and foreign currency exchange rates have caused large swings in our production costs. As the global economic climate changes, we anticipate that our commodity costs and foreign currency exposures may continue to fluctuate as they have in the past several years. Overall, on a consolidated basis, we have experienced stable trends more recently in our revenue and order rates and commodity cost changes have not been substantial. However, we have experienced lower revenues and increased costs due to movements in foreign currency exchange rates.
Customer Pricing
Our selling prices fluctuated during the last several years to offset the volatile cost of commodities. Approximately 35% of our revenue is currently subject to agreements that adjust pricing to a market-based index for lead. During fiscal 2015, our selling prices increased slightly, compared to the comparable prior year periods.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
We believe that our financial position is strong, and we have substantial liquidity with $269 million of available cash and cash equivalents and undrawn committed and uncommitted credit lines of approximately $465 million at March 31, 2015 to cover short-term liquidity requirements and anticipated growth in the foreseeable future. Our 2011 Credit Facility, which we entered into in March 2011 and expanded in July 2014, is committed through September 2018 as long as we continue to comply with its covenants and conditions.
Current market conditions related to our liquidity and capital resources are favorable. We believe current conditions remain favorable for the Company to have continued positive cash flow from operations that, along with available cash and cash
equivalents and our undrawn lines of credit, will be sufficient to fund our capital expenditures, acquisitions and other investments for growth.
The Convertible Notes became convertible at the option of the holders effective March 1, 2015. Additionally, on May 7, 2015, the Company announced that it had called for redemption all of the Convertible Notes on June 8, 2015, at a price equal to $1,000.66 per $1,000 original principal amount of Convertible Notes, which is equal to 100% of the accreted principal amount of the Convertible Notes being repurchased, plus accrued and unpaid interest. Additionally, the holders are now permitted to convert their Convertible Notes at their option on or before June 5, 2015. The conversion rate, as of May 7, 2015, of the Convertible Notes is 25.1086 shares of the Company's common stock per $1,000 in principal amount of the Convertible Notes. The Company has also offered (the “Offer”) to purchase all outstanding Convertible Notes in cash at a purchase price of $1,000 original principal amount of Convertible Notes, with such offer expiring on May 29, 2015. As of March 31, 2015, the Company has $172.3 million of Convertible Notes outstanding. If the holders of the Convertible Notes would exercise their conversion rights or have their Convertible Notes repurchased by the Company pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Offer, it is our current intent to pay the principal amount and any accrued and unpaid interest by using the net proceeds from the April 2015 financings discussed below, and/or drawing on our 2011 Credit Facility. However, the Company may, at its election, pay the premium on the Convertible Notes in connection with any conversion with cash or shares of our common stock or a combination of both cash or shares.
In April 2015, we issued $300 million of Notes bearing interest at 5% and maturing in April 2023. See Note 24 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional details.
Our leverage increased in fiscal 2015 mainly due to the our share repurchase program. We believe that our strong capital structure and liquidity affords us access to capital for future acquisition and additional stock repurchase opportunities and continued dividend payments.
A substantial majority of the Company’s cash and investments are held by foreign subsidiaries and are considered to be indefinitely reinvested and expected to be utilized to fund local operating activities, capital expenditure requirements and acquisitions. The Company believes that it has sufficient sources of domestic and foreign liquidity.
Cost Savings Initiatives-Restructuring
Cost savings programs remain a continuous element of our business strategy and are directed primarily at further reductions in plant manufacturing (labor and overhead), raw material costs and our operating expenses (primarily selling, general and administrative). In order to realize cost savings benefits for a majority of these initiatives, costs are incurred either in the form of capital expenditures, funding the cash obligations of previously recorded restructuring expenses or current period expenses.
During fiscal 2012, we announced restructuring programs related to our operations in EMEA, primarily consisting of the transfer of manufacturing of select products between certain of our manufacturing operations and restructuring of our selling, general and administrative operations. These actions were completed during fiscal 2014 and resulted in the reduction of approximately 85 employees with an estimated annual savings of $6.0 million.
During fiscal 2013, we announced further restructuring related to improving the efficiency of our manufacturing operations in EMEA, primarily consisting of cash expenses for employee severance-related payments and non-cash expenses associated with the write-off of certain fixed assets and inventory. These actions were substantially completed in fiscal 2015 and resulted in the reduction of approximately 140 employees. Our fiscal 2015 operating results reflect the full benefit of the estimated $7.0 million of favorable annualized pre-tax earnings impact of the fiscal 2013 programs. There are no further costs to be incurred under these programs.
During fiscal 2014, we announced additional restructuring programs to improve the efficiency of our manufacturing, sales and engineering operations in EMEA including the restructuring of its manufacturing operations in Bulgaria. The restructuring of the Bulgaria operations was announced during the third quarter of fiscal 2014 and consists of the transfer of motive power and a portion of reserve power battery manufacturing to our facilities in Western Europe. We estimate that the total charges for all actions announced during fiscal 2014 will amount to approximately $23.4 million, primarily from non-cash charges related to the write-off of fixed assets and inventory of approximately $11.0 million, along with cash charges for employee severance-related payments and other charges of $12.4 million. We estimate that these actions will result in the reduction of approximately 500 employees upon completion. Our fiscal 2015 operating results reflect approximately $19.0 million of the total estimated $20.0 million of favorable annualized pre-tax earnings impact of the fiscal 2014 programs. We expect to be committed to an additional $1.2 million of restructuring charges related to these programs during fiscal 2016, and expect to complete the program during fiscal 2016.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Our significant accounting policies are described in Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8. In preparing our financial statements, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that, among other things, affect the reported amounts in the Consolidated Financial Statements and accompanying notes. These estimates and assumptions are most significant where they involve levels of subjectivity and judgment necessary to account for highly uncertain matters or matters susceptible to change, and where they can have a material impact on our financial condition and operating performance. We discuss below the more significant estimates and related assumptions used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements. If actual results were to differ materially from the estimates made, the reported results could be materially affected.
Revenue Recognition
We recognize revenue when the earnings process is complete. This occurs when risk and title transfers, collectibility is reasonably assured and pricing is fixed or determinable. Shipment terms to our battery product customers are either shipping point or destination and do not differ significantly between our business segments of the world. Accordingly, revenue is recognized when risk and title is transferred to the customer. Amounts invoiced to customers for shipping and handling are classified as revenue. Taxes on revenue producing transactions are not included in net sales.
We recognize revenue from the service of reserve power and motive power products when the respective services are performed.
Management believes that the accounting estimates related to revenue recognition are critical accounting estimates because they require reasonable assurance of collection of revenue proceeds and completion of all performance obligations. Also, revenues are recorded net of provisions for sales discounts and returns, which are established at the time of sale. These estimates are based on our past experience.
Asset Impairment Determinations
We test for the impairment of our goodwill and indefinite-lived trademarks at least annually and whenever events or circumstances occur indicating that a possible impairment has been incurred.
We perform our annual goodwill impairment test on the first day of our fourth quarter for each of our reporting units based on the income approach, also known as the discounted cash flow (“DCF”) method, which utilizes the present value of future cash flows to estimate fair value. We also use the market approach, which utilizes market price data of companies engaged in the same or a similar line of business as that of our company, to estimate fair value. A reconciliation of the two methods is performed to assess the reasonableness of fair value of each of the reporting units.
The future cash flows used under the DCF method are derived from estimates of future revenues, operating income, working capital requirements and capital expenditures, which in turn reflect specific global, industry and market conditions. The discount rate developed for each of the reporting units is based on data and factors relevant to the economies in which the business operates and other risks associated with those cash flows, including the potential variability in the amount and timing of the cash flows. A terminal growth rate is applied to the final year of the projected period and reflects our estimate of stable growth to perpetuity. We then calculate the present value of the respective cash flows for each reporting unit to arrive at the fair value using the income approach and then determine the appropriate weighting between the fair value estimated using the income approach and the fair value estimated using the market approach. Finally, we compare the estimated fair value of each reporting unit to its respective carrying value in order to determine if the goodwill assigned to each reporting unit is potentially impaired. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, we are required to perform a second step of the goodwill impairment test to measure the amount of impairment loss, if any.
Significant assumptions used include management’s estimates of future growth rates, the amount and timing of future operating cash flows, capital expenditures, discount rates as well as market and industry conditions and relevant comparable company multiples for the market approach. Assumptions utilized are highly judgmental, especially given the role technology plays in driving the demand for products in the telecommunications and aerospace markets.
With respect to our other long-lived assets other than goodwill and indefinite-lived trademarks, we test for impairment when indicators of impairment are present. An asset is considered impaired when the undiscounted estimated net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset are less than its carrying amount. The impairment recognized is the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the fair value of the impaired asset.
Our annual goodwill impairment test, which we performed during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2015, resulted in an impairment charge for goodwill and certain indefinite-lived assets such as trademarks in the Purcell and Quallion/ABSL US reporting units, which are both part of the Americas operating segment, as discussed in Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. The excess of fair value over carrying value for each of our other reporting units as of December 29, 2014, the annual testing date, ranged from approximately 6% to approximately 146% of carrying value. The ABSL UK and South Africa reporting units have the lowest excess of fair value over carrying value at 6% and 11%, respectively. The aggregate carrying value as of March 31, 2015, of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangibles of ABSL UK was $8.9 million and goodwill of South Africa was $2.3 million.
In order to evaluate the sensitivity of the fair value calculations on the goodwill impairment test, we applied a hypothetical 10% decrease to the fair values of each reporting unit. This hypothetical 10% decrease would result in the ABSL UK reporting unit having a fair value below its carrying value of 5%. For the remaining reporting units, such hypothetical decrease would result in excess fair values over carrying values range from approximately 1% to approximately 122% of the carrying values. We will continue to evaluate goodwill on an annual basis as of the beginning of our fourth fiscal quarter and whenever events or changes in circumstances, such as significant adverse changes in business climate or operating results, changes in management's business strategy or loss of a major customer, indicate that there may be a potential indicator of impairment.
Litigation and Claims
From time to time, the Company has been or may be a party to various legal actions and investigations including, among others, employment matters, compliance with government regulations, federal and state employment laws, including wage and hour laws, contractual disputes and other matters, including matters arising in the ordinary course of business. These claims may be brought by, among others, governments, customers, suppliers and employees. Management considers the measurement of litigation reserves as a critical accounting estimate because of the significant uncertainty in some cases relating to the outcome of potential claims or litigation and the difficulty of predicting the likelihood and range of potential liability involved, coupled with the material impact on our results of operations that could result from litigation or other claims.
In determining legal reserves, management considers, among other issues:
| |
• | interpretation of contractual rights and obligations; |
| |
• | the status of government regulatory initiatives, interpretations and investigations; |
| |
• | the status of settlement negotiations; |
| |
• | prior experience with similar types of claims; |
| |
• | whether there is available insurance coverage; and |
| |
• | advice of outside counsel. |
Environmental Loss Contingencies
Accruals for environmental loss contingencies (i.e., environmental reserves) are recorded when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount can reasonably be estimated. Management views the measurement of environmental reserves as a critical accounting estimate because of the considerable uncertainty surrounding estimation, including the need to forecast well into the future. From time to time, we may be involved in legal proceedings under federal, state and local, as well as international environmental laws in connection with our operations and companies that we have acquired. The estimation of environmental reserves is based on the evaluation of currently available information, prior experience in the remediation of contaminated sites and assumptions with respect to government regulations and enforcement activity, changes in remediation technology and practices, and financial obligations and creditworthiness of other responsible parties and insurers.
Warranty
We record a warranty reserve for possible claims against our product warranties, which generally run for a period ranging from one to twenty years for our reserve power batteries and for a period ranging from one to seven years for our motive power batteries. The assessment of the adequacy of the reserve includes a review of open claims and historical experience.
Management believes that the accounting estimate related to the warranty reserve is a critical accounting estimate because the underlying assumptions used for the reserve can change from time to time and warranty claims could potentially have a material impact on our results of operations.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
We encounter risks associated with sales and the collection of the associated accounts receivable. We record a provision for accounts receivable that are considered to be uncollectible. In order to calculate the appropriate provision, management analyzes the creditworthiness of specific customers and the aging of customer balances. Management also considers general and specific industry economic conditions, industry concentration and contractual rights and obligations.
Management believes that the accounting estimate related to the allowance for doubtful accounts is a critical accounting estimate because the underlying assumptions used for the allowance can change from time to time and uncollectible accounts could potentially have a material impact on our results of operations.
Retirement Plans
We use certain economic and demographic assumptions in the calculation of the actuarial valuation of our defined benefit plans. These assumptions include the discount rate, expected long-term rates of return on assets and rates of increase in compensation levels. Changes in these assumptions can result in changes to the pension expense and recorded liabilities. Management reviews these assumptions at least annually. We use independent actuaries to assist us in formulating assumptions and making estimates. These assumptions are updated periodically to reflect the actual experience and expectations on a plan-specific basis, as appropriate. During fiscal 2015, we revised our mortality assumptions to incorporate the new set of tables issued by the Society of Actuaries for purposes of measuring U.S. pension and other post-retirement obligations at year-end.
For benefit plans which are funded, we establish strategic asset allocation percentage targets and appropriate benchmarks for significant asset classes with the aim of achieving a prudent balance between return and risk. We set the expected long-term rate of return based on the expected long-term average rates of return to be achieved by the underlying investment portfolios. In establishing this rate, we consider historical and expected returns for the asset classes in which the plans are invested, advice from pension consultants and investment advisors, and current economic and capital market conditions. The expected return on plan assets is incorporated into the computation of pension expense. The difference between this expected return and the actual return on plan assets is deferred and will affect future net periodic pension costs through subsequent amortization.
We believe that the current assumptions used to estimate plan obligations and annual expense are appropriate in the current economic environment. However, if economic conditions change materially, we may change our assumptions, and the resulting change could have a material impact on the consolidated statements of income and on the consolidated balance sheets.
Equity-Based Compensation
We recognize compensation cost relating to equity-based payment transactions by using a fair-value measurement method whereby all equity-based payments to employees, including grants of restricted stock units, stock options, market share units and performance market share units, are recognized as compensation expense based on fair value at grant date over the requisite service period of the awards. We determine the fair value of restricted stock units based on the quoted market price of our common stock on the date of grant. The fair value of stock options is determined using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, which uses both historical and current market data to estimate the fair value. The fair value of market share units and performance market share units are estimated at the date of grant using a binomial lattice model and a Monte Carlo Simulation, respectively. All models incorporate various assumptions such as the risk-free interest rate, expected volatility, expected dividend yield and expected life of the awards. When estimating the requisite service period of the awards, we consider many related factors including types of awards, employee class, and historical experience. Actual results, and future changes in estimates of the requisite service period may differ substantially from our current estimates.
Income Taxes
Our effective tax rate is based on pretax income, statutory tax rates and tax planning opportunities available in the various jurisdictions in which we operate. We account for income taxes in accordance with applicable guidance on accounting for income taxes, which requires that deferred tax assets and liabilities be recognized using enacted tax rates for the effect of temporary differences between book and tax bases on recorded assets and liabilities. Accounting guidance also requires that deferred tax assets be reduced by a valuation allowance, when it is more likely than not that a tax benefit will not be realized.
The recognition and measurement of a tax position is based on management’s best judgment given the facts, circumstances and information available at the reporting date. We evaluate tax positions to determine whether the benefits of tax positions are more likely than not of being sustained upon audit based on the technical merits of the tax position. For tax positions that are more likely than not of being sustained upon audit, we recognize the largest amount of the benefit that is greater than 50% likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement in the financial statements. For tax positions that are not more likely than not of being sustained upon audit, we do not recognize any portion of the benefit in the financial statements. If the more likely than
not threshold is not met in the period for which a tax position is taken, we may subsequently recognize the benefit of that tax position if the tax matter is effectively settled, the statute of limitations expires, or if the more likely than not threshold is met in a subsequent period.
We evaluate, on a quarterly basis, our ability to realize deferred tax assets by assessing our valuation allowance and by adjusting the amount of such allowance, if necessary. The factors used to assess the likelihood of realization are our forecast of future taxable income and available tax planning strategies that could be implemented to realize the net deferred tax assets.
To the extent we prevail in matters for which reserves have been established, or are required to pay amounts in excess of our reserves, our effective tax rate in a given financial statement period could be materially affected. An unfavorable tax settlement would require use of cash and result in an increase in the effective tax rate in the year of resolution. A favorable tax settlement would be recognized as a reduction in our effective tax rate in the year of resolution.
Results of Operations—Fiscal 2015 Compared to Fiscal 2014
The following table presents summary consolidated statement of income data for fiscal year ended March 31, 2015, compared to fiscal year ended March 31, 2014:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Fiscal 2015 | | Fiscal 2014 | | Increase (Decrease) |
| | In Millions | | As % Net Sales | | In Millions | | As % Net Sales | | In Millions | | % |
Net sales | | $ | 2,505.5 |
| | 100.0 | % | | $ | 2,474.4 |
| | 100.0 | % | | $ | 31.1 |
| | 1.3 | % |
Cost of goods sold | | 1,864.6 |
| | 74.4 |
| | 1,844.8 |
| | 74.6 |
| | 19.8 |
| | 1.1 |
|
Gross profit | | 640.9 |
| | 25.6 |
| | 629.6 |
| | 25.4 |
| | 11.3 |
| | 1.8 |
|
Operating expenses | | 358.4 |
| | 14.3 |
| | 344.4 |
| | 13.9 |
| | 14.0 |
| | 4.1 |
|
Restructuring and other exit charges | | 11.4 |
| | 0.5 |
| | 27.4 |
| | 1.1 |
| | (16.0 | ) | | (58.2 | ) |
Impairment of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangibles | | 23.9 |
| | 1.0 |
| | 5.2 |
| | 0.2 |
| | 18.7 |
| | NM |
|
Legal proceedings charge (reversal of legal accrual, net of fees) | | (16.2 | ) | | (0.7 | ) | | 58.2 |
| | 2.3 |
| | (74.4 | ) | | NM |
|
Operating earnings | | 263.4 |
| | 10.5 |
| | 194.4 |
| | 7.9 |
| | 69.0 |
| | 35.4 |
|
Interest expense | | 19.7 |
| | 0.8 |
| | 17.1 |
| | 0.7 |
| | 2.6 |
| | 14.8 |
|
Other (income) expense, net | | (5.6 | ) | | (0.2 | ) | | 13.6 |
| | 0.6 |
| | (19.2 | ) | | NM |
|
Earnings before income taxes | | 249.3 |
| | 9.9 |
| | 163.7 |
| | 6.6 |
| | 85.6 |
| | 52.3 |
|
Income tax expense | | 67.8 |
| | 2.7 |
| | 17.0 |
| | 0.7 |
| | 50.8 |
| | NM |
|
Net earnings | | 181.5 |
| | 7.2 |
| | 146.7 |
| | 5.9 |
| | 34.8 |
| | 23.7 |
|
Net losses attributable to noncontrolling interests | | 0.3 |
| | — |
| | (3.6 | ) | | (0.1 | ) | | 3.9 |
| | NM |
|
Net earnings attributable to EnerSys stockholders | | $ | 181.2 |
| | 7.2 | % | | $ | 150.3 |
| | 6.0 | % | | $ | 30.9 |
| | 20.5 | % |
NM = not meaningful
Overview
Our sales in fiscal 2015 were $2.5 billion, a 1.3% increase from prior year's sales. This was the result of a 2% increase in organic volume and a 3% increase from acquisitions partially offset by a 4% decrease due to foreign currency translation impact.
Gross margin percentage in fiscal 2015 increased by 20 basis points to 25.6% compared to fiscal 2014, mainly due to higher organic volume and favorable mix combined with the benefits of restructuring programs in EMEA.
A discussion of specific fiscal 2015 versus fiscal 2014 operating results follows, including an analysis and discussion of the results of our reportable segments.
Net Sales
Net sales by reportable segment were as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Fiscal 2015 | | Fiscal 2014 | | Increase (Decrease) |
| | In Millions | | % Net Sales | | In Millions | | % Net Sales | | In Millions | | % |
Americas | | $ | 1,322.4 |
| | 52.8 | % | | $ | 1,267.6 |
| | 51.2 | % | | $ | 54.8 |
| | 4.3 | % |
EMEA | | 948.8 |
| | 37.9 |
| | 966.1 |
| | 39.1 |
| | (17.3 | ) | | (1.8 | ) |
Asia | | 234.3 |
| | 9.3 |
| | 240.7 |
| | 9.7 |
| | (6.4 | ) | | (2.6 | ) |
Total net sales | | $ | 2,505.5 |
| | 100.0 | % | | $ | 2,474.4 |
| | 100.0 | % | | $ | 31.1 |
| | 1.3 | % |
The Americas segment’s revenue increased by $54.8 million or 4.3% in fiscal 2015, as compared to fiscal 2014, primarily due to an increase in acquisitions and organic volume of approximately 4% and 2%, respectively, partially offset by a negative currency translation impact of approximately 2%.
The EMEA segment’s revenue decreased by $17.3 million or 1.8% in fiscal 2015, as compared to fiscal 2014, primarily due to an 8% decrease due to currency translation impact partially offset by an increase of 5% in organic volume and a 1% increase in pricing.
The Asia segment’s revenue decreased by $6.4 million or 2.6% in fiscal 2015, as compared to fiscal 2014, primarily due to a 14% decrease in organic volume and a 3% decrease in currency translation impact partially offset by a 14% increase in acquisitions. The decrease in Asia's organic volume is primarily due to lower sales to a major Chinese telecommunication company under a new tender program pursuant to which we participated at a lower volume.
Net sales by product line were as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Fiscal 2015 | | Fiscal 2014 | | Increase (Decrease) |
| | In Millions | | As % Net Sales | | In Millions | | As % Net Sales | | In Millions | | % |
Reserve power | | $ | 1,252.7 |
| | 50.0 | % | | $ | 1,234.5 |
| | 49.9 | % | | $ | 18.2 |
| | 1.5 | % |
Motive power | | 1,252.8 |
| | 50.0 |
| | 1,239.9 |
| | 50.1 |
| | 12.9 |
| | 1.1 |
|
Total net sales | | $ | 2,505.5 |
| | 100.0 | % | | $ | 2,474.4 |
| | 100.0 | % | | $ | 31.1 |
| | 1.3 | % |
Sales in our reserve power product line increased in fiscal 2015 by $18.2 million or 1.5% compared to the prior year primarily due to acquisitions and higher organic volume which contributed approximately 5% and 1%, respectively, offset by negative currency translation impact of 4%.
Sales in our motive power product line increased in fiscal 2015 by $12.9 million or 1.1% compared to the prior year primarily due to higher organic volume and acquisitions of 2% each, pricing of approximately 1%, offset partially by negative currency translation impact of 4%.
Gross Profit
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Fiscal 2015 | | Fiscal 2014 | | Increase (Decrease) |
| | In Millions | | As % Net Sales | | In Millions | | As % Net Sales | | In Millions | | % |
Gross profit | | $ | 640.9 |
| | 25.6 | % | | $ | 629.6 |
| | 25.4 | % | | $ | 11.3 |
| | 1.8 | % |
Gross profit increased $11.3 million or 1.8% in fiscal 2015 compared to fiscal 2014. Gross profit, excluding the effect of foreign currency translation, increased $30 million or 4.7% in fiscal 2015 compared to fiscal 2014. This increase is primarily attributed to higher organic volume and favorable mix combined with the benefits of restructuring programs in EMEA.
Operating Items
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Fiscal 2015 | | Fiscal 2014 | | Increase (Decrease) |
| | In Millions | | As % Net Sales | | In Millions | | As % Net Sales | | In Millions | | % |
Operating expenses | | $ | 358.4 |
| | 14.3 | % | | $ | 344.4 |
| | 13.9 | % | | $ | 14.0 |
| | 4.1 | % |
Restructuring and other exit charges | | 11.4 |
| | 0.5 |
| | 27.4 |
| | 1.1 |
| | (16.0 | ) | | (58.2 | ) |
Impairment of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangibles | | 23.9 |
| | 1.0 |
| | 5.2 |
| | 0.2 |
| | 18.7 |
| | NM |
|
Legal proceedings charge / (reversal of legal accrual, net of fees) | | (16.2 | ) | | (0.7 | ) | | 58.2 |
| | 2.3 |
| | (74.4 | ) | | NM |
|
NM = not meaningful
Operating Expenses
Operating expenses increased $14.0 million or 4.1% in fiscal 2015 from fiscal 2014. Operating expenses, excluding the effect of foreign currency translation, increased $8.0 million or 2.3% in fiscal 2015 compared to fiscal 2014. As a percentage of sales, operating expenses increased from 13.9% in fiscal 2014 to 14.3% in fiscal 2015 primarily due to acquisitions, stock-based compensation, implementation costs for a new ERP system in the Americas, and payroll related expenses.
Restructuring and other exit charges
Included in fiscal 2015 operating results are restructuring and other exit charges in EMEA of $7.5 million and restructuring charges of $3.9 million in Asia.
In fiscal 2014, we recorded $27.4 million of restructuring charges, primarily for staff reductions and write-off of fixed assets and inventory in EMEA including relocating our motive power and a portion of our reserve power manufacturing from Bulgaria to our facilities in Western Europe. Included in these charges are exit charges of $5.6 million related to certain operations in Europe.
Impairment of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangibles
We perform our annual goodwill impairment test on the first day of our fourth quarter or whenever an event occurs that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount. We use the income approach, also known as the discounted cash flow (“DCF”) method, which utilizes the present value of future cash flows to estimate fair value for each of our reporting units. We also use the market approach, which utilizes market price data of companies engaged in the same or a similar line of business as that of our company, to estimate fair value. A reconciliation of the two methods is performed to assess the reasonableness of fair value of each of the reporting units. The impairment test for goodwill is a two-step process. Step one consists of a comparison of the fair value of a reporting unit against its carrying amount, including the goodwill allocated to each reporting unit. If the carrying amount of the reporting unit is in excess of its fair value, step two requires the comparison of the implied fair value of the reporting unit’s goodwill against the carrying amount of the reporting unit’s goodwill. Any excess of the carrying value of the reporting unit’s goodwill over the implied fair value of the reporting unit’s goodwill is recorded as an impairment loss.
In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2015, we conducted step one of our annual goodwill impairment test which indicated that the fair values of two of our reporting units - Purcell and Quallion/ABSL US - in the Americas operating segment were less than their respective carrying value, and we proceeded to perform step two of the goodwill impairment analysis.
Step two of the goodwill impairment analysis measures the impairment charge by allocating the reporting unit's fair value to all of the assets and liabilities of the reporting unit in a hypothetical analysis that calculates the implied fair value of goodwill in the same manner as if the reporting unit was being acquired in a business combination. This allocation process was performed only for the purpose of measuring the goodwill impairment, and not to adjust the carrying values of the recognized tangible assets and liabilities. Indefinite-lived intangibles, like trademarks were adjusted as a result of fair value being lower than their respective carrying value. Any excess of the carrying value of the reporting unit's goodwill over the implied fair value of the reporting unit's goodwill is recorded as an impairment loss. Based on our analysis, the implied fair value of goodwill was lower than the carrying value of the goodwill for the Purcell and Quallion/ABSL US reporting units in the Americas operating segment. We recorded a non-cash charge of $20.3 million related to goodwill impairment in the Americas and EMEA operating segments and $3.6 million related to impairment of indefinite-lived trademarks in the Americas. The combined charges resulted
in a tax benefit of $3.2 million, for a net charge of $20.7 million.
The key factors contributing to the impairments were that both reporting units were recent acquisitions that have not performed to our expectations. In the case of Purcell, sales were negatively impacted by the slowdown in the enclosure business resulting from lower capital spending by a major customer in the telecommunications market. In the case of Quallion/ABSL US, the cancellation of certain programs with a major contractor serving the aerospace and defense markets resulted in poor performance. The sales levels began to decline in our second quarter of fiscal 2015, and despite our initial expectation that the declines were temporary, their downward trend continued through fiscal 2015.
Legal proceedings charge / (reversal of legal accrual, net of fees)
In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014, the Company recorded a $58.2 million legal proceedings charge in connection with an adverse arbitration result involving disputes between the Company's wholly-owned subsidiary, EnerSys Delaware Inc. (“EDI”), and Altergy Systems (“Altergy”). EDI and Altergy were parties to a Supply and Distribution Agreement (the “SDA”) pursuant to which EDI was, among other things, granted the exclusive right to distribute and sell certain fuel cell products manufactured by Altergy for various applications throughout the United States. Commencing in 2011, various disputes arose and, because of the mandatory arbitration provision in the SDA, the parties moved forward with arbitration in August 2013.
After discovery, a hearing and post-hearing submissions by each party, on May 13, 2014, the arbitration panel issued an award in favor of Altergy. As a result, the arbitration panel concluded that Altergy should recover $58.2 million in net money damages from EDI.
On August 12, 2014, EDI, on behalf of itself and its affiliates, entered into a binding term sheet with Altergy that resolved the outstanding legal challenges related to this award. In accordance with the term sheet, in September 2014, EDI and Altergy entered into (a) a settlement agreement and release of claims pursuant to which EDI paid Altergy $40.0 million in settlement of this award, a separate proceeding related to certain rights of EDI as a shareholder of Altergy and related litigations and the parties granted the other a release and (b) a stock purchase agreement pursuant to which Altergy paid EDI $2.0 million to purchase EDI’s entire equity interest in Altergy. On September 16, 2014, courts in the respective jurisdictions had issued orders ending all of the ongoing litigation between EDI and Altergy. Since the full amount of the initial award of $58.2 million was recorded in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014, the Company reversed approximately $16.2 million, net of professional fees, from this previously recorded legal proceedings charge during the second quarter of fiscal 2015. The Company also included the $2.0 million received in exchange for its equity interest in Altergy in the Consolidated Statements of Income in Other (income) expense, net during the second quarter of fiscal 2015. The Company had previously written off the carrying value of the investment of $5.0 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2014.
Operating Earnings
Operating earnings by segment were as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Fiscal 2015 | | Fiscal 2014 | | Increase (Decrease) |
| | In Millions | | As % Net Sales(1) | | In Millions | | As % Net Sales(1) | | In Millions | | % |
Americas | | $ | 162.8 |
| | 12.3 | % | | $ | 179.1 |
| | 14.1 | % | | $ | (16.3 | ) | | (9.1 | )% |
EMEA | | 109.8 |
| | 11.6 |
| | 84.9 |
| | 8.8 |
| | 24.9 |
| | 29.4 |
|
Asia | | 9.9 |
| | 4.2 |
| | 21.2 |
| | 8.8 |
| | (11.3 | ) | | (53.2 | ) |
Subtotal | | 282.5 |
| | 11.3 |
| | 285.2 |
| | 11.5 |
| | (2.7 | ) | | (0.9 | ) |
Restructuring and other exit charges-EMEA | | (7.5 | ) | | (0.8 | ) | | (27.1 | ) | | (2.8 | ) | | 19.6 |
| | (72.1 | ) |
Restructuring charges-Asia | | (3.9 | ) | | (1.7 | ) | | (0.3 | ) | | (0.1 | ) | | (3.6 | ) | | NM |
|
Impairment of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangibles-Americas | | (23.1 | ) | | (1.8 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (23.1 | ) | | NM |
|
Goodwill impairment charge-EMEA | | (0.8 | ) | | (0.1 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (0.8 | ) | | NM |
|
Goodwill impairment charge-Asia | | — |
| | — |
| | (5.2 | ) | | (2.2 | ) | | 5.2 |
| | NM |
|
Legal proceedings (charge) reversal of legal accrual, net of fees-Americas | | 16.2 |
| | 1.2 |
| | (58.2 | ) | | (4.6 | ) | | 74.4 |
| | NM |
|
Total | | $ | 263.4 |
| | 10.5 | % | | $ | 194.4 |
| | 7.9 | % | | $ | 69.0 |
| | 35.4 | % |
NM = not meaningful
| |
(1) | The percentages shown for the segments are computed as a percentage of the applicable segment’s net sales. |
Fiscal 2015 operating earnings of $263.4 million were $69.0 million higher than in fiscal 2014 and were 10.5% of sales. Fiscal 2015 operating earnings included $19.1 million in net restructuring, impairment charges and reversal of legal proceedings accrual compared to $90.8 million in fiscal 2014. Without these charges, operating earnings were $282.5 million or 11.3% of sales in fiscal 2015 compared to $285.2 million or 11.5% of sales in fiscal 2014, which reflects a relatively stable environment for revenues, pricing and commodity costs between the two fiscal years.
The Americas segment’s operating earnings, excluding the highlighted items discussed above, decreased $16.3 million or 9.1% in fiscal 2015 compared to fiscal 2014, with the operating margin decreasing 180 basis points to 12.3%. This decrease of operating margin in our Americas segment is primarily due to lower pricing for a single customer, our recent acquisition of Purcell, which has not delivered the accretion we had expected by this time, due primarily to the delay in capital spending in their enclosure programs by a large telecommunications customer, stock-based compensation and implementation costs relating to a new ERP system.
The EMEA segment’s operating earnings, excluding the highlighted items discussed above, increased $24.9 million or 29.4% in fiscal 2015 compared to fiscal 2014, with the operating margin increasing 280 basis points to 11.6%. Benefits of the restructuring programs on both production and operating expenses and better pricing and customer mix drove the improvements. This improvement in EMEA earnings primarily reflects improved market segment mix across the business, 4G expansion, strong reserve power demand in emerging markets and shifts to our premium TPPL solutions, further amplified by the execution of our restructuring programs.
Operating earnings in Asia, excluding the highlighted items discussed above, decreased $11.3 million or 53.2% in fiscal 2015 compared to fiscal 2014, with the operating margin decreasing by 460 basis points to 4.2% primarily due to costs associated with a temporary shut down at one of our plants in the PRC, transition to our new plant in the PRC, reduction in telecom sales in the PRC and adverse impact of currency translation in Australia and Japan.
Interest Expense
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Fiscal 2015 | | Fiscal 2014 | | Increase (Decrease) |
| | In Millions | | As % Net Sales | | In Millions | | As % Net Sales | | In Millions | | % |
Interest expense | | $ | 19.7 |
| | 0.8 | % | | $ | 17.1 |
| | 0.7 | % | | $ | 2.6 |
| | 14.8 | % |
Interest expense of $19.7 million in fiscal 2015 (net of interest income of $1.3 million) was $2.6 million higher than the $17.1 million in fiscal 2014 (net of interest income of $1.0 million). The increase in interest expense in fiscal 2015 compared to fiscal 2014 was primarily due to higher average debt outstanding and increased accreted interest on the Convertible Notes partially offset by lower average interest rates.
Our average debt outstanding (including the average amount of the Convertible Notes discount of $5.6 million) was $422.5 million in fiscal 2015, compared to our average debt outstanding (including the average amount of the Convertible Notes discount of $13.5 million) of $236.9 million in fiscal 2014. Our average cash interest rate incurred in fiscal 2015 was 2.3% compared to 3.5% in fiscal 2014. This higher average debt outstanding is the result of our stock buy back program under which over $205 million of our shares were purchased during fiscal 2015.
Included in interest expense was non-cash, accreted interest on the Convertible Notes of $8.3 million in fiscal 2015 and $7.6 million in fiscal 2014. Also included in interest expense were non-cash charges related to amortization of deferred financing fees of $1.3 million in fiscal 2015 and $1.1 million in fiscal 2014.
Other (Income) Expense, Net
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Fiscal 2015 | | Fiscal 2014 | | Increase (Decrease) |
| | In Millions | | As % Net Sales | | In Millions | | As % Net Sales | | In Millions | | % |
Other (income) expense, net | | $ | (5.6 | ) | | (0.2 | )% | | $ | 13.6 |
| | 0.6 | % | | $ | (19.2 | ) | | NM |
NM = not meaningful
Other (income) expense, net was income of $5.6 million in fiscal 2015 compared to expense of $13.6 million in fiscal 2014. The favorable impact in fiscal 2015 is mainly attributable to foreign currency gains of $5.0 million in fiscal 2015 compared to foreign currency losses in fiscal 2014 of $5.8 million due mainly to the impact of a strong U.S. dollar and a weak euro on our foreign exchange exposures. Also contributing to the favorable impact in fiscal 2015 is the receipt of $2.0 million in exchange for our equity interest in Altergy pursuant to the final legal settlement with Altergy compared to the write-off of $5.0 million relating to the carrying value of our investment in Altergy and $1.5 million relating to other charges in fiscal 2014.
Earnings Before Income Taxes
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Fiscal 2015 | | Fiscal 2014 | | Increase (Decrease) |
| | In Millions | | As % Net Sales | | In Millions | | As % Net Sales | | In Millions | | % |
Earnings before income taxes | | $ | 249.3 |
| | 9.9 | % | | $ | 163.7 |
| | 6.6 | % | | $ | 85.6 |
| | 52.3 | % |
As a result of the factors discussed above, fiscal 2015 earnings before income taxes were $249.3 million, an increase of $85.6 million or 52.3% compared to fiscal 2014.
Income Tax Expense
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Fiscal 2015 | | Fiscal 2014 | | Increase (Decrease) |
| | In Millions | | As % Net Sales | | In Millions | | As % Net Sales | | In Millions | | % |
Income tax expense | | $ | 67.8 |
| | 2.7 | % | | $ | 17.0 |
| | 0.7 | % | | $ | 50.8 |
| | NM |
Effective tax rate | | 27.2 | % | | | | 10.4 | % | | | | 16.8 | % | | |
Our effective corporate income tax rate with respect to any period may be volatile based on the mix of income in the tax jurisdictions in which we operate and the amount of our consolidated income before taxes.
The Company’s income tax provisions consist of federal, state and foreign income taxes. The effective income tax rate was 27.2% in fiscal 2015 compared to the fiscal 2014 effective income tax rate of 10.4%. The rate increase in fiscal 2015 as compared to fiscal 2014 is primarily due to the reversal of a previously recognized deferred tax valuation allowance related to one of our foreign subsidiaries of $24.9 million in fiscal 2014 and changes in the mix of earnings among tax jurisdictions, which were significantly impacted by a legal proceedings charge recorded in fiscal 2014. The fiscal 2015 effective income tax rate also includes an increase due to non-deductible goodwill impairment charges.
The fiscal 2015 foreign effective income tax rate on foreign pre-tax income of $173.0 million was 14.8%. The difference in the foreign effective tax rate versus the U.S. statutory rate of 35% is primarily attributable to lower tax rates in the foreign countries in which we operate. The fiscal 2014 foreign effective income tax rate on foreign pre-tax income of $116.0 million was a net benefit of 4.0 %. The difference in the foreign effective tax rate versus the U.S. statutory rate of 35% is primarily due to a release of a valuation allowance in a European subsidiary combined with lower statutory tax rates in foreign countries. The foreign effective income tax rate of fiscal 2014 without the valuation allowance release was 17.5%, and is higher than the fiscal 2015 foreign effective income tax rate of 14.8% due to a change in mix of earnings between foreign jurisdictions.
Income from our Swiss subsidiary comprised a substantial portion of our overall foreign mix of income for both fiscal 2015 and fiscal 2014 and is taxed at approximately 7%.
Results of Operations—Fiscal 2014 Compared to Fiscal 2013
The following table presents summary consolidated statement of income data for fiscal year ended March 31, 2014, compared to fiscal year ended March 31, 2013:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Fiscal 2014 | | Fiscal 2013 | | Increase (Decrease) |
| | In Millions | | As % Net Sales | | In Millions | | As % Net Sales | | In Millions | | % |
Net sales | | $ | 2,474.4 |
| | 100.0 | % | | $ | 2,277.6 |
| | 100.0 | % | | $ | 196.8 |
| | 8.6 | % |
Cost of goods sold | | 1,844.8 |
| | 74.6 |
| | 1,708.2 |
| | 75.0 |
| | 136.6 |
| | 8.0 |
|
Gross profit | | 629.6 |
| | 25.4 |
| | 569.4 |
| | 25.0 |
| | 60.2 |
| | 10.6 |
|
Operating expenses | | 344.4 |
| | 13.9 |
| | 312.3 |
| | 13.7 |
| | 32.1 |
| | 10.3 |
|
Restructuring and other exit charges | | 27.4 |
| | 1.1 |
| | 7.2 |
| | 0.3 |
| | 20.2 |
| | NM |
|
Legal proceedings charge | | 58.2 |
| | 2.3 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 58.2 |
| | NM |
|
Goodwill impairment charge | | 5.2 |
| | 0.2 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 5.2 |
| | NM |
|
Operating earnings | | 194.4 |
| | 7.9 |
| | 249.9 |
| | 11.0 |
| | (55.5 | ) | | (22.2 | ) |
Interest expense | | 17.1 |
| | 0.7 |
| | 18.7 |
| | 0.8 |
| | (1.6 | ) | | (8.6 | ) |
Other (income) expense, net | | 13.6 |
| | 0.6 |
| | 0.9 |
| | 0.1 |
| | 12.7 |
| | NM |
|
Earnings before income taxes | | 163.7 |
| | 6.6 |
| | 230.3 |
| | 10.1 |
| | (66.6 | ) | | (28.9 | ) |
Income tax expense | | 17.0 |
| | 0.7 |
| | 65.3 |
| | 2.9 |
| | (48.3 | ) | | (74.0 | ) |
Net earnings | | 146.7 |
| | 5.9 |
| | 165.0 |
| | 7.2 |
| | (18.3 | ) | | (11.0 | ) |
Net losses attributable to noncontrolling interests | | (3.6 | ) | | (0.1 | ) | | (1.5 | ) | | (0.1 | ) | | (2.1 | ) | | NM |
|
Net earnings attributable to EnerSys stockholders | | $ | 150.3 |
| | 6.0 | % | | $ | 166.5 |
| | 7.3 | % | | $ | (16.2 | ) | | (9.7 | )% |
NM = not meaningful
Overview
Our sales in fiscal 2014 were $2.5 billion, an 8.6% increase from prior year's sales primarily due to improvement in organic volume and acquisitions of approximately 5% and 3%, respectively. Gross margin percentage in fiscal 2014 increased by 40 basis points to 25.4% compared to fiscal 2013, mainly due to organic volume of 5% and improved pricing offsetting increased commodity costs. Our fourth quarter gross margin was the highest compared to other quarters in the fiscal year.
A discussion of specific fiscal 2014 versus fiscal 2013 operating results follows, including an analysis and discussion of the results of our reportable segments.
Net Sales
Net sales by reportable segment were as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Fiscal 2014 | | Fiscal 2013 | | Increase (Decrease) |
| | In Millions | | % Net Sales | | In Millions | | % Net Sales | | In Millions | | % |
Americas | | $ | 1,267.6 |
| | 51.2 | % | | $ | 1,126.9 |
| | 49.5 | % | | $ | 140.7 |
| | 12.5 | % |
EMEA | | 966.1 |
| | 39.1 |
| | 926.2 |
| | 40.7 |
| | 39.9 |
| | 4.3 |
|
Asia | | 240.7 |
| | 9.7 |
| | 224.5 |
| | 9.8 |
| | 16.2 |
| | 7.2 |
|
Total net sales | | $ | 2,474.4 |
| | 100.0 | % | | $ | 2,277.6 |
| | 100.0 | % | | $ | 196.8 |
| | 8.6 | % |
The Americas segment’s revenue increased by $140.7 million or 12.5% in fiscal 2014, as compared to fiscal 2013, primarily due to an increase in organic volume, acquisitions and pricing of approximately 7%, 5% and 1%, respectively, partially offset by a negative currency translation impact of approximately 1%.
The EMEA segment’s revenue increased by $39.9 million or 4.3% in fiscal 2014, as compared to fiscal 2013 primarily due to an increase of 1% each in organic volume and pricing and a 2% increase due to currency translation impact.
The Asia segment’s revenue increased by $16.2 million or 7.2% in fiscal 2014 as compared to fiscal 2013. Higher organic volume and acquisitions contributed approximately 10% and 2%, respectively, partially offset by a decrease in pricing and currency translation impact of approximately 2% and 3%, respectively.
Net sales by product line were as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Fiscal 2014 | | Fiscal 2013 | | Increase (Decrease) |
| | In Millions | | As % Net Sales | | In Millions | | As % Net Sales | | In Millions | | % |
Reserve power | | $ | 1,234.5 |
| | 49.9 | % | | $ | 1,119.1 |
| | 49.1 | % | | $ | 115.4 |
| | 10.3 | % |
Motive power | | 1,239.9 |
| | 50.1 |
| | 1,158.5 |
| | 50.9 |
| | 81.4 |
| | 7.0 |
|
Total net sales | | $ | 2,474.4 |
| | 100.0 | % | | $ | 2,277.6 |
| | 100.0 | % | | $ | 196.8 |
| | 8.6 | % |
Sales in our reserve power product line increased in fiscal 2014 by $115.4 million or 10.3% compared to the prior year primarily due to acquisitions, higher organic volume and pricing which contributed approximately 6%, 4% and 1%, respectively, offset by negative currency translation impact of 1%.
Sales in our motive power product line increased in fiscal 2014 by $81.4 million or 7.0% compared to the prior year primarily due to higher organic volume of approximately 6%.
Gross Profit
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Fiscal 2014 | | Fiscal 2013 | | Increase (Decrease) |
| | In Millions | | As % Net Sales | | In Millions | | As % Net Sales | | In Millions | | % |
Gross profit | | $ | 629.6 |
| | 25.4 | % | | $ | 569.4 |
| | 25.0 | % | | $ | 60.2 |
| | 10.6 | % |
Gross profit increased $60.2 million or 10.6% in fiscal 2014 compared to fiscal 2013. Gross profit, excluding the effect of foreign currency translation, increased $63 million or 11.1% in fiscal 2014 compared to fiscal 2013. This increase is primarily attributed to lower manufacturing costs resulting from higher volume and prior year's restructuring activities along with improved pricing.
Operating Items
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Fiscal 2014 | | Fiscal 2013 | | Increase (Decrease) |
| | In Millions | | As % Net Sales | | In Millions | | As % Net Sales | | In Millions | | % |
Operating expenses | | $ | 344.4 |
| | 13.9 | % | | $ | 312.3 |
| | 13.7 | % | | $ | 32.1 |
| | 10.3 | % |
Restructuring and other exit charges | | 27.4 |
| | 1.1 |
| | 7.2 |
| | 0.3 |
| | 20.2 |
| | NM |
|
Legal proceedings charge | | 58.2 |
| | 2.3 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 58.2 |
| | NM |
|
Goodwill impairment charge | | 5.2 |
| | 0.2 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 5.2 |
| | NM |
|
NM = not meaningful
Operating Expenses
Operating expenses increased $32.1 million or 10.3% in fiscal 2014 from fiscal 2013. Operating expenses, excluding the effect of foreign currency translation, increased $33.1 million or 10.6% in fiscal 2014 compared to fiscal 2013. As a percentage of sales, operating expenses increased from 13.7% in fiscal 2013 to 13.9% in fiscal 2014 partially as a result of higher payroll related costs, including stock compensation expense.
Restructuring and other exit charges
In fiscal 2014, we recorded $27.4 million of restructuring charges, primarily for staff reductions and write-off of fixed assets and inventory in EMEA including relocating our motive power and a portion of our reserve power manufacturing from Bulgaria to our facilities in Western Europe. Included in these charges are exit charges of $5.6 million related to certain operations in Europe.
In fiscal 2013, we recorded $7.2 million of restructuring charges, primarily for staff reductions and asset write-offs in Europe and Asia.
Legal proceedings charge
In connection with the litigation involving Altergy, which is discussed in detail “- Results of Operations - Fiscal 2015 Compared to Fiscal 2014 - Legal proceedings charge/ (reversal of legal accrual, net of fees)” above, we recorded a $58.2 million legal proceedings charge in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014 in connection with the related adverse arbitration result. This reflected the full amount of the award, which amounted to an after tax expense of approximately $35.7 million.
Goodwill impairment charge
Goodwill is tested annually for impairment during the fourth quarter or earlier upon the occurrence of certain events or substantive changes in circumstances that indicate goodwill is more likely than not impaired. During the third quarter of fiscal 2014, we determined that the fair value of our subsidiary in India, which was acquired in fiscal 2012, was less than its carrying amount based on our analysis of the estimated future expected cash flows we anticipate from the operations of this subsidiary. Accordingly, we recorded a non-cash charge of $5.2 million for goodwill impairment relating to this subsidiary (see Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements).
Operating Earnings
Operating earnings by segment were as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Fiscal 2014 | | Fiscal 2013 | | Increase (Decrease) |
| | In Millions | | As % Net Sales(1) | | In Millions | | As % Net Sales(1) | | In Millions | | % |
Americas | | $ | 179.1 |
| | 14.1 | % | | $ | 171.7 |
| | 15.3 | % | | $ | 7.4 |
| | 4.2 | % |
EMEA | | 84.9 |
| | 8.8 |
| | 64.2 |
| | 6.9 |
| | 20.7 |
| | 32.6 |
|
Asia | | 21.2 |
| | 8.8 |
| | 21.2 |
| | 9.4 |
| | — |
| | 0.3 |
|
Subtotal | | 285.2 |
| | 11.5 |
| | 257.1 |
| | 11.3 |
| | 28.1 |
| | 11.0 |
|
Restructuring and other exit charges-EMEA | | (27.1 | ) | | (2.8 | ) | | (4.5 | ) | | (0.5 | ) | | (22.6 | ) | | NM |
|
Restructuring charges-Asia | | (0.3 | ) | | (0.1 | ) | | (2.7 | ) | | (1.2 | ) | | 2.4 |
| | NM |
|
Legal proceedings charge-Americas | | (58.2 | ) | | (4.6 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (58.2 | ) | | NM |
|
Goodwill impairment charge-Asia | | (5.2 | ) | | (2.2 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (5.2 | ) | | NM |
|
Total | | $ | 194.4 |
| | 7.9 | % | | $ | 249.9 |
| | 11.0 | % | | $ | (55.5 | ) | | (22.2 | )% |
NM = not meaningful
| |
(1) | The percentages shown for the segments are computed as a percentage of the applicable segment’s net sales. |
Fiscal 2014 operating earnings of $194.4 million were $55.5 million lower than in fiscal 2013 and were 7.9% of sales. Fiscal 2014 operating earnings were favorably affected by organic volume, acquisitions, our continuing cost savings programs and our pricing actions catching up to commodity cost increases in early fiscal 2014. The unfavorable arbitration ruling of $58.2 million offset those other benefits. Fiscal 2014 and 2013 operating earnings included $27.4 million and $7.2 million, respectively, of restructuring charges and $1.9 million and $0.3 million, respectively, for acquisition activity related expense.
The Americas segment’s operating earnings, excluding the highlighted items discussed above, increased $7.4 million or 4.2% in fiscal 2014, with the operating margin decreasing 120 basis points to 14.1%. This decrease of operating margin in our Americas segment was primarily due to an increase in commodity costs and unfavorable product mix partially offset by improved pricing and volume.
The EMEA segment’s operating earnings, excluding the highlighted items discussed above, increased $20.7 million or 32.6% in fiscal 2014 compared to fiscal 2013. Benefits of the restructuring programs on both production and operating expenses and better pricing and customer mix drove the improvements.
Operating earnings in Asia, excluding the highlighted items discussed above, remained flat in fiscal 2014 in comparison to fiscal 2013, with the operating margin as a percentage of sales decreasing by 60 basis points to 8.8%. The decrease in our Asia segment margins in fiscal 2014 was primarily attributable to unfavorable customer mix.
Interest Expense
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Fiscal 2014 | | Fiscal 2013 | | Increase (Decrease) |
| | In Millions | | As % Net Sales | | In Millions | | As % Net Sales | | In Millions | | % |
Interest expense | | $ | 17.1 |
| | 0.7 | % | | $ | 18.7 |
| | 0.8 | % | | $ | (1.6 | ) | | (8.6 | )% |
Interest expense of $17.1 million in fiscal 2014 (net of interest income of $1.0 million) was $1.6 million lower than the $18.7 million in fiscal 2013 (net of interest income of $1.4 million). The decrease in interest expense in fiscal 2014 compared to fiscal 2013 is primarily due to lower average interest rates and lower average debt outstanding, partially offset by increased accreted interest on the Convertible Notes.
Our average debt outstanding (including the average amount of the Convertible Notes discount of $13.5 million) was $236.9 million in fiscal 2014, compared to our average debt outstanding (including the average amount of the Convertible Notes discount of $20.8 million) of $246.3 million in fiscal 2013. Our average cash interest rate incurred in fiscal 2014 was 3.5% compared to 4.2% in fiscal 2013.
Included in interest expense is non-cash, accreted interest on the Convertible Notes of $7.6 million in fiscal 2014 and $7.0 million in fiscal 2013. Also included in interest expense are non-cash charges related to amortization of deferred financing fees of $1.1 million in fiscal 2014 and $1.3 million in fiscal 2013.
Other (Income) Expense, Net
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Fiscal 2014 | | Fiscal 2013 | | Increase (Decrease) |
| | In Millions | | As % Net Sales | | In Millions | | As % Net Sales | | In Millions | | % |
Other (income) expense, net | | $ | 13.6 |
| | 0.6 | % | | $ | 0.9 |
| | 0.1 | % | | $ | 12.7 |
| | NM |
NM = not meaningful
Other (income) expense, net was expense of $13.6 million in fiscal 2014 compared to expense of $0.9 million in fiscal 2013. The unfavorable impact in fiscal 2014 was mainly attributable to write-offs relating to non-operating assets and other charges of $6.5 million and higher foreign currency losses of $5.8 million compared to foreign currency losses of $1.9 million in fiscal 2013. The prior year also included insurance recoveries of $1.8 million.
Earnings Before Income Taxes
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Fiscal 2014 | | Fiscal 2013 | | Increase (Decrease) |
| | In Millions | | As % Net Sales | | In Millions | | As % Net Sales | | In Millions | | % |
Earnings before income taxes | | $ | 163.7 |
| | 6.6 | % | | $ | 230.3 |
| | 10.1 | % | | $ | (66.6 | ) | | (28.9 | )% |
As a result of the factors discussed above, fiscal 2014 earnings before income taxes were $163.7 million, a decrease of $66.6 million or 28.9% compared to fiscal 2013.
Income Tax Expense
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Fiscal 2014 | | Fiscal 2013 | | Increase (Decrease) |
| | In Millions | | As % Net Sales | | In Millions | | As % Net Sales | | In Millions | | % |
Income tax expense | | $ | 17.0 |
| | 0.7 | % | | $ | 65.3 |
| | 2.9 | % | | $ | (48.3 | ) | | (74.0 | )% |
Effective tax rate | | 10.4 | % | | | | 28.4 | % | | | | (18.0 | )% | | |
Our corporate effective income tax rate with respect to any period may be volatile based on the mix of income in the tax jurisdictions in which we operate and the amount of our consolidated income before taxes.
The Company’s income tax provisions consist of federal, state and foreign income taxes. The effective income tax rate was 10.4% in fiscal 2014 compared to the fiscal 2013 effective tax rate of 28.4%. The rate decrease in fiscal 2014 as compared to fiscal 2013 was primarily due to the reversal of a previously recognized deferred tax valuation allowance related to one of our foreign subsidiaries of $24.9 million and changes in the mix of earnings among tax jurisdictions, which were significantly impacted by a legal proceedings charge recorded in fiscal 2014. The valuation allowance release was the result of an operational restructuring approved during fiscal 2014.
The fiscal 2014 foreign effective income tax rate on foreign pre-tax income of $116.0 million was a net benefit of 4.0 %. The difference in the foreign effective tax rate versus the U.S. statutory rate of 35% was primarily attributable to a release of a valuation allowance in a European subsidiary combined with lower statutory rates in foreign countries. The foreign effective income tax rate without the valuation allowance release was 17.5%. The fiscal 2013 foreign effective income tax rate on foreign pre-tax income of $123.0 million was 13.8%. The difference in the foreign effective income tax rate versus the U.S. statutory rate of 35% was attributable to lower statutory rates in foreign countries.
Income from our Swiss subsidiary comprised a substantial portion of our overall foreign mix of income for both fiscal 2014 and fiscal 2013 and is taxed at approximately 7%.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash Flow and Financing Activities
Cash and cash equivalents at March 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, were $268.9 million, $240.1 million and $249.3 million, respectively.
Cash provided by operating activities for fiscal 2015, 2014 and 2013, was $194.5 million, $193.6 million and $244.4 million, respectively.
During fiscal 2015, cash from operating activities was provided primarily from net earnings of $181.5 million, depreciation and amortization of $57.0 million, non-cash charges relating to write-off of goodwill and other assets of $23.9 million, deferred taxes of $31.9 million, stock-based compensation of $25.3 million, non-cash interest and restructuring charges of $9.5 million and $3.3 million, respectively, were partially offset by a non-cash gain of $2.0 million on disposition of our equity interest in Altergy and non-cash credits relating to the reversal of the remaining legal accrual of $16.2 million. Also partially offsetting our cash provided from operating activities was the increase in Primary Working Capital of $49.9 million, net of currency translation changes and our payment of $40.0 million towards the Altergy award, pursuant to the final legal settlement of the Altergy matter and accrued income tax expense of $15.5 million.
During fiscal 2014, cash from operating activities was provided primarily from net earnings of $146.7 million, depreciation and amortization of $54.0 million, non-cash charges relating to write-off of goodwill and other assets of $10.2 million, restructuring charges of $11.5 million, a net source of $25.6 million from non-cash interest expense and stock compensation, $90.3 million from other accrued, including the legal proceedings charge of $58.2 million, were partially offset by cash used for the increase in Primary Working Capital of $77.0 million and deferred taxes of $49.7 million, net of currency translation changes.
During fiscal 2013, cash from operating activities was provided primarily from net earnings of $165.0 million, depreciation and amortization of $50.5 million and a net source of $26.4 million from non-cash interest expense, provision for doubtful accounts, deferred taxes, net gains and settlements on derivatives, stock compensation, asset write-offs related to restructuring
and losses on disposal of fixed assets. Primary Working Capital improved by $9.9 million and was offset partially by a change in current and other assets, accrued expenses, and other liabilities of $7.4 million.
As explained in the discussion of our use of “non-GAAP financial measures,” we monitor the level and percentage of Primary Working Capital to sales. Primary Working Capital for this purpose is trade accounts receivable, plus inventories, minus trade accounts payable and the resulting net amount is divided by the trailing three-month net sales (annualized) to derive a primary working capital percentage. Primary Working Capital was $636.6 million (yielding a Primary Working Capital percentage of 25.3%) at March 31, 2015 and $666.9 million (yielding a Primary Working Capital percentage of 25.1%) at March 31, 2014.
Primary Working Capital and Primary Working Capital percentages at March 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 are computed as follows: