SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20459
FORM 10-KSB/A3
(Mark One)
[X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2002
OR
[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934
Commission File Number 0-17580
SYNERGX SYSTEMS INC (Formerly, Firetector, Inc.)
(Exact name of Small Business Issuer in its charter)
Delaware 11-2941299
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification No.)
209 Lafayette Drive, Syosset, New York 11791
(Address of principal executive offices) (zip code)
Issuer's telephone number, including area code: (516) 433-4700
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Common Stock, $.001 par value per share
(Title of Class)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days. YES X NO
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405
of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the
best of the Registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information
statements by reference in Part III of this Form 10-KSB ( )
State issuer's revenues for its most recent fiscal year: $16,943,000
The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the
Registrant, based upon the average bid and ask prices for the Registrant's
Common Stock, $.001 par value per share, as of December 16, 2002 was $1,079,784.
As of December 14, 2002, the Registrant had 1,874,425 shares of Common
Stock outstanding.
Documents Incorporated by Reference: Definitive Proxy Statement to be filed.
PART I
ITEM 1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS
The Company
Synergx Systems Inc. formerly known as Firetector inc. ("Synergx" or the
"Company") is a Delaware corporation organized in October 1988 to acquire
controlling interests in companies engaged in the design, manufacture, sale and
servicing of fire, life safety security, energy management, intercom,
audio-video communication and other systems. Reference to Synergx or the Company
include operations of each of its subsidiaries except where the context
otherwise requires. Synergx's business is conducted through subsidiaries in New
York City metropolitan area and Dallas, Texas.
Synergx conducts its business in New York principally through Casey Systems
Inc., its wholly owned subsidiary located in Long Island, New York ("Casey") and
in Texas through General Sound (Texas) Company its wholly owned subsidiary in
Dallas, Texas ("General Sound").
Synergx Products
Synergx designs, manufactures, markets and sells its own proprietary life
safety and communication systems and also engineers, markets and sells systems
and products manufactured by other parties. Synergx's proprietary product line
features the COMTRAK 1720 and 2000 Life Safety Systems and the TELTRAK
Communications System.
In 1973, New York City passed Local Law 5 requiring that all office
buildings of 100 feet or more be outfitted with smoke detectors, manual and
audio communicating systems for life safety and fire reporting purposes. In
anticipation of the demand that this legislation would create for equipment and
systems employing improved technology and design features, Synergx engaged in
extensive research and development which led to its proprietary COMTRAK 1720
Life Safety System which has been installed in scores of buildings since the
early 1980's.
To meet the challenges of more stringent code requirements and a sluggish
market for new construction, Synergx developed its new generation proprietary
COMTRAK 2000 Life Safety System which utilizes the latest technology to not only
meet the current code requirements, and satisfy the "wish list" of current
COMTRAK customers, but many likely future code requirements as well. One of the
improvements incorporated into the COMTRAK 2000 is a Fire Command Station which
offers a color CRT display system along with three sectional displays. These
features provide the operator with a wide variety of pertinent information,
allowing for quicker response, which is critical in an emergency. In addition,
the expanded memory capability of the new Fire Command Station enables a single
station to control multi-building projects and permits simplified operation.
COMTRAK 1720 and 2000 Systems are operating in approximately 100 buildings
in New York City. Synergx has approvals from FM Approvals and various New York
City agencies for the COMTRAK 1720 and COMTRAK 2000 System.
FM Approvals is an independent testing and certification laboratory similar
to Underwriters Laboratory. In order for Synergx to sell and maintain their
proprietary fire alarm systems, certification from an approved independent
testing agency is required. Without this certification, Synergx would not be
allowed to produce and maintain its fire systems for its existing customer base,
as well as new customers.
Neither Synergx, nor its officers or directors has any affiliation with FM
Approvals.
TELTRAK Communications Systems. In the early 1980s, Synergx began
investigating the intercom market and the possibilities of utilizing its
computerized multiplex technology for this market. Significant construction of
new high-rise housing occurred in the 1970s and 1980s and increased the
potential demand for technologically advanced intercom systems. To meet this
demand, Synergx developed a micro-processor-based combination intercom and
security system using Casey's multiplex technology. The TELTRAK I intercom and
security system is capable of a variety of accessory functions in addition to
its basic intercom and security function. Synergx added video capabilities to
its TELTRAK I technology and created the TELTRAK II, for installation in luxury
condominium, cooperative and apartment buildings. Over 16,000 TELTRAK I and II
units have been sold. In 1991, the redesigned TELTRAK III intercom/security
station was introduced, with enhanced features to expand its use and
competitiveness in the face of the reduced market for these products. New
features, such as public address, enable important messages to be given to
building occupants either locally or by groups in case of emergency.
Multiplex technology is a term that is used in the industry to define the
systems architecture of the Company's equipment. All multiplex technology has
basically the same concept with variation for specific equipment.
Other Products
In the past six years Synergx has sought to diversify its product lines to
establish a greater base to absorb product support, R & D and other overhead and
to provide product and customer diversification. To that end, Synergx has
augmented its established position in marketing engineered life safety systems
(proprietary and third party) by developing a significant business in engineered
sound systems for application to a variety of users including hospitals,
educational facilities and transit facilities (e.g. subway stations). Synergx
has developed a focused unit with a high level of experience to penetrate this
niche market with significant success as a substantial portion of Synergx's
order position derives from this effect. In addition, Synergx organized new
marketing units to focus on marketing, engineering and servicing systems and
products manufactured by third parties, particularly national manufacturers.
These marketing units are service oriented organizations which focus on close
relationships with customers and key suppliers. During the last two years,
Synergx has added marketing personnel and new security products from other
manufacturers to accelerate its focus into the security market for the sale of
products and services in the New York Metropolitan area.
In 1993, Synergx acquired assets of a company which manufactured and
marketed sophisticated products and on-board information and communication
systems with applications for municipal transit carriers, long-distance
passenger carriers and bus and train builders. Synergx has integrated this
operation into its New York division and has to date supplied products to
customers such as Bombardier, Nippon Sharyo, Sumitomo, Kawasaki, Motive Power,
Siemens, the New York City Transit Authority and AMTRAK. These customers have
supplied Synergx's equipment to the Baltimore MTA, the Bi-State Development
Agency (St Louis), the Boston MBTA, CONRAIL, the San Diego Trolley, the
Washington Metropolitan Transit Authority (Washington, D.C.), and METRA
(Chicago). Recently Synergx began to integrate its on board communication
products with products supplied by other manufacturers. These integrated
products include electronic signage and automatic announcement systems.
Service
Synergx continues to put an increasing priority on the development of an
integrated and efficient service organization. Sales personnel have been
dedicated to securing service contracts and are intensifying efforts to market
service to COMTRAK and other Synergx projects coming out of warranty and the
renewal of such contracts. To improve efficiencies and productivity, Synergx
organized a division to perform cleaning on life safety systems, which was
previously subcontracted to an external entity. To improve customer service,
Synergx maintains an office in New York City which houses its New York service
management.
General Sound (Texas) Company
Synergx conducts business in Texas through its subsidiary, General Sound
(Texas) Company, which distributes, services, installs and designs a variety of
sound, fire alarm, intercom and security systems in the Dallas/Ft. Worth, Texas
area. General Sound concentrates its sales effort on the commercial market and
schools. General Sound provides its customers, primarily electrical contractors,
with engineered systems, assistance in design, installation support and
post-installation service.
General Sound has non-exclusive distribution agreements for the Dallas/Ft.
Worth area with Notifier, Dukane, and other manufacturers. The product mix and
dependence on individual suppliers varies from year to year depending on
customer requirements and market trends.
Research and Development
During the fiscal years ended September 30, 2002 and 2002, Synergx spent
approximately $149,000 and $142,000, respectively, for research and development
of Synergx's life safety and communication systems.
Customers and Suppliers
For the fiscal years ended September 30, 2002 and 2001, no customer
accounted for more than 10% of Synergx's revenues.
Regulations
Synergx believes that it is in compliance with applicable building codes,
zoning ordinances, occupational, safety and hazard standards and other Federal,
state and local ordinances and regulations governing its business activities.
Competition
Synergx business is competitive; some of Synergx's competitors may have
greater financial resources and may offer a broader line of fire and life safety
products. Synergx also faces competition in the servicing of systems which it
sells. Accordingly, even though Synergx may sell and install a fire and life
safety control and communications system, it may not receive the contract to
service that system. Synergx, however, believes that it can effectively compete
with any entity which conforms with applicable rules and regulations.
Employees
Synergx and its subsidiaries have 116 full time employees, including 37 New
York hourly employees that are covered by a Collective Bargaining Agreement
expiring July 2005.
Business Conditions
Synergx believes that its labor and material sources are sufficient and that
other than normal competitive factors, and what is discussed above or under
"MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATION", Synergx's operations and industry do not have any special
characteristics which may have a material impact upon its future financial
performance.
Patents and Trademarks
The Company does not have any patents on its systems, but, it uses
proprietary technology which it seeks to protect as trade secrets. The
"Firetector", "Casey Systems" and "COMTRAK" trademarks are registered with the
United States Patent and Trademark Office.
ITEM 2. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY
The Company leases approximately 15,700 square feet of office, manufacturing
and warehouse space in Syosset, New York under a seven year lease expiring June
2007. The rental schedule provides for monthly rent of $13,966 during the first
and second years of the initial term and with 3.3% yearly increases for the
third thru seventh years.
The Company had a lease for approximately 4,000 square feet of office and
warehouse space in New York City. The lease agreement provided for annual rental
fees of $115,000, which included the cost of certain services including
electricity. The lease was to expire October 1, 2003 and can be terminated by
either party giving 180 days notice. The Company terminated its present lease
for office and warehouse space in New York City by giving six months notice,
which became effective December 5, 2002. The Company entered into a new lease
for 4,800 square feet of office and warehouse space in New York City. The new
lease became effective August 2002 and runs thru December 31, 2009. The new
lease provides for yearly rental of $84,000 during the first year plus expenses
with yearly escalation of 2% each year thereafter. Total cost of space over the
life of the lease will approximate $631,000.
The Company leases a 7,700 square foot office and warehouse facility in
Richardson, Texas, a suburb of Dallas, pursuant to a lease that was extended in
October, 1997 and extended again in August, 2002 to expire on June 30, 2010
providing for annual rent on a net basis of $50,152 escalating annually to
$64,016 in the final year of the lease.
Management believes there is sufficient space at these facilities for its
current and intended business.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
In the normal course of its operations, the Company has been or, from time
to time, may be named in legal actions seeking monetary damages. While the
outcome of these matters cannot be estimated with certainty, Management does not
expect, based upon consultation with legal counsel, that they will have a
material effect on the Company's business or financial condition.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITIES HOLDERS.
None
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.
Synergx's Common Stock has been traded on the National Association of
Securities Dealer's Inc. Automated Quotation System ("NASDAQ") since April 11,
1989 under the "FTEC" symbol and since May 2002 under the "SYNX" symbol. The
following table shows the high and low bid and ask quotations for each fiscal
quarter from December 31, 2000 through September 30, 2002 which quotations were
obtained from the National Association of Securities Dealers Inc.
Common Stock Bid Ask
Quarter Ended High Low High Low
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
December 31, 2000 1.438 0.844 4.750 0.938
March 31, 2001 1.719 1.000 1.750 1.094
June 30, 2001 1.469 1.170 1.500 1.250
September 30, 2001 1.780 1.180 1.870 1.250
December 31, 2001 2.000 1.200 2.090 1.260
March 31, 2002 2.950 1.470 2.550 1.500
June 30, 2002 1.850 1.250 1.900 1.300
September 30, 2002 1.550 1.160 1.550 1.200
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The above quotations represent prices between dealers, do not include
retail markups, markdowns or commissions and may not represent actual
transactions. As of December 14, 2002, there were 463 record holders of
Synergx's Common Stock.
On December 16, 2002 the closing bid and ask prices for the Common Stock
were $1.160 and $1.350, respectively.
The Company has not paid any cash dividends on its Common Stock. Payment of
cash dividends in the foreseeable future is not contemplated by the Company.
Whether dividends are paid in the future will depend on the Company's earnings,
capital requirements, financial condition along with economic and market
conditions, industry standard and other factors considered relevant to the
Company's Board of Directors. Payment of dividends is restricted in certain
cases by the Company's credit facilities. Accordingly, no assurance can be given
as to the amount or timing of future dividend payments, if any.
On September 30, 2002, the Company sold 170,000 units ("Units") in a private
placement to an unaffiliated investor for $1.40 per Unit. Each Unit consists of
one share of Common Stock and one warrant (the "Warrant") to purchase an
additional share of Common Stock at $1.40 for a period of 24 months from
September 30, 2002.
The Units, Common Stock, Warrants and Common Stock issue able upon exercise
of the warrants will be restricted and may not be sold or transferred without
registration under or exemption from applicable securities laws. The purchaser
will be granted one-time piggyback registration rights.
ITEM 6. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
The Company has a $3 million credit facility with Citizens Business Credit
of Boston (the "Credit Facility") that expires in December, 2004. The Credit
Facility has an interest rate of prime plus 1/4% on outstanding balances.
Advances under the Credit Facility are measured against a borrowing base
calculated on eligible receivables and inventory. The Credit Facility is secured
by all assets of the Company and all of its operating subsidiaries.
The Credit Facility includes various covenants, which among other things,
impose limitations on declaring or paying dividends, acquisitions and capital
expenditures. The Company is also required to maintain certain financial ratios.
Citizens Business Credit of Boston has modified the requirements for one of
these ratios for the fiscal year 2002. At September 30, 2002, the Company was
not in default with any of its financial covenants as a result of this
modification and at such time owed $848,000 under the Credit Facility.
Net cash provided by operations for the twelve months ended September 30,
2002 amounted to $312,000 as compared to $630,000 for the comparable prior
period. The primary reason for the lower amount of cash being provided by
operations was due to a decrease of $1,226,000 in profit before taxes (a
$493,000 loss in 2002 versus a $733,000 profit in 2001). Offsetting this outflow
from the loss was $1.3 million reduction of accounts receivable, which was used
to increase inventory and reduce accounts payable and accrued expenses. In 2002,
the $312,000 cash from operations along with $238,000 of proceeds from the sale
of 170,000 units (comprising one share of common stock and a warrant for one
additional share of common stock) was primarily used to reduce borrowings under
the Company's Credit Facility to the $848,000 level. In 2001, the $630,000 cash
from operations was primarily used to pay off borrowing under a Note Payable to
Mirtronics by $243,000 and reduce borrowings under the Company's Credit Facility
to a level of $1,310,000. The Company anticipates continuation of the
negotiation of certain terms with its customers prior to the beginning of a
project, the monitoring of its terms during a project and completing projects in
timely fashion, resulting in faster final payments. It is the intention of the
Company to closely monitor this program throughout fiscal 2002.
The ratio of the Company's current assets to current liabilities improved
to approximately 2.60 to 1 at September 30, 2002 compared to 2.45 at September
30, 2001.
Synergx's terms of sale are net 30 days. However, the normal receivable
collection period is 60-120 days, exclusive of retainage, because certain
governmental regulations and the Company's frequent status as a subcontractor
(entitled to pro rata payments as the general project is completed) extends the
normal collection period. Synergx believes this is a standard industry practice.
Synergx's receivable experience is consistent with the industry as a whole and
will likely continue. This could be considered an area of risk and concern.
However, due to the proprietary nature of Synergx's systems, many projects
require Synergx's cooperation to secure a certificate of occupancy and/or to
activate/operate a life safety system, thus assisting Synergx's collection of a
significant portion or even total payment, even when Synergx's immediate account
debtor's (contractor) creditors have seized a project.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Revenues and Gross Profit
For the years ended September 30,
2002 2001
(In thousands)
Product Sales $10,672 $14,073
Subcontract Sales 1,763 1,505
Service Revenue 4,508 4,349
------- --------
Total Revenue $16,943 $19,927
Product Gross Margin $ 3,484 $ 4,782
Subcontract Gross Margin 307 286
Service Gross Margin 1,328 1,213
------- --------
Total Gross Margin $ 5,119 $ 6,281
Gross Profit Product % 33% 34%
Gross Profit Subcontractor % 17% 19%
Gross Profit Service % 29% 28%
Total Gross Profit % 30% 32%
Revenues
The 24% decrease in product revenue was caused by a general slowdown in
economic activity in the Company's principal markets, New York City and Dallas.
In addition, the events of September 11th delayed work on several projects
involving New York City Transit Authority and caused indefinite postponement of
projects at existing customer facilities.
Subcontract revenue increased in 2002 as the Company, acting as prime
contractor, was responsible for electrical installation on several large fire
alarm projects in 2002.
Service revenues increased 4% in 2001 to $4,508,000. This increase in
service revenues resulted from higher call-in maintenance service on fire
systems (replacement parts and service required by buildings affected by
contamination from the events of September 11th) and from increased revenues
related to security systems.
Gross Profit
Gross profit from product revenues decreased 27% to $3,484,000 as a result
of the 24% decline in product sales. Gross profit margin as a percentage of
product revenues was only 33% in 2002 compared to 34% in 2001. This decrease in
gross profit percentage was due to the relative fixed nature of certain overhead
costs which could not be reduced in line with the decline in sales.
Gross profit from subcontract revenues increased in absolute terms as the
Company was responsible for performance of electrical installation
(subcontracted to outside electrical contractors) on two large fire alarm
projects in 2002. However, the gross profit margin was lower during 2002 as one
project was contracted for sale at a lower than normal mark up.
Gross profit and gross profit margin (percentage) on service revenues
increased due to higher call-in maintenance service which resulted in better
utilization of labor costs.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses ("S G &A") increased by 2% in
2002 over 2001 primarily as a result of the Company's continued expansion of its
marketing programs for new products. During 2002 additional staffing was made to
address the markets for audio/visual and security products. During 2001 the
Company increased staffing in the railcar transit communication group as it
addressed a marketing opportunity for future business over the next 2 to 5
years. However, S G & A expenses as a percentage of sales increased 6% to 32% in
2002 due to the relative fixed nature of these costs, given the Company's
decision to staff for sales of new products in future years.
Income Before Tax
During 2002 the Company's operations resulted in a loss before income tax
of $493,000 compared to income before income taxes of $733,000 in 2001. This
decline in income was primarily due to the loss of gross margin due to the $3.4
million or 24% decline in product revenues caused by the general slowdown in
economic activity and delays and postponements in certain projects caused by the
events of September 11th. Also contributing to the decline in operating income
was the 2% increase in selling, general and administrative expenses to support
higher product sales and expand product territory. Partially offsetting the
increase in SG&A was a $57,000 reduction in interest costs primarily due to
lower interest rates in 2002.
Tax Provisions
The Company's current income tax provision represents Federal, state and
local income taxes. The Company intends to file for a net operating loss
carryback credit for the loss generate during the year ended September 30, 2002.
Deferred taxes represent the net change in deferred tax assets and non current
deferred tax liability as it related to certain timing differences of book and
tax deductions.
Order Position
Synergx's order position, excluding service, increased to $12.1 million at
September 30, 2002 compared to the $7.8 million level at September 30, 2001. The
Company expects to fulfill a significant portion of its backlog over the next
twelve months. This high level of backlog reflects recent large new orders for
several subway complexes which will be deliverable over several years as the
projects are released. In addition, the backlog includes $2.2 million of recent
orders for communication and announcement systems from several transit car
manufacturers, that will be shippable over the next 24 month period. While
quotation activity is brisk, there is no assurance when orders will be received
and whether the order position will increase. Due to the fact that some of the
Company's products are sold and installed as part of larger construction or mass
transit projects, there is typically a delay between the booking of the contract
and its revenue realization. The order position includes, and the Company
continues to bid on, projects that include significant subcontractor labor,
(electrical installation performed by others). The Company expects to be active
in seeking orders where the Company would act as a prime contractor and
responsible for management of the project as well as electrical installation.
Plan of Operations
During fiscal 2003, management intends to continue to focus on its
intensified marketing programs that were begun in 1998 and to continue to
contain or monitor fixed overhead as well as to reduce variable costs through
improved efficiency and productivity. Management anticipates improved demand for
products in 2003 and some improved performance. However, competition remains
severe in many of the Company's product categories and demand remains quite low
in the Dallas market area due to contraction of computer communication and
internet related companies. Longer term, management expects increased demand for
the Company's audio-visual, public address, security and other communication
products. Enhancements in recent years to Synergx's management information
systems and methods of approving and monitoring project costs have improved
management's ability to pinpoint waste and/or third party (supplier or customer)
cost responsibility.
Inflation
The impact of inflation on the Company's business operations has not been
material in the past. Casey's labor costs are normally controlled by union
contracts covering a period of three years and its material costs have remained
relatively stable. However in July of 2002, the Company and its union agreed to
a new three year contract that provides for wage/benefits increases of
approximately 5% in each year. During 2001, under terms of the previous union
contract, certain union members, upon passing certain test requirements, began
moving up to higher paying categories that have multiple salary steps per year
in excess of the 5% contractual level. In addition, the demand for highly
skilled professionals has resulted in the need to assess salary levels in order
to remain competitive. It is expected that required salary adjustments will
exceed normal increases given in the past. The Company will try to mitigate the
effect of these increases in labor costs by price increases, if possible, and
expense reductions.
ITEM 7. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The consolidated financial statements required to be filed hereunder are
indexed at Page 11 and are incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 8. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.
None
PART III
ITEM 9. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, PROMOTERS AND CONTROL
PERSONS; COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 16(a) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT.
The Directors and Executive Officers of the Company are as follows:
DATE SERVICE
NAME AGE OFFICE COMMENCED
Daniel S. Tamkin 43 Chairman, Chief October 1990
Executive Officer,
General Counsel,
Director, and
Audit Committee
Joseph Vitale 56 President, Chief May 1994
Operating Officer
and Director
John A. Poserina 62 Treasurer, Vice January 1997
President, Chief
Financial Officer,
Secretary and
Director
Dennis P. McConnell 49 Director and January 1997
Audit Committee
Henry Schnurbach 51 Director and October 1988
Audit Committee
J. Ian Dalrymple 51 Director May 2002
Mark I. Litwin 40 Director May 2002
Mr. Tamkin has a J.D. degree from New York University School of Law and an
A.B. degree from Columbia University. Mr. Tamkin has been Chief Executive
Officer since March 15, 1996, prior to which Mr. Tamkin was Vice President and
General Counsel of the Company from October 1990. Also since October 1990, Mr.
Tamkin has been a Vice President of Mirtronics and Executive Vice President of
Forum Financial Corporation, a Toronto based merchant banking organization
controlled by a Director of Mirtronics. Since November 1992, Mr. Tamkin has been
a director of Unicap Commercial Corporation, an Ontario corporation which is
registered under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act"). Since
November 1998, Mr. Tamkin has been a Director and Chief Operating Officer of
Ntex Incorporated, a manufacturer of textile products. Mr. Tamkin is presently
Counsel to Dolgenos Newman & Cronin LLP, counsel to the Company.
Mr. Vitale has been President of the Company since March 15, 1996. Mr.
Vitale has been active in the fire/communications industry with Casey Systems
Inc. since 1982. Mr. Vitale has been President of Casey since 1993 and has held
the positions of Director of Engineering, Vice President - Engineering and
Executive Vice President. Mr. Vitale holds a Bachelor of Science degree in
Engineering from C.W. Post College and a Master of Science degree in Electrical
Engineering from New York University.
Mr. Poserina joined the Company as Treasurer, Vice President, Chief
Financial Officer and Director as of January 1, 1997. From December 1995 until
he joined the Company, Mr. Poserina was an independent financial consultant.
Also, from July 1996 to September 1996, Mr. Poserina was Chief Financial Officer
of Happiness Express Inc. Mr. Poserina was Chief Financial Officer of Dorne and
Margolin Inc. from November 1994 to December 1995. Prior to that, Mr. Poserina
spent 15 years as Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of
Chryon Corporation, a NYSE listed company registered under the Exchange Act. Mr.
Poserina holds a Bachelor of Science degree in accounting from the University of
Rhode Island and is a Certified Public Accountant.
Mr. McConnell is a partner in the firm of Dolgenos Newman & Cronin LLP,
counsel to the Company. Prior to being associated with Dolgenos Newman & Cronin
LLP, he was associated with Varet & Fink P.C. from 1989 to March 1993. Mr.
McConnell holds a J.D. degree from New York Law School.
Mr. Schnurbach has a Bachelor of Commerce degree from Sir George Williams
University and is a Certified Management Accountant in Ontario. Since October
1991, Mr. Schnurbach has been Chief Executive Officer of Cantar/Polyair
Corporation ("CPC"). Since February 1996, Mr. Schnurbach has also served as
President of Polyair Inter Pack Inc., an Ontario corporation traded on the
Toronto Stock Exchange, and the holding company of CPC.
Mr. Dalrymple has a Bachelor of Commerce degree and a Masters of Arts in
Economics from the University of Toronto. Since 1990, Mr. Dalrymple has been a
director of Nigel Stephens Counsel Inc., an Ontario corporation, which provides
investment and portfolio management services; NSC Holdings Inc., an Ontario
corporation which provides investment research and client administrative
services; and Fordal Holdings Inc., an Ontario corporation which provides
trading, settlement and related services to portfolio management firms. Mr.
Dalrymple is also a director of Cornerstone 52 Foundation, a charitable
foundation with focus on children's charities. In addition, Mr. Dalrymple has
been, since 1993, a director of Nafund Inc., an Ontario investment corporation
and, since 1996, a director of Nafund Administrators Inc., an Ontario
corporation originating merchant banking investments and advisory services.
Mr. Litwin has a B.A. and an M.B.A. from York University in Toronto,
Canada. Since 1990, Mr. Litwin has been the President, Chief Executive Officer
and a director of Mirtronics Inc. an Ontario corporation which is registered
under the Exchange Act. Mirtronics is the largest stockholder of Synergx.
There are no family relationships between any Director or Executive Officer
of Synergx and any other Director or Executive Officer of Synergx.
Directors hold office for a period of one year from the Annual Meeting of
Stockholders at which they are elected or until their successors are duly
elected and qualified. Officers are appointed by the Board of Directors and hold
office at the will of the Board. There is no nominating, or compensation
committee of the Board of Directors nor is there any committee performing
similar functions.
The Registrant is not aware of any Section 16(a) filing deficiences. In
making these statements, the Company has relied on the written representations
of its directors and officers and copies of the reports that they and 10%
holders have filed with the Commission.
ITEM 10. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The following table sets forth certain information with respect to
compensation paid or accrued by the Company for services rendered to it for each
of the three fiscal years ended September 30, 2002, as to Daniel S. Tamkin, the
Company's present Chief Executive Officer, Joseph Vitale, the Company's
President and Chief Operating Officer, and John A. Poserina, the Company's Chief
Financial Officer and Secretary; none of the Company's other Executive Officers
had aggregate remuneration in excess of $100,000.
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
LONG
ANNUAL COMPENSATION TERM COMPENSATION
All Other
Year Salary ($) Bonus($) Other($) Option/SAR Compensation
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Daniel S. Tamkin
2002 $97,000 $5,600 --
2001 87,000 $20,000 5,600 (1) --
2000 74,000 20,000 5,600 --
Joseph Vitale
2002 $140,000 $6,000 --
2001 130,000 $30,000 6,000 (2) --
2000 113,000 30,000 6,000 --
John A. Poserina
2002 $151,000 $5,600 --
2001 141,000 $30,000 5,600 --
2000 124,000 30,000 5,600 --
- ------
(1) Options to purchase 4,167 shares of Common Stock, at a price of $1.03 per
share were issued to Mr. Tamkin in December, 2000.
(2) Options to purchase 7,959 shares of Common Stock, at a price of $1.03 per
share were issued to Mr. Vitale in December, 2000.
- -----------
The following table details, as of September 30, 2002, the value of
unexercised in-the-money options held by Daniel S. Tamkin, Joseph Vitale and
John A. Poserina:
Number of Securities Value of Unexercised
Underlying Unexercised Options In-The-Money Options (1)
Exercisable Unexercisable Exercisable Unexercisable
---------- ------------ ----------- -------------
Daniels S. Tamkin 8,833 2,000 $ 792 $ 250
Joseph Vitale 14,367 2,758 3,001 417
John A. Poserina 7,667 2,000 1,542 250
- - - ------
(1) Net value, calculated as the difference between the exercise price and the
market price reported for September 30, 2002.
In December 1995, the Board of Directors voted to institute a 401(k) plan
for nonunion employees to be effective January 1, 1996. The plan includes a
profit sharing provision at the discretion of the Board of Directors. No profit
sharing contributions were authorized in 2002. In 2001 the Board of Directors
approved a payment totaling $44,000 for participants of the non-union and union
401(k) plans.
Directors do not receive any compensation for their service. Out-of-pocket
expenses for travel, meals and miscellaneous expenses incurred in the course of
the Director's activities on behalf of the Company are reimbursed at cost.
On April 30, 1997, the Company and its shareholders adopted a nonqualified
stock option plan ("1997 Plan"), which expires September 30, 2002, except as to
options then outstanding under the 1997 Plan. Under the 1997 Plan, the Board of
Directors may grant options to eligible employees at exercise prices not less
than 100% of the fair market value of the common shares at the time the option
is granted. The number of shares of Common Stock that may be issued shall not
exceed an aggregate of up to 10% of its issued and outstanding shares from time
to time. Options vest at a rate of 20% per year commencing one year after date
of grant. Issuances under the 1997 Plan are to be reduced by options outstanding
under a 1990 nonqualified stock option plan (replaced by the 1997 Plan).
Effective September 30, 1998, all outstanding employee stock options were reset
to an exercise price of $1.00 per share.
On September 30, 2002, options on 24,083 of Common Stock were extended to
December 31, 2005 and the option exercise price remained $1.00 per share.
On December 29, 2000, options on 43,375 shares of Common Stock were
extended for five more years and the option price was reset from $1.00 to $1.03
per share.
The Company currently has issued and outstanding options to purchase
101,791 shares of its Common Stock, at various exercise prices ranging between
$1.00 and $1.125 per share, to certain of its officers, Directors and employees.
See "SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT."
ITEM 11. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The following table sets forth certain information known to the Company
regarding beneficial ownership of the Company's outstanding Common Stock at
December 10, 2002 of (i) each beneficial owner of more than five percent of the
Common Stock, (ii) each of the Company's Directors, and (iii) all Officers and
Directors of the Company as a group.
Common Stock Beneficially Owned At January 7, 2002
Number of Shares Percent of Shares
--------------------------------------
Mirtronics Inc.(1) 896,311 41.0%
Investors Money Management (10) 340,000 16.6%
Genterra Capital Corporation 152,167 6.8%
Daniel S. Tamkin (2) 127,733 6.0%
Joseph Vitale (3, 4) 17,125 nil
Henry Schnurbach (4) 5,167 nil
John A. Poserina (3, 5) 17,167 nil
Dennis P. McConnell (4, 6) 4,167 nil
Mark Litwin (8) 1,048,478 48.0%
J. Ian Dalrymple (9) 0 nil
All Executive Officers and
Directors as a Group (5 Persons) 1,219,837 54.7%
- ----------
(1) Includes 310,000 shares of Common Stock issuable upon conversion of
debt owed to Mirtronics and convertible into shares of Common Stock. See
"CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS". Address is 106 Avenue Road,
Toronto, Ontario.
(2) Includes 10,833 shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of
options granted by the Company. Address is 96 Spring Street, New York, NY.
(3) Address is 209 Lafayette Drive, Syosset, NY 11791.
(4) Issuable upon exercise of options granted by the Company.
(5) Includes 9,667 shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of
options granted by the Company.
(6) Address is 96 Spring Street, New York, NY.
(7) Address is 106 Avenue Road, Toronto, Ontario.
(8) By virtue of his position as an officer and/or director of such
entities, Mr. Litwin may be considered the beneficial owner of shares owned by
Mirtronics Inc. and Genterra Capital Corporation. Mr. Litwin expressly disclaims
such beneficial ownership. Address is 106 Avenue Road, Toronto, Ontario.
(9) Address is 1200 Sheppard Avenue East, Willowdale, Ontario.
(10) Includes 170,000 shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of
warrants.
ITEM 12. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
In 1985, Casey entered into a royalty agreement with Joseph Vitale, prior
to his becoming the President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company. The
agreement pays Mr. Vitale a royalty on certain systems marketed and serviced by
Casey. In fiscal year ended September 30, 2002, Casey paid $75,852 pursuant to
the terms of the agreement.
Management believes each of the foregoing transactions was entered into on
terms at least as favorable as could be obtained from unrelated parties
negotiating at arms-length.
Daniel S. Tamkin, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and General Counsel of
Synergx, is also an officer of a company controlled by a Director of
Mirtronics, Synergx's largest stockholder. Mr. Schnurbach, a Director of the
Company, is a Director of Mirtronics.
ITEM 13. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
(a) Exhibits
Exhibit No. Description of Exhibit Page No.
3.1 Certificate of Incorporation of the Company, as amended *
3.2 By-Laws of the Company (2)
4.1 Specimen Common Stock Certificate (2)
10.1 Credit Agreement dated June 23, 1998 between Firetector Inc. as Borrower
and Citizens Business Credit Company as Lender (3)
10.2 Form of First amendment to Credit Agreement dated October, 2000 between
Firetector Inc. as borrower and Citizens Business Credit Company as
Lender(4)
10.3 Form of Second amendment to Credit Agreement dated October 1, 2001 between
Firetector Inc. as borrower and Citizens Business Credit Company as Lender*
10.4 Form of Third amendment to Credit Agreement dated May 14, 2002 between
Firetector Inc. as borrower and Citizens Business Credit Company as Lender
(5)
10.5 Form of Fourth amendment to Credit Agreement dated June 24, 2002 between
Synergx Systems Inc. as borrower and Citizens Business Credit Company as
Lender (6)
10.6 Form of Fifth amendment to Credit Agreement dated November 26, 2002 between
Synergx Sysstems Inc. as borrower and Citizens Business Credit Company as
Lender.*
10.7 Form of Lease dated February, 2000 between Casey Systems as Tenant and
First Industrial L.P. as Landlord (7)
10.8 Form of Lease dated July 23rd, 2002 between Systems Service Technology Corp
as Tenant and Balbo Realty LLC as Landlord*
10.9 Form of Subscription Agreement and Investment Letter dated September 30,
2002 between Synergx Systems and Investors Money Management*
22.1 Subsidiaries of the Registrant (Exhibit 22.1)(1)
99.1 Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*
- --------
* filed herewtih
(1) Reference is made to the correspondingly numbered Exhibit to Amendment
No. 1 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-2, Registration No.
33-51472, filed with the Commission on December 23, 1992, which is incorporated
herein by reference.
(2) Reference is made to the correspondingly numbered Exhibit to Amendment
No. 1 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-1, Registration No.
22-26050, filed with the Commission on January 23, 1989, which is incorporated
herein by reference.
(3) Reference is made to the correspondingly numbered Exhibit to the
Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the Fiscal Year Ended September 30,
1998, which Exhibit is incorporated herein by reference.
(4) Reference is made to the correspondingly numbered Exhibit to the
Company's Report on Form 10-KSB for the Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2001,
which Exhibit is incorporated herein by reference.
(5) Reference is made to the Exhibit numbered 10.1 to the Company's
Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the Quarter Ended March 31, 2002, which
Exhibit is incorporated herein by reference.
(6) Reference is made to the correspondingly numbered Exhibit to the
Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the Quarter Ended June 30, 2002,
which Exhibit is incorporated herein by reference.
(7) Reference is made to the Exhibit numbered 10.6 to the Company's Report
on Form 10-KSB for the Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2001, which Exhibit is
incorporated herein by reference.
(b) Reports on Form 8-K
Form 8-K dated August 14, 2002 regarding Certification requirements of
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer under Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 covering quarterly period ending June 30, 2002.
ITEM 14. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and procedures
Based on their evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures conducted
within 90 days of the date of filing this report on Form 10-KSB, our Chief
Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer has concluded that our
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a - 14(c) and 15(d)
promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 are effective.
(b) Changes in Internal Controls
There were no significant changes in our internal controls or in other factors
that could significantly affect these controls subsequent to the date of their
evaluation.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, the Company has duly caused this amended Report to be
signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
SYNERGX SYSTEMS INC.
(Registrant)
By: /s/ JOHN A. POSERINA
-----------------------
John A. Poserina,
Chief Financial Officer, Secretary
And Director(Principal Accounting and
Financial Officer)
Dated: June 25, 2003
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, Daniel S. Tamkin, Chief Executive Officer, of Synergx Systems Inc. hereby
certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB/A of Synergx Systems Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:
a) Designated such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this annual report is being
prepared;
b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures as of a dated within 90 days prior to December 20, 2002 (the
Evaluation Date); and
c) Presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;
5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions);
a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, the involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls;
and
6. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this
annual report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in
other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
Date: June 25, 2003
/s/ Daniel S. Tamkin
--------------------
Daniel S. Tamkin
Chief Executive Officer
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, John A. Poserina, Chief Financial Officer of Synergx Systems Inc., hereby
certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB/A of Synergx Systems Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:
a) Designated such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this annual report is being
prepared;
b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures as of a dated within 90 days prior to December 20, 2002 (the
Evaluation Date); and
c) Presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;
5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions);
a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, the involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls;
and
6. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this annual
report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other
factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date
of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
Date: June 25, 2003
/s/ John A. Poserina
---------------------
John A. Poserina
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting
Officer), Secretary and Director
Index to Consolidated Financial Statements
Synergx Systems Inc. and Subsidiaries
Item 7
Independent Auditors' Report .................................... 1
Audited Consolidated Financial Statements
Consolidated Balance Sheet-September 30, 2002 ....... 2 - 3
Consolidated Statements of Operations
Years Ended September 30, 2002 and 2001 ...................... 4
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity
Years Ended September 30, 2002 and 2001 ...................... 5
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Years Ended September 30, 2002 and 2001 ..................... 6
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements ................... 7 - 21
Independent Auditors' Report
To the Stockholders and Board of Directors of
Synergx Systems Inc. and Subsidiaries
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Synergx Systems
Inc. and its subsidiaries as of September 30, 2002 and the related consolidated
statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for years ended
September 30, 2002 and 2001. These financial statements are the responsibility
of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated
financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the consolidated financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well
as evaluating the overall consolidated financial statement presentation. We
believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Synergx Systems
Inc. and its subsidiaries as of September 30, 2002 and the consolidated results
of their operations and their cash flows for the years ended September 30, 2002
and 2001, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America.
December 6, 2002 /s/ MARCUM & KLIEGMAN LLP
New York, NY
Part I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
SYNERGX SYSTEMS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
SEPTEMBER 30, 2002
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents 200,000
Accounts receivable, principally trade, less allowance
for doubtful accounts of $429,000 5,030,000
Inventories 2,437,000
Deferred taxes 339,000
Prepaid expenses and other current assets 394,000
-----------
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS 8,400,000
-----------
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT -at cost, less
accumulated depreciation and amortization of $1,241,000 372,000
OTHER ASSETS 154,000
-----------
TOTAL ASSETS 8,926,000
===========
See accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
SYNERGX SYSTEMS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
SEPTEMBER 30, 2002
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Notes payable - principally to related party 109,000
Accounts payable and accrued expenses 2,658,000
Deferred revenue 446,000
Current portion of capital lease obligations 24,000
-----------
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES 3,237,000
Note payable to bank 848,000
Notes payable - principally to related party,
less current portion 52,000
Capital lease obligations, less current portion 43,000
Deferred taxes 11,000
-----------
TOTAL LIABILITIES 4,191,000
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES -----------
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Preferred stock, 2,000,000 shares authorized-
none issued and outstanding
Common stock, 10,000,000 shares authorized, $.001
par value; issued and outstanding 1,874,430 shares 2,000
Capital in excess of par 5,524,000
Accumulated Deficit (791,000)
-----------
TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY 4,735,000
-----------
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY 8,926,000
===========
See accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
SYNERGX SYSTEMS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
For the Year Ended September 30,
2002 2001
---------- ----------
Product sales 10,672,000 14,073,000
Subcontract sales 1,763,000 1,505,000
Service revenue 4,508,000 4,349,000
---------- ----------
Total revenues 16,943,000 19,927,000
---------- ----------
Cost of product sales 7,188,000 9,291,000
Cost of subcontract sales 1,456,000 1,219,000
Cost of service 3,180,000 3,136,000
Selling, general and administrative 5,374,000 5,252,000
Interest expense 89,000 146,000
Depreciation and amortization expense 149,000 150,000
---------- ----------
17,436,000 19,194,000
---------- ----------
(Loss) Income before (benefit from)
provision for income taxes (493,000) 733,000
(Benefit from) provision for income taxes:
Current (184,000) 334,000
Deferred (16,000) (34,000)
---------- ----------
(200,000) 300,000
----------- ----------
Net (Loss) Income (293,000) 433,000
=========== ==========
Earnings Per Common Share
Basic (Loss) Earnings Per Share ($0.17) $0.25
Diluted (Loss) Earnings Per Share ($0.17) $0.24
===== =====
Weighted Average Number of Common Shares Outstanding 1,704,897 1,704,425
Weighted Average Number of Common and Potential Dilutive
Common Shares Outstanding 1,704,897 1,784,089
See accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
SYNERGX SYSTEMS INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
FOR THE YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2002 and 2001
TOTAL
STOCKHOLDERS' PREFERRED STOCK COMMON STOCK
EQUITY SHARES AMOUNT SHARES AMOUNT
----------------- ----------- ----------- ------------- ---------
Balance at September 30, 2000 4,350,000 0 0 1,704,430 2,000
----------------- ----------- ----------- ------------- ---------
Net Income 433,000
----------------- ----------- ----------- ------------- ---------
Balance at September 30, 2001 4,783,000 0 0 1,704,430 2,000
Issuance of shares from
private placement 238,000 170,000 0
Stock option compensation 7,000
Net (Loss) (293,000)
----------------- ----------- ----------- ------------- ---------
Balance at September 30, 2002 4,735,000 0 0 1,874,430 2,000
================= =========== =========== ============= =========
SYNERGX SYSTEMS INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
FOR THE YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2002 and 2001
(continued)
CAPITAL RETAINED
IN EXCESS EARNINGS
OF PAR (DEFICIT)
--------- -----------
Balance at September 30, 2000 5,279,000 (931,000)
--------- -----------
Net Income 433,000
--------- -----------
Balance at September 30, 2001 5,279,000 (498,000)
Issuance of shares from
private placement 238,000
Stock option compensation 7,000
Net (Loss) (293,000)
----------- -----------
Balance at September 30, 2002 5,524,000 (791,000)
=========== ===========
See accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
SYNERGX SYSTEMS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Year Ended September 30,
2002 2001
-------- --------
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net (loss) income (293,000) 433,000
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash
provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization 149,000 150,000
Stock option compensation 7,000
Deferred tax (16,000) (34,000)
Provision for doubtful accounts 101,000 (21,000)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable 1,326,000 (319,000)
Inventories (146,000) 46,000
Prepaid expenses and other current assets (156,000) (112,000)
Other assets (4,000) (39,000)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses (647,000) 446,000
Deferred revenue (8,000) 80,000
---------- ---------
NET CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES 313,000 630,000
---------- ---------
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Purchases of property and equipment (119,000) (148,000)
---------- ---------
NET CASH USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES (119,000) (148,000)
---------- ---------
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Principal payments on revolving line of credit, long-term
debt, notes payable and capital lease obligations (628,000) (271,000)
Proceeds from revolving line of credit and notes payable 98,000 92,000
Proceeds from private placement 238,000
Notes payable to affiliated companies 0 (243,000)
---------- ----------
NET CASH USED IN FINANCING ACTIVITIES (292,000) (422,000)
---------- ----------
NET (DECREASE) INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS (98,000) 60,000
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period 298,000 239,000
---------- ---------
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period 200,000 299,000
========== =========
SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Cash paid during the period for:
Income taxes 151,000 389,000
Interest 96,000 145,000
SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULE OF NONCASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
During the year ended September 30, 2002 and 2001, the Company incurred no
capital lease obilgations for the acquisition of equipment.
See accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Synergx Systems Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at September 30,
2002, and reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the fiscal year.
Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Synergx Systems
Inc. (formerly Firetector Inc.) and its subsidiaries, all of which are wholly
owned (the "Company"). The principal operating subsidiaries are: Casey Systems
Inc. ("Casey"), General Sound (Texas) Company ("GenSound"), and Systems Service
Technology Corp. ("SST"). Significant intercompany items and transactions have
been eliminated in consolidation. The Company is a subsidiary of Mirtronics,
Inc. ("Mirtronics"), an Ontario publicly-held corporation.
At the annual meeting of Firetector Inc. stockholders, held on May 22, 2002,
stockholders voted to amend the company's Certificate of Incorporation to change
Firetector's name to Synergx Systems Inc.
Business
The Company operates in one industry segment: the design, manufacture, marketing
and service of a variety of data communications product and systems with
applications in the fire alarm, life safety, transit, security and
communications industry.
Revenue Recognition
Product sales include sale of systems, which are similar in nature, that involve
fire alarm, life safety and security (CCTV and card access), transit (on board
systems) and communication (paging, announcement and audio/visual). Product
sales represent sales of product along with the integration of technical
services at a fixed price under a contract with an electrical contractor or end
user customer (building owner or tenant), or customer agent. Product sales is
allocated using a constant gross profit percentage over the entire contract, and
is recognized, using the percentage-of-completion method of accounting. The
Company utilizes a units-of-work performed method to measure progress towards
completion of the contract. The effects of changes in contract terms are
reflected in the accounting period in which they become known. Contract terms
provide for billing schedules that differ from revenue recognition and give rise
to costs and estimated profits in excess billings, and billings in excess of
costs and estimated profits. Costs and estimated profits in excess of billing
were not material at September 30, 2002 and 2001 and have been included in
accounts receivable. There was no billing in excess of costs and estimated
profits at September 30, 2002 and 2001.
Subcontract sales principally represent revenues related to electrical
installation of wiring and piping performed by others for the Company when the
Company acts as the prime contractor and sells its products along with
electrical installation. Subcontract sales is also recognized during the entire
project using the percentage-of-completion method of accounting as electrical
installation is performed at the job site.
Service revenue from separate maintenance contracts is recognized on a
straight-line basis over the terms of the respective contract, which is
generally one year. Non-contract service revenue is recognized when services are
performed.
Reclassifications
Certain accounts in the prior year financial statements have been reclassified
for comparative purposes to conform with the presentation in the current year
financial statements. These reclassifications have no effect on previously
reported income.
Inventories
Inventories are priced at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out) or market and
consist primarily of raw materials.
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment are stated at historical cost. Leases meeting the
criteria for capitalization are recorded at the present value of future lease
payments.
Depreciation and amortization of machinery and equipment and furniture and
fixtures are provided primarily by the straight-line method over their estimated
useful lives. The Company depreciates machinery and equipment over periods of 3
to 10 years and amortizes leasehold improvements and assets acquired under
capitalized leases over the life of the lease or their economic useful life,
whichever is shorter.
Other Assets
Other assets are comprised principally of the excess of cost over the fair value
of the assets acquired in the acquisition of certain subsidiaries. The excess of
cost over the fair value of the assets acquired approximates $104,000 (net of
accumulated amortization of $70,000) and relates principally to the 1990
acquisition of GenSound. This amount is being amortized over forty years under
the straight line method.
The Company evaluates the periods of goodwill amortization to determine whether
later events and circumstances warrant revised estimates of useful lives. The
Company also evaluates whether the carrying value of goodwill has become
impaired.
Advertising Costs
Advertising Costs are expensed as incurred during the year. Advertising Costs
for the years ended September 30, 2002 and 2001 amounted to $23,000 and $26,000,
respectively.
Research and Development Cost
Research and development costs are expensed as incurred during the year.
Research and development costs for the years ended September 30, 2002 and 2001
amounted to $149,000 and $142,000, respectively.
Income Taxes
The Company accounts for income taxes under Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards (SFAS) No. 109, "Accounting for Income Taxes". Under SFAS No. 109, the
asset and liability method is used to determine deferred tax assets and
liabilities based on differences between financial reporting and tax bases of
assets and liabilities and are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws
that will be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse.
Earnings Per Share
SFAS No. 128 "Earnings Per Share" requires companies to report basic and diluted
earnings per share ("EPS") computations. Basic EPS excludes dilution and is
based on the weighted-average common shares outstanding and diluted EPS gives
effect to potential dilution of securities that could share in the earnings of
the Company. Diluted EPS reflects the assumed issuance of shares with respect to
the Company's employee stock options, non-employee stock options, and warrants.
Cash Equivalents
The Company considers all highly liquid investments with maturities of three
months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents.
Concentration of Credit Risk
The Company's operations are located in two large U.S. cities (New York City,
New York and Dallas, Texas), each of which is an independent market. The Company
grants credit to its customers, principally all of which are general or
specialized construction contractors, none of which individually constitutes a
significant portion of outstanding receivables. Approximately 84% of such
outstanding receivables at September 30, 2002 are due from customers in New
York.
At September 30, 2002, the Company had approximately $73,000 based on checks
that had not cleared the financial institutions that are subject to insured
amount limitations. The Company does not require collateral to support financial
instruments subject to credit risk.
Stock Options and Similar Equity Instruments
The Company adopted the disclosure requirements of Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation," for stock options and similar equity instruments (collectively,
"Options") issued to employees; however, the Company will continue to apply the
intrinsic value based method of accounting for options issued to employees
prescribed by Accounting Principles Board ("APB") Opinion 25, "Accounting for
Stock Issues to Employees," rather than the fair value based method of
accounting prescribed by SFAS No. 123. SFAS No. 123 also applies to transactions
in which an entity issues its equity instruments to acquire goods or services
from non-employees. Those transactions must be accounted for based on the fair
value of the consideration received or the fair value of the equity instruments
issued, whichever is more reliably measured. (see Note 9).
2. Transactions with Related Parties
Mirtronics is the largest stockholder of the Company. In 1994 and 1995,
Mirtronics provided financial assistance to the Company by way of a Letter of
Credit in support of the Company's credit facility, further advances to the
Company, and an exchange of debt for equity. In connection with this financial
assistance, the Company has outstanding warrants to purchase 310,000 shares of
the Company's Common Stock, which were issued in 1998, and are exercisable at
any time until December 31, 2003 at an exercise price of $1.02 per share.
Notes Payable Principally to Related Party includes $59,000 due to a former
officer/director of the Company under a seven year installment promissory note
dated January 1, 1997 that bears interest at 4% per annum.
3. Property and Equipment
Property and equipment (including those arising from capital leases) are
summarized as follows:
September 30,
2002
--------------
Machinery and equipment $1,422,000
Furniture and fixtures 152,000
Leasehold improvements 39,000
--------------
1,613,000
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization 1,241,000
--------------
$372,000
==============
Annual amortization of equipment under capital leases is included with
depreciation and amortization expense.
Depreciation and amortization expense related to these assets were $133,000 and
$129,000 for the years ended September 30, 2002 and 2001, respectively.
4. Long-Term Debt
In 1998, the Company entered into a revolving credit facility with Citizens
Business Credit Company of Boston, Massachusetts (the "Credit Facility"). The
Credit Facility was revised in September 2000 and provides for a $3,000,000
revolving line of credit through December 2004 and carries an interest rate of
prime plus 1/4% on outstanding balances (5% at September 30, 2002). The Credit
Facility limits capital expenditures to $250,000 in each year. At September 30,
2002, $848,000 was outstanding under this facility. Advances under the Credit
Facility are measured against a borrowing base calculated on eligible
receivables and inventory. The Credit Facility is secured by all of the assets
of the Company and all of its operating subsidiaries.
The Credit Facility includes certain restrictive covenants, which among other
things, impose limitations on declaring or paying dividends, acquisitions and
capital expenditures. The Company is also required to maintain certain financial
ratios. Citizens Business Credit Company of Boston has modified the requirement
of one of the ratios for fiscal 2002. At September 30, 2002, the Company was not
in default of any of its financial covenants as a result of this modification.
Annual maturities of Loans and Notes Payable are as follows:
Bank Other Notes Total
Loan Payable
------------------------------------------------------------
2003 $ -- $109,000 $109,000
2004 -- 36,000 36,000
2005 848,000 16,000 864,000
-------------------------------------------------------------
Total $ 848,000 $161,000 $1,009,000
5. Leases
The Company leases certain office and warehouse space under noncancelable
operating leases expiring at various times through 2010. In February 2000, the
Company signed a new lease for office, manufacturing and warehouse space in
Syosset, New York. This lease expires in June 2007.
The Company had a lease for its service center in New York City that was set to
expire in August 2003. The Company was able to exercise a six month termination
option and terminated its lease in New York City by giving six months notice,
which became effective December 5, 2002. The Company entered into a new lease
for office and warehouse space in New York City. The new lease became effective
August 2002 and runs thru December 31, 2009. The new lease provides for yearly
rental of $84,000 during the first year plus expenses with yearly escalation of
2% each year thereafter. Total cost of space over the life of the lease will
approximate $631,000.
The Company leases an office and warehouse facility in Richardson, Texas, a
suburb of Dallas, pursuant to a lease that was extended in August, 2002 to
expire on June 30, 2010 providing for annual rent on a net basis of $50,152
escalating annually to $64,016 in the final year of the lease.
The Company also leases certain office equipment and vehicles under
noncancelable capital and operating leases expiring in various years through
fiscal 2005.
The following is a schedule of future minimum payments, by year and in the
aggregate, under non cancelable capital and operating leases with initial or
remaining terms of one year or more at September 30, 2002:
Capital Leases Operating Leases Total
2003 $31,000 $398,000 $429,000
2004 26,000 323,000 349,000
2005 22,000 333,000 355,000
2006 343,000 343,000
2007 300,000 300,000
2008 155,000 155,000
2009 159,000 159,000
2010 24,000 24,000
----------------------------------------------
Total minimum lease payments $79,000 $2,035,000 $2,114,000
Less amount representing interest 12,000 =============================
---------
Present value of net minimum lease payments (including current
portion of $24,000) $67,000
=========
Rental expense amounted to $366,000 and $343,000 for 2002 and 2001,
respectively.
6. Significant Customers
During fiscal 2002 and 2001, no customer accounted for more than 10% of sales.
7. Income Taxes
During the year ended September 30, 2002, the Company recorded a tax benefit of
($200,000) compared to a tax provision of $300,000 for the year ended September
30, 2001. A reconciliation of such with the amounts computed by applying the
statutory federal income tax rate is follows:
Year ended September 30,
2002 2001
--------------------------
Statutory federal income tax rate 34% 34%
Computed expected tax from income ($168,000) $249,000
(Decrease)Increase in taxes resulting from:
State and local income taxes, net of Federal tax benefit (22,000) 53,000
Nondeductible expenses 8,000 8,000
(Decrease) in taxes resulting from
benefit of future tax deductible items (18,000) (10,000)
(Benefit) Provision ($200,000) $300,000
The Company provided $13,000 and $14,000 for state and local franchise and
capital taxes for the years ended September 30, 2002 and 2001, respectively.
These expenses have been included in selling, general and administrative
expenses for each of the years presented.
The Company has recorded a current deferred tax asset and a non current deferred
tax liability at September 30, 2002 and a current and non current deferred tax
asset at September 30, 2001 related to certain accelerated tax deductions or
book provisions to be deducted in future tax returns. Management anticipates
profitable operations to continue at a level that will result in the utilization
of the entire deferred tax asset.
The components of deferred tax assets and liabilities at September 30, 2002 and
2001 consist of the following:
Deferred Tax Assets 2002 2001
------------------- ---- ----
Allowance for doubtful accounts $172,000 $131,000
Inventory reserve 120,000 120,000
Depreciation and amortization 60,000
Net operating loss carryforward 47,000 ---
--------- -----------
Total deferred tax asset $339,000 $311,000
======== ===========
Deferred Tax Liabilities
Depreciation and amortization $11,000 $ ---
------- -----------
Total deferred tax liability $11,000 $ ---
======= ===========
8. Earnings Per Share
Shown below is a table that presents for 2002 and 2001 the computation of basic
earnings per share, diluted earnings per share, weighted shares outstanding, and
weighted average shares after potential dilution.
Year Ended
Basic EPS Computation 2002 2001
--------------------- -------------------------
Net (loss) Income available to common
stockholders $(293,000) $433,000
Weighted average outstanding shares 1,704,897 1,704,425
Basic (loss) EPS $(.17) $.25
======= =======
Diluted EPS Computation
(Loss) Income available to common
stockholders $(293,000) $433,000
Weighted-average shares 1,704,897 1,704,425
Plus: Incremental shares from
assumed conversions
Employee Stock Options* 18,640
Warrants* 61,024
------
Dilutive potential common shares N/A 79,664
--------- ---------
Adjusted weighted-average shares 1,704,897 1,784,089
--------- ---------
Diluted (loss) EPS ($.17) $.24
========== =========
*All warrants and options were antidilutive in 2002 and 16,667 warrants were
antidilutive in 2001.
9. Stockholders' Equity
On September 30, 2002, the Company sold 170,000 units ("Units") in a private
placement to an unaffiliated investor for $1.40 per Unit. Each Unit consists of
one share of Common Stock and one warrant (the "Warrant") to purchase an
additional share of Common Stock at $1.40 for a period of 24 months from
September 30, 2002.
The Units, Common Stock, Warrants and Common Stock issue able upon exercise of
the warrants will be restricted and may not be sold or transferred without
registration under or exemption from applicable securities laws. The purchaser
will be granted one-time piggyback registration rights.
10. Employee Stock Options, Options, and Warrants
On April 30, 1997, the Company and its stockholders adopted a nonqualified stock
option plan ("1997 Plan"), which was to expire September 30, 2002, except as to
options outstanding under the 1997 Plan. Under the 1997 Plan, the Board of
Directors may grant options to eligible employees at exercise prices not less
than 100% of the fair market value of the common shares at the time the option
is granted. The number of shares of Common Stock that may be issued shall not
exceed an aggregate of up to 10% of its issued and outstanding shares from time
to time. Options vest at a rate of 20% per year commencing one year after date
of grant. Issuances under the 1997 Plan are to be reduced by options outstanding
under a 1990 nonqualified stock option plan (replaced by the 1997 Plan). In
September 2002, the stock option plan was extended to expire on December 31,
2005.
The Company applies the intrinsic value base method of accounting for options
issued to employees rather than the fair value based method of accounting. On
September 19, 2002, options on 24,083 shares of common stock were extended to
December 31, 2005 and the option price remained at $1.00 per share. On December
29, 2000, options on 43,375 shares of common stock were extended for five more
years and the option price was reset from $1.00 to $1.03 per share. Stock option
compensation expense of $6,743 and $0 for years ended September 30, 2002 and
2001, respectively was recorded to General and Administrative expense in
connection with the extension of these options. If the Company had elected to
recognize compensation expense based upon the fair value at the grant date for
awards under these plans consistent with the methodology prescribed by SFAS 123,
the Company's net (loss) income and net (loss) income per share for 2002 and
2001 would be reduced to the pro forma amounts indicated below:
2002 2001
Net (Loss) Income:
As reported $(293,000) $433,000
Pro forma (300,000) 404,000
(Loss) earnings per common share:
As reported
($0.17) $0.25
Basic ($0.17) $0.24
====== =====
Diluted
Pro forma
Basic ($0.18) $0.24
Diluted ($0.18) $0.23
====== =====
These pro forma amounts may not be representative of future disclosures since
the estimated fair value of stock options is amortized to expense over the
vesting period for purposes of future pro forma disclosures, and additional
options may be granted in future years. The fair value of these options was
estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with
the following weighted average assumptions for 2002 and 2001, repectively:
dividend yield of zero; expected volatility of 45% and 75%, respectively and
expected life of 3.25 and 5 years, respectively. The weighted average risk fee
interest rates for 2002 and 2001 were 3.22% and 4.64%, respectively. The
weighted average fair value of options granted (extended) 2002 and 2001, was
$.56 and $.66, respectively.
The Black-Scholes option valuation model was developed for use in estimating the
fair value of traded options which have no vesting restrictions and are fully
transferable. In addition, option valuation models require the input of highly
subjective assumptions including the expected price volatility. Because the
Company's employees' stock options have characteristics significantly different
from those of traded options, and because changes in the subjective input
assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate, in management's'
opinion, the existing models do not necessarily provide a reliable single
measure of the fair value of employee stock options.
10. Employee Stock Options, Options, and Warrants (continued)
Transactions involving stock options are summarized as follows:
Weighted Average
Exercise Price of
Stock Options Outstanding Options Outstanding
Balance September 30, 2000 107,958 1.04
Options granted (extended) 43,375 1.03
Options expired (43,375) 1.00
Balance September 30, 2001 107,958 1.05
Options granted (extended) 24,083 1.00
Option expired (30,250) 1.00
Balance September 30, 2002 101,791 1.06
There were 94,791 exercisable options at September 30, 2002 and 93,958
exercisable options at September 30, 2001.
..
The following table summarizes information concerning currently outstanding and
exercisable stock options.
Outstanding at Weighted Average Exercisable at
Exercise Price September 30, 2002 Contractual Life September 30, 2002
1.13 35,000 2.0 years 28,000
1.03 42,708 3.3 years 42,708
1.00 24,083 3.3 years 24,083
In 1998, the Company granted Mirtronics warrants to purchase 310,000 shares of
the Company's Common Stock which are exercisable at a price of $1.02 per share
at any time until December 31, 2003. (See Note 2 - Transactions with Related
parties)
In May 1995, the Company granted Judson Enterprises, Ltd. 33,334 options to
purchase common stock at a price of $3.00 per share in exchange for investment
banking services. In April 1997, the Company entered into an agreement to
exchange 16,667 of these options for 16,667 new options to purchase common stock
at a price of $4.50. These options expired in April 2002 and 16,667 options had
expired in May 2000.
On September 30, 2002, the Company issued 170,000 warrants in connection with a
private placement. (See Note - 9)
Transactions involving non-employee stock options and warrants are summarized as
follows:
Weighted Average
Options and Warrants Exercise Price of
Outstanding Options Outstanding
Balance September 30, 2000 326,667 $1.20
Balance September 30, 2001 326,667 1.20
Warrants expired 16,667 4.50
Warrants issued 170,000 1.40
Balance September 30, 2002 480,000 $1.15
All of these options and warrants were exercisable at the end of the periods
indicated in the above schedule.
The following table summarizes information concerning currently outstanding and
exercisable non-employee warrants.
Outstanding at Weighted Average Exercisable at
Exercise Price September 30, 2002 Contractual Life September 30, 2002
1.02 310,000 1.3 years 310,000
1.40 170,000 2.0 years 170,000
11. Contingencies
In the normal course of its operations, the Company has been or, from time to
time, may be named in legal actions seeking monetary damages. Management does
not expect, based upon consultation with legal counsel, that any material item
exists that will affect the Company's business or financial condition.
12. Other
Approximately 32% of the Company's employees are covered by collective
bargaining agreements. On July 20, 2002, the union representing hourly employees
and the Company ratified a Collective Bargaining Agreement expiring July 9,
2005, providing for an increase in salaries and benefits averaging approximately
4 1/2% per year over the life of the contract.
Effective January 1, 1996, the Board of Directors instituted a 401K plan for
nonunion employees. The plan includes a profit sharing provision at the
discretion of the Board of Directors. No profit sharing contribution was
authorized in 2002. In 2001 a profit sharing contribution of $44,000 was
authorized and charged to expense.
13. Fair Value of Financial Instruments
SFAS No. 107, "Disclosures about Fair Values of Financial Instruments", requires
disclosing fair value to the extent practicable for financial instruments which
are recognized or unrecognized in the balance sheet. The fair value of the
financial instruments disclosed herein is not necessarily representative of the
amount that could be realized or settled, nor does the fair value amount
consider the tax consequences of realization or settlement.
For certain financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, trade
receivables and payables, and short-term debt, it was assumed that the carrying
amount approximated fair value because of the near term maturities of such
obligations. The fair value of long-term debt was determined based on current
rates at which the Company could borrow funds with similar remaining maturities,
which amount approximates its carrying value.
14. Authoritative Pronouncements
In July 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued SFAS No.
141, "Business Combinations". SFAS No. 141 requires the purchase method of
accounting for business combinations initiated after June 30, 2001 and
eliminates the pooling-of-interests method. The adoption of SFAS No. 141 did not
have a significant impact on its financial statements.
In July 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets", which was effective for the Company commencing October 1, 2002. SFAS
No. 142 requires, among other things, the discontinuance of goodwill
amortization. In addition, the standard includes provisions for the
reclassification of certain existing recognized intangibles as goodwill,
reassessment of the useful lives of existing recognized intangibles,
reclassification of certain intangibles out of previously reported goodwill and
the identification of reporting units for purposes of assessing potential future
impairment of goodwill. The impact of the adoptions of SFAS No. 142 will result
in the Company discontinuing goodwill amortization.
In August 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or
Disposal of Long-Lived Assets. SFAS No. 144 changes the accounting for
long-lived assets to be held and used by eliminating the requirement to allocate
goodwill to long-lived assets to be tested for impairment, by providing a
probability weighted cash flow estimation approach to deal with situations in
which alternative courses of action to recover the carrying amount of possible
future cash flows and by establishing a primary-asset approach to determine the
cash flow estimation period for a group of assets and liabilities that
represents the unit of accounting for long-lived assets to be held and used.
SFAS No. 144 changes the accounting for long-lived assets to be disposed of
other than by sale by requiring that the depreciable life of a long-lived asset
to be abandoned be revised to reflect a shortened useful life and by requiring
the impairment loss to be recognized at the date a long-lived asset is exchanged
for a similar productive asset or distributed to owners in a spin-off if the
carrying amount of the asset exceeds its fair value. SFAS No. 144 changes the
accounting for long-lived assets to be disposed of by sale by requiring that
discontinued operations no longer be recognized on a net realizable value basis
(but at the lower of carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell), by
eliminating the recognition of future operating losses of discontinued
components before they occur and by broadening the presentation of discontinued
operations in the income statement to include a component of an entity rather
than a segment of a business. A component of an entity comprises operations and
cash flows that can be clearly distinguished, operationally, and for financial
reporting purposes, from the rest of the entity. The effective date for SFAS No.
144 is for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2001. The Company expects
that the adoption of the SFAS No. 144 will not have a significant impact on its
financial statements.
On April 30, 2002 the FASB issued SFAS No. 145, "Rescission of FASB No.4, 44 and
64, Amendment of FASB Statement No. 13 and Technical Corrections". SFAS No. 145
eliminates the requirement that gains and losses from the extinguishment of debt
be aggregated and, if material, classified as an extraordinary item, net of the
related income tax effect and eliminates an inconsistency between the accounting
for sale-leaseback transactions and certain lease modifications that have
economic effects that are similar to sale-leaseback transactions. SFAS No. 145
is effective for transactions occurring after May 15, 2002. The adoption of SFAS
No. 145 did not have a material effect on the Company's operation.
SFAS No. 146, "Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal
Activities", provides guidance on the recognition and measurement of liabilities
for cost associated with exit or disposal activities. The provisions of the
Statement are effective for exit or activities that are initiated after December
31, 2002. The Company does not expect that the adoption of SFAS No. 146 will
have a material effect on its operations.