SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934

Filed by the Registrant [X]
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant [  ]

Check the appropriate box:
[  ] Preliminary Proxy Statement                                                                                                          [  ] Confidential, for use of the
[X] Definitive Proxy Statement                                                                                             Commission only
[  ] Definitive Additional Materials
[  ] Soliciting Material pursuant to Rule 14a-11c or Rule 14a-12


MATTHEWS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION
 (Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

_________________________________________________________
 (Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)


Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
[X] No fee required.

[  ] Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(I)(4) and 0-11.
    1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: __________________

    2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: _________________

    3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed
       pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11: _____________________________________

    4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: ________________________

    5) Total fee paid: ______________________________________________________

[  ] Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

[  ] Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act
     Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee
     was previously paid.  Identify the previous filing by registration
     statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
     1) Amount Previously Paid: _____________________________________________

     2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: ____________________________

     3) Filing Party: ________________________________________________________

     4) Date Filed: ________________________________________________________

















2016

NOTICE

OF

ANNUAL

MEETING

AND

PROXY

STATEMENT






Notice of
ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
To be held February 18, 2016



To Our Shareholders:

The Annual Meeting of the Shareholders of Matthews International Corporation ("Matthews" or the "Company") will be held at 9:00 AM on Thursday, February 18, 2016 at the Loews Hotel, located at 601 First Avenue North, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55403, for the purpose of considering and acting upon the following:

1.
To elect one director of the Company for a term of one year and four directors of the Company for a term of three years.

2.
To approve the adoption of the 2015 Incentive Compensation Plan.

3.
To ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm to audit the records of the Company for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2016.

4. To provide an advisory (non-binding) vote on the executive compensation of the Company's named executive officers.

5. To transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting.

Shareholders of record as of December 31, 2015 will be entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting or any adjournments thereof.

Please indicate on the enclosed proxy card whether you will or will not be able to attend this meeting. Return the card in the enclosed envelope as soon as possible.  If you receive more than one proxy card (for example, because you own common stock in more than one account), please be sure to complete and return all of them.

We hope you can be with us for this important occasion.

                                                                                                                              Sincerely,
 
                              
                              /s/ Steven F. Nicola
                              
                              
                              
                                                                                                                              Steven F. Nicola
                                                                                                                              Corporate Secretary

January 19, 2016

Matthews International Corporation
Proxy Statement

Table of Contents

Page
Proxy Statement
   
1
 
Outstanding Stock and Voting Rights
   
2
 
General Information Regarding Corporate Governance
   
3
 
Board of Directors
   
3
 
Board Composition….
   
3
 
Board Committees
   
4
 
Executive Committee
   
4
 
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
   
4
 
Audit Committee
   
5
 
Finance Committee
   
5
 
Compensation Committee
   
5
 
Special Board Committee
   
6
 
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
   
6
 
Meeting Attendance
   
6
 
Compensation of Directors
   
6
 
Non-Employee Director Compensation Table
   
7
 
Access to Directors
   
7
 
Proposal 1 – Election of Directors
   
8
 
Nominees
   
9
 
Continuing Directors
   
11
 
Proposal 2 – Adoption of the 2015 Incentive Compensation Plan
   
14
 
Proposal 3 – Selection of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
   
21
 
Proposal 4 – Advisory (non-binding) vote on the executive compensation of
       
the Company's named executive officers
   
22
 
Stock Ownership
   
23
 
Stock Ownership Guidelines
   
24
 
Executive Compensation and Retirement Benefits
   
26
 
Compensation Committee Report
   
26
 
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
   
26
 
Annual Compensation of the Named Executive Officers
   
42
 
Summary Compensation Table
   
42
 
Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table
   
43
 
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End Table
   
44
 
Option Exercises and Stock Vested Table
   
45
 
Retirement Benefits
   
45
 
Pension Benefits Table
   
46
 
Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control
   
46
 
Audit Committee Matters
   
49
 
Report of the Audit Committee
   
49
 
Relationship with Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
   
50
 
Certain Transactions with Related Persons
   
51
 
Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act
   
52
 
Shareholder Proposals for the 2017 Annual Meeting
   
52
 
Other Matters
   
53
 
Exhibit A
   
54
 
Exhibit B
   
66
 


Matthews International Corporation
Two NorthShore Center
Pittsburgh, PA 15212 - 5851
412 / 442‑8200



Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Shareholder Meeting to Be Held on February 18, 2016

The Company's 2016 Proxy Statement and the Annual Report to Shareholders for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2015 are available free of charge on the Company's website at http://www.matw.com/investor/financial-reports.



PROXY STATEMENT

The accompanying proxy is solicited by the Board of Directors of Matthews International Corporation ("Matthews" or the "Company") whose principal executive offices are located at Two NorthShore Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15212.  This Proxy Statement is being sent and made available to shareholders on or about January 19, 2016.

Execution of the proxy will not affect a shareholder's right to attend the meeting and vote in person.  Any shareholder giving a proxy has the right to revoke it at any time before it is voted by giving notice to the Corporate Secretary or by attending the meeting and voting in person.

Matters to be considered at the Annual Meeting are those set forth in the accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the "Notice").  Shares represented by proxy will be voted in accordance with instructions.  In the absence of instructions to the contrary, the proxy solicited will be voted FOR the proposals set forth therein.

Management does not intend to bring before the meeting any business other than that set forth in the Notice.  If any other business should properly come before the meeting, it is the intention of management that the persons named in the proxy will vote in accordance with their best judgment.



1

OUTSTANDING STOCK AND VOTING RIGHTS

The Company has one class of stock outstanding:  Class A Common Stock, par value $1.00 per share, referred to as the "Common Stock."

Each outstanding share of Common Stock of the Company entitles the holder to one vote upon any business properly presented at the shareholders' meeting.  As provided in the Company's Articles of Incorporation, cumulative voting is not applicable to the election of directors.

The Board of Directors of the Company has established December 31, 2015 as the record date for shareholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. The transfer books of the Company will not be closed, but only shareholders of record as of December 31, 2015 will be entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. A total of 33,015,340 shares of Common Stock are outstanding and entitled to vote at the meeting.  A quorum (the presence in person or by proxy of the majority of the voting power of the Common Stock) is required to transact business at the Annual Meeting.  The holders of 16,507,670 shares will constitute a quorum at the Annual Meeting.

Broker Authority to Vote

Abstentions and broker non-votes (explained herein) will be counted for purposes of determining a quorum.  If your shares are held in street name, follow the voting instructions that you receive from your broker, bank or other nominee. If you want to vote in person, you must obtain a legal proxy from your broker, bank, or other nominee and bring it to the Annual Meeting.  If you do not submit voting instructions, your broker, bank, or other nominee may still be permitted to vote your shares under the following circumstances:

·
Discretionary items – The ratification of the selection of the independent registered public accounting firm is a discretionary item. Generally, brokers, banks and other nominees that do not receive instructions from beneficial owners may vote on this proposal in their discretion.

·
Non-discretionary items – The election of directors, approval of the adoption of the 2015 Incentive Compensation Plan, and the advisory resolution to approve executive compensation are non-discretionary items and may not be voted on by brokers, banks or other nominees who have not received voting instructions from beneficial owners (referred to as "broker non-votes").


2

GENERAL INFORMATION REGARDING CORPORATE GOVERNANCE


Board of Directors

The Board of Directors (sometimes referred to throughout this Proxy Statement as the "Board") is the ultimate governing body of the Company. As such, it functions within a framework of duties and requirements established by Pennsylvania statute, government regulations, court decisions and the Company's organizational documents. Generally, the Board of Directors reviews and confirms the basic objectives and broad policies of the Company, approves various important transactions, appoints the officers of the Company and monitors Company performance in key results areas.  The Board also has oversight responsibility of the processes established to report and monitor systems for material risks applicable to the Company.  The full Board regularly reviews enterprise-wide risk management, which includes relationships with significant customers, volatility of commodity costs, changes in the markets in which the Company operates and existing and potential competitors.  In addition, each Board committee plays a significant role in carrying out the risk oversight function.  The Executive Committee assists in monitoring and assessing relevant risks between the times at which the full Board convenes.  The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee oversees risks related to corporate governance and ethics.  The Audit Committee oversees risks related to financial reporting and control; environmental, health and sustainability matters; management policies and guidelines; legal claims and issues; and information technology.  The Finance Committee oversees the Company's financial policies, strategies and capital structure.  The Compensation Committee oversees risks related to human resources, succession planning and compensation.

Board Composition

The Articles of Incorporation of the Company provide that the Board of Directors has the power to set the number of directors constituting the full Board, provided that such number shall not be less than five or more than fifteen. Until further action, the Board of Directors has fixed the number of directors constituting the full Board at eleven, divided into three classes.  The terms of office of the three classes of directors end in successive years.

After reviewing the independence standards contained in the NASDAQ listing requirements, the Board of Directors has determined that each of its directors is independent under these standards, other than Joseph C. Bartolacci, the Company's President and Chief Executive Officer; David A. Schawk, President of the Company's SGK Brand Solutions segment; and Gregory S. Babe, the Company's Chief Technology Officer.

The Company's Governance Guidelines provide that an employee member can remain on the Board for a period of no longer than one year following retirement from employment with the Company.

The Board of Directors has determined that an independent, non-employee member should be appointed to serve as Chairman of the Board.  The Board believes that separation of the positions of Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, with the appointment of an independent, non-employee director as Chairman of the Board, strengthens the Company's corporate governance.  John D. Turner is the Company's current independent, non-employee Chairman of the Board.
 
Mr. Turner and the other independent directors meet at such times as necessary and generally on the dates of regularly scheduled Board meetings.  The independent directors met a total of five times in fiscal 2015.
3

During fiscal 2015, there were six regularly scheduled Board meetings.

Board Committees

There are five standing committees appointed by the Board of Directors -- the Executive Committee, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, the Audit Committee, the Finance Committee and the Compensation Committee.

Each Committee has the same power as the Board of Directors to employ the services of outside consultants and to have discussions and interviews with personnel of the Company and others.

The principal functions of the five standing Committees are summarized as follows:

Executive Committee

The Executive Committee is appointed by the Board of Directors to have and exercise during periods between Board meetings all of the powers of the Board of Directors, except that the Executive Committee may not elect directors, change the membership of or fill vacancies on the Executive Committee, change the By‑laws of the Company or exercise any authority specifically reserved by the Board of Directors.  Among the functions customarily performed by the Executive Committee during periods between Board meetings are the approval, within limitations previously established by the Board of Directors, of the principal terms involved in sales of securities of the Company, and such reviews as may be necessary of significant developments in major events and litigation involving the Company.  In addition, the Executive Committee is called upon periodically to provide advice and counsel in the formulation of corporate policy changes and, where it deems advisable, make recommendations to the Board of Directors.

The members of the Executive Committee are John D. Turner (Chairperson), Katherine E. Dietze, Alvaro Garcia-Tunon and Jerry R. Whitaker.  The Executive Committee holds meetings at such times as are required.  The Executive Committee did not meet in fiscal 2015.

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

The principal functions of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee are to (1) identify individuals qualified to become members of the Board of Directors, (2) recommend to the Board of Directors the director nominees for the next annual meeting of shareholders, (3) monitor and recommend to the Board of Directors changes, as necessary, to the Company's Corporate Governance Guidelines, (4) lead the Board of Directors in complying with its Corporate Governance Guidelines (5) review and make recommendations to the Board of Directors concerning director compensation and (6) review and approve related person transactions pursuant to the Company's Code of Conduct.  The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is also responsible for the annual evaluations of the performance of the Board of Directors and Committees of the Board, including individual directors.  The Committee is committed to ensuring that (i) the nominees for membership on the Board of Directors are of the highest possible caliber and are able to provide insightful, intelligent and effective guidance to the management of the Company and (ii) the governance of the Company is in full compliance with applicable law, reflects generally accepted principles of good corporate governance, encourages flexible and dynamic management without undue burdens and effectively manages the risks of the business and operations of the Company.  From time to time, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee has retained the services of a third-party search firm to assist in the identification and evaluation of potential nominees for the Board
 
 
4

 of Directors.  The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee operates pursuant to a Charter and the Company's Corporate Governance Guidelines, which are available for viewing on the Company's website at www.matw.com under the "Corporate" tab in the section entitled "Corporate Governance".  The Board has determined that all members of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee are independent in accordance with the listing standards of NASDAQ.  The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee met four times during fiscal 2015.  The current members of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee are Jerry R. Whitaker (Chairperson), Katherine E. Dietze and Alvaro Garcia-Tunon.

Audit Committee

The principal functions of the Audit Committee are to provide oversight of (1) the integrity of the Company's financial statements, reports on internal controls and other financial information provided by the Company, (2) the Company's compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, (3) the qualifications and independence of the Company's independent registered public accounting firm and (4) the performance of the Company's internal audit function (including disclosure controls and procedures for internal controls over financial reporting) and independent registered public accounting firm. The Committee will serve as a vehicle to provide an open avenue of communication between the Company's Board of Directors and financial management, the internal audit department, and the independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee is responsible for appointing the Company's independent registered public accounting firm.  The Audit Committee operates pursuant to a Charter, which is available for viewing on the Company's website at www.matw.com under the section entitled "Corporate Governance".

All of the Audit Committee members, Alvaro Garcia-Tunon (Chairperson), Terry L. Dunlap, Morgan K. O'Brien and John P. O'Leary, Jr., have been determined in the Board's business judgment to be independent from the Company and its management within the meaning of SEC regulations relating to audit committee independence, NASDAQ regulation and the Company's Corporate Governance Guidelines.  All of the Audit Committee members are considered to meet the criteria for financial expert, and Mr. Garcia-Tunon has been designated as the Audit Committee financial expert as determined by the SEC regulations.  During fiscal 2015, the Audit Committee met nine times.

Finance Committee

The Finance Committee provides oversight of the Company's financial policies, strategies and capital structure.  The Committee's principal responsibilities include review and monitoring of the Company's (1) significant capital expenditures, (2) mergers, acquisitions and divestitures, (3)  capital structure, debt and equity offerings, (4) the dividend policy and share repurchase program, (5) risk management programs and (6) investor relations program.  The Committee also provides oversight to the Pension Board on employee benefit plan matters and related plan investment management.  Members of the Finance Committee are Katherine E. Dietze (Chairperson), Terry L. Dunlap, Morgan K. O'Brien and Jerry R. Whitaker.  The Finance Committee met nine times in fiscal 2015.
 
Compensation Committee
The principal functions of the Compensation Committee, the members of which are John D. Turner (Chairperson), Alvaro Garcia-Tunon and Morgan K. O'Brien, are to review periodically the suitability of the remuneration arrangements (including benefits) for the principal executives of the Company, and to prepare an annual report on executive compensation for inclusion in the
 
5

 
Company's Proxy Statement.  The Committee also reviews, at least annually, succession plans for the position of Chief Executive Officer and other senior executive positions of the Company.  The Compensation Committee operates pursuant to a Charter, which is available for viewing on the Company's website at www.matw.com under the section entitled "Corporate Governance". The Board has determined that all members of the Compensation Committee are independent in accordance with the listing standards of NASDAQ.  During fiscal 2015, the Compensation Committee met three times.

Special Board Committee

In April 2014, the Board of Directors established a special ad hoc Committee (the "Special Committee") to provide oversight of integration planning and implementation for the Company's acquisition of Schawk, Inc. ("Schawk") that was completed on July 29, 2014.  The members of the Special Committee are Alvaro Garcia-Tunon (Chairperson), Gregory S. Babe and Joseph C. Bartolacci.  The Committee met two times in fiscal 2015.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
The Compensation Committee currently consists of Messrs. Turner, Garcia-Tunon and O'Brien. None of Mr. Turner, Mr. Garcia-Tunon, or Mr. O'Brien has ever been an officer or employee of ours or any of our subsidiaries. None of our executive officers serves or has served as a member of the board of directors, compensation committee or other board committee performing equivalent functions of any entity that has one or more executive officers serving as one of our directors or on our Compensation Committee.

Meeting Attendance

During fiscal 2015, all directors attended at least 75% of Board and respective Committee meetings.

The Company does not have a formal policy with regard to Board members attending the Annual Meeting of Shareholders, but it is customary for the Board members to do so, and in general all or most of the Board members have attended annual meetings in the recent past.  All members of the Board, except Ms. Dietze and Mr. O'Brien, attended the 2015 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

Compensation of Directors

Director compensation is administered and determined by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.  In performing its duties, the Committee consults with various independent third-party advisors.  In fiscal 2015, the Committee consulted primarily with Pay Governance LLC ("Pay Governance"), an independent human resources consulting firm.
 
Under the Company's 2014 Director Fee Plan, for fiscal 2015 each eligible independent director received an annual retainer valued at $75,000, which was payable either in cash or in shares of the Company's Common Stock, as determined by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.  If payable in cash, a director may elect to receive the annual retainer in shares of Company Common Stock or Common Stock credited to a deferred stock account as phantom stock.  If the annual retainer is paid in shares of Company Common Stock, a director may defer the receipt of such Common Stock into a deferred stock account as phantom stock.
Each independent director also receives an annual stock-based grant (non-statutory stock options, stock appreciation rights and/or restricted shares).  The precise annual stock-based
 
 
6

awards to be granted and their valuation are determined by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.  The fiscal 2015 value of this annual grant was $110,000, issued in the form of restricted stock, which vest on the second anniversary of the date of the grant.  At December 31, 2015, there were 116,582 shares available for future grant under the 2014 Director Fee Plan.

The non-employee Chairman of the Board received an additional annual retainer fee of $100,000 in fiscal 2015, which was paid in cash, current shares of the Company's Common Stock or Common Stock credited to a deferred stock account as phantom stock.  Except for the Special Committee, each Committee chairperson received an additional retainer fee for their service as a Committee chairperson.  The chairperson retainer fee paid was $7,500 in fiscal 2015 ($12,000 in the case of the Audit Committee chairperson and $10,000 in the case of the Compensation Committee chairperson).  In fiscal 2015, non-employee members of the Special Committee received $1,500 per day of service on the Committee.  Other than the Special Committee, directors receive no other meeting fees.

The Company does not provide any retirement benefits or perquisites to any of its non-employee directors.

The following table summarizes the director compensation earned by the non-employee directors of the Company for fiscal 2015.

Non-Employee Director Compensation Table

Name
 
Fees Earned or Paid in Cash
   
Stock Awards (1)
   
Option Awards
   
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compen-sation
   
Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings
   
All Other Compen-sation
   
Total
 
J.D. Turner
 
$
185,000
   
$
110,000
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
   
$
295,000
 
K.E. Dietze
   
82,500
     
110,000
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
192,500
 
T.L. Dunlap
   
75,000
     
110,000
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
185,000
 
A. Garcia-Tunon
   
94,500
     
110,000
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
204,500
 
M.K. O'Brien
   
75,000
     
110,000
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
185,000
 
J.P. O'Leary, Jr.
   
75,000
     
110,000
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
185,000
 
J.R. Whitaker
   
82,500
     
110,000
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
192,500
 

(1)
Amounts in this column reflect the grant date fair value of awards of restricted shares of the Company's Common Stock granted during fiscal 2015 computed in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board ASC Topic 718; however, the estimate of forfeiture related to service-based vesting conditions is disregarded for purposes of this valuation.  There were no forfeitures of restricted shares by any of the directors during fiscal 2015.  On March 12, 2015, each of the non-employee directors were awarded 2,295 restricted shares with a grant date fair value of $110,000.
Access to Directors
 
The shareholders of the Company may communicate in writing to the Board of Directors by sending such communication to the Board or a particular director in care of Steven F. Nicola, Corporate Secretary, at the Company's principle executive offices.  At present, such communications will be directly forwarded to the Board or such particular director, as applicable.


7

PROPOSAL 1

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Nominations for election to the Board of Directors may be made by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee or by the shareholders.  Section 3.01 of the Company's Bylaws provides that "No one shall be eligible for nomination as a Director for any term during which, or before which, he will attain 70 years of age or for any term during which he will attain 70 years of age.  Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Board of Directors may, by majority vote, permit the Chairman of the Board to be nominated for one (1) additional term, such additional term not to exceed three (3) years, regardless of whether the Chairman has attained or would attain 70 years of age, if the Board determines that such nomination would be in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders."  The Board of Directors voted to permit Mr. Turner, Chairman of the Board, to be nominated for one additional three (3) year term under this provision of the Bylaws.

Don W. Quigley, Jr., who was elected to the Board of Directors on September 28, 2015, has been nominated by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee to serve for a one-year term that will end in 2017.  Terry L. Dunlap (who was elected to the Board of Directors on February 19, 2015), Alvaro Garcia-Tunon, John D. Turner and Jerry R. Whitaker, whose terms of office are expiring, have been nominated by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee to serve for three-year terms that will end in 2019.  In connection with the election of Messrs. Dunlap and Quigley, a third-party search firm was retained to assist in the identification and evaluation of director candidates.  The Company's Corporate Governance Guidelines require that all newly-elected directors be nominated for election by the shareholders at the next scheduled Annual Meeting after such election by the Board.

Shareholder nominations for directors to be elected at the 2017 Annual Meeting must be submitted to the Company in writing no later than 75 days prior to the anniversary date of the 2016 Annual Meeting, or December 5, 2016.  Such nominations made by the shareholders must be made in writing in accordance with Section 6.1 of the Company's Restated Articles of Incorporation, which notice shall include (1) the name and address of the shareholder who intends to make the nomination and of the person(s) to be nominated; (2) a representation that the shareholder is a holder of record of stock of the Company entitled to vote at such meeting and intends to appear in person or by proxy at the meeting to nominate the person(s) specified in the notice; (3) a description of all arrangements or understandings between the shareholder and each nominee and any other person(s) (naming such person(s)) pursuant to which the nomination or nominations are to be made by the shareholder; (4) such other information regarding each nominee proposed by such shareholder as would be required to be included in a proxy statement filed pursuant to the proxy rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, had the nominee been nominated by the Board of Directors; and (5) the consent of each nominee to serve as a director of the Company if so elected.   The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and Board will consider any candidate for nominee as a director that are properly submitted by a shareholder in accordance with the Company's Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws.  No such nominations have been received with respect to the 2016 Annual Meeting.

The Company's process for filling director vacancies includes determination of the professional skills and background desired to serve the best interests and current needs of the Company and its shareholders, possible retention of a third-party search firm to assist in the identification and evaluation of director candidates, consideration of candidates nominated by shareholders (if any), evaluation of a candidate's credentials and experience by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee (including personal interviews with selected candidates), and a formal
 
8

 
recommendation by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee to the Board of Directors regarding the candidate considered to be the most qualified to fill the director vacancy.

The Committee assesses a candidate's background, skills, diversity, personal characteristics and business experience and applies the following criteria and qualifications.  Candidates are to be of the highest ethical character, share the values of the Company, have reputations, both personal and professional, consistent with the image and reputation of the Company, be highly accomplished in their respective field, with superior credentials and recognition, and provide the relevant expertise and experience necessary to assist the Board and the Company to increase shareholder value.  The Board may prioritize the foregoing criteria depending on the current needs of the Board and the Company.  The Board does not have a formal diversity policy for selecting directors, but considers diversity of race, gender and national origin to be relevant factors that are weighed with other criteria in recommending and nominating directors for election to the Board of Directors of Matthews.

Under the Company's Corporate Governance Guidelines, any director who experiences a change in principal occupation or primary business affiliation from that in which such director was engaged upon their last election to the Board, should promptly offer to submit a letter of resignation as a director to the Chief Executive Officer and to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.  The Board, with input from the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the Chief Executive Officer, will consider whether to accept such offer.

The Board of Directors has no reason to believe that any of the nominees will become unavailable for election. If any nominee should become unavailable prior to the Annual Meeting, the accompanying proxy will be voted for the election in the nominee's place of such other person as the Board of Directors may recommend in the nominee's place.

Only affirmative votes are counted in the election of directors.  The nominee for election as a director at the Annual Meeting in the Class of 2017 and the nominees for election as directors of the Class of 2019 who receive the highest number of votes cast for the election of directors at the Annual Meeting by the holders of the Company's Common Stock present in person or voting by proxy, a quorum being present, will be elected as directors.  Abstentions, broker non-votes and instructions to withhold authority to vote for one or more of the nominees will result in those nominees receiving fewer votes but will not count as votes against the nominee.

The Board of Directors recommends that you vote FOR the election of the nominated directors.

The following information is furnished with respect to the persons nominated by the Board of Directors for election as directors and with respect to the continuing directors.


Nominees

Class of 2017

Don W. Quigley, Jr., age 60, was elected to the Board of Directors of the Company in September 2015.  Mr. Quigley is currently a Senior Advisor for the Boston Consulting Group, a global management consulting firm.  Mr. Quigley served as President of U.S. Sales of Mondelez International, Inc., a global provider of snack food and beverage products to consumers from 2012 until his retirement in March 2015.  Prior thereto, he served as President, Global Consumer Sales of Kimberley-Clark Corporation from 2004 to 2012, and Vice President of Sales for PepsiCo from 1998 to 2004.   Mr. Quigley's experience and knowledge as a senior sales and marketing executive at consumer products companies is a valuable resource to the Company. 
 
9

 
Mr. Quigley received a Bachelor of Science degree in Business from the Kelley School at Indiana University, where he serves on the Dean's Advisory Council.  He currently serves on the Board of Directors of Gold Eagle Company, a family-owned provider of automotive fluids and additives.

Class of 2019

Terry L. Dunlap, age 56, was elected to the Board of Directors in February 2015.  Mr. Dunlap currently serves as the principal of Sweetwater LLC, a consulting and investing firm with a focus on manufacturing and technology.  Prior thereto, Mr. Dunlap spent 31 years with Allegheny Technologies, where he  served as Executive Vice President, Flat-Rolled Products from May 2011 until his retirement in December 2014, President, ATI Allegheny Ludlum from 2002 to 2014, and Group President, ATI Flat-Rolled Products from 2008 to May 2011.  Mr. Dunlap's experience and knowledge in the metal manufacturing industry are valuable resources to the Board of Directors.  Mr. Dunlap received a Bachelor of Science degree in Marketing from Indiana University of Pennsylvania and attended the Loyola University of Chicago MBA program.  Mr. Dunlap serves on the Board of Directors and Compensation Committee of TimkenSteel Corp., a specialty steel producer, and is a director and a member of the Compensation Committee of Elliot Group/EBARA Corp., a global producer of turbomachinery, compressors and turbines.  He also serves as the Vice President of the Indiana University of Pennsylvania Foundation Board.

Alvaro Garcia-Tunon, age 63, was elected to the Board of Directors in October 2009.  Mr. Garcia-Tunon retired as the Chief Financial Officer of Wabtec Corporation ("Wabtec"), a provider of products and services for the global rail industry, effective January 1, 2014.  He remains with Wabtec as a strategic advisor.  Mr. Garcia-Tunon was named Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer for Wabtec in February 2012.  Prior to that, he was Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of Wabtec since December 2010.  Prior thereto, he served as Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of Wabtec since 2003.  Having served as the Chief Financial Officer of a public company with global operations, Mr. Garcia-Tunon has leadership skills in international business, corporate governance and risk management.  He also provides the Board and the Audit Committee, of which he is a Chairman, the strong financial and accounting skills required to be considered a financial expert.  Mr. Garcia-Tunon is also a member of the Executive, Nominating and Corporate Governance and Compensation Committees.  In addition, he is Chairman of the Special Committee of the Board. Mr. Garcia-Tunon currently is serving on the Board of Directors of MSA Safety, a global leader in the development, manufacture and supply of safety products that protect people and facility infrastructures, since 2012, and serves on the Audit, Legal and Finance Committees of that Board. He also is a board member of the Pittsburgh Civic Light Orchestra and Senator John Heinz History Center, where he serves as its Treasurer.  Mr. Garcia-Tunon graduated from the College of William and Mary with a Juris Doctor degree and is a graduate of the University of Virginia with a Bachelor of Science degree in Commerce and Accounting.

John D. Turner, age 70, has been a director of the Company since 1999.  Mr. Turner retired as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Copperweld Corporation, a manufacturer of tubular and bimetallic wire products, in 2003, where he had served as Chief Executive Officer since 1988.  Mr. Turner's experience, knowledge and expertise as an executive in the metal manufacturing industry are valuable resources to the Company.  During his tenure as a director, Mr. Turner has also served or participated on each of the Committees of the Board, providing him with the experience and perspective of the Board's decision making process in all areas of the Company's operations.  Mr. Turner also has experience as a director for several large public companies. Mr. Turner serves as Chairman of the Executive and Compensation Committees.
 
10

 
Mr. Turner received a Bachelor's Degree in Biology from Colgate University.  He currently also serves on the Board of Directors of Allegheny Technologies Incorporated, a position he has held since February 2004, and is the chairman of the Technology Committee of that Board.

Jerry R. Whitaker, age 65, was elected to the Board of Directors of the Company in July 2011.  Mr. Whitaker was President of Electrical Sector-Americas, Eaton Corporation, a global manufacturer of highly engineered products, until his retirement in June 2011.  Prior thereto, he served in various management positions at Eaton Corporation since 1994.  Prior to joining Eaton Corporation, Mr. Whitaker spent 22 years with Westinghouse Electric Corporation.  Mr. Whitaker's experience and knowledge as an executive in global manufacturing industries and acquisition integration are valuable resources to the Company.  Mr. Whitaker is the Chairman of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and a member of the Finance Committee.  Mr. Whitaker received a Bachelor of Science degree from Syracuse University and a Masters in Business Administration from George Washington University.  He currently serves as a director on the boards of Crescent Electric Company, an independent distributor of electrical hardware and supplies, where he is a member of the Audit Committee and Chairman of the Compensation Committee, and Sealed Air Corporation, a global leader in packaging, food safety and hygiene, where he serves on the Nominating and Governance Committee and is Chairman of the Audit Committee.  He is also on the advisory board for Universal Electric Company, a manufacturer of customizable power distribution systems.  Mr. Whitaker also serves on the Board of Trustees for the Carnegie Museums of Pittsburgh, as well as the boards of the Carnegie Science Center, the Energy Innovation Center and the Advisory Board of the L.C. Smith School of Engineering at Syracuse University.

Continuing Directors

Gregory S. Babe, age 58, was elected to the Board of Directors in November 2010.  In November 2015, Mr. Babe was appointed as the Company's Chief Technology Officer.  In November 2014, Mr. Babe was appointed, on an interim basis, as the Company's Executive Vice President, Global Information Technology and Integration.  Mr. Babe previously served as President and Chief Executive Officer of the start-up corporation Liquid X Printed Metals, Inc., a Carnegie Mellon University spin out.  From July 2012 to June 2013, Mr. Babe served as Chief Executive Officer of Orbital Engineering, Inc., a privately held engineering services company.  Mr. Babe retired as President and Chief Executive Officer of Bayer Corporation and Bayer MaterialScience LLC in June 2012.  Mr. Babe was appointed President and Chief Executive Officer of Bayer Corporation and Senior Bayer Representative for the United States and Canada in October 2008.  Mr. Babe was responsible for the North American activities of the worldwide Bayer Group, an international health care, nutrition and high-tech materials group based in Leverkusen, Germany.  In addition, he held the position of President and Chief Executive Officer of Bayer MaterialScience LLC, a producer of polymers and high-performance plastics in North America, from July 2004 until June 2012.  Mr. Babe is considered well-qualified to serve on the Company's Board of Directors based on his experience as a Chief Executive Officer of a multinational manufacturing company. He possesses a strong background in manufacturing and regulatory and government affairs. Mr. Babe is a member of the Special Committee of the Board.  He serves on the Board and chairs the Audit Committee of the Benedum Foundation.  Mr. Babe holds a Bachelor of Science degree in mechanical engineering from West Virginia University.
 
Joseph C. Bartolacci, age 55, was appointed Chief Executive Officer of the Company in 2006. Prior to his appointment as Chief Executive Officer, he was President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company since 2005. Mr. Bartolacci was elected to the Board of Directors in 2005. Prior thereto, he held various positions within Matthews, including President, Casket Division; Executive Vice President of Matthews; President, Matthews Europe; President,
 
 
 
 
11

Caggiati, S.p.A. (a wholly-owned subsidiary of Matthews) and General Counsel of Matthews.  Mr. Bartolacci provides management's perspective in Board decisions about the business and strategic direction of the Company.  He has first-hand operating experience in many of the Company's diverse global businesses, and brings a well-developed understanding of the industries in which the Company operates, and the opportunities within those industries to drive shareholder value.  Mr. Bartolacci received a Bachelor of Science degree in Accounting from Saint Vincent College and a Juris Doctor from the University of Pittsburgh.  Mr. Bartolacci serves on the newly-established Special Committee.  He also serves on the Company's Pension Board, the Board of the Jas. H. Matthews & Co. Educational and Charitable Trust, and on the boards of various subsidiaries of Matthews.  Mr. Bartolacci is a member of the Board of Directors of Saint Vincent College and serves as a member of the Citizens Bank Mid-Atlantic Regional Advisory Board.

Katherine E. Dietze, age 58, was elected to the Board of Directors of the Company in July 2008.  Ms. Dietze was Global Chief Operating Officer, Investment Banking Division of Credit Suisse First Boston, a financial services company, until her retirement in 2005.  She had also held the position of Managing Director, Investment Banking.  Prior to joining Credit Suisse First Boston, Ms. Dietze was a Managing Director for Salomon Brothers Inc, a financial services company.  Ms. Dietze brings a strong background in global investment and financial matters.  With her background in investment banking, Ms. Dietze provides a unique and valuable perspective on global financial markets, investments and financial transactions.  Ms. Dietze received a Bachelor of Arts degree from Brown University and graduated from Columbia University with a Masters in Business Administration in Finance and Marketing.  Ms. Dietze serves as Chairperson of the Finance Committee and is a member of the Executive Committee.  She is also a director and Chairperson of the Audit Committee and a member of the Governance Committee of Cowen Group, Inc., a financial services firm.  She previously served as Chairperson of the Audit Committee and member of both the Governance and Compensation Committees for LaBranche, LLC, a financial services firm purchased by the Cowen Group in June 2011.  In January 2011, Ms. Dietze was elected to the Board of Trustees of Liberty Property Trust, a real estate investment trust, where she currently is a member of the Audit and Governance Committees.

Morgan K. O'Brien, age 55, was elected to the Board of Directors of the Company in July 2011.  Mr. O'Brien has served as the President and Chief Executive Officer of Peoples Natural Gas Company LLC, a utility serving the southwestern Pennsylvania market, since February 2010.  Prior thereto, Mr. O'Brien served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Duquesne Light Holdings, an electric utility company serving western Pennsylvania, since 2001.  He held various senior executive positions at Duquesne Light Holdings since 1991.  Prior to joining Duquesne Light Holdings, Mr. O'Brien served in various management positions at PNC Bank and at major accounting firms.  As a current Chief Executive Officer with more than 10 years experience in that role, Mr. O'Brien brings significant leadership skills to the Board of Directors.  With his experience in the areas of accounting and taxation, he also provides the Board and the Audit Committee, of which he is a member, with strong financial skills.  Mr. O'Brien is also a member of the Compensation and Finance Committees.  Mr. O'Brien received a Bachelor's degree in Business Administration and a Masters degree in taxation from Robert Morris University.  Mr. O'Brien serves on the Board of Directors of Peoples Natural Gas Company LLC, HFF, Inc. and on the Board of Trustees of Robert Morris University.  He also serves on the boards of several civic and charitable organizations in western Pennsylvania.
 
David A. Schawk, age 60, was named President, SGK Brand Solutions and elected to the Company's Board of Directors effective upon the Company's acquisition of Schawk on July 29, 2014. Mr. Schawk previously served as Schawk's Chief Executive Officer from July 2012, and Chief Executive Officer and President for more than five years prior thereto. He also served on the Schawk Board of Directors since 1992. Mr. Schawk is considered well-qualified to serve on
 
 
 
12

the Company's Board of Directors based on his experience as a Chief Executive Officer and director of a multinational brand development and brand management company.

The term for each nominee and director is listed below:

 
Nominees:
Term to expire at Annual
Meeting of Shareholders in:
    
Don W. Quigley, Jr.
2017
    
Terry L. Dunlap
2019
Alvaro Garcia-Tunon
2019
John D. Turner
2019
Jerry R. Whitaker
2019
    
Continuing Directors:
 
    
Joseph C. Bartolacci
2018
Katherine E. Dietze
2018
Morgan K. O'Brien
2018
    
Gregory S. Babe
2017
David A. Schawk
2017



13

Proposal 2

ADOPTION OF THE
2015 INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN

Introduction

The Company's 2015 Incentive Compensation Plan (the "Plan") was adopted by the Company's Board of Directors on November 11, 2015.  The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast in person or by proxy by the Company's shareholders, at a meeting held on or prior to the date any compensation is paid pursuant to any award issued under the Plan to a Covered Employee (as defined below) in which the holders of at least a majority of the outstanding shares of the Company's Common Stock are present and voting, is required for any award to a Covered Employee to be effective.  A Covered Employee is a covered employee as defined in Section 162(m)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code (which generally includes the officers listed in the Summary Compensation Table in this Proxy Statement).  If the shareholders of the Company do not approve the Plan as proposed in this proxy statement, the Plan will only be used by the Company for non-Covered Employees.

Description of 2015 Incentive Compensation Plan

The full text of the Plan is set forth as Exhibit A to this Proxy Statement.  The following description of the Plan is qualified in its entirety by reference to Exhibit A.

General.  The purpose of the Plan is to provide annual incentive payment opportunities to key management employees of the Company and its subsidiaries and affiliates, which may be earned upon the achievement of pre-established performance goals.  Awards to Covered Employees are intended to qualify as "performance-based compensation" that is tax deductible without limitation under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code.

Any key management employee of the Company or any subsidiary or affiliate is eligible to participate in the Plan if designated by the Committee referred to below.

Administration.  The Plan will be administered by a Committee appointed by the Board of Directors.  At present, this is the Compensation Committee of the Company.  None of the members of such Committee are eligible to participate in the Plan.

Subject to the provisions of the Plan, the Committee has full and final authority, in its discretion, to make awards under the Plan, and to determine the key management employees to whom each award is made, and the terms of such awards (including incentive targets, performance periods and performance goals).  In determining awards to any eligible employee, the Committee considers the position and responsibilities of the employee being considered, the nature and value to the Company or a subsidiary or affiliate of his or her services, his or her present and/or potential contribution to the success of the Company or a subsidiary or affiliate and such other factors as the Committee may deem relevant.

The Committee also has the power to interpret the Plan, to make determinations under the Plan, and to prescribe such rules, guidelines and practices in connection with the operations of the Plan as it deems necessary and advisable in its administration of the Plan.  Committee determinations under the Plan need not be uniform.
14

The Committee may allocate certain of its responsibilities and powers to any one or more of its members and may delegate certain of its responsibilities and powers to officers or a committee of officers of the Company except with respect to awards to any Covered Employee to the extent such responsibilities and powers must be exercised by the Committee for those awards to qualify for the exemption for "performance-based compensation" under Section 162 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Performance Periods, Performance Goals and Incentive Awards.  Awards issued under the Plan will have one-year performance periods unless otherwise determined by the Committee. A new performance period will commence at the beginning of each fiscal year (October 1) and end at the completion of such fiscal year (September 30). Within ninety days after the beginning of each annual performance period, the Committee will establish specific performance goals for the period. The performance goals are the specific targets and objectives established by the Committee under one or more, or a combination of, absolute or relative values or rates of change, and on a gross or net basis, in any of the following objective performance measures:

 
1.
 
earnings per share;
 
2.
 
earnings per share growth;
 
3.
 
return on capital;
 
4.
 
return on invested capital;
 
5.
 
costs;
 
6.
 
net income;
 
7.
 
net income growth;
 
8.
 
operating margin;
 
9.
 
sales;
 
10.
 
revenue growth;
 
11.
 
revenue from operations;
 
12.
 
expenses;
 
13.
 
income from operations as a percent of capital employed;
 
14.
 
operating income;
 
15.
 
pre-tax profit or income;
 
16.
 
cash flow;
 
17.
 
free cash flow;
 
18.
 
cash flow per share;
 
19.
 
market share;
 
20.
 
return on shareholders' equity;
 
21.
 
return on assets;
 
22.
 
return on net assets;
 
23.
 
earnings (including earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization ("EBITDA") and earnings before interest and taxes ("EBIT"));
 
24.
 
operating cash flow;
 
25.
 
operating cash flow per share;
 
26.
 
operating cash flow as a percent of capital employed;
 
27.
 
economic value added (earnings less a capital charge);
 
28.
 
gross margin;
 
29.
 
total shareholder return (stock price appreciation plus dividends);
 
30.
 
shareholder equity;
 
31.
 
debt;
 
32.
 
debt to shareholder equity;
15


 
33.
 
debt to earnings (including EBITDA and EBIT);
 
34.
 
interest expense and/or other fixed charges;
 
35.
 
earnings (including EBITDA and EBIT) to interest expense and/or other fixed charges;
 
36.
 
environmental emissions improvement;
 
37.
 
workforce diversity;
 
38.
 
number of accounts;
 
39.
 
safety performance;
 
40.
 
workers' compensation claims;
 
41.
 
budgeted amounts;
 
42.
 
cost per hire;
 
43.
 
turnover rate;
 
44.
 
training costs and expenses;
 
45.
 
working capital;
 
46.
 
innovation as measured by a percentage of sales from new products; and/or
 
47.
 
stock price.


(A)            The following criteria for the Company on a consolidated basis, one or more of its direct or indirect subsidiaries, and/or one or more divisions of them, either in absolute terms or relative to the performance of (x) the Company, its subsidiaries or divisions (for a different period), (y) one or more other companies or (z) an index covering multiple companies:

 
1.
 
net income;
 
2.
 
economic value added (earnings less a capital charge);
 
3.
 
EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization);
 
4.
 
sales;
 
5.
 
costs;
 
6.
 
gross margin;
 
7.
 
operating margin;
 
8.
 
pre-tax profit or income;
 
9.
 
market share;
 
10.
 
return on net assets;
 
11.
 
return on assets;
 
12.
 
return on capital;
 
13.
 
return on invested capital;
 
14.
 
cash flow;
 
15.
 
free cash flow;
 
16.
 
operating cash flow;
 
17.
 
operating income;
 
18.
 
EBIT;
 
19.
 
working capital; and/or
 
20.
 
innovation as measured by a percentage of sales from new products.

16

(B)            The following criteria for the Company, either in absolute terms or relative to the performance of the Company (for a different period), one or more other companies or an index covering multiple companies:

 
1.
 
stock price;
 
2.
 
return on shareholders' equity;
 
3.
 
earnings per share;
 
4.
 
cash flow per share; and/or
 
5.
 
total shareholder return (stock price appreciation plus dividends).

The Committee may establish one or more of the performance goals as a threshold performance goal for the Company. Additionally, the Committee may base one or more of the goals on the performance of the Company, one or more subsidiaries, affiliates, branches, departments, business units or portions thereof, and/or upon a comparison with performance of a peer group of companies, prior performance periods or other measures selected or defined by the Committee.  The Committee may also have one or more of the goals based upon the performance of an individual participant.  The Committee may determine the relative weighting among the various performance goals established.

At the time performance goals are established for each performance period, the Committee will also establish a schedule of incentive targets, setting forth the amount to be paid based on the extent to which the performance goals for the performance period are actually achieved. The incentive targets may be expressed as a percentage of a participant's base salary, or other measure specified by the Committee, in effect at the time the performance goal is established. Results against the performance goals will be determined and measured by an objective calculation method established by the Committee at the time of establishment of the performance goals, except that the Committee may determine, at the time the performance goals are established, that unusual items or certain specified events or occurrences, including changes in accounting standards or tax laws and the effects of non-operational items or extraordinary items as defined by generally accepted accounting principles, will be excluded from the calculation of the performance goal but, in the case of awards to Covered Employees, only to the extent permitted under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code.

Payment of any incentive award under the Plan will be contingent upon the attainment of the pre-established performance goals. The amount of any incentive award paid may not exceed the incentive target established. The Committee may not increase any incentive target or incentive award payable to a Covered Employee, or otherwise modify any performance goals associated with a performance period, with respect to a Covered Employee. The Committee may, however, reduce or eliminate any incentive target or incentive award payable, provided that the action will not result in any increase in the amount of any incentive target or incentive award payable to any other Plan participant who is a Covered Employee.

Payment of Incentive Awards.  Subject to certain minor exceptions, as set forth in the Plan, incentive awards will be paid in cash, on or before the fifteenth day of the third month following the end of a performance period (which would typically be December 15 for the Company) and after the Committee has determined the extent to which the performance goals were attained and the incentive awards were earned.

The maximum amount payable in cash and/or in shares of the Company common stock to any one participant under the Plan in any fiscal year will be $3,000,000. The Plan contains provisions for calculating the amount payable in any fiscal year if the underlying performance period covers multiple fiscal years. Additionally, the Committee will retain discretion to reduce or eliminate the incentive awards payable to any participant under the Plan.
17

Participants are mere unsecured creditors as to amounts payable under the Plan and none of the assets of the Company or any subsidiary or affiliate will be segregated or removed from any such company's general or judgment creditors with respect to those amounts.

Except as provided below, a participant whose employment with the Company or a subsidiary or affiliate terminates prior to the end of the performance period in which an incentive award is earned by the participant will forfeit all right to such incentive award.
If, during a performance period, a participant's employment with the Company or a subsidiary or affiliate terminates because (a) the participant dies, (b) the participant becomes disabled, (c) the participant retires, (d) there occurs an involuntary termination of employment (other than for cause) of the participant with the Company or a subsidiary or affiliate, or a voluntary termination of employment of a participant with the consent of the Company or a subsidiary or affiliate, or (e) there occur similar circumstances deemed to be appropriate by the Committee, or the participant's participation in the Plan is withdrawn by the Committee (e.g., due to a leave of absence) even though the participant is still employed or deemed to be employed, the participant is entitled to receive a pro-rata incentive award for the portion of the performance period during which the participant was employed or prior to the date the participant's participation was withdrawn, as the case may be, provided that the applicable performance goals for such performance period are achieved and the participant is not employed in any capacity by any competitor of the Company or otherwise then engaging in competitive activities or activities that could injure the Company.
If a Section 11 Event (as defined below) occurs, the results under the performance goals to the date of such Section 11 Event will be determined, the performance goals will be prorated based on a shortened performance period ending on the date of such Section 11 Event, each participant's portion of his or her incentive award for that performance period shall be prorated to reflect the shortened performance period, and any amount earned under the incentive award will be paid to each participant.
"Section 11 Event" shall generally mean the date upon which any of the following events occurs: (a) the Company acquires knowledge that a person has acquired beneficial ownership, directly or indirectly, of Company securities equal to 20% or more of the voting power of the Company; (b) at any time less than 60% of the members of the Board of Directors (excluding vacant seats) are individuals who were either directors on the effective date of the Plan or whose election, or nomination for election, was approved by a vote of at least two-thirds of the Directors then still in office who were Directors on the effective date of the Plan or who were so approved; (c) the consummation of a merger, consolidation, sale, disposition of assets or similar transaction as a result of which the shareholders of the Company immediately prior to such transaction shall not hold, directly or indirectly, immediately following such transaction, a majority of the voting power of the resulting corporation; or (d) the commencement of any liquidation or dissolution of the Company.
An employee who is not a participant as of the first day of a performance period shall not become a participant for that performance period except that new employees of the Company or any subsidiary or affiliate hired during a performance period, and employees promoted or engaged, as the case may be, during the performance period who were not eligible to participate in the Plan at the beginning of the performance period may become a participant, as determined by the Committee in its sole discretion, during a performance period and participate in the Plan for such performance period on a pro-rata basis.
18

Amendment or Termination of Incentive Plan.  The Plan shall remain in effect until it is terminated by the Company.  The Company may amend or terminate the Plan at any time. Because the Company will retain the discretion to change specific performance targets, shareholder re-approval of the Incentive Plan will be required in the future under the regulations issued pursuant to Internal Revenue Code Section 162(m), which currently require such re-approval every five years.

Forfeiture and Repayment of Incentive Awards.  The Committee or the Company's Chief Executive Officer may determine that an incentive award shall be forfeited and/or any value received from the award shall be repaid to the Company pursuant to the recoupment provisions contained in the Plan.

Miscellaneous.  The Plan contains provisions governing any required tax withholding with respect to an award.

The Committee may permit payment of any award to be deferred provided the deferral is consistent with Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code.

The material terms of the Plan (as defined in Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code) as applicable to Covered Employees are subject to re-approval by the shareholders of the Company no later than the first meeting of the shareholders to take place in 2015, if that approval is required by Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code at the time, such terms have not been earlier modified and approved by the shareholders, and the Company intends that the Plan continue to meet the requirements for "performance-based compensation" under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code for awards to Covered Employees made following the date of such meeting.

Additional Information.  The Company expects to award performance-based compensation under the Plan that is exempt from the $1,000,000 annual deduction limit (for Federal income tax purposes) of compensation paid by public corporations to each of the Company's chief executive officer and three other most highly compensated executive officers (other than the principal financial officer) in each fiscal year, which limit is imposed by Internal Revenue Code Section 162(m). Because of ambiguities and uncertainties as to the application and interpretation of Internal Revenue Code Section 162(m) and the regulations issued thereunder, no assurance can be given, notwithstanding the Company's efforts, that compensation intended by the Company to satisfy the requirements for deductibility under Internal Revenue Code Section 162(m) will in fact do so.

Possible Anti-takeover Effect

The provisions of the Plan providing for the acceleration of the payment of awards upon the occurrence of a Section 11 Event, described in the "Payment of Incentive Awards" section of the preceding description of the Plan, may be considered as having an anti-takeover effect with respect to the Company.
19

Awards to Named Executive Officers and Other Employees

The following is a list of target awards for fiscal 2016 approved on November 11, 2015 under the Plan, the grants of which are conditioned upon shareholder approval of the Plan.  The actual amounts to be earned under the Plan, if any, will be determined based on the operating performance of the Company and other criteria under the Plan.


NEW PLAN BENEFITS
2015 MANAGEMENT INCENTIVE PLAN

Name
 
Dollar Value
 
     
J.C. Bartolacci
 
$
810,000
 
S.F. Nicola
 
$
336,000
 
D.A. Schawk
 
$
459,638
 
S.D. Gackenbach
 
$
211,750
 
B.D. Walters
 
$
135,600
 
         
All Executive Officers as a Group
 
$
2,725,000
 
         
All Employees other than Executive
       
Officers as a Group
 
$
968,000
 


Vote Required for Approval of Proposal 2

The vote required for approval of Proposal 2 is the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares represented at the meeting and entitled to vote, a quorum being present; provided, however, that the terms of the Plan require the additional approval of the Plan by the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast by all the shareholders entitled to vote thereon prior to any award issued under the Plan to a Covered Employee to be effective.  Abstentions and broker non-votes will have the effect of a vote cast "against" the proposal.  The proxy holders will vote your proxy FOR this item unless you give instructions to the contrary on the proxy.

The Board of Directors recommends that you vote FOR approval of Proposal 2.


20

PROPOSAL 3

SELECTION OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Audit Committee of the Company's Board of Directors has appointed Ernst & Young LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm to audit the records of the Company for the year ending September 30, 2016.

The Audit Committee has determined that it would be desirable as a matter of good corporate practice to request an expression of opinion from the shareholders on the appointment.  Ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares represented at the meeting and entitled to vote, a quorum being present.  Abstentions and non-broker votes will have the effect of a vote cast "against" the proposal.

If the shareholders do not ratify the selection of Ernst & Young LLP, the selection of an alternative independent registered public accounting firm will be considered by the Audit Committee; provided, further, however, even if the shareholders do ratify the selection of Ernst & Young LLP, as requested in this Proxy Statement, the Audit Committee reserves the right, at any time, to re-designate and retain a different independent registered public accounting firm to audit the records of the Company for the year ending September 30, 2016.

It is not expected that any representative of Ernst & Young LLP will be present at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

The Board of Directors recommends that you vote FOR Proposal 3.
21

PROPOSAL 4
ADVISORY (NON-BINDING) VOTE ON THE EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
 OF THE COMPANY'S NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
As described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis in this Proxy Statement, and summarized in the "Executive Summary" thereto, the Compensation Committee of the Board has developed an executive compensation program designed to pay for performance and to align the long-term interests of our named executive officers with the long-term interests of our shareholders.  The Company presents a proposal for an advisory (non-binding) vote on the executive compensation of the Company's named executive officers on an annual basis.  Accordingly, the Company is presenting the following proposal, which gives our shareholders the opportunity to endorse or not endorse our pay program for named executive officers by voting for or against the resolution set forth below.  This resolution is required pursuant to Section 14A of the Securities Exchange Act.  Approval of the compensation paid to our named executive officers, as disclosed in this Proxy Statement, will be approved (on a non-binding basis) if the proposal receives the affirmative vote of at least a majority of the shares represented, in person or by proxy, at the meeting and entitled to vote, a quorum being present.  Abstentions and broker non-votes will have the effect of a vote cast "against" the proposal.  Because the vote is advisory, it will not be binding on the Board.  However, the Board and the Compensation Committee will review the voting results and take into account the outcome when considering future executive compensation arrangements.  The Board and management are committed to our shareholders and understand that it is useful and appropriate to obtain the views of our shareholders when considering the design and implementation of executive compensation programs.

RESOLVED, that the shareholders approve the compensation of the Company's named executive officers, as disclosed in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the compensation tables, and the related disclosure contained in the Proxy Statement set forth under the caption "Executive Compensation and Retirement Benefits."
The Board of Directors recommends that you vote FOR approval of the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the compensation tables, and the related disclosure contained in this Proxy Statement set forth under the caption "Executive Compensation and Retirement Benefits" of this Proxy Statement.  Proxies will be voted FOR approval of the proposal unless otherwise specified.
The Board of Directors recommends that you vote FOR Proposal 4.


22

STOCK OWNERSHIP

The Company's Articles of Incorporation divide its voting stock into three classes:  Preferred Stock, and Class A and Class B Common Stock.  At the present time, no Preferred Stock or Class B Common Stock is issued or outstanding.  The following information is furnished with respect to persons who the Company believes, based on its records and filings made with the Securities and Exchange Commission, beneficially own five percent or more of the outstanding shares of Common Stock of the Company, and with respect to directors, officers and executive management.  Those individuals with more than five percent of such shares could be deemed to be "control persons" of the Company.

This information presented is as of November 30, 2015, except as otherwise noted.
 
 
 
 
Name of
Beneficial Owner (1)
 
Number of
Class A Shares
Beneficially
Owned (1)(2)
       
Percent
of Class
   
Deferred
Stock
Compensation Shares (8)
 
Directors, Officers and Executive Management:
               
                 
J.C. Bartolacci
   
378,343
     
(3
)(4)
   
1.1
     
-
 
G.S. Babe
   
23,493
     
(4
)(5)
   
0.1
     
5,798
 
K.E. Dietze
   
18,043
     
(5
)
   
0.1
     
-
 
T.L. Dunlap
   
2,295
     
(5
)
   
*
     
-
 
S.D. Gackenbach
   
47,380
     
(4
)
   
0.1
     
-
 
A. Garcia-Tunon
   
17,013
     
(5
)
   
0.1
     
-
 
S.F. Nicola
   
158,413
     
(3
)(4)
   
0.5
     
-
 
M.K. O'Brien
   
10,235
     
(5
)
   
*
     
-
 
J.P. O'Leary, Jr.
   
16,195
     
(5
)
   
*
     
6,900
 
D.W. Quigley, Jr.
   
-
             
*
     
-
 
D.A. Schawk
   
536,991
     
(4
)(6)
   
1.6
     
-
 
J.D. Turner
   
28,043
     
(5
)
   
0.1
     
4,307
 
B.D. Walters
   
39,570
     
(4
)
   
0.1
         
J.R. Whitaker
   
11,085
     
(5
)
   
*
     
-
 
All directors, officers and executive     management as a group (19 persons)
   
1,502,512
     
(3
)
(7)
   
4.6
     
17,005
 
                                 
Others:
                               
Franklin Advisory Services LLC
55 Challenger Road, Suite 501
Ridgefield Park, NJ 07660
   
2,926,527
       
**
   
8.9
         
BlackRock Institutional Trust Company, N.A.
525 Washington Boulevard, Suite 1405
Jersey, NJ 07310
   
2,748,315
       
**
   
8.3
         
The Vanguard Group, Inc.
100 Vanguard Boulevard
Malvern, PA 19355-2331
   
2,445,421
       
**
   
7.4
         
T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc.
100 East Pratt Street
Baltimore, MD 21202
   
1,673,260
     
**
(9)
   
5.1
         
                                 
*     Less than 0.1%.
                               
** Information as of September 30, 2015, derived from Schedule 13D or 13G filings filed by the beneficial owner.
 

23

(1)
Any shares that may be beneficially owned within 60 days of November 30, 2015 are included in beneficial ownership.  Unless otherwise noted, the mailing address of each beneficial owner is the same as that of the Company.
(2)
To the best of the Company's knowledge, the nature of the beneficial ownership for all shares is sole voting and investment power, except as otherwise noted in these footnotes:
(3)
Includes stock options exercisable within 60 days of November 30, 2015 as follows:  Mr. Bartolacci, 47,432 shares; Mr. Nicola, 21,728 shares; and all directors, officers and executive management as a group, 89,859 shares.
(4)
Includes restricted shares with performance and time vesting provisions as follows: Mr. Bartolacci, 145,666 shares; Mr. Babe, 13,320 shares, Mr. Gackenbach, 24,984 shares; Mr. Nicola, 42,205 shares; Mr. Schawk, 23,425 shares; and Mr. Walters, 20,029 shares.
(5)
Includes restricted shares with time vesting provisions as follows: Messrs. Garcia-Tunon, O'Brien, O'Leary, Turner, Whitaker and Ms. Dietze, 4,774 shares; Mr. Babe, 2,479 shares; and Mr. Dunlap, 2,295 shares.
(6)
Includes 17,331 shares held in the David and Teryl Schawk Family Foundation over which Mr. Schawk has voting and investment control but no pecuniary interest; 39,298 shares held in the Teryl Alyson Schawk 1998 Trust; 51,514 shares held in trusts for the benefit of Mr. Schawk's children for which Mr. Schawk or his spouse serves as trustee; 204,227 shares held in the David A. Schawk 1998 Trust for which Mr. Schawk serves as trustee with voting and investment power over such shares; 224,524 shares held in trusts for the benefit of Mr. Schawk's niece for which Mr. Schawk serves as custodian with voting and investment power but no pecuniary interest; and 97 shares held as custodian.
(7)
Includes 33,418 restricted shares with time vesting provisions and 334,018 restricted shares with performance and time vesting provisions.
(8)
Represents shares of Common Stock held in a deferred stock compensation account for the benefit of the director under the Company's Director Fee Plan.  See "General Information Regarding Corporate Governance--Compensation of Directors" of this Proxy Statement.
(9)
These securities are owned by various individual and institutional investors which T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. ("Price Associates") serves as an investment advisor with power to direct investments and/or sole power to vote the securities.  For the purposes of the reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Price Associates is deemed to be a beneficial owner of such securities; however, Price Associates expressly disclaims that it is, in fact, the beneficial owner of such securities.  Price Associates has sole dispositive power for the entire holding of 1,673,260 shares and has sole voting power for 443,200 shares.


Stock Ownership Guidelines

The Company has established guidelines for stock ownership by management.  These guidelines are intended to promote the alignment of the interests of management with the Company's shareholders.  As more fully described under "Compensation Discussion and Analysis" of this Proxy Statement, the guidelines provide for ownership by management of shares of the Company's Common Stock with a minimum market value ranging up to five times base salary depending upon the individual's position with the Company.  Individuals are expected to achieve compliance with these guidelines within a reasonable period of time after appointment to their respective positions.

For purposes of these guidelines, stock ownership includes all shares directly owned (including shares held under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan and time-vesting restricted shares), but does not include outstanding stock options or unvested performance-based restricted shares.  Immediate compliance with these guidelines is not mandatory; however, individuals are expected to undertake a program to achieve compliance within five years of their hire date or promotion to their respective position.  The ownership policy mandates that at least 50% of the after-tax shares realized upon an option exercise or vesting of restricted stock must be retained until the ownership guideline is met.  Compliance with these ownership guidelines is one of the factors considered by the Compensation Committee in determining eligibility for participation in the Company's equity compensation programs.  As of November 30, 2015, all of the Named Executive Officers had exceeded the Company's stock ownership guidelines.
24

The Company has also adopted guidelines for stock ownership by non-employee directors.  The guidelines provide that each director maintain ownership of shares of the Company's Common Stock (either directly, through restricted shares issued under the Company's Director Fee Plan or through shares held in a deferred stock compensation account for the benefit of the director under the Company's Director Fee Plan) with a market value approximating five times the current annual retainer ($75,000).  Directors are expected to achieve compliance with these guidelines within a reasonable period of time after becoming a director.  As of November 30, 2015, all of the directors had met or exceeded the Company's stock ownership guidelines, except Messrs. Dunlap and Quigley who were elected to the Board of Directors in February 2015 and September 2015, respectively.
25

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the following Compensation Discussion and Analysis with the Company's management.  Based upon such review and discussion, the Compensation Committee recommends to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in the Company's 2016 Proxy Statement, and incorporated by reference in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2015.

Submitted by:

The Compensation Committee of the Board of  Directors of Matthews International Corporation

J.D. Turner, Chairperson
A. Garcia-Tunon
M.K. O'Brien


Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Executive Summary

Continuous improvement in operating results and the creation of shareholder value are key elements of the compensation philosophy of Matthews International Corporation.  This philosophy serves as the framework for the Company's executive compensation program.  Our program is designed to provide incentive arrangements that reward executives for improvement in the Company's operating results and appreciation in our stock value.

To underscore the importance of "pay-for-performance" in our compensation philosophy and our Company's culture, our Committee (referred to throughout this section as the Committee) has developed incentive arrangements based on rigorous performance standards.  The incentive compensation plan component of compensation rewards executives for improvements in operating profit and economic value added which are generally greater than the respective targets set by the Committee at the beginning of the fiscal year.  These targets are based upon the Company's business plan.  Accordingly, the incentive compensation plan is designed to motivate management to maintain and, more importantly, achieve higher levels of profits and economic value added for the Company.  "Economic value added" is the measure of operating profit compared to the cost of the capital utilized to generate this profit.

Our long-term incentive program provides for grants of shares of restricted stock, with one-half of the shares vesting based on the achievement of performance targets and the remaining one-half based on the continued employment of a named executive officer ("NEO") over a three-year period.  For the fiscal 2015 grant, the Company established two criteria for the performance-vesting shares:
·
One-half (50%) of the performance-vesting shares vest upon the attainment of non-GAAP annual earnings per share of $2.88, $3.11 and $3.36, and
·
One-half (50%) of the performance-vesting shares vest upon the attainment of 5%, 15% and 25% appreciation in the Company's stock price.
 
26

Failure to achieve the earnings per share targets within three years of the date of grant or the stock price hurdles within five years of the date of grant will result in forfeiture of the respective awards. Vested shares are subject to the Company's stock ownership guidelines which require each executive to own shares the value of which equals a multiple of the executive's base salary.
 
 
Other notable highlights of our executive compensation program include:
·
Both the incentive compensation plan and long-term incentive program provide the Committee with discretion to adjust for the recovery of previously paid awards in the event of a restatement of financial statements, or to cancel, suspend, or require repayment to the Company of outstanding awards for violation of non-compete, non-solicitation or disparagement provisions.
·
The Company offers no employment, severance or change in control agreement to any executive, except as customary in certain foreign countries and in certain cases in connection with acquired companies or as necessary in the recruitment of a new executive.
·
The Company de-emphasizes the use of perquisites but does provide certain market competitive perquisites to executives.
·
Both the incentive compensation plan and long-term incentive programs are designed and administered to preserve the deductibility of NEO compensation under IRC Section 162(m) and have been approved by the Company's shareholders.

At the annual shareholders' meeting in February 2015, the fiscal 2014 executive compensation of the Company's NEO's was approved by our shareholders, with approximately 96% of the votes cast voting in favor of the proposal.

The Committee considered the favorable shareholder vote in February 2015 in connection with its determination of compensation policies and decisions and concluded that the Company would maintain its existing compensation philosophy in determining current year compensation design and implementation.


CEO Compensation Determination

In its determination of the specific elements of fiscal 2015 executive compensation for the Company's Chief Executive Officer ("CEO"), the Committee considered the following:

Base Salary – CEO base salary for 2015 was established at the Committee's meeting in November 2014.  Based on the competitive market assessment prepared by Pay Governance LLC, our independent executive compensation consultant, the Company's CEO base salary was determined to be approximately 92% of the market median.  As Mr. Bartolacci has held the CEO position since 2006 and his fiscal 2014 individual performance was rated Distinguished (highest), the Committee agreed that his annual base salary adjustments over the next several years should be determined with a goal of attaining market median, provided his individual performance remains at or above the current level.  As a result, the base salary for Mr. Bartolacci was increased 5.0% for 2015.  After this adjustment, Mr. Bartolacci's base salary remained below the "mid-point" for his position at approximately 97% of market median.

Incentive Compensation – Mr. Bartolacci's incentive compensation target as a percent of base pay for fiscal 2015 was determined based on the competitive market assessment prepared by our independent compensation consultant.  Actual CEO incentive compensation for fiscal 2015 was determined based on the operating results and economic value added performance of the Company in comparison to targets established by the Committee.  The Company's consolidated operating results and economic value added performance exceeded the specified ranges for
 
27

fiscal 2015.  As a result, Mr. Bartolacci received incentive compensation equivalent to 200% of target as described later in this report.

Stock Awards – CEO equity compensation awards for fiscal 2015 were granted in November 2014.  In determining equity compensation grants, the Committee considers total shareholder return ("TSR") as an important factor in the alignment of CEO performance-based compensation with the interests of the Company's shareholders.  For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2014, the Company's stock price appreciated approximately 15% and the Company's earnings (on an adjusted non-GAAP basis) increased over fiscal 2013.  In addition, the Company's stock price appreciated 12% from September 30, 2014 to September 30, 2015.

The Committee also considers the individual performance evaluation of Mr. Bartolacci, which was rated as Distinguished for fiscal 2014.  As a result, the Committee determined an equity compensation award of 65,000 shares to Mr. Bartolacci for fiscal 2015.

In its evaluation of executive compensation, the Committee considers TSR a significant factor in determining the total compensation that can be earned by the Company's CEO.  Specifically, one of the performance elements of our equity compensation program requires the attainment of pre-defined stock appreciation thresholds to achieve vesting.  Failure to achieve the stock price hurdles within five years of the date of grant will result in forfeiture of the shares.  The other performance element of our equity compensation program requires the attainment of pre-defined earnings per share growth thresholds to achieve vesting.  Failure to achieve these thresholds within three years of the date of grant will also result in forfeiture of the shares.

For awards granted during the past seven fiscal years, an average of 69.0% of the performance-based stock awards as included in the Summary Compensation Table have actually been earned by our CEO (see table under "Pay-For-Performance Alignment") as a result of the Company's performance.  Restricted stock awards granted in fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2010 expired in November 2013 and November 2014, respectively, and stock option awards granted in fiscal 2005 expired in November 2015.  As a result, the unvested portions of these performance-based stock awards, totaling $1,356,332, were forfeited.

Retirement Benefits – There were no changes in the Company's executive retirement benefit formulas and, as such, Mr. Bartolacci did not have a significant change in his defined benefits under the plans.


Compensation Committee Administration

The Company's executive compensation policies are administered by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. The Committee consists of three independent directors:  Mr. Turner (Chairperson), Mr. Garcia-Tunon and Mr. O'Brien.  Compensation for the Company's Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and the three other most highly compensated executives is presented in the Summary Compensation Table.

The principal function of the Compensation Committee is to review the Company's compensation and benefit programs, including executive compensation and benefits, to ensure that total compensation is appropriate, competitive and consistent with the Company's compensation philosophy.  In performing its duties, the Committee consults with the Company's Chief Executive Officer, the Company's Vice President, Human Resources and various independent external advisors.  In fiscal 2015, the Committee consulted principally with Pay Governance, an independent executive compensation consulting firm.  Pay Governance does no other work for the Company and reports directly to the Compensation Committee. The
 
28

 
Committee has full authority to retain external advisors, consultants and agents, as necessary, in the fulfillment of its responsibilities.  The Committee reviews the performance and the fees of the independent consultant each year and determines whether to retain such consultant for the upcoming year.

Among its other duties, the Committee has responsibility for setting executive base salary levels and administering the terms and policies of the following key executive benefit plans:
·
2010 Incentive Compensation Plan
·
2012 Equity Incentive Plan
·
2015 Incentive Compensation Plan
·
Supplemental Retirement Plan ("SERP")

 
Compensation Philosophy

The principal objectives of the Company's executive compensation program, including compensation provided to the NEOs, are to:
·
Attract, retain and motivate highly-qualified executives;
·
Reward continuous improvement in operating results and the creation of shareholder value; and
·
Align the interests of Company executives with shareholders.

The Company seeks to accomplish these objectives by maintaining a compensation philosophy that emphasizes rigorous performance-based programs.  The foundation of its philosophy is to:
·
Emphasize performance-based compensation elements while providing fixed compensation (base salary) commensurate with the market;
·
Provide retirement and other benefits that are competitive with the market;
·
Provide no employment contracts or other guarantees of employment except as customary in certain foreign countries or in connection with the negotiation of acquisitions; and
·
De-emphasize the use of perquisites except for business purposes.

The Company believes that executive compensation should be designed to provide management with incentives for the achievement of annual and long-term strategic objectives, with the ultimate objective of delivering improvement in shareholder value.  The Committee believes that an effective compensation structure should focus executives on the achievement of the Company's business objectives and reward executives for achieving those objectives.  As such, the Committee's philosophy is to provide performance-based compensation that targets levels modestly above the market median while targeting fixed base salaries at the median of the market.  The Committee has designed this approach in light of the rigorous performance standards of the Company's incentive plans and because the Company does not in general provide any type of employment contracts or severance programs to executives.  The Committee believes it has structured its annual and long-term performance-based compensation to encourage and reward high performance and achievement of Company objectives.
 
In pursuit of this philosophy, the Company's executive compensation program includes the following key components:
 
·
Base salaries;
·
Annual cash incentive payments under the Company's 2010 Incentive Compensation Plan;
·
Long-term incentive compensation under the Company's 2012 Equity Incentive Plan;
·
Retirement benefits; and
·
Other benefits (i.e., health & welfare benefits, insurance, certain perquisites).

29

In general, the Committee's desire to align the executive compensation program with the market drives the allocation between short-term and long-term compensation as well as cash and equity components.  The Committee believes that the level of compensation provided to an executive should be based on success against pre-established performance goals that drive the creation of shareholder value.  To achieve this objective, the Company has built its current short-term cash incentive plan based on growth in operating profit and economic value added.  Over the long-term, the Committee believes that stock price growth is one of the best indicators of the creation of shareholder value.  Therefore, the Committee provides equity awards with a level of value and rate of vesting that are dependent on time and the achievement of earnings per share and stock price hurdles.  The Company has no formal policy regarding the allocation of variable and fixed compensation for its NEOs.

The Committee has considered whether its executive compensation program promotes risk taking at levels that are unacceptable to the Company.  The Committee considered the following factors related to risk:
·
Compensation philosophy that targets salaries at the market median and incentives modestly above median;
·
Short-term incentive design that caps maximum awards for the achievement of operating profit and economic value added targets reflective of the Company's business plan;
·
Long-term incentives allocated to two separate vehicles;
·
Stock ownership guidelines; and
·
Incentive compensation recoupment policy.

The Committee believes that the above factors as well as the overall executive compensation design, policies and mix of compensation serve to manage risk in a manner that is acceptable to the Company and its shareholders.

The Committee makes decisions regarding executive compensation with input from its independent consultant.  When making decisions regarding compensation for the Chief Executive Officer ("CEO"), the Committee has a process in which it considers comparative market data provided by its independent consultant and the CEO's performance assessment prepared by the Company's Board of Directors.  When making decisions regarding compensation for executives other than the CEO, the Committee considers comparative market data and seeks input and evaluates recommendations from the CEO.  In order to obtain comparative market data for evaluating executive compensation, the Company, through its independent consultant, utilizes compensation data published by Towers Watson.  This survey contains hundreds of company participants, although the number of participants and the names of the companies that provided data for each position varies by position and is not provided by the survey publisher.  The Company targets industrial / manufacturing companies of similar size, complexity, employment region and performance in developing this data.  Because data sample sizes for these types of companies may not be sufficient, the Company supplements such data with broader and more general industry data to develop its market data.
 
In evaluating compensation for calendar 2015, the Committee's independent consultant developed a group of peer companies to make assessments of market compensation and to determine the alignment of compensation earned relative to Company and peer performance. The peer group targeted industrial/manufacturing companies of similar size, complexity, employment region and performance. The Company's peer group was modified from the prior year in order to increase the sample size and to also include "creative services" companies to better represent Matthews' diversified business units. The peer group of companies used in evaluating compensation for calendar 2015 was:

 
30

Actuant Corporation
CLARCOR Inc.
Deluxe Corp.
Graco Inc.
Hillenbrand, Inc.
ICF International, Inc.
IDEX Corporation
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Kaman  Corporation
MDC Partners, Inc.
Meredith Corporation
Middleby Corp.
Minerals Technologies Inc.
MSA Safety Incorporated
Moog, Inc.
RTI International Metals, Inc.
Schweitzer-Mauduit International.
Service Corp. International
Standex International Corp.
Teledyne Technologies, Inc.
Viad Corporation
Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation
Woodward, Inc.

The Committee does not consider amounts from prior performance-based compensation, such as prior bonus awards or realized or unrealized equity compensation gains, in its decisions to increase or decrease compensation in the current year.  The Committee believes that this would not be in the best interest of retaining and motivating the executive.


Pay-for-Performance Alignment

The Committee believes there are different ways of assessing whether compensation paid to executives aligns with the performance of the Company.  For the Committee's consideration in understanding the Company's pay-for-performance alignment, the Committee's compensation consultant examined the relationship of our CEO's realizable compensation and the Company's performance relative to the CEO compensation and performance of our Peer Group.  Performance was defined as the relative ranking of the following four performance metrics:
·
Net sales growth;
·
Return on invested capital;
·
Growth in earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA); and
·
Total shareholder return (stock price appreciation plus dividends)

The consultant evaluated each performance metric independently relative to the Peer Group for the year 2014, the three-year period 2012 through 2014, and the five-year period 2010 through 2014.  The relative ranking of each performance metric was averaged to form a composite ranking.  The Company's relative composite performance ranking was aligned with the peer companies as follows:
·
2014: 50th  percentile
·
2012 through 2014: 25th percentile
·
2010 through 2014: 19th percentile

The consultant compared the performance for 2014 to the CEO's bonus for fiscal year 2014.  This ranked at the 38th percentile of the Peer Group CEO's, while the Company's relative performance composite ranked at the 50th percentile of the Peer Group. The Committee is satisfied with the alignment of the relative ranking of the CEO's bonus with the relative ranking of Company performance.

For the three-year period 2012 through 2014, the CEO's three-year realizable compensation relative to peers ranked at the 29th percentile while the Company's performance composite ranked at the 25th percentile of the peers.  Realizable compensation includes base salary, actual bonuses paid, the intrinsic value of equity awards at the year-end 2014 stock price and performance shares earned or expected to be earned.

For the five-year period 2010 through 2014, the CEO's five-year realizable compensation relative to peers ranked at the 21st percentile while the Company's performance composite ranked at the 19th percentile of the Peer Group.
31



The Committee evaluated this information and concluded that the Company's relative performance was aligned with the relative realizable value of compensation paid to the CEO on both a three-year and five-year basis.

As further emphasis on the Committee's philosophy to align long-term incentive compensation with the Company's performance, below is a table which reflects the actual realized portion as of September 30, 2015 of the performance-based long-term incentive compensation awards over the past seven years for our CEO:

Grant
Performance Measure
 
Grant Value
   
Grant Date Stock Price
   
Vesting Thresholds
   
Percent of Shares Earned
   
Forfeiture Date
 
2009
Stock Price
 
$
811,710
   
$
41.24
   
$
45.37
   
$
51.55
   
$
57.74
     
0.0
%
 
Forfeited
 
2010
Stock Price
 
$
829,635
   
$
37.31
   
$
41.05
   
$
46.64
   
$
52.24
     
66.7
%
 
Forfeited
 
2011
Stock Price
 
$
985,250
   
$
33.39
   
$
35.06
   
$
38.40
   
$
41.74
     
100.0
%
   
2016
 
2012
Stock Price
 
$
570,700
   
$
34.89
   
$
36.63
   
$
40.12
   
$
43.61
     
100.0
%
   
2017
 
2013
Non-GAAP EPS
 
$
354,875
   
$
28.39
   
$
2.57
   
$
2.83
   
$
3.11
     
66.7
%
   
2016
 
2013
Stock Price
 
$
439,875
   
$
28.39
   
$
29.81
   
$
32.65
   
$
35.49
     
100.0
%
   
2018
 
2014
Non-GAAP EPS
 
$
427,770
   
$
40.74
   
$
2.69
   
$
2.94
   
$
3.14
     
66.7
%
   
2017
 
2014
Stock Price
 
$
558,810
   
$
40.74
   
$
42.78
   
$
46.85
   
$
50.93
     
100.0
%
   
2019
 
2015
Non-GAAP EPS
 
$
499,200
   
$
46.08
   
$
2.88
   
$
3.11
   
$
3.36
     
33.3
%
   
2018
 
2015
Stock Price
 
$
591,012
   
$
46.08
   
$
48.39
   
$
53.00
   
$
57.60
     
66.7
%
   
2020
 
Total
                                           
69.0
%
       

Restricted stock awards granted in fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2010 expired in November 2013 and November 2014, respectively, and stock option awards granted in fiscal 2005 expired in November 2015.  As a result, the unvested portions of these performance-based stock awards, totaling $1,356,332, were forfeited.
32

Base Salaries

The Committee determines and approves the base salaries of the Company's executives, including the CEO, and considers recommendations from the CEO with respect to the other executives.  The Committee employs the same principles that are applied in developing the base salaries of all employees.  Base salary ranges are determined for each executive position based on their level, responsibilities and complexity using the 50th percentile survey data for similar positions at comparable companies.  A base salary "mid-point" is determined for each position based on this competitive market median data and ranges are established to provide that the Company's salary levels are managed between 80% and 120% of such "mid-point."

In determining base salary adjustments for each executive, the Committee considers the individual's performance evaluation, the level of responsibility for the position, an individual's current base salary in relation to "mid-point" and industry competition for executive talent.  As discussed earlier, the Committee's philosophy is to target fixed base salaries at the median of the market.  On this basis, calendar 2014 base salaries were increased for calendar 2015 as follows:

NEO
 
Percent Increase
 
Mr. Bartolacci
   
5.0%
 
Mr. Nicola
   
4.5%
 
Mr. Schawk
   
n/a
 
Mr. Gackenbach
   
3.5%
 
Mr. Walters
   
5.1%
 

As a result of these adjustments, when compared to the market median base salary data developed for each position by our consultant, each named executive officer's fiscal 2015 base salary was positioned as follows:  Mr. Bartolacci – 97%, Mr. Nicola – 99%, Mr. Gackenbach – 97%, and Mr. Walters – 91%.  Mr. Schawk is subject to an employment agreement effective July 29, 2014 which did not provide for a base salary adjustment at January 1, 2015.  When compared to the market median base salary data developed for his current position by our consultant, his base salary was positioned above the market median, but consistent with his prior salary as the Chief Executive Officer of Schawk, Inc.

The Company has a process under which executives are subject to an annual individual performance evaluation.  The evaluations are designed to rate each executive on various criteria, both objective and subjective, including the areas of leadership, technical expertise, initiative, judgment and personal development.   An overall rating is assessed to each individual from these evaluations and is an important element in determining annual adjustments to base salaries.  The rating levels include:  Distinguished (highest rating), Commendable, Competent, Adequate and Provisional (lowest rating).  The Committee conducts an evaluation of the CEO's performance and the CEO conducts an evaluation of each executive officer's performance.  Each of the named executives, including Mr. Bartolacci, was rated at either the Commendable or Distinguished levels.


Annual Incentive Compensation

The Company's 2010 Incentive Compensation Plan (the "2010 Plan") covers the annual incentive compensation to be paid to key managers of the Company, including the NEOs.  The 2010 Plan provides an incentive arrangement based on the establishment and achievement of
 
33

annual goals reflective of the Company's business plan.  The objective of the program is to promote the Company's goal of increasing shareholder value.  The Company believes that two of the key elements in the creation of shareholder value are:

·
growth in operating profit (or EBITDA); and
·
improvement in operating profit greater than the cost of the capital utilized to generate this profit.

Operating profit less the associated capital cost is referred to as "economic value added".  Accordingly, the 2015 incentive compensation plan was designed to motivate management to achieve levels of operating profit (or EBITDA) and economic value added reflective of the Company's business plan.

Designated managers within each of the Company's business segments participate in the incentive program for their respective business unit.  Incentive compensation for these participants (except the SGK Brand Solutions segment) is calculated based on the achievement of operating profit and economic value added targets established for their individual business unit.  Economic value added for business units is defined as the unit's operating profit less its cost of capital (cost of capital is determined based on a pre-tax rate of 12% times net controllable assets, which is estimated to be the Company's weighted average pre-tax cost of capital).  Incentive compensation for SGK Brand Solutions participants, including Mr. Schawk, is calculated based on the achievement of EBITDA targets established for this business unit.

Incentive compensation for corporate executives is calculated based on the achievement of pre-established targets for net income and economic value added performance of the Company on a consolidated basis.  Corporate economic value added is defined as the Company's net income less its after-tax cost of capital (with cost of capital based on an after-tax rate of 8%, which is estimated to be the Company's weighted average after-tax cost of capital).

Operating profit, EBITDA, net income and economic value added targets are established at the beginning of the fiscal year by the Compensation Committee.  In determining these targets for fiscal 2015, the Committee considered the long-term growth objectives of the Company; fiscal 2015 operating budgets approved by the Company's Board of Directors; and current economic, industry and competitive market conditions.  Fiscal 2015 performance targets established for the business units of the NEO's were as follows:

Corporate (Mr. Bartolacci, Mr. Nicola and Mr. Walters)
   
Net Income
   
Economic Value Added
   
Relative Incentive %
 
Target
 
$
78,900
   
$
14,100
     
100
%
Minimum
 
$
71,010
   
$
7,050
     
50
%
Maximum
 
$
86,790
   
$
21,150
     
200
%

SGK Brand Solutions (Mr. Schawk)
   
EBITDA
   
Relative Incentive %
 
Target
 
$
157,788
     
100
%
Minimum
 
$
142,009
     
50
%
Maximum
 
$
173,567
     
200
%

34


Memorialization (Mr. Gackenbach)
   
Operating Profit
   
Economic Value Added
   
Relative Incentive %
 
Target
 
$
82,658
   
$
25,400
     
100
%
Minimum
 
$
74,392
   
$
19,050
     
50
%
Maximum
 
$
90,924
   
$
31,750
     
200
%


Note:  All targets exclude certain non-GAAP adjustments as approved by the Committee, such as acquisition related costs, restructuring costs, asset impairments, litigation settlement and related costs, and other non-GAAP adjustments as presented in the Company's quarterly an annual earnings reports.

Corporate amounts are based on consolidated net income and economic value added of the Company.  Memorialization amounts do not include the results of the Environmental Solutions division of this segment.

The attainment of target performance levels result in an earned incentive equivalent to the participant's target incentive amount (discussed below).  No incentive amounts are earned for operating results that do not achieve the defined minimum performance levels.  Incentive amounts cannot exceed the defined maximum percentage of the participant's target incentive amount.  Earned incentive percentages are interpolated within the ranges.

For the NEOs (except Mr. Schawk) for fiscal 2015, one-half of the participant's incentive compensation opportunity was based on the achievement of operating profit targets (net income in the case of Corporate participants), with the remaining portion based on the achievement of economic value added targets.  To better align business unit performance with the Company's consolidated objectives, 25% of the incentive compensation opportunity for Mr. Gackenbach was based on the achievement of the Company's consolidated results.

The target incentive amount is expressed as a percentage of the participant's base salary and based upon the executive's position and the industry recommended percentage target for the position as provided to the Company by Pay Governance LLC.  Target, minimum and maximum incentive award opportunities for the CEO and other NEOs are included in the table below.

Named Executive Officer
 
Target Incentive Award as a Percent of Base Salary
   
Minimum Incentive Award as a Percent of Base Salary
   
Maximum Incentive Award as a Percent of Base Salary
 
J.C. Bartolacci
   
100
%
   
50
%
   
200
%
S.F. Nicola
   
70
%
   
35
%
   
140
%
D.A. Schawk
   
75
%
   
50
%
   
150
%
S.D. Gackenbach
   
50
%
   
25
%
   
100
%
B.D. Walters
   
40
%
   
20
%
   
80
%

Actual results for fiscal 2015 compared to target levels were as follows.  Actual and target amounts reflect the following non-GAAP adjustments as pre-approved by the Compensation Committee:  acquisition-related costs, restructuring costs, asset impairments, litigation settlement and related costs, and other non-GAAP adjustments as presented in the Company's quarterly and annual earnings reports.
35

Corporate

   
Actual
   
Target
   
Relative Incentive %
   
Allocation
   
Incentive Earned
 
Net income
 
$
90,492
   
$
78,900
     
200
%
   
50
%
   
100
%
Economic value added
 
$
26,073
   
$
14,100
     
200
%
   
50
%
   
100
%
   Total
                                   
200
%

SGK Brand Solutions

   
Actual
   
Target
   
Incentive Earned
 
EBITDA
 
$
158,867
   
$
157,788
     
101
%

Memorialization

   
Actual
   
Target
   
Relative Incentive %
   
Allocation
   
Incentive Earned
 
Operating profit
 
$
92,684
   
$
82,658
     
200
%
   
50
%
   
100
%
Economic value added
 
$
33,826
   
$
25,400
     
200
%
   
50
%
   
100
%
   Total
                                   
200
%


Based on actual results, the calculation of the earned incentive amounts were as follows:

 
 
Named Executive Officer
 
Base Salary
   
Target Incentive
   
Target
Incentive Amount
   
Earned Incentive
   
Earned
Incentive Amount
 
J.C. Bartolacci
 
$
773,850
     
100
%
 
$
773,850
     
200
%
 
$
1,547,700
 
S.F. Nicola
 
$
464,000
     
70
%
 
$
324,800
     
200
%
 
$
649,600
 
D.A. Schawk
 
$
595,000
     
75
%
 
$
446,250
     
101
%
 
$
449,597
 
S.D. Gackenbach
 
$
369,500
     
50
%
 
$
184,750
     
200
%
 
$
369,500
 
B.D. Walters
 
$
323,000
     
40
%
 
$
129,200
     
200
%
 
$
258,400
 
Note: 25% of the target incentive amount for Mr. Gackenbach was based on the achievement of the Corporate results.

Incentive amounts may be subject to reduction at the discretion of the Committee based on the performance of the NEO relative pre-established, quantifiable personal goals.  Each incentive compensation plan participant develops personal goals, which are subject to review and approval by the business unit President or Chief Executive Officer, as appropriate.  The personal goals of the CEO are reviewed and approved by the Committee.  The Committee may use discretion to decrease calculated awards based on the participant's performance relative to the quantifiable individual goals, however, no adjustments were made in fiscal 2015.


Long-Term Incentive Compensation

Long-Term Incentive Compensation for fiscal 2015 was provided to key managers and executives under the Company's 2012 Equity Incentive Plan (the "2012 Equity Plan").

The 2012 Equity Plan is an equity compensation plan designed to directly align the interests of employees with the Company's shareholders.
36

The 2012 Equity Plan is intended to encourage eligible employees to increase their efforts to make the Company more successful, to provide an additional inducement for such employees to remain with the Company, to reward such employees by providing an opportunity to acquire shares of the Company's common stock on favorable terms and to provide a means through which the Company may attract able persons to enter the employ of the Company.  The eligible employees are those employees of the Company or any subsidiary who share responsibility for the management, growth or protection of the business of the Company.

Under the 2012 Equity Plan, equity grants can be made in the form of:
·
Stock options,
·
Restricted share awards,
·
Restricted stock units,
·
Performance units,
·
Stock appreciation rights, and
·
Other stock-based awards.

Prior to fiscal 2008, equity grants were predominantly in the form of performance-vesting stock options.  Since fiscal 2008, the Company has issued restricted shares with time and performance-vesting provisions.

The Committee considers growth in stock price as the best means of measuring shareholder value creation over the long-term.  For this reason, the Committee believes that the use of stock-based compensation has provided a strong link to meeting this objective.  In keeping with the Committee's philosophy of providing performance-based incentives, the restricted shares awarded in fiscal 2015 generally contained performance-vesting provisions for one-half of the shares granted.  Further, in order to enhance the Company's retention objectives, the remaining one-half of the shares granted contain a time-vesting feature in which such shares vest three years from the grant date subject to continued employment of the executive by the Company.

For the fiscal 2015 grant, the Company established two criteria for the performance-vesting shares
·
One-half (50%) of the performance-vesting shares (i.e., 25% of the overall award) vest upon the attainment of non-GAAP annual earnings per share of $2.88, $3.11 and $3.36, and
·
One-half (50%) of the performance-vesting shares (i.e., 25% of the overall award) vest upon the attainment of 5%, 15% and 25% appreciation in the Company's stock price.

Failure to achieve the earnings per share targets within three years of the date of grant or the stock price hurdles within five years of the date of grant will result in forfeiture of the applicable portion of the respective awards.

In July 2014, as an incentive for achievement of the Company's integration objectives in connection with the SGK acquisition and the retention of key executives, the Committee awarded a special grant of 28,110 shares of restricted stock on the acquisition date to Mr. Schawk.  One-half (50%) of the shares vest based on the achievement of performance targets, with the remaining half of the shares based on continued employment over a three-year period.  The performance-vesting shares require the achievement of pre-determined EBITDA targets for the SGK Brand Solutions segment within three years of the date of grant.

Every year, the Committee determines individual grant levels through consultation with the independent compensation advisor.  The Committee is provided grant guidelines by Pay Governance LLC, which provide recommended grant award ranges based on current market thresholds.  The recommended ranges provide a minimum, maximum and target grant award for
 
37

each position / salary level. The grant ranges are developed such that the minimum of the range aligns with the market 50th percentile, the maximum of the range aligns with the market 75th percentile and the target level in the range represents the average of the market 50th and 75th percentile opportunity.  The Committee has chosen this approach since a portion of the grants contain performance-vesting criteria and to align with its philosophy of providing modestly above market variable compensation opportunities.  Additionally, the design of our performance-based awards requires the achievement of all performance targets to vest in the target number of shares.  Our performance-vesting share design caps award payouts at the target level and does not provide for awards to vest in an amount above the target number of shares granted.  Actual grants within this range are determined based on the individual performance assessments of each executive during the past fiscal year.  Grants made to the NEOs in November 2014 were within the above range, but were capped at the target level.

Grant recommendations are developed using a valuation model consistent with accounting policies for stock-based compensation and is based on the fair market value of the Company's common stock on the dates of grant.  Grants to executive officers are generally made only once a year in the Company's first fiscal quarter (usually at the November meeting of the Committee), except for new hires and promotions.  The Company does not time the release of material non-public information around the granting of equity compensation awards.

Stock options and restricted shares may also vest under certain change in control circumstances.  Performance-based restricted shares cannot vest earlier than one year from the date of grant and expire on the earlier of three or five years (depending on the vesting criteria) from the date of grant, upon employment termination, or within specified time limits following voluntary employment termination (with consent of the Company), retirement or death.  Stock options are not exercisable within six months from the date of grant and expire on the earlier of ten years from the date of grant, upon employment termination, or within specified time limits following voluntary employment termination (with consent of the Company), retirement or death.
The minimum holding periods for vested stock options and restricted share awards are governed by the Company's stock ownership guidelines.  The ownership policy mandates that at least 50% of the after-tax shares realized upon an option exercise or vesting of restricted stock must be retained until the ownership guideline is met.

Beginning with the November 2011 restricted share grant, dividends on unvested shares are no longer paid directly; rather, dividends associated with unvested restricted stock are accrued and  only become payable if and upon the vesting of the restricted shares.  Accordingly, dividends will not be paid if the restricted shares do not become vested and are instead forfeited.


Adjustments or Recovery of Prior Compensation

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 requires the CEO and Chief Financial Officer to reimburse the Company for any awards received following the release of financial results that subsequently require an accounting restatement due to noncompliance with a material financial reporting requirement as a result of misconduct.  Additionally, our 2010 Plan has a recoupment provision under which the Committee has the discretion to adjust for the recovery of previously paid awards from any participant, where appropriate, in the event of restatement of prior financial statements.  No such adjustments have been necessary under these provisions. 
 
The 2010 Plan and the 2012 Plan provide the Committee the discretion over the three-year period following the grant of awards to cancel, suspend or require repayment to the Company of outstanding awards if the participant (i) competes with the Company or its subsidiaries, (ii) violates solicitation provisions with customers or employees, or (iii) defames or disparages the Company, its subsidiaries or certain related persons.


38

Stock Ownership Guidelines

The Company has established stock ownership guidelines for executive officers and business unit management in order to support a culture of ownership among the management team.  The Committee believes significant ownership levels will provide additional motivation to executives to perform in accordance with the interests of the Company's shareholders. The ownership guidelines are expressed as a multiple of base salary and are as follows:

 
Position
Minimum Equivalent Stock Value
 
Chief Executive Officer
 
5 times base salary
 
Chief Financial Officer; Group Presidents
 
4 times base salary
 
Division Presidents; Vice President, Human Resources; Vice President and General Counsel; Vice President and Controller
 
3 times base salary
 
Managers directly reporting to Division Presidents
 
2 times base salary
 
Other managers eligible for equity compensation and other incentive compensation plan participants
 
1 time base salary

For purposes of these guidelines, stock ownership includes all shares directly owned (including shares held under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan and time-vesting restricted shares), but does not include outstanding stock options or unvested performance-based restricted shares.  Immediate compliance with these guidelines is not mandatory; however, individuals are expected to undertake a program to achieve compliance within five years of their hire date or promotion to their respective position.  The ownership policy mandates that at least 50% of the after-tax shares realized upon an option exercise or vesting of restricted stock must be retained until the ownership guideline is met.  Compliance with these ownership guidelines is one of the factors considered by the Compensation Committee in determining eligibility for participation in the Company's equity compensation programs.

As of November 30, 2015, all NEOs exceeded the Company's stock ownership guidelines.


Anti-Hedging Policy

The Company has a policy that prohibits directors, officers and employees from hedging the Company's stock.
39

Retirement Benefits

Retirement benefits are generally provided to executives under the Company's principal retirement plan and in some cases, a SERP.  The purpose of both these plans is to provide post-retirement compensation and stability to executives.  The Committee's goal is to provide a benefit that is competitive with plans which would be available to executives of similar companies. The Committee believes this philosophy will allow the Company to effectively attract and retain talented executives.

Executive officers may become eligible to participate in the Company's SERP.  To be eligible for participation, the individual must be an executive officer of the Company as designated by the Board of Directors annually and meet certain length of service requirements as a designated executive officer and in total with the Company.  Of the NEOs, Messrs. Bartolacci and Nicola participate in the SERP.  Unlike the principal retirement plan, the SERP is an unsecured obligation of the Company and is not a tax-qualified plan.  Funding for the SERP is provided through a non-revocable trust arrangement.  The SERP is intended to make-up the tax-related limitation of benefits under the principal retirement plan and to provide retirement benefits at competitive market rates.  In addition, the SERP serves as a retention vehicle as benefits generally do not fully vest until the completion of a minimum of 15 years of service.

In 2009, the Committee closed the SERP to any new participants going forward, including Messrs. Gackenbach and Walters, and created a separate plan for any new designate executive going forward, which limits the benefit available to the restoration of amounts lost to tax-related limitations under the Company's other retirement and 401(k) plans.


Other Compensation

The Company generally provides all domestic employees with the following:
·
401(k) plan,
·
Employee stock purchase plan,
·
Health and dental coverage,
·
Company-paid term life insurance,
·
Disability insurance,
·
Educational assistance, and
·
Paid time off (vacations and holidays).

These benefits are designed to be competitive with overall market practices.  Educational assistance for dependent children is also provided to any employee of the Company whose child meets the scholastic eligibility criteria and is attending an eligible college or university.  Educational assistance is limited to $1,200 for each semester and $2,400 annually.

The Company provides executives with other benefits, reflected in the "All Other Compensation" column in the Summary Compensation Table, which the Committee considers reasonable, competitive and consistent with the Company's compensation philosophy.  These benefits include supplemental life insurance coverage, costs associated with personal use of a vehicle and, in certain circumstances, club dues, financial counseling and tax preparation services.
 
Employment and Severance Agreements

None of the named executives have employment, severance or change-of-control agreements, except for Mr. Schawk.
 
 
40

Mr. Schawk signed an employment agreement with the Company upon the acquisition of Schawk, Inc., on July 29, 2014.  Under his employment agreement, which has an initial term of three-years, he will receive base salary at an initial annual rate of $595,000 and will be entitled to an annual incentive bonus at a target rate of 75% of base salary based on the performance of his business unit.  For fiscal 2015, the incentive bonus was subject to a minimum payment amount of $297,500.  In addition, under the employment agreement, Mr. Schawk received an award of 28,110 shares of restricted stock effective July 29, 2014.  The restricted shares are subject to performance-based vesting criteria for 50% of the shares granted, with the remaining 50% of the shares subject to continued employment for the initial three-year term of the employment agreement.  The employment agreement also specifies other compensation generally consistent with the Company's employee benefit plans.


Tax Policy

Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, disallows federal income tax deductions for compensation paid to the Chief Executive Officer and any of the other four highest compensated executives in excess of $1 million in any taxable year, subject to certain exceptions. One exception involves compensation paid pursuant to shareholder-approved compensation plans that are performance-based.  Certain of the provisions in the 2010 Plan are intended to cause awards earned under such plan to be eligible for this exception (so that compensation related to such awards should be deductible under the Internal Revenue Code).  In addition, certain of the provisions in the 2007 Equity Incentive Plan and 2012 Equity Incentive Plan are intended to cause grants of performance-based stock compensation under such plan to be eligible for this exception (so that compensation related to the vesting or exercise of such shares should be deductible under the Internal Revenue Code).  Payments of cash compensation to executives (except annual incentive compensation awards earned under the 2010 Plan) and time-based grants of restricted shares under the 2012 Plan are not at present eligible for this performance-based exception.  The Committee has taken and intends to continue to take actions, as appropriate, to attempt to minimize, if not eliminate, the Company's non-deductible compensation expense within the context of maintaining the flexibility which the Committee believes to be an important element of the Company's executive compensation program.




41

Annual Compensation of the Named Executive Officers

The table below summarizes the compensation for fiscal 2015, 2014 and 2013 earned by the Company's Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and each of the three other most highly paid executive officers who were serving as executive officers at September 30, 2015.  These individuals are sometimes referred to in this Proxy Statement as the "named executive officers", or the "NEOs".

Summary Compensation Table

Name and
Principal Position
 
Year (1)
   
Salary
   
Bonus
   
Stock
Awards (2)
   
Option
Awards
   
Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compen-sation (3)
   
Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Plan Compen-sation (4)
   
All
Other Compen-sation (5)
   
Total
 
Joseph C. Bartolacci
Director, President and Chief Executive Officer
   
2015
2014
2013
   
$
765,346
729,615
698,769
   
$
-
-
-
   
$
2,837,417
2,449,493
2,036,813
     
-
-
-
   
$
1,547,700
774,587
552,368
   
$
886,052
531,501
-
   
$
80,584
83,690
77,107
   
$
6,117,099
4,568,886
3,365,057
 
Steven F. Nicola
Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
   
2015
2014
2013
     
459,385
439,673
420,577
     
-
-
-
     
984,800
781,505
651,780
     
-
-
-
     
649,600
326,651
233,228
     
570,508
297,112
-
     
35,480
38,495
36,033
     
2,699,773
1,883,436
1,341,618
 
David A. Schawk
Director, President,
SGK Brand Solutions (6)
   
2015
2014
     
595,000
114,423
     
-
     
-
1,225,033
     
-
     
449,597
71,057
     
-
-
     
10,200
8,646
     
1,054,797
1,419,159
 
Steven D. Gackenbach
Group President,
Memorialization
   
2015
2014
2013
     
366,615
354,231
334,615
     
-
-
-
     
436,520
443,241
439,952
     
-
-
-
     
369,500
88,175
286,730
     
28,643
40,478
8,319
     
29,507
27,806
22,783
     
1,230,785
953,931
1,092,399
 
Brian D. Walters
Vice President and General Counsel
   
2015
2014
2013
     
319,377
304,231
291,000
     
-
-
-
     
528,190
256,614
244,418
     
-
-
-
     
258,400
129,189
92,140
     
80,827
121,372
-
     
21,867
21,633
18,158
     
1,208,661
833,039
645,716
 

(1) For the fiscal years ended September 30, 2015, 2014 and 2013.
(2) Amounts in this column reflect the grant date fair value of awards of restricted shares of the Company's Common Stock granted during fiscal 2015, 2014 and 2013 computed in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board ASC Topic 718; however, the estimate of forfeiture related to service-based vesting conditions is disregarded for purposes of this valuation.  For details of individual grants of restricted shares during fiscal 2015, see the Grants of Plan-Based Awards table below.  During fiscal 2015, restricted shares were forfeited by the named executive officers, as follows:  Mr. Bartolacci, 9,500 shares; Mr. Nicola, 2,940 shares; and Mr. Walters, 700 shares.  During fiscal 2014, restricted shares were forfeited by the named executive officers, as follows:  Mr. Bartolacci, 26,100 shares; Mr. Nicola, 8,070 shares; and Mr. Dunn, 4,500 shares.  During fiscal 2013, restricted shares were forfeited by the named executive officers, as follows:  Mr. Bartolacci, 11,600 shares; Mr. Nicola, 4,833 shares; and Mr. Dunn, 1,800 shares.  The assumptions on which this valuation is based are set forth in Note 9 to the audited financial statements included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 24, 2015.
(3) The amounts shown in this column reflect amounts earned and paid under the 2010 Plan, except the amount shown for Mr. Schawk in fiscal 2014.  For a full explanation of the operation of the Incentive Compensation Plan, refer to the narrative disclosure above and the Annual Incentive Compensation section of the Compensation Discussion and Analysis beginning on page 33 of this Proxy Statement.  The amount shown for Mr. Schawk for fiscal 2014 represents the pro rata portion (for the period July 29, 2014 through September 30, 2014) of the amount earned under the Annual Incentive Program of Schawk, Inc. ("Schawk"), which was paid by the Company.
(4) The amount shown in this column for each of the named executive officers is the increase, if any, in the actuarial present value of the accumulated benefits under all defined benefit plans for the years ended September 30, 2015, 2014 and 2013.  A significant portion of the amounts listed for fiscal 2015 resulted from a change in the mortality table in fiscal 2015, and a significant portion of the amounts listed for fiscal 2014 resulted from a reduction in the discount rate, due to the decline in market interest rates.  For additional information regarding defined benefit pension plans, see the Pension Benefits table below.
(5) Amounts represent one or more of the following:  premiums for officer's life insurance, incremental premiums for long-term disability insurance, club dues, dividends on restricted shares, the value for personal use of Company leased vehicles, matching contributions to the Company's 401(k) Plan, educational assistance, and the personal use of aircraft (Mr. Schawk in fiscal 2014 only).  The fiscal 2015, 2014 and 2013 amounts for Mr. Bartolacci include dividends on restricted shares of $43,578, $47,978 and $41,667, respectively.  The fiscal 2015, 2014 and 2013 amounts for Mr. Nicola include dividends on restricted shares of $15,494, $16,775 and $12,756, respectively.  The amounts for Mr. Gackenbach include vehicle allowances of $15,600 in fiscal 2015, 2014 and 2013.
(6) Mr. Schawk joined the Company on July 29, 2014 and received a pro-rated base salary pursuant to the terms of his employment agreement.


42

The following table provides information on grants of plan-based awards held by the named executive officers during fiscal 2015.

Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table

 
Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards
 
Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards
           
Name
Grant Date (1)
 
Threshold
($)
   
Target
($) ( 2)
   
Maximum
($)
 
Threshold
(#)
 
Target
(# ) (3)
 
Maximum
(#)
 
All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock or Units
(#) (4)
 
All Other Option Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Options
(#)
Exercise or Base Price of Option Awards
($/Share)
 
Grant Date
Fair Value of Stock Awards
($) (5)
 
J.C. Bartolacci
11/12/14
                 
5,417
                
$
249,615
 
 11/12/14
                 
5,417
               
249,615
 
 11/12/14
                 
5,416
               
249,570
 
 11/12/14
                 
5,417
               
223,830
 
 11/12/14
                 
5,417
               
196,366
 
 11/12/14
                 
5,416
               
170,821
 
 11/12/14
                           
32,500
         
1,497,600
 
 11/12/14
 
 
$386,925
   
 
$773,850
   
 
$1,547,700
                                 
S.F. Nicola
11/12/14
                             
1,880
                   
86,630
 
 11/12/14
                             
1,880
                   
86,630
 
 11/12/14
                             
1,880
                   
86,630
 
 11/12/14
                             
1,880
                   
77,682
 
 11/12/14
                             
1,880
                   
68,150
 
 11/12/14
                             
1,880
                   
59,295
 
 11/12/14
                                       
11,280
         
519,783
 
 11/12/14
   
162,400
     
324,800
     
649,600
                                 
D.A. Schawk
11/12/14
   
297,500
     
446,250
     
892,500
       
-
       
-
         
-
 
S.D. Gackenbach
11/12/14
                             
833
                   
38,385
 
 11/12/14
                             
833
                   
38,385
 
 11/12/14
                             
834
                   
38,430
 
 11/12/14
                             
833
                   
34,420
 
 11/12/14
                             
833
                   
30,196
 
 11/12/14
                             
834
                   
26,304
 
 11/12/14
                                       
5,000
         
230,400
 
 11/12/14
   
92,375
     
184,750
     
369,500
                                 
B.D. Walters
11/12/14
                             
1,008
                   
46,448
 
 11/12/14
                             
1,008
                   
46,448
 
 11/12/14
                             
1,009
                   
46,495
 
 11/12/14
                             
1,008
                   
41,651
 
 11/12/14
                             
1,008
                   
36,540
 
 11/12/14
                             
1,009
                   
31,824
 
 11/12/14
                                       
6,050
         
278,784
 
 11/12/14
   
64,600
     
129,200
     
258,400
                                 

(1(1)
All grants were effective as of the date on which the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors met to approve them.
(2(2)
Amounts represent target payouts under the Company's 2010 Plan.  The target represents the named executive officer's annual salary multiplied by his respective target incentive award percentage.  The target incentive award percentages, expressed as a percentage of annual base salary are 100% for Mr. Bartolacci, 70% for Mr. Nicola, 75% for Mr. Schawk, 50% for Mr. Gackenbach, and 40% for Mr. Walters.  For a full explanation of the operation of the 2010 Plan, refer to the Annual Incentive Compensation section of the Compensation Discussion and Analysis beginning on page 33 of this Proxy Statement.
(3) Amounts represent the number of shares of restricted stock granted pursuant to the 2012 Equity Plan that vest upon certain performance criteria.  Performance-based restricted shares granted in November 2014 were granted such that for 50% of such shares vesting occurs in one-third increments upon the attainment of annual adjusted earnings per share of $2.88, $3.11 and $3.36, respectively; and for 50% of such shares vesting occurs upon the attainment of 5%, 15% and 25% appreciation, respectively, in the market value of the Company's Common Stock, but in no event prior to the expiration of one year from the date of the grant.  Restricted shares may also vest under certain change in control circumstances.  The restricted shares are forfeited if the adjusted earnings per share and stock price appreciation performance vesting criteria have not been met on the earlier of three and five years from the date of grant, respectively, upon employment termination, or within specified time limits following voluntary employment termination (with consent of the Company), retirement or death. For a full explanation of the operation of the 2012 Equity Plan, refer to the Long-Term Incentive Compensation section of the Compensation Discussion and Analysis beginning on page 36 of this Proxy Statement.
43

(4) Amounts represent the number of shares of restricted stock granted pursuant to the 2012 Equity Plan that fully vest on the third anniversary of the grant date.  Restricted shares may also vest under certain change in control circumstances.  The restricted shares are forfeited upon employment termination, or within specified time limits following voluntary employment termination (with consent of the Company), retirement or death. For a full explanation of the operation of the 2012 Equity Plan, refer to the Long-Term Incentive Compensation section of the Compensation Discussion and Analysis beginning on page 36 of this Proxy Statement.
(5) Grant date fair values are developed using a Binomial pricing model based on the fair market value of the Company's common stock on the dates of grant.  The assumptions on which this valuation is based are set forth in Note 9 to the audited financial statements included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 24, 2015.


The following table sets forth information concerning the fiscal 2015 year-end value of unexercised options and unearned restricted shares for each of the named executive officers.

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End Table

  Option Awards Stock Awards
   
Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Exercisable
   
Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Unexercisable (1)
   
Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Unearned Options (#) (2)
   
Option Exercise Price
 
Option Expiration Date
 
No. of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#)
   
Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested ($) (9)
   
Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (#)
   
Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested ($) (9)
 
J.C. Bartolacci
   
0
     
0
     
26,666
     
(3
)
 
$
37.29
 
11/16/2015
               
     
47,432
     
0
     
34,166
     
(4
)
 
$
40.56
 
11/15/2016
               
                                               
37,500
(5)
   
1,836,375
     
12,500
(10)
   
612,125
 
                                               
31,500
(6)
   
1,542,555
     
10,500
(11)
   
514,185
 
                                               
32,500
(7)
   
1,591,525
     
32,500
(12)
   
1,591,525
 
                                                                           
S.F.  Nicola
   
0
     
0
     
18,333
     
(3
)
 
$
37.29
 
11/16/2015
                               
     
21,728
     
0
     
14,666
     
(4
)
 
$
40.56
 
11/15/2016
                               
                                               
12,000
(5)
   
587,640
     
4,000
(10)
   
195,880
 
                                               
10,050
(6)
   
492,149
     
3,350
(11)
   
164,050
 
                                               
11,280
(7)
   
552,382
     
11,280
(12)
   
552,382
 
                                                                           
D.A.Schawk
                                             
14,055
(8)
   
688,273
     
14,055
(13)
   
688,273
 
                                                                           
S.D. Gackenbach
                                             
8,100
(5)
   
396,657
     
2,700
(10)
   
132,219
 
                                               
5,700
(6)
   
279,129
     
1,900
(11)
   
93,043
 
                                               
5,000
(7)
   
244,850
     
5,000
(12)
   
244,850
 
                                                                           
B.D.Walters
   
0
     
0
     
4,166
     
(3
)
 
$
37.29
 
11/16/2015
                               
     
0
     
0
     
2,666
     
(4
)
 
$
40.56
 
11/15/2016
                               
                                               
4,500
(5)
   
220,365
     
1,500
(10)
   
73,455
 
                                               
3,300
(6)
   
161,601
     
1,100
(11)
   
53,867
 
                                               
6,050
(7)
   
296,269
     
6,050
(12)
   
296,269
 


(1(1)
Represents options that have met performance vesting thresholds, but have not met time vesting thresholds as of September 30, 2015 (unvested options).
(2(2)
Represents options that have not met performance vesting thresholds as of September 30, 2015 (unearned options).
(3(3)
The unearned portion of this option grant will be earned and vested upon the stock price of the Company's common stock reaching 160% of the exercise price for ten consecutive trading days.  These options were forfeited on November 16, 2015.
(4(4)
The unearned portion of this option grant will be earned and vested upon the stock price of the Company's common stock reaching 160% of the exercise price for ten consecutive trading days.
(5(5)
Represents restricted shares that were fully vested on November 14, 2015.
(6(6)
Represents restricted shares that will be earned and fully vested on November 13, 2016.
(7(7)
Represents restricted shares that will be earned and fully vested on November 12, 2017.
(8(8)
Represents restricted shares that will be earned and fully vested on July 29, 2017.
(9(9)
Represents the value of all unvested restricted shares as of September 30, 2015.  The value is computed by multiplying all unvested restricted shares by the $48.97, the closing price of the Company's common stock on September 30, 2015.
(1(10)
Represents restricted shares that will be earned and vested as follows: one-half upon the adjusted earnings per share of the Company reaching $2.83, and one-half upon the adjusted earnings per share of the Company reaching $3.11.  These shares vested on November 16, 2015.
44

(1(11)
Represents restricted shares that will be earned and vested as follows: one-half upon the adjusted earnings per share of the Company reaching $2.91, and one-half upon the adjusted earnings per share of the Company reaching $3.14.  One-half of these shares vested on November 16, 2015.
(1(12)
Represents restricted shares that will be earned and vested as follows: one-sixth upon the stock price of the Company's common stock reaching 105% of the grant date fair value of the Company's common stock ($46.08) for ten consecutive trading days, one-sixth upon the stock price of the Company's common stock reaching 115% of the grant date fair value of the Company's common stock for ten consecutive trading days, one-sixth upon the price of the Company's common stock reaching 125% of the grant date fair value of the Company's common stock for ten consecutive trading days, one-sixth upon the adjusted earnings per share of the Company reaching $2.88, one-sixth upon the adjusted earnings per share of the Company reaching $3.11, and one-sixth upon the adjusted earnings per share of the Company reaching $3.36.  One-third of these shares vested on November 16, 2015.
(1(13)
Represents restricted shares that will be earned and vested as follows:  One-third upon the Company's annual adjusted EBITDA reaching $145 million, one-third upon the Company's annual adjusted EBITDA reaching $160 million and one-third upon the Company's annual adjusted EBITDA reaching $170 million.  One-third of these share vested on November 16, 2015.


The following table provides information on the exercise of stock options and vesting of restricted shares for each of the named executive officers during fiscal 2015.

Option Exercises and Stock Vested

 
Option Awards
Stock Awards
Name
Number of Shares Acquired on Exercise
Value Realized on Exercise
Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting
Value Realized on Vesting
J.C. Bartolacci
47,569
$391,850
46,750
$2,205,255
S.F. Nicola
25,940
226,287
16,200
763,122
S.D. Gackenbach
-
-
8,150
384,903
B.D. Walters
2,667
33,775
7,000
328,556


Retirement Benefits

The Company's domestic retirement plan is noncontributory and provides benefits based upon length of service and final average earnings. Generally, employees age 21 with one year of continuous service are eligible to participate in the retirement plan. The benefit formula is 3/4 of 1% of the first $550 of final average monthly earnings plus 1‑1/4% of the excess times years of credited service (maximum 35 years).  The plan is a defined benefit plan and covered compensation is limited generally to base salary or wages. Benefits are not subject to any deduction or offset for Social Security.

In addition to benefits provided by the Company's retirement plan, the Company has a Supplemental Retirement Plan ("SERP"), which provides for supplemental pension benefits to certain executive officers of the Company designated by the Board of Directors.  Upon normal retirement under this plan, such individuals who meet stipulated age and service requirements are entitled to receive monthly supplemental retirement payments which, when added to their pension under the Company's retirement plan and their maximum anticipated Social Security primary insurance amount, equal, in total, 1.85% of final average monthly earnings (including incentive compensation) times the individual's years of continuous service (subject to a maximum of 35 years).  Upon early retirement under the SERP, reduced benefits will be provided, depending upon age and years of service. Benefits under the SERP vest based upon the attainment of certain levels of qualified and total continuous service.  The Company has established a non-revocable trust to fund the SERP, and a provision has been made on the Company's books for the actuarially computed obligation.

In 2009, the Committee closed the SERP to new participants and created a separate plan for any new designated executive going forward, limiting its benefit to restoring amounts lost to tax-related limitations under the Company's regular retirement and 401(k) plans.
 

 
45

The table below sets forth the number of years of credited service and the present value at September 30, 2015 of the accumulated benefits under the each of the retirement plans for each of the named executive officers.

Pension Benefits Table

Name
Plan Name
 
Number of Years Credited Service
(#) (1)
   
Present Value of Accumulated Benefit
($) (2)
   
Payments During Last Fiscal Year
($)
 
J.C. Bartolacci
Matthews International Corporation Employees Retirement Plan
   
17
   
$
459,983
     
-
 
Matthews International Corporation SERP
   
18
     
3,217,633
     
-
 
S.F. Nicola
Matthews International Corporation Employees Retirement Plan
   
21
     
573,902
     
-
 
Matthews International Corporation SERP
   
22
     
1,640,467
     
-
 
S.D. Gackenbach
Matthews International Corporation Employees Retirement Plan
   
3
     
85,069
     
-
 
B.D. Walters
Matthews International Corporation Employees Retirement Plan
   
9
     
171,763
     
-
 

(1) As of September 30, 2015. Years of credited service for the Matthews International Corporation Employees Retirement Plan begin on the first of the month following the completion of one year of service.  Years of credited service for the Company's SERP begin on the initial date of service.
(2) The assumptions on which this valuation is based are set forth in Note 11 to the audited financial statements included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 24, 2015.


The Company provides a 401(k) Plan covering substantially all domestic employees of the Company.  Participants may make pre-tax contributions to their account of 1% up to 60% of their annual compensation.  For employees covered under the Matthews International Corporation Employees Retirement Plan, which includes the named executive officers, the Company makes matching contributions to each participant at a rate of 50% of participants' deferrals up to 1% their annual compensation.  Participants are fully vested immediately in the value of their contributions and fully vested in the value of Company matching contributions after three years of service, provided they are a participant of the plan.

Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control

The following discussion describes and quantifies the payments that would be made to each of the NEOs under a variety of circumstances, assuming that each had taken place on September 30, 2015: (1) the executive resigns voluntarily without the consent of the Company; (2) the executive resigns voluntarily with the consent of the Company; (3) the executive is involuntarily terminated without cause; (4) the executive is involuntarily terminated with cause; (5) the executive dies or becomes permanently disabled while employed; (6) the executive retires; or (7) a change in control of the Company takes place.
 
Stock Options.  Under the terms of the existing stock option grants, in the event of voluntary termination of employment without the Company's consent or any involuntary terminations, any unexercised stock options are cancelled at the time of termination.  In the event of retirement or voluntary termination with the Company's consent, options granted in fiscal 2006 and 2007 continue to performance vest for a period of two years following termination.  In the event of death or termination due to permanent disability, all outstanding options become exercisable in full. 
 
46

In the event of a change in control of the Company, as defined in the Company's 2007 Equity Incentive Plan and 2012 Equity Plan, all outstanding stock options become immediately exercisable.

Restricted Stock.  Under the terms of the existing restricted stock grants, in the event of voluntary termination of employment without the Company's consent or any involuntary terminations, any unvested restricted shares are forfeited at the time of termination.  In the event of death or termination due to permanent disability, retirement or voluntary termination with the Company's consent, unvested performance-based restricted shares continue to performance vest for a period of two years following termination.  In the event of death or termination due to permanent disability, retirement or voluntary termination with the Company's consent, unvested time-based restricted shares become immediately vested.  In the event of a change in control of the Company, as defined in the Company's 2007 and 2012 Equity Incentive Plans, all unvested restricted shares immediately vest.

Supplemental Retirement Plan.  Upon a change in control of the Company, as defined in the SERP, participants accrue five additional years of credited service under the SERP.
 
The following table provides information on the potential incremental value of executive benefits upon termination of employment prior to and after a change of control, assuming termination would have occurred as of September 30, 2015.

Named Executive
Executive Benefit and Payment upon Separation
 
Voluntary Termination Without Consent
   
Voluntary Termination With
Consent (1) (3) (4)
   
Involuntary Termination Without Cause
   
Involuntary Termination With Cause
   
Death or Disability (2) (3) (4)
   
Retirement (1) (3) (4)
   
Change in Control
(2) (5) (6)
 
J.C. Bartolacci
Stock Options
 
$
0
   
$
0