10-Q
Table of Contents

 
 
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED March 31, 2011
Commission File Number 1-34073
Huntington Bancshares Incorporated
     
Maryland   31-0724920
(State or other jurisdiction of   (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)   Identification No.)
41 South High Street, Columbus, Ohio 43287
Registrant’s telephone number (614) 480-8300
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. þ Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). þ Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
             
Large accelerated filer þ   Accelerated filer o   Non-accelerated filer o   Smaller reporting company o
        (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)    
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). o Yes þ No
There were 863,398,578 shares of Registrant’s common stock ($0.01 par value) outstanding on March 31, 2011.
 
 

 

 


 

HUNTINGTON BANCSHARES INCORPORATED
INDEX
         
       
 
       
       
 
       
    67  
 
       
    68  
 
       
    69  
 
       
    70  
 
       
    71  
 
       
       
 
       
    6  
 
       
    9  
 
       
       
 
       
    24  
 
       
    46  
 
       
    49  
 
       
    52  
 
       
    52  
 
       
    53  
 
       
    56  
 
       
    66  
 
       
    115  
 
       
    115  
 
       
       
 
       
    115  
 
       
    115  
 
       
    115  
 
       
    117  
 
       
 Exhibit 12.1
 Exhibit 12.2
 Exhibit 31.1
 Exhibit 31.2
 Exhibit 32.1
 Exhibit 32.2
 EX-101 INSTANCE DOCUMENT
 EX-101 SCHEMA DOCUMENT
 EX-101 CALCULATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT
 EX-101 LABELS LINKBASE DOCUMENT
 EX-101 PRESENTATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT
 EX-101 DEFINITION LINKBASE DOCUMENT

 

2


Table of Contents

Glossary of Acronyms and Terms
The following listing provides a comprehensive reference of common acronyms and terms used throughout the document:
     
2010 Form 10-K
  Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010
ABL
  Asset Based Lending
ACL
  Allowance for Credit Losses
AFCRE
  Automobile Finance and Commercial Real Estate
ALCO
  Asset-Liability Management Committee
ALLL
  Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses
ARM
  Adjustable Rate Mortgage
ARRA
  American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009
ASC
  Accounting Standards Codification
ATM
  Automated Teller Machine
AULC
  Allowance for Unfunded Loan Commitments
AVM
  Automated Valuation Methodology
C&I
  Commercial and Industrial
CDARS
  Certificate of Deposit Account Registry Service
CDO
  Collateralized Debt Obligations
CFPB
  Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection
CMO
  Collateralized Mortgage Obligations
CPP
  Capital Purchase Program
CRE
  Commercial Real Estate
DDA
  Demand Deposit Account
DIF
  Deposit Insurance Fund
Dodd-Frank Act
  Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act
EESA
  Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008
EPS
  Earnings Per Share
ERISA
  Employee Retirement Income Security Act
EVE
  Economic Value of Equity
Fannie Mae
  (see FNMA)
FASB
  Financial Accounting Standards Board
FDIC
  Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
FDICIA
  Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991
FFIEC
  Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council
FHA
  Federal Housing Administration
FHFA
  Federal Housing Finance Agency
FHLB
  Federal Home Loan Bank
FHLMC
  Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation
FICA
  Federal Insurance Contributions Act
FICO
  Fair Isaac Corporation
FNMA
  Federal National Mortgage Association
Franklin
  Franklin Credit Management Corporation
Freddie Mac
  (see FHLMC)
FSP
  Financial Stability Plan
FTE
  Fully-Taxable Equivalent
FTP
  Funds Transfer Pricing

 

3


Table of Contents

     
GAAP
  Generally Accepted Accounting Principles in the United States of America
GSE
  Government Sponsored Enterprise
HASP
  Homeowner Affordability and Stability Plan
HCER Act
  Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010
IPO
  Initial Public Offering
IRS
  Internal Revenue Service
LIBOR
  London Interbank Offered Rate
LTV
  Loan to Value
MD&A
  Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
MRC
  Market Risk Committee
MSR
  Mortgage Servicing Rights
NALs
  Nonaccrual Loans
NAV
  Net Asset Value
NCO
  Net Charge-off
NPAs
  Nonperforming Assets
NSF / OD
  Nonsufficient Funds and Overdraft
OCC
  Office of the Comptroller of the Currency
OCI
  Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
OCR
  Optimal Customer Relationship
OLEM
  Other Loans Especially Mentioned
OREO
  Other Real Estate Owned
OTTI
  Other-Than-Temporary Impairment
Plan
  Huntington Bancshares Retirement Plan
Reg E
  Regulation E, of the Electronic Fund Transfer Act
REIT
  Real Estate Investment Trust
SAD
  Special Assets Division
SBA
  Small Business Administration
SEC
  Securities and Exchange Commission
SERP
  Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan
Sky Financial
  Sky Financial Group, Inc.
SRIP
  Supplemental Retirement Income Plan
Sky Trust
  Sky Bank and Sky Trust, National Association
TAGP
  Transaction Account Guarantee Program
TARP
  Troubled Asset Relief Program
TARP Capital
  Series B Preferred Stock
TCE
  Tangible Common Equity
TDR
  Troubled Debt Restructured Loan
TLGP
  Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program
Treasury
  U.S. Department of the Treasury
UCS
  Uniform Classification System
Unizan
  Unizan Financial Corp.
USDA
  U.S. Department of Agriculture
VA
  U.S. Department of Veteran Affairs
VIE
  Variable Interest Entity
WGH
  Wealth Advisors, Government Finance, and Home Lending

 

4


Table of Contents

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
When we refer to “we,” “our,” and “us” in this report, we mean Huntington Bancshares Incorporated and our consolidated subsidiaries, unless the context indicates that we refer only to the parent company, Huntington Bancshares Incorporated. When we refer to the “Bank” in this report, we mean our only bank subsidiary, The Huntington National Bank, and its subsidiaries.
Item 2:   Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
INTRODUCTION
We are a multi-state diversified regional bank holding company organized under Maryland law in 1966 and headquartered in Columbus, Ohio. Through the Bank, we have 145 years of servicing the financial needs of our customers. Through our subsidiaries, we provide full-service commercial and consumer banking services, mortgage banking services, automobile financing, equipment leasing, investment management, trust services, brokerage services, customized insurance service programs, and other financial products and services. Our over 600 banking offices are located in Indiana, Kentucky, Michigan, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and West Virginia. Selected financial services and other activities are also conducted in various other states. International banking services are available through the headquarters office in Columbus, Ohio and a limited purpose office located in the Cayman Islands and another limited purpose office located in Hong Kong. Our foreign banking activities, in total or with any individual country, are not significant.
This MD&A provides information we believe necessary for understanding our financial condition, changes in financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows. The MD&A included in our 2010 Form 10-K should be read in conjunction with this MD&A as this discussion provides only material updates to the 2010 Form 10-K. This MD&A should also be read in conjunction with the financial statements, notes and other information contained in this report.
Our discussion is divided into key segments:
    Executive Overview - Provides a summary of our current financial performance, and business overview, including our thoughts on the impact of the economy, legislative and regulatory initiatives, and recent industry developments. This section also provides our outlook regarding our expectations for the remainder of 2011.
    Discussion of Results of Operations - Reviews financial performance from a consolidated Company perspective. It also includes a Significant Items section that summarizes key issues helpful for understanding performance trends. Key consolidated average balance sheet and income statement trends are also discussed in this section.
    Risk Management and Capital - Discusses credit, market, liquidity, operational, and compliance risks, including how these are managed, as well as performance trends. It also includes a discussion of liquidity policies, how we obtain funding, and related performance. In addition, there is a discussion of guarantees and / or commitments made for items such as standby letters of credit and commitments to sell loans, and a discussion that reviews the adequacy of capital, including regulatory capital requirements.
    Business Segment Discussion - Provides an overview of financial performance for each of our major business segments and provides additional discussion of trends underlying consolidated financial performance.
    Additional Disclosures - Provides comments on important matters including forward-looking statements, critical accounting policies and use of significant estimates, recent accounting pronouncements and developments, and acquisitions.
A reading of each section is important to understand fully the nature of our financial performance and prospects.

 

5


Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW
Summary of 2011 First Quarter Results
For the quarter, we reported net income of $126.4 million, or $0.14 per common share, compared with $122.9 million, or $0.05 per common share, in the prior quarter (see Table 1). The 2010 fourth quarter included a nonrecurring reduction of $0.07 per common share for the deemed dividend resulting from the repurchase of $1.4 billion in TARP Capital.
Fully-taxable equivalent net interest income was $408.3 million for the quarter, down $10.7 million, or 3%, from the 2010 fourth quarter. The decline primarily reflected the impact of fewer days and a decline in average investment securities. The fully-taxable equivalent net interest margin increased to 3.42% from 3.37%.
Total noninterest income declined $27.3 million, or 10%. This reflected a $30.5 million, or 57%, decline in mortgage banking income from the prior quarter primarily related to a 49% decline in mortgage originations. The anticipated decline was due to expected lower originations as mortgage interest rates increased late in the prior quarter. The decline was partially offset by a 5% increase in trust services income and a 21% increase in brokerage income.
Total noninterest expense declined $3.9 million, or 1%, reflecting declines in legal costs as collection activities declined, consulting expenses, OREO and foreclosure expense, and several other expense categories. Partially offsetting these declines were $17.0 million in additions to litigation reserves, seasonal increases in certain expenses, most notably personnel costs related to the annual FICA and other benefit expense resets, as well as annual merit increases for nonexecutives.
Credit quality performance in the current quarter continued to show significant improvement as NALs and criticized loans declined 18% and 13%, respectively. NCOs were $165.1 million, or an annualized 1.73% of average total loans and leases, down from $172.3 million, or 1.82%, in the 2010 fourth quarter. This helped drive a $37.6 million, or 43%, decline in the provision for credit losses. While the ACL as a percentage of loans and leases was 3.07%, down from 3.39% at December 31, 2010, the ACL as a percentage of NALs increased to 185% from 166%.
On January 19, 2011, we repurchased for $49.1 million the warrant to purchase 23.6 million common shares issued to the Treasury in connection with the CPP under the TARP. While the repurchase of this warrant had the positive effect of removing any possible future share dilutive impact, it negatively impacted our capital ratios. For example, the warrant repurchase negatively impacted our tangible common equity ratio by 9 basis points. Despite this impact, as a result of the first quarter’s earnings, our March 31, 2011, capital ratios increased from the end of last year.
Business Overview
General
Our general business objectives are: (1) grow revenue and profitability, (2) grow key fee businesses (existing and new), (3) improve credit quality, including lower NCOs and NPAs, (4) improve cross-sell and share-of-wallet across all business segments, (5) reduce noncore CRE exposure, and (6) continue to improve our overall management of risk.
Throughout last year, and continuing into this year, we are taking advantage of what we view as an opportunity to make significant investments in strategic initiatives to position us for more profitable and sustainable long-term growth. This includes implementing our ‘Fair Play’ banking philosophy value proposition for our customers, deepening product penetration, investing in expanding existing business, and launching new businesses.
This quarter, we are especially pleased with the increase in our net interest margin as this primarily reflected the benefit of continued growth in low cost noninterest-bearing demand deposits. These represent our most profitable deposits and the primary customer banking relationship. During the quarter, consumer checking account households grew at a 9% annualized rate, reflecting the traction we are gaining with customers in our markets as they increasingly embrace the benefits offered through our ‘Fair Play’ banking philosophy with programs such as 24-Hour Grace™ on overdrafts.
Economy
Borrower and consumer confidence and the sustainability of the slow economic recovery remain major factors impacting growth opportunities for the rest of 2011. Some signs that our footprint states of Indiana, Kentucky, Michigan, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and West Virginia have been experiencing cyclical recovery in line with, and in certain instances stronger than, the national average over the past year include:
    Increase in total payroll for all of our footprint states, with all but Indiana and West Virginia (two of our smaller regions) exceeding the national average.
    Strong manufacturing growth providing a boost to the regional economy as evidenced by the first manufacturing payroll growth since the 1990’s.

 

6


Table of Contents

    Decline in unemployment rates for all of our footprint states, except West Virginia.
    Combined exports from our footprint states have risen 51% between the recession low in January 2009 and February 2011.
    With the exception of Michigan, the FHFA House Price Index in the Huntington footprint states declined by less than the national average during the recession and all footprint states outperformed the FHFA House Price Index during 2010. Overall regional vacancy rates have shown signs of stabilization along with the national vacancy rate in 2010.
Unfortunately, during the 2011 first quarter a number of issues have emerged that could negatively impact the recovery. These include the continued instability in the Middle East with its ramifications on the cost of oil translating to higher gas prices, and the crisis in Japan which could negatively impact the production of consumer goods and services, most notably the electronics and automobile sectors. In addition, above average office vacancy rates in large metropolitan areas indicate the possibility for some continued softness in commercial real estate in 2011. For now, we continue to believe that the economy will remain relatively stable throughout 2011, with the potential for improvement in the latter half.
Legislative and Regulatory
Legislative and regulatory reforms continue to be adopted which impose additional restrictions on current business practices. Recent actions affecting us included an amendment to Reg E relating to certain overdraft fees for consumer deposit accounts and the passage of the Dodd-Frank Act.
Durbin Amendment — The Durbin Amendment to the Dodd-Frank Act instructed the Federal Reserve to establish the rate merchants pay banks for electronic clearing of debit card transactions (i.e., the interchange rate). Interchange fees accounted for about $90 million, or just over 80%, of our electronic banking income last year, our fourth largest fee income activity. In the fourth quarter, the Federal Reserve put out a proposal for comment that would cap the interchange rate at either $0.07 or $0.12 per transaction. While these rates are not finalized, if they stand, we estimate that between 75%-85% of our interchange income could be lost. The new rate is scheduled to take effect July 21, 2011.
Recent Industry Developments
Foreclosure Documentation — We are continuing to evaluate our foreclosure process and procedures given the recent consent orders entered into by some of the largest servicers regarding their foreclosure activities. We have determined that there is no reason to conclude that foreclosures were filed that should not have been filed. We have identified and are implementing process and control enhancements to ensure that our foreclosure processes are in compliance with applicable laws and regulations. We are consulting with counsel as necessary with respect to requirements imposed on the largest servicers in the consent orders and by the courts in which foreclosure proceedings are pending, which could impact our foreclosure actions.
Representation and Warranty Reserve —We primarily conduct our loan sale and securitization activity with FNMA and FHLMC. In connection with these and other sale and securitization transactions, we make certain representations and warranties that the loans meet certain criteria, such as collateral type and underwriting standards. In the future, we may be required to repurchase individual loans and / or indemnify these organizations against losses due to material breaches of these representations and warranties. At March 31, 2011, we have a reserve for such losses of $23.8 million, which is included in accrued expenses and other liabilities.
Mortgage Servicing Rights — MSR fair values are estimated based on residential mortgage servicing revenue in excess of estimated market costs to service the underlying loans. Historically, the estimated market cost to service has been stable. Due to changes in the regulatory environment related to loan servicing and foreclosure activities, costs to service may potentially increase, however the potential impact on the market costs to service remains uncertain. Certain large residential mortgage loan servicers entered into consent orders with banking regulators in April 2011, which require the banks to remedy deficiencies and unsafe or unsound practices and to enhance residential mortgage servicing and foreclosure processes. It is unclear what impact this may ultimately have on market costs to service. At March 31, 2011, we estimated a 25% increase to our loan servicing market cost assumption would result in a fair value impairment charge of approximately $8 million.
Expectations
We are optimistic about our prospects for continued earnings growth for the rest of the year.
Net income is expected to grow from the current quarter level throughout the rest of the year as pretax, pre-provision income rebounds from the current quarter’s level.

 

7


Table of Contents

We believe the momentum we are seeing in loan and deposit growth, coupled with a stable net interest margin, will contribute to growth in net interest income. Our C&I portfolio is expected to continue to show meaningful growth with much of this reflecting the positive impact from strategic initiatives to expand our commercial lending expertise into areas like specialty banking, asset based lending, and equipment financing, in addition to our long-standing continued support of small business lending. Growth in automobile loans is also expected to remain strong, aided by our recent expansion into new markets. Home equity and residential mortgages are likely to show only modest growth until there is more consumer confidence in the sustainability of the economic recovery. Our noncore CRE portfolio is expected to continue to decline, but likely at a slower rate.
We anticipate our core deposits will continue to grow, reflecting growth in consumer households and business relationships. Further, we expect the shift toward lower-cost noninterest-bearing demand deposit accounts will continue.
From a fee income perspective, first quarter results reflect for the most part the negative run rate impacts from the decline in mortgage banking income and deposit service charges. Mortgage banking income will likely show only modest, if any, growth throughout the rest of this year. Service charge income should begin to show modest growth later in this year as the benefits from our ‘Fair Play’ banking philosophy continue to gain momentum commensurate with consumer household growth and increased product penetration.
Electronic banking income in the second half of the year could be negatively impacted by as much as $45 million if the Federal Reserve’s currently proposed interchange fee structure is implemented July 21, 2011 as planned. There are some congressional movements to block or postpone the implementation, but any outcome is uncertain at this time. We also expect to see continued growth in the earnings contribution from other key fee income activities including capital markets, treasury management services, and brokerage, reflecting the impact of our cross-sell and product penetration initiatives throughout the Company, as well as the positive impact from strategic initiatives.
Expense levels are expected to remain relatively stable with declines resulting from continued low credit costs and improved expense efficiencies, offset by continued investments in strategic initiatives.
Nonaccrual loans are expected to decline meaningfully throughout the year.
We anticipate an effective tax rate for the remainder of the year to approximate 35% of income before income taxes less approximately $60.0 million of permanent tax differences over the remainder of 2011 primarily related to tax-exempt income, tax-advantaged investments, and general business credits.

 

8


Table of Contents

DISCUSSION OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
This section provides a review of financial performance from a consolidated perspective. It also includes a “Significant Items” section that summarizes key issues important for a complete understanding of performance trends. Key Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet and Statement of Income trends are discussed. All earnings per share data are reported on a diluted basis. For additional insight on financial performance, please read this section in conjunction with the “Business Segment Discussion.”

 

9


Table of Contents

Table 1 — Selected Quarterly Income Statement Data (1)
                                         
    2011     2010  
(dollar amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)   First     Fourth     Third     Second     First  
Interest income
  $ 501,877     $ 528,291     $ 534,669     $ 535,653     $ 546,779  
Interest expense
    97,547       112,997       124,707       135,997       152,886  
 
                             
Net interest income
    404,330       415,294       409,962       399,656       393,893  
Provision for credit losses
    49,385       86,973       119,160       193,406       235,008  
 
                             
Net interest income after provision for credit losses
    354,945       328,321       290,802       206,250       158,885  
 
                             
Service charges on deposit accounts
    54,324       55,810       65,932       75,934       69,339  
Mortgage banking income
    22,684       53,169       52,045       45,530       25,038  
Trust services income
    30,742       29,394       26,997       28,399       27,765  
Electronic banking income
    28,786       28,900       28,090       28,107       25,137  
Insurance income
    17,945       19,678       19,801       18,074       18,860  
Brokerage income
    20,511       16,953       16,575       18,425       16,902  
Bank owned life insurance income
    14,819       16,113       14,091       14,392       16,470  
Automobile operating lease income
    8,847       10,463       11,356       11,842       12,303  
Securities gains (losses)
    40       (103 )     (296 )     156       (31 )
Other income
    38,247       33,843       32,552       28,784       29,069  
 
                             
Total noninterest income
    236,945       264,220       267,143       269,643       240,852  
 
                             
Personnel costs
    219,028       212,184       208,272       194,875       183,642  
Outside data processing and other services
    40,282       40,943       38,553       40,670       39,082  
Net occupancy
    28,436       26,670       26,718       25,388       29,086  
Deposit and other insurance expense
    17,896       23,320       23,406       26,067       24,755  
Professional services
    13,465       21,021       20,672       24,388       22,697  
Equipment
    22,477       22,060       21,651       21,585       20,624  
Marketing
    16,895       16,168       20,921       17,682       11,153  
Amortization of intangibles
    13,370       15,046       15,145       15,141       15,146  
OREO and foreclosure expense
    3,931       10,502       12,047       4,970       11,530  
Automobile operating lease expense
    6,836       8,142       9,159       9,667       10,066  
Other expense
    48,083       38,537       30,765       33,377       30,312  
 
                             
Total noninterest expense
    430,699       434,593       427,309       413,810       398,093  
 
                             
Income before income taxes
    161,191       157,948       130,636       62,083       1,644  
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
    34,745       35,048       29,690       13,319       (38,093 )
 
                             
Net income
  $ 126,446     $ 122,900     $ 100,946     $ 48,764     $ 39,737  
 
                             
Dividends on preferred shares
    7,703       83,754       29,495       29,426       29,357  
 
                             
Net income applicable to common shares
  $ 118,743     $ 39,146     $ 71,451     $ 19,338     $ 10,380  
 
                             
Average common shares — basic
    863,359       757,924       716,911       716,580       716,320  
Average common shares — diluted(2)
    867,237       760,582       719,567       719,387       718,593  
Net income per common share — basic
  $ 0.14     $ 0.05     $ 0.10     $ 0.03     $ 0.01  
Net income per common share — diluted
    0.14       0.05       0.10       0.03       0.01  
Cash dividends declared per common share
    0.01       0.01       0.01       0.01       0.01  
Return on average total assets
    0.96 %     0.90 %     0.76 %     0.38 %     0.31 %
Return on average common shareholders’ equity
    10.3       3.8       7.4       2.1       1.1  
Return on average common tangible shareholders’ equity(3)
    12.7       5.6       10.0       3.8       2.7  
Net interest margin(4)
    3.42       3.37       3.45       3.46       3.47  
Efficiency ratio(5)
    64.7       61.4       60.6       59.4       60.1  
Effective tax rate
    21.6       22.2       22.7       21.5       (2,317.1 )
Revenue — FTE
                                       
Net interest income
  $ 404,330     $ 415,294     $ 409,962     $ 399,656     $ 393,893  
FTE adjustment
    3,945       3,708       2,631       2,490       2,248  
 
                             
Net interest income(4)
    408,275       419,002       412,593       402,146       396,141  
Noninterest income
    236,945       264,220       267,143       269,643       240,852  
 
                             
Total revenue(4)
  $ 645,220     $ 683,222     $ 679,736     $ 671,789     $ 636,993  
 
                             
     
(1)   Comparisons for presented periods are impacted by a number of factors. Refer to “Significant Items” for additional discussion regarding these key factors.

 

10


Table of Contents

     
(2)   For all periods presented, the impact of the convertible preferred stock issued in 2008 and the warrants issued to the U.S. Department of the Treasury in 2008 related to Huntington’s participation in the voluntary Capital Purchase Program was excluded from the diluted share calculation because the result was more than basic earnings per common share (anti-dilutive) for the periods. The convertible preferred stock and warrants were repurchased in December 2010, and January 2011, respectively.
 
(3)   Net income excluding expense for amortization of intangibles for the period divided by average tangible shareholders’ equity. Average tangible shareholders’ equity equals average total shareholders’ equity less average intangible assets and goodwill. Expense for amortization of intangibles and average intangible assets are net of deferred tax liability, and calculated assuming a 35% tax rate.
 
(4)   On a fully-taxable equivalent (FTE) basis assuming a 35% tax rate.
 
(5)   Noninterest expense less amortization of intangibles and goodwill impairment divided by the sum of FTE net interest income and noninterest income excluding securities gains (losses).
Significant Items
Definition of Significant Items
From time-to-time, revenue, expenses, or taxes, are impacted by items judged by us to be outside of ordinary banking activities and / or by items that, while they may be associated with ordinary banking activities, are so unusually large that their outsized impact is believed by us at that time to be infrequent or short-term in nature. We refer to such items as Significant Items. Most often, these Significant Items result from factors originating outside the Company; e.g., regulatory actions / assessments, windfall gains, changes in accounting principles, one-time tax assessments / refunds, litigation actions, etc. In other cases, they may result from our decisions associated with significant corporate actions out of the ordinary course of business; e.g., merger / restructuring charges, recapitalization actions, goodwill impairment, etc.
Even though certain revenue and expense items are naturally subject to more volatility than others due to changes in market and economic environment conditions, as a general rule volatility alone does not define a Significant Item. For example, changes in the provision for credit losses, gains / losses from investment activities, asset valuation writedowns, etc., reflect ordinary banking activities and are, therefore, typically excluded from consideration as a Significant Item.
We believe the disclosure of Significant Items provides a better understanding of our performance and trends to ascertain which of such items, if any, to include or exclude from an analysis of our performance; i.e., within the context of determining how that performance differed from expectations, as well as how, if at all, to adjust estimates of future performance accordingly. To this end, we adopted a practice of listing Significant Items in our external disclosure documents (e.g., earnings press releases, investor presentations, Forms 10-Q and 10-K).
Significant Items for any particular period are not intended to be a complete list of items that may materially impact current or future period performance.
Significant Items Influencing Financial Performance Comparisons
Earnings comparisons were impacted by the Significant Items summarized below.
  1.   Litigation Reserve. During the 2011 first quarter, $17.0 million of additions to litigation reserves were recorded as other noninterest expense. This resulted in a negative impact of $0.01 per common share.
  2.   TARP Capital Purchase Program Repurchase. During the 2010 fourth quarter, we issued $920.0 million of our common stock and $300.0 million of subordinated debt. The net proceeds, along with other available funds, were used to repurchase all $1.4 billion of TARP capital that we issued to the Treasury under its TARP CPP in 2008. As part of this transaction, there was a deemed dividend that did not impact net income, but resulted in a negative impact of $0.07 per common share for the 2010 fourth quarter.
  3.   Franklin Relationship. Our relationship with Franklin was acquired in the Sky Financial acquisition in 2007. On March 31, 2009, we restructured our relationship with Franklin. During the 2010 first quarter, a $38.2 million ($0.05 per common share) net tax benefit was recognized, primarily reflecting the increase in the net deferred tax asset relating to the assets acquired from the March 31, 2009 restructuring.

 

11


Table of Contents

The following table reflects the earnings impact of the above-mentioned significant items for periods affected by this Results of Operations discussion:
Table 2 — Significant Items Influencing Earnings Performance Comparison
                                                 
    Three Months Ended  
    March 31, 2011     December 31, 2010     March 31, 2010  
(dollar amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)   After-tax     EPS     After-tax     EPS     After-tax     EPS  
Net income — GAAP
  $ 126,446             $ 122,900             $ 39,737          
Earnings per share, after-tax
          $ 0.14             $ 0.05             $ 0.01  
Change from prior quarter — $
            0.09               (0.05 )             0.57  
Change from prior quarter — %
            180.0 %             (50 )%             N.R. %
 
                                               
Change from year-ago — $
          $ 0.13             $ 0.61             $ 6.80  
Change from year-ago — %
            1,300 %             109 %             N.R. %
                                                 
Significant Items - favorable (unfavorable) impact:   Earnings (1)     EPS     Earnings (1)     EPS     Earnings (1)     EPS  
Net tax benefit recognized (2)
                            38,222       0.05  
Litigation reserves addition
    (17,028 )     (0.01 )                        
Preferred stock conversion deemed dividend
                      (0.07 )            
     
N.R. — not relevant. The numerator of the calculation is a positive value and the dominator is a negative value.
 
(1)   Pretax unless otherwise noted.
 
(2)   After-tax.
Pretax, Pre-provision Income Trends
One non-GAAP performance measurement that we believe is useful in analyzing our underlying performance trends is pretax, pre-provision income. This is the level of pretax earnings adjusted to exclude the impact of: (a) provision expense, (b) investment securities gains/losses, which are excluded because securities market valuations may become particularly volatile in times of economic stress, (c) amortization of intangibles expense, which is excluded because the return on tangible common equity is a key measurement we use to gauge performance trends, and (d) certain other items identified by us (see Significant Items) that we believe may distort our underlying performance trends.
The following table reflects pretax, pre-provision income for each of the past five quarters:
Table 3 — Pretax, Pre-provision Income (1)
                                         
    2011     2010  
(dollar amounts in thousands)   First     Fourth     Third     Second     First  
 
 
Income before income taxes
  $ 161,191     $ 157,948     $ 130,636     $ 62,083     $ 1,644  
 
                                       
Add: Provision for credit losses
    49,385       86,973       119,160       193,406       235,008  
Less: Securities gains (losses)
    40       (103 )     (296 )     156       (31 )
Add: Amortization of intangibles
    13,370       15,046       15,145       15,141       15,146  
Less: Litigation reserves addition
    (17,028 )                        
 
                             
 
                                       
Total pretax, pre-provision income
  $ 240,934     $ 260,070     $ 265,237     $ 270,474     $ 251,829  
 
                             
 
                                       
Change in total pretax, pre-provision income:
                                       
Prior quarter change — amount
  $ (19,136 )   $ (5,167 )   $ (5,237 )   $ 18,645     $ 9,768  
Prior quarter change — percent
    (7 )%     (2 )%     (2 )%     7 %     4 %
     
(1)   Pretax, pre-provision income is a non-GAAP financial measure. Any ratio utilizing this financial measure is also non-GAAP. This financial measure has been included as it is considered to be an important metric with which to analyze and evaluate our results of operations and financial strength. Other companies may calculate this financial measure differently.

 

12


Table of Contents

Pretax, pre-provision income was $240.9 million in the 2011 first quarter, down $19.1 million, or 7%, from the prior quarter. From a run-rate basis, the decline reflected:
    $8.8 million seasonal reduction in revenue as the current quarter had fewer days than the prior quarter. This included a $7.0 million reduction in net interest income and a $1.8 million reduction in service charge and electronic banking income.
    $6.9 million seasonal increase in noninterest expense, primarily associated with the annual reset of FICA and other payroll taxes.
Net Interest Income / Average Balance Sheet
2011 First Quarter versus 2010 First Quarter
Fully-taxable equivalent net interest income increased $12.1 million, or 3%, from the year-ago quarter. This reflected the benefit of a $2.1 billion, or 5%, increase in average earning assets. The FTE net interest margin declined to 3.42% from 3.47%. The increase in average earning assets reflected a combination of factors including:
    $1.1 billion, or 3%, increase in average total loans and leases.
    $1.1 billion, or 13%, increase in average total available-for-sale and other securities, reflecting the deployment of cash from core deposit growth.
The 5 basis point decline in the FTE net interest margin reflected the impact of stronger deposit growth funding available-for-sale and other securities purchases at a lower incremental spread.
The following table details the change in our average loans and leases and deposits:
Table 4 — Average Loans/Leases and Deposits — 2011 First Quarter vs. 2010 First Quarter
                                 
    First Quarter     Change  
(dollar amounts in millions)   2011     2010     Amount     Percent  
Loans/Leases
                               
Commercial and industrial
  $ 13,121     $ 12,314     $ 807       7 %
Commercial real estate
    6,524       7,677       (1,153 )     (15 )
 
                       
Total commercial
    19,645       19,991       (346 )     (2 )
Automobile
    5,701       4,250       1,451       34  
Home equity
    7,728       7,539       189       3  
Residential mortgage
    4,465       4,477       (12 )      
Other loans
    559       723       (164 )     (23 )
 
                       
Total consumer
    18,453       16,989       1,464       9  
 
                       
Total loans and leases
  $ 38,098     $ 36,980     $ 1,118       3 %
 
                       
Deposits
                               
Demand deposits — noninterest-bearing
  $ 7,333     $ 6,627     $ 706       11 %
Demand deposits — interest-bearing
    5,357       5,716       (359 )     (6 )
Money market deposits
    13,492       10,340       3,152       30  
Savings and other domestic time deposits
    4,701       4,613       88       2  
Core certificates of deposit
    8,391       9,976       (1,585 )     (16 )
 
                       
Total core deposits
    39,274       37,272       2,002       5  
Other deposits
    2,390       2,951       (561 )     (19 )
 
                       
Total deposits
  $ 41,664     $ 40,223     $ 1,441       4 %
 
                       
The $1.1 billion, or 3%, increase in average total loans and leases primarily reflected:
    $1.5 billion, or 34%, increase in the average automobile portfolio. Automobile lending is a core competency and continued to be an area of growth. The growth from the year-ago quarter exhibited further penetration within our historical geographic footprint, as well as the positive impact of our expansion into Eastern Pennsylvania and five New England states. Origination quality remained high.
    $0.8 billion, or 7%, increase in the average C&I portfolio. Growth from the year-ago quarter reflected the benefits from our strategic initiatives including large corporate, asset based lending, and equipment finance. In addition, we continued to see growth in automobile floor plan lending as well as more traditional middle-market loans. This growth is evident despite line-of-credit utilization rates that remain well below historical norms.
    $0.2 billion, or 3%, increase in the average home equity portfolio, reflecting higher originations and continued slower runoff.

 

13


Table of Contents

Partially offset by:
    $1.2 billion, or 15%, decrease in average CRE loans reflecting the continued execution of our plan to reduce CRE exposure, primarily in the noncore CRE segment. This reduction will continue through 2011, reflecting normal amortization, paydowns, and refinancing.
Average total deposits increased $1.4 billion, or 4%, from the year-ago quarter reflecting:
    $2.0 billion, or 5%, growth in average total core deposits. The drivers of this change were a $3.2 billion, or 30%, growth in average money market deposits, and a $0.7 billion, or 11%, growth in average noninterest-bearing demand deposits. These increases were partially offset by a $1.6 billion, or 16%, decline in average core certificates of deposit and a $0.4 billion, or 6%, decrease in average interest-bearing demand deposits. Contributing to the growth in noninterest-bearing demand deposits was 7% growth in the number of retail banking DDA households.
Partially offset by:
    $0.4 billion, or 23%, decline in average brokered deposits and negotiable CDs, reflecting a strategy of reducing such noncore funding.
2011 First Quarter versus 2010 Fourth Quarter
FTE net interest income decreased $10.7 million, or 3%, from the 2010 fourth quarter. This reflected a 2% (8% annualized) decrease in average earning assets as the FTE net interest margin increased to 3.42% from 3.37%. The decrease in average earning assets reflected a combination of factors including:
    $0.6 billion, or 6% (25% annualized), decrease in average available-for-sale and other securities, primarily related to two funding requirements. The first was to fund the repurchase of TARP capital and related warrants and the second was the $0.4 billion decline in noncore deposits.
    $0.4 billion, or 46%, decline in loans held for sale as our mortgage pipeline slowed considerably during the current quarter.
Partially offset by:
    $0.3 billion, or 1% (3% annualized), increase in average total loans and leases.
The net interest margin increased 5 basis points, reflecting the positive impacts of increases in lower cost deposits, improved deposit pricing, and day count, partially offset by the negative impacts of a reduction in swap income, lower loan yields, and the issuance of subordinated debt.

 

14


Table of Contents

The following table details the change in our average loans / leases and deposits:
Table 5 — Average Loans/Leases and Deposits — 2011 First Quarter vs. 2010 Fourth Quarter
                                 
    2011     2010     Change  
(dollar amounts in millions)   First Quarter     Fourth Quarter     Amount     Percent  
Loans/Leases
                               
Commercial and industrial
  $ 13,121     $ 12,767     $ 354       3 %
Commercial real estate
    6,524       6,798       (274 )     (4 )
 
                       
Total commercial
    19,645       19,565       80        
Automobile
    5,701       5,520       181       3  
Home equity
    7,728       7,709       19        
Residential mortgage
    4,465       4,430       35       1  
Other consumer
    559       576       (17 )     (3 )
 
                       
Total consumer
    18,453       18,235       218       1  
 
                       
Total loans and leases
  $ 38,098     $ 37,800     $ 298       1 %
 
                       
Deposits
                               
Demand deposits — noninterest-bearing
  $ 7,333     $ 7,188     $ 145       2 %
Demand deposits — interest-bearing
    5,357       5,317       40       1  
Money market deposits
    13,492       13,158       334       3  
Savings and other domestic time deposits
    4,701       4,640       61       1  
Core certificates of deposit
    8,391       8,646       (255 )     (3 )
 
                       
Total core deposits
    39,274       38,949       325       1  
Other deposits
    2,390       2,755       (365 )     (13 )
 
                       
Total deposits
  $ 41,664     $ 41,704     $ (40 )     %
 
                       
The $0.3 billion, or 1% (3% annualized), increase in average total loans and leases primarily reflected:
    $0.4 billion, or 3% (11% annualized), growth in the average C&I portfolio. The growth in the C&I portfolio during the 2011 first quarter came from several business lines including large corporate, middle market, asset based lending, automobile floor plan lending, and equipment finance. On a geographic basis, nine of our eleven regions experienced loan growth in the quarter, adding to the diversity of the portfolio growth. Line-of-credit utilization rates remained low and little changed from the end of the prior quarter.
    $0.2 billion, or 3% (13% annualized), growth in the average automobile portfolio. We continue to originate high quality loans with acceptable returns. To date, we have seen no material change in our outlook for automobile originations as a result of the crisis in Japan. While the crisis in Japan has resulted in a selective slowdown in automobile production, we currently do not see this having a material negative impact on our automobile finance business. We focus on larger, multi-franchised, well-capitalized dealers that are rarely reliant on the success of one franchise to generate profitability. In addition, the slowdown is only impacting new automobile production, which is providing support to used automobile pricing and sales activity. More than half of our loan production represents used automobile financing.
Partially offset by:
    $0.3 billion, or 4% (16% annualized), decline in average CRE loans, primarily as a result of our ongoing strategy to reduce our exposure to the commercial real estate market. The decline in noncore CRE accounted for 63% of the decline in the total CRE portfolio. The noncore CRE declines reflected paydowns, refinancing, and NCOs. The core CRE portfolio continued to exhibit high quality characteristics with minimal downgrade or NCO activity.
Average total deposits were little changed from the prior quarter reflecting:
    $0.3 billion, or 1% (3% annualized), growth in average total core deposits. The primary drivers of this growth were a 3% (10% annualized) increase in average money market deposits, partially reflecting funds from maturing CDs flowing into money market accounts given the low absolute level of rates on new CD offerings. The growth in average total core deposits also reflected 2% (8% annualized) growth in average noninterest-bearing demand deposits. Contributing to the growth in noninterest-bearing demand deposits was a 9% annualized prior quarter growth in consumer checking account households.
Partially offset by:
    $0.2 billion, or 10% (42% annualized), decline in average brokered deposits and negotiable CDs, reflecting a strategy of reducing such noncore funding.

 

15


Table of Contents

Tables 6 and 7 reflect quarterly average balance sheets and rates earned and paid on interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities.
Table 6 — Consolidated Quarterly Average Balance Sheets
                                                         
                                            Change  
    2011     2010     1Q11 vs. 1Q10  
(dollar amounts in millions)   First     Fourth     Third     Second     First     Amount     Percent  
Assets
                                                       
Interest-bearing deposits in banks
  $ 130     $ 218     $ 282     $ 309     $ 348     $ (218 )     (63 )%
Trading account securities
    144       297       110       127       96       48       50  
Loans held for sale
    420       779       663       323       346       74       21  
Available-for-sale and other securities:
                                                       
Taxable
    9,108       9,747       8,876       8,369       8,027       1,081       13  
Tax-exempt
    445       449       365       389       443       2        
 
                                         
Total available-for-sale and other securities
    9,553       10,196       9,241       8,758       8,470       1,083       13  
Loans and leases: (1)
                                                       
Commercial:
                                                       
Commercial and industrial
    13,121       12,767       12,393       12,244       12,314       807       7  
Commercial real estate:
                                                       
Construction
    611       716       989       1,279       1,409       (798 )     (57 )
Commercial
    5,913       6,082       6,084       6,085       6,268       (355 )     (6 )
 
                                         
Commercial real estate
    6,524       6,798       7,073       7,364       7,677       (1,153 )     (15 )
 
                                         
Total commercial
    19,645       19,565       19,466       19,608       19,991       (346 )     (2 )
 
                                         
Consumer:
                                                       
Automobile
    5,701       5,520       5,140       4,634       4,250       1,451       34  
Home equity
    7,728       7,709       7,567       7,544       7,539       189       3  
Residential mortgage
    4,465       4,430       4,389       4,608       4,477       (12 )      
Other consumer
    559       576       653       695       723       (164 )     (23 )
 
                                         
Total consumer
    18,453       18,235       17,749       17,481       16,989       1,464       9  
 
                                         
Total loans and leases
    38,098       37,800       37,215       37,089       36,980       1,118       3  
Allowance for loan and lease losses
    (1,231 )     (1,323 )     (1,384 )     (1,506 )     (1,510 )     279       (18 )
 
                                         
Net loans and leases
    36,867       36,477       35,831       35,583       35,470       1,397       4  
 
                                         
Total earning assets
    48,345       49,290       47,511       46,606       46,240       2,105       5  
 
                                         
Cash and due from banks
    1,299       1,187       1,618       1,509       1,761       (462 )     (26 )
Intangible assets
    665       679       695       710       725       (60 )     (8 )
All other assets
    4,291       4,313       4,277       4,384       4,486       (195 )     (4 )
 
                                         
Total assets
  $ 53,369     $ 54,146     $ 52,717     $ 51,703     $ 51,702     $ 1,667       3 %
 
                                         
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity
                                                       
Deposits:
                                                       
Demand deposits — noninterest-bearing
  $ 7,333     $ 7,188     $ 6,768     $ 6,849     $ 6,627     $ 706       11 %
Demand deposits — interest-bearing
    5,357       5,317       5,319       5,971       5,716       (359 )     (6 )
Money market deposits
    13,492       13,158       12,336       11,103       10,340       3,152       30  
Savings and other domestic deposits
    4,701       4,640       4,639       4,677       4,613       88       2  
Core certificates of deposit
    8,391       8,646       8,948       9,199       9,976       (1,585 )     (16 )
 
                                         
Total core deposits
    39,274       38,949       38,010       37,799       37,272       2,002       5  
Other domestic time deposits of $250,000 or more
    606       737       690       661       698       (92 )     (13 )
Brokered deposits and negotiable CDs
    1,410       1,575       1,495       1,505       1,843       (433 )     (23 )
Deposits in foreign offices
    374       443       451       402       410       (36 )     (9 )
 
                                         
Total deposits
    41,664       41,704       40,646       40,367       40,223       1,441       4  
Short-term borrowings
    2,134       2,134       1,739       966       927       1,207       130  
Federal Home Loan Bank advances
    30       112       188       212       179       (149 )     (83 )
Subordinated notes and other long-term debt
    3,525       3,558       3,672       3,836       4,062       (537 )     (13 )
 
                                         
Total interest-bearing liabilities
    40,020       40,320       39,477       38,532       38,764       1,256       3  
 
                                         
All other liabilities
    994       993       952       924       947       47       5  
Shareholders’ equity
    5,022       5,645       5,520       5,398       5,364       (342 )     (6 )
 
                                         
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity
  $ 53,369     $ 54,146     $ 52,717     $ 51,703     $ 51,702     $ 1,667       3 %
 
                                         
     
(1)   For purposes of this analysis, NALs are reflected in the average balances of loans.

 

16


Table of Contents

Table 7 — Consolidated Quarterly Net Interest Margin Analysis
                                         
    Average Rates (2)  
    2011     2010  
Fully-taxable equivalent basis (1)   First     Fourth     Third     Second     First  
Assets
                                       
Interest-bearing deposits in banks
    0.11 %     0.63 %     0.21 %     0.20 %     0.18 %
Trading account securities
    1.37       1.98       1.20       1.74       2.15  
Loans held for sale
    4.08       4.01       5.75       5.02       4.98  
Available-for-sale and other securities:
                                       
Taxable
    2.53       2.42       2.77       2.85       2.94  
Tax-exempt
    4.70       4.59       4.70       4.62       4.37  
 
                             
Total available-for-sale and other securities
    2.63       2.52       2.84       2.93       3.01  
Loans and leases: (3)
                                       
Commercial:
                                       
Commercial and industrial
    4.57       4.94       5.14       5.31       5.60  
Commercial real estate:
                                       
Construction
    3.36       3.07       2.83       2.61       2.66  
Commercial
    3.93       3.92       3.91       3.69       3.60  
 
                             
Commercial real estate
    3.88       3.83       3.76       3.49       3.43  
 
                             
Total commercial
    4.34       4.56       4.64       4.63       4.76  
 
                             
Consumer:
                                       
Automobile
    5.22       5.46       5.79       6.46       6.63  
Home equity
    4.54       4.64       4.74       5.26       5.59  
Residential mortgage
    4.76       4.82       4.97       4.70       4.89  
Other consumer
    7.85       7.92       7.10       6.84       7.00  
 
                             
Total consumer
    4.90       5.04       5.19       5.49       5.73  
 
                             
Total loans and leases
    4.61       4.79       4.90       5.04       5.21  
 
                             
Total earning assets
    4.24 %     4.29 %     4.49 %     4.63 %     4.82 %
 
                             
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity
                                       
Deposits:
                                       
Demand deposits — noninterest-bearing
    %     %     %     %     %
Demand deposits — interest-bearing
    0.09       0.13       0.17       0.22       0.22  
Money market deposits
    0.50       0.77       0.86       0.93       1.00  
Savings and other domestic deposits
    0.81       0.90       0.99       1.07       1.19  
Core certificates of deposit
    2.07       2.11       2.31       2.68       2.93  
 
                             
Total core deposits
    0.89       1.05       1.18       1.33       1.51  
Other domestic time deposits of $250,000 or more
    1.08       1.21       1.28       1.37       1.44  
Brokered deposits and negotiable CDs
    1.11       1.53       2.21       2.56       2.49  
Deposits in foreign offices
    0.20       0.17       0.22       0.19       0.19  
 
                             
Total deposits
    0.90       1.06       1.21       1.37       1.55  
Short-term borrowings
    0.18       0.20       0.22       0.21       0.21  
Federal Home Loan Bank advances
    2.98       0.95       1.25       1.93       2.71  
Subordinated notes and other long-term debt
    2.34       2.15       2.15       2.05       2.25  
 
                             
Total interest-bearing liabilities
    0.99 %     1.11 %     1.25 %     1.41 %     1.60 %
 
                             
 
 
Net interest rate spread
    3.21 %     3.16 %     3.24 %     3.22 %     3.22 %
Impact of noninterest-bearing funds on margin
    0.21       0.21       0.21       0.24       0.25  
 
                             
Net interest margin
    3.42 %     3.37 %     3.45 %     3.46 %     3.47 %
 
                             
     
(1)   FTE yields are calculated assuming a 35% tax rate.
 
(2)   Loan and lease and deposit average rates include impact of applicable derivatives, non-deferrable fees, and amortized deferred fees.
 
(3)   For purposes of this analysis, NALs are reflected in the average balances of loans.

 

17


Table of Contents

Provision for Credit Losses
(This section should be read in conjunction with the Credit Risk section.)
The provision for credit losses is the expense necessary to maintain the ALLL and the AULC at levels adequate to absorb our estimate of inherent credit losses in the loan and lease portfolio and the portfolio of unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit.
The provision for credit losses for the 2011 first quarter was $49.4 million, down $37.6 million, or 43%, from the prior quarter and down $185.6 million, or 79%, from the year-ago quarter. Reflecting the resolution of problem credits for which reserves had previously been established, the current quarter’s provision for credit losses was $115.7 million less than total NCOs (see Credit Quality discussion).
Noninterest Income
The following table reflects noninterest income for each of the past five quarters:
Table 8 — Noninterest Income
                                         
    2011     2010  
(dollar amounts in thousands)   First     Fourth     Third     Second     First  
Service charges on deposit accounts
  $ 54,324     $ 55,810     $ 65,932     $ 75,934     $ 69,339  
Mortgage banking income
    22,684       53,169       52,045       45,530       25,038  
Trust services income
    30,742       29,394       26,997       28,399       27,765  
Electronic banking income
    28,786       28,900       28,090       28,107       25,137  
Insurance income
    17,945       19,678       19,801       18,074       18,860  
Brokerage income
    20,511       16,953       16,575       18,425       16,902  
Bank owned life insurance income
    14,819       16,113       14,091       14,392       16,470  
Automobile operating lease income
    8,847       10,463       11,356       11,842       12,303  
Securities gains (losses)
    40       (103 )     (296 )     156       (31 )
Other income
    38,247       33,843       32,552       28,784       29,069  
 
                             
Total noninterest income
  $ 236,945     $ 264,220     $ 267,143     $ 269,643     $ 240,852  
 
                             

 

18


Table of Contents

The following table details mortgage banking income and the net impact of MSR hedging activity for each of the past five quarters:
Table 9 — Mortgage Banking Income
                                         
    2011     2010  
(dollar amounts in thousands, except as noted)   First     Fourth     Third     Second     First  
Mortgage Banking Income
                                       
Origination and secondary marketing
  $ 19,799     $ 48,236     $ 35,840     $ 19,778     $ 13,586  
Servicing fees
    12,546       11,474       12,053       12,178       12,418  
Amortization of capitalized servicing
    (9,863 )     (13,960 )     (13,003 )     (10,137 )     (10,065 )
Other mortgage banking income
    3,769       4,789       4,966       3,664       3,210  
 
                             
Sub-total
    26,251       50,539       39,856       25,483       19,149  
MSR valuation adjustment(1)
    774       31,319       (12,047 )     (26,221 )     (5,772 )
Net trading (losses) gains related to MSR hedging
    (4,341 )     (28,689 )     24,236       46,268       11,661  
 
                             
Total mortgage banking income
  $ 22,684     $ 53,169     $ 52,045     $ 45,530     $ 25,038  
 
                             
 
                                       
Mortgage originations (in millions)
  $ 929     $ 1,827     $ 1,619     $ 1,161     $ 869  
Average trading account securities used to hedge MSRs (in millions)
    46       184       23       28       18  
Capitalized mortgage servicing rights(2)
    202,559       196,194       161,594       179,138       207,552  
Total mortgages serviced for others (in millions)(2)
    16,456       15,933       15,713       15,954       15,968  
MSR % of investor servicing portfolio
    1.23 %     1.23 %     1.03 %     1.12 %     1.30 %
 
                                       
Net Impact of MSR Hedging
                                       
MSR valuation adjustment(1)
  $ 774     $ 31,319     $ (12,047 )   $ (26,221 )   $ (5,772 )
Net trading (losses) gains related to MSR hedging
    (4,341 )     (28,689 )     24,236       46,268       11,661  
Net interest income related to MSR hedging
    99       713       32       58       169  
 
                             
Net (loss) gain of MSR hedging
  $ (3,468 )   $ 3,343     $ 12,221     $ 20,105     $ 6,058  
 
                             
     
(1)   The change in fair value for the period represents the MSR valuation adjustment, net of amortization of capitalized servicing.
 
(2)   At period end.
2011 First Quarter versus 2010 First Quarter
Noninterest income decreased $3.9 million, or 2%, from the year-ago quarter.
Table 10 — Noninterest Income — 2011 First Quarter vs. 2010 First Quarter
                                 
    First Quarter     Change  
(dollar amounts in thousands)   2011     2010     Amount     Percent  
 
 
Service charges on deposit accounts
  $ 54,324     $ 69,339     $ (15,015 )     (22 )%
Mortgage banking income
    22,684       25,038       (2,354 )     (9 )
Trust services income
    30,742       27,765       2,977       11  
Electronic banking income
    28,786       25,137       3,649       15  
Insurance income
    17,945       18,860       (915 )     (5 )
Brokerage income
    20,511       16,902       3,609       21  
Bank owned life insurance income
    14,819       16,470       (1,651 )     (10 )
Automobile operating lease income
    8,847       12,303       (3,456 )     (28 )
Securities gains (losses)
    40       (31 )     71       N.R.  
Other income
    38,247       29,069       9,178       32  
 
                       
Total noninterest income
  $ 236,945     $ 240,852     $ (3,907 )     (2 )%
 
                       
     
N.R. — Not relevant, as denominator of calculation is a loss in prior period compared with income in current period.

 

19


Table of Contents

The $3.9 million, or 2%, decrease in total noninterest income from the year-ago quarter reflected:
    $15.0 million, or 22%, decline in service charges on deposit accounts, reflecting lower consumer service charges due to a combination of factors including the implementation of the amendment to Reg E, our “Fair Play” banking philosophy, and lower underlying activity levels.
    $3.5 million, or 28%, decline in automobile operating lease income reflecting the impact of a declining portfolio as a result of having exited that business in 2008.
    $2.4 million, or 9%, decrease in mortgage banking income. This primarily reflected a $9.5 million reduction in MSR net hedging income (losses), as the current quarter reflected a $3.6 million net loss, partially offset by a $6.2 million, or 46%, increase in origination and secondary marketing income, as originations increased 7% from the year-ago quarter.
Partially offset by:
    $9.2 million, or 32%, increase in other income, of which $7.5 million was associated with increased gains from the sale of SBA loans. Also contributing to the growth were increases from capital market activities and the sale of interest rate protection products.
    $3.6 million, or 15%, increase in electronic banking income, reflecting an increase in debit card transaction volume and new account growth.
    $3.6 million, or 21%, increase in brokerage income, primarily reflecting increased sales of investment products.
    $3.0 million, or 11%, increase in trust services income, reflecting increases in asset market values, net growth in accounts, and higher fees for income tax preparation.
2011 First Quarter versus 2010 Fourth Quarter
Noninterest income decreased $27.3 million, or 10%, from the prior quarter.
Table 11 — Noninterest Income — 2011 First Quarter vs. 2010 Fourth Quarter
                                 
    2011     2010     Change  
(dollar amounts in thousands)   First Quarter     Fourth Quarter     Amount     Percent  
 
 
Service charges on deposit accounts
  $ 54,324     $ 55,810     $ (1,486 )     (3 )%
Mortgage banking income
    22,684       53,169       (30,485 )     (57 )
Trust services income
    30,742       29,394       1,348       5  
Electronic banking income
    28,786       28,900       (114 )      
Insurance income
    17,945       19,678       (1,733 )     (9 )
Brokerage income
    20,511       16,953       3,558       21  
Bank owned life insurance income
    14,819       16,113       (1,294 )     (8 )
Automobile operating lease income
    8,847       10,463       (1,616 )     (15 )
Securities gains (losses)
    40       (103 )     143       N.R.  
Other income
    38,247       33,843       4,404       13  
 
                       
Total noninterest income
  $ 236,945     $ 264,220     $ (27,275 )     (10 )%
 
                       
     
N.R. — Not relevant, as denominator of calculation is a loss in prior period compared with income in current period.
The $27.3 million, or 10%, decrease in total noninterest income from the prior quarter reflected:
    $30.5 million, or 57%, decline in mortgage banking income. The decrease primarily resulted from a $28.4 million, or 59%, reduction in origination and secondary marketing income. Mortgage originations declined to $0.9 billion, or 49%, from $1.8 billion in the prior quarter, reflecting a rise in mortgage interest rates late in the 2010 fourth quarter, thus decreasing refinancing and purchase activity. The decline also reflected a $6.2 million reduction associated with MSR hedging activities as the current quarter reflected $3.6 million of MSR net hedging losses compared with $2.6 million of such gains in the prior quarter.

 

20


Table of Contents

Partially offset by:
    $4.4 million, or 13%, growth in other income, reflecting a $4.8 million increase in gains on the sale of SBA loans.
    $3.6 million, or 21%, growth in brokerage income, reflecting increased annuity sales.
Noninterest Expense
(This section should be read in conjunction with Significant Item 1.)
The following table reflects noninterest expense for each of the past five quarters:
Table 12 — Noninterest Expense
                                         
    2011     2010  
(dollar amounts in thousands)   First     Fourth     Third     Second     First  
 
 
Personnel costs
  $ 219,028     $ 212,184     $ 208,272     $ 194,875     $ 183,642  
Outside data processing and other services
    40,282       40,943       38,553       40,670       39,082  
Net occupancy
    28,436       26,670       26,718       25,388       29,086  
Deposit and other insurance expense
    17,896       23,320       23,406       26,067       24,755  
Professional services
    13,465       21,021       20,672       24,388       22,697  
Equipment
    22,477       22,060       21,651       21,585       20,624  
Marketing
    16,895       16,168       20,921       17,682       11,153  
Amortization of intangibles
    13,370       15,046       15,145       15,141       15,146  
OREO and foreclosure expense
    3,931       10,502       12,047       4,970       11,530  
Automobile operating lease expense
    6,836       8,142       9,159       9,667       10,066  
Other expense
    48,083       38,537       30,765       33,377       30,312  
 
                             
 
                                       
Total noninterest expense
  $ 430,699     $ 434,593     $ 427,309     $ 413,810     $ 398,093  
 
                             
Number of employees (FTE), at period-end
    11,319       11,341       11,279       11,117       10,678  
2011 First Quarter versus 2010 First Quarter
Noninterest expense increased $32.6 million, or 8%, from the year-ago quarter.
Table 13 — Noninterest Expense — 2011 First Quarter vs. 2010 First Quarter
                                 
    First Quarter     Change  
(dollar amounts in thousands)   2011     2010     Amount     Percent  
 
                               
Personnel costs
  $ 219,028     $ 183,642     $ 35,386       19 %
Outside data processing and other services
    40,282       39,082       1,200       3  
Net occupancy
    28,436       29,086       (650 )     (2 )
Deposit and other insurance expense
    17,896       24,755       (6,859 )     (28 )
Professional services
    13,465       22,697       (9,232 )     (41 )
Equipment
    22,477       20,624       1,853       9  
Marketing
    16,895       11,153       5,742       51  
Amortization of intangibles
    13,370       15,146       (1,776 )     (12 )
OREO and foreclosure expense
    3,931       11,530       (7,599 )     (66 )
Automobile operating lease expense
    6,836       10,066       (3,230 )     (32 )
Other expense
    48,083       30,312       17,771       59  
 
                       
 
                               
Total noninterest expense
  $ 430,699     $ 398,093     $ 32,606       8 %
 
                       
 
                               
Number of employees (FTE), at period-end
    11,319       10,678       641       6 %

 

21


Table of Contents

The $32.6 million, or 8%, increase in total noninterest expense from the year-ago quarter reflected:
    $35.4 million, or 19%, increase in personnel costs, primarily reflecting a 6% increase in full-time equivalent staff in support of strategic initiatives, as well as higher benefit related expenses, including the reinstatement of our 401(k) plan matching contribution in the second quarter of last year.
    $17.8 million, or 59%, increase in other expense, primarily reflecting $17.0 million of expense associated with additions to litigation reserves in the current quarter.
    $5.7 million, or 51%, increase in marketing expense, reflecting increases in branding and product advertising activities in support of strategic initiatives.
Partially offset by:
    $9.2 million, or 41%, decrease in professional services, reflecting a decline in costs related to collection activities and consulting expenses.
    $7.6 million, or 66%, decline in OREO and foreclosure expense, reflecting a 64% decline in OREO from the year-ago quarter.
    $6.9 million, or 28%, decline in deposit and other insurance expense.
    $3.2 million, or 32%, decline in automobile operating lease expense as that portfolio continued to run-off.
2011 First Quarter versus 2010 Fourth Quarter
Noninterest expense decreased $3.9 million, or 1%, from the prior quarter.
Table 14 — Noninterest Expense — 2011 First Quarter vs. 2010 Fourth Quarter
                                 
    2011     2010     Change  
(dollar amounts in thousands)   First Quarter     Fourth Quarter     Amount     Percent  
 
                               
Personnel costs
  $ 219,028     $ 212,184     $ 6,844       3 %
Outside data processing and other services
    40,282       40,943       (661 )     (2 )
Net occupancy
    28,436       26,670       1,766       7  
Deposit and other insurance expense
    17,896       23,320       (5,424 )     (23 )
Professional services
    13,465       21,021       (7,556 )     (36 )
Equipment
    22,477       22,060       417       2  
Marketing
    16,895       16,168       727       4  
Amortization of intangibles
    13,370       15,046       (1,676 )     (11 )
OREO and foreclosure expense
    3,931       10,502       (6,571 )     (63 )
Automobile operating lease expense
    6,836       8,142       (1,306 )     (16 )
Other expense
    48,083       38,537       9,546       25  
 
                       
 
                               
Total noninterest expense
  $ 430,699     $ 434,593     $ (3,894 )     (1 )%
 
                       
 
                               
Number of employees (FTE), at period-end
    11,319       11,341       (22 )     %
The $3.9 million, or 1%, decrease in total noninterest expense from the prior quarter reflected:
    $7.6 million, or 36%, decline in professional services, reflecting a decline in legal costs related to collection activities and consulting expenses.
    $6.6 million, or 63%, decline in OREO and foreclosure expense as OREO balances declined 18% in the current quarter.
    $5.4 million, or 23%, decline in deposit and other insurance expense.
Partially offset by:
    $9.5 million, or 25%, increase in other expense. This reflected the current quarter’s $17.0 million of expense associated with additions to litigation reserves, partially offset by the benefit of declines in fraud losses, repurchase losses related to representations and warranties made on mortgage loans sold, and travel expense.
    $6.8 million, or 3%, increase in personnel costs, primarily reflecting a seasonal $6.9 million increase in FICA and other employment taxes.

 

22


Table of Contents

Provision for Income Taxes
(This section should be read in conjunction with Significant Item 3.)
The provision for income taxes in the 2011 first quarter was $34.7 million. This compared with a provision for income taxes of $35.0 million in the 2010 fourth quarter and a benefit for income taxes of $38.1 million in the 2010 first quarter. All three quarters include the benefits from tax-exempt income, tax-advantaged investments, and general business credits. At March 31, 2011, we had a net deferred tax asset of $532.6 million. Based on both positive and negative evidence and our level of forecasted future taxable income, there was no impairment to the deferred tax asset at March 31, 2011. The total disallowed deferred tax asset for regulatory capital purposes decreased to $89.9 million at March 31, 2011, from $161.3 million at December 31, 2010.
The IRS completed audits of our consolidated federal income tax returns for tax years through 2007. The IRS, various states, and other jurisdictions remain open to examination, including Kentucky, Indiana, Michigan, Pennsylvania, West Virginia and Illinois. The IRS and the Commonwealth of Kentucky have proposed adjustments to our previously filed tax returns. We believe that our tax positions related to such proposed adjustments are correct and supported by applicable statutes, regulations, and judicial authority, and intend to vigorously defend them. It is possible the ultimate resolution of the proposed adjustments, if unfavorable, may be material to the results of operations in the period it occurs. However, although no assurance can be given, we believe the resolution of these examinations will not, individually or in the aggregate, have a material adverse impact on our consolidated financial position.

 

23


Table of Contents

RISK MANAGEMENT AND CAPITAL
Risk awareness, identification and assessment, reporting, and active management are key elements in overall risk management. We manage risk to an aggregate moderate-to-low risk profile strategy through a control framework and by monitoring and responding to potential risks. We believe that our primary risk exposures are credit, market, liquidity, operational, and compliance risk. We hold capital proportionately against these risks. More information on risk can be found in the Risk Factors section included in Item 1A of our 2010 Form 10-K and subsequent filings with the SEC. Additionally, the MD&A included in our 2010 Form 10-K should be read in conjunction with this MD&A as this discussion provides only material updates to the 2010 Form 10-K. Our definition, philosophy, and approach to risk management have not materially changed from the discussion presented in the 2010 Form 10-K.
Credit Risk
Credit risk is the risk of financial loss if a counterparty is not able to meet the agreed upon terms of the financial obligation. The majority of our credit risk is associated with lending activities, as the acceptance and management of credit risk is central to profitable lending. We also have significant credit risk associated with our available-for-sale and other investment securities portfolio (see Investment Securities Portfolio discussion). While there is credit risk associated with derivative activity, we believe this exposure is minimal. The significant change in the economic conditions and the resulting changes in borrower behavior over the past several years resulted in our focusing significant resources to the identification, monitoring, and managing of our credit risk. In addition to the traditional credit risk mitigation strategies of credit policies and processes, market risk management activities, and portfolio diversification, we added more quantitative measurement capabilities utilizing external data sources, enhanced use of modeling technology, and internal stress testing processes. Our portfolio management policies demonstrate our commitment to maintaining an aggregate moderate-to-low risk profile. To that end, we continue to expand resources in our credit risk management area.
Our portfolio has shown steadily improving credit quality trends across the entire loan and lease portfolio despite the continued weakness in the residential real estate market and the U.S. economy in general. Although NCOs and delinquencies remain elevated, the improving trend of our credit metrics is significant and sustained. We believe that early identification of problem loans and aggressive action plans for these problem loans, combined with high quality new loan originations, will result in continuing improvement. However, despite the improvement in credit metrics, additional risks emerged during the 2011 first quarter. These include the continued instability in the Middle East with its ramifications on the cost of oil, and the crisis in Japan that could negatively impact the production of consumer goods and services, most notably in the automobile sector. In the short term, we anticipate the rising price of gasoline will have a direct affect on the consumer confidence index, and will impact the finances of some of our retail and commercial borrowers. The pronounced downturn in the residential real estate market that began in early 2007 has resulted in significantly lower residential real estate values and higher delinquencies and NCOs, including loans to builders and developers of residential real estate. In addition, continued high unemployment, among other factors, has slowed any significant recovery. As a result, we have experienced higher than historical levels of delinquencies and NCOs in our loan portfolios since 2008. The value of our investment securities backed by residential and commercial real estate was also negatively impacted by a lack of liquidity in the financial markets and anticipated credit losses.
Loan and Lease Credit Exposure Mix
At March 31, 2011, our loans and leases totaled $38.2 billion, little changed compared to $38.1 billion at December 31, 2010.
At March 31, 2011, commercial loans and leases totaled $19.6 billion, and represented 52% of our total credit exposure. Our commercial portfolio is diversified along product type, size, and geography within our footprint and is comprised of the following (see Commercial Credit discussion):
C&I — C&I loans and leases are made to commercial customers for use in normal business operations to finance working capital needs, equipment purchases, or other projects. The majority of these borrowers are customers doing business within our geographic regions. C&I loans and leases are generally underwritten individually and secured with the assets of the company and/or the personal guarantee of the business owners. The financing of owner occupied facilities is considered a C&I loan even though there is improved real estate as collateral. This treatment is a function of the credit decision process, which focuses on cash flow from operations of the business to repay the debt. The operation, sale, rental, or refinancing of the real estate is not considered the primary repayment source for these types of loans. As we look to grow our C&I portfolio, we have further developed our ABL capabilities by adding experienced ABL professionals to take advantage of market opportunities resulting in better leveraging of the manufacturing base in our primary markets. Also, our Equipment Finance area is targeting larger equipment financings in the manufacturing sector in addition to our core products. We also added a large corporate banking group with sufficient resources to ensure we appropriately recognize and manage the risks associated with these types of lending.

 

24


Table of Contents

CRE — CRE loans consist of loans for income-producing real estate properties, real estate investment trusts, and real estate developers. We mitigate our risk on these loans by requiring collateral values that exceed the loan amount and underwriting the loan with projected cash flow in excess of the debt service requirement. These loans are made to finance properties such as apartment buildings, office and industrial buildings, and retail shopping centers, and are repaid through cash flows related to the operation, sale, or refinance of the property.
Construction CRE — Construction CRE loans are loans to individuals, companies, or developers used for the construction of a commercial or residential property for which repayment will be generated by the sale or permanent financing of the property. Our construction CRE portfolio primarily consists of retail, residential (land, single family, and condominiums), office, and warehouse product types. Generally, these loans are for construction projects that have been presold or preleased, or have secured permanent financing, as well as loans to real estate companies with significant equity invested in each project. These loans are underwritten and managed by a specialized real estate lending group that actively monitors the construction phase and manages the loan disbursements according to the predetermined construction schedule.
Total consumer loans and leases were $18.6 billion at March 31, 2011, and represented 48% of our total loan and lease credit exposure. The consumer portfolio was primarily diversified among home equity loans and lines-of-credit, residential mortgages, and automobile loans and leases (see Consumer Credit discussion).
Automobile — Automobile loans and leases are primarily comprised of loans made through automotive dealerships and include exposure in selected states outside of our primary banking markets. No state outside of our primary banking markets represented more than 5% of our total automobile portfolio at March 31, 2011. Our automobile lease portfolio represents an immaterial portion of the total portfolio as we exited the automobile leasing business during the 2008 fourth quarter.
Home equity — Home equity lending includes both home equity loans and lines-of-credit. This type of lending, which is secured by a first- or second- lien on the borrower’s residence, allows customers to borrow against the equity in their home. Given the current low interest rate environment, many borrowers have utilized the line-of-credit home equity product as the primary source of financing their home. As a result, the proportion of the home equity portfolio secured by a first-lien has increased significantly in our portfolio over the past three years, positively impacting the portfolio’s performance. We expect this positive impact to continue in the future. Real estate market values at the time of origination directly affect the amount of credit extended and, in the event of default, subsequent changes in these values impact the severity of losses. We actively manage the extension of credit and the amount of credit extended through a combination of criteria including debt-to-income policies and LTV policy limits.
Residential mortgage — Residential mortgage loans represent loans to consumers for the purchase or refinance of a residence. These loans are generally financed over a 15- to 30- year term, and in most cases, are extended to borrowers to finance their primary residence. Generally, our practice is to sell a significant portion of our fixed-rate originations in the secondary market. As such, the majority of the loans in our portfolio are ARMs. These ARMs primarily consist of a fixed-rate of interest for the first 3 to 5 years, and then adjust annually. These loans comprised approximately 56% of our total residential mortgage loan portfolio at March 31, 2011. We are subject to repurchase risk associated with residential mortgage loans sold in the secondary market. This activity has increased recently reflecting the overall market conditions and GSE activity and an appropriate level of allowance has been established to address the repurchase risk inherent in the portfolio.
Other consumer — This portfolio primarily consists of consumer loans not secured by real estate or automobiles, including personal unsecured loans.

 

25


Table of Contents

Table 15 — Loan and Lease Portfolio Composition
                                                                                 
    2011     2010  
(dollar amounts in millions)   March 31,     December 31,     September 30,     June 30,     March 31,  
 
 
Commercial:(1)
                                                                               
Commercial and industrial
  $ 13,299       35 %   $ 13,063       34 %   $ 12,425       33 %   $ 12,392       34 %   $ 12,245       33 %
Commercial real estate:
                                                                               
Construction
    587       2       650       2       738       2       1,106       3       1,443       4  
Commercial
    5,711       15       6,001       16       6,174       16       6,078       16       6,013       16  
 
                                                           
Total commercial real estate
    6,298       17       6,651       18       6,912       18       7,184       19       7,456       20  
 
                                                           
Total commercial
    19,597       52       19,714       52       19,337       51       19,576       53       19,701       53  
 
                                                           
Consumer:
                                                                               
Automobile
    5,802       15       5,614       15       5,385       14       4,847       13       4,403       12  
Home equity
    7,784       20       7,713       20       7,690       21       7,510       20       7,514       20  
Residential mortgage
    4,517       12       4,500       12       4,511       12       4,354       12       4,614       12  
Other consumer
    546       1       566       1       578       2       683       2       700       3  
 
                                                           
Total consumer
    18,649       48       18,393       48       18,164       49       17,394       47       17,231       47  
 
                                                           
Total loans and leases
  $ 38,246       100 %   $ 38,107       100 %   $ 37,501       100 %   $ 36,970       100 %   $ 36,932       100 %
 
                                                           
     
(1)   There were no commercial loans outstanding that would be considered a concentration of lending to a particular industry or group of industries.
The table below provides our total loan and lease portfolio segregated by the type of collateral securing the loan or lease:
Table 16 — Loan and Lease Portfolio by Collateral Type
                                                                                 
    2011     2010  
(dollar amounts in millions)   March 31,     December 31,     September 30,     June 30,     March 31,  
 
 
Real estate
  $ 22,231       58 %   $ 22,603       59 %   $ 22,717       61 %   $ 22,666       61 %   $ 23,238       63 %
Vehicles
    7,333       19       7,134       19       6,652       18       6,054       16       5,583       15  
Receivables/Inventory
    3,819       10       3,763       10       3,524       9       3,511       9       3,503       9  
Machinery/Equipment
    1,787       5       1,766       5       1,763       5       1,812       5       1,792       5  
Unsecured
    1,159       3       1,117       3       1,018       3       1,027       3       997       3  
Securities/Deposits
    778       2       734       2       730       2       780       2       742       2  
Other
    1,139       3       990       2       1,097       2       1,120       4       1,077       3  
 
                                                           
Total loans and leases
  $ 38,246       100 %   $ 38,107       100 %   $ 37,501       100 %   $ 36,970       100 %   $ 36,932       100 %
 
                                                           
Commercial Credit
In commercial lending, on-going credit management is dependent on the type and nature of the loan. We monitor all significant exposures on an on-going basis. All commercial credit extensions are assigned internal risk ratings reflecting the borrower’s probability-of-default and loss-given-default (severity of loss). This two-dimensional rating methodology provides granularity in the portfolio management process. The probability-of-default is rated and applied at the borrower level. The loss-given-default is rated and applied based on the specific type of credit extension and the quality and lien position associated with the underlying collateral. The internal risk ratings are assessed at origination and updated at each periodic monitoring event. There is also extensive macro portfolio management analysis on an on-going basis. As an example, the retail properties class of the CRE portfolio and manufacturing loans within the C&I portfolio have each received more frequent evaluation at the individual loan level given the weak environment and our portfolio composition. We continually review and adjust our risk-rating criteria based on actual experience, which provides us with the current risk level in the portfolio and is the basis for determining an appropriate allowance amount for this portfolio.

 

26


Table of Contents

Our Credit Review group performs testing to provide an independent review and assessment of the quality and / or risk of new loan originations. This group is part of our Risk Management area, and conducts portfolio reviews on a risk-based cycle to evaluate individual loans, validate risk ratings, as well as test the consistency of credit processes. Similarly, to provide consistent oversight, a centralized portfolio management team monitors and reports on the performance of small business loans, which are included within the commercial loan portfolio.
All loans categorized as Classified (see Note 3 of Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements) are managed by our SAD. The SAD is a specialized credit group that handles the day-to-day management of workouts, commercial recoveries, and problem loan sales. Its responsibilities include developing action plans, assessing risk ratings, and determining the adequacy of the allowance, the accrual status, and the ultimate collectability of the Classified loan portfolio.
Our commercial portfolio is diversified by customer size, as well as geographically throughout our footprint. No outstanding commercial loans and leases comprised an industry or geographic concentration of lending. Certain segments of our commercial portfolio are discussed in further detail below.
C&I PORTFOLIO
We manage the risks inherent in this portfolio through origination policies, concentration limits, on-going loan level reviews, recourse requirements, and continuous portfolio risk management activities. Our origination policies for this portfolio include loan product-type specific policies such as LTV and debt service coverage ratios, as applicable.
While C&I borrowers have been challenged by the weak economy, quarterly levels of newly identified problem loans have declined, reflecting a combination of proactive risk identification as well as some relative improvement in the economic conditions. Nevertheless, some borrowers may no longer have sufficient capital to withstand the extended stress. As a result, these borrowers may not be able to comply with the original terms of their credit agreements. We continue to focus attention on the portfolio management process to proactively identify borrowers that may be facing financial difficulty and to assess all potential solutions. The impact of the economic environment is further evidenced by the level of line-of-credit activity, as borrowers continued to maintain relatively low utilization percentages.
As shown in the following table, C&I loans and leases totaled $13.3 billion at March 31, 2011:
Table 17 — Commercial and Industrial Loans and Leases by Class
                                 
    March 31, 2011  
    Commitments     Loans Outstanding  
(dollar amounts in millions)   Amount     Percent     Amount     Percent  
 
 
Class:
                               
Owner occupied
  $ 4,288       22 %   $ 3,861       29 %
Other commercial and industrial
    15,244       78       9,438       71  
 
                       
 
                               
Total
  $ 19,532       100 %   $ 13,299       100 %
 
                       
The difference in the composition between the commitments and loans and leases outstanding in the other commercial and industrial class results from a significant amount of working capital lines-of-credit and businesses have reduced these borrowings. The funding percentage associated with the lines-of-credit has been a significant indicator of credit quality. Generally, borrowers that fully utilize their line-of-credit consistently, over time, have a higher risk profile. This represents one of many credit risk factors we utilize in assessing the credit risk portfolio of individual borrowers and the overall portfolio.
CRE PORTFOLIO
We manage the risks inherent in this portfolio specific to CRE lending, focusing on the quality of the developer, and the specifics associated with each project. Generally, we: (1) limit our loans to 80% of the appraised value of the commercial real estate, (2) require net operating cash flows to be 125% of required interest and principal payments, and (3) if the commercial real estate is nonowner occupied, require that at least 50% of the space of the project be preleased.
Each CRE loan is classified as either core or noncore. We separated the CRE portfolio into these categories in order to provide more clarity around our portfolio management strategies and to provide an additional level of transparency. We believe segregating the noncore CRE from core CRE improves our ability to understand the nature, performance prospects, and problem resolution opportunities, thus allowing us to continue to deal proactively with any emerging credit issues.

 

27


Table of Contents

A CRE loan is generally considered core when the borrower is an experienced, well-capitalized developer in our Midwest footprint, and has either an established meaningful relationship with us that generates an acceptable return on capital or demonstrates the prospect of becoming one. The core CRE portfolio was $3.9 billion at March 31, 2011, representing 62% of total CRE loans. The performance of the core portfolio met our expectations based on the consistency of the asset quality metrics within the portfolio. Based on our extensive project level assessment process, including forward-looking collateral valuations, we continue to believe the credit quality of the core portfolio is stable.
A CRE loan is generally considered noncore based on the lack of a substantive relationship outside of the loan product, with no immediate prospects for meeting the core relationship criteria. The noncore CRE portfolio declined from $2.6 billion at December 31, 2010, to $2.4 billion at March 31, 2011, and represented 38% of total CRE loans. Of the loans in the noncore portfolio at March 31, 2011, 53% were categorized as Pass, 95% had guarantors, 99% were secured, and 92% were located within our geographic footprint. However, it is within the noncore portfolio where most of the credit quality challenges exist. For example, $0.3 billion, or 12%, of related outstanding balances, are classified as NALs. SAD administered $1.2 billion, or 52%, of total noncore CRE loans at March 31, 2011. We expect to exit the majority of noncore CRE relationships over time through normal repayments and refinancings, possible sales should economically attractive opportunities arise, or the reclassification to a core CRE relationship if it expands to meet the core criteria.
The table below provides a segregation of the CRE portfolio as of March 31, 2011:
Table 18 — Core Commercial Real Estate Loans by Property Type and Property Location
                                                                                 
    March 31, 2011  
                                                    West                    
(dollar amounts in millions)   Ohio     Michigan     Pennsylvania     Indiana     Kentucky     Florida     Virginia     Other     Total Amount     %  
 
                                                                               
Core portfolio:
                                                                               
Retail properties
  $ 453     $ 89     $ 72     $ 77     $ 8     $ 39     $ 30     $ 344     $ 1,112       18 %
Office
    327       101       101       21       12             39       54       655       10  
Multi family
    267       86       39       32       29       1       39       58       551       9  
Industrial and warehouse
    238       60       22       44       3       30       6       83       486       8  
Other commercial real estate
    708       133       36       44             19       52       115       1,107       18  
 
                                                           
Total core portfolio
    1,993       469       270       218       52       89       166       654       3,911       62  
Total noncore portfolio
    1,353       389       140       215       33       77       55       125       2,387       38  
 
                                                           
 
                                                                               
Total
  $ 3,346     $ 858     $ 410     $ 433     $ 85     $ 166     $ 221     $ 779     $ 6,298       100 %
 
                                                           

 

28


Table of Contents

Credit quality data regarding the ACL and NALs, segregated by core CRE loans and noncore CRE loans, is presented in the following table:
Table 19 — Commercial Real Estate — Core vs. Noncore Portfolios
                                                 
    March 31, 2011  
    Ending                                     Nonaccrual  
(dollar amounts in millions)   Balance     Prior NCOs     ACL $     ACL %     Credit Mark (1)     Loans  
Total core
  $ 3,911     $ 12     $ 140       3.58 %     3.87 %   $ 30.6  
 
                                               
Noncore — SAD (2)
    1,249       353       285       22.82       39.83       239.3  
Noncore — Other
    1,138       14       95       8.35       9.46       35.9  
 
                                   
Total noncore
    2,387       367       380       15.92       27.12       275.2  
 
                                   
Total commercial real estate
  $ 6,298     $ 379     $ 520       8.26 %     13.46 %   $ 305.8  
 
                                   
                                                 
    December 31, 2010  
Total core
  $ 4,042     $ 5     $ 160       3.96 %     4.08 %   $ 15.7  
 
                                               
Noncore — SAD (2)
    1,400       379       329       23.50       39.80       307.2  
Noncore — Other
    1,209       5       105       8.68       9.06       40.8  
 
                                   
Total noncore
    2,609       384       434       16.63       27.33       348.0  
 
                                   
Total commercial real estate
  $ 6,651     $ 389     $ 594       8.93 %     13.96 %   $ 363.7  
 
                                   
     
(1)   Calculated as (Prior NCOs + ACL $) / (Ending Balance + Prior NCOs).
 
(2)   Noncore loans managed by SAD, the area responsible for managing loans and relationships designated as Classified Loans.
As shown in the above table, the ending balance of the CRE portfolio at March 31, 2011, declined $0.4 billion, or 5%, compared with December 31, 2010. Of this decline, 63% occurred in the noncore segment of the portfolio and was a result of payoffs and NCOs as we actively focus on the noncore portfolio to reduce our overall CRE exposure. This reduction demonstrates our continued commitment to maintaining an aggregate moderate-to-low risk profile. We anticipate further noncore CRE declines in future periods based on our strategy to reduce our overall CRE exposure. The reduction in the core segment is a result of limited origination activity reflecting our strategy to reduce our overall CRE exposure. We will continue to support our core developer customers as appropriate, however, we do not believe that significant additional CRE activity is appropriate given our current exposure in CRE lending and the current economic conditions.
Also as shown above, substantial reserves for the noncore portfolio have been established. At March 31, 2011, the ACL related to the noncore portfolio was 15.92%. The combination of the existing ACL and prior NCOs represents the total credit actions taken on each segment of the portfolio. From this data, we calculate a credit mark that provides a consistent measurement of the cumulative credit actions taken against a specific portfolio segment. We believe the combined credit activity is appropriate for each of the CRE segments.
Retail Properties
Our portfolio of CRE loans secured by retail properties totaled $1.7 billion, or approximately 4% of total loans and leases, at March 31, 2011. Loans within this portfolio segment declined $0.1 billion, or 4%, from $1.8 billion at December 31, 2010. Credit approval in this portfolio segment is generally dependent on preleasing requirements, and net operating income from the project must cover debt service by specified percentages when the loan is fully funded.
The weakness of the economic environment in our geographic regions continued to impact the projects that secure the loans in this portfolio class. Lower occupancy rates, reduced rental rates, and the expectation these levels will remain stressed for the foreseeable future may adversely affect some of our borrowers’ ability to repay these loans. We have increased the level of credit risk management activity on this portfolio segment, and we analyze our retail property loans in detail by combining property type, geographic location, and other data, to assess and manage our credit risks. We review the majority of this portfolio segment on a monthly basis.
Consumer Credit
Consumer credit approvals are based on, among other factors, the financial strength and payment history of the borrower, type of exposure, and the transaction structure. We make extensive use of portfolio assessment models to continuously monitor the quality of the portfolio, which may result in changes to future origination strategies. The on-going analysis and review process results in a determination of an appropriate allowance for our consumer loan and lease portfolio.

 

29


Table of Contents

AUTOMOBILE PORTFOLIO
Our strategy in the automobile portfolio continued to focus on high quality borrowers as measured by both FICO and internal custom scores, combined with appropriate LTVs, terms, and a reasonable level of profitability. We discontinued automobile leasing in 2008 with the portfolio in run-off mode thereafter. Our strategy and operational capabilities allow us to appropriately manage the origination quality across the entire portfolio, including our newer markets. Although increased origination volume and the expansion into new markets can be associated with increased risk levels, we believe our strategy and operational capabilities significantly mitigate these risks.
We have continued to consistently execute our value proposition while taking advantage of market opportunities that allow us to grow our automobile loan portfolio. The significant growth in the portfolio over the past two years was accomplished while maintaining our consistently high credit quality metrics. As we further execute our strategies and take advantage of these opportunities, we are developing alternative plans to address any growth in excess of our established portfolio concentration limits, including both securitizations and loan sales.
RESIDENTIAL-SECURED PORTFOLIOS
The residential mortgage and home equity portfolios are primarily located within our footprint. The continued stress on home prices has caused the performance in these portfolios to remain weaker than historical levels. We continue to evaluate all of our policies and processes associated with managing these portfolios to provide as much clarity as possible. In the 2011 first quarter, we implemented a more conservative position regarding NCOs in our residential mortgage portfolio by accelerating the timing of charge-off recognition. In addition, we established an immediate charge-off process regardless of the delinquency status for short sale situations. Both of these policy changes resulted in accelerated recognition of charge-offs totaling $6.8 million in the 2011 first quarter. These changes in our charge-off policies do not impact our commitment to providing assistance to our borrowers through our Home Savers Group. Our charge-off policies for the home equity portfolio remain unchanged.
Table 20 — Selected Home Equity and Residential Mortgage
Portfolio Data

(dollar amounts in millions)
                                                 
    Home Equity     Residential Mortgage  
    Secured by first-lien     Secured by second-lien        
    03/31/11     12/31/10     03/31/11     12/31/10     03/31/11     12/31/10  
Ending balance
  $ 3,194     $ 3,041     $ 4,590     $ 4,672     $ 4,517     $ 4,500  
Portfolio weighted average LTV ratio(1)
    70 %     70 %     80 %     80 %     78 %     77 %
Portfolio weighted average FICO score(2)
    745       745       731       733       723       721  
                                                 
    Home Equity     Residential Mortgage (3)  
    Secured by first-lien     Secured by second-lien        
    Three Months Ended March 31,  
    2011     2010     2011     2010     2011     2010  
Originations
  $ 404     $ 232     $ 194     $ 130     $ 304     $ 242  
Origination weighted average LTV ratio(1)
    71 %     67 %     82 %     77 %     82 %     73 %
Origination weighted average FICO score(2)
    767       766       756       753       755       764  
     
(1)   The LTV ratios for home equity loans and home equity lines-of-credit are cumulative and reflect the balance of any senior loans. LTV ratios reflect collateral values at the time of loan origination.
 
(2)   Portfolio weighted average FICO scores reflect currently updated customer credit scores whereas origination weighted average FICO scores reflect the customer credit scores at the time of loan origination.
 
(3)   Represents only owned-portfolio originations.
Home Equity Portfolio
Our home equity portfolio (loans and lines-of-credit) consists of both first-lien and second-lien mortgage loans with underwriting criteria based on minimum credit scores, debt-to-income ratios, and LTV ratios. We offer closed-end home equity loans which are generally fixed-rate with principal and interest payments, and variable-rate interest-only home equity lines-of-credit which do not require payment of principal during the 10-year revolving period of the line-of-credit.

 

30


Table of Contents

At March 31, 2011, approximately 41% of our home equity portfolio was secured by first-lien mortgages. The credit risk profile is substantially reduced when we hold a first-lien position. During the 2011 first quarter, more than 65% of our home equity portfolio originations were secured by a first-lien mortgage. We focus on high quality borrowers primarily located within our footprint. The majority of our home equity line-of-credit borrowers consistently pay more than the required interest-only amount. Additionally, since we focus on developing complete relationships with our customers, many of our home equity borrowers are utilizing other products and services.
We believe we have underwritten credit conservatively within this portfolio. We have not originated home equity loans or lines-of-credit with an LTV at origination greater than 100%, except for infrequent situations with high quality borrowers. However, continued declines in housing prices have likely decreased the value of the collateral for this portfolio and it is likely some loans with an original LTV ratio of less than 100% currently have an LTV ratio greater than 100%.
For certain home equity loans and lines-of-credit, we may utilize an AVM or other model-driven value estimate during the credit underwriting process. We utilize a series of credit parameters to determine the appropriate valuation methodology. While we believe an AVM estimate is an appropriate valuation source for a portion of our home equity lending activities, we continue to re-evaluate all of our policies on an on-going basis, specifically related to recent FFIEC guidelines regarding property valuation. The intent of these guidelines is to ensure complete independence in the requesting and review of real estate valuations associated with loan decisions. We are committed to appropriate valuations for all of our real estate lending, and do not anticipate significant impacts to our loan decision process as a result of these guidelines. We update values as appropriate, and in compliance with applicable regulations, for loans identified as higher risk. Loans are identified as higher risk based on performance indicators and the updated values are utilized to facilitate our portfolio management, as well as our workout and loss mitigation functions.
We continue to make origination policy adjustments based on our assessment of an appropriate risk profile, as well as industry actions. In addition to origination policy adjustments, we take actions, as necessary, to manage the risk profile of this portfolio.
Residential Mortgage Portfolio
We focus on higher quality borrowers and underwrite all applications centrally, often through the use of an automated underwriting system. We do not originate residential mortgages that allow negative amortization or allow the borrower multiple payment options.
All residential mortgages are originated based on a completed full appraisal during the credit underwriting process. We update values on a regular basis in compliance with applicable regulations to facilitate our portfolio management, as well as our workout and loss mitigation functions.
Several government actions were enacted that impacted the residential mortgage portfolio, including various refinance programs which positively affected the availability of credit for the industry. We are utilizing these programs to enhance our existing strategy of working closely with our customers.
Credit Quality
We believe the most meaningful way to assess overall credit quality performance is through an analysis of credit quality performance ratios. This approach forms the basis of most of the discussion in the sections immediately following: NPAs and NALs, TDRs, ACL, and NCOs. In addition, we utilize delinquency rates, risk distribution and migration patterns, and product segmentation in the analysis of our credit quality performance.
Credit quality performance in the 2011 first quarter reflected continued improvement in the commercial loan portfolio relating to NCO activity, as well as some improvement in the consumer portfolio relating to delinquency trends and NCO activity in certain segments excluding any policy change impacts (see Consumer Credit section). Key credit quality metrics also showed improvement, including an 18% decline in NPAs and a 13% decline in the level of Criticized commercial loans compared to the prior quarter. New NPA inflows also declined and delinquency trends continued to improve compared to the prior quarter.
Our ACL declined $115.7 million to $1,175.4 million, or 3.07% of period-end loans and leases at March 31, 2011, from $1,291.1 million, or 3.39% at December 31, 2010. Importantly, our ACL as a percent of period-end NALs increased to 185% from 166%, and the coverage ratio associated with NPAs also increased. These improved coverage ratios indicated a strengthening of our allowance position relative to troubled assets from the prior year-end. These coverage ratios are a key component of our internal adequacy assessment process and provide an important consideration in the determination of the adequacy of the ACL.

 

31


Table of Contents

NPAs, NALs, AND TDRs
NPAs and NALs
NPAs consist of (1) NALs, which represent loans and leases no longer accruing interest, (2) impaired loans held for sale, (3) OREO properties, and (4) other NPAs. A C&I or CRE loan is generally placed on nonaccrual status no later than 90-days past due. With the exception of residential mortgage loans guaranteed by government organizations which continue to accrue interest, residential mortgage loans are placed on nonaccrual status no later than 180-days past due. A home equity loan is placed on nonaccrual status no later than 180-days past due. Automobile and other consumer loans are not placed on nonaccrual status, but are charged-off when the loan is 120-days past due. Any loan in our portfolio may be placed on nonaccrual status prior to the policies described above when collection of principal or interest is in doubt. When interest accruals are suspended, accrued interest income is reversed with current year accruals charged to earnings and prior year amounts generally charged-off as a credit loss. When, in our judgment, the borrower’s ability to make required interest and principal payments has resumed and collectability is no longer in doubt, the loan or lease is returned to accrual status.

 

32


Table of Contents

The following table reflects period-end NALs and NPAs detail for each of the last five quarters:
Table 21 — Nonaccrual Loans and Leases and Nonperforming Assets
                                         
    2011     2010  
(dollar amounts in thousands)   March 31,     December 31,     September 30,     June 30,     March 31,  
 
                                       
Nonaccrual loans and leases:
                                       
Commercial and industrial
  $ 260,397     $ 346,720     $ 398,353     $ 429,561     $ 511,588  
Commercial real estate
    305,793       363,692       478,754       663,103       826,781  
Residential mortgage
    44,812       45,010       82,984       86,486       372,950  
Home equity
    25,255       22,526       21,689       22,199       54,789  
 
                             
Total nonaccrual loans and leases
    636,257       777,948       981,780       1,201,349       1,766,108  
Other real estate owned, net
                                       
Residential
    28,668       31,649       65,775       71,937       68,289  
Commercial
    25,961       35,155       57,309       67,189       83,971  
 
                             
Total other real estate owned, net
    54,629       66,804       123,084       139,126       152,260  
Impaired loans held for sale(1)
                      242,227        
 
                             
Total nonperforming assets
  $ 690,886     $ 844,752     $ 1,104,864     $ 1,582,702     $ 1,918,368  
 
                             
 
                                       
Nonaccrual loans as a % of total loans and leases
    1.66 %     2.04 %     2.62 %     3.25 %     4.78 %
Nonperforming assets ratio(2)
    1.80       2.21       2.94       4.24       5.17  
 
                                       
Nonperforming Franklin assets:
                                       
Residential mortgage
  $     $     $     $     $ 297,967  
Home equity
                            31,067  
OREO
    5,971       9,477       15,330       24,515       24,423  
Impaired loans held for sale
                      242,227        
 
                             
Total nonperforming Franklin assets
  $ 5,971     $ 9,477     $ 15,330     $ 266,742     $ 353,457  
 
                             
     
(1)   The June 30, 2010, figure represents NALs associated with the transfer of Franklin-related residential mortgage and home equity loans to loans held for sale. Loans held for sale are carried at the lower of cost or fair value less costs to sell.
 
(2)   This ratio is calculated as NPAs divided by the sum of loans and leases, impaired loans held for sale, and net other real estate.
The $153.9 million decline in NPAs primarily reflected:
    $86.3 million, or 25%, decline in C&I NALs, reflecting both NCO activity and problem credit resolutions, including payoffs. The decline was associated with loans throughout our footprint, with no specific geographic concentration. From an industry perspective, improvement in the manufacturing-related segment accounted for a significant portion of the decrease.
    $57.9 million, or 16%, decline in CRE NALs, reflecting both NCO activity and problem credit resolutions, including borrower payments and payoffs. This decline was a direct result of our on-going proactive management of these credits by our SAD. Also key to the decline was the significantly lower level of inflows. The level of inflows, or migration, is an important indicator of the future trend for the portfolio.
    $12.2 million, or 18%, decline in OREO, primarily reflecting continued declines in both the commercial and residential segments. Of this decline, only $3.0 million was in the residential segment as the selling of residential properties remains challenging in our markets.
As part of our loss mitigation process, we reunderwrite, modify, or restructure loans when borrowers are experiencing payment difficulties, based on the borrower’s ability to repay the loan.

 

33


Table of Contents

NPA activity for each of the past five quarters was as follows:
Table 22 — Nonperforming Asset Activity
                                         
    2011     2010  
(dollar amounts in thousands)   First     Fourth     Third     Second     First  
 
                                       
Nonperforming assets, beginning of period
  $ 844,752     $ 1,104,864     $ 1,582,702     $ 1,918,368     $ 2,058,091  
New nonperforming assets
    192,044       237,802       278,388       171,595       237,914  
Franklin-related impact, net
    (3,506 )     (5,853 )     (251,412 )     (86,715 )     14,957  
Returns to accruing status
    (70,886 )     (100,051 )     (111,168 )     (78,739 )     (80,840 )
Loan and lease losses
    (128,730 )     (126,047 )     (151,013 )     (173,159 )     (185,387 )
Other real estate owned gains (losses)
    1,492       (5,117 )     (5,302 )     2,483       (4,160 )
Payments
    (87,041 )     (191,296 )     (210,612 )     (140,881 )     (107,640 )
Sales
    (57,239 )     (69,550 )     (26,719 )     (30,250 )     (14,567 )
 
                             
 
                                       
Nonperforming assets, end of period
  $ 690,886     $ 844,752     $ 1,104,864     $ 1,582,702     $ 1,918,368  
 
                             

 

34


Table of Contents

Table 23 — Accruing Past Due Loans and Leases
                                         
    2011     2010  
(dollar amounts in thousands)   March 31,     December 31,     September 30,     June 30,     March 31,  
 
                                       
Accruing loans and leases past due 90 days or more:
                                       
Commercial and industrial
  $     $     $     $     $ 475  
Residential mortgage (excluding loans guaranteed by the U.S. government)
    41,858       53,983       56,803       47,036       72,702  
Home equity
    24,130       23,497       27,160       26,797       29,438  
Other consumer
    7,578       10,177       11,423       9,533       10,598  
 
                             
Total, excl. loans guaranteed by the U.S. government
    73,566       87,657       95,386       83,366       113,213  
Add: loans guaranteed by the U.S. government
    94,440       98,288       94,249       95,421       96,814  
 
                             
Total accruing loans and leases past due 90 days or more, including loans guaranteed by the U.S. government
  $ 168,006     $ 185,945     $ 189,635     $ 178,787     $ 210,027  
 
                             
 
                                       
Ratios: (1)
                                       
 
                                       
Excluding loans guaranteed by the U.S. government, as a percent of total loans and leases
    0.19 %     0.23 %     0.25 %     0.23 %     0.31 %
 
                                       
Guaranteed by the U.S. government, as a percent of total loans and leases
    0.25       0.26       0.26       0.26       0.26  
 
                                       
Including loans guaranteed by the U.S. government, as a percent of total loans and leases
    0.44       0.49       0.51       0.49       0.57  
     
(1)   Ratios are calculated as a percentage of related loans and leases.
TDR Loans
TDRs are modified loans in which a concession is provided to a borrower experiencing financial difficulties. Loan modifications are considered TDRs when the concessions provided are not available to the borrower through either normal channels or other sources. However, not all loan modifications are TDRs. Our standards relating to loan modifications consider, among other factors, minimum verified income requirements, cash flow analysis, and collateral valuations. However, each potential loan modification is reviewed individually and the terms of the loan are modified to meet a borrower’s specific circumstances at a point in time. All loan modifications, including those classified as TDRs, are reviewed and approved. Our ALLL is largely driven by updated risk ratings assigned to commercial loans, updated borrower credit scores on consumer loans, and borrower delinquency history in both the commercial and consumer portfolios. As such, the provision for credit losses is impacted primarily by changes in borrower payment performance rather than the TDR classification. TDRs can be classified as either accrual or nonaccrual loans. Nonaccrual TDRs are included in NALs whereas accruing TDRs are excluded because the borrower remains contractually current.
In the workout of a problem loan, many factors are considered when determining the most favorable resolution. For consumer loans, we evaluate the ability and willingness of the borrower to make contractual or reduced payments, the value of the underlying collateral, and the costs associated with the foreclosure or repossession, and remarketing of the collateral. For commercial loans, we consider similar criteria and also evaluate the borrower’s business prospects.

 

35


Table of Contents

Residential Mortgage loan TDRs — Residential mortgage TDRs represent loan modifications associated with traditional first-lien mortgage loans in which a concession has been provided to the borrower. Residential mortgages identified as TDRs involve borrowers who are unable to refinance their mortgages through our normal mortgage origination channels or through other independent sources. Some, but not all, of the loans may be delinquent. Modifications can include adjustments to rates and/or principal. Modified loans identified as TDRs are aggregated into pools for analysis. Cash flows and weighted average interest rates are used to calculate impairment at the pooled-loan level. Once the loans are aggregated into the pool, they continue to be classified as TDRs until contractually repaid or charged-off. No consideration is given to removing individual loans from the pools.
Residential mortgage loans not guaranteed by a U.S. government agency such as the FHA, VA, and the USDA, including restructured loans, are reported as accrual or nonaccrual based upon delinquency status. NALs are those that are greater than 180-days contractually past due. Loans guaranteed by U.S. government organizations continue to accrue interest upon delinquency.
Residential mortgage loan TDR classifications resulted in an impairment adjustment of $2.0 million during the 2011 first quarter. Prior to the TDR classification, residential mortgage loans individually had minimal ALLL associated with them because the ALLL is calculated on a total pooled-portfolio basis.
Other Consumer loan TDRs — Generally, these are TDRs associated with home equity borrowings and automobile loans. We make similar interest rate, term, and principal concessions as with residential mortgage loan TDRs. The TDR classification for these other consumer loans resulted in an impairment adjustment of $0.6 million during the 2011 first quarter.
Commercial loan TDRs — Commercial accruing TDRs represent loans rated as Classified and are no more than 90-days past due on contractual principal and interest, but undergo a modification. Accruing TDRs often result from loans rated as Classified receiving an extension on the maturity of their loan, for example, to allow additional time for the sale or lease of underlying CRE collateral. Often, it is prudent to extend the maturity rather than foreclose on a commercial loan, particularly for borrowers who are generating cash flows to support contractual interest payments. These borrowers cannot obtain a loan with similar terms through other independent sources because of their current financial circumstances. Therefore, a concession is provided and the modification is classified as a TDR. The TDR remains in accruing status as long as the customer is current on payments and no loss is probable.
Commercial nonaccrual TDRs result from either: (1) an accruing commercial TDR being placed on nonaccrual status (at March 31, 2011, approximately $12.8 million of our commercial nonaccrual TDRs represented this situation); or (2) a workout where an existing commercial NAL is restructured and a concession is given. The majority of these workouts restructure the NAL so that two or more new notes are created. The senior note is underwritten based upon our normal underwriting standards at current market rates and is sized so projected cash flows are sufficient to repay contractual principal and interest. The terms on the subordinate note(s) vary by situation, but often defer interest payments until after the senior note is repaid. Creating two or more notes often allows the borrower to continue a project or weather a temporary economic downturn and allows us to right-size a loan based upon the current expectations for a project’s performance. The senior note is considered for return to accrual status if the borrower has sustained sufficient cash flows for a six-month period of time and we believe no loss is probable. This six-month period could extend before or after the restructure date. Subordinated notes created in the workout are charged-off immediately. Any interest or principal payments received on the subordinated notes are applied to the principal of the senior note first until the senior note is repaid. Further payments are recorded as recoveries on the subordinated note. At March 31, 2011, approximately $25.0 million of our commercial nonaccrual TDRs resulted from such workouts.
As the loans are already considered Classified, an adequate ALLL has been recorded when appropriate. Consequently, a TDR classification on commercial loans does not usually result in significant additional reserves. We consider removing the TDR status on commercial loans if the loan is at a market rate of interest and after the loan has performed in accordance with the restructured terms for a sustained period of time, generally one year.

 

36


Table of Contents

The table below provides a summary of our accruing and nonaccruing TDRs by loan type for each of the past five quarters:
Table 24 — Accruing and Nonaccruing Troubled Debt Restructured Loans
                                         
    2011     2010  
(dollar amounts in thousands)   March 31,     December 31,     September 30,     June 30,     March 31,  
Troubled debt restructured loans — accruing:
                                       
Residential mortgage
  $ 333,492     $ 328,411     $ 304,356     $ 281,473     $ 253,135  
Other consumer
    78,488       76,586       73,210       65,061       62,148  
Commercial
    206,462       222,632       157,971       141,353       117,667  
 
                             
Total troubled debt restructured loans — accruing
    618,442       627,629       535,537       487,887       432,950  
Troubled debt restructured loans — nonaccruing:
                                       
Residential mortgage
    8,523       5,789       10,581       11,337       9,415  
Other consumer
    14                          
Commercial
    37,858       33,462       33,236       90,266       122,759  
 
                             
Total troubled debt restructured loans — nonaccruing
    46,395       39,251       43,817       101,603       132,174  
 
                             
Total troubled debt restructured loans
  $ 664,837     $ 666,880     $ 579,354     $ 589,490     $ 565,124  
 
                             
ACL
(This section should be read in conjunction with Note 3 of the Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.)
We maintain two reserves, both of which in our judgment are adequate to absorb credit losses inherent in our loan and lease portfolio: the ALLL and the AULC. Combined, these reserves comprise the total ACL. Our Credit Administration group is responsible for developing the methodology assumptions and estimates used in the calculation, as well as determining the adequacy of the ACL. The ALLL represents the estimate of losses inherent in the loan portfolio at the reported date. Additions to the ALLL result from recording provision expense for loan losses or increased risk levels resulting from loan risk-rating downgrades, while reductions reflect charge-offs, recoveries, decreased risk levels resulting from loan risk-rating upgrades, or the sale of loans. The AULC is determined by applying the transaction reserve process to the unfunded portion of the loan exposures adjusted by an applicable funding expectation.
A provision for credit losses is recorded to adjust the ACL to the level we have determined to be adequate to absorb credit losses inherent in our loan and lease portfolio. The provision for credit losses in the 2011 first quarter was $49.4 million, compared with $87.0 million in the prior quarter and $235.0 million in the year-ago quarter. The decline in provision expense reflects a combination of lower NCOs and the reduction of Criticized loans throughout the entire loan and lease portfolio.
We regularly assess the adequacy of the ACL by performing on-going evaluations of the loan and lease portfolio, including such factors as the differing economic risks associated with each loan category, the financial condition of specific borrowers, the level of delinquent loans, the value of any collateral and, where applicable, the existence of any guarantees or other documented support. We evaluate the impact of changes in interest rates and overall economic conditions on the ability of borrowers to meet their financial obligations when quantifying our exposure to credit losses and assessing the adequacy of our ACL at each reporting date. In addition to general economic conditions and the other factors described above, we also consider the impact of declining residential real estate values and the diversification of CRE loans, particularly loans secured by retail properties.
Our ACL assessment process includes the on-going assessment of credit quality metrics, and a comparison of certain ACL adequacy benchmarks to current performance. While the total ACL balance has declined in recent quarters, all of the relevant benchmarks improved as a result of the asset quality improvement. The coverage ratios of NALs, Criticized, and Classified loans have significantly improved in recent quarters despite the decline in the ACL level.

 

37


Table of Contents

The table below reflects activity in the ALLL and the AULC for each of the last five quarters:
Table 25 — Quarterly Allowance for Credit Losses Analysis
                                         
    2011     2010  
(dollar amounts in thousands)   First     Fourth     Third     Second     First  
 
                                       
Allowance for loan and lease losses, beginning of period
  $ 1,249,008     $ 1,336,352     $ 1,402,160     $ 1,477,969     $ 1,482,479  
Loan and lease losses
    (199,007 )     (205,587 )     (221,144 )     (312,954 )     (264,222 )
Recoveries of loans previously charged-off
    33,924       33,336       36,630       33,726       25,741  
 
                             
Net loan and lease losses
    (165,083 )     (172,251 )     (184,514 )     (279,228 )     (238,481 )
 
                             
Provision for loan and lease losses
    49,301       84,907       118,788       203,633       233,971  
Allowance for assets sold
                (82 )     (214 )      
 
                             
Allowance for loan and lease losses, end of period
  $ 1,133,226     $ 1,249,008     $ 1,336,352     $ 1,402,160     $ 1,477,969  
 
                             
 
                                       
Allowance for unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit, beginning of period
  $ 42,127     $ 40,061     $ 39,689     $ 49,916     $ 48,879  
 
                                       
Provision for (reduction in) unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit losses
    84       2,066       372       (10,227 )     1,037  
 
                             
Allowance for unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit, end of period
  $ 42,211     $ 42,127     $ 40,061     $ 39,689     $ 49,916  
 
                             
Total allowance for credit losses, end of period
  $ 1,175,437     $ 1,291,135     $ 1,376,413     $ 1,441,849     $ 1,527,885  
 
                             
 
                                       
Allowance for loan and lease losses as % of:
                                       
Total loans and leases
    2.96 %     3.28 %     3.56 %     3.79 %     4.00 %
Nonaccrual loans and leases
    178       161       136       117       84  
Nonperforming assets
    164       148       121       89       77  
 
                                       
Total allowance for credit losses as % of:
                                       
Total loans and leases
    3.07 %     3.39 %     3.67 %     3.90 %     4.14 %
Nonaccrual loans and leases
    185       166       140       120       87  
Nonperforming assets
    170       153       125       91       80  
The reduction in the ACL, compared with December 31, 2010, reflected a decline in the commercial portfolio ALLL as a result of NCOs on loans with specific reserves, and an overall reduction in the level of commercial Criticized loans. Commercial Criticized loans are commercial loans rated as OLEM, Substandard, Doubtful, or Loss. As shown in the table below, commercial Criticized loans declined $0.4 billion from December 31, 2010, reflecting significant upgrade and payment activity.
Table 26 — Criticized Commercial Loan Activity
                                         
    2011     2010  
(dollar amounts in thousands)   First     Fourth     Third     Second     First  
 
                                       
Criticized commercial loans, beginning of period
  $ 3,074,481     $ 3,637,533     $ 4,106,602     $ 4,608,610     $ 4,971,637  
New additions / increases
    169,884       289,850       407,514       280,353       306,499  
Advances
    61,516       52,282       75,386       79,392       91,450  
Upgrades to Pass
    (238,518 )     (382,713 )     (391,316 )     (409,092 )     (273,011 )
Payments
    (294,564 )     (401,302 )     (408,698 )     (331,145 )     (324,229 )
Loan losses
    (112,008 )     (121,169 )     (151,955 )     (121,516 )     (163,736 )
 
                             
 
                                       
Criticized commercial loans, end of period
  $ 2,660,792     $ 3,074,481     $ 3,637,533     $ 4,106,602     $ 4,608,610  
 
                             
Compared with December 31, 2010, the AULC was little changed.
The ACL coverage ratio associated with NALs was 185% at March 31, 2011, representing a continued improvement compared with recent prior periods. This improvement reflected substantial payments on C&I and CRE NALs.
Although credit quality asset metrics and trends, including those mentioned above, continued to improve in the 2011 first quarter, the economic environment in our markets remained weak and uncertain as reflected by continued weak residential values, continued weakness in industrial employment in northern Ohio and southeast Michigan, and the significant subjectivity involved in commercial real estate valuations for properties located in areas with limited sale or refinance activities. Residential real estate values continued to be negatively impacted by high unemployment, increased foreclosure activity, and the elimination of home-buyer tax credits. In the near-term, we believe these factors will result in continued stress in our portfolios secured by residential real estate and an elevated level of NCOs compared to historic levels. Further, concerns continue to exist regarding conditions in both national and international markets (for example, the political turmoil in the Middle East and the natural disasters in Japan), the conditions of both the financial and credit markets, the unemployment rate, the impact of the Federal Reserve monetary policy, and continued uncertainty regarding federal, state, and local government budget deficits. We do not anticipate any meaningful change in the overall economy in the near-term. All of these factors are impacting consumer confidence, as well as business investments and acquisitions. Given the combination of these noted factors, we believe that our ACL coverage levels are reflective of the quality of our portfolio and the operating environment.

 

38


Table of Contents

The table below reflects the allocation of our ACL among our various loan categories during each of the past five quarters:
Table 27 — Allocation of Allowance for Credit Losses (1)
                                                                                 
    2011     2010  
(dollar amounts in thousands)   March 31,     December 31,     September 30,     June 30,     March 31,  
 
                                                                               
Commercial
                                                                               
Commercial and industrial
  $ 299,564       35 %   $ 340,614       34 %   $ 353,431       33 %   $ 426,767       34 %   $ 459,011       33 %
Commercial real estate
    511,068       17       588,251       18       654,219       18       695,778       19       741,669       20  
 
                                                           
Total commercial
    810,632       52       928,865       52       1,007,650       51       1,122,545       53       1,200,680       53  
 
                                                           
Consumer
                                                                               
Automobile
    50,862       15       49,488       15       44,505       14       41,762       13       56,111       12  
Home equity
    149,370       20       150,630       20       154,323       21       117,708       20       127,970       20  
Residential mortgage
    96,741       12       93,289       12       93,407       12       79,105       12       60,295       12  
Other consumer
    25,621       1       26,736       1       36,467       2       41,040       2       32,913       3  
 
                                                           
Total consumer
    322,594       48       320,143       48       328,702       49       279,615       47       277,289       47  
 
                                                           
Total allowance for loan and lease losses
    1,133,226       100 %     1,249,008       100 %     1,336,352       100 %     1,402,160       100 %     1,477,969       100 %
 
                                                           
Allowance for unfunded loan commitments
    42,211               42,127               40,061               39,689               49,916          
 
                                                           
Total allowance for credit losses
  $ 1,175,437             $ 1,291,135             $ 1,376,413             $ 1,441,849             $ 1,527,885          
 
                                                           
     
(1)   Percentages represent the percentage of each loan and lease category to total loans and leases.
NCOs
C&I and CRE loans are either charged-off or written down to fair value at 90-days past due. Automobile loans and other consumer loans are charged-off at 120-days past due. Home equity loans are charged-off to fair value at 120-days past due. Residential mortgages are charged-off to fair value at 150-days past due. Any loan in any portfolio may be charged-off prior to the policies described above if a loss confirming event has occurred. Loss confirming events include, but are not limited to, bankruptcy (unsecured), continued delinquency, foreclosure, or receipt of an asset valuation indicating a collateral deficiency and that asset is the sole source of repayment.

 

39


Table of Contents

Table 28 reflects NCO detail for each of the last five quarters. Table 29 displays the NCO Franklin-related impacts for each of the last five quarters.
Table 28 — Quarterly Net Charge-off Analysis
                                         
    2011     2010  
(dollar amounts in thousands)   First     Fourth     Third     Second     First  
Net charge-offs by loan and lease type:
                                       
Commercial:
                                       
Commercial and industrial
  $ 42,191     $ 59,124     $ 62,241     $ 58,128     $ 75,439  
Commercial real estate:
                                       
Construction
    28,400       11,084       17,936       45,562       34,426  
Commercial
    39,283       33,787       45,725       36,169       50,873  
 
                             
Commercial real estate
    67,683       44,871       63,661       81,731       85,299  
 
                             
Total commercial
    109,874       103,995       125,902       139,859       160,738  
 
                             
Consumer:
                                       
Automobile
    4,712       7,035       5,570       5,436       8,531  
Home equity(1)
    26,715       29,175       27,827       44,470       37,901  
Residential mortgage(2), (3)
    18,932       26,775       18,961       82,848       24,311  
Other consumer
    4,850       5,271       6,254       6,615       7,000  
 
                             
Total consumer
    55,209       68,256       58,612       139,369       77,743  
 
                             
Total net charge-offs
  $ 165,083     $ 172,251     $ 184,514     $ 279,228     $ 238,481  
 
                             
 
                                       
Net charge-offs — annualized percentages:
                                       
Commercial:
                                       
Commercial and industrial
    1.29 %     1.85 %     2.01 %     1.90 %     2.45 %
Commercial real estate:
                                       
Construction
    18.59       6.19       7.25       14.25       9.77  
Commercial
    2.66       2.22       3.01       2.38       3.25  
 
                             
Commercial real estate
    4.15       2.64       3.60       4.44       4.44  
 
                             
Total commercial
    2.24       2.13       2.59       2.85       3.22  
 
                             
Consumer:
                                       
Automobile
    0.33       0.51       0.43       0.47       0.80  
Home equity(1)
    1.38       1.51       1.47       2.36       2.01  
Residential mortgage(2), (3)
    1.70       2.42       1.73       7.19       2.17  
Other consumer
    3.47       3.66       3.83       3.81       3.87  
 
                             
Total consumer
    1.20       1.50       1.32       3.19       1.83  
 
                             
Net charge-offs as a % of average loans
    1.73 %     1.82 %     1.98 %     3.01 %     2.58 %
 
                             
     
(1)   The 2010 second quarter included net charge-offs totaling $14,678 thousand associated with the transfer of Franklin-related home equity loans to loans held for sale and $1,262 thousand of other Franklin-related net charge-offs.
 
(2)   The 2010 second quarter included net charge-offs totaling $60,822 thousand associated with the transfer of Franklin-related residential mortgage loans to loans held for sale and $3,403 thousand of other Franklin-related net charge-offs.
 
(3)   The 2010 fourth quarter included net charge-offs of $16,389 thousand related to the sale of certain underperforming residential mortgage loans.

 

40


Table of Contents

Table 29 — Quarterly NCOs — Franklin-Related Impact
                                         
    2011     2010  
(dollar amounts in millions)   First     Fourth     Third     Second     First  
Total residential mortgage net charge-offs (recoveries):
                                       
Franklin
  $ (3.1 )   $ (4.4 )   $ 3.4     $ 64.2     $ 8.1  
Non-Franklin
    22.0       31.2       15.6       18.6       16.2  
 
                             
Total
  $ 18.9     $ 26.8     $ 19.0     $ 82.8     $ 24.3  
 
                             
Total residential mortgage net charge-offs — annualized percentages:
                                       
Total
    1.70 %     2.42 %     1.73 %     7.19 %     2.17 %
Non-Franklin
    1.98       2.82       1.42       1.74       1.57  

 

41


Table of Contents

In assessing NCO trends, it is helpful to understand the process of how these loans are treated as they deteriorate over time. The allowance for loans are established at origination consistent with the level of risk associated with the original underwriting. As a part of our normal portfolio management process for commercial loans, the loan is reviewed and the allowance is increased or decreased as warranted. If the quality of a loan has deteriorated, it migrates to a lower quality risk rating, and a higher reserve amount is assigned. Charge-offs, if necessary, are generally recognized in a period after the allowance was established. If the previously established allowance exceeds that needed to satisfactorily resolve the problem loan, a reduction in the overall level of the allowance could be recognized. In summary, if loan quality deteriorates, the typical credit sequence is periods of allowance building, followed by periods of higher NCOs as the previously established allowance is utilized. Additionally, an increase in the allowance either precedes or is in conjunction with increases in NALs. When a loan is classified as NAL, it is evaluated for specific allowance or charge-off. As a result, an increase in NALs does not necessarily result in an increase in the allowance or an expectation of higher future NCOs.
C&I NCOs declined $16.9 million, or 29%, reflected lower levels of large dollar NCOs in the current quarter as well as the results of our continued proactive credit risk management practices.
CRE NCOs increased $22.8 million, or 51%, reflected an increase in loan sale activity in the current quarter combined with our continued aggressive treatment of problem loans, including conservative valuation of the underlying collateral. The majority of these NCOs were in the noncore portfolio as our core portfolio continued to perform well. Based on asset quality trends, we anticipate lower CRE NCOs in future quarters.
Automobile NCOs declined $2.3 million, or 33%, reflected historically lower delinquency levels during the current quarter and high credit quality of originations. Also, the current quarter benefited from $0.5 million of recoveries associated with a previously charged-off loan sale.
Home equity NCOs declined $2.5 million, or 8%. This performance was consistent with our expectations for the portfolio given the economic conditions in our markets. We continue to manage the default rate through focused delinquency monitoring as virtually all defaults for second-lien home equity loans incur significant losses primarily due to insufficient equity in the collateral property.
Residential mortgage NCOs declined $7.8 million, or 29%, included $6.8 million of NCOs related to a more conservative loss recognition policy (see Consumer Credit section) and Franklin-related net recoveries of $3.1 million in the current quarter, and the prior quarter included $16.4 million of NCOs related to the sale of certain underperforming loans and Franklin-related net recoveries of $4.4 million. Excluding these impacts, residential mortgage NCOs increased $0.4 million, consistent with our expectations.

 

42


Table of Contents

Table 30 reflects NCO activity for the first three-month period of 2011 and the first three-month period of 2010. Table 31 displays the NCO Franklin-related impacts for the first three-month period of 2011 and the first three-month period of 2010.
Table 30 — Year to Date Net Charge-off Analysis
                 
    Three Months Ended March 31,  
(dollar amounts in thousands)   2011     2010  
Net charge-offs by loan and lease type:
               
Commercial:
               
Commercial and industrial
  $ 42,191     $ 75,439  
Commercial real estate:
               
Construction
    28,400       34,426  
Commercial
    39,283       50,873  
 
           
Commercial real estate
    67,683       85,299  
 
           
 
               
Total commercial
    109,874       160,738  
 
           
Consumer:
               
Automobile
    4,712       8,531  
Home equity
    26,715       37,901  
Residential mortgage
    18,932       24,311  
Other consumer
    4,850       7,000  
 
           
 
               
Total consumer
    55,209       77,743  
 
           
 
               
Total net charge-offs
  $ 165,083     $ 238,481  
 
           
 
               
Net charge-offs — annualized percentages:
               
Commercial:
               
Commercial and industrial
    1.29 %     2.45 %
Commercial real estate:
               
Construction
    18.59       9.77  
Commercial
    2.66       3.25  
 
           
Commercial real estate
    4.15       4.44  
 
           
 
               
Total commercial
    2.24       3.22  
 
           
Consumer:
               
Automobile
    0.33       0.80  
Home equity
    1.38       2.01  
Residential mortgage
    1.70       2.17  
Other consumer
    3.47       3.87  
 
           
 
               
Total consumer
    1.20       1.83  
 
           
Net charge-offs as a % of average loans
    1.73 %     2.58 %
 
           

 

43


Table of Contents

Table 31 — Year to Date NCOs — Franklin-Related Impact
                 
    Three Months Ended March 31,  
(dollar amounts in millions)   2011     2010  
Total home equity net charge-offs (recoveries):
               
Franklin
  $     $ 3.7  
Non-Franklin
    26.7       34.2  
 
           
Total
  $ 26.7     $ 37.9  
 
           
Total home equity net charge-offs — annualized percentages:
               
Total
    1.38 %     2.01 %
Non-Franklin
    1.38       1.83  
 
               
Total residential mortgage net charge-offs (recoveries):
               
Franklin
  $ (3.1 )   $ 8.1  
Non-Franklin
    22.0       16.2  
 
           
Total
  $ 18.9     $ 24.3  
 
           
Total residential mortgage net charge-offs — annualized percentages:
               
Total
    1.70 %     2.17 %
Non-Franklin
    1.98       1.57  

 

44


Table of Contents

C&I NCOs decreased $33.2 million, or 44%, primarily reflected significant credit quality improvement in the underlying portfolio as well as our on-going proactive credit management practices.
CRE NCOs decreased $17.6 million, or 21%, primarily reflected significant credit quality improvement in the underlying portfolio as well as our on-going proactive credit management practices.
Automobile NCOs decreased $3.8 million, or 45%, reflected our consistent high quality origination profile since the beginning of 2008, as well as a continued strong market for used automobiles. This focus on origination quality has been the primary driver for the improvement in this portfolio in the current period compared with the year-ago period. Origination quality remains high as measured by our vintage analysis.
Home equity NCOs declined $11.2 million, or 30%. The first three-month period of 2010 included $3.7 million of Franklin-related NCOs compared with no Franklin-related NCOs in the current period. Excluding the Franklin-related impacts, home equity NCOs decreased $7.5 million compared with the first three-month period of 2010. The performance is consistent with our expectations for the portfolio.
Residential mortgage NCOs declined $5.4 million, or 22%. The first three-month period of 2010 included $8.1 million of Franklin-related NCOs, while the first three-month period of 2011 included $6.8 million of NCOs related to a more conservative loss recognition policy (see Consumer Credit section) and Franklin-related net recoveries of $3.1 million. Excluding these impacts, residential mortgage NCOs decreased $1.0 million compared with the first three-month period of 2010. Delinquency trends continued to improve, indicating losses should remain manageable even with the economic stress on our borrowers.
AVAILABLE-FOR-SALE AND OTHER SECURITIES PORTFOLIO
(This section should be read in conjunction with Note 4 of Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.)
During the first three-month period of 2011, we recorded $4.2 million of credit OTTI losses. This amount was comprised of $3.2 million related to the pooled-trust-preferred securities, $0.8 million related to the CMO securities, and $0.2 million related to the Alt-A mortgage-backed securities. Given the continued disruption in the housing and financial markets, we may be required to recognize additional credit OTTI losses in future periods with respect to our available-for-sale and other securities portfolio. The amount and timing of any additional credit OTTI will depend on the decline in the underlying cash flows of the securities. If our intent to hold temporarily impaired securities changes in future periods, we may be required to recognize noncredit OTTI through income, which will negatively impact earnings.
Alt-A mortgage-backed, Pooled-Trust-Preferred, and Private-Label CMO Securities
Our three highest risk segments of our investment portfolio are the Alt-A mortgage-backed, pooled-trust-preferred, and private-label CMO portfolios. The Alt-A mortgage-backed securities and pooled-trust-preferred securities are located within the asset-backed securities portfolio. The performance of the underlying securities in each of these segments continues to reflect the economic environment. Each of these securities in these three segments is subjected to a rigorous review of its projected cash flows. These reviews are supported with analysis from independent third parties.
The following table presents the credit ratings for our Alt-A mortgage-backed, pooled-trust-preferred, and private label CMO securities as of March 31, 2011:
Table 32 — Credit Ratings of Selected Investment Securities (1)
(dollar amounts in millions)
                                                         
    Amortized             Average Credit Rating of Fair Value Amount  
    Cost     Fair Value     AAA     AA +/-     A +/-     BBB +/-     <BBB-  
Private-label CMO securities
  $ 124.4     $ 115.5     $ 21.3     $ 6.6     $ 5.3     $ 13.5     $ 68.8  
Alt-A mortgage-backed securities
    64.7       58.1       12.9       26.9                   18.3  
Pooled-trust-preferred securities
    229.2       107.5                   25.4             82.1  
 
                                         
 
                                                       
Total at March 31, 2011
  $ 418.3     $ 281.1     $ 34.2     $ 33.5     $ 30.7     $ 13.5     $ 169.2  
 
                                         
 
                                                       
Total at December 31, 2010
  $ 435.8     $ 284.6     $ 41.2     $ 33.8     $ 29.7     $ 15.1     $ 164.8  
 
                                         
     
(1)   Credit ratings reflect the lowest current rating assigned by a nationally recognized credit rating agency.

 

45


Table of Contents

Negative changes to the above credit ratings would generally result in an increase of our risk-weighted assets, and a reduction to our regulatory capital ratios.
The following table summarizes the relevant characteristics of our pooled-trust-preferred securities portfolio at March 31, 2011. Each security is part of a pool of issuers and supports a more senior tranche of securities except for the I-Pre TSL II, MM Comm II and MM Comm III securities which are the most senior class.
Table 33 — Trust-preferred Securities Data
March 31, 2011
(dollar amounts in thousands)
                                                                 
                                            Actual              
                                            Deferrals     Expected        
                                            and     Defaults        
                                        # of Issuers   Defaults     as a % of        
                                    Lowest   Currently   as a % of     Remaining        
            Amortized     Fair     Unrealized     Credit   Performing/   Original     Performing     Excess  
Deal Name   Par Value     Cost     Value     Loss     Rating(2)   Remaining(3)   Collateral     Collateral     Subordination(4)  
Alesco II(1)
  $ 41,241     $ 31,540     $ 11,118     $ (20,422 )   C   32/38     14 %     16 %     %
Alesco IV(1)
    20,773       8,243       1,726       (6,517 )   C   31/44     21       26        
ICONS
    20,000       20,000       13,500       (6,500 )   BB   28/29     3       14       55  
I-Pre TSL II
    36,916       36,817       25,395       (11,422 )   A   28/29     3       16       68  
MM Comm II
    21,085       20,150       18,679       (1,471 )   BB   4/7     5       3       17  
MM Comm III
    11,150       10,653       7,185       (3,468 )   CC   7/11     7       12       39  
Pre TSL IX(1)
    5,026       4,035       1,617       (2,418 )   C   34/49     27       24        
Pre TSL X(1)
    17,595       9,915       3,322       (6,593 )   C   35/55     40       31        
Pre TSL XI(1)
    25,239       22,725       7,678       (15,047 )   C   43/64     29       22        
Pre TSL XIII(1)
    27,939       22,703       6,398       (16,305 )   C   43/65     34       25        
Reg Diversified(1)
    25,500       7,499       495       (7,004 )   D   23/44     46       32        
Soloso(1)
    12,500       3,906       501       (3,405 )   C   43/69     29       23        
Tropic III
    31,000       31,000       9,877       (21,123 )   CC   25/45     39       26       23  
 
                                                       
Total
  $ 295,964     $ 229,186     $ 107,491     $ (121,695 )                                
 
                                                       
     
(1)   Security was determined to have OTTI. As such, the book value is net of recorded credit impairment.
 
(2)   For purposes of comparability, the lowest credit rating expressed is equivalent to Fitch ratings even where the lowest rating is based on another nationally recognized credit rating agency.
 
(3)   Includes both banks and/or insurance companies.
 
(4)   Excess subordination percentage represents the additional defaults in excess of both current and projected defaults that the CDO can absorb before the bond experiences credit impairment. Excess subordinated percentage is calculated by (a) determining what percentage of defaults a deal can experience before the bond has credit impairment, and (b) subtracting from this default breakage percentage both total current and expected future default percentages.
Market Risk
Market risk represents the risk of loss due to changes in market values of assets and liabilities. We incur market risk in the normal course of business through exposures to market interest rates, foreign exchange rates, equity prices, credit spreads, and expected lease residual values. We have identified two primary sources of market risk: interest rate risk and price risk.
Interest Rate Risk
OVERVIEW
Interest rate risk is the risk to earnings and value arising from changes in market interest rates. Interest rate risk arises from timing differences in the repricings and maturities of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities (reprice risk), changes in the expected maturities of assets and liabilities arising from embedded options, such as borrowers’ ability to prepay residential mortgage loans at any time and depositors’ ability to redeem certificates of deposit before maturity (option risk), changes in the shape of the yield curve where interest rates increase or decrease in a non-parallel fashion (yield curve risk), and changes in spread relationships between different yield curves, such as U.S. Treasuries and LIBOR (basis risk).

 

46


Table of Contents

INCOME SIMULATION AND ECONOMIC VALUE ANALYSIS
Interest rate risk measurement is performed monthly. Two broad approaches to modeling interest rate risk are employed: income simulation and economic value analysis. An income simulation analysis is used to measure the sensitivity of forecasted net interest income to changes in market rates over a one-year time period. Although bank owned life insurance, automobile operating lease assets, and excess cash balances held at the Federal Reserve Bank are classified as noninterest earning assets, and the net revenue from these assets is recorded in noninterest income and noninterest expense, these portfolios are included in the interest sensitivity analysis because they have attributes similar to interest-earning assets. EVE analysis is used to measure the sensitivity of the values of period-end assets and liabilities to changes in market interest rates. EVE analysis serves as a complement to income simulation modeling as it provides risk exposure estimates for time periods beyond the one-year simulation period.
The models used for these measurements take into account prepayment speeds on mortgage loans, mortgage-backed securities, and consumer installment loans, as well as cash flows of other assets and liabilities. Balance sheet growth assumptions are also considered in the income simulation model. The models include the effects of derivatives, such as interest rate swaps, caps, floors, and other types of interest rate options.
The baseline scenario for income simulation analysis, with which all other scenarios are compared, is based on market interest rates implied by the prevailing yield curve as of the period-end. Alternative interest rate scenarios are then compared with the baseline scenario. These alternative interest rate scenarios include parallel rate shifts on both a gradual and an immediate basis, movements in interest rates that alter the shape of the yield curve (e.g., flatter or steeper yield curve), and no changes in current interest rates for the entire measurement period. Scenarios are also developed to measure short-term repricing risks, such as the impact of LIBOR-based interest rates rising or falling faster than the prime rate.
The simulations for evaluating short-term interest rate risk exposure are scenarios that model gradual +/-100 and +/-200 basis points parallel shifts in market interest rates over the next one-year period beyond the interest rate change implied by the current yield curve. We assumed market interest rates would not fall below 0% over the next one-year period for the scenarios that used the -100 and -200 basis points parallel shift in market interest rates. The table below shows the results of the scenarios as of March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010. All of the positions were within the board of directors’ policy limits as of March 31, 2011, except for the -100 basis points scenario.
Table 34 — Net Interest Income at Risk
                                 
    Net Interest Income at Risk (%)  
Basis point change scenario   -200     -100     +100     +200  
Board policy limits
    -4.0 %     -2.0 %     -2.0 %     -4.0 %
 
                       
March 31, 2011
    -3.5       -2.7       1.3       2.5  
December 31, 2010
    -3.2       -1.8       0.3       0.0  
The net interest income at risk reported as of March 31, 2011 for the +200 basis points scenario shows a significant change to an asset sensitive near-term interest rate risk position compared with December 31, 2010. The ALCO’s strategy is to be near-term asset-sensitive to a rising rate scenario. The primary factor contributing to this change is the termination of $4.1 billion of interest rate swaps maturing through June 2012. The terminations also impacted exposure to declining interest rate scenarios, resulting in the -100 basis points scenario exceeding the board of directors’ policy limit. A key factor which impacts the exposure to declining interest rates is an assumption that rates paid on deposit products, such as money market accounts, savings accounts, and interest-bearing checking accounts, will not decline much further from current rates being paid. However, management would most likely lower the rates on these deposit products if the economic climate associated with a declining interest rate environment warranted such action. The ALCO recommended, and the board approved, an exception to the policy limit noting a low probability of rates going lower. The ALCO has no immediate plans to take any action at this time to bring the down 100 basis point scenario results within policy limits.
The following table shows the income sensitivity of select portfolios to changes in market interest rates. A portfolio with 100% sensitivity would indicate that interest income and expense will change with the same magnitude and direction as interest rates. A portfolio with 0% sensitivity is insensitive to changes in interest rates. For the +200 basis points scenario, total interest-sensitive income is 41.6% sensitive to changes in market interest rates, while total interest-sensitive expense is 43.3% sensitive to changes in market interest rates. However, net interest income at risk for the +200 basis points scenario has a neutral near-term interest rate risk position because of the larger base of total interest-sensitive income relative to total interest-sensitive expense.

 

47


Table of Contents

Table 35 — Interest Income/Expense Sensitivity
                                         
    Percent of     Percent Change in Interest Income/Expense for a Given  
    Total Earning     Change in Interest Rates  
    Assets (1)     Over / (Under) Base Case Parallel Ramp  
Basis point change scenario         -200     -100     +100     +200  
Total loans
    80 %     -21.5 %     -32.1 %     46.1 %     46.3 %
Total investments and other earning assets
    20       -18.9       -22.0       38.7       28.4  
Total interest sensitive income
            -20.4       -29.3       43.4       41.6  
 
                             
Total interest-bearing deposits
    72       -9.9       -11.7       41.1       38.8  
Total borrowings
    11       -20.5       -38.4       71.5       72.1  
Total interest-sensitive expense
            -11.3       -15.4       45.2       43.3  
 
                             
     
(1)   At March 31, 2011.
Table 36 — Economic Value of Equity at Risk
                                 
    Economic Value of Equity at Risk (%)  
Basis point change scenario   -200     -100     +100     +200  
Board policy limits
    -12.0 %     -5.0 %     -5.0 %     -12.0 %
 
                       
March 31, 2011
    0.9       1.8       -3.5       -7.7  
December 31, 2010
    -0.5       1.3       -4.0       -8.9  
The EVE at risk reported as of March 31, 2011, for the +200 basis points scenario shows a change to a lower long-term liability sensitive position compared with December 31, 2010. The primary factor contributing to this change is the termination of $4.1 billion of interest rate swaps maturing through June 2012.
The following table shows the economic value sensitivity of select portfolios to changes in market interest rates. The change in economic value for each portfolio is measured as the percent change from the base economic value for that portfolio. For the +200 basis points scenario, total net tangible assets decreased in value 3.4% to changes in market interest rates, while total net tangible liabilities increased in value 2.6% to changes in market interest rates.
Table 37 — Economic Value Sensitivity
                                         
    Percent of        
    Total Net     Percent Change in Economic Value for a Given  
    Tangible     Change in Interest Rates  
    Assets (1)     Over / (Under) Base Case Parallel Shocks  
Basis point change scenario         -200     -100     +100     +200  
Total loans
    72 %     1.8 %     1.2 %     -1.4 %     -2.8 %
Total investments and other earning assets
    18       4.6       2.7       -3.3       -6.6  
Total net tangible assets (2)
            2.2       1.4       -1.7       -3.4  
 
                             
Total deposits
    78       -2.6       -1.4       1.5       2.8  
Total borrowings
    10       -1.6       -0.8       0.8       1.6  
Total net tangible liabilities (3)
            -2.5       -1.3       1.4       2.6  
 
                             
     
(1)   At March 31, 2011.
 
(2)   Tangible assets excluding ALLL.
 
(3)   Tangible liabilities excluding AULC.
MSRs
(This section should be read in conjunction with Note 5 of Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.)
At March 31, 2011, we had a total of $202.6 million of capitalized MSRs representing the right to service $16.5 billion in mortgage loans. Of this $202.6 million, $119.2 million was recorded using the fair value method, and $83.4 million was recorded using the amortization method. When we actively engage in hedging, the MSR asset is carried at fair value.

 

48


Table of Contents

MSR fair values are very sensitive to movements in interest rates as expected future net servicing income depends on the projected outstanding principal balances of the underlying loans, which can be greatly reduced by prepayments. Prepayments usually increase when mortgage interest rates decline and decrease when mortgage interest rates rise. We have employed strategies to reduce the risk of MSR fair value changes or impairment. In addition, we engage a third party to provide valuation tools and assistance with our strategies with the objective to decrease the volatility from MSR fair value changes. However, volatile changes in interest rates can diminish the effectiveness of these hedges. We typically report MSR fair value adjustments net of hedge-related trading activity in the mortgage banking income category of noninterest income. Changes in fair value between reporting dates are recorded as an increase or a decrease in mortgage banking income.
MSRs recorded using the amortization method generally relate to loans originated with historically low interest rates, resulting in a lower probability of prepayments and, ultimately, impairment. MSR assets are included in other assets and presented in Table 9.
Price Risk
Price risk represents the risk of loss arising from adverse movements in the prices of financial instruments that are carried at fair value and are subject to fair value accounting. We have price risk from trading securities, securities owned by our broker-dealer subsidiaries, foreign exchange positions, equity investments, investments in securities backed by mortgage loans, and marketable equity securities held by our insurance subsidiaries. We have established loss limits on the trading portfolio, on the amount of foreign exchange exposure that can be maintained, and on the amount of marketable equity securities that can be held by the insurance subsidiaries.
Liquidity Risk
Liquidity risk is the risk of loss due to the possibility that funds may not be available to satisfy current or future commitments resulting from external macro market issues, investor and customer perception of financial strength, and events unrelated to us, such as war, terrorism, or financial institution market specific issues. We manage liquidity risk at both the Bank and the parent company.
Bank Liquidity and Sources of Liquidity
Our primary sources of funding for the Bank are retail and commercial core deposits. At March 31, 2011, these core deposits funded 74% of total assets. At March 31, 2011, total core deposits represented 95% of total deposits, an increase from 93% at the prior year-end.
Core deposits are comprised of interest-bearing and noninterest-bearing demand deposits, money market deposits, savings and other domestic deposits, consumer certificates of deposit both over and under $250,000, and nonconsumer certificates of deposit less than $250,000. Noncore deposits consist of brokered money market deposits and certificates of deposit, foreign time deposits, and other domestic deposits of $250,000 or more comprised primarily of public fund certificates of deposit more than $250,000.
Core deposits may increase our need for liquidity as certificates of deposit mature or are withdrawn before maturity and as nonmaturity deposits, such as checking and savings account balances, are withdrawn.
Demand deposit overdrafts that have been reclassified as loan balances were $12.0 million, $13.1 million, and $15.5 million at March 31, 2011, December 31, 2010, and March 31, 2010, respectively.
Other domestic time deposits of $250,000 or more and brokered deposits and negotiable CDs totaled $1.8 billion, $2.2 billion, and $2.3 billion at March 31, 2011, December 31, 2010, and March 31, 2010, respectively.

 

49


Table of Contents

The following table reflects deposit composition detail for each of the past five quarters:
Table 38 — Deposit Composition
                                                                                 
    2011     2010  
(dollar amounts in millions)   March 31,     December 31,     September 30,     June 30,     March 31,  
By Type
                                                                               
Demand deposits — noninterest-bearing
  $ 7,597       18 %   $ 7,217       17 %   $ 6,926       17 %   $ 6,463       16 %   $ 6,938       17 %
Demand deposits — interest-bearing
    5,532       13       5,469       13       5,347       13       5,850       15       5,948       15  
Money market deposits
    13,105       32       13,410       32       12,679       31       11,437       29       10,644       26  
Savings and other domestic deposits
    4,762       12       4,643       11       4,613       11       4,652       12       4,666       12  
Core certificates of deposit
    8,208       20       8,525       20       8,765       21       8,974       23       9,441       23  
 
                                                           
Total core deposits
    39,204       95       39,264       93       38,330       93       37,376       95       37,637       93  
Other domestic deposits of $250,000 or more
    531       1       675       2       730       2       678       2       684       2  
Brokered deposits and negotiable CDs
    1,253       3       1,532       4       1,576       4       1,373       3       1,605       4  
Deposits in foreign offices
    378       1       383       1       436       1       422             377       1  
 
                                                           
 
                                                                               
Total deposits
  $ 41,366       100 %   $ 41,854       100 %   $ 41,072       100 %   $ 39,849       100 %   $ 40,303       100 %
 
                                                           
 
                                                                               
Total core deposits:
                                                                               
Commercial
  $ 12,785       33 %   $ 12,476       32 %   $ 12,262       32 %   $ 11,515       31 %   $ 11,844       31 %
Personal
    26,419       67       26,788       68       26,068       68       25,861       69       25,793       69  
 
                                                           
 
                                                                               
Total core deposits
  $ 39,204       100 %   $ 39,264       100 %   $ 38,330       100 %   $ 37,376       100 %   $ 37,637       100 %
 
                                                           
To the extent we are unable to obtain sufficient liquidity through core deposits, we may meet our liquidity needs through sources of wholesale funding. These sources include other domestic time deposits of $250,000 or more, brokered deposits and negotiable CDs, deposits in foreign offices, short-term borrowings, FHLB advances, other long-term debt, and subordinated notes. At March 31, 2011, total wholesale funding was $7.6 billion, a decrease from $8.4 billion at December 31, 2010.
The Bank also has access to the Federal Reserve’s discount window. These borrowings are secured by commercial loans and home equity lines-of-credit. The Bank is also a member of the FHLB, and as such, has access to advances from this facility. These advances are generally secured by residential mortgages, other mortgage-related loans, and available-for-sale securities. Information regarding amounts pledged, for the ability to borrow if necessary, and the unused borrowing capacity at both the Federal Reserve Bank and the FHLB, is outlined in the following table:
Table 39 — Federal Reserve and FHLB Borrowing Capacity
                 
    March 31,     December 31,  
(dollar amounts in billions)   2011     2010  
Loans and Securities Pledged:
               
Federal Reserve Bank
  $ 9.9     $ 9.7  
FHLB
    7.5       7.8  
 
           
Total loans and securities pledged
  $ 17.4     $ 17.5  
 
               
Total unused borrowing capacity at Federal Reserve Bank and FHLB
  $ 9.5     $ 8.8  
We can also obtain funding through other methods including: (1) purchasing federal funds, (2) selling securities under repurchase agreements, (3) the sale or maturity of investment securities, (4) the sale or securitization of loans, (5) the sale of national market certificates of deposit, (6) the relatively shorter-term structure of our commercial loans and automobile loans, and (7) the issuance of common and preferred stock.
At March 31, 2011, we believe the Bank has sufficient liquidity to meet its cash flow obligations for the foreseeable future.

 

50


Table of Contents

Parent Company Liquidity
The parent company’s funding requirements consist primarily of dividends to shareholders, debt service, income taxes, operating expenses, funding of nonbank subsidiaries, repurchases of our stock, and acquisitions. The parent company obtains funding to meet obligations from interest received from the Bank, interest and dividends received from direct subsidiaries, net taxes collected from subsidiaries included in the federal consolidated tax return, fees for services provided to subsidiaries, and the issuance of debt securities.
At March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the parent company had $0.6 billion in cash and cash equivalents. Appropriate limits and guidelines are in place to ensure the parent company has sufficient cash to meet operating expenses and other commitments during 2011 without relying on subsidiaries or capital markets for funding.
During the 2010 fourth quarter, we completed a public offering and sale of 146.0 million shares of common stock at a price of $6.30 per share, or $920.0 million in aggregate gross proceeds. Also during the 2010 fourth quarter, we completed the public offering and sale of $300.0 million aggregate principal amount of 7.00% Subordinated Notes due 2020. We used the net proceeds from these transactions to repurchase our TARP Capital. On January 19, 2011, we repurchased the warrant we had issued to the Treasury at an agreed upon purchase price of $49.1 million. The warrant had entitled the Treasury to purchase 23.6 million shares of common stock.
Based on the current dividend of $0.01 per common share, cash demands required for common stock dividends are estimated to be approximately $8.6 million per quarter. Based on the current dividend, cash demands required for Series A Preferred Stock are estimated to be approximately $7.7 million per quarter.
Based on a regulatory dividend limitation, the Bank could not have declared and paid a dividend to the parent company at March 31, 2011, without regulatory approval. We do not anticipate that the Bank will need to request regulatory approval to pay dividends in the near future as we continue to build Bank regulatory capital above its already Well-capitalized level. To help meet any additional liquidity needs, we have an open-ended, automatic shelf registration statement filed and effective with the SEC, which permits us to issue an unspecified amount of debt or equity securities.
With the exception of the common and preferred dividends previously discussed, the parent company does not have any significant cash demands. There are no maturities of parent company obligations until 2013, when a debt maturity of $50.0 million is payable.
Considering the factors discussed above, and other analyses that we have performed, we believe the parent company has sufficient liquidity to meet its cash flow obligations for the foreseeable future.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
In the normal course of business, we enter into various off-balance sheet arrangements. These arrangements include financial guarantees contained in standby letters of credit issued by the Bank and commitments by the Bank to sell mortgage loans.
Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. These guarantees are primarily issued to support public and private borrowing arrangements, including commercial paper, bond financing, and similar transactions. Most of these arrangements mature within two years and are expected to expire without being drawn upon. Standby letters of credit are included in the determination of the amount of risk-based capital that the parent company and the Bank are required to hold.
Through our credit process, we monitor the credit risks of outstanding standby letters of credit. When it is probable that a standby letter of credit will be drawn and not repaid in full, losses are recognized in the provision for credit losses. At March 31, 2011, we had $0.6 billion of standby letters of credit outstanding, of which 77% were collateralized. Included in this $0.6 billion are letters of credit issued by the Bank that support securities that were issued by our customers and remarketed by The Huntington Investment Company, our broker-dealer subsidiary.
We enter into forward contracts relating to the mortgage banking business to hedge the exposures we have from commitments to extend new residential mortgage loans to our customers and from our mortgage loans held for sale. At March 31, 2011, December 31, 2010, and March 31, 2010, we had commitments to sell residential real estate loans of $360.9 million, $998.7 million, and $600.9 million, respectively. These contracts mature in less than one year.
We do not believe that off-balance sheet arrangements will have a material impact on our liquidity or capital resources.

 

51


Table of Contents

Operational Risk
As with all companies, we are subject to operational risk. Operational risk is the risk of loss due to human error; inadequate or failed internal systems and controls; violations of, or noncompliance with, laws, rules, regulations, prescribed practices, or ethical standards; and external influences such as market conditions, fraudulent activities, disasters, and security risks. We continuously strive to strengthen our system of internal controls to ensure compliance with laws, rules, and regulations, and to improve the oversight of our operational risk.
To mitigate operational risks, we have established a senior management Operational Risk Committee and a senior management Legal, Regulatory, and Compliance Committee. The responsibilities of these committees, among other duties, include establishing and maintaining management information systems to monitor material risks and to identify potential concerns, risks, or trends that may have a significant impact and ensuring that recommendations are developed to address the identified issues. Both of these committees report any significant findings and recommendations to the Risk Management Committee. Additionally, potential concerns may be escalated to our Board Risk Oversight Committee, as appropriate.
The goal of this framework is to implement effective operational risk techniques and strategies, minimize operational and fraud losses, and enhance our overall performance.
Representation and Warranty Reserve
We primarily conduct our loan sale and securitization activity with Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. In connection with these and other securitization transactions, we make certain representations and warranties that the loans meet certain criteria, such as collateral type and underwriting standards. We may be required to repurchase individual loans and / or indemnify these organizations against losses due to a loan not meeting the established criteria. We have a reserve for such losses, which is included in accrued expenses and other liabilities. The reserves were estimated based on historical and expected repurchase activity, average loss rates, and current economic trends. The level of mortgage loan repurchase losses depends upon economic factors, investor demand strategies and other external conditions containing a level of uncertainty and risk that may change over the life of the underlying loans. We do not believe we have sufficient information to estimate the range of reasonably possible loss related to representation and warranty exposure.
The table below reflects activity in the representations and warranties reserve:
Table 40 — Summary of Reserve for Representations and Warranties on Mortgage Loans Serviced for Others
                                         
    2011     2010  
(dollar amounts in thousands)   First     Fourth     Third     Second     First  
Reserve for representations and warranties, beginning of period
  $ 20,170     $ 18,026     $ 10,519     $ 5,920     $ 5,916  
Acquired reserve for representations and warranties
                7,000              
Reserve charges
    (270 )     (4,242 )     (1,787 )     (1,875 )     (1,108 )
Provision for representations and warranties
    3,885       6,386       2,294       6,474       1,112  
 
                             
Reserve for representations and warranties, end of period
  $ 23,785     $ 20,170     $ 18,026     $ 10,519     $ 5,920  
 
                             
Foreclosure Documentation
Recently, several high volume servicers have announced the execution of consent orders with various federal regulators. Those consent orders do not preclude the assessment of civil money penalties in the future by the regulators.
Compared to the high volume servicers, we service a relatively low volume of residential mortgage foreclosures, with approximately 3,900 foreclosure cases as of March 31, 2011, in states that require foreclosures to proceed through the courts. We have reviewed and are continuing to review our residential foreclosure process. We have no reason to conclude that foreclosures were filed that should not have been filed. We have and are strengthening our processes and controls to ensure that our foreclosure processes do not have the deficiencies identified in those institutions which are the subject of the consent orders.
Compliance Risk
Financial institutions are subject to a myriad of laws, rules and regulations emanating at both the federal and state levels. These mandates cover a broad scope, including but not limited to, expectations on anti-money laundering, lending limits, client privacy, fair lending, community reinvestment, and other important areas. Recently, the volume and complexity of regulatory changes adds to the overall compliance risk. At Huntington, we take these mandates seriously and have invested in people, processes, and systems to help ensure we meet expectations. At the corporate level, we have a team of compliance experts and lawyers dedicated to ensuring our conformance. We provide, and require, training for our colleagues on a number of broad-based laws and regulations. For example, all of our employees are expected to take, and pass, courses on anti-money laundering and customer privacy. Those who are engaged in lending activities must also take training related to flood disaster protection, equal credit opportunity, fair lending, and / or a variety of other courses related to the extension of credit. We set a high standard of expectation for adherence to compliance management and seek to continuously enhance our performance in this regard.

 

52


Table of Contents

Capital
(This section should be read in conjunction with Significant Item 2.)
Capital is managed both at the Bank and on a consolidated basis. Capital levels are maintained based on regulatory capital requirements and the economic capital required to support credit, market, liquidity, and operational risks inherent in our business, and to provide the flexibility needed for future growth and new business opportunities. Shareholders’ equity totaled $5.0 billion at March 31, 2011, a slight increase from December 31, 2010, primarily reflecting an increase in retained earnings.
We believe our current level of capital is adequate.
TARP Capital
As discussed in our 2010 Form 10-K, we fully exited our TARP relationship during the 2011 first quarter by repurchasing the ten-year warrant we had issued to the Treasury as part of the TARP Capital for $49.1 million. Refer to the 2010 Form 10-K for a complete discussion regarding the issuing and repayment of our TARP Capital.
Capital Adequacy
The following table presents risk-weighted assets and other financial data necessary to calculate certain financial ratios that we use to measure capital adequacy.
Table 41 — Capital Adequacy
                                         
    2011     2010  
(dollar amounts in millions)   March 31,     December 31,     September 30,     June 30,     March 31,  
Consolidated capital calculations:
                                       
 
                                       
Common shareholders’ equity
  $ 4,676     $ 4,618     $ 3,867     $ 3,742     $ 3,678  
Preferred shareholders’ equity
    363       363       1,700       1,696       1,692  
 
                             
Total shareholders’ equity
    5,039       4,981       5,567       5,438       5,370  
Goodwill
    (444 )     (444 )     (444 )     (444 )     (444 )
Other intangible assets
    (215 )     (229 )     (244 )     (259 )     (274 )
Other intangible assets deferred tax liability (1)
    75       80       85       91       95  
 
                             
Total tangible equity (2)
    4,455       4,388       4,964       4,826       4,747  
Preferred shareholders’ equity
    (363 )     (363 )     (1,700 )     (1,696 )     (1,692 )
 
                             
Total tangible common equity (2)
  $ 4,092     $ 4,025     $ 3,264     $ 3,130     $ 3,055  
 
                             
Total assets
  $ 52,949     $ 53,820     $ 53,247     $ 51,771     $ 51,867  
Goodwill
    (444 )     (444 )     (444 )     (444 )     (444 )
Other intangible assets
    (215 )     (229 )     (244 )     (259 )     (274 )
Other intangible assets deferred tax liability (1)
    75       80       85       91       95  
 
                             
Total tangible assets (2)
  $ 52,365     $ 53,227     $ 52,644     $ 51,159     $ 51,244  
 
                             
 
                                       
Tier 1 capital
  $ 5,179     $ 5,022     $ 5,480     $ 5,317     $ 5,090  
Preferred shareholders’ equity
    (363 )     (363 )     (1,700 )     (1,696 )     (1,692 )
Trust-preferred securities
    (570 )     (570 )     (570 )     (570 )     (570 )
REIT-preferred stock
    (50 )     (50 )     (50 )     (50 )     (50 )
 
                             
Tier 1 common equity (2)
  $ 4,196     $ 4,039     $ 3,160     $ 3,001     $ 2,778  
 
                             
Risk-weighted assets (RWA)
  $ 43,024     $ 43,471     $ 42,759     $ 42,486     $ 42,522  
 
                             
 
                                       
Tier 1 common equity / RWA ratio (2)
    9.75 %     9.29 %     7.39 %     7.06 %     6.53 %
 
                                       
Tangible equity / tangible asset ratio (2)
    8.51       8.24       9.43       9.43       9.26  
 
                                       
Tangible common equity / tangible asset ratio (2)
    7.81       7.56       6.20       6.12       5.96  
 
                                       
Tangible common equity / RWA ratio (2)
    9.51       9.26       7.63       7.37       7.18  
     
(1)   Other intangible assets are net of deferred tax liability, and calculated assuming a 35% tax rate.
 
(2)   Tangible equity, Tier 1 common equity, tangible common equity, and tangible assets are non-GAAP financial measures. Additionally, any ratios utilizing these financial measures are also non-GAAP. These financial measures have been included as they are considered to be critical metrics with which to analyze and evaluate financial condition and capital strength. Other companies may calculate these financial measures differently.

 

53


Table of Contents

Our consolidated TCE ratio was 7.81% at March 31, 2011, an increase from 7.56% at December 31, 2010. The 25 basis point increase from December 31, 2010, primarily reflected the combination of an increase in retained earnings and lower period-end tangible assets, partially offset by the repurchase of the TARP warrant during the current quarter.
Regulatory Capital
Regulatory capital ratios are the primary metrics used by regulators in assessing the safety and soundness of banks. We intend to maintain both our and the Bank’s risk-based capital ratios at levels at which both would be considered Well-capitalized by regulators. The Bank is primarily supervised and regulated by the OCC, which establishes regulatory capital guidelines for banks similar to those established for bank holding companies by the Federal Reserve Board.
Regulatory capital primarily consists of Tier 1 capital and Tier 2 capital. The sum of Tier 1 capital and Tier 2 capital equals our total risk-based capital. The following table reflects changes and activity to the various components utilized in the calculation of our consolidated Tier 1, Tier 2, and total risk-based capital amounts during the first three-month period of 2011.
Table 42 — Consolidated Regulatory Capital Activity
                                                 
    Tier 1 Capital  
    Common     Preferred             Disallowed     Disallowed     Total  
    Shareholders’     Shareholders’     Qualifying     Goodwill &     Other     Tier 1  
(dollar amounts in millions)   Equity (1)     Equity     Core Capital (2)     Intangible assets     Adjustments (net)     Capital  
 
                                               
Balance at December 31, 2010
  $ 4,815.1     $ 362.5     $ 620.3     $ (607.2 )   $ (168.9 )   $ 5,021.8  
 
                                               
Earnings
    126.4                               126.4  
Changes to disallowed adjustments
                      21.7       (0.7 )     21.0  
Dividends
    (16.3 )                             (16.3 )
Repurchase of TARP Capital warrant
    (49.1 )                             (49.1 )
Disallowance of deferred tax assets
                            71.3       71.3  
Other
    3.5                               3.5  
 
                                   
 
                                               
Balance at March 31, 2011
  $ 4,879.6     $ 362.5     $ 620.3     $ (585.5 )   $ (98.3 )   $ 5,178.6  
 
                                   
                                         
    Total risk-based capital  
            Qualifying                     Total  
    Qualifying     Subordinated             Tier 1 Capital     risk-based  
    ACL     Debt     Tier 2 Capital     (from above)     capital  
 
                                       
Balance at December 31, 2010
  $ 552.3     $ 710.5     $ 1,262.8     $ 5,021.8     $ 6,284.6  
 
                                       
Change in qualifying subordinated debt
          (45.2 )     (45.2 )           (45.2 )
Change in qualifying ACL
    (6.6 )           (6.6 )           (6.6 )
Changes to Tier 1 Capital (see above)
                      156.8       156.8  
 
                             
 
                                       
Balance at March 31, 2011
  $ 545.7     $ 665.3     $ 1,211.0     $ 5,178.6     $ 6,389.6  
 
                             
     
(1)   Excludes accumulated other comprehensive income and minority interest.
 
(2)   Includes minority interest.

 

54


Table of Contents

The following table presents our regulatory capital ratios at both the consolidated and Bank levels for each of the past five quarters:
Table 43 — Regulatory Capital Ratios
                                             
        2011     2010  
        March 31,     December 31,     September 30,     June 30,     March 31,  
Total risk-weighted assets (in millions)
  Consolidated   $ 43,024     $ 43,471     $ 42,759       42,486     $ 42,522  
 
  Bank     42,750       43,281       42,503       42,249       42,511  
Tier 1 leverage ratio
  Consolidated     9.80 %     9.41 %     10.54 %     10.45 %     10.05 %
 
  Bank     7.23       6.97       6.85       6.54       5.99  
Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio
  Consolidated     12.04       11.55       12.82       12.51       11.97  
 
  Bank     8.87       8.51       8.28       7.80       7.11  
Total risk-based capital ratio
  Consolidated     14.85       14.46       15.08       14.79       14.28  
 
  Bank     13.11       12.82       12.69       12.23       11.53  
The increase in our consolidated Tier 1 risk-based capital ratios compared with December 31, 2010 primarily reflected current quarter earnings, a reduction in the disallowed deferred tax asset, and a slight decline in risk-weighted assets, partially offset by the negative impact related to the repurchase of the TARP warrants.
At March 31, 2011, our Tier 1 and total risk-based capital in excess of the minimum level required to be considered Well-capitalized were $2.6 billion and $2.1 billion, respectively. The Bank had Tier 1 and total risk-based capital in excess of the minimum level required to be considered Well-capitalized of $1.2 billion and $1.3 billion, respectively, at March 31, 2011.
Other Capital Matters
Our strong capital ratios and expectations for continued earnings growth positions us to actively explore capital management opportunities, including raising our dividend.

 

55


Table of Contents

BUSINESS SEGMENT DISCUSSION
Overview
This section reviews financial performance from a business segment perspective and should be read in conjunction with the Discussion of Results of Operations, Note 17 of the Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, and other sections for a full understanding of our consolidated financial performance.
Business segment results are determined based upon our management reporting system, which assigns balance sheet and income statement items to each of the business segments. The process is designed around our organizational and management structure and, accordingly, the results derived are not necessarily comparable with similar information published by other financial institutions.
Funds Transfer Pricing
We use an active and centralized FTP methodology to attribute appropriate net interest income to the business segments. The intent of the FTP methodology is to eliminate all interest rate risk from the business segments by providing matched duration funding of assets and liabilities. The result is to centralize the financial impact, management, and reporting of interest rate and liquidity risk in the Treasury / Other function where it can be centrally monitored and managed. The Treasury / Other function charges (credits) an internal cost of funds for assets held in (or pays for funding provided by) each business segment. The FTP rate is based on prevailing market interest rates for comparable duration assets (or liabilities), and includes an estimate for the cost of liquidity (liquidity premium). Deposits of an indeterminate maturity receive an FTP credit based on a combination of vintage-based average lives and replicating portfolio pool rates. Other assets, liabilities, and capital are charged (credited) with a four-year moving average FTP rate. The denominator in the net interest margin calculation has been modified to add the amount of net funds provided by each business segment for all periods presented.
Revenue Sharing
Revenue is recorded in the business segment responsible for the related product or service. Fee sharing is recorded to allocate portions of such revenue to other business segments involved in selling to, or providing service to, customers. Results of operations for the business segments reflect these fee sharing allocations.
Expense Allocation
The management accounting process that develops the business segment reporting utilizes various estimates and allocation methodologies to measure the performance of the business segments. Expenses are allocated to business segments using a two-phase approach. The first phase consists of measuring and assigning unit costs (activity-based costs) to activities related to product origination and servicing. These activity-based costs are then extended, based on volumes, with the resulting amount allocated to business segments that own the related products. The second phase consists of the allocation of overhead costs to all four business segments from Treasury / Other. We utilize a full-allocation methodology, where all Treasury / Other expenses, except those related to our insurance business, reported Significant Items (except for the goodwill impairment), and a small amount of other residual unallocated expenses, are allocated to the four business segments.
Treasury / Other
The Treasury / Other function includes revenue and expense related to our insurance business, and assets, liabilities, and equity not directly assigned or allocated to one of the four business segments. Assets include investment securities, bank owned life insurance, and the OREO properties acquired through the 2009 first quarter Franklin restructuring. The financial impact associated with our FTP methodology, as described above, is also included.
Net interest income includes the impact of administering our investment securities portfolios and the net impact of derivatives used to hedge interest rate sensitivity. Noninterest income includes insurance income, miscellaneous fee income not allocated to other business segments, such as bank owned life insurance income and any investment security and trading asset gains or losses. Noninterest expense includes any insurance-related expenses, as well as certain corporate administrative, merger, and other miscellaneous expenses not allocated to other business segments. The provision for income taxes for the business segments is calculated at a statutory 35% tax rate, though our overall effective tax rate is lower. As a result, Treasury / Other reflects a credit for income taxes representing the difference between the lower actual effective tax rate and the statutory tax rate used to allocate income taxes to the business segments.

 

56


Table of Contents

Net Income by Business Segment
We reported net income of $126.4 million during the first three-month period of 2011. This compared with net income of $39.7 million during the first three-month period of 2010. The segregation of net income by business segment for the first three-month period of 2011 and 2010 is presented in the following table:
Table 44 — Net Income by Business Segment
                 
    Three Months Ended March 31,  
(dollar amounts in thousands)   2011     2010  
Retail and Business Banking
  $ 54,887     $ 9,944  
Regional and Commercial Banking
    24,067       (349 )
AFCRE
    34,656       (40,637 )
WGH
    9,448       17,923  
Treasury/Other
    3,388       52,856  
 
           
 
               
Total net income
  $ 126,446     $ 39,737  
 
           
Average Loans/Leases and Deposits by Business Segment
The segregation of total average loans and leases and total average deposits by business segment for the first three-month period of 2011, is presented in the following table:
Table 45 — Average Loans/Leases and Deposits by Business Segment
                                                 
    Three Months Ended March 31, 2011  
            Regional and                              
    Retail and     Commercial                     Treasury /        
(dollar amounts in millions)   Business Banking     Banking     AFCRE     WGH     Other     TOTAL  
Average Loans/Leases
                                               
Commercial and industrial
  $ 2,966     $ 7,480     $ 1,803     $ 774     $ 98     $ 13,121  
Commercial real estate
    452       323       5,565       184             6,524  
 
                                   
Total commercial
    3,418       7,803       7,368       958       98       19,645  
Automobile
                5,701                   5,701  
Home equity
    6,907       13       1       780       27       7,728  
Residential mortgage
    1,048       3             3,410       4       4,465  
Other consumer
    407       5       138       44       (35 )     559  
 
                                   
Total consumer
    8,362       21       5,840       4,234       (4 )     18,453  
 
                                   
Total loans and leases
  $ 11,780     $ 7,824     $ 13,208     $ 5,192     $ 94     $ 38,098  
 
                                   
 
                                               
Average Deposits
                                               
Demand deposits — noninterest-bearing
  $ 3,511     $ 2,032     $ 394     $ 1,259     $ 137     $ 7,333  
Demand deposits — interest-bearing
    4,406       91       44       811       5       5,357  
Money market deposits
    8,297       1,280       257       3,658             13,492  
Savings and other domestic deposits
    4,533       14       11       143             4,701  
Core certificates of deposit
    8,202       29       4       152       4       8,391  
 
                                   
Total core deposits
    28,949       3,446       710       6,023       146       39,274  
Other deposits
    190       220       53       1,371       556       2,390  
 
                                   
Total deposits
  $ 29,139     $ 3,666     $ 763     $ 7,394     $ 702     $ 41,664  
 
                                   

 

57


Table of Contents

Retail and Business Banking
Table 46 — Key Performance Indicators for Retail and Business Banking
                                 
    Three Months Ended March 31,     Change  
(dollar amounts in thousands unless otherwise noted)   2011     2010     Amount     Percent  
Net interest income
  $ 235,845     $ 203,405     $ 32,440       16 %
Provision for credit losses
    23,694       67,974       (44,280 )     (65 )
Noninterest income
    94,428       94,645       (217 )      
Noninterest expense
    222,137       214,777       7,360       3  
Provision for income taxes
    29,555       5,355       24,200       452  
 
                       
 
                               
Net income
  $ 54,887     $ 9,944     $ 44,943       452 %
 
                       
 
                               
Number of employees (full-time equivalent)
    5,460       5,213       247       5 %
 
                               
Total average assets (in millions)
  $ 13,157     $ 13,158     $ (1 )      
Total average loans/leases (in millions)
    11,780       11,779       1        
Total average deposits (in millions)
    29,139       28,371       768       3  
Net interest margin
    3.26 %     2.90 %     0.36 %     12  
NCOs
  $ 39,008     $ 69,718     $ (30,710 )     (44 )
NCOs as a % of average loans and leases
    1.32 %     2.37 %     (1.05 )%     (44 )
Return on average common equity
    15.2       2.9       12.3       424  
Retail banking # DDA households (eop)
    1,005,107       936,081       69,026       7  
Business banking # business DDA relationships (eop)
    122,271       114,335       7,936       7  
     
N.R. — Not relevant, as denominator of calculation is a loss in prior period compared with income in current period.
 
eop — End of Period.
2011 First Three Months vs. 2010 First Three Months
Retail and Business Banking reported net income of $54.9 million for the first three-month period of 2011, compared with net income of $9.9 million in the first three-month period of 2010. As discussed further below, the $44.9 million increase included a $32.4 million, or 16%, increase in the net interest income and a $44.3 million, or 65%, decline in the provision for credit losses, partially offset by a $24.2 million increase in income taxes.
Net interest income increased $32.4 million, or 16%, primarily reflecting a $0.8 billion increase in average total deposits, a 39 basis point improvement in our deposit spread, and a 7% increase in the number of DDA households. These increases were the result of increased sales results throughout 2010 and 2011, particularly in our money market and checking account deposit products through the use of more targeted direct mail and advertising of 24-Hour Grace™, part of our “Fair Play” banking philosophy.
Total average loans and leases were flat between the first three-month period of 2011, and the first three-month period in 2010. The CRE portfolio declined $103 million and reflected our ongoing commitment to reduce our exposure to CRE loans. This CRE decrease was partially offset by a $50 million increase in our C&I portfolio. We also sold SBA loans of $38.0 million, and the gains are referenced below.
Provision for credit losses declined $44.3 million, or 65%, reflecting lower NCOs and improvement in delinquencies. NCOs declined $30.7 million, or 44%, and reflected a $10.1 million decline in total commercial NCOs, and a $20.7 million decline in total consumer NCOs. The decrease in NCOs reflected a lower level of large dollar charge-offs, improvement in delinquencies, and an improved credit environment.

 

58


Table of Contents

Noninterest income decreased $0.2 million, or 0.2%, reflecting a $14.6 million decline in deposit service charges resulting from the amendment to Reg E, the reduction or elimination of certain overdraft fees, and the introduction of our new 24-Hour Grace™ consumer checking feature. The decrease was partially offset by (1) $3.6 million increase in electronic banking income, primarily reflecting an increased number of deposit accounts and transaction volumes, (2) $2.3 million increase in mortgage banking income, (3) $1.0 million increase in brokerage and insurance income, and (4) $7.5 million increase in other income primarily related to recognition of additional gains on sales of SBA loans.
Noninterest expense increased $7.3 million, or 3%. This increase reflected: (1) $5.4 million increase in personnel expense reflecting a 5% increase in full-time equivalent employees and salary increases, (2) $5.5 million increase in marketing expenses related to branch and product advertising and direct mail efforts, and branch and ATM branding investments in support of strategic initiatives, and (3) $1.0 million increase in equipment expenses related to branch refurbishment and rebrand strategies. These increases were partially offset by: (1) $1.8 million improvement in OREO losses, (2) $1.1 million of lower allocated expenses, and (3) $1.4 million of lower amortization of intangibles expense.

 

59


Table of Contents

Regional and Commercial Banking
Table 47 — Key Performance Indicators for Regional and Commercial Banking
                                 
    Three Months Ended March 31,     Change  
(dollar amounts in thousands unless otherwise noted)   2011     2010     Amount     Percent  
Net interest income
  $ 57,438     $ 50,831     $ 6,607       13 %
Provision for credit losses
    5,969       41,207       (35,238 )     (86 )
Noninterest income
    29,238       25,393       3,845       15  
Noninterest expense
    43,681       35,554       8,127       23  
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
    12,959       (188 )     13,147       (6,993 )
 
                       
 
                               
Net income (loss)
  $ 24,067     $ (349 )   $ 24,416       N.R. %
 
                       
 
                               
Number of employees (full-time equivalent)
    568       449       119       27 %
 
                               
Total average assets (in millions)
  $ 8,722     $ 8,143     $ 579       7  
Total average loans/leases (in millions)
    7,824       7,322       502       7  
Total average deposits (in millions)
    3,666       3,130       536       17  
Net interest margin
    2.99 %     2.77 %     0.22 %     8  
NCOs
  $ 15,160     $ 40,509     $ (25,349 )     (63 )
NCOs as a % of average loans and leases
    0.78 %     2.21 %     (1.43 )%     (65 )
Return on average common equity
    14.1       (0.2 )     14.3       N.R.  
     
N.R. — Not relevant, as denominator of calculation is a loss in prior period compared with income in current period.
2011 First Three Months vs. 2010 First Three Months
Regional and Commercial Banking reported net income of $24.1 million in the first three-month period of 2011, compared with a net loss of $0.3 million in the first three-month period of 2010. This $24.4 million improvement reflected a $35.2 million decline in provision for credit losses. The increased earnings also reflected significant improvement in our net interest income and noninterest income due to the successful execution of our strategic initiatives. Noninterest expense and total FTEs have increased as a result of these strategic investments.
Net interest income increased $6.6 million, or 13%. The primary drivers of this increase are due to: (1) $0.5 billion, or 7%, increase in average total loans and leases, (2) $0.6 billion, or 22%, increase in average core deposits, and (3) net interest margin expanded 22 basis points. The commercial loan spread improved by 34 basis points primarily due to a lower cost of funds on our renewals. In addition, as the liquidity position of the Bank improved in 2010, the liquidity premium was lowered for new and renewed loans.
Average total loans and leases increased $0.5 billion, or 7%, primarily reflecting the successful execution of our strategic initiatives, higher sales performance levels within our primary markets, and investments in additional leadership, expertise and sales talent. Seven out of our eleven markets experienced loan growth during this time period. Our core middle market loan portfolio average balance grew $259 million from the 2010 first quarter. The majority of this growth was due to marketing efforts and community development within our Michigan and Cleveland markets. Our equipment finance portfolio grew $180 million, or 21%, from the 2010 first quarter due to our focus on developing vertical strategies in business aircraft, rail, and syndications. Our large corporate portfolio grew $279 million due to establishing relationships with targeted prospects within our footprint.
We have made significant investments in our sales process, with an emphasis on our Optimal Customer Relationship, or OCR, program which entails robust customer relationship planning, as well as a renewed investment in technology, including a referral tracking system and new customer relationship management system. These investments have resulted in loan originations in the 2011 first quarter that increased 75% from the year-ago period.
Total average deposits increased $0.5 billion, or 17%, primarily reflecting a $0.6 billion increase in core deposits. The increase in core deposits primarily reflected: (1) $0.5 billion increase in commercial savings and money market deposits; and (2) $0.1 billion increase in commercial demand deposits. These increases were primarily a result of strategic initiatives to deepen customer relationships, new and innovative product offerings, pricing discipline and sales & retention initiatives.

 

60


Table of Contents

The Commercial Relationship Manager sales teams were educated on the importance of liquidity solutions in partnering with Treasury Management to deliver customer-focused solutions. This partnership, combined with the value of depository solutions, enabled our relationship managers to shift from a lending focus to a broader solutions-based cross-selling approach, including depository solutions. Targeted money market promotions and sales campaigns for loans and other products were deployed in Regional and Commercial Banking. They served as an effective “door opener” to drive success in ultimately obtaining operating account supported with Treasury management solutions which generally produce longer relationships. Best practices from each region were shared and institutionalized. A “money desk” was created to assist commercial bankers with tailored pricing solutions for customers having complex large dollar depository needs. This additional support and expertise helped our bankers win relationships and encouraged their expanded prospecting efforts.
Provision for credit losses declined $35.2 million, or 86%, reflecting improved credit quality of the portfolio, as well as a $25.3 million decline in NCOs. Expressed as a percentage of related average balances, NCOs decreased to 0.78% in the 2011 first quarter from 2.21% in the 2010 first quarter. The decline was primarily driven by $27.4 million lower C&I NCOs, partially offset by $2.4 million higher CRE NCOs. The overall decline in NCOs was the result of proactive treatment of problem credits since mid-2009, an improved credit environment, and increased recoveries.
Noninterest income increased $3.8 million, or 15%, and primarily reflected: (1) $1.2 million in derivatives revenue due to increased sales and trading activities, (2) $1.3 million in brokerage income reflecting the transfer of our institutional sales business to Regional and Commercial Banking from WGH during the first three-month period of 2011, (3) $1.1 million in capital markets income resulting from strategic investments made over the last year in these types of products and services, and (4) $0.5 million increase of loan-related fees relating to the improved collection efforts. These increases were partially offset by a $0.9 million decline in equipment operating lease income as lease originations were structured as direct finance leases beginning in the 2009 second quarter.
Noninterest expense increased $8.1 million, or 23%, and reflected a $7.7 million increase in personnel expense due to a 27% increase in full-time equivalent employees. This increase in personnel is attributable to our strategic investments in our core footprint markets, vertical strategies, and product capabilities.

 

61


Table of Contents

Automobile Finance and Commercial Real Estate
Table 48 — Key Performance Indicators for Automobile Finance and Commercial Real Estate
                                 
    Three Months Ended March 31,     Change  
(dollar amounts in thousands unless otherwise noted)   2011     2010     Amount     Percent  
Net interest income
  $ 87,849     $ 77,044     $ 10,805       14 %
Provision for credit losses
    4,784       117,639       (112,855 )     (96 )
Noninterest income
    13,379       17,101       (3,722 )     (22 )
Noninterest expense
    43,127       39,025       4,102       11  
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
    18,661       (21,882 )