FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 6-K
REPORT OF FOREIGN PRIVATE ISSUER PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-16 OR 15d-16 OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Compagnie Générale de Géophysique-Veritas
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
CGG Veritas
(Translation of registrants name into English)
Republic of France
Tour Maine Montparnasse
33, avenue du Maine
75015 Paris
France
(33) 1 64 47 45 00
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual
reports under cover of Form 20-F or Form 40-F.
Form 20-F
þ Form 40-F o
(Indicate by check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the information contained in this form is also thereby
furnishing the information to the Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.)
Yes o No þ
(If Yes is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the registrant in connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): 82
- .)
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This document includes forward-looking statements. We have based these forward-looking
statements on our current views and assumptions about future events.
These forward-looking statements involve certain risks and uncertainties. Factors that could
cause actual results to differ materially from those contemplated by the forward-looking statements
include, among others, the following factors:
|
|
|
developments affecting our international operations; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to develop an integrated strategy for CGGVeritas; |
|
|
|
|
difficulties and delays in achieving synergies and cost savings; |
|
|
|
|
any write-downs of goodwill on our balance sheet; |
|
|
|
|
our substantial indebtedness and the restrictive covenants in our debt agreements; |
|
|
|
|
changes in international economic and political conditions and, in particular, in oil and
gas prices; |
|
|
|
|
exposure to the credit risk of customers; |
|
|
|
|
exposure to interest rate risk; |
|
|
|
|
exposure to foreign exchange rate risk; |
|
|
|
|
exposure to credit risk and counter-party risk; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to finance our operations on acceptable terms; |
|
|
|
|
the timely development and acceptance of our new products and services; |
|
|
|
|
the complexity of products sold; |
|
|
|
|
changes in demand for seismic products and services; |
|
|
|
|
the effects of competition; |
|
|
|
|
the social, political and economic risks of our global operations; |
|
|
|
|
the costs and risks associated with pension and post-retirement benefit obligations; |
|
|
|
|
changes to existing regulations or technical standards; |
|
|
|
|
existing or future litigation; |
|
|
|
|
difficulties and costs in protecting intellectual property rights and exposure to
infringement claims by others; |
|
|
|
|
the costs of compliance with environmental, health and safety laws; |
|
|
|
|
the accuracy of our assessment of risks related to acquisitions, projects and contracts
and whether these risks materialize; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to integrate successfully the businesses or assets we acquire; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to monitor existing and targeted partnerships; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to sell our seismic data library; |
|
|
|
|
difficulties and costs in obtaining new vessels or in temporarily or permanently reducing
the capacity of our fleet; |
|
|
|
|
our clients ability to unilaterally terminate certain contracts in our backlog; |
|
|
|
|
fluctuations in the value of our shareholdings; |
- 3 -
|
|
|
our ability to access the debt and equity markets during the periods covered by the
forward-looking statements, which will depend on general market conditions, including the
ongoing crisis in the financial markets, and on our credit ratings for our debt obligations;
and |
|
|
|
|
our success at managing the risks of the foregoing. |
We undertake no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a
result of new information, future events or otherwise. In light of these risks, uncertainties and
assumptions, the forward-looking events discussed in this document might not occur.
Certain of these risks can be found in our annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended
December 31, 2008 that we filed with the SEC on April 22, 2009. Our annual report on Form 20-F is
available on our website at www.cggveritas.com or on the website maintained by the SEC at
www.sec.gov. You may request a copy of our annual report on Form 20-F, which includes our
complete audited financial statements, at no charge, by calling our investor relations department
at + 33 1 6447 3831, sending an electronic message to invrelparis@cggveritas.com or
invrelhouston@cggveritas.com or writing to CGG Veritas Investor Relations Department,
Tour Maine Montparnasse 33, avenue du Maine 75015 Paris, France.
- 4 -
Item 1: FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
COMPAGNIE GÉNÉRALE DE GÉOPHYSIQUE-VERITAS, S.A.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
December 31, 2008 |
amounts in millions of |
|
|
|
US$ (1) |
|
|
|
US$ (2) |
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
418.1 |
|
|
|
556.4 |
|
|
|
516.9 |
|
|
|
719.4 |
|
Trade accounts and notes receivable, net |
|
|
705.1 |
|
|
|
938.4 |
|
|
|
712.3 |
|
|
|
991.4 |
|
Inventories and work-in-progress, net |
|
|
278.4 |
|
|
|
370.5 |
|
|
|
287.9 |
|
|
|
400.7 |
|
Income tax assets |
|
|
84.4 |
|
|
|
112.3 |
|
|
|
102.2 |
|
|
|
142.2 |
|
Other current assets, net |
|
|
115.3 |
|
|
|
153.4 |
|
|
|
101.5 |
|
|
|
141.2 |
|
Assets held for sale, net |
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
|
10.7 |
|
|
|
7.6 |
|
|
|
10.6 |
|
Total current assets |
|
|
1,609.3 |
|
|
|
2,141.7 |
|
|
|
1,728.4 |
|
|
|
2,405.5 |
|
Deferred tax assets |
|
|
71.1 |
|
|
|
94.7 |
|
|
|
109.2 |
|
|
|
151.9 |
|
Investments and other financial assets, net |
|
|
28.5 |
|
|
|
38.0 |
|
|
|
26.2 |
|
|
|
36.4 |
|
Investments in companies under equity method |
|
|
77.9 |
|
|
|
103.7 |
|
|
|
72.9 |
|
|
|
101.5 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
871.9 |
|
|
|
1,160.4 |
|
|
|
822.4 |
|
|
|
1,144.5 |
|
Intangible assets, net |
|
|
875.2 |
|
|
|
1,164.8 |
|
|
|
820.0 |
|
|
|
1,141.2 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
2,157.5 |
|
|
|
2,871.3 |
|
|
|
2,055.1 |
|
|
|
2,860.1 |
|
Total non-current assets |
|
|
4,082.1 |
|
|
|
5,432.9 |
|
|
|
3,905.8 |
|
|
|
5,435.6 |
|
TOTAL ASSETS |
|
|
5,691.4 |
|
|
|
7,574.6 |
|
|
|
5,634.2 |
|
|
|
7,841.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank overdrafts |
|
|
9.8 |
|
|
|
13.0 |
|
|
|
8.2 |
|
|
|
11.4 |
|
Current portion of financial debt |
|
|
183.1 |
|
|
|
243.7 |
|
|
|
241.5 |
|
|
|
336.1 |
|
Trade accounts and notes payable |
|
|
266.9 |
|
|
|
355.3 |
|
|
|
282.2 |
|
|
|
398.4 |
|
Accrued payroll costs |
|
|
127.0 |
|
|
|
169.0 |
|
|
|
144.3 |
|
|
|
200.8 |
|
Income taxes liability |
|
|
57.7 |
|
|
|
76.7 |
|
|
|
85.5 |
|
|
|
119.0 |
|
Advance billings to customers |
|
|
27.4 |
|
|
|
36.5 |
|
|
|
43.5 |
|
|
|
60.5 |
|
Provisions current portion |
|
|
20.1 |
|
|
|
26.8 |
|
|
|
20.7 |
|
|
|
28.8 |
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
150.1 |
|
|
|
199.9 |
|
|
|
173.3 |
|
|
|
241.2 |
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
842.1 |
|
|
|
1,120.9 |
|
|
|
1,003.2 |
|
|
|
1,396.2 |
|
Deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
197.7 |
|
|
|
263.2 |
|
|
|
223.8 |
|
|
|
311.5 |
|
Provisions non-current portion |
|
|
78.9 |
|
|
|
105.0 |
|
|
|
82.4 |
|
|
|
114.6 |
|
Financial debt |
|
|
1,365.3 |
|
|
|
1,817.0 |
|
|
|
1,296.3 |
|
|
|
1,804.0 |
|
Other non-current liabilities |
|
|
31.8 |
|
|
|
42.5 |
|
|
|
29.9 |
|
|
|
41.6 |
|
Total non-current liabilities |
|
|
1,673.7 |
|
|
|
2,227.7 |
|
|
|
1,632.4 |
|
|
|
2,271.7 |
|
Common stock 276,413,038 shares authorized and
150,617,709 shares with a 0.40 nominal value
issued and outstanding at March 31, 2009 and at
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
60.2 |
|
|
|
80.2 |
|
|
|
60.2 |
|
|
|
83.8 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
1,964.7 |
|
|
|
2,614.6 |
|
|
|
1,964.7 |
|
|
|
2,734.2 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
1,138.6 |
|
|
|
1,515.3 |
|
|
|
799.4 |
|
|
|
1,112.6 |
|
Treasury shares |
|
|
(18.4 |
) |
|
|
(24.5 |
) |
|
|
(18.1 |
) |
|
|
(25.1 |
) |
Net income (loss) for the period Attributable
to the Group |
|
|
52.7 |
|
|
|
70.0 |
|
|
|
332.8 |
|
|
|
463.1 |
|
Income and expense recognized directly in equity |
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
(2.5 |
) |
|
|
(3.5 |
) |
Cumulative translation adjustment |
|
|
(65.6 |
) |
|
|
(87.3 |
) |
|
|
(176.4 |
) |
|
|
(245.5 |
) |
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
3,133.7 |
|
|
|
4,170.3 |
|
|
|
2,960.1 |
|
|
|
4,119.6 |
|
Minority interests |
|
|
41.9 |
|
|
|
55.7 |
|
|
|
38.5 |
|
|
|
53.6 |
|
Total shareholders equity and minority interests |
|
|
3,175.6 |
|
|
|
4,226.0 |
|
|
|
2,998.6 |
|
|
|
4,173.2 |
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
5,691.4 |
|
|
|
7,574.6 |
|
|
|
5,634.2 |
|
|
|
7,841.1 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Dollar amounts represent euro amounts converted at the exchange rate of US$1.331 per
on the balance sheet date. |
|
(2) |
|
Dollar amounts represent euro amounts converted at the exchange rate of US$1.392 per
on the balance sheet date. |
See notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
- 5 -
COMPAGNIE GÉNÉRALE DE GÉOPHYSIQUE-VERITAS, S.A.
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
except per share data, amounts in millions of |
|
|
|
US$ (1) |
|
|
|
US$ (2) |
|
|
|
Operating revenues |
|
|
648.5 |
|
|
|
851.2 |
|
|
|
585.0 |
|
|
|
872.8 |
|
Other income from ordinary activities |
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
Total income from ordinary activities |
|
|
649.3 |
|
|
|
852.2 |
|
|
|
585.3 |
|
|
|
873.3 |
|
Cost of operations |
|
|
(454.0 |
) |
|
|
(595.9 |
) |
|
|
(384.9 |
) |
|
|
(574.3 |
) |
Gross profit |
|
|
195.3 |
|
|
|
256.3 |
|
|
|
200.4 |
|
|
|
299.0 |
|
Research and development expenses, net |
|
|
(16.1 |
) |
|
|
(21.2 |
) |
|
|
(16.5 |
) |
|
|
(24.5 |
) |
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
(66.7 |
) |
|
|
(87.6 |
) |
|
|
(62.8 |
) |
|
|
(93.7 |
) |
Other revenues (expenses), net |
|
|
(12.2 |
) |
|
|
(16.0 |
) |
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
Operating income |
|
|
100.3 |
|
|
|
131.5 |
|
|
|
123.3 |
|
|
|
184.1 |
|
Expenses related to financial debt |
|
|
(27.1 |
) |
|
|
(35.5 |
) |
|
|
(24.9 |
) |
|
|
(37.2 |
) |
Income provided by cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
Cost of financial debt, net |
|
|
(26.2 |
) |
|
|
(34.3 |
) |
|
|
(22.9 |
) |
|
|
(34.2 |
) |
Other financial income (loss) |
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
|
|
(1.8 |
) |
Income of consolidated companies before income taxes |
|
|
76.5 |
|
|
|
100.3 |
|
|
|
99.2 |
|
|
|
148.1 |
|
Deferred taxes on currency translation |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
Other income taxes |
|
|
(23.2 |
) |
|
|
(30.5 |
) |
|
|
(39.7 |
) |
|
|
(59.2 |
) |
Total Income taxes |
|
|
(22.9 |
) |
|
|
(30.1 |
) |
|
|
(38.1 |
) |
|
|
(56.8 |
) |
Net income from consolidated companies |
|
|
53.6 |
|
|
|
70.2 |
|
|
|
61.1 |
|
|
|
91.3 |
|
Equity in income of investees |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
Net income |
|
|
54.0 |
|
|
|
70.7 |
|
|
|
64.0 |
|
|
|
95.5 |
|
|
Attributable to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders |
|
|
52.7 |
|
|
|
69.1 |
|
|
|
62.6 |
|
|
|
93.4 |
|
Minority interest |
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of shares outstanding (3) |
|
|
150,617,709 |
|
|
|
150,617,709 |
|
|
|
137,295,995 |
|
|
|
137,295,995 |
|
Dilutive potential shares from stock-options (3) |
|
|
281,467 |
|
|
|
281,467 |
|
|
|
799,467 |
|
|
|
799,467 |
|
Dilutive potential shares from free shares (3) |
|
|
806,500 |
|
|
|
806,500 |
|
|
|
871,938 |
|
|
|
871,938 |
|
Adjusted weighted average number of shares and
assumed option exercises when dilutive (3) |
|
|
151,705,676 |
|
|
|
151,705,676 |
|
|
|
138,967,400 |
|
|
|
138,967,400 |
|
Net earning per share attributable to shareholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
0.35 |
|
|
|
0.46 |
|
|
|
0.46 |
|
|
|
0.68 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
0.35 |
|
|
|
0.46 |
|
|
|
0.45 |
|
|
|
0.67 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Dollar amounts represent euro amounts converted at the average exchange rate for the
period of US$1.313 per . |
|
(2) |
|
Dollar amounts represent euro amounts converted at the average exchange rate for the
period of US$1.492 per . |
|
(3) |
|
Number of shares for the three months ended March 31, 2008 has been restated to
reflect the five-for-one stock split on June 3, 2008. |
See notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
- 6 -
COMPAGNIE GÉNÉRALE DE GÉOPHYSIQUE-VERITAS, S.A.
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
amounts in millions of |
|
|
|
US$ (1) |
|
|
|
US$ (2) |
|
|
|
OPERATING |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
54.0 |
|
|
|
70.7 |
|
|
|
64.0 |
|
|
|
95.5 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
67.6 |
|
|
|
88.7 |
|
|
|
47.8 |
|
|
|
71.3 |
|
Multi-client surveys amortization |
|
|
40.4 |
|
|
|
53.0 |
|
|
|
52.9 |
|
|
|
78.9 |
|
Variance on provisions |
|
|
(3.7 |
) |
|
|
(4.9 |
) |
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
Expense & income calculated on stock-option |
|
|
6.9 |
|
|
|
9.1 |
|
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
|
8.7 |
|
Net gain on disposal of fixed assets |
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
Equity in income of affiliates |
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
(2.9 |
) |
|
|
(4.2 |
) |
Dividends received from affiliates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
Other non-cash items |
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
|
5.4 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
Net cash including net cost of financial debt and income taxes |
|
|
170.0 |
|
|
|
223.1 |
|
|
|
171.0 |
|
|
|
255.3 |
|
Less net cost of financial debt |
|
|
26.2 |
|
|
|
34.3 |
|
|
|
22.9 |
|
|
|
34.2 |
|
Less income taxes expenses |
|
|
22.9 |
|
|
|
30.1 |
|
|
|
38.1 |
|
|
|
56.8 |
|
Net cash excluding net cost of financial debt and income taxes |
|
|
219.1 |
|
|
|
287.5 |
|
|
|
232.0 |
|
|
|
346.3 |
|
Income taxes paid |
|
|
(36.0 |
) |
|
|
(47.4 |
) |
|
|
(13.4 |
) |
|
|
(20.0 |
) |
Net cash before changes in working capital |
|
|
183.1 |
|
|
|
240.1 |
|
|
|
218.6 |
|
|
|
326.3 |
|
- change in trade accounts and notes receivables |
|
|
(6.6 |
) |
|
|
(8.7 |
) |
|
|
(27.1 |
) |
|
|
(40.4 |
) |
- change in inventories and work-in-progress |
|
|
13.3 |
|
|
|
17.4 |
|
|
|
(5.1 |
) |
|
|
(7.6 |
) |
- change in other currents assets |
|
|
(13.9 |
) |
|
|
(18.2 |
) |
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
- change in trade accounts and notes payable |
|
|
(41.9 |
) |
|
|
(55.1 |
) |
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
|
5.8 |
|
- change in other current liabilities |
|
|
(29.9 |
) |
|
|
(39.2 |
) |
|
|
(5.7 |
) |
|
|
(8.5 |
) |
Impact of changes in exchange rate |
|
|
(10.7 |
) |
|
|
(14.0 |
) |
|
|
(9.6 |
) |
|
|
(14.5 |
) |
Net cash provided by operating activity |
|
|
93.4 |
|
|
|
122.3 |
|
|
|
177.2 |
|
|
|
264.4 |
|
INVESTING |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchases of tangible and intangible assets (including
variation of fixed assets suppliers) |
|
|
(40.6 |
) |
|
|
(53.3 |
) |
|
|
(41.5 |
) |
|
|
(61.9 |
) |
Increase in multi-client surveys |
|
|
(69.5 |
) |
|
|
(91.2 |
) |
|
|
(97.3 |
) |
|
|
(145.2 |
) |
Proceeds from disposals of tangible and intangible |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
Total net acquisition of investments |
|
|
(59.5 |
) |
|
|
(78.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impact of changes in consolidation scope |
|
|
(2.0 |
) |
|
|
(2.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variation in loans granted |
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
Variation in subsidies for capital expenditures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variation in other financial assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3.5 |
) |
|
|
(5.1 |
) |
Net cash from investing activities |
|
|
(169.5 |
) |
|
|
(222.4 |
) |
|
|
(142.9 |
) |
|
|
(213.1 |
) |
FINANCING |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of long-term debts |
|
|
(24.3 |
) |
|
|
(31.9 |
) |
|
|
(4.7 |
) |
|
|
(7.0 |
) |
Total issuance of long-term debts |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reimbursement on leasing |
|
|
(7.3 |
) |
|
|
(9.6 |
) |
|
|
(4.5 |
) |
|
|
(6.7 |
) |
Change in short-term loans |
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
(9.8 |
) |
|
|
(14.5 |
) |
Financial interest paid |
|
|
(11.3 |
) |
|
|
(14.8 |
) |
|
|
(9.7 |
) |
|
|
(14.5 |
) |
Net proceeds from capital increase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- from shareholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
- from minority interest of integrated companies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buying & sales of own shares |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
(10.7 |
) |
|
|
(16.0 |
) |
Net cash provided by financial activities |
|
|
(41.8 |
) |
|
|
(54.8 |
) |
|
|
(38.6 |
) |
|
|
(57.5 |
) |
Effects of exchange rate changes on cash |
|
|
19.1 |
|
|
|
(8.1 |
) |
|
|
(12.9 |
) |
|
|
6.7 |
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(98.8 |
) |
|
|
(163.0 |
) |
|
|
(17.2 |
) |
|
|
0.5 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year |
|
|
516.9 |
|
|
|
719.4 |
|
|
|
254.3 |
|
|
|
374.4 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
|
418.1 |
|
|
|
556.4 |
|
|
|
237.1 |
|
|
|
374.9 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Dollar amounts represent euro amounts converted at the average exchange rate for the
period of US$1.313 per (except cash and cash equivalents balances converted at the
closing exchange rate of US$1.331 per at March 31, 2009 and of US$1.392 per at
December 31, 2008). |
|
(2) |
|
Dollar amounts represent euro amounts converted at the average exchange rate for the
period of US$1.492 per (except cash and cash equivalents balances converted at the
closing exchange rate of US$1.581 per at March 31, 2008 and of US$1.472 per at
December 31, 2007). |
- 7 -
COMPAGNIE GÉNÉRALE DE GÉOPHYSIQUE-VERITAS, S.A.
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
March 31, |
amounts in millions of |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
|
|
Net income from statements of operations |
|
|
54.0 |
|
|
|
64.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain (loss) on cash flow hedges |
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
|
6.9 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
(1.8 |
) |
|
|
(2.8 |
) |
Net gain (loss) on cash flow hedges |
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain (loss) on available-for-sale investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9.6 |
) |
Income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net gain (loss) on available-for-sale investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain (loss) on actuarial changes on pension plan |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net gain (loss) on actuarial changes on pension plan |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange differences on foreign currency translation |
|
|
112.9 |
|
|
|
(155.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss) for the period, net of taxes |
|
|
116.9 |
|
|
|
(160.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net comprehensive income for the period |
|
|
170.9 |
|
|
|
(96.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Attributable to : |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders |
|
|
167.5 |
|
|
|
(96.7 |
) |
Minority interest |
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
- 8 -
COMPAGNIE GÉNÉRALE DE GÉOPHYSIQUE-VERITAS, S.A.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
Note 1Summary of significant accounting policies
Compagnie Générale de Géophysique-Veritas, S.A. (the Company) and its subsidiaries
(together, the Group) is a global participant in the geophysical seismic industry, as a
manufacturer of geophysical equipment and providing a wide range of services (seismic data
acquisition and related processing and interpretation software) principally to clients in the oil
and gas exploration and production business.
Given that the Company is listed on Euronext Paris and pursuant to European regulation
n°1606/2002 dated July 19, 2002, the accompanying interim consolidated financial statements have
been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) and its
interpretations as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB). These interim
consolidated financial statements are also in accordance with IFRS adopted by the European Union at
March 31, 2009 and are available on the following web site
http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/accounting/ias_en.htm#adopted-commission.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with IFRS requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that impact the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the
reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could
differ from those estimates.
The financial statements have been prepared on a historical cost basis, except for certain
financial assets and liabilities that have been measured at fair value.
Critical accounting policies
The interim condensed consolidated financial statements for the three months ended March 31,
2009 have been prepared in accordance with IAS 34 Interim Financial Reporting.
The interim condensed consolidated financial statements do not include all the information
and disclosures required in the annual financial statements, and should be read in conjunction
with the Groups annual financial statements as at and for the year ended December 31, 2008
included in its report on Form 20-F for the year 2008 filed with the SEC on April 22, 2009.
The accounting policies adopted in the preparation of the interim condensed consolidated
financial statements are consistent with those followed in the preparation of the Groups annual
financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2008, except for the following adoption of new
Standards and Interpretations:
- IAS 32 and IAS 1 Amendment Puttable Financial Instruments and Obligations Arising on
Liquidation IFRS 8 Operating segments
- IFRS 1 and IAS 27 Amendment Cost of an Investment in a Subsidiary, Jointly Controlled Entity or
Associate
- 2008 Annual Improvements to IFRS (excepted amendment to IFRS 5)
- IAS 1 revised Presentation of Financial Statements
- IAS 23 revised Borrowing costs
- IFRS 2 Amendment Vesting Conditions and Cancellations
- Amendment to IAS 39 Reclassification of Financial Assets: Effective Date and Transition
- IFRIC 13 Customer loyalty programs
- IFRIC 14 IAS 19 The Limit on a Defined Benefit Asset, Minimum Funding Requirements and their
Interaction
These principles do not differ from IFRS issued by the IASB as long as the adoption of the
interpretations listed below, effective since January 1, 2009 but not yet adopted by the European
Union, has no significant impact on the Group interim condensed consolidated financial statements:
- IFRIC 15 Agreements for the Construction of Real Estate
- IFRIC 16 Hedges of a Net Investment in a Foreign Operation
- IFRIC 12 Service Concession Arrangements endorsed by the European Union in March 2009 but
compulsory for financial years starting as of January 1, 2010
At the date of issuance of these financial statements, the following Standards and
Interpretations were issued but not yet effective:
- IAS 27 Amendment Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements
- IFRS 3R Business Combinations
- Amendment to IAS 39 Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement: Eligible Hedged Items
- Embedded derivatives Amendments to IFRIC 9 and IAS 39 (March 2009)
- 9 -
- Improving disclosures about financial instruments Amendment to IFRS7 (March 2009)
- IFRIC 17 Distributions of Non-cash Assets to Owners
- IFRIC 18 Transfers of assets from customers
We have not opted for the early adoption of these Standards, Amendments and Interpretations and we
are currently reviewing them to measure the potential impact on our interim condensed consolidated
financial statements. At this stage, we do not anticipate any significant impact.
Operating revenues
Operating revenues are recognized when they can be measured reliably, and when it is likely
that the economic benefits associated with the transaction will flow to the entity, which is at the
point that such revenues have been realized or are considered realizable. For contracts where the
percentage of completion method of accounting is being applied, revenues are only recognized when
the costs incurred for the transaction and the cost to complete the transaction can be measured
reliably and such revenues are considered earned and realizable.
Multi-client surveys consist of seismic surveys to be licensed to customers on a non-exclusive
basis. All costs directly incurred in acquiring, processing and otherwise completing seismic
surveys are capitalized into the multi-client surveys. The value of our multi-client library is
stated on our balance sheet at the aggregate of those costs less accumulated amortization or at
fair value if lower. We review the library for potential impairment of our independent surveys on
an ongoing basis.
Revenues related to multi-client surveys result from (i) pre-commitments and (ii) licenses
after completion of the surveys (after-sales).
Pre-commitments Generally, we obtain commitments from a limited number of customers before
a seismic project is completed. These pre-commitments cover part or all of the survey area blocks.
In return for the commitment, the customer typically gains the right to direct or influence the
project specifications, advance access to data as it is being acquired, and favorable pricing. The
Company records payments that it receives during periods of mobilization as advance billing in the
balance sheet in the line item Advance billings to customers.
The Company recognizes pre-commitments as revenue when production is begun based on the
physical progress of the project.
After sales Generally, we grant a license entitling non-exclusive access to a complete and
ready-for-use, specifically defined portion of our multi-client data library in exchange for a
fixed and determinable payment. We recognize after sales revenue upon the client executing a valid
license agreement and having been granted access to the data. Within thirty days of execution and
access, the client may exercise our warranty that the medium on which the data is transmitted (a
magnetic cartridge) is free from technical defects. If the warranty is exercised, the Company will
provide the same data on a new magnetic cartridge. The cost of providing new magnetic cartridges is
negligible.
After sales volume agreementsWe enter into a customer arrangement in which we agree to grant
licenses to the customer for access to a specified number of blocks of the multi-client library.
These arrangements typically enable the customer to select and access the specific blocks for a
limited period of time. We recognize revenue when the blocks are selected and the client has been
granted access to the data and if the corresponding revenue can be reliably estimated. Within
thirty days of execution and access, the client may exercise our warranty that the medium on which
the data is transmitted (a magnetic cartridge) is free from technical defects. If the warranty is
exercised, the Company will provide the same data on a new magnetic cartridge. The cost of
providing new magnetic cartridges is negligible.
In exclusive surveys, we perform seismic services (acquisition and processing) for a specific
customer. We recognize proprietary/contract revenues as the services are rendered. We evaluate the
progress to date, in a manner generally consistent with the physical progress of the project, and
recognize revenues based on the ratio of the project cost incurred during that period to the total
estimated project cost. We believe this ratio to be generally consistent with the physical progress
of the project.
The billings and the costs related to the transit of seismic vessels at the beginning of the
survey are deferred and recognized over the duration of the contract by reference to the technical
stage of completion.
In some exclusive survey contracts and a limited number of multi-client survey contracts, the
Company is required to meet certain milestones. The Company defers recognition of revenue on such
contracts until all milestones that provide the customer a right of cancellation or refund of
amounts paid have been met.
|
|
|
Other geophysical services |
- 10 -
Revenues from our other geophysical services are recognized as the services are performed and,
when related to long-term
contracts, using the proportional performance method of recognizing revenues.
We recognize revenues on equipment sales upon delivery to the customer. Any advance billings
to customers are recorded in current liabilities.
|
|
|
Software and hardware sales |
We recognize revenues from the sale of software and hardware products following acceptance of
the product by the customer at which time we have no further significant vendor obligations
remaining. Any advance billings to customers are recorded in current liabilities.
If an arrangement to deliver software, either alone or together with other products or
services, requires significant production, modification, or customization of software, the entire
arrangement is accounted for as a production-type contract, i.e. using the percentage of completion
method.
If the software arrangement provides for multiple deliverables (e.g. upgrades or enhancements,
post-contract customer support such as maintenance, or services), the revenue is allocated to the
various elements based on specific objective evidence of fair value, regardless of any separate
allocations stated within the contract for each element. Each element is appropriately accounted
for under the applicable accounting standard.
Maintenance revenues consist primarily of post contract customer support agreements and are
recorded as advance billings to customers and recognized as revenue on a straight-line basis over
the contract period.
Multi-client surveys
Multi-client surveys consist of seismic surveys to be licensed to customers on a non-exclusive
basis. All costs directly incurred in acquiring, processing and otherwise completing seismic
surveys are capitalized into the multi-client surveys (including transit costs when applicable).
The value of our multi-client library is stated on our balance sheet at the aggregate of those
costs less accumulated amortization or at fair value if lower. We review the library for potential
impairment of our independent surveys on an ongoing basis.
We amortize the multi-client surveys over the period during which the data is expected to be
marketed using a pro-rata method based on recognized revenues as a percentage of total estimated
sales.
In this respect, we use four amortization rates: 50%, 75%, 80% or 83.3% of revenues depending
on the category of the surveys. Multi-client surveys are classified into a same category when they
are located in the same area with the same estimated sales ratio, such estimates generally relying
on the historical pattern.
For all categories of surveys and starting from data delivery, a minimum straight-line depreciation
scheme is applied over a five-year period, if total accumulated depreciation from the applicable
amortization rate is below this minimum level.
Multi-client surveys acquired as part of the business combination with Veritas and which have
been valued for purchase price allocation purposes are amortized based on 65% of revenues and an
impairment loss is recognized on a survey-by-survey basis in case of any indication of impairment.
Development costs
Expenditures on research activities undertaken with the prospect of gaining new scientific or
technological knowledge and understanding are recognized in the income statement as expenses as
incurred and are presented as Research and development expenses, net.
Expenditures on development activities, whereby research findings are applied to a plan or
design for the production of new or substantially improved products and processes, are capitalized
if:
|
|
|
the project is clearly defined, and costs are separately identified and reliably
measured, |
|
|
|
|
the product or process is technically and commercially feasible, |
|
|
|
|
we have sufficient resources to complete development, and |
|
|
|
|
the intangible asset is likely to generate future economic benefits, either because
it is useful to us or through an existing market for the intangible asset itself or for
its products. |
The expenditures capitalized include the cost of materials, direct labor and an appropriate
proportion of overhead. Other development expenditures are recognized in the income statement as
expenses as incurred and are presented as Research and
- 11 -
development expenses, net.
Capitalized development expenditures are stated at cost less accumulated amortization and
impairment losses. We amortize capitalized developments costs over 5 years.
Research & development expenses in our income statement represent the net cost of development
costs that are not capitalized, of research costs, offset by government grants acquired for
research and development.
Note 2 Acquisitions and divestitures
In February 2009, Wavefield shares subject to the mandatory offer and the squeeze-out were
transferred to CGGVeritas, while compensation of 59.2 million for those shares was paid after the
objection period expired. As a result, the minority interests recognized as a financial debt of 62
million on our balance sheet at December 31, 2008 have been cancelled. The remaining 2.8 million
have been reclassified to current liabilities as of March 31, 2009, and were settled on April 17,
2009.
The preliminary goodwill determined as of December 31, 2008 has been revised for an additional
amount of 10 million, leading to a total goodwill of 18.5 million at March 31, 2009.
On January 8, 2009, Cybernetix conducted a 4 million share capital increase that was entirely
subscribed by Sercel Holding, bringing its stake to a total of 749,480 shares, representing 46.10%
of Cybernetixs share capital and 43.07% of its voting rights.
The French financial markets regulator (Autorité des
Marchés Financiers) exempted Sercel Holding from the
requirement to conduct a tender offer for all shares when its holding
exceeded 33.33%. The
consideration for the share capital increase was 2 million in cash and the incorporation of a 2
million cash advance granted by Sercel Holding to Cybernetix in November 2008. Cybernetix is consolidated under
the equity method in our financial statements.
Note 3Common Stock and Stock Options Plans
As of March 31, 2009, the Companys share capital consisted of 150,617,709 shares, each with a
nominal value of 0.40.
New
stock-option plans and performance shares allocation plan
On March 16, 2009, our Board of Directors allocated 1,327,000 stock options to 149
beneficiaries pursuant to a shareholders resolution, including stock options to purchase a total
of 260,000 ordinary shares that were allocated to executive officers who were members of the
Executive Committee (excluding the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Operating
Officer). The exercise price of the stock options is 8.82. The stock options expire on March 15,
2017.
On March 16, 2009, our Board of Directors allocated 516,250 performance shares to 291
beneficiaries pursuant to a shareholders resolution, including 46,250 performance shares that were
allocated to executive officers who were members of the Executive Committee (excluding the Chairman
and Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Operating Officer).
On March 16, 2009, our Board of Directors allocated 200,000 stock options to the Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer and 125,000 stock options to the Chief Operating Officer. Their exercise
price is 8.82. Rights to these options vest by one-third during each of the first three years of
the plan. Such vesting is subject to performance conditions based on the fulfillment of one of the
following objectives:
|
|
|
a share price performance objective relative to the share price considering the SBF 120
index; |
|
|
|
|
a share price performance objective relative to the ADS price considering the PHLX Oil
Services Sector SM (OSX SM) index; or |
|
|
|
|
a financial indicator of EBIT objective expressed in US$ and related to the target for
the annual variable part of the compensation of the executive officers. |
The options have an eight-year duration subject to the requirement, for all French residents,
to hold the resulting shares in registered form from their purchase date until March 16, 2013,
inclusive, except in limited cases listed in the plan regulations.
- 12 -
Consolidated statements of changes in equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders |
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
recognized |
|
|
Cumulative |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
equity and |
|
|
|
shares |
|
|
Share |
|
|
paid-in |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
Treasury |
|
|
directly in |
|
|
translation |
|
|
shareholders |
|
|
Minority |
|
|
minority |
|
(Unaudited) |
|
issued |
|
|
capital |
|
|
capital |
|
|
earnings |
|
|
shares |
|
|
equity |
|
|
adjustment |
|
|
equity |
|
|
interest |
|
|
interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(amounts in millions of euros, except share data) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2008 |
|
|
135,903,790 |
|
|
|
54.9 |
|
|
|
1,820.0 |
|
|
|
784.1 |
|
|
|
(3.9 |
) |
|
|
(5.1 |
) |
|
|
(248.4 |
) |
|
|
2,401.6 |
|
|
|
24.0 |
|
|
|
2,425.6 |
|
Capital increase |
|
|
13,363,919 |
|
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
144.7 |
|
|
|
(9.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
140.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
140.4 |
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
332.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
332.8 |
|
|
|
7.2 |
|
|
|
340.0 |
|
Cost of share-based payment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25.1 |
|
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
|
|
23.7 |
|
Operations on treasury shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14.2 |
) |
Actuarial gains and losses
of pension plans (1) (a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
Financial
instruments: change
in fair value and
transfer to income
statement(2) (a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
Foreign currency
translation: change in fair
value and transfer to income
statement(3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72.1 |
|
|
|
72.1 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
75.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income and expense
recognized directly in
equity (1) + (2) + (3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
72.1 |
|
|
|
75.3 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
78.8 |
|
Changes in consolidation
scope |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
|
5.2 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
Balance
at December 31, 2008 |
|
|
150,617,709 |
|
|
|
60.2 |
|
|
|
1,964.7 |
|
|
|
1,132.2 |
|
|
|
(18.1 |
) |
|
|
(2.5 |
) |
|
|
(176.4 |
) |
|
|
2,960.1 |
|
|
|
38.5 |
|
|
|
2,998.6 |
|
Capital increase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52.7 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
54.0 |
|
Cost of share-based payment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.9 |
|
Operations on treasury shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
Actuarial gains and losses
of pension plans (1) (a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
Financial instruments: change
in fair value and
transfer to income
statement(2) (a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
Foreign currency
translation: change in fair
value and transfer to income
statement(3) (a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110.8 |
|
|
|
110.8 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
112.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income and expense
recognized directly in
equity (1) + (2) + (3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
110.8 |
|
|
|
114.8 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
116.9 |
|
Others |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
Balance at March 31, 2009 |
|
|
150,617,709 |
|
|
|
60.2 |
|
|
|
1,964.7 |
|
|
|
1,191.3 |
|
|
|
(18.4 |
) |
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
(65.6 |
) |
|
|
3,133.7 |
|
|
|
41.9 |
|
|
|
3,175.6 |
|
- 13 -
Note 4Analysis by operating segment and geographic area
Financial information by operating segment is reported in accordance with the internal
reporting system and shows internal segment information that is used to manage and measure the
performance of CGG Veritas. We divide our business into two operating segments, geophysical
services and geophysical equipment.
Our geophysical services segment comprises:
|
|
|
Land contract: seismic data acquisition for land, transition zones and shallow water
undertaken by us on behalf of a specific client; |
|
|
|
|
Marine contract: seismic data acquisition offshore undertaken by us on behalf of a
specific client; |
|
|
|
|
Multi-client land and marine: seismic data acquisition undertaken by us and licensed to a
number of clients on a non-exclusive basis; and |
|
|
|
|
Processing & Imaging: processing and imaging and interpretation of geophysical data, data
management and reservoir studies for clients. |
Our equipment segment, which we conduct through Sercel Holding S.A. and its subsidiaries, is
our manufacturing and sales activities for seismic equipment used for data acquisition, both on
land and offshore.
Inter-company sales between the two segments are made at prices approximating market prices
and relate primarily to equipment sales made by the geophysical equipment segment to the
geophysical services segment. These inter-segment sales, the related operating income recognized by
the geophysical equipment segment, and the related effect on capital expenditures and depreciation
expense of the geophysical services segment are eliminated in consolidation and presented in the
column Eliminations and Adjustments in the tables that follow.
Operating income represents operating revenues and other operating income less expenses of the
relevant industry segment. It includes non-recurring and unusual items, which are disclosed in the
operating segment if material. General corporate expenses, which include Group management,
financing, and legal activities, have been included in the column Eliminations and Adjustments in
the tables that follow. The Group does not disclose financial expenses or revenues by operating
segment because these items are not followed by the segment management and because financing and
investment are mainly managed at the corporate level.
Identifiable assets are those used in the operations of each industry segment and geographic
zone. Unallocated and corporate assets consist primarily of financial assets, including cash and
cash equivalents.
Due to the constant changes in work locations, the Group does not track its assets based on
country of origin or ownership.
The following tables present revenues, operating income and identifiable assets by operating
segment, and operating revenues by geographic area (by location of customers).
- 14 -
COMPAGNIE GÉNÉRALE DE GÉOPHYSIQUE-VERITAS, S.A.
Analysis by operating segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 (unaudited) |
|
|
2008 (unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
Services |
|
|
Equipment |
|
|
Adjustments |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Services |
|
|
Equipment |
|
|
Adjustments |
|
|
Total |
|
Historical data |
|
(in millions of euros) |
|
|
(in millions of euros) |
|
Revenues from unaffiliated
customers |
|
|
524.3 |
|
|
|
124.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
648.5 |
|
|
|
433.3 |
|
|
|
151.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
585.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inter-segment revenues |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
29.6 |
|
|
|
(30.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37.0 |
|
|
|
(37.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating revenues |
|
|
524.7 |
|
|
|
153.8 |
|
|
|
(30.0 |
) |
|
|
648.5 |
|
|
|
433.3 |
|
|
|
188.7 |
|
|
|
(37.0 |
) |
|
|
585.0 |
|
Other income from ordinary
activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
Total income from ordinary
activities |
|
|
524.7 |
|
|
|
154.6 |
|
|
|
(30.0 |
) |
|
|
649.3 |
|
|
|
433.2 |
|
|
|
189.1 |
|
|
|
(37.0 |
) |
|
|
585.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
75.3 |
|
|
|
41.2 |
|
|
|
(16.2 |
) (a) |
|
|
100.3 |
|
|
|
89.1 |
|
|
|
60.1 |
|
|
|
(25.9 |
) (a) |
|
|
123.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in income (loss) of
investees |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures (b) |
|
|
142.8 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
|
(14.5 |
) |
|
|
133.4 |
|
|
|
162.8 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
(17.5 |
) |
|
|
148.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
(c) |
|
|
106.2 |
|
|
|
6.8 |
|
|
|
(5.1 |
) |
|
|
107.9 |
|
|
|
98.8 |
|
|
|
5.4 |
|
|
|
(3.5 |
) |
|
|
100.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments in companies under
equity method |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identifiable assets |
|
|
4,729.2 |
|
|
|
788.6 |
|
|
|
(327.7 |
) |
|
|
5,190.1 |
|
|
|
3,790.0 |
|
|
|
657.9 |
|
|
|
(296.6 |
) |
|
|
4,151.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unallocated and corporate assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
501.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
292.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,691.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,443.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes general corporate expenses of 8.8 million for the three months ended March 31,
2009 and 11.2 million for the comparable period in 2008. |
|
(b) |
|
Includes investments in multi-client surveys of 69.5 million for the three months ended
March 31, 2009 and 97.3 million for the three months
ended March 31, 2008, capitalized
development costs of 3.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009
and 1.3 million for the comparable period of 2008, and
capital leases for 22.8 million
for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and none for the three months ended March 3&, 2008
in the Services segment. Capitalized development costs in the Equipment segment were 0.6
million for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 0.5 million for the comparable
period of 2008. |
|
(c) |
|
Includes multi-client survey amortization of 40.4 million for the three months ended
March 31, 2009 and 52.9 million for the comparable period of 2008. |
- 15 -
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
|
|
2009 (1) |
|
|
2008 (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and |
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and |
|
Consolidated |
(in millions of US$) |
|
Services |
|
Equipment |
|
Adjustments (2) |
|
Total |
|
|
Services |
|
Equipment |
|
Adjustments |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from unaffiliated customers |
|
|
688.2 |
|
|
|
160.7 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
851.2 |
|
|
|
|
646.4 |
|
|
|
226.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
872.8 |
|
Inter-segment revenues |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
40.4 |
|
|
|
(40.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55.2 |
|
|
|
(55.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating revenues |
|
|
688.7 |
|
|
|
201.1 |
|
|
|
(38.6 |
) |
|
|
851.2 |
|
|
|
|
646.4 |
|
|
|
281.6 |
|
|
|
(55.2 |
) |
|
|
872.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income from ordinary activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income from ordinary activities |
|
|
688.7 |
|
|
|
202.1 |
|
|
|
(38.6 |
) |
|
|
852.2 |
|
|
|
|
646.3 |
|
|
|
282.2 |
|
|
|
(55.2 |
) |
|
|
873.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
98.9 |
|
|
|
54.3 |
|
|
|
(21.7 |
) |
|
|
131.5 |
|
|
|
|
132.9 |
|
|
|
89.7 |
|
|
|
(38.5 |
) |
|
|
184.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Dollar amounts represent euro amounts converted at the average exchange rate for the
period of US$1.313 per in 2009, and of US$1.492 per in 2008. |
|
(2) |
|
Dollar amounts for the Equipment segment reflect the management reporting figures. The
exchange difference between management reporting in US dollars and consolidated financial
statements translated into US dollars is reported into this column. |
Revenues by geographic area
The following table sets forth our consolidated operating revenues by location of customers,
and the percentage of total consolidated operating revenues represented thereby:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
Except percentages, in millions of |
|
|
|
US$ (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US$ (1) |
|
|
|
|
North America |
|
|
129.6 |
|
|
|
170.1 |
|
|
|
20 |
% |
|
|
185.1 |
|
|
|
276.1 |
|
|
|
32 |
% |
Central and South Americas |
|
|
36.1 |
|
|
|
47.4 |
|
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
34.8 |
|
|
|
51.9 |
|
|
|
6 |
% |
Europe, Africa and Middle East |
|
|
275.1 |
|
|
|
361.0 |
|
|
|
42 |
% |
|
|
213.8 |
|
|
|
319.1 |
|
|
|
36 |
% |
Asia Pacific |
|
|
207.7 |
|
|
|
272.7 |
|
|
|
32 |
% |
|
|
151.3 |
|
|
|
225.7 |
|
|
|
26 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
648.5 |
|
|
|
851.2 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
585.0 |
|
|
|
872.8 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Dollar amounts represent euro amounts converted at the average exchange rate for
the period of US$1.313 per in 2009, and of US$1.492 per in 2008. |
Note 5Litigation
On
October 20, 2006, a complaint was filed against CGGVeritas subsidiary, Sercel Inc., in the
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. The complaint alleges that several of
Sercel Inc.s seismic data acquisition products that include micro electromechanical systems
(MEMS) infringe a U.S. patent allegedly owned by the plaintiff. The plaintiff has requested a
permanent injunction prohibiting Sercel Inc. from making, using, selling, offering for sale or
importing the equipment in question into the United States. In addition, the plaintiff has requested
damages based on lost profits in the amount of U.S.$14,672,261 plus prejudgment interest of
U.S.$775,254. In the alternative, the plaintiff is requesting damages based on a reasonable royalty
in the amount of U.S.$6,185,924 plus prejudgment interest of U.S.$374,898. Sercel is confident
that the products in question do not infringe any valid claims under the patent in question and
intends to contest this claim vigorously. During 2008, the discovery process was completed and
the Court provided a claim construction opinion. The Court has found that three of the seven of the
patent claims are invalid for indefiniteness and one claim is not infringed. The parties attended
mediation on March 4, 2009, but the case was not settled, and is now set for trial in August 2009.
We do not believe this litigation will have a material adverse effect on our financial position or
results of operations. Accordingly, no provision has been recorded in our consolidated financial
statements, except for the fees related to preparing the defence.
Note 6Subsequent Events
On April 8, 2009, a judgment related to the suit against Arrow Seismic ASA following Arrow
Seismic ASAs withdrawal from negotiations for the construction of a 3D seismic vessel was rendered
in favor of Arrow Seismic ASA. CGGVeritas has decided not to appeal.
On April 22, 2009, CGGVeritas Services exercised the purchase option on the seismic vessels
Fohn and Harmattan, pursuant to the time charter agreements for US$0.75 million (0.6 million)
each.
- 16 -
COMPAGNIE GÉNÉRALE DE GÉOPHYSIQUE-VERITAS, S.A.
|
|
|
Item 2: |
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
Group organization
We report financial information by operating segment in accordance with our internal reporting
system and the internal segment information that is used to manage and measure our performance. We
divide our business into two operating segments, geophysical services and geophysical equipment.
Our geophysical services segment comprises:
|
- |
|
Land contract: seismic data acquisition for land, transition zones and shallow water
undertaken by us on behalf of a specific client; |
|
- |
|
Marine contract: seismic data acquisition offshore undertaken by us on behalf of a
specific client; |
|
- |
|
Multi-client land and marine: seismic data acquisition undertaken by us and licensed
to a number of clients on a non-exclusive basis; and |
|
- |
|
Processing and Imaging: processing and imaging as well as interpretation of
geophysical data, data management and reservoir studies for clients. |
Our geophysical equipment segment, which we conduct through Sercel Holding S.A. and its
subsidiaries, comprises our manufacturing and sales activities for seismic equipment used for data
acquisition, both on land and offshore.
Factors Affecting Results of Operations
Geophysical market environment
Overall demand for geophysical services and equipment is dependent on spending by oil and gas
companies for exploration development and production and field management activities. We believe
the level of spending of such companies depends on their assessment of their ability to efficiently
supply the oil and gas market in the future and the current balance of hydrocarbon supply and
demand.
The geophysical market has historically been cyclical, with notably a trough in 1999 following
a sharp drop in the price of oil to U.S.$10 per barrel. We believe many factors contribute to the
volatility of this market, such as the geopolitical uncertainties that can harm the confidence and
visibility that are essential to our clients long-term decision-making processes and the expected
balance in the mid to long term between supply and demand for hydrocarbons.
See Item 4: Information on the Company Industry conditions of our annual report on Form
20-F for the year ended December 31, 2008 for a discussion of developments in the geophysical
industry.
Foreign exchange fluctuations
As a company that derives a substantial amount of its revenue from sales internationally, our
results of operations are affected by fluctuations in currency exchange rates.
In order to present trends in our business that may be obscured by currency fluctuations, we
have translated certain euro amounts in this Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Conditions and Results of Operations into U.S. dollars. See Trend InformationCurrency
Fluctuations.
Unless otherwise indicated, balance sheet data expressed in U.S. dollars have been converted
from euros at the exchange rate on the relevant balance sheet date, and income statement data in
U.S. dollars have been converted from euros at the average exchange rate for the relevant year.
The exchange rates as of December 31, 2008 and March 31, 2009 were U.S.$1.3917 and
U.S.$1.331, respectively, per euro, and the average exchange rates for the three-month periods
ended March 31, 2008 and 2009 were U.S.$1.492 and U.S.$1.313,
respectively, per euro.
- 17 -
Acquisitions and divestitures
Wavefield-Inseis
On November 25, 2008, we launched a voluntary exchange offer to acquire 100% of the share
capital of Wavefield-Inseis ASA (Wavefield). We offered Wavefield shareholders one newly issued
CGGVeritas share for every seven Wavefield shares. A total of 90,480,237 shares were tendered in
the offer, representing 69.9% of the share capital of Wavefield. In consideration of the Wavefield
shares tendered to the offer, we issued 12,925,743 new shares on December 18, 2008. The fair value
of those issued shares amounted to 139.0 million.
On December 30, 2008, we launched a mandatory public offer for the remaining 38,903,024
outstanding shares (i.e, 30.1% of the share capital) as well as for the 2,892,875 shares that could
result from the exercise of stock options. The offer price calculated in accordance with the
provisions of Chapter VI of the Norwegian Securities Trading Act amounted to NOK 15.17 per share to
be paid in cash. At the end of this mandatory offer period, which expired on January 27, 2009, we
acquired 37,043,013 additional shares for a total of 98.6% of Wavefields share capital. We then
launched a squeeze-out process for the remaining outstanding shares of Wavefield at a price of NOK
15.17 per share to be paid in cash. As of February 13, 2009, we owned 100% of Wavefields share
capital. Wavefield was de-listed from the Oslo Bors on
February 16, 2009.
The total consideration for the acquisition in our financial statements, including the
remaining 30.1% acquired in February 2009, was 206.6 million (US$287.6 million). Total direct
transaction costs related to the acquisition (including advisory fees and legal fees) amounted to
5.5 million and were recognized as part of the cost of the acquisition.
Cybernetix
On January 8, 2009, Cybernetix conducted a 4 million share capital increase that was entirely
subscribed by Sercel Holding, bringing its stake to a total of 749,480 shares, representing 46.10%
of Cybernetixs share capital and 43.07% of its voting rights. The French financial markets regulator (Autorité des
Marchés Financiers) exempted Sercel Holding from the
requirement to conduct a tender offer for all shares when its holding
exceeded 33.33%. The
consideration for the share capital increase was 2 million in cash and the incorporation of a 2
million cash advance granted by Sercel Holding to Cybernetix in November 2008. Cybernetix is consolidated under
the equity method in our financial statements.
Seismic vessels
On April 22, 2009, CGGVeritas Services exercised the purchase option on the seismic vessels
Fohn and Harmattan pursuant to their time charter agreements for US$0.75 million (0.6 million) each.
New stock-option plans and performance shares allocation plan
On March 16, 2009, our Board of Directors allocated 1,327,000 stock options to 149
beneficiaries pursuant to a shareholders resolution, including stock options to purchase a total
of 260,000 ordinary shares that were allocated to executive officers who were members of the
Executive Committee (excluding the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Operating
Officer). The exercise price of the stock options is 8.82. The stock options expire on March 15,
2017.
On March 16, 2009, our Board of Directors allocated 516,250 performance shares to 291
beneficiaries pursuant to a shareholders resolution, including 46,250 performance shares that were
allocated to executive officers who were members of the Executive Committee (excluding the Chairman
and Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Operating Officer).
On March 16, 2009, our Board of Directors allocated 200,000 stock options to the Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer and 125,000 stock options to the Chief Operating Officer. Their exercise
price is 8.82. Rights to these options vest by one-third during each of the first three years of
the plan. Such vesting is subject to performance conditions based on the fulfillment of one of the
following objectives:
|
|
|
a share price performance objective relative to the share price considering the SBF 120
index; |
|
|
|
|
a share price performance objective relative to the ADS price considering the PHLX Oil
Services Sector SM (OSX SM) index; or |
|
|
|
|
a financial indicator of EBIT objective expressed in US$ and related to the target for
the annual variable part of the compensation of the executive officers. |
The options have an eight-year duration subject to the requirement, for all French residents,
to hold the resulting shares in registered form from their purchase date until March 16, 2013,
inclusive, except in limited cases listed in the plan regulations.
- 18 -
Backlog
Our backlog at May 1, 2008 was U.S.$1.4 billion.
Contracts for services are occasionally modified by mutual consent and in certain instances are
cancelable by the customer on short notice without penalty. Consequently, backlog as of any
particular date may not be indicative of actual operating results for any succeeding period.
Three months ended March 31, 2009 compared to three months ended March 31, 2008
Operating revenues
The following table sets forth our consolidated operating revenues by business line, and the
percentage of total consolidated operating revenues represented thereby, during each of the
periods stated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Except percentages, in millions of |
|
|
|
U.S.$(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S.$(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land |
|
|
109.9 |
|
|
|
144.2 |
|
|
|
17 |
% |
|
|
129.8 |
|
|
|
193.6 |
|
|
|
22 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Marine |
|
|
337.4 |
|
|
|
442.9 |
|
|
|
52 |
% |
|
|
238.2 |
|
|
|
355.0 |
|
|
|
41 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Processing & Imaging |
|
|
77.1 |
|
|
|
101.2 |
|
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
65.3 |
|
|
|
97.8 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Services |
|
|
524.3 |
|
|
|
688.3 |
|
|
|
81 |
% |
|
|
433.3 |
|
|
|
646.4 |
|
|
|
74 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Equipment |
|
|
124.1 |
|
|
|
162.9 |
|
|
|
19 |
% |
|
|
151.7 |
|
|
|
226.4 |
|
|
|
26 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
648.5 |
|
|
|
851.2 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
585.0 |
|
|
|
872.8 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Dollar amounts represent euro amounts converted at the average exchange rate
for the period of U.S.$1.313 per in 2009, and of U.S.$1.492 per in 2008. |
Our consolidated operating revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2009 increased 11% to
648.5 million from 585.0 million for the comparable period of 2008. Expressed in U.S dollars, our
consolidated operating revenues decreased 2% to U.S.$851.2 million in the three months ended March
31, 2009 from U.S.$872.8 million for the comparable period of 2008. Operating revenues for our
Equipment segment decreased as expected and multi-client after sales were particularly low.
Contract marine performed well with high utilization rates and the addition of Wavefield vessels to
our fleet.
Services
Operating revenues for our Services segment (excluding intra-group sales) increased 21% to
524.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009 from 433.3 million for the comparable
period of 2008 (and increased 7% in U.S. dollar terms) mainly due to a change of scope of
consolidation with the acquisition of Wavefield in December 2008.
Marine
Operating revenues from our Marine business line for the three months ended March 31, 2009
increased 42% to 337.4 million from 238.2 million for the comparable period of 2008 (and
increased 25% in U.S. dollar terms).
Contract revenues increased 78% to 284.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009 from
159.2 million for the comparable period of 2008 (and increased 58% in U.S. dollar terms)
principally due to the addition of the Wavefield vessels to the fleet
in December 2008 and the shift toward contract activity. During the
three months ended March 31, 2009, 82% of our high-end 3D fleet
operated on contract compared to 66% for the three months ended March
31, 2008.
The fleet availability and production rate was 93% and 89%,
respectively, for the three months ended March 31, 2009. Contract revenues accounted
for 84% of marine revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2009 compared to 67% for the
comparable period of 2008.
Multi-client marine data library revenues decreased 32% to 53.4 million for the three months
ended March 31, 2009 from 79.1 million for the comparable period of 2008 (and decreased 41% in
U.S. dollar terms) principally due to reduced demand and a sharp
decrease in after-sales in particular. A vessel was active in the Gulf of Mexico completing the wide-azimuth Garden
Banks survey, and another one was active in Brazil, where we initiated an extension program of
our Santos cluster survey around the Tupi discovery. Prefunding, with a rate of 74%, decreased
20% to 42.1 for the three months ended March 31, 2009 from 52.5 million for the comparable
period of 2008 (and decreased 29% in U.S. dollar terms). After-sales decreased 58% to 11.3
million for the three months ended March 31, 2009 from 26.6 million for the comparable period of
2008 (and decreased 63% in U.S. dollar terms) with low activity
worldwide due to a drop in exploration expenditures in the oil and
gas industry as a result of economic conditions.
Land
Operating revenues from our Land business line decreased 15% to 109.9 million for the three
months ended March 31, 2009, from
- 19 -
129.8 million for the comparable period of 2008 (and decreased 26% in U.S. dollar terms).
Contract revenues decreased 3% to 100.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009 from
103.4 million for the comparable period of 2008 (and decreased 14% in U.S. dollar terms). We
operated 17 crews worldwide during the three months ended March 31, 2009 compared to 25 for the
comparable period of 2008 as a result of reduced demand in North
America. Contract revenues accounted for 92% of land revenues for the three
months ended March 31, 2009 compared to 80% for the comparable period of 2008.
Prefunding, with a rate of 27%, decreased 63% to 3.5 million for the three months ended March
31, 2009 from 9.4 million for the comparable period of 2008 (and decreased 68% in U.S. dollar
terms). After sales decreased 66% to 5.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009 from
17.0 million for the comparable period of 2008 (and decreased 70% in U.S. dollar terms) with low
activity in North America as a result of reductions in spending by
oil and gas companies due to low gas prices.
Processing &Imaging
Operating revenues from our Processing & Imaging business line increased 18% to 77.1 million for
the three months ended March 31, 2009 from 65.3 million for the comparable period of 2008 (and
increased 4% in US$ terms) as demand for our high-end depth imaging technologies remained high.
Equipment
Operating revenues for our Equipment segment decreased 18% to 153.8 million for the three months
ended March 31, 2009 from 188.7 million for the comparable period of 2008. In U.S. dollar terms,
revenues decreased 28% to U.S.$201.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009 from
U.S.$281.6 million for the comparable period of 2008. While sales of land equipment remained stable
in a more difficult environment due to the increased market penetration of our flagship 428 XL
recording system, demand for marine products fell sharply as shipyard deliveries of new seismic
vessels fell to very low levels from their record numbers last year as a result of overcapacity in
the marine market.
Operating revenues for our Equipment segment (excluding intra-group sales) decreased 18% to 124.2
million for the three months ended March 31, 2009 from 151.7 million for the comparable period in
2008 and decreased 29% in U.S. dollar terms).
Operating Expenses
Cost of operations, including depreciation and amortization, increased 18% to 454.0 million
for the three months ended March 31, 2009 from 384.9 million for the comparable period of 2008. As
a percentage of operating revenues, cost of operations increased to 70% for the three months ended
March 31, 2009 from 66% for the comparable period of 2008 mainly
due to the lower activity of our Equipment segment. Gross profit decreased 2% to 195.3
million for the three months ended March 31, 2009 from 200.4 million for the comparable period of
2008, representing 30% and 34% of operating revenues, respectively.
Research and development expenditures decreased 2% to 16.1 million for the three months ended
March 31, 2009, from 16.4 million for the comparable period of 2008, representing 2.5% and 2.8% of
operating revenues, respectively.
Selling, general and administrative expenses, excluding share-based compensation, increased
5% to 59.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009 from 57.0 million for the
comparable period of 2008 mainly due to a higher average
U.S.$/
exchange rate. In addition, share-based
compensation expense increased to 6.9 for the three months ended March 31, 2009 from 5.8 for
the comparable period of 2008.
As a percentage of operating revenues, selling, general and administrative costs decreased to 10%
for the three months ended March 31, 2009 from 11% for the comparable period of 2008.
Other expenses amounted to 12.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009 mainly
due to the negative impact of foreign exchange hedging activities. Other revenues for the three
months ended March 31, 2008 amounted to 2.2 million and included primarily gains on foreign
exchange hedging activities.
Operating Income (Loss)
Our operating income decreased 19% to 100.3 million for the three months ended March 31,
2009, from 123.3 million for the comparable period of 2008 (and decreased 29% in U.S. dollar
terms) as a result of the factors described above.
Operating income for our Services segment decreased 15% to 75.3 million for the three months
ended March 31, 2009 from 89.1 million for the comparable period of 2008 (and decreased 26% in
U.S. dollar terms).
Operating income from our Equipment segment decreased 30% to 41.2 million for three months
ended March 31, 2009 from 60.1 million for the comparable period of 2008 (and decreased 39% in
U.S. dollar terms).
- 20 -
Financial Income and Expenses
Cost of net financial debt increased 14% to 26.1 million for the three months ended March 31,
2009 from 22.9 million for the comparable period of 2008 (and was stable in U.S.dollar terms).
This increase was mainly due to the negative impact of a higher average U.S.$/ exchange rate on
our cost of financial debt.
Other financial income was 2.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009 compared to
a loss of
1.2 million
for the three months ended March 31, 2008 due to currency
fluctuations.
Income Taxes
Income tax expenses decreased to 22.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009 from
38.1 million for the comparable period of 2008. The effective tax rate in the first quarter of
2009 was 30% compared to 38% for the comparable period of 2008.
Equity in Income (Losses) of Affiliates
Income from investments accounted for under the equity method decreased to 0.4 million for
the three months ended March 31, 2009 from 2.9 million for the comparable period of 2008 and
corresponded essentially to our share in the income of Argas, our joint venture in Saudi Arabia.
Net Income
Net income was 54.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009 compared to a net
income of 64.0 million for the comparable period of 2008 as a result of the factors discussed
above.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our principal capital needs are for the funding of ongoing operations, capital expenditures
(particularly repairs and improvements to our seismic vessels), investments in our multi-client
data library and acquisitions (such as Veritas in 2007 and most recently Wavefield).
We intend to fund our liquidity needs through cash generated by operations, senior notes and
borrowings under our U.S. and French facilities. Our senior facilities consist of a term loan B
facility (U.S.$803 million outstanding as of March 31, 2009) with a seven year maturity and a U.S.
revolving facility (U.S.$135 million outstanding as of March 31, 2009) with a five year maturity.
The French revolving facility consists of a U.S.$153 million senior secured revolving facility with
a five year maturity.
We believe that we are not subject to near-term liquidity constraints, given our liquidity
available as of March 31, 2009, our cash flow generation capability and prospects, and our near-to
mid-term debt repayment schedule.
Cash Flows
Operations
Net cash provided by operating activities was 93.4 million for the three months ended March
31, 2009 compared to 177.2 million for the comparable period of 2008. Before changes in working
capital, net cash provided by operating activities for the three months ended March 31, 2009 was
183.1 million compared to 218.6 million for the comparable period for 2008. Changes in working
capital had a negative impact on cash from operating activities of 89.7 million in the three
months ended March 31, 2009 compared to a negative impact of
41.4 million
for the comparable period for 2008 notably due to the additional
working capital requirements linked to the change in the scope of
consolidation.
Investing activities
Net cash used in investing activities was 169.5 million in the three months ended March 31,
2009 compared to 142.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008.
In the three months ended March 31, 2009, we incurred purchases of tangible and intangible
assets of 40.6 million mainly for the Geowave Voyager seismic vessel delivered in January 2009
and streamers on it and other vessels, compared to 41.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008.
We also
invested 69.5 million in our multi-client library, mainly in the Gulf of Mexico and Brazil,
compared to 97.3 million in the comparable period of 2008. As of March 31, 2009, the net book
value of our multi-client data library was 584.8 million compared
- 21 -
to 535.6 million as of December 31, 2008.
During
the three months ended March 31, 2009, we acquired the remaining 30% of
Wavefield for 59.5 million as part of the mandatory offer launched in December 30, 2008 and
the squeeze-out process closed on February 16, 2009.
Financing activities
Net cash used in financing activities during the three months ended March 31, 2009 was
41.8 million compared to 38.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008.
As part of the amendment of our senior credit facilities signed on December 12, 2008, we repaid
U.S.$25.0 million of our senior facilities during the three months ended March 31, 2009.
Net debt
Net debt as of March 31, 2009 was 1,140.1 million compared to 1,029.1 million at
December 31, 2008. The ratio of net debt to equity increased to 36.4% as of March 31, 2009 from
34.8% as of December 31, 2008.
Net debt is the amount of bank overdrafts, plus current portion of financial debt, plus
financial debt, less cash and cash equivalents. Net debt is presented as additional information
because we understand that certain investors believe that netting cash against debt provides a
clearer picture of the financial liability exposure. However, other companies may present net
debt differently than we do. Net debt is not a measure of financial performance under IFRS and
should not be considered as an alternative to any other measures of performance derived in
accordance with IFRS.
The following table presents a reconciliation of net debt to financing items of the balance
sheet at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
(in millions of euros) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
|
|
Bank overdrafts |
|
|
9.8 |
|
|
|
8.2 |
|
Current portion of long-term debt |
|
|
183.1 |
|
|
|
241.5 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
1,365.3 |
|
|
|
1,296.3 |
|
Less : cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(418.1 |
) |
|
|
(516.9 |
) |
|
|
|
Net debt |
|
|
1,140.1 |
|
|
|
1,029.1 |
|
|
|
|
For a more detailed description of our financing activities, see Liquidity and Capital
Resources in our annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2008.
EBITDAS
EBITDAS for the three months ended March 31, 2009 was 215.2 million compared to 229.8
million for the comparable period of 2008, representing 33% and 39% of operating revenues,
respectively.
We define EBITDAS as earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, amortization and share-based
compensation cost. Share-based compensation includes both stock options and shares issued under our
performance share allocation plans. EBITDAS is presented as additional information because we
understand that it is a measure used by certain investors to determine our operating cash flow and
historical ability to meet debt service and capital expenditure requirements. However, other
companies may present EBITDAS and related measures differently than we do. EBITDAS is not a measure
of financial performance under IFRS and should not be considered as an alternative to cash flow
from operating activities or as a measure of liquidity or an alternative to net income as
indicators of our operating performance or any other measures of performance derived in accordance
with IFRS.
The following table presents a reconciliation of EBITDAS to Net cash provided by operating
activity, according to our cash-flow statement, for the periods indicated:
- 22 -
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
March 31, |
(in millions of euros) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
|
|
EBITDAS |
|
|
215.2 |
|
|
|
229.8 |
|
Other financial income (loss) |
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
Variance on Provisions |
|
|
(3.7 |
) |
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
Net gain on disposal of fixed assets |
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
Dividends received from affiliates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
Other non-cash items |
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
Income taxes paid |
|
|
(36.0 |
) |
|
|
(13.4 |
) |
Change in trade accounts receivables |
|
|
(6.6 |
) |
|
|
(27.1 |
) |
Change in inventories |
|
|
13.3 |
|
|
|
(5.1 |
) |
Change in other current assets |
|
|
(13.9 |
) |
|
|
2.2 |
|
Change in trade accounts payables |
|
|
(41.9 |
) |
|
|
3.9 |
|
Change on other current liabilities |
|
|
(29.9 |
) |
|
|
(5.7 |
) |
Impact of changes in exchange rate |
|
|
(10.7 |
) |
|
|
(9.6 |
) |
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activity |
|
|
93.4 |
|
|
|
177.2 |
|
|
|
|
Contractual obligations
The following table sets forth our future cash obligations as of March 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More than 5 |
|
|
(in millions of euros) |
|
Less than 1 year |
|
2-3 years |
|
4-5 years |
|
years |
|
Total |
Financial Debt |
|
|
123.3 |
|
|
|
45.8 |
|
|
|
23.7 |
|
|
|
1,183.6 |
|
|
|
1,376.4 |
|
Capital Lease Obligations (not discounted) |
|
|
36.1 |
|
|
|
85.5 |
|
|
|
30.5 |
|
|
|
7.9 |
|
|
|
160.0 |
|
Operating Leases |
|
|
159.5 |
|
|
|
221.6 |
|
|
|
171.7 |
|
|
|
212.9 |
|
|
|
765.7 |
|
Other Long-Term Obligations (bond interest) |
|
|
53.2 |
|
|
|
106.3 |
|
|
|
106.3 |
|
|
|
126.3 |
|
|
|
392.1 |
|
|
|
|
Total Contractual Cash Obligations |
|
|
372.1 |
|
|
|
459.2 |
|
|
|
332.2 |
|
|
|
1,530.7 |
|
|
|
2,694.3 |
|
|
|
|
Reconciliation of EBITDAS to U.S. GAAP
Summary of differences between IFRS and u.s. gaap with respect to EBITDAS
The principal differences between IFRS and U.S. GAAP as they relate to our EBITDAS relate to the
treatment of pension plans, development costs and derivative instruments and hedging activities.
Pension plan
Pursuant to an exemption provided by IFRS 1 First-time adoption of IFRS, we have elected to
record unrecognized actuarial gains and losses as of January 1, 2004 to retained earnings. Under
U.S. GAAP, this exemption is not applicable, which generates a difference resulting from the
amortization of actuarial gains and losses recognized in statement of income.
Under IFRS, in accordance with IAS 19 Revised, actuarial gains or losses are recognized in the
statement of recognized income and expense (SORIE) attributable to shareholders.
Under U.S. GAAP, we apply Statement 158 Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and
Other Postretirement Plan, an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and 132(R), effective
for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2006.
Gains or losses are amortized over the remaining service period of employees expected to receive
benefits under the plan, and therefore recognized in the income statement.
Development costs
Under IFRS, expenditure on development activities, whereby research findings are applied to a plan
or design for the production of new or substantially improved products and processes, is
capitalized if:
- 23 -
|
|
|
the project is clearly defined, and costs are separately identified and reliably
measured, |
|
|
|
|
the product or process is technically and commercially feasible, |
|
|
|
|
the Group has sufficient resources to complete development, and |
|
|
|
|
the intangible asset is likely to generate future economic benefits. |
Under U.S. GAAP, all expenditures related to research and development are recognized as an expense
in the income statement.
Derivative instruments and hedging activity
Under IFRS, long-term contracts in foreign currencies (primarily U.S. dollar) are not considered to
include embedded derivatives when such contracts are routinely denominated in this currency
(primarily U.S. dollar) in the industry.
Under U.S. GAAP, such an exemption does not exist and embedded derivatives in long-term contracts
in foreign currencies (primarily U.S. dollar) are recorded in the balance sheet at fair value and
revenues and expenses with a non-U.S. client or supplier are recognized at the forward exchange
rate negotiated at the beginning of the contract. The variation of fair market value of the
embedded derivative foreign exchange contracts is recognized in the income statement in the line
item Other financial income (loss).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
in millions of euros |
|
(unaudited) |
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
EBITDAS as reported |
|
|
215.2 |
|
|
|
229.8 |
|
Actuarial gains (losses) on pension plan |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
Cancellation of IFRS capitalization of development costs |
|
|
(3.8 |
) |
|
|
(1.8 |
) |
Derivative instruments |
|
|
(1.5 |
) |
|
|
16.6 |
|
|
|
|
EBITDAS according to U.S. GAAP |
|
|
209.8 |
|
|
|
244.4 |
|
|
|
|
Trend information
Currency fluctuations
Certain changes in operating revenues set forth in U.S. dollars in this current report on
Form 6-K were derived by converting revenues recorded in euros at the average rate for the relevant
period. Such information is presented in light of the fact that most of our revenues are
denominated in U.S. dollars while our consolidated financial statements are presented in euros.
Converted figures are presented only to assist in an understanding of our operating revenues but
are not part of our reported financial statements and may not be indicative of changes in our
actual or anticipated operating revenues.
Our business faces foreign exchange risks because a large percentage of our revenues and cash
receipts are denominated in U.S. dollars, while a significant portion of our operating expenses and
income taxes accrue in euro and other currencies. Movements between the U.S dollar and euro or
other currencies may adversely affect our operating revenues and results. In the years ended
December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, more than 80% of our operating revenues and approximately
two-thirds of our operating expenses were denominated in currencies other than euros. These
included U.S. dollars and, to a significantly lesser extent, Canadian dollars, Brazilian reals,
Australian dollars, British pounds and Norwegian kroner. In addition, a significant portion of our
revenues that were invoiced in euros related to contracts that were effectively priced in U.S.
dollars, as the U.S. dollar often serves as the reference currency when bidding for contracts to
provide geophysical services to the oil and gas industry.
Fluctuations in the exchange rate of the euro against such other currencies, particularly the
U.S. dollar, have had in the past and can be expected in future periods to have a significant
effect upon our results of operations. For financial reporting purposes, such depreciation of the
U.S. dollar against the euro negatively affects our reported results of operations since U.S.
dollar-denominated earnings that are converted to euros are stated at a reduced value. Since we
participate in competitive bids for data acquisition contracts that are denominated in U.S.
dollars, such depreciation reduces our competitive position against that of other companies whose
costs and expenses are denominated in U.S. dollars. An appreciation of the U.S. dollar against the
euro has the opposite effect. As a result, our sales and operating income are exposed to the
effects of fluctuations in the value of the euro versus the U.S. dollar. In addition, our exposure
to fluctuations in the U.S.$/euro exchange rate has considerably increased over the last few years
due to increased sales outside Europe. Based on our operations in 2008, and given the portfolio of
currencies during that year, a 10-cent variance of the U.S. dollar against the euro would have
affected our dollar equivalent-value operating income by approximately
- 24 -
U.S.$50 million.
We attempt to match foreign currency revenues and expenses in order to balance our net
position of receivables and payables denominated in foreign currencies. For example, charter costs
for our vessels, as well as our most important computer hardware leases, are denominated in U.S.
dollars. Nevertheless, during the past five years such dollar-denominated expenses have not equaled
dollar-denominated revenues principally due to personnel costs payable in euros.
In addition, to be protected against the reduction in value of future foreign currency cash flows,
we follow a policy of selling U.S. dollars forward at average contract maturity dates that we
attempt to match with future net U.S. dollar cash flows (revenues less costs in U.S. dollars)
expected from firm contract commitments, generally over the ensuing six months. Our average
forward U.S.$/ exchange rate was 1.397 for the three months ended March 31, 2009 compared to
1.465 for the three months ended March 31, 2008.
We do not enter into forward foreign currency exchange contracts for trading purposes.
Main risk factors that may affect us for the three months ending March 31, 2009
The main risk factors to which the Group is subject are detailed in Item 3 of the annual report
on Form 20-F filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on April 22, 2009 and
Chapter IV of the Document de Référence filed with the Autorité des Marchés Financiers (AMF) on
April 22, 2009.
The annual report on Form-20-F and the Document de Référence are available on the website of the
Company or on the website maintained by the SEC at www.sec.gov and the AMF at www.amf-france.org respectively.
Item 3: CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting during the period
covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
our internal control over financial reporting.
- 25 -
THIS FORM 6-K REPORT IS HEREBY INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE INTO THE PROSPECTUS CONTAINED IN CGG
VERITAS REGISTRATION STATEMENT ON FORM S-8 (REGISTRATION STATEMENT NO. 333-150384 AND
NO.333-158684) AND SHALL BE A PART THEREOF FROM THE DATE ON WHICH THIS REPORT IS FURNISHED, TO THE
EXTENT NOT SUPERSEDED BY DOCUMENTS OR REPORTS SUBSEQUENTLY FILED OR FURNISHED.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, CGG has duly caused this
report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Stéphane-Paul Frydman
Compagnie Générale de Géophysique Veritas
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Registrant) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Stéphane-Paul Frydman
Stéphane-Paul Frydman
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Group Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: May 14, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
- 26 -