FORM 6-K
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 6-K
Report of Foreign Private Issuer
Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16 of
The Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the month of September, 2006
General Company of Geophysics
(Translation of Registrants Name Into English)
1, rue Léon Migaux 91341 Massy France (33) 1 64 47 3000 (Address of principal executive offices)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports under cover of Form 20-F or Form 40-F.
Form 20-F þ Form 40-F o
(Indicate by check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the information contained in this form is also thereby
furnishing the information to the Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.)
Yes o No þ
(If Yes is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the registrant in connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): 82 - .)
Page 1
Compagnie generale de Geophysique, S.A.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This document includes forward-looking statements. We have based these forward-looking
statements on our current views and assumptions about future events.
These forward-looking statements are subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions we have
made, including, among other things:
|
|
changes in international economic and political conditions, and in particular in oil and gas prices; |
|
|
|
our ability to reduce costs; |
|
|
|
our ability to finance our operations on acceptable terms; |
|
|
|
the timely development and acceptance of our new products and services; |
|
|
|
the effects of competition; |
|
|
|
political, legal and other developments in foreign countries; |
|
|
|
the timing and extent of changes in exchange rates for non-U.S. currencies and interest rates; |
|
|
|
the accuracy of our assessment of risks related to acquisitions, projects and contracts, and whether these risks
materialize; |
|
|
|
our ability to integrate successfully the businesses or assets we acquire, including Exploration Resources ASA; |
|
|
|
our ability to sell our seismic data library; |
|
|
|
our ability to access the debt and equity markets during the periods covered by the forward-looking statements, which
will depend on general market conditions and on our credit ratings for our debt obligations; and |
|
|
|
our success at managing the risks of the foregoing. |
We undertake no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a
result of new information, future events or otherwise. In light of these risks, uncertainties and
assumptions, the forward-looking events discussed in this document might not occur.
Page 3
Compagnie generale de Geophysique, S.A.
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
COMPAGNIE GÉNÉRALE DE GÉOPHYSIQUE, S.A.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2006 |
|
December 31, |
(in millions of euros) |
|
Notes |
|
(unaudited) |
|
2005 (audited) |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
206.4 |
|
|
|
112.4 |
|
Trade accounts and notes receivable, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
279.8 |
|
|
|
297.5 |
|
Inventories and work-in-progress, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
164.8 |
|
|
|
139.5 |
|
Income tax assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.5 |
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
Other current assets, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
72.5 |
|
|
|
41.5 |
|
Assets held for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
Total current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
738.0 |
|
|
|
604.5 |
|
Deferred tax assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
30.3 |
|
|
|
31.6 |
|
Investments and other financial assets, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.2 |
|
|
|
15.3 |
|
Investments in companies under equity method |
|
|
|
|
|
|
43.6 |
|
|
|
44.4 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
484.8 |
|
|
|
480.1 |
|
Goodwill and intangible assets, net |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
360.7 |
|
|
|
389.2 |
|
Total non-current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
935.6 |
|
|
|
960.6 |
|
TOTAL ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,673.6 |
|
|
|
1,565.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank overdrafts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.2 |
|
|
|
9.3 |
|
Current portion of financial debt |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
38.3 |
|
|
|
157.9 |
|
Trade accounts and notes payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
140.1 |
|
|
|
178.5 |
|
Accrued payroll costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
63.7 |
|
|
|
57.8 |
|
Income taxes payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
33.6 |
|
|
|
29.3 |
|
Advance billings to customers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
27.3 |
|
|
|
19.5 |
|
Provisions current portion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
15.4 |
|
|
|
17.7 |
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.7 |
|
|
|
35.2 |
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
367.3 |
|
|
|
505.2 |
|
Deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
45.1 |
|
|
|
56.9 |
|
Provisions non-current portion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.7 |
|
|
|
18.4 |
|
Financial debt |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
393.4 |
|
|
|
242.4 |
|
Derivative on convertible bonds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.3 |
|
Other non-current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
21.6 |
|
|
|
20.7 |
|
Total non-current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
480.8 |
|
|
|
349.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, 26 610 299 shares authorized
17 485 446 shares with a 2
nominal value issued and
outstanding at June 30,
2006; 17,081,680 at December 31, 2005 |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
35.0 |
|
|
|
34.2 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
389.5 |
|
|
|
372.3 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
314.7 |
|
|
|
291.0 |
|
Treasury shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
(1.1 |
) |
Net income (loss) for the
period Attributable to the Group |
|
|
|
|
|
|
75.3 |
|
|
|
(7.8 |
) |
Income and expense recognized
directly in equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.4 |
|
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
Cumulative translation adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20.7 |
) |
|
|
11.3 |
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
802.6 |
|
|
|
698.5 |
|
Minority interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
22.9 |
|
|
|
11.7 |
|
Total shareholders equity
and minority interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
825.5 |
|
|
|
710.2 |
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,673.6 |
|
|
|
1,565.1 |
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
Page 4
Compagnie generale de Geophysique, S.A.
COMPAGNIE GÉNÉRALE DE GÉOPHYSIQUE, S.A.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended |
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
(in millions of euros, except per share data) |
|
Notes |
| | |
|
|
restated (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
restated (1) |
|
Operating revenues |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
634.5 |
|
|
|
387.0 |
|
|
|
312.4 |
|
|
|
192.6 |
|
Other income from ordinary activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
Total income from ordinary activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
635.4 |
|
|
|
387.8 |
|
|
|
312.9 |
|
|
|
193.2 |
|
|
Cost of operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(420.4 |
) |
|
|
(298.2 |
) |
|
|
(218.3 |
) |
|
|
(145.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
215.0 |
|
|
|
89.6 |
|
|
|
94.6 |
|
|
|
47.5 |
|
|
Research and development expenses net |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
(18.4 |
) |
|
|
(14.8 |
) |
|
|
(9.6 |
) |
|
|
(7.1 |
) |
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(60.3 |
) |
|
|
(41.9 |
) |
|
|
(31.7 |
) |
|
|
(22.1 |
) |
Other revenues (expenses) net |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
9.8 |
|
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
8.3 |
|
|
|
(1.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
146.1 |
|
|
|
32.1 |
|
|
|
61.6 |
|
|
|
16.6 |
|
|
Expenses related to financial debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16.1 |
) |
|
|
(21.2 |
) |
|
|
(7.8 |
) |
|
|
(15.4 |
) |
Income provided by cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
Cost of financial debt, net |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
(13.1 |
) |
|
|
(19.6 |
) |
|
|
(6.1 |
) |
|
|
(14.2 |
) |
Derivative
and other expenses on convertible bonds |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
(23.0 |
) |
|
|
(14.7 |
) |
|
|
(10.6 |
) |
|
|
0.3 |
|
Other financial income (loss) |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
(6.6 |
) |
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
(4.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from
consolidated companies before
income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
103.4 |
|
|
|
(1.5 |
) |
|
|
40.0 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
Income taxes |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
(33.0 |
) |
|
|
(14.8 |
) |
|
|
(13.4 |
) |
|
|
(6.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
from consolidated companies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
70.4 |
|
|
|
(16.3 |
) |
|
|
26.6 |
|
|
|
(3.8 |
) |
|
Equity in income (losses) of affiliates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
|
6.7 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
76.2 |
|
|
|
(9.6 |
) |
|
|
29.7 |
|
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
Attributable to : |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
75.3 |
|
|
|
(9.6 |
) |
|
|
29.1 |
|
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
Minority interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
average number of shares outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,219,465 |
|
|
|
11,736,024 |
|
|
|
17,246,720 |
|
|
|
11,709,348 |
|
Dilutive
potential shares from stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
364,461 |
|
|
|
189,706 |
|
|
|
384,479 |
|
|
|
197,910 |
|
Dilutive potential shares
from convertible bonds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,400,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,400,000 |
|
Dilutive weighted
average number of shares
outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,583,926 |
|
|
|
11,736,024 |
|
|
|
17,631,198 |
|
|
|
11,709,348 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.37 |
|
|
|
(0.82 |
) |
|
|
1.69 |
|
|
|
(0.07 |
) |
Diluted (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.28 |
|
|
|
(0.82 |
) |
|
|
1.65 |
|
|
|
(0.07 |
) |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Restatement of IFRS financial statements based on same standards than those used in our 20F
for the year ended December 31, 2005 filed with the SEC on May 9, 2006. |
|
(2) |
|
Stock options and convertible bonds had an anti-dilutive effect for the three months and
the six months periods ended June 30, 2005; as a consequence, potential shares linked to
those instruments are not taken into account in the adjusted dilutive weighted average
number of shares, nor in the calculation of diluted loss per share. |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
Page 5
Compagnie generale de Geophysique, S.A.
COMPAGNIE GÉNÉRALE DE GÉOPHYSIQUE, S.A.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
(in millions of euros) |
|
|
|
|
|
restated (1) |
|
OPERATING |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
76.2 |
|
|
|
(9.6 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
48.2 |
|
|
|
32.1 |
|
Multi-client surveys amortization |
|
|
38.6 |
|
|
|
31.3 |
|
Variance on provisions |
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
Expense & income calculated on stock-option |
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
Net gain on disposal of fixed assets |
|
|
(6.7 |
) |
|
|
0.8 |
|
Equity in income of affiliates |
|
|
(5.8 |
) |
|
|
(6.7 |
) |
Dividends received from affiliates |
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
Other non-cash items |
|
|
28.7 |
|
|
|
13.5 |
|
Net cash including net cost of financial debt and income taxes |
|
|
187.3 |
|
|
|
65.1 |
|
Less net cost of financial debt |
|
|
13.1 |
|
|
|
19.6 |
|
Less income taxes expenses |
|
|
33.0 |
|
|
|
14.8 |
|
Net cash excluding net cost of financial debt and income taxes |
|
|
233.4 |
|
|
|
99.5 |
|
Income taxes paid |
|
|
(37.9 |
) |
|
|
(17.3 |
) |
Net cash before changes in working capital |
|
|
195.5 |
|
|
|
82.2 |
|
- change in trade accounts and notes receivable |
|
|
(8.3 |
) |
|
|
(21.0 |
) |
- change in inventories and work in progress |
|
|
(22.4 |
) |
|
|
(7.6 |
) |
- change in other current assets |
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
5.5 |
|
- change in trade accounts and notes payable |
|
|
(19.1 |
) |
|
|
11.1 |
|
- change in other current liabilities |
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
Impact of changes in exchange rate |
|
|
(11.6 |
) |
|
|
7.4 |
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
142.0 |
|
|
|
77.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTING |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchases of tangible & intangible assets
(included variation of fixed assets suppliers) |
|
|
(94.0 |
) |
|
|
(36.8 |
) |
Investments in multi-client surveys |
|
|
(26.5 |
) |
|
|
(15.0 |
) |
Proceeds from disposals tangible & intangible |
|
|
5.6 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
Total net proceeds from financial assets |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition in investments, net of cash and cash equivalents acquired |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variation in loans granted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
Variation in subsidies for Capital Expenditures |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
Variation in other non-current financial assets |
|
|
(2.2 |
) |
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
Net cash from investing activities |
|
|
(116.7 |
) |
|
|
(51.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCING |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of long-term debt |
|
|
(128.4 |
) |
|
|
(177.6 |
) |
Total issuance of long-term debt |
|
|
214.1 |
|
|
|
139.1 |
|
Reimbursement on leasing |
|
|
(14.9 |
) |
|
|
(7.0 |
) |
Change in short-term loans |
|
|
8.5 |
|
|
|
5.4 |
|
Financial interest paid |
|
|
(12.1 |
) |
|
|
(21.0 |
) |
Net proceeds from capital increase : |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- from shareholders |
|
|
6.8 |
|
|
|
5.8 |
|
- from minority interest of integrated companies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid and share capital reimbursements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- to shareholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- to minority interest of integrated companies |
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
Buying & sales from treasury shares |
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
77.1 |
|
|
|
(55.3 |
) |
|
Effects of exchange rate changes on cash |
|
|
(8.4 |
) |
|
|
11.6 |
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
94.0 |
|
|
|
(17.5 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year |
|
|
112.4 |
|
|
|
130.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
|
206.4 |
|
|
|
113.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Restatement of IFRS financial statements based on same standards than those used in
our 20F for the year ended December 31, 2005 filed with the SEC on May 9, 2006. |
Page 6
Compagnie
generale de geophysique, S.A.
COMPAGNIE GÉNÉRALE DE GÉOPHYSIQUE, S.A.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
recognized |
|
Cumulative |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
shareholders |
|
|
shares |
|
Share |
|
paid-in |
|
Retained |
|
|
|
|
|
directly |
|
translation |
|
shareholders |
|
Minority |
|
equity and minority |
|
|
issued |
|
capital |
|
capital |
|
earnings |
|
Treasury shares |
|
in equity |
|
adjustment |
|
equity |
|
interests |
|
interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions of euros) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at
January 01, 2005 |
|
|
11,682,218 |
|
|
|
23.4 |
|
|
|
173.4 |
|
|
|
208.1 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
(17.2 |
) |
|
|
393.3 |
|
|
|
9.1 |
|
|
|
402.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital increase |
|
|
114,622 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9.6 |
) |
Cost of
share-based payment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
0.1 |
|
Transactions
with treasury
shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
Financial
instruments : |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
variance and
transfer to income
statement (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8.7 |
) |
Foreign
currency
translation: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
variance and
transfer to income
statement (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26.2 |
|
|
|
26.2 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
27.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income and
expense recognized
directly in equity
(1) + (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8.7 |
) |
|
|
26.2 |
|
|
|
17.5 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
17.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Others (a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(54.2 |
) |
|
|
53.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June
30, 2005 restated
(b) |
|
|
11,796,840 |
|
|
|
23.6 |
|
|
|
125.1 |
|
|
|
252.5 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
(4.6 |
) |
|
|
9.0 |
|
|
|
407.5 |
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
|
417.6 |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
deduction from issuance premium for allocation to the carry forward |
|
(b) |
|
restatement of IFRS financial statements based on same standards than those used in our 20F for the year ended December 31, 2005 filed with the SEC on May 9, 2006. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
recognized |
|
Cumulative |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
shareholders |
|
|
shares |
|
Share |
|
paid-in |
|
Retained |
|
|
|
|
|
directly |
|
translation |
|
shareholders |
|
Minority |
|
equity and minority |
|
|
issued |
|
capital |
|
capital |
|
earnings |
|
Treasury shares |
|
in equity |
|
adjustment |
|
equity |
|
interests |
|
interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(amounts in millions of euros) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at
January 01, 2006 |
|
|
17,081,680 |
|
|
|
34.2 |
|
|
|
372.3 |
|
|
|
283.2 |
|
|
|
(1.1 |
) |
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
|
|
11.3 |
|
|
|
698.5 |
|
|
|
11.7 |
|
|
|
710.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital increase |
|
|
128, 852 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.9 |
|
Conversion of
convertible bonds |
|
|
274,914 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
10.6 |
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75.3 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
76.2 |
|
Cost of
share-based payment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
1.1 |
|
Transactions
with treasury
shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
Actuarial
gains/losses on
pension plans (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
Financial
instruments : |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
variance and
transfer to income
statement (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.7 |
|
Financial
assets available
for sale : variance
and transfer to
income statement
(3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
Foreign
currency
translation: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
variance and
transfer to income
statement (4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(32.0 |
) |
|
|
(32.0 |
) |
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
(32.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income and
expense recognized
directly in equity
(1) + (2) + (3) +
(4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.8 |
|
|
|
(32.0 |
) |
|
|
(25.2 |
) |
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
(26.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Others (a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.4 |
|
|
|
11.4 |
|
|
Balance at June
30, 2006 |
|
|
17,485,446 |
|
|
|
35.0 |
|
|
|
389.5 |
|
|
|
390.0 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
6.4 |
|
|
|
(20.7 |
) |
|
|
802.6 |
|
|
|
22.9 |
|
|
|
825.5 |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Sale of 49% of CGG Ardiseis to minority shareholders. |
Page 7
Compagnie generale de geophysique, S.A.
Statement of incomes and expenses attributable to shareholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June, 30 |
|
|
June, 30 |
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
restated (1) |
|
|
|
(in millions of euros) |
|
Net income |
|
|
75.3 |
|
|
|
(9.6 |
) |
Actuarial gains and losses on pension plans |
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Variance in fair value of hedging instruments |
|
|
7.7 |
|
|
|
(8.7 |
) |
Variance in fair value of available-for-sale financial assets |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Variance in foreign currency translation adjustment |
|
|
(32.0 |
) |
|
|
26.2 |
|
|
Incomes and expenses recognized directly in equity for the period |
|
|
50.1 |
|
|
|
7.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Restatement of IFRS financial statements based on same standards than those used in
our 20F for the year ended December 31, 2005 filed with the SEC on May 9, 2006. |
Page 8
Compagnie generale de geophysique, S.A.
COMPAGNIE GÉNÉRALE DE GÉOPHYSIQUE, S.A.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
Note 1Summary of significant accounting policies
Compagnie Générale de Géophysique, S.A. (the Company) and its subsidiaries (together, the
Group) is a global participant in the geophysical services industry, providing a wide range of
seismic data acquisition, processing and interpretation services as well as related processing and
interpretation software to clients in the oil and gas exploration and production business. It is
also a global manufacturer of geophysical equipment.
Pursuant to European regulation n°1606/2002 dated July 19, 2002, the accompanying consolidated
financial statements have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting
Standards (IFRS) and its interpretations adopted by the International Accounting Standards Board
(IASB) at June 30, 2006.
International Financial Reporting Standards differ in certain significant respects from
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (U.S. GAAP). Note 17 describes the
principal differences between IFRS and U.S. GAAP as they relate to the Group, and reconciles net
income at and for the six months periods ended June 30, 2006 and June 30, 2005 and shareholders
equity at June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005 to U.S. GAAP.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with IFRS requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure
of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported
amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from
those estimates.
Critical Accounting Policies
Our significant accounting policies, which we have applied in preparing our interim
consolidated financial statements at and for the six months ended June 30, 2006 are the same as
those applied in preparing our consolidated financial statements at and for the year ended December
31, 2005, as described in our 20F for the year ended December 31, 2006 filed with the SEC on May 9,
2006.
The following Standards and Interpretations have been effective since January 1, 2006:
IFRS 6 Exploration for and evaluation of mineral resources
Amendment to IAS 19 Employee benefits Actuarial gains and losses, Group Plans and Disclosures
Amendment to IAS 21 Net investment in a foreign operation
Amendment to IAS 39 Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement The Fair Value Option
Amendment to IAS 39 Cash-flow Hedge Accounting of Forecast Intragroup Transactions
Amendment to IAS 39 and to IFRS 4 Financial Guarantees Contracts
Amendment to IFRS 1 and to IFRS 6 First time adoption of IFRS 6
IFRIC 4 Determining whether an arrangement contains a lease
IFRIC 5 Rights to interests arising from decommissioning, restoration and environmental rehabilitation funds
IFRIC 6 Liabilities arising from Participating in a Specific Market Waste electrical and Electronic equipment
These Standards and Interpretations had no significant impact on our consolidated financial
statements.
At the date of issuance of these financial statements, the following Standards and Interpretations
were issued but not yet effective:
IFRS 7 Financial instruments Disclosures
Amendment to IAS 1 Presentation of financial statements: Capital disclosures
IFRIC 7 Applying the restatement approach under IAS 29 Financial reporting in hyperinflationary economies
IFRIC 8 Scope of IFRS 2
IFRIC 9 Reassessment of embedded derivatives
IFRIC 10 Interim Financial Reporting and Impairment
We are currently reviewing these Standards and Interpretations to measure the potential impact on
our consolidated financial statements. At this stage, we do not anticipate any significant impact.
Page 9
Compagnie
generale de geophysique, S.A.
Note 2Acquisitions and divestitures
On March 27, 2006, we signed a Memorandum of Understanding with Industrialization & Energy Services
Company (TAQA), our long term Saudi Partner in Argas (Arabian Geophysical and Surveying Company),
which is 51% owned by TAQA and 49% by us. Following this agreement, on June 24, 2006, TAQA acquired
49% of the capital of CGG Ardiseis, a newly formed CGG subsidiary dedicated to land and shallow
water seismic data acquisition in the Middle East, and we kept a 51% interest. CGG Ardiseis, whose
headquarters are located in Dubai, provides its clients with the complete range of CGG land and
shallow water acquisition services, focusing on Eye-D, the latest CGG technology for full 3D
seismic imaging. As part of the agreement, CGG Ardiseis activities in the Gulf Cooperation Council
countries (GCC) are operated by Argas.
Note 3 Property, plant and equipment
Analysis of Property, plant and equipment is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2006 |
|
December 31, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
(in millions of euros) |
|
Gross |
|
depreciation |
|
Net |
|
Gross |
|
depreciation |
|
Net |
|
Land |
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
4.5 |
|
Buildings |
|
|
60.3 |
|
|
|
(30.2 |
) |
|
|
30.1 |
|
|
|
60.3 |
|
|
|
(29.6 |
) |
|
|
30.7 |
|
Machinery & equipment |
|
|
445.2 |
|
|
|
(257.6 |
) |
|
|
187.6 |
|
|
|
457.0 |
|
|
|
(295.9 |
) |
|
|
161.1 |
|
Vehicles & vessels |
|
|
335.6 |
|
|
|
(90.6 |
) |
|
|
245.0 |
|
|
|
373.1 |
|
|
|
(104.3 |
) |
|
|
268.8 |
|
Other tangible assets |
|
|
37.1 |
|
|
|
(26.7 |
) |
|
|
10.4 |
|
|
|
35.8 |
|
|
|
(25.9 |
) |
|
|
9.9 |
|
Assets under constructions |
|
|
7.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.4 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
Total Property, plant and equipment |
|
|
890.1 |
|
|
|
(405.3 |
) |
|
|
484.8 |
|
|
|
936.0 |
|
|
|
(455.9 |
) |
|
|
480.1 |
|
|
In addition, seismic equipment no longer in use and held to be sold was reclassified as
Assets held for sale for 3.5 million at December 31, 2005. The seismic equipment was sold in
February 2006 for 5.0 million.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
Variations of the period (in millions of euros) |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
Balance at beginning of period |
|
|
480.1 |
|
|
|
204.1 |
|
Acquisitions |
|
|
87.4 |
|
|
|
107.7 |
|
Acquisitions through capital lease |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
17.4 |
|
Depreciation |
|
|
(43.5 |
) |
|
|
(67.9 |
) |
Disposals |
|
|
(4.1 |
) |
|
|
(6.0 |
) |
Changes in exchange rates |
|
|
(28.6 |
) |
|
|
35.2 |
|
Changes in scope of consolidation |
|
|
(6.6 |
) |
|
|
195.1 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5.5 |
) |
|
Balance at end of period |
|
|
484.8 |
|
|
|
480.1 |
|
|
The change in scope of consolidation corresponds in 2005 to the acquisition of Exploration
Resources and in 2006 to the adjustment of the fair value of Exploration Resources fixed assets
acquired in 2005.
Reconciliation of acquisitions with the cash-flow statement and capital expenditures in note 8 is
as follows :
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
(in millions of euros) |
|
2006 |
|
Acquisitions of tangible assets (excluding capital lease) see above |
|
|
87.4 |
|
Development costs capitalized see note 4 |
|
|
5.3 |
|
Additions in other intangible assets (excluding non-exclusive surveys) see note 4 |
|
|
1.0 |
|
Variance of fixed assets suppliers |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
Total purchases of tangible and intangible assets according to cash-flow statement |
|
|
94.0 |
|
|
Acquisitions through capital lease see above |
|
|
0.1 |
|
Increase in multi-clients surveys see note 4 |
|
|
26.5 |
|
Less variance of fixed assets suppliers |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
Capital expenditures according to note 8 |
|
|
120.3 |
|
|
Page 10
Compagnie
generale de geophysique, S.A.
Note 4Goodwill and Intangible assets
Analysis of goodwill and intangible assets is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2006 |
|
December 31, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
(in millions of euros) |
|
Gross |
|
depreciation |
|
Net |
|
Gross |
|
depreciation |
|
Net |
|
Goodwill of consolidated subsidiaries |
|
|
238.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
238.5 |
|
|
|
252.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
252.9 |
|
Multi-clients surveys |
|
|
579.6 |
|
|
|
(500.2 |
) |
|
|
79.4 |
|
|
|
568.4 |
|
|
|
(474.8 |
) |
|
|
93.6 |
|
Development costs capitalized |
|
|
33.6 |
|
|
|
(5.4 |
) |
|
|
28.2 |
|
|
|
29.2 |
|
|
|
(3.9 |
) |
|
|
25.3 |
|
Software |
|
|
26.0 |
|
|
|
(20.4 |
) |
|
|
5.6 |
|
|
|
25.9 |
|
|
|
(19.5 |
) |
|
|
6.4 |
|
Other intangible assets |
|
|
18.3 |
|
|
|
(9.3 |
) |
|
|
9.0 |
|
|
|
19.6 |
|
|
|
(8.6 |
) |
|
|
11.0 |
|
|
Total Goodwill and Intangible assets |
|
|
896.0 |
|
|
|
(535.3 |
) |
|
|
360.7 |
|
|
|
896.0 |
|
|
|
(506.8 |
) |
|
|
389.2 |
|
|
On March 31, 2006, the Norwegian government decided not to award exploration-production licenses on
blocks covered by one of our surveys (Moere). As this decision changed our previous estimate of
future sales, this 4.6 million survey was fully depreciated at March 31, 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
Variations of the period (in millions of euros) |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
Balance at beginning of period |
|
|
389.2 |
|
|
|
225.2 |
|
Additions in goodwill |
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
177.1 |
|
Increase in multi-clients surveys |
|
|
26.5 |
|
|
|
32.0 |
|
Development costs capitalized |
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
8.2 |
|
Other acquisitions |
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
Depreciation on multi-client surveys |
|
|
(38.6 |
) |
|
|
(69.6 |
) |
Other depreciation |
|
|
(4.6 |
) |
|
|
(8.4 |
) |
Disposals |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Changes in exchange rates |
|
|
(20.9 |
) |
|
|
22.4 |
|
Other |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
|
360.7 |
|
|
|
389.2 |
|
|
Additions in goodwill corresponds in 2005 to the acquisition of Exploration Resources and in 2006
to the adjustment of the fair value of Exploration Resources assets acquired and liabilities
assumed in 2005 (net of deferred tax).
Note 5 Financial debt
Analysis of financial debt by type is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2006 |
|
December 31, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non- |
|
|
(in millions of euros) |
|
Current |
|
current |
|
Total |
|
Current |
|
current |
|
Total |
|
Outstanding bonds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
254.3 |
|
|
|
254.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
146.3 |
|
|
|
146.3 |
|
Bank loans |
|
|
25.9 |
|
|
|
80.6 |
|
|
|
106.5 |
|
|
|
135.9 |
|
|
|
28.8 |
|
|
|
164.7 |
|
Capital lease obligations |
|
|
9.7 |
|
|
|
58.5 |
|
|
|
68.2 |
|
|
|
20.1 |
|
|
|
67.3 |
|
|
|
87.4 |
|
|
Sub-total |
|
|
35.6 |
|
|
|
393.4 |
|
|
|
429.0 |
|
|
|
156.0 |
|
|
|
242.4 |
|
|
|
398.4 |
|
|
Accrued interest |
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
38.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
157.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At June 30, 2006, 165.7 million of bank loans and capital lease obligations were secured by
tangible assets and receivables.
Page 11
Compagnie
generale de geophysique, S.A.
Analysis of financial debt (including amounts due within one year) by currency is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
(in millions of euros) |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
Euro |
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
11.8 |
|
U.S. dollar |
|
|
426.9 |
|
|
|
385.6 |
|
Other currencies |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
429.0 |
|
|
|
398.4 |
|
|
Analysis of financial debt (including amounts due within one year) by interest rate is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
(in millions of euros) |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
Variable
rates (effective rate June 30, 2006: 6.38%; December 31, 2005: 7.60%) |
|
|
95.2 |
|
|
|
156.6 |
|
Fixed rates
(effective rate June 30, 2006: 7.24%; December 31, 2005: 7.06%) |
|
|
333.8 |
|
|
|
241.8 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
429.0 |
|
|
|
398.4 |
|
|
Variable interest rates generally are based on inter-bank offered rates of the related currency.
The weighted average interest rate on bank overdrafts was 8.83% and 7.81% at June 30, 2006 and
December 31, 2005 respectively.
At June 30, 2006 the Group had 4.5 million available in unused short-term credit lines and
overdraft facilities and 31.5 million in unused long-term credit lines with a maturity date
less than one year away.
71/2 Senior Notes due 2015 Additional notes
On February 3, 2006, we issued an additional $165 million principal amount of our
dollar-denominated 71/2% Senior Notes due 2015 issued in April 2005 in a private placement to certain
eligible investors. The notes were issued at a price of 1031/4% of their principal amount, resulting
in a Yield-to-Worst of 6.9%. The net proceeds from the notes were used on February 10, 2006 to
repay the $140.3 million remaining outstanding under our $375 million bridge credit facility used
to finance the acquisition of Exploration Resources and for general corporate purposes.
Additional asset financing agreement
On March 13, 2006, CGG Marine Resources Norge AS concluded an asset financing agreement for
U.S.$26.5 million with a bank. The purpose of this agreement was to finance the acquisition of
newly-developed Sentinel streamers for the vessel Symphony. This financing agreement is
guaranteed by a pledge on the streamers. At June 30, 2006, this facility was fully drawn.
Additional credit line
On March 29, 2006, Exploration Resources concluded a credit facility of U.S.$70 million. The
proceeds from this credit facility were used to finance the conversion of the Geo-Challenger from a
cable laying vessel to a 3D seismic vessel and seismic equipment for the vessels C-Orion and
Geo-Challenger. At June 30, 2006, this facility was fully drawn.
Conversion of the remaining part of our 7.75% $85 million convertible bonds due 2012, with
nominal value of $15.3 million
Approximately $70 million of our 7.75% convertible bonds due 2012 were converted in November 2005.
A general meeting of bondholders, held on April 5, 2006, and a general meeting of CGG shareholders,
held on May 11, 2006, approved a change to the terms and conditions of the remaining convertible
bonds to grant bondholders a right to cash payment upon immediate conversion of the bonds. The
early conversion period was open on May 12, 2006 only. At the conclusion of the conversion period,
all the remaining 2,525 convertible bonds were converted, leading to the issuance of 274,914 new
shares. The Group paid a total premium of $2.1 million (1.6 million) to the bondholders who
converted. This premium has been recognized as an expense under the line item Derivative and other
expenses on convertible bonds in the income statement for the six months period ended June 30,
2006. In addition, the deferred issuance costs attached to the remaining 2,525 convertible bonds
were written-off in connection with the early conversion, corresponding to a 0.7 million
expense under the line item Derivative and other expenses on convertible bonds in the income
statement for the six months period ended June 30, 2006.
Page 12
Compagnie generale de geophysique, S.A.
A component of our convertible bonds due 2012 denominated in U.S. dollars constituted an embedded
derivative as the shares to be issued upon conversion are denominated in Euro. A portion of the
issuance proceeds was deemed to relate to the fair value of the derivative on issuance and
subsequent changes in fair value of the derivative were recorded through earnings. The allocation
of a portion of the proceeds to the derivative created a discount on issuance that was being
amortized to earnings over the life of the bonds.
The fair value of the embedded derivative has been determined using a binomial model. The fair
value increased from
11.3 million
at December, 31, 2005 to
32.0 million
at May 12, 2006 at
the date of the conversion of the remaining 2,525 convertible bonds due 2012. Then, at the
conversion, the 32.0 million derivative was reclassified in reserves in the balance sheet.
The global increase of 20.7 million in the value of the derivative from January 1, 2006 to May
12, 2006 is mainly explained by the increase in the CGG share price, although, as regards the
derivative related to the bonds effectively converted in May 2006, the value was reduced by the
time-component as a result of the conversion into shares, for an amount of 1.6 million.
The 20.7 million increase in the value of the derivative together with the 1.6 million
premium paid and the 0.7 million deferred issuance costs written of resulted in aggregate
expense of 23.0 million in the six months period ended June 30, 2006, accounted for as
Derivative and other expenses on convertible bonds in the income statement.
Note 6 Financial Instruments
Foreign currency exposure management
The reporting currency for the Groups consolidated financial statements is the euro. However, as a
result of having primarily customers that operate in the oil and gas industry, more than 90% of the
Groups operating revenues are denominated in currencies other than the euro, primarily the U.S.
dollar.
As a result, the Groups sales and operating income are exposed to the effects of fluctuations in
the value of the euro versus the U.S. dollar. A strengthening of the euro compared to the U.S.
dollar has a negative effect on the Groups net sales and operating income denominated in U.S.
dollars when translated to euro, while a weakening of the euro has a positive effect. In addition,
the Groups exposure to fluctuations in the euro / U.S. dollar exchange rate has considerably
increased over the last few years due to increased sales outside of Europe.
In order to improve the balance of its net position of receivables and payables denominated in
foreign currencies, the Group maintains a portion of its financing in U.S. dollars. At June 30,
2006 and at December 31, 2005, the Groups financial debt denominated in U.S. dollars amounted to
U.S.$541.7 million (426.1 million) and U.S.$454.9 million (385.6 million), respectively.
In addition, to protect against the reduction in the value of future foreign currency cash flows,
the Group follows a policy of selling U.S. dollars forward at average contract maturity dates that
the Group attempts to match with future net U.S. dollar cash flows (revenues less costs in U.S.
dollars) to be generated by firm contract commitments in its backlog generally over the ensuing six
months. A similar policy, to a lesser extent, is carried out with respect to contracts denominated
in British pounds. This foreign currency risk management strategy has enabled the Group to reduce,
but not eliminate, the positive or negative effects of exchange movements with respect to these
currencies.
Page 13
Compagnie generale de geophysique, S.A.
Details of forward exchange contracts are as follows :
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
Forward sales of U.S. dollars against euros |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional amount (in millions of U.S.$) |
|
|
305.3 |
|
|
|
183.6 |
|
-of which forward sales qualifying as cash-flow hedges |
|
|
305.3 |
|
|
|
183.6 |
|
-of which forward sales not qualifying as cash-flow
hedges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average maturity |
|
135 days |
|
91 days |
Weighted average forward U.S.$/Euro exchange rate |
|
|
1.2287 |
|
|
|
1.2048 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forward sales of U.S. dollars against British pounds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional amount (in millions of U.S.$) |
|
|
10.3 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
|
-of which forward sales qualifying as cash-flow hedges |
|
|
10.3 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
|
-of which forward sales not qualifying as cash-flow
hedges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average maturity |
|
84 days |
|
90 days |
Weighted average forward U.S.$/G.B. pounds exchange rate |
|
|
1.7761 |
|
|
|
1.8871 |
|
|
Effect of forward exchange contracts on financial statements are as follows :
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
(in millions of euros) |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
Carrying value of forward exchange contracts |
|
|
6.4 |
|
|
|
(4.7) |
|
Fair value of forward exchange contracts |
|
|
6.4 |
|
|
|
(4.7) |
|
Gains recognized in profit and loss |
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Losses recognized in profit and loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.9) |
|
Gains recognized directly in equity |
|
|
7.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
Losses recognized directly in equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5.6) |
|
|
Interest rate risk management
No interest rate cap agreement was subscribed during the first six months of 2006.
Fair value information
The carrying amounts and fair values of the Groups financial instruments are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2006 |
|
December 31, 2005 |
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
Fair |
|
Carrying |
|
Fair |
(in millions of euros) |
|
Amount |
|
Value |
|
Amount |
|
Value |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
206.4 |
|
|
|
206.4 |
|
|
|
112.4 |
|
|
|
112.4 |
|
Bank overdraft facilities |
|
|
17.2 |
|
|
|
17.2 |
|
|
|
9.3 |
|
|
|
9.3 |
|
Bank loans, vendor equipment
financing and shareholder loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variable rate |
|
|
95.2 |
|
|
|
95.2 |
|
|
|
156.6 |
|
|
|
156.6 |
|
Fixed rate |
|
|
333.8 |
|
|
|
338.7 |
|
|
|
241.8 |
|
|
|
244.0 |
|
Foreign currency exchange contracts |
|
|
6.4 |
|
|
|
6.4 |
|
|
|
(4.7 |
) |
|
|
(4.7 |
) |
|
Note 7 Common stock and stock option plans
At June 30, 2006, the Companys share capital consisted of 17,485,446 shares, each with a nominal
value of 2.
Dividend rights
Dividends may be distributed from the statutory retained earnings, subject to the requirements of
French law and the Companys Articles of Association (statuts). Retained earnings available for
distribution at the holding company, CGG S.A., totaled 461.5 million at June 30, 2006.
Page 14
Compagnie generale de geophysique, S.A.
Stock options
Pursuant to various resolutions adopted by the Board of Directors according to the authorizations
voted by the General Shareholders meeting, the Group has granted options to purchase Ordinary
Shares to certain employees, executive officers and directors of the Group.
Options granted under the provisions of the 2000 option plan which expires eight years from the
date of grant could not generally be exercised before 2003 and for the options to subscribe 1,000
shares or more, the shares resulting from the exercise of those options could not be sold before
January 18, 2005.
Options granted under the provisions of the 2001 option plan, which expires eight years from
the date of grant, are vested by one fifth each year from March 2001 and could not generally be
exercised before 2004 and for the options to subscribe 1,000 shares or more, the shares resulting
from the exercise of those options could not be sold before January 18, 2005.
Options granted under the 2002 option plan, which expires eight years from the date of grant,
are vested by one fifth each year from May 2002 and could not generally be exercised before 2005.
Moreover, for options to subscribe 1,000 shares or more, the shares resulting from the exercise of
those options could not be sold before May 15, 2006.
Options granted under the 2003 option plan, which expires eight years from the date of grant, are
vested by one-fourth each year from May 2003 and could not generally be exercised before May 16,
2006. Moreover, for options to subscribe 1,000 shares or more, the shares resulting from the
exercise of those options could not be sold before May 17, 2007.
Options granted under the 2006 option plan, which expires eight years from the date of grant, are
vested by one fourth each year from May 2006 and could not generally be exercised before May 2010.
Moreover, for options to subscribe 1,000 shares or more, the shares resulting from the exercise of
those options could not be sold before May, 2010. Out of the 202,500 options granted in May 2006,
136,000 were granted to the executive managers of the Group.
The exercise price for each option is the average fair market value for the common stock during the
20 trading days ending on the trading day next proceeding the date the option is granted.
According to IFRS 2, fair value of stock-options granted since November 7, 2002 (in the May 2003
and May 2006 plans) was recognized as an expense over the life of the plan, which represented a
1.1 million expense on the six months period ended June 30, 2006 (of which 0.7 million for
the executive managers of the Group).
Information relating to options outstanding at June 30, 2006 is summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options |
|
Exercise |
|
Fair value |
|
|
|
|
Options |
|
outstanding at |
|
price per |
|
per share at |
|
|
Date of Board of Directors Resolution |
|
granted |
|
June 30, 2006 |
|
share |
|
the grant date |
|
Expiration date |
|
January 18, 2000 |
|
|
231,000 |
|
|
|
93,226 |
|
|
|
45.83 |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
January 17, 2008 |
March 14, 2001 |
|
|
256,000 |
|
|
|
184,108 |
|
|
|
65.39 |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
March 13, 2009 |
May 15, 2002 |
|
|
138,100 |
|
|
|
113,580 |
|
|
|
39.92 |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
May 14, 2010 |
May 15, 2003 |
|
|
169,900 |
|
|
|
171,662 |
|
|
|
14.53 |
|
|
|
11.13 |
(b) |
|
May 14, 2011 |
May 11, 2006 |
|
|
202,500 |
|
|
|
202,150 |
|
|
|
131.26 |
|
|
|
74.83 |
(c) |
|
May 10, 2014 |
|
Total |
|
|
997,500 |
|
|
|
764,726 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Application of IFRS2 is prospective for options granted from November 7, 2002. |
|
(b) |
|
Based on a volatility of 57% and a risk-free rate of 3.9%. |
|
(c) |
|
Based on a volatility of 35% and a risk-free rate of 3.8%. |
A summary of the Companys stock option transactions and related information follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2006 |
|
June 30, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Number of |
|
average |
|
Number of |
|
average |
|
|
options |
|
exercise price |
|
options |
|
exercise price |
|
Outstanding-beginning of period |
|
|
691,939 |
|
|
|
43.63 |
|
|
|
809,050 |
|
|
|
48.95 |
|
Granted |
|
|
202,500 |
|
|
|
131.26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
(128,852 |
) |
|
|
53.06 |
|
|
|
(114,622 |
) |
|
|
53.59 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(861 |
) |
|
|
69.65 |
|
|
|
(21,515 |
) |
|
|
56.06 |
|
|
Outstanding-end of period |
|
|
764,726 |
|
|
|
65.22 |
|
|
|
672,913 |
|
|
|
47.93 |
|
Page 15
Compagnie generale de geophysique, S.A.
Allocaton of free shares
The General Shareholders meeting dated May, 11, 2006 authorized the Board of Directors to
implement a plan of allocation of free shares. The maximum number of free shares that may be
allocated is 53,200 shares, out of which, 13,100 may be allocated to the executive managers of the
Group. The fair value of one free share is 158.2. The fair value of free shares expected to be
allocated was recognized as an expense over the life of the plan, which represented a 0.3 million
expense for the six months period ended June 30, 2006 (of which 0.1 million for the executive
managers of the Group).
Free shares are allocated according to the following plan:
- Period of acquisition of the rights for allocation and realization of the conditions
Shares will be issued from May 11, 2008 if the realization of the conditions mentioned below has
been enacted by the Board of Directors.
- General conditions of allocation
The beneficiaries would become actually owners of the shares, after the two-years acquisition
period had expired, only if each beneficiary still has a valid employment contract with CGG or one
of its subsidiaries (except specific conditions) at the date the two-years acquisition period
expires and if the conditions of allocation are realized.
- Other conditions of allocations Performance conditions
The Board of Directors also defined two general performance conditions of the Group based on:
- the Group average consolidated net income per share over the year ended December 31, 2006 and
2007.
- the average yearly return before tax on capital employed over the year ended December 31, 2006
and 2007 of either the Group, the Services segment, or the Products segment, according to which
segment the beneficiary belongs to.
- Holding Period of the allocated shares
Once allocated, the shares may not be sold for two years from the date of the actual allocation.
Note 8 Analysis by operating segment and geographic zone
The following tables present revenues, operating income and identifiable assets by operating
segment, operating revenues by geographic zone (by location of customers and by origin) as well as
operating revenues by category.
The Group principally services the oil and gas exploration and production industry and currently
operates in two industry segments:
|
|
|
Geophysical services, which consist of (i) land seismic data acquisition, (ii) marine
seismic data acquisition, (iii) other geophysical data acquisition, including activities not
exclusively linked to oilfield services, and (iv) data processing, and data management; |
|
|
|
Products, which consist of the manufacture and sale of equipment involved in seismic data
acquisition, such as recording and transmission equipment and vibrators for use in land
seismic acquisition. |
Inter-company sales between such industry segments are made at prices approximating market prices
and relate primarily to equipment sales made by the geophysical products segment to the geophysical
services segment. These inter-segment sales, the related operating income recognized by the
geophysical products segment, and the related effect on capital expenditures and depreciation
expense of the geophysical services segment are eliminated in consolidation and presented in the
column Eliminations and Adjustments in the tables that follow.
Operating income represents operating revenues and other operating income less expenses of the
industry segment. It includes non-recurring and unusual items, which are disclosed in the operating
segment if material. General corporate expenses, which include Group management, financing, and
legal activities, have been included in the column Eliminations and Adjustments in the tables
that follow. The Group does not disclose financial expenses or revenues by operating segment
because these items are not monitored by the operating management, financing and investing being
mainly managed at the corporate level.
Identifiable assets are those used in the operations of each industry segment and geographic zone.
Unallocated and corporate assets consist primarily of financial assets, including cash and cash
equivalents.
Net sales originating in France include export sales of approximately 126.0 million for the six
months ended June 30, 2006 and 87.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005. Net sales of
CGG S.A. on a stand alone basis amounted to 150.7 million for the six months period ended June 30,
2006 and to 104.3 million for the six months period ended June 30, 2005.
For the first half of 2006, the Groups two most significant customers accounted for 14.4% and
5.0%, respectively, of the Groups consolidated revenues compared with 16.7% and 3.6% for the first
half of 2005.
Page 16
Compagnie generale de geophysique, S.A.
Analysis by operating segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30, 2006 |
|
|
Six months period ended June 30, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and |
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and |
|
Consolidated |
(in millions of euros) |
|
Services |
|
Products |
|
Adjustments |
|
Total |
|
|
Services |
|
Products |
|
Adjustments |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
Revenues from unaffiliated customers |
|
|
402.3 |
|
|
|
232.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
634.5 |
|
|
|
|
248.4 |
|
|
|
138.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
387.0 |
|
Inter-segment revenues |
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
55.0 |
|
|
|
(55.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
20.2 |
|
|
|
(20.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating revenues |
|
|
402.9 |
|
|
|
287.2 |
|
|
|
(55.6 |
) |
|
|
634.5 |
|
|
|
|
248.7 |
|
|
|
158.8 |
|
|
|
(20.5 |
) |
|
|
387.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other income from ordinary activities |
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total income from ordinary activities |
|
|
403.8 |
|
|
|
287.2 |
|
|
|
(55.6 |
) |
|
|
635.4 |
|
|
|
|
249.5 |
|
|
|
158.8 |
|
|
|
(20.5 |
) |
|
|
387.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
89.7 |
|
|
|
74.9 |
|
|
|
(18.5) |
(a) |
|
|
146.1 |
|
|
|
|
11.6 |
|
|
|
30.1 |
|
|
|
(9.6) |
(a) |
|
|
32.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Equity income (loss) of investees |
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
|
|
7.0 |
|
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.7 |
|
Capital expenditures (b) |
|
|
124.0 |
|
|
|
8.5 |
|
|
|
(12.2 |
) |
|
|
120.3 |
|
|
|
|
61.9 |
|
|
|
8.5 |
|
|
|
(5.1 |
) |
|
|
65.3 |
|
Depreciation and amortization (c) |
|
|
82.9 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
|
(4.1 |
) |
|
|
86.8 |
|
|
|
|
57.2 |
|
|
|
8.4 |
|
|
|
(2.2 |
) |
|
|
63.4 |
|
Investments in companies under equity method |
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identifiable assets |
|
|
1,118.1 |
|
|
|
443.1 |
|
|
|
(142.4 |
) |
|
|
1,418.8 |
|
|
|
|
594.6 |
|
|
|
325.7 |
|
|
|
(37.2 |
) |
|
|
883.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unallocated and corporate assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
254.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
153.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,673.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,036.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes general corporate expenses of 12.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006
and of 6.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005 |
|
(b) |
|
Includes (i) investments in multi-client surveys of 26.5 million for the six months ended
June 30, 2006 and 15.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005, (ii) equipment
acquired under capital leases of 0.1 million in six months ended June 30, 2006 and 13.2
million for the six months ended June 30, 2005, (iii) capitalized development costs in the
Services segment for 3.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2.2 million for
the six months ended June 30, 2005, and (iv) capitalized development costs in the Products
segment for 1.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 1.8 million for the six
months ended June 30, 2005 |
|
(c) |
|
Includes multi-client amortization of 38.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006
and 31.3 million for six months ended June 30, 2005. |
Page 17
Compagnie generale de geophysique, S.A.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30, 2006 |
|
|
Three months ended June 30, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and |
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and |
|
Consolidated |
(in millions of euros) |
|
Services |
|
Products |
|
Adjustments |
|
Total |
|
|
Services |
|
Products |
|
Adjustments |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
Revenues from unaffiliated customers |
|
|
172.7 |
|
|
|
139.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
312.4 |
|
|
|
|
131.0 |
|
|
|
61.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
192.6 |
|
Inter-segment revenues |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
26.1 |
|
|
|
(26.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
16.6 |
|
|
|
(16.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating revenues |
|
|
173.0 |
|
|
|
165.8 |
|
|
|
(26.4 |
) |
|
|
312.4 |
|
|
|
|
131.1 |
|
|
|
78.2 |
|
|
|
(16.7 |
) |
|
|
192.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other income from ordinary activities |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total income from ordinary activities |
|
|
173.5 |
|
|
|
165.8 |
|
|
|
(26.4 |
) |
|
|
312.9 |
|
|
|
|
131.7 |
|
|
|
78.2 |
|
|
|
(16.7 |
) |
|
|
193.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
27.8 |
|
|
|
45.5 |
|
|
|
(11.7) |
(a) |
|
|
61.6 |
|
|
|
|
9.9 |
|
|
|
14.3 |
|
|
|
(7.6) |
(a) |
|
|
16.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Equity income (loss) of investees |
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
Capital expenditures (b) |
|
|
57.4 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
(7.8 |
) |
|
|
53.9 |
|
|
|
|
47.8 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
(5.1 |
) |
|
|
46.8 |
|
Depreciation and amortization (c) |
|
|
41.9 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
(2.0 |
) |
|
|
43.6 |
|
|
|
|
30.0 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
(1.1 |
) |
|
|
33.2 |
|
Investments in companies under equity method |
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes general corporate expenses of 8.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2006
and of 3.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2005. |
|
(b) |
|
Includes (i) investments in multi-client surveys for 16.1 million for the three months ended
June 30, 2006 and 8.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2005, (ii) no equipment
acquired under capital leases for the three months ended June 30, 2006 and for 13.0 million
for the three months ended June 30, 2005, (iii) and development costs capitalized in the
Services segment of 2.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2006 and for 1.2 million
for the three months ended June 30, 2005, and (iv) development costs capitalized in the
Products segment for 0.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2006 and for 1.0
million for the three months ended June 30, 2005. |
|
(c) |
|
Includes multi-client amortization of 19.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2006
and of 17.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2005. |
Page 18
Compagnie generale de geophysique, S.A.
Analysis by geographic zone
Analysis of operating revenues by location of customers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions of euros, except |
|
|
|
|
percentages) |
|
Six months ended June 30, |
|
Three months ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
France |
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
Rest of Europe |
|
|
127.0 |
|
|
|
20 |
% |
|
|
66.0 |
|
|
|
17 |
% |
|
|
82.5 |
|
|
|
26 |
% |
|
|
40.1 |
|
|
|
21 |
% |
Asia-Pacific/Middle East |
|
|
222.7 |
|
|
|
35 |
% |
|
|
147.8 |
|
|
|
38 |
% |
|
|
89.4 |
|
|
|
29 |
% |
|
|
53.8 |
|
|
|
28 |
% |
Africa |
|
|
59.8 |
|
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
47.2 |
|
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
32.2 |
|
|
|
10 |
% |
|
|
24.2 |
|
|
|
13 |
% |
Americas |
|
|
220.7 |
|
|
|
35 |
% |
|
|
122.0 |
|
|
|
32 |
% |
|
|
106.1 |
|
|
|
34 |
% |
|
|
72.4 |
|
|
|
37 |
% |
|
Consolidated Total |
|
|
634.5 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
387.0 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
312.4 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
192.6 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
Analysis of operating revenues by origin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions of euros, except |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
percentages) |
|
Six months ended June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
France |
|
|
136.9 |
|
|
|
22 |
% |
|
|
107.3 |
|
|
|
28 |
% |
|
|
63.9 |
|
|
|
21 |
% |
|
|
43.6 |
|
|
|
23 |
% |
Rest of Europe |
|
|
42.2 |
|
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
41.4 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
23.1 |
|
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
29.6 |
|
|
|
15 |
% |
Asia-Pacific/Middle East |
|
|
155.8 |
|
|
|
25 |
% |
|
|
106.1 |
|
|
|
27 |
% |
|
|
59.5 |
|
|
|
19 |
% |
|
|
45.2 |
|
|
|
24 |
% |
Africa |
|
|
46.8 |
|
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
22.5 |
|
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
27.8 |
|
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
14.2 |
|
|
|
7 |
% |
Americas |
|
|
252.8 |
|
|
|
40 |
% |
|
|
109.7 |
|
|
|
28 |
% |
|
|
138.1 |
|
|
|
44 |
% |
|
|
60.0 |
|
|
|
31 |
% |
|
Consolidated Total |
|
|
634.5 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
387.0 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
312.4 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
192.6 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
Analysis of assets by geographic zone
Due to the constant change in working locations the Group does not track its assets based on
country of origin or ownership.
Analysis of operating revenues by category
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions of euros, except |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
percentages) |
|
Six months ended June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
Sales of goods |
|
|
226.6 |
|
|
|
36 |
% |
|
|
129.3 |
|
|
|
33 |
% |
|
|
134.9 |
|
|
|
43 |
% |
|
|
59.4 |
|
|
|
31 |
% |
Services rendered |
|
|
317.5 |
|
|
|
50 |
% |
|
|
205.9 |
|
|
|
53 |
% |
|
|
149.2 |
|
|
|
48 |
% |
|
|
102.4 |
|
|
|
53 |
% |
Royalties (after-sales) |
|
|
85.7 |
|
|
|
13 |
% |
|
|
48.6 |
|
|
|
13 |
% |
|
|
25.6 |
|
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
29.5 |
|
|
|
15 |
% |
Leases |
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
|
Consolidated Total |
|
|
634.5 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
387.0 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
312.4 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
192.6 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
Page 19
Compagnie generale de geophysique, S.A.
Note 9 Research and development expenses
Analysis of research and development expenses is as follows :
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended |
|
Three months ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
(in millions of euros) |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
Research and development costs gross, incurred |
|
|
(25.1 |
) |
|
|
(21.4 |
) |
|
|
(13.6 |
) |
|
|
(11.4 |
) |
Development costs capitalized |
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
Research and development expensed |
|
|
(19.8 |
) |
|
|
(17.4 |
) |
|
|
(10.4 |
) |
|
|
(9.2 |
) |
Government grants recognized in income |
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
Research and development costs net |
|
|
(18.4 |
) |
|
|
(14.8 |
) |
|
|
(9.6 |
) |
|
|
(7.1 |
) |
Note 10 Other revenues (Expenses)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended |
|
Three months ended |
|
|
June 30 |
|
June 30 |
(in millions of euros) |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
Assets depreciation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
Restructuring costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variation of reserves for restructuring (a) |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other non-recurring revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other non-recurring expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
Non-recurring revenues (expenses) net |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
Exchange gains (losses) on hedging contracts |
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
Gains (losses) on sales of assets (b) |
|
|
6.7 |
|
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
Other revenues (expenses) net |
|
|
9.8 |
|
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
8.3 |
|
|
|
(1.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Variances linked to 2003 Land SBU restructuring plan |
|
(b) |
|
Gains on sales of assets in 2006 included primarily the gain on sale of 49% of CGG
Ardiseis, amounting to 5.3 million, and the gain on the sale of second-hand streamers of
1.5 million. |
Note 11 Cost of financial debt
Cost of financial debt includes expenses related to financial debt, composed of bonds, the debt
component of convertible bonds, bank loans, capital-lease obligations and other financial
borrowings, net of income provided by cash and cash equivalents.
Analysis of cost of financial debt is as follows :
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended |
|
Three months ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
(en millions of euros) |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
Current interest expenses related to financial debt |
|
|
(14.1 |
) |
|
|
(11.8 |
) |
|
|
(7.8 |
) |
|
|
(6.0 |
) |
Financial cost on early redemption of bonds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9.4 |
) |
Interest expenses and financial expenses related
to the bridge loan put in place for the
acquisition of Exploration Resources |
|
|
(2.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income provided by cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of financial debt, net |
|
|
(13.1 |
) |
|
|
(19.6 |
) |
|
|
(6.1 |
) |
|
|
(14.2 |
) |
|
Page 20
Compagnie generale de geophysique, S.A.
Note 12 Other financial items
Analysis of derivative on convertible bonds is as follows :
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended |
|
Three months ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
(in millions of euros) |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
Variance on
derivative on
convertible bonds |
|
|
(20.7 |
) |
|
|
(14.7 |
) |
|
|
(8.3 |
) |
|
|
0.3 |
|
Premium paid for the
nearly conversion of
the convertible bonds |
|
|
(1.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Write-off of issuance
costs on convertible
bonds recognized as
expense at the time
of the early
conversion |
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative and other
expenses on
convertible bonds |
|
|
(23.0 |
) |
|
|
(14.7 |
) |
|
|
(10.6 |
) |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
Analysis of other financial income (loss) is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended |
|
Three months ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
(in millions of euros) |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
Exchange gains and losses, net (a) |
|
|
(4.2 |
) |
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
(2.6 |
) |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
Other financial income |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
Other financial expenses (b) |
|
|
(2.7 |
) |
|
|
(1.5 |
) |
|
|
(2.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other financial income (loss) |
|
|
(6.6 |
) |
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
(4.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes variance of fair value of hedging instruments hedging balance sheet items
|
|
(b) |
|
Includes mainly cost of forward on forward sales of U.S. dollars |
Note 13 Income taxes
Income tax expense consists of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended |
|
Three months ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
(in millions of euros) |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
France |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
current income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
deferred taxes and other |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
Foreign countries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
current income taxes (a) |
|
|
(42.1 |
) |
|
|
(15.9 |
) |
|
|
(18.3 |
) |
|
|
(8.3 |
) |
deferred taxes and other (b) |
|
|
9.2 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
Total income tax expense |
|
|
(33.0 |
) |
|
|
(14.8 |
) |
|
|
(13.4 |
) |
|
|
(6.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes withholding taxes |
|
(b) |
|
Includes primarily deferred tax out of which deferred tax on exchange differences
arising on translating fixed assets in Norwegian Krone reported in U.S. dollars represent
4.6 millions for the six month period ended June 30, 2006, (2.8) million for the six month
period ended June 30, 2005, 4.6 million for the three month period ended June 30, 2006 and
(2.0) for the three month period ended June 30, 2005. |
CGG Nigeria, the Nigerian branch of CGG SA and the Nigerian branch of CGG Marine are currently
subject to a verification by Nigerian tax authorities with respect to corporate tax and value added
tax for the years 1999 to 2004. This tax audit is currently in progress and we do not expect any material adjustment.
There are no significant changes in the other tax audits described in our annual report on Form
20-F for the year ended December 31, 2005.
Page 21
Compagnie generale de geophysique, S.A.
Note 14 Contractual obligations, commitments and contingencies
Contractual obligations
The Group leases primarily geophysical equipment under capital lease agreements expiring at various
dates during the next five years.
The Group also presently operates seismic vessels under long-term charter agreements with
ship-owners that expire at various dates over the next 8 to 48 months.
Other lease agreements relate primarily to operating leases for offices, computer equipment and
other items of personal property.
The following table presents on the future periods payments relating to contractual obligations at
June 30, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments due by period |
(in millions of euros) |
|
Less than 1 year |
|
2-3 years |
|
4-5 years |
|
After 5 years |
|
Total |
|
Financial debt (see note 5) |
|
|
25.9 |
|
|
|
34.1 |
|
|
|
38.6 |
|
|
|
262.2 |
|
|
|
360.8 |
|
Capital Lease Obligations (not discounted) |
|
|
12.4 |
|
|
|
23.0 |
|
|
|
13.6 |
|
|
|
29.3 |
|
|
|
78.3 |
|
Operating Leases |
|
|
50.1 |
|
|
|
40.5 |
|
|
|
15.9 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
108.9 |
|
Other long-term Obligations (a) |
|
|
14.6 |
|
|
|
34.1 |
|
|
|
38.9 |
|
|
|
87.6 |
|
|
|
175.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Contractual Obligations |
|
|
103.0 |
|
|
|
131.7 |
|
|
|
107.0 |
|
|
|
381.5 |
|
|
|
723.2 |
|
|
Other commitments
Outstanding commitments at June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005 include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
(in millions of euros) |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
Guarantees issued in favor of clients |
|
|
80.8 |
|
|
|
82.4 |
|
Guarantees issued in favor of banks |
|
|
28.8 |
|
|
|
26.3 |
|
Other guarantees (a) |
|
|
14.2 |
|
|
|
14.2 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
123.8 |
|
|
|
122.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Other guarantees relate primarily to guarantees we issue in favor of customs or
government administrations |
Litigation and other risks
There is no significant change in the litigation disclosed in our annual report on Form 20-F for
the year ended December 31, 2005.
Note 15 Related party transactions
Operating transactions
Louis Dreyfus Armateurs (LDA) provides ship management services for a portion of our fleet.
Charter party contracts associated with these services are concluded at arms length. Accounts
payable to LDA were 0.5 million at June 30, 2006. Total net charges paid throughout the six months
ended June 30, 2006 for the provision of ship management services amounted to 2.4 million, and the
future commitments for such services to LDA were 13.6 million.
LDA is an owner, together with the Group, of a company the Group consolidates under the equity
method, namely Geomar, owner of the CGG Alizé seismic vessel. LDA has a 51% stake in Geomar, and
amounts paid to Geomar by the Group during the six months ended June 30, 2006 were 4.5 million,
while future charterparty amounts due to Geomar amounted to 6.6 million. Accounts payable to
Geomar were 0.7 million at June 30, 2006.
Page 22
Compagnie generale de geophysique, S.A.
For the six months ended June 30, 2006, the sales of geophysical products from Sercel to Argas,
which is 49% owned by the Group, amounted to 0.6 million, representing approximately 0.1% of Group
revenues.
For the six months ended June 30, 2006, the sales of geophysical products from Sercel to JV Xian
Peic/Sercel Limited, which is 40% owned by the Group, amounted to 2.4 million, representing
approximately 0.4% of Group revenues.
Financing
No credit facility or loan was granted to the Company by shareholders during the For the six months
ended June 30, 2006 and 2005.
Note 16 Subsequent events
On July 1, 2006, we renewed the time charter party agreement of our seismic vessel, the Laurentian,
with modified contractual conditions that still qualified as a capital lease. The total lease
obligation is approximately U.S.$28 million (22 million) over its three-year term. The net present
value of future lease payments under the capital lease is approximately U.S.$11 million (9
million) and the remaining part of the obligation is accounted for as operating expenses over the
agreement duration. The capital lease amount will be depreciated over the agreement duration.
On July 10, 2006, Sercel has acquired Cybernetixs shares held by the company Comex and its
management. Cybernetixs share capital is now distributed between its chairman and CEO Gilles
Michel (18.5%), Comex (20.4%), Sercel (20%), the Truffle Ventures fund (18.1%) and the float (23%).
Sercel would be granted a seat on the board of the Company. Through this investment, Sercel intends
to reinforce the technical partnership established with Cybernetix in offshore oil equipment, which
is one of the key areas for expansion of the Marseilles based company. Cybernetix is a world
specialist in innovative solutions in robotics and automated machines designed to work in hostile
environments such as nuclear, oil services and other industries.
Note 17 Reconciliation to u.s. gaap
A Summary of differences between accounting principles followed
by the group and u.s. gaap
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with
International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) as endorsed by the European Union, which differ
in certain significant respects from U.S. GAAP. These differences relate mainly to the following
items, and the necessary adjustments are shown in the tables in section B below.
Goodwill
Under IFRS, we no longer amortize goodwill beginning January 1, 2004. Under U.S. GAAP, we no longer
amortize goodwill beginning January 1, 2002.
Deferred taxes
Under IFRS, deferred tax assets or liabilities, related to non-monetary assets or liabilities that
are remeasured from the local currency into the functional currency using historical exchange rates
and that result from changes in exchange rates, are recognized.
Under U.S. GAAP, deferred tax liabilities or assets are not recognized for differences related to
assets and liabilities that, under FASB Statement N°52 (Foreign Currency Translation), are
remeasured from the local currency into the functional currency using historical exchange rates and
that result from changes in exchange rates.
Currency translation adjustment
Under IFRS, the accumulated total of translation adjustments at January 1, 2004 is reversed against
consolidated reserves. As a consequence, all gains and losses linked to the currency translation
adjustment on entities that are sold or that exit our scope of scope of consolidation are computed
on the basis of the restated currency translation adjustment.
Under U.S. GAAP, historical values are maintained for currency translation adjustment and thus for
calculation of gains and losses linked to the currency translation adjustment on entities that are
sold or that exit our scope of consolidation.
Page 23
Compagnie generale de geophysique, S.A.
Stock-based compensation
Under IFRS, stock options granted to employees are included in the financial statements using the
following principles: the stock options fair value is determined on the granting date and is
recognized in personnel costs on a straight-line basis over the period between the grant date and
the exercise date corresponding to the vesting period. Stock option fair value is calculated
using the Black-Scholes model only for stock-options plans granted since November 7, 2002.
Under U.S. GAAP, the Group applies the FAS 123R standard in 2006. Compensation costs for requisite
services rendered over the period are recognized at their fair value through the income statement.
This method applies to all plans granted by the Group.
Development costs
Under IFRS, expenditure on development activities, whereby research findings are applied to a plan
or design for the production of new or substantially improved products and processes, is
capitalized if:
|
|
|
the project is clearly defined, and costs are separately identified and reliably measured, |
|
|
|
|
the product or process is technically and commercially feasible and, |
|
|
|
|
the Group has sufficient resources to complete development. |
Under U.S. GAAP, all expenditures related to research and development are recognized as an expense
in the income statement.
Convertible bonds
For U.S. GAAP purposes, as regards convertible bonds, there was an embedded derivative that cannot
be reliably assessed, corresponding to the early redemption clause (see note 12 to our consolidated
annual financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December
31, 2005) that was not recognized in the financial statements. The convertible bonds were fully
converted in May 2006 and the early redemption clause was not exercised.
Pension, post-employment benefits and other post-employment benefits
Under IFRS, we record actuarial gains and losses on defined benefit plans directly in equity.
Under U.S. GAAP, we record actuarial gains and losses on defined benefit plans as a cost in the
income statement.
Derivative instruments and hedging activity
Under IFRS, long-term contracts in foreign currencies (primarily U.S. dollar) are not considered to
include embedded derivatives when such contracts are routinely denominated in this currency
(primarily U.S. dollars) in the industry. .
Under U.S. GAAP, such an exemption does not exist and embedded derivatives in long-term contracts
in foreign currencies (primarily U.S. dollar) are recorded in the balance sheet at fair value and
revenues and expenses with a non-U.S. client or supplier are recognized at the forward exchange
rate negotiated at the beginning of the contract. The variation of fair market value of the
embedded derivative foreign exchange contracts is recognized in earnings.
Comprehensive income
Comprehensive income includes all changes in equity during a period except those resulting from
investments by owners and distributions to owners. In our consolidated financial statements, the
concept of comprehensive income correspond to the caption Gains and losses directly recognized in
equity in IFRS consolidated statements.
In U.S. GAAP financial statements, comprehensive income and its components must be displayed in a
statement of comprehensive income.
For us, this statements includes, in addition to net income:
|
|
|
changes in the cumulative translation adjustment related to consolidated foreign subsidiaries, |
|
|
|
|
changes in the fair value of derivative instruments designed as cash flow hedges meeting
the criteria established by SFAS 133; and |
|
|
|
|
changes in the amount of the additional minimum pension liability due to actuarial
losses. |
Page 24
Compagnie generale de geophysique, S.A.
B Reconciliation of net income and shareholders equity to u.s. gaap
Consolidated Net Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
restated (1) |
(in millions of euros, except per share data) |
|
(unaudited) |
|
(unaudited) |
|
Net income (loss) as reported in Consolidated Statements of
operations |
|
|
75.3 |
|
|
|
(9.6 |
) |
Deferred tax (FAS 109) |
|
|
(4.7 |
) |
|
|
2.2 |
|
Loss on extinguishment of debt (APB 26) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.8 |
) |
Stock options |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
0.1 |
|
Actuarial gain/(loss) on pension plan |
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Cancellation of IFRS long-term contracts adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.4 |
) |
Cancellation of IFRS currency translation adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
Cancellation of IFRS tangible assets adjustment |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
Cancellation of IFRS capitalization of development costs |
|
|
(3.8 |
) |
|
|
(3.2 |
) |
Derivative instruments (FAS 133) |
|
|
(23.0 |
) |
|
|
19.2 |
|
|
Net income according to U.S. GAAP |
|
|
42.6 |
|
|
|
7.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of shares outstanding |
|
|
17,219,465 |
|
|
|
11,736,024 |
|
Dilutive potential shares from stock-options |
|
|
364,461 |
|
|
|
189,706 |
|
Dilutive potential shares from convertible bonds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,400,000 |
|
|
Adjusted weighted average shares and assumed option exercises |
|
|
17,583,926 |
|
|
|
13,325,731 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic for shareholder |
|
|
2.47 |
|
|
|
0.62 |
|
Diluted for shareholder |
|
|
2.42 |
|
|
|
0.55 |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Restatement of convertible bonds accounting treatment (14.7 million expense in income
statement) |
Shareholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
December 31, |
(in millions of euros) |
|
(unaudited) |
|
2005 |
|
Shareholders equity as reported in the Consolidated
Balance Sheets |
|
|
802.6 |
|
|
|
698.5 |
|
Goodwill amortization (FAS 142) (a) |
|
|
12.5 |
|
|
|
13.4 |
|
Deferred tax (FAS 109) (a) |
|
|
(13.1 |
) |
|
|
(8.3 |
) |
Stock options |
|
|
(4.2 |
) |
|
|
(2.5 |
) |
Cancellation of IFRS tangible assets adjustment |
|
|
(6.8 |
) |
|
|
(6.9 |
) |
Cancellation of IFRS capitalization of development costs (a) |
|
|
(17.2 |
) |
|
|
(13.6 |
) |
Derivative instruments |
|
|
(14.1 |
) |
|
|
8.9 |
|
|
Shareholders equity according to U.S. GAAP |
|
|
759.7 |
|
|
|
689.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Net of currency translation adjustment effect |
Page 25
Compagnie generale de geophysique, S.A.
CONDENSED US GAAP INCOME STATEMENT AND BALANCE SHEET
Condensed US GAAP income statement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
restated (1) |
|
|
|
(amounts in millions of euros |
|
|
|
|
except per share data) |
|
Operating revenues |
|
|
642.0 |
|
|
|
398.8 |
|
Cost of operations |
|
|
(420.9 |
) |
|
|
(298.4 |
) |
|
Gross profit |
|
|
221.1 |
|
|
|
91.4 |
|
|
Research and development expenses net |
|
|
(23.7 |
) |
|
|
(18.8 |
) |
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
(60.6 |
) |
|
|
(41.8 |
) |
Other revenues (expenses) net |
|
|
7.4 |
|
|
|
(2.3 |
) |
|
Operating income |
|
|
144.2 |
|
|
|
28.5 |
|
|
Cost of financial debt, net |
|
|
(13.1 |
) |
|
|
(22.4 |
) |
Derivative and other expenses on convertible bonds |
|
|
(23.0 |
) |
|
|
(14.7 |
) |
Other financial income (loss) |
|
|
(40.6 |
) |
|
|
21.6 |
|
Equity in income of affiliates |
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
|
6.7 |
|
|
Income of consolidated companies before income taxes
and minority interests |
|
|
73.3 |
|
|
|
19.7 |
|
|
Income taxes |
|
|
(29.8 |
) |
|
|
(12.4 |
) |
Minority interests |
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
42.6 |
|
|
|
7.3 |
|
|
Dilutive weighted average number of shares outstanding |
|
|
17,219,465 |
|
|
|
11,736,024 |
|
Dilutive potential shares from stock-options |
|
|
364,461 |
|
|
|
189,706 |
|
Dilutive potential shares from convertible bonds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,400,000 |
|
Adjusted weighted average shares and assumed option
exercises when dilutive |
|
|
17,583,926 |
|
|
|
13,325,731 |
|
|
Net income per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic for shareholder |
|
|
2.47 |
|
|
|
0.62 |
|
Diluted for shareholder |
|
|
2.42 |
|
|
|
0.55 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Restatement of convertible bonds accounting treatment (14.7 million expense in income
statement) |
Condensed US GAAP Balance Sheet
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
(amounts in millions of euros) |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets |
|
|
738.0 |
|
|
|
608.5 |
|
Long-term assets |
|
|
939.7 |
|
|
|
965.4 |
|
|
Total Assets |
|
|
1,677.7 |
|
|
|
1,573.8 |
|
|
LIABILITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
395.3 |
|
|
|
509.9 |
|
Long term liabilities |
|
|
499.8 |
|
|
|
362.7 |
|
Minority interests |
|
|
22.9 |
|
|
|
11.7 |
|
Shareholders equity |
|
|
759.7 |
|
|
|
689.5 |
|
|
Total Liabilities |
|
|
1,677.7 |
|
|
|
1,573.8 |
|
|
Page 26
Compagnie generale de geophysique, S.A.
Statement of Comprehensive income (loss) US GAAP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
(in million of euros) |
|
Net income (loss) under US GAAP |
|
|
42.6 |
|
|
|
7.3 |
|
Other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in the cumulative translation adjustment |
|
|
(32.8 |
) |
|
|
21.4 |
|
Changes in the fair value of available-for-sale securities |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in the fair value of derivative instruments |
|
|
7.7 |
|
|
|
(8.2 |
) |
|
Comprehensive income (loss) under U.S. GAAP |
|
|
17.6 |
|
|
|
20.5 |
|
|
Statement of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss US GAAP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
(in million of euros) |
|
Cumulative Translation adjustment |
|
|
(74.7 |
) |
|
|
(43.8 |
) |
Fair value of available-for-sale securities |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of derivative instruments |
|
|
6.3 |
|
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
Accumulated Other Comprehensive loss under
U.S. GAAP |
|
|
(68.3 |
) |
|
|
(49.3 |
) |
|
Page 27
Compagnie generale de geophysique, S.A.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Group Organization
We divide our businesses into two segments, geophysical services and geophysical products
(seismic equipment produced by our Sercel subsidiaries).
We organize our geophysical services business into two geographical areas: the Western
hemisphere, which includes the Americas, and the Eastern hemisphere, which includes Europe, Africa
and Asia-Pacific. We also divide our services segment into three strategic business units, or SBUs:
|
|
|
the Land SBU for land, transition zone and shallow water seismic acquisition activities; |
|
|
|
|
the Offshore SBU for marine seismic acquisition and multi-client library sales; and |
|
|
|
|
the Processing & Reservoir SBU for seismic data processing, data management and reservoir studies. |
Our Products segment, which we operate through Sercel and its subsidiaries, is made up of our
manufacturing and sales activities for seismic data acquisition equipment, both land and offshore.
Geophysical Market environment
Overall demand for geophysical services is dependent upon spending by oil and gas companies
for exploration, production development and field management activities. We believe the level of
spending by such companies depends on their perception of the relationship between proven future
reserves and expected future energy consumption.
After many years of strong growth, the geophysical market in 1999, following a sharp drop in
the price of oil, experienced a deep recession, which we believe resulted in a reduction of more
than 40% in industry revenues compared to 1998. The geophysical services market (particularly the
offshore segment) has improved since 1999 in terms of both volumes of sales and prices, gradually
until mid-2004, and then more rapidly.
We believe that two principal factors have contributed to the slow recovery from 1999 to
mid-2004 of geophysical services despite increasing oil and gas prices. First, global geopolitical
uncertainty, particularly following the events of September 11, 2001 and the conflict in Iraq in
2003, harmed the confidence and visibility that are essential to our main clients long-term
decision-making processes. As a consequence, they delayed or cancelled many projects. Second,
geophysical service providers have generally not reacted efficiently to the difficult industry
environment and have, in particular, failed to adjust their capacity in response to reduced demand,
leading to continuing excess supply pushing down market prices.
We believe that during 2004, oil and gas companies (including both the major multinational oil
companies and the national oil companies) and the large oil and gas consuming nations suddenly
perceived a growing and potentially lasting imbalance between the supply of and demand for
hydrocarbons. A rapid rise in world consumption requirements, particularly in China and India,
resulted in demand for hydrocarbons growing more rapidly than anticipated. At the same time, the
excess production capacity of OPEC appeared to have reached historical lows, focusing attention on
existing production capacities and available reserves. These market pressures from the both the
supply and demand sides consequently produced a sharp rise in oil and gas prices.
The recognition of an imbalance between hydrocarbon supply and demand has led the oil and gas
industry to significantly increase capital expenditures in exploration and production. The seismic
services market generally benefits from this spending since seismic services are an important
element in the search for new reserves and extraction of more oil from existing reservoirs.
Nevertheless, we believe that the seismic industry should consolidate. We believe that the
benefit of consolidation would be to exploit synergies and to promote the emergence of increasingly
global seismic operators possessing larger financial and technological bases.
Page 28
Compagnie generale de geophysique, S.A.
Foreign Exchange Fluctuations
As a company that derives a substantial amount of its revenue from sales internationally, our
results of operations are affected by fluctuations in currency exchange rates.
In order to present trends in our business that may be obscured by currency fluctuations, we
have translated certain euro amounts in this Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations into U.S. dollars. See Trend InformationCurrency
Fluctuations.
Change in scope of Offshore activities
We expanded the capacity of the fleet of our Offshore SBU from five seismic acquisition
vessels and one source vessel during the six months ended June 30, 2005 to twelve seismic
acquisition vessels during the six months ended June 30, 2006 with:
- | |
the technological upgrade of one source vessel, the Laurentian, into a 3D seismic vessel in the second half of 2005; and |
|
- |
|
the addition to our existing fleet, through the acquisition of Exploration Resources ASA (Exploration Resources) on
September 1, 2005, of three owned seismic vessels equipped for 2D studies (Princess, Duke and Venturer), two owned
vessels equipped for 3D studies (Search and C-Orion, the latter of which was launched as a 3D vessel with 8 streamers
in early 2006), one chartered cable vessel (Geo Challenger) that was converted to a 3D seismic vessel and started
seismic operations as a 3D vessel since mid-May 2006 and one chartered 2D vessel (Pacific Titan). |
2D vessels (Princess, Duke and Venturer) operated mainly under Fugros agreement during the
six months period ended June 30, 2006 and entered our fleet only progressively.
Revenues and backlog
Our revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2006 increased 64% to 635.0 million from
387.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2005. Expressed in U.S. dollars, our
consolidated operating revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2006 increased 55% to U.S.$776.2
million from U.S.$501.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2005. This increase results
mainly from our Offshore SBU, in which revenues increased 82% (71% in U.S. dollars terms) between
the six months ended June 30, 2006 and the three months ended June 30, 2005 and from our Products
segment, in which revenues increased 68% (59% in U.S. dollars terms) between the six months ended
June 30, 2006 and the three months ended June 30, 2005.
Our
backlog at August 31, 2006 was
840 million (U.S.$1.080 million) compared to 394 million
(U.S.$481 million) at August 31, 2005.
Acquisitions and disposals for the first half ended June 30, 2006
On March 27, 2006, we signed a Memorandum of Understanding with Industrialization & Energy
Services Company (TAQA), our long term Saudi Partner in Argas (Arabian Geophysical and Surveying
Company), which is 51% owned by TAQA and 49% by us. Following this agreement, on June 24, 2006,
TAQA acquired 49% of the capital of CGG Ardiseis, a newly formed CGG subsidiary dedicated to land
and shallow water seismic data acquisition in the Middle East, and we kept a 51% interest. CGG
Ardiseis, whose headquarters are located in Dubai, provides its clients with the complete range of
CGG land and shallow water acquisition services, focusing on Eye-D, the latest CGG technology for
full 3D seismic imaging. As part of the agreement, CGG Ardiseis activities in the Gulf Cooperation
Council (GCC) countries are exclusively operated by Argas.
7
1/2 Senior Notes due 2015 Additional notes
On February 3, 2006, we issued an additional $165 million principal amount of our
dollar-denominated 71/2% Senior Notes due 2015 issued in April 2005 in a private placement to certain
eligible investors. The notes were issued at a price of 103-1/4% of their principal amount,
resulting in a Yield-to-Worst of 6.9%. The net proceeds from the notes were used on February 10,
2006 to repay the $140.3 million remaining outstanding under our $375 million bridge credit
facility used to financed the acquisition of Exploration Resources. On August 17, 2006, U.S. $164
million in principal amount of these notes were exchanged for identical notes registered with the
SEC.
Additional asset financing agreement
On March 13, 2006, CGG Marine Resources Norge AS concluded an asset financing agreement for
U.S.$26.5 million with a bank. The purpose of this agreement was to finance the acquisition of
newly-developed Sentinel streamers for the vessel
Page 29
Compagnie generale de geophysique, S.A.
Symphony. This financing agreement is guaranteed by a pledge on the streamers. At June 30,
2006, this facility was fully drawn.
Additional credit line
On March 29, 2006, Exploration Resources concluded a credit facility of U.S.$70 million. The
proceeds from this credit facility were used to finance the conversion of the Geo-Challenger from a
cable laying vessel to a 3D seismic vessel and seismic equipment for the vessels C-Orion and
Geo-Challenger. At June 30, 2006, this facility was fully drawn.
Conversion of the remaining part of our 7.75% $85 million convertible bonds due 2012, with nominal
value of $15.3 million
Approximately $70 million of our 7.75% convertible bonds due 2012 were converted in November
2005. A general meeting of bondholders, held on April 5, 2006, and a general meeting of CGG
shareholders, held on May 11, 2006, approved a change to the terms and conditions of the remaining
convertible bonds to grant bondholders a right to cash payment upon immediate conversion of the
bonds. The early conversion period was open on May 12, 2006 only. At the conclusion of the
conversion period, all the remaining 2,525 convertible bonds were converted, leading to the
issuance of 274,914 new shares. The Group paid a total premium of $2.1 million (1.6 million) to
the bondholders who converted. This premium has been recognized as an expense under the line item
Derivative and other expenses on convertible bonds in the income statement for the six months
period ended June 30, 2006. In addition, the deferred issuance costs attached to the remaining
2,525 convertible bonds were written-off in connection with the early conversion, corresponding to
a 0.7 million expense under the line item Derivative and other expenses on convertible bonds in
the income statement for the six months period ended June 30, 2006.
Three months ended June 30, 2006 compared with three months ended June 30, 2005
Revenues by Activity
The following table sets forth our consolidated operating revenues by activity (excluding
intra-group sales), and the percentage of total consolidated operating revenues represented
thereby, during each of the periods stated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30, |
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions of euros, except percentages) |
|
Land SBU |
|
|
40.2 |
|
|
|
13 |
% |
|
|
31.9 |
|
|
|
17 |
% |
Offshore SBU |
|
|
98.4 |
|
|
|
31 |
% |
|
|
71.8 |
|
|
|
37 |
% |
Processing & Reservoir SBU |
|
|
34.1 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
27.3 |
|
|
|
14 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Services |
|
|
172.7 |
|
|
|
55 |
% |
|
|
131.0 |
|
|
|
68 |
% |
Products |
|
|
139.7 |
|
|
|
45 |
% |
|
|
61.6 |
|
|
|
32 |
% |
|
Total |
|
|
312.4 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
192.6 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
Operating Revenues
Our consolidated operating revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2006 increased 62% to
312.4 million from 192.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2005. Expressed in U.S.
dollars, our consolidated operating revenues increased 61% to U.S.$391.4 million for the three
months ended June 30, 2006 from U.S.$243.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2005. This
increase was primarily attributable to our Products segment.
Services
Operating revenues for our Services segment (excluding intra-group sales) increased 32% to
172.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2006 from 131.0 million for the three months
ended June 30, 2005. Expressed in U.S. dollars, operating revenues increased 31% to U.S.$216.4
million for the three months ended June 30, 2006 from U.S.$165.6 million for the three months ended
June 30, 2005. This increase was primarily attributable to our Offshore SBU.
Land SBU. Operating revenues for our Land SBU increased 26% to 40.2 million for the three
months ended June 30, 2006 from 31.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2005. In U.S.
dollar terms, operating revenues increased 25% to U.S$50.4 million for the three months ended June
30, 2006 from U.S.$40.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2005. The increase was
attributable to a more customary backlog in a market that continues to be competitive.
On average and including Argas, twelve crews were in operation during the second quarter of
2006, compared to eleven crews in the three months ended June 30, 2005.
Page 30
Compagnie generale de geophysique, S.A.
Offshore SBU. Operating revenues for our Offshore SBU increased 37% to 98.4 million for the
three months ended June 30, 2006 compared to 71.8 million for the three months ended June 30,
2005. In U.S dollar terms, operating revenues increased 36% to U.S.$123.3 million for the three
months ended June 30, 2006 from U.S.$90.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2005, mainly
due to the extension of our fleet size (notably nine 3D vessels in operations on the three months
ended June 30, 2006 versus five 3D vessels on the three months ended June 30, 2005) and price
increases in the exclusive marine market.
Exclusive sales increased 72% to 61.2 million in the three months ended June 30, 2006 from
35.5 million for the comparable period 2005. Our return to multi-clients surveys acquisition in
2006 was more than offset, as a percentage of Offshore revenues, by the increase of 3D capacity as
well as the new 2D activity in exclusive surveys. Exclusive contracts accounted for 62% of Offshore
SBU sales for the three months ended June 30, 2006 compared to 49% for the comparable period 2005,
with most of the fleet dedicated to exclusive surveys.
Multi-client data sales increased 2% to 37.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2006
from 36.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2005 with a different mix between
pre-commitments and after-sales. Pre-commitment sales increased 76% to 11.8 million in the three
months ended June 30, 2006 from 6.7 million in the three months ended June 30, 2005, due to
multi-clients surveys in progress in Brazil and a multi-clients survey in the Gulf of Mexico.
After-sales levels decreased by 14% to 25.4 million in the three months ended June 30, 2006 from
29.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2005.
Processing & Reservoir SBU. Operating revenues for our Processing & Reservoir SBU 2006
increased 25% to 34.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2006 from 27.3 million for the
three months ended June 30, 2005. In U.S. dollar terms, operating revenues increased 24% to
U.S.$42.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2006 compared to U.S.$34.5 million for the
three months ended June 30, 2005, primarily due to an increase in the volume of demand in the
marine acquisition market and to the new processing centers we opened at the end of 2005 in India
and Libya.
Products
Operating revenues for our Products segment increased 112% to 165.8 million for the three
months ended June 30, 2006 from 78.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2005. In U.S.
dollar terms, operating revenues increased 110% to U.S.$207.8 million from U.S.$98.9 million for
the three months ended June 30, 2005. This strong increase was due to the successful launch of the
Sentinel, the new generation of Marine solid streamers, and to the still strong demand for Land
products.
Excluding intra-group sales, revenues in our Products segment increased 127% to 139.7 million
for the three months ended June 30, 2006 from 61.6 million for the three months ended June 30,
2005.
Operating Expenses
Cost of operations, including depreciation and amortization, increased 50% to 218.3 million
for the three months ended June 30, 2006 from 145.7 million for the three months ended June 30,
2005. As a percentage of operating revenues, cost of operations decreased to 70% for the three
months ended June 30, 2006 from 75% in the three months ended June 30, 2005. This decrease was due
to improved productivity in both Services and Products segments. As a consequence, gross profit
increased 99% to 94.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2006 compared to 47.5 million
for the three months ended June 30, 2005.
Research and development expenditures, net of government grants, increased 35% to 9.6 million
for the three months ended June 30, 2006 from 7.1 million for the three months ended June 30,
2005, due to development efforts in our Product segment, and lower research tax credit granted in
2006 to our Services segment.
Selling, general and administrative expenses increased 43% to 31.7 million for the three
months ended June 30, 2006 (including the IFRS2 cost of the May 2006 stock-option plan amounting to
1.1 million) from 22.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2005, primarily as a result of
the Exploration Resources integration and the need to support the significant organic growth. As a
percentage of operating revenues, selling, general and administrative costs decreased from 11% in
the three months ended June 30, 2005 to 10% in the three months ended June 30, 2006.
Operating Income (Loss)
We had operating income of 61.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2006 compared to
16.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2005 due to a significant improvement in
operating income in both our Products and Services segments.
Operating income from our Services segment was 27.8 million for the three months ended June
30, 2006 compared to a 9.9 million income for the three months ended June 30, 2005. This increase
was mainly due to a larger fleet capacity, high
Page 31
Compagnie generale de geophysique, S.A.
prices in the exclusive marine acquisition sector, the recovery of our Land SBU, and the
positive effect of the euro/U.S. dollar exchange rate.
Operating income from our Products segment was 45.5 million in the three months ended June
30, 2006 compared to 14.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2005, due the overall
high level of sales, an improved productivity on Marine products and a more favorable U.S.
dollar/euro exchange rate.
Other revenues (expenses) net were a 8.3 million income for the three months ended
June 30, 2006 compared to a loss of 1.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2005. Other
revenues in 2006 included primarily the gain on the sale of 49% of CGG Ardiseis in our Services
segment, amounting to 5.3 million and a $3.1 million hedging exchange gain on forward sales of
U.S. dollars.
Financial Income and Expenses, Net
Cost of financial debt, net decreased 57% to 6.1 million for the three months ended June
30, 2006 from 14.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2005, which included the
financial cost of the early redemption of our remaining 10-5/8% bonds due 2007 of 9.4 million.
In U.S. dollars term, the cost decreased 58% to U.S.$7.6 million for the three months ended June
30, 2006, from U.S.$18.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2005.
This decrease is due to the financial cost of the early redemption of our remaining 10-5/8%
bonds due 2007 of 9.4 million in the three months ended June 30, 2005 and is offset by changes
in the structure of our financial debt from a financial debt mainly composed of our $150 million of
10 5/8% Senior Notes (repaid in May 2005) and our 7.75% U.S.$85 million convertible bonds due 2012
(partially converted in November 2005, with the remainder converted in May 2006) during the three
months ended June 30, 2005 to a financial debt mainly composed of our U.S.$165 million 71/2% Senior
Notes due 2015 issued in April 2005, with a further fungible issuance of U.S.$165 million in
principal amount in January 2006, as well as our credit facility of U.S.$70 million.
The cost of the conversion option embedded in the U.S.$85 million remaining part of our 7.75%
U.S.$85 million convertible bonds due 2012 resulted in an aggregate expense of 10.6 for the
three months period ended June 30, 2006 and an aggregate income of 0.3 million for the three
months period ended June 30, 2005, accounted for as Derivative and other expenses on convertible
bonds in our income statement. The expense was due to an increase in the value of the derivative
mainly linked to (i) the increase in our share price, (ii) the 1.6 million premium paid for the
early conversion of the remaining convertible bonds on May 12, 2006 and (iii) the 0.7 million
write-off of issuance costs on convertible bonds recognized as expense at the time of the early
conversion.
We had a 4.9 million loss in other financial items for the three months ended June 30,
2006, including a 2.3 million of cost of forward on forward exchange contracts of U.S dollars
compared to a 0.7 million gain for the three months ended June 30, 2005. The remaining 2.6
million loss was mainly due to exchange losses difference which were offset by the 3.1 million
gain on forward exchange contracts in U.S. dollars that qualify for cash-flow hedge treatment,
presented as Other operating income in the income statement.
Equity in Income (Losses) of Investees
Income from investments accounted for under the equity method increased to 3.1 million for
the three months ended June 30, 2006 from 2.9 million in the three months ended June 30, 2005.
Equity in income from Argas, our joint venture in Saudi Arabia, was 3.1 million for the three
months ended June 30, 2006 compared to 2.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2005.
Income Taxes
Income taxes increased to 13.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2006 from
6.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2005, principally due to the increase of our
U.S. income tax, linked to the high level of Marine products sales.
We are not subject to a worldwide taxation system and the income tax paid in foreign
countries, mainly based on revenues, does not generate comparable tax credits in France, our
country of consolidated taxation.
Net Income (Loss)
Our net income for the three months ended June 30, 2006 was an income of 29.7 million
compared to a loss of 0.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2005 as a result of the
factors described above.
Page 32
Compagnie generale de geophysique, S.A.
Six months ended June 30, 2006 compared with six months ended June 30, 2005
Revenues by Activity
The following table sets forth our consolidated operating revenues by activity (excluding
intra-group sales), and the percentage of total consolidated operating revenues represented
thereby, during each of the periods stated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|
(in millions of euros, except percentages) |
Land SBU |
|
|
73.6 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
54.4 |
|
|
|
14 |
% |
Offshore SBU |
|
|
260.0 |
|
|
|
41 |
% |
|
|
142.8 |
|
|
|
37 |
% |
Processing & Reservoir SBU |
|
|
68.7 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
51.2 |
|
|
|
13 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Services |
|
|
402.3 |
|
|
|
63 |
% |
|
|
248.4 |
|
|
|
64 |
% |
Products |
|
|
232.2 |
|
|
|
37 |
% |
|
|
138.6 |
|
|
|
36 |
% |
|
Total |
|
|
634.5 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
387.0 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
Operating Revenues
Our consolidated operating revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2006 increased 64% to
634.5 million from 387.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005. Expressed in U.S
dollar terms, our consolidated operating revenues increased 55% to U.S.$775.7 million from
U.S.$501.1 million. The increase was both attributable to our Products segment and to our Services
segment, and particularly to our Offshore SBU.
Services
Operating revenues for our Services segment (excluding intra-group sales) for the six months
ended June 30, 2006 increased 62% to 402.3 million from 248.4 million for the six months
ended June 30, 2005. Expressed in U.S. dollars, operating revenues increased 53% to U.S.$490.2
million from U.S.$321.2 million. This increase was primarily attributable to our Offshore SBU.
Land SBU. Operating revenues for our Land SBU for the six months ended June 30, 2006
increased 35% to 73.6 million from 54.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005. In
U.S. dollars terms, operating revenues increased 29% to U.S.$90.2 million from U.S.$70.1 million.
The increase was attributable to a higher usual level of backlog in a market that remains
competitive.
On average and including Argas, twelve crews were in operation during the six months ended
June 30, 2006 compared to ten crews during the six months ended June 30, 2005.
Offshore SBU. Operating revenues for our Offshore SBU for six months ended June 30, 2006
increased 82% to 260.0 million from 142.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005.
In U.S. dollars terms, operating revenues increased 71% to U.S.$316.0 million for the six months
ended June 30, 2006 from U.S.$184.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005 mainly due to:
mainly due to the extension of our fleet size (notably nine 3D vessels in operations at June 30,
2006 versus five 3D vessels at June 30, 2005), price increases in the exclusive marine market and
effective use of our seismic vessels capacity, and high after-sales of our multi-client surveys.
Exclusive sales increased 81% to 151.9 million in the six months ended June 30, 2006 from
83.9 million for the comparable period 2005, due principally to higher prices and increased
capacity. Exclusive contracts accounted for 58% of Offshore SBU sales for the six months ended June
30, 2006 compared to 59% for the comparable period 2005.
Multi-client data sales increased 84% to 108.1 million for the six months ended June 30,
2006 from 58.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005 due to a significant increase in
both after-sales and pre-commitment sales. Pre-commitment sales increased 117% to 22.4 million
in the six months ended June 30, 2006 from 10.3 million in the six months ended June 30, 2005,
due to multi-clients surveys in progress in Brazil and a multi-clients survey in the Gulf of
Mexico. After-sales levels increased by 76% to 85.7 million in the six months ended June 30,
2006 from 48.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005. For the six months period ended
June 30, 2006, and particularly in the three months period ended March 31, 2006, there was a very
high demand for data in the Gulf of Mexico, where exploration licenses were allocated in March
2006, and in Brazil, where exploration blocks awarded in 2005 were effectively allocated at the
beginning of 2006.
Page 33
Compagnie generale de geophysique, S.A.
The net book value of our marine multi-clients data library was 79.4 million at June
30, 2006 compared to 93.6 million at December 31, 2005. On March 31, 2006, the Norwegian
government decided not to award exploration-production licenses on blocks where one of our surveys
(Moere) is located. As this decision changed previous estimate of future sales, this 4.6
million survey was fully depreciated at March 31, 2006 and remained fully depreciated at June 30,
2006.
Processing & Reservoir SBU. Operating revenues for our Processing & Reservoir SBU increased
34% to 68.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006 from 51.2 million for the six
months ended June 30, 2005. In U.S. dollar terms, operating revenues increased 27% to U.S.$84.0
million from U.S.$ 66.2 million, due to dynamic market buoyed up by a high increase in the volume
of demand in the marine acquisition market and on customer-oriented services and to the new
processing centers we opened at the end of 2005 in India and Libya.
Products
Operating revenues for our Products segment in the six months ended June 30, 2006 increased
81% to 287.2 million from 158.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005. Expressed
in U.S. dollar terms, revenues increased 71% to U.S.$352.6 million from U.S.$205.7 million. This
strong increase was due to the successful launch of the Sentinel, the new generation of Marine
solid streamers, and to the still strong demand for Land products.
Excluding intra-group sales, operating revenues increased 68% to 232.2 million for the six
months ended June 30, 2006 from 138.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005.
Operating Expenses
Cost of operations, including depreciation and amortization, increased 41% to 420.4
million for the six months ended June 30, 2006 from 298.2 million for the six months ended June
30, 2005. As a percentage of operating revenues, cost of operations decreased to 66% for the six
months ended June 30, 2006 from 77% for the six months ended June 30, 2005. This decrease was due
to improved productivity in both Services and Products segments and to significant after-sales on
multi-client surveys that were already fully depreciated. This increase was due to improved
productivity in both Services and Products segments and to significant after-sales on multi-client
surveys that were already fully depreciated. As a consequence, gross profit increased 140% to
215.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006 from 89.6 million for the six months
ended June 30, 2005.
Research and development expenditures, net of government grants, increased 24% to 18.4
million for the six months ended June 30, 2006 from 14.8 million for the six months ended June
30, 2005 due to development efforts in our Product segment, and alower research tax credit granted
in 2006 to our Services segment.
Selling, general and administrative expenses increased 44% to 60.3 million for the six
months ended June 30, 2006 (including the IFRS2 cost of the May 2006 stock-option plan amounting to
1.1 million) from 41.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005, primarily as a
result of the Exploration Resources integration and the need to support the significant organic
growth. As a percentage of operating revenues, selling, general and administrative costs decreased
to 9% for the six months ended June 30, 2006 compared to 11% for the six months ended June 30,
2005.
Operating Income (Loss)
Our operating income increased to 146.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006,
from 32.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005. This increase resulted from both
Services and Products segment.
Operating income from our Services segment was 89.7 million profit for the six months
ended June 30, 2006 compared to 11.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005. This
increase was mainly due to a high level of after-sales, high prices in the exclusive marine
acquisition sector, improved use of our seismic vessels capacity, the recovery of our Land SBU, and
the positive effect of the euro/U.S. dollar exchange rate.
Operating income from our Products segment was 74.9 million for the six months ended June
30, 2006 compared to 30.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005, due the overall high
level of sales, an improved productivity in Marine products and a more favorable U.S. dollar/euro
exchange rate.
Other revenues were a profit of 9.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006
compared to a loss of 0.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2004. Other revenues in
2006 included primarily the gain on the sale of 49% of CGG Ardiseis in our Services segment,
amounting to 5.3 million, a $3.0 million hedging exchange gain on forward sales of U.S. dollars
and the gain on the sale of second-hand streamers for 1.5 million in our Services segment.
Page 34
Compagnie generale de geophysique, S.A.
Financial Income and Expenses, Net
Cost of financial debt, net decreased 33% to 13.1 million in the six months ended June 30,
2006 from 19.6 million during the six months ended June 30, 2005, which included the financial
cost of the early redemption of our remaining 10 5/8% bonds due 2007 of 9.4 million. In U.S.
dollars term, the cost decreased 37% to U.S.$16.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006,
from U.S.$25.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005.
This decrease is due to the financial cost of the early redemption of our remaining 10-5/8%
bonds due 2007 of 9.4 million in the six months ended June 30, 2005 and is partially offset by
changes in the structure of our financial debt from a financial debt mainly composed of our $150
million of 10 5/8% Senior Notes (repaid in May 2005) and our 7.75% U.S.$84,980,000 convertible
bonds due 2012 (partially converted in November 2005, with the remainder converted in May 2006)
during the six months ended June 30, 2005 to a financial debt mainly composed of our U.S.$165
million 71/2% Senior Notes due 2015 issued in April 2005, with a further fungible issuance of
U.S.$165 million in principal amount in January 2006 and a credit facility of U.S.$70 million
during the six months ended June 30, 2006.
The cost of the conversion option embedded in the U.S.$85 million remaining part of our 7.75%
U.S.$85 million convertible bonds due 2012 resulted in an aggregate expense of 23.0 for the six
months period ended June 30, 2006 and an aggregate expense of 21.2 million for the six months
period ended June 30, 2005, accounted for as Derivative and other expenses on convertible bonds
in our income statement. The increase is due to an increase in the value of the derivative mainly
linked to (i) the increase in our share price in both periods, (ii) the 1.6 million premium
paid for the early conversion of the remaining convertible bonds dated May 12, 2006 and (iii) the
0.7 million write-off of issuance costs on convertible bonds recognized as expense at the time
of the early conversion.
We had a 6.6 million loss in other financial items for the six months ended June 30, 2006,
including a 2.3 million of cost of forward on forward exchange contracts of U.S dollars
compared to no other financial items for the six months ended June 30, 2005. The remaining 2.3
million loss is mainly due to exchange losses difference which were offset by the 3.0 million
gain on forward exchange contracts in U.S. dollars that qualify for cash-flow hedge treatment,
presented as Other operating income in the income statement.
Equity in Income (Losses) of Investees
Income from investments accounted for under the equity method increased to 5.8 million for
the six month ended June 30, 2006 from 6.7 million for the six month ended June 30, 2005.
Equity in income from Argas, our joint venture in Saudi Arabia, increased to 5.7 million for
the six months ended June 30, 2006 from 6.7 million for the six month ended June 30, 2005.
Income Taxes
Income taxes increased to 33.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006 from
14.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005, principally attributable to an increase in
our U.S. income tax, linked to the high level of Marine products sales and after-sales of
multi-clients surveys in the Gulf of Mexico.
We are not subject to a worldwide taxation system and the income tax paid in foreign
countries, mainly based on revenues, does not generate comparable tax credits in France, our
country of consolidated taxation.
Net Income (Loss)
Our net income for the six months ended June 30, 2006 was a profit of 76.2 million
compared to a loss of 9.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005 as a result of the
factors described above.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our principal capital needs are for the funding of ongoing operations, capital expenditures,
investments in our multi-client data library and acquisitions.
Operations
For the six months ended June 30, 2006, our net cash provided by operating activities, before
changes in working capital, was 195.5 million compared to 82.2 million for the six months
ended June 30, 2005. This increase is linked to the increase in our net income, once financial
expenses are eliminated. Changes in working capital for the six months ended June 30, 2006 had a
negative impact of 53.5 million compared to a negative impact of 4.3 million for the six
months ended June 30, 2005.
Investing Activities
During the six months ended June 30, 2006, we incurred purchases of tangible and intangible
assets of 94.0 million (including 5.3 million capitalized development costs), mainly linked
to the conversion of our vessel, the Geo Challenger, from
Page 35
Compagnie generale de geophysique, S.A.
a cable vessel into a 3D seismic vessel, and to the equipping of the Symphony with Sentinel
streamers, compared to 36.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005 (including 4.0
million capitalized development costs). In addition, we entered into 0.2 million of new capital
leases in the six months ended June 30, 2006.
We also invested 26.5 million in our multi-client library during the six months ended June
30, 2005, primarily in the Gulf of Mexico and Brazil, compared to 15.0 million for the six
months ended June 30, 2005. At June 30, 2006, the net book value of our marine multi-client data
library was 79.4 million compared to 93.6 million at December 31, 2005.
Financing Activities
Net cash provided by financing activities during the six months period ended June 30, 2006 was
77.1 million compared to net cash used for financing activities of 55.3 million for the six
months ended June 30, 2006. In February 2006, we issued an additional $165 million of our
dollar-denominated 71/2% Senior Notes due 2015 first issued in April 2005 and the net proceeds from
the additional notes were used on February 10, 2006 primarily to repay the $140.3 million remaining
outstanding under our U.S.$375 million bridge credit facility used to finance the acquisition of
Exploration Resources. In March 2006, we concluded an asset financing agreement for U.S.$26.5
million with a bank, which was fully drawn at June 30, 2006 to finance the acquisition of
newly-developed Sentinel streamers for the vessel Symphony. In March 2006, we also concluded a
credit facility of U.S.$70 million, which was fully drawn at June 30, 2006, to finance the
conversion of the Geo-Challenger from a cable laying vessel to a 3D seismic vessel and seismic
equipment for the vessels C-Orion and Geo-Challenger.
Net debt was 242.5 million at June 30, 2006 and 297.2 million at December 31, 2005.
The ratio of net debt to equity decreased to 30% at June 30, 2006 from 43% at December 31, 2005.
Net debt is the amount of bank overdrafts, plus current portion of financial debt, plus
financial debt, less cash and cash equivalents. The following table presents a reconciliation of
net debt to financing items of the balance sheet at June 30, 2006 and at December 31, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions of euros) |
|
June 30, 2006 |
|
December 31, 2005 |
|
Bank overdrafts |
|
|
17.2 |
|
|
|
9.3 |
|
Current portion of financial debt |
|
|
38.3 |
|
|
|
157.9 |
|
Financial debt |
|
|
393.4 |
|
|
|
242.4 |
|
Less cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(206.4 |
) |
|
|
(112.4 |
) |
|
Net debt |
|
|
242.5 |
|
|
|
297.2 |
|
|
ORBDA for the three months ended June 30, 2006 was 106.3 million compared to 49.5
million for the three months ended June 30, 2005.
ORBDA for the six months ended June 30, 2006 was 237.6 million compared to 99.6
million for the six months ended June 30, 2005.
ORBDA (Operating Result Before Depreciation and Amortization is defined as operating
income (loss) excluding non-recurring revenues (expenses) plus depreciation, amortization and
additions (deductions) to valuation allowances of assets and add-back of dividends received from
equity companies. ORBDA is presented as additional information because our syndicated credit
facility dated March 12, 2004 requires us to respect a maximum ratio of consolidated net debt to
ORBDA. The maximum permitted ratio of consolidated net debt to ORBDA under the syndicated credit
facility is 2.50 on the 12 months period preceding December 31, 2005 and 2.00 on the following 12
months periods. If we fail to meet this ratio and do not obtain waivers, we may be unable to borrow
under such facility and may be compelled to repay amounts outstanding thereunder. Either the
inability to borrow or the requirement to repay borrowed sums may have a negative effect on our
liquidity and, consequently, may increase our vulnerability to general adverse economic and
industry trends or limit our flexibility in adapting to such trends. ORBDA is not a measure of
financial performance under IFRS or U.S. GAAP and should not be considered as
an alternative to cash flow from operating activities or as a measure of liquidity or an
alternative to net income as indicators of our operating performance or any other measures of
performance derived in accordance with IFRS or U.S. GAAP.
Page 36
Compagnie generale de geophysique, S.A.
The following table presents a reconciliation of ORBDA to Net cash provided by operating
activities for the periods indicated as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
June 30, |
(in million of euros) |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
ORBDA |
|
|
237,6 |
|
|
|
99.6 |
|
Other financial income (expense) net |
|
|
(29.6 |
) |
|
|
(14.0 |
) |
Income tax paid |
|
|
(37.9 |
) |
|
|
(17.3 |
) |
Non-recurring gains (losses) |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
Increase (decrease) in other long-term liabilities |
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
Expense and income calculated on stock-option |
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
Less net gain on sale of asset |
|
|
(6.7 |
) |
|
|
0.8 |
|
Other non-cash items |
|
|
28.7 |
|
|
|
13.5 |
|
(Increase) decrease in trade accounts and notes receivables |
|
|
(8.3 |
) |
|
|
(21.0 |
) |
(Increase) decrease in inventories and work in progress |
|
|
(22.4 |
) |
|
|
(7.6 |
) |
(Increase) decrease in other current assets |
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
5.5 |
|
Increase (decrease) in trade accounts and notes payables |
|
|
(19.1 |
) |
|
|
11.1 |
|
Increase (decrease) in other current liabilities |
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
Impact of changes in exchange rates on financial assets & liabilities |
|
|
(11.6 |
) |
|
|
7.4 |
|
Less variation of current assets allowance included above |
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
0.6 |
|
Net cash provided by operating activities according to cash-flow
statement |
|
|
142.0 |
|
|
|
77.9 |
|
For a more detailed description of our financing activities, see Liquidity and Capital
Resources in our annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2005.
Contractual Obligations
The following table sets forth our future cash obligations at June 30, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period |
|
|
Less than 1 year |
|
2-3 years |
|
4-5 years |
|
After 5 years |
|
Total |
|
|
(in millions of euros) |
|
Financial Debt |
|
|
25.9 |
|
|
|
34.1 |
|
|
|
38.6 |
|
|
|
262.2 |
|
|
|
360.8 |
|
Capital Lease Obligations (not discounted) |
|
|
12.4 |
|
|
|
23.0 |
|
|
|
13.6 |
|
|
|
29.3 |
|
|
|
78.3 |
|
Operating Leases |
|
|
50.1 |
|
|
|
40.5 |
|
|
|
15.9 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
108.9 |
|
Other Long-Term Obligations (bond
interest) |
|
|
14.6 |
|
|
|
34.1 |
|
|
|
38.9 |
|
|
|
87.6 |
|
|
|
175.2 |
|
|
Total Contractual Cash Obligations |
|
|
103.0 |
|
|
|
131.7 |
|
|
|
107.0 |
|
|
|
381.5 |
|
|
|
723.2 |
|
|
Trend Information
Currency Fluctuations
Certain changes in operating revenues set forth in U.S. dollars in this report on Form 20-F
were derived by translating revenues recorded in euros at the average rate for the relevant period.
Such information is presented in light of the fact that most of our revenues are denominated in
U.S. dollars while our consolidated financial statements are presented in euros. Such changes are
presented only in order to assist in an understanding of our operating revenues but are not part of
our reported financial statements and may not be indicative of changes in our actual or anticipated
operating revenues.
As a company that derives a substantial amount of its revenue from sales internationally, we
are subject to risks relating to fluctuations in currency exchange rates. In the six month period
ended June 30, 2006 and in year ended December 31, 2005, about 90% of our operating revenues and
approximately two-thirds of our operating expenses were denominated in currencies other than euros.
These included U.S. dollars and, to a significantly lesser extent, other non-Euro Western European
currencies, principally British pounds and Norwegian kroner. In addition, a significant portion of
our revenues that were invoiced in euros related to contracts that were effectively priced in U.S.
dollars, as the U.S. dollar often serves as the reference currency when bidding for contracts to
provide geophysical services.
Page 37
Compagnie generale de geophysique, S.A.
Fluctuations in the exchange rate of the euro against such other currencies, particularly
the U.S. dollar, have had in the past and can be expected in future periods to have a significant
effect upon our results of operations. Since we participate in competitive bids for data
acquisition contracts that are denominated in U.S. dollars, an appreciation of the U.S. dollar
against the euro improves our competitive position against that of other companies whose costs and
expenses are denominated in U.S. dollars. For financial reporting purposes, such appreciation
positively affects our reported results of operations since U.S. dollar-denominated earnings that
are converted to euros are stated at an increased value. An appreciation of the euro against the
U.S. dollar has the opposite effect. As a result, our sales and operating income are exposed to the
effects of fluctuations in the value of the euro versus the U.S. dollar. In addition, our exposure
to fluctuations in the euro/U.S. dollar exchange rate has considerably increased over the last few
years due to increased sales outside of Europe.
We attempt to match foreign currency revenues and expenses in order to balance our net
position of receivables and payables denominated in foreign currencies. For example, charter costs
for our vessels, as well as our most important computer hardware leases, are denominated in U.S.
dollars. Nevertheless, during the past five years such dollar-denominated expenses have not equaled
dollar-denominated revenues principally due to personnel costs payable in euros.
We do not enter into forward foreign currency exchange contracts for trading purposes.
Seasonality
Our land and marine seismic acquisition activities are seasonal in nature. We generally
experience decreased revenues in the first quarter of each year due to the effects of weather
conditions in the Northern Hemisphere. Also, our principal clients are generally not prepared to
fully commit their annual exploration budget to specific projects during the first quarter of the
year. We have historically experienced higher levels of activity in our equipment manufacturing
operations in the fourth quarter as our clients seek to fully deploy annual budgeted capital.
Nevertheless, we do not believe that these factors have negatively affected the sales during the
six months period ended June 30, 2006.
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting during the period
covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
our internal control over financial reporting. Nevertheless, following our acquisition of
Exploration Resources, our audit committee was informed of certain weaknesses in Exploration
Resources internal controls as well as actions being implemented to correct them, in particular
with regard to the IFRS and associated deadlines. An action plan is being implemented since the
last six months in which the local accounting team has been reinforced and internal controls have
been put in place in line with CGGs requirements and included as part of our Sarbanes Oxley
compliance project.
Page 38
Compagnie generale de geophysique, S.A.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, CGG has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Stéphane-Paul Frydman |
|
|
|
Compagnie Générale de Géophysique |
|
|
|
(Registrant) |
|
|
|
|
/s/ Stéphane-Paul Frydman |
|
|
Stéphane-Paul Frydman |
|
|
Group Controller, Treasurer and |
|
|
Deputy Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
Date:
September 5, 2006
Page 39