FORM 10-Q
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED September 30, 2008
Commission File Number 1-34073
Huntington Bancshares Incorporated
|
|
|
Maryland
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
31-0724920
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.) |
41 South High Street, Columbus, Ohio 43287
Registrants telephone number (614) 480-8300
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months and (2)
has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. þ Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
(Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ |
|
Accelerated filer o |
|
Non-accelerated filer o |
|
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act).
o Yes þ No
There were 366,050,446 shares of Registrants common stock ($0.01 par value) outstanding on October
31, 2008.
Huntington Bancshares Incorporated
INDEX
2
Part 1. Financial Information
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
INTRODUCTION
Huntington Bancshares Incorporated (we or our) is a multi-state diversified financial holding
company organized under Maryland law in 1966 and headquartered in Columbus, Ohio. Through our
subsidiaries, including our bank subsidiary, The Huntington National Bank (the Bank), organized in
1866, we provide full-service commercial and consumer banking services, mortgage banking services,
automobile financing, equipment leasing, investment management, trust services, brokerage services,
customized insurance service programs, and other financial products and services. Our banking
offices are located in Ohio, Michigan, Pennsylvania, Indiana, West Virginia, and Kentucky.
Selected financial service activities are also conducted in other states including: Auto Finance
and Dealer Services offices in Arizona, Florida, Nevada, New Jersey, New York, Tennessee, and
Texas; Private Financial and Capital Markets Group offices in Florida; and Mortgage Banking offices
in Maryland and New Jersey. Huntington Insurance offers retail and commercial insurance agency
services in Ohio, Pennsylvania, Michigan, Indiana, and West Virginia. International banking
services are available through the headquarters office in Columbus and a limited purpose office
located in both the Cayman Islands and Hong Kong.
The following Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations (MD&A) provides you with information we believe necessary for understanding our
financial condition, changes in financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows and
should be read in conjunction with the financial statements, notes, and other information contained
in this report. This discussion and analysis provides updates to the MD&A appearing in our 2007
Annual Report on Form 10-K (2007 Form 10-K), which should be read in conjunction with this
discussion and analysis.
Our discussion is divided into key segments:
|
|
|
Introduction - Provides overview comments on important matters including risk factors,
acquisitions, and other items. These are essential for understanding our performance and
prospects. |
|
|
|
|
Discussion of Results of Operations - Reviews financial performance from a consolidated
company perspective. It also includes a Significant Items section that summarizes key
issues helpful for understanding performance trends, including our acquisition of Sky
Financial Group, Inc. (Sky Financial) and our relationship with Franklin Credit Management
Corporation (Franklin). Key consolidated balance sheet and income statement trends are
also discussed in this section. |
|
|
|
|
Risk Management and Capital - Discusses credit, market, liquidity, and operational
risks, including how these are managed, as well as performance trends. It also includes a
discussion of liquidity policies, how we obtain funding, and related performance. In
addition, there is a discussion of guarantees and/or commitments made for items such as
standby letters of credit and commitments to sell loans, and a discussion that reviews the
adequacy of capital, including regulatory capital requirements. |
|
|
|
|
Lines of Business Discussion - Provides an overview of financial performance for each of
our major lines of business and provides additional discussion of trends underlying
consolidated financial performance. |
A reading of each section is important to understand fully the nature of our financial
performance and prospects.
Forward-Looking Statements
This report, including MD&A, contains certain forward-looking statements, including certain
plans, expectations, goals, and projections, which are subject to numerous assumptions, risks, and
uncertainties. Statements that do not describe historical or current facts, including statements
about beliefs and expectations, are forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements
are intended to be subject to the safe harbor provided by Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933
and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Actual results could differ materially from those contained or implied by such statements for
a variety of factors including: (a) deterioration in the loan portfolio could be worse than
expected due to a number of factors such as the
3
underlying value of the collateral could prove less valuable than otherwise assumed and
assumed cash flows may be worse than expected; (b) changes in economic conditions; (c) movements in
interest rates and spreads; (d) competitive pressures on product pricing and services; (e) success
and timing of other business strategies; (f) the nature, extent, and timing of governmental actions
and reforms; and (g) extended disruption of vital infrastructure. The Emergency Economic
Stabilization Act of 2008 (EESA) passed on October 3, 2008, could have an undetermined material
impact on company performance depending on rules of participation that have yet to be finalized.
Additional factors that could cause results to differ materially from those described above can be
found in Huntingtons 2007 Form 10-K, and documents subsequently filed by Huntington with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).
All forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made and are based on
information available at that time. We assume no obligation to update forward-looking statements to
reflect circumstances or events that occur after the date the forward-looking statements were made
or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events except as required by federal securities laws.
As forward-looking statements involve significant risks and uncertainties, readers of this
document are cautioned against placing undue reliance on such statements.
Risk Factors
We, like other financial companies, are subject to a number of risks that may adversely affect
our financial condition or results of operation, many of which are outside of our direct control,
though efforts are made to manage those risks while optimizing returns. Among the risks assumed
are: (1) credit risk, which is the risk of loss due to loan and lease customers or other
counterparties not being able to meet their financial obligations under agreed upon terms, (2)
market risk, which is the risk of loss due to changes in the market value of assets and
liabilities due to changes in market interest rates, foreign exchange rates, equity prices, and
credit spreads, (3) liquidity risk, which is the risk of loss due to the possibility that
funds may not be available to satisfy current or future commitments based on external macro market
issues, investor and customer perception of financial strength, and events unrelated to the company
such as war, terrorism, or financial institution market specific issues, and (4) operational
risk, which is the risk of loss due to human error, inadequate or failed internal systems and
controls, violations of, or noncompliance with, laws, rules, regulations, prescribed practices, or
ethical standards, and external influences such as market conditions, fraudulent activities,
disasters, and security risks. (See Risk Management and Capital discussion for additional
information regarding risk factors.) Additionally, more information on risk is set forth below,
and under the heading Risk Factors included in Item 1A of our 2007 Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2007, and subsequent filings with the SEC.
Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008
On October 3, 2008, the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 (EESA) was enacted. EESA
enables the federal government, under terms and conditions to be developed by the Secretary of the
Treasury, to insure troubled assets, including mortgage-backed securities, and collect premiums
from participating financial institutions. EESA includes, among other provisions: (a) the $700
billion Troubled Assets Relief Program (TARP), under which the Secretary of the Treasury is
authorized to purchase, insure, hold, and sell a wide variety of financial instruments,
particularly those that are based on or related to residential or commercial mortgages originated
or issued on or before March 14, 2008; and (b) an increase in the amount of deposit insurance
provided by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC). Both of these specific provisions
are discussed in the below sections.
We continue to evaluate the key provisions of EESA, as well as the related accounting, tax,
and business issues and their impact on Huntingtons consolidated financial statements. At this
time, we are uncertain as to the total impact EESA, other legislation, regulations, and
pronouncements that may be enacted or adopted in response to the current worldwide economic
uncertainty, may have on our financial condition, results of operations, liquidity, and stock
price.
Troubled Assets Relief Program (TARP)
Under the TARP, the Department of Treasury has authorized a voluntary capital purchase program
(CPP) to purchase up to $250 billion of senior preferred shares of qualifying financial
institutions that elect to participate by November 14, 2008. A company that participates must
adopt certain standards for executive compensation, including (a) prohibiting golden parachute
payments as defined in EESA to senior Executive Officers; (b) requiring recovery of any
compensation paid to senior Executive Officers based on criteria that is later proven to be
materially inaccurate; and (c) prohibiting incentive compensation that encourages unnecessary
and excessive risks that threaten the value of the financial institution.
4
On October 27, 2008, we announced that the Department of Treasury had preliminarily approved our
application to participate in the TARP voluntary CPP. Our participation is subject to the
standard terms and conditions of the program. We have been approved for approximately $1.4
billion in capital that will take the form of non-voting cumulative preferred stock that would
pay cash dividends at the rate of 5% per annum for the first five years, and then pay cash
dividends at the rate of 9% per annum thereafter. In addition, the Department of Treasury will
receive warrants to purchase shares of our common stock having an aggregate market price equal
to 15% of the preferred stock amount. The expected proceeds of the $1.4 billion would be
allocated to the preferred stock and additional paid-in-capital. Any resulting discount on the
preferred stock would be amortized, resulting in additional dilution to our common stock. The
exercise price for the warrant, and the market price for determining the number of shares of
common stock subject to the warrants, would be determined on the date of the preferred
investment (calculated on a 20-trading day trailing average). The warrants would be immediately
exercisable, in whole or in part, over a term of 10 years. The warrants would be included in
our diluted average common shares outstanding.
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC)
The FDIC is an independent agency of the United States government that protects against the
loss of insured deposits if any FDIC insured bank or savings association fails. All participants
are assessed quarterly deposit insurance premiums.
As a participating FDIC insured bank, we were assessed quarterly deposit insurance premiums
totaling $18.1 million for the first nine-month period of 2008. However, we received a one-time
assessment credit from the FDIC (see Business discussion in the 2007 Form 10-K) which
substantially offset our year-to-date 2008 deposit insurance premium and, therefore, only $1.8
million of deposit insurance premium expense was recognized for the first nine-month period of
2008. At September 30, 2008, our remaining assessment credit available to offset future FDIC
insurance premiums was $0.2 million.
On October 7, 2008, the FDIC requested comment on a proposed rule that would increase the
rates banks pay for deposit insurance. Specifically, the assessment rate schedule would be raised
by 7 basis points (annualized) beginning January 1, 2009. The FDIC has also proposed changing the
way the system measures risk among insured institutions in order to require riskier institutions to
pay a larger assessment. Based on these proposed changes, as well as the full consumption of the
one-time assessment credit (discussed above), we anticipate that our full-year 2009 deposit
insurance premium expense will increase approximately $44 million compared with our expected
full-year 2008 deposit insurance premium expense.
EESA temporarily raised the limit on federal deposit insurance coverage from $100,000 to
$250,000 per depositor. Separate from EESA, in October 2008, the FDIC also announced the Temporary
Liquidity Guarantee Program. Under one component of this program, the FDIC temporarily provides
unlimited coverage for non-interest bearing transaction deposit accounts through December 31, 2009.
The limits return to $100,000 on January 1, 2010. (See Bank Liquidity discussion for additional
details regarding the Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program.)
Critical Accounting Policies and Use of Significant Estimates
Our financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States (GAAP). The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
GAAP requires us to establish critical accounting policies and make accounting estimates,
assumptions, and judgments that affect amounts recorded and reported in our financial statements.
Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in our 2007 Form 10-K as
supplemented by this report lists significant accounting policies we use in the development and
presentation of our financial statements. This discussion and analysis, the significant accounting
policies, and other financial statement disclosures identify and address key variables and other
qualitative and quantitative factors necessary for an understanding and evaluation of our company,
financial position, results of operations, and cash flows.
An accounting estimate requires assumptions about uncertain matters that could have a material
effect on the financial statements if a different amount within a range of estimates were used or
if estimates changed from period to period. Readers of this report should understand that estimates
are made under facts and circumstances at a point in time, and changes in those facts and
circumstances could produce actual results that differ from when those estimates were made. The
most significant accounting estimates and their related application are discussed in our 2007 Form
10-K. The following discussion provides an update of our accounting estimates related to goodwill.
Also, based on recent market
5
developments,
we now consider the results of our other-than-temporary-impairment
(OTTI) analysis of
securities available-for-sale to be a significant estimate.
Goodwill
We account for goodwill in accordance with FASB Statement No. 142, Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets. The reporting units are tested for impairment annually as of October 1, to
determine whether any goodwill impairment exists. Goodwill is also tested for impairment on an
interim basis if an event occurs or circumstances change between annual tests that would more
likely than not reduce the fair value of the reporting unit below its carrying amount. Impairment
losses, if any, would be reflected in non-interest expense.
We apply judgment in assessing goodwill for impairment. Estimates of fair value are based
primarily on the market capitalization of Huntington, adjusted for a control premium. Also
considered are projections of cash flows considering historical and anticipated future results, and
general economic and market conditions. Changes in market capitalization, certain judgments, and
projections could result in a significantly different estimate of the fair value of the reporting
units and could result in an impairment of goodwill.
As a result of the continued economic weakness across our Midwest markets, our stock price
declined significantly during the first six-month period of 2008. Therefore, we performed an
interim impairment test of our goodwill as of June 30, 2008. Based upon the results of the test,
no impairment to goodwill was required. No factors occurred during the 2008 third quarter that
required an additional impairment test.
Securities
As described in Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in our 2007 Form
10-K, investments are reviewed quarterly for indicators of OTTI.
This determination requires significant judgment. In making this judgment, we evaluate, among
other factors, the expected cash flows of the security, the duration and extent to which the fair
value of an investment is less than its cost, the historical and implicit volatility of the
security, and our intent and ability to hold the investment until recovery, which may be maturity.
During the current quarter, we recognized OTTI of $76.6 million in our Alt-A mortgage
loan-backed portfolio (see Investment Portfolio discussion within the Credit Risk section).
Given the continued disruption in the financial markets, we may be required to recognize additional
OTTI losses in future periods with respect to these or other securities held in our
available-for-sale portfolio. Also, we have experienced an increase in unrealized losses primarily
as a result of wider liquidity spreads on our asset-backed securities. At September 30, 2008,
unrealized losses on our asset-backed securities totaled $209.2 million, up from unrealized losses
of $35.2 million at December 31, 2007 and unrealized losses of $4.2 million at September 30, 2007.
The amount and timing of any additional impairment recognized will depend on the severity and
duration of the decline in fair value of the securities, our estimation of the anticipated recovery
period, and the expected cash flows of the security. (See Note 4 in the Notes to Unaudited
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for additional discussion.)
Recent Accounting Pronouncements and Developments
Note 2 to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements discusses new accounting
policies adopted during 2008 and the expected impact of accounting policies recently issued but not
yet required to be adopted. To the extent the adoption of new accounting standards materially
affect financial condition, results of operations, or liquidity, the impacts are discussed in the
applicable section of this MD&A and the Notes to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements.
Acquisition of Sky Financial
The merger with Sky Financial was completed on July 1, 2007. At the time of acquisition, Sky
Financial had assets of $16.8 billion, including $13.3 billion of loans, and total deposits of
$12.9 billion. The impact of this acquisition has been included in our consolidated results since
July 1, 2007. As a result of this acquisition, we have a significant loan
6
relationship with Franklin. This relationship is discussed in greater detail in the
Significant Items and Commercial Credit sections of this report.
Given the significant impact of the merger on year-to-date reported results, we believe that
an understanding of the impacts of the merger and certain post-merger restructuring activities is
necessary to better understand the underlying performance trends. When comparing post-merger period
results to premerger periods, we use the following terms when discussing financial performance:
|
|
|
Merger-related refers to amounts and percentage changes representing the impact
attributable to the merger. |
|
|
|
|
Merger and restructuring costs represent non-interest expenses primarily
associated with merger integration activities, including severance expense for key
executive personnel. |
|
|
|
|
Non-merger-related refers to performance not attributable to the merger, and
includes merger efficiencies, which represent non-interest expense reductions
realized as a result of the merger. |
After completion of the merger, we combined Sky Financials operations with ours, and as such,
we could no longer separately monitor the subsequent individual results of Sky Financial. As a
result, the following methodologies were implemented to estimate the approximate effect of the Sky
Financial merger used to determine merger-related impacts. Certain tables and comments contained
within our discussion and analysis provide detail of changes to reported results to quantify the
estimated impact of the Sky Financial merger using this methodology. Only year-to-date
comparisons are impacted by the Sky Financial acquisition in this MD&A, as all quarterly periods
presented are post-merger.
Balance Sheet Items
For average loans and leases, as well as average deposits, Sky Financials balances as of June
30, 2007, adjusted for purchase accounting adjustments, and transfers of loans to loans
held-for-sale, were used in the comparison. To estimate the impact on 2008 year-to-date average
balances, it was assumed that the June 30, 2007 balances, as adjusted, remained constant over
time.
Income Statement Items
Sky Financials actual results for the first six months of 2007, adjusted for the impact of
unusual items and purchase accounting adjustments, were determined. This six-month adjusted
amount was divided by two to estimate a quarterly impact. The quarterly amount was then
multiplied by three to arrive at a year-to-date amount. This methodology does not adjust for
any market related changes, or seasonal factors in Sky Financials 2007 six-month results. Nor
does it consider any revenue or expense synergies realized since the merger date. The one
exception to this methodology of holding the estimated annual impact constant relates to the
amortization of intangibles expense where the amount is known and is therefore used.
7
DISCUSSION OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
This section provides a review of financial performance from a consolidated perspective. It
also includes a Significant Items section that summarizes key issues important for a complete
understanding of performance trends. Key consolidated balance sheet and income statement trends are
discussed in this section. All earnings per share data are reported on a diluted basis. For
additional insight on financial performance, please read this section in conjunction with the
Lines of Business discussion.
Summary
We reported 2008 third quarter net income of $75.1 million representing earnings per common
share of $0.17. These results compared with net income of $101.4 million, or $0.25 per common
share, in the 2008 second quarter. Comparisons with the prior quarter were significantly impacted
by a number of factors that are discussed later in the Significant Items section.
During the 2008 third quarter, the primary focus within our industry continued to be credit
quality. The economy remained weak in our markets and continued to put stress on our borrowers.
Our expectation is that the economy will remain under stress, and that no improvement will be seen
until well into 2009.
Given the current economic conditions, the decline in credit quality performance during the
current quarter was anticipated, and the results were consistent with our expectations. Net
charge-offs and provision levels continued to be elevated, however the increases were manageable.
During the 2008 third quarter, the allowance for credit losses (ACL) increased 10 basis points from
the prior quarter to 1.90% of total loans and leases. Nonaccrual loans (NALs) increased $50.9
million, or 10%, reflecting increased NALs in our commercial real estate (CRE) loans to single
family home builders, and within our commercial and industrial (C&I) portfolio related to
businesses that support residential development.
Our period end capital levels were strong. Our tangible equity ratio improved 8 basis points
to 5.98% compared with the prior quarter, and is near our 6.00%-6.25% targeted range. This
quarters performance permitted us to build capital levels even more, and we believe that we are
well positioned given the current stresses in the financial markets. We expect our capital
position will be strengthened further with our participation in the Department of Treasurys
voluntary CPP under TARP (see Risk Factors discussion within the Introduction section).
Additionally, our period-end liquidity position was strong, as we have conservatively managed our
liquidity position at both the parent company and bank levels. At September 30, 2008, the parent
company had sufficient cash for operations and does not have any debt maturities for several years.
Further, the Bank has a very manageable level of debt maturities during the next 12-month period.
The loan restructuring associated with our relationship with Franklin, completed during the
2007 fourth quarter, continued to perform consistent with the terms of the restructuring agreement.
Cash flows exceeded the required debt service, the loans continued to perform with interest
accruing, and there were no charge-offs or related provision for credit losses related to this
credit during the quarter. Our exposure to Franklin declined $36 million, or 3%, compared with the
prior quarter. We remain comfortable with our credit assumptions regarding the overall performance
of this portfolio.
Fully taxable net interest income in the 2008 third quarter decreased $1.4 million, or less
than 1%, compared with the prior quarter. This decrease was primarily the result of a $0.6
billion, or 1%, decline in average total earning assets, as the net interest margin was unchanged
from the prior quarter at 3.29%.
Non-interest income in the 2008 third quarter decreased $68.6 million, or 29%, compared with
the prior quarter. Comparisons with the prior quarter were affected by Significant Items (see
Significant Items) that resulted in a net charge of $58.5 million. Mortgage banking income,
after considering the impact of MSR hedging results (see Significant Items), declined 51%
primarily relating to lower origination activity, and trust services income declined 6% reflecting
the impact of lower market values on asset management revenues.
Expenses continue to be well controlled, with our efficiency ratio improving to 50.3% for the
current quarter. Non-interest expense in the 2008 third quarter decreased $38.8 million, or 10%,
compared with the prior quarter. Comparisons with the prior quarter were affected by Significant
Items (see Significant Items) that resulted in a net positive impact of $19.2 million, and
reduced restructuring/merger costs that resulted in a net positive impact of $14.6 million.
Considering the impact of both of these items, the remaining components of non-interest expense
decreased $5.1 million, or 1%, primarily reflecting a decline in personnel expense due to merger
efficiencies.
8
Table 1 Selected Quarterly Income Statement Data (1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
(in thousands, except per share amounts) |
|
Third |
|
Second |
|
First |
|
Fourth |
|
Third |
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
$ |
685,728 |
|
|
$ |
696,675 |
|
|
$ |
753,411 |
|
|
$ |
814,398 |
|
|
$ |
851,155 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
297,092 |
|
|
|
306,809 |
|
|
|
376,587 |
|
|
|
431,465 |
|
|
|
441,522 |
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
388,636 |
|
|
|
389,866 |
|
|
|
376,824 |
|
|
|
382,933 |
|
|
|
409,633 |
|
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
125,392 |
|
|
|
120,813 |
|
|
|
88,650 |
|
|
|
512,082 |
|
|
|
42,007 |
|
|
|
|
Net interest income (loss) after provision for credit losses |
|
|
263,244 |
|
|
|
269,053 |
|
|
|
288,174 |
|
|
|
(129,149 |
) |
|
|
367,626 |
|
|
|
|
Service charges on deposit accounts |
|
|
80,508 |
|
|
|
79,630 |
|
|
|
72,668 |
|
|
|
81,276 |
|
|
|
78,107 |
|
Trust services |
|
|
30,952 |
|
|
|
33,089 |
|
|
|
34,128 |
|
|
|
35,198 |
|
|
|
33,562 |
|
Brokerage and insurance income |
|
|
34,309 |
|
|
|
35,694 |
|
|
|
36,560 |
|
|
|
30,288 |
|
|
|
28,806 |
|
Other service charges and fees |
|
|
23,446 |
|
|
|
23,242 |
|
|
|
20,741 |
|
|
|
21,891 |
|
|
|
21,045 |
|
Bank owned life insurance income |
|
|
13,318 |
|
|
|
14,131 |
|
|
|
13,750 |
|
|
|
13,253 |
|
|
|
14,847 |
|
Mortgage banking income (loss) |
|
|
10,302 |
|
|
|
12,502 |
|
|
|
(7,063 |
) |
|
|
3,702 |
|
|
|
9,629 |
|
Securities (losses) gains |
|
|
(73,790 |
) |
|
|
2,073 |
|
|
|
1,429 |
|
|
|
(11,551 |
) |
|
|
(13,152 |
) |
Other income (loss) (2) |
|
|
48,812 |
|
|
|
36,069 |
|
|
|
63,539 |
|
|
|
(3,500 |
) |
|
|
31,830 |
|
|
|
|
Total non-interest income |
|
|
167,857 |
|
|
|
236,430 |
|
|
|
235,752 |
|
|
|
170,557 |
|
|
|
204,674 |
|
|
|
|
Personnel costs |
|
|
184,827 |
|
|
|
199,991 |
|
|
|
201,943 |
|
|
|
214,850 |
|
|
|
202,148 |
|
Outside data processing and other services |
|
|
32,386 |
|
|
|
30,186 |
|
|
|
34,361 |
|
|
|
39,130 |
|
|
|
40,600 |
|
Net occupancy |
|
|
25,215 |
|
|
|
26,971 |
|
|
|
33,243 |
|
|
|
26,714 |
|
|
|
33,334 |
|
Equipment |
|
|
22,102 |
|
|
|
25,740 |
|
|
|
23,794 |
|
|
|
22,816 |
|
|
|
23,290 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
19,463 |
|
|
|
19,327 |
|
|
|
18,917 |
|
|
|
20,163 |
|
|
|
19,949 |
|
Marketing |
|
|
7,049 |
|
|
|
7,339 |
|
|
|
8,919 |
|
|
|
16,175 |
|
|
|
13,186 |
|
Professional services |
|
|
13,405 |
|
|
|
13,752 |
|
|
|
9,090 |
|
|
|
14,464 |
|
|
|
11,273 |
|
Telecommunications |
|
|
6,007 |
|
|
|
6,864 |
|
|
|
6,245 |
|
|
|
8,513 |
|
|
|
7,286 |
|
Printing and supplies |
|
|
4,316 |
|
|
|
4,757 |
|
|
|
5,622 |
|
|
|
6,594 |
|
|
|
4,743 |
|
Other expense (2) |
|
|
24,226 |
|
|
|
42,876 |
|
|
|
28,347 |
|
|
|
70,133 |
|
|
|
29,754 |
|
|
|
|
Total non-interest expense |
|
|
338,996 |
|
|
|
377,803 |
|
|
|
370,481 |
|
|
|
439,552 |
|
|
|
385,563 |
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
92,105 |
|
|
|
127,680 |
|
|
|
153,445 |
|
|
|
(398,144 |
) |
|
|
186,737 |
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes |
|
|
17,042 |
|
|
|
26,328 |
|
|
|
26,377 |
|
|
|
(158,864 |
) |
|
|
48,535 |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
75,063 |
|
|
$ |
101,352 |
|
|
$ |
127,068 |
|
|
$ |
(239,280 |
) |
|
$ |
138,202 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends declared on preferred shares |
|
|
12,091 |
|
|
|
11,151 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) applicable to common shares |
|
$ |
62,972 |
|
|
$ |
90,201 |
|
|
$ |
127,068 |
|
|
$ |
(239,280 |
) |
|
$ |
138,202 |
|
|
|
|
Average common shares basic |
|
|
366,124 |
|
|
|
366,206 |
|
|
|
366,235 |
|
|
|
366,119 |
|
|
|
365,895 |
|
Average common shares diluted (3) |
|
|
367,361 |
|
|
|
367,234 |
|
|
|
367,208 |
|
|
|
366,119 |
|
|
|
368,280 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per common share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) basic |
|
$ |
0.17 |
|
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
$ |
0.35 |
|
|
$ |
(0.65 |
) |
|
$ |
0.38 |
|
Net income (loss) diluted |
|
|
0.17 |
|
|
|
0.25 |
|
|
|
0.35 |
|
|
|
(0.65 |
) |
|
|
0.38 |
|
Cash dividends declared |
|
|
0.1325 |
|
|
|
0.1325 |
|
|
|
0.2650 |
|
|
|
0.2650 |
|
|
|
0.2650 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on average total assets |
|
|
0.55 |
% |
|
|
0.73 |
% |
|
|
0.93 |
% |
|
|
(1.74 |
)% |
|
|
1.02 |
% |
|
Return on average total shareholders equity |
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
6.4 |
|
|
|
8.7 |
|
|
|
(15.3 |
) |
|
|
8.8 |
|
|
Return on average tangible shareholders equity (4) |
|
|
11.6 |
|
|
|
15.0 |
|
|
|
22.0 |
|
|
|
(30.7 |
) |
|
|
19.7 |
|
|
Net interest margin (5) |
|
|
3.29 |
|
|
|
3.29 |
|
|
|
3.23 |
|
|
|
3.26 |
|
|
|
3.52 |
|
|
Efficiency ratio (6) |
|
|
50.3 |
|
|
|
56.9 |
|
|
|
57.0 |
|
|
|
73.5 |
|
|
|
57.7 |
|
|
Effective tax rate (benefit) |
|
|
18.5 |
|
|
|
20.6 |
|
|
|
17.2 |
|
|
|
(39.9 |
) |
|
|
26.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue fully taxable equivalent (FTE) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
$ |
388,636 |
|
|
$ |
389,866 |
|
|
$ |
376,824 |
|
|
$ |
382,933 |
|
|
$ |
409,633 |
|
FTE adjustment |
|
|
5,451 |
|
|
|
5,624 |
|
|
|
5,502 |
|
|
|
5,363 |
|
|
|
5,712 |
|
|
|
|
Net interest income (5) |
|
|
394,087 |
|
|
|
395,490 |
|
|
|
382,326 |
|
|
|
388,296 |
|
|
|
415,345 |
|
Non-interest income |
|
|
167,857 |
|
|
|
236,430 |
|
|
|
235,752 |
|
|
|
170,557 |
|
|
|
204,674 |
|
|
|
|
Total revenue (5) |
|
$ |
561,944 |
|
|
$ |
631,920 |
|
|
$ |
618,078 |
|
|
$ |
558,853 |
|
|
$ |
620,019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Comparisons for presented periods are impacted by a number of factors. Refer to the
Significant Items section for additional discussion regarding these key factors. |
|
(2) |
|
Automobile operating lease income and expense is included in Other Income and
Other Expense, respectively. |
|
(3) |
|
For the three-month period ended September 30, 2008, and the three-month period
ended June 30, 2008, the impact of the convertible preferred stock issued in April of 2008 totaling
47.6 million shares and 39.8 million shares, respectively, were excluded from the diluted share
calculations. They were excluded because the results would have been higher than basic earnings
per common share (anti-dilutive) for the periods. |
|
(4) |
|
Net income excluding expense for amortization of intangibles for the period divided
by average tangible shareholders equity. Average tangible shareholders equity equals average
total stockholders equity less average intangible assets and goodwill. Expense for amortization
of intangibles and average intangible assets are net of deferred tax liability, and calculated
assuming a 35% tax rate. |
|
(5) |
|
On a fully taxable equivalent (FTE) basis assuming a 35% tax rate. |
|
(6) |
|
Non-interest expense less amortization of intangibles divided by the sum of FTE net
interest income and non-interest income excluding securities gains (losses). |
9
Table 2 Selected Year to Date Income Statement Data (1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
Change |
(in thousands, except per share amounts) |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Amount |
|
Percent |
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
$ |
2,135,814 |
|
|
$ |
1,928,565 |
|
|
$ |
207,249 |
|
|
|
10.7 |
% |
Interest expense |
|
|
980,488 |
|
|
|
1,009,986 |
|
|
|
(29,498 |
) |
|
|
(2.9 |
) |
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
1,155,326 |
|
|
|
918,579 |
|
|
|
236,747 |
|
|
|
25.8 |
|
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
334,855 |
|
|
|
131,546 |
|
|
|
203,309 |
|
|
|
N.M. |
|
|
|
|
Net interest income after provision for credit losses |
|
|
820,471 |
|
|
|
787,033 |
|
|
|
33,438 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
|
Service charges on deposit accounts |
|
|
232,806 |
|
|
|
172,917 |
|
|
|
59,889 |
|
|
|
34.6 |
|
Trust services |
|
|
98,169 |
|
|
|
86,220 |
|
|
|
11,949 |
|
|
|
13.9 |
|
Brokerage and insurance income |
|
|
106,563 |
|
|
|
62,087 |
|
|
|
44,476 |
|
|
|
71.6 |
|
Other service charges and fees |
|
|
67,429 |
|
|
|
49,176 |
|
|
|
18,253 |
|
|
|
37.1 |
|
Bank owned life insurance income |
|
|
41,199 |
|
|
|
36,602 |
|
|
|
4,597 |
|
|
|
12.6 |
|
Mortgage banking income |
|
|
15,741 |
|
|
|
26,102 |
|
|
|
(10,361 |
) |
|
|
(39.7 |
) |
Securities losses |
|
|
(70,288 |
) |
|
|
(18,187 |
) |
|
|
(52,101 |
) |
|
|
286.5 |
|
Other income (2) |
|
|
148,420 |
|
|
|
91,127 |
|
|
|
57,293 |
|
|
|
62.9 |
|
|
|
|
Total non-interest income |
|
|
640,039 |
|
|
|
506,044 |
|
|
|
133,995 |
|
|
|
26.5 |
|
|
|
|
Personnel costs |
|
|
586,761 |
|
|
|
471,978 |
|
|
|
114,783 |
|
|
|
24.3 |
|
Outside data processing and other services |
|
|
96,933 |
|
|
|
88,115 |
|
|
|
8,818 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
Net occupancy |
|
|
85,429 |
|
|
|
72,659 |
|
|
|
12,770 |
|
|
|
17.6 |
|
Equipment |
|
|
71,636 |
|
|
|
58,666 |
|
|
|
12,970 |
|
|
|
22.1 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
57,707 |
|
|
|
29,868 |
|
|
|
27,839 |
|
|
|
93.2 |
|
Marketing |
|
|
23,307 |
|
|
|
25,856 |
|
|
|
(2,549 |
) |
|
|
(9.9 |
) |
Professional services |
|
|
36,247 |
|
|
|
15,989 |
|
|
|
20,258 |
|
|
|
N.M. |
|
Telecommunications |
|
|
19,116 |
|
|
|
11,657 |
|
|
|
7,459 |
|
|
|
64.0 |
|
Printing and supplies |
|
|
14,695 |
|
|
|
24,988 |
|
|
|
(10,293 |
) |
|
|
(41.2 |
) |
Other expense (2) |
|
|
95,449 |
|
|
|
72,514 |
|
|
|
22,935 |
|
|
|
31.6 |
|
|
|
|
Total non-interest expense |
|
|
1,087,280 |
|
|
|
872,290 |
|
|
|
214,990 |
|
|
|
24.6 |
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
373,230 |
|
|
|
420,787 |
|
|
|
(47,557 |
) |
|
|
(11.3 |
) |
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
69,747 |
|
|
|
106,338 |
|
|
|
(36,591 |
) |
|
|
(34.4 |
) |
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
303,483 |
|
|
$ |
314,449 |
|
|
$ |
(10,966 |
) |
|
|
(3.5 |
)% |
|
|
|
Dividends declared on preferred shares |
|
|
23,242 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,242 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income applicable to common shares |
|
$ |
280,241 |
|
|
$ |
314,449 |
|
|
$ |
(34,208 |
) |
|
|
(10.9 |
)% |
|
|
|
Average common shares basic |
|
|
366,188 |
|
|
|
279,171 |
|
|
|
87,017 |
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
Average common shares diluted (3) |
|
|
367,268 |
|
|
|
282,014 |
|
|
|
85,254 |
|
|
|
30.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per common share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share basic |
|
$ |
0.77 |
|
|
$ |
1.13 |
|
|
$ |
(0.36 |
) |
|
|
(31.9 |
)% |
Net income per common share diluted |
|
|
0.76 |
|
|
|
1.12 |
|
|
|
(0.36 |
) |
|
|
(32.1 |
) |
Cash dividends declared |
|
|
0.530 |
|
|
|
0.795 |
|
|
|
(0.265 |
) |
|
|
(33.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on average total assets |
|
|
0.74 |
% |
|
|
1.02 |
% |
|
|
(0.28 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
Return on average total shareholders equity |
|
|
6.6 |
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
|
|
(3.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Return on average tangible shareholders equity (4) |
|
|
15.9 |
|
|
|
16.8 |
|
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net interest margin (5) |
|
|
3.27 |
|
|
|
3.40 |
|
|
|
(0.13 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Efficiency ratio (6) |
|
|
54.7 |
|
|
|
58.2 |
|
|
|
(3.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Effective tax rate (5) |
|
|
18.7 |
|
|
|
25.3 |
|
|
|
(6.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue fully taxable equivalent (FTE) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
$ |
1,155,326 |
|
|
$ |
918,579 |
|
|
$ |
236,747 |
|
|
|
25.8 |
% |
FTE adjustment (5) |
|
|
16,577 |
|
|
|
13,886 |
|
|
|
2,691 |
|
|
|
19.4 |
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
1,171,903 |
|
|
|
932,465 |
|
|
|
239,438 |
|
|
|
25.7 |
|
Non-interest income |
|
|
640,039 |
|
|
|
506,044 |
|
|
|
133,995 |
|
|
|
26.5 |
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
$ |
1,811,942 |
|
|
$ |
1,438,509 |
|
|
$ |
373,433 |
|
|
|
26.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
N.M., not a meaningful value. |
|
(1) |
|
Comparisons for presented periods are impacted by a number of factors. Refer to the
Significant Items section for additional discussion regarding these key factors. |
|
(2) |
|
Automobile operating lease income and expense is included in Other Income and
Other Expense, respectively. |
|
(3) |
|
For the nine-month period ended September 30, 2008, the impact of the convertible
preferred stock issued in April of 2008 totaling 29.1 million shares was excluded in the diluted
share calculation. It was excluded because the result would have been higher than basic earnings
per common share (anti-dilutive) for the period. |
|
(4) |
|
Net income excluding expense of amortization of intangibles (net of tax) for the
period divided by average tangible common shareholders equity. Average tangible common
shareholders equity equals average total common shareholders equity less average intangible
assets and goodwill. Expense for amortization of intangibles and average intangible assets are net
of deferred tax liability, and calculated assuming a 35% tax rate. |
|
(5) |
|
On a fully taxable equivalent (FTE) basis assuming a 35% tax rate. |
|
(6) |
|
Non-interest expense less amortization of intangibles divided by the sum of FTE net
interest income and non-interest income excluding securities gains/(losses). |
10
Significant Items
Definition of Significant Items
Certain components of the income statement are naturally subject to more volatility than
others. As a result, readers of this report may view such items differently in their assessment of
underlying or core earnings performance compared with their expectations and/or any
implications resulting from them on their assessment of future performance trends.
Therefore, we believe the disclosure of certain Significant Items affecting current and
prior period results aids readers of this report in better understanding corporate performance so
that they can ascertain for themselves what, if any, items they may wish to include or exclude from
their analysis of performance, within the context of determining how that performance differed from
their expectations, as well as how, if at all, to adjust their estimates of future performance
accordingly.
To this end, we have adopted a practice of listing as Significant Items in our external
disclosure documents, including earnings press releases, investor presentations, reports on Forms
10-Q and 10-K, individual and/or particularly volatile items that impact the current period results
by $0.01 per share or more. Our adopted practice methodology is outlined in the MD&A section
appearing in our 2007 Form 10-K.
Significant Items Influencing Financial Performance Comparisons
Earnings comparisons from the beginning of 2007 through the 2008 third quarter were impacted
by a number of significant items summarized below.
|
1. |
|
Sky Financial Acquisition. The merger with Sky Financial was completed on July 1,
2007. The impacts of Sky Financial on the 2008 year-to-date reported results compared with
the 2007 year-to-date reported results are as follows: |
|
|
|
Increased the absolute level of reported average balance sheet, revenue, expense,
and credit quality results (e.g., net charge-offs). |
|
|
|
|
Increased reported non-interest expense items as a result of costs incurred as part
of merger integration and post-merger restructuring activities, most notably employee
retention bonuses, outside programming services related to systems conversions, and
marketing expenses related to customer retention initiatives. These net merger and
restructuring costs were $14.6 million in the 2008 second quarter, $7.3 million in the
2008 first quarter, $44.4 million in the 2007 fourth quarter, $32.3 million in the 2007
third quarter, $7.6 million in the 2007 second quarter, and $0.8 million in the 2007
first quarter. |
|
2. |
|
Franklin Relationship Restructuring. Performance for the 2007 fourth quarter included
a $423.6 million ($0.75 per common share based upon the quarterly average outstanding
diluted common shares) negative impact related to our Franklin relationship acquired in the
Sky Financial acquisition. On December 28, 2007, the loans associated with Franklin were
restructured, resulting in a $405.8 million provision for credit losses and a $17.9 million
reduction of net interest income. The net interest income reduction reflected the
placement of the Franklin loans on nonaccrual status from November 16, 2007, until December
28, 2007. |
|
|
3. |
|
Visaâ Initial Public Offering (IPO). Performance for the 2008 first quarter
included the positive impact of $37.5 million ($0.07 per common share) related to the
Visa® IPO occurring in March of 2008. This impact was comprised of two
components: (a) $25.1 million gain, recorded in other non-interest income, resulting from
the proceeds of the IPO, and (b) $12.4 million partial reversal of the 2007 fourth quarter
accrual of $24.9 million ($0.04 per common share) for indemnification charges against
Visa®, recorded in other non-interest expense. |
|
|
4. |
|
Mortgage Servicing Rights (MSRs) and Related Hedging. Included in total net
market-related losses are net losses or gains from our MSRs and the related hedging.
Additional information regarding MSRs is located under the Market Risk heading of the
Risk Management and Capital section. Net income included the following net impact of MSR
hedging activity (see Table 11): |
11
(in thousands, except per common share)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest |
|
Non-interest |
|
Pretax |
|
Net |
|
Per common |
Period |
|
income |
|
income |
|
income |
|
income |
|
share |
|
|
|
1Q07 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(2,018 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,018 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,312 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.01 |
) |
2Q07 |
|
|
248 |
|
|
|
(4,998 |
) |
|
|
(4,750 |
) |
|
|
(3,088 |
) |
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
3Q07 |
|
|
2,357 |
|
|
|
(6,002 |
) |
|
|
(3,645 |
) |
|
|
(2,369 |
) |
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
4Q07 |
|
|
3,192 |
|
|
|
(11,766 |
) |
|
|
(8,574 |
) |
|
|
(5,573 |
) |
|
|
(0.02 |
) |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
$ |
5,797 |
|
|
$ |
(24,784 |
) |
|
$ |
(18,987 |
) |
|
$ |
(12,342 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.04 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1Q08 |
|
$ |
5,934 |
|
|
$ |
(24,706 |
) |
|
$ |
(18,772 |
) |
|
$ |
(12,202 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.03 |
) |
2Q08 |
|
|
9,364 |
|
|
|
(10,697 |
) |
|
|
(1,333 |
) |
|
|
(866 |
) |
|
|
|
|
3Q08 |
|
|
8,368 |
|
|
|
(6,468 |
) |
|
|
1,900 |
|
|
|
1,235 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 (year-to-date) |
|
$ |
23,666 |
|
|
$ |
(41,871 |
) |
|
$ |
(18,205 |
) |
|
$ |
(11,833 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.03 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective with the 2008 second quarter, we engaged an independent party to provide improved
analytical tools and insight to enhance our strategies with the objective to decrease the
volatility from MSR fair value changes. |
|
|
5. |
|
Other Net Market-Related Gains or Losses. Other net market-related gains or losses
included gains and losses related to the following market-driven activities: gains and
losses from public and private equity investing included in other non-interest income, net
securities gains and losses, net gains and losses from the sale of loans included in other
non-interest income, and the impact from the extinguishment of debt included in other
non-interest expense. Total net market-related losses also include the net impact of MSRs
and related hedging (see item 4 above). Net income included the following impact from
other net market-related losses: |
(in thousands, except per common share)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities |
|
|
|
|
|
Net |
|
Debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
gains/ |
|
Equity |
|
gain / (loss) |
|
extinguish- |
|
Pretax |
|
Net |
|
Per common |
Period |
|
(losses) |
|
investments |
|
on loans sold |
|
ment |
|
income |
|
income |
|
share |
|
|
|
1Q07 |
|
$ |
104 |
|
|
$ |
(8,530 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(8,426 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,477 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.02 |
) |
2Q07 |
|
|
(5,139 |
) |
|
|
2,301 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,090 |
|
|
|
1,252 |
|
|
|
814 |
|
|
|
|
|
3Q07 |
|
|
(13,900 |
) |
|
|
(4,387 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,968 |
|
|
|
(14,319 |
) |
|
|
(9,307 |
) |
|
|
(0.03 |
) |
4Q07 |
|
|
(11,551 |
) |
|
|
(9,393 |
) |
|
|
(34,003 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(54,947 |
) |
|
|
(35,716 |
) |
|
|
(0.09 |
) |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
$ |
(30,486 |
) |
|
$ |
(20,009 |
) |
|
$ |
(34,003 |
) |
|
$ |
8,058 |
|
|
$ |
(76,440 |
) |
|
$ |
(49,686 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.16 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1Q08 |
|
$ |
1,429 |
|
|
$ |
(2,668 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(1,239 |
) |
|
$ |
(805 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
2Q08 |
|
|
2,073 |
|
|
|
(4,609 |
) |
|
|
(5,131 |
) |
|
|
2,177 |
|
|
|
(5,490 |
) |
|
|
(3,569 |
) |
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
3Q08 |
|
|
(73,790 |
) |
|
|
3,399 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,364 |
|
|
|
(49,027 |
) |
|
|
(31,868 |
) |
|
|
(0.08 |
) |
|
|
|
2008 (year-to-date) |
|
$ |
(70,288 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,878 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,131 |
) |
|
$ |
23,541 |
|
|
$ |
(55,756 |
) |
|
$ |
(36,241 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.09 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The 2008 third quarter securities losses total included an OTTI adjustment of $76.6 million
in our Alt-A mortgage loan-backed portfolio (see Investment Portfolio discussion within
the Credit Risk section). |
|
|
6. |
|
Other Significant Items Influencing Earnings Performance Comparisons. In addition to
the items discussed separately in this section, a number of other items impacted financial
results. These included: |
2008 Third Quarter
|
|
|
$3.7 million ($0.01 per common share) increase to provision for income taxes,
representing an increase to the previously established capital loss carry-forward
valuation allowance related to the current quarters decline in value of
Visa®
shares held. |
12
2008 Second Quarter
|
|
|
$3.4 million ($0.01 per common share) benefit to provision for income taxes,
representing a reduction to the previously established capital loss carry-forward
valuation allowance related to the value of Visa®
shares held. |
2008 First Quarter
|
|
|
$11.1 million ($0.03 per common share) benefit to provision for income taxes,
representing a reduction to the previously established capital loss carry-forward
valuation allowance as a result of the 2008 first quarter Visa® IPO. |
|
|
|
$11.0 million ($0.02 per common share) of asset impairment, including (a) $5.9
million venture capital loss included in other non-interest income, (b) $2.6 million
charge off of a receivable included in other non-interest expense, and (c) $2.5 million
write-down of leasehold improvements in our Cleveland main office included in net
occupancy expense. |
2007 Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
$8.9 million ($0.02 per common share) negative impact primarily due to increases to
litigation reserves on existing cases included in other non-interest expense. |
2007 First Quarter
|
|
|
$1.9 million ($0.01 per common share) negative impact primarily due to increases to
litigation reserves on existing cases included in other non-interest expense. |
Table 3 reflects the earnings impact of the above-mentioned significant items for periods affected
by this Results of Operations discussion:
13
Table 3 Significant Items Influencing Earnings Performance Comparison (1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
September 30, 2007 |
(in millions) |
|
After-tax |
|
EPS |
|
After-tax |
|
EPS |
|
After-tax |
|
EPS |
|
Net income reported earnings |
|
$ |
75.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
101.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
138.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share, after tax |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.38 |
|
Change from prior quarter $ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.08 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.10 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.04 |
|
Change from prior quarter % |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(32.0 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(28.6 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change from a year-ago $ |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(0.21 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(0.09 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(0.27 |
) |
Change from a year-ago % |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(55.3 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26.5 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(41.5 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significant items - favorable (unfavorable) impact: |
|
Earnings (2) |
|
EPS |
|
Earnings (2) |
|
EPS |
|
Earnings (2) |
|
EPS |
|
Net market-related losses |
|
$ |
(47.1 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.08 |
) |
|
$ |
(6.8 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.01 |
) |
|
$ |
(18.0 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.03 |
) |
Deferred tax valuation allowance (provision) benefit (3) |
|
|
(3.7 |
) |
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Merger and restructuring costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14.6 |
) |
|
|
(0.03 |
) |
|
|
(32.3 |
) |
|
|
(0.06 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
September 30, 2007 |
(in millions) |
|
After-tax |
|
EPS |
|
After-tax |
|
EPS |
|
Net income reported earnings |
|
$ |
303.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
314.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share, after tax |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.76 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1.12 |
|
Change from a year-ago $ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.36 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.44 |
) |
Change from a year-ago % |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(32.1 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(28.2 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significant items - favorable (unfavorable) impact: |
|
Earnings (2) |
|
EPS |
|
Earnings (2) |
|
EPS |
|
Aggregate impact of Visa® IPO |
|
$ |
37.5 |
|
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Deferred tax valuation allowance benefit (3) |
|
|
10.8 |
|
|
|
0.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net market-related losses |
|
|
(74.0 |
) |
|
|
(0.13 |
) |
|
|
(31.9 |
) |
|
|
(0.07 |
) |
Merger and restructuring costs |
|
|
(21.8 |
) |
|
|
(0.04 |
) |
|
|
(40.7 |
) |
|
|
(0.09 |
) |
Asset impairment |
|
|
(11.0 |
) |
|
|
(0.02 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Litigation losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Refer to the Significant Items section for additional discussion regarding these
items. |
|
(2) |
|
Pre-tax unless otherwise noted. |
|
(3) |
|
After-tax. |
14
Net Interest Income / Average Balance Sheet
(This section should be read in conjunction with Significant Items 1, 2, and 4.)
2008 Third Quarter versus 2007 Third Quarter
Fully taxable equivalent net interest income decreased $21.3 million, or 5%, from the year-ago
quarter. This reflected the unfavorable impact of a 23 basis point decline in the net interest
margin to 3.29%, with 8 basis points of the decline reflecting the 2007 fourth quarter
restructuring of the Franklin credit. The negative impact from the decline in the net interest
margin was partially offset by a $0.8 billion, or 2%, increase in average earning assets. The
increase in average earning assets, reflected growth in average loans and leases, partially offset
by a decline in other earnings assets.
Table 4 details the increases in average loans and leases and average deposits.
Table 4
Average Loans/Leases and Deposits 2008 Third Quarter
vs. 2007 Third Quarter
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third Quarter |
|
Change |
(in thousands) |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Amount |
|
Percent |
Net interest income FTE |
|
$ |
394,087 |
|
|
$ |
415,345 |
|
|
$ |
(21,258 |
) |
|
|
(5.1 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Loans and Deposits
(in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans/Leases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and industrial |
|
$ |
13,629 |
|
|
$ |
13,036 |
|
|
$ |
593 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
% |
Commercial real estate |
|
|
9,816 |
|
|
|
8,980 |
|
|
|
836 |
|
|
|
9.3 |
|
|
|
|
Total commercial |
|
|
23,445 |
|
|
|
22,016 |
|
|
|
1,429 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automobile loans and leases |
|
|
4,624 |
|
|
|
4,354 |
|
|
|
270 |
|
|
|
6.2 |
|
Home equity |
|
|
7,453 |
|
|
|
7,468 |
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
Residential mortgage |
|
|
4,812 |
|
|
|
5,456 |
|
|
|
(644 |
) |
|
|
(11.8 |
) |
Other consumer |
|
|
670 |
|
|
|
534 |
|
|
|
136 |
|
|
|
25.5 |
|
|
|
|
Total consumer |
|
|
17,559 |
|
|
|
17,812 |
|
|
|
(253 |
) |
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
|
|
|
Total loans |
|
$ |
41,004 |
|
|
$ |
39,828 |
|
|
$ |
1,176 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Demand deposits non-interest bearing |
|
$ |
5,080 |
|
|
$ |
5,384 |
|
|
$ |
(304 |
) |
|
|
(5.6 |
)% |
Demand deposits interest bearing |
|
|
4,005 |
|
|
|
3,808 |
|
|
|
197 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
Money market deposits |
|
|
5,860 |
|
|
|
6,869 |
|
|
|
(1,009 |
) |
|
|
(14.7 |
) |
Savings and other domestic time deposits |
|
|
4,911 |
|
|
|
5,127 |
|
|
|
(216 |
) |
|
|
(4.2 |
) |
Core certificates of deposit |
|
|
11,883 |
|
|
|
10,451 |
|
|
|
1,432 |
|
|
|
13.7 |
|
|
|
|
Total core deposits |
|
|
31,739 |
|
|
|
31,639 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
Other deposits |
|
|
6,064 |
|
|
|
6,013 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
|
Total deposits |
|
$ |
37,803 |
|
|
$ |
37,652 |
|
|
$ |
151 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
% |
|
|
|
The $1.2 billion, or 3%, increase in average total loans and leases primarily reflected:
|
|
|
$1.4 billion, or 6%, increase in average total commercial loans, with growth
reflected in both C&I and CRE loans. The $0.8 billion, or 9%, increase in average CRE
loans was primarily to existing borrowers with a focus on traditional income producing
property types and was not related to the single family home builder segment. The $0.6
billion, or 5%, growth in C&I loans reflected a combination of originations to existing
borrowers and originations to new high credit quality customers. We have been able to
attract new relationships that historically dealt exclusively with competitors. These
house account types of relationships are typically the highest quality borrowers and
bring the added benefit of significant new deposit and other non-credit relationships. |
15
Partially offset by:
|
|
|
$0.3 billion, or 1%, decrease in average total consumer loans. This reflected a
$0.6 billion, or 12%, decline in residential mortgages, reflecting loan sales in prior
quarters. Average home equity loans were little changed. Partially offsetting the
decline was a $0.3 billion, or 6%, growth in average automobile loans and leases. The
increase was exclusively in the automobile loan segment, and we are confident in the
underwriting strategies employed that generated the growth as our 2008 originations
have shown lower levels of risk. |
The $0.2 billion increase in average total deposits reflected growth in both average total
core deposits, and to a lesser degree, other deposits. Changes from the year-ago period reflected
the continuation of customers transferring funds from lower rate to higher rate accounts like
certificates of deposits as short-term rates have fallen. Specifically, average core certificates
of deposit increased $1.4 billion, or 14%, whereas average money market deposits and savings and
other domestic time deposits decreased $1.0 billion and $0.2 billion, respectively. Average
interest bearing demand deposits increased $0.2 billion, or 5%, whereas average non-interest
bearing demand deposits declined $0.3 billion, or 6%, again reflecting customer preference for
interest bearing accounts.
2008 Third Quarter versus 2008 Second Quarter
Compared with the 2008 second quarter, fully taxable equivalent net interest income decreased
$1.4 million. This reflected a $0.6 billion, or 1%, decline in average earning assets, as the net
interest margin was unchanged at 3.29%.
Table 5 details the slight decreases in average loans and leases and average deposits.
Table 5 Average Loans/Leases and Deposits 2008 Third Quarter vs. 2008 Second Quarter
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
Change |
(in thousands) |
|
Third Quarter |
|
Second Quarter |
|
Amount |
|
Percent |
Net interest income FTE |
|
$ |
394,087 |
|
|
$ |
395,490 |
|
|
$ |
(1,403 |
) |
|
|
(0.4 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Loans and Deposits
(in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans/Leases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and industrial |
|
$ |
13,629 |
|
|
$ |
13,631 |
|
|
$ |
(2 |
) |
|
|
(0.0 |
)% |
Commercial real estate |
|
|
9,816 |
|
|
|
9,601 |
|
|
|
215 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
|
Total commercial |
|
|
23,445 |
|
|
|
23,232 |
|
|
|
213 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automobile loans and leases |
|
|
4,624 |
|
|
|
4,551 |
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
Home equity |
|
|
7,453 |
|
|
|
7,365 |
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
Residential mortgage |
|
|
4,812 |
|
|
|
5,178 |
|
|
|
(366 |
) |
|
|
(7.1 |
) |
Other consumer |
|
|
670 |
|
|
|
699 |
|
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
|
(4.1 |
) |
|
|
|
Total consumer |
|
|
17,559 |
|
|
|
17,793 |
|
|
|
(234 |
) |
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
|
|
|
Total loans |
|
$ |
41,004 |
|
|
$ |
41,025 |
|
|
$ |
(21 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Demand deposits non-interest bearing |
|
$ |
5,080 |
|
|
$ |
5,061 |
|
|
$ |
19 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
% |
Demand deposits interest bearing |
|
|
4,005 |
|
|
|
4,086 |
|
|
|
(81 |
) |
|
|
(2.0 |
) |
Money market deposits |
|
|
5,860 |
|
|
|
6,267 |
|
|
|
(407 |
) |
|
|
(6.5 |
) |
Savings and other domestic time deposits |
|
|
4,911 |
|
|
|
5,047 |
|
|
|
(136 |
) |
|
|
(2.7 |
) |
Core certificates of deposit |
|
|
11,883 |
|
|
|
10,950 |
|
|
|
933 |
|
|
|
8.5 |
|
|
|
|
Total core deposits |
|
|
31,739 |
|
|
|
31,411 |
|
|
|
328 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
Other deposits |
|
|
6,064 |
|
|
|
6,616 |
|
|
|
(552 |
) |
|
|
(8.3 |
) |
|
|
|
Total deposits |
|
$ |
37,803 |
|
|
$ |
38,027 |
|
|
$ |
(224 |
) |
|
|
(0.6 |
)% |
|
|
|
16
Average total loans and leases were essentially unchanged between quarters. However, average
total commercial loans increased 1%, reflecting 2% growth in CRE loans, as total average C&I loans
were little changed. The current quarters CRE growth was comprised primarily of new or increased
loan facilities to existing borrowers. This growth was not associated with the single family home
builder segment as exposure to this segment declined during the quarter. Average total consumer
loans decreased $0.2 billion, or 1%, reflecting a $0.4 billion, or 7%, decline in average
residential mortgages
due to a full quarters impact of $473 million of the residential mortgages sold in the prior
quarter. Average automobile loans and leases increased 2%, with average home equity loans
increasing 1%. We remain very comfortable with our origination strategies in the consumer
segments, and are confident that we are continuing to lend to high quality borrowers.
Average total deposits were $37.8 billion, down $0.2 billion, or 1%, from the prior quarter
and reflected:
|
|
|
$0.6 billion, or 8%, decrease in average non-core deposits, primarily reflecting
a decline in brokered deposits. |
Partially offset by:
|
|
|
$0.3 billion, or 1%, increase in average total core deposits. The primary driver
of the change was growth in higher rate core certificates of deposit, partially
offset by a decline in lower rate money market accounts. |
Tables 6 and 7 reflect quarterly average balance sheets and rates earned and paid on
interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities.
17
Table 6 Consolidated Quarterly Average Balance Sheets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Balances |
|
|
Change |
Fully taxable equivalent basis |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
|
3Q08 vs 3Q07 |
(in millions) |
|
Third |
|
Second |
|
First |
|
Fourth |
|
Third |
|
|
Amount |
|
Percent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest bearing deposits in banks |
|
$ |
321 |
|
|
$ |
256 |
|
|
$ |
293 |
|
|
$ |
324 |
|
|
$ |
292 |
|
|
|
$ |
29 |
|
|
|
9.9 |
% |
Trading account securities |
|
|
992 |
|
|
|
1,243 |
|
|
|
1,186 |
|
|
|
1,122 |
|
|
|
1,149 |
|
|
|
|
(157 |
) |
|
|
(13.7 |
) |
Federal funds sold and securities purchased
under resale agreements |
|
|
363 |
|
|
|
566 |
|
|
|
769 |
|
|
|
730 |
|
|
|
557 |
|
|
|
|
(194 |
) |
|
|
(34.8 |
) |
Loans held for sale |
|
|
274 |
|
|
|
501 |
|
|
|
565 |
|
|
|
493 |
|
|
|
419 |
|
|
|
|
(145 |
) |
|
|
(34.6 |
) |
Investment securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable |
|
|
3,975 |
|
|
|
3,971 |
|
|
|
3,774 |
|
|
|
3,807 |
|
|
|
3,951 |
|
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
Tax-exempt |
|
|
712 |
|
|
|
717 |
|
|
|
703 |
|
|
|
689 |
|
|
|
675 |
|
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment securities |
|
|
4,687 |
|
|
|
4,688 |
|
|
|
4,477 |
|
|
|
4,496 |
|
|
|
4,626 |
|
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
Loans and leases: (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and industrial |
|
|
13,629 |
|
|
|
13,631 |
|
|
|
13,343 |
|
|
|
13,270 |
|
|
|
13,036 |
|
|
|
|
593 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
Commercial real estate: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction |
|
|
2,090 |
|
|
|
2,038 |
|
|
|
2,014 |
|
|
|
1,892 |
|
|
|
1,815 |
|
|
|
|
275 |
|
|
|
15.2 |
|
Commercial |
|
|
7,726 |
|
|
|
7,563 |
|
|
|
7,273 |
|
|
|
7,161 |
|
|
|
7,165 |
|
|
|
|
561 |
|
|
|
7.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate |
|
|
9,816 |
|
|
|
9,601 |
|
|
|
9,287 |
|
|
|
9,053 |
|
|
|
8,980 |
|
|
|
|
836 |
|
|
|
9.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial |
|
|
23,445 |
|
|
|
23,232 |
|
|
|
22,630 |
|
|
|
22,323 |
|
|
|
22,016 |
|
|
|
|
1,429 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automobile loans |
|
|
3,856 |
|
|
|
3,636 |
|
|
|
3,309 |
|
|
|
3,052 |
|
|
|
2,931 |
|
|
|
|
925 |
|
|
|
31.6 |
|
Automobile leases |
|
|
768 |
|
|
|
915 |
|
|
|
1,090 |
|
|
|
1,272 |
|
|
|
1,423 |
|
|
|
|
(655 |
) |
|
|
(46.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automobile loans and leases |
|
|
4,624 |
|
|
|
4,551 |
|
|
|
4,399 |
|
|
|
4,324 |
|
|
|
4,354 |
|
|
|
|
270 |
|
|
|
6.2 |
|
Home equity |
|
|
7,453 |
|
|
|
7,365 |
|
|
|
7,274 |
|
|
|
7,297 |
|
|
|
7,468 |
|
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
Residential mortgage |
|
|
4,812 |
|
|
|
5,178 |
|
|
|
5,351 |
|
|
|
5,437 |
|
|
|
5,456 |
|
|
|
|
(644 |
) |
|
|
(11.8 |
) |
Other loans |
|
|
670 |
|
|
|
699 |
|
|
|
713 |
|
|
|
728 |
|
|
|
534 |
|
|
|
|
136 |
|
|
|
25.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consumer |
|
|
17,559 |
|
|
|
17,793 |
|
|
|
17,737 |
|
|
|
17,786 |
|
|
|
17,812 |
|
|
|
|
(253 |
) |
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans and leases |
|
|
41,004 |
|
|
|
41,025 |
|
|
|
40,367 |
|
|
|
40,109 |
|
|
|
39,828 |
|
|
|
|
1,176 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses |
|
|
(731 |
) |
|
|
(654 |
) |
|
|
(630 |
) |
|
|
(474 |
) |
|
|
(475 |
) |
|
|
|
(256 |
) |
|
|
(53.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loans and leases |
|
|
40,273 |
|
|
|
40,371 |
|
|
|
39,737 |
|
|
|
39,635 |
|
|
|
39,353 |
|
|
|
|
920 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total earning assets |
|
|
47,641 |
|
|
|
48,279 |
|
|
|
47,657 |
|
|
|
47,274 |
|
|
|
46,871 |
|
|
|
|
770 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
|
925 |
|
|
|
943 |
|
|
|
1,036 |
|
|
|
1,098 |
|
|
|
1,111 |
|
|
|
|
(186 |
) |
|
|
(16.7 |
) |
Intangible assets |
|
|
3,441 |
|
|
|
3,449 |
|
|
|
3,472 |
|
|
|
3,440 |
|
|
|
3,337 |
|
|
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
All other assets |
|
|
3,384 |
|
|
|
3,522 |
|
|
|
3,350 |
|
|
|
3,142 |
|
|
|
3,124 |
|
|
|
|
260 |
|
|
|
8.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
54,660 |
|
|
$ |
55,539 |
|
|
$ |
54,885 |
|
|
$ |
54,480 |
|
|
$ |
53,968 |
|
|
|
$ |
692 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Shareholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Demand deposits non-interest bearing |
|
$ |
5,080 |
|
|
$ |
5,061 |
|
|
$ |
5,034 |
|
|
$ |
5,218 |
|
|
$ |
5,384 |
|
|
|
$ |
(304 |
) |
|
|
(5.6 |
)% |
Demand deposits interest bearing |
|
|
4,005 |
|
|
|
4,086 |
|
|
|
3,934 |
|
|
|
3,929 |
|
|
|
3,808 |
|
|
|
|
197 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
Money market deposits |
|
|
5,860 |
|
|
|
6,267 |
|
|
|
6,753 |
|
|
|
6,845 |
|
|
|
6,869 |
|
|
|
|
(1,009 |
) |
|
|
(14.7 |
) |
Savings and other domestic deposits |
|
|
4,911 |
|
|
|
5,047 |
|
|
|
5,004 |
|
|
|
5,012 |
|
|
|
5,127 |
|
|
|
|
(216 |
) |
|
|
(4.2 |
) |
Core certificates of deposit |
|
|
11,883 |
|
|
|
10,950 |
|
|
|
10,790 |
|
|
|
10,666 |
|
|
|
10,451 |
|
|
|
|
1,432 |
|
|
|
13.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total core deposits |
|
|
31,739 |
|
|
|
31,411 |
|
|
|
31,515 |
|
|
|
31,670 |
|
|
|
31,639 |
|
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
Other domestic deposits of $100,000 or more |
|
|
1,991 |
|
|
|
2,145 |
|
|
|
1,989 |
|
|
|
1,739 |
|
|
|
1,584 |
|
|
|
|
407 |
|
|
|
25.7 |
|
Brokered deposits and negotiable CDs |
|
|
3,025 |
|
|
|
3,361 |
|
|
|
3,542 |
|
|
|
3,518 |
|
|
|
3,728 |
|
|
|
|
(703 |
) |
|
|
(18.9 |
) |
Deposits in foreign offices |
|
|
1,048 |
|
|
|
1,110 |
|
|
|
885 |
|
|
|
748 |
|
|
|
701 |
|
|
|
|
347 |
|
|
|
49.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits |
|
|
37,803 |
|
|
|
38,027 |
|
|
|
37,931 |
|
|
|
37,675 |
|
|
|
37,652 |
|
|
|
|
151 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
Short-term borrowings |
|
|
2,131 |
|
|
|
2,854 |
|
|
|
2,772 |
|
|
|
2,489 |
|
|
|
2,542 |
|
|
|
|
(411 |
) |
|
|
(16.2 |
) |
Federal Home Loan Bank advances |
|
|
3,139 |
|
|
|
3,412 |
|
|
|
3,389 |
|
|
|
3,070 |
|
|
|
2,553 |
|
|
|
|
586 |
|
|
|
23.0 |
|
Subordinated notes and other long-term debt |
|
|
4,382 |
|
|
|
3,928 |
|
|
|
3,814 |
|
|
|
3,875 |
|
|
|
3,912 |
|
|
|
|
470 |
|
|
|
12.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest bearing liabilities |
|
|
42,375 |
|
|
|
43,160 |
|
|
|
42,872 |
|
|
|
41,891 |
|
|
|
41,275 |
|
|
|
|
1,100 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All other liabilities |
|
|
884 |
|
|
|
963 |
|
|
|
1,104 |
|
|
|
1,160 |
|
|
|
1,103 |
|
|
|
|
(219 |
) |
|
|
(19.9 |
) |
Shareholders equity |
|
|
6,321 |
|
|
|
6,355 |
|
|
|
5,875 |
|
|
|
6,211 |
|
|
|
6,206 |
|
|
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities and Shareholders Equity |
|
$ |
54,660 |
|
|
$ |
55,539 |
|
|
$ |
54,885 |
|
|
$ |
54,480 |
|
|
$ |
53,968 |
|
|
|
$ |
692 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
For purposes of this analysis, non-accrual loans are reflected in the average balances of loans. |
18
Table 7 Consolidated Quarterly Net Interest Margin Analysis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Rates (2) |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
Fully taxable equivalent basis (1) |
|
Third |
|
Second |
|
First |
|
Fourth |
|
Third |
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest bearing deposits in banks |
|
|
2.17 |
% |
|
|
2.77 |
% |
|
|
3.97 |
% |
|
|
4.30 |
% |
|
|
4.69 |
% |
Trading account securities |
|
|
5.45 |
|
|
|
5.13 |
|
|
|
5.27 |
|
|
|
5.72 |
|
|
|
6.01 |
|
Federal funds sold and securities purchased
under resale agreements |
|
|
2.02 |
|
|
|
2.08 |
|
|
|
3.07 |
|
|
|
4.59 |
|
|
|
5.26 |
|
Loans held for sale |
|
|
6.54 |
|
|
|
5.98 |
|
|
|
5.41 |
|
|
|
5.86 |
|
|
|
5.13 |
|
Investment securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable |
|
|
5.54 |
|
|
|
5.50 |
|
|
|
5.71 |
|
|
|
5.98 |
|
|
|
6.09 |
|
Tax-exempt |
|
|
6.80 |
|
|
|
6.77 |
|
|
|
6.75 |
|
|
|
6.74 |
|
|
|
6.78 |
|
|
|
|
Total investment securities |
|
|
5.73 |
|
|
|
5.69 |
|
|
|
5.88 |
|
|
|
6.10 |
|
|
|
6.19 |
|
Loans and leases: (3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and industrial |
|
|
5.46 |
|
|
|
5.53 |
|
|
|
6.32 |
|
|
|
6.92 |
|
|
|
7.70 |
|
Commercial real estate: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction |
|
|
4.69 |
|
|
|
4.81 |
|
|
|
5.86 |
|
|
|
7.24 |
|
|
|
7.70 |
|
Commercial |
|
|
5.33 |
|
|
|
5.47 |
|
|
|
6.27 |
|
|
|
7.09 |
|
|
|
7.63 |
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate |
|
|
5.19 |
|
|
|
5.32 |
|
|
|
6.18 |
|
|
|
7.12 |
|
|
|
7.65 |
|
|
|
|
Total commercial |
|
|
5.35 |
|
|
|
5.45 |
|
|
|
6.27 |
|
|
|
7.00 |
|
|
|
7.68 |
|
|
|
|
Consumer: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automobile loans |
|
|
7.13 |
|
|
|
7.12 |
|
|
|
7.25 |
|
|
|
7.31 |
|
|
|
7.25 |
|
Automobile leases |
|
|
5.70 |
|
|
|
5.59 |
|
|
|
5.53 |
|
|
|
5.52 |
|
|
|
5.56 |
|
|
|
|
Automobile loans and leases |
|
|
6.89 |
|
|
|
6.81 |
|
|
|
6.82 |
|
|
|
6.78 |
|
|
|
6.70 |
|
Home equity |
|
|
6.19 |
|
|
|
6.43 |
|
|
|
7.21 |
|
|
|
7.81 |
|
|
|
7.94 |
|
Residential mortgage |
|
|
5.83 |
|
|
|
5.78 |
|
|
|
5.86 |
|
|
|
5.88 |
|
|
|
6.06 |
|
Other loans |
|
|
9.71 |
|
|
|
9.98 |
|
|
|
10.43 |
|
|
|
10.91 |
|
|
|
11.48 |
|
|
|
|
Total consumer |
|
|
6.41 |
|
|
|
6.48 |
|
|
|
6.84 |
|
|
|
7.10 |
|
|
|
7.17 |
|
|
|
|
Total loans and leases |
|
|
5.80 |
|
|
|
5.89 |
|
|
|
6.51 |
|
|
|
7.05 |
|
|
|
7.45 |
|
|
|
|
Total earning assets |
|
|
5.77 |
% |
|
|
5.85 |
% |
|
|
6.40 |
% |
|
|
6.88 |
% |
|
|
7.25 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Shareholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Demand deposits non-interest bearing |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
% |
Demand deposits interest bearing |
|
|
0.51 |
|
|
|
0.55 |
|
|
|
0.82 |
|
|
|
1.14 |
|
|
|
1.53 |
|
Money market deposits |
|
|
1.66 |
|
|
|
1.76 |
|
|
|
2.83 |
|
|
|
3.67 |
|
|
|
3.78 |
|
Savings and other domestic deposits |
|
|
1.74 |
|
|
|
1.83 |
|
|
|
2.27 |
|
|
|
2.54 |
|
|
|
2.54 |
|
Core certificates of deposit |
|
|
4.05 |
|
|
|
4.37 |
|
|
|
4.68 |
|
|
|
4.83 |
|
|
|
4.98 |
|
|
|
|
Total core deposits |
|
|
2.57 |
|
|
|
2.67 |
|
|
|
3.18 |
|
|
|
3.55 |
|
|
|
3.69 |
|
Other domestic deposits of $100,000 or more |
|
|
3.47 |
|
|
|
3.77 |
|
|
|
4.38 |
|
|
|
5.00 |
|
|
|
4.89 |
|
Brokered deposits and negotiable CDs |
|
|
3.37 |
|
|
|
3.38 |
|
|
|
4.43 |
|
|
|
5.24 |
|
|
|
5.42 |
|
Deposits in foreign offices |
|
|
1.49 |
|
|
|
1.66 |
|
|
|
2.16 |
|
|
|
3.27 |
|
|
|
3.29 |
|
|
|
|
Total deposits |
|
|
2.66 |
|
|
|
2.78 |
|
|
|
3.36 |
|
|
|
3.80 |
|
|
|
3.94 |
|
Short-term borrowings |
|
|
1.42 |
|
|
|
1.66 |
|
|
|
2.78 |
|
|
|
3.74 |
|
|
|
4.10 |
|
Federal Home Loan Bank advances |
|
|
2.92 |
|
|
|
3.01 |
|
|
|
3.94 |
|
|
|
5.03 |
|
|
|
5.31 |
|
Subordinated notes and other long-term debt |
|
|
4.29 |
|
|
|
4.21 |
|
|
|
5.12 |
|
|
|
5.93 |
|
|
|
6.15 |
|
|
|
|
Total interest bearing liabilities |
|
|
2.79 |
% |
|
|
2.85 |
% |
|
|
3.53 |
% |
|
|
4.09 |
% |
|
|
4.24 |
% |
|
|
|
Net interest rate spread |
|
|
2.98 |
% |
|
|
3.00 |
% |
|
|
2.87 |
% |
|
|
2.79 |
% |
|
|
3.01 |
% |
Impact of non-interest bearing funds on margin |
|
|
0.31 |
|
|
|
0.29 |
|
|
|
0.36 |
|
|
|
0.47 |
|
|
|
0.51 |
|
|
|
|
Net interest margin |
|
|
3.29 |
% |
|
|
3.29 |
% |
|
|
3.23 |
% |
|
|
3.26 |
% |
|
|
3.52 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Fully taxable equivalent (FTE) yields are calculated assuming a 35% tax rate. See
Table 1 for the FTE adjustment. |
|
(2) |
|
Loan, lease, and deposit average rates include impact of applicable derivatives and
non-deferrable fees. |
|
(3) |
|
For purposes of this analysis, non-accrual loans are reflected in the average
balances of loans. |
19
2008 First Nine Months versus 2007 First Nine Months
Fully taxable equivalent net interest income increased $239.4 million, or 26%, from the first
nine-month period of 2007. This reflected the favorable impact of an $11.2 billion, or 31%,
increase in average earning assets. The increase in average earning assets, with $9.9 billion
representing an increase in average loans and leases, was partially offset by a 13 basis point
decline in the net interest margin to 3.27%. The increase in average earning assets, including
loans and leases, was primarily Sky Financial merger-related.
Table 8 details the estimated merger-related impacts to our average loans and leases and
average deposits.
Table 8 Average Loans/Leases and Deposits Estimated Merger Related Impacts 2008 First Nine
Months vs. 2007 First Nine Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Merger |
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Related |
|
|
Non-merger Related |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Percent (1) |
|
Net interest income FTE |
|
$ |
1,171,903 |
|
|
$ |
932,463 |
|
|
$ |
239,440 |
|
|
|
25.7 |
% |
|
$ |
303,184 |
|
|
$ |
(63,744 |
) |
|
|
(5.2 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Loans and Deposits
(in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and industrial |
|
$ |
13,535 |
|
|
$ |
9,748 |
|
|
$ |
3,787 |
|
|
|
38.8 |
% |
|
$ |
3,183 |
|
|
$ |
604 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
% |
Commercial real estate |
|
|
9,568 |
|
|
|
6,051 |
|
|
|
3,517 |
|
|
|
58.1 |
|
|
|
2,647 |
|
|
|
870 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial |
|
|
23,103 |
|
|
|
15,799 |
|
|
|
7,304 |
|
|
|
46 |
% |
|
|
5,830 |
|
|
|
1,474 |
|
|
|
6.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automobile loans and leases |
|
|
4,525 |
|
|
|
4,048 |
|
|
|
477 |
|
|
|
11.8 |
% |
|
|
288 |
|
|
|
189 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
Home equity |
|
|
7,364 |
|
|
|
5,794 |
|
|
|
1,570 |
|
|
|
27.1 |
|
|
|
1,590 |
|
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
Residential mortgage |
|
|
5,113 |
|
|
|
4,771 |
|
|
|
342 |
|
|
|
7.2 |
|
|
|
741 |
|
|
|
(399 |
) |
|
|
(7.2 |
) |
Other consumer |
|
|
695 |
|
|
|
461 |
|
|
|
234 |
|
|
|
50.8 |
|
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
139 |
|
|
|
25.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consumer |
|
|
17,697 |
|
|
|
15,074 |
|
|
|
2,623 |
|
|
|
17.4 |
|
|
|
2,714 |
|
|
|
(91 |
) |
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans |
|
$ |
40,800 |
|
|
$ |
30,873 |
|
|
$ |
9,927 |
|
|
|
32.2 |
% |
|
$ |
8,544 |
|
|
$ |
1,383 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Demand deposits non-interest bearing |
|
$ |
5,058 |
|
|
$ |
4,175 |
|
|
$ |
883 |
|
|
|
21.1 |
% |
|
$ |
1,219 |
|
|
$ |
(336 |
) |
|
|
(6.2 |
)% |
Demand deposits interest bearing |
|
|
4,008 |
|
|
|
2,859 |
|
|
|
1,149 |
|
|
|
40.2 |
|
|
|
973 |
|
|
|
176 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
Money market deposits |
|
|
6,292 |
|
|
|
5,946 |
|
|
|
346 |
|
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
|
664 |
|
|
|
(318 |
) |
|
|
(4.8 |
) |
Savings and other domestic time deposits |
|
|
4,987 |
|
|
|
3,660 |
|
|
|
1,327 |
|
|
|
36.3 |
|
|
|
1,729 |
|
|
|
(402 |
) |
|
|
(7.5 |
) |
Core certificates of deposit |
|
|
11,210 |
|
|
|
7,183 |
|
|
|
4,027 |
|
|
|
56.1 |
|
|
|
3,087 |
|
|
|
940 |
|
|
|
9.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total core deposits |
|
|
31,555 |
|
|
|
23,823 |
|
|
|
7,732 |
|
|
|
32.5 |
|
|
|
7,672 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
Other deposits |
|
|
6,366 |
|
|
|
5,017 |
|
|
|
1,349 |
|
|
|
26.9 |
|
|
|
895 |
|
|
|
454 |
|
|
|
7.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits |
|
$ |
37,921 |
|
|
$ |
28,840 |
|
|
$ |
9,081 |
|
|
|
31.5 |
% |
|
$ |
8,567 |
|
|
$ |
514 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Calculated as non-merger related / (prior period + merger-related) |
The $1.4 billion, or 4%, non-merger-related increase in average total loans and leases
primarily reflected:
|
|
|
$1.5 billion, or 7%, growth in average total commercial loans, with growth reflected
in both the C&I and CRE portfolios. The growth in CRE loans was primarily to existing
borrowers with a focus on traditional income producing property types and was not
related to the single family home builder segment. The growth in C&I loans reflected a
combination of originations to existing borrowers and originations to new high quality
borrowers. |
Partially offset by:
|
|
|
$0.1 billion, or 1%, decline in total average consumer loans reflecting a $0.4
billion, or 7%, decline in residential mortgages, due to loan sales. This decrease was
partially offset by a $0.2 billion, or 4%, increase in average automobile loans and
leases reflecting higher automobile loan originations. |
20
The $0.5 billion, or 1%, non-merger-related increase in average total deposits reflected a
$0.5 billion, or 8%, growth in other deposits. These deposits were primarily other domestic time
deposits of $100,000 or more reflecting increases in commercial and public fund deposits. Changes
from the comparable year-ago period also reflected customers transferring funds from lower rate to
higher rate accounts like certificates of deposit as short-term rates had fallen.
21
Table 9 Consolidated YTD Average Balance Sheets and Net Interest Margin Analysis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
YTD Average Balances |
|
|
|
|
|
YTD Average Rates (2) |
Fully taxable equivalent basis (1) |
|
Nine Months Ended Sept 30, |
|
Change |
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
(in millions of dollars) |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Amount |
|
Percent |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest bearing deposits in banks |
|
$ |
290 |
|
|
$ |
187 |
|
|
$ |
103 |
|
|
|
55.1 |
% |
|
|
2.96 |
% |
|
|
4.93 |
% |
Trading account securities |
|
|
1,139 |
|
|
|
480 |
|
|
|
659 |
|
|
|
N.M. |
|
|
|
5.26 |
|
|
|
5.94 |
|
Federal funds sold and securities purchased
under resale agreements |
|
|
565 |
|
|
|
545 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
2.52 |
|
|
|
5.26 |
|
Loans held for sale |
|
|
446 |
|
|
|
318 |
|
|
|
128 |
|
|
|
40.3 |
|
|
|
5.86 |
|
|
|
5.61 |
|
Investment securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable |
|
|
3,907 |
|
|
|
3,601 |
|
|
|
306 |
|
|
|
8.5 |
|
|
|
5.58 |
|
|
|
6.11 |
|
Tax-exempt |
|
|
711 |
|
|
|
632 |
|
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
12.5 |
|
|
|
6.77 |
|
|
|
6.71 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment securities |
|
|
4,618 |
|
|
|
4,233 |
|
|
|
385 |
|
|
|
9.1 |
|
|
|
5.76 |
|
|
|
6.20 |
|
Loans and leases: (3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and industrial |
|
|
13,535 |
|
|
|
9,748 |
|
|
|
3,787 |
|
|
|
38.8 |
|
|
|
5.79 |
|
|
|
7.52 |
|
Commercial real estate: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction |
|
|
2,047 |
|
|
|
1,412 |
|
|
|
635 |
|
|
|
45.0 |
|
|
|
5.14 |
|
|
|
7.88 |
|
Commercial |
|
|
7,521 |
|
|
|
4,639 |
|
|
|
2,882 |
|
|
|
62.1 |
|
|
|
5.68 |
|
|
|
7.56 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate |
|
|
9,568 |
|
|
|
6,051 |
|
|
|
3,517 |
|
|
|
58.1 |
|
|
|
5.56 |
|
|
|
7.64 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial |
|
|
23,103 |
|
|
|
15,799 |
|
|
|
7,304 |
|
|
|
46.2 |
|
|
|
5.68 |
|
|
|
7.57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automobile loans |
|
|
3,601 |
|
|
|
2,492 |
|
|
|
1,109 |
|
|
|
44.5 |
|
|
|
7.16 |
|
|
|
7.11 |
|
Automobile leases |
|
|
924 |
|
|
|
1,556 |
|
|
|
(632 |
) |
|
|
(40.6 |
) |
|
|
5.60 |
|
|
|
5.38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automobile loans and leases |
|
|
4,525 |
|
|
|
4,048 |
|
|
|
477 |
|
|
|
11.8 |
|
|
|
6.85 |
|
|
|
6.44 |
|
Home equity |
|
|
7,364 |
|
|
|
5,794 |
|
|
|
1,570 |
|
|
|
27.1 |
|
|
|
6.60 |
|
|
|
7.72 |
|
Residential mortgage |
|
|
5,113 |
|
|
|
4,771 |
|
|
|
342 |
|
|
|
7.2 |
|
|
|
5.83 |
|
|
|
5.76 |
|
Other loans |
|
|
695 |
|
|
|
461 |
|
|
|
234 |
|
|
|
50.8 |
|
|
|
10.05 |
|
|
|
10.88 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consumer |
|
|
17,697 |
|
|
|
15,074 |
|
|
|
2,623 |
|
|
|
17.4 |
|
|
|
6.58 |
|
|
|
6.85 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans and leases |
|
|
40,800 |
|
|
|
30,873 |
|
|
|
9,927 |
|
|
|
32.2 |
|
|
|
6.08 |
|
|
|
7.22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses |
|
|
(672 |
) |
|
|
(351 |
) |
|
|
(321 |
) |
|
|
91.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loans and leases |
|
|
40,128 |
|
|
|
30,522 |
|
|
|
9,606 |
|
|
|
31.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total earning assets |
|
|
47,858 |
|
|
|
36,636 |
|
|
|
11,222 |
|
|
|
30.6 |
|
|
|
6.01 |
% |
|
|
7.08 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
|
968 |
|
|
|
925 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets |
|
|
3,454 |
|
|
|
1,540 |
|
|
|
1,914 |
|
|
|
N.M. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All other assets |
|
|
3,419 |
|
|
|
2,670 |
|
|
|
749 |
|
|
|
28.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
55,027 |
|
|
$ |
41,420 |
|
|
$ |
13,607 |
|
|
|
32.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Shareholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Demand deposits non-interest bearing |
|
$ |
5,058 |
|
|
$ |
4,175 |
|
|
$ |
883 |
|
|
|
21.1 |
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
% |
Demand deposits interest bearing |
|
|
4,008 |
|
|
|
2,859 |
|
|
|
1,149 |
|
|
|
40.2 |
|
|
|
0.62 |
|
|
|
1.36 |
|
Money market deposits |
|
|
6,292 |
|
|
|
5,946 |
|
|
|
346 |
|
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
|
2.11 |
|
|
|
4.00 |
|
Savings and other domestic time deposits |
|
|
4,987 |
|
|
|
3,660 |
|
|
|
1,327 |
|
|
|
36.3 |
|
|
|
1.95 |
|
|
|
2.02 |
|
Core certificates of deposit |
|
|
11,210 |
|
|
|
7,183 |
|
|
|
4,027 |
|
|
|
56.1 |
|
|
|
4.36 |
|
|
|
4.86 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total core deposits |
|
|
31,555 |
|
|
|
23,823 |
|
|
|
7,732 |
|
|
|
32.5 |
|
|
|
2.80 |
|
|
|
3.56 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other domestic time deposits of $100,000 or more |
|
|
2,042 |
|
|
|
1,266 |
|
|
|
776 |
|
|
|
61.3 |
|
|
|
3.87 |
|
|
|
5.14 |
|
Brokered deposits and negotiable CDs |
|
|
3,309 |
|
|
|
3,146 |
|
|
|
163 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
|
|
3.75 |
|
|
|
5.48 |
|
Deposits in foreign offices |
|
|
1,015 |
|
|
|
605 |
|
|
|
410 |
|
|
|
67.8 |
|
|
|
1.75 |
|
|
|
3.16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits |
|
|
37,921 |
|
|
|
28,840 |
|
|
|
9,081 |
|
|
|
31.5 |
|
|
|
2.93 |
|
|
|
3.88 |
|
Short-term borrowings |
|
|
2,584 |
|
|
|
2,163 |
|
|
|
421 |
|
|
|
19.5 |
|
|
|
1.99 |
|
|
|
4.29 |
|
Federal Home Loan Bank advances |
|
|
3,312 |
|
|
|
1,675 |
|
|
|
1,637 |
|
|
|
97.7 |
|
|
|
3.30 |
|
|
|
4.97 |
|
Subordinated notes and other long-term debt |
|
|
4,043 |
|
|
|
3,624 |
|
|
|
419 |
|
|
|
11.6 |
|
|
|
4.52 |
|
|
|
5.96 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest bearing liabilities |
|
|
42,802 |
|
|
|
32,127 |
|
|
|
10,675 |
|
|
|
33.2 |
|
|
|
3.05 |
|
|
|
4.20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All other liabilities |
|
|
983 |
|
|
|
1,018 |
|
|
|
(35 |
) |
|
|
(3.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity |
|
|
6,184 |
|
|
|
4,100 |
|
|
|
2,084 |
|
|
|
50.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities and Shareholders Equity |
|
$ |
55,027 |
|
|
$ |
41,420 |
|
|
$ |
13,607 |
|
|
|
32.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest rate spread |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.96 |
|
|
|
2.88 |
|
Impact of non-interest bearing funds on margin |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.31 |
|
|
|
0.52 |
|
|
| |
| |
| | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest margin |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.27 |
% |
|
|
3.40 |
% |
|
| | | |
| | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N.M., not a meaningful value. |
|
(1) |
|
Fully taxable equivalent (FTE) yields are calculated assuming a 35% tax rate. |
|
(2) |
|
Loan and lease and deposit average rates include impact of applicable derivatives and non-deferrable fees. |
|
(3) |
|
For purposes of this analysis, non-accrual loans are reflected in the average balances of loans. |
22
Provision for Credit Losses
(This section should be read in conjunction with Significant Item 2 and the Credit Risk section.)
The provision for credit losses is the expense necessary to maintain the allowance for loan
and lease losses (ALLL) and the allowance for unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit
(AULC) at levels adequate to absorb our estimate of probable inherent credit losses in the loan and
lease portfolio and the portfolio of unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit.
The provision for credit losses in the 2008 third quarter was $125.4 million, up $4.6 million
from the prior quarter, and exceeded net charge-offs by $41.6 million. The provision for credit
losses in the current quarter was $83.4 million higher than in the year-ago quarter. The provision
for credit losses in the first nine-month period of 2008 was $334.9 million, an increase of $203.3
million from $131.5 million in the comparable year-ago period. The reported provision for credit
losses for the first nine-month period of 2008 exceeded net charge-offs by $137.4 million (see
Credit Quality discussion).
Non-Interest Income
(This section should be read in conjunction with Significant Items 1, 3, 4, 5, and 6.)
Table 10 reflects non-interest income for each of the past five quarters:
Table 10 Non-Interest Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
(in thousands) |
|
Third |
|
Second |
|
First |
|
Fourth |
|
Third |
|
|
|
Service charges on deposit accounts |
|
$ |
80,508 |
|
|
$ |
79,630 |
|
|
$ |
72,668 |
|
|
$ |
81,276 |
|
|
$ |
78,107 |
|
Trust services |
|
|
30,952 |
|
|
|
33,089 |
|
|
|
34,128 |
|
|
|
35,198 |
|
|
|
33,562 |
|
Brokerage and insurance income |
|
|
34,309 |
|
|
|
35,694 |
|
|
|
36,560 |
|
|
|
30,288 |
|
|
|
28,806 |
|
Other service charges and fees |
|
|
23,446 |
|
|
|
23,242 |
|
|
|
20,741 |
|
|
|
21,891 |
|
|
|
21,045 |
|
Bank owned life insurance income |
|
|
13,318 |
|
|
|
14,131 |
|
|
|
13,750 |
|
|
|
13,253 |
|
|
|
14,847 |
|
Mortgage banking income (loss) |
|
|
10,302 |
|
|
|
12,502 |
|
|
|
(7,063 |
) |
|
|
3,702 |
|
|
|
9,629 |
|
Securities (losses) gains |
|
|
(73,790 |
) |
|
|
2,073 |
|
|
|
1,429 |
|
|
|
(11,551 |
) |
|
|
(13,152 |
) |
Other income (loss) |
|
|
48,812 |
|
|
|
36,069 |
|
|
|
63,539 |
|
|
|
(3,500 |
) |
|
|
31,830 |
|
|
|
|
Total non-interest income |
|
$ |
167,857 |
|
|
$ |
236,430 |
|
|
$ |
235,752 |
|
|
$ |
170,557 |
|
|
$ |
204,674 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
Change |
|
|
September 30, |
|
YTD 2008 vs 2007 |
(in thousands) |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Amount |
|
Percent |
|
|
|
Service charges on deposit accounts |
|
$ |
232,806 |
|
|
$ |
172,917 |
|
|
$ |
59,889 |
|
|
|
34.6 |
% |
Trust services |
|
|
98,169 |
|
|
|
86,220 |
|
|
|
11,949 |
|
|
|
13.9 |
|
Brokerage and insurance income |
|
|
106,563 |
|
|
|
62,087 |
|
|
|
44,476 |
|
|
|
71.6 |
|
Other service charges and fees |
|
|
67,429 |
|
|
|
49,176 |
|
|
|
18,253 |
|
|
|
37.1 |
|
Bank owned life insurance income |
|
|
41,199 |
|
|
|
36,602 |
|
|
|
4,597 |
|
|
|
12.6 |
|
Mortgage banking income |
|
|
15,741 |
|
|
|
26,102 |
|
|
|
(10,361 |
) |
|
|
(39.7 |
) |
Securities losses |
|
|
(70,288 |
) |
|
|
(18,187 |
) |
|
|
(52,101 |
) |
|
|
N.M. |
|
Other income |
|
|
148,420 |
|
|
|
91,127 |
|
|
|
57,293 |
|
|
|
62.9 |
|
|
|
|
Total non-interest income |
|
$ |
640,039 |
|
|
$ |
506,044 |
|
|
$ |
133,995 |
|
|
|
26.5 |
% |
|
|
|
Table 11 details mortgage banking income and the net impact of MSR hedging activity for each
of the past five quarters:
23
Table 11 Mortgage Banking Income and Net Impact of MSR Hedging
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
|
3Q08 vs 3Q07 |
(in thousands, except as noted) |
|
Third |
|
Second |
|
First |
|
Fourth |
|
Third |
|
|
Amount |
|
Percent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage Banking Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Origination and secondary marketing |
|
$ |
7,647 |
|
|
$ |
13,098 |
|
|
$ |
9,332 |
|
|
$ |
5,879 |
|
|
$ |
8,375 |
|
|
|
$ |
(728 |
) |
|
|
(8.7) |
% |
Servicing fees |
|
|
11,838 |
|
|
|
11,166 |
|
|
|
10,894 |
|
|
|
11,405 |
|
|
|
10,811 |
|
|
|
|
1,027 |
|
|
|
9.5 |
|
Amortization of capitalized servicing (1) |
|
|
(6,234 |
) |
|
|
(7,024 |
) |
|
|
(6,914 |
) |
|
|
(5,929 |
) |
|
|
(6,571 |
) |
|
|
|
337 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
|
Other mortgage banking income |
|
|
3,519 |
|
|
|
5,959 |
|
|
|
4,331 |
|
|
|
4,113 |
|
|
|
3,016 |
|
|
|
|
503 |
|
|
|
16.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sub-total |
|
|
16,770 |
|
|
|
23,199 |
|
|
|
17,643 |
|
|
|
15,468 |
|
|
|
15,631 |
|
|
|
|
1,139 |
|
|
|
7.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MSR valuation adjustment (1) |
|
|
(10,251 |
) |
|
|
39,031 |
|
|
|
(18,093 |
) |
|
|
(21,245 |
) |
|
|
(9,863 |
) |
|
|
|
(388 |
) |
|
|
3.9 |
|
Net trading gains (losses) related to MSR hedging |
|
|
3,783 |
|
|
|
(49,728 |
) |
|
|
(6,613 |
) |
|
|
9,479 |
|
|
|
3,861 |
|
|
|
|
(78 |
) |
|
|
(2.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total mortgage banking income (loss) |
|
$ |
10,302 |
|
|
$ |
12,502 |
|
|
$ |
(7,063 |
) |
|
$ |
3,702 |
|
|
$ |
9,629 |
|
|
|
$ |
673 |
|
|
|
7.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average trading account securities used to hedge
MSRs (in millions) |
|
$ |
941 |
|
|
$ |
1,190 |
|
|
$ |
1,139 |
|
|
$ |
1,073 |
|
|
$ |
1,102 |
|
|
|
$ |
(161 |
) |
|
|
(14.6) |
% |
Capitalized mortgage servicing rights (2) |
|
|
230,398 |
|
|
|
240,024 |
|
|
|
191,806 |
|
|
|
207,894 |
|
|
|
228,933 |
|
|
|
|
1,465 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
Total mortgages serviced for others (in millions) (2) |
|
|
15,741 |
|
|
|
15,770 |
|
|
|
15,138 |
|
|
|
15,088 |
|
|
|
15,073 |
|
|
|
|
668 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
MSR % of investor servicing portfolio |
|
|
1.46 |
% |
|
|
1.52 |
% |
|
|
1.27 |
% |
|
|
1.38 |
% |
|
|
1.52 |
% |
|
|
|
(0.06 |
)% |
|
|
(3.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Impact of MSR Hedging |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MSR valuation adjustment (1) |
|
$ |
(10,251 |
) |
|
$ |
39,031 |
|
|
$ |
(18,093 |
) |
|
$ |
(21,245 |
) |
|
$ |
(9,863 |
) |
|
|
$ |
(388 |
) |
|
|
3.9 |
% |
Net trading gains (losses) related to MSR hedging |
|
|
3,783 |
|
|
|
(49,728 |
) |
|
|
(6,613 |
) |
|
|
9,479 |
|
|
|
3,861 |
|
|
|
|
(78 |
) |
|
|
(2.0 |
) |
Net interest income related to MSR hedging |
|
|
8,368 |
|
|
|
9,364 |
|
|
|
5,934 |
|
|
|
3,192 |
|
|
|
2,357 |
|
|
|
|
6,011 |
|
|
|
N.M. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net impact of MSR hedging |
|
$ |
1,900 |
|
|
$ |
(1,333 |
) |
|
$ |
(18,772 |
) |
|
$ |
(8,574 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,645 |
) |
|
|
$ |
5,545 |
|
|
|
N.M. |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
YTD 2008 vs 2007 |
(in thousands, except as noted) |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Amount |
|
Percent |
|
|
|
Mortgage Banking Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Origination and secondary marketing |
|
$ |
30,077 |
|
|
$ |
20,086 |
|
|
$ |
9,991 |
|
|
|
49.7 |
% |
Servicing fees |
|
|
33,898 |
|
|
|
24,607 |
|
|
|
9,291 |
|
|
|
37.8 |
|
Amortization of capitalized servicing (1) |
|
|
(20,172 |
) |
|
|
(14,658 |
) |
|
|
(5,514 |
) |
|
|
37.6 |
|
Other mortgage banking income |
|
|
13,809 |
|
|
|
9,085 |
|
|
|
4,724 |
|
|
|
52.0 |
|
|
|
|
Sub-total |
|
|
57,612 |
|
|
|
39,120 |
|
|
|
18,492 |
|
|
|
47.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MSR valuation adjustment (1) |
|
|
10,687 |
|
|
|
5,114 |
|
|
|
5,573 |
|
|
|
N.M. |
|
Net trading losses related to MSR hedging |
|
|
(52,558 |
) |
|
|
(18,132 |
) |
|
|
(34,426 |
) |
|
|
N.M. |
|
|
|
|
Total mortgage banking income |
|
$ |
15,741 |
|
|
$ |
26,102 |
|
|
$ |
(10,361 |
) |
|
|
(39.7) |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average trading account securities used to hedge
MSRs (in millions) |
|
$ |
1,089 |
|
|
$ |
433 |
|
|
$ |
656 |
|
|
|
N.M. |
% |
Capitalized mortgage servicing rights (2) |
|
|
230,398 |
|
|
|
228,933 |
|
|
|
1,465 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
% |
Total mortgages serviced for others (in millions) (2) |
|
|
15,741 |
|
|
|
15,073 |
|
|
|
668 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
MSR % of investor servicing portfolio |
|
|
1.46 |
% |
|
|
1.52 |
% |
|
|
(0.06 |
) |
|
|
(14.9) |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Impact of MSR Hedging |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MSR valuation adjustment (1) |
|
$ |
10,687 |
|
|
$ |
5,114 |
|
|
$ |
5,573 |
|
|
|
N.M. |
% |
Net trading losses related to MSR hedging |
|
|
(52,558 |
) |
|
|
(18,132 |
) |
|
|
(34,426 |
) |
|
|
N.M. |
|
Net interest income related to MSR hedging |
|
|
23,666 |
|
|
|
2,605 |
|
|
|
21,061 |
|
|
|
N.M. |
|
|
|
|
Net impact of MSR hedging |
|
$ |
(18,205 |
) |
|
$ |
(10,413 |
) |
|
$ |
(7,792 |
) |
|
|
74.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
N.M., not a meaningful value. |
|
(1) |
|
The change in fair value for the period represents the MSR valuation adjustment, excluding amortization of capitalized servicing. |
|
(2) |
|
At period end. |
24
2008 Third Quarter versus 2007 Third Quarter
Non-interest income decreased $36.8 million, or 18%, from the year-ago quarter.
Table 12 Non-Interest Income 2008 Third Quarter vs. 2007 Third Quarter
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change attributable to: |
|
|
|
Third Quarter |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
Other |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
Items |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service charges on deposit accounts |
|
$ |
80,508 |
|
|
$ |
78,107 |
|
|
$ |
2,401 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
% |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,401 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
% |
Trust services |
|
|
30,952 |
|
|
|
33,562 |
|
|
|
(2,610 |
) |
|
|
(7.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,610 |
) |
|
|
(7.8 |
) |
Brokerage and insurance income |
|
|
34,309 |
|
|
|
28,806 |
|
|
|
5,503 |
|
|
|
19.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,503 |
|
|
|
19.1 |
|
Other service charges and fees |
|
|
23,446 |
|
|
|
21,045 |
|
|
|
2,401 |
|
|
|
11.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,401 |
|
|
|
11.4 |
|
Bank owned life insurance income |
|
|
13,318 |
|
|
|
14,847 |
|
|
|
(1,529 |
) |
|
|
(10.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,529 |
) |
|
|
(10.3 |
) |
Mortgage banking income |
|
|
10,302 |
|
|
|
9,629 |
|
|
|
673 |
|
|
|
7.0 |
|
|
|
(466 |
) (1) |
|
|
1,139 |
|
|
|
11.8 |
|
Securities losses |
|
|
(73,790 |
) |
|
|
(13,152 |
) |
|
|
(60,638 |
) |
|
|
N.M. |
|
|
|
(60,638 |
) (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
Other income |
|
|
48,812 |
|
|
|
31,830 |
|
|
|
16,982 |
|
|
|
53.4 |
|
|
|
7,786 |
(2) |
|
|
9,196 |
|
|
|
28.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-interest income |
|
$ |
167,857 |
|
|
$ |
204,674 |
|
|
$ |
(36,817 |
) |
|
|
(18.0) |
% |
|
$ |
(53,318 |
) |
|
$ |
16,501 |
|
|
|
8.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N.M., not a Meaningful Value. |
|
(1) |
|
Refer to Significant Item #4 of the Significant Items discussion. |
|
(2) |
|
Refer to Significant Item #5 of the Significant Items discussion. |
Of the $36.8 million, or 18%, decrease in total non-interest income, $53.3 million came from
Significant Items (see Significant Items discussion). The remaining $16.5 million, or 8%,
increase reflected:
|
|
|
$9.2 million, or 29%, increase in other income, reflecting higher operating lease
income, partially offset by declines in official check processing, merchant services,
and derivatives income. |
|
|
|
|
$5.5 million, or 19%, increase in brokerage and insurance income, reflecting growth
in annuity sales and the 2007 fourth quarter acquisition of an insurance agency. |
|
|
|
|
$2.4 million, or 3%, increase in service charges on deposit accounts, primarily
reflecting strong growth in commercial service charges, partially offset by a decline
in personal service charge income. |
|
|
|
|
$2.4 million, or 11%, increase in other service charges and fees, reflecting higher
debit card volume. |
Partially offset by:
|
|
|
$2.6 million, or 8%, decline in trust services income, reflecting the impact of
lower market values on asset management revenues. |
25
2008 Third Quarter versus 2008 Second Quarter
Non-interest income decreased $68.6 million, or 29%, from the second quarter.
Table 13 Non-Interest Income 2008 Third Quarter vs. 2008 Second Quarter
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third |
|
Second |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change attributable to: |
|
|
Quarter |
|
Quarter |
|
Change |
|
Significant |
|
Other |
(in thousands) |
|
2008 |
|
2008 |
|
Amount |
|
Percent |
|
Items |
|
Amount |
|
Percent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service charges on deposit
accounts |
|
$ |
80,508 |
|
|
$ |
79,630 |
|
|
$ |
878 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
% |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
878 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
% |
Trust services |
|
|
30,952 |
|
|
|
33,089 |
|
|
|
(2,137 |
) |
|
|
(6.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,137 |
) |
|
|
(6.5 |
) |
Brokerage and insurance income |
|
|
34,309 |
|
|
|
35,694 |
|
|
|
(1,385 |
) |
|
|
(3.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,385 |
) |
|
|
(3.9 |
) |
Other service charges and fees |
|
|
23,446 |
|
|
|
23,242 |
|
|
|
204 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
204 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
Bank owned life insurance income |
|
|
13,318 |
|
|
|
14,131 |
|
|
|
(813 |
) |
|
|
(5.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(813 |
) |
|
|
(5.8 |
) |
Mortgage banking income |
|
|
10,302 |
|
|
|
12,502 |
|
|
|
(2,200 |
) |
|
|
(17.6 |
) |
|
|
4,229 |
(1) |
|
|
(6,429 |
) |
|
|
(51.4 |
) |
Securities (losses) gains |
|
|
(73,790 |
) |
|
|
2,073 |
|
|
|
(75,863 |
) |
|
|
N.M. |
|
|
|
(75,863 |
)(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
Other income |
|
|
48,812 |
|
|
|
36,069 |
|
|
|
12,743 |
|
|
|
35.3 |
|
|
|
13,139 |
(2) |
|
|
(396 |
) |
|
|
(1.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-interest income |
|
$ |
167,857 |
|
|
$ |
236,430 |
|
|
$ |
(68,573 |
) |
|
|
(29.0) |
% |
|
$ |
(58,495 |
) |
|
$ |
(10,078 |
) |
|
|
(4.3) |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N.M., not a meaningful value. |
|
(1) |
|
Refer to Significant Item #4 of the Significant
Items discussion. |
|
(2) |
|
Refer to Significant Item #5 of the Significant Items discussion. |
The $68.6 million decrease in total non-interest income included a net charge of $58.5 million
from Significant Items (see Significant Items discussion). The remaining $10.1 million, or 4%,
decline reflected:
|
|
|
$6.4 million, or 51%, decline in mortgage banking income, primarily reflecting a
35% decline in origination activity, and lower gains on loan sales. |
|
|
|
|
$2.1 million, or 6%, decline in trust services income, reflecting the impact of
lower market values on asset management revenues. |
|
|
|
|
$1.4 million, or 4%, decline in brokerage and insurance income, primarily
reflecting seasonally lower insurance contingency fees. |
26
2008 First Nine Months versus 2007 First Nine Months
Non-interest income for the first nine-month period of 2008 increased $134.0 million from the
comparable year-ago period.
Table 14 Non-Interest Income Estimated Merger Related Impact 2008 First
Nine Months vs. 2007 First Nine Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
Change attributable to: |
|
|
September 30, |
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
Significant |
|
|
Other |
(in thousands) |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Amount |
|
Percent |
|
Merger Related |
|
Items |
|
|
Amount |
|
Percent (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service charges on deposit accounts |
|
$ |
232,806 |
|
|
$ |
172,917 |
|
|
$ |
59,889 |
|
|
|
34.6 |
% |
|
$ |
48,220 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
11,669 |
|
|
|
5.3 |
% |
Trust services |
|
|
98,169 |
|
|
|
86,220 |
|
|
|
11,949 |
|
|
|
13.9 |
|
|
|
14,018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,069 |
) |
|
|
(2.1 |
) |
Brokerage and insurance income |
|
|
106,563 |
|
|
|
62,087 |
|
|
|
44,476 |
|
|
|
71.6 |
|
|
|
34,122 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,354 |
|
|
|
10.8 |
|
Other service charges and fees |
|
|
67,429 |
|
|
|
49,176 |
|
|
|
18,253 |
|
|
|
37.1 |
|
|
|
11,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,653 |
|
|
|
10.9 |
|
Bank owned life insurance income |
|
|
41,199 |
|
|
|
36,602 |
|
|
|
4,597 |
|
|
|
12.6 |
|
|
|
3,614 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
983 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
Mortgage banking income |
|
|
15,741 |
|
|
|
26,102 |
|
|
|
(10,361 |
) |
|
|
(39.7 |
) |
|
|
12,512 |
|
|
|
(28,853 |
)(2) |
|
|
5,980 |
|
|
|
15.5 |
|
Securities losses |
|
|
(70,288 |
) |
|
|
(18,187 |
) |
|
|
(52,101 |
) |
|
|
286.5 |
|
|
|
566 |
|
|
|
(52,667 |
)(3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income |
|
|
148,420 |
|
|
|
91,127 |
|
|
|
57,293 |
|
|
|
62.9 |
|
|
|
12,780 |
|
|
|
20,794 |
(4) |
|
|
23,719 |
|
|
|
22.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-interest income |
|
$ |
640,039 |
|
|
$ |
506,044 |
|
|
$ |
133,995 |
|
|
|
26.5 |
% |
|
$ |
137,432 |
|
|
$ |
(60,726 |
) |
|
$ |
57,289 |
|
|
|
8.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Calculated as other / (prior period + merger-related) |
|
(2) |
|
Refer to Significant Item #4 of the Significant Items discussion. |
|
(3) |
|
Refer to Significant Item #5 of the Significant Items discussion. |
|
(4) |
|
Refer to Significant Items #3, #5, and #6 of the Significant Items discussion. |
The $134.0 million increase in total non-interest income reflected the $137.4 million of
merger-related impacts, and the net charge of $60.7 million from Significant Items (see
Significant Items discussion). The remaining $57.3 million, or 9%, increase included:
|
|
|
$23.7 million, or 23%, increase in other income, reflecting primarily higher
operating lease income. |
|
|
|
|
$11.7 million, or 5%, increase in service charges on deposit accounts, primarily
reflecting strong growth in personal service charge income. |
|
|
|
|
$10.4 million, or 11%, increase in brokerage and insurance income, reflecting
growth in annuity sales and the 2007 fourth quarter acquisition of an insurance
agency. |
27
Non-Interest Expense
(This section should be read in conjunction with Significant Items 1, 3, 5, and 6.)
Table 15 reflects non-interest expense for each of the past five quarters:
Table 15 Non-Interest Expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
(in thousands) |
|
Third |
|
Second |
|
First |
|
Fourth |
|
Third |
|
|
|
Salaries |
|
$ |
151,982 |
|
|
$ |
163,595 |
|
|
$ |
159,946 |
|
|
$ |
178,855 |
|
|
$ |
166,719 |
|
Benefits |
|
|
32,845 |
|
|
|
36,396 |
|
|
|
41,997 |
|
|
|
35,995 |
|
|
|
35,429 |
|
|
|
|
Personnel costs |
|
|
184,827 |
|
|
|
199,991 |
|
|
|
201,943 |
|
|
|
214,850 |
|
|
|
202,148 |
|
Outside data processing and other services |
|
|
32,386 |
|
|
|
30,186 |
|
|
|
34,361 |
|
|
|
39,130 |
|
|
|
40,600 |
|
Net occupancy |
|
|
25,215 |
|
|
|
26,971 |
|
|
|
33,243 |
|
|
|
26,714 |
|
|
|
33,334 |
|
Equipment |
|
|
22,102 |
|
|
|
25,740 |
|
|
|
23,794 |
|
|
|
22,816 |
|
|
|
23,290 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
19,463 |
|
|
|
19,327 |
|
|
|
18,917 |
|
|
|
20,163 |
|
|
|
19,949 |
|
Marketing |
|
|
7,049 |
|
|
|
7,339 |
|
|
|
8,919 |
|
|
|
16,175 |
|
|
|
13,186 |
|
Professional services |
|
|
13,405 |
|
|
|
13,752 |
|
|
|
9,090 |
|
|
|
14,464 |
|
|
|
11,273 |
|
Telecommunications |
|
|
6,007 |
|
|
|
6,864 |
|
|
|
6,245 |
|
|
|
8,513 |
|
|
|
7,286 |
|
Printing and supplies |
|
|
4,316 |
|
|
|
4,757 |
|
|
|
5,622 |
|
|
|
6,594 |
|
|
|
4,743 |
|
Other expense |
|
|
24,226 |
|
|
|
42,876 |
|
|
|
28,347 |
|
|
|
70,133 |
|
|
|
29,754 |
|
|
|
|
Total non-interest expense |
|
$ |
338,996 |
|
|
$ |
377,803 |
|
|
$ |
370,481 |
|
|
$ |
439,552 |
|
|
$ |
385,563 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
YTD 2008 vs 2007 |
(in thousands) |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Amount |
|
Percent |
|
|
|
Salaries |
|
$ |
475,523 |
|
|
$ |
378,399 |
|
|
$ |
97,124 |
|
|
|
25.7 |
|
Benefits |
|
|
111,238 |
|
|
|
93,579 |
|
|
|
17,659 |
|
|
|
18.9 |
|
|
|
|
Personnel costs |
|
|
586,761 |
|
|
|
471,978 |
|
|
|
114,783 |
|
|
|
24.3 |
|
Outside data processing and other services |
|
|
96,933 |
|
|
|
88,115 |
|
|
|
8,818 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
Net occupancy |
|
|
85,429 |
|
|
|
72,659 |
|
|
|
12,770 |
|
|
|
17.6 |
|
Equipment |
|
|
71,636 |
|
|
|
58,666 |
|
|
|
12,970 |
|
|
|
22.1 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
57,707 |
|
|
|
24,988 |
|
|
|
32,719 |
|
|
|
N.M. |
|
Marketing |
|
|
23,307 |
|
|
|
29,868 |
|
|
|
(6,561 |
) |
|
|
(22.0 |
) |
Professional Services |
|
|
36,247 |
|
|
|
25,856 |
|
|
|
10,391 |
|
|
|
40.2 |
|
Telecommunication |
|
|
19,116 |
|
|
|
15,989 |
|
|
|
3,127 |
|
|
|
19.6 |
|
Printing and supplies |
|
|
14,695 |
|
|
|
11,657 |
|
|
|
3,038 |
|
|
|
26.1 |
|
Other expense |
|
|
95,449 |
|
|
|
72,514 |
|
|
|
22,935 |
|
|
|
31.6 |
|
|
|
|
Total non-interest expense |
|
$ |
1,087,280 |
|
|
$ |
872,290 |
|
|
$ |
214,990 |
|
|
|
24.6 |
% |
|
|
|
N.M., not a meaningful value.
28
2008 Third Quarter versus 2007 Third Quarter
Non-interest expense decreased $46.6 million, or 12%, from the year-ago quarter.
Table 16 Non-Interest Expense 2008 Third Quarter vs. 2007 Third Quarter
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third |
|
|
Third |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change attributable to: |
|
|
|
Quarter |
|
|
Quarter |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Restructuring/ |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
Other |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
Merger Costs |
|
|
Items |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Percent (1) |
|
Personnel costs |
|
$ |
184,827 |
|
|
$ |
202,148 |
|
|
$ |
(17,321 |
) |
|
|
(8.6 |
)% |
|
$ |
(7,750 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(9,571 |
) |
|
|
(4.9 |
)% |
Outside data processing and other services |
|
|
32,386 |
|
|
|
40,600 |
|
|
|
(8,214 |
) |
|
|
(20.2 |
) |
|
|
(6,854 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,360 |
) |
|
|
(4.0 |
) |
Net occupancy |
|
|
25,215 |
|
|
|
33,334 |
|
|
|
(8,119 |
) |
|
|
(24.4 |
) |
|
|
(7,439 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(680 |
) |
|
|
(2.6 |
) |
Equipment |
|
|
22,102 |
|
|
|
23,290 |
|
|
|
(1,188 |
) |
|
|
(5.1 |
) |
|
|
(1,792 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
604 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
19,463 |
|
|
|
19,949 |
|
|
|
(486 |
) |
|
|
(2.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(486 |
) |
|
|
(2.4 |
) |
Marketing |
|
|
7,049 |
|
|
|
13,186 |
|
|
|
(6,137 |
) |
|
|
(46.5 |
) |
|
|
(4,966 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,171 |
) |
|
|
(14.2 |
) |
Professional services |
|
|
13,405 |
|
|
|
11,273 |
|
|
|
2,132 |
|
|
|
18.9 |
|
|
|
(1,555 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,687 |
|
|
|
37.9 |
|
Telecommunications |
|
|
6,007 |
|
|
|
7,286 |
|
|
|
(1,279 |
) |
|
|
(17.6 |
) |
|
|
(193 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,086 |
) |
|
|
(15.3 |
) |
Printing and supplies |
|
|
4,316 |
|
|
|
4,743 |
|
|
|
(427 |
) |
|
|
(9.0 |
) |
|
|
(456 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
Other expense (2) |
|
|
24,226 |
|
|
|
29,754 |
|
|
|
(5,528 |
) |
|
|
(18.6 |
) |
|
|
(1,255 |
) |
|
|
(18,144 |
)(2) |
|
|
13,871 |
|
|
|
48.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-interest expense |
|
$ |
338,996 |
|
|
$ |
385,563 |
|
|
$ |
(46,567 |
) |
|
|
(12.1 |
)% |
|
$ |
(32,260 |
) |
|
$ |
(18,144 |
) |
|
$ |
3,837 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Calculated as other / (prior period + restructuring/merger costs) |
|
(2) |
|
Refer to Significant Item #5 of the Significant Items discussion. |
Of the $46.6 million decline, $32.3 million represented Sky Financial merger/restructuring
costs in the year-ago quarter and $18.1 million reflected Significant Items (see Significant
Items discussion). The remaining $3.8 million, or 1%, increase reflected:
|
|
|
$13.9 million, or 49%, increase in other expense, primarily reflecting an
increase in operating lease expense ($8.8 million), with the remainder of the
increase spread over a number of miscellaneous expense categories including
other-real-estate-owned (OREO) losses ($2.8 million) and franchise and other taxes
($2.3 million). |
|
|
|
|
$3.7 million, or 38%, increase in professional services expenses, reflecting
increased legal and collection costs. |
Partially offset by:
|
|
|
Expense reductions in various expense categories reflecting merger efficiencies. |
|
|
|
|
$9.6 million, or 5%, decline in personnel costs reflecting the benefit of merger
and restructuring efficiencies, including the impact of a 1,422, or 12%, reduction
in full-time equivalent staff from the year-ago period, as well as lower incentive
compensation. |
29
2008 Third Quarter versus 2008 Second Quarter
Non-interest expense decreased $38.8 million, or 10%, from the 2008 second quarter.
Table 17 Non-Interest Expense 2008 Third Quarter vs. 2008 Second Quarter
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third |
|
|
Second |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change attributable to: |
|
|
|
Quarter |
|
|
Quarter |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Restructuring/ |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
Other |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
Merger Costs |
|
|
Items |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Percent (1) |
|
Personnel costs |
|
$ |
184,827 |
|
|
$ |
199,991 |
|
|
$ |
(15,164 |
) |
|
|
(7.6 |
)% |
|
$ |
(10,663 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(4,501 |
) |
|
|
(2.4 |
)% |
Outside data processing and other services |
|
|
32,386 |
|
|
|
30,186 |
|
|
|
2,200 |
|
|
|
7.3 |
|
|
|
898 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,302 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
Net occupancy |
|
|
25,215 |
|
|
|
26,971 |
|
|
|
(1,756 |
) |
|
|
(6.5 |
) |
|
|
(1,813 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
Equipment |
|
|
22,102 |
|
|
|
25,740 |
|
|
|
(3,638 |
) |
|
|
(14.1 |
) |
|
|
(2,813 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(825 |
) |
|
|
(3.6 |
) |
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
19,463 |
|
|
|
19,327 |
|
|
|
136 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
136 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
Marketing |
|
|
7,049 |
|
|
|
7,339 |
|
|
|
(290 |
) |
|
|
(4.0 |
) |
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(267 |
) |
|
|
(3.6 |
) |
Professional services |
|
|
13,405 |
|
|
|
13,752 |
|
|
|
(347 |
) |
|
|
(2.5 |
) |
|
|
(91 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(256 |
) |
|
|
(1.9 |
) |
Telecommunications |
|
|
6,007 |
|
|
|
6,864 |
|
|
|
(857 |
) |
|
|
(12.5 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(854 |
) |
|
|
(12.4 |
) |
Printing and supplies |
|
|
4,316 |
|
|
|
4,757 |
|
|
|
(441 |
) |
|
|
(9.3 |
) |
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(421 |
) |
|
|
(8.9 |
) |
Other expense (2) |
|
|
24,226 |
|
|
|
42,876 |
|
|
|
(18,650 |
) |
|
|
(43.5 |
) |
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
(19,187 |
)(2) |
|
|
561 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-interest expense |
|
$ |
338,996 |
|
|
$ |
377,803 |
|
|
$ |
(38,807 |
) |
|
|
(10.3 |
)% |
|
$ |
(14,552 |
) |
|
$ |
(19,187 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,068 |
) |
|
|
(1.4 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Calculated as other / (prior period + restructuring/merger costs)
|
|
(2) |
|
Refer to Significant Item #5 of the Significant Items discussion. |
Of the $38.8 million decline, $14.6 million represented second quarter Sky Financial
merger/restructuring costs and $19.2 million related to Significant Items (see Significant Items
discussion). The remaining $5.1 million, or 1%, decline primarily reflected a $4.5 million, or 2%,
decline in personnel costs, as full-time equivalent staff decreased by 360, or 3%.
2008 First Nine Months versus 2007 First Nine Months
Non-interest expense for the first nine-month period of 2008 increased $215.0, or 25%, from
the comparable year-ago period.
Table 18 Non-Interest Expense Estimated Merger Related Impact 2008 First Nine Months vs. 2007
First Nine Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change Attributable to: |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring/ |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
Other |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
Merger Related |
|
|
Merger Costs |
|
|
Items |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Percent (1) |
|
Personnel costs |
|
$ |
586,761 |
|
|
$ |
471,978 |
|
|
$ |
114,783 |
|
|
|
24.3 |
% |
|
$ |
136,500 |
|
|
$ |
5,147 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(26,864 |
) |
|
|
(4.4 |
)% |
Outside data processing and other services |
|
|
96,933 |
|
|
|
88,115 |
|
|
|
8,818 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
|
|
24,524 |
|
|
|
(9,012 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,694 |
) |
|
|
(6.5 |
) |
Net occupancy |
|
|
85,429 |
|
|
|
72,659 |
|
|
|
12,770 |
|
|
|
17.6 |
|
|
|
20,368 |
|
|
|
(5,283 |
) |
|
$ |
2,500 |
(2) |
|
|
(4,815 |
) |
|
|
(5.5 |
) |
Equipment |
|
|
71,636 |
|
|
|
58,666 |
|
|
|
12,970 |
|
|
|
22.1 |
|
|
|
9,598 |
|
|
|
1,117 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,255 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
57,707 |
|
|
|
24,988 |
|
|
|
32,719 |
|
|
|
N.M. |
|
|
|
32,962 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(243 |
) |
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
Marketing |
|
|
23,307 |
|
|
|
29,868 |
|
|
|
(6,561 |
) |
|
|
(22.0 |
) |
|
|
8,722 |
|
|
|
(6,495 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,788 |
) |
|
|
(27.4 |
) |
Professional services |
|
|
36,247 |
|
|
|
25,856 |
|
|
|
10,391 |
|
|
|
40.2 |
|
|
|
5,414 |
|
|
|
(2,952 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,929 |
|
|
|
28.0 |
|
Telecommunications |
|
|
19,116 |
|
|
|
15,989 |
|
|
|
3,127 |
|
|
|
19.6 |
|
|
|
4,448 |
|
|
|
404 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,725 |
) |
|
|
(8.3 |
) |
Printing and supplies |
|
|
14,695 |
|
|
|
11,657 |
|
|
|
3,038 |
|
|
|
26.1 |
|
|
|
2,748 |
|
|
|
(390 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
680 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
Other expense |
|
|
95,449 |
|
|
|
72,514 |
|
|
|
22,935 |
|
|
|
31.6 |
|
|
|
26,096 |
|
|
|
(1,374 |
) |
|
|
(27,933 |
)(3) |
|
|
26,146 |
|
|
|
26.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-interest expense |
|
$ |
1,087,280 |
|
|
$ |
872,290 |
|
|
$ |
214,990 |
|
|
|
24.6 |
% |
|
$ |
271,380 |
|
|
$ |
(18,838 |
) |
|
$ |
(25,433 |
) |
|
|
(12,119 |
) |
|
|
(1.1 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N.M., not a meaningful value |
|
(1) |
|
Calculated as other / (prior period + merger-related + restructuring/merger costs) |
|
(2) |
|
Refer to Significant Item #6 of the Significant Items discussion. |
|
(3) |
|
Refer to Significant Items #3, #5, and #6 of the Significant Items discussion. |
30
Of the $215.0 million increase, $271.4 million pertained to merger-related expenses, partially
offset by $18.8 million of lower merger/restructuring costs and $25.4 million lower expenses
related to Significant Items (see Significant Items discussion). The net remaining $12.1
million, or 1%, decrease reflected:
|
|
|
$26.9 million, or 4%, decline in personnel expense reflecting the benefit of
merger and restructuring efficiencies. |
|
|
|
|
$8.8 million, or 27%, decline in marketing expense. |
|
|
|
|
$7.4 million, or 8%, decline in occupancy expense, reflecting merger
efficiencies. |
|
|
|
|
$6.7 million, or 6%, decline in outside data processing and other services,
reflecting merger efficiencies. |
Partially offset by:
|
|
|
$28.7 million, or 30%, increase in other expense reflecting higher operating
lease expense, insurance expense, and OREO losses. |
|
|
|
|
$7.9 million, or 28%, increase in professional services, reflecting increased
legal and collection costs. |
As a participating FDIC insured bank, we were assessed quarterly deposit insurance premiums
totaling $18.1 million for the first nine-month period of 2008. However, we received a one-time
assessment credit from the FDIC (see 2007 Form 10-K) which substantially offset our year-to-date
2008 deposit insurance premium and, therefore, only $1.8 million of deposit insurance premium
expense was recognized for the first nine-month period of 2008.
On October 7, 2008, the FDIC requested comment on a proposed rule that would increase the
rates banks pay for deposit insurance. Specifically, the assessment rate schedule would be raised
by 7 basis points (annualized) beginning January 1, 2009. The FDIC has also proposed changing the
way the system measures risk among insured institutions in order to require riskier institutions to
pay a larger assessment. Based on these proposed changes, as well as the full consumption of the
one-time assessment credit (discussed above), we anticipate that our full-year 2009 deposit
insurance premium expense will increase approximately $44 million compared with our expected
full-year 2008 deposit insurance premium expense.
Provision for Income Taxes
(This section should be read in conjunction with Significant Items 1, 2, 3, and 6.)
The provision for income taxes in the 2008 third quarter was $17.0 million, resulting in an
effective tax rate of 18.5%. The effective tax rates in prior quarter and year-ago quarters were
20.6% and 26.0% respectively. During the 2008 third quarter, the effective tax rate included a
$3.7 million addition to provision for income taxes, representing an increase to the previously
established capital loss carry-forward valuation allowance related to the current quarters decline
in value of Visa® shares held. This compared with $3.4 million benefit to the 2008
second quarter provision for income taxes, representing a reduction to the previously established
capital loss carry-forward valuation allowance related to the value of Visa® shares
held. The effective tax rate for the 2008 fourth quarter is expected to be in the range of
18%-20%.
In the ordinary course of business, we operate in various taxing jurisdictions and are subject
to income and non-income taxes. Our effective tax rate is based, in part, on our interpretation of
the relevant current tax laws. We believe the aggregate liabilities related to taxes are
appropriately reflected in the consolidated financial statements. We review the appropriate tax
treatment of all transactions taking into consideration statutory, judicial, and regulatory
guidance in the context of our tax positions. In addition, we rely on various tax opinions, recent
tax audits, and historical experience. The Internal Revenue Service is currently examining our
federal tax returns for the years ending 2004 and 2005. Also, we are subject to ongoing tax
examinations in various jurisdictions for other time periods.
During the 2008 third quarter, the Internal Revenue Service and other taxing jurisdictions
have proposed various adjustments to our previously filed tax returns. We believe that the tax
positions taken related to such proposed adjustments were correct and supported by applicable
statutes, regulations, and judicial authority, and intend to vigorously defend them. It is possible
that the ultimate resolution of the proposed adjustments, if unfavorable, may be material to the
results of operations in the period it occurs. However, although no assurance can be given, we
believe that the resolution of these examinations will not, individually or in the aggregate, have
a material adverse impact on our consolidated financial position.
31
RISK MANAGEMENT AND CAPITAL
Risk identification and monitoring are key elements in overall risk management. We believe our
primary risk exposures are credit, market, liquidity, and operational risk. More information on
risk is set forth under the heading Risk Factors included in Item 1A of our 2007 Form 10-K, and
subsequent filings with the SEC. Additionally, the MD&A appearing in our 2007 Form 10-K should be
read in conjunction with this discussion and analysis as this report provides only material updates
to the 2007 Form 10-K. Our definition, philosophy, and approach to risk management are unchanged
from the discussion presented in that document.
Credit Risk
Credit risk is the risk of loss due to loan and lease customers or other counterparties not
being able to meet their financial obligations under agreed upon terms. The majority of our credit
risk is associated with lending activities, as the acceptance and management of credit risk is
central to profitable lending. We also have credit risk associated with investment securities and
derivatives. Credit risk is mitigated through a combination of credit policies and processes,
market risk management activities, and portfolio diversification.
Counterparty Risk
In the normal course of business, we engage with other financial counterparties for a variety
of purposes including asset and liability management, mortgage banking, and for trading activities.
As a result, we are exposed to credit risk, or the risk of losses if the counterparty fails to
perform according to the terms of a contract or agreement.
We minimize counterparty risk through credit approvals, limits, and monitoring procedures
similar to those used for our commercial portfolio (see Commercial Credit discussion), generally
entering into transactions only with counterparties that carry high quality ratings, and obtain
collateral when appropriate.
Credit Exposure Mix
(This section should be read in conjunction with Significant Items 1 and 2.)
As shown in Table 19, at September 30, 2008, commercial loans totaled $23.5 billion, and
represented 57% of our total credit exposure. This portfolio was diversified between C&I and CRE
loans (see Commercial Credit discussion).
Total consumer loans were $17.6 billion at September 30, 2008, and represented 43% of our
total credit exposure. The consumer portfolio was diversified among home equity loans, residential
mortgages, and automobile loans and leases (see Consumer Credit discussion). Our home equity
and residential mortgages portfolios represented $12.4 billion, or 30%, of our total loans and
leases. These portfolios are discussed in greater detail below in the Consumer Credit section.
32
Table 19 Loans and Leases Composition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
(in thousands) |
|
September 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
By Type |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and industrial |
|
$ |
13,638,066 |
|
|
|
33.1 |
% |
|
$ |
13,745,515 |
|
|
|
33.5 |
% |
|
$ |
13,645,890 |
|
|
|
33.3 |
% |
|
$ |
13,125,565 |
|
|
|
32.8 |
% |
|
$ |
13,125,158 |
|
|
|
32.8 |
% |
Commercial real estate: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction |
|
|
2,111,027 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
|
2,135,979 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
|
|
2,058,105 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
1,961,839 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
1,876,075 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
Commercial |
|
|
7,796,133 |
|
|
|
18.9 |
|
|
|
7,565,486 |
|
|
|
18.4 |
|
|
|
7,457,744 |
|
|
|
18.2 |
|
|
|
7,221,213 |
|
|
|
18.0 |
|
|
|
7,097,465 |
|
|
|
17.7 |
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate |
|
|
9,907,160 |
|
|
|
24.0 |
|
|
|
9,701,465 |
|
|
|
23.6 |
|
|
|
9,515,849 |
|
|
|
23.2 |
|
|
|
9,183,052 |
|
|
|
22.9 |
|
|
|
8,973,540 |
|
|
|
22.4 |
|
|
|
|
Total commercial |
|
|
23,545,226 |
|
|
|
57.1 |
|
|
|
23,446,980 |
|
|
|
57.1 |
|
|
|
23,161,739 |
|
|
|
56.5 |
|
|
|
22,308,617 |
|
|
|
55.7 |
|
|
|
22,098,698 |
|
|
|
55.2 |
|
|
|
|
Consumer: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automobile loans |
|
|
3,917,576 |
|
|
|
9.5 |
|
|
|
3,758,715 |
|
|
|
9.2 |
|
|
|
3,491,369 |
|
|
|
8.5 |
|
|
|
3,114,029 |
|
|
|
7.8 |
|
|
|
2,959,913 |
|
|
|
7.4 |
|
Automobile leases |
|
|
698,450 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
834,777 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
999,629 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
1,179,505 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
1,365,805 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
Home equity |
|
|
7,496,875 |
|
|
|
18.2 |
|
|
|
7,410,393 |
|
|
|
18.1 |
|
|
|
7,296,448 |
|
|
|
17.8 |
|
|
|
7,290,063 |
|
|
|
18.2 |
|
|
|
7,317,545 |
|
|
|
18.3 |
|
Residential mortgage |
|
|
4,854,260 |
|
|
|
11.8 |
|
|
|
4,901,420 |
|
|
|
11.9 |
|
|
|
5,366,414 |
|
|
|
13.1 |
|
|
|
5,447,126 |
|
|
|
13.6 |
|
|
|
5,505,340 |
|
|
|
13.8 |
|
Other loans |
|
|
679,336 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
694,855 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
698,620 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
714,998 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
739,939 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
|
Total consumer |
|
|
17,646,497 |
|
|
|
42.9 |
|
|
|
17,600,160 |
|
|
|
42.9 |
|
|
|
17,852,480 |
|
|
|
43.5 |
|
|
|
17,745,721 |
|
|
|
44.3 |
|
|
|
17,888,542 |
|
|
|
44.8 |
|
|
|
|
Total loans and leases |
|
$ |
41,191,723 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
41,047,140 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
41,014,219 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
40,054,338 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
39,987,240 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By Business Segment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regional Banking: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Central Ohio |
|
$ |
5,223,789 |
|
|
|
12.7 |
% |
|
$ |
5,226,741 |
|
|
|
12.7 |
% |
|
$ |
5,229,075 |
|
|
|
12.7 |
% |
|
$ |
5,149,503 |
|
|
|
12.9 |
% |
|
$ |
5,010,489 |
|
|
|
12.5 |
% |
Northwest Ohio |
|
|
2,179,160 |
|
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
2,238,454 |
|
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
|
2,280,255 |
|
|
|
5.6 |
|
|
|
2,280,648 |
|
|
|
5.7 |
|
|
|
2,314,424 |
|
|
|
5.8 |
|
Greater Cleveland |
|
|
3,301,249 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
|
3,262,379 |
|
|
|
7.9 |
|
|
|
3,194,533 |
|
|
|
7.8 |
|
|
|
3,104,336 |
|
|
|
7.8 |
|
|
|
3,063,600 |
|
|
|
7.7 |
|
Greater Akron/Canton |
|
|
2,598,991 |
|
|
|
6.3 |
|
|
|
2,583,536 |
|
|
|
6.3 |
|
|
|
2,555,695 |
|
|
|
6.2 |
|
|
|
2,477,467 |
|
|
|
6.2 |
|
|
|
2,530,292 |
|
|
|
6.3 |
|
Southern Ohio/Kentucky |
|
|
3,021,163 |
|
|
|
7.3 |
|
|
|
2,966,035 |
|
|
|
7.2 |
|
|
|
2,900,259 |
|
|
|
7.1 |
|
|
|
2,668,073 |
|
|
|
6.7 |
|
|
|
2,555,900 |
|
|
|
6.4 |
|
Mahoning Valley |
|
|
1,240,950 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
1,251,491 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
1,292,837 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
1,274,608 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
1,300,711 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
West Michigan |
|
|
2,624,581 |
|
|
|
6.4 |
|
|
|
2,600,512 |
|
|
|
6.3 |
|
|
|
2,535,359 |
|
|
|
6.2 |
|
|
|
2,478,683 |
|
|
|
6.2 |
|
|
|
2,521,990 |
|
|
|
6.3 |
|
East Michigan |
|
|
1,818,433 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
1,809,680 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
1,766,750 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
1,747,914 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
1,752,106 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
Pittsburgh |
|
|
2,003,051 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
1,959,811 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
|
1,923,011 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
1,859,401 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
1,818,292 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
Central Indiana |
|
|
1,585,247 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
1,527,627 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
1,507,934 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
1,421,401 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
1,420,084 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
West Virginia |
|
|
1,221,503 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
1,213,033 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
1,158,915 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
1,155,719 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
1,125,628 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
Other Regional |
|
|
5,866,427 |
|
|
|
14.3 |
|
|
|
5,837,079 |
|
|
|
14.2 |
|
|
|
6,259,617 |
|
|
|
15.3 |
|
|
|
6,287,871 |
|
|
|
15.6 |
|
|
|
6,645,158 |
|
|
|
16.6 |
|
|
|
|
Regional Banking |
|
|
32,684,544 |
|
|
|
79.3 |
|
|
|
32,476,378 |
|
|
|
79.1 |
|
|
|
32,604,240 |
|
|
|
79.5 |
|
|
|
31,905,624 |
|
|
|
79.7 |
|
|
|
32,058,674 |
|
|
|
80.2 |
|
Auto Finance and Dealer Services |
|
|
5,900,223 |
|
|
|
14.3 |
|
|
|
5,958,599 |
|
|
|
14.5 |
|
|
|
5,862,116 |
|
|
|
14.3 |
|
|
|
5,563,415 |
|
|
|
13.9 |
|
|
|
5,449,580 |
|
|
|
13.6 |
|
Private Financial and Capital Markets Group |
|
|
2,606,956 |
|
|
|
6.4 |
|
|
|
2,612,163 |
|
|
|
6.4 |
|
|
|
2,547,863 |
|
|
|
6.2 |
|
|
|
2,585,299 |
|
|
|
6.4 |
|
|
|
2,478,986 |
|
|
|
6.2 |
|
Treasury / Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans and leases |
|
$ |
41,191,723 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
41,047,140 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
41,014,219 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
40,054,338 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
39,987,240 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
33
Commercial Credit
(This section should be read in conjunction with Significant Items 1 and 2.)
Commercial credit approvals are based on, among other factors, the financial strength of the
borrower, assessment of the borrowers management capabilities, industry sector trends, type of
exposure, transaction structure, and the general economic outlook.
In commercial lending, ongoing credit management is dependent on the type and nature of the
loan. In general, quarterly monitoring is normal for all significant exposures. The internal risk
ratings are revised and updated with each periodic monitoring event. There is also extensive macro
portfolio management analysis on an ongoing basis. We continually review and adjust our risk
rating criteria based on actual experience, which may result in changes to such criteria, in future
periods. The continuous analysis and review process results in a determination of an appropriate
ALLL amount for our commercial loan portfolio.
Our commercial loan portfolio, including commercial real estate, is diversified by customer
size, as well as throughout our geographic footprint. However, the following segments are
noteworthy:
Franklin Relationship
(This section should be read in conjunction with Significant Items 1 and 2.)
Franklin is a specialty consumer finance company primarily engaged in the servicing and
resolution of performing, reperforming, and nonperforming residential mortgage loans. Franklins
portfolio consists of loans secured by 1-4 family residential real estate that generally fall
outside the underwriting standards of the Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA or Fannie
Mae) and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (FHLMC or Freddie Mac) and involve elevated
credit risk as a result of the nature or absence of income documentation, limited credit histories,
and higher levels of consumer debt, or past credit difficulties. Through December 2007, Franklin
purchased these loan portfolios at a discount to the unpaid principal balance and originated loans
with interest rates and fees calculated to provide a rate of return adjusted to reflect the
elevated credit risk inherent in these types of loans. Franklin originated nonprime loans through
its wholly owned subsidiary, Tribeca Lending Corp., and has generally held for investment the loans
acquired and a significant portion of the loans originated.
Loans to Franklin are funded by a bank group, of which we are the lead bank and largest
participant. The loans participated to other banks have no recourse to Huntington. The term debt
exposure is secured by over 30,000 individual first- and second-priority lien residential
mortgages. In addition, pursuant to an exclusive lockbox arrangement, we receive substantially all
payments made to Franklin on these individual mortgages.
At September 30, 2008, bank group loans totaled $1.456 billion, down $129 million from $1.585
billion at December 31, 2007 (see Table 20). This reduction reflected loan payments of $172
million, partially offset by an increase of $43 million as another institution entered into the
restructuring agreement. The loans participated to other banks commensurately increased $43
million reflecting this institutions participation in the restructuring during the 2008 first
quarter. The monthly cash flow has been above the required debt service, allowing for accelerated
principal paydowns of approximately $60 million of the total bank group debt during the first
nine-month period of 2008.
At September 30, 2008, our exposure to Franklin net of charge-offs was $1.095 billion, down
$93 million, or 8%, from $1.188 billion exposure at December 31, 2007 (see Table 20). In the 2008
fourth quarter, we expect our proportion of payments received to continue to increase to our
pro-rata participation level, as satisfaction of certain terms of the restructuring agreement that
provided for a more rapid amortization on a certain participants portion of the debt were met in
August of 2008.
During the 2008 third quarter, this relationship continued to perform with interest being
accrued. While the cash flow generated by the underlying collateral declined during the quarter
due to the weakening economic environment, it continued to exceed the requirements of the 2007
fourth quarter restructuring agreement. The 2008 third quarter cash flows were also affected by
lower OREO sales proceeds because of a slowdown in the operational foreclosure resolution
processes. Franklin continued to actively restructure and modify existing delinquent loans in
order to generate principal and interest payments in future periods. Franklin was also actively
engaged in recovering against judgments they have filed in prior periods.
34
The following table details our loan relationship with Franklin as of September 30, 2008, and
changes from December 31, 2007:
Table 20 Commercial Loans to Franklin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Participated |
|
|
Previously |
|
|
Huntington |
|
(in thousands of dollars) |
|
Franklin |
|
|
Tribeca |
|
|
Subtotal |
|
|
to others |
|
|
charged off |
|
|
Total |
|
Variable rate, term loan (Facility A) |
|
$ |
513,335 |
|
|
$ |
363,252 |
|
|
$ |
876,587 |
|
|
$ |
(147,910 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
728,677 |
|
Variable rate, subordinated term loan (Facility B) |
|
|
315,764 |
|
|
|
96,849 |
|
|
|
412,613 |
|
|
|
(68,296 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
344,317 |
|
Fixed rate, junior subordinated term loan (Facility C) |
|
|
125,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
125,000 |
|
|
|
(8,224 |
) |
|
|
(116,776 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Line of credit facility |
|
|
949 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
949 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
949 |
|
Other variable rate term loans |
|
|
41,243 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,243 |
|
|
|
(20,622 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,621 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal |
|
|
996,291 |
|
|
|
460,101 |
|
|
|
1,456,392 |
|
|
$ |
(245,052 |
) |
|
$ |
(116,776 |
) |
|
$ |
1,094,564 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Participated to others |
|
|
(151,883 |
) |
|
|
(93,169 |
) |
|
|
(245,052 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total principal owed to Huntington |
|
|
844,408 |
|
|
|
366,932 |
|
|
|
1,211,340 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Previously charged off |
|
|
(116,776 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(116,776 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total book value of loans |
|
$ |
727,632 |
|
|
$ |
366,932 |
|
|
$ |
1,094,564 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank Group |
|
Huntington |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Participated to |
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative Net |
|
|
(in thousands of dollars) |
|
Total Loans |
|
Others |
|
Total Loans |
|
Charge-offs |
|
Net Loans |
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial loans, at December 31, 2007 |
|
$ |
1,584,967 |
|
|
$ |
(279,790 |
) |
|
$ |
1,305,177 |
|
|
$ |
(116,776 |
) |
|
$ |
1,188,401 |
|
New institution enters restructuring |
|
|
43,295 |
|
|
|
(43,295 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal payments received |
|
|
(56,699 |
) |
|
|
25,659 |
|
|
|
(31,040 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(31,040 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial loans, at March 31, 2008 |
|
|
1,571,563 |
|
|
|
(297,426 |
) |
|
|
1,274,137 |
|
|
|
(116,776 |
) |
|
|
1,157,361 |
|
Principal payments received |
|
|
(59,478 |
) |
|
|
32,529 |
|
|
|
(26,949 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26,949 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial loans, at June 30, 2008 |
|
|
1,512,085 |
|
|
|
(264,897 |
) |
|
|
1,247,188 |
|
|
|
(116,776 |
) |
|
|
1,130,412 |
|
Principal payments received |
|
|
(55,693 |
) |
|
|
19,845 |
|
|
|
(35,848 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(35,848 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial loans, at September 30, 2008 |
|
$ |
1,456,392 |
|
|
$ |
(245,052 |
) |
|
$ |
1,211,340 |
|
|
$ |
(116,776 |
) |
|
$ |
1,094,564 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
At September 30, 2008, our specific ALLL for Franklin loans was $115.3 million, unchanged
compared with December 31, 2007, and there were no charge-offs or provision for credit losses
during the first nine-month period of 2008. The table below details our probability-of-default and
loss-given-default performance assumptions for estimating anticipated cash flows from the Franklin
loans that were used to determine the appropriate amount of specific ALLL for the Franklin loans.
The calculation of our specific ALLL for the Franklin portfolio is dependent, among other factors,
on the assumptions provided in the table, as well as the current one-month LIBOR rate on the
underlying loans to Franklin. As LIBOR rates increase, the specific ALLL for the Franklin
portfolio may also increase.
35
Table 21 Franklin Performance Assumptions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Huntington collateral performance assumptions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
UPB (1) |
|
|
Probability of Default |
|
|
Loss Given Default |
|
Purchased 2nd mortgages |
|
$0.8 billion |
|
|
65 |
% |
|
|
90 |
% |
Purchased 1st mortgages |
|
$0.5 billion |
|
|
70 |
% |
|
|
40 |
% |
Tribeca originated 1st mortgages |
|
$0.5 billion |
|
|
70 |
% |
|
|
10 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$1.8 billion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
As of June 30, 2008, unpaid principal balance of mortgage collateral supporting
total bank debt, including OREO. Data is obtained from the June 30, 2008, 10-Q filing of Franklin. |
Commercial Real Estate Portfolio
As shown in Table 22, commercial real estate loans totaled $9.9 billion and represented 24% of
our total loan exposure at September 30, 2008.
Table 22 Commercial Real Estate Loans by Property Type and Borrower Location
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At September 30, 2008 |
(in millions) |
|
Ohio |
|
Michigan |
|
Pennsylvania |
|
Indiana |
|
West Virginia |
|
Other |
|
Total Amount |
|
|
|
|
|
Retail properties |
|
$ |
1,555 |
|
|
$ |
227 |
|
|
$ |
189 |
|
|
$ |
191 |
|
|
$ |
42 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
2,207 |
|
|
|
22.3 |
% |
Single family home builders |
|
|
1,155 |
|
|
|
228 |
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
1,596 |
|
|
|
16.1 |
|
Office |
|
|
727 |
|
|
|
209 |
|
|
|
153 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
1,193 |
|
|
|
12.0 |
|
Multi family |
|
|
851 |
|
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
1,183 |
|
|
|
11.9 |
|
Industrial and warehouse |
|
|
723 |
|
|
|
202 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
1,095 |
|
|
|
11.1 |
|
Lines to real estate companies |
|
|
685 |
|
|
|
172 |
|
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
959 |
|
|
|
9.7 |
|
Raw land and other land uses |
|
|
520 |
|
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
791 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
Health care |
|
|
266 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
363 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
Hotel |
|
|
178 |
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
280 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
Other |
|
|
192 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
240 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
6,852 |
|
|
$ |
1,354 |
|
|
$ |
847 |
|
|
$ |
579 |
|
|
$ |
228 |
|
|
$ |
47 |
|
|
$ |
9,907 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net charge-offs (first nine-month period of 2008) |
|
$ |
19.2 |
|
|
$ |
7.2 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1.2 |
|
|
$ |
1.5 |
|
|
$ |
1.3 |
|
|
$ |
30.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
% of portfolio |
|
|
0.39 |
% |
|
|
0.67 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.89 |
% |
|
|
0.36 |
% |
|
|
0.42 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-accrual loans |
|
$ |
179.2 |
|
|
$ |
65.8 |
|
|
$ |
5.9 |
|
|
$ |
36.7 |
|
|
$ |
2.1 |
|
|
$ |
9.1 |
|
|
$ |
298.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
% of portfolio |
|
|
2.62 |
% |
|
|
4.86 |
% |
|
|
0.70 |
% |
|
|
6.34 |
% |
|
|
0.92 |
% |
|
|
19.36 |
% |
|
|
3.02 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accruing loans past due 90 days or more |
|
$ |
54.4 |
|
|
$ |
0.5 |
|
|
$ |
1.0 |
|
|
$ |
0.8 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2.2 |
|
|
$ |
58.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
% of portfolio |
|
|
0.79 |
% |
|
|
0.04 |
% |
|
|
0.12 |
% |
|
|
0.14 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.68 |
% |
|
|
0.59 |
% |
|
|
|
|
We manage the risks inherent in this portfolio through origination policies, concentration
limits, on-going loan level reviews, and continuous portfolio risk management activities. Our
origination policies for this portfolio include loan product-type specific policies such as
loan-to-value (LTV), debt service coverage ratios, and pre-leasing requirements, as applicable.
Except for our mezzanine portfolio, we generally: (a) limit our loans to 80% of the appraised
value of the commercial real estate, (b) require net operating cash flows to be 125% of required
interest and principal payments, and (c) if the commercial real estate is non-owner occupied,
require that at least 50% of the space of the project be pre-leased. We also may require more
conservative loan terms, depending on the project.
Dedicated commercial real estate professionals located in our major metropolitan areas
originated the majority of this portfolio. Appraisals from approved vendors are reviewed by an
appraisal review group within Huntington to ensure the quality of the valuation used in the
underwriting process. The portfolio is diversified by project type and loan size. This
diversification is a significant piece of the credit risk management strategies employed for this
portfolio. Our loan review
36
staff provides an assessment of the quality of the underwriting and structure and confirms
that an appropriate internal risk rating has been assigned to the loan.
Appraisal values are updated as needed, in conformity with regulatory requirements. Given the
stressed environment for some loan types, we have initiated on-going portfolio level reviews of
segments such as single family home builders (see Single Family Home Builder discussion). These
reviews often generate an updated appraisal based on the current occupancy or sales volume
associated with the project being reviewed.
At the portfolio level, we actively monitor the concentrations and performance metrics of all
loan types, with a focus on higher risk segments. Macro-level stress-test scenarios based on
home-price depreciation trends for the builder segment are embedded in our performance
expectations. Table 22 provides certain performance metrics for the commercial real estate loan
portfolio by state. Michigan and Ohio have experienced the most stress historically as measured by
delinquency and loss rates.
Single Family Home Builders
At September 30, 2008, we had $1.6 billion of loans to single family home builders. Such
loans represented 4% of total loans and leases. Of this portfolio, 69% were to finance projects
currently under construction, 17% to finance land under development, and 14% to finance land held
for development. The $1.6 billion represented a $49 million, or 3%, decrease compared with the
2008 second quarter. We did not originate any new loans in this portfolio during the current
quarter. This portfolio is included within our commercial real estate portfolio, discussed above.
The housing market across our geographic footprint remained stressed, reflecting relatively
lower sales activity, declining prices, and excess inventories of houses to be sold, particularly
impacting borrowers in our eastern Michigan and northern Ohio regions. We anticipate the
residential developer market will continue to be depressed, and anticipate continued pressure on
the single family home builder segment in the coming months. We have taken the following steps to
mitigate the risk arising from this exposure: (a) all loans within the portfolio have been
reviewed continuously over the past 18 months and will continue to be closely monitored, (b) credit
valuation adjustments have been made when appropriate based on the current condition of each
relationship, and (c) reserves have been increased based on proactive risk identification and
thorough borrower analysis.
Consumer Credit
(This section should be read in conjunction with Significant Item 1.)
Consumer credit approvals are based on, among other factors, the financial strength and
payment history of the borrower, type of exposure, and the transaction structure. We make
extensive use of portfolio assessment models to continuously monitor the quality of the portfolio,
which may result in changes to future origination strategies. The continuous analysis and review
process results in a determination of an appropriate ALLL amount for our consumer loan portfolio.
Our consumer loan portfolio is primarily comprised of traditional residential mortgages, home
equity loans and lines of credit, and automobile loans and leases. The residential mortgage and
home equity portfolios are diversified throughout our geographic footprint.
As the performance of our automobile loan and lease portfolio changed during 2007, adjustments
were made to our underwriting processes and modeling approach that resulted in increased average
FICO score and lower LTV ratios. The positive effects have continued into the first nine-months of
2008 as originations during this period have shown lower levels of cumulative risk compared with
2007. Our automobile loan and lease portfolio is primarily located within our banking footprint,
with no out-of-footprint state representing more than 10% of our 2008 originations, except Florida,
which represented 13% of our automobile loan and lease originations during the first nine-month
period of 2008. We have consistently operated in Florida for over 10 years.
The general slowdown in the housing market has impacted the performance of our residential
mortgage and home equity portfolios over the past year. While the degree of price depreciation
varies across our markets, all regions throughout our footprint have been affected.
Given the market conditions in our markets as described above in the single family home
builder section, the home equity and residential mortgage portfolios are particularly noteworthy,
and are discussed below:
37
Table 23 Selected Home Equity and Residential Mortgage Portfolio Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home Equity Loans |
|
|
Home Equity Lines of Credit |
|
|
Residential Mortgages |
|
|
09/30/08 |
|
12/31/07 |
|
|
09/30/08 |
|
12/31/07 |
|
|
09/30/08 |
|
12/31/07 |
Ending Balance |
|
$3.2 billion |
|
$3.4 billion |
|
|
$4.3 billion |
|
$3.9 billion |
|
|
$4.8 billion |
|
$5.4 billion |
Portfolio Weighted Average LTV ratio (1) |
|
|
70 |
% |
|
|
69 |
% |
|
|
|
78 |
% |
|
|
78 |
% |
|
|
|
76 |
% |
|
|
76 |
% |
Portfolio Weighted Average FICO (2) |
|
|
727 |
|
|
|
732 |
|
|
|
|
719 |
|
|
|
724 |
|
|
|
|
706 |
|
|
|
709 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(First Nine Months of 2008) |
|
Home Equity Loans |
|
|
Home Equity Lines of Credit |
|
|
Residential Mortgages |
Originations |
|
$460 million |
|
|
$1,529 million |
|
|
$559 million |
Origination Weighted Average LTV ratio (1) |
|
|
66 |
% |
|
|
|
74 |
% |
|
|
|
74 |
% |
Origination Weighted Average FICO (2) |
|
|
741 |
|
|
|
|
754 |
|
|
|
|
736 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The loan-to-value (LTV) ratios for home equity loans and home equity lines of credit are cumulative LTVs reflecting the balance of any senior loans. |
|
(2) |
|
Portfolio Weighted Average FICO reflects a currently updated customer credit scores whereas Origination Weighted Average FICO reflects the customer credit scores at the time of loan origination. |
Home Equity Portfolio
Our home equity portfolio (loans and lines of credit) consists of both first and second
mortgage loans with underwriting criteria based on minimum FICO credit scores, debt-to-income
ratios, and LTV ratios. Included in our home equity loan portfolio are $1.4 billion of loans where
the loan is secured by a first-mortgage lien on the property. We offer closed-end home equity
loans with a fixed interest rate and level monthly payments and a variable-rate, interest-only home
equity line of credit. The weighted average cumulative LTV ratio at origination of our home equity
portfolio was 75% at September 30, 2008, unchanged from December 31, 2007.
We believe we have granted credit conservatively within this portfolio. We have not
originated home equity loans or lines of credit that allow negative amortization, or any with an
LTV ratio at origination greater than 100%. Our portfolio weighted average LTV ratio at
origination as of September 30, 2008, was 70% for home equity loans and 78% for home equity lines
of credit. Home equity loans are generally fixed rate with periodic principal and interest
payments. Home equity lines of credit generally have variable rates of interest and do not require
payment of principal during the 10-year revolving period of the line.
We have taken several actions to mitigate the risk profile of this portfolio. We stopped
originating new production through brokers in 2007, a culmination of our strategy begun in early
2005 to reduce our exposure to the broker channel. Reducing our reliance on brokers also lowers
the risk profile as this channel typically included a higher-risk borrower profile, as well as the
risks associated with a third party sourcing arrangement. Also, we have focused production within
our banking footprint. In 2008, a home-equity line-of-credit management program was initiated to
reduce our exposure to higher-risk customers.
We continue to make appropriate origination policy adjustments based on our own assessment of
an appropriate risk profile as well as industry actions. As an example, the significant changes
made by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac resulted in the reduction of our maximum LTV ratio on
second-mortgage loans, even for customers with high FICO scores. While it is still too early to
make any declarative statements regarding the impact of these actions, our more recent originations
have shown consistent, or lower, levels of cumulative risk during the first twelve months of the
loan or line of credit term compared with earlier originations.
38
Residential Mortgages
We focus on higher quality borrowers, and underwrite all applications centrally, or through
the use of an automated underwriting system. We do not originate residential mortgage loans that
(a) allow negative amortization, (b) have an LTV ratio at origination greater than 100%, or (c) are
payment option adjustable-rate mortgages.
A majority of the loans in our loan portfolio have adjustable rates. Our adjustable-rate
mortgages (ARMs) are primarily residential mortgages that have a fixed rate for the first 3 to 5
years and then adjust annually. These loans comprised approximately 63% of our total residential
mortgage loan portfolio at September 30, 2008. At September 30, 2008, ARM loans that were
expected to have rates reset in 2009 totaled $878 million. Also, our residential mortgage
portfolio has immaterial loan balances with teaser-rates, that is, loans with a lower introductory
interest rates that generally increase after the introductory period has expired. Given the
quality of our borrowers, the decline in interest rates during the first nine-month period of 2008,
and the immaterial loan balances in our portfolio with teaser-rates, we believe that we have a
relatively limited exposure to ARM reset risk. Nonetheless, we have taken actions to mitigate our
risk exposure. We initiate borrower contact at least six months prior to the interest rate
resetting, and have been successful in converting many ARMs to fixed-rate loans through this
process. Additionally, where borrowers are experiencing payment difficulties, loans may be
re-underwritten or restructured based on the borrowers ability to repay the loan.
We had $461.0 million of Alt-A mortgages in the residential mortgage loan portfolio at
September 30, 2008, compared with $531.4 million at December 31, 2007. These loans have a higher
risk profile than the rest of the portfolio as a result of origination policies including stated
income, stated assets, and higher acceptable LTV ratios. At September 30, 2008, borrowers for
Alt-A mortgages had an average current FICO score of 672 and the loans had an average LTV ratio of
88%. Total Alt-A net charge-offs were an annualized 3.05% during the 2008 third quarter, and an
annualized 1.87% during the first nine-month period of 2008. Our exposure related to this product
will decline in the future as we stopped originating these loans in 2007.
Interest-only loans comprised $702.1 million, or 14%, of residential real estate loans at
September 30, 2008, compared with $856.4 million, or 16%, at December 31, 2007. Interest-only
loans are underwritten to specific standards including minimum FICO credit scores, stressed
debt-to-income ratios, and extensive collateral evaluation. At September 30, 2008, borrowers for
interest-only loans had an average current FICO score of 725 and the loans had an average LTV ratio
of 78%, compared with 729 and 79%, respectively, at December 31, 2007. Total interest-only net
charge offs were an annualized 0.40% during the 2008 third quarter and 0.22% during the first
nine-month period of 2008. We continue to believe that we have mitigated the risk of such loans by
matching this product with appropriate borrowers.
Credit Quality
We believe the most meaningful way to assess overall credit quality performance for the 2008
third quarter is through an analysis of credit quality performance ratios. This approach forms the
basis of most of the discussion in the three sections immediately following: Nonaccruing Loans and
Nonperforming Assets, Allowance for Credit Losses, and Net Charge-offs.
Credit quality performance in the 2008 third quarter was generally consistent with our
expectations, reflecting the negative impact of the continued economic weakness across our Midwest
markets. These economic factors influenced the performance of net charge-offs (NCOs) and NALs, as
well as an expected commensurate significant increase in the provision for credit losses (see
Provision for Credit Losses discussion) that increased the absolute and relative levels of our
ACL.
Nonaccruing Loans (NAL/NALs) and Nonperforming Assets (NPA/NPAs)
(This section should be read in conjunction with Significant Item 2.)
Nonperforming assets (NPAs) consist of (a) NALs, which represent loans and leases that are no
longer accruing interest and/or have been renegotiated to below market rates based upon financial
difficulties of the borrower, (b) troubled-debt restructured loans, (c) NALs held-for-sale, (d)
OREO, and (e) other NPAs. C&I and CRE loans are generally placed on nonaccrual status when
collection of principal or interest is in doubt or when the loan is 90-days past due. When interest
accruals are suspended, accrued interest income is reversed with current year accruals charged to
earnings and prior-year amounts generally charged-off as a credit loss.
39
Table 24 reflects period-end NALs, NPAs, and past due loans and leases detail for each of the
last five quarters.
Table 24 Nonaccruing Loans (NALs), Nonperforming Assets (NPAs) and Past Due Loans and Leases
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
(in thousands) |
|
September 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
Non-accrual loans and leases: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and industrial |
|
$ |
174,207 |
|
|
$ |
161,345 |
|
|
$ |
101,842 |
|
|
$ |
87,679 |
|
|
$ |
82,960 |
|
Commercial real estate |
|
|
298,844 |
|
|
|
261,739 |
|
|
|
183,000 |
|
|
|
148,467 |
|
|
|
95,587 |
|
Residential mortgage |
|
|
85,163 |
|
|
|
82,882 |
|
|
|
66,466 |
|
|
|
59,557 |
|
|
|
47,738 |
|
Home equity |
|
|
27,727 |
|
|
|
29,076 |
|
|
|
26,053 |
|
|
|
24,068 |
|
|
|
23,111 |
|
|
|
|
Total NALs |
|
|
585,941 |
|
|
|
535,042 |
|
|
|
377,361 |
|
|
|
319,771 |
|
|
|
249,396 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructured loans (1) |
|
|
364,939 |
|
|
|
368,379 |
|
|
|
1,157,361 |
|
|
|
1,187,368 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other real estate: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential |
|
|
59,302 |
|
|
|
59,119 |
|
|
|
63,675 |
|
|
|
60,804 |
|
|
|
49,555 |
|
Commercial |
|
|
14,176 |
|
|
|
13,259 |
|
|
|
10,181 |
|
|
|
14,467 |
|
|
|
19,310 |
|
|
|
|
Total other real estate |
|
|
73,478 |
|
|
|
72,378 |
|
|
|
73,856 |
|
|
|
75,271 |
|
|
|
68,865 |
|
Impaired loans held for sale (2) |
|
|
13,503 |
|
|
|
14,759 |
|
|
|
66,353 |
|
|
|
73,481 |
|
|
|
100,485 |
|
Other NPAs (3) |
|
|
2,397 |
|
|
|
2,557 |
|
|
|
2,836 |
|
|
|
4,379 |
|
|
|
16,296 |
|
|
|
|
Total NPAs |
|
$ |
1,040,258 |
|
|
$ |
993,115 |
|
|
$ |
1,677,767 |
|
|
$ |
1,660,270 |
|
|
$ |
435,042 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NALs as a % of total loans and leases |
|
|
1.42 |
% |
|
|
1.30 |
% |
|
|
0.92 |
% |
|
|
0.80 |
% |
|
|
0.62 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NPA ratio (4) |
|
|
2.52 |
|
|
|
2.41 |
|
|
|
4.08 |
|
|
|
4.13 |
|
|
|
1.08 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accruing loans and leases past due 90
days or more |
|
$ |
191,518 |
|
|
$ |
136,914 |
|
|
$ |
152,897 |
|
|
$ |
140,977 |
|
|
$ |
115,607 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accruing loans and leases past due 90 days
or
more as a percent of total loans and
leases |
|
|
0.46 |
% |
|
|
0.33 |
% |
|
|
0.37 |
% |
|
|
0.35 |
% |
|
|
0.29 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Restructured loans represent loans to Franklin that were restructured during the 2007 fourth quarter, and the subsequent
removal of the Franklin Tranche A loans from nonperforming status during the 2008 second quarter. |
|
(2) |
|
Impaired loans held for sale represent impaired loans obtained from the Sky Financial acquisition. Impaired loans held for
sale are carried at the lower of cost or fair value less costs to sell. The decline from March 31, 2008 to June 30, 2008
was primarily due to the sale of these loans. |
|
(3) |
|
Other NPAs represent certain investment securities backed by mortgage loans to borrowers with lower FICO scores. |
|
(4) |
|
Nonperforming assets divided by the sum of loans and leases, impaired loans held for sale, other real estate, and other NPAs. |
Compared with the prior quarter, NALs increased $50.1 million, or 10%. The majority of this
increase was primarily in the C&I and CRE portfolios, with the single family home builder segment
representing approximately $26 million of the increase. The increase was a result of a number of
small relationships, as only two loans exceeded $5 million.
The $47.1 million, or 5%, increase in NPAs, which include NALs, from the end of the prior
quarter reflected:
|
|
|
$50.1 million, or 10%, increase in NALs (discussed above) |
Partially offset by:
|
|
|
$3.4 million reduction in restructured Franklin loans, reflecting loan payments. |
40
Compared with December 31, 2007, NPAs, which include NALs, decreased $620.0 million, or 37%,
reflecting:
|
|
|
$822.4 million, or 69%, reduction in Franklin loans, primarily reflecting the
removal of the Tranche A portion of the total Franklin loans from NPAs during the
2008 second quarter. |
|
|
|
|
$60.0 million, or 82%, reduction in impaired loans held-for-sale, primarily
reflecting loans sales and payments. |
Partially offset by:
|
|
|
$266.2 million, or 83%, increase in NALs primarily reflecting the overall
economic weakness in our markets. The increases were primarily in our C&I and CRE
portfolios, reflecting the continued softness in the residential real estate
development markets. |
The over 90-day delinquent, but still accruing, ratio was 0.46% at September 30, 2008, up from
0.33% at June 30, 2008, and from 0.29% at the end of the year-ago quarter. The 13 basis point
increase in the 90-day delinquent ratio from June 30, 2008, reflected a 21 basis point increase in
the total commercial loan 90-day delinquent ratio to 0.35% from 0.14%, and a 2 basis point increase
in the total consumer loan 90-day delinquent ratio to 0.61% from 0.59%.
The significant increase in the over 90-day delinquent, but still accruing, C&I and CRE loans
reflected maturity issues including loans that have matured where we are working with our borrowers
to ensure mutually beneficial arrangements are secured given the economic conditions. C&I 90-day
delinquencies increased 11 basis points, with a 34 basis point increase in the CRE segment.
The consumer loan 90-day past due performance was relatively stable, with the home equity
portfolio delinquencies declining 5 basis points. The increase in the automobile loan and lease
portfolio delinquencies represented normal seasonal patterns. The increase in residential mortgage
delinquencies was consistent with our performance expectations for the portfolio.
From time to time, as part of our loss mitigation process, loans may be renegotiated when we
determine that we will ultimately receive greater economic value under the new terms than through
foreclosure, liquidation, or bankruptcy. We may consider the borrowers payment status and history,
borrowers ability to pay upon a rate reset on an adjustable rate mortgage, size of the payment
increase upon a rate reset, period of time remaining prior to the rate reset and other relevant
factors in determining whether a borrower is experiencing financial difficulty. These
restructurings generally occur within the residential mortgage and home equity loan portfolios and
were not material in any period presented.
NPA activity for each of the past five quarters was as follows:
Table 25 Non-Performing Assets (NPAs) Activity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
(in thousands) |
|
Third |
|
Second |
|
First |
|
Fourth |
|
Third |
|
|
|
NPAs, beginning of period |
|
$ |
993,115 |
|
|
$ |
1,677,767 |
|
|
$ |
1,660,270 |
|
|
$ |
435,042 |
|
|
$ |
261,185 |
|
New NPAs |
|
|
175,345 |
|
|
|
256,308 |
|
|
|
141,090 |
|
|
|
211,134 |
|
|
|
92,986 |
|
Restructured loans (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(762,033 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,187,368 |
|
|
|
|
|
Acquired NPAs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
144,492 |
|
Returns to accruing status |
|
|
(9,104 |
) |
|
|
(5,817 |
) |
|
|
(13,484 |
) |
|
|
(5,273 |
) |
|
|
(8,829 |
) |
Loan and lease losses |
|
|
(52,792 |
) |
|
|
(40,808 |
) |
|
|
(27,896 |
) |
|
|
(62,502 |
) |
|
|
(28,031 |
) |
Payments |
|
|
(46,759 |
) |
|
|
(73,040 |
) |
|
|
(68,753 |
) |
|
|
(30,756 |
) |
|
|
(17,589 |
) |
Sales |
|
|
(19,547 |
) |
|
|
(59,262 |
) |
|
|
(13,460 |
) |
|
|
(74,743 |
) |
|
|
(9,172 |
) |
|
|
|
NPAs, end of period |
|
$ |
1,040,258 |
|
|
$ |
993,115 |
|
|
$ |
1,677,767 |
|
|
$ |
1,660,270 |
|
|
$ |
435,042 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Restructured loans represent loans to Franklin that were
restructured during the 2007 fourth quarter, and the
subsequent removal of the Franklin Tranche A loans from
nonperforming status during the 2008 second quarter. |
41
Allowances for Credit Losses (ACL)
(This section should be read in conjunction with Significant Item 2.)
We maintain two reserves, both of which are available to absorb credit losses: the ALLL and the
AULC. When summed together, these reserves constitute the total ACL. Our credit administration
group is responsible for developing the methodology and determining the adequacy of the ACL.
Table 26 reflects activity in the ALLL and AULC for each of the last five quarters.
Table 26 Quarterly Credit Reserves Analysis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
(in thousands) |
|
Third |
|
|
Second |
|
|
First |
|
|
Fourth |
|
|
Third |
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses,
beginning of period |
|
$ |
679,403 |
|
|
$ |
627,615 |
|
|
$ |
578,442 |
|
|
$ |
454,784 |
|
|
$ |
307,519 |
|
Acquired allowance for loan and lease losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
188,128 |
|
Loan and lease losses |
|
|
(96,388 |
) |
|
|
(78,084 |
) |
|
|
(60,804 |
) |
|
|
(388,506 |
) |
|
|
(57,466 |
) |
Recoveries of loans previously charged off |
|
|
12,637 |
|
|
|
12,837 |
|
|
|
12,355 |
|
|
|
10,599 |
|
|
|
10,360 |
|
|
|
|
Net loan and lease losses |
|
|
(83,751 |
) |
|
|
(65,247 |
) |
|
|
(48,449 |
) |
|
|
(377,907 |
) |
|
|
(47,106 |
) |
|
|
|
Provision for loan and lease losses |
|
|
125,086 |
|
|
|
117,035 |
|
|
|
97,622 |
|
|
|
503,781 |
|
|
|
36,952 |
|
Allowance for loans transferred to held-for-sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,216 |
) |
|
|
(30,709 |
) |
|
|
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses, end of period |
|
$ |
720,738 |
|
|
$ |
679,403 |
|
|
$ |
627,615 |
|
|
$ |
578,442 |
|
|
$ |
454,784 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for unfunded loan commitments
and letters of credit, beginning of period |
|
$ |
61,334 |
|
|
$ |
57,556 |
|
|
$ |
66,528 |
|
|
$ |
58,227 |
|
|
$ |
41,631 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquired AULC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,541 |
|
(Reduction in) provision for unfunded loan
commitments and letters of credit losses |
|
|
306 |
|
|
|
3,778 |
|
|
|
(8,972 |
) |
|
|
8,301 |
|
|
|
5,055 |
|
|
|
|
Allowance for unfunded loan commitments
and letters of credit, end of period |
|
$ |
61,640 |
|
|
$ |
61,334 |
|
|
$ |
57,556 |
|
|
$ |
66,528 |
|
|
$ |
58,227 |
|
|
Total allowances for credit losses |
|
$ |
782,378 |
|
|
$ |
740,737 |
|
|
$ |
685,171 |
|
|
$ |
644,970 |
|
|
$ |
513,011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses (ALLL) as % of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transaction reserve |
|
|
1.54 |
% |
|
|
1.45 |
% |
|
|
1.34 |
% |
|
|
1.27 |
% |
|
|
0.97 |
% |
Economic reserve |
|
|
0.21 |
|
|
|
0.21 |
|
|
|
0.19 |
|
|
|
0.17 |
|
|
|
0.17 |
|
|
|
|
Total loans and leases |
|
|
1.75 |
% |
|
|
1.66 |
% |
|
|
1.53 |
% |
|
|
1.44 |
% |
|
|
1.14 |
% |
|
|
|
Nonaccrual loans and leases (NALs) (1) |
|
|
123 |
% |
|
|
127 |
% |
|
|
166 |
% |
|
|
181 |
% |
|
|
182 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total allowances for credit losses (ACL) as % of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans and leases |
|
|
1.90 |
% |
|
|
1.80 |
% |
|
|
1.67 |
% |
|
|
1.61 |
% |
|
|
1.28 |
% |
NALs (1) |
|
|
134 |
|
|
|
138 |
|
|
|
182 |
|
|
|
202 |
|
|
|
206 |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Beginning in the 2007 fourth quarter, the ALLL includes a specific reserve of $115.3 million related to Franklin, which remains an accruing loan. |
42
Table 27 reflects activity in the ALLL and AULC for the first nine-month periods of 2008 and
2007.
Table 27 Year to Date Credit Reserves Analysis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
(in thousands) |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
Allowance for loan and lease losses,
beginning of period |
|
$ |
578,442 |
|
|
$ |
272,068 |
|
Acquired allowance for loan and lease losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
188,128 |
|
Loan and lease losses |
|
|
(235,276 |
) |
|
|
(129,437 |
) |
Recoveries of loans previously charged off |
|
|
37,829 |
|
|
|
29,713 |
|
|
Net loan and lease losses |
|
|
(197,447 |
) |
|
|
(99,724 |
) |
Provision for loan and lease losses |
|
|
339,743 |
|
|
|
125,021 |
|
Allowance for loans transferred to held-for-sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30,709 |
) |
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses, end of period |
|
$ |
720,738 |
|
|
$ |
454,784 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for unfunded loan commitments
and letters of credit, beginning of period |
|
$ |
66,527 |
|
|
$ |
40,161 |
|
Acquired AULC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,541 |
|
(Reduction in) provision for unfunded loan
commitments
and letters of credit losses |
|
|
(4,888 |
) |
|
|
6,525 |
|
|
Allowance for unfunded loan commitments
and letters of credit, end of period |
|
$ |
61,639 |
|
|
$ |
58,227 |
|
|
Total allowances for credit losses |
|
$ |
782,377 |
|
|
$ |
513,011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses (ALLL) as % of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transaction reserve |
|
|
1.54 |
% |
|
|
0.97 |
% |
Economic reserve |
|
|
0.21 |
|
|
|
0.17 |
|
|
Total loans and leases |
|
|
1.75 |
% |
|
|
1.14 |
% |
|
Nonaccrual loans and leases (NALs) (1) |
|
|
123 |
% |
|
|
182 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total allowances for credit losses (ACL) as % of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans and leases |
|
|
1.90 |
% |
|
|
1.28 |
% |
NALs (1) |
|
|
134 |
|
|
|
206 |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Beginning in the 2007 fourth quarter, the ALLL includes a
specific reserve of $115.3 million related to Franklin,
which remains an accruing loan. |
The ALLL increases of $41.3 million and $142.3 million compared with June 30, 2008 and
December 31, 2007, respectively, primarily reflected the impact of the continued economic weakness
across our Midwest markets. As new non-accruals are identified, we conduct formal impairment
testing that may result in an increase to our ALLL. A significant portion of the increases in the
ALLL has been a result of this impairment testing process. At September 30, 2008, the specific
ALLL related to Franklin was $115.3 million, unchanged from June 30, 2008.
We have an established process to determine the adequacy of the ALLL that relies on a number
of analytical tools and benchmarks. No single statistic or measurement, in itself, determines the
adequacy of the ALLL. The ALLL is comprised of two components: The transaction reserve and the
economic reserve. Changes to the transaction reserve component of the ALLL are impacted by changes
in the estimated loss inherent in our loan portfolios. For example, our process requires
increasingly higher level of reserves as a loans internal classification moves from higher quality
rankings to lower, and vice versa. This movement across the credit scale is called migration.
During the 2008 third quarter, the transaction component of the ALLL increased to 1.54% at
September 30, 2008, from 1.45% at the end of the prior quarter, and from 1.27% at 2007 year-end.
This reflected the continued downward migration
43
in the credit quality of loans, reflecting the
negative impact of the continued economic weakness on both the borrowers ability to repay, as well
as declining collateral values. This downward migration from the end of the prior quarter was most
pronounced in our East Michigan and Northwest Ohio regions, while the downward migration from 2007
year-end was most pronounced in our Central Ohio, Greater Cleveland, and Northwest Ohio regions.
The estimated loss factors assigned to credit exposures across our portfolios are updated from
time to time based on changes in actual performance. During the 2008 first quarter, we updated the
expected loss factors used to estimate the AULC. The lower expected loss factors were based on our
observations of how unfunded loan commitments have historically become funded loans. Additionally,
we also made other adjustments that affected the level of the ALLL during the first nine-month
period of 2008. In the aggregate, these changes did not have a significant impact to the provision
for credit losses for the first nine-month period of 2008.
44
Net Charge-offs (NCOs)
(This section should be read in conjunction with Significant Item 2.)
Table 28 reflects net loan and lease charge-off detail for each of the last five quarters.
Table 28 Quarterly Net Charge-Off Analysis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
(in thousands) |
|
Third |
|
|
Second |
|
|
First |
|
|
Fourth |
|
|
Third |
|
|
|
|
Net charge-offs by loan and lease type: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and industrial (1) |
|
$ |
29,646 |
|
|
$ |
12,361 |
|
|
$ |
10,732 |
|
|
$ |
323,905 |
|
|
$ |
12,641 |
|
Commercial real estate: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction |
|
|
3,539 |
|
|
|
575 |
|
|
|
122 |
|
|
|
6,800 |
|
|
|
2,157 |
|
Commercial |
|
|
7,446 |
|
|
|
14,524 |
|
|
|
4,153 |
|
|
|
13,936 |
|
|
|
2,506 |
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate |
|
|
10,985 |
|
|
|
15,099 |
|
|
|
4,275 |
|
|
|
20,736 |
|
|
|
4,663 |
|
|
|
|
Total commercial |
|
|
40,631 |
|
|
|
27,460 |
|
|
|
15,007 |
|
|
|
344,641 |
|
|
|
17,304 |
|
|
|
|
Consumer: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automobile loans |
|
|
9,813 |
|
|
|
8,522 |
|
|
|
8,008 |
|
|
|
7,347 |
|
|
|
5,354 |
|
Automobile leases |
|
|
3,532 |
|
|
|
2,928 |
|
|
|
3,211 |
|
|
|
3,046 |
|
|
|
2,561 |
|
|
|
|
Automobile loans and leases |
|
|
13,345 |
|
|
|
11,450 |
|
|
|
11,219 |
|
|
|
10,393 |
|
|
|
7,915 |
|
Home equity (2) |
|
|
15,828 |
|
|
|
17,345 |
|
|
|
15,215 |
|
|
|
12,212 |
|
|
|
10,841 |
|
Residential mortgage |
|
|
6,706 |
|
|
|
4,286 |
|
|
|
2,927 |
|
|
|
3,340 |
|
|
|
4,405 |
|
Other loans (2) |
|
|
7,241 |
|
|
|
4,706 |
|
|
|
4,081 |
|
|
|
7,321 |
|
|
|
6,641 |
|
|
|
|
Total consumer |
|
|
43,120 |
|
|
|
37,787 |
|
|
|
33,442 |
|
|
|
33,266 |
|
|
|
29,802 |
|
|
|
|
Total net charge-offs |
|
$ |
83,751 |
|
|
$ |
65,247 |
|
|
$ |
48,449 |
|
|
$ |
377,907 |
|
|
$ |
47,106 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net charge-offs annualized percentages: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and industrial (1) |
|
|
0.87 |
% |
|
|
0.36 |
% |
|
|
0.32 |
% |
|
|
9.76 |
% |
|
|
0.39 |
% |
Commercial real estate: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction |
|
|
0.68 |
|
|
|
0.11 |
|
|
|
0.02 |
|
|
|
1.44 |
|
|
|
0.48 |
|
Commercial |
|
|
0.39 |
|
|
|
0.77 |
|
|
|
0.23 |
|
|
|
0.78 |
|
|
|
0.14 |
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate |
|
|
0.45 |
|
|
|
0.63 |
|
|
|
0.18 |
|
|
|
0.92 |
|
|
|
0.21 |
|
|
|
|
Total commercial |
|
|
0.69 |
|
|
|
0.47 |
|
|
|
0.27 |
|
|
|
6.18 |
|
|
|
0.31 |
|
|
|
|
Consumer: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automobile loans |
|
|
1.02 |
|
|
|
0.94 |
|
|
|
0.97 |
|
|
|
0.96 |
|
|
|
0.73 |
|
Automobile leases |
|
|
1.84 |
|
|
|
1.28 |
|
|
|
1.18 |
|
|
|
0.96 |
|
|
|
0.72 |
|
|
|
|
Automobile loans and leases |
|
|
1.15 |
|
|
|
1.01 |
|
|
|
1.02 |
|
|
|
0.96 |
|
|
|
0.73 |
|
Home equity (2) |
|
|
0.85 |
|
|
|
0.94 |
|
|
|
0.84 |
|
|
|
0.67 |
|
|
|
0.58 |
|
Residential mortgage |
|
|
0.56 |
|
|
|
0.33 |
|
|
|
0.22 |
|
|
|
0.25 |
|
|
|
0.32 |
|
Other loans (2) |
|
|
4.32 |
|
|
|
2.69 |
|
|
|
2.29 |
|
|
|
4.02 |
|
|
|
4.97 |
|
|
|
|
Total consumer |
|
|
0.98 |
|
|
|
0.85 |
|
|
|
0.75 |
|
|
|
0.75 |
|
|
|
0.67 |
|
|
|
|
Net charge-offs as a % of average loans |
|
|
0.82 |
% |
|
|
0.64 |
% |
|
|
0.48 |
% |
|
|
3.77 |
% |
|
|
0.47 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The 2007 fourth quarter includes charge-offs totaling $397 million associated with
the Franklin restructuring. These charge-offs were reduced by the unamortized discount associated
with the loans, and by other amounts received from Franklin totaling $88.5 million, resulting in
net charge-offs totaling $308.5 million. |
|
(2) |
|
During the 2008 third quarter, we reclassified certain previously reported 2008
first and second quarter charge-offs from other consumer loans to home equity loans. |
45
Current quarter C&I NCOs reflected the impact of charging-off two relationships totaling $11
million, with the rest of the increase spread among smaller loans across the portfolio. Current
quarter CRE NCOs were consistent with our expectations and reflected smaller dollar activity and
the resolution of previously identified NALs.
Both automobile loan and automobile lease NCOs continued to be negatively impacted by declines
in used car prices. While there was some evidence of used car price stabilization, the overall
market remained under stress as consumer spending on vehicles declined. While both the loan and
lease segments were negatively impacted by general economic weakness, the reported automobile lease
NCO annualized percentage was also negatively affected by declining balances. Although we
anticipate that automobile loan and lease NCOs will remain under pressure due to continued economic
weakness in our markets, we believe that our focus on high quality borrowers over the last several
years will continue to result in better performance relative to other peer bank automobile
portfolios.
The home equity portfolio continued to be negatively impacted by the general economic and
housing market slowdown. The impact was evident across our footprint, but performance was most
impacted in our West Michigan and East Michigan regions, particularly the Detroit market. Given
that we have: (a) no exposure to the very volatile west coast market, (b) insignificant exposure to
the Florida markets, resulting from loans made to our Private Banking customers in that area, (c)
less than 10% of the portfolio originated via the broker channel, and (d) conservatively assessed
the borrowers ability to repay at the time of underwriting, we continue to believe our home equity
NCO experience will compare favorably relative to the industry.
The residential mortgage portfolio remained under the same economic and housing related
pressures as the home equity portfolio, and we expect to see additional stress in our markets in
future periods. However, as our origination strategy specifically excluded the riskier mortgage
structures, we believe that our performance throughout this cycle will compare favorably on a
relative basis to the industry. In addition, loss mitigation strategies have been in place for
over a year and are helping to successfully mitigate risks in our ARM portfolio.
46
Table 29 reflects net loan and lease charge-off detail for the first nine-month periods of
2008 and 2007.
Table 29 Year To Date Net Charge-Off Analysis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Net charge-offs by loan and lease type: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and industrial |
|
$ |
52,739 |
|
|
$ |
21,935 |
|
Commercial real estate: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction |
|
|
4,236 |
|
|
|
5,054 |
|
Commercial |
|
|
26,123 |
|
|
|
13,314 |
|
|
Commercial real estate |
|
|
30,359 |
|
|
|
18,368 |
|
|
Total commercial |
|
|
83,098 |
|
|
|
40,303 |
|
|
Consumer: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automobile loans |
|
|
26,343 |
|
|
|
9,838 |
|
Automobile leases |
|
|
9,671 |
|
|
|
7,461 |
|
|
Automobile loans and leases |
|
|
36,014 |
|
|
|
17,299 |
|
Home equity |
|
|
48,388 |
|
|
|
22,214 |
|
Residential mortgage |
|
|
13,919 |
|
|
|
8,031 |
|
Other loans |
|
|
16,028 |
|
|
|
11,877 |
|
|
Total consumer |
|
|
114,349 |
|
|
|
59,421 |
|
|
Total net charge-offs |
|
$ |
197,447 |
|
|
$ |
99,724 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net charge-offs annualized percentages: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and industrial |
|
|
0.52 |
% |
|
|
0.30 |
% |
Commercial real estate: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction |
|
|
0.28 |
|
|
|
0.48 |
|
Commercial |
|
|
0.46 |
|
|
|
0.38 |
|
|
Commercial real estate |
|
|
0.42 |
|
|
|
0.40 |
|
|
Total commercial |
|
|
0.48 |
|
|
|
0.34 |
|
|
Consumer: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automobile loans |
|
|
0.98 |
|
|
|
0.53 |
|
Automobile leases |
|
|
1.40 |
|
|
|
0.64 |
|
|
Automobile loans and leases |
|
|
1.06 |
|
|
|
0.57 |
|
Home equity |
|
|
0.88 |
|
|
|
0.51 |
|
Residential mortgage |
|
|
0.36 |
|
|
|
0.22 |
|
Other loans |
|
|
3.07 |
|
|
|
3.44 |
|
|
Total consumer |
|
|
0.86 |
|
|
|
0.53 |
|
|
Net charge-offs as a % of average loans |
|
|
0.65 |
% |
|
|
0.43 |
% |
|
Investment Portfolio
(This section should be read in conjunction with Significant Item 5.)
We routinely review our available-for-sale portfolio, and recognize impairment write-downs
based primarily on fair value, issuer-specific factors and results, and our intent to hold such
investments.
Available-for-sale portfolio
Our available-for-sale portfolio is evaluated in light of established asset/liability
management objectives, and changing market conditions that could affect the profitability
of the portfolio, as well as the level of interest rate risk to which we are exposed.
47
Within our securities available-for-sale portfolio are asset-backed securities. At September
30, 2008, the securities in this portfolio had a fair value that was $209.2 million less than their
book value (net of impairment), resulting from increased liquidity spreads and extended duration.
Table 30 details our asset-backed securities exposure:
Table 30 Asset-Backed Securities Exposure
(in thousands of dollars)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
Collateral Type |
|
Book value |
|
|
Fair value |
|
|
Credit Rating |
|
|
Book value |
|
|
Fair value |
|
|
Credit Rating |
|
Alt-A mortgage loans |
|
$ |
472,874 |
|
|
$ |
382,469 |
|
|
A+ |
|
$ |
560,654 |
|
|
$ |
547,358 |
|
|
AAA |
Pooled trust preferred securities |
|
|
299,039 |
|
|
|
180,276 |
|
|
BBB+ |
|
|
301,231 |
|
|
|
279,175 |
|
|
A |
Other securities(1) |
|
|
2,397 |
|
|
|
2,397 |
|
|
B- |
|
|
7,769 |
|
|
|
7,956 |
|
|
BB- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
774,310 |
|
|
$ |
565,142 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
869,654 |
|
|
$ |
834,489 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Other securities represent certain investment securities backed by mortgage loans
to borrowers with lower FICO scores. |
Our Alt-A mortgage securities were purchased in 2006. The assets backing these securities are
either 10/1 ARMs or 15- or 30- year fixed-rate loans, and none of the securities are backed by
option ARMs. Our pooled trust preferred securities were purchased between 2003 and 2005, and
consist of 16 pools with 400 separate issues. A total of 80% of these securities are either first-
or second- tier bank trust preferred securities, and none of the securities are backed by REIT
trust-preferred securities. The remaining 20% are backed by senior tranche insurance company
trust-preferred securities. A rigorous cash flow analysis of the Alt-A mortgage securities and the
first- and second- tier bank trust preferred securities was conducted
to test for any OTTI. During the 2008 third quarter, we estimated
that the cash flows from eight Alt-A mortgage backed securities would
fall short of the required contractual interest principal payments
over the estimated remaining life of these securities. As such, OTTI
was recognized.
No OTTI was recognized in either the pooled trust preferred securities portfolio or the other
securities portfolio as we believe all impairment within these portfolios to be temporary.
However, during the current quarter, we recognized OTTI of $76.6 million in the Alt-A mortgage
loan-backed portfolio relating to eight of the 25 securities held in that portfolio.
Table 31 provides additional detail regarding our Alt-A mortgage loan-backed portfolio at
September 30, 2008.
48
Table 31 Alt-A Mortgage Loan Backed Portfolio
(in thousands of dollars)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
Impaired |
|
|
Unimpaired |
|
|
Total |
|
Par value |
|
$ |
212,062 |
|
|
$ |
342,844 |
|
|
$ |
554,906 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Book value |
|
$ |
134,821 |
|
|
$ |
338,053 |
|
|
$ |
472,874 |
|
Unrealized losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(90,405 |
) |
|
|
(90,405 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value |
|
$ |
134,821 |
|
|
$ |
247,648 |
|
|
$ |
382,469 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative OTTI |
|
$ |
76,553 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average: (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value |
|
|
64 |
% |
|
|
72 |
% |
|
|
69 |
% |
Collateral LTV |
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
72 |
|
Expected loss |
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
Market Risk
Market risk represents the risk of loss due to changes in market values of assets and
liabilities. We incur market risk in the normal course of business through exposures to market
interest rates, foreign exchange rates, equity prices, credit spreads, and expected lease residual
values. We have identified two primary sources of market risk: interest rate risk and price risk.
Interest rate risk is our primary market risk.
Interest Rate Risk
Interest rate risk is the risk to earnings and value arising from changes in market interest
rates. Interest rate risk arises from timing differences in the repricings and maturities of
interest bearing assets and liabilities (reprice risk), changes in the expected maturities of
assets and liabilities arising from embedded options, such as borrowers ability to prepay
residential mortgage loans at any time and depositors ability to terminate certificates of deposit
before maturity (option risk), changes in the shape of the yield curve whereby market interest
rates increase or decrease in a non-parallel fashion (yield curve risk), and changes in spread
relationships between different yield curves, such as U.S. Treasuries and LIBOR (basis risk.)
The simulations for evaluating short-term interest rate risk exposure are scenarios that
model gradual +/-100 and +/-200 basis point parallel shifts in market interest rates over
the next 12-month period beyond the interest rate change implied by the current yield curve. As of
September 30, 2008, the scenario that used the -200 basis point parallel shift in market interest
rates over the next 12-month period indicated that market interest rates could fall below
historical levels. Accordingly, management instituted an assumption that market interest rates
would not fall below 0.50% over the next 12-month period. The table below shows the results of the
scenarios as of September 30, 2008, and December 31, 2007. All of the positions were within the
board of directors policy limits.
Table 32 Net Interest Income at Risk
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Interest Income at Risk (%) |
|
|
Basis point change scenario |
|
|
-200 |
|
|
|
-100 |
|
|
|
+100 |
|
|
|
+200 |
|
|
Board policy limits |
|
|
-4.0 |
% |
|
|
-2.0 |
% |
|
|
-2.0 |
% |
|
|
-4.0 |
% |
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
|
-2.3 |
% |
|
|
-0.7 |
% |
|
|
+0.5 |
% |
|
|
+0.8 |
% |
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
-3.0 |
% |
|
|
-1.3 |
% |
|
|
+1.4 |
% |
|
|
+2.2 |
% |
The change to net interest income at risk reported as of September 30, 2008 compared with
December 31, 2007 reflected actions taken by management to reduce net interest income at risk.
During the first quarter of 2008, $2.5 billion of receive fixed rate, pay variable rate interest
rate swaps were executed, and $0.2 billion of pay fixed rate, receive variable
49
rate interest rate
swaps were terminated. The combined impact of these actions decreased net interest income at risk
to market interest rates +200 basis points 1.9%. The remainder of the change in net interest
income at risk to market interest rates + 200 basis points was primarily related to slower growth
in fixed rate loans and a shift in deposits towards fixed rate time deposits from money market
accounts, offset by the impact of slower prepayments on mortgage assets.
The primary simulations for economic value of equity (EVE) at risk assume immediate +/-100
and +/-200 basis point parallel shifts in market interest rates beyond the interest rate change
implied by the current yield curve. The table below outlines the September 30, 2008, results
compared with December 31, 2007.
Table 33 Economic Value of Equity at Risk
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Economic Value of Equity at Risk (%) |
|
|
Basis point change scenario |
|
|
-200 |
|
|
|
-100 |
|
|
|
+100 |
|
|
|
+200 |
|
|
Board policy limits |
|
|
-12.0 |
% |
|
|
-5.0 |
% |
|
|
-5.0 |
% |
|
|
-12.0 |
% |
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
|
+0.4 |
% |
|
|
+1.5 |
% |
|
|
-4.1 |
% |
|
|
-8.9 |
% |
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
-0.3 |
% |
|
|
+1.1 |
% |
|
|
-4.4 |
% |
|
|
-10.8 |
% |
The change to EVE at risk reported as of September 30, 2008 compared with December 31, 2007
reflected the impact of fixed-rate deposit growth, partially offset by slower prepayments on
mortgage assets.
Mortgage Servicing Rights (MSRs)
(This section should be read in conjunction with Significant Item 4.)
MSR fair values are very sensitive to movements in interest rates as expected future net
servicing income depends on the projected outstanding principal balances of the underlying loans,
which can be greatly reduced by prepayments. Prepayments usually increase when mortgage interest
rates decline and decrease when mortgage interest rates rise. We have employed strategies to
reduce the risk of MSR fair value changes. In addition, a third party has been engaged to provide
improved analytical tools and insight to enhance our strategies with the objective to decrease the
volatility from MSR fair value changes. However, volatile changes in interest rates can diminish
the effectiveness of these hedges. We typically report MSR fair value adjustments net of
hedge-related trading activity in the mortgage banking income category of non-interest income.
At September 30, 2008, we had a total of $230.4 million of MSRs representing the right to
service $15.7 billion in mortgage loans. (See Note 5 of the Notes to the Unaudited Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements for additional discussion regarding MSRs.)
Price Risk
(This section should be read in conjunction with Significant Item 5.)
Price risk represents the risk of loss arising from adverse movements in the prices of
financial instruments that are carried at fair value and are subject to fair value accounting. We
have price risk from trading securities, which includes instruments to hedge MSRs. We also have
price risk from securities owned by our broker-dealer subsidiaries, foreign exchange positions,
equity investments, investments in securities backed by mortgage loans, and marketable equity
securities held by our insurance subsidiaries. We have established loss limits on the trading
portfolio, on the amount of foreign exchange exposure that can be maintained, and on the amount of
marketable equity securities that can be held by the insurance subsidiaries.
Equity Investment Portfolios
In reviewing our equity investment portfolio, we consider general economic and market
conditions, including industries in which private equity merchant banking and community development
investments are made, and adverse changes affecting the availability of capital. We determine any
impairment based on all of the information available at the time of the assessment. New
information or economic developments in the future could result in recognition of additional
impairment.
50
From time to time, we invest in various investments with equity risk. Such investments
include investment funds that buy and sell publicly traded securities, investment funds that hold
securities of private companies, direct equity or venture capital investments in companies (public
and private), and direct equity or venture capital interests in private companies in connection
with our mezzanine lending activities. These investments are reported as a component of accrued
income and other assets on our consolidated balance sheet. At September 30, 2008, we had a total
of $47.8 million of such investments, down from $48.7 million at December 31, 2007. The following
table details the components of this change during the first nine-month period of 2008:
Table 34 Equity Investment Activity
(in thousands of dollars)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
New |
|
|
Returns of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
Investments |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Gain / (Loss) |
|
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
Type: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Public equity |
|
$ |
16,583 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(2,384 |
) |
|
$ |
14,199 |
|
Private equity |
|
|
20,202 |
|
|
|
5,472 |
|
|
|
(391 |
) |
|
|
(1,494 |
) |
|
|
23,789 |
|
Direct investment |
|
|
11,962 |
|
|
|
1,893 |
|
|
|
(473 |
) |
|
|
(3,587 |
) |
|
|
9,795 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
48,747 |
|
|
$ |
7,365 |
|
|
$ |
(864 |
) |
|
$ |
(7,465 |
) |
|
$ |
47,783 |
|
|
The equity investment losses in the first nine-month period of 2008 reflected a $5.9 million
venture capital loss during the 2008 first quarter, and $3.9 million of losses on public equity
investment funds that buy and sell publicly traded securities, and private equity investments.
These investments were in funds that focus on the financial services sector that, during the first
nine-month period of 2008, performed worse than the broad equity market.
Investment decisions that incorporate credit risk require the approval of the independent
credit administration function. The degree of initial due diligence and subsequent review is a
function of the type, size, and collateral of the investment. Performance is monitored on a regular
basis, and reported to the MRC and the Risk Committee of the board of directors.
Liquidity Risk
Liquidity risk is the risk of loss due to the possibility that funds may not be available to
satisfy current or future commitments based on external macro market issues, investor and customer
perception of financial strength, and events unrelated to the company such as war, terrorism, or
financial institution market specific issues. We manage liquidity risk at both the Bank and at the
parent company, Huntington Bancshares Incorporated.
Liquidity policies and limits are established by our board of directors, with operating limits
set by the MRC, based upon analyses of the ratio of loans to deposits, the percentage of assets
funded with non-core or wholesale funding, and the amount of liquid assets available to cover
non-core funds maturities. In addition, guidelines are established to ensure diversification of
wholesale funding by type, source, and maturity and provide sufficient balance sheet liquidity to
cover 100% of wholesale funds maturing within a six-month period. A contingency funding plan is in
place, which includes forecasted sources and uses of funds under various scenarios in order to
prepare for unexpected liquidity shortages, including the implications of any rating changes. The
MRC meets monthly to identify and monitor liquidity issues, provide policy guidance, and oversee
adherence to, and the maintenance of, the contingency funding plan.
Bank Liquidity
Conditions in the capital markets remained volatile throughout the first nine-month period of
2008 resulting from the disruptions caused by the crises of investment banking firms and subsequent
forced portfolio liquidations from a variety of investment funds. As a result, liquidity premiums
and credit spreads widened significantly and many investors remained invested in lower risk
investments such as U.S. Treasuries. Many banks relying on short term funding structures, such as
commercial paper, alternative collateral repurchase agreements, or other short term funding
vehicles, have had limited access to these funding markets. We, however, have maintained a
diversified wholesale funding structure with an emphasis on reducing the risk from maturing
borrowings resulting in minimizing our reliance on the short term funding markets. We do not have
an active commercial paper funding program and, while historically we have used the securitization
markets (primarily indirect auto loans and leases) to provide funding, we do not rely heavily on
these sources of funding. In addition, we do not provide liquidity facilities for conduits,
structured investment vehicles, or other off-balance sheet
51
financing structures. As expected,
indicative credit spreads have widened in the secondary market for our debt. We expect these
spreads to remain wider than in prior periods for the foreseeable future.
Our primary sources of funding for the Bank are retail and commercial core deposits. Core
deposits are comprised of interest bearing and non-interest bearing demand deposits, money market
deposits, savings and other domestic time deposits, consumer certificates of deposit both over and
under $100,000, and non-consumer certificates of deposit less than $100,000. Non-core deposits are
comprised of brokered money market deposits and certificates of deposit, foreign time deposits, and
other domestic time deposits of $100,000 or more comprised primarily of public fund certificates of
deposit greater than $100,000.
Table 35 reflects deposit composition detail for each of the past five quarters.
52
Table 35 Deposit Composition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
(in thousands) |
|
September 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
By Type |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Demand deposits non-interest bearing |
|
$ |
5,135,164 |
|
|
|
13.7 |
% |
|
$ |
5,253,156 |
|
|
|
13.8 |
% |
|
$ |
5,160,068 |
|
|
|
13.5 |
% |
|
$ |
5,371,747 |
|
|
|
14.2 |
% |
|
$ |
4,984,663 |
|
|
|
13.0 |
% |
Demand deposits interest bearing |
|
|
4,052,032 |
|
|
|
10.8 |
|
|
|
4,074,202 |
|
|
|
10.7 |
|
|
|
4,040,747 |
|
|
|
10.6 |
|
|
|
4,048,873 |
|
|
|
10.7 |
|
|
|
3,982,102 |
|
|
|
10.4 |
|
Money market deposits |
|
|
5,565,439 |
|
|
|
14.8 |
|
|
|
6,170,640 |
|
|
|
16.2 |
|
|
|
6,681,412 |
|
|
|
17.5 |
|
|
|
6,643,242 |
|
|
|
17.6 |
|
|
|
6,721,963 |
|
|
|
17.5 |
|
Savings and other domestic deposits |
|
|
4,816,038 |
|
|
|
12.8 |
|
|
|
5,198,488 |
|
|
|
13.6 |
|
|
|
5,267,364 |
|
|
|
13.8 |
|
|
|
5,163,287 |
|
|
|
13.7 |
|
|
|
5,286,236 |
|
|
|
13.8 |
|
Core certificates of deposit |
|
|
12,156,660 |
|
|
|
32.4 |
|
|
|
11,273,807 |
|
|
|
29.6 |
|
|
|
10,582,394 |
|
|
|
27.8 |
|
|
|
10,736,146 |
|
|
|
28.4 |
|
|
|
10,611,821 |
|
|
|
27.6 |
|
|
|
|
Total core deposits |
|
|
31,725,333 |
|
|
|
84.5 |
|
|
|
31,970,293 |
|
|
|
83.9 |
|
|
|
31,731,985 |
|
|
|
83.2 |
|
|
|
31,963,295 |
|
|
|
84.6 |
|
|
|
31,586,785 |
|
|
|
82.3 |
|
Other domestic deposits of $100,000 or
more |
|
|
1,948,899 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
|
|
1,949,059 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
|
1,976,021 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
|
|
1,676,058 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
1,505,657 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
|
Brokered deposits and negotiable CDs |
|
|
2,925,440 |
|
|
|
7.8 |
|
|
|
3,100,955 |
|
|
|
8.1 |
|
|
|
3,361,957 |
|
|
|
8.8 |
|
|
|
3,376,854 |
|
|
|
8.9 |
|
|
|
3,701,726 |
|
|
|
9.6 |
|
Deposits in foreign offices |
|
|
969,384 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
1,104,119 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
1,046,378 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
726,714 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
1,610,197 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
|
Total deposits |
|
$ |
37,569,056 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
38,124,426 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
38,116,341 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
37,742,921 |
|
|
|
99.9 |
% |
|
$ |
38,404,365 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
Total core deposits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
$ |
8,007,619 |
|
|
|
25.2 |
% |
|
$ |
8,471,809 |
|
|
|
26.5 |
% |
|
$ |
8,715,690 |
|
|
|
27.5 |
% |
|
$ |
9,017,852 |
|
|
|
28.2 |
% |
|
$ |
9,017,474 |
|
|
|
28.5 |
% |
Personal |
|
|
23,717,714 |
|
|
|
74.8 |
|
|
|
23,498,484 |
|
|
|
73.5 |
|
|
|
23,016,295 |
|
|
|
72.5 |
|
|
|
22,945,443 |
|
|
|
71.8 |
|
|
|
22,569,311 |
|
|
|
71.5 |
|
|
|
|
Total core deposits |
|
$ |
31,725,333 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
31,970,293 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
31,731,985 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
31,963,295 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
31,586,785 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By Business Segment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regional Banking: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Central Ohio |
|
$ |
6,136,030 |
|
|
|
16.3 |
% |
|
$ |
6,618,913 |
|
|
|
17.4 |
% |
|
$ |
6,665,031 |
|
|
|
17.5 |
% |
|
$ |
6,319,899 |
|
|
|
16.7 |
% |
|
$ |
5,922,566 |
|
|
|
15.4 |
% |
Northwest Ohio |
|
|
2,690,720 |
|
|
|
7.3 |
|
|
|
2,775,959 |
|
|
|
7.3 |
|
|
|
2,798,377 |
|
|
|
7.3 |
|
|
|
2,836,309 |
|
|
|
7.5 |
|
|
|
2,839,877 |
|
|
|
7.4 |
|
Greater Cleveland |
|
|
3,248,385 |
|
|
|
7.2 |
|
|
|
3,334,461 |
|
|
|
8.7 |
|
|
|
3,263,713 |
|
|
|
8.6 |
|
|
|
3,201,791 |
|
|
|
8.5 |
|
|
|
3,074,412 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
Greater Akron/Canton |
|
|
3,270,480 |
|
|
|
8.6 |
|
|
|
3,186,097 |
|
|
|
8.4 |
|
|
|
3,228,245 |
|
|
|
8.5 |
|
|
|
3,188,682 |
|
|
|
8.4 |
|
|
|
3,249,922 |
|
|
|
8.5 |
|
Southern Ohio / Kentucky |
|
|
2,643,955 |
|
|
|
8.7 |
|
|
|
2,655,612 |
|
|
|
7.0 |
|
|
|
2,676,381 |
|
|
|
7.0 |
|
|
|
2,628,879 |
|
|
|
7.0 |
|
|
|
2,625,958 |
|
|
|
6.8 |
|
Mahoning Valley |
|
|
2,263,719 |
|
|
|
7.0 |
|
|
|
2,258,802 |
|
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
|
2,337,816 |
|
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
|
2,333,794 |
|
|
|
6.2 |
|
|
|
2,324,259 |
|
|
|
6.1 |
|
West Michigan |
|
|
3,021,528 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
2,946,401 |
|
|
|
7.7 |
|
|
|
2,937,318 |
|
|
|
7.7 |
|
|
|
2,918,709 |
|
|
|
7.7 |
|
|
|
2,965,334 |
|
|
|
7.7 |
|
East Michigan |
|
|
2,663,131 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
|
2,513,804 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
|
|
|
2,445,148 |
|
|
|
6.4 |
|
|
|
2,444,269 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
|
2,422,248 |
|
|
|
6.3 |
|
Pittsburgh |
|
|
2,749,254 |
|
|
|
7.1 |
|
|
|
2,527,984 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
|
|
|
2,555,309 |
|
|
|
6.7 |
|
|
|
2,536,007 |
|
|
|
6.7 |
|
|
|
2,555,209 |
|
|
|
6.7 |
|
Central Indiana |
|
|
1,902,232 |
|
|
|
7.3 |
|
|
|
1,973,110 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
|
|
1,881,781 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
1,894,940 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
1,909,499 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
West Virginia |
|
|
1,723,002 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
|
1,658,034 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
1,584,233 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
1,589,520 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
1,559,909 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
Other Regional |
|
|
711,649 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
851,169 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
782,844 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
788,703 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
632,177 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
|
Regional Banking |
|
|
33,024,085 |
|
|
|
87.9 |
|
|
|
33,300,346 |
|
|
|
87.3 |
|
|
|
33,156,196 |
|
|
|
87.0 |
|
|
|
32,681,502 |
|
|
|
86.6 |
|
|
|
32,081,370 |
|
|
|
83.5 |
|
Auto Finance and Dealer Services |
|
|
67,040 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
56,517 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
55,557 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
58,196 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
63,399 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
Private Financial and Capital Markets Group |
|
|
1,552,591 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
1,666,608 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
1,542,631 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
1,626,043 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
1,630,675 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
Treasury / Other (1) |
|
|
2,925,340 |
|
|
|
7.8 |
|
|
|
3,100,955 |
|
|
|
8.2 |
|
|
|
3,361,957 |
|
|
|
8.9 |
|
|
|
3,377,180 |
|
|
|
8.9 |
|
|
|
4,628,921 |
|
|
|
12.1 |
|
|
|
|
Total deposits |
|
$ |
37,569,056 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
38,124,426 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
38,116,341 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
37,742,921 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
38,404,365 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Comprised largely of national market deposits. |
53
Core deposits may increase our need for liquidity as certificates of deposit mature or are
withdrawn before maturity and as non-maturity deposits, such as checking and savings account
balances, are withdrawn. Additionally, we are exposed to the risk that customers with large
deposit balances will withdraw all or a portion of such deposits as the FDIC establishes certain
limits on the amount of insurance coverage provided to depositors (see Emergency Economic
Stabilization Act of 2008 discussion). At September 30, 2008, we had approximately $12.4 billion
of uninsured deposits. To mitigate the uninsured deposit risk, we have joined the Certificate of
Deposit Account Registry Service (CDARS), a program that allows customers to invest up to $50
million in certificates of deposit through one participating financial institution, with the entire
amount being covered by FDIC insurance.
To the extent that we are unable to obtain sufficient liquidity through core deposits, we may
meet our liquidity needs through short-term borrowings by purchasing federal funds or by selling
securities under repurchase agreements. The Bank also has access to the Federal Reserves discount
window and Term Auction Facility (TAF). As of September 30, 2008, a total of $8.3 billion of
commercial loans and home equity lines of credit were pledged to these facilities. As of September
30, 2008, TAF borrowings totaled $0.2 billion, with $6.4 billion of borrowing capacity available
from both facilities. Additionally, the Bank had a $4.4 billion borrowing capacity at the Federal
Home Loan Bank of Cincinnati, of which $0.9 billion remained unused at September 30, 2008. Other
sources of liquidity exist within our securities available-for-sale, and the relatively
shorter-term structure of our commercial loans and automobile loans.
During the 2008 second quarter, we reduced our dependency on overnight funding through: (a) an
on-balance sheet securitization transaction, which raised $887 million of longer-term funding, (b)
the net proceeds of our convertible preferred stock issuance, (c) the sale of $473 million of
residential real estate loans, and (d) managing down of certain non-relationship collateralized
public funds deposits and related collateral securities. These actions result in approximately
$1.0 billion of national market maturities over the next 12 months. We anticipate that these
maturities can be met through core deposit growth, Federal Home Loan Bank advances, and normal
national market funding sources, including brokered deposits and additional securitizations.
As previously discussed, the FDIC introduced the Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program in
October 2008. One component of this program guarantees certain newly issued senior unsecured debt.
We are currently in the process of evaluating the impact of this program.
At September 30, 2008, we believe that the Bank had sufficient liquidity to meet its cash flow
obligations for the foreseeable future.
Parent Company Liquidity
At September 30, 2008, the parent company had $279.7 million in cash or cash equivalents,
compared with $153.5 million at December 31, 2007. Quarterly cash dividends paid on our common
stock totaled $242.5 million for the first nine-month period of 2008. Table 38 provides additional
detail regarding dividends declared per common share. Additional cash demands of $48.5 million,
are required in both the 2008 fourth quarter and the 2009 first quarter, representing quarterly
cash dividends declared on our common stock that are not payable until after September 30, 2008.
During the 2008 second quarter, we issued an aggregate $569 million of Series A Preferred
Stock. The Series A Preferred Stock will pay, as declared by our board of directors, dividends in
cash at a rate of 8.50% per annum, payable quarterly. (See Note 7 of the Notes to Unaudited
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.) Cash dividends paid on
the Series A Preferred Stock totaled $11.2 million for the first nine-month period of 2008. An
additional cash demand of $12.2 million is required in the 2008 fourth quarter, representing a
quarterly cash dividend declared on our Series A Preferred Stock that is not payable until after
September 30, 2008.
Based on a regulatory dividend limitation, the Bank could not have declared and paid a
dividend to the parent company at September 30, 2008, without regulatory approval. During the
2008 third quarter, the parent company requested, and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency
(OCC) granted approval, to have the bank dividend, in-kind, certain assets of the bank. As a
result of this dividend, we do not anticipate the parent company will receive any cash dividends
from the Bank in 2008. However, we do anticipate the resumption of cash bank dividends to the
parent company beginning in the 2009 first quarter. To help meet any additional liquidity needs,
we have an open-ended, automatic shelf registration statement filed and effective with the SEC,
which permits us to issue an unspecified amount of debt or equity securities.
54
With the exception of the common and preferred dividends previously discussed, the parent
company does not have any significant cash demands. There are no debt maturities until 2013, when
a debt maturity of $50 million is payable.
Considering our participation in the TARP voluntary CPP (see Risk Factors discussion within
the Introduction section), anticipated earnings, capital raised from the 2008 second quarter
preferred-stock issuance, other factors discussed above, and other analyses that we have performed,
we believe the parent company has sufficient liquidity to meet its cash flow obligations for the
foreseeable future.
Credit Ratings
Credit ratings by the three major credit rating agencies are an important component of our
liquidity profile. Among other factors, the credit ratings are based on financial strength, credit
quality and concentrations in the loan portfolio, the level and volatility of earnings, capital
adequacy, the quality of management, the liquidity of the balance sheet, the availability of a
significant base of core retail and commercial deposits, and our ability to access a broad array of
wholesale funding sources. Adverse changes in these factors could result in a negative change in
credit ratings and impact not only the ability to raise funds in the capital markets, but also the
cost of these funds. In addition, certain financial on- and off-balance sheet arrangements contain
credit rating triggers that could increase funding needs if a negative rating change occurs. Letter
of credit commitments for marketable securities, interest rate swap collateral agreements, and
certain asset securitization transactions contain credit rating provisions. (See the Liquidity
Risks section in Part 1 of the 2007 Form 10-K for additional discussion.)
On February 22, 2008, Moodys Investor Service affirmed the ratings of the parent company and
the Bank. Moodys Investor Service and Fitch Ratings upgraded the ratings outlook comment to
stable from negative on May 13, 2008, and June 27, 2008, respectively.
Credit ratings as of September 30, 2008, for the parent company and the Bank were:
Table 36 Credit Ratings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
Senior Unsecured |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Subordinated Notes |
|
|
Short-Term |
|
|
Outlook |
|
|
|
|
Huntington Bancshares Incorporated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moodys Investor Service |
|
|
A3 |
|
|
Baal |
|
|
P-2 |
|
|
Stable |
Standard and Poors |
|
BBB+ |
|
BBB |
|
|
A-2 |
|
|
Negative |
Fitch Ratings |
|
|
A- |
|
|
BBB+ |
|
|
F1 |
|
|
Stable |
|
The Huntington National Bank |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moodys Investor Service |
|
|
A2 |
|
|
|
A3 |
|
|
|
P-1 |
|
|
Stable |
Standard and Poors |
|
|
A- |
|
|
BBB+ |
|
|
A-2 |
|
|
Negative |
Fitch Ratings |
|
|
A- |
|
|
BBB+ |
|
|
F1 |
|
|
Stable |
Investors should be aware that a security rating is not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold
securities, that it may be subject to revision or withdrawal at any time by the assigning rating
organization, and that each rating should be evaluated independently of any other rating.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
In the normal course of business, we enter into various off-balance sheet arrangements. These
arrangements include financial guarantees contained in standby letters of credit issued by the Bank
and commitments by the Bank to sell mortgage loans.
55
Through our credit process, we monitor the credit risks of outstanding standby letters of
credit. When it is probable that a standby letter of credit will be drawn and not repaid in full,
losses are recognized in the provision for credit losses. At September 30, 2008, we had $1.6
billion of standby letters of credit outstanding, of which 48% were collateralized. Included in
this $1.6 billion total are letters of credit issued by the Bank that support $0.7 billion of
securities that were issued by our customers and sold by The Huntington Investment Company (HIC),
our broker-dealer subsidiary. If the Banks short-term credit ratings were downgraded, the Bank
could be required to obtain funding in order to purchase the entire amount of these securities
pursuant to its letters of credit. Due to lower demand, investors have begun returning these
securities either to HIC for re-marketing or to the Bank for redemption. Pursuant to the letters
of credit issued by the Bank, the Bank repurchased, in October 2008, $266.2 million of these
securities representing: (a) $57.2 million that were returned to HIC, and held in its securities
portfolio, as of September 30, 2008, and (b) $209.0 million that were returned to the Bank for
redemption by the current investors of the securities in October 2008.
We enter into forward contracts relating to the mortgage banking business to hedge the
exposures we have from commitments to extend new residential mortgage loans to our customers and
from our held-for-sale mortgage loans. At September 30, 2008, December 31, 2007, and September 30,
2007, we had commitments to sell residential real estate loans of $485.6 million, $555.9 million,
and $466.1 million, respectively. These contracts mature in less than one year.
We do not believe that off-balance sheet arrangements will have a material impact on our
liquidity or capital resources.
Operational Risk
Operational risk is the risk of loss due to human error, inadequate or failed internal systems
and controls, violations of, or noncompliance with, laws, rules, regulations, prescribed practices,
or ethical standards, and external influences such as market conditions, fraudulent activities,
disasters, and security risks. We continuously strive to strengthen our system of internal controls
to ensure compliance with laws, rules and regulations, and to improve the oversight of our
operational risk.
Capital
Capital is managed both at the Bank and on a consolidated basis. Capital levels are maintained
based on regulatory capital requirements and the economic capital required to support credit,
market, liquidity, and operational risks inherent in our business, and to provide the flexibility
needed for future growth and new business opportunities.
As shown in Table 37, our consolidated tangible equity to assets ratio was 5.98% at September
30, 2008, an increase from 5.08% at December 31, 2007, and 5.90% at June 30, 2008. The 8 basis
point increase from June 30, 2008, primarily reflected a decrease in total assets, and to a lesser
extent, a decrease in goodwill and other intangible assets.
56
Table 37 Capital Adequacy
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Well- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Capitalized |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
(in millions) |
|
|
|
Minimums |
|
September 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
September 30, |
Total risk-weighted assets (1) |
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
46,608 |
|
|
$ |
46,602 |
|
|
$ |
46,546 |
|
|
$ |
46,044 |
|
|
$ |
45,931 |
|
|
|
Bank |
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,883 |
|
|
|
46,346 |
|
|
|
46,333 |
|
|
|
45,731 |
|
|
|
45,444 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier 1 leverage ratio (1) |
|
Consolidated |
|
|
5.00 |
% |
|
|
7.99 |
% |
|
|
7.88 |
% |
|
|
6.83 |
% |
|
|
6.77 |
% |
|
|
7.57 |
% |
|
|
Bank |
|
|
5.00 |
|
|
|
6.36 |
|
|
|
6.37 |
|
|
|
6.24 |
|
|
|
5.99 |
|
|
|
6.23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio (1) |
|
Consolidated |
|
|
6.00 |
|
|
|
8.80 |
|
|
|
8.82 |
|
|
|
7.56 |
|
|
|
7.51 |
|
|
|
8.35 |
|
|
|
Bank |
|
|
6.00 |
|
|
|
7.01 |
|
|
|
7.10 |
|
|
|
6.89 |
|
|
|
6.64 |
|
|
|
6.99 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total risk-based capital ratio (1) |
|
Consolidated |
|
|
10.00 |
|
|
|
12.03 |
|
|
|
12.05 |
|
|
|
10.87 |
|
|
|
10.85 |
|
|
|
11.58 |
|
|
|
Bank |
|
|
10.00 |
|
|
|
10.25 |
|
|
|
10.32 |
|
|
|
10.39 |
|
|
|
10.17 |
|
|
|
10.42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tangible equity / asset ratio |
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.98 |
|
|
|
5.90 |
|
|
|
4.92 |
|
|
|
5.08 |
|
|
|
5.70 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tangible common equity / asset ratio |
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.88 |
|
|
|
4.80 |
|
|
|
4.92 |
|
|
|
5.08 |
|
|
|
5.70 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tangible equity / risk-weighted assets ratio
(1) |
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.59 |
|
|
|
6.58 |
|
|
|
5.57 |
|
|
|
5.67 |
|
|
|
6.46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average equity / average assets |
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.56 |
|
|
|
11.44 |
|
|
|
10.70 |
|
|
|
11.40 |
|
|
|
11.50 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Based on an interim decision by the banking agencies on
December 14, 2006, Huntington has excluded the impact of
adopting Statement 158 from the regulatory capital
calculations. |
The Bank is primarily supervised and regulated by the OCC, which establishes regulatory
capital guidelines for banks similar to those established for bank holding companies by the Federal
Reserve Board. We intend to maintain both the parent companys and the Banks risk-based capital
ratios at levels at which each would be considered well capitalized by regulators. At September
30, 2008, the Bank had Tier 1 and Total risk-based capital in excess of the minimum level required
to be considered well capitalized of $0.5 billion and $0.1 billion, respectively; and the parent
company had Tier 1 and Total risk-based capital in excess of the minimum level required to be
considered well capitalized of $1.3 billion and $0.9 billion, respectively.
Our participation in the TARP voluntary CPP (see Risk Factors discussion within the
Introduction section) is expected to increase our Tier 1 leverage ratio, Tier 1 risk-based
capital ratio, and total risk-based capital ratio by approximately three percentage points.
Shareholders equity totaled $6.4 billion at September 30, 2008. This represented an increase
compared with $5.9 billion at December 31, 2007, primarily reflecting the prior quarters issuance
of an aggregate $569 million of Series A Preferred Stock. The Series A Preferred Stock pays, as
declared by our board of directors, dividends in cash at a rate of 8.50% per annum, payable
quarterly. Each share of the Series A Preferred Stock is non-voting and may be convertible at any
time, at the option of the holder, into 83.668 shares of common stock of Huntington.
Additionally, to accelerate the building of capital and to lower the cost of issuing the
aforementioned securities, we reduced our quarterly common stock dividend to $0.1325 per common
share, effective with the dividend paid July 1, 2008.
No shares were repurchased during the quarter. Although there are currently 3.9 million
shares remaining available under the current authorization announced April 20, 2006, no future
share repurchases are contemplated.
57
Table 38 Quarterly Common Stock Summary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
(in thousands, except per share amounts) |
|
Third |
|
Second |
|
First |
|
Fourth |
|
Third |
|
|
|
Common stock price, per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High (1) |
|
$ |
13.500 |
|
|
$ |
11.750 |
|
|
$ |
14.870 |
|
|
$ |
18.390 |
|
|
$ |
22.930 |
|
Low (1) |
|
|
4.370 |
|
|
|
4.940 |
|
|
|
9.640 |
|
|
|
13.500 |
|
|
|
16.050 |
|
Close |
|
|
7.990 |
|
|
|
5.770 |
|
|
|
10.750 |
|
|
|
14.760 |
|
|
|
16.980 |
|
Average closing price |
|
|
7.510 |
|
|
|
8.783 |
|
|
|
12.268 |
|
|
|
16.125 |
|
|
|
18.671 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends, per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends declared per common
share |
|
$ |
0.1325 |
|
|
$ |
0.1325 |
|
|
$ |
0.2650 |
|
|
$ |
0.2650 |
|
|
$ |
0.2650 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average basic |
|
|
366,124 |
|
|
|
366,206 |
|
|
|
366,235 |
|
|
|
366,119 |
|
|
|
365,895 |
|
Average diluted (2) |
|
|
367,361 |
|
|
|
367,234 |
|
|
|
367,208 |
|
|
|
366,119 |
|
|
|
368,280 |
|
Ending |
|
|
366,069 |
|
|
|
366,197 |
|
|
|
366,226 |
|
|
|
366,262 |
|
|
|
365,898 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Book value per share |
|
$ |
15.86 |
|
|
$ |
15.87 |
|
|
$ |
16.13 |
|
|
$ |
16.24 |
|
|
$ |
17.08 |
|
Tangible book value per share |
|
|
6.84 |
|
|
|
6.82 |
|
|
|
7.08 |
|
|
|
7.13 |
|
|
|
8.10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common share repurchases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of shares repurchased |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
High and low stock prices are intra-day quotes obtained
from NASDAQ. |
|
(2) |
|
For the three-month period ended September 30, 2008, and
the three-month period ended June 30, 2008, the impact of
the convertible preferred stock issued in April of 2008
totaling 47.6 and 39.8 million shares, respectively, were
excluded from the diluted share calculations. They was
excluded because the results would have been higher than
basic earnings per common share (anti-dilutive) for the
periods. |
58
LINES OF BUSINESS DISCUSSION
This section reviews financial performance from a line of business perspective and should be
read in conjunction with the Discussion of Results of Operations,
Note 15 of the Notes to Unaudited
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, and other sections for a full understanding of
consolidated financial performance.
We have three distinct lines of business: Regional Banking, Auto Finance and Dealer Services
(AFDS), and the Private Financial and Capital Markets Group (PFCMG). A fourth segment includes our
Treasury function and other unallocated assets, liabilities, revenue, and expense. Lines of
business results are determined based upon our management reporting system, which assigns balance
sheet and income statement items to each of the business segments. The process is designed around
our organizational and management structure and, accordingly, the results derived are not
necessarily comparable with similar information published by other financial institutions. An
overview of this system is provided below, along with a description of each segment and discussion
of financial results.
Acquisition of Sky Financial
The businesses acquired in the Sky Financial merger were fully integrated into each of the
corresponding Huntington lines of business as of July 1, 2007. The Sky Financial merger had the
largest impact to Regional Banking, but also impacted PFCMG and Treasury/Other. For Regional
Banking, the merger added four new banking regions and strengthened our presence in five regions
where Huntington previously operated. The merger did not significantly impact AFDS.
Methodologies were implemented to estimate the approximate effect of the acquisition for the
entire company; however, these methodologies were not designed to estimate the approximate effect
of the acquisition to individual lines of business. As a result, the effect of the acquisition to
the individual lines of business is not quantifiable. In the following individual line of business
discussions, 2008 third quarter results are compared with 2008 second quarter results. We believe
that this comparison provides the most meaningful analysis because: (a) the impacts of the Sky
Financial acquisition are included in both periods, and (b) the comparisons of the first nine-month
period of 2008 to the first nine-month period of 2007 are distorted as a result of the
non-quantifiable impact of the Sky Financial acquisition to the individual lines of business, and
(c) the comparisons of the 2008 third quarter to the 2007 third quarter are skewed as the current
general economic environment is significantly different than during the 2007 third quarter. As a
result, we believe that a more meaningful analysis of our core activities is obtained by
comparisons to the prior quarter; as such comparisons are less affected by the impact of the
overall economic changes.
Funds Transfer Pricing
We use a centralized funds transfer pricing (FTP) methodology to attribute appropriate net
interest income to the business segments. The Treasury/Other business segment charges (credits) an
internal cost of funds for assets held in (or pays for funding provided by) each line of business.
The FTP rate is based on prevailing market interest rates for comparable duration assets (or
liabilities). Deposits of an indeterminate maturity receive an FTP credit based on vintage-
59
based
pool rates. Other assets, liabilities, and capital are charged (credited) with a four-year moving
average FTP rate. The intent of the FTP methodology is to eliminate all interest rate risk from
the lines of business by providing matched duration funding of assets and liabilities. The result
is to centralize the financial impact, management, and reporting of interest rate and liquidity
risk in Treasury/Other where it can be monitored and managed.
Treasury/Other
The Treasury function includes revenue and expense related to assets, liabilities, and equity
not directly assigned or allocated to one of the other three business segments. Assets in this
segment include insurance, investment securities, and bank owned life insurance. The financial
impact associated with our FTP methodology, as described above, is also included in this segment.
Net interest income includes the impact of administering our investment securities portfolios
and the net impact of derivatives used to hedge interest rate sensitivity. Non-interest income
includes miscellaneous fee income not allocated to other business segments such as bank owned life
insurance income, insurance revenue, and any investment securities and trading assets gains or
losses. Non-interest expense includes certain corporate administrative, merger, and other
miscellaneous expenses not allocated to other business segments. The provision for income
taxes for the other business segments is calculated at a statutory 35% tax rate, though our overall
effective tax rate is lower. As a result, Treasury/Other reflects a credit for income taxes
representing the difference between the lower actual effective tax rate and the statutory tax rate
used to allocate income taxes to the other segments.
Net Income by Business Segment
The company reported net income of $75.1 million in the 2008 third quarter. This compared
with a net income of $101.4 million in the 2008 second quarter, a decrease of $26.3 million. The
breakdown of net income for the 2008 third quarter by business segment is as follows:
|
§ |
|
Regional Banking: $121.2 million ($3.7 million increase compared with 2008 second
quarter) |
|
|
§ |
|
AFDS: $0.1 million loss ($8.0 million decrease compared with 2008 second quarter) |
|
|
§ |
|
PFCMG: $21.1 million ($11.6 million increase compared with 2008 second quarter) |
|
|
§ |
|
Treasury/Other: $67.1 million loss ($33.6 million decline compared with 2008 second
quarter) |
60
Regional Banking
(This section should be read in conjunction with Significant Items 1, 2, and 4.)
Objectives, Strategies, and Priorities
Our Regional Banking line of business provides traditional banking products and services to
consumer, small business, and commercial customers located in its 11 operating regions within the
six states of Ohio, Michigan, Pennsylvania, Indiana, West Virginia, and Kentucky. It provides
these services through a banking network of over 600 branches, and almost 1,400 ATMs, along with
internet and telephone banking channels. It also provides certain services on a limited basis
outside of these six states, including mortgage banking and equipment leasing. Each region is
further divided into retail and commercial banking units. Retail products and services include home
equity loans and lines of credit, first mortgage loans, direct installment loans, small business
loans, personal and business deposit products, as well as sales of investment and insurance
services. At September 30, 2008, Retail Banking accounted for 50% and 82% of total Regional Banking
loans and deposits, respectively. Commercial Banking serves middle market commercial banking
relationships, which use a variety of banking products and services including, but not limited to,
commercial loans, international trade, cash management, leasing, interest rate protection products,
capital market alternatives, 401(k) plans, and mezzanine investment capabilities.
We have a business model that emphasizes the delivery of a complete set of banking products
and services offered by larger banks, but distinguished by local decision-making about the pricing
and the offering of these products. Our strategy is to focus on building a deeper relationship
with our customers by providing a Simply the Best service experience. This focus on service
requires continued investments in state-of-the-art platform technology in our branches,
award-winning retail and business websites for our customers, extensive development of associates,
and internal processes that empower our local bankers to serve our customers better. We expect the
combination of local decision-making and Simply the Best service provides a competitive advantage
and supports revenue and earnings growth.
2008 Third Quarter versus 2008 Second Quarter
Table 39 Key Performance Indicators for Regional Banking
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three
Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
Change |
(in thousands unless otherwise noted) |
|
2008 |
|
2008 |
|
Amount |
|
Percent |
|
Net interest income |
|
$ |
366,466 |
|
|
$ |
366,001 |
|
|
$ |
465 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
% |
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
100,319 |
|
|
|
104,660 |
|
|
|
(4,341 |
) |
|
|
(4.1 |
) |
Non-interest income |
|
|
140,936 |
|
|
|
148,264 |
|
|
|
(7,328 |
) |
|
|
(4.9 |
) |
Non-interest expense |
|
|
220,628 |
|
|
|
228,826 |
|
|
|
(8,198 |
) |
|
|
(3.6 |
) |
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
65,259 |
|
|
|
63,273 |
|
|
|
1,986 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
Net Income |
|
$ |
121,196 |
|
|
$ |
117,506 |
|
|
$ |
3,690 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
% |
|
Total average earning assets (in millions) |
|
$ |
32,782 |
|
|
$ |
33,060 |
|
|
$ |
(278 |
) |
|
|
(0.8) |
% |
Total average loans/leases (in millions) |
|
|
32,479 |
|
|
|
32,557 |
|
|
|
(78 |
) |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
Total average deposits (in millions) |
|
|
33,132 |
|
|
|
33,095 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
Net interest margin |
|
|
4.46 |
% |
|
|
4.46 |
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
Net charge-offs (NCOs) |
|
$ |
69,073 |
|
|
$ |
51,286 |
|
|
$ |
17,787 |
|
|
|
34.7 |
|
NCOs as a % of average loans and leases |
|
|
0.85 |
% |
|
|
0.63 |
% |
|
|
0.22 |
% |
|
|
34.9 |
|
Return on average equity |
|
|
20.4 |
|
|
|
20.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
--- |
% |
Retail banking # DDA households (eop) |
|
|
898,966 |
|
|
|
897,023 |
|
|
|
1,943 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
% |
Retail banking # new relationships 90-day
cross-sell (average) |
|
|
2.23 |
|
|
|
2.54 |
|
|
|
(0.31 |
) |
|
|
(12.2 |
) |
Small business # business DDA relationships (eop) |
|
|
106,538 |
|
|
|
105,337 |
|
|
|
1,201 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
Small business # new relationships 90-day
cross-sell (average) |
|
|
2.07 |
|
|
|
2.11 |
|
|
|
(0.04 |
) |
|
|
(1.9 |
) |
Mortgage banking closed loan volume (in millions) |
|
$ |
680 |
|
|
$ |
1,127 |
|
|
$ |
(447 |
) |
|
|
(39.7 |
) |
61
Regional Banking contributed $121.2 million of the companys net income in the 2008 third
quarter. This compared with net income of $117.5 million in the 2008 second quarter, and
represented an increase of $3.7 million.
Fully taxable equivalent net interest income was essentially unchanged from the prior quarter as
total average earning assets and the net interest margin were essentially flat. This reflected an
increase in consumer deposit spreads, offset by a decrease in commercial loan spreads, as well as a
decrease in commercial deposit balances.
Total average loans and leases were little changed compared with the prior quarter primarily
reflecting growth in our commercial portfolios, and to a lesser extent, our home equity portfolio.
The loan growth was centered in the Pittsburgh and Southern Ohio regions. The increase in home
equity loans reflected borrowers moving into this product, as lower rates were available. These
increases were offset by declines in some of our other consumer portfolios, particularly our
residential mortgage portfolio reflecting a $473 million loan sale in the prior quarter.
Average deposits were also essentially flat compared with the prior quarter. Consumer
deposits increased $499.6 million, or 2.3%, compared with the prior quarter. However, despite an
increase in the number of DDA households during the quarter, consumer transaction deposits
decreased $111.7 million, or 3%, reflecting lower economic stimulus deposits in the current
quarter, as well as the continuation of customers transferring funds to higher rate accounts such
as certificates of deposit as short-term rates declined. Commercial deposits decreased $343.2
million, or 4%, primarily reflecting our initiative to reduce collateralized public fund
non-transaction account deposit balances. However, commercial transaction deposits increased $85.1
million, or 2%, reflecting an increase in small business DDA relationships. Foreign deposits
declined during the quarter primarily reflecting the anticipated $159.5 million decline in one
customer account.
The provision for credit losses decreased to $100.3 million in the current quarter compared
with $104.7 million in the prior quarter primarily reflecting lower economic reserve adjustments as
consumer confidence within our footprint improved during the current quarter. NCOs totaled $69.1
million, or an annualized 0.85% of average loans and leases, in the 2008 third quarter compared
with $51.3 million, or an annualized 0.63% of average loans and leases, in the 2008 second quarter.
This increase reflected the impact of the continued economic weakness across our Midwest markets,
most notably in portfolios related to the residential housing sector, both commercial and consumer.
Non-interest income decreased $7.3 million, or 5%, primarily reflecting: (a) $4.2 million
decrease in derivative net fee sharing reflecting decreased commercial real estate transactions,
and (b) $2.1 million decrease in mortgage banking income primarily reflecting a $2.1 million gain
in the prior quarter relating to the sale of $473 million in residential real estate loans, as well
as a $5.5 million decline in origination and secondary marketing fees driven by a decline in closed
loan volume, partially offset by a $4.2 million improvement in the net hedging impact of MSRs.
Non-interest expense decreased $8.2 million, or 4%, reflecting: (a) $3.5 million decrease in
personnel expense resulting from the impact of a reduction of 158, or 2%, full-time equivalent
staff during the quarter reflecting the benefit of continued merger efficiencies and a
restructuring in which two regions were collapsed and 13 banking offices were consolidated, (b)
$3.6 million decline in allocated indirect expense related to merger efficiencies, and (c) $1.5
million decline in losses on the sale of OREO.
62
Auto Finance and Dealer Services (AFDS)
(This section should be read in conjunction with Significant Item 1.)
Objectives, Strategies, and Priorities