Altera_2012Q3_10-Q
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
(Mark One) |
| |
[x] | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 28, 2012
OR
|
| |
[ ] | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from ________ to ________
Commission file number 0-16617
|
| | |
| | |
ALTERA CORPORATION |
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) |
| | |
|
| | |
DELAWARE | | 77-0016691 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | | (I.R.S. Employer Identification Number) |
101 INNOVATION DRIVE
SAN JOSE, CALIFORNIA 95134
(Address of principal executive offices) (zip code)
408-544-7000
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [x] No [ ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes [x] No [ ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act:
|
| | | |
Large accelerated filer [x] | Accelerated filer [ ] | Non-accelerated filer [ ] | Smaller reporting company [ ] |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes [ ] No [x]
Number of shares of common stock outstanding at October 10, 2012: 320,572,559
|
| |
| PAGE NUMBER |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Exhibit 31.1 | |
Exhibit 31.2 | |
Exhibit 32.1 | |
Exhibit 32.2 | |
EX-101 Instance Document | |
EX-101 Schema Document | |
EX-101 Calculation Linkbase Document | |
EX-101 Label Linkbase Document | |
EX-101 Presentation Linkbase Document | |
EX-101 Definition Linkbase Document | |
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
| |
ITEM 1: | Financial Statements |
ALTERA CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited)
|
| | | | | | | | |
(In thousands, except par value amount) | | September 28, 2012 | | December 31, 2011 |
Assets | | | | |
Current assets: | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 2,849,829 |
| | $ | 3,371,933 |
|
Short-term investments | | 144,195 |
| | 65,222 |
|
Total cash, cash equivalents, and short-term investments | | 2,994,024 |
| | 3,437,155 |
|
Accounts receivable, net | | 348,273 |
| | 232,273 |
|
Inventories | | 157,848 |
| | 122,279 |
|
Deferred income taxes — current | | 65,223 |
| | 58,415 |
|
Deferred compensation plan — marketable securities | | 58,151 |
| | 54,041 |
|
Deferred compensation plan — restricted cash equivalents | | 18,524 |
| | 17,938 |
|
Other current assets | | 42,134 |
| | 52,710 |
|
Total current assets | | 3,684,177 |
| | 3,974,811 |
|
Property and equipment, net | | 200,172 |
| | 171,721 |
|
Long-term investments | | 685,945 |
| | 74,033 |
|
Deferred income taxes — non-current | | 23,047 |
| | 26,629 |
|
Other assets, net | | 49,519 |
| | 35,074 |
|
Total assets | | $ | 4,642,860 |
| | $ | 4,282,268 |
|
Liabilities and stockholders' equity | | | | |
Current liabilities: | | | | |
Accounts payable | | $ | 45,589 |
| | $ | 52,154 |
|
Accrued liabilities | | 39,183 |
| | 34,029 |
|
Accrued compensation and related liabilities | | 43,563 |
| | 78,181 |
|
Deferred compensation plan obligations | | 76,675 |
| | 71,979 |
|
Deferred income and allowances on sales to distributors | | 400,351 |
| | 279,876 |
|
Credit facility | | — |
| | 500,000 |
|
Total current liabilities | | 605,361 |
| | 1,016,219 |
|
Income taxes payable — non-current | | 261,843 |
| | 263,423 |
|
Long-term debt | | 500,000 |
| | — |
|
Other non-current liabilities | | 9,496 |
| | 8,730 |
|
Total liabilities | | 1,376,700 |
| | 1,288,372 |
|
Commitments and contingencies | |
|
| |
|
|
(See “Note 11 — Commitments and Contingencies”) | | | | |
Stockholders' equity: | | | | |
Common stock: $.001 par value; 1,000,000 shares authorized; outstanding - 320,563 shares at September 28, 2012 and 322,054 shares at December 31, 2011 | | 321 |
| | 322 |
|
Capital in excess of par value | | 1,107,614 |
| | 1,050,752 |
|
Retained earnings | | 2,151,627 |
| | 1,942,955 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) | | 6,598 |
| | (133 | ) |
Total stockholders' equity | | 3,266,160 |
| | 2,993,896 |
|
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity | | $ | 4,642,860 |
| | $ | 4,282,268 |
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
ALTERA CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(Unaudited)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended | | Nine Months Ended |
(In thousands, except per share amounts) | | September 28, 2012 | | September 30, 2011 | | September 28, 2012 | | September 30, 2011 |
Net sales | | $ | 495,010 |
| | $ | 522,474 |
| | $ | 1,343,595 |
| | $ | 1,606,671 |
|
Cost of sales | | 152,007 |
| | 166,938 |
| | 408,156 |
| | 473,565 |
|
Gross margin | | 343,003 |
| | 355,536 |
| | 935,439 |
| | 1,133,106 |
|
Research and development expense | | 91,606 |
| | 80,771 |
| | 266,259 |
| | 235,438 |
|
Selling, general, and administrative expense | | 74,243 |
| | 69,345 |
| | 215,824 |
| | 208,550 |
|
Compensation expense (benefit) — deferred compensation plan | | 3,274 |
| | (6,642 | ) | | 6,697 |
| | (4,926 | ) |
(Gain) loss on deferred compensation plan securities | | (3,274 | ) | | 6,642 |
| | (6,697 | ) | | 4,926 |
|
Interest income and other | | (2,775 | ) | | (663 | ) | | (5,997 | ) | | (2,505 | ) |
Loss/(gain) reclassified from other comprehensive income | | 108 |
| | — |
| | (63 | ) | | — |
|
Interest expense | | 2,333 |
| | 806 |
| | 5,386 |
| | 2,717 |
|
Income before income taxes | | 177,488 |
| | 205,277 |
| | 454,030 |
| | 688,906 |
|
Income tax expense | | 19,999 |
| | 19,873 |
| | 18,028 |
| | 64,806 |
|
Net income | | 157,489 |
| | 185,404 |
| | 436,002 |
| | 624,100 |
|
| | | | | | | | |
Other comprehensive income: | | | | | | | | |
Unrealized gain on investments: | | | | | | | | |
Unrealized holding gain on investments arising during period, net of tax of $43 and $108 | | 3,620 |
| | — |
| | 6,723 |
| | — |
|
Less: Reclassification adjustments for gain on investments included in net income, net of tax of $1, and $6 | | (41 | ) | | — |
| | (64 | ) | | — |
|
| | 3,579 |
| | — |
| | 6,659 |
| | — |
|
Unrealized gain on derivatives: | | | | | | | | |
Unrealized (loss)/gain on derivatives arising during period, net of tax of $6 and $36 | | (10 | ) | | — |
| | 67 |
| | — |
|
Less: Reclassification adjustments for loss on derivatives included in net income, net of tax of $53, and $2 | | 97 |
| | — |
| | 5 |
| | — |
|
| | 87 |
| | — |
| | 72 |
| | — |
|
Other comprehensive income | | 3,666 |
| | — |
| | 6,731 |
| | — |
|
Comprehensive income | | $ | 161,155 |
| | $ | 185,404 |
| | $ | 442,733 |
| | $ | 624,100 |
|
| | | | | | | | |
Net income per share: | | | | | | | | |
Basic | | $ | 0.49 |
| | $ | 0.58 |
| | $ | 1.36 |
| | $ | 1.94 |
|
Diluted | | $ | 0.49 |
| | $ | 0.57 |
| | $ | 1.34 |
| | $ | 1.90 |
|
| | | | | | | | |
Shares used in computing per share amounts: | | | | | | | | |
Basic | | 319,870 |
| | 321,745 |
| | 321,200 |
| | 322,012 |
|
Diluted | | 323,560 |
| | 327,044 |
| | 325,275 |
| | 328,264 |
|
| | | | | | | | |
Cash dividends per common share | | $ | 0.10 |
| | $ | 0.08 |
| | $ | 0.26 |
| | $ | 0.20 |
|
| | | | | | | | |
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
ALTERA CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited, in thousands)
|
| | | | | | | |
| Nine Months Ended |
| September 28, 2012 | | September 30, 2011 |
| | | |
Cash Flows from Operating Activities: | | | |
Net income | $ | 436,002 |
| | $ | 624,100 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: | | | |
Depreciation and amortization | 26,426 |
| | 23,443 |
|
Stock-based compensation | 70,790 |
| | 59,983 |
|
Deferred income tax benefit | (3,367 | ) | | (9,549 | ) |
Tax effect of employee stock plans | 14,381 |
| | 26,077 |
|
Excess tax benefit from employee stock plans | (20,790 | ) | | (22,959 | ) |
Changes in assets and liabilities: | | | |
Accounts receivable, net | (116,000 | ) | | (23,228 | ) |
Inventories | (35,569 | ) | | 12,496 |
|
Other assets | 5,478 |
| | 47,986 |
|
Accounts payable and other liabilities | (34,670 | ) | | (40,004 | ) |
Deferred income and allowances on sales to distributors | 120,475 |
| | 11,115 |
|
Income taxes payable | (650 | ) | | 30,122 |
|
Deferred compensation plan obligations | (2,001 | ) | | (345 | ) |
Net cash provided by operating activities | 460,505 |
| | 739,237 |
|
Cash Flows from Investing Activities: | | | |
Purchases of property and equipment | (53,712 | ) | | (23,178 | ) |
Proceeds from sales of deferred compensation plan securities, net | 2,001 |
| | 345 |
|
Purchases of available-for-sale securities | (819,662 | ) | | (130,146 | ) |
Proceeds from sale and maturity of available-for-sale securities | 135,650 |
| | 1,750 |
|
Purchases of intangible assets | (2,280 | ) | | — |
|
Purchases of other investments | (4,510 | ) | | — |
|
Net cash used in investing activities | (742,513 | ) | | (151,229 | ) |
Cash Flows from Financing Activities: | | | |
Proceeds from issuance of common stock through various stock plans | 37,514 |
| | 93,619 |
|
Shares withheld for employee taxes | (30,529 | ) | | (31,122 | ) |
Payment of dividends to stockholders | (83,570 | ) | | (64,328 | ) |
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt | 500,000 |
| | — |
|
Repayment of credit facility | (500,000 | ) | | — |
|
Long-term debt and credit facility issuance costs | (5,244 | ) | | — |
|
Repurchases of common stock | (179,057 | ) | | (197,018 | ) |
Excess tax benefit from employee stock plans | 20,790 |
| | 22,959 |
|
Net cash used in financing activities | (240,096 | ) | | (175,890 | ) |
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents | (522,104 | ) | | 412,118 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period | 3,371,933 |
| | 2,765,196 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | $ | 2,849,829 |
| | $ | 3,177,314 |
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
ALTERA CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Note 1 — Organization and Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of Altera Corporation and its subsidiaries, collectively referred to herein as “Altera”, “we”, “us”, or “our”, have been prepared by us in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) for interim financial information. This financial information reflects all adjustments which are, in the opinion of our management, of a normal recurring nature and necessary for a fair statement of the results for the periods presented. The December 31, 2011 consolidated balance sheet data was derived from our audited consolidated financial statements included in our 2011 Annual Report on Form 10-K, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), but does not include all disclosures required by U.S. GAAP. The consolidated financial statements include our accounts as well as those of our wholly-owned subsidiaries after elimination of all significant inter-company balances and transactions.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in our consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ materially from those estimates.
These consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2011 included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K. The consolidated operating results for the three or nine months ended September 28, 2012 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for any future period.
Note 2 — Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-05, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220), Presentation of Comprehensive Income, which requires companies to present the total of comprehensive income, the components of net income, and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. This update eliminates the option to present the components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of equity. In December 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-12, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220), Deferral of the Effective Date for Amendments to the Presentation of Reclassifications of Items Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income in ASU 2011-05, to defer the effective date of the specific requirement to present items that are reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income to net income alongside their respective components of net income and other comprehensive income. We adopted the guidance in our first quarter of 2012 with no significant impact on our consolidated financial statements or related footnotes.
Note 3 — Financial Instruments
Cash, Cash Equivalents and Marketable Securities
The following tables summarize our cash and available-for-sale securities by significant investment category.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | September 28, 2012 |
(In thousands) | | Cost | | Unrealized Gains | | Unrealized Losses | | Fair Value | | Cash and Cash Equivalents | | Short-Term Marketable Securities | | Long-Term Marketable Securities |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash | | $ | 39,112 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 39,112 |
| | $ | 39,112 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Available for sale: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Level 1: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Money market funds | | 2,744,850 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 2,744,850 |
| | 2,744,850 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
U.S. treasury securities | | 579,281 |
| | 6,113 |
| | (1 | ) | | 585,393 |
| | 35,446 |
| | 32,382 |
| | 517,565 |
|
Subtotal | | 3,324,131 |
| | 6,113 |
| | (1 | ) | | 3,330,243 |
| | 2,780,296 |
| | 32,382 |
|
| 517,565 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Level 2: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
U.S. agency securities | | 107,799 |
| | 43 |
| | (3 | ) | | 107,839 |
| | 27,278 |
| | 40,470 |
| | 40,091 |
|
Non-U.S. government securities | | 11,813 |
| | 15 |
| | (2 | ) | | 11,826 |
| | — |
| | 6,253 |
| | 5,573 |
|
Municipal bond | | 1,370 |
| | 2 |
| | — |
| | 1,372 |
| | — |
| | 752 |
| | 620 |
|
Corporate securities | | 189,133 |
| | 484 |
| | (40 | ) | | 189,577 |
| | 3,143 |
| | 64,338 |
| | 122,096 |
|
Subtotal | | 310,115 |
| | 544 |
| | (45 | ) | | 310,614 |
| | 30,421 |
| | 111,813 |
| | 168,380 |
|
Total | | $ | 3,673,358 |
| | $ | 6,657 |
| | $ | (46 | ) | | $ | 3,679,969 |
| | $ | 2,849,829 |
| | $ | 144,195 |
| | $ | 685,945 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2011 |
(In thousands) | | Cost | | Unrealized Gains | | Unrealized Losses | | Fair Value | | Cash and Cash Equivalents | | Short-Term Marketable Securities | | Long-Term Marketable Securities |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash | | $ | 165,122 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 165,122 |
| | $ | 165,122 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Available for sale: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Level 1: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Money market funds | | 3,189,462 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 3,189,462 |
| | 3,189,462 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
U.S. treasury securities | | 6,199 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 6,199 |
| | — |
| | 6,199 |
| | — |
|
Corporate securities | | 12,999 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 12,999 |
| | 10,999 |
| | 2,000 |
| | — |
|
Subtotal | | 3,208,660 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 3,208,660 |
| | 3,200,461 |
| | 8,199 |
| — |
| — |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Level 2: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
U.S. agency securities | | 41,167 |
| | 11 |
| | (7 | ) | | 41,171 |
| | 750 |
| | 25,890 |
| | 14,531 |
|
Non-U.S. government securities | | 8,221 |
| | — |
| | (8 | ) | | 8,213 |
| | — |
| | 8,213 |
| | — |
|
Municipal bond | | 754 |
| | — |
| | (1 | ) | | 753 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 753 |
|
Corporate securities | | 87,415 |
| | 84 |
| | (230 | ) | | 87,269 |
| | 5,600 |
| | 22,920 |
| | 58,749 |
|
Subtotal | | 137,557 |
| | 95 |
| | (246 | ) | | 137,406 |
| | 6,350 |
| | 57,023 |
| | 74,033 |
|
Total | | $ | 3,511,339 |
| | $ | 95 |
| | $ | (246 | ) | | $ | 3,511,188 |
| | $ | 3,371,933 |
| | $ | 65,222 |
| | $ | 74,033 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
During the three months ended September 28, 2012, we made certain cost method investments of approximately $4.5 million. These investments are included within Other assets, net in our consolidated balance sheets.
The adjusted cost and estimated fair value of marketable debt securities (corporate bonds, municipal bonds, U.S. and foreign government securities, and U.S. treasury securities) as of September 28, 2012, by contractual maturity, are shown below. Actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities because issuers may have the right to call or prepay obligations without call or prepayment penalties.
|
| | | | | | | | |
(In thousands) | | Cost | | Estimated Fair Value |
Due in one year or less | | $ | 210,020 |
| | $ | 210,059 |
|
Due after one year through five years | | 679,373 |
| | 685,945 |
|
| | $ | 889,393 |
| | $ | 896,004 |
|
Derivative Financial Instruments
We use derivative financial instruments primarily to manage foreign currency exchange rate risk. Substantially all of our operational expenditures are transacted in U.S. dollars. However, operating expenditures of our subsidiaries are incurred in or exposed to other currencies, primarily the Malaysian Ringgit. We hedge portions of the forecasted foreign currency exposure associated with operational expenditures in Malaysia generally up to three months in advance. We record all derivatives at fair value. These forward foreign currency exchange contracts were designated and qualified as cash flow hedges, and the effective portion of the gain or loss on the forward contracts was reported as a component of other comprehensive income and reclassified into net income in the same period during which the hedged transaction affected earnings.
The notional amount of our outstanding foreign exchange contracts was $7.8 million as of September 28, 2012. The outstanding forward currency exchange contracts expire at various dates between October 2012 and December 2012. We did not have any hedging activities as of December 31, 2011. These derivative instruments are classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, as they are not actively traded and are valued using pricing models that use observable market inputs.
Note 4 — Accounts Receivable, Net and Significant Customers
Accounts receivable, net was comprised of the following:
|
| | | | | | | | |
(In thousands) | | September 28, 2012 | | December 31, 2011 |
Gross accounts receivable | | $ | 348,847 |
| | $ | 232,838 |
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts | | (500 | ) | | (500 | ) |
Allowance for sales returns | | (74 | ) | | (65 | ) |
Accounts receivable, net | | $ | 348,273 |
| | $ | 232,273 |
|
We sell our products to original equipment manufacturers, or OEMs, and to electronic components distributors who resell these products to OEMs, or their subcontract manufacturers. Net sales by customer type and net sales to significant customers were as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended | | Nine Months Ended |
(Percentage of Net Sales) | | September 28, 2012 | | September 30, 2011 | | September 28, 2012 | | September 30, 2011 |
| | | | | | | | |
Sales to distributors | | 69 | % | | 74 | % | | 70 | % | | 74 | % |
Sales to OEMs | | 31 | % | | 26 | % | | 30 | % | | 26 | % |
| | 100 | % | | 100 | % | | 100 | % | | 100 | % |
| | | | | | | | |
Significant Distributors(1): | | | | | | | | |
Arrow Electronics, Inc. ( “Arrow”) | | 40 | % | | 40 | % | | 39 | % | | 39 | % |
Macnica, Inc. (“Macnica”) | | 19 | % | | 19 | % | | 21 | % | | 20 | % |
| |
(1) | Except as presented above, no other distributor accounted for greater than 10% of our net sales for the quarterly or year-to-date periods ended September 28, 2012 or September 30, 2011. |
One OEM accounted for 16% and 18% of our net sales for the quarterly and year-to-date periods ended September 28, 2012, respectively. The same OEM accounted for 12% and 13% for the quarterly and year-to-date periods ended September 30, 2011, respectively. No other individual OEM accounted for more than 10% of our net sales for the quarterly or year-to-date periods ended September 28, 2012 or September 30, 2011.
As of September 28, 2012, accounts receivable from Arrow and Macnica individually accounted for approximately 34% and 46%, respectively, of our gross accounts receivable. As of December 31, 2011, accounts receivable from Arrow, Macnica and Avnet, Inc. including its affiliates, individually accounted for approximately 30%, 43% and 11%, respectively, of our gross accounts receivable. No other distributor or OEM accounted for more than 10% of our accounts receivable as of September 28, 2012 or December 31, 2011. Accounts receivable from distributors may not be proportionate to net sales and may fluctuate on a quarterly basis due to varying factors, including inventory levels held by distributors and timing of price concessions and payments.
Note 5 — Inventories
Inventories were comprised of the following:
|
| | | | | | | | |
(In thousands) | | September 28, 2012 | | December 31, 2011 |
Raw materials | | $ | 9,219 |
| | $ | 9,293 |
|
Work in process | | 103,902 |
| | 71,696 |
|
Finished goods | | 44,727 |
| | 41,290 |
|
Total inventories | | $ | 157,848 |
| | $ | 122,279 |
|
Note 6 — Property and Equipment
Property and equipment, net was comprised of the following:
|
| | | | | | | | |
(In thousands) | | September 28, 2012 | | December 31, 2011 |
Land and land rights | | $ | 23,157 |
| | $ | 23,157 |
|
Buildings | | 158,612 |
| | 148,323 |
|
Equipment and software | | 243,782 |
| | 232,793 |
|
Office furniture and fixtures | | 24,012 |
| | 23,440 |
|
Leasehold improvements | | 11,618 |
| | 7,652 |
|
Construction in progress | | 2,043 |
| | 5,836 |
|
Property and equipment, at cost | | 463,224 |
| | 441,201 |
|
Accumulated depreciation and amortization | | (263,052 | ) | | (269,480 | ) |
Property and equipment, net | | $ | 200,172 |
| | $ | 171,721 |
|
Depreciation expense was $8.7 million and $23.7 million for the three months and nine months ended September 28, 2012 respectively. Depreciation expense was $7.4 million and $21.1 million for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2011, respectively. Depreciation and amortization expense as presented in our consolidated statements of cash flows includes the above amounts, together with amortization expense on our intangible assets. Intangible asset amortization expense was not significant for any period presented in our consolidated statements of comprehensive income.
Note 7 — Deferred Income and Allowances on Sales to Distributors
Deferred income and allowances on sales to distributors was comprised of the following:
|
| | | | | | | | |
(In thousands) | | September 28, 2012 | | December 31, 2011 |
| | | | |
Deferred revenue on shipment to distributors | | $ | 422,826 |
| | $ | 302,815 |
|
Deferred cost of sales on shipment to distributors | | (33,180 | ) | | (30,536 | ) |
Deferred income on shipment to distributors | | 389,646 |
| | 272,279 |
|
Advances to distributors | | — |
| | (648 | ) |
Other deferred revenue (1) | | 10,705 |
| | 8,245 |
|
Total | | $ | 400,351 |
| | $ | 279,876 |
|
| |
(1) | Principally represents revenue deferred on our software and intellectual property licenses. |
The Deferred income and allowances on sales to distributors activity for the nine months ended September 28, 2012 and September 30, 2011 was as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | Nine Months Ended |
(In thousands) | | September 28, 2012 | | September 30, 2011 |
| | | | |
Balance at beginning of period | | $ | 279,876 |
| | $ | 428,711 |
|
Deferred revenue recognized upon shipment to distributors | | 4,006,945 |
| | 3,992,638 |
|
Deferred cost of sales recognized upon shipment to distributors | | (181,660 | ) | | (227,189 | ) |
Decrease in advances to distributors | | 648 |
| | 63,803 |
|
Revenue recognized upon sell-through to end customers | | (763,141 | ) | | (979,877 | ) |
Cost of sales recognized upon sell-through to end customers | | 176,455 |
| | 224,933 |
|
Earned distributor price concessions (1) | | (3,057,927 | ) | | (2,952,593 | ) |
Returns | | (61,531 | ) | | (111,851 | ) |
Other | | 686 |
| | 1,251 |
|
Balance at end of period | | $ | 400,351 |
| | $ | 439,826 |
|
| |
(1) | Average aggregate price concessions typically range from 65% to 80% of our list price on an annual basis, depending upon the composition of our sales, volumes and factors associated with timing of shipments to distributors. |
We sell the majority of our products to distributors worldwide at a list price. However, distributors resell our products to end customers at a very broad range of individually negotiated prices based on a variety of factors, including customer, product, quantity, geography and competitive differentiation. The majority of our distributors' sales to their customers are priced at a discount from our list price. Under these circumstances, we remit back to the distributor a portion of its original purchase price after the resale transaction is completed, and we validate the distributor's resale information, including end customer, device, quantity and price, against the distributor price concession that we have approved in advance. To receive a price concession, a distributor must submit the price concession claim to us for approval within 60 days of the resale of the product to an end customer. It is our practice to apply these negotiated price discounts to future purchases, requiring the distributor to settle receivable balances, on a current basis, generally within 30 days, for amounts originally invoiced.
Note 8 — Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
The following table presents the components of, and the changes in, accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
(In thousands) | | December 31, 2011 | | Other Comprehensive Income | | September 28, 2012 |
| | | | | | |
Accumulated unrealized (losses) gains on available-for-sale securities, net of tax | | $ | (133 | ) | | $ | 6,659 |
| | $ | 6,526 |
|
Accumulated unrealized losses on hedging transactions, net of tax | | — |
| | 72 |
| | 72 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income | | $ | (133 | ) | | $ | 6,731 |
| | $ | 6,598 |
|
Note 9 — Income Per Share
A reconciliation of basic and diluted income per share is presented below:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended | | Nine Months Ended |
(In thousands, except per share amounts) | | September 28, 2012 | | September 30, 2011 | | September 28, 2012 | | September 30, 2011 |
| | | | | | | | |
Basic: | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Net income | | $ | 157,489 |
| | $ | 185,404 |
| | $ | 436,002 |
| | $ | 624,100 |
|
Basic weighted shares outstanding | | 319,870 |
| | 321,745 |
| | 321,200 |
| | 322,012 |
|
Net income per share | | $ | 0.49 |
| | $ | 0.58 |
| | $ | 1.36 |
| | $ | 1.94 |
|
| | | | | | | | |
Diluted: | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Net income | | $ | 157,489 |
| | $ | 185,404 |
| | $ | 436,002 |
| | $ | 624,100 |
|
| | | | | | | | |
Weighted shares outstanding | | 319,870 |
| | 321,745 |
| | 321,200 |
| | 322,012 |
|
Effect of dilutive securities: | | | | | | | | |
Stock options, ESPP, and restricted stock unit shares | | 3,690 |
| | 5,299 |
| | 4,075 |
| | 6,252 |
|
| | | | | | | | |
Diluted weighted shares outstanding | | 323,560 |
| | 327,044 |
| | 325,275 |
| | 328,264 |
|
| | | | | | | | |
Net income per share | | $ | 0.49 |
| | $ | 0.57 |
| | $ | 1.34 |
| | $ | 1.90 |
|
In applying the treasury stock method, we excluded 1.7 million and 1.4 million stock option shares and restricted stock units for the three and nine months ended September 28, 2012, respectively, and 2.7 million and 1.4 million stock option shares and restricted stock units for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, respectively, because their effect was anti-dilutive. While these shares have been anti-dilutive, they could be dilutive in the future.
Note 10 — Credit Facility and Long-Term Debt
Credit Facility
In May 2012, we repaid in full the $500 million outstanding under our former credit agreement dated August 31, 2007.
On June 29, 2012, we entered into a five-year $250 million unsecured revolving credit facility (the "Facility"). Under certain circumstances, upon our request and with the consent of the lenders, the commitments under the Facility may be increased up to an additional $250 million. Borrowings under the Facility will bear interest at a base rate determined in accordance with the Facility, plus an applicable margin based upon the debt rating of our non-credit enhanced, senior unsecured long-term debt. In addition, we are obligated to pay a quarterly commitment fee, payable in arrears, based on the available commitments. This facility fee varies and is also determined based on our debt rating. The terms of the Facility require compliance with certain financial and non-financial covenants, which we have satisfied as of September 28, 2012. As of September 28, 2012, we have not borrowed any funds under the Facility.
Long-term Debt
On May 8, 2012, we completed a public offering of $500 million aggregate principal amount of 1.75% senior notes that will mature on May 15, 2017 (the "Notes") with an effective interest rate of 1.91%. Interest on the Notes is payable semiannually in arrears on May 15 and November 15 of each year, beginning on November 15, 2012. The Notes are governed by a base and supplemental indenture between Altera and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee. The Notes are our unsecured and unsubordinated obligations, ranking equally in right of payment to all of our existing and future unsecured and unsubordinated indebtedness and senior in right of payment to any of our future indebtedness that is expressly subordinated to the Notes. We may redeem the Notes, in whole or in part, at any time and from time to time for cash at the redemption prices described in the indenture.
We received net proceeds of $495.5 million from issuance of the Notes, after deduction of issuance costs of $3.7 million and a discount of $0.8 million. The debt issuance costs are recorded in other assets and are being amortized to interest expense over five years using the effective interest method. We used the net proceeds of the Notes to re-pay our former credit facility that was entered into on August 31, 2007.
The estimated fair value of Altera's long-term debt was approximately $515.7 million at September 28, 2012. Our long-term debt is classified within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy and the estimated fair value of the debt is based on quoted market prices.
Note 11 — Commitments and Contingencies
Indemnification and Product Warranty
We indemnify certain customers, distributors, suppliers, and subcontractors for attorney's fees and damages and costs awarded against these parties in certain circumstances in which our products are alleged to infringe third party intellectual property rights, including patents, trade secrets, trademarks or copyrights. We cannot estimate the amount of potential future payments, if any, that we might be required to make as a result of these agreements. To date, we have not paid any claim or been required to defend any action related to our indemnification obligations, and, accordingly, we have not accrued any amounts for such indemnification obligations. However, we may record charges in the future as a result of these indemnification obligations.
We generally warrant our devices for one year against defects in materials, workmanship and material non-conformance to our specifications. We accrue for known warranty issues if a loss is probable and can be reasonably estimated, and accrue for estimated but unidentified issues based on historical activity. If there is a material increase in customer claims compared with our historical experience or if the costs of servicing warranty claims are greater than expected, we may record a charge against cost of sales. Warranty expense was not significant for any period presented in our consolidated statements of comprehensive income.
Purchase Obligations
We depend entirely upon subcontractors to manufacture our silicon wafers and provide assembly and test services. Due to lengthy subcontractor lead times, we must order these materials and services from these subcontractors well in advance, and we are obligated to pay for the materials and services once they are completed. As of September 28, 2012, we had approximately $136.7 million of outstanding purchase commitments to such subcontractors. We expect to receive and pay for these materials and services over the next six months.
Operating Leases
We lease facilities under non-cancelable lease agreements expiring at various times through 2021. There have been no significant changes to our operating lease obligations since December 31, 2011.
Legal Proceedings
On December 8, 2010, Intellectual Ventures I LLC and Intellectual Ventures II LLC (“Intellectual Ventures”) filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware against Altera, Microsemi Corporation, and Lattice Semiconductor Corporation alleging that Altera infringes five patents. The complaint requests unspecified monetary damages including enhanced damages for willful infringement. In February 2011, Intellectual Ventures filed a First Amended Complaint adding Xilinx, Inc. as a defendant. In March 2011, Altera answered the complaint and asserted counterclaims against Intellectual Ventures for non-infringement and invalidity of the asserted patents. The defendants filed motions in the District of Delaware to transfer the case to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California and to stay the action pending re-examination proceedings
in the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Intellectual Ventures opposed the motions. In January 2012, the United States District Court for the District of Delaware denied the defendants' motion to transfer the case to the Northern District of California, and in February 2012, the court denied the defendants' motion to stay. Three of the four defendants, including Altera, filed a writ of mandamus in the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit requesting that the case be transferred to the Northern District of California. In July 2012, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied the writ of mandamus. Because the case is at a very early stage, it is not possible for us to determine whether there is a reasonable possibility that a loss has been incurred nor can we estimate the range of potential loss. The case is currently scheduled for trial in May 2014.
We file income tax returns with the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) and in various states and foreign jurisdictions. In 2008, the IRS completed field examinations for 2002 through 2004 and proposed an additional tax liability of $34.5 million, excluding interest. We contested this proposed additional tax liability in the IRS Office of Appeals and resolved several of the issues. On December 8, 2011, the IRS issued a Statutory Notice of Deficiency, revising the assessment of additional taxes for 2002 through 2004 to $19.8 million, excluding interest. The Notice relates primarily to inter-company adjustments between related companies, computational adjustments to the research and development ("R&D") credit and reductions to the benefits of tax credit carrybacks and carryforwards to subsequent years. On March 6, 2012, we filed a petition in the U.S. Tax Court to request a redetermination of the tax deficiency regarding certain IRS adjustments for 2004. We deposited $18.0 million as a cash bond with the IRS in 2008, and converted this amount to tax payments in March 2012. On May 8, 2012, the IRS filed its petition response in the Tax Court, in which the IRS conceded the R&D credit adjustment for 2004. In June 2012, the federal statute of limitations for the 2002 and 2003 tax years expired.
In addition, in 2010 the IRS completed field examinations for 2005 through 2007 and proposed an additional tax liability of $34.2 million, excluding interest. On January 23, 2012, the IRS issued a Statutory Notice of Deficiency, revising the assessment of additional taxes for 2005 through 2007 to $21.4 million, excluding interest. The Notice relates primarily to intercompany adjustments between related companies and reductions to the benefits of tax credit carrybacks and carryforwards to subsequent years. On April 20, 2012, we filed a petition in the U.S. Tax Court to request a redetermination of the tax deficiencies regarding certain IRS adjustments for 2005 through 2007. On June 21, 2012, the IRS filed its petition response in the Tax Court.
On August 15, 2012, the case for the 2004 tax year was combined with that for the 2005 through 2007 tax years. The case is currently scheduled for trial in March 2013. We believe we have made adequate tax payments and/or accrued adequate amounts for our tax liabilities for 2004 through 2007 and that the outcome of the above matters will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated operating results, cash flows or financial position.
Note 12 — Stock-Based Compensation
Our stock-based compensation plans include the 2005 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2005 Plan”) and the 1987 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “ESPP”).
2005 Plan
Our equity incentive program is a broad-based, long-term retention program intended to attract, motivate, and retain talented employees as well as align stockholder and employee interests. The 2005 Plan provides stock-based incentive compensation (“awards”) to both our eligible employees and non-employee directors. Awards that may be granted under the 2005 Plan include non-qualified and incentive stock options, restricted stock units (“RSU”s), performance-based restricted stock units (“PRSU”s), restricted stock awards, stock appreciation rights, and stock bonus awards. To date, awards granted under the 2005 Plan consist of stock options, RSUs and PRSUs. The majority of stock-based awards granted under the 2005 Plan vest over four years. Stock options granted under the 2005 Plan have a maximum contractual term of ten years. As of September 28, 2012, the 2005 Plan had a total of 29.1 million shares reserved for future issuance, of which 22.0 million shares were available for future grants.
A summary of activity for our RSUs and PRSUs for the nine months ended September 28, 2012 and information regarding RSUs and PRSUs outstanding and expected to vest as of September 28, 2012 is as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(In thousands, except per share amounts and terms) | | Number of Shares | | Weighted-Average Grant-Date Fair Market Value Per Share | | Weighted-Average Remaining Contractual Term (in Years) | | Aggregate Intrinsic Value (1) |
Outstanding, December 31, 2011 | | 8,176 |
| | $ | 31.62 |
| | | | |
Grants | | 2,057 |
| | $ | 34.12 |
| | | | |
Vested | | (2,851 | ) | | $ | 27.34 |
| | | | |
Forfeited | | (565 | ) | | $ | 31.93 |
| | | | |
Outstanding, September 28, 2012 | | 6,817 |
| | $ | 34.15 |
| | 1.66 | | $ | 231,766 |
|
Vested and expected to vest, September 28, 2012 | | 5,953 |
| | $ | 34.15 |
| | 1.59 | | $ | 202,390 |
|
| |
(1) | Aggregate intrinsic value represents the closing price per share of our stock on September 28, 2012, multiplied by the number of RSUs and PRSUs outstanding or vested and expected to vest as of September 28, 2012. |
A summary of stock option activity for the nine months ended September 28, 2012 and information regarding stock options outstanding, exercisable, and vested and expected to vest as of September 28, 2012 is as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(In thousands, except per share amounts and terms) | | Number of Shares | | Weighted-Average Exercise Price Per Share | | Weighted-Average Remaining Contractual Term (in Years) | | Aggregate Intrinsic Value (1) |
Outstanding, December 31, 2011 | | 6,138 |
| | $ | 22.96 |
| | | | |
Grants | | 707 |
| | $ | 34.43 |
| | | | |
Exercises | | (1,505 | ) | | $ | 18.81 |
| | | | |
Forfeited/Cancelled/Expired | | (44 | ) | | $ | 32.50 |
| | | | |
Outstanding, September 28, 2012 | | 5,296 |
| | $ | 25.59 |
| | 4.20 | | $ | 51,658 |
|
Exercisable, September 28, 2012 | | 3,950 |
| | $ | 21.75 |
| | 2.60 | | $ | 50,064 |
|
Vested and expected to vest, September 28, 2012 | | 5,107 |
| | $ | 25.17 |
| | 4.00 | | $ | 51,535 |
|
| |
(1) | For those stock options with an exercise price below the closing price per share on September 28, 2012, aggregate intrinsic value represents the difference between the exercise price and the closing price per share of our common stock on September 28, 2012, multiplied by the number of stock options outstanding, exercisable, or vested and expected to vest as of September 28, 2012. |
For the three and nine months ended September 28, 2012, 0.6 million and 1.5 million non-qualified stock option shares were exercised, respectively. The total intrinsic value of stock options exercised for the three and nine months ended September 28, 2012 was $10.1 million and $28.6 million, respectively. The aggregate intrinsic value represents the difference between the exercise price and the selling price received by option holders upon the exercise of stock options during the period. The total cash received from employees as a result of employee stock option exercises during the three and nine months ended September 28, 2012 was $11.4 million and $37.5 million, respectively.
ESPP
Our ESPP has two consecutive, overlapping twelve-month offering periods, with a new period commencing on the first trading day on or after May 1 and November 1 of each year and terminating on the last trading day on or before April 30 and October 31. Each twelve-month offering period generally includes two six-month purchase periods. The purchase price at which shares are sold under the ESPP is 85% of the lower of the fair market value of a share of our common stock on (1) the first day of the offering period, or (2) the last trading day of the purchase period. If the fair market value at the end of any purchase period is less than the fair market value at the beginning of the offering period, each participant is automatically withdrawn from the current offering period following the purchase of shares on the purchase date and is automatically re-enrolled in the immediately following offering period.
We sold 304,468 shares of common stock under the ESPP at a price of $30.23 during the nine months ended September 28, 2012, and 402,913 shares of common stock under the ESPP at a price of $22.40 during the nine months ended September 30, 2011. As of September 28, 2012, 3.2 million shares were available for future issuance under the ESPP.
VALUATION AND EXPENSE INFORMATION
The assumptions used to estimate the fair value of ESPP, RSUs and PRSUs were as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended | | Nine Months Ended |
| | September 28, 2012 | | September 30, 2011 | | September 28, 2012 | | September 30, 2011 |
| | | | | | | | |
ESPP purchase rights: | | | | | | | | |
Expected term (in years) | | — |
| | — |
| | 1.0 |
| | 0.8 |
|
Expected stock price volatility | | — |
| | — |
| | 39.1 | % | | 34.5 | % |
Risk-free interest rate | | — |
| | — |
| | 0.2 | % | | 0.2 | % |
Dividend yield | | — |
| | — |
| | 0.9 | % | | 0.5 | % |
Weighted-average estimated fair value | | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 10.54 |
| | $ | 12.88 |
|
| | | | | | | | |
RSUs and PRSUs: | | | | | | | | |
Risk-free interest rate | | 0.3 | % | | 0.5 | % | | 0.3 | % | | 0.6 | % |
Dividend yield | | 1.1 | % | | 0.8 | % | | 1.0 | % | | 0.7 | % |
Weighted-average estimated fair value | | $ | 35.68 |
| | $ | 41.50 |
| | $ | 33.52 |
| | $ | 41.71 |
|
In addition, we apply an expected forfeiture rate when amortizing stock-based compensation expense. Our stock-based compensation expense included in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income for the three and nine months ended September 28, 2012 and September 30, 2011 was as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended | | Nine Months Ended |
(In thousands) | | September 28, 2012 | | September 30, 2011 | | September 28, 2012 | | September 30, 2011 |
| | | | | | | | |
Cost of sales | | $ | 492 |
| | $ | 450 |
| | $ | 1,416 |
| | $ | 1,200 |
|
Research and development expense | | 11,065 |
| | 9,923 |
| | 31,393 |
| | 26,393 |
|
Selling, general, and administrative expense | | 13,033 |
| | 12,178 |
| | 37,981 |
| | 32,390 |
|
Pre-tax stock-based compensation expense | | 24,590 |
| | 22,551 |
| | 70,790 |
| | 59,983 |
|
Less: income tax benefit | | (6,606 | ) | | (5,907 | ) | | (18,412 | ) | | (16,210 | ) |
Net stock-based compensation expense | | $ | 17,984 |
| | $ | 16,644 |
| | $ | 52,378 |
| | $ | 43,773 |
|
No stock-based compensation was capitalized during any period presented above. As of September 28, 2012, unrecognized stock-based compensation cost related to outstanding unvested stock options, RSUs, PRSUs and ESPP shares that are expected to vest was approximately $181.3 million. This unrecognized stock-based compensation cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 2.6 years. To the extent the actual forfeiture rate is different from what we have anticipated, stock-based compensation related to these awards will be different from that presented.
Note 13 — Income Taxes
We file income tax returns with the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) and in various states and foreign jurisdictions. In 2008, the IRS completed field examinations for 2002 through 2004 and proposed an additional tax liability of $34.5 million, excluding interest. We contested this proposed additional tax liability in the IRS Office of Appeals and resolved several of the issues. On December 8, 2011, the IRS issued a Statutory Notice of Deficiency, revising the assessment of additional taxes for 2002 through 2004 to $19.8 million, excluding interest. The Notice relates primarily to inter-company adjustments between related companies, computational adjustments to the research and development ("R&D") credit and reductions to the benefits of tax credit carrybacks and carryforwards to subsequent years. On March 6, 2012, we filed a petition in the U.S. Tax Court to request a redetermination of the tax deficiency regarding certain IRS adjustments for 2004. We deposited $18.0 million as a cash bond with the IRS in 2008, and converted this amount to tax payments in March 2012. On May 8, 2012, the IRS filed its petition response in the Tax Court, in which the IRS conceded the R&D credit adjustment for 2004. In June 2012, the federal statute of limitations for the 2002 and 2003 tax years expired.
In addition, in 2010 the IRS completed field examinations for 2005 through 2007 and proposed an additional tax liability of $34.2 million, excluding interest. On January 23, 2012, the IRS issued a Statutory Notice of Deficiency, revising the assessment of additional taxes for 2005 through 2007 to $21.4 million, excluding interest. The Notice relates primarily to inter-company adjustments between related companies and reductions to the benefits of tax credit carrybacks and carryforwards to subsequent years. On April 20, 2012, we filed a petition in the U.S. Tax Court to request a redetermination of the tax deficiencies regarding certain IRS adjustments for 2005 through 2007. On June 21, 2012, the IRS filed its petition response in the Tax Court.
On August 15, 2012, the case for the 2004 tax year was combined with that for the 2005 through 2007 tax years. The case is currently scheduled for trial in March 2013. We believe we have made adequate tax payments or accrued adequate amounts for our tax liabilities for 2004 through 2007 and that the outcome of the above matters will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated operating results, cash flows or financial position.
Other significant jurisdictions in which we are or may be subject to examination for fiscal years 2002 forward include China (including Hong Kong), Ireland, Malaysia, Japan, United Kingdom and the state of California. We believe we have made adequate tax payments and/or accrued adequate amounts such that the outcome of these audits will have no material adverse effect on our consolidated operating results. Due to the potential resolution of various tax examinations, and the expiration of various statutes of limitations, it is possible that our gross unrecognized tax benefits may change within the next twelve months. However, given the number of years remaining subject to examination and the number of matters being examined, we are unable to estimate the full range of possible adjustments to the balance of gross unrecognized tax benefits.
Our effective tax rate reflects the impact of a significant amount of our earnings being taxed in foreign jurisdictions at rates below the U.S. statutory tax rate.
Our effective tax rate for the three months ended September 28, 2012 was 11.3%, compared with 9.7% for the three months ended September 30, 2011. The net increase in our effective tax rate was primarily due to lower one-time tax benefits due primarily to the expiration of the statute of limitations in foreign jurisdictions in 2012 compared to 2011, partially offset by the absence of a U.S. federal research and development tax credit in 2012 due to its expiration in 2011. During the three months ended September 28, 2012, the effective tax rate includes a $3.9 million net tax benefit primarily associated with the release of liabilities for uncertain tax positions upon the expiration of foreign statutes of limitation and the reversal of the related interest accruals.
Our effective tax rate for the nine months ended September 28, 2012 was 4.0%, compared with 9.4% for the nine months ended September 30, 2011. The net decrease in our effective tax rate was primarily due to higher one-time tax benefits in 2012 compared to 2011, partially offset by the absence of a U.S. federal research and development tax credit in 2012, due to its expiration in 2011. During the nine months ended September 28, 2012, the effective tax rate includes the following net tax benefits associated with the release of liabilities for uncertain tax positions: 1) a $24.4 million net tax benefit primarily associated with the expiration of the federal statutes of limitation, the reassessment and recognition of previously unrecognized federal tax benefits, and the reversal of the related interest accruals; 2) a $6.9 million net tax benefit as a result of a Statutory Notice of Deficiency received from the IRS for 2005 to 2007; and 3) a $9.1 million net tax benefit as a result of the expiration of the statutes of limitations for certain foreign jurisdictions.
As of September 28, 2012, we had total gross unrecognized tax benefits of $263.9 million, if recognized, would impact our effective tax rate. On December 31, 2011, we had total gross unrecognized tax benefits of $284.9 million. We are unable to make a reasonable estimate as to when cash settlements with the relevant taxing authorities will occur.
We recognize interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions in our income tax provision. We accrued approximately $47.6 million and $54.8 million for the payment of interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions as of September 28, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively.
Note 14 — Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan
We allow our U.S.-based officers and director-level employees to defer a portion of their compensation under the Altera Corporation Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan (the “NQDC Plan”). Our Retirement Plans Committee administers the NQDC Plan. As of September 28, 2012, there were 123 participants in the NQDC Plan who self-direct their investments, subject to certain limitations. In the event we become insolvent, the NQDC Plan assets are subject to the claims of our general creditors. Since the inception of the NQDC Plan, we have not made any contributions to the NQDC Plan, and we have no commitments to do so in the future. There are no NQDC Plan provisions that provide for any guarantees or minimum return on investments. NQDC Plan participants are prohibited from investing NQDC Plan contributions in Altera common stock. The balance of the NQDC Plan assets and related obligations was $76.7 million and $72.0 million as of September 28, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively.
Investment income or loss earned by the NQDC Plan is recorded as (Gain) Loss on deferred compensation plan securities in our consolidated statements of comprehensive income. The investment (gain) loss also represents an (increase) decrease in the future payout to participants and is recorded as Compensation expense (benefit) — deferred compensation plan in our consolidated statements of comprehensive income. Compensation expense (benefit) associated with our NQDC Plan obligations is offset by the (gain) loss from related securities. The net effect of investment income or loss and related compensation expense or benefit has no impact on our income before income taxes, net income or cash balances.
The following tables summarize the fair value of our deferred compensation plan assets by significant investment category:
|
| | | | | | | | |
(In thousands) | | September 28, 2012 | | December 31, 2011 |
| | | | |
Deferred compensation plan assets: (1) | | | | |
| | | | |
Level 1: | | | | |
Restricted cash equivalents | | $ | 18,524 |
| | $ | 17,938 |
|
Equity securities | | 27,852 |
| | 23,530 |
|
Mutual funds | | 26,895 |
| | 25,375 |
|
Subtotal | | 73,271 |
| | 66,843 |
|
| | | | |
Level 2: | | | | |
Fixed income securities | | 3,404 |
| | 5,136 |
|
Total | | $ | 76,675 |
| | $ | 71,979 |
|
| | | | |
(1) Included in Deferred compensation plan - marketable securities and Deferred compensation plan - restricted cash equivalents in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets as of September 28, 2012 and December 31, 2011.
Note 15 — Subsequent Event
On October 15, 2012 our board of directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.10 per common share, payable on December 3, 2012 to stockholders of record on November 13, 2012.
| |
ITEM 2: | Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
The following Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, as well as information contained in the risk factors described in Item 1A of this report and elsewhere in this report, contains forward-looking statements, which are provided under the “safe harbor” protection of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements are generally written in the future tense and/or are preceded by words such as “will,” “may,” “should,” “could,” “expect,” “suggest,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “plan,” or other similar words. Examples of forward-looking statements include statements regarding (1) our gross margins and factors that affect gross margins; (2) trends in our future sales; (3) our research and development expenditures and efforts; (4) our capital expenditures; (5) our provision for tax liabilities and other critical accounting estimates; and (6) our exposure to market risks related to changes in interest rates, equity prices and foreign currency exchange rates.
Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks and uncertainties. The forward-looking statements contained in this report are based on information that is currently available to us and expectations and assumptions that we deemed reasonable at the time the statements were made. We do not undertake any obligation to update any forward-looking statements in this report or in any of our other communications, except as required by law. All such forward-looking statements should be read as of the time the statements were made and with the recognition that these forward-looking statements may not be complete or accurate at a later date.
Many factors may cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements contained in this report. These factors include, but are not limited to, those risks described in Part II Item 1A of this report and those risks described under “Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES
The preparation of our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires our management to make judgments and estimates that affect the amounts reported in our consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Our management believes that we consistently apply these judgments and estimates and the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes fairly represent all periods presented. However, any differences between these judgments and estimates and actual results could have a material impact on our consolidated statements of comprehensive income and financial position. Critical accounting estimates, as defined by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), are those that are most important to the portrayal of our consolidated financial condition and results of operations and require our management's most difficult and subjective judgments and estimates of matters that are inherently uncertain. Our critical accounting estimates include those regarding (1) revenue recognition, (2) valuation of inventories, and (3) income taxes. For a discussion of our critical accounting estimates, see “Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Critical Accounting Estimates” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Sales Overview
We design, manufacture, and market high-performance, high-density programmable logic devices, or PLDs; HardCopy® ASIC devices; pre-defined software design building blocks known as intellectual property cores, or IP cores; and associated development tools.
Our net sales of $495.0 million for the three months ended September 28, 2012, decreased by $27.5 million, or 5%, from our net sales of $522.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011. Our net sales of $1.3 billion for the nine months ended September 28, 2012 decreased by $263.1 million, or 16%, from our net sales of $1.6 billion for the nine months ended September 30, 2011. The decrease in net sales for the three-month period was a result of weakened demand in Europe, Japan and Asia Pacific, partially offset by growth in North America and declines in all other vertical markets with the exception of Telecom and Wireless which exhibited modest growth. For the nine months ended September 28, 2012, the decrease in net sales was a result of weakened demand in all geographies and vertical markets.
Net sales of new products increased as sales of 28 nm products accelerated strongly. The net sales of FPGAs and CPLDs as a percentage of total net sales for the three-month period remained consistent with the prior year. For the nine-month period,
FPGAs increased modestly as a percentage of total net sales compared with CPLDs. For the three-month period, the Americas increased as a percentage of total net sales, partially offset by a decline in Japan with all other geographies essentially unchanged. For the nine-month period, Asia Pacific increased as a percentage of total net sales, partially offset by a decline in EMEA with all other geographies essentially unchanged.
Sales by Product Category
We classify our products into three categories: New, Mainstream, and Mature and Other Products. The composition of each product category is as follows:
| |
• | New Products include the Stratix® V (including GS, GT and GX), Stratix IV (including E, GX and GT), Arria® V, Arria II (including GX and GZ), Cyclone® V, Cyclone IV (including E and GX), MAX® V and HardCopy® IV devices. |
| |
• | Mainstream Products include the Stratix III, Cyclone III, MAX II and HardCopy III devices. |
| |
• | Mature and Other Products include the Stratix II (and GX), Stratix (and GX), Arria GX, Cyclone II, Cyclone, Classic™, MAX 3000A, MAX 7000, MAX 7000A, MAX 7000B, MAX 7000S, MAX 9000, HardCopy II, HardCopy, FLEX® series, APEX™ series, Mercury™, and Excalibur™ devices, configuration and other devices, intellectual property cores and software and other tools. |
Net sales by product category were as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended | | Year- Over- Year Change | | Sequential Change | | Nine Months Ended | | Year- Over- Year Change |
| September 28, 2012 | | September 30, 2011 | | June 29, 2012 | | | | September 28, 2012 | | September 30, 2011 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
New | 31 | % | | 27 | % | | 31 | % | | 8 | % | | 8 | % | | 29 | % | | 20 | % | | 16 | % |
Mainstream | 32 | % | | 32 | % | | 30 | % | | (8 | )% | | 13 | % | | 31 | % | | 34 | % | | (23 | )% |
Mature and Other | 37 | % | | 41 | % | | 39 | % | | (12 | )% | | 1 | % | | 40 | % | | 46 | % | | (27 | )% |
Net Sales | 100 | % | | 100 | % | | 100 | % | | (5 | )% | | 6 | % | | 100 | % | | 100 | % | | (16 | )% |
Sales by Vertical Market
The following vertical market data is derived from data that is provided to us by our distributors and end customers. With a broad base of customers, who in some cases manufacture end products spanning multiple market segments, the assignment of net sales to a vertical market requires the use of estimates, judgment and extrapolation. As such, actual results may differ from those reported.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended | | Year- Over- Year Change | | Sequential Change | | Nine Months Ended | | Year- Over- Year Change |
| September 28, 2012 | | September 30, 2011 | | June 29, 2012 | | | | September 28, 2012 | | September 30, 2011 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Telecom & Wireless | 45 | % | | 42 | % | | 45 | % | | 2 | % | | 7 | % | | 44 | % | | 43 | % | | (15 | )% |
Industrial Automation, Military & Automotive | 20 | % | | 22 | % | | 19 | % | | (11 | )% | | 11 | % | | 21 | % | | 22 | % | | (24 | )% |
Networking, Computer & Storage | 17 | % | | 20 | % | | 18 | % | | (21 | )% | | 5 | % | | 17 | % | | 17 | % | | (13 | )% |
Other | 18 | % | | 16 | % | | 18 | % | | 3 | % | | 3 | % | | 18 | % | | 18 | % | | (13 | )% |
Net Sales | 100 | % | | 100 | % | | 100 | % | | (5 | )% | | 6 | % | | 100 | % | | 100 | % | | (16 | )% |
Sales of FPGAs and CPLDs
Our PLDs consist of field-programmable gate arrays, or FPGAs, and complex programmable logic devices, or CPLDs. FPGAs consist of our Stratix, Cyclone, Arria, APEX, FLEX and ACEX 1K, as well as our Excalibur and Mercury families. CPLDs consist of our MAX, MAX II, MAX V and Classic families. Other Products consist of our HardCopy series and other masked programmed logic devices, configuration devices, software and other tools and IP cores.
Our net sales of FPGAs, CPLDs, and Other Products were as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended | | Year- Over- Year Change | | Sequential Change | | Nine Months Ended | | Year- Over- Year Change |
| September 28, 2012 | | September 30, 2011 | | June 29, 2012 | | | | September 28, 2012 | | September 30, 2011 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
FPGA | 82 | % | | 82 | % | | 85 | % | | (5 | )% | | 4 | % | | 83 | % | | 81 | % | | (14 | )% |
CPLD | 9 | % | | 9 | % | | 9 | % | | (9 | )% | | 4 | % | | 9 | % | | 10 | % | | (24 | )% |
Other Products | 9 | % | | 9 | % | | 6 | % | | (6 | )% | | 45 | % | | 8 | % | | 9 | % | | (29 | )% |
Net Sales | 100 | % | | 100 | % | | 100 | % | | (5 | )% | | 6 | % | | 100 | % | | 100 | % | | (16 | )% |
Sales by Geography
The following table is based on the geographic location of the original equipment manufacturers or the distributors who purchased our products. The geographic location of distributors may be different from the geographic location of the ultimate end users.
Net sales by geography were as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended | | Year- Over- Year Change | | Sequential Change | | Nine Months Ended | | Year- Over- Year Change |
| September 28, 2012 | | September 30, 2011 | | June 29, 2012 | | | | September 28, 2012 | | September 30, 2011 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Americas | 19 | % | | 16 | % | | 17 | % | | 6 | % | | 15 | % | | 18 | % | | 19 | % | | (20 | )% |
Asia Pacific | 43 | % | | 44 | % | | 46 | % | | (6 | )% | | 1 | % | | 44 | % | | 41 | % | | (10 | )% |
EMEA | 25 | % | | 25 | % | | 23 | % | | (5 | )% | | 18 | % | | 24 | % | | 26 | % | | (23 | )% |
Japan | 13 | % | | 15 | % | | 14 | % | | (16 | )% | | (4 | )% | | 14 | % | | 14 | % | | (17 | )% |
Net Sales | 100 | % | | 100 | % | | 100 | % | | (5 | )% | | 6 | % | | 100 | % | | 100 | % | | (16 | )% |
Price Concessions and Product Returns from Distributors
We sell the majority of our products to distributors worldwide at a list price. However, distributors resell our products to end customers at a very broad range of individually negotiated prices based on a variety of factors, including customer, product, quantity, geography and competitive differentiation. The majority of our distributors' sales to their customers are priced at a discount from our list price. Under these circumstances, we remit back to the distributor a portion of its original purchase price after the resale transaction is completed and we validate the distributor's resale information, including end customer, device, quantity and price, against the distributor price concession that we have approved in advance. To receive price concessions, distributors must submit the price concession claims to us for approval within 60 days of the resale of the product to an end customer. Primarily because of the uncertainty related to the final price, we defer revenue recognition on sales to distributors until our products are sold from the distributor to the end customer, which is when our price is fixed or determinable. Accordingly, these pricing uncertainties impact our results of operations, liquidity and capital resources. Average aggregate price concessions typically range from 65% to 80% of our list price on an annual basis, depending upon the composition of our sales, volume and factors associated with timing of shipments to distributors. Total price concessions earned by distributors were $3.1 billion and $3.0 billion for the nine months ended September 28, 2012 and September 30, 2011, respectively.
Our distributors have certain rights under our contracts to return defective, overstocked, obsolete or discontinued products. Our stock rotation program generally allows distributors to return unsold product to Altera, subject to certain contract limits, based on a percentage of sales occurring over various periods prior to the stock rotation. Products resold by the distributor to end customers are no longer eligible for return, unless specifically authorized by us. In addition, we generally warrant our products against defects in material, workmanship and non-conformance to our specifications. Returns from distributors totaled $61.5 million and $111.9 million for the nine months ended September 28, 2012 and September 30, 2011, respectively.
Gross Margin
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended | | Nine Months Ended |
| September 28, 2012 | | September 30, 2011 | | June 29, 2012 | | September 28, 2012 | | September 30, 2011 |
| | | | | | | | | |
Gross Margin Percentage | 69.3 | % | | 68.0 | % | | 69.6 | % | | 69.6 | % | | 70.5 | % |
Gross margin rates are heavily influenced by both vertical market mix and the timing of material cost improvements. While these variables will continue to fluctuate on a quarterly basis, our gross margin target over the long term is 67%. We believe that the 67% gross margin target will enable us to achieve our desired balance between growth and profitability. Our gross margin percentage for the three months ended September 28, 2012 increased by 1.3 points compared with the same period of 2011. The increase is primarily due to our improved Telecom and Wireless product mix when compared with the same period of 2011. Our gross margin percentage for the nine months ended September 28, 2012 decreased by 0.9 points compared to the same period of 2011 which was attributable to an unfavorable vertical market mix when compared with the same period of 2011.
Research and Development Expense
Research and development expense includes costs for compensation and benefits, development masks, prototype wafers, and depreciation and amortization. These expenditures are for the design of new PLD and ASIC families, the development of process technologies, new package technology, software to support new products and design environments and IP cores.
We will continue to make significant investments in the development of new products and focus our efforts on the development of new programmable logic devices that use advanced semiconductor wafer fabrication processes, as well as related development software. We are currently investing in the development of future silicon products, as well as our Quartus® II software, our library of IP cores and other future products.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended | | Year- Over- Year Change | | Sequential Change | | Nine Months Ended | | Year- Over- Year Change |
(In millions) | | September 28, 2012 | | September 30, 2011 | | June 29, 2012 | | |