Edgar Filing: BOSTON PRIVATE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS INC

2012 Q1 10-Q BPFH

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)


x	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2012


o	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to .

Commission File Number: 0-17089

BOSTON PRIVATE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)




Commonwealth of Massachusetts	04-2976299
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)

Ten Post Office Square Boston, Massachusetts	02109
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (888) 666-1363

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check One)



Large accelerated filer o		Accelerated filer x
Non-accelerated filer o	(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	Smaller reporting company o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act) Yes o No x

APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common stock as of May 4, 2012:



Common Stock-Par Value $1.00	78,159,980
(class)	(outstanding)

BOSTON PRIVATE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC.

FORM 10-Q

TABLE OF CONTENTS



PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1	Financial Statements (Unaudited)	1
	Consolidated Balance Sheets	1
	Consolidated Statements of Operations	2
	Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income	4
	Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity	5
	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows	6
	Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements	8
Item 2	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	41
	Executive Summary	41
	Critical Accounting Policies	43
	Financial Condition	43
	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets and Discussion	43
	Loan Portfolio and Credit Quality	45
	Liquidity	50
	Capital Resources	51
	Results of Operations	53
	Recent Accounting Developments	57
Item 3	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	57
Item 4	Controls and Procedures	58
PART II—OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1	Legal Proceedings	59
Item 1A	Risk Factors	59
Item 2	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	59
Item 3	Defaults upon Senior Securities	59
Item 4	Mine Safety Disclosure	59
Item 5	Other Information	59
Item 6	Exhibits	60
	Signature Page	61
	Certifications

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION, ITEM 1. CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

BOSTON PRIVATE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (Unaudited)



	March 31, 2012			December 31, 2011
	(In thousands, except share and per share data)
Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	131,136		$	203,354
Investment securities available for sale (amortized cost of $814,469 and $833,375 at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively)	825,614			844,496
Loans held for sale	3,727			12,069
Total loans	4,849,048			4,651,228
Less: Allowance for loan losses	97,902			96,114
Net loans	4,751,146			4,555,114
Other real estate owned ("OREO")	3,886			5,103
Stock in Federal Home Loan Banks	42,639			43,714
Premises and equipment, net	29,432			29,224
Goodwill	110,180			110,180
Intangible assets, net	27,479			28,569
Fees receivable	9,042			8,147
Accrued interest receivable	16,968			16,875
Deferred income taxes, net	66,105			66,782
Other assets	120,318			115,069
Assets of discontinued operations	10,890			10,676
Total assets	$	6,148,562		$	6,049,372
Liabilities:
Deposits	$	4,602,451		$	4,530,411
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase	108,551			130,791
Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings	582,551			521,827
Junior subordinated debentures	178,645			182,053
Other liabilities	91,827			94,811
Liabilities of discontinued operations	1,392			1,663
Total liabilities	5,565,417			5,461,556
Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests	21,604			21,691
Shareholders’ Equity:
Preferred stock, $1.00 par value; authorized: 2,000,000 shares;
Series B, issued and outstanding (contingently convertible): 401 shares at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011; liquidation value: $100,000 per share	58,089			58,089
Common stock, $1.00 par value; authorized: 170,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding: 78,151,609 shares at March 31, 2012 and 78,023,317 shares at December 31, 2011	78,152			78,023
Additional paid-in capital	642,276			656,436
Accumulated deficit	(220,512		)	(230,017		)
Accumulated other comprehensive income	3,536			3,594
Total shareholders’ equity	561,541			566,125
Total liabilities, redeemable noncontrolling interests and shareholders’ equity	$	6,148,562		$	6,049,372

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

BOSTON PRIVATE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (Unaudited)



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2012			2011
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
Interest and dividend income:
Loans	$	51,946		$	52,571
Taxable investment securities	1,256			1,380
Non-taxable investment securities	848			1,089
Mortgage-backed securities	1,603			1,807
Federal funds sold and other	149			319
Total interest and dividend income	55,802			57,166
Interest expense:
Deposits	4,903			6,650
Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings	3,945			4,391
Junior subordinated debentures	1,752			1,893
Repurchase agreements and other short-term borrowings	434			521
Total interest expense	11,034			13,455
Net interest income	44,768			43,711
Provision/ (credit) for loan losses	4,000			13,350
Net interest income after provision for loan losses	40,768			30,361
Fees and other income:
Investment management and trust fees	15,238			16,083
Wealth advisory fees	9,236			8,433
Other banking fee income	1,017			1,234
Gain on repurchase of debt	879			—
Gain on sale of investments, net	13			419
Gain on sale of loans, net	421			385
Gain/ (loss) on OREO, net	(41		)	110
Other	691			1,792
Total fees and other income	27,454			28,456
Operating expense:
Salaries and employee benefits	36,912			35,636
Occupancy and equipment	7,265			7,228
Professional services	2,939			5,143
Marketing and business development	1,329			1,434
Contract services and data processing	1,188			1,134
Amortization of intangibles	1,090			1,159
FDIC insurance	849			2,236
Restructuring expense	135			1,982
Other	3,920			4,109
Total operating expense	55,627			60,061
Income/ (loss) before income taxes	12,595			(1,244		)
(Continued)



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2012			2011
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
Income tax expense/ (benefit)	3,851			(179		)
Net income/ (loss) from continuing operations	8,744			(1,065		)
Net income/ (loss) from discontinued operations	1,554			1,663
Net income/ (loss) before attribution to noncontrolling interests	10,298			598
Less: Net income/ (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests	793			747
Net income/ (loss) attributable to the Company	$	9,505		$	(149	)
Adjustments to net income/ (loss) attributable to the Company to arrive at net (loss)/ income attributable to common shareholders	(1,110		)	(276		)
Net (loss)/ income attributable to common shareholders for (loss)/ earnings per share calculation	$	8,395		$	(425	)
Basic earnings/ (loss) per share attributable to common shareholders:
From continuing operations:	$	0.09		$	(0.03	)
From discontinued operations:	$	0.02		$	0.02
Total attributable to common shareholders:	$	0.11		$	(0.01	)
Weighted average basic common shares outstanding	75,632,980			74,670,533
Diluted earnings/ (loss) per share attributable to common shareholders:
From continuing operations:	$	0.09		$	(0.03	)
From discontinued operations:	$	0.02		$	0.02
Total attributable to common shareholders:	$	0.11		$	(0.01	)
Weighted average diluted common shares outstanding	76,432,851			74,670,533

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

BOSTON PRIVATE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (Unaudited)



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2012			2011
	(In thousands)
Net income/ (loss) attributable to the Company	$	9,505		$	(149	)
Other comprehensive income/ (loss), net of tax:
Change in unrealized gain/ (loss) on securities available for sale	9			(575		)
LESS: Realized gain/ (loss) on securities available for sale	7			256
Change in unrealized gain/ (loss) on securities available for sale	2			(831		)
Change in unrealized gain/ (loss) on cash flow hedges	(162		)	146
LESS: Amount of gain/ (loss) reclassified into net income	(243		)	(270		)
Change in unrealized gain/ (loss) on cash flow hedges	81			416
Change in unrealized gain/ (loss) on other	(141		)	42
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax	(58		)	(373		)
Total comprehensive income/ (loss) attributable to the Company, net	$	9,447		$	(522	)

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

BOSTON PRIVATE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY (Unaudited)



	Common Stock			Preferred Stock		Additional Paid-in Capital			Retained Earnings/ (Accumulated Deficit)			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income/ (Loss)			Total
	(In thousands, except share data)
Balance at December 31, 2010	$	76,307		$	58,089	$	652,288		$	(269,154	)	$	1,348		$	518,878
Net income/ (loss) attributable to the Company	—			—		—			(149		)	—			(149		)
Other comprehensive income/ (loss), net	—			—		—			—			(373		)	(373		)
Dividends paid to common shareholders: $0.01 per share	—			—		(761		)	—			—			(761		)
Dividends paid to preferred shareholder	—			—		(73		)	—			—			(73		)
Net proceeds from issuance of:
711,399 shares of common stock	711			—		4,170			—			—			4,881
Shares through incentive stock grants, net of cancellations and forfeitures	(22		)	—		22			—			—			—
Amortization of stock compensation and employee stock purchase plan	—			—		1,469			—			—			1,469
Stock options exercised	16			—		64			—			—			80
Tax deficiency from certain stock compensation awards	—			—		(1,221		)	—			—			(1,221		)
Other equity adjustments	—			—		(620		)	—			—			(620		)
Balance at March 31, 2011	$	77,012		$	58,089	$	655,338		$	(269,303	)	$	975		$	522,111

Balance at December 31, 2011	$	78,023		$	58,089	$	656,436		$	(230,017	)	$	3,594		$	566,125
Net income/ (loss) attributable to the Company	—			—		—			9,505			—			9,505
Other comprehensive income/ (loss), net	—			—		—			—			(58		)	(58		)
Dividends paid to common shareholders: $0.01 per share	—			—		(776		)	—			—			(776		)
Dividends paid to preferred shareholder	—			—		(73		)	—			—			(73		)
Repurchase of Carlyle warrants and Director's warrants	—			—		(15,000		)	—			—			(15,000		)
Net proceeds from issuance of:
98,500 shares of common stock	99			—		458			—			—			557
6,609 shares of incentive stock grants, net of cancellations and forfeitures	7			—		(7		)	—			—			—
Amortization of stock compensation and employee stock purchase plan	—			—		1,927			—			—			1,927
Stock options exercised	23			—		161			—			—			184
Tax deficiency from certain stock compensation awards	—			—		(952		)	—			—			(952		)
Other equity adjustments	—			—		102			—			—			102
Balance at March 31, 2012	$	78,152		$	58,089	$	642,276		$	(220,512	)	$	3,536		$	561,541

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

BOSTON PRIVATE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited)



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2012			2011
	(In thousands)
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income/ (loss) attributable to the Company	$	9,505		$	(149	)
Adjustments to arrive at net income/ (loss) from continuing operations
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests	793			747
Net (income)/ loss from discontinued operations	(1,554		)	(1,663		)
Net income/ (loss) from continuing operations	8,744			(1,065		)
Adjustments to reconcile net income/ (loss) from continuing operations to net cash provided by/ (used in) operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization	4,960			4,765
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests	(793		)	(747		)
Equity issued as compensation	1,927			1,469
Provision for loan losses	4,000			13,350
Loans originated for sale	(34,218		)	(22,665		)
Proceeds from sale of loans held for sale	42,981			27,838
Gain on the repurchase of debt	(879		)	—
Deferred income tax expense/ (benefit)	674			1,801
Net decrease/ (increase) in other operating activities	(9,296		)	(20,214		)
Net cash provided by/ (used in) operating activities of continuing operations	18,100			4,532
Net cash provided by/ (used in) operating activities of discontinued operations	1,090			1,642
Net cash provided by/ (used in) operating activities	19,190			6,174
Cash flows from investing activities:
Investment securities available for sale:
Purchases	(102,353		)	(195,874		)
Sales	4,359			82,102
Maturities, redemptions, and principal payments	115,079			121,177
(Investments)/ distributions in trusts, net	(591		)	(336		)
(Purchase)/ redemption of Federal Home Loan Banks stock	1,075			521
Net (increase)/ decrease in portfolio loans	(200,414		)	8,910
Proceeds from sale of OREO	1,176			4,861
Proceeds from sale and repayments of non-strategic loan portfolio, net of advances	—			1,000
Capital expenditures, net of sale proceeds	(1,864		)	(1,263		)
Cash received from dispositions	—			2,752
Net cash provided by/ (used in) investing activities of continuing operations	(183,533		)	23,850
Net cash provided by/ (used in) investing activities of discontinued operations	(21		)	—
Net cash provided by/ (used in) investing activities	(183,554		)	23,850
(Continued)



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2012			2011
	(In thousands)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Net increase in deposits	72,040			53,464
Net (decrease)/ increase in securities sold under agreements to repurchase	(22,240		)	(131,320		)
Net (decrease)/ increase in short-term Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings	70,000			(10,000		)
Advances of long-term Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings	15,000			15,000
Repayments of long-term Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings	(24,276		)	(85,868		)
Repurchase of debt	(2,420		)	—
Dividends paid to common shareholders	(776		)	(761		)
Dividends paid to preferred shareholder	(73		)	(73		)
Repurchase of warrants	(15,000		)	—
Tax deficiency from certain stock compensation awards	(952		)	(1,221		)
Proceeds from stock option exercises	184			80
Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net	557			591
Other equity adjustments	102			(620		)
Net cash provided by/ (used in) financing activities of continuing operations	92,146			(160,728		)
Net cash provided by/ (used in) financing activities of discontinued operations	—			—
Net cash provided by/ (used in) financing activities	92,146			(160,728		)
Net increase/ (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents	(72,218		)	(130,704		)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year	203,354			494,433
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	131,136		$	363,729
Supplementary schedule of non-cash investing and financing activities:
Cash paid for interest	$	11,165		$	13,623
Cash paid for income taxes, net of (refunds received)	996			13,605
Change in unrealized gain/ (loss) on securities available for sale, net of tax	2			(831		)
Change in unrealized gain/ (loss) on cash flow hedges, net of tax	81			416
Change in unrealized gain/ (loss) on other, net of tax	(141		)	42
Non-cash transactions:
Held to maturity investments transferred to available for sale or other investments at fair value	—			500
Loans transferred into other real estate owned from held for sale or portfolio	—			3,311
Loans transferred into/ (out of) held for sale from/ (to) portfolio	—			(526		)
Equity issued for acquisitions, including deferred acquisition obligations	—			4,290

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

BOSTON PRIVATE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements


1.	Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Boston Private Financial Holdings, Inc. (the "Company" or "BPFH"), is a holding company with three reportable segments: Private Banking, Investment Management, and Wealth Advisory.

On May 27, 2011, Boston Private Bank & Trust Company (the "Bank" or "Boston Private Bank"), a trust company chartered by The Commonwealth of Massachusetts, insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the "FDIC"), and a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, merged, as the surviving bank, with Borel Private Bank & Trust Company ("Borel"), First Private Bank & Trust ("FPB"), and Charter Private Bank ("Charter"), all of which were also wholly-owned subsidiaries of the Company.

Boston Private Bank operates primarily in four geographic markets: New England, San Francisco Bay, Southern California, and the Pacific Northwest. The Bank currently conducts business under the name of Boston Private Bank & Trust Company in its New England, Southern California, and Pacific Northwest markets. In its San Francisco Bay market, the Bank currently conducts business under the name of Borel Private Bank & Trust Company, A Division of Boston Private Bank & Trust Company.

The Investment Management segment has two consolidated affiliates, consisting of Dalton, Greiner, Hartman, Maher & Co., LLC ("DGHM") and Anchor Capital Holdings, LLC ("Anchor") (together, the "Investment Managers").

The Wealth Advisory segment has three consolidated affiliates, consisting of KLS Professional Advisors Group, LLC ("KLS"), Bingham, Osborn & Scarborough, LLC ("BOS"), and Davidson Trust Company ("DTC") (together, the "Wealth Advisors"). In addition, at December 31, 2010, the Company held an equity interest in Coldstream Holdings, Inc. of approximately 45%, which it sold in January 2011. In the first quarter of 2012, the Company announced the sale of DTC. The sale is expected to close in the second quarter of 2012, and the Company expects to record a gain on the transaction. Accordingly, prior period and current financial information related to DTC is included with discontinued operations.

The Company conducts substantially all of its business through its three reportable segments. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

The unaudited interim consolidated financial statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States ("GAAP"), and include all necessary adjustments of a normal recurring nature which, in the opinion of management, are required for a fair presentation of the results of operations and financial condition of the Company. The interim results of consolidated operations are not necessarily indicative of the results for the entire year.

The information in this report should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"). Prior period amounts are reclassified whenever necessary to conform to the current period presentation.

The Company’s significant accounting policies are described in Part II. Item 8. "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data - Note 1: Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies" in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, as filed with the SEC. For interim reporting purposes, the Company follows the same significant accounting policies, except for earnings per share, as described below.

Earnings Per Share ("EPS")

Basic EPS is computed by dividing net income/ (loss) attributable to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the year. Diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock (such as stock options) were exercised or converted into additional common shares that would then share in the earnings of the entity. Diluted EPS is computed by dividing net income attributable to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the year, plus an incremental number of common-equivalent shares computed using the treasury stock method. Dilutive potential common shares could consist of: stock options, performance-based restricted stock, warrants or other dilutive securities, and conversion of the convertible trust preferred securities. Additionally, when dilutive, interest expense (net of tax) related to the convertible trust preferred securities is added back to net income attributable to common shareholders. The calculation of diluted EPS excludes the potential dilution of common shares and the inclusion of any related expenses if the effect is antidilutive.

Unvested time-based restricted stock and Series B Non-Cumulative Perpetual Contingent Convertible Preferred Stock ("Series B Preferred"), both of which include the right to receive non-forfeitable dividends, are considered to participate with common stock in undistributed earnings for purposes of computing EPS. Companies, such as BPFH, that have such participating securities are required to calculate basic EPS using the two-class method and diluted EPS using the more dilutive amount resulting from the application of either the two-class method or the if-converted method. Calculations of EPS under the two-class method (i) exclude from the numerator any dividends paid or owed on participating securities and any undistributed earnings considered to be attributable to participating securities and (ii) exclude from the denominator the dilutive impact of the participating securities. Calculations of EPS under the if-converted method (i) include in the numerator any dividends paid or owed on participating securities and (ii) include the dilutive impact of the participating securities using the treasury stock method.


2.	Earnings Per Share

The computations of basic and diluted EPS are set forth below:

BOSTON PRIVATE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)



	For the three months ended March 31,
	2012			2011
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
Basic earnings/ (loss) per share - Numerator:
Net income/ (loss) from continuing operations	$	8,744		$	(1,065	)
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests	793			747
Net income/ (loss) from continuing operations attributable to the Company	7,951			(1,812		)
Decrease/ (increase) in noncontrolling interests' redemption values (1)	(86		)	(203		)
Dividends on participating securities	(92		)	(73		)
Total adjustments to income attributable to common shareholders	(178		)	(276		)
Net income/ (loss) from continuing operations attributable to common shareholders, before allocation to participating securities	7,773			(2,088		)
Less: Amount allocated to participating securities	(763		)	—
Net income/ (loss) from continuing operations attributable to common shareholders, after allocation to participating securities	$	7,010		$	(2,088	)
Net income/ (loss) from discontinued operations, before allocation to participating securities	$	1,554		$	1,663
Less: Amount allocated to participating securities	(169		)	—
Net income/ (loss) from discontinued operations, after allocation to participating securities	$	1,385		$	1,663
Net income/ (loss) attributable to common shareholders, before allocation to participating securities	$	9,327		$	(425	)
Less: Amount allocated to participating securities	(932		)	—
Net income/ (loss) attributable to common shareholders, after allocation to participating securities	$	8,395		$	(425	)

Basic earnings/ (loss) per share - Denominator:
Weighted average basic common shares outstanding	75,632,980			74,670,533
Per share data - Basic earnings/ (loss) per share from:
Continuing operations	$	0.09		$	(0.03	)
Discontinued operations	$	0.02		$	0.02
Total attributable to common shareholders	$	0.11		$	(0.01	)
Diluted earnings/ (loss) per share - Numerator:
Net income/ (loss) from continuing operations attributable to common shareholders	$	7,010		$	(2,088	)
Add back: income allocated to dilutive securities	—			—
Net income/ (loss) from continuing operations attributable to common shareholders, after assumed dilution	7,010			(2,088		)
Net income/ (loss) from discontinued operations	1,385			1,663
Net income/ (loss) attributable to common shareholders, after assumed dilution	$	8,395		$	(425	)
Diluted earnings/ (loss) per share - Denominator:
Weighted average basic common shares outstanding	75,632,980			74,670,533
Dilutive effect of:
Stock options and performance-based restricted stock(2)	453,626			—
Warrants to purchase common stock (2)	346,245			—
Dilutive common shares	799,871			—
Weighted average diluted common shares outstanding (2)	76,432,851			74,670,533
Per share data - Diluted earnings/ (loss) per share from:
Continuing operations	$	0.09		$	(0.03	)
Discontinued operations	$	0.02		$	0.02
Total attributable to common shareholders	$	0.11		$	(0.01	)
Dividends per share declared on common stock	$	0.01		$	0.01

BOSTON PRIVATE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)

_____________________

(1)

See Part II. Item 8. "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data—Note 16: Noncontrolling Interests" in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 for a description of the redemption values related to the redeemable noncontrolling interests. In accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") 480, Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity ("ASC 480"), an increase in redemption value from period to period reduces income attributable to common shareholders. Decreases in redemption value from period to period increase income attributable to common shareholders, but only to the extent that the cumulative change in redemption value remains a cumulative increase since adoption of this standard in the first quarter of 2009.


(2)	The diluted EPS computations for the three month periods ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 do not assume the conversion, exercise, or contingent issuance of the following shares for these periods because the result would have been anti-dilutive for the periods indicated. As a result of the anti-dilution, the potential common shares excluded from the diluted EPS computation are as follows:



	For the three months ended March 31,
	2012	2011
Shares excluded due to anti-dilution (treasury method):	(In thousands)
Potential common shares from:
Convertible trust preferred securities (a)	1,399	1,860
Conversion of the Series B Preferred stock	—	7,261
Exercise or contingent issuance of options or other dilutive securities (b)	—	725
Exercise or contingent issuance of warrants (c)	—	259
Total shares excluded due to anti-dilution	1,399	10,105

Shares excluded due to exercise price exceeding the average market price of common shares during the period (total outstanding):
Potential common shares from:
Options, restricted stock, or other dilutive securities (b)	2,495	3,802
Warrants (c)	—	2,888
Total shares excluded due to exercise price exceeding the average market price of common shares during the period	2,495	6,690

(a)

If the effect of the conversion of the trust preferred securities would have been dilutive, interest expense, net of tax, related to the convertible trust preferred securities of $0.3 million and $0.4 million for the three month periods ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively, would have been added back to net income/ (loss) attributable to common shareholders for diluted EPS computations for the periods presented.

(b)

Options to purchase shares of common stock, non-participating restricted stock, and other dilutive securities that were outstanding at period ends were not included in the computation of diluted EPS or in the above anti-dilution table because their exercise or conversion prices were greater than the average market price of the common shares during the respective period. Shares excluded from the diluted EPS computation are listed in the second table above for each respective period.

(c)

Certain warrants to purchase shares of common stock that were outstanding at period ends were not included in the computations of diluted EPS because the warrants' exercise price was greater than the average market price of the common shares during the respective period. Shares excluded from the diluted EPS computation are listed in the second table above for each respective period. See Part II. Item 8. "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data—Note 27: Subsequent Events" in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 for a discussion of the 2012 repurchase of the Carlyle Warrants and the Carlyle Director's Warrants.

BOSTON PRIVATE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)


3.	Reportable segments

Management Reporting

The Company has three reportable segments (Private Banking, Investment Management, and Wealth Advisory) and the Parent Company (Boston Private Financial Holdings, Inc.) (the "Holding Company"). The financial performance of the Company is managed and evaluated by these three areas. The segments are managed separately as a result of business concentrations in each function.

Measurement of Segment Profit and Assets

The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in Part II. Item 8. "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data - Note 1: Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies" in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.

Revenues, expenses, and assets are recorded by each segment, and separate financial statements are reviewed by their management and the Company’s Segment CEOs.

Reconciliation of Reportable Segment Items

The following tables provide a reconciliation of the revenues, profits, assets, and other significant items of reportable segments as of and for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and March 31, 2011. Interest expense on junior subordinated debentures is reported at the Holding Company.



	For the three months ended March 31,
	Net interest income						Non-interest income				Total revenues
	2012			2011			2012		2011		2012			2011
	(In thousands)
Total Bank(s) (1)	$	46,441		$	45,509		$	7,654	$	8,600	$	54,095		$	54,109
Total Investment Managers	7			33			9,484		10,132		9,491			10,165
Total Wealth Advisors (2)	7			5			9,237		8,433		9,244			8,438
Total Segments	46,455			45,547			26,375		27,165		72,830			72,712
Holding Company and Eliminations	(1,687		)	(1,836		)	1,079		1,291		(608		)	(545		)
Total Company	$	44,768		$	43,711		$	27,454	$	28,456	$	72,222		$	72,167



	For the three months ended March 31,
	Non-interest expense (3)				Income tax expense/(benefit)						Net income/ (loss) from continuing operations
	2012		2011		2012			2011			2012			2011
	(In thousands)
Total Bank(s) (1)	$	35,634	$	38,274	$	4,649		$	(274	)	$	9,812		$	2,759
Total Investment Managers	7,644		7,885		618			737			1,229			1,543
Total Wealth Advisors (2)	6,727		6,450		924			695			1,593			1,293
Total Segments	50,005		52,609		6,191			1,158			12,634			5,595
Holding Company and Eliminations	5,622		7,452		(2,340		)	(1,337		)	(3,890		)	(6,660		)
Total Company	$	55,627	$	60,061	$	3,851		$	(179	)	$	8,744		$	(1,065	)

BOSTON PRIVATE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)



	For the three months ended March 31,
	Net income/ (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests				Net income/ (loss) attributable to the Company (4)						Amortization of intangibles
	2012		2011		2012			2011			2012		2011
	(In thousands)
Total Bank(s) (1)	$	—	$	—	$	9,812		$	2,759		$	26	$	56
Total Investment Managers	395		380		834			1,163			800		830
Total Wealth Advisors (2)	398		367		1,195			926			264		273
Total Segments	793		747		11,841			4,848			1,090		1,159
Holding Company and Eliminations	—		—		(2,336		)	(4,997		)	—		—
Total Company	$	793	$	747	$	9,505		$	(149	)	$	1,090	$	1,159



	As of March 31,										For the three months ended March 31,
	Assets				AUM (5)						Depreciation
	2012		2011		2012			2011			2012		2011
	(In thousands)				(In millions)						(In thousands)
Total Bank(s) (1)	$	5,939,691	$	5,775,955	$	3,696		$	3,670		$	1,458	$	1,383
Total Investment Managers	105,640		114,682		8,047			8,437			62		69
Total Wealth Advisors (2)	66,880		66,319		7,579			7,071			88		86
Total Segments	6,112,211		5,956,956		19,322			19,178			1,608		1,538
Holding Company and Eliminations	36,351		26,365		(20		)	(20		)	45		52
Total Company	$	6,148,562	$	5,983,321	$	19,302		$	19,158		$	1,653	$	1,590

___________________


(1)	In the second quarter of 2011, the Company merged its four Private Banking affiliates into one bank operating under the charter of Boston Private Bank. See Part I. Item 1. "Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements - Note 1: Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies" for additional details.


(2)	In the first quarter of 2012, the Company announced the sale of its Wealth Advisory affiliate, DTC. This sale is expected to close in the second quarter of 2012. Accordingly, current and prior period results for DTC have been reclassified into discontinued operations and are included with Holding Company and Eliminations in the tables above.


(3)	Non-interest expense for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 includes $0.1 million and $2.0 million, respectively, of restructuring expense. Restructuring expenses have been incurred in the Private Banking segment as well as at the Holding Company.


(4)	Net income/ (loss) from discontinued operations for the three months ended March 31, 2012, and 2011 of $1.6 million, and $1.7 million, respectively, are included in Holding Company and Eliminations in the calculation of net loss attributable to the Company.


(5)	"AUM" represents Assets Under Management and Advisory at the affiliates. AUM at DTC have been removed since DTC operations are classified with discontinued operations.

BOSTON PRIVATE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)


4.	Investments

A summary of investment securities follows:



	Amortized Cost		Unrealized					Fair Value
	Amortized Cost		Gains		Losses			Fair Value
	(In thousands)
At March 31, 2012:
Available for sale securities at fair value:
U.S. government and agencies	$	12,687	$	1	$	(22	)	$	12,666
Government-sponsored entities	348,124		1,282		(273		)	349,133
Corporate bonds	4,966		—		(16		)	4,950
Municipal bonds	195,382		3,718		(132		)	198,968
Mortgage-backed securities (1)	252,855		6,687		(215		)	259,327
Other	455		129		(14		)	570
Total	$	814,469	$	11,817	$	(672	)	$	825,614

At December 31, 2011:
Available for sale securities at fair value:
U.S. government and agencies	$	4,603	$	20	$	(21	)	$	4,602
Government-sponsored entities	378,055		1,458		(90		)	379,423
Corporate bonds	4,953		—		(41		)	4,912
Municipal bonds	196,961		3,733		(19		)	200,675
Mortgage-backed securities (1)	248,329		6,403		(388		)	254,344
Other	474		95		(29		)	540
Total	$	833,375	$	11,709	$	(588	)	$	844,496

___________________


(1)	All mortgage-backed securities are guaranteed by U.S. government agencies or Government-sponsored entities.

The following table sets forth the maturities of investment securities available for sale, based on contractual maturity, as of March 31, 2012. Certain securities are callable before their final maturity. Additionally, certain securities (such as mortgage-backed securities) are shown within the table below based on their final (contractual) maturity, but, due to prepayments and amortization, are expected to have shorter lives.



	Available for Sale Securities
	Amortized cost		Fair value
	(In thousands)
Within one year	$	27,982	$	28,224
After one, but within five years	448,591		452,732
After five, but within ten years	101,210		101,925
Greater than ten years	236,686		242,733
Total	$	814,469	$	825,614

BOSTON PRIVATE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)

The following table presents the proceeds from sales, gross realized gains and gross realized losses for securities available for sale that were sold during the following periods:



	For the three months ended March 31,
	2012			2011
	(In thousands)
Proceeds from sales	$	4,359		$	82,102
Realized gains	16			656
Realized losses	(3		)	(237		)

The following tables set forth information regarding securities at March 31, 2012 having temporary impairment, due to the fair values having declined below the amortized cost of the individual securities, and the time period that the investments have been temporarily impaired.



	Less than 12 months					12 months or longer					Total
	Fair value		Unrealized losses			Fair value		Unrealized losses			Fair value		Unrealized losses			# of securities
Available for sale securities	(In thousands)
U.S. government and agencies	$	3,204	$	(22	)	$	—	$	—		$	3,204	$	(22	)	2
Government-sponsored entities	66,893		(273		)	—		—			66,893		(273		)	9
Corporate bonds	4,950		(16		)	—		—			4,950		(16		)	1
Municipal bonds	11,807		(132		)	—		—			11,807		(132		)	10
Mortgage-backed securities	39,262		(193		)	2,982		(22		)	42,244		(215		)	9
Other	69		(12		)	17		(2		)	86		(14		)	13
Total	$	126,185	$	(648	)	$	2,999	$	(24	)	$	129,184	$	(672	)	44

The U.S. government and agencies securities, government-sponsored entities securities, and mortgage-backed securities in the table above had a Standard and Poor’s credit rating of AA+. The one corporate bond in the table above had a Moody’s credit rating of Baa3. The municipal bonds in the table above had Moody’s credit ratings of at least Aa2 or a Standard and Poor's credit rating of at least AA+. The other securities consisted of equity securities.

At March 31, 2012, the amount of investment securities in an unrealized loss position greater than 12 months as well as in total was not significant and was primarily due to movements in interest rates. The Company has no intent to sell any securities in an unrealized loss position at March 31, 2012 and it is not more likely than not that the Company would be forced to sell any of these securities prior to the full recovery of all unrealized loss amounts.

Cost method investments, which are included in other assets, can be temporarily impaired when the fair values decline below the amortized costs of the individual investments. There were no cost method investments with unrealized losses at March 31, 2012. The Company invests primarily in low income housing partnerships which generate tax credits. The Company also holds partnership interests in venture capital funds formed to provide financing to small businesses and to promote community development. The Company had $22.1 million and $22.3 million in cost method investments included in other assets at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively.

BOSTON PRIVATE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)


5.	Fair Value Measurements

Fair value is defined under GAAP as the exchange price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. The Company determines the fair values of its financial instruments based on the fair value hierarchy established in ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures ("ASC 820"), which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. ASC 820 describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value. Financial instruments are considered Level 1 when valuation can be based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Level 2 financial instruments are valued using quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices in markets that are not active, or models using inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data of substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities. Financial instruments are considered Level 3 when their values are determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies or similar techniques and at least one significant model assumption or input is unobservable and when determination of the fair value requires significant management judgment or estimation.

The following tables present the Company's assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, aggregated by the level in the fair value hierarchy within which those measurements fall:



	At March 31, 2012		Fair value measurements at reporting date using:
			Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets (Level 1)		Significant other observable inputs (Level 2)		Significant unobservable inputs (Level 3)
	(In thousands)
Assets:
Available for sale securities:
U.S. government and agencies	$	12,666	$	9,463	$	3,203	$	—
Government-sponsored entities	349,133		—		349,133		—
Corporate bonds	4,950		—		4,950		—
Municipal bonds	198,968		—		198,968		—
Mortgage-backed securities	259,327		—		259,327		—
Other	570		570		—		—
Total available for sale securities	825,614		10,033		815,581		—
Derivatives - interest rate customer swaps	3,930		—		3,930		—
Derivatives - customer foreign exchange forward	51		—		51		—
Other investments	5,821		5,082		739		—
Liabilities:
Derivatives - interest rate customer swaps	$	4,008	$	—	$	4,008	$	—
Derivatives - customer foreign exchange forward	51		—		51		—
Derivatives - junior subordinated debenture interest rate swap	5,170		—		5,170		—

BOSTON PRIVATE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)



			Fair value measurements at reporting date using:
	At December 31, 2011		Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets (Level 1)		Significant other observable inputs (Level 2)		Significant unobservable inputs (Level 3)
	(In thousands)
Assets:
Available for sale securities
U.S. government and agencies	$	4,602	$	1,002	$	3,600	$	—
Government-sponsored entities	379,423		—		379,423		—
Corporate bonds	4,912		—		4,912		—
Municipal bonds	200,675		—		200,675		—
Mortgage-backed securities	254,344		—		254,344		—
Other	540		540		—		—
Total available for sale securities	844,496		1,542		842,954		—
Derivatives - interest rate customer swaps	4,207		—		4,207		—
Derivatives - customer foreign exchange forward	7		—		7		—
Other investments	5,317		4,493		824		—
Liabilities:
Derivatives - interest rate customer swaps	$	4,366	$	—	$	4,366	$	—
Derivatives - customer foreign exchange forward	7		—		7		—
Derivatives - junior subordinated debenture interest rate swap	5,308		—		5,308		—

At March 31, 2012, available for sale securities consist primarily of U.S. government and agency securities, government-sponsored entities, corporate bonds, municipal bonds, mortgage-backed securities, and other available for sale securities. The U.S. government securities and equities (which are categorized as other available for sale securities) are valued with prices quoted in active markets. Therefore, they have been categorized as a Level 1 measurement. The government-sponsored entities, corporate bonds, municipal bonds, mortgage-backed securities, and certain investments in Small Business Administration ("SBA") loans (which are categorized as U.S. government and agencies available for sale securities) generally have quoted prices but are traded less frequently than exchange-traded securities and can be priced using market data from similar assets. Therefore, they have been categorized as a Level 2 measurement. No investments held at March 31, 2012 were categorized as Level 3.

At December 31, 2011, available for sale securities consist primarily of U.S. government and agency securities, government-sponsored entities, corporate bonds, municipal bonds, mortgage-backed securities, and other available for sale securities. The U.S. government securities and equities (which are categorized as other available for sale securities) are valued with prices quoted in active markets. Therefore, they have been categorized as a Level 1 measurement. The government-sponsored entities, corporate bonds, municipal bonds, mortgage-backed securities, and certain investments in SBA loans (which are categorized as U.S. government and agencies available for sale securities) generally have quoted prices but are traded less frequently than exchange-traded securities and can be priced using market data from similar assets. Therefore, they have been categorized as a Level 2 measurement. No investments held at December 31, 2011 were categorized as Level 3.

BOSTON PRIVATE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)

The Company uses interest rate customer swaps and a junior subordinated debenture interest rate swap to manage its interest rate risk, and customer foreign exchange forward contracts to manage its foreign exchange risk. The valuation of these instruments is determined using widely accepted valuation techniques including discounted cash flow analysis on the expected cash flows of each derivative. This analysis reflects the contractual terms of the derivatives, including the period to maturity, and uses observable market-based inputs, including interest rate curves and implied volatilities. Therefore, they have been categorized as a Level 2 measurement. See Part I. Item 1. "Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements-Note 8: Derivatives and Hedging Activities" for further details.

To comply with the provisions of ASC 820, the Company incorporates credit valuation adjustments to appropriately reflect both its own nonperformance risk and the respective counterparty's nonperformance risk in the fair value measurements. In adjusting the fair value of its derivative contracts for the effect of nonperformance risk, the Company has considered the impact of netting and any applicable credit enhancements, such as collateral postings, thresholds, mutual puts and guarantees. Counterparty exposure is evaluated by netting positions that are subject to master netting agreements, as well as considering the amount of collateral securing the position. The Company met the criteria for and, effective January 1, 2012, elected to apply the accounting policy exception with respect to measuring counterparty credit risk for derivative transactions subject to master netting arrangements provided in Accounting Standards Updates ("ASU") 2011-04, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurements and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRS ("ASU 2011-04"). Electing this policy exception had no impact on financial statement presentation.

The Company has determined that the majority of the inputs used to value its derivatives fall within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, although the credit valuation adjustments associated with its derivatives utilize Level 3 inputs, such as estimates of current credit spreads to evaluate the likelihood of default by itself and its counterparties. As a result, the Company has determined that its derivative valuations in their entirety are classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

Other investments, which are not considered available for sale investments, consist of deferred compensation trusts for the benefit of certain current or former employees, which consist of publicly traded mutual fund investments that are valued at prices quoted in active markets. Therefore, they have been categorized as a Level 1 measurement. The remaining other investments categorized as Level 2 consist of the Company's cost-method investments.

The following tables present a rollforward of the Level 3 assets for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

Balance at

January 1, 2012

Purchase, (sales),

issuances and

(settlements), net

Transfers

into (out of)

Level 3

Unrealized

gains

(losses)

Amortization

Balance at

March 31, 2012

(In thousands)

Other available for sale investments

—

Total Level 3 assets

—



	Balance at January 1, 2011		Purchase, (sales), issuances and (settlements), net		Transfers into (out of) Level 3		Unrealized gains (losses)		Amortization		Balance at March 31, 2011
	(In thousands)
Other available for sale investments	$	750	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	750
Total Level 3 assets	$	750	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	750

The following tables present the Company's assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis during the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively, aggregated by the level in the fair value hierarchy within which those measurements fall.

BOSTON PRIVATE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)



	March 31, 2012		Fair value measurements recorded during the three months ended:
	March 31, 2012		Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets (Level 1)		Significant other observable inputs (Level 2)		Significant unobservable inputs (Level 3)
	(In thousands)
Assets:
Impaired loans (1)	$	4,894	$	—	$	—	$	4,894
OREO (2)	198		—		—		198
	$	5,092	$	—	$	—	$	5,092

___________________


(1)	Collateral-dependent impaired loans held at March 31, 2012 that had write-downs in fair value or whose specific reserve changed during the first quarter of 2012.


(2)	One OREO property held at March 31, 2012 had a write-down during the first quarter of 2012.



	March 31, 2011		Fair value measurements recorded during the three months ended:
	March 31, 2011		Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets (Level 1)		Significant other observable inputs (Level 2)		Significant unobservable inputs (Level 3)
	(In thousands)
Assets:
Impaired loans (1)	$	26,022	$	—	$	—	$	26,022
OREO (2)	3,186		—		—		3,186
	$	29,208	$	—	$	—	$	29,208

___________________


(1)	Collateral-dependent impaired loans held at March 31, 2011 that had write-downs in fair value or whose specific reserve changed during the first quarter of 2011.


(2)	Two OREO properties held at March 31, 2011 had write-downs during the first quarter of 2011.

The following table presents additional quantitative information about assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis for which the Company has utilized Level 3 inputs to determine fair value.



	March 31, 2012
	Fair Value		Valuation technique	Unobservable Input	Range of Inputs Utilized	Weighted Average of Inputs Utilized
	(In thousands)
Impaired Loans	$	4,894	Appraisals of Collateral	Discount for costs to sell	7% - 25%	9%
Impaired Loans	$	4,894	Appraisals of Collateral	Appraisal adjustments	0% - 25%	5%
OREO	$	198	Appraisals of Collateral	Discount for costs to sell	9%	9%
OREO	$	198	Appraisals of Collateral	Appraisal adjustments	—%	—%

Impaired loans include those loans that were adjusted to the fair value of underlying collateral as required under ASC 310. The amount does not include impaired loans that are measured based on expected future cash flows discounted at the respective loan's original effective interest rate, as that amount is not considered a fair value measurement. The Company uses appraisals, which management may adjust to reflect estimated fair value declines, or apply other discounts to appraised values for unobservable factors resulting from its knowledge of the property or consideration of broker quotes. The appraisers use a market, income, and/or a cost approach in determining the value of the collateral. Therefore they have been categorized as a Level 3 measurement.

BOSTON PRIVATE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)

The OREO in the tables above includes those properties that had an adjustment to fair value during the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The Company uses appraisals, which management may adjust to reflect estimated fair value declines, or may apply other discounts to appraised values for unobservable factors resulting from its knowledge of the property or consideration of broker quotes. The appraisers use a market, income, and/or a cost approach in determining the value of the collateral. Therefore they have been categorized as a Level 3 measurement.

The following tables present the carrying values and fair values of the Company's financial instruments that are not measured at fair value on a recurring basis (other than certain loans, as noted below):



	March 31, 2012
	Book Value		Fair Value		Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets (Level 1)		Significant other observable inputs (Level 2)		Significant unobservable inputs (Level 3)
	(In thousands)
FINANCIAL ASSETS:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	131,136	$	131,136	$	131,136	$	—	$	—
Loans, net (including loans held for sale)	4,754,873		4,795,625		—		—		4,795,625
Other financial assets	120,335		120,335		—		120,335		—
FINANCIAL LIABILITIES:
Deposits	4,602,451		4,606,940		—		4,606,940		—
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase	108,551		111,295		—		111,295		—
Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings	582,551		607,305		—		607,305		—
Junior subordinated debentures	178,645		166,701		—		166,701		—
Other financial liabilities	11,541		11,541		—		11,541		—



	December 31, 2011
	Book Value		Fair Value
	(In thousands)
FINANCIAL ASSETS:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	203,354	$	203,354
Loans, net (including loans held for sale)	4,567,183		4,631,890
Other financial assets	120,097		120,097
FINANCIAL LIABILITIES:
Deposits	4,530,411		4,538,137
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase	130,791		133,660
Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings	521,827		547,584
Junior subordinated debentures	182,053		165,242
Other financial liabilities	11,388		11,388

BOSTON PRIVATE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)

The estimated fair values have been determined by using available quoted market information or other appropriate valuation methodologies. The aggregate fair value amounts presented do not represent the underlying value of the Company taken as a whole.

The fair value estimates provided are made at a specific point in time, based on relevant market information and the characteristics of the financial instrument. The estimates do not provide for any premiums or discounts that could result from concentrations of ownership of a financial instrument. Because no active market exists for some of the Company's financial instruments, certain fair value estimates are based on subjective judgments regarding current economic conditions, risk characteristics of the financial instruments, future expected loss experience, prepayment assumptions, and other factors. The resulting estimates involve uncertainties and therefore cannot be determined with precision. Changes made to any of the underlying assumptions could significantly affect the estimates.

Cash and cash equivalents

The carrying value reported in the balance sheets for cash and cash equivalents approximates fair value due to the short-term nature of their maturities and are classified as Level 1.

Loans, net (including loans held for sale)

Fair value estimates are based on loans with similar financial characteristics. Fair values of commercial and residential mortgage loans are estimated by discounting contractual cash flows adjusted for prepayment estimates and using discount rates approximately equal to current market rates on loans with similar credit and interest rate characteristics and maturities. The fair value estimates for home equity and other loans are based on outstanding loan terms and pricing in the local markets. The method of estimating the fair value of the loans disclosed in the table above does not incorporate the exit price concept in the presentation of the fair value of these financial instruments. Loans are included in the Level 3 fair value category based upon the inputs and valuation techniques used.

Other financial assets

Other financial assets consist of accrued interest and fees receivable, stock in FHLBs, and the cash surrender value of bank-owned life insurance, for which the carrying amount approximates fair value, and are classified as Level 2.

The Company carries the FHLB stock at the original cost basis (par value) and is classified as Level 2. Subsequent to the bank merger on May 27, 2011, the only FHLB that the Bank is a member of is Boston. FHLB stock in both the FHLBs of San Francisco and Seattle is still owned by the Bank. At the time of the bank merger there were outstanding FHLB borrowings with both the FHLBs of San Francisco and Seattle. Until these borrowings in the FHLBs of San Francisco and Seattle mature and are subsequently paid off, the FHLB stock associated with these borrowings cannot be redeemed. The Bank has requested to redeem the excess FHLB stock in these two FHLBs above the amount required for the related borrowings. The FHLBs may wait up to five years from the redemption request to redeem the stock. Of the $42.6 million of stock in FHLBs held at March 31, 2012, $13.6 million, or 32%, of the balance related to stock held in the FHLBs of San Francisco and Seattle.

At each period end, the Company evaluates its investment in the respective FHLB's stock for other-than-temporary impairment. The Company has not recognized an other-than-temporary impairment loss with respect to stock in the FHLBs, based on the following considerations: the Company's evaluation of the underlying investment, including the long-term nature of the asset; the liquidity position of the respective FHLBs; the actions being taken by the respective FHLBs to address their regulatory situations; the improving financial position; and the 2011 and first quarter 2012 redemptions at par of a portion of FHLB stock held in the Boston and San Francisco FHLBs.

BOSTON PRIVATE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)

Deposits

The fair values reported for transaction accounts (demand, NOW, savings, and money market) equal their respective book values reported on the balance sheets and are classified as Level 2. The fair values disclosed are, by definition, equal to the amount payable on demand at the reporting date. The fair values for certificates of deposit are based on the discounted value of contractual cash flows. The discount rates used are representative of approximate rates currently offered on certificates of deposit with similar remaining maturities and are classified as Level 2.

Securities sold under agreements to repurchase

The fair value of securities sold under agreements to repurchase are estimated based on contractual cash flows discounted at the Bank's incremental borrowing rate for FHLB borrowings with similar maturities and have been classified as Level 2.

Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings

The fair value reported for FHLB borrowings is estimated based on the discounted value of contractual cash flows. The discount rate used is based on the Bank's estimated current incremental borrowing rate for FHLB borrowings of similar maturities and have been classified as Level 2.

Junior subordinated debentures

The fair value of the junior subordinated debentures issued by Boston Private Capital Trust I was based on the current market price of the securities at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 and have been classified as Level 2. The fair value of the junior subordinated debentures issued by Boston Private Capital Trust II and the junior subordinated debentures acquired in the FPB, Gibraltar (acquired as part of the 2005 acquisition of Gibraltar which was subsequently sold in 2009), and Charter acquisitions approximates book value because of the floating rate nature of the securities and are classified as Level 2.

Other financial liabilities

Other financial liabilities consist of accrued interest payable and deferred compensation for which the carrying amount approximates fair value and are classified as Level 2.

Financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk

The Bank's commitments to originate loans and for unused lines and outstanding letters of credit are primarily at market interest rates and therefore, the carrying amount approximates fair value.

BOSTON PRIVATE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)


6.	Loans Receivable and Credit Quality

The Bank's lending activities are conducted principally in New England, San Francisco Bay, Southern California, and the Pacific Northwest. The Bank originates single and multi-family residential loans, commercial real estate loans, commercial and industrial loans, construction and land loans, and home equity and other consumer loans. The Bank also purchases high quality residential mortgage loans as a way to increase volumes more efficiently. Most loans are secured by borrowers’ personal or business assets. The ability of the Bank's single family residential and consumer borrowers to honor their repayment commitments is generally dependent on the level of overall economic conditions within the Bank's lending areas. Commercial, construction, and land borrowers’ ability to repay is generally dependent upon the health of the economy and real estate values, including the performance of the construction sector in particular. Accordingly, the ultimate collectability of a substantial portion of the Bank's loan portfolio is susceptible to changing conditions in the New England, San Francisco Bay, Southern California, and Pacific Northwest economies and real estate markets.

Total loans include deferred loan fees/ (costs), net, of $3.3 million and $3.2 million of net deferred loan costs as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively. Deferred loan fees/ (costs) include unamortized premiums or discounts related to mortgage loans purchased by the Bank. Also included in total loans is the unamortized loan fair market valuation discount related to an acquisition of an immaterial amount as of December 31, 2011.

The following table presents a summary of the loan portfolio based on the portfolio segment as of the dates indicated:



	March 31, 2012		December 31, 2011
	(In thousands)
Commercial and industrial	$	727,161	$	687,102
Commercial real estate	1,777,170		1,669,220
Construction and land	149,655		153,709
Residential	1,879,148		1,823,403
Home equity	138,958		143,698
Consumer and other	176,956		174,096
Total	$	4,849,048	$	4,651,228

The following table presents nonaccrual loans receivable by class of receivable as of the dates indicated:



	March 31, 2012		December 31, 2011
	(In thousands)
Commercial and industrial	$	7,665	$	3,759
Commercial real estate	34,552		38,581
Construction and land	7,281		7,772
Residential	22,570		17,513
Home equity	491		457
Consumer and other	107		27
Total	$	72,666	$	68,109

The Bank's policy is to discontinue the accrual of interest on a loan when the collectability of principal or interest is in doubt. In certain instances, although infrequent, loans that have become 90 days or more past due may remain on accrual status if the value of the collateral securing the loan is sufficient to cover principal and interest and the loan is in the process of collection. There was an immaterial amount of loans 90 days or more past due, but still accruing, as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011. The Bank's policy for returning a loan to accrual status requires the loan to be brought current and for the client to show a history of making timely payments (generally six months). For troubled debt restructured loans ("TDR"s), a return to accrual status generally requires timely payments for a period of six months, along with meeting other criteria. TDRs are assessed on a case-by-case basis.

BOSTON PRIVATE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)

The following tables present an age analysis of loans receivable by class of receivable as of the dates indicated:



	March 31, 2012
	Accruing Past Due						Nonaccrual Loans
	30-59 Days Past Due		60-89 Days Past Due		Total Accruing Past Due (1)		Current Payment Status		30-89 Days Past Due		90 Days or Greater Past Due		Total Non-Accrual Loans		Current Accruing Loans		Total Loans Receivable
	(In thousands)
Commercial and industrial	$	3,628	$	203	$	3,831	$	5,637	$	1,607	$	421	$	7,665	$	715,665	$	727,161
Commercial real estate	7,604		3,419		11,023		28,856		1,220		4,476		34,552		1,731,595		1,777,170
Construction and land	48		247		327		4,349		172		2,760		7,281		142,047		149,655
Residential	5,560		—		5,560		6,018		5,109		11,443		22,570		1,851,018		1,879,148
Home equity	129		—		129		131		—		360		491		138,338		138,958
Consumer and other	506		13		519		2		—		105		107		176,330		176,956
Total	$	17,475	$	3,882	$	21,389	$	44,993	$	8,108	$	19,565	$	72,666	$	4,754,993	$	4,849,048

___________________


(1)	Includes an additional $32 thousand of accruing construction and land loans that are 90 days or greater past due.



	December 31, 2011
	Accruing Past Due						Nonaccrual Loans
	30-59 Days Past Due		60-89 Days Past Due		Total Accruing Past Due (1)		Current Payment Status		30-89 Days Past Due		90 Days or Greater Past Due		Total Non-Accrual Loans		Current Accruing Loans		Total Loans Receivable
	(In thousands)
Commercial and industrial	$	1,284	$	364	$	1,648	$	2,866	$	566	$	327	$	3,759	$	681,695	$	687,102
Commercial real estate	6,779		2,136		8,915		32,096		2,310		4,175		38,581		1,621,724		1,669,220
Construction and land	48		26		106		4,825		172		2,775		7,772		145,831		153,709
Residential	8,997		5,410		14,407		7,236		1,849		8,428		17,513		1,791,483		1,823,403
Home equity	1,223		—		1,223		131		—		326		457		142,018		143,698
Consumer and other	689		1		690		3		—		24		27		173,379		174,096
Total	$	19,020	$	7,937	$	26,989	$	47,157	$	4,897	$	16,055	$	68,109	$	4,556,130	$	4,651,228

___________________


(1)	Includes an additional $32 thousand of accruing construction and land loans that are 90 days or greater past due.

Nonperforming and delinquent loans are affected by factors, including economic and business conditions, such as interest rates, and unemployment levels, real estate collateral values, among others. In periods of prolonged economic declines, borrowers may become more severely impacted over time as liquidity levels decline and the borrower's ability to continue to make payments deteriorates. With respect to real estate collateral values, the declines from the peak, as well as the value of the real estate at the time of origination versus the current value, can impact the level of problem loans. For instance, if the loan to value ratio at the time of renewal has increased due to the decline in the real estate value since origination, the loan may no longer meet the Bank's underwriting standards and not be renewed.

BOSTON PRIVATE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)

Generally when a collateral dependent commercial loan becomes impaired, an updated appraisal of the collateral, if appropriate, is obtained. In limited circumstances, an updated appraisal is obtained on residential and home equity loans that are classified as impaired. If the impaired loan has not been upgraded to a performing status within a reasonable amount of time, the Bank continues to obtain newer appraisals, approximately every 12 to 18 months or sooner, if deemed necessary, especially during periods of declining values.

The past due status of a loan is determined in accordance with its contractual repayment terms. All loan types are reported past due when one scheduled payment is due and unpaid for 30 days or more.

Credit Quality Indicators

The Bank uses a risk rating system to monitor the credit quality of its loan portfolio. Loan classifications are assessments made by the Bank of the status of the loans based on the facts and circumstances known to the Bank, including management's judgment, at the time of assessment. Some or all of these classifications may change in the future if there are unexpected changes in the financial condition of the borrower, including but not limited to, changes resulting from continuing deterioration in general economic conditions on a national basis or in the local markets in which the Bank operates adversely affecting, among other things, real estate values. Such conditions, as well as other factors which adversely affect borrowers' ability to service or repay loans, typically result in changes in loan default and charge-off rates, and increased provisions for loan losses, which would adversely affect the Company's financial performance and financial condition. These circumstances are not entirely foreseeable and, as a result, it may not be possible to accurately reflect them in the Company's analysis of credit risk.

A summary of the rating system used by the Bank, repeated here from Part II. Item 8. "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data—Note 1: Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies," in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 follows:

Acceptable or Pass - All loans graded as acceptable or pass are considered acceptable credit quality by the Bank and are grouped for purposes of calculating the allowance for loan losses. Only commercial loans, including commercial real estate, commercial and industrial loans, and construction and land loans are given a numerical grade. For residential, home equity and consumer loans, the Bank classifies loans as acceptable or pass unless there is known information such as delinquency or client requests for modifications which would then generally result in a risk rating such as special mention or more severe depending on the factors.

Special Mention - Loans rated in this category are defined as having potential weaknesses that deserve management's close attention. If left uncorrected, these potential weaknesses may, at some future date, result in the deterioration of the repayment prospects for the credit or the Bank's credit position. These loans are currently protected but have the potential to deteriorate to a substandard rating. For commercial loans, the borrower's financial performance may be inconsistent or below forecast, creating the possibility of liquidity problems and shrinking debt service coverage. In loans having this rating, the primary source of repayment is still good, but there is increasing reliance on collateral or guarantor support. Collectability of the loan is not yet in jeopardy. In particular, loans in this category are considered more variable than other categories, since they will typically migrate through categories more quickly.

Substandard - Loans rated in this category are inadequately protected by the current sound worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any. A substandard credit has a well-defined weakness or weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt. They are characterized by the distinct possibility that the Bank will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected. Substandard loans may be either still accruing or nonaccruing depending upon the severity of the risk and other factors such as the value of the collateral, if any, and past due status.

Doubtful - Loans rated in this category indicate that collection or liquidation in full on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions and values, is highly questionable and improbable. Loans in this category are usually on nonaccrual and are classified as impaired.

BOSTON PRIVATE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)

The following tables present the loan portfolio's credit risk profile by internally assigned grade by class of financing receivable as of the dates indicated:



	March 31, 2012
	By Loan Grade or Nonaccrual Status
	Pass		Special Mention		Accruing Classified		Nonaccrual Loans		Total
	(In thousands)
Commercial and industrial	$	681,828	$	23,854	$	13,814	$	7,665	$	727,161
Commercial real estate	1,570,737		92,927		78,954		34,552		1,777,170
Construction and land	128,875		9,283		4,216		7,281		149,655
Residential	1,850,112		—		6,466		22,570		1,879,148
Home equity	136,599		—		1,868		491		138,958
Consumer and other	174,616		2,229		4		107		176,956
Total	$	4,542,767	$	128,293	$	105,322	$	72,666	$	4,849,048



	December 31, 2011
	By Loan Grade or Nonaccrual Status
	Pass		Special Mention		Accruing Classified		Nonaccrual Loans		Total
	(In thousands)
Commercial and industrial	$	641,831	$	19,263	$	22,249	$	3,759	$	687,102
Commercial real estate	1,454,786		112,748		63,105		38,581		1,669,220
Construction and land	131,205		10,978		3,754		7,772		153,709
Residential	1,798,635		—		7,255		17,513		1,823,403
Home equity	141,373		—		1,868		457		143,698
Consumer and other	173,927		132		10		27		174,096
Total	$	4,341,757	$	143,121	$	98,241	$	68,109	$	4,651,228

BOSTON PRIVATE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)

The following tables present, by class of receivable, the balance of impaired loans with and without a related allowance, the associated allowance for those impaired loans with a related allowance, and the total unpaid principal on impaired loans:



	As of and for the three months ended March 31, 2012
	Recorded Investment (1)		Unpaid Principal Balance		Related Allowance		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized while Impaired
	(In thousands)
With no related allowance recorded:
Commercial and industrial	$	6,538	$	9,264	n/a		$	5,855	$	—
Commercial real estate	29,964		44,809		n/a		33,543		104
Construction and land	6,087		10,360		n/a		6,294		97
Residential	9,572		10,542		n/a		10,232		81
Home equity	360		360		n/a		342		1
Consumer and other	—		—		n/a		—		—
Subtotal	$	52,521	$	75,335	n/a		$	56,266	$	283
With an allowance recorded:
Commercial and industrial	1,081		1,109		113		1,101		—
Commercial real estate	28,121		29,624		3,245		24,586		173
Construction and land	1,194		1,224		313		1,234		—
Residential	13,757		13,757		868		8,295		63
Home equity	131		131		131		131		2
Consumer and other	—		—		—		—		—
Subtotal	$	44,284	$	45,845	$	4,670	$	35,347	$	238
Total:
Commercial and industrial	7,619		10,373		113		6,956		—
Commercial real estate	58,085		74,433		3,245		58,129		277
Construction and land	7,281		11,584		313		7,528		97
Residential	23,329		24,299		868		18,527		144
Home equity	491		491		131		473		3
Consumer and other	—		—		—		—		—
Total	$	96,805	$	121,180	$	4,670	$	91,613	$	521

___________________


(1)	Recorded investment represents the client loan balance net of historical charge-offs of $20.8 million and historical nonaccrual interest paid, which is applied to principal, of $3.6 million.

BOSTON PRIVATE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)



	As of and for the year ended December 31, 2011
	Recorded Investment (1)		Unpaid Principal Balance		Related Allowance		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized while Impaired
	(In thousands)
With no related allowance recorded:
Commercial and industrial	$	5,595	$	6,239	n/a		$	6,437	$	59
Commercial real estate	34,963		49,690		n/a		49,765		373
Construction and land	6,493		10,783		n/a		6,473		—
Residential	10,451		11,222		n/a		8,810		198
Home equity	326		360		n/a		745		—
Consumer and other	—		—		n/a		11		—
Subtotal	$	57,828	$	78,294	n/a		$	72,241	$	630
With an allowance recorded:
Commercial and industrial	1,123		1,137		149		748		—
Commercial real estate	23,202		24,398		3,307		26,274		440
Construction and land	1,279		1,302		219		2,591		—
Residential	6,230		6,230		402		4,279		137
Home equity	131		131		131		131		6
Consumer and other	—		—		—		—		—
Subtotal	$	31,965	$	33,198	$	4,208	$	34,023	$	583
Total:
Commercial and industrial	6,718		7,376		149		7,185		59
Commercial real estate	58,165		74,088		3,307		76,039		813
Construction and land	7,772		12,085		219		9,064		—
Residential	16,681		17,452		402		13,089		335
Home equity	457		491		131		876		6
Consumer and other	—		—		—		11		—
Total	$	89,793	$	111,492	$	4,208	$	106,264	$	1,213

___________________


(1)	Recorded investment represents the client loan balance net of historical charge-offs of $18.2 million and historical nonaccrual interest paid, which is applied to principal, of $3.5 million.

When management determines that it is probable that the Bank will not collect all principal and interest on loans in accordance with the original loan terms, as well as all TDRs, the loan is designated as impaired.

Loans that are designated as impaired require an analysis to determine the amount of impairment, if any. Impairment would be indicated as a result of the carrying value of the loan exceeding the estimated collateral value, less costs to sell, for collateral dependent loans or the net present value of the projected cash flow, discounted at the loan's contractual effective interest rate, for loans not considered to be collateral dependent. Generally, shortfalls in the analysis on collateral dependent loans would result in the impairment amount being charged-off to the allowance for loan losses. Shortfalls on cash flow dependent loans may be carried as specific allocations to the general reserve unless a known loss is determined to have occurred, in which case such known loss is charged-off.

Loans in the held for sale category are carried at the lower of cost or estimated fair value in the aggregate and are excluded from the allowance for loan losses analysis.

BOSTON PRIVATE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)

The Bank may, under certain circumstances, restructure loans as a concession to borrowers who have experienced financial difficulty. Such loans are classified as TDRs and are included in impaired loans. TDRs typically result from the Company’s loss mitigation activities which, among other activities, could include rate reductions, payment extensions, and/or principal forgiveness. TDRs totaled $62.4 million and $55.3 million at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively. Of the $62.4 million in TDR loans at March 31, 2012, $29.4 million were on accrual status. Of the $55.3 million in TDR loans at December 31, 2011, $27.4 million were on accrual status.

Since all TDR loans are considered impaired loans, they are individually evaluated for impairment. The resulting impairment, if any, would have an impact on the allowance for loan losses as a specific reserve or charge-off. If, prior to the classification as a TDR, the loan was not impaired, there would have been a general reserve on the particular loan. Therefore, depending upon the result of the impairment analysis, there could be an increase or decrease in the related allowance for loan losses. Many loans initially categorized as TDR are already on nonaccrual status and are already considered impaired. Therefore, there is generally not a material change to the allowance for loan losses when a loan is categorized as a TDR. The following tables present the balance of troubled debt restructured loans that were restructured or defaulted during the periods indicated.



	As of and for the three months ended March 31, 2012
	Restructured three month period					TDRs that defaulted in the current three month period that were restructured in prior twelve months
	# of Loans	Pre- modification recorded investment		Post- modification recorded investment		# of Loans	Post- modification recorded investment
(Dollars In thousands)
Commercial and industrial	—	$	—	$	—	—	$	—
Commercial real estate (1)	4	5,545		5,545		—	—
Construction and land	—	—		—		—	—
Residential (2)	8	3,702		3,702		—	—
Home equity	—	—		—		—	—
Consumer and other	—	—		—		—	—
Total	12	$	9,247	$	9,247	—	$	—

___________________


(1)	Represents the following concessions: extension of term (3 loans; post-modification recorded investment of $2.7 million; and combination of concessions (1 loan; post-modification recorded investment of $2.8 million).


(2)	Represents the following concessions: payment deferral (1 loan; post-modification balance of $1.9 million); temporary rate reduction (6 loans; post-modification recorded investment of $0.5 million); and combination of concessions (1 loan; post-modification recorded investment of $1.3 million).

BOSTON PRIVATE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)



	As of and for the year ended December 31, 2011
	Restructured Current Year to Date					TDRs that defaulted in 2011 that were restructured in a TDR in 2011
	# of Loans	Pre- modification recorded investment		Post- modification recorded investment		# of Loans	Post- modification recorded investment
(Dollars In thousands)
Commercial and industrial (1)	7	$	5,983	$	5,983	1	$	125
Commercial real estate (2)	10	33,406		33,758		2	2,111
Construction and land (3)	2	4,452		3,852		—	—
Residential (4)	11	2,951		2,951		—	—
Home equity	—	—		—		—	—
Consumer and other	—	—		—		—	—
Total	30	$	46,792	$	46,544	3	$	2,236

___________________


(1)	Represents the following concessions: extension of term (1 loan; post-modification recorded investment of $3.1 million; temporary rate reduction (1 loan; post-modification recorded investment of $0.2 million); and combination of concessions (5 loans; post-modification recorded investment of $2.7 million).


(2)	Represents the following concessions: extension of term (1 loan; post-modification recorded investment of $1.0 million); temporary rate reduction (4 loans; post-modification recorded investment of $13.7 million); and combination of concessions (5 loans; post-modification recorded investment of $19.1 million).


(3)	Represents the following concessions: extension of term (2 loans; post-modification recorded investment of $3.9 million).


(4)	Represents the following concessions: extension of term (1 loan; post-modification recorded investment of $2.0 million); and temporary rate reduction (10 loans; post-modification recorded investment of $1.0 million).

BOSTON PRIVATE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)


7.	Allowance for Loan Losses

The allowance for loan losses is reported as a reduction of outstanding loan balances, and totaled $97.9 million and $96.1 million at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively. The following tables summarize the changes in the allowance for loan losses for the periods indicated:



	At and for the three months ended March 31,
	2012			2011
	(In thousands)
Allowance for loan losses, beginning of period:
Commercial and industrial	$	12,163		$	13,438
Commercial real estate	63,625			65,760
Construction and land	6,382			6,875
Residential	9,286			7,449
Home equity	1,535			1,231
Consumer and other	1,149			1,478
Unallocated	1,974			2,172
Total allowance for loan losses, beginning of period	96,114			98,403
Provision for loan losses:
Commercial and industrial	1,827			875
Commercial real estate	2,030			11,911
Construction and land	(712		)	282
Residential	966			619
Home equity	(53		)	(33		)
Consumer and other	(116		)	165
Unallocated	58			(469		)
Total provision for loan losses	4,000			13,350

(continued)

BOSTON PRIVATE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)



	At and for the three months ended March 31,
	2012			2011
(continued)	(In thousands)
Loans charged-off:
Commercial and industrial	$	(2,311	)	$	(806	)
Commercial real estate	(406		)	(10,246		)
Construction and land	—			(1,628		)
Residential	(198		)	(195		)
Home equity	—			—
Consumer and other	(26		)	(191		)
Total charge-offs	(2,941		)	(13,066		)
Recoveries on loans previously charged-off:
Commercial and industrial	383			357
Commercial real estate	117			868
Construction and land	166			358
Residential	—			—
Home equity	61			1
Consumer and other	2			11
Total recoveries	729			1,595
Allowance for loan losses at end of period:
Commercial and industrial	12,062			13,864
Commercial real estate	65,366			68,293
Construction and land	5,836			5,887
Residential	10,054			7,873
Home equity	1,543			1,199
Consumer and other	1,009			1,463
Unallocated	2,032			1,703
Total allowance for loan losses at end of period	$	97,902		$	100,282

BOSTON PRIVATE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)

The following tables show the Company's allowance for loan losses and loan portfolio at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 by portfolio segment, disaggregated by method of impairment analysis. The Company had no loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality at March 31, 2012 or December 31, 2011.



	Commercial and industrial		Commercial real estate		Construction and land		Residential
	(In thousands)
Allowance for loan losses balance at March 31, 2012 attributable to:
Loans collectively evaluated	$	11,949	$	62,121	$	5,523	$	9,186
Loans individually evaluated	113		3,245		313		868
Total allowance for loan losses	$	12,062	$	65,366	$	5,836	$	10,054

Recorded investment (loan balance) at March 31, 2012:
Loans collectively evaluated	$	719,542	$	1,719,085	$	142,374	$	1,855,819
Loans individually evaluated	7,619		58,085		7,281		23,329
Total Loans	$	727,161	$	1,777,170	$	149,655	$	1,879,148



	Home equity		Consumer and other		Unallocated		Total
(Continued from above)	(In thousands)
Allowance for loan losses balance at March 31, 2012 attributable to:
Loans collectively evaluated	$	1,412	$	1,009	$	2,032	$	93,232
Loans individually evaluated	131		—		—		4,670
Total allowance for loan losses	$	1,543	$	1,009	$	2,032	$	97,902

Recorded investment (loan balance) at March 31, 2012:
Loans collectively evaluated	$	138,467	$	176,956	$	—	$	4,752,243
Loans individually evaluated	491		—		—		96,805
Total Loans	$	138,958	$	176,956	$	—	$	4,849,048



	Commercial and industrial		Commercial real estate		Construction and land		Residential
	(In thousands)
Allowance for loan losses balance at December 31, 2011 attributable to:
Loans collectively evaluated	$	12,014	$	60,318	$	6,163	$	8,884
Loans individually evaluated	149		3,307		219		402
Total allowance for loan losses	$	12,163	$	63,625	$	6,382	$	9,286

Recorded investment (loan balance) at December 31, 2011:
Loans collectively evaluated	$	680,384	$	1,611,055	$	145,937	$	1,806,722
Loans individually evaluated	6,718		58,165		7,772		16,681
Total Loans	$	687,102	$	1,669,220	$	153,709	$	1,823,403

BOSTON PRIVATE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)



	Home equity		Consumer and other		Unallocated		Total
(Continued from above)	(In thousands)
Allowance for loan losses balance at December 31, 2011 attributable to:
Loans collectively evaluated	$	1,404	$	1,149	$	1,974	$	91,906
Loans individually evaluated	131		—		—		4,208
Total allowance for loan losses	$	1,535	$	1,149	$	1,974	$	96,114

Recorded investment (loan balance) at December 31, 2011:
Loans collectively evaluated	$	143,241	$	174,096	$	—	$	4,561,435
Loans individually evaluated	457		—		—		89,793
Total Loans	$	143,698	$	174,096	$	—	$	4,651,228


8.	Derivatives and Hedging Activities

The Company is exposed to certain risks arising from both its business operations and economic conditions. The Company principally manages its exposures to a wide variety of business and operational risks through management of its core business activities. The Company manages economic risks, including interest rate, liquidity, and credit risk, primarily by managing the amount, sources, and duration of its assets and liabilities and, to a lesser extent, the use of derivative financial instruments. Specifically, the Company enters into derivative financial instruments to manage exposures that arise from business activities that result in the receipt or payment of future known and uncertain cash amounts, the value of which are generally determined by interest rates. The Company's derivative financial instruments are used to manage differences in the amount, timing, and duration of the Company's known or expected cash receipts and its known or expected cash payments principally related to certain variable rate loan assets and variable rate borrowings.

The table below presents the fair value of the Company's derivative financial instruments as well as their classification on the consolidated balance sheets as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011.



	March 31, 2012							December 31, 2011
	Asset derivatives			Liability derivatives				Asset derivatives			Liability derivatives
	Balance sheet location	Fair value (1)		Balance sheet location	Fair value (1)			Balance sheet location	Fair value (1)		Balance sheet location	Fair value (1)
	(In thousands)
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:
Interest rate products	Other assets	$	—	Other liabilities	$	(5,170	)	Other assets	$	—	Other liabilities	$	(5,308	)
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
Interest rate products	Other assets	3,930		Other liabilities	(4,008		)	Other assets	4,207		Other liabilities	(4,366		)
Foreign exchange contracts	Other assets	51		Other liabilities	(51		)	Other assets	7		Other liabilities	(7		)
Total		$	3,981		$	(9,229	)		$	4,214		$	(9,681	)

___________________


(1)	For additional details, see Part I. Item 1. "Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements-Note 5: Fair Value Measurements."

BOSTON PRIVATE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)

The table below presents the effect of the Company's derivative financial instruments in the consolidated statement of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011.



Derivatives in Cash Flow Hedging Relationships	Amount of Gain or (Loss) Recognized in OCI on Derivative (Effective Portion) Three Months Ended March 31,					Location of Gain or (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated OCI into Income (Effective Portion)	Amount of Gain or (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated OCI into Income (Effective Portion) Three Months Ended March 31,
Derivatives in Cash Flow Hedging Relationships	2012			2011			2012			2011
(In thousands)
Interest rate products	$	(277	)	$	248	Interest income	$	(416	)	$	(463	)
Total	$	(277	)	$	248		$	(416	)	$	(463	)

The table below presents the components of the Company's accumulated other comprehensive income/ (loss) related to the derivatives for the periods indicated.



	March 31, 2012			March 31, 2011
	(In thousands)
Balance at beginning of year	$	(3,106	)	$	(1,371	)
Change in unrealized gain/ (loss) on cash flow hedges	81			416
Balance at end of period	$	(3,025	)	$	(955	)

Cash Flow Hedges of Interest Rate Risk

The Company's objective in using derivatives is to add stability to interest income and expense and to manage the risk related to exposure to changes in interest rates. To accomplish this objective, the Holding Company entered into an interest rate swap in the second quarter of 2010 with a notional amount of $75 million related to the Holding Company's cash outflows associated with the subordinated debt related to trust preferred securities to protect against rising London Interbank Offered Rate ("LIBOR"). The interest rate swap had an effective date of December 30, 2010 and a term of five years. As of December 30, 2010, the subordinated debt switched from a fixed rate of 6.25% to a variable rate of three-month LIBOR plus 1.68%. The interest rate swap effectively fixed the Holding Company's interest rate payments on the $75 million of debt at 4.45%.

The Company uses the "Hypothetical Derivative Method" described in ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging ("ASC 815"), for quarterly prospective and retrospective assessments of hedge effectiveness, as well as for measurements of hedge ineffectiveness. Under this method, the Company assesses the effectiveness of each hedging relationship by comparing the changes in cash flows of the derivative hedging instrument with the changes in cash flows of the designated hedged transactions. The effective portion of changes in the fair value of the derivative is initially reported in other comprehensive income ("OCI") (outside of earnings) and subsequently reclassified to earnings in interest and dividend income when the hedged transactions affect earnings. Ineffectiveness resulting from the hedge is recorded as a gain or loss in the consolidated statement of operations as part of fees and other income. The Holding Company did not have any hedge ineffectiveness recognized in earnings during the three month periods ended March 31, 2012 and 2011. The Holding Company also monitors the risk of counterparty default on an ongoing basis.

A portion of the balance reported in accumulated other comprehensive income related to derivatives will be reclassified to interest income or expense as interest payments are made or received on the Holding Company's interest rate swap. During the next twelve months, the Holding Company estimates that $1.7 million will be reclassified as an increase in interest expense.

BOSTON PRIVATE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)

Non-designated Hedges

Derivatives not designated as hedges are not speculative and result from two different services the Bank provides to qualified commercial clients. The Bank offers certain derivative products directly to such clients. The Bank economically hedges derivative transactions executed with commercial clients by entering into mirror-image, offsetting derivatives with third parties. Derivative transactions executed as part of these programs are not designated in ASC 815-qualifying hedging relationships and are, therefore, marked-to-market through earnings each period. Because the derivatives have mirror-image contractual terms, the changes in fair value substantially offset through earnings. Fees earned in connection with the execution of derivatives related to this program are recognized in the consolidated statement of operations in other income. The derivative asset and liability values above include an adjustment related to the consideration of credit risk required under ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures ("ASC 820"), of less than $0.1 million in earnings for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011. At March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the Bank had 12 interest rate swaps with an aggregate notional amount of $102.4 million and $102.7 million, respectively, related to this program. As of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the Bank also had four and two, respectively, foreign currency exchange contracts with notional amounts of $1.5 million and $0.2 million, respectively, related to this program.

The table below presents the effect of the Company's derivative financial instruments, not designated as hedging instruments, in the consolidated statement of operations for the periods ended March 31, 2012 and 2011.



Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments	Location of Gain or (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative	Amount of Gain or (Loss), Net, Recognized in Income on Derivative Three Months Ended March 31,
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments		2012		2011
		(In thousands)
Interest rate products	Other income/ expense	$	81	$	30
Foreign exchange contracts	Other income/ expense	—		12
Total		$	81	$	42

The Holding Company and the Bank have agreements with their derivative counterparties that contain provisions where, if the Holding Company or Bank defaults on any of its indebtedness, including default where repayment of the indebtedness has not been accelerated by the lender, then the Holding Company or the Bank could also be declared in default on its derivative obligations. The Holding Company and the Bank were in compliance with these provisions as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011.

The Holding Company and the Bank also have agreements with certain of its derivative counterparties that contain provisions where, if the Holding Company or Bank fails to maintain its status as a well- or adequately-capitalized institution, then the counterparty could terminate the derivative positions and the Holding Company or the Bank would be required to settle its obligations under the agreements. The Holding Company and the Bank were in compliance with these provisions as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011.

Certain of the Holding Company and the Bank's agreements with its derivative counterparties contain provisions where if specified events or conditions occur that materially change the Holding Company's or the Bank's creditworthiness in an adverse manner, the Holding Company or the Bank may be required to fully collateralize its obligations under the derivative instruments. The Holding Company and the Bank were in compliance with these provisions as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011.

As of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the termination amounts related to collateral determinations of derivatives in a liability position was $9.4 million and $9.9 million, respectively. The Holding Company has minimum collateral posting thresholds with its derivative counterparty and has posted collateral of $8.0 million as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, against its obligation under this agreement.

BOSTON PRIVATE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)


9.	Income Taxes

The components of income tax expense/ (benefit) for continuing operations, discontinued operations, noncontrolling interests and the Company are as follows:



	Three months ended March 31,
	2012			2011
	(In thousands)
Income/ (loss) from continuing operations:
Income/ (loss) before income taxes	$	12,595		$	(1,244	)
Income tax expense/ (benefit)	3,851			(179		)
Net income/ (loss) from continuing operations	$	8,744		$	(1,065	)
Effective tax rate, continuing operations	30.6		%	14.4		%

Income/ (loss) from discontinued operations:
Income/ (loss) before income taxes	$	2,752		$	2,966
Income tax expense/ (benefit)	1,198			1,303
Net income/ (loss) from discontinued operations	$	1,554		$	1,663
Effective tax rate, discontinued operations	43.5		%	43.9		%

Income/ (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests:
Income/ (loss) before income taxes	$	793		$	747
Income tax expense/ (benefit)	—			—
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests	$	793		$	747
Effective tax rate, noncontrolling interests	—		%	—		%

Income/ (loss) attributable to the Company
Income/ (loss) before income taxes	$	14,554		$	975
Income tax expense/ (benefit)	5,049			1,124
Net income/ (loss) attributable to the Company	$	9,505		$	(149	)
Effective tax rate attributable to the Company	34.7		%	115.3		%

The effective tax rate for continuing operations for the three months ended March 31, 2012 of 30.6%, with related tax expense of $3.9 million, was calculated based on a projected 2012 annual effective tax rate. The effective tax rate was less than the statutory rate of 35% due primarily to earnings from tax-exempt investments, income tax credits, and income attributable to noncontrolling interests. These savings were partially offset by state and local income taxes.

The effective tax rate for continuing operations for the three months ended March 31, 2011 of 14.4%, with related tax benefit of $0.2 million, was calculated based on a projected 2011 annual effective tax rate. The effective tax rate was less than the statutory rate of 35% due primarily to earnings from tax-exempt investments, income tax credits, and income attributable to noncontrolling interests. These items were partially offset by state and local income taxes.

The effective tax rate for the three months ended March 31, 2012 is greater than the effective tax rate for the same period in 2011 due primarily to earnings from tax-exempt investments, income tax credits, and income attributable to noncontrolling interests having a smaller impact on the effective tax rate, due primarily to the higher level of income before taxes in 2012 as compared to the loss before taxes in 2011.

BOSTON PRIVATE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)

Due to the adoption of plans in the first three months of 2012 to dispose of DTC, the results of operations related to DTC are included in "discontinued operations" in the table above. Contingent consideration related to the 2009 divestiture of certain affiliates, primarily related to the revenue sharing agreement with Westfield Capital Management Company, LLC, is also reflected under "discontinued operations" in the table above. The profits and losses attributable to owners other than the Company are reflected under "noncontrolling interests" in the table above.


10.	Noncontrolling Interests

At the Company, noncontrolling interests typically consist of equity owned by management of the Company’s respective majority-owned affiliates. Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests in the consolidated statements of operations represents the net income allocated to the noncontrolling interest owners of the affiliates. Net income allocated to the noncontrolling interest owners was $0.8 million and $0.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. To the extent that the increase in the estimated maximum redemption amounts exceeds the net income attributable to the noncontrolling interests, such excess reduces net income available to common shareholders for purposes of EPS computation.

Noncontrolling interests which are not redeemable as provided in ASC 480, are included in shareholders’ equity in the consolidated balance sheets, and include the capital and undistributed profits owned by the noncontrolling partner. The Company did not have any noncontrolling interests included in shareholder's equity at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011.

Each affiliate operating agreement provides the Company and/or the noncontrolling interests with contingent call or put redemption features used for the orderly transfer of noncontrolling equity interests between the affiliate minority shareholders and the Company at fair value. Fair value is generally defined in the operating agreements as a multiple of earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization. The aggregate amount of such redeemable noncontrolling interests at the estimated maximum redemption amounts of $21.6 million and $21.7 million are included in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively. The Company may liquidate these noncontrolling interests with cash, shares of the Company’s common stock, or other forms of consideration dependent on the operating agreement. These agreements are discussed in Part II. Item 8. "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Note 16: Noncontrolling Interests" in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.

Generally, these put and call options refer to shareholder rights of both the Company and the noncontrolling interests of the Company's majority-owned affiliate companies. The affiliate company noncontrolling interests generally take the form of LLC units, profits interests, or common stock (collectively, the "noncontrolling equity interests"). In most circumstances, the put and call options generally relate to the Company's right and, in some cases, obligation to purchase and the noncontrolling equity interests’ right to sell their equity interests. There are various events that could cause the puts or calls to be exercised, such as a change in control, death, disability, retirement, resignation or termination. The puts and calls are generally to be exercised at the then fair value. The terms of these rights vary and are governed by the respective individual operating and legal documents that were negotiated at the time of acquisition.

The following table presents the contractually determined maximum redemption values to repurchase the noncontrolling interests at the periods indicated:



	March 31, 2012		December 31, 2011
	(In thousands)
Anchor	$	11,951	$	12,089
BOS	5,873		5,873
DTC (1)	1,889		1,924
DGHM	1,891		1,805
Total	$	21,604	$	21,691

_____________________


(1)	In the first quarter of 2012, the Company announced the sale of its affiliate DTC. The sale is expected to close in the second quarter of 2012.

BOSTON PRIVATE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)

The following table is an analysis of the Company’s redeemable noncontrolling interests for the periods indicated:



	Three months ended
	March 31, 2012			March 31, 2011
	(In thousands)
Balance at beginning of year	$	21,691		$	19,598
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests	793			747
Distributions	(445		)	—
Adjustments to fair value	(435		)	(4		)
Balance at end of period	$	21,604		$	20,341


11.	Restructuring

On May 27, 2011, the Company completed the legal consolidation of its four private banks, operating in the New England, San Francisco Bay, Southern California and Pacific Northwest markets, under one unified charter based in Massachusetts. Restructuring charges related to the merger generally consist of severance charges, costs to terminate contracts, legal, audit and consulting costs, and other costs. The Company estimates that such charges will result in approximately $8.5 million in restructuring expense, of which $8.1 million was expensed in 2011. The Company expects to complete the restructuring in the first half of 2012. Restructuring expenses incurred by the Private Banking segment amounted to $5.5 million, with the remaining $2.6 million incurred by the Holding Company. The following table summarizes the restructuring activity for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011.



	Severance Charges			Contract Termination Fees		Professional Expenses			Other Associated Costs			Total
	(In thousands)
Accrued charges at December 31, 2010	$	—		$	—	$	—		$	—		$	—
Costs incurred	1,161			—		815			6			1,982
Costs paid	—			—		(143		)	(6		)	(149		)
Accrued charges at March 31, 2011	$	1,161		$	—	$	672		$	—		$	1,833

Accrued charges at December 31, 2011	$	2,658		$	211	$	230		$	—		$	3,099
Costs incurred	(1		)	—		128			8			135
Costs paid	(459		)	—		(254		)	(8		)	(721		)
Accrued charges at March 31, 2012	$	2,198		$	211	$	104		$	—		$	2,513


12.	Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2011, the FASB issued new guidance, ASU 2011-04. The amendments in this update further clarify the requirements in U.S. GAAP for measuring fair value and enhance the disclosures for information about fair value measurements. The new guidance is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011. The Company does not expect this ASU to have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements.

BOSTON PRIVATE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued)

In June 2011, the FASB issued new guidance, ASU 2011-05, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Presentation of Comprehensive Income. Under this new guidance, an entity must present the components of net income and comprehensive income in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. The new guidance eliminates the option to present other comprehensive income in the statement of shareholders’ equity. The new guidance is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011. In December 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-12, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Deferral of the Effective Date for Amendments to the Presentation of Reclassifications of Items Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income in ASU No. 2011-05, which defers indefinitely certain changes related to the presentation of reclassification adjustments in ASU 2011-05. The Company does not expect this ASU to have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements.

In September 2011, the FASB issued new guidance, ASU 2011-08, Intangibles - Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Goodwill for Impairment. This new guidance allows entities to perform a qualitative assessment to determine if it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying value in order to determine if quantitative testing is required. This qualitative assessment is optional and is intended to reduce the cost and complexity of annual goodwill impairment tests. The new guidance is effective for annual and interim impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011 and early adoption is allowed provided the entity has not yet performed its 2011 impairment test or issued its financial statements. The Company did not elect to early adopt ASU 2011-08 and does not expect this ASU to have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements.

In December 2011, the FASB issued new guidance, ASU 2011-11, Balance Sheet (Topic 210): Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities. The amendments in this update require entities to disclose both gross and net information about both instruments and transactions eligible for offset in the statement of financial position and instruments and transactions subject to an agreement similar to a master netting arrangement. The new guidance is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after January 1, 2013 and requires a retrospective application for all comparative periods which are presented. The Company does not expect this ASU to have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements.


13.	Subsequent Events

The Company evaluated subsequent events through the date the accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements were issued. Pursuant to the requirements of ASC 855, Subsequent Events, there were no events or transactions during the subsequent event reporting period that required disclosure in the financial statements.

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF

FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

As of and for the three months ended March 31, 2012

Certain statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q that are not historical facts may constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and are intended to be covered by the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties. These statements, which are based on certain assumptions and describe our future plans, strategies and expectations, can generally be identified by the use of the words "may," "will," "should," "could," "would," "plan," "potential," "estimate," "project," "believe," "intend," "anticipate," "expect," "target" and similar expressions. These statements include, among others, statements regarding our strategy, effectiveness of our investment programs, evaluations of future interest rate trends and liquidity, expectations as to growth in assets, deposits and results of operations, receipt of regulatory approval for pending acquisitions, success of acquisitions, future operations, market position, financial position, and prospects, plans and objectives of management. You should not place undue reliance on our forward-looking statements. You should exercise caution in interpreting and relying on forward-looking statements because they are subject to significant risks, uncertainties and other factors which are, in some cases, beyond the Company’s control.

Forward-looking statements are based on the current assumptions and beliefs of management and are only expectations of future results. The Company’s actual results could differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements as a result of, among others, factors referenced herein under the section captioned "Risk Factors"; adverse conditions in the capital and debt markets and the impact of such conditions on the Company’s private banking, investment management and wealth advisory activities; changes in interest rates; competitive pressures from other financial institutions; the effects of continuing deterioration in general economic conditions on a national basis or in the local markets in which the Company operates, including changes which adversely affect borrowers’ ability to service and repay our loans; changes in the value of the securities and other assets; changes in loan default and charge-off rates; the adequacy of loan loss reserves; reductions in deposit levels necessitating increased borrowing to fund loans and investments; increasing government regulation, such as the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010; the risk that goodwill and intangibles recorded in the Company’s financial statements will become impaired; the risk that the Company's deferred tax assets may not be realized; risks related to the integration of the Company's bank subsidiaries; risks related to the identification and implementation of acquisitions; and changes in assumptions used in making such forward-looking statements, as well as the other risks and uncertainties detailed in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K and updated in the Company's Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and other filings submitted to the Securities and Exchange Commission. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date on which they are made. The Company does not undertake any obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect circumstances or events that occur after the date the forward-looking statements are made.

Executive Summary

The Company offers a wide range of wealth management services to high net worth individuals, families, businesses and select institutions through its three reportable segments: Private Banking, Investment Management, and Wealth Advisory. This Executive Summary provides an overview of the most significant aspects of our operating segments and the Company's operations in the first quarter of 2012. Details of the matters addressed in this summary are provided elsewhere in this document and, in particular, in the sections immediately following.



	Three months ended March 31,								% Change
	2012		2011			Change			% Change
	(In thousands, except per share data)
Total revenues	$	72,222	$	72,167		$	55		—	%
Provision/ (credit) for loan losses	4,000		13,350			(9,350		)	(70	)%
Total operating expenses	55,627		60,061			(4,434		)	(7	)%
Net income/ (loss) from continuing operations	8,744		(1,065		)	9,809			nm
Net income/ (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests	793		747			46			6	%
Net income/ (loss) attributable to the Company	9,505		(149		)	9,654			nm
Diluted earnings/ (loss) per share:
From continuing operations	$	0.09	$	(0.03	)	$	0.12		nm
From discontinued operations	$	0.02	$	0.02		$	—		—	%
Attributable to common shareholders	$	0.11	$	(0.01	)	$	0.12		nm

________________


nm	= not meaningful

Net income attributable to the Company was $9.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012, compared to a loss of $0.1 million in the same period of 2011. The Company recognized diluted earnings per share of $0.11 for the three months ended March 31, 2012, compared to a loss per share of $0.01 for the same period of 2011.

Key items that affected the Company's results in the first quarter 2012 compared to the same period of 2011 include:


▪	Loan growth of $197.8 million, or 4%, to $4.8 billion at March 31, 2012 from $4.7 billion at December 31, 2011. This increase was primarily driven by increases in commercial real estate loans and residential loans and regionally in the Southern California market.

▪

An increase in net interest income of $1.1 million, or 2%, to $44.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012 as compared to the same period in 2011. Net interest margin ("NIM") increased 5 basis points to 3.23% for the three months ended March 31, 2012 as compared to the same period in 2011. The increased NIM is primarily related to the mix of interest-earning assets. In the first quarter of 2012, the Company had a lower ratio of liquid assets, which have a low yield of approximately 25 basis points, as compared to the same period in 2011.


▪	A decrease in operating expenses of $4.4 million, or 7%, for the three months ended March 31, 2012, as compared to the same period in 2011, primarily due to a decrease in professional fees of $2.2 million, a decrease in restructuring expense of $1.8 million, and a decrease in FDIC insurance of $1.4 million, partially offset by an increase in salaries and employee benefits expense of $1.3 million.

The Company's Private Banking segment reported net income attributable to the Company of $9.8 million in the first quarter of 2012, compared to net income of $2.8 million in the same period of 2011. The $7.1 million increase in net income was a result of a decrease in provision for loan losses, and a decrease in operating expenses primarily due to decreases in professional fees and FDIC insurance expense, partially offset by increased income tax expense.

The Company's Investment Management segment reported net income attributable to the Company of $0.8 million in the first quarter of 2012, compared to net income attributable to the Company of $1.2 million in the same period of 2011. The $0.3 million, or 28%, decrease was primarily due to a decrease in investment management and trust fees, partially offset by a decrease in operating expenses. The decrease in investment management and trust fees was related to negative net flows in assets under management and advisory ("AUM") during 2011. AUM decreased $0.4 billion, or 5%, from March 31, 2011 to March 31, 2012, of which $0.7 billion related to net outflows, partially offset by $0.3 billion in favorable investment performance.

The Company's Wealth Advisory segment reported net income attributable to the Company of $1.2 million in the first quarter of 2012, compared to net income attributable to the Company of $0.9 million in the same period of 2011. The $0.3 million, or 29%, increase was primarily due to an increase in wealth advisory fees, offset by increases in professional fees. AUM increased $0.5 billion, or 7%, from March 31, 2011 to March 31, 2012, of which $0.3 billion related to net inflows and $0.2 billion related to favorable investment performance.

Critical Accounting Policies

Critical accounting policies reflect significant judgments and uncertainties, and could potentially result in materially different results under different assumptions and conditions. The Company believes that its most critical accounting policies upon which its financial condition depends, and which involve the most complex or subjective decisions or assessments are the allowance for loan and lease losses, the valuation of goodwill and intangible assets and analysis for impairment, and tax estimates. These policies are discussed in Part II. Item 7. "Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Critical Accounting Policies" in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011. There have been no changes to these policies through the filing of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

Financial Condition

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets and Discussion



	March 31, 2012		December 31, 2011		Increase/ (decrease)			% Change
	(In thousands)
Assets:
Total cash and investments	$	999,389	$	1,091,564	$	(92,175	)	(8	)%
Loans held for sale	3,727		12,069		(8,342		)	(69	)%
Total loans	4,849,048		4,651,228		197,820			4	%
Less: allowance for loan losses	97,902		96,114		1,788			2	%
Net loans	4,751,146		4,555,114		196,032			4	%
Goodwill and intangible assets	137,659		138,749		(1,090		)	(1	)%
Other assets	256,641		251,876		4,765			2	%
Total assets	$	6,148,562	$	6,049,372	$	99,190		2	%
Liabilities and Equity:
Deposits	$	4,602,451	$	4,530,411	$	72,040		2	%
Total borrowings	869,747		834,671		35,076			4	%
Other liabilities	93,219		96,474		(3,255		)	(3	)%
Total liabilities	5,565,417		5,461,556		103,861			2	%
Redeemable noncontrolling interests	21,604		21,691		(87		)	—	%
Total shareholders’ equity	561,541		566,125		(4,584		)	(1	)%
Total liabilities, redeemable noncontrolling interests and shareholders’ equity	$	6,148,562	$	6,049,372	$	99,190		2	%

Total Assets. Total assets increased $99.2 million, or 2%, to $6.1 billion at March 31, 2012 from $6.0 billion at December 31, 2011. This increase was due to increases in loans, deposits, and borrowings, slightly offset by decreases in cash.

Cash and Investments. Total cash and investments (consisting of cash and cash equivalents, investment securities, and stock in the FHLBs) decreased $92.2 million, or 8%, to $1.0 billion, or 16% of total assets at March 31, 2012 from $1.1 billion, or 18% of total assets at December 31, 2011. The decrease was primarily due to the $72.2 million, or 36%, decrease in cash and cash equivalents and the $18.9 million, or 2% decrease in investment securities. The decrease in cash and cash equivalents is the net result in liquidity from short-term fluctuations in deposits, borrowings and loans outstanding. Additionally, $15.0 million of cash was used during the quarter to repurchase all of the 5.44 million warrants held by affiliates of The Carlyle Group, and BPFH Director John Morton III. The Bank has a policy on balance sheet liquidity which requires that a certain minimum balance of cash and investments be maintained at all times.

The majority of the investments held by the Company are held by the Bank. The Bank's investment policies require management to maintain a portfolio of securities which will provide liquidity necessary to facilitate funding of loans, to cover deposit fluctuations, and to mitigate the Bank's overall balance sheet exposure to interest rate risk, while at the same time achieving a satisfactory return on the funds invested. The securities in which the Bank may invest are subject to regulation and are generally limited to securities that are considered "investment grade."

Investment maturities, principal payments, and sales of the Company's available for sale securities provided $119.4 million of cash proceeds during the first three months of 2012, and $102.4 million was used to purchase new investments. The timing of sales and reinvestments is based on various factors, including management's evaluation of interest rate trends, the credit risk of municipal securities and the Company's liquidity. The Company's available for sale investment portfolio carried a total of $11.8 million of unrealized gains and $0.7 million of unrealized losses at March 31, 2012, compared to $11.7 million of unrealized gains and $0.6 million of unrealized losses at December 31, 2011.

No impairment losses were recognized through earnings related to available for sale securities during the three month periods ended March 31, 2012 and 2011. The amount of investment securities in an unrealized loss position greater than 12 months as well as the total amount of unrealized losses was not significant and was primarily due to changes in interest rates. At March 31, 2012, the Company had no intent to sell any securities in an unrealized loss position at March 31, 2012 and it is not more likely than not that the Company would be forced to sell any of these securities prior to the full recovery of all unrealized losses. See Part I. Item 1. "Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements - Note 4: Investments" for further details of the Company's investment securities.

Loans held for sale. Loans held for sale decreased $8.3 million, or 69%, to $3.7 million at March 31, 2012 from $12.1 million at December 31, 2011. Factors affecting the balance of loans held for sale include the timing and volume of residential loans originated for sale in the secondary market. The Bank sells the majority of its fixed rate loans in the secondary market to mitigate interest rate risk.

Goodwill and intangible assets, net. Goodwill and intangible assets decreased $1.1 million, or 1%, to $137.7 million at March 31, 2012 from $138.7 million at December 31, 2011. The decrease is due to amortization of intangible assets. The Company tests goodwill for impairment on an annual basis and between annual dates if events or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of the reporting unit below its carrying value, in accordance with ASC 350, Intangibles-Goodwill and Other. Management concluded at March 31, 2012 that there were no triggering events during the first three months of 2012. Declines in AUM at some of the Company's nonbanking affiliates and related revenue losses could potentially lead to future impairment.

Other. Other assets, consisting of OREO, premises and equipment, fees receivable, accrued interest receivable, deferred income taxes, net, other assets, and assets of discontinued operations increased $4.8 million, or 2%, to $256.6 million at March 31, 2012 from $251.9 million at December 31, 2011. The increase is primarily due to the increase in other assets and fees receivable, partially offset by decreases in OREO.

OREO decreased $1.2 million, or 24%, to $3.9 million at March 31, 2012 from $5.1 million at December 31, 2011. The decrease is due to the sale of one OREO property.

Other assets, which consist primarily of prepaid expenses, investment in partnerships, income taxes receivable, and other receivables, increased $5.2 million, or 5%, to $120.3 million at March 31, 2012 from $115.1 million at December 31, 2011. The increase is primarily due to increases in the fair value of the rabbi trust investments and other assets, partially offset by the settlement of certain receivables and amortization of prepaid FDIC insurance.

Deposits. Total deposits increased $72.0 million, or 2%, to $4.6 billion, at March 31, 2012 from $4.5 billion at December 31, 2011.

The following table shows the composition of the Company's deposits at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011:



	March 31, 2012				December 31, 2011
	Balance		as a % of total		Balance		as a % of total
	(In thousands)
Demand deposits	$	1,168,446	25	%	$	1,117,350	25	%
NOW	492,440		11	%	467,535		10	%
Savings	63,716		1	%	58,074		1	%
Money market	1,972,889		43	%	1,966,073		44	%
Certificates of deposit under $100,000 (1)	237,125		5	%	227,000		5	%
Certificates of deposit of $100,000 or greater	667,835		15	%	694,379		15	%
Total deposits	$	4,602,451	100	%	$	4,530,411	100	%

_________________


(1)	Includes brokered CDs.

Borrowings. Total borrowings (consisting of FHLB borrowings, securities sold under agreements to repurchase, and junior subordinated debentures) increased $35.1 million, or 4%, to $0.9 billion at March 31, 2012 from $0.8 billion at December 31, 2011. Repurchase agreements decreased $22.2 million, or 17%, to $108.6 million at March 31, 2012 from $130.8 million at December 31, 2011. The decrease is primarily due to the timing of large repurchase relationships which spanned the year end. Repurchase agreements are generally linked to commercial demand deposit accounts with an overnight sweep feature. FHLB borrowings increased $60.7 million, or 12%, to $582.6 million at March 31, 2012 from $521.8 million at December 31, 2011. FHLB borrowings are generally used to provide additional funding for loan growth when it is in excess of deposit growth and to manage interest rate risk, but can also be used as an additional source of liquidity for the Bank. Also, during the three months ended March 31, 2012, the Company repurchased $3.4 million of its junior subordinated debt.

Other liabilities. Other liabilities, consisting of accrued interest, accrued bonus, other accrued expenses, and liabilities of discontinued operations decreased $3.3 million, or 3% to $93.2 million at March 31, 2012 from $96.5 million at December 31, 2011. The decrease is due to payments on 2011 accrued compensation.

Loan Portfolio and Credit Quality

Loans. Total portfolio loans increased 4% to $4.8 billion, or 79% of total assets, at March 31, 2012, from $4.7 billion, or 77% of total assets, at December 31, 2011. Increases in commercial real estate loans of $108.0 million, or 6%, commercial and industrial loans of $40.1 million, or 6%, residential loans of $55.7 million, or 3%, and other consumer loans of $2.9 million, or 2%, were slightly offset by decreases in construction and land loans of $4.1 million, or 3%, and in home equity loans of $4.7 million, or 3%.

The Bank's loans are affected by the economic and real estate markets in which they are located. Generally, commercial real estate, construction, and land loans are affected more than residential loans in an economic downturn.

Geographic concentration. The following table details the Bank's outstanding loan balance concentrations at March 31, 2012 based on the location of the lender's regional offices. Net loans from the Holding Company to certain principals of the Company's affiliates, DTC, and loans at the Company's non-banking segments are identified as "Other, net."



	Commercial and Industrial				Commercial Real Estate				Construction and Land				Residential				Home Equity and Other Consumer
	Amount		Percent		Amount		Percent		Amount		Percent		Amount		Percent		Amount		Percent
	(In thousands)
New England	$	572,091	79	%	$	667,014	37	%	$	99,387	66	%	$	1,246,700	66	%	$	237,578	75	%
San Francisco Bay	74,100		10	%	691,644		39	%	40,390		27	%	335,753		18	%	54,851		17	%
Southern California	39,508		5	%	282,407		16	%	5,899		4	%	231,284		12	%	15,876		5	%
Pacific Northwest	41,462		6	%	136,105		8	%	3,979		3	%	65,411		4	%	5,478		2	%
Other, net	—		—	%	—		—	%	—		—	%	—		—	%	2,131		1	%
Total	$	727,161	100	%	$	1,777,170	100	%	$	149,655	100	%	$	1,879,148	100	%	$	315,914	100	%

The allowance for loan losses is reported as a reduction of outstanding loan balances, and totaled $97.9 million and $96.1 million at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively.

The allowance for loan losses at March 31, 2012 increased $1.8 million, or 1.9%, from December 31, 2011. The increase in the allowance for loan losses reflects the increase in the loan portfolio and additional classified loans partially offset by lower quantitative loss factors as a result of recent lower average net charge-offs. Allowance for loan losses as a percentage of total loans decreased five basis points to 2.02% at March 31, 2012 from 2.07% at December 31, 2011. See Part I. Item 1. "Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements - Note 7: Allowance for Loan Losses" for an analysis of the Company’s allowance for loan losses.

An analysis of the risk in the loan portfolio as well as management judgment is used to determine the estimated appropriate amount of the allowance for loan losses. The Company's allowance for loan losses is comprised of three primary components (general reserve, allocated reserves on non-impaired special mention and substandard loans, and allocated reserves on impaired loans). In addition, the unallocated portion of the allowance for loan losses, which is not considered a significant component of the overall allowance for loan losses, primarily relates to a general assessment of the potential variability of applicable qualitative factors subject to a higher degree of variability. See Part I. Item 1. "Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements - Note 7: Allowance for Loan Losses" and the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 for further information.

The following table presents a summary by geography of loans charged-off, net of recoveries, for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The geography assigned to the Private Banking data is based on the location of the lender's regional offices.



	Three months ended March 31,
	2012			2011
	(In thousands)
Net loans (charged-off)/ recovered:
New England	$	(341	)	$	(1,274	)
San Francisco Bay	(1,980		)	(11,289		)
Southern California	(72		)	1,086
Pacific Northwest	181			6
Total net loans (charged-off)/ recovered	$	(2,212	)	$	(11,471	)

Net charge-offs of $2.2 million were recorded in the first quarter of 2012, compared to $11.5 million in net charge-offs in the same period of 2011. The Company believes that commercial real estate loans represent the greatest risk of loss due to the size of the portfolio and nature of the commercial real estate market. Economic and business conditions continue to have a significant impact on the loan portfolio. This can be seen in the current economic downturn where, as businesses downsize, vacancy rates increase which can lead to financial difficulties for the borrower. Commercial real estate loans have been impacted by the current economic climate which has resulted in weakened demand for retail and office space, lower lease rates, and reduced collateral values. Of the $2.2 million in net charge-offs recorded in the first three months of 2012, $0.3 million were in commercial real estate loans, $1.9 million were in commercial and industrial loans, $0.2 million were in residential loans, offset by $0.2 million of net recoveries on construction and land loans.

Nonperforming assets. The Company's nonperforming assets include nonaccrual loans and OREO. OREO consists of real estate acquired through foreclosure proceedings and real estate acquired through acceptance of deeds in lieu of foreclosure. In addition, the Company may, under certain circumstances, restructure loans in troubled debt restructurings as a concession to a borrower when the borrower is experiencing financial distress. Such restructured loans are generally included in impaired loans. Nonperforming assets increased $3.3 million, or 5%, to $76.6 million, or 1.25% of total assets at March 31, 2012, from $73.2 million, or 1.21% of total assets at December 31, 2011.

Rollforwards of nonaccrual loans for the three month periods ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 are presented in the table below:



	At and for the three months ended March 31,
	2012			2011
	(In thousands)
Nonaccrual loans, beginning of period	$	68,109		$	105,465
Transfers in to nonaccrual status	19,611			33,350
Transfers out to OREO	—			(3,311		)
Transfers in from/ (out to) loans held for sale	—			526
Transfers out to accrual status	(8,767		)	(608		)
Charge-offs	(2,877		)	(12,524		)
Paid off/ paid down	(3,410		)	(11,662		)
Nonaccrual loans, end of period	$	72,666		$	111,236

The following tables are a summary of the Private Banking credit quality and concentration data by geography, based on the location of the lender's regional offices:



	March 31, 2012		December 31, 2011
	(In thousands)
Nonaccrual loans:
New England	$	34,629	$	33,411
San Francisco Bay	28,721		25,598
Southern California	7,572		7,323
Pacific Northwest	1,744		1,777
Total nonaccrual loans	$	72,666	$	68,109
Loans 30-89 days past due and accruing:
New England (1)	$	5,336	$	9,866
San Francisco Bay	10,824		11,446
Southern California	5,130		5,677
Pacific Northwest	99		—
Total loans 30-89 days past due	$	21,389	$	26,989
Accruing classified loans:
New England	$	25,002	$	23,133
San Francisco Bay	57,629		57,199
Southern California	19,374		15,723
Pacific Northwest	3,317		2,186
Total accruing classified loans	$	105,322	$	98,241

_____________________


(1)	Loans 30-89 days past due and accruing include an additional $32 thousand of accruing loans that were 90 days or greater past due at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011.

Of the $72.7 million of loans on nonaccrual status at March 31, 2012, $45.0 million, or 62%, had a current payment status. Of the $68.1 million of nonaccrual loans at December 31, 2011, $47.2 million, or 69%, had a current payment status. In

these situations, despite the loan's current payment status, if the Bank has reason to believe it may not collect all principal and interest on the loan in accordance with the related contractual terms, the Bank will generally discontinue the accrual of interest income and apply any payments received to principal. See Part I. Item 1. "Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements - Note 6: Loans Receivable" for additional detail on the payment status of nonaccrual loans.

The following tables are a summary of the Private Banking credit quality and concentration data by loan type. The loan type assigned to the Private Banking credit quality data is based on the purpose of the loan.



	March 31, 2012		December 31, 2011
	(In thousands)
Nonaccrual loans:
Commercial and industrial	$	7,665	$	3,759
Commercial real estate	34,552		38,581
Construction and land	7,281		7,772
Residential	22,570		17,513
Home equity and other consumer	598		484
Total nonaccrual loans	$	72,666	$	68,109
Loans 30-89 days past due and accruing:
Commercial and industrial	$	3,831	$	1,648
Commercial real estate	11,023		8,915
Construction and land (1)	327		106
Residential	5,560		14,407
Home equity and other consumer	648		1,913
Total loans 30-89 days past due	$	21,389	$	26,989
Accruing classified loans:
Commercial and industrial	$	13,814	$	22,249
Commercial real estate	78,954		63,105
Construction and land	4,216		3,754
Residential	6,466		7,255
Home equity and other consumer	1,872		1,878
Total accruing classified loans	$	105,322	$	98,241

_____________________


(1)	Loans 30-89 days past due and accruing include an additional $32 thousand of accruing loans that were 90 days or greater past due at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011.

Nonaccruing and delinquent loans are affected by many factors including economic and business conditions, such as interest rates and unemployment levels, and real estate collateral values, among others. In periods of prolonged economic declines, borrowers may become more severely impacted over time as liquidity levels decline and the borrower's ability to continue to make payments deteriorates. With respect to real estate collateral values, the declines from the peak, as well as the value of the real estate as the time of origination versus the current value, can impact the level of problem loans. For instance, if the loan to value ratio at the time of renewal has increased due to the decline in the real estate value since origination, the loan may no longer meet the Bank's underwriting standards and not be renewed.

Delinquencies. At March 31, 2012, accruing loans with an aggregate balance of $21.4 million, or 0.44% of total loans, were 30-89 days past due, a decrease of $5.6 million, or 21%, compared to $27.0 million, or 0.58%, of total loans, at December 31, 2011. Loan delinquencies are generally the result of deteriorating economic conditions of the region and the resulting liquidity impact upon the client. The payment performance of delinquent clients can vary from month to month. Further deterioration in the credit condition of these delinquent loans could lead to the loans going to nonaccrual status and/or being downgraded with respect to the loan grades. Downgrades would generally result in additional provision for loan losses. If the loan is downgraded to nonaccrual, the loan would generally be considered impaired and an impairment analysis is performed to determine the amount of impairment, if any. Based on the impairment analysis, the provision could be higher or lower than the amount of provision associated with a loan prior to its classification as impaired. Past due loans may be included

with accruing classified loans.

The Bank's policy is to discontinue the accrual of interest on a loan when the collectability of principal or interest in accordance with the contractual terms of the loan agreement is in doubt. When management determines that it is probable that the Bank will not collect all principal and interest on a loan in accordance with the original loan terms, the loan is designated as impaired. Impaired loans are generally included within the balance of nonaccrual loans. Impaired loans totaled $96.8 million as of March 31, 2012, an increase of $7.0 million, or 8%, as compared to $89.8 million at December 31, 2011. At March 31, 2012, $44.3 million of the impaired loans had $4.7 million in specific allocations to the general reserve. The remaining $52.5 million of impaired loans did not have specific allocations due primarily to the adequacy of collateral, prior charge-offs taken, or previous interest collected and applied to principal. At December 31, 2011, $32.0 million of impaired loans had $4.2 million in specific allocations to the general reserve, and the remaining $57.8 million of impaired loans did not have specific allocations.

Loans that are designated as impaired require an analysis to determine the amount of impairment, if any. The need for a specific reserve or charge-off would be indicated as a result of the carrying value of the loan exceeding the estimated collateral value, less costs to sell, for collateral dependent loans or the net present value of the projected cash flow, discounted at the loan's contractual effective interest rate, for loans not considered to be collateral dependent. Generally, shortfalls in the analysis of collateral dependent loans would result in the impairment amount being charged-off to the allowance for loan losses. Shortfalls on cash flow dependent loans may be carried as specific allocations to the general reserve unless a known loss is determined to have occurred, in which case such known loss is charged-off.

In certain instances, although very infrequent, loans that have become 90 days past due may remain on accrual status if the value of the collateral securing the loan is sufficient to cover principal and interest and the loan is in the process of collection. There were less than $0.1 million of loans past due 90 days or more and still accruing interest at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011.

The Bank's general policy for returning a loan to accrual status requires the loan to be brought current and for the client to show a history of making timely payments (generally six months). For troubled debt restructured loans ("TDRs"), a return to accrual status requires timely payments (for a period of six months), along with meeting other criteria. TDRs are assessed on a case-by-case basis.

The Company may, under certain circumstances, restructure loans as a concession to borrowers who are experiencing financial difficulty. These loans are classified as TDRs and are included in impaired loans. These TDRs typically result from the Company's loss mitigation activities which, among other activities, could include rate reductions, payment extensions, and/ or principal forgiveness. TDRs totaled $62.4 million and $55.3 million at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively. Of the $62.4 million in TDR loans at March 31, 2012, $29.4 million were on accrual status. Of the $55.3 million in TDR loans at December 31, 2011, $27.4 million were on accrual status.

The Bank continues to evaluate the underlying collateral of each nonaccruing loan and pursue the collection of interest and principal. Where appropriate, the Bank obtains updated appraisals on the collateral. Please refer to Part I. Item 1. "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data—Note 6: Loans Receivable" for further information on nonperforming loans.

Potential Problem Loans. Loans that evidence weakness or potential weakness related to repayment history, the borrower's financial condition, or other factors are reviewed by the Bank's management to determine if the loan should be adversely classified. Delinquent loans may or may not be adversely classified depending upon management's judgment with respect to each individual loan. The Company classifies certain loans as "substandard," "doubtful," or "loss" based on criteria consistent with guidelines provided by banking regulators. Potential problem loans consist of classified accruing loans that were less than 90 days past due, but where known information about possible credit problems of the related borrowers causes management to have doubts as to the ability of such borrowers to comply with the present loan repayment terms and which may result in disclosure of such loans as nonperforming at some time in the future. Management cannot predict the extent to which economic conditions may worsen or other factors which may impact borrowers and the potential problem loans. Triggering events for loan downgrades include updated appraisal information, inability of borrowers to cover debt service payments, inability of borrowers to sell completed construction projects, and the inability of borrowers to complete the sale of property. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that other loans will not become 90 days or more past due and be placed on nonaccrual, be restructured, or require increased allowance coverage and provision for loan losses. The Company has identified approximately $105.3 million in potential problem loans at March 31, 2012, an increase of $7.1 million, or 7%, as compared to $98.2 million at December 31, 2011.

The increase in accruing classified loans consists primarily of commercial real estate loans which increased by $15.8 million, or 25%, to $79.0 million at March 31, 2012 as compared to $63.1 million at December 31, 2011. There are

numerous factors which contributed to this increase including the prolonged economic downturn. These factors negatively affect our borrowers' liquidity and, in some cases, our borrowers' ability to comply with loan covenants such as debt service coverage.

The past due status of a loan is determined in accordance with its contractual repayment terms. All loan types are reported past due when one scheduled payment is due and unpaid for 30 days or more.

Liquidity

Liquidity is defined as the Company's ability to generate adequate cash to meet its needs for day-to-day operations and material long and short-term commitments. Liquidity risk is the risk of potential loss if the Company were unable to meet its funding requirements at a reasonable cost. The Company manages its liquidity based on demand, commitments, specific events and uncertainties to meet current and future financial obligations of a short-term nature. The Company's objective in managing liquidity is to respond to the needs of depositors and borrowers as well as to earnings enhancement opportunities in a changing marketplace.

At March 31, 2012, the Company's cash and cash equivalents amounted to $131.1 million. The Holding Company's cash and cash equivalents amounted to $81.2 million. Management believes that the Company and the Holding Company have adequate liquidity to meet their commitments for the foreseeable future.

Management is responsible for establishing and monitoring liquidity targets as well as strategies to meet these targets. At March 31, 2012, consolidated cash and cash equivalents and securities available for sale, less securities pledged, amounted to $0.8 billion, or 13% of total assets, compared to $0.9 billion, or 14% of total assets at December 31, 2011. In addition, the Company has access to available borrowings through the FHLB totaling $439.2 million as of March 31, 2012 compared to $509.5 million at December 31, 2011. Combined, this liquidity totals $1.2 billion, or 20% of assets and 27% of total deposits as of March 31, 2012 compared to $1.4 billion, or 23% of assets and 30% of total deposits as of December 31, 2011.

Holding Company Liquidity. The Company and some of the Company's majority-owned affiliates hold put and call options that would require the Company to purchase (and the majority-owned affiliates to sell) the remaining noncontrolling interests in these companies at the then fair value generally as determined by the respective agreements. At March 31, 2012, the estimated maximum redemption value for these affiliates related to put options was $21.6 million, all of which could be redeemed within the next 12 months, under certain circumstances, and is classified in the consolidated balance sheets as redeemable noncontrolling interests. These put and call options are discussed in detail in Part II. Item 8. "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data - Note 16: Noncontrolling Interests" of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.

The Holding Company's primary sources of funds are dividends from its affiliates, access to the capital and debt markets, and private equity investments. The Holding Company recognized $1.6 million in net income from discontinued operations during the three months ended March 31, 2012. The majority of this amount related to a revenue sharing agreement with Westfield Capital Management Company, LLC ("Westfield"). The Company expects to receive cash proceeds from the sale of DTC in the second quarter of 2012. Additionally, the Holding Company may receive additional contingent consideration in future years. However, other than the revenue sharing agreement with Westfield, divestitures are not ongoing sources of funds for the Holding Company. Dividends from the Bank are limited by various regulatory requirements relating to capital adequacy and retained earnings. See Part II. Item 5. "Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholders Matters, and Issuers Purchases of Equity Securities" in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 for further details.

Although not a significant source of liquidity to the Holding Company, the Bank has paid dividends to the Holding Company depending on its profitability and asset growth. If regulatory agencies were to require banks to increase their capital ratios, or impose other restrictions, it may limit the ability of the Bank to pay dividends to the Holding Company and/or limit the amount the Bank could grow.

Although the Bank is currently above current regulatory requirements for capital, the Holding Company could

downstream additional capital to increase the rate the Bank could grow. Depending upon the amount of capital, the approval of the Company's board of directors may be required prior to the payment, if any.

The Company is required to pay interest quarterly on its junior subordinated debentures. Since 2010, the Company has been a party to an interest rate swap to hedge a portion of the cash flow associated with a junior subordinated debenture which converted from a fixed rate to a floating rate on December 30, 2010. The estimated cash outlay for the remaining nine months of 2012 for the interest payments, including the effect of the cash flow hedge, is approximately $4.9 million based on the debt outstanding at March 31, 2012 and estimated LIBOR.

The Company presently plans to pay cash dividends on its common stock on a quarterly basis dependent upon a number of factors such as profitability, Holding Company liquidity, and the Company's capital levels. However, the ultimate declaration of dividends by the board of directors of the Company will depend on a review of such issues including recent financial trends and internal forecasts, regulatory limitations, alternative uses of capital deployment, and general economic conditions. Based on the current dividend rate and estimated shares outstanding, the Company estimates the amount to be paid out in the remaining nine months of 2012 for dividends to common shareholders will be approximately $2.3 million. Based on the Company's preferred stock outstanding and the dividend rate, the Company expects to pay $0.2 million in cash dividends on preferred stock in the remaining nine months of 2012. The estimated dividend payments in 2012 could increase or decrease if the Company's board of directors voted to increase or decrease, respectively, the current dividend rate.

Bank Liquidity. The Bank has established various borrowing arrangements to provide additional sources of liquidity and funding. Management believes that the Bank currently has adequate liquidity available to respond to current demands. The Bank is a member of the FHLB of Boston, and as such, has access to short and long-term borrowings from that institution. The FHLB can change the advance amounts that banks can utilize based on a bank's current financial condition as obtained from publicly available data such as FDIC Call Reports. Decreases in the amount of FHLB borrowings available to the Bank would lower its liquidity and possibly limit the Bank's ability to grow in the short term. Management believes that the Bank has adequate liquidity to meet its commitments for the foreseeable future.

In addition to the above liquidity, the Bank has access to the Federal Reserve discount window facility, which can provide short-term liquidity as "lender of last resort," brokered certificates of deposit, and federal funds lines. The use of non-core funding sources, including brokered deposits and borrowings, by the Bank may be limited by regulatory agencies. Generally, the regulatory agencies prefer that banks rely on core-funding sources for liquidity.

From time to time the Bank purchases federal funds from the FHLB and other banking institutions to supplement its liquidity position. The Bank had unused federal fund lines of credit totaling $241.0 million with correspondent institutions to provide it with immediate access to overnight borrowings. At both March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the Bank had no outstanding borrowings under these federal funds lines.

If the Bank was no longer able to utilize the FHLB for borrowing, collateral currently used for FHLB borrowings could be transferred to other facilities such as the Federal Reserve's discount window. In addition, the Bank could increase its usage of brokered certificates of deposit. Other borrowing arrangements may have higher rates than the FHLB would typically charge.

Capital Resources

Total shareholders’ equity at March 31, 2012 was $561.5 million, compared to $566.1 million at December 31, 2011, a decrease of $4.6 million, or 1%. The decrease in shareholders' equity was primarily the result of the $15.0 million repurchase of stock warrants during the quarter, partially offset by net income. During the quarter, the Company repurchased all of the 5.44 million warrants held by affiliates of The Carlyle Group, and BPFH Director John Morton III.

As a bank holding company, the Company is subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by federal agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can result in certain mandatory, and possibly additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a material effect on the Company's financial statements. For example, under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the Bank, which is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of the Bank's assets and certain off-balance sheet items as calculated under regulatory guidelines. The Bank's capital and classifications are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings, and other factors. Similarly, the Company is also subject to capital requirements administered by the Federal Reserve with respect to certain non-banking activities, including adjustments in connection with off-balance sheet items.

To be categorized as "well capitalized," the Company and the Bank must maintain minimum total risk-based, Tier I

risk-based, and Tier I leverage ratios as set forth in the regulatory capital and capital ratios table, below. In addition, the Company and the Bank cannot be subject to any written agreement, order or capital directive or prompt corrective action to be considered "well capitalized." Both the Company and the Bank maintain capital at levels that would be considered "well capitalized" as of March 31, 2012 under the applicable regulations.

The following table presents the Company's and the Bank's amount of regulatory capital and related ratios as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011. Also presented are the capital guidelines established by the Federal Reserve, which pertain to the Company, and by the FDIC, which pertains to the Bank. To be categorized as "adequately capitalized" or "well capitalized," the Company and the Bank must be in compliance with these ratios as long as the Company and/or the Bank are not subject to any written agreement, order, capital directive, or prompt corrective action directive. The Federal Reserve, the FDIC, and the Massachusetts Commissioner of Banks may impose higher capital ratios than those listed below based on the results of regulatory exams.



	Actual				For capital adequacy purposes			To be well capitalized under prompt corrective action provisions
	Amount		Ratio		Amount		Ratio	Amount		Ratio
	(In thousands)
As of March 31, 2012
Total risk-based capital
Company	$	636,562	14.43	%	$	352,831	>8.0%	$	441,039	>10.0%
Boston Private Bank	546,690		12.48		350,519		8.0	438,148		10.0
Tier I risk-based capital
Company	527,824		11.97		176,416		4.0	264,623		6.0
Boston Private Bank	491,369		11.21		175,259		4.0	262,889		6.0
Tier I leverage capital
Company	527,824		8.80		239,797		4.0	299,747		5.0
Boston Private Bank	491,369		8.30		236,871		4.0	296,089		5.0

As of December 31, 2011
Total risk-based capital
Company	$	644,272	15.22	%	$	338,742	>8.0%	$	423,428	>10.0%
Boston Private Bank	538,643		12.80		336,667		8.0	420,834		10.0
Tier I risk-based capital
Company	535,467		12.65		169,371		4.0	254,057		6.0
Boston Private Bank	485,481		11.54		168,333		4.0	252,500		6.0
Tier I leverage capital
Company	535,467		8.99		238,146		4.0	297,682		5.0
Boston Private Bank	485,481		8.25		235,279		4.0	294,099		5.0

Bank regulatory authorities restrict the Bank from lending or advancing funds to, or investing in the securities of, the Company. Further, these authorities restrict the amounts available for the payment of dividends by the Bank to the Company.

As of March 31, 2012, the Company has sponsored the creation of, or assumed sponsorship of, five statutory trusts for the sole purpose of issuing trust preferred securities and investing the proceeds in junior subordinated debentures of the Company. In accordance with ASC 810-10-55, Consolidation - Overall - Implementation Guidance and Illustrations - Variable Interest Entities, these statutory trusts created by, or assumed by, the Company are not consolidated into the Company's financial statements; however, the Company reflects the amounts of junior subordinated debentures payable to the preferred stockholders of statutory trusts as debt in its financial statements. As of March 31, 2012, $140.1 million of the net balance of these trust preferred securities qualified as Tier I capital and $31.4 million qualified as Tier II capital. As of December 31, 2011, $141.3 million of the net balance of these trust preferred securities qualified as Tier I capital and $33.6 million qualified as Tier II capital. Tier I capital is included in the calculation of all three capital ratios in the above table, while Tier II capital is only

included in the calculation of total risk-based capital in the above table.

Results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2012 versus March 31, 2011

Net Income/ (Loss). The Company recorded net income from continuing operations for the three months ended March 31, 2012 of $8.7 million, compared to a loss of $1.1 million for the same period in 2011. Net income attributable to the Company, which includes income/ (loss) from both continuing and discontinued operations, for the three months ended March 31, 2012 was $9.5 million, compared to a loss of $0.1 million for the same period in 2011.

The Company recognized diluted earnings per share from continuing operations for the three months ended March 31, 2012 of $0.09 per share, compared to a diluted loss per share of $0.03 per share for the same period in 2011. Diluted earnings per share attributable to common shareholders, which includes both continuing and discontinued operations, for the three months ended March 31, 2012 was $0.11 per share, compared to a diluted loss per share of $0.01 per share for the same period in 2011. Net income/ (loss) from continuing operations in both 2012 and 2011 was offset by charges that reduce income available to common shareholders. See Part I. Item 1. "Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements - Note 2: Earnings Per Share" for further detail on these charges to income available to common shareholders.

The following discussions are based on the Company's continuing operations, unless otherwise stated.

Selected financial highlights are presented in the table below:



	Three months ended March 31,					% Change
	2012		2011			% Change
	(In Thousands)
Net interest income	$	44,768	$	43,711		2	%
Fees and other income	27,454		28,456			(4	)%
Total revenue	72,222		72,167			—	%
Provision/ (credit) for loan losses	4,000		13,350			(70	)%
Operating expense	55,627		60,061			(7	)%
Income tax expense/ (benefit)	3,851		(179		)	nm
Net income/ (loss) from continuing operations	8,744		(1,065		)	nm
Net income/ (loss) from discontinued operations	1,554		1,663			(7	)%
Less: Net income/ (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests	793		747			6	%
Net income/ (loss) attributable to the Company	$	9,505	$	(149	)	nm

Net interest income. Net interest income represents the difference between interest earned, primarily on loans and investments, and interest paid on funding sources, primarily deposits and borrowings. Interest rate spread is the difference between the average rate earned on total interest-earning assets and the average rate paid on total interest-bearing liabilities. Net interest margin ("NIM") is the amount of net interest income, on a fully taxable-equivalent ("FTE") basis, expressed as a percentage of average interest-earning assets. The average rate earned on earning assets is the amount of annualized taxable equivalent interest income expressed as a percentage of average interest-earning assets. The average rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities is equal to annualized interest expense as a percentage of average interest-bearing liabilities. When credit quality declines and loans are placed on nonaccrual status, NIM can decrease because the same assets are earning less income. Loans that are classified as substandard but are still accruing interest income of $105.3 million at March 31, 2012 could be placed on nonaccrual status if their credit quality declines further.

Net interest income for the three months ended March 31, 2012 was $44.8 million, an increase of $1.1 million, or 2%, compared to the same period in 2011. The increase is primarily due to an increase in volume of the loan portfolio and lower average rates paid on the Company's deposits and interest-bearing liabilities. These factors were partially offset by lower average yields on loans. The NIM was 3.23%, and 3.18% for the three month periods ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

The following table sets forth the composition of the Company's NIM on a FTE basis for the three month periods ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, however the discussion following this table reflects non-FTE data.



	Average Balance				Interest Income/Expense				Average Yield/Rate
(In Thousands)	At and for the three months ended March 31,
AVERAGE BALANCE SHEET:	2012		2011		2012		2011		2012		2011
AVERAGE ASSETS
Interest-Earning Assets:
Cash and Investments (1):
Taxable investment securities	$	376,206	$	358,837	$	1,256	$	1,380	1.34	%	1.54	%
Non-taxable investment securities (2)	194,410		202,281		1,323		1,642		2.72	%	3.25	%
Mortgage-backed securities	251,989		235,233		1,603		1,807		2.54	%	3.07	%
Federal funds sold and other	197,183		532,580		149		319		0.30	%	0.24	%
Total Cash and Investments	1,019,788		1,328,931		4,331		5,148		1.70	%	1.55	%
Loans: (3)
Commercial and Construction (2)	2,591,377		2,446,178		32,693		32,316		5.07	%	5.32	%
Residential	1,857,838		1,685,001		17,826		18,729		3.84	%	4.45	%
Home Equity and Other Consumer	320,160		296,259		2,760		2,879		3.45	%	3.92	%
Total Loans	4,769,375		4,427,438		53,279		53,924		4.48	%	4.89	%
Total Earning Assets	5,789,163		5,756,369		57,610		59,072		3.99	%	4.12	%
Less: Allowance for Loan Losses	97,471		99,667
Cash and due from Banks (non-interest bearing)	46,432		33,565
Other Assets (4)	427,083		457,786
TOTAL AVERAGE ASSETS	$	6,165,207	$	6,148,053
AVERAGE LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
Interest-Bearing Liabilities:
Deposits:
Savings and NOW	$	533,075	$	542,011	$	331	$	375	0.25	%	0.28	%
Money Market	1,983,558		1,858,645		2,136		2,814		0.43	%	0.61	%
Certificates of Deposits	898,458		1,084,494		2,436		3,461		1.09	%	1.29	%
Total Deposits	3,415,091		3,485,150		4,903		6,650		0.58	%	0.77	%
Junior Subordinated Debentures	180,817		193,645		1,752		1,893		3.83	%	3.91	%
FHLB Borrowings and Other	709,611		698,034		4,379		4,912		2.44	%	2.82	%
Total Interest-Bearing Liabilities	4,305,519		4,376,829		11,034		13,455		1.02	%	1.24	%
Noninterest Bearing Demand Deposits	1,167,623		1,117,347
Payables and Other Liabilities (4)	106,536		114,203
Total Average Liabilities	5,579,678		5,608,379
Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests	21,701		19,891
Average Shareholders' Equity	563,828		519,783
TOTAL AVERAGE LIABILITIES & SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY	$	6,165,207	$	6,148,053
Net Interest Income - on a FTE Basis					$	46,576	$	45,617
LESS: FTE Adjustment (2)					1,808		1,906
Net Interest Income (GAAP Basis)					$	44,768	$	43,711
Interest Rate Spread									2.97	%	2.88	%
Net Interest Margin									3.23	%	3.18	%

________________________


(1)	Investments classified as available for sale are shown in the average balance sheet at amortized cost.


(2)	Interest income on non-taxable investments and loans is presented on a FTE basis using statutory rates. The discussion following these tables reflects non-FTE data.


(3)	Includes loans held for sale and nonaccrual loans.


(4)	Includes assets and liabilities of discontinued operations.

Interest and Dividend Income. Interest and dividend income for the three months ended March 31, 2012 was $55.8 million, a decrease of $1.4 million, or 2%, compared to the same period in 2011. The decrease was primarily due to lower loan yields, offset by increased loan volume, and a shift in the mix of interest-bearing assets from cash and investments into the loan portfolio.

Interest income on commercial loans (including construction loans), on a non-FTE basis, for the three months ended March 31, 2012 was $31.4 million, an increase of $0.4 million, or 1%, compared to the same period in 2011 as a result of a 6% increase in the average balance, partially offset by a 22 basis point decrease in the average yield. The increase in the average balance is related to the organic growth of the commercial loan portfolio at the Bank, as discussed above in Part I. Item 2. "Management's Discussion and Analysis - Loan Portfolio and Credit Quality." The decrease in the average yield is the result of market conditions leading to lower rates due to competition for higher quality loans and lower client demand.

Interest income on residential mortgage loans for the three months ended March 31, 2012 was $17.8 million, a decrease of $0.9 million, or 5%, compared to the same period in 2011 as a result of a 61 basis point decrease in the average yield, partially offset by a 10% increase in the average balance. The decrease in the average yield was primarily due to adjustable rate mortgage ("ARM") loans repricing to lower rates, clients refinancing into lower rates and new loan originations at historically low rates. The decline in U.S. Treasury yields, the index to which the ARMs are typically linked, has decreased the yields on these mortgage loans. The increase in the average balances was due to the organic growth of the residential loan portfolio at the Bank.

Interest income on home equity and other consumer loans for the three months ended March 31, 2012 was $2.8 million, a decrease of $0.1 million, or 4%, compared to the same period in 2011, as a result of a 47 basis point decrease in the average yield, partially offset by an 8% increase in the average balance. The decrease in average yield is primarily due to lower market rates on consumer loans. The increase in the average balance is due to the organic growth of the home equity and other consumer loan portfolio at the Bank.

Investment income, on a non-FTE basis, for the three months ended March 31, 2012 was $3.9 million, a decrease of $0.7 million, or 16%, compared to the same period in 2011, as a result of a 23% decrease in the average balance, partially offset by a 13 basis point increase in the average yield. The decrease in the average balance is primarily due to timing and volume of deposit balances as compared to the level of loans outstanding. The increase in the average yield was primarily due to the mix of investments within the investment portfolio. Investment decisions are made based on anticipated liquidity, loan demand, and asset-liability management considerations.

Interest expense. Interest expense on deposits and borrowings for the three months ended March 31, 2012 was $11.0 million, a decrease of $2.4 million, or 18%, compared to the same period in 2011. The decrease was attributable to decreases in the average rate paid on deposits as well as a decrease in the average balance outstanding of higher-rate certificates of deposit as some of these accounts shifted to more liquid, and lower-rate, money market accounts.

Interest expense on deposits for the three months ended March 31, 2012 was $4.9 million, a decrease of $1.7 million, or 26%, compared to the same period in 2011, as a result of a 19 basis point decrease in the average yield, slightly offset by a 2% decrease in the average balance. The decrease in the average rates paid was primarily due to the Bank's ability to lower interest rates on money market accounts and certificates of deposit due to the low interest rate environment. The decrease in the average balance was primarily due to the decline in higher rate certificates of deposit.

Interest paid on borrowings for the three months ended March 31, 2012 was $6.1 million, a decrease of $0.7 million, or 10%, compared to the same period in 2011, as a result of a 33 basis point decrease in the average rate paid, as well as a $1.3 million decrease in the average balance. The decrease in the average rate paid is primarily due to the higher-rate FHLB borrowings maturing and being replaced with current lower rates, and the repurchase of a portion of the Company's junior subordinated debt in the second and fourth quarters of 2011 and the first quarter of 2012. The decrease in the average balance is due to the Company repurchasing a portion of the junior subordinated debt in the second and fourth quarters of 2011 and in the first quarter of 2012.

Provision/ (credit) for loan losses. The provision/ (credit) for loan losses for the three months ended March 31, 2012 was $4.0 million, a decrease of $9.4 million, or 70%, compared to the same period in 2011. The decrease in 2012 was primarily related to the elevated loan loss provisions in 2011 due to the adverse credit issues experienced primarily in the San Francisco

Bay market. The current period's provision for loan losses consists of $3.3 million related to the increased loans outstanding, $2.2 million related to net charge-offs, and $1.0 million related to increases in classified loans. These amounts were partially offset by $2.5 million related to decreases in loss factors.

The provision/ (credit) for loan losses is determined as a result of the required level of the allowance for loan losses, estimated by management, which reflects the inherent risk of loss in the loan portfolio as of the balance sheet dates. The factors used by management to determine the level of the allowance for loan losses include the trends in problem loans, economic and business conditions, strength of management, real estate collateral values, underwriting standards, loan volumes and loan concentrations. For further details, see Part I. Item 2. "Management's Discussion and Analysis - Loan Portfolio and Credit Quality" above.

Fees and other income. Fees and other income for the three months ended March 31, 2012 was $27.5 million, a decrease of $1.0 million, or 4%, compared to the same period in 2011. The decrease is primarily due to decreases in investment management and trust fees and other income, partially offset by the gain recognized from the 2012 debt repurchase and the increase in wealth advisory fees.

Investment management and trust fees for the three months ended March 31, 2012 was $15.2 million, a decrease of $0.8 million, or 5%, compared to the same period in 2011. The decrease is primarily due to the decrease in AUM. AUM as of March 31, 2012 for the Bank and the Investment Managers was $11.7 billion, a decrease of $0.4 billion, or 3%, compared to March 31, 2011. Investment management and trust fees from the Bank and Investment Managers are typically calculated based on a percentage of AUM. Approximately 62% of the first quarter 2012 investment management and trust fee revenues were earned based upon beginning-of-period (December 31, 2011) AUM for the quarter. Therefore, changes in revenue generally lag behind changes in AUM.

Wealth advisory fee income for the three months ended March 31, 2012 was $9.2 million, an increase of $0.8 million, or 10%, compared to the same period in 2011. The increase is primarily due to increases in fee-based contracts and AUM. AUM as of March 31, 2012 managed by the Wealth Advisors was $7.6 billion, an increase of $0.5 billion, or 7%, compared to March 31, 2011.

Gain on repurchase of debt for the three months ended March 31, 2012 was $0.9 million. During the first quarter of 2012, the Company repurchased $3.4 million of its junior subordinated debt. The Company used available cash on hand to repurchase the securities.

Other income for the three months ended March 31, 2012 was $0.7 million, a decrease of $1.1 million compared to the same period in 2011. This decrease is primarily due to the gain resulting from the January 2011 sale of the Company's equity investment in Coldstream Holdings, Inc. and earnings from the Company's other cost method investments.

Operating Expense. Operating expense for the three months ended March 31, 2012 was $55.6 million, a decrease of $4.4 million, or 7%, compared to the same period in 2011. Included in operating expense are the restructuring expenses of $0.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012, and $2.0 million for the same period in 2011. Excluding restructuring, operating expense for the three months ended March 31, 2012 decreased $2.6 million, or 4%. This decrease is primarily due to decreases in professional services expense and FDIC insurance expense, partially offset by increased salaries and employee benefits expense.

Salaries and employee benefits expense, the largest component of operating expense, for the three months ended March 31, 2012 was $36.9 million, an increase of $1.3 million, or 4%, compared to the same period in 2011. The increase is primarily due to expenses incurred in the current year for performance-related compensation.

Professional services for the three months ended March 31, 2012 was $2.9 million, a decrease of $2.2 million, or 43%, compared to the same period in 2011. The decrease is primarily due to decreases in consulting and legal services for general corporate matters, as well as decreases in director and audit fees as a result of the Bank merger.

FDIC insurance expense for the three months ended March 31, 2012 was $0.8 million, a decrease of $1.4 million, or 62%, compared to the same period in 2011. The decrease is primarily due to the consolidation of the Bank charters and the change in the FDIC's assessment rate methodology, which was effective April 1, 2011.

Income Tax Expense/ (Benefit). Income tax expense/ (benefit) for continuing operations for the three months ended March 31, 2012 was an expense of $3.9 million. The effective tax rate for the three months ended March 31, 2012 was 30.6%, compared to an effective tax rate of 14.4%, for the same period in 2011. See Part I. Item 1. "Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements - Note 9: Income Taxes" for further detail.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2011, the FASB issued new guidance, Accounting Standards Updates ("ASU") 2011-04, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurements and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRS. The amendments in this update further clarify the requirements in U.S. GAAP for measuring fair value and enhance the disclosures for information about fair value measurements. The new guidance is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011. The Company does not expect this ASU to have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements.


Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

There have been no material changes in the Interest Rate Sensitivity and Market Risk as described in Part II. Item 7A. "Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk – Interest Rate Sensitivity and Market Risk" in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.


Item 4.	Controls and Procedures

(a) Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures.

As required by Rule 13a-15 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Company has evaluated, with the participation of management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as of the end of the period covered by this report, the effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures. In designing and evaluating the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures, the Company and its management recognize that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only a reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating and implementing possible controls and procedures.

Based on such evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that such disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of March 31, 2012 in ensuring that material information required to be disclosed by the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, was made known to the certifying officers by others within the Company and its consolidated subsidiaries in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reporting within the time periods specified in the SEC rules and forms. On a quarterly basis, the Company evaluates the disclosure controls and procedures, and may from time to time make changes aimed at enhancing their effectiveness and to ensure that the Company’s systems evolve with its business.

(b) Change in internal controls over financial reporting.

There have been no changes in the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended March 31, 2012, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting.

PART II. Other Information


Item 1.	Legal Proceedings

The Company is involved in various legal proceedings. In the opinion of management, final disposition of these proceedings will not have a material adverse effect on the financial condition or results of operations of the Company.


Item 1A.	Risk Factors

Before deciding to invest in us or deciding to maintain or increase your investment, you should carefully consider the risks described in Part I. Item 1A. "Risk Factors" of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 as filed with the SEC. There have been no material changes to these risk factors since the filing of that report.


Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

None.


Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities

None.


Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosure

None.


Item 5.	Other Information

None.


Item 6.	Exhibits

(a) Exhibits



Exhibit No.	Description	Incorporated by Reference			Filed or Furnished with this 10-Q
Exhibit No.	Description	Form	SEC Filing Date	Exhibit Number	Filed or Furnished with this 10-Q
3.1	Articles of Amendment of Boston Private Financial Holdings, Inc.	8-K	5/2/2012	3.1
10.1	Form of Restricted Stock Agreement Under the Boston Private Financial Holdings, Inc. 2009 Stock Option and Incentive Plan				Filed
10.2	Form of Performance Stock Agreement Under the Boston Private Financial Holdings, Inc. 2009 Stock Option and Incentive Plan				Filed
10.3	Form of Stock Option Agreement Under the Boston Private Financial Holdings, Inc. 2009 Stock Option and Incentive Plan				Filed
31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a - 14(a)/15d - 14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934				Filed
31.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a - 14(a)/15d - 14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934				Filed
32.1	Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002				Furnished
32.2	Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002				Furnished
101.INS	XBRL Instance Document				Furnished
101.SCH	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document				Furnished
101.CAL	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document				Furnished
101.DEF	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document				Furnished
101.LAB	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document				Furnished
101.PRE	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document				Furnished

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.




	BOSTON PRIVATE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC.

	/s/ CLAYTON G. DEUTSCH
May 8, 2012	Clayton G. Deutsch
	President and Chief Executive Officer

	/s/ DAVID J. KAYE
May 8, 2012	David J. Kaye
	Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer