e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For
the quarterly period ended June 30, 2005
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period of___to___
Commission file number 000-02333
Open Solutions Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
22-3173050 |
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
incorporation or organization)
|
|
Identification No.) |
455 Winding Brook Drive, Glastonbury, CT
(Address of principal executive offices)
06033
(Zip Code)
(860) 652-3155
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes
þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Exchange
Act Rule 12b-2).þ
As of August 3, 2005, 19,696,706 shares of common stock, $0.01 par value per share, were
outstanding.
OPEN SOLUTIONS INC.
QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
FOR THE FISCAL QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2005
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1: FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
OPEN SOLUTIONS INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
(In thousands, except |
|
|
share and per share data) |
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
102,517 |
|
|
$ |
49,447 |
|
Investments in marketable securities |
|
|
51,380 |
|
|
|
12,736 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
33,912 |
|
|
|
19,975 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
8,521 |
|
|
|
5,989 |
|
Deferred tax assets |
|
|
11,757 |
|
|
|
12,356 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
208,087 |
|
|
|
100,503 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed assets, net |
|
|
17,170 |
|
|
|
14,410 |
|
Intangible assets, net |
|
|
42,819 |
|
|
|
37,379 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
96,668 |
|
|
|
66,548 |
|
Deferred tax assets |
|
|
2,830 |
|
|
|
4,560 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
7,064 |
|
|
|
2,074 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
374,638 |
|
|
$ |
225,474 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
3,885 |
|
|
$ |
2,521 |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
16,671 |
|
|
|
15,338 |
|
Deferred revenue, current portion |
|
|
26,929 |
|
|
|
21,586 |
|
Long-term debt from customers, current portion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,239 |
|
Capital lease obligations, current portion |
|
|
296 |
|
|
|
735 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
47,781 |
|
|
|
41,419 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible notes payable |
|
|
144,061 |
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt from customers, less current portion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,736 |
|
Capital lease obligations, less current portion |
|
|
164 |
|
|
|
223 |
|
Deferred revenue, less current portion |
|
|
3,190 |
|
|
|
2,706 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
1,455 |
|
|
|
1,077 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
196,651 |
|
|
|
47,161 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 6) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders Equity; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; 5,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued
and outstanding at June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value; 95,000,000 shares authorized; 19,598,520 and
19,379,701 shares issued and 19,132,047 and 19,379,701 shares outstanding at
June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively |
|
|
196 |
|
|
|
194 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
(In thousands, except |
|
|
share and per share data) |
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
201,630 |
|
|
|
199,272 |
|
Deferred compensation |
|
|
(134 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income |
|
|
(173 |
) |
|
|
718 |
|
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(15,071 |
) |
|
|
(21,871 |
) |
Treasury stock at cost; 466,473 and no treasury shares at June 30, 2005 and
December 31, 2004, respectively |
|
|
(8,461 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
177,987 |
|
|
|
178,313 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
374,638 |
|
|
$ |
225,474 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
2
OPEN SOLUTIONS INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
(In thousands, except share and per share data) |
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Software license |
|
$ |
11,349 |
|
|
$ |
6,914 |
|
|
$ |
19,254 |
|
|
$ |
13,355 |
|
Service, maintenance and hardware |
|
|
35,738 |
|
|
|
14,906 |
|
|
|
65,559 |
|
|
|
29,415 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
47,087 |
|
|
|
21,820 |
|
|
|
84,813 |
|
|
|
42,770 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Software license |
|
|
1,638 |
|
|
|
1,223 |
|
|
|
2,828 |
|
|
|
2,543 |
|
Service, maintenance and hardware |
|
|
18,741 |
|
|
|
7,862 |
|
|
|
33,943 |
|
|
|
15,597 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of revenues |
|
|
20,379 |
|
|
|
9,085 |
|
|
|
36,771 |
|
|
|
18,140 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
26,708 |
|
|
|
12,735 |
|
|
|
48,042 |
|
|
|
24,630 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and marketing |
|
|
6,003 |
|
|
|
3,400 |
|
|
|
10,808 |
|
|
|
6,299 |
|
Product development |
|
|
5,080 |
|
|
|
2,221 |
|
|
|
9,105 |
|
|
|
4,183 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
9,169 |
|
|
|
4,108 |
|
|
|
16,762 |
|
|
|
8,217 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
20,252 |
|
|
|
9,729 |
|
|
|
36,675 |
|
|
|
18,699 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
|
6,456 |
|
|
|
3,006 |
|
|
|
11,367 |
|
|
|
5,931 |
|
Interest income and other |
|
|
1,170 |
|
|
|
290 |
|
|
|
2,040 |
|
|
|
555 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(1,210 |
) |
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
(2,067 |
) |
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
6,416 |
|
|
|
3,280 |
|
|
|
11,340 |
|
|
|
6,453 |
|
Income tax provision |
|
|
2,581 |
|
|
|
141 |
|
|
|
4,540 |
|
|
|
312 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
3,835 |
|
|
$ |
3,139 |
|
|
$ |
6,800 |
|
|
$ |
6,141 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
$ |
0.35 |
|
|
$ |
0.35 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
0.18 |
|
|
|
0.16 |
|
|
|
0.32 |
|
|
|
0.32 |
|
Weighted average common shares
used to compute net income per
common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
19,372,648 |
|
|
|
17,905,430 |
|
|
|
19,412,034 |
|
|
|
17,411,099 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
25,399,423 |
|
|
|
19,788,844 |
|
|
|
24,638,388 |
|
|
|
19,404,573 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
OPEN SOLUTIONS INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
(In thousands) |
Cash flows from operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
6,800 |
|
|
$ |
6,141 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
5,342 |
|
|
|
2,329 |
|
Non-cash interest expense |
|
|
294 |
|
|
|
|
|
Stock based compensation expense |
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
200 |
|
Deferred tax provision |
|
|
3,707 |
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for doubtful accounts |
|
|
277 |
|
|
|
169 |
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, excluding effects from acquisitions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
(10,955 |
) |
|
|
(3,330 |
) |
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
|
|
(1,023 |
) |
|
|
(737 |
) |
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
|
809 |
|
|
|
(1,064 |
) |
Deferred revenue |
|
|
3,399 |
|
|
|
2,913 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
8,850 |
|
|
|
6,621 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of fixed assets |
|
|
(3,936 |
) |
|
|
(2,140 |
) |
Purchases of marketable securities |
|
|
(92,758 |
) |
|
|
(5,103 |
) |
Sales of marketable securities |
|
|
54,168 |
|
|
|
45,696 |
|
Business acquisitions, net of cash received |
|
|
(41,936 |
) |
|
|
(13,580 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash
(used in) provided by investing activities |
|
|
(84,462 |
) |
|
|
24,873 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from exercise of stock options |
|
|
807 |
|
|
|
2,029 |
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock from employee stock purchase plan |
|
|
634 |
|
|
|
332 |
|
Repayment of long-term debt from customers |
|
|
(2,917 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Repayment of capital lease obligation |
|
|
(479 |
) |
|
|
(214 |
) |
Net proceeds from sale of common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,469 |
|
Proceeds from convertible notes payable |
|
|
144,061 |
|
|
|
|
|
Payment of debt issuance costs |
|
|
(4,915 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Repurchase of common stock |
|
|
(8,461 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
128,730 |
|
|
|
35,616 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effects of exchange rate on cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(48 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
53,070 |
|
|
|
67,110 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
|
|
49,447 |
|
|
|
14,853 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
102,517 |
|
|
$ |
81,963 |
|
Supplemental disclosures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest |
|
$ |
121 |
|
|
$ |
34 |
|
Cash paid for income taxes |
|
|
405 |
|
|
|
247 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
OPEN SOLUTIONS INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
Open Solutions Inc. (the Company) is a provider of software and services that allow
financial institutions to compete and service their customers more effectively. The Company
develops, markets, licenses and supports an enterprise-wide suite of software and services that
performs a financial institutions data processing and information management functions. The
Companys software can be operated either by the financial institution itself, on an outsourced
basis in one of the Companys outsourcing centers or through an outsourcing center hosted by one of
the Companys resellers. As a result of the acquisition of Datawest Solutions Inc. in October 2004,
the Company also provides payment processing services to customers in Canada.
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation and Principles of Consolidation
The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These accounting
principles were applied on a basis consistent with those of the consolidated financial statements
contained in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The accompanying condensed consolidated
financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements
contained in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004. In the
opinion of management, the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements contain all
adjustments (consisting only of normal, recurring adjustments) necessary for a fair presentation.
The operating results for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2005 may not be indicative
of the results expected for any succeeding quarter or for the entire fiscal year ending December
31, 2005.
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned
subsidiaries. All significant accounts, transactions and profits between the consolidated companies
have been eliminated in consolidation.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and
expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Certain
reclassifications to the prior period information, including the classification of auction rate
securities from cash and cash equivalents to investments in marketable securities, have been made
to conform with the current period classifications.
Segment Reporting
The Company views its operations and manages its business as one segment, the development and
marketing of computer software and related services. Factors used to identify the Companys single
operating segment include the organizational structure of the Company and the financial information
available for evaluation by the chief operating decision-maker in making decisions about how to
allocate resources and assess performance. The Company operates primarily in two geographical
areas, the United States of America and Canada. The Company provides the following disclosures of
revenues from products and services:
5
OPEN SOLUTIONS INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Software license |
|
$ |
11,349,000 |
|
|
$ |
6,914,000 |
|
|
$ |
19,254,000 |
|
|
$ |
13,355,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Installation, training and
professional services |
|
|
6,812,000 |
|
|
|
3,902,000 |
|
|
|
12,566,000 |
|
|
|
7,994,000 |
|
Maintenance and support |
|
|
11,320,000 |
|
|
|
6,792,000 |
|
|
|
20,555,000 |
|
|
|
12,675,000 |
|
Data center and payment
processing services |
|
|
15,352,000 |
|
|
|
2,984,000 |
|
|
|
28,705,000 |
|
|
|
6,054,000 |
|
Hardware and other |
|
|
2,254,000 |
|
|
|
1,228,000 |
|
|
|
3,733,000 |
|
|
|
2,692,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service, maintenance and hardware |
|
|
35,738,000 |
|
|
|
14,906,000 |
|
|
|
65,559,000 |
|
|
|
29,415,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
47,087,000 |
|
|
$ |
21,820,000 |
|
|
$ |
84,813,000 |
|
|
$ |
42,770,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues and tangible long-lived assets by significant geographic region are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States |
|
$ |
39,076,000 |
|
|
$ |
21,820,000 |
|
|
$ |
68,761,000 |
|
|
$ |
42,770,000 |
|
Canada |
|
|
8,011,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,052,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
47,087,000 |
|
|
$ |
21,820,000 |
|
|
$ |
84,813,000 |
|
|
$ |
42,770,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of |
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Tangible long-lived assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States |
|
$ |
12,903,000 |
|
|
$ |
9,664,000 |
|
Canada |
|
|
4,267,000 |
|
|
|
4,746,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
17,170,000 |
|
|
$ |
14,410,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income Per Share
Basic earnings per share (EPS), which excludes dilution, is computed by dividing income or
loss available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding
for the period. Diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other
contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock. Diluted EPS includes
in-the-money stock options and warrants using the treasury stock method and also includes the
assumed conversion of the convertible notes payable using the if-converted method. Under the
if-converted method, the after-tax interest expense is added to the numerator and the weighted
average shares issuable upon conversion of the debt instrument are added to the denominator.
6
OPEN SOLUTIONS INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(unaudited)
The following table reconciles net income and the weighted average shares outstanding used to
calculate basic and diluted income per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Net income used for basic calculation |
|
$ |
3,835,000 |
|
|
$ |
3,139,000 |
|
|
$ |
6,800,000 |
|
|
$ |
6,141,000 |
|
Interest expense from convertible debt, net
of tax effect |
|
|
703,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,167,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income used for diluted calculation |
|
$ |
4,538,000 |
|
|
$ |
3,139,000 |
|
|
$ |
7,967,000 |
|
|
$ |
6,141,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income per share weighted
average common shares outstanding |
|
|
19,372,648 |
|
|
|
17,905,430 |
|
|
|
19,412,034 |
|
|
|
17,411,099 |
|
Dilutive effect of stock options and
warrants |
|
|
1,062,571 |
|
|
|
1,883,414 |
|
|
|
1,139,799 |
|
|
|
1,993,474 |
|
Dilutive effect of convertible debt |
|
|
4,964,204 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,086,555 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net income per share weighted
average common shares outstanding |
|
|
25,399,423 |
|
|
|
19,788,844 |
|
|
|
24,638,388 |
|
|
|
19,404,573 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares of 1,477,425 and 1,286,019 were excluded from the computation
of diluted EPS for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2005 and 12,374 and 7,502 were
excluded for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2004, as they would have been
anti-dilutive.
Comprehensive Income
The following table summarizes the Companys comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Net income |
|
$ |
3,835,000 |
|
|
$ |
3,139,000 |
|
|
$ |
6,800,000 |
|
|
$ |
6,141,000 |
|
Unrealized gain (loss) on marketable
securities |
|
|
38,000 |
|
|
|
(96,000 |
) |
|
|
54,000 |
|
|
|
(61,000 |
) |
Foreign currency translation
adjustment |
|
|
(452,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(945,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
$ |
3,421,000 |
|
|
$ |
3,043,000 |
|
|
$ |
5,909,000 |
|
|
$ |
6,080,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
OPEN SOLUTIONS INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(unaudited)
Concentration of Credit Risk
Financial instruments that potentially expose the Company to concentrations of credit risk are
limited to accounts receivable. No customers accounted for more than 10% of total revenues for the
three and six month periods ended June 30, 2005. One individual customer accounted for 13.5% and
11.8%, respectively, of total revenues for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2004.
At June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, no customer accounted for 10% or more of the total
accounts receivable balance. The Company maintains allowances for potential credit risks and
otherwise controls this risk through monitoring procedures.
Stock Compensation
The Company records stock-based compensation for awards issued to employees and directors
(collectively, employees) using the intrinsic value method and stock-based compensation issued to
non-employees using the fair value method. Stock-based compensation expense is recognized over the
vesting period to the extent that the fair market value of the underlying stock on the date of
grant exceeds the exercise price of the employee stock option.
The following table illustrates the effect on net income if the Company had applied the fair
value recognition provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, Accounting
for Stock Based Compensation (SFAS No. 123), to stock compensation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Net income, as reported |
|
$ |
3,835,000 |
|
|
$ |
3,139,000 |
|
|
$ |
6,800,000 |
|
|
$ |
6,141,000 |
|
Add: Stock compensation expense,
net of tax effect, included in
reported net income |
|
|
86,000 |
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
152,000 |
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
Subtract: Total stock compensation
expense determined under fair
value method, net of tax effect |
|
|
(1,539,000 |
) |
|
|
(1,286,000 |
) |
|
|
(2,827,000 |
) |
|
|
(2,230,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net income |
|
$ |
2,382,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,953,000 |
|
|
$ |
4,125,000 |
|
|
$ |
4,111,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reported net income per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
$ |
0.35 |
|
|
$ |
0.35 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
0.18 |
|
|
|
0.16 |
|
|
|
0.32 |
|
|
|
0.32 |
|
Pro forma net income per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.12 |
|
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
$ |
0.21 |
|
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
0.12 |
|
|
|
0.10 |
|
|
|
0.21 |
|
|
|
0.21 |
|
The weighted average SFAS No. 123 fair value at grant date was $8.30 and $8.97 for options
granted in the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2005 and $12.41 and $13.20 for options
granted in the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2004. The above pro forma results are not
necessarily indicative of future pro forma results.
The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes
option pricing model with the following assumptions used for options granted during the applicable
period:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Risk free interest rate |
|
|
3.82 |
% |
|
|
3.74 |
% |
Expected dividend yield |
|
None |
|
None |
Expected life of option |
|
4 years |
|
5 years |
Expected volatility |
|
|
48.63 |
% |
|
|
59.67 |
% |
8
OPEN SOLUTIONS INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(unaudited)
The fair value method requires the input of highly subjective assumptions, including expected
stock price volatility. Changes in the subjective input assumptions can materially affect the fair
value estimate.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS No. 123R,
Share-Based Payment: an amendment of FASB Statements No. 123 and 95 (SFAS 123R), which requires
companies to recognize in their statement of operations the grant-date fair value of stock options
and other equity-based compensation issued to employees. SFAS 123R is effective for annual periods
beginning after June 15, 2005. Accordingly, the Company will adopt SFAS 123R in its first quarter
of 2006. SFAS 123R requires all share-based payments to employees, including stock options and
stock issued under certain employee stock purchase plans, to be recognized in the financial
statements at their fair value. SFAS 123R will require the estimation of future forfeitures of
stock based compensation, while the current pro forma disclosure includes only those options that
have been forfeited during the current period. Therefore, the Company believes that the pro forma
expense currently disclosed in Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements represents an
estimate of the amounts that would have been recorded under the provisions of SFAS 123R. The
Company has not yet determined which fair value method and transitional provision to follow. The
Company is currently evaluating its stock-based compensation plans to determine if changes should
be made to minimize compensation charges resulting from the adoption of SFAS 123R.
3. Acquisitions
The Company has entered into three acquisitions since the beginning of 2005 which are
summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S.O.S. Computer |
|
Financial Data |
|
|
CU Technologies |
|
Systems, Inc. |
|
Solutions, Inc. |
|
|
(March 2005) |
|
(April 2005) |
|
(June 2005) |
Tangible assets acquired |
|
$ |
2,551,000 |
|
|
$ |
4,754,000 |
|
|
$ |
3,169,000 |
|
Purchased technology |
|
|
350,000 |
|
|
|
500,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
20,230,000 |
|
|
|
5,705,000 |
|
|
|
4,773,000 |
|
Other intangibles |
|
|
2,300,000 |
|
|
|
3,320,000 |
|
|
|
1,250,000 |
|
Liabilities assumed |
|
|
(1,087,000 |
) |
|
|
(2,734,000 |
) |
|
|
(143,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase price |
|
$ |
24,344,000 |
|
|
$ |
11,545,000 |
|
|
$ |
9,049,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Each of these acquisitions was accounted for as a purchase transaction.
Accordingly, the purchase price was allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based
on estimates of fair value. The fair value of any purchased technology was determined based on
managements valuation analysis utilizing an income approach that takes into account future cash
flows. The excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the net assets acquired has been
allocated to goodwill. The operating results of each business acquired have been included in the
Companys consolidated financial statements from the respective dates of acquisition.
Financial Data Solutions, Inc.
On June 7, 2005, the Company acquired substantially all of the operating assets
and assumed certain liabilities of Financial Data Solutions, Inc. (FDSI), a company which
provides image and remittance item processing, and image statement and rendering services, for cash
consideration of $9,000,000 and acquisition-related costs of approximately $49,000. Intangible
assets, comprised of customer relationships, is being amortized over its useful life of 10 years.
Purchase accounting for this acquisition is preliminary, primarily with respect to the
identification and valuation of intangibles, and is expected to be finalized during 2005. Pro
forma information related to the combined results of operations of the Company and FDSI were not
material for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005.
S.O.S. Computer Systems, Inc.
On April 6, 2005, the Company acquired substantially all of the operating assets
and assumed certain liabilities of S.O.S. Computer Systems, Inc. (SO Systems), a provider of core
processing software and related services for credit unions, for cash consideration of $11,400,000
and acquisition related costs of approximately $145,000. The purchased technology related to this
9
OPEN SOLUTIONS INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(unaudited)
acquisition is being amortized over its useful life of five years. The other intangible assets,
comprised of customer relationships and trade name are being amortized over their useful lives of
25 and 5 years, respectively. Purchase accounting for this acquisition is preliminary, primarily
with respect to the identification and valuation of intangibles, and is expected to be finalized
during 2005. Pro forma information related to the combined results of operations of the Company
and SO Systems were not material for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005.
U.S.-Based Services to Credit Unions Business of CGI-AMS Inc.
On March 10, 2005, the Company acquired the U.S.-based services to credit unions business of
CGI-AMS Inc. (CU Technologies) for cash consideration of $24,000,000. In connection with the
acquisition, the Company incurred approximately $344,000 of acquisition-related costs. This
acquisition increased the Companys core data processing client base among credit unions and
increased the recurring revenue component of revenues. The purchased technology related to this
acquisition is being amortized over its useful life of five years. The other intangible assets,
comprised of customer relationships, is being amortized over its useful life of sixteen years.
Purchase accounting for this acquisition is preliminary, including the identification and valuation
of tangible and intangible assets, and is expected to be finalized during 2005.
The financial information in the table below summarizes the combined results of operations of the
Company and CU Technologies on a pro forma basis, as though the companies had been combined as of
the beginning of the periods being presented. Pro forma information related to the combined
results of operations of FDSI and SO Systems are immaterial to all periods presented and therefore
not included in the following table. This pro forma financial information is not necessarily
indicative of the results of operations that would have been achieved had the acquisition actually
taken place as of the beginning of the period being presented below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Pro forma revenues |
|
$ |
26,389,000 |
|
|
$ |
88,027,000 |
|
|
$ |
51,908,000 |
|
Pro forma net income |
|
|
3,090,000 |
|
|
|
6,731,000 |
|
|
|
6,043,000 |
|
Pro forma
net income per share basic |
|
$ |
0.17 |
|
|
$ |
0.35 |
|
|
$ |
0.35 |
|
Pro forma net income per share diluted |
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
$ |
0.32 |
|
|
$ |
0.31 |
|
4. Treasury Stock
On April 26, 2005, the Companys Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $10
million of the Companys common stock on or before May 2, 2006. The Company repurchased 466,473
shares of its common stock for approximately $8.5 million during the three months ended June 30,
2005.
5. Convertable Notes Payable
In
February 2005, the Company sold senior subordinated convertible notes
due 2035 (the Notes) with an aggregate principal amount at
maturity of $270 million to qualified institutional buyers pursuant
to the exemptions from the registration requirements of the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the Act), afforded by
Section 4(2) of the Act and Rule 144A under the Act. The issue price
of the Notes was $533.36 per $1,000 principal at maturity of Notes,
which resulted in aggregate gross proceeds to us of approximately
$144.1 million. The Notes are general unsecured obligations and
junior to any of our existing and future senior indebtedness. The
Company
incurred $4.9 million of Costs related to the issuance of the Notes.
6. Commitments and Contingencies
Legal Proceedings
The Company is from time to time a party to legal proceedings which arise in the normal course
of business. The Company is not currently involved in any material litigation, the outcome of which
would, in managements judgment based on information currently available, have a material adverse
effect on the Companys results of operations or financial condition, nor is management aware of
any such litigation.
10
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations.
The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations
should be read in conjunction with, and are derived from, our consolidated financial statements and
related notes appearing elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. In addition to historical
information, this discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements that involve risks,
uncertainties and assumptions, which could cause actual results to differ materially from
managements expectations. Important factors that could cause these differences include those
described in Factors That May Affect Future Results and elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q.
We use the terms Open Solutions, we, us and our to refer to the business of Open
Solutions Inc. and our subsidiaries. All references to years, unless otherwise noted, refer to our
fiscal years, which end on December 31.
Overview
We are a provider of software and services that allow financial institutions to compete and
service their customers more effectively. We develop, market, license and support an
enterprise-wide suite of software and services that perform a financial institutions data
processing and information management functions, including account, transaction, lending,
operations, back office, client information and reporting. Our complementary products and services
supplement our core software to provide our clients with fully-integrated business intelligence,
customer relationship management, or CRM, check imaging, Internet banking and cash management,
general ledger and profitability, loan origination, interactive voice solutions and check and item
processing functions. Our software can be operated either by the financial institution itself, on
an outsourced basis in one of our outsourcing centers or through an outsourcing center hosted by
one of our resellers. Substantially all of our historical revenue has been generated through the
licensing of our core software and our complementary products and the provision of related services
and maintenance to small and mid-size commercial banks and thrifts and credit unions of all sizes.
With the acquisition of the Payment Solutions Group of Datawest Solutions Inc. in October 2004, we
have added products targeted at institutions beyond the traditional definition of a financial
institution, but which nonetheless participate in the processing of retail financial transactions
in North America and internationally. These include independent sales organizations, large
merchants and non-bank transaction processors.
We derive revenues from two primary sources:
|
|
|
sales of licenses for our core software and complementary products, and |
|
|
|
|
fees from installation, training, maintenance and support services, as
well as fees generated from our outsourcing and payment processing
centers and the outsourcing centers hosted by our resellers. |
Our revenues have grown from approximately $14.1 million in 1999 to approximately $107.2
million in 2004. Our revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2005 were $84.8 million. This
growth has resulted from strategic acquisitions and internal expansion, through which we have
developed and acquired new products and services and have expanded the number of clients using one
or more of our products to approximately 4,056 as of June 30, 2005.
Software license revenue includes fees received from the licensing of application software. We
license our proprietary software products under standard agreements which typically provide our
clients with a perpetual, non-exclusive, non-transferable right to use the software for a single
financial institution upon payment of a license fee. We also license certain third party software
to end users.
We generate service and maintenance fees by converting clients to our core software suite,
installing our software, assisting our clients in operating the applications, modifying and
updating the software and providing outsourcing and payment processing services. Our software
license agreements typically provide for five years of support and maintenance. We perform
outsourcing services through our six outsourcing centers, our payment processing center and our
check and item processing centers. Revenues from outsourcing center services, payment processing
services and the check and item processing centers are derived from monthly and transaction based
usage fees, typically under three to five-year service contracts with our clients.
We derive other revenues from hardware sales and client reimbursement of out-of-pocket and
telecommunication costs. We have entered into agreements with several hardware manufacturers under
which we sell computer hardware and related services. Client reimbursements represent direct costs
paid to third parties primarily for data communication, postage and travel.
11
We expect that our revenues from installation, training, maintenance, support
services, our outsourcing centers and the outsourcing centers hosted by our resellers will continue
to expand as our base of clients expands. Our maintenance and outsourcing revenues are the largest
of these revenue components, and we expect that these revenues, due to their recurring nature, will
continue to be a significant portion of our total revenue as our client base grows.
Application of Critical Accounting Policies
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, which require that management make
numerous estimates and assumptions. Actual results could differ from those estimates and
assumptions, impacting our reported results of operations and financial position. The application
of our critical accounting policies is described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2004 filed with the SEC. These critical accounting policies include:
|
|
|
Revenue Recognition, |
|
|
|
|
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts, |
|
|
|
|
Stock Compensation, |
|
|
|
|
Software Development Costs, |
|
|
|
|
Accounting for Purchase Business Combinations, and |
|
|
|
|
Long-Lived Assets, Intangible Assets and Goodwill. |
There were no material changes to the application of our critical accounting
policies for the six months ended June 30, 2005.
Acquisitions
Since August 2001, we have expanded our product offerings and client base through the
acquisition of twelve businesses. Each of these acquisitions was accounted for as a purchase
transaction. Accordingly, the purchase price was allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities
assumed based on estimates of fair value. The fair value of any purchased technology was
determined based on managements valuation analysis utilizing an income approach that takes into
account future cash flows. The excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the net assets
acquired has been allocated to goodwill. The operating results of each business acquired have been
included in our financial statements from the respective dates of acquisition.
On June 7, 2005, we acquired substantially all of the outstanding operating assets and assumed
certain liabilities of FDSI, a company which provides image and remittance item processing, and
image statement and rending services, for cash consideration of $9,000,000 and acquisition-related
costs of approximately $49,000. This acquisition increased our item processing customer base and
increased the recurring revenue component of our revenues.
On April 6, 2005, we acquired substantially all of the outstanding operating assets and
assumed certain liabilities of SO Systems, a provider of core processing software and related
services for credit unions, for cash consideration of $11,400,000 and acquisition related costs of
approximately $145,000. This acquisition increased our in-house core data processing client base
among credit unions and increased the maintenance, software and hardware components of our
revenues.
On March 10, 2005, we acquired CU Technologies for cash consideration of $24,000,000. In
connection with the acquisition, we incurred approximately $344,000 of acquisition-related costs.
This acquisition increased our core data processing client base among credit unions and increased
the recurring revenue component of revenues.
12
Results of Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
As a Percentage of Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Software license |
|
|
24.1 |
% |
|
|
31.7 |
% |
|
|
22.7 |
% |
|
|
31.2 |
% |
Service, maintenance and hardware |
|
|
75.9 |
|
|
|
68.3 |
|
|
|
77.3 |
|
|
|
68.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
Cost of revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Software license |
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
5.6 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
5.9 |
|
Service, maintenance and hardware |
|
|
39.8 |
|
|
|
36.0 |
|
|
|
40.1 |
|
|
|
36.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of revenues |
|
|
43.3 |
|
|
|
41.6 |
|
|
|
43.4 |
|
|
|
42.4 |
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and marketing |
|
|
12.8 |
|
|
|
15.6 |
|
|
|
12.7 |
|
|
|
14.7 |
|
Product development |
|
|
10.8 |
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
|
10.7 |
|
|
|
9.8 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
19.5 |
|
|
|
18.8 |
|
|
|
19.8 |
|
|
|
19.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
43.1 |
|
|
|
44.6 |
|
|
|
43.2 |
|
|
|
43.7 |
|
Income from operations |
|
|
13.6 |
|
|
|
13.8 |
|
|
|
13.4 |
|
|
|
13.9 |
|
Interest income, net |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
13.5 |
|
|
|
15.0 |
|
|
|
13.4 |
|
|
|
15.1 |
|
Income tax provision |
|
|
(5.5 |
) |
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
(5.4 |
) |
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
|
14.4 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
|
14.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2005 Compared to Three Months Ended June 30, 2004
Revenues. We generate revenues from licensing the rights to use our software products and
certain third-party software products to clients. We also generate revenues from installation,
training, maintenance and support services provided to clients, from outsourcing center services
and from hardware sales related to our core software, check imaging and telephony businesses.
Revenues increased 115.8% from $21.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2004 to $47.1
million for the three months ended June 30, 2005. This increase was attributable to a $4.4 million
increase in licensing revenue from our core and complementary products attributable to sales to new
clients, sales of additional products to existing clients and an increase in license fees from
BISYS. Of the $4.4 million increase in licensing revenues,
$1.7 million related to aggregate revenues from
those acquisitions completed subsequent to June 30, 2004, which were re:Member Data Services, Inc.,
Omega Systems of North America LLC, Datawest Solutions Inc., CU Technologies, SO Systems and FDSI
plus the partial period effect from the acquisition completed during the three months ended June 30,
2004, which was Eastpoint Technologies Inc. The increase in revenues was also attributable to an
increase of $2.9 million in our implementation and other professional services, $2.2 million of
which was from acquired businesses. We also realized an increase of $4.5 million in our maintenance
revenue, $3.6 million of which was from acquired businesses, and an increase of $12.4 million in
our outsourcing revenues, $12.0 million of which was from acquired businesses. Hardware and other
revenue increased by $1.0 million which was primarily attributable to the acquisition of SO
Systems. The increases in implementation, professional services and maintenance revenues are also
directly related to the increase in sales of licenses to new clients and sales of additional
products to existing clients.
Cost of Revenues. Cost of revenues includes third party license fees and the direct expenses
associated with providing our services such as systems operations, customer support, installations,
professional services and other related expenses. Cost of revenues increased 124.3% from $9.1
million for the three months ended June 30, 2004 to $20.4 million for the three months ended June
30, 2005. The increase was due primarily to a $2.0 million increase in costs associated with
implementation and other professional services, $1.2 million of which is from acquired businesses,
a $1.6 million increase in costs associated with maintenance, $1.3 million
13
of which is from the acquired businesses and a $6.7 million increase in costs associated with
the growth of our outsourcing business, $6.3 million of which is from the acquired businesses.
Additionally, the costs associated with hardware and other revenues increased by $700,000 which was
primarily due to the acquisition of SO Systems. Cost of revenues represented 41.6% of revenues for
the three months ended June 30, 2004 as opposed to 43.3% of revenues for the three months ended
June 30, 2005. Cost of revenues increased on an absolute basis primarily as a result of the
acquisitions completed since June 30, 2004, but also from increased third party license and
hardware costs and costs of professional services associated with our revenue growth. Cost of
revenues as a percentage of revenues increased primarily due to the increase in our service,
maintenance and hardware revenues as a percentage of total revenues which generally earn lower
margins than software license revenue.
Operating Expenses
Sales and Marketing. Sales and marketing expenses include salaries and commissions paid to
sales and marketing personnel and other costs incurred in marketing our products and services.
Sales and marketing expenses increased 76.6% from $3.4 million for the three months ended June 30,
2004 to $6.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2005. This increase was due primarily to
increases in commissions from higher revenues and additional sales and marketing employees as a
result of the acquired businesses. Sales and marketing expenses represented 15.6% of revenues for
the three months ended June 30, 2004 as opposed to 12.8% of revenues for the three months ended
June 30, 2005. Sales and marketing expenses as a percentage of revenues decreased primarily because
sales and marketing expenses did not increase proportionally to our revenue growth. For certain
acquisitions, we acquired a wide client base, but did not continue to market the acquired companys
products, as our strategy has been to market our solutions to
the clients of these acquired companies, resulting in lower sales and marketing expenses compared to revenues. In the event that
we acquire product lines or businesses in the future, we would anticipate that, based on the nature
and magnitude of those acquisitions, our sales and marketing expenses would increase as a result of
those acquisitions.
Product Development. Product development expenses include salaries of personnel in our product
development department, consulting fees and other related expenses. Product development expenses
increased 128.7% from $2.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2004 to $5.1 million for the
three months ended June 30, 2005. This increase was due primarily to an increase in our investment
in the internationalization and localization of our products of $573,000 and a $1.7 million
increase in product development expenses from the acquired businesses. Product development expenses
represented 10.2% of revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2004 as opposed to 10.8% of
revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2005. Product development expenses as a percentage of
revenues increased primarily due to our investment in the internationalization of our products, the
localization of our products in Canada, as well as other enhancements to our major product lines.
General and Administrative. General and administrative expenses consist of salaries for
executive, administrative and financial personnel, consulting expenses and facilities costs such as
office leases, insurance and depreciation. General and administrative expenses increased 123.3%
from $4.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2004 to $9.2 million for the three months
ended June 30, 2005. The increase was due primarily to $3.3 million of expense from the acquired
businesses, professional fees and certain costs related to the requirements of being a public
company, particularly the cost of compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and investments in
our infrastructure, including increases in depreciation expense from the development of new
internal software systems. General and administrative expenses represented 18.8% of revenues for
the three months ended June 30, 2004 as opposed to 19.5% for the three months ended June 30, 2005.
General and administrative expenses as a percentage of revenues increased primarily as a result of
investments in our infrastructure and the amortization of certain acquired intangibles. In the
event that we acquire product lines or businesses in the future, we would anticipate that, based on
the nature and magnitude of those acquisitions, our general and administrative expenses would
increase more significantly as a result of those acquisitions.
Interest Income, net. Interest income, net, decreased from $274,000 for the three months ended
June 30, 2004 to $(40,000) for the
three months ended June 30, 2005. This decrease was due to interest expense of approximately $1.2
million related to our convertible notes payable offset by interest income of approximately $
956,000 from the investment of the proceeds from our convertible notes payable offering.
Income Tax Provision. Income tax provision increased from $141,000 for the three months ended
June 30, 2004 to $2.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2005. We reversed the valuation
allowance on our deferred tax assets as of December 31, 2004 and beginning in the first quarter of
2005, we began recording a tax provision against our income at our estimated annual effective tax
rate which we currently estimate to be approximately 40%. Prior to December 31, 2004, we recorded
a tax provision primarily related to state and alternative minimum taxes only. Going forward, we
will continue to provide a tax provision based on an estimate of our annual effective tax rate.
Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2004
Revenues. Revenues increased 98.3% from $42.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2004
to $84.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005. This increase was attributable to a $5.9
million increase in licensing revenue from our core and complementary products attributable to
sales to new clients, sales of additional products to existing clients and an increase in license
fees from BISYS. Of the $5.9 million increase in licensing revenues, $3.2 million related to
aggregate revenues from those acquisitions
14
completed subsequent to June 30, 2004 which were re:Member Data Services, Inc., Omega
Systems of North America LLC, Datawest Solutions Inc., CU
Technologies, SO Systems and FDSI plus the
partial period effect from acquisitions completed during the six months ended June 30, 2004, which
were Eastpoint Technologies, Inc. and Maxxar Corporation. The increase in revenues was also
attributable to an increase of $4.6 million in our implementation and other professional services,
$3.5 million of which was from acquired businesses. We also realized an increase of $7.9 million in
our maintenance revenue, $5.9 million of which was from acquired businesses, and an increase of
$22.7 million in our outsourcing revenues, $22.1 million of which was from acquired businesses. The
increases in implementation, professional services and maintenance revenues are also directly
related to the increase in sales of licenses to new clients and sales of additional products to
existing clients.
Cost of Revenues. Cost of revenues increased 102.7% from $18.1 million for the six months
ended June 30, 2004 to $36.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005. The increase was due
primarily to a $3.5 million increase in costs associated with implementation and other professional
services, $2.5 million of which is from acquired businesses, a $2.6 million increase in costs
associated with maintenance, $2.0 million of which is from the acquired businesses and an $11.8
million increase in costs associated with the growth of our outsourcing business, $11.3 million of
which is from the acquired businesses. Additionally, the costs associated with hardware and other
revenues increased by $400,000 which was primarily due to the acquisition of SO Systems. Cost of
revenues represented 42.4% of revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2004 as opposed to 43.4%
of revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2005. Cost of revenues increased on an absolute basis
primarily as a result of the acquisitions completed since June 30, 2004, but also from increased
third party license costs and costs of professional services associated with our revenue growth.
Cost of revenues as a percentage of revenues increased primarily because certain of our costs are
fixed and our revenues grew at a faster rate than our costs. Cost of revenues as a percentage of
revenues increased primarily due to the increase in our service, maintenance and hardware revenues
as a percentage of total revenues as these carry lower margins than software license revenue.
Operating Expenses
Sales and Marketing. Sales and marketing expenses increased 71.6% from $6.3 million for the
six months ended June 30, 2004 to $10.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005. This
increase was due primarily to increases in commissions from higher revenues and additional sales
and marketing employees as a result of the acquired businesses. Sales and marketing expenses
represented 14.7% of revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2004 as opposed to 12.7% of
revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2005. Sales and marketing expenses as a percentage of
revenues decreased because sales and marketing expenses did not increase proportionally to our
revenue growth. For certain acquisitions, we acquired a wide client base but did not continue to
market the acquired companys products, as our strategy has been
to market our solutions to the clients of these acquired companies, resulting in lower sales and marketing expenses compared to
revenues. In the event that we acquire product lines or businesses in the future, we would
anticipate that, based on the nature and magnitude of those acquisitions, our sales and marketing
expenses would increase as a result of those acquisitions.
Product Development. Product development expenses increased 117.7% from $4.2 million for the
six months ended June 30, 2004 to $9.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005. This
increase was due primarily to an increase in our investment in the internationalization and
localization of our products of $984,000 and a $2.7 million increase in product development
expenses from the acquired businesses. Product development expenses represented 9.8% of revenues
for the six months ended June 30, 2004 as opposed to 10.7% of revenues for the six months ended
June 30, 2005. Product development expenses as a percentage of revenues increased primarily due to
our investment in the internationalization of our products, the localization of our products in
Canada, as well as other enhancements to our major product lines.
General and Administrative. General and administrative expenses increased 104.0% from $8.2
million for the six months ended June 30, 2004 to $16.8 million for the six months ended June 30,
2005. The increase was due primarily to $6.1 million of expense from the acquired businesses,
professional fees and other costs related to the requirements of being a public company,
particularly the cost of compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and investments in our
infrastructure, including increases in depreciation expense from the development of new internal
software systems. General and administrative expenses represented 19.2% of revenues for the six
months ended June 30, 2004 as opposed to 19.8% of revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2005.
General and administrative expenses as a percentage of revenues increased primarily as a result of
investments in our infrastructure and the amortization of certain acquired intangibles. In the
event that we acquire product lines or businesses in the future, we would anticipate that, based on
the nature and magnitude of those acquisitions, our general and administrative expenses would
increase more significantly as a result of those acquisitions.
Interest Income, net. Interest income, net, decreased from $522,000 for the six months ended
June 30, 2004 to $(27,000) for the six months ended June 30, 2005. This decrease was due to
interest expense of approximately $1.9 million related to our convertible notes payable offset by
interest income of approximately $1.6 million from the investment of the proceeds from the
convertible notes payable offering.
15
Income Tax Provision. Income tax provision increased from $312,000 for the six
months ended June 30, 2004 to $4.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005. We reversed the
valuation allowance on our deferred tax assets as of December 31, 2004 and beginning in the first
quarter of 2005, we began recording a tax provision against our income at our estimated annual
effective tax rate which we currently estimate to be approximately 40%. Prior to December 31,
2004, we recorded a tax provision primarily related to state and alternative minimum taxes only.
Going forward, we will continue to provide a tax provision based on an estimate of our annual
effective tax rate.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
At June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, we had cash and cash equivalents totaling $102.5
million and $49.4 million, respectively.
The following table sets forth the elements of our cash flow statement for the following
periods:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
(in thousands) |
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
8,850 |
|
|
$ |
6,621 |
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(84,462 |
) |
|
|
24,873 |
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
128,730 |
|
|
|
35,616 |
|
Cash from Operating Activities
Cash provided by operations in the six months ended June 30, 2005 was attributable to net
income of $6.8 million, depreciation and amortization and other non-cash items of $9.8 million
partially offset by an increase in working capital of $7.8 million, primarily due to an increase in
accounts receivable and a decrease in deferred revenue. Cash provided by operations in the six
months ended June 30, 2004 was attributable to net income of $6.1 million, depreciation and
amortization and other non-cash items of $2.7 million partially offset by an increase in working
capital of $2.2 million, primarily due to an increase in accounts receivable and a decrease in
accounts payable and accrued expenses.
Cash from Investing Activities
Cash from investing activities consists primarily of purchases of fixed assets, investments in
marketable securities and business acquisitions. Total capital expenditures for the six months
ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 were $3.9 million and $2.1 million, respectively, and were primarily
related to the purchase of computer equipment, computer software, software development services,
furniture and fixtures and leasehold improvements. The increase in capital expenditures relates
primarily to the implementation of a new enterprise software system and leasehold improvements at
our new corporate lease facility. We currently have no other significant capital spending or
purchase commitments, but expect to continue to engage in capital spending in the ordinary course
of business.
In the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, we purchased $92.8 million and $5.1 million,
respectively, in marketable securities. In the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, we sold
$54.2 million and $45.7 million of marketable securities.
Additionally, cash used in investing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2005
included $24.3 million used for the acquisition of CU Technologies, $9.1 million used for the
acquisition of SO Systems and $8.5 million used for the acquisition of FDSI, net of cash received.
Cash from Financing Activities
During the six months ended June 30, 2005, we received $807,000 of proceeds from the exercise
of stock options and purchase of common stock under our employee stock purchase plan. In addition,
during the six months ended June 30, 3005, we repaid $2.9 million of long-term debt from customers.
In February 2005, we sold senior subordinated convertible notes due 2035 (the Notes) with an
aggregate principal amount at maturity of $270 million to qualified institutional buyers pursuant
to the exemptions from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the
Act), afforded by Section 4(2) of the Act and Rule 144A under the Act. The issue price of the
Notes was $533.56 per $1,000 principal amount at maturity of Notes, which resulted in aggregate
gross proceeds to us of approximately $144.1 million. The Notes are general unsecured obligations
and are junior to any of our existing and future senior indebtedness. We incurred $4.9 million
of costs related to the issuance of the notes.
16
In April 2005, our Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $10
million of our common stock on or before May 2, 2006. We repurchased 466,473 shares of our common
stock for approximately $8.5 million during the three months ended June 30, 2005.
We currently anticipate that our current cash balance and cash flow from operations will be
sufficient to meet our presently anticipated capital needs for the next twelve months, but may be
insufficient to provide funds necessary for any future acquisitions we may make during that time.
To the extent we require additional funds, whether for acquisitions or otherwise, we may seek
additional equity or debt financing. Such financing may not be available to us on terms that are
acceptable to us, if at all, and any equity financing may be dilutive to our stockholders. To the
extent we obtain additional debt financing, our debt service obligations will increase and the
relevant debt instruments may, among other things, impose additional restrictions on our
operations, require us to comply with additional financial covenants or require us to pledge assets
to secure our borrowings.
As defined in Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code, certain ownership changes limit the
annual utilization of federal net
operating losses and tax credit carry forwards. We experienced such an ownership change in 1995.
Our follow-on offering in May 2004 resulted in a second ownership change. This limitation of the
utilization of federal net operating losses imposed by Section 382 is applied annually and is equal
to a published long term exempt rate multiplied by the aggregate fair value of the company
immediately prior to the ownership change. This resulting limitation may also be increased by
imputed tax deductions of certain intangibles resulting from built-in gains, as defined. We do not
believe that the Section 382 limitation with respect to the 1995 ownership change nor the change
that resulted from the follow-on offering will result in the loss of any net operating losses or
tax credit carry forwards prior to their expiration. As a result of future issuance of, sales of,
and other transactions involving our common stock, we may experience an ownership change in the
future, which could cause such federal net operating losses and tax credit carry forwards to be
subject to limitation under Section 382.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements or relationships with unconsolidated
entities or financial partnerships, such as entities often referred to as structured finance or
special purpose entities, which are typically established for the purpose of facilitating
off-balance sheet arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited purposes.
Contractual Obligations as of June 30, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period |
Contractual Obligations |
|
Total |
|
Less than 1 year |
|
1-3 years |
|
3-5 years |
|
More than 5 years |
Convertible Notes Payable |
|
$ |
144,061 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
144,061 |
|
Capital Lease Obligations |
|
|
460 |
|
|
|
296 |
|
|
|
164 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Leases |
|
|
30,958 |
|
|
|
4,996 |
|
|
|
10,014 |
|
|
|
8,026 |
|
|
|
7,922 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Contractual Obligations |
|
$ |
175,479 |
|
|
$ |
5,292 |
|
|
$ |
10,178 |
|
|
$ |
8,026 |
|
|
$ |
151,983 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
Factors That May Affect Future Results
The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only risks we face. Additional risks
and uncertainties not presently known
to us or that are currently deemed immaterial may also impair our business operations. If any of
the following risks actually occur, our financial condition and operating results could be
materially adversely affected.
We are dependent on the banking and credit union industry, and changes within that industry could
reduce demand for our products and services.
The large majority of our revenues are derived from financial institutions in the banking and
credit union industry, primarily small to mid-size banks and thrifts and credit unions of all
sizes, and we expect to continue to derive substantially all of our revenues from these
institutions for the foreseeable future. Unfavorable economic conditions adversely impacting the
banking and credit union industry could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial
condition and results of operations. For example, financial institutions in the banking and credit
union industry have experienced, and may continue to experience, cyclical fluctuations in
profitability as well as increasing challenges to improve their operating efficiencies. Due to the
entrance of non-traditional competitors and the current environment of low interest rates, the
profit margins of commercial banks, thrifts and credit unions have narrowed. As a result, some
banks have slowed, and may continue to slow, their capital spending, including spending on computer
software and hardware, which can negatively impact license sales of our core and complementary
products to new and existing clients. Decreases in or reallocation of capital expenditures by our
current and potential clients, unfavorable economic conditions and new or persisting competitive
pressures could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Consolidation in the banking and financial services industry could adversely impact our business by
eliminating a number of our existing and potential clients.
There has been and continues to be merger, acquisition and consolidation activity in the
banking and financial services industry. Mergers or consolidations of banks and financial
institutions in the future could reduce the number of our clients and potential clients. A smaller
market for our services could have a material adverse impact on our business and results of
operations. In addition, it is possible that the larger banks or financial institutions which
result from mergers or consolidations could decide to perform themselves some or all of the
services which we currently provide or could provide. If that were to occur, it could have a
material adverse impact on our business and results of operations.
Our success depends on decisions by potential clients to replace their legacy computer systems, and
their failure to do so would adversely affect demand for our products and services.
We primarily derive our revenues from two sources: license fees for software products and fees
for a full range of services complementing our products, including outsourcing, installation,
training, maintenance and support services. A large portion of these fees are either directly
attributable to licenses of our core software system or are generated over time by clients using
our core software. Banks and credit unions historically have been slow to adapt to and accept new
technologies. Many of these financial institutions have traditionally met their information
technology needs through legacy computer systems, in which they have often invested significant
resources. As a result, these financial institutions may be inclined to resist replacing their
legacy systems with our core software system. Our future financial performance will depend in part
on the successful development, introduction and client acceptance of new and enhanced versions of
our core software system and our other complementary products. A decline in demand for, or failure
to achieve broad market acceptance of, our core software system or any enhanced version as a result
of competition, technological change or otherwise, will have a material adverse effect on our
business, financial condition and results of operations.
If we fail to expand our outsourcing business and other sources of recurring revenue, we may be
unable to successfully implement our business strategy.
We can host a financial institutions data processing functions at our outsourcing centers.
Our outsourcing centers currently serve clients using our core software and our Internet banking,
ATM, cView, cash management, collections, automated clearing house, or ACH, processing, and check
and item processing and telephony products. In the future we plan to offer all of our products in
our outsourcing centers and continue to market our outsourcing services aggressively.
Our outsourcing services provide a source of recurring revenue which can grow as the number of
accounts processed for a client increases. We also seek to generate recurring revenue through our
licensing model, which generates additional fees for us as a clients business grows or it adds
more software applications, as well as through the provision of maintenance, support and other
professional services. Our data center and payment processing services are the largest of these
revenue components, and we expect that these revenues will continue to be a significant portion of
our total revenues as our client base grows due to their recurring nature. To the extent we fail to
persuade new or existing clients to purchase our outsourcing services or we are unable to offer
some or all of our products to clients on an outsourced basis, we will be unable to implement our
strategy and our revenue may be less predictable.
18
We have had several profitable quarters, but we may never achieve continued sustained
profitability.
We were incorporated in May 1992 and did not release our first product until 1995.
Accordingly, our prospects must be considered in light of the risks, expenses and difficulties
frequently encountered by companies with limited operating histories. Although we were profitable
for the year ended December 31, 2004, and the three and six months ended June 30, 2005, we may not
be profitable in future periods, either on a short or long-term basis. As of June 30, 2005, we had
an accumulated deficit of approximately $15.1 million. There can be no assurance that operating
losses will not recur in the future, that we will sustain profitability on a quarterly or annual
basis or that our actual results will meet our projections, expectations or announced guidance. To
the extent that revenues do not grow at anticipated rates, increases in operating expenses precede
or are not subsequently followed by commensurate increases in revenues or we are unable to adjust
operating expense levels accordingly, our business, financial condition and results of operations
will be materially adversely affected.
If we fail to adapt our products and services to changes in technology or in the marketplace, we
could lose existing clients and be unable to attract new business.
The markets for our software products and services are characterized by technological change,
frequent new product introductions and evolving industry standards. The introduction of products
embodying new technologies and the emergence of new industry standards can render our existing
products obsolete and unmarketable in short periods of time. We expect new products and services,
and enhancements to existing products and services, to continue to be developed and introduced by
others, which will compete with, and reduce the demand for, our products and services. Our
products life cycles are difficult to estimate. Our future success will depend, in part, on our
ability to enhance our current products and to develop and introduce new products that keep pace
with technological developments and emerging industry standards and to address the increasingly
sophisticated needs of our clients. There can be no assurance that we will be successful in
developing, marketing, licensing and selling new products or product enhancements that meet these
changing demands, that we will not experience difficulties that could delay or prevent the
successful development, introduction and marketing of these products or that our new products and
product enhancements will adequately meet the demands of the marketplace and achieve market
acceptance.
We encounter a long sales and implementation cycle requiring significant capital commitments by our
clients which they may be unwilling or unable to make.
The implementation of our core software system involves significant capital commitments by our
clients. Potential clients generally commit significant resources to an evaluation of available
software and require us to expend substantial time, effort and money educating them as to the value
of our software. Sales of our core processing software products require an extensive education and
marketing effort throughout a clients organization because decisions relating to licensing our
core processing software generally involve the evaluation of the software by senior management and
a significant number of client personnel in various functional areas, each having specific and
often conflicting requirements.
We may expend significant funds and management resources during the sales cycle and ultimately
fail to close the sale. Our core software product sales cycle generally ranges between six to nine
months, and our implementation cycle for our core software generally ranges between six to nine
months. Our sales cycle for all of our products and services is subject to significant risks and
delays over which we have little or no control, including:
|
|
our clients budgetary constraints, |
|
|
|
the timing of our clients budget cycles and approval processes, |
|
|
|
our clients willingness to replace their core software solution vendor, |
|
|
|
the success and continued support of our strategic marketing partners sales efforts, and |
|
|
|
the timing and expiration of our clients current license agreements or outsourcing agreements for similar services. |
If we are unsuccessful in closing sales after expending significant funds and management
resources or if we experience delays as discussed above, it could have a material adverse effect on
our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We utilize certain key technologies from third parties, and may be unable to replace those
technologies if they become obsolete or incompatible with our products.
19
Our proprietary software is designed to work in conjunction with certain
third-party software products, including Microsoft and Oracle relational databases. Although we
believe that there are alternatives to these products generally available to us, any significant
interruption in the supply of such third-party software could have a material adverse effect on our
sales unless and until we can replace the functionality provided by these products. In addition, we
are dependent upon these third parties abilities to enhance their current products, to develop new
products on a timely and cost-effective basis and to respond to emerging industry standards and
other technological changes. There can be no assurance that we would be able to replace the
functionality provided by the third-party software currently offered in conjunction with our
products in the event that such software becomes obsolete or incompatible with future versions of
our products or is otherwise not adequately maintained or updated. The absence of, or any
significant delay in, the replacement of that functionality could have a material adverse effect on
our business, financial condition and results of operations. Furthermore, delays in the release of
new and upgraded versions of third-party software products, particularly the Oracle relational
database management system, could have a material adverse effect on our revenues and results of
operations. Because of the complexities inherent in developing sophisticated software products and
the lengthy testing periods associated with these products, no assurance can be given that our
future product introductions will not be delayed.
We operate in a competitive business environment, and if we are unable to compete effectively, we
may face price reductions and decreased demand for our products.
The market for our products and services is intensely competitive and subject to technological
change. Competitors vary in size and in the scope and breadth of the products and services they
offer. We encounter competition from a number of sources, all of which offer core software systems
to the banking and credit union industry. We expect additional competition from other established
and emerging companies as the market for core processing software solutions and complementary
products continues to develop and expand.
We also expect that competition will increase as a result of software industry consolidation,
including particularly the acquisition of any of our competitors or any of the retail banking
system providers by one of the larger service providers to the banking industry. We encounter
competition in the United States from a number of sources, including Fiserv, Inc., Jack Henry &
Associates, Inc., Fidelity National Financial Corporation and John H. Harland Company, all of which
offer core processing systems or outsourcing alternatives to banks, thrifts and credit unions. Some
of our current, and many of our potential, competitors have longer operating histories, greater
name recognition, larger client bases and significantly greater financial, engineering, technical,
marketing and other resources than we do. As a result, these companies may be able to respond more
quickly to new or emerging technologies and changes in client demands or to devote greater
resources to the development, promotion and sale of their products than we can.
In addition, current and potential competitors have established or may establish cooperative
relationships among themselves or with third parties to increase the ability of their products to
address the needs of our prospective clients. Accordingly, it is possible that new competitors or
alliances among competitors may emerge and acquire significant market share. We expect that the
banking and credit union software market will continue to attract new competitors and new
technologies, possibly involving alternative technologies that are more sophisticated and
cost-effective than our technology. There can be no assurance that we will be able to compete
successfully against current or future competitors or that competitive pressures faced by us will
not materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
An impairment of the value of our goodwill, capitalized software costs and other intangible assets
could significantly reduce our earnings.
We periodically review several items on our balance sheet for impairment and record an
impairment charge if we determine that the value of our assets has been impaired. As of June 30,
2005, we had approximately $96.7 million of goodwill and $42.8 million of intangible assets. We
periodically review these assets for impairment. If we determine that the carrying value of these
assets are not recoverable, we would record an impairment charge against our results of operations.
Such an impairment charge may be significant, and we are unable to predict the amount, in any, of
potential future impairments. In addition, if we engage in additional acquisitions, we may incur
additional goodwill and other intangible assets.
Our quarterly revenues, operating results and profitability will vary from quarter to quarter,
which may result in volatility in our stock price.
Our quarterly revenues, operating results and profitability have varied in the past and are
likely to continue to vary significantly from quarter to quarter. This may lead to volatility in
our stock price. These fluctuations are due to several factors relating to the license and sale of
our products, including:
20
|
|
the timing, size and nature of our licensing transactions, |
|
|
|
lengthy and unpredictable sales cycles, |
|
|
|
the timing of introduction and market acceptance of new products or product enhancements by us or our competitors, |
|
|
|
the timing of acquisitions by us of businesses and products, |
|
|
|
product and price competition, |
|
|
|
the relative proportions of revenues derived from license fees and services, |
|
|
|
changes in our operating expenses, |
|
|
|
software bugs or other product quality problems, and |
|
|
|
personnel changes and fluctuations in economic and financial market conditions. |
We believe that period-to-period comparisons of our results of operations are not necessarily
meaningful. There can be no assurance that future revenues and results of operations will not vary
substantially. It is also possible that in future quarters, our results of operations will be below
the expectations of public market analysts or investors or our announced guidance. In either case,
the price of our common stock could be materially adversely affected.
We face a lengthy sales cycle for our core software, which may cause fluctuations in our revenues
from quarter to quarter.
We may not be able to increase revenue or decrease expenses to meet expectations for a given
quarter. We recognize software license revenues upon delivery and, if required by the underlying
agreement, upon client acceptance, if such criteria is other than perfunctory, which does not
always occur in the same quarter in which the software license agreement for the system is signed.
As a result, we are constrained in our ability to increase our software license revenue in any
quarter if there are unexpected delays in delivery or required acceptance of systems for which
software licenses were signed in previous quarters. Implementation of our core software system
typically occurs over six to nine months. Delays in the delivery, implementation or any required
acceptance of our products could materially adversely affect our quarterly results of operations.
Revenues from software license sales accounted for 22.7% of revenues for the six months ended June
30, 2005, 30.8% of revenues for the year ended December 31, 2004, 33.5% of revenues for the year
ended December 31, 2003 and 30.3% of revenues for the year ended December 31, 2002. We expect that
revenues from software license sales will continue to provide a significant percentage of our
revenues in future periods, and our ability to close license sales, as well as the timing of those
sales, may have a material impact on our quarterly results. In addition, increased sales and
marketing expenses for any given quarter may negatively impact operating results of that quarter
due to lack of recognition of associated revenues until the delivery of the product in a subsequent
quarter.
Our level of fixed expenses may cause us to incur operating losses if we are unsuccessful in
maintaining our current revenue levels.
Our expense levels are based, in significant part, on our expectations as to future revenues
and are largely fixed in the short term. As a result, we may be unable to adjust spending in a
timely manner to compensate for any unexpected shortfall in revenues. Accordingly, any significant
shortfall of revenues in relation to our expectations would have an immediate and materially
adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, as we
expand we would anticipate increasing our operating expenses to expand our installation, product
development, sales and marketing and administrative organizations. The time of such expansion and
the rate at which new personnel become productive could cause material losses to the extent we do
not generate additional revenue.
We rely on our direct sales force to generate revenue, and may be unable to hire additional sales
personnel in a timely manner.
We rely primarily on our direct sales force to sell licenses of our core software system. We
may need to hire additional sales, client care and implementation personnel in the near-term and
beyond if we are to achieve revenue growth in the future. Competition for such personnel is
intense, and there can be no assurance that we will be able to retain our existing sales, customer
service and implementation personnel or will be able to attract, assimilate or retain additional
highly qualified personnel in the future. If we are unable to hire or retain qualified sales
personnel on a timely basis, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be
materially adversely affected.
21
We receive a portion of our revenues from relationships with strategic marketing partners, and
if we lose one or more of these marketing partners or fail to add new ones it could have a negative
impact on our business.
We expect that revenues generated from the sale of our products and services by our strategic
marketing partners will account for a meaningful portion of our revenues for the foreseeable
future. In particular, we expect that BISYS, Inc., a national outsourcing center, will account for
a meaningful portion of our revenues over time. During the six months ended June 30, 2005, BISYS
represented approximately $7.9 million, or 9.3%, of our total revenues. During the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2004, BISYS represented approximately $12.5 million, or 11.7%, of our total
revenues.
Our strategic marketing partners pay us license fees based on the volume of products and
services that they sell. If we lose one or more of our major strategic marketing partners or
experience a decline in the revenue from them, we may be unable in a timely manner, or at all, to
replace them with another entity with comparable client bases and user demographics, which would
adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, we plan
to supplement our existing distribution partners with other national and regional outsourcing
centers. If we are unable to identify appropriate resellers and enter into arrangements with them
for the outsourcing of our products and services to financial institutions, we may not be able to
sustain or grow our business.
If we do not retain our senior management and other key employees, we may not be able to
successfully implement our business strategy.
We have grown significantly in recent years, and our management remains concentrated in a
small number of key employees. Our future success depends to a significant extent on our executive
officers and key employees, including our sales force and software professionals, particularly
project managers, software engineers and other senior technical personnel. The loss of the services
of any of these individuals or group of individuals could have a material adverse effect on our
business, financial condition and results of operations. Competition for qualified personnel in the
software industry is intense and we compete for these personnel with other software companies that
have greater financial and other resources than we do. Our future success will depend in large part
on our ability to attract, retain and motivate highly qualified personnel, and there can be no
assurance that we will be able to do so. Any difficulty in hiring personnel could have a material
adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We rely on internally developed software and systems as well as third-party products, any of which
may contain errors and bugs.
Our software may contain undetected errors, defects or bugs. Although we have not suffered
significant harm from any errors or defects to date, we may discover significant errors or defects
in the future that we may or may not be able to correct. Our products involve integration with
products and systems developed by third parties. Complex software programs of third parties may
contain undetected errors or bugs when they are first introduced or as new versions are released.
There can be no assurance that errors will not be found in our existing or future products or
third-party products upon which our products are dependent, with the possible result of delays in
or loss of market acceptance of our products, diversion of our resources, injury to our reputation
and increased service and warranty expenses and/or payment of damages.
We could be sued for contract or product liability claims and lawsuits may disrupt our business,
divert managements attention or have an adverse effect on our financial results.
Failures in a clients system could result in an increase in service and warranty costs or a
claim for substantial damages against us. There can be no assurance that the limitations of
liability set forth in our contracts would be enforceable or would otherwise protect us from
liability for damages. We maintain general liability insurance coverage, including coverage for
errors and omissions in excess of the applicable deductible amount. There can be no assurance that
this coverage will continue to be available on acceptable terms or will be available in sufficient
amounts to cover one or more large claims, or that the insurer will not deny coverage as to any
future claim. The successful assertion of one or more large claims against us that exceeds
available insurance coverage, or the occurrence of changes in our insurance policies, including
premium increases or the imposition of large deductible or co-insurance requirements, could have a
material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Furthermore, litigation, regardless of its outcome, could result in substantial cost to us and
divert managements attention from our operations. Any contract liability claim or litigation
against us could, therefore, have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition
and results of operations. In addition, because many of our projects are business-critical projects
for financial institutions, a failure or inability to meet a clients expectations could seriously
damage our reputation and affect our ability to attract new business.
Our indebtedness could adversely affect our financial health and prevent us from fulfilling our
obligations under our senior subordinated convertible notes.
22
We have a significant amount of indebtedness. Our substantial indebtedness could
have important consequences to our stockholders and note holders. For example, it could:
|
|
|
make it more difficult for us to satisfy our obligations with respect to our notes, |
|
|
|
|
increase our vulnerability to general adverse economic and industry conditions, |
|
|
|
|
require us to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash flow from operations to payments on our indebtedness,
thereby reducing the availability of our cash flow to fund working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions,
product development efforts and other general corporate purposes, |
|
|
|
|
limit our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and the industry in which we operate, |
|
|
|
|
place us at a disadvantage compared to our competitors that have less debt, and |
|
|
|
|
limit our ability to borrow additional funds. |
If we are unable to generate sufficient cash flow or otherwise obtain funds necessary to make
required payments, or if we fail to comply with the various requirements of our notes or any
indebtedness that we may incur in the future, we would be in default, which would permit the
holders of the notes and the holders of such other indebtedness to accelerate the maturity of the
notes or such other indebtedness, as the case may be, and could cause defaults under the notes and
such other indebtedness. Any default under the notes or any indebtedness that we may incur in the
future could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results, liquidity and
financial condition.
Government regulation of our business could cause us to incur significant expenses, and failure to
comply with applicable regulations could make our business less efficient or impossible.
The financial services industry is subject to extensive and complex federal and state
regulation. Financial institutions, including banks, thrifts and credit unions, operate under high
levels of governmental supervision. Our clients must ensure that our products and services work
within the extensive and evolving regulatory requirements applicable to them, including those under
federal and state truth-in-lending and truth-in-deposit rules, usury laws, the Equal Credit
Opportunity Act, the Fair Housing Act, the Electronic Fund Transfer Act, the Fair Credit Reporting
Act, the Bank Secrecy Act, the Community Reinvestment Act, the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999, the
USA Patriot Act and other state and local laws and regulations. The compliance of our products and
services with these requirements may depend on a variety of factors, including the product at issue
and whether the client is a bank, thrift, credit union or other type of financial institution.
Neither federal depository institution regulators nor other federal or state regulators of
financial services require us to obtain any licenses. We are subject to examination by federal
depository institution regulators under the Bank Service Company Act and the Examination Parity and
Year 2000 Readiness for Financial Institutions Act.
Although we believe we are not subject to direct supervision by federal and state banking
agencies relating to other regulations, we have from time to time agreed to examinations of our
business and operations by these agencies. These regulators have broad supervisory authority to
remedy any shortcomings identified in any such examination.
Federal, state or foreign authorities could also adopt laws, rules or regulations relating to
the financial services industry that affect our business, such as requiring us or our clients to
comply with data, record keeping and processing and other requirements. It is possible that laws
and regulations may be enacted or modified with respect to the Internet, covering issues such as
end-user privacy, pricing, content, characteristics, taxation and quality of services and products.
Adoption of these laws, rules or regulations could render our business or operations more costly
and burdensome or less efficient and could require us to modify our current or future products or
services.
Our limited ability to protect our proprietary technology and other rights may adversely affect our
ability to compete.
We rely on a combination of copyright, trademark and trade secret laws, as well as licensing
agreements, third-party nondisclosure agreements and other contractual provisions and technical
measures to protect our intellectual property rights. There can be no assurance that these
protections will be adequate to prevent our competitors from copying or reverse-engineering our
products, or that our competitors will not independently develop technologies that are
substantially equivalent or superior to our technology. To
23
protect our trade secrets and other proprietary information, we require employees,
consultants, advisors and collaborators to enter into confidentiality agreements. We cannot assure
you that these agreements will provide meaningful protection for our trade secrets, know-how or
other proprietary information in the event of any unauthorized use, misappropriation or disclosure
of such trade secrets, know-how or other proprietary information. We do not include in our products
any mechanism to prevent unauthorized copying and any such unauthorized copying could have a
material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. We have no
patents, and existing copyright laws afford only limited protection for our intellectual property
rights and may not protect such rights in the event competitors independently develop products
similar to ours. In addition, the laws of certain countries in which our products are or may be
licensed do not protect our products and intellectual property rights to the same extent as the
laws of the United States.
If we are found to infringe the proprietary rights of others, we could be required to redesign our
products, pay royalties or enter into license agreements with third parties.
Although we have never been the subject of a material intellectual property dispute, there can
be no assurance that a third party will not assert that our technology violates its intellectual
property rights in the future. As the number of software products in our target market increases
and the functionality of these products further overlap, we believe that software developers may
become increasingly subject to infringement claims. Any claims, whether with or without merit,
could:
|
|
be expensive and time consuming to defend, |
|
|
|
cause us to cease making, licensing or using products that incorporate the challenged intellectual property, |
|
|
|
require us to redesign our products, if feasible, |
|
|
|
divert managements attention and resources, and |
|
|
|
require us to enter into royalty or licensing agreements in order to obtain the right to use necessary
technologies. |
There can be no assurance that third parties will not assert infringement claims against us in
the future with respect to our current or future products or that any such assertion will not
require us to enter into royalty arrangements (if available) or litigation that could be costly to
us.
We have entered into and may continue to enter into or seek to enter into business combinations and
acquisitions which may be difficult to integrate, disrupt our business, dilute stockholder value or
divert management attention.
Since August 2001, we have acquired twelve businesses. As part of our business strategy, we
may enter into additional business combinations and acquisitions in the future. We have limited
experience in making acquisitions. In addition, acquisitions are typically accompanied by a number
of risks, including:
|
|
the difficulty of integrating the operations and personnel of the acquired companies, |
|
|
|
the maintenance of acceptable standards, controls, procedures and policies, |
|
|
|
the potential disruption of our ongoing business and distraction of management, |
|
|
|
the impairment of relationships with employees and clients as a result of any integration of new management
and other personnel, |
|
|
|
the inability to maintain relationships with clients of the acquired business, |
|
|
|
the difficulty of incorporating acquired technology and rights into our products and services, |
|
|
|
the failure to achieve the expected benefits of the combination or acquisition, |
|
|
|
expenses related to the acquisition, |
|
|
|
potential unknown liabilities associated with acquired businesses, |
|
|
|
unanticipated expenses related to acquired technology and its integration into existing technology, and |
|
|
|
differing regulatory and industry standards, certification requirements and product functional requirements. |
24
If we are not successful in completing acquisitions that we may pursue in the future, we would
be required to reevaluate our growth strategy and we may have incurred substantial expenses and
devoted significant management time and resources in seeking to complete the acquisitions. In
addition, with future acquisitions, we could use substantial portions of our available cash as all
or a portion of the purchase price. We could also issue additional securities as consideration for
these acquisitions, which could cause our stockholders to suffer significant dilution. Any future
acquisitions may not generate additional revenue for us.
We may not have sufficient funds available to pay amounts due under our senior subordinated
convertible notes.
We will be required to pay cash to holders of our senior subordinated convertible notes:
|
|
|
upon purchase of the notes by us at the option of holders on February 2 in each of 2012,
2015, 2020, 2025 and 2030, in an amount equal to the issue price and accrued original issue
discount plus accrued and unpaid cash interest and liquidated damages, if any, |
|
|
|
|
upon purchase of the notes by us at the option of holders upon some changes of control, in
an amount equal to the issue price and accrued original issue discount plus accrued and
unpaid cash interest and liquidated damages, if any, |
|
|
|
|
at maturity of the notes, in an amount equal to the entire outstanding principal amount, and |
|
|
|
|
in the event that we elect to pay cash in lieu of the delivery of shares of common stock
upon conversion of the notes, upon conversion, in an amount up to the conversion value of
the notes. |
We may not have sufficient funds available or may be unable to arrange for additional
financing to satisfy these obligations. A failure to pay amounts due under the notes upon
repurchase, at maturity or upon conversion in the event we elect to pay cash in lieu of shares of
common stock upon conversion, would constitute an event of default under the indenture, which
could, in turn, constitute a default under the terms of any other indebtedness.
We face risks associated with our Canadian operations that could harm our financial condition and
results of operations.
On October 29, 2004, we completed the acquisition of Datawest Solutions Inc., a provider of
banking and payment technology solutions located in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Although
historically we have not generated significant revenues from operations outside the United States,
we expect that the portion of our revenues generated by our international operations will increase
as a result of our acquisition of Datawest. As is the case with most international operations, the
success and profitability of such operations are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties that
include, in addition to the risks our business as a whole faces, the following:
|
|
|
difficulties and costs of staffing and managing foreign operations, |
|
|
|
|
differing regulatory and industry standards and certification requirements, |
|
|
|
|
the complexities of foreign tax jurisdictions, |
|
|
|
|
currency exchange rate fluctuations, and |
|
|
|
|
import or export licensing requirements. |
To service our indebtedness, we will require a significant amount of cash. Our ability to
generate cash depends on many factors beyond our control.
Our ability to make payments on and to refinance our indebtedness, including our notes, and to
fund planned capital expenditures and product development efforts will depend on our ability to
generate cash in the future. This, to a certain extent, is subject to general economic, financial,
competitive, legislative, regulatory and other factors that are beyond our control.
We cannot assure you that our business will generate sufficient cash flow from operations or
that future borrowings will be available to us in an amount sufficient to enable us to pay our
indebtedness, including the notes, or to fund our other liquidity needs. We may need to refinance
all or a portion of our indebtedness, including the notes, on or before maturity. We cannot assure
you that we will be able to refinance any of our indebtedness, including the notes, on commercially
reasonable terms or at all.
25
If we fail to effectively manage our growth, our financial results could be adversely
affected.
We have expanded our operations rapidly in recent years. For example, our aggregate annual
revenues increased from approximately $14.1 million in 1999 to approximately $107.2 million in
2004. As of June 30, 2005, we had 1,037 employees, up from 577 as of December 31, 2003. In
addition, we continue to explore ways to extend our target markets, including to larger financial
institutions, international clients, and clients in the payroll services, insurance and brokerage
industries. Our growth may place a strain on our management systems, information systems and
resources. Our ability to successfully offer products and services and implement our business plan
requires adequate information systems and resources and oversight from our senior management. We
will need to continue to improve our financial and managerial controls, reporting systems and
procedures as we continue to grow and expand our business. As we grow, we must also continue to
hire, train, supervise and manage new employees. We may not be able to hire, train, supervise and
manage sufficient personnel or develop management and operating systems to manage our expansion
effectively. If we are unable to manage our growth, our operations and financial results could be
adversely affected.
The requirements of being a public company may strain our resources and distract management.
As a public company, we are subject to the reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. These requirements may place a strain on our
systems and resources. The Securities Exchange Act requires, among other things, that we file
annual, quarterly and current reports with respect to our business and financial condition. The
Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires, among other things, that we maintain effective disclosure controls and
procedures and internal controls for financial reporting. In order to maintain and improve the
effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial
reporting, significant resources and management oversight will be required. As a result,
managements attention may be diverted from other business concerns, which could have a material
adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. In
addition, we will need to hire additional accounting and financial staff with appropriate public
company experience and technical accounting knowledge and we cannot assure you that we will be able
to do so in a timely fashion.
Failure to continue to comply with all of the requirements imposed by Section 404 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 could result in a negative market reaction.
Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 requires that we establish and maintain an
adequate internal control structure and procedures for financial reporting and assess on an
on-going basis the design and operating effectiveness of our internal control structure and
procedures for financial reporting. Our independent registered public accounting firm is required
to audit both the design and operating effectiveness of our internal control over financial
reporting and managements assessment of the design and the effectiveness of its internal control
over financial reporting. If we do not continue to comply with all of the requirements of Section
404 or if our internal controls are not designed or operating effectively, it could result in a
negative market reaction.
The design of other core vendors software or their use of financial incentives may make it more
difficult for clients to use our complementary products.
Currently, some core software vendors design their software so that it is difficult or
infeasible to use third-party complementary products, including ours. Some core software vendors
use financial incentives to encourage their core software clients to purchase their proprietary
complementary products. For example, in the past a core software vendor has charged
disproportionately high fees to integrate third-party complementary products such as ours, thereby
providing a financial incentive for clients of that vendors core software to use its complementary
products. We have responded to this practice by emphasizing to prospective clients the features and
functionality of our products, lowering our price or offering to perform the relevant integration
services ourselves. We cannot assure you that these competitors, or other vendors of core software,
will not begin or continue to construct technical, or implement financial, obstacles to the
purchase of our products. These obstacles could make it more difficult for us to sell our
complementary products and could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of
operations.
Operational failures in our outsourcing centers could cause us to lose clients.
Damage or destruction that interrupts our provision of outsourcing services could damage our
relationship with our clients and may cause us to incur substantial additional expense to repair or
replace damaged equipment. Although we have installed back-up systems and procedures to prevent or
reduce disruption, we cannot assure you that we will not suffer a prolonged interruption of our
data processing services. In the event that an interruption of our network extends for more than
several hours, we may experience data loss or a reduction in revenues by reason of such
interruption. In addition, a significant interruption of service could have a negative impact on
our reputation and could lead our present and potential clients to choose service providers other
than us.
Unauthorized disclosure of data, whether through breach of our computer systems or otherwise, could
expose us to protracted and costly litigation or cause us to lose clients.
26
In our outsourcing centers, we collect and store sensitive data, including
names, addresses, social security numbers, checking and savings account numbers and payment history
records, such as account closures and returned checks. If a person penetrates our network security
or otherwise misappropriates sensitive data, we could be subject to liability or our business could
be interrupted. Penetration of the network security of our outsourcing centers could have a
negative impact on our reputation and could lead our present and potential clients to choose
service providers other than us.
We may need additional capital in the future, which may not be available to us, and if we raise
additional capital, it may dilute your ownership in us.
We may need to raise additional funds through public or private debt or equity financings in
order to meet various objectives, such as:
|
|
taking advantage of growth opportunities, including more rapid expansion, |
|
|
|
acquiring businesses and products, |
|
|
|
making capital improvements to increase our servicing capacity, |
|
|
|
paying amounts due under our senior subordinated convertible notes, |
|
|
|
developing new services or products, and |
|
|
|
responding to competitive pressures. |
In addition, we may need additional financing if we decide to undertake new sales and/or marketing
initiatives, if we are required to defend or enforce our intellectual property rights, or if sales
of our products do not meet our expectations.
Any debt incurred by us could impair our ability to obtain additional financing for working
capital, capital expenditures or further acquisitions. Covenants governing any indebtedness we
incur would likely restrict our ability to take specific actions, including our ability to pay
dividends or distributions on, or redeem or repurchase, our capital stock, enter into transactions
with affiliates, merge, consolidate or sell our assets or make capital expenditure investments. In
addition, the use of a substantial portion of the cash generated by our operations to cover debt
service obligations and any security interests we grant on our assets could limit our financial and
business flexibility.
Any additional capital raised through the sale of equity or convertible debt securities may
dilute your ownership percentage in us. Furthermore, any additional debt or equity financing we may
need may not be available on terms favorable to us, or at all. If future financing is not available
or is not available on acceptable terms, we may not be able to raise additional capital, which
could significantly limit our ability to implement our business plan. In addition, we may have to
issue securities, including debt securities that may have rights, preferences and privileges senior
to our common stock.
The price of our common stock may be volatile. |
The
price of our common stock may be volatile.
In the past few years, technology stocks listed on the Nasdaq National Market have experienced
high levels of volatility. The price of our common stock depends on many factors, some of which are
beyond our control and may not be related to our operating performance. The factors that could
cause fluctuations in the trading price of our common stock include, but are not limited to, the
following:
|
|
|
price and volume fluctuations in the overall stock market from time to time, |
|
|
|
|
significant volatility in the market price and trading volume of financial services companies, |
|
|
|
|
actual or anticipated changes in our earnings or fluctuations in our operating results or in
the expectations of securities analysts, |
|
|
|
|
general economic conditions and trends, |
|
|
|
|
major catastrophic events, |
|
|
|
|
loss of a significant client or clients, |
|
|
|
|
sales of large blocks of our stock, or |
|
|
|
|
departures of key personnel. |
27
In the past, following periods of volatility in the market price of a companys securities,
securities class action litigation has often been brought against that company. Due to the
potential volatility of our stock price, we may therefore be the target of securities litigation in
the future. Securities litigation could result in substantial costs and divert managements
attention and resources from our business.
If a substantial number of shares of our common stock become available for sale and are sold in a
short period of time, the market price of our common stock could decline significantly.
If our stockholders sell substantial amounts of our common stock in the public market, the
market price of our common stock could decrease significantly. The perception in the public market
that our stockholders might sell shares of common stock could also depress the market price of our
common stock.
In addition, as of June 30, 2005, we had options to purchase a total of 3,884,589 shares of
our common stock outstanding under our stock incentive plans, of which 1,691,973 were vested. We
have filed Form S-8 registration statements to register all of the shares of our common stock
issuable under these plans. A decline in the price of shares of our common stock might impede our
ability to raise capital through the issuance of additional shares of our common stock or other
equity securities, and may cause you to lose part or all of your investment in our shares of common
stock.
Some provisions in our certificate of incorporation and by-laws may deter third parties from
acquiring us.
Our restated certificate of incorporation and our amended and restated by-laws contain
provisions that may make the acquisition of our company more difficult without the approval of our
board of directors, including the following:
|
|
our board of directors is classified into three classes, each of which serves for a staggered three year term, |
|
|
|
only our board of directors, the chairman of our board of directors or
our president may call special meetings of our stockholders, |
|
|
|
our stockholders may take action only at a meeting of our stockholders and not by written consent, |
|
|
|
we have authorized undesignated preferred stock, the terms of which
may be established and shares of which may be issued without
stockholder approval, |
|
|
|
our stockholders have only limited rights to amend our by-laws, and |
|
|
|
we require advance notice requirements for stockholder proposals. |
These anti-takeover defenses could discourage, delay or prevent a transaction involving a
change in control of our company. These provisions could also discourage proxy contests and make it
more difficult for you and other stockholders to elect directors of your choosing and cause us to
take other corporate actions you desire.
Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law may delay, defer or prevent a change in control
that our stockholders might consider to be in their best interest.
We are subject to Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law which, subject to
certain exceptions, prohibits business combinations between a publicly-held Delaware corporation
and an interested stockholder, which is generally defined as a stockholder who becomes a
beneficial owner of 15% or more of a Delaware corporations voting stock for a three-year period
following the date that such stockholder became an interested stockholder. Section 203 could have
the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in control of our company that our
stockholders might consider to be in their best interests.
28
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
We transact business with clients almost exclusively in the United States and Canada and
receive payment for our services exclusively in United States dollars or Canadian dollars.
Therefore, we are exposed to foreign currency exchange risks and fluctuations in foreign currencies
which could impact our results of operations and financial condition. A 10% increase or decrease in
currency exchange rates would not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or
results of operations.
Our interest expense is generally not sensitive to changes in the general level of interest
rates in the United States, particularly because a substantial majority of our indebtedness is at
fixed rates. A 10% increase or decrease in interest rates would not have a material adverse effect
on our financial condition or results of operations.
We do not hold derivative financial or commodity instruments and all of our cash and cash
equivalents are held on deposit with banks and highly liquid marketable securities with maturities
of three months or less.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures.
Our management, with the participation of our chief executive officer and chief financial
officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of June 30, 2005.
The term disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under
the Exchange Act, means controls and other procedures of a company that are designed to ensure that
information required to be disclosed by the company in the reports that it files or submits under
the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified
in the SECs rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation,
controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company
in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to
the companys management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, as
appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Our management recognizes that
any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable
assurance of achieving their objectives, and management necessarily applies its judgment in
evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. Based on the
evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of June 30, 2005, our chief executive
officer and chief financial officer concluded that, as of such date, our disclosure controls and
procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level.
Changes in Internal Controls over Financial Reporting
We began using a new enterprise accounting system in the first quarter of fiscal 2005. The
implementation of the new accounting system required us to modify and add certain internal controls
and processes. No change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) occurred during the three months ended June 30,
2005 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal
control over financial reporting.
29
PART
II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings.
We are from time to time a party to legal proceedings which arise in the normal course of
business. We are not currently involved in any material litigation, the outcome of which would, in
managements judgment based on information currently available, have a material adverse effect on
our results of operations or financial condition, nor is management aware of any such litigation
threatened against us.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
The following table provides information about purchases by us of our common stock during the three
months ended June 30, 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased as |
|
Remaining Funds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Part of Publicly |
|
Available to |
|
|
Total Number of Shares |
|
Average Price Paid |
|
Announced Program |
|
Repurchase Shares |
Period |
|
Purchased (1) |
|
per Share |
|
(2) |
|
Under the Program |
4/26/05 4/30/05 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
10,000,000 |
|
5/1/05 5/31/05 |
|
|
251,430 |
|
|
|
18.09 |
|
|
|
251,430 |
|
|
|
5,451,631 |
|
6/1/05 6/30/05 |
|
|
215,043 |
|
|
|
18.19 |
|
|
|
215,043 |
|
|
|
1,533,450 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
466,473 |
|
|
$ |
18.14 |
|
|
|
466,473 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
All repurchases by us of our common stock during the three months ended June 30, 2005
were done pursuant to the repurchase program that we publicly announced on April 27, 2005
(the Program). |
|
(2) |
|
Our Board of Directors approved the repurchase of $10,000,000 of our common stock
pursuant to the Program. The Program expires May 2, 2006 unless terminated earlier by
resolution of our Board of Directors. |
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.
None.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
On May 19, 2005, we held our 2005 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the Annual Meeting). The
following matters were voted upon at the Annual Meeting, for which there were no broker non-votes:
|
1. |
|
Douglas K. Anderson and Samuel F. McKay were elected to serve as Class II Directors.
The remaining terms of Louis Hernandez, Jr., Howard L. Carver, Dennis F. Lynch, Carlos P.
Naudon and Richard P. Yanak continued after the meeting. The results of the vote with
respect to each nominee for director were as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For |
|
Withheld |
Douglas K. Anderson |
|
|
11,852,910 |
|
|
|
6,560,784 |
|
Samuel F. McKay |
|
|
18,024,841 |
|
|
|
388,853 |
|
|
2. |
|
The ratification of the selection by the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors of
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the
year ending December 31, 2005 was approved. The votes were cast as follows: 18,390,134
shares of common stock were voted for the ratification, 15,700 shares of common stock were
voted against the ratification and 7,860 shares of common stock abstained from the vote. |
Item 5. Other Information.
None.
Item 6. Exhibits.
The exhibits listed in the Exhibit Index immediately preceding the exhibits are filed as part
of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
30
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto
duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPEN SOLUTIONS INC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dated: August 8, 2005
|
|
/s/ Louis Hernandez, Jr. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Louis Hernandez, Jr. |
|
|
|
|
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dated: August 8, 2005
|
|
/s/ Carl D. Blandino |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carl D. Blandino |
|
|
|
|
Senior Vice President, Chief
Financial Officer and
Treasurer |
|
|
|
|
(Principal Financial Officer
and Principal Accounting
Officer) |
|
|
31
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
Exhibit Number |
|
Description |
|
|
10.1
|
|
Asset Purchase Agreement, dated as of April 6, 2005,
among Ship Acquisition Corp., S.O.S Computer Systems,
Inc., the Clark Lindsay Ballantyne Trust, and Laura
Ballantyne Warner Trust, the Dunster Family Trust and
David Smart (Incorporated by reference to the
Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 6,
2005) |
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
Employment Agreement between Open Solutions Inc. and
Louis Hernandez, Jr. dated April 21, 2005 (Incorporated
by reference to the Registrants Current Report on Form
8-K dated April 21, 2005) |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of Louis Hernandez, Jr., Chairman of the
Board and Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to Rules
13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) of the Exchange Act, as adopted
pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of Carl D. Blandino, Senior Vice
President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer,
pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) of the
Exchange Act, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification of Louis Hernandez, Jr., Chairman of the
Board and Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 1350. |
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification of Carl D. Blandino, Senior Vice
President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350. |